Slashdot Mirror


NCsoft Sued For Making Lineage II 'Too Addictive'

An anonymous reader writes "South Korean MMO game publisher NCsoft is finding itself facing another lawsuit, this time for making games that are 'too addictive.' US Lineage II player Craig Smallwood is suing the publisher for $3 million because he found himself playing Lineage II for 20,000 hours over a period of 5 years. At times, his average play session would persist for over 11 hours, crippling his life and ability to function. A federal judge is allowing the court case to go forward (PDF), stating that the plaintiff has a claim for negligence and gross negligence against the publisher."

52 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. I Too Am a Victim ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    3142 comments?
    Submission Summary: 36 pending, 879 rejected, 607 accepted (1522 total, 39.88% accepted)?

    Yes, surely that is why I have no life! See you in court, Slashdot!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Much like this lawsuit, you're running into a chicken and egg problem...

      Do you have no life because you post on Slashdot?

      Or do you post on Slashdot because you have no life?

      Ah, the great philosophical questions of our times...

    2. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While you bring up a point, I don't think it should matter.

      The immediate question is Should Smallwood get 3 Million dollars for playing a video game for 5 years?

      It doesn't matter how addictive it is. I could develop Alchoholism but I can't sue Bacardi for keeping me in the hole. It's negligent? What the heck is NCsoft supposed to do? Make Lineage II LESS fun?

      I can't believe a judge allowed this case to go forward. On what grounds does developing an addiction allow you to persue a lawsuit? (If thats the case, can't every single smoker in the country sue the cigarette companies for 3 million dollars for every 5 years they smoked, essentially bankrupting that industry?)

    3. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

      Much like this lawsuit, you're running into a chicken and egg problem...

      Do you have no life because you post on Slashdot?

      Or do you post on Slashdot because you have no life?

      Ah, the great philosophical questions of our times...

      And more importantly, how can you kill that which has no life?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by Vhyrrimyr · · Score: 2

      And more importantly, how can you kill that which has no life?

      That is not dead which can eternal lie,
      And with strange aeons even death may die.

    5. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by spun · · Score: 2

      And more importantly, how can you kill that which has no life?

      That is not dead which can eternal lie,

      And with strange aeons even death may die.

      Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

      But I was actually referring to a South park episode

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by ooshna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't believe a judge allowed this case to go forward. On what grounds does developing an addiction allow you to persue a lawsuit? (If thats the case, can't every single smoker in the country sue the cigarette companies for 3 million dollars for every 5 years they smoked, essentially bankrupting that industry?)

      Do you think the Government would allow the cigarette industry to go under with all the taxes they are collecting?

    7. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by asills · · Score: 4, Informative

      (If thats the case, can't every single smoker in the country sue the cigarette companies for 3 million dollars for every 5 years they smoked, essentially bankrupting that industry?)
      Reply to This

      You must be pretty young or not from the US. The cigarette industry did get sued (quite a few times) and the biggest settlement was from 1998 where they effectively had to pay a bit over $200 billion over the next 25 years. The suit was 46 states versus the tobacco industry. You know all those "The Truth" ads? Those are funded by the tobacco companies.

      The downside to this settlement is it also exempts the industry from further tort lawsuits (although, apparently not, there have been some since).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_politics
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_Master_Settlement_Agreement

      --
      -- What did Spock find in Kirk's toilet? The captain's log.
    8. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by ChristopherBurg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't believe a judge allowed this case to go forward. On what grounds does developing an addiction allow you to persue a lawsuit?

      Although I'm not claiming this is the case sometimes a judge will let a lawsuit go through if they believe the grounds of the lawsuit are sufficiently stupid and there is a likelihood of the plaintiff losing. This sets up precedence and allows future lawsuits of the same nature to be thrown out using the original case as reasoning.

    9. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Informative

      In all fairness, the tobacco industries were sued for:

      - withholding information on and downright lying about the addictiveness of nicotine.
      - withholding information on and downright lying about the health consequences of smoking.
      - adding artificial agents to make the product even more addictive.
      - targeting their product at children while knowing damn well what smoking does to kids.

      Selling an addictive product is one thing. Lying to congress, marketing at those who are considered incompetent(children) is an entirely different ballgame.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    10. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by flibuste · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need a class action against Slashdot for all of us clods who were rendered insensitive by this web site.

    11. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      We need a class action against Slashdot for all of us clods who were rendered insensitive by this web site.

      Speak for yourself. I was insensitive before I got here. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:I Too Am a Victim ... by udoschuermann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, if they marketed the game to children, secretly added extra-cute stuff in there that nobody could find out about until they played it for a while themselves, scoured facebook for their friends and hammered them with messages ("hey, your friend's playing this, and so should you!"), and then publicly lied about all of it, and "proved" through fake studies that there's nothing remotely addicting about the game at all.

      Bottom line, the tobacco industry is/was a bunch of lying drug peddlers without a conscience. But if NCSoft doesn't get this lawsuit laughed out of court (with court costs hung on the idjet who file the suit), then 12 million lawsuits might next get filed against Blizzard, for a grand total of 36 trillion dollars in damages.

      WTFLOLBBQWOW.

      --
      --Udo.
  2. "Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    US Lineage II player Craig Smallwood is suing the publisher for $3 million because he found himself playing Lineage II for 20,000 hours over a period of 5 years.

    The whole victim-mentality that runs rampant makes my blood boil: "He had bad parenting" "She wasn't potty trained properly" "The breweries make beer taste too good" "I have a disease" blah blah blah fucking excuses blah blah blah.

    Hey Craig Smallwood, take responsibility for your actions; you're not a victim. In actuality your lawsuit paints you as a blatant parasite.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by Kitten+Killer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are they alive? Maybe he can sue them too!

    2. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by rainmouse · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fact that these games do use very morally dubious techniques to create a feeling of addiction and endless time sinks to nurture that addiction. There are a LOT of people who's lives have been utterly ruined by MMORPG's and its easy to laugh at them, point fingers and call them weak but the fact of the matter is they are being psychologically manipulated. The problem is only going to get worse as developers better perfect these techniques and create deeper levels of immersion. I would have to agree that at some point a line has to be drawn and lawsuits like this could become more common until someone could actually win one.

    3. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by DurendalMac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And suing game companies will do...what, exactly? Make less games? People are responsible for themselves. If they can't cope with game addiction, then they need help with their lack of self-control. Suing game companies is a ridiculous measure by greedy lawyers and whiny little bastards who can't accept that they're responsible for their own damned behavior.

    4. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by dhermann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I get it; you're hard and edgy, and by disagreeing with you, that makes me an emo pansy, but just to put up a decent counterargument...

      What would you say if, during the discovery phase of Craig's claim, e-mails and documents subpoenaed reveal that NCSoft actively created their games with the intent not to entertain, but to entice and entangle? What if they commissioned a psychological research study on how to make their games more addictive, and made major alterations to the gameplay based on the results? What if they made it a primary goal to target certain segments of the population, what you would call the weak-willed and easily manipulated, what others might call aged 18-25 unmarried males?

      What if their next game specifically targeted children, aged 9-15? Is it a parental responsibility to identify each game's level of addictiveness before purchasing it for their child? Isn't there no way to tell until the child has become addicted, and now both parent and child are forced to endure a period of withdrawal?

      I think that this lawsuit is probably frivolous, but I can definitely see a situation where it is not. You certainly can't make the blanket assumption that this guy's claim is worthless before it plays out.

    5. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by Hydian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it the responsibility of the game companies to police their users for addictive tendencies and then treat them? If those people weren't playing games, they'd be on IRC or Facebook all day or the next episode of hoarders or something. Games are the outlet, not the cause.

    6. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's bullshit, sorry. Back in uni I did get myself into some serious mess because of online gaming addition (NWN, which, while not "massive", is still a multiplayer online RPG). And, in retrospect, I only had myself to blame for this. All the talk about being "psychologically manipulated" is silly - the "manipulation" is hardly above the level of your typical advertising, but you don't see people suing McDonalds for posting ad with a picture of a burger that looked so tasty they just had to go buy it.

    7. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are consistently trying to psychologically manipulate you.

      Go shout fire in a crowded theater. That's "psychologically manipulating" the crowd to panic. And then you're liable for any injuries that result.

      Heck, it even works if we go for that mother-of-all libertarian examples, the 2nd amendment. You have an absolute right to own a gun. You have the right to keep it unlocked, loaded, and sitting on your desk in your home office while you're doing whatever. You even have the right to shoot it--but if you hit anything, you're 100% liable for what happens.

      MMOs make their games intentionally addictive. Nothing wrong with that, per se, and there's no reason to formally regulate it. The basic rule of "be responsible for your actions" should apply here, and to the extent that NCSoft making Lineage II addictive caused this guy harm, they should be held accountable. But, he's also an adult, and needs to have at least SOME self-control.

      Thankfully, we have an amazing system to decide how liable NCSoft is. It's called a trial, and the judge is letting that happen.

    8. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      This judge should be removed from his position for letting this laughable shit actually get into the courts

      Funny, the cigarette companies felt the exact same way. And, in fact, I think they made the exact same argument. Hell, I think RAPISTS and CHILD MOLESTORS feel the same way. (And, yes, so do folk who get sued by the RIAA)

      It's a fundamental component of liberty that, if you cannot come to a reasonable settlement with someone between the two of you, you can go to a court of law to have an impartial jury decide on what "reasonable settlement" you'll get.

      The bar for just dismissing a case is VERY high, and should require either a lack of applicable law ("I'm sorry, but Bob has the right to call you stupid to your face"), or an impossibility of the facts ("you're alleging that Bob had UFO's brainwash your wife into leaving you?").

      Companies intentionally getting customers addictive IS established as a tort in the law already (cigarettes!), so if you think this lawsuit should be thrown out you're claiming, what... that it's impossible for a video game to be addictive? People had died from playing video games, and there are thousands of stories of video game addiction. Are you claiming that Lineage II isn't that addictive? That NCSoft shouldn't be liable for the consequences of how they made their game? The first is a point of fact, and the second is a point of law. Both are supposed to be resolved, by a jury and judge in particular, AT TRIAL.

    9. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So we should also eliminate or create legal liability for all forms of psychological manipulation? Advertising and political speech come to mind, do we want to protect against that?

      Your quoting me out of context there and ignoring a lot of what I said. Try watching some of the Youtube video's on people deleting their Warcraft characters, people who have lost their jobs, homes, wives and kids. I hardly think being manipulated into buying another cheesburger or diet pepsi is going to have a similar effect. At no point did I say that this lawsuit was a good idea, in fact I think its ridiculous. I do however think that as developers get better at nutruring addiction and creating ever more immersive worlds, it's going to develop into an increasingly serious problem that will need addressing at some point.

    10. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by Leafheart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I hardly think being manipulated into buying another cheesburger or diet pepsi is going to have a similar effect.

      You never saw someone with morbid obesity, did you?

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    11. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by dhermann · · Score: 2

      So you'd say an ice cream company doing research into making their ice cream more enjoyable to their target audience is doing something wrong by making changes based on that research? Unless they're lacing their ice cream with cocaine, no change is inherently wrong.

      What if the ice cream company added a substance that provided no change in the taste, smell, or texture whatsoever, but was naturally addictive?

      Plenty of people play MMOs without being addicted. The whole point of a game is that it should be fun - if a game developer is not researching ways to make the game more fun, they're not doing their job, and their customers are not getting what they're paying for.

      No, plenty of people play MMOs and do not realize they are addicted because they do not recognize that spending 25-50 hours per week has moved your hobby into an obsession. "To be an alcholic, you have to admit that you have a problem." Sure, there are plenty of people that integrate playing MMOs into their normal lives, but plenty of people work a normal day job then go shoot up heroine three times a week in their basement. That doesn't mean that they aren't addicted!

      Even if NCSoft did what you hypothesize, it would still not be wrong - if it were, then the mere act of making a game fun would be wrong, because somebody somewhere could get addicted to it. (It doesn't even have to be *fun* to be addicting - look at all the stupid Facebook games that people spend 12 hours a day playing...)

      I'm not saying it is wrong to make your game more enjoyable. I'm just saying that the question is not pointless to ask: there must be a line out there that is dangerous. There must be a way to determine whether or not a product has been maliciously designed to control you. And I would like to know what it is.

    12. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2

      What if the ice cream company added a substance that provided no change in the taste, smell, or texture whatsoever, but was naturally addictive?

      Are you arguing that Coca-cola has done something wrong by adding caffeine to their sodas? (And don't try to tell me caffeine is not addictive. I've been addicted to it myself.)

      plenty of people play MMOs and do not realize they are addicted because they do not recognize that spending 25-50 hours per week has moved your hobby into an obsession.

      Your statement and mine are not mutually exclusive...

      There must be a way to determine whether or not a product has been maliciously designed to control you. And I would like to know what it is.

      With physically addicting products like cigarettes, it's easy, because there are physical substances we can measure. With games or ads or whatever else companies research in order to get people to buy, it's not so easy.

      Should ads be illegal, just because companies spend countless millions on market research trying to figure out what type of ad will generate the most revenue? That's the entire purpose of an ad - to entice you to spend your money on a product you would probably not otherwise buy.

      Games are no different in that regard. The entire purpose of MMOs is to get you to give the company money every month. Why is it any different than a subscription to Time or Playboy? I'm sure those companies spend lots of money determining how they can keep their subscribers subscribing...

      My point is, it's stupid to single out game companies, when in reality it's an attribute common to all companies that have a product to sell.

    13. Re:"Wahh, I'm a victim! Waahhh!" by zemkai · · Score: 2, Funny

      The whole victim-mentality that runs rampant makes my blood boil: "He had bad parenting" "She wasn't potty trained properly" "The breweries make beer taste too good" "I have a disease" blah blah blah fucking excuses blah blah blah.

      ... mmmmmm... Beer.

  3. No personal responsibility. by scribblej · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I firmly believe that Craig Smallwood is an appropriately named man with no sense of personal responsibility.

    That said, it will be interesting to see how this court case plays out considering there is NO QUESTION that the developers of these games intentionally try to make them as 'addictive' as possible. There are many studies in the industry meant to determine the appropriate level of payout (loot, level gains, etc) required to keep someone interested all the time.

    1. Re:No personal responsibility. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It should get laughed out of court, there should be no question about that at all.

      In every article, summary, post, comment, reply, you can easily interchange 'addictive' with 'entertaining'.

      Now try it, and see how ridiculous it sounds. NCsoft Sued for Making Lineage II 'Too Entertaining'.

  4. You're going down Atari & Namco! by countSudoku() · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm putting Atari on notice for Asteroids Deluxe and Namco for Xevious! I've wasted far too many hours of my younger days on those two games and I want my quarters back! Waaaaah!!1!

    Plus, we should blow up the moon. Thank you.

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  5. Default Judgment Payout by ThinkWeak · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he somehow wins this case, NCSoft should payout with the equivalent of $3,000,000 in in-game currency.

  6. I'm suing my employer by Daddy-Oh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I waste 2,000-3,000 hours *a year* working for my employer. I can't stop myself. I feel that, if I stop, my ability to function in society will end. I must be addicted to work.

    Anyone have the number for a good lawyer? (hmm, is that an oxymoron?)

    1. Re:I'm suing my employer by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worse, your employer obviously feeds your addiction far more than a video game company ever could.

      I mean, they pay you by the hour for something as precious as your soul.

      If Smallwood gets millions, I think you could get billions man.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  7. "Wah, I Don't Want Choice or Responsibility! Wah!" by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah, not a whole lot of sympathy from me either on this one. In fact, I'm a little upset this hasn't been thrown out:

    A federal judge is allowing the court case to go forward (PDF), stating that the plaintiff has a claim for negligence and gross negligence against the publisher.

    So what the judge is saying is that if online gaming services don't regulate against lengthy usage of their services by adult citizens they may face lawsuits like this? Hopefully this sets a precedent that such a claim is a load of horse shit and should never be considered in a court of law again. Where does The "Science" of Game Addiction draw the line?

    In America, you're suppose to have the freedom to do whatever you want with your time so long as it doesn't impair another person's life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. This includes, for better or for worse, devoting as much time as you see fit to a game. It's called "responsibility" and I'd rather you accept it before the decision is made for you and you never had a choice to begin with (a la China's government regulations for online game play time).

    --
    My work here is dung.
  8. Well, not if that girl next door sues you first by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny

    3142 times she walked past her bedroom window, with the curtains just open enough to show her in her lace underwear.

    Flirty looks at you as you passed by on your way to the 7-11 for ramen. 0% returned.

    Yes, you are the reason she had to hook up with that jock. She is sueing YOU for emotional traume and unsatisfied sexual desire of her self and her close female friends because YOU spend all that time on slashdot instead.

    Pay up!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  9. Re:Virtual ambulance chasing? by SirGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of lawyer takes on a case like this?

    One who gets paid regardless of the outcome ?

  10. You know what my first thought was? by Ironhandx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My first thought was "Hmm, I haven't played lineage, apparently I should."

  11. Blame the socialist drug war by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With our country's "War" on drugs, we have a society which perpetuates the idea that addiction is the fault of the dealer. The drug war is socialism for cops and addicts, it takes money from the general population and uses it to "help" a small class of people who are prone to addiction or can't find employment except as a state thug. If drug addicts can get this socialist "help,"why not other addicts? If drug dealers are to blame for addiction, why not video game publishers?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Blame the socialist drug war by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what drug are you on, exactly?? The drug war does NOT help the addict what so ever. The drug war helps maintain the government as the top dealer of all drugs.

      Thus, the quotes around the word "help." Helping the addicts is the justification used, and if that justification works for the drug war (obviously, I don't think it does) then it should work for any other addiction as well. If we "help" one type of addict, we should help them all.

      Especially those addicted to material consumption and consumerism. Why, we allow "pushers" to air advertisements that have been proven to "force" people to desire and purchase things they wouldn't have spent money on otherwise. We need to help these poor addicts of consumerism.

      But of course, that would ruin our economy, now wouldn't it? You see, we have these puritanical ideals ingrained into our culture. Excess is bad. Taking too much, using too much, these are bad according to deep seated tenants of our culture. But our economy requires excess consumption, and so we excuse that type of addiction, but our puritanical ideals demand we punish excess consumption, and so we define certain types of consumption as automatically excessive and punish those in lieu of punishing all excess.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  12. You're Making It Worse! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm suing you for making your comments too entertaining!

    I'm suing you for giving my addiction positive reinforcement and feedback! I also want the logs so I can see which moderators continue to mod me up so I can add defendants to my lawsuit! By the time I'm done sobbing in front of the jury, they'll believe I never had a choice to quit!

    What the hell, did you just add me to your friend's list? Oh you better believe that's a lawsuit.

    Oh. My. God. Did you see my achievements?! My lawyer's head just exploded.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  13. He was banned in 2009. by Blackwulf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I skimmed NCSoft's defense pdf (linked in the Wired article) and it winds up that the guy in question was involved in real-money transfers and had all of his accounts banned from Lineage II in 2009.

    Could that possibly be the REAL reason he's suing?

  14. Re:"At Times" by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also note that "At times" and "his average play session" are contradictory. It's either "at times his play session would persist over 11 hours" or it's "his average play session would persist over 11 hours" and the "at times" bit would be some number higher than 11 hours (probably 20 hours on occasion).

    Since we can do basic math, we know it's the average play session that was 11 hours. :)

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  15. Re:Corrected Headline by nomadic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh give me a break, it's such an echo chamber in here, the usual screeching about how horrible the courts are, without anyone even looking at what the judge actually did. The problem with this country isn't the judicial system, it's the ignorant people who go from zero to outraged in 5 seconds based on a slashdot summary written by some anonymous guy. The judge is ruled by the Federeal Rules of Civil Procedure. Those rules say you can't just throw out a lawsuit AT THE DISMISSAL STAGE simply because you don't think the plaintiff will win. To survive dismissal, all you have to do is draft your complaint in a way that, if the facts you allege are accepted as true, your claim can move on to the next stage. That's it. The judge isn't saying the guy's going to win, just that under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, promulgated by the Supreme Court, as authorized by Congress, he has to let the lawsuit go to the next stage.

  16. Re:The guy played for 20,000 hours? by wbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ah, but FFXI encourages players to leave themselves logged in even when they aren't playing. FFXI allows players to sell items directly to other players through the bazaar system but a player's bazaar is only open when they are logged in. Many players leave their characters logged in while they are at work or while they are sleeping. As a result, the time reported by the FFXI /playtime command can be deceiving.

    Yes, there is also the auction house system which allows players to sell items while they are not logged in but some items cannot be sold via the auction house and others are almost always sold via the bazaar system.

  17. Well, McDonals is being sued for being to tasty by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lets face it, if McD gets sued because people like their hamburgers so much they can't stop eating, everybody is a target. Just waiting for the first thief to claim the object he stole was simply to tempting.

    On a more serious note, this is exactly what people who claim women cause rape by dressing to sexy are claiming AND have at times got away with.

    Anything to get off facing the consequence of your own actions.

    And I played Lineage II. It is not that good a game. And you got to wonder what the hell he was doing. These game have no real end-game worth speaking off and with 5 years of 11 hours play, my god he must have reached the end game hundreds of times and done what? What could POSSIBLY keep you playing a dumb grind game for SO long.

    No, this guy is just a recluse, a lock-in. He could have been folding paper hats or read soccer scores. The game is not the problem, his own mind is. That is sad, but not NCSofts problem. Just as McD is not to blame if you never excersise and eat a hamburger each and every day.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Well, McDonals is being sued for being to tasty by couchslug · · Score: 2

      For once, I think the 4chan meme is appropriate. If he's that fucked up, he won't get better, and should "an hero".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  18. Googling him shows otherwise by linuxgurugamer · · Score: 4, Informative

    When you do the following google search:

            craig smallwood honolulu

    it becomes evident that Mr. Smallwood has plenty of time on his hands to file lawsuits. This seems to put the lie to his claim that he is unable to function.

  19. Re:Virtual ambulance chasing? by SirWhoopass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As of now, no lawyer takes on a case like this. The plantiff is pro se (representing himself).

    The court is allowing a portion of the case to go forward. The summary fails to note that the judge dismissed the claims of misrepresentation, unfair trade practices, intentional infliction of emotional harm, and punitive damages.

    The judge is merely determining if there could be a case. The plantiff was hospitalized for three weeks and has on-going therapy. There has been no determination yet that the game is the cause or what liability the game makers may have (the court notes it is limited to levels set in the game user agreement for negligent infliction of emotional distress). In short, the guy has been injured by "something". He says it was the game, and he'll get his day in court to try and make that claim.

    It's funny how so many /.'ers complain about people who believe the outrageous stories from [Glenn Beck, Fox New, whatever]. This is pretty much the same thing. The actual story is only about 1/10 what is implied in the headline, but now we have a forum full of people screaming about it

  20. Can You Say 'Pro Se'? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Informative
    From the court documents (emphasis mine):

    On October 19, 2009, pro se Plaintiff Craig Smallwood (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint (“Complaint”) against NCSOFT. Although Plaintiff named only “NCSOFT” in the caption on his original complaint, two NCsoft entities have appeared in this action, Defendants NC Interactive Inc. and NCsoft Corporation, both of whom are named in the Second Amended Complaint (“Defendants”).

    He's representing himself. I guess we can't blame a lawyer for this one ...

    1. Re:Can You Say 'Pro Se'? by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He'll get creamed as a pro se. I'm sure the defense is already hand selecting a psychiatrist or two to evaluate him and I have no doubt they'll find that he has some kind of obsessive personality disorder, which is probably true. My wife plays farmville obsessively, but before that, she hassled me constantly about some irrational dirt or germ issue till I said I was moving out, and before that she collected podcasts she never listened to till her 500gb HD died, before that it was playing spider solitaire, and before that it was something I forget. Anyway, my point it, the problem is the person with the obsessive disorder, not the object of their obsession.

      Secondly, this trial is about to become this guy's obsession, and one of the absolutely certain ways to scare of attorneys, is to come across as an extremely needy, obsessed client who will extravagantly abuse the lawyer's time, which is OK if you get paid by the hour I suppose, but in a contingent situation, it means losing money. So there are probably two reasons why he may have a hard time getting a lawyer: one, he IS crazy (intervening cause); and two, he's crazy (super annoying).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  21. Re:Virtual ambulance chasing? by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2, Informative

    He's representing himself.

    In fact, he nearly got in trouble over it because used an attorney as ghostwriter for the claims. Something that was not initially disclosed. NCsoft tried to get a dismissal because of it, but the court decided that was too drastic. Instead, he is not being afforded the latitude normally given to a pro se litigant. (pages 14-16 of the PDF linked from the summary).

  22. Re:Corrected Headline by mshannon78660 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Agreed - and now, having read the judge's decision (OK, to be honest, I skimmed sections of it) - he actually tossed out about half of the complaint. This motion to dismiss from NC-Soft was strictly on procedural grounds (alleging that the plaintiff hadn't properly worded things, etc.).

    The plaintiff was originally representing himself (and may still be, that was unclear) - and the judge points out that federal courts give a certain amount of leeway to people who represent themselves, as it is assumed that they are at a disadvantage against a legal team (I didn't realize that, I had assumed somewhat the opposite, that courts would be a little harder on someone representing themselves, to make the practice less appealing). But a lawyer helped him amend his complaint (the judge had thrown it out twice, but given the plaintiff an option to amend (because he was representing himself) - after the second time, he apparently had a lawyer help him with it, and she was hauled into court to answer for herself (lawyers are generally not permitted to write documents for the court unless they sign them).

    My guess is that the next thing to happen in this case is that NC-Soft will submit a motion for summary judgement, which will likely be granted, and returned in their favor. Reading between the lines, the judge doesn't seem to think too much of the plaintiff's claims.