Slashdot Mirror


HP CEO Resigns During Sexual Harassment Investigation

A number of readers are letting us know that HP CEO Mark Hurd just resigned over sexual harassment accusations. The company's board has appointed CFO Cathie Lesjak as interim CEO. A contractor had accused Hurd of sexual harassment, and the board brought in outside counsel to investigate. While the harassment claim could not be substantiated, the investigation did uncover other misconduct. Hurd's "close personal relationship" with the contractor created a conflict of interest, and he was also found to have misused company assets. In a statement, Hurd said, "As the investigation progressed, I realized there were instances in which I did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity that I have espoused at HP and which have guided me throughout my career."

233 comments

  1. Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal? by rsborg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like a classy guy, but sadly I'm guessing this is par for the course at this level of "leadership" in most companies.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  2. Guidence System Failure! Eject! by VortexCortex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I realized ... I did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity that ... have guided me throughout my career."

    Clearly the principles haven't been "guiding" him to within a tolerable deviance...

  3. "realized"? by Lost+Race · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He "realized there were instances" of misconduct on his part? More like he realized he'd been caught.

    1. Re:"realized"? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      He "realized there were instances" of misconduct on his part? More like he realized he'd been caught.

      "Realized" means, his lawyers told him, "You're fucked."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:"realized"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to read between the lines:

      "As the investigation progressed, I realized there were instances in which [people realised that] I did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity that I have espoused at HP and which have guided me throughout my career. [Shiiiiiiit.]"

    3. Re:"realized"? by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That, and the rest of the board probably deciding that they had to get rid of him to avoid exposing any of them to investigations.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:"realized"? by selven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he's fairly honest here. Do you think these people even bother to read principles of conduct, except when they absent-mindedly recite them to their intended audience (other people)?

    5. Re:"realized"? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      As a great man once said, "Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorence on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I've worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time."

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:"realized"? by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm going to play devil's advocate, keep in mind it may not work.

      I find when I look at people who are given a lot of power don't tend to view "misuses" of power the same way as people do when looking at it from the outside. A lot of different kinds of corruption can be born from, "What's the harm?" and it can be very easy to run away from the consequences and by doing so, lie to themselves.

      In cases like that, when you are forced and/or given an excuse to stop lying to yourself, you actually learn a lot about yourself and your behavior that you may not have known, but which you should have. It's actually rather easy to 'misfile' things in your head such that you actually do know them, but they're not properly weighted or not connected to other facts, for (a made up) example, "I hired my cousin in place of a qualified applicant, as a favor." Okay, you hired your cousin--did you check to see that he was doing a good job? Did the company suffer because you didn't look into his behavior? Did the company actually need that qualified applicant? Was the qualified applicant already working there (internal promotion) and have they gotten the shit end of the stick because of it? Was the qualified applicant, perchance, someone you actually knew and respected and who hasn't talked to you since?

      Once you stop hiding from your own closet and its skeletons, you may in fact get hit by the realization that you aren't nearly as clean as you thought you were. That's all I'm saying.

    7. Re:"realized"? by AshtangiMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      [Shiiiiiiit.]

      *caption: "[Golly]"

    8. Re:"realized"? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      "Realized" means, his lawyers told him, "You're fucked."

      Isn't that why he's in trouble in the first place?

    9. Re:"realized"? by Smauler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hehe... I love ignorance as an excuse.

    10. Re:"realized"? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      I'm going to play devil's advocate, keep in mind it may not work.

      I'll further play the devil's advocate.

      Perhaps he's innocent of the charges, but the public assumption of guilt for anyone accused of a sexual offense is so great that he could no longer effectively carry out his job.

      I'm not saying he's innocent, nor am I saying he's guilty. But for the sake of argument, I can imagine an innocent man being accused of an offense, and the resulting PR-flak being so great that he could not effectively continue as CEO of a large company.

    11. Re:"realized"? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      He's as much admitted as having an affair with a contractor. Given that there is a massive power imbalance there, that's almost by definition sexual harassment.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  4. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "As the investigation progressed, I realized there were instances in which I did not live up to the standards and principles..."

    Thank goodness there was an investigation, so he could realize what he had done!

  5. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by dan828 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More like, at some point in the investigation he realized that he was busted and couldn't cover up or plausibly deny things. He was probably feeling pretty untouchable up to that point after coming out unscathed from the other little upset they had a while back.

  6. Crap floats. by Spazntwich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else's skin crawl as they read the rehearsed and empty words? Reeks of a sociopath saying what he thinks folks want to hear to let him off the hook. Funny how many seem to make it to the top.

    1. Re:Crap floats. by mapcan · · Score: 5, Funny

      He thought harass was two words

    2. Re:Crap floats. by bertoelcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyone else's skin crawl as they read the rehearsed and empty words? Reeks of a sociopath saying what he thinks folks want to hear to let him off the hook. Funny how many seem to make it to the top.

      Only the sociopaths want the power so only the sociopaths get the power.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    3. Re:Crap floats. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Which is why the power should be randomly assigned from a pool of competent workers, and not able to be turned-down. Don't want to be a janitor? You'll have to take your chance at being forced to be CEO for a couple years just like everybody else.

    4. Re:Crap floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else's skin crawl as they read the rehearsed and empty words? Reeks of a sociopath saying what he thinks folks want to hear to let him off the hook. Funny how many seem to make it to the top.

      ALL of his speeches were like this. You should have seen some of the sleazy things he has said to employees.

      Good riddance to this guy, while he made things shine on Wall Street, it was at the cost of long term stability and employee morale.

    5. Re:Crap floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. This guy makes over $40 million per year, and he has to lie and steal to get laid? Does he have the tiniest dick in the world or is it just the sheer rancid force of his personality? He fakes expense reports? What a pathetic scumbag. But then, that sort of sociopathic behaviour is what gets you to that level in the first place.

    6. Re:Crap floats. by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Criminal psychologst calls CEOs psychopaths
      Sociologist/Criminologist calls CEOs sociopaths

      Take your pick. Or maybe they're both. It would explain a lot.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:Crap floats. by LordNimon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you expect him to do? Stand up there and cry like a baby? Of course the words were rehearsed. The CEO is only answerable to the board and shareholders. He doesn't have to apologize to the managers or the employees. Considering how fickle investors are, he needs to say all the right things to make sure none of them panic.

      Sounds to me like he had a consensual relationship with an underling that was prohibited by company rules. That's why it's not a sexual harassment violation, because no one felt he (or she) was harassed. If so, then as far as I'm concerned, he didn't really do anything wrong (IMHO), so he should just make his exit quickly and be done with it.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    8. Re:Crap floats. by SDF-7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You rather glossed over the whole inaccurate expense reports, misappropriation of corporate resources and undisclosed close relationship with a contractor part of things that was uncovered while investigating the non-violation. Either that or your opinion of "didn't really do anything wrong" is substantively different than most other folks'. Perhaps you should get your resume over to the HP board soon?

    9. Re:Crap floats. by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone else's skin crawl as they read the rehearsed and empty words? Reeks of a sociopath saying what he thinks folks want to hear to let him off the hook.

      It sounds more like the words of an agreed-to statement made as part of a deal that involves the person making a statement and resigning while the other party to the agreement (in this case, the HP board) elects not to pursue some of the other remedies it might have available for the misconduct at issue, so that the offender merely loses the job (notionally voluntarily) and everyone moves on with a minimum expenditure of resources on further proceedings (litigation, etc.)

    10. Re:Crap floats. by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I follow the news. I'm pretty immune at this point to rehearsed and empty words from sociopaths.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Crap floats. by hitmark · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    12. Re:Crap floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be a redneck if...

    13. Re:Crap floats. by sexconker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Criminal psychologst calls CEOs psychopaths
      Sociologist/Criminologist calls CEOs sociopaths

      Take your pick. Or maybe they're both. It would explain a lot.

      While I'd love to agree with their assessments, the simple fact is that psychology, sociology, and criminology are not sciences.

      They're often useful practices, but whenever someone from one of these field tries to push some claim forward, all I see is their opinion, and a glaring lack of scientific method.

    14. Re:Crap floats. by Raenex · · Score: 5, Funny

      You only say these things because of your repressive mother.

    15. Re:Crap floats. by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd refine that to "they're not hard sciences - yet". There's a dispute that's older than me (by a long way) as to whether soft/social sciences and social sciences are sciences at all and I won't get into that. What I will say is that there is absolutely nothing in any physical science which strictly prohibits any of the soft/social sciences becoming hard sciences eventually. That anyone knows with any certainty.

      I will add this proviso: "The Emperor's New Mind" by Roger Penrose would seem to imply that psychology can never be a hard science, since it does claim that the brain is a quantum computer which is irreducible to a deterministic model. That's not quite enough, since QM is perfectly good physics and yet not reducible to a deterministic model, but the brain is hellishly complex and if we can't model even trivial macroscale systems using QM we certainly won't be able to model something as convoluted as the human brain. We might not need to model it to quite that degree to be able to derive laws that are as good in the social disciplines as Newtonian mechanics is in the physical sciences, which would probably be good enough to qualify as a hard science, but we'd not be able to go beyond that point if Penrose is right.

      However, as things stand, you are absolutely correct. The soft sciences (whether or not they really are science) often do not use the scientific method and frequently are more opinion-based than anything. In short, not merely pre-modern-science but pre-Socratic. It shouldn't take more than 2,500 years for them to catch up, though. Less, if they put in the fundamental research necessary.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    16. Re:Crap floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good thing i left a few weeks ago.

      the ones in my department who are not looking for new jobs are either brown nosing scumbags or oblivious to reality. the other half is desperate to leave.

      posted as AC for obvious reasons.

    17. Re:Crap floats. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      This guy makes over $40 million per year, and he has to lie and steal to get laid?

      No kidding. He could have just paid for it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    18. Re:Crap floats. by yuhong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hopefully next time the board of directors will not choose a sociopath as a CEO. But that is not the only problem:
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1285008/Why-Modern-Business-Is-Bad-for-Your-Mental-Health
      Should I resubmit this?

    19. Re:Crap floats. by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that they're the only people who want to be highly paid no matter how well or poorly they do, they're just the only ones who are able and willing to stab enough people in the back and stomp on enough puppies over the years to get there.

      Most people would feel too much personal shame to lay off half the workforce "to save the company" and then collect more than their cumulative incomes as a bonus.

    20. Re:Crap floats. by hey! · · Score: 1

      No kidding. He could have just paid for it.

      Did you read the article? He did pay for it, but with he stockholders' money. That probably made it better for him.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:Crap floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would explain a lot."

      News flash--most nerds are smart. Most doctors are good lucking and have OCD. Most computer programmers have decent analytical skills. You want to shag an attractive mate. Anything else obvious that needs to be spelled out to you?

      CEOs are psychos and socios? It's freaking inherent in and to the job position.

      You're a fool if you couldn't figure this out for yourself. Or an underachiever that needs it to be fed to you by "experts."

      Anyone who reaches a point where they are responsible for that much money, and that many people, HAS to be indifferent on some level when they get to the job position and have the responsibility they have. Otherwise, they wouldn't be able to get to or proceed at the level expected.

      Even if they are nice people, seeking do better, even the very nature of climbing the ladder makes them develop that indifference. I know. I was a kind, gentle person who wanted to help people. I chose a career path. In the middle of the path, I realized while I was still a good person, it was becoming more and more relative to the company I "kept," namely those all around me in the same classes, in the same internships, etc. I saw the end point, said, hell no, and removed myself, even though I knew that too would partly fail since the changes were already in place. I still developed into a sociopath in many ways, but it's not as bad as what I originally had projected, and I manage very well to direct my hate towards those who clearly try to hurt me. One "friend" described me as a beserker when I saw me let loose.

      The problem is not CEOs. It's that we HAVE A CEO POSITION AT ALL. There is and always will be sociopaths and psychopaths, and even those who hunt or want to take them down, often are of the same ilk, just less able. The problem isn't that they exist, it's in managing them. Heck, most of the people commenting on their hatred or disgust at these actions are the same--they come off as jealous or envious, which is a sort of sick and twisted way to say they are pissed they don't have the opportunity themselves to get away with it; they just reveal it as moral disappointment instead of saying "damn, I wish I had the opportunity to have an inappropriate relationship with millions of dollars if I get fired too." It's disingenuous and frankly pathetic.

      Are all people like that? Hell no. But nearly all who have the mental ability to fully understand this, who study it, and who realize it, are also not in the position to do anything effective in preventing it. Here, the board is firing him, more to save their own asses, not because of some moral outrage or belief in fair play. Anyone here commenting on this didn't do squat to remove the CEO or find an effective and active solution. And the rest? Too damn to know or too busy or burdened to care.

    22. Re:Crap floats. by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd refine that to "they're not hard sciences - yet". There's a dispute that's older than me (by a long way) as to whether soft/social sciences and social sciences are sciences at all and I won't get into that. What I will say is that there is absolutely nothing in any physical science which strictly prohibits any of the soft/social sciences becoming hard sciences eventually.

      Sure there is. There is no real definition of "hard sciences" except by subject matter, so as long as "soft sciences" study what they currently study, they won't become "hard sciences".

      Particularly, the kinds of experimental difficulties that require non-laboratory kind of experiments in the social sciences are also found in many areas in the physical (and, for those who distinguish them, life) sciences, as well. They may be somewhat more prevalent in the social sciences generally, but that's not a difference of kind.

      The soft sciences (whether or not they really are science) often do not use the scientific method and frequently are more opinion-based than anything.

      There are certainly people who write about the subject matter of social sciences who do not use the scientific method, but that is also true of the physical (or life sciences.)

      There are certainly also people in the social sciences that adopt the form of the scientific method but misapply it, but that, too, is also true of the physical and life sciences.

    23. Re:Crap floats. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It is actually rather odd how this story is being reported. The investigation may have started because of concerns about sexual harassment; but all the actual dirt is financial fraud and conflict of interest, which are Real Serious Business for somebody in an executive position. And yet, for whatever reason, all the headlines are "...resigns...sexual harassment..."

      Given the potential for subtle coercions, favoritism(perceived or actual, either tanks morale), and other such drama, companies having rules about relationships that traverse certain paths on the org chart is understandable enough; but it is hard to get too worked up about violations of them, assuming all other aspects of the relationship are on the up and up.

      A CEO who can't keep his hands out of the piggy bank, though, seems both serious and indefensible. I'm not sure why that isn't the bit that is making the headlines. I'm also not clear, given that that was going on, why he is being golden parachuted, rather than shitcanned. Some he-said, she-said dramafest that boils down to no morally shocking offenses and a few technical violations is something I can see a company wanting to avoid. Fraud of the sort that a decent forensic accountant could demonstrate seems like the sort of thing that they could, and would, want to nail you to the wall for....

    24. Re:Crap floats. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      But never any of the fun sociopaths, like the ones who start a puppy-powered computing initiative.

    25. Re:Crap floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the sociopaths want the power so only the sociopaths get the power.

      First you get the money... then you get the power.. Then you get the women. He was just following the plan... Fourth step.. then you get the resigned.

    26. Re:Crap floats. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Penrose is a physicist, not a cognitive scientist. There's no reason to believe anything the brain does requires anything but classical mechanics and basic chemistry.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:Crap floats. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, how much of "sociologist/Criminologist calls CEOs sociopaths" is a sociologist making a sound general judgment of a class of people, and how much of it is sensationalist headline targeted towards many persons' hatred of those in power? What is the connotation of the word "sociopath"--it's negative, isn't it? We love to hear negative things about people we don't like. It's easy for some random asshole with paltry ambitions and little to recommend him to sit back and say "CEOs are sociopaths!!!!1" and get the nodding heads and approval of all his similarly incompetent peers.

    28. Re:Crap floats. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      You rather glossed over the whole inaccurate expense reports, misappropriation of corporate resources and undisclosed close relationship with a contractor part of things that was uncovered while investigating the non-violation. Either that or your opinion of "didn't really do anything wrong" is substantively different than most other folks'.

      The funny part is, EVERYONE DOES THIS KIND OF SHIT. For every one CEO "misappropriating corporate resources" how many underlings are there stealing extra pens, note pads, computers stuffed in the corner, etc? Not defending this guy cause I don't know him, but I am so sick and tired of people hearing about some minor infraction another person committed and then getting all up in arms about it like this kind of shit doesn't go on all day, every day, and everyone knows about it. This isn't about the guy's misconduct, because I guarantee nobody truly gives a fuck to hear he was banging a contractor. It's other things he did that put the nails in his coffin, like running the company poorly and/or pissing people off, and this is simply the leverage they gained to get rid of him. That's all.

    29. Re:Crap floats. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I'm also not clear, given that that was going on, why he is being golden parachuted, rather than shitcanned. Some he-said, she-said dramafest that boils down to no morally shocking offenses and a few technical violations is something I can see a company wanting to avoid. Fraud of the sort that a decent forensic accountant could demonstrate seems like the sort of thing that they could, and would, want to nail you to the wall for....

      The secret of life: everything is a charade.

      The (the board) just wanted him gone, for whatever reason, nothing personal but we're tired of you running our company. Maybe he refused to leave, or wasn't taking their strong hints about it. So they found whatever they could on him, drummed up all the charges they could, in order to force him to resign. So he did, and he gets his golden parachute of course, cause like I said: nothing personal, they accomplished their goal, no need to stir up further drama by refusing to pay a bonus. It's not like the money is coming out of these people's own personal checking accounts or anything, so it's all good.

      Or what? You think this board of directors is a bunch of saints, having never committed any similar offenses and were thus shocked to hear that this guy was banging a contractor? I guarantee every one of those guys and girls has their own skeletons in the closet, but most smart people keep those well hidden to avoid them being used against oneself.

  7. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen brother, and pass the golden trough.

  8. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but sadly I'm guessing this is par for the course at this level of "leadership" in most companies.

    Yeah but HP also had Carly who was forced to resign. Hopefully trouble doesn't come in 3's for HP.

    **Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  9. Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what kind of golden parachute the board paid to make him go away quietly?

  10. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that before Carly?

  11. What info do we have on his... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And what info do we have on that golden parachute he will be receiving from HP?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:What info do we have on his... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      One made from 100 dollar bills and wet with the tears of laid off employees and their families. It's probably monogrammed with his initials too.

    2. Re:What info do we have on his... by SDF-7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      $40 to $50 million by current estimates: http://www.businessinsider.com/hp-severance-2010-8.

      Part of me wonders if it was actually in his contract that even on being fired for ethical/criminal reasons [i.e. not just fired because "we don't think you're pumping the stock quite enough"] he gets a severance or if the board just wants this over with / is such pals with him / whatnot that they gave it to him anyway. If the former is true -- the hiring committees really need to make better contracts (and stop being packed with the friends of the folks they're hiring... but I suppose that's what happens when boards keep cross-pollinating as they do).

    3. Re:What info do we have on his... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the best question. Oh, well you caught me being a dirt bag, give me my 50mill to go away. One of our former cio's got caught doing the same thing, except she also left us with years of crap to clean up. Her prize for being an equal scumbag, another multi-million dollar golden parachute.

    4. Re:What info do we have on his... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The fact is that the CEOs and highly posted people get paid for keeping their trap shut after they are fired. They know too many company secrets and can potentially cause more damage than 10s of millions of dollars, especially to a company like HP. So ethical/criminal or whatever the reasons, they can essentially blackmail the companies into giving them a diamond studded golden parachute.

    5. Re:What info do we have on his... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the military "cross pollination" is usually called a "circle jerk" or a "cluster fuck". Or are board roorooms more like Colorado City in their inbred nature? I guess in those terms,im happier being broke. At least I can still see myself when I look in a mirror.

    6. Re:What info do we have on his... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget he will probably get a cushy job as "economic adviser" or some such for the next Republican Presidential nominee, just like Carly did.

    7. Re:What info do we have on his... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's done so that companies of this size can continue to attract the top CEOs.

      The issue is if you include an "even if you get fired" clause it will put off top talent. A good recent example of why this causes problems is with BP's now ex-CEO Hayward, the Obama administration made him their scapegoat over the disaster and the intolerant xenophobic US press repeatedly attacked him simply because he wasn't American. Yet, if you look at what he did- how he handled it all apart from some soundbytes the media jumped upon and stupid things like slagging him off for spending a day yachting with his son who'd he'd not been able to spend any time with for months, he actually did a great job. BP is actually one of the more responsible oil companies if you look at their record overall, particularly in Africa, the Middle East and Asia compared to for example, Exxon and Shell. He made it clear from the outset BP would pay full costs for the spill, well over and above their $75 million legal obligation, despite the fact Obama and much of the US press then attacked him and BP as if they weren't paying out. Apart from managing the media, few CEOs in the world do a better job of running the country than Hayward has managed with BP- you only have to look at how bad Microsoft is doing under Ballmer for example.

      So you see, the issue isn't the contracts per-se, there's really nothing wrong with offering this type of severance package whatever the circumstance so that good CEOs have the confident to work for you such that if they're made a scapegoat for something they're still looked after.

      The real issue is the recruiting process, was enough done to ensure Hurd was a respectable person? Someone with a good track record? Someone competent, dependable and trustworthy?

      The issue isn't the contracts and the severance, the issue is the quality of recruitment into said posts. For what it's worth, following the previous example, BP's new CEO does a great job with the American media being American himself, but many analysts agree that he's going to be hopeless moving past the gulf oil spill at improving business links and winning contracts compared to Hayward, and they're probably quite right. I wouldn't be suprised if once the whole gulf oil spill drama is forgotten about it he doesn't last long and also gets replaced- not necessarily his fault he doesn't have the contacts or experience outside the US, and so rightly he'll get his severance and it'll be someone elses turn.

  12. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    While it pains me to defend this piece of shit, the truth is that the pretexting was the handiwork of Patricia Dunn (chairwoman of HP board at the time), and the Hurd wasn't involved.

  13. This is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that the Hurd is abandonware, will HP contribute the source back tot he community?

    I've been waiting for Gnu to deliver the Hurd for the last 20 years, and this might be enough to get them over the hump.

    1. Re:This is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But that's exactly the problem - the Hurd was humping the help!

      In any case, I don't think I'm interested in the sort of "source" Hurd was contributing.

    2. Re:This is good news! by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Well done.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:This is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She didn't think much of his microkernel. Or the timing of its presentation.

    4. Re:This is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but we may get some corporate butt Hurd, in nice wrap. Or something.

  14. Messrs Hewlett and Packard by blair1q · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...would like their good names back, now.

    After what Carly Fiorina did to H-P, and the nation, and now this tool...hell, I remember when "hp" on the logo meant the very best in quality, not scandal and treason...

    1. Re:Messrs Hewlett and Packard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They changed the HP logo in December 2009

    2. Re:Messrs Hewlett and Packard by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Unless they changed it to "BP" they didn't change it enough.

    3. Re:Messrs Hewlett and Packard by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! Alas, even the geeks of the world are becoming more like those who would join the new HP than the old.

    4. Re:Messrs Hewlett and Packard by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Oh come'on. Let's be serious. Before HP aquired Compaq, they had awesome printers and crappy everything else. Now they have awesome low and medium end servers. Printers started sucking wind some time ago (mostly because of those awful drivers, WTF is going on over there), but the essentially Compaq servers they are putting out are decent. Plus, I'm none too displeased with my HP stock price.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    5. Re:Messrs Hewlett and Packard by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Before HP started making printers to sell ink for 500X its value, it had great electronics products, and middling if earnest PC products.

      Fiorina and the printer scam turned the company's values on its head. She expanded that profit-at-all-costs mentality to her push to outsource all of America's technology production. She doesn't understand the point of a good economy is to give us all a chance live decently, not just pile up cash as fast as possible in her hands. Or maybe she does, and doesn't care that her way got about 5% of the total economic return and gave it to 0.5% of the people.

  15. HP CEO title is cursed by zero_out · · Score: 1

    Okay, so it's only the last to CEOs that I know of, but both have been ousted due to misconduct. It seems like the title is cursed to bring the person's career to a shameful end.

    1. Re:HP CEO title is cursed by SDF-7 · · Score: 1

      I don't remember Carly being bumped for misconduct - it was performance and just generally clashing with the board once too often, if I recall correctly [Hey, maybe I don't].

      You may be thinking of Patricia Dunn who left the board due to the pretexting scandal when she was Chairwoman. That's when Hurd got both roles (even though the board and he made such a big deal about how that was such a danger when Carly was ousted... funny how that didn't seem to be a problem for them anymore...)

    2. Re:HP CEO title is cursed by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Carly was ousted for staggering incompetence, not misconduct. HP's stock shot up 6.9% the day Carly's departure was announced, whereas it dropped 4% when Hurd's departure was announced. In other words, stockholders felt Hurd was good for HPs value, but Fiorina was not.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:HP CEO title is cursed by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Well, at least he isn't trying to teach Defense Against the Dark Arts.

  16. Golden Parachute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much money it would have cost him to be fired versus resigning. Now would be a really good time for Wikileaks to get a copy of his employment agreement ...

  17. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by jd · · Score: 1

    I always thought the cases WERE from tanks. I could have sworn an old HPUX box I used had 8" armor-plating. It certainly felt like it when trying to move it around.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  18. download link? by catmistake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hurd was released?!? link plz!

  19. Fortunately by 32771 · · Score: 1

    Fortunately they don't produce anything important anymore like those Agilent scopes and *analyzers. So it is not like the foundation of electrical engineering would have received any cracks or so. If that would have happened to Agilent nobody would have bothered anyway.

    After all, even to HP and its customers it probably won't mean much. Why do i see the same headlines on slashdot as I see on google news again?

    --
    Je me souviens.
    1. Re:Fortunately by Pingmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the thing that gets me: Why do I see the headlines on Google News, CNet and CNN hours before it's on Slashdot? I remember (not too long ago even) when /. would have articles out far in advance of mainstream media.

    2. Re:Fortunately by zxsqkty · · Score: 1

      Because /. isn't about 'breaking stories' or 'investigative journalism' or anything of the kind. /. is about discussing recent news stories from your mom's basement, and it normally takes a moment or two for that news to to filter down through the carpet tiles and ventilation ducts. The delay is intentional.

      As a bonus, this delay gives you time to formulate your rage into a semi-coherent rant for / against the subject and post it here for the world to point fingers at. Alternatively, you could just troll like everyone else does. Or post a link to goatse or tubgirl. Or your lame blog.

      Or you know, you could actually get involved with the discussion.

      Your call...

      --
      Caution: May contain nuts.
  20. I'd like to say "Unbeliveable", but I can't by sirwired · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it hilarious/scary that whenever a CxO gets caught doing something stupid/criminal, the defense is always ignorance. These weasels who get paid more in a day than I get paid in a year suddenly become the most oblivious, ignorant, and stupid morons in the world when they are being investigated for wrongdoing.

    It wasn't until the middle of the investigation that he realized he did something wrong? *retch*

    Possible scenario:
    He hires a mistress / "marketing" contractor.
    Takes her on "fact-finding trips" in a company jet.
    Dumps her / stops paying.
    She sues for "harassment."
    Board figures out the real story and lets him "resign"... in the meantime, they quietly pay off the mistress in return for her not filing suit. (Once you've gone public and filed suit with a high-profile case like this, you've just pissed away your best bargaining chips, which involve sweeping under the rug.)

    If I was HP's board, I would not have let him resign; he would have been fired on the spot. Although I admit to being surprised that they didn't ham-handedly cover up the story; perhaps they learned their lesson with the wiretap fiasco from several years ago.

    SirWired

    1. Re:I'd like to say "Unbeliveable", but I can't by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I was HP's board, I would not have let him resign; he would have been fired on the spot. Although I admit to being surprised that they didn't ham-handedly cover up the story; perhaps they learned their lesson with the wiretap fiasco from several years ago.

      Most US banks never press charges against employee embezzlers. They are just quietly "let go."

      Why? Would you do your business with a bank that had headlines in the news for embezzelers . . .?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:I'd like to say "Unbeliveable", but I can't by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If I was HP's board, I would not have let him resign; he would have been fired on the spot.

      That's because you aren't his neighbor, don't sit on the boards of any other corps with him, don't drink and play golf with him on a regular basis and don't have your own contract mistresses too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:I'd like to say "Unbeliveable", but I can't by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't imagine he'll be on the boards of any other companies for long. At least not the current big ones.

  21. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by oldhack · · Score: 1, Troll

    Thanks for the elaboration, Capt. Obvious.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  22. Oh, that kind of contractor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hurd's 'close personal relationship' with the contractor created a conflict of interest, and he was also found to have misused company assets."

    at least it reads that way to me.

  23. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by selven · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, that kind of casing is for products less than 100 cm^3 only. Anything bigger doesn't need protective casing since there's no possible rearrangement of particles that could make it any less useful.

  24. It's not the title that's cursed by sirwired · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not the title that's cursed, its the reputation of a once-great company repeatedly getting abused and taken for granted by those chosen to lead it.

    Here's to hoping the board has better judgment when choosing the next one. Their track record so far (Carly, and now this) isn't exactly inspiring.

    SirWired

  25. Some are more equal than others by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Had this been a "rank and file" employee, the said employee would've been escorted out of the building on the same day, no severance. Instead we get this loop that's just going to go lay low for a few months then move on and pull the same shit again, till caught... (rinse and repeat.)

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Some are more equal than others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. The employee would not have been escorted out - they would have been arrested for theft.

    2. Re:Some are more equal than others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sup dawg, I Hurd you like sexual harassment so I put...

  26. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by HarvardAce · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder what kind of golden parachute the board paid to make him go away quietly?

    According to CNN, he could make $53 million in severance pay.

    --
    Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  27. Posted Nude Photos by imscarr · · Score: 1

    Is he the one that made the web site with that ladies nude photos? He only said he was in India?

    --
    Like the beaver, it's just Dam one thing after another
  28. The guy was... by master_p · · Score: 1

    ...Hurd (pun intended, sorry).

    1. Re:The guy was... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      ...GNU/Hurd

      FTFY.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:The guy was... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Hurd?

      I thought he just got told by the board and the investigator.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  29. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    Our old HP-3000's were built to last too. I feel all sentimental now ... I'm gonna revisit the John Sculley years at Apple and crash back to earth.

  30. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    While it pains me to defend this piece of shit, the truth is that the pretexting was the handiwork of Patricia Dunn (chairwoman of HP board at the time), and the Hurd wasn't involved.

    damn ..so trouble does come in 3's

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  31. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by zhong-guo · · Score: 1

    It definitely still sounds like a tank

  32. SBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Posting this anonymously since I work for HP.
    Seems Mark violated the Standarts of Business Conduct (SBC). Every new employee has to study the SBC and every year these is a mandatory training on understanding this document. It kind of discredits both the SBC and the trainings if the CEO breaks his own rules.

    Oh, and I hope they will find a new CEO who actually understands how technology works. Mark was not much better than Carly - HP now hardly does any serious R&D (except for HP Labs which actually does pretty cool stuff), preferring to buy established companies.

    1. Re:SBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the only Standards of Business for which legal attachment could be made and action taken. I can see Mark Hurd violated quite a few other Standards of Business for which he will not be held accountable.

    2. Re:SBC by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Both Fiorina and Hurd were just following the HP board's road map. When Hurd replaced Fiorina, the road map did not change. Hurd was actually much better than Fiorina at implemented the road map, since Fiorina was an epic fail at getting HP's divisions to work together. Replacing Hurd will not alter the direction of HP -- the old "HP way" is gone forever, and has been for many years.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:SBC by Alystair · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could bump Rahul Sood up during this mess, the envy line of products is pretty awesome.

    4. Re:SBC by donutello · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SBC training is about limiting the companies liability when there is a lawsuit. The purpose is not to "train" or "educate" employees. The purpose is to be able to say "we made it clear that this is not how you should act so this is the employee's fault - don't sue us".

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    5. Re:SBC by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Posting this anonymously since I work for HP.

      Even in this case I'd post non-anonymously when I can. This kind of comment in particular sounds like it would be no problem to do so.

      Oh, and I hope they will find a new CEO who actually understands how technology works. Mark was not much better than Carly - HP now hardly does any serious R&D (except for HP Labs which actually does pretty cool stuff), preferring to buy established companies./quote

    6. Re:SBC by yuhong · · Score: 1
      Previous comment was incomplete. Sadly Slashdot do not allow comment deletion or editing. Here is the corrected comment:

      Posting this anonymously since I work for HP.

      Even in this case I'd post non-anonymously when I can. This kind of comment in particular sounds like it would be no problem to do so. But that is a different topic altogether

      Oh, and I hope they will find a new CEO who actually understands how technology works. Mark was not much better than Carly - HP now hardly does any serious R&D (except for HP Labs which actually does pretty cool stuff), preferring to buy established companies.

      Agreed.

    7. Re:SBC by yuhong · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by HP board's roadmap?

    8. Re:SBC by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even in this case I'd post non-anonymously when I can. This kind of comment in particular sounds like it would be no problem to do so.

      Clearly you've never dealt with upper management at a large company. I was once reprimanded at a former job (cough*AOL*cough) by upper management for praising, on an internal mailing list, the technology the company was using in its infrastructure, but which had fallen into disfavor by many in management.

      When dealing with upper management, my policy has become, "Expressing any opinion is like poking a rabid wolverine with a sharp stick."

      It doesn't stop me from doing it. I'm just not surprised when there is retaliation all out of proportion. Almost always, these are not people who want to hear from anyone not parroting exactly what they say.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    9. Re:SBC by yuhong · · Score: 1

      In fact, I have been saying that we should no longer default to MBAs like Carly for a while now.

    10. Re:SBC by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      SBC training is about limiting the companies liability when there is a lawsuit. The purpose is not to "train" or "educate" employees. The purpose is to be able to say "we made it clear that this is not how you should act so this is the employee's fault - don't sue us".

      So "SBC" is really another way of saying "CYA".

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:SBC by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Sorry for sounding like it would always be no problem to to post this kind of comment. I know that it was not always feasible to post non-anonymously from long before I wrote this though, hence why I said "when I can". And yes I know, being rewarded for saying what they want to hear not the truth, a common problem.

    12. Re:SBC by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean the decisions to ditch quality and over-engineering all their products, and instead start buying up other companies like Compaq in order to become a computer services company to compete with IBM, were made by the HP board, not by the CEO. (As opposed to the HP tradition of being a high-end hardware supplier that innovated through basic research.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    13. Re:SBC by jojowombl · · Score: 0, Funny

      obligatory "kids in the hall" sketch.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJNsZgHCVKU

    14. Re:SBC by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I did some quick research using Google and seems like Carly started the merger.

    15. Re:SBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprisingly, expressing opinions internally in HP does not get you in trouble. You won't believe how many people told their salary sucks and that HP doesn't innovate anymore and that the HP way is forgotten. And nobody got into trouble.
      It's just that expressing these thoughts to outside media may get you into trouble, especially if you're writing confidential info or expressing your own opinion as being HP's official. I decided to be on the safe side, just in case.

    16. Re:SBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, work for HP and have a slightly different take here. What makes me believe that some of the most disastrous shit could be behind us is that we held to the spirit of our values, not the letter of our SBC in this case. We have always had a culture, and never one that would tolerate this. Mark fucked up...it's about that simple. And the board stepped in and put things right. That leaves me feeling at least a bit more optimistic.

    17. Re:SBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and being an ex-HP employee, I'm also an anonymous coward. Can't agree more with the analysis on the SBC.

      Especially pissed me off when you read of his rorting the expense system when we couldn't even get proper training because there wasn't the money there.

      It makes a mockery of the whole lip service you received from those at the top. They are nothing but money-grubbing, greedy bastards.

  33. Solution will be more ethics classes for employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The solution, as always, will be more ethics classes for HP employees

  34. HP isn't a bank by sirwired · · Score: 1

    HP isn't a bank, and there is no mention he abused client funds or assets. The official reason for the firing was expense account fraud. I see folks prosecuted for embezzlement in the local news all the time.

    And even at banks, they get fired and escorted out the door by security. They don't get to "resign" (and keep whatever pension and perks you might ordinarily keep as a former employee.) Betcha he gets to keep his stock options, pension, etc.

    SirWired

    1. Re:HP isn't a bank by uncqual · · Score: 1

      I think pensions are safe regardless of why you were fired. They are already earned - sort of like vacation in many/most states, they still have to pay you for your accrued vacation no matter why you leave.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    2. Re:HP isn't a bank by klui · · Score: 1

      Any chance he'll get hit by the IRS for tax evasion?

  35. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an employee of HP, good riddance. The company's employees have been treated like dirt for at least the past two years. I don't think there is one person who sits within 50 feet of me who isn't actively job hunting. Sexual harassment is just one of his many offenses.

  36. ...what? by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

    First Bob Moffat, now Mark Hurd.... both got caught in strange sexual histories.... Larry Ellison, better keep your hands where we can see it.

    1. Re:...what? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Larry Ellison, better keep your hands where we can see it.

      People have been saying that for a long time. Of course, they've also been saying "Steve Ballmer, get your hands out of the crack of your ass... and stop smelling them!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:...what? by afabbro · · Score: 1

      First Bob Moffat, now Mark Hurd.... both got caught in strange sexual histories.... Larry Ellison, better keep your hands where we can see it.

      When Larry E plays the field, he plays all the way - he's been married four times.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
  37. In Las Vegas by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Las Vegas, that type of contractor is called an "escort."

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:In Las Vegas by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      In Las Vegas, that type of contractor is called an "escort."

      That's still a euphemism. The correct term would be something on the order of "prostitute", "hooker" or "call-girl"

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  38. As a followup... one impressive thing by sirwired · · Score: 3, Informative

    While Hurd himself has proven to be yet another spineless idiot with no moral compass, the General Counsel did not mince words:
    (From CNET)
    -----
    Holston said the company's investigation revealed that the contractor had received compensation and incorrect expense reimbursement from Hurd as part of his attempt to conceal his relationship with her.

    HP's board was notified of the matter after receiving a letter from the outside contracting firm on June 29. HP conducted an investigation with outside investigators and concluded that Hurd's conduct "exhibited a profound lack of judgment," according to Holston.

    The amount of expenses involved is not material to HP, according to Holston. "The facts that drove the decision for the company had to do with integrity, with credibility, and honesty," he told investors on a call Friday.
    ----

    For a corporate press release, this is practically ten-magaton nuclear anger. The only time I've seen something close is bankrupt corrupt company trying to throw the old CEO under the bus while trying to worm out of a shareholder lawsuit.

    1. Re:As a followup... one impressive thing by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I love how "lack of judgment" has become the newest euphemism for "crook". Misappropriating funds, preferential treatment for a contractor (which really is a form of theft too), and instead of being labeled a conniving embezzler, he gets the wooly "profound lack of judgment" crapola.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:As a followup... one impressive thing by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

      Empty words. I have a hard time seeing the downside for Hurd here. He gets millions in severance. After the announcement today, I told one of my co-workers "he must've really messed up". However, when I look at the severance filing, can you really say "He fucked up"? Hell, I'm thinking he's a freaking genius except for 1 nagging question - I wonder how Mrs. Hurd is taking the news?

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
    3. Re:As a followup... one impressive thing by klui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Divorce and take half?

    4. Re:As a followup... one impressive thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not an euphemism.

      Being a crook is not a disqualification for being a CEO, being a *stupid* crook is - if you get caught doing something unethical for little or no monetary gain in a way that is easy to prove, you show "profound lack of judgement".

  39. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by mevets · · Score: 1

    Maybe the contractor was Carly!

  40. Get Rubenstien in there by 13bPower · · Score: 1

    Hey they just got palm, and Rubenstien has some experience. I don't care how bad of a business move it is, I just want some new WebOS hardware that can hold a candle to the new Droid stuff.

  41. How many times will we have to tell you ? by Juba · · Score: 1

    The name is not "Hurd". It is "GNU/Hurd".
    And I think we should not be too harsh with someone whose kernel is quite small and who is permanently surrounded by daemons...

  42. "contractors" like this, so no women taken srsly by wagadog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It only takes ONE "contractor" like this in a company to totally discredit any other incoming women, no matter how many times over they can prove that their technical qualifications and achievements were earned fair and square. People won't even bother to find out. They'll just *assume* she got her grades, degrees, honors and awards on her back, got men to do her homework for her, "managed" to take credit for other peoples' work in all other previous work experience, and just happens to "know what the words mean." Except that the a-hole men on the project will simply not listen, assume she's "got it all wrong" and then have to find out the hard way what her point was -- when the little boys walk right into typical traps for young players that she'd warned them about .... having more experience.

    "contractors" like this piss me off even more than ethically-impaired sociopaths like Hurd. And for a *prostitute* like that to scream "sexual harassment" when he gets tired of her just makes a mockery of *real* cases of sexual harassment, which sorry -- goes on ALL the time.

  43. He used company funds for his fling by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He can have a consensual relationship all he wants, (I never recall a CEO getting fired over an affair) but HP found him using company funds for this relationship. That crosses the line into misconduct worthy of firing. It's perfectly legal to have a mistress, and not something a CEO is going to get fired over. But he should have paid for the whole fling out of his own pocket; too many CEOs treat the company treasury as their piggy bank. As if their outsize salaries aren't big enough already...

    And apologizing to the managers and employees would be appropriate here; nothing steams employees more than executives only paying lip service to a company's "values." The non-apology wasn't worth the paper it was written on. (It wasn't until he was investigated that it dawned on him it was wrong? *blech*)

    It wasn't harassment because she probably agreed to the whole deal (likely up until the point he decided to dump her.)

    Oh, and the "no panic" plan doesn't seem to be working. HP is down 10% in after-hours trading. (Which makes sense... an abrupt CEO transition from an executive that by all accounts was doing a good job is going to be tough.)

    1. Re:He used company funds for his fling by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      But he should have paid for the whole fling out of his own pocket; too many CEOs treat the company treasury as their piggy bank.

      True, but if you use company funds for your peccadilloes it's a lot harder for your wife to find out.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:He used company funds for his fling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I think it was stupid to fire him or pressure him to resign. So what, he appropriated company funds. A drop in the bucket. Have the lawyers haggle over compensation back to the company.

      Now they've lost 10% of their stock price because a CEO who was doing a good job was forced to step down. Who knows if the replacement will be competent or not.

    3. Re:He used company funds for his fling by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but if you use company funds for your peccadilloes it's a lot harder for your wife to find out.

      If you have the restraint to do it carefully, and do it so that the company doesn't find out about it, that might be true in something other than the very short run.

      OTOH, I suspect that people that use company funds to hide actual or attempted fooling around from their spouses are not generally people for whom that kind of restraint is normal.

      I think that it is more the case that, when drunk on your own power, its sometimes easy to imagine that using company resources as if they were your own personal slush fund will make it easier to get away without being discovered rather than that it actually helps all that much.

    4. Re:He used company funds for his fling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I never recall a CEO getting fired over an affair)

      Well, there was Boeing...

    5. Re:He used company funds for his fling by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 1

      But he should have paid for the whole fling out of his own pocket; too many CEOs treat the company treasury as their piggy bank.

      True, but if you use company funds for your peccadilloes it's a lot harder for your wife to find out.

      It would seem that wives are more effective financial auditors than corporate accountants.

      Somewhere in that lies a business model for a successful accounting firm; a marketing pitch at the very least.

  44. Motto by eulernet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mark Hurd's bio disappeared from HP's site:
    http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/execteam/bios/hurd.html

    His motto was:
    "Everything we do must be for the customer. If it's not, then we need to reconsider why we're doing it."
    http://web.archive.org/web/20071226095057/http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/execteam/bios/hurd.html

    He should have tried to respect it...

    1. Re:Motto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it but so far my interaction with big corporate CxOs has been limited to parsing their political pep-talks they have no intention of following-up on. They justify their behavior by claiming to care about their investors (nevermind that I was vested and a stock-owner as well I guess). I'm not a cynic by nature, I've been trained to assume they're pouring bullshit as soon as they open their mouths to speak into any kind of electronic recording device.

  45. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Silly stupid bastard! Everyone knows you only bang your secretary, or if you're desperate, one of the girls in the office pool. Contractors are just so beneath an executive. It's like dicking the guy that refills the water coolers.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  46. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

    He was during the end of the pretexting scandal. The practice started under Carly Fiorina. At the time, he said he wasn't aware of it and he was believed. This time, his guilt was undeniable.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  47. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Servaas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't seem to remember ANY employee of a tech company that had anything good to say about the company they work for...

  48. Sexual Harassment? Too Bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping he'd be forced to resign over putting overheating nVidia chips in their Pavilion notebooks and telling everybody there wasn't a problem.

  49. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well Done, Sarcastic Boy!

    Now, off to the Alliteration Mobile!

    Nanananannanana

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  50. First he said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As the investigation progressed, I realized there were instances in which I did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity that I have espoused at HP and which have guided me throughout my career."

    And then he said, "I should have gone straight into politics in the first place"

  51. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    "I'm guessing this is par for the course at this level of "leadership" in most companies.

    I disagree. I mean, I could be wrong, but most of the ceos I've met over the years, aside from the odd quirk, were very stand-up people, they had to be, otherwise no one would ever be able to do business, unless you buy that ALL ceos are sexual harasser. Clearly not so.. Also, Hurd Was Not CEO during the pretexting scandal, that was Patricia Dunn.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  52. The difference between Hurd and Fiorina by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HP stock dropped 4% the day Hurd's departure was announced, whereas is shot up 6.9% (at one point it was up 10.5%) the day Fiorina's departure was announced. Larry Ellison has repeated been accused of sexually harassing, then paying off his personal secretaries, but he's still CEO of Oracle... go figure. Charles Phillips, president of Oracle, screwed around on his wife for years, finally concluding in a Billboard in Times Square, but no impact to his career. I guess it just depends on which company you work for...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:The difference between Hurd and Fiorina by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is a function of anti-woman behavior on the stock market?

      I'd be willing to guess no, and it's more like anti-incompetent. Sure, Hurd was misappropriating funds to his mistress, he hadn't ran the company further into the ground than Carly did.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:The difference between Hurd and Fiorina by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Larry Ellison has repeated been accused of sexually harassing, then paying off his personal secretaries, but he's still CEO of Oracle... go figure.

      I'm guessing that the difference here isn't the accusations, its the fact that in Hurd's case, investigation based on the allegations turned up all kinds of misconduct against the company.

      Sexual harassment allegations (especially when made by someone else where the alleged victim isn't backing them up, whether or not they have been paid off) can be difficult to substantiate even if true, and people in power can draw lots of false allegations -- OTOH, things like misappropriating company resources for personal use are often leave evidence that is far more cut and dried.

  53. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by hitmark · · Score: 1

    dunno, he seem to have gotten HP back on course after the spending spree of the previous CEO.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  54. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't seem to remember ANY employee of a tech company that had anything good to say about the company they work for...

    I just want to preemptively get this in:

    Google is not a tech company - they're an ad agency.

  55. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Kingrames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, a 53 million dollar reward for sexual harassment, theft, and other misconduct to horrifying to speak aloud. Friends we are in the wrong goddamn industry.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  56. Re:"contractors" like this, so no women taken srsl by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, only the attractive female contractors will be assumed to have slept their way to the top. The butt-ugly ones will still be presumed to have some skills. For the record, I have worked with women that were both very attractive (to the point of distracting me from my work) and extremely competent and hard working. But I've also worked with a contractor who literally got her job because she was sleeping with another contractor, who then became her boss. This same female contractor then complained when a junior employee made a comment about preferring a blond for the next hire -- fucking hypocrite!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  57. There's no fury like a woman scorned... by Fizzl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... less eloquently: Some bitch ruins guys shit over nothing.
    Never seen this in the history of mankind...

    I see the scales of feminism and chauvinism become to a balance in couple of years time, when there is no longer retarded pandering or fury from neither side. Both terms would be equally disgusting.

    1. Re:There's no fury like a woman scorned... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      It' simple. Don't think with the small head.

      Otherwise I want to see pictures so I can see whether or not it was worth it.

    2. Re:There's no fury like a woman scorned... by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

      40-53 million dollars says it was worth it. Hell, my wife just gave me the green light if I can get 40 million out of the deal.

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
  58. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $50e6 probably sounds very reasonable when you're accustomed to making $30e6 every year. It's funny, how small must have his fraudulent expenses been, compared to being paid over $100K every single work day. He probably feels like he just got fired for going home with an HP ballpoint pen in his pocket.

  59. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by timelorde · · Score: 1

    Followed the link, and what pops up? ... wait for it ... a full page HP printer ad.

    Classic.

  60. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's slashdot, you aren't in the computer industry?

  61. Victims speak out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the harassment claims of the contractor could not be substantiated three goats and a Great Dane made damaging statements that were backed up by multiple video tapes. His on-line handle animallover69 didn't help his case.

  62. Re:Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vote for Basil Marceaux. I'm sure he'll be willing to move.

  63. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you don't consider EDS, 3COM and palm a spending spree ???

    holly jeebus in a pogo stick, man! the guy spent nearly 20 giga dolars on those. i bet carly is proud of him (except for the harrasment thingy, of course)

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  64. Re:Opportunity by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    I think you could have Gary Coleman's corpse running California. The place has such a ridiculously bad constitution that it wouldn't really matter.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  65. So THAT's why HP bought Palm by 5pp000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They wanted to be able to say, "No, your Honor, we didn't say we were pretexting, we said we were Pre texting."

    --
    Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
  66. Why you don't want women anywhere near work by fkx · · Score: 1

    Now we get to watch HP crash again under the "leadership" of yet another "squat to pee" manager.

    1. Re:Why you don't want women anywhere near work by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Now we get to watch HP crash again under the "leadership" of yet another "squat to pee" manager.

      You do realize that Mark Hurd is a guy, right?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Why you don't want women anywhere near work by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

      Ann Livermore - if anyone can prove you wrong, it's her.

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
    3. Re:Why you don't want women anywhere near work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ann Livermore - if anyone can prove you wrong, it's her.

      I've seen her picture. Clearly a man.

    4. Re:Why you don't want women anywhere near work by fkx · · Score: 1

      I've already discounted the Hurdster, the comment refers to next year around this time.

      Maybe muzzies are right about how to best treat the twatters.

  67. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Smauler · · Score: 1

    Yeah... one simple tip though - try not to include your boss when complaining about them, people.

  68. Wig / Comb Over by pcardno · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gosh, his corporate picture is terrifying! He's combing hair over from his right ear (as we look at it), adding various bits of hair, to pretend he isn't balding!

    WIG! WIG!

    --
    --- Band: Joey Ultra
    1. Re:Wig / Comb Over by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Gosh, his corporate picture is terrifying! He's combing hair over from his right ear (as we look at it), adding various bits of hair, to pretend he isn't balding!

      WIG! WIG!

      He could probably get some advice along those lines from William Shatner.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  69. Isn't is supposed to be lonely at the top? by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    I guess not!

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  70. Re:"contractors" like this, so no women taken srsl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't hate the player, hate the game... and all the feminists who demanded the rules be written in the favor of the exact type of woman who undermines feminist principles of autonomy, and a self-sufficient women of equal standing.

    They created a legal situation that creates huge financial incentives for women to sleep their way to the top.

    The name of the game is:
    Seduce one superior after another until the ruse is up: then sue for sexual harassment and when the coke/plastic surgery money runs out: sweep it under the rug so that the next unsuspecting human resources manager will hire the affirmative action queen.

    Meanwhile: cynical opportunists write op ed pieces about needing more women in the sciences, effectively keeping the game alive.

    Meanwhile, chauvinist pigs such as myself crack jokes about the entire thing, and create a culture hostile to women. Effectively creating the "glass ceiling" professional failures that don't know the correct way to advance their careers love to bitch about. They demand Standards of Business Conduct, internal complaint processes, and sexual harassment laws effectively completing the cycle.

     

  71. Call Me A Conspiracy Theorist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But to me this smells like 'Mark, take one for the team and we'll give you a cushy position elsewhere in the firm. No one needs to make a bigger scandal than we've already got.' Meanwhile behind closed doors the other board members are up to things just as dirty, things they could be exposed for, but in the end, Mr. Hurd would be burned a lot worse than them by leaving all his 'friends' out to dry.

    Or maybe I just watched The Wire too many times.

  72. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, you thought we would not recognise you, evil Contradicto! Only you could have diminished the sidekick's post by calling him Sarcastic, and at the same time reaffirmed the Captain's position by pointing out his sidekick in the first place!

  73. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this mother fucker should be in jail, goddammit.

  74. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by yuhong · · Score: 1

    IMO the problem is which kind of CEO the Board of Directors will seek as a replacement.

  75. He's resigning to spend more time with his family. by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    ...And his wife's divorce lawyer.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  76. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's slashdot, you aren't in the computer industry?

    I think the GPP was talking about the CEO industry, which is quite separate from the industry of any company the CEO happens to be running at the moment. It's really bizarre how successful the business model is: tell people what to do, even when what you tell them to do is quite clearly contrary to their own interests and the interests of the company, and they give you gobs of money for it; then when they finally get sick of doing all the stupid and counterproductive things you've been telling them to do, they give you even more money on your way out the door.

    Imagine, if, oh, say, plumbing worked that way.

    "Hi, is this Joe's Plumbing? My toilet's leaking, what should I do?"

    "Okay, what you need to do is turn off your water, disconnect the toilet, and then turn the water back on."

    "Um ... shouldn't I connect a new toilet first?"

    "No, trust me, it'll be fine."

    "Great, thanks! Here's my Visa card number ... Okay, hold on a minute, let me try this ... now I've got water gushing out of my bathroom and flooding all over my house!"

    "Sorry, can't be helped. That just happens sometimes."

    "You're incompetent! I'm going to call another plumber who knows what the hell he's talking about! Oh, and before I hang up, here's my Mastercard number too."

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  77. Damn these hoes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contracted for teh sex0rd to teh max0rz, and then they complain?

  78. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by yuhong · · Score: 1

    Does the Board of Directors really tell CEOs what to do? I never heard that claim before.

  79. Re:Solution will be more ethics classes for employ by jd2112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except at the executive level where it's actually needed.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  80. Interesting... by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

    First I've hurd of this...

  81. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Announcer · · Score: 1

    RE: His statements... I have two words that are just as sincere, just as believable: "Wardrobe Malfunction"

    --
    Willie...
  82. Hey get your hand off my leg!! by nanospook · · Score: 1

    Oh GOD, sORRY! i was just looking for the USB hub!

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  83. Re:"contractors" like this, so no women taken srsl by nanospook · · Score: 1

    You are making assumptions about how this went down.. perhaps they had the right chemistry and started something and then she wanted to stop and he wouldn't. Then he persists after she has asked him to stop and starts stalking her, she blows the whistle.. All I'm saying is that you don't really know the personal details..

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  84. Any change in HP will be fore the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP is a shell of the company it once was, I didn't think it could get worse after Carly, but it did, under Hurd, so *this* time the change has to be for the better right? BTW, is everyone assuming the contractor was a female?

    --ed fardos

  85. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by olyar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I started working for HP shortly after Carly came in, and I had the privilege to work with a number of 30+ year HP employees. They had worked for (and in several cases personally met) Bill and Dave and they had nothing but praise for them. They also had an amazing loyalty to the company - a loyalty that took one beating after another under Carly's leadership.

    Maybe you're right that no employee of a tech company has anything good to say these days, but it wasn't the case at HP for many years.

    As to the current situation, I know a number of people that still work there and they are miserable - far more so than when I left 5 years ago. Things were tough when I left, but it sounds like they've gotten far worse over time.

    --
    Custom, hands-free Linux installs. Instalinux
  86. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by the_womble · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should have known that Hurd is unstable

  87. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by homer_s · · Score: 1

    but sadly I'm guessing this is par for the course at this level of "leadership" in most companies.

    Or countries for that matter. The president gets blowjobs from an intern and he doesn't have to resign; the CEO did something similar and he has to resign. Looks like the corporation has higher standards than the govt.

  88. Something about HP bugs me by dbIII · · Score: 1

    perhaps they learned their lesson with the wiretap fiasco from several years ago.

    How many of them did jail time for that just like I would if I had pulled that stunt?
    Ok then, none. Did anything inconvenient happen to them at all?
    No? Then they did not learn that lesson and are probably still doing similar things but just being a bit quieter about it.

  89. HP CEO Resigns ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carlie is vindicated!

    The Missanthropic-Pervert Mark Hud is relagated to the gutter ... all be it a 12 million gutter.

    What else lies in wait for the Perverts-behind-their-glass-ceiling of the HP Board?

    I'd gladly give up all my wrights as a Citizen of the United States of American and all wrights as a Human Being, jus to have ALL federal emploiees, the President and Vice President and UNELECTED cabinet officers and down to mid-level department managers tracked 24/7/365-66 by GPS implants and have their real-time positions posted to the world to see.

    Perverts like Barak Hussain Obama would be outed in 60 seconds.

  90. Big money , CEO's and senator's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay the trend continues.

  91. Carly II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another failed HP CEO. I guess he's qualified to run for the Senate now.

  92. Re:Solution will be more ethics classes for employ by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    The great thing about ethics classes(the behavioral kind, not the philosophy kind) is that everybody passes: Either the material is common sense, or you have no problem with cheating...

  93. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    **Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank

    You must be very old.

  94. Sad thing about social sciences by pipy · · Score: 1
    is that the societies don't want educating them to bee good and objective, they want education to justify current political and economical systems.

    The soft sciences (whether or not they really are science) often do not use the scientific method and frequently are more opinion-based than anything.

    This is plainly not true. Social sciences actually use scientific metod, but education about them don't.

    It shouldn't take more than 2,500 years for them to catch up, though. Less, if they put in the fundamental research necessary.

    Research is literally already there, good books are already there. The problem is that the social sciences are really complex and hard to learn (I say that as a person who studied fundamental and applied maths) and good books about them are eclipsed by the pills of rubbish. For example, there is a great Russian social scientist, Yuriy Semenov, but you probably never heard about him even if you lived in Russia. And he is an Einstein of social sciences.

    1. Re:Sad thing about social sciences by jd · · Score: 1

      If it was plain, then it would be more obvious to the rest of us. Since not a single one of the replies to me agreed on the issue - with me or each other - it is clear it is not plain. I will certainly look the guy up, but I sincerely doubt it will change my mind on whether the social sciences are currently or could potentially be a science.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  95. You are lucky by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I haven't met a SINGLE hot contractor which was competent (and since competence was not the reason they were hired, I can only surmise there were other reasons, even if not sexual, like being a cousin or something).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  96. Just a nitpick by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Contrary to what Penrose says De-coherence (microseconds) time compared to neurone reaction time (milliseconds;usually for a total of hundred of milliseconds for the brain reaction) certainly hint that QM effect have only a minor role in the neuron function. Chemistry and thermodynamic, statistic laws are what take the lead. Anyway if you go down that road, there is QM *everywhere*, so theoretically we would not be able to model anything whatsoever. We still do (even the neurons). The trick is to go fine grained enough in the model at a level where QM does not yet has its sway, and you still got a valid model. At that level the neuron is deterministic and still pretty well modelled.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Just a nitpick by pipy · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we shouldn't forget that the chemistry has developed to very high level without any help of quantum mechanics. Even if quantum mechanics is playing core role in social development, it haven't to play core role in evolution of social sciences.

    2. Re:Just a nitpick by jd · · Score: 1

      Personally I agree with you, and if it's now pretty much solidly known then that's in line with what I'd have expected. My use of Penrose's claim is because I'm extremely wary of asserting that I'm right and a highly respected professor is wrong. (Wary, but I sometimes do that anyway, and I'm right often enough to make me wonder why they're the one with the cool title and tenure.)

      I am extremely glad for your point, though, as it does help clarify things.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  97. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    Sadly the Alliteration Mobile has a three-stroke, two cylinder engine so it's more like:
    Na--NaNa-Na-NaNaNa--NanNa-NaNa...
    Unless you are going downhill, in which case it sounds like a Gnu playing a kazoo.

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  98. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by rdnetto · · Score: 4, Funny

    **Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank

    These days, the packaging is built like a tank's.

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  99. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it doesn't. 160% annual salary is a pretty sweet severance package and I don't understand why this scumbag would get anything at all. Ordinary people don't get squat when they resign (and wouldn't even have had the option anyway).

    I can't imagine any situation where I (along with 99% of non-CEO workers) would get this kind of parachute. At the very best case I'm looking at 3-6 months salary, not 1+ year.

  100. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    **Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank

    That was when they were engineering products instead of marketing commodities.

  101. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by hitmark · · Score: 1

    i was unaware of the first two. HP still seemed to have more direction tho, iirc.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  102. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by ryantmer · · Score: 1

    He was probably feeling pretty untouchable up to that point after coming out unscathed from the other little upset they had a while back.

    Good choice of words.

    --
    Whatever it is, it's notablog.
  103. Ahh by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    There's nothing like the back-stabbing hateful environment of the corporate world. Still, I'm sure the CEO will be ok with his multi-million dollar pension and more millions in stock and options.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  104. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by IYagami · · Score: 1

    We re in the correct sector.

    However, we are in the wrong position ;-)

  105. There is NO WAY they'd be able to keep it secret by sirwired · · Score: 1

    A scandal like this... there is NO WAY they'd be able to sweep it under the rug. Once the secret was out, you've opened up the whole company to a world of hurt. Namely, you've just endorsed expense account fraud and made it pretty much impossible to fire somebody as a result. In addition, employees learning that blatant misconduct is tolerated in the executive suites does devastating things to morale and recruitment.

    If expense account fraud happens in a govt. contract, HP could have lost the ability to win ANY govt. contracts.

  106. two crimes here by stabiesoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first is obviously Mark committing theft, probably grand theft. The second is the board failing in their fudiciary as usual. If the board did what they are charged with doing, Mark would have been told, either resign and get nothing or we take you to court on grand theft charges. Yes you can sue us for your contract spoils, but do enjoy what money can buy in the slammer. I'm pretty sure grand theft is over a year, and in cali that means wonderful places like san quentin are an option. But of course the board rolled over as usual and the shareholders get screwed for 28M. It is just sick what happens in the boardroom. H&P would be puking right now.

  107. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Migity · · Score: 1

    Hey we're all responsible for filling the water coolers in my office you insensitive clod!

  108. Hell Hath No Fury? by stereoroid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speculation: for there to be a sexual harassment case, there must have been a complaint, which tells me that the lady in question was not happy with Mr. Hurd. She would also be aware of the misuse of expenses, something to be used against him if needed ... so a sexual harassment complaint might be swept under the carpet, but misuse of expenses would be taken a bit more seriously. Lawyers can more easily sink their teeth that kind of complaint. In my estimation, that is.

    I can't talk about current HP culture, since I left there about three years ago to go to university. I was wondering whether I had made the right choice, whether I'd have been better off staying. Financially, sure, but in terms of general quality of life ... nah.

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
  109. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The president gets blowjobs from an intern and he doesn't have to resign; the CEO did something similar and he has to resign.

    The president didn't force or even coerce anyone to suck his dick. He only lied about it under oath, and it was a question being asked to try to establish something about allegedly nonconsensual sexual advances, meaning that it never should have been asked as it was irrelevant to the case, and asking the question was a political act.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  110. ahh, hp by elmick · · Score: 1

    This is quite a moment for something like this to happen in HP. As they are slap in the middle of a fairly significant restructuring of the organization (or at least a good part of it) and in so doing losing the confidence of their clients and engineers, this is not going to do any good whatsoever for the low rumbles of dissent one can hear in the place. Funny story; a lot of euros worth of account support was going from a certain destination to another. Let's say, Europe to Africa. This process was about 7 months into implementation - I'm talking RACIs, knowledge transfers and pending handovers - when woops, suddenly all the clients from a certain European nation mention to their ADMs that they have specific contract clauses saying no non-EU sysadmin may access their infrastructure. Clear as day, and not exactly private knowledge given the amount of NDAs one signs upon assuming such a role. However, everything had to be scrapped, people re-hired, everything on-hold while someone pulls a finger out. Like I said, eh, funny..

  111. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not in the wrong industry, we're just signing our contracts too easily. I was laid off without warning while my company was still cranking out industry-defying profits and given nothing more for my trouble than 1 month's severance (which works out to about 1/5th of what I would be entitled to for unemployment insurance). My contract for working there required nothing more from them than that and in hindsight, I wished I'd negotiated for a contract that would have required them to treat me like a human being not a copier machine they could dump to Craigslist. I guess that's my fault for assuming if I treat people kindly and do a good job by them, they'd return the favor. As it stood, the company *DID* have to re-arrange their pay structure at the time to accommodate me (no, before you assume so, I was NOT asking for above even industry average) so I assumed that would carry over across my career. Their HR folks did a fantastic job and I should have known something was up when they were replaced by ex-Microsoft HR management.

    At any rate, I'm sure his contract states that no manner of termination precludes him from his benefits for X months, his bonuses will all be intact for the rest of the year, and he gets twice his normal yearly salary. If we all signed contracts like that when we hire in we'd probably use the company like our own piggy bank and expense our dalliances with mistresses to our company accounts as well. Sarcasm aside, HP would NOT be doing this if it weren't in a rather large legally binding contract. I doubt any company would want to lose money in the effort to get rid of a scumbag unless they had to. What companies need to do is stop bending over for these CEOs. They need to treat the CEOs like employees, not kings. Make them sign reasonable contracts and base any perks by the same bonus structure the rest of the employees are beholden to.

  112. Re:Solution will be more ethics classes for employ by IICV · · Score: 1

    No, the executives are ten times more important, so they'll have to attend a ten-day long ethics training seminar in Hawaii.

  113. program by nord1984 · · Score: 1
    This is a fantastic program. I first read about it in this article. Hey randki kochanek flirt zdrada this is really nice information. I was looking for something similar like this. Thanks for this useful information

    flirt

    randki

  114. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "**Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank"

    Yeah, and they found out how much more money they could make by firing all of their American workers and off-shoring thier jobs. Since then it has been a slippery slope of lower quality and just putting out any ol' crap to make a buck.

    The companies I used to work for in the 90's would not touch an HP PC or laptop now in the 00's. The printers are next on the list, they are slowly phasing those out as well. Hello Lenovo and Xerox. If you going to buy low quality crap then you may as well pay the least for it as you can.

  115. Heading OT ... by DavidRawling · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He only lied about it under oath, ...

    Look, I understand politicians are commonly held to be basically the same everywhere (nominally crap), but in which reality is lying under oath excusable? I mean seriously, I'm assuming he "only lied when he had pledged to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth". I'm outside looking in (AU is still thankfully not the 51st state); I couldn't care less if he had a mistress. But if he's going to lie about that while under oath, I don't understand why it would be considered gospel that he didn't and wouldn't lie about anything else in any other situation?

    Not that the bleached out water-coloured Australian dross are any better though ... no colour or strength to their campaigns.

  116. it's ee cummings, it doesn't have to rhyme by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Mark Hurd's
    defunct
    who used to
    snort up 4.2E7 dollar
    bonuses
    and layoff onetwothreefourfivethousand peons justlikethat
    Jesus
    he was a slimy man
    and what I want to know is
    how do you like your blue-eyed boy NOW
    Mister Board



    way to fuck up ee cummings with your antitroll paranoia, /.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  117. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by phlack · · Score: 1

    These days, the packaging is built like a tank's.

    Sad, but true. I'd mod this, but it's already +5 Funny. Their paper license key request information is very well packed in a sturdy cardboard box, lined with foam. That piece of paper isn't gonna have anything done to it!

  118. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  119. Re:Opportunity by sexconker · · Score: 1

    The constitution is fine.
    It's the constituency.

    And the legislature.