Slashdot Mirror


Doctors Save Premature Baby Using Sandwich Bag

Born 14 weeks early, Lexi Lacey owes her life to some MacGyver inspired doctors and a sandwich bag. Lexi was so small at birth that even the tiniest insulating jacket was too big, but she fit into a plastic sandwich bag nicely. ''The doctors told us they had never known a baby born as prematurely as Lexi survive. She was so tiny the only thing they had to keep her body temperature warm was a sandwich bag from the hospital canteen — it's incredible to think that saved her life," says her mom.

246 comments

  1. Fetus in a bag by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the survival rate will be now she is stabilized?

    --
    That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    1. Re:Fetus in a bag by angiasaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One or none?

      --
      Geekism is your _only_ God!
    2. Re:Fetus in a bag by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Clever. I mean what is the probability of survival.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    3. Re:Fetus in a bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50/50 Alive or Dead would be my guess..?

    4. Re:Fetus in a bag by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh... none. What's yours?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Fetus in a bag by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Well, I would wager surviving the next 20 minutes would be 99.9 percent. If no infant had survived after being born that premature before, it stands to reason she still wont. Im just asking if a medical professional knows the answer.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    6. Re:Fetus in a bag by Xacid · · Score: 1

      I'll try to branch off the direction this overly cynical, overly semantic person is going and say simply "it depends". I was born two months early @ 4lbs 10oz and I'm 24 now. The first paragraph of the article does state "and her parents were told she had a ten per cent chance of survival." I'd be interested in seeing how this ends up. I hope the kid makes it and lives a happy, healthy life. I'd be a little pissed if I didn't get to exist. :)

    7. Re:Fetus in a bag by Xacid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Meant to add:

      "Lexi is now 11-week-olds old and weighs 5lbs 6oz. "

      All things considered - as long as there are no other immediate complications this kid might make it out just fine.

    8. Re:Fetus in a bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no statistics, so no averages, no estimates, just pure guesses.

    9. Re:Fetus in a bag by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      She's home now with her parents, so the doctors must think she has a pretty good chance. They don't usually let premies out of the NICU till they feel comfortable that they are no more or less likely than a normal baby to die. Baring the things that occasionally kill babies ( friend of mine's daughter got meningitis at three days old. She was perfectly healthy at birth, but almost didn't make it through her first week of life.) seems as though she'll be fine.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    10. Re:Fetus in a bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fetus? No.

      Technically, she’s a baby now – she was only a fetus until she hit the open air. The main difference (only difference, that I’ve ever been able to tell) is her method of breathing and feeding and that it’s now illegal to kill her.

    11. Re:Fetus in a bag by sconeu · · Score: 1

      When my daughter was in NICU (back in 1993, she was 7 weeks preemie), there was a 3 month preemie there. He survived and is fine.

      Hell, my *MOTHER* was 2.5 months preemie, and that was in 1938.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:Fetus in a bag by Americano · · Score: 1

      TFA states:

      Lexi is now 11-week-olds old and weighs 5lbs 6oz.

      and,

      Lexi was finally allowed home on September 3.

      I'd say her prognosis is pretty good, considering she's now about the size, weight, and developmental stage as a newborn. The last 11 weeks were the rather critical point, I'd imagine.

    13. Re:Fetus in a bag by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think your information is reliable.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    14. Re:Fetus in a bag by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      I suppose thats what I get for skimming the article.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    15. Re:Fetus in a bag by baegucb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife was born that size/premature, so it happens from time to time.

    16. Re:Fetus in a bag by be951 · · Score: 1

      These doctors need to get out more if they are unfamiliar with more premature babies surviving. Lots of 22-25 week gestation babies (that's 15-18 weeks premature) survive, with the record being 21 weeks 5 days gestation. In terms of size, the baby in the article is fairly small at 14 ounces. But the record in that category is 8.6 ounces, with a few other cases under 10, including the previous record holder.

    17. Re:Fetus in a bag by Americano · · Score: 1

      It's okay, this is slashdot. "Skimming the article" actually puts you on the high-performing end of the scale. :)

    18. Re:Fetus in a bag by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      You're grouping different categories of babies there. A few under 24 weeks survive, most neonatal units worldwide consider 24 weeks to be the threshold of viability, and would be very tentative about what to do with a baby under 24 weeks. The gestations and weights you mention are rare outliers, not common occurrences. Morbidity and Mortality are still very high in 24-26 weekers, but get better and better after that.

      This newspaper article is a non-story however. It's standard practice to deliver extremely preterm babies into plastic, and it's not uncommon to have to improvise. Every hospital in the UK with a 24hr paediatric service will have paediatricians with experience resuscitating extremely preterm babies, and all should have the equipment to stabilise them for transfer to a more advanced unit.

    19. Re:Fetus in a bag by catmistake · · Score: 1

      My wife was born that size/premature, so it happens from time to time.

      Just... wow. I've heard of robbing the cradle... but buddy, robbing the womb is just wrong. At least give a lady a chance to be born before you make her life miserable.

    20. Re:Fetus in a bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like Lexi Lacey, odds are she'll grow up to be a stripper.

    21. Re:Fetus in a bag by be951 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Size and gestational age are different categories. But either could be considered a measure of "premature-ness". And pre and post 24 weeks could be considered different categories. The point was, a doctor who "had never known a baby born as prematurely as Lexi survive" hopefully is not the neonatalogist. I guess 24 weeks is still generally considered the threshold, as it was over a decade ago. But as I understand it, that threshold is being pushed more and more. So while younger preemies (who survive) are less common, almost any medical professional should be aware that 26 weeks is not a particularly "rare outlier" as far as preterm babies go.

    22. Re:Fetus in a bag by angiasaa · · Score: 1

      A stripper in Smallville to be precise. :)

      --
      Geekism is your _only_ God!
  2. Now I'm confused. by Enderwiggin13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mom always told me not to play with plastic bags...

    --
    This sig is in another castle.
  3. This is almost as impressive by Macman408 · · Score: 1

    I too used a plastic sandwich bag this week for a medical miracle; I was hiking and developed a blister on my heel, but through the use of a plastic sandwich bag as cushioning and slippery material so that my heel wouldn't rub, I was able to continue with less pain, and without worsening the blister.

    I know, impressive.

    Maybe this means that plastic baggies will soon be needing FDA approval, or maybe a prescription.

    1. Re:This is almost as impressive by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Someone give this guy a medal!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:This is almost as impressive by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      did you take the baby out of the bag first? Or did the baby make it slippery.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:This is almost as impressive by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      OK, OK, I am on it already.

    4. Re:This is almost as impressive by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Always carry a little tiny roll of duck tape. Besides its numerous other qualities and applications a strip over your heel will effectively completely heal (no pun intended) any blistering for several days.

      I sometimes even proactively duct tape the contact points if I haven't worn my hiking boots for a few months.

    5. Re:This is almost as impressive by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      You can take the baby out of the bag, but you can never take the... bag... can never... won't get fooled again!

    6. Re:This is almost as impressive by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Use medical tape instead, I do it often. It peels off easier and contains a more skin-friendly glue. It's cheaper too, and almost as useful as duct tape for most things. I carry a small roll everywhere (the geek bag) but duct tape wouldn't fit.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    7. Re:This is almost as impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Use medical tape instead, I do it often. It peels off easier and contains a more skin-friendly glue. It's cheaper too, and almost as useful as duct tape for most things. I carry a small roll everywhere (the geek bag) but duct tape wouldn't fit.

      Or you could just get moleskin, which is designed for this very function.

    8. Re:This is almost as impressive by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I've never heard of that.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    9. Re:This is almost as impressive by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Moleskin won't help fix my tent/poncho/backpack. Duct/medical tape will.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  4. Lexi Lacey? by Thanshin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lexi Lacey?Seriously?

    Aren't there laws to protect children from that?

    1. Re:Lexi Lacey? by NevarMore · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only until they turn 18. Giggity.

    2. Re:Lexi Lacey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Father's name is Lee Lacey.
      I guess they can share monogrammed towels.

    3. Re:Lexi Lacey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK readers probably jumped to their own conclusions about the social status of the family -- Miss Chelsea Rowberry, 17, Lee Lacey, 24, and Lexi Lacey.

    4. Re:Lexi Lacey? by hrvatska · · Score: 1

      In some US states Lee Lacey would be guilty of statutory rape and be facing time in jail. Even more so if Chelsea Rowberry was under 17 when she got pregnant. Several years ago a guy in the state of Georgia was sentenced to 10 years in prison for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 17.

    5. Re:Lexi Lacey? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      In some US states Lee Lacey would be guilty of statutory rape and be facing time in jail. Even more so if Chelsea Rowberry was under 17 when she got pregnant. Several years ago a guy in the state of Georgia was sentenced to 10 years in prison for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 17.

      The lesson here? Do not live in a backwards theocracy if you can avoid it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Lexi Lacey? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      In some US states Lee Lacey would be guilty of statutory rape and be facing time in jail. Even more so if Chelsea Rowberry was under 17 when she got pregnant.

      Age of consent in the UK is 16.

      Several years ago a guy in the state of Georgia was sentenced to 10 years in prison for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 17.

      Prosecuting in a case like that would be deemed "not in the public interest". The law should really be changed, it would be better for the law to say 17/15 is OK, rather than for it to be standard practise to ignore it.

  5. Sandwich bag symbiosis. by tacarat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comic book penciled by Jim Lee coming soon.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  6. Lexi Lacey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lexi Lacey?!

    I suppose that's one more porn star we'll have in 18 year's time.

  7. 0% by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    She will not survive. Nobody does. What counts is how long you manage to put off the dying.

    Live, it is a killer.

    Lucky that hospital is in England, in the US they would have their ass sued off for telling the mother it was nothing. And rightly so.

    Remember US, when you complain about law suits, in the EU we have no means of putting the fear of god (or rather dollars, which doctor worship) into doctors.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:0% by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Doctors can still be suspended or fired for negligence in a country with a NHS like the UK.

      And getting a job outside the national health system won't be easy, generally.

    2. Re:0% by Anarki2004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you came off as an idiot who tries too hard to smart.

      Lessons of the internet, part 1:

      When insulting the intelligence of another, make sure your grammar doesn't fail at life.

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    3. Re:0% by sycodon · · Score: 1

      "She rang the maternity suite at Worcestershire Royal Hospital in Worcester but was told it was nothing to worry about and to go back to sleep. "

      Coming soon, to a hospital near you!

       

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:0% by egcagrac0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Parent is not offtopic. Everybody dies. It's just a question of when.

    5. Re:0% by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      He's right though. Unless you are in high school and trying to play the part of the drug addled schmuck, your mind isn't going to be blown by the exciting news that everyone's survival rate is ultimately 0 in a long enough time frame. It's a stupid thing to point out, it reeks of pseudointellectualism and it ultimately makes the person saying it come off like a complete idiot except to only the most vapid of failures. In fact, the only people who are that easily impressed by shitty wordplay and not-so-witty spin are the same types of people who followed Manson because he talked about God, had a beard and did LSD.

      Hipsters, people who attempt to sound intellectual by stating the obvious or talking about things they don't understand and the other weak minded who mistakenly believe they are mentally superior to those around them aren't just annoying. They are dangerous.

    6. Re:0% by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Yeah the parent should be modded informative. I had no idea everyone eventually dies, it was a very helpful post.

    7. Re:0% by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      agreed but i think it is very erroneous (and that it creates obscurity) to put a label on them (hipsters) - you follow up with a definition of the word used, i think that was enough to be crystal clear about who you were talking about.

  8. Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Hmmm, a second trimester baby living(so far). Now why are the pro-choice folks so adamant about NOT outlawing 3rd trimester abortions*?

    *Special cases excluded of course.

  9. Cue the jokes by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Funny

    of what your Mom accidentally packed you for lunch.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Cue the jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And put up the "don't try this at home" signs.

    2. Re:Cue the jokes by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Funny

      You must mean "of when your Mom accidentally packed you for lunch"

    3. Re:Cue the jokes by gorckat · · Score: 1

      One of my high school girlfriends had the idea to use a sandwich bag and a hair tie as a prophylactic in the absence of a condom one Saturday afternoon. Hope you weren't her brother.

    4. Re:Cue the jokes by TandooriC · · Score: 0

      One of my high school girlfriends had the idea to use a sandwich bag and a hair tie as a prophylactic in the absence of a condom one Saturday afternoon. Hope you weren't her brother.

      This is Slashdot you insensitive clod!

  10. Stupid doctors by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone knows babies will keep better in tupperware

    1. Re:Stupid doctors by udoschuermann · · Score: 1

      Sings, "I bagged the baby / 'cause I didn't have no tupperware" (to the tune of I Shot the Sherriff)

      --
      --Udo.
    2. Re:Stupid doctors by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

      Oh god, what was the show - Eerie, Indiana, sort of a Twilight Zone/Haven thing. Actually was very similar to Haven, but predated it by 19 years. The pilot episode, "Foreverware", had people sleeping in non-trademark-infringing resealable plastic containers and living forever. Well, longer, at any rate.

      --
      Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
    3. Re:Stupid doctors by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's what they mean by burping infants...

  11. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Her parents will tell her "You were almost a ham sandwich".

  12. Parents Must Have Been Happy by FrankDrebin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or should I say Glad?

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
    1. Re:Parents Must Have Been Happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Must have been a hefty ordeal for them to go through.

    2. Re:Parents Must Have Been Happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must have been quite a Hefty ordeal for them to go through...

    3. Re:Parents Must Have Been Happy by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      Wow. Must have been a hefty ordeal for them to go through.

      And that just about saran wraps it up for the bag jokes

  13. how long until by Just_Say_Duhhh · · Score: 1, Funny

    Some kid, hearing his slashdot-reading parents discuss this, decides to "play doctor" and stuffs his little brother into a trash bag? The industry will have to react by poking air-holes in all plastic bags. Wait, they do that already! Every new zip-top sandwich bag I fill with liquid seems to come pre-perforated.

    --
    I need trepanation like I need a hole in the head.
    1. Re:how long until by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Some kid, hearing his slashdot-reading parents discuss this, decides to "play doctor" and stuffs his little brother into a trash bag?

      Slashdot-reading and had sex multiple times?

      I think we have little to worry about here.

    2. Re:how long until by Just_Say_Duhhh · · Score: 1

      Obviously I meant to say "creepy uncle" instead of parents. What was I thinking?

      --
      I need trepanation like I need a hole in the head.
  14. 14 weeks seem way too much.. by Polizei · · Score: 1

    I don't know if she survives, yet I was born ~25 days prematurely.
    It's still very impressive, though.

    1. Re:14 weeks seem way too much.. by Robin47 · · Score: 1

      My son was born 16 weeks prematurely 20 years ago. So far so good. His head is now larger than a walnut which was about the size it was at the time.

    2. Re:14 weeks seem way too much.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should hope your 20 year old son's head is larger than a walnut.

  15. I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Prostate+of+Grace · · Score: 5, Funny

    The $.05 sandwich bag was probably billed at $50+

    1. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20,000

    2. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by choongiri · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It was in the UK. The fully itemised bill looks like this:

      |
      |
      |
      |
      |
      |
      |
      |

                                              Total: £0.00

    3. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, more like:

      Sandwich bag: $0.15
      Bag overhead fee: $3.80 (the rest of the box)
      Emergency courier fee: $15,000 (guy running a block to the 7-11)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by fireylord · · Score: 1

      well those that rtfa would know that this happened in the UK, where we have a medical system that doesn't take the proverbial

    5. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... which works out very well considering something like 50% of your income goes towards taxes? Hookers, drugs, and liquor should be on the gov't tab too.

          Or just finish it off, and let the gov't take 100% of your income, and let them decide where you live, what you own, and where you work.

    6. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by choongiri · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, I bite.

      I'm not talking about the UK in particular here, but compare quality of life indexes to taxation rates sometime, e.g. some of the Scandinavian countries. High taxes does not correlate with unhappy people. Great health care, dental, good working conditions, sports facilities, public services, a 35 hr work week, lots of vacation - now those things correlate with happy people.

    7. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

      High taxes does not correlate with unhappy people.

      Look, if it's still that way in CivV, then it's true.

    8. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't want to be happy. They just want to get ahead of others around them.

    9. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

      I had returned, with family, to Ontario, Canada, after my H1B ran out in 2003 (Got sponsored for a Green Card in 2004 by the Redmond Devil, but that's a whole 'nother shameful story about prostituting ethics for permanent residency).

      Anyyyyywayyyyy, my then-wife got sick, and there was a three month wait for the silly socialized "care" there, so we had private health insurance (never got the Canadian health care back in any case, since we wanted as few ties as possible if we left again (and, we did)). So, off to the hospital she goes, for some outpatient IV antibiotics to be administered every 8 hours. We get a bill for some $1000. No biggie, right? Send the itemized bill to the insurer, right?

      Wrong!

      Because "all Canadians and residents" are "covered", patients don't get itemized bills, citing privacy issues between the provider and the payor (i.e. the government). Well, that flies in the face of several mercantile laws, so we pressed for one. Finally, the hospital relented, but charged us a "service fee": $150 for the first page of the invoice, and $10 a page for every page thereafter.

      Fucking bastards.

      I wondered if it was the Canuckistani paper or ink that was so expensive, or the labor cost of the unionized lard-ass that had to move three feet from desk to printer.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    10. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by dave420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      50%? Ha! What the fuck are you smoking? 30%-35% is what I was on when I was still in the UK, and lots of people pay a lot less than that.

      Give it a rest, fucknut.

    11. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by skine · · Score: 1

      Well, it was a medical grade sandwich bag.

      You're charged more in order to subsidize the testing.

    12. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by treeves · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's best to keep all the costs hidden so when something goes wrong, noone thinks "But it cost XXX!!" They can just comfort themselves with the fact that they paid "nothing".

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    13. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      22% of income. Another 5-ish% to the government pension scheme, doing the maths off the top of my head. Another 5% local tax, and finally the rather scary 17.5% sales tax.

      So... if you add together all your taxes, then throw medical costs on top, how does it work out?

    14. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Oddly, no, I comfort myself with the knowledge that being ill can never bankrupt me.

      I'm not really sure that given the options of "Increased cost transparency" and "Paying for the overheads and profits of the medical insurance industry", the latter is really the better option...

    15. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Erm, that should have been "Decreased cost transparency", or they're the same option, sorry.

    16. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by operagost · · Score: 1

      Your top income tax rate is 50%, and you have a VAT. You also have oppressive taxes on gasoline and diesel.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, I know that you are being funny, but this happened in England. Here we have the NHS so it would have been free. Anyway: our unit of currency is £.

    18. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by naich · · Score: 1

      It's the NHS - you don't get a bill.

    19. Re:I'd like to see the itemized medical bill by dave420 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with people wanting to be happy? Most people are fine paying taxes if it is of benefit to them, which the taxes in question are. Healthcare, quality of life, security. Alien concepts to you, I'm sure.

  16. How did they use it? by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

    Did they poke holes for her to breathe, or did they cut little head holes so she could wear it like a tiny parka?

    1. Re:How did they use it? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Likely they just placed the baby in the bag and only zipped the top partway closed. Easier than cutting holes.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    2. Re:How did they use it? by snsh · · Score: 1

      Yellow and blue make green.

    3. Re:How did they use it? by geoffball · · Score: 1

      She was on a ventilator, so it really didn't matter. There did have to be an opening to get the tube through.

  17. Had one too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was born roughly three months early. The doctors made a little jacket for me out of a sandwich bag as well. I still have it.

  18. Just wait... by lancelotlink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Until you have a baby. None of these kind of comments will be funny anymore. Seriously.

    1. Re:Just wait... by rabidjoe · · Score: 1

      I've got 3 children in full voice this evening, do those baggies come in sizes of 3 foot upwards?

    2. Re:Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's true: people with kids aren't fun to be around.

    3. Re:Just wait... by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Strongly seconded.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    4. Re:Just wait... by Scyth3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Until you have a baby. None of these kind of comments will be funny anymore. Seriously.

      Let me guess, you were a bag baby....?

    5. Re:Just wait... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      I've had 2 babies, and I've had a couple chuckles so far in this thread. Granted, I browse at 3, but it's been pretty mild stuff about 10 comments in.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    6. Re:Just wait... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right. Parents lose their sense of humor awfully quick. Just one more reason not to be a parent.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Just wait... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      For 3 feet I recommend the white "kitchen" bags. For teenagers you may need to upgrade to the black ones. I've got a terrible two year old, I'm sizing him for a large Target shopping bag.

    8. Re:Just wait... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

      Or lost one, premature or otherwise.

      I'm so please for the little girl, and yet sad - because she is probably in for a much tougher life than most of her peers.

    9. Re:Just wait... by jweller · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My twin girls were born at 31 weeks and required a stay in NICU. I'm laughing. You should try it, you'll live longer.

    10. Re:Just wait... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see, so once you're a parent, your sense of humour is carved out of your skull? You're suddenly no longer able to see the humour in a situation that is both tragic and, ultimately, joyful?

      Wow... you're really marketing parenthood well, there, buddy.

    11. Re:Just wait... by tool462 · · Score: 1

      I have a kid. The jokes are still funny. I'm probably a lot more happy for that family than I would have been before I had a child, since I can identify with the stress and joy childbirth brings, but the jokes are still funny.

      I heard that the generic store-brand baggies didn't work. They had to use Glad bags with the yellow-and-blue-makes green seal (patented). It was guaranteed to lock in the freshness.

    12. Re:Just wait... by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aren't you glad your parents weren't thinking that way?

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    13. Re:Just wait... by Luveno · · Score: 1

      Until you have a baby. None of these kind of comments will be funny anymore. Seriously.

      Wait until your babies grow up, then you will find these comments funny again. Seriously.

    14. Re:Just wait... by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

      I'm pregnant with complications, browsing at -1, and still managed to get a few giggles in. Sometimes you just can't take life so seriously.

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    15. Re:Just wait... by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

      That's the one thing I keep wondering about. Ok, she's beaten the odds but will she have life-long problems such as cerebral palsy, mental retardation, or respiratory ailments?

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    16. Re:Just wait... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      True, I joke about my kids illnesses, after the fact. "WTF is croup?!? He sounds like a dying beagle! Next you'll tell me my kid has the plague, totally normal, just wait it out."

      Anyway, good luck to you and your complications! Hope all goes well.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    17. Re:Just wait... by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. If they chose not to have me, I wouldn't mind at all. Since I wouldn't have a mind.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    18. Re:Just wait... by zmooc · · Score: 1

      So either you're an incredibly boring dad or you don't have a baby:P

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    19. Re:Just wait... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

      As a parent of a little girl who didn't live very long, I can tell you. Whatever time she's got is beautiful. Be it a century, a decade, a year, a month, a day, or just a minute.

      At the same time, I can empathise with a parent who chooses to withhold care, and allow nature to take its course. Because that's sometimes kinder than the alternative.

    20. Re:Just wait... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I had a baby. My dick still hurts.

    21. Re:Just wait... by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

      Wait; you mean I have "humor being stripped from my soul" and "sounding like a dying beagle" to look forward to?! Maybe I should have done a poll on Slashdot first.

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    22. Re:Just wait... by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

      Very sorry to hear that, waterford. :( I'm sure you enjoyed the time you had. I hope we never have to experience that.

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    23. Re:Just wait... by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Speaking as the father of a micro-preemie (12 weeks early, 1 pound 12 ounces), who is now going on six years old and mostly quite healthy.... I found them a little funny.

      Time heals all wounds.

    24. Re:Just wait... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, my daughter had croup too. On top of undiagnosed respiratory allergies. 't was no fun at the time. We eventually switched her pediatrician, now we go to a tiny office where you never wait longer than 5 minutes, and where if you call in they can see you in an hour. Now expecting our 2nd one, 2 more months to go.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    25. Re:Just wait... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      That would have been great.

      Should I get pregnant?
      - No, children are a hotbox for every communicable disease imaginable.
      - No, the planet is overpopulated as it is.
      - Yes, children are beautiful and can be trained to do all sorts of menial labor.
      - Yes, CowboyNeal will stop hitting on you.
      - I don't have a uterus, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    26. Re:Just wait... by antdude · · Score: 1

      What? Do you expect us geeks/nerds to have babies or even get laid? HAHAH! I am over 30 years and still not married and have any kids. And yet, I am still a virgin.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    27. Re:Just wait... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, wouldn't?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:Just wait... by Bufferine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my experience it's not the parents (ie us) that's stripped of sense of humour, it's everyone else... cold looks all round when you describe your kid's feeding technique as 'grunting and panting like a rapist' or make fun of the continuous reminders not to shake the baby (really.. does anyone normal actually need those reminders?) And whatever you do, don't make jokes about giving him back because the bills are too much!

    29. Re:Just wait... by HotBBQ · · Score: 1

      I respectfully disagree. Just the opposite has happened since my daughter was born six months ago. I get pooped on and laugh it off. I get vomited on and laugh it off. You have to have an uber sense of humor to make it through the rough days. Just my opinion, of course.

    30. Re:Just wait... by operagost · · Score: 1

      You know what else isn't funny? The only difference between this baby and an abortion is whether it's wanted. Yes, yes, -1 Truth, I mean Troll.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Just wait... by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      I have a son and have been chuckling throughout the thread. Your point is invalid, as are many of the ill-informed responses to your post.

    32. Re:Just wait... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Yo whats it feel like to blow the minds of everyone in your 10th grade english class on a daily basis

    33. Re:Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A) This birth happened two weeks after the legal cut off in the US.

      B) Well, being wanted, plus $50,000 in medical care during the first year (and probably more; that's the average for all premature births), several weeks of incubation before it became viable and the on-going potential for life-long medical complications. NICU's are an imperfect reproduction of the womb. If you look at the picture, there is clearly the potential to become a human being, but just because it's left the womb doesn't mean it is. Even with that medical care, there was still a 90% chance that this would be an abortion.

      It just goes to show, we ought to be paying women $50,000 for the last 14 weeks of carrying an infant. It should work out to about $20 an hour.

    34. Re:Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ditto - I just had a 10 week premi-baby and stories like this get me a little emo. Funny thing is, baby's mum (my wife) stayed off caffeine all the pregnancy and as soon as the baby was in his humidicrib, he was on a daily caffeine drip!

    35. Re:Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alive now, thanks to a pretty creative sounding hack. I'm glad some of these guys live outside Scrubs.

      In fact, I'd like to propose a Scrubs episode dedicated to this survival story.

      Would give the writers a break :p

      Hail to the live kid! as soon as a high five won't cause death....

    36. Re:Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      life is life.
      You may call me weird for riding my hardware to the same limit, but AFAI care they check out when they're ready. That's as late as I can help because I'm a tech. I wanna fix where I can, but where I can't is the call of Eris back to the fractal.

    37. Re:Just wait... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is another difference.

      One looks like it went through a garbage disposal and the other didn't!

      THAT'S how you do concern trolling, here on Slashdot.

      Alas, there is no -5 "EPIC FAIL" moderation for trolls like yourself.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    38. Re:Just wait... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      A) This birth happened two weeks after the legal cut off in the US.

      Let me guess... that’s coming from someone who would argue hard and long about how stupid it is that someone can go into a store and get a bottle of booze on their 21st but not two weeks before it.

      Well, hey, I could be wrong. Maybe you like artificial timelines. But answer me this. What’s the difference between hunting turkeys the day before or the day after turkey-hunting season opens? What’s the difference between “aborting” a baby the day before or “murdering” it the day after the law says it’s no longer okay?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  19. Another true baby plastic bag story by ilo.v · · Score: 2, Funny

    True story that I witnessed myself: When a woman is about to deliver vaginally, there is a drape under her with plastic bags to collect the amniotic fluid and keep it from splashing all over the MD/midwife's legs and feet as they sit/stand there to help the baby out. In this case, the obstetrician dropped the baby as she came out (they are very slippery). By shear luck, the baby fell into the plastic bag instead of falling all the way to the floor. We all went "whew!" as the Daddy said "so THATS what that plastic bag is for!" Needless to say, we didn't correct him.

  20. Hold the pickles! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    (Do I really need to put something in here to be more funny? I thought the title was good enough!)

    1. Re:Hold the pickles! by sxltrex · · Score: 1

      Apparently you were incorrect.

  21. more premature babies have survived by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    The world record for preemies is about 18 weeks. My girlfriend was about two months premature, and her younger sister was about 16 weeks premature -- and is doing surprisingly well, after a whole lot of surgery in her first six months. She had her twenty-first birthday last month and we were joking that she was actually only 20 1/2. But my girlfriend said that when her sister was born, she easily fit in a person's hand, and was covered in dark brown hair all over her body, so for years they called her 'mouse' or 'rat'.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:more premature babies have survived by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It really makes you wonder what saving all these preemies is doing to the human gene pool. Will we someday be unable to breed without the help of medical technology?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:more premature babies have survived by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Premature birth is not a genetic condition so thers is no eugenics risk to saving premature babies:
        http://www.marchofdimes.com/professionals/14332_1157.asp#head2
      There is only some additional costs at time of birth and risk of some health problems later in life that are also non-genetic.

    3. Re:more premature babies have survived by Reziac · · Score: 1

      All sorts of things are proving genetic that we didn't used to think were. Studies on spontaneous abortions have found numerous known lethal defects. I think stating that saving them is not harming the gene pool is a trifle optimistic. At the very least, it preserves a *tendency* toward premature delivery or of some unknown defect in the fetus.

      There is a known syndrome in dogs and horses where the dam fails to produce enough progesterone or thyroid to maintain pregnancy, often causing a pre-viable delivery. When progesterone or thyroid is supplemented and a live delivery results, and the next generation is bred... same thing again.

      But we keep records of such things in livestock, so we KNOW where it's going wrong. Human pedigrees are abysmally lacking in such data, where the pedigree is known at all.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:more premature babies have survived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. Sometimes the mother's body will get rid of defective babies on purpose. In that case it would be the baby that is broken and not the mother.

      Other reasons could include the mother's body not being healthy enough to carry a baby (which includes a huge number of possibilities including bad genetics). Those genes surely could be passed to the baby.

    5. Re:more premature babies have survived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really makes you wonder what saving all these preemies is doing to the human gene pool. Will we someday be unable to breed without the help of medical technology?

      It really makes you wonder what giving all these people glasses and contacts is doing to the human gene pool. Will we someday be unable to see without the help of medical technology?

    6. Re:more premature babies have survived by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's not a genetic condition that we are aware of. It'll take a few more centuries to positively state that premature births have no underlying genetic factors.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:more premature babies have survived by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      What's the point of a gene pool if it's been obsoleted by science? That is to say, who cares if people are born with congenital conditions if the technology exists to mitigate or cure that condition? Imagine, if you will, that you had a "repairer" capable of fixing any possible fault with any piece of electronics. There would be little or no value in buying an expensive pristine item when you could obtain and repair a broken one for cheap or free.

      In the same way, "pristine" genes are only important insomuch as they provide an individual with a) the ability to survive, b) a decent quality of life and perhaps, to a lesser degree, c) provide society with a productive member. If technology can provide those attributes, then we are no longer reliant on the gene pool as a whole to provide them, hence the gene pool becomes obsolete.

    8. Re:more premature babies have survived by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      My phrenology professor seems to think there is a correlation between simian jaw structure and mothers who give birth prematurely so i dunno but it sure sounds to me like a group of people who should be forcefully sterilized.

      Tell me Hatta, does your view on "breeders" make the high school administration react negatively? I'll bet they made you stop wearing your "What Are You Fucking Looking At" tshirt :( I totally agree with your sig by the way, I also strongly dislike things that I observe others doing

    9. Re:more premature babies have survived by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Wow, you've got a bit to learn about trolling. You're supposed to bait them into making fools of themselves. If you just insult them (poorly) you just look foolish instead. Thanks for trying though. Better luck next time.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:more premature babies have survived by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I find it cathartic to insult people on this site whenever given a chance

      ps: whenever someone has to say "haha no guys im trolling" they've already made a fool of themselves so your point is moot

      hth :)

  22. Watch the bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look for the itemized line item:

        Fetus protection jacket: $643.72

  23. Record for smallest babies to survive by PackMan97 · · Score: 2, Informative

    No infant at THAT hospital has survived at that age. Plenty of kids at other hospitals have survived I believe the record for youngest is 21 weeks 6 day and the record for the smallest is 244 grams. So this girl doesn't really come close to those records. In the article the hospital says they are only equipped for deliveries of preemies 28+ weeks and usually refer to a hospital with more specialized equipment for the cases more premature than that. Reality TV star, Josie Duggar, was born at 24 weeks and is doing great (newest member of the Duggar family from "19 kids and counting" on TLC)

    1. Re:Record for smallest babies to survive by Dishevel · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your choice of television shows to follow forces me to ask you to never visit /. again.
      Sorry.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:Record for smallest babies to survive by dwinks616 · · Score: 4, Funny

      19th kid? No wonder it's premature, it probably just fell out! Jeez.

    3. Re:Record for smallest babies to survive by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps other hospitals have better cafeteria technologies.

    4. Re:Record for smallest babies to survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely correct. Due to complications I already have, my doctor is putting me on travel restrictions at 20 weeks. She knows survival is possible at 22 weeks and added an extra 2 on for "insurance". My hospital is only equipped for 28+ weeks, so I guess if anything happens before then it will be a LifeFlight to Hopkins. If I can make it to 28 weeks, I'll be a very happy camper.

      +Insightful for parent

    5. Re:Record for smallest babies to survive by operagost · · Score: 1

      Get that would you, Deirdre...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Record for smallest babies to survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fuck's sake, it's a vagina, not a clown car.

  24. Lucky she was past 24 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this makes up for all the babies they let die for being born before the 24 week mark.

  25. Itemized bill will still be the same... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    And just as confusing...

    Infant insulating jacket. $247.58 billed
    Insurance adjustment: $198.42.
    Amount covered 49.16.
    Deductible $25.
    Insurance pays $24.16.

    Please pay $25.00

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  26. Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Or is this a reflection on healthcare differences in the UK vs the USA?

    I had _twins_ born at 26 weeks gestation in April. THe claim that the UK doctors had never seen a baby born this early could only be true if one of the following were also true

    - it was a very small hospital and they didn't have much prematurity experience
    - the stated age is incorrect. when you use relative gestational ages (i.e. 14 weeks early), people disagree on what the "end goal" is.. is it 40 weeks? 38 weeks? 37 weeks? SInce people count weeks from different starting points (start of menstrual cycle, post fertilization, etc), the total number of gestational weeks can be thought of differently. So if the age was "37 weeks minus 14 weeks, i.e. 23 weeks" then that is still an EARLY baby, but not the earliest recorded surviving baby (that honor is currently 21 weeks)
    - the quality of NICU care in the UK is so poor that they really don't see surviving babies this early

    My wife's water broke at 24 weeks; the doctor told us at that time that if the kids were to be born immediately they'd have about a 20% chance of living and not having long term disabilities.

    They were able to prevent labor for about 2 weeks, such that my children were born at 26 weeks, weighing right around 2 lbs each (2x the weight of the baby in the article.. who is statistically undersized for 26 weeks gestation)

    I wonder if this is a reflection on differing medical care in various countries. The oft-cited report about infant mortality in the US leaves out some important factors -- namely that socio-economic diversity in the US, and racial heterogenoy correlate with and explain some of our increased infant mortality. But furthermore, that nearly 1 out of 8 babies in the US are born prematurely, wich is MUCH higher than developed european nations.

    Finally, we measure mortality much differently here than do most other places. If the baby in this story had died, it would have counted as mortality here, but would not have counted as infant mortality in many developed nations.

    Aggregately, our different demographics and our higher incidence of prematurity, combined with our more broad definition of mortality skew the infant mortality higher than some nations we rank against.

    Yet the most interesting fact is that premature babies do better in the USA than anywhere else (with perhaps 1-2 scandavian countries ranking marginally better).

    IOW, we have lots of premature babies, and they have a beter shot of surviving here than they do anywhere else.

    I happen to live in a smallish city -- around 100k people, and we have two big hospitals, one of which has a helicopter.

    Yet even in this small town in a remote part of the country, my twins, born at 26 weeks (allegedly the same age as the baby in this story) lived and came home after 100 days of NICU stay.

    Incidentally, there was no need to use sandwhich bags to keep my kids alive.

    A lot of people have a lot of bad things to say about the US medical system. What I know is that 30 years ago, my children would have died, but in 2010, even in remote North Dakota, they lived. And statistically, they are living more and more often here.

    Is this really what parents in the UK should expect if they go into pre-term labor? And if so, is that the kind of medical service we want here in the USA? With sandwhich bags?

    You might want it. However, I'm glad my wife went into early labor in the US.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:Is the Story Real? by MWoody · · Score: 0, Troll

      List of Infant Mortality Rates

      United States: 6.3 deaths per 100,000 live births

      United Kingdom: 4.8 deaths per 100,000 live births

      Oh I'm sorry, do the facts get in the way of your opinion? How rude of me.

    2. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your reading comprehension is an abysmal joke.

      I concede that the aggregate IMR in the US is surprisingly high, and then i discuss why that is (Based on the findings in the oft-cited research). I further explain that for premature babies, the US IMR is one of the best in the world.

      I lay all of this out in my post.

      I am very worried that you feel comfortable arguing with people based on pushing aggregate statistics from other sources when you have not displayed the ability to comprehend what you have read.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    3. Re:Is the Story Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yet the most interesting fact is that premature babies do better in the USA than anywhere else (with perhaps 1-2 scandavian countries ranking marginally better)."
      "Is this really what parents in the UK should expect if they go into pre-term labor? And if so, is that the kind of medical service we want here in the USA? With sandwhich bags?"

      Regardless of the quality of healthcare in the UK, you just sort of killed off your own point seeing as those 1-2 scandinavian countries ALSO have universal healthcare.

    4. Re:Is the Story Real? by xaxa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps you should read the article: "Worcestershire Royal Hospital only has the facilities to care for premature babies born from 28 weeks onwards and doctors wanted to transfer her to a specialist unit at Birmingham's Heartlands Hospital but there wasn't time."

      If more American hospitals are equipped to deal with babies born earlier than this that could explain a difference in survival rates, but I don't know if that's the case.

      Note that Sweden and Germany count the birth rate in the same way as the USA, but do better. At the end of this article are some survival results for full-term births. On Wikipedia there's the 5-year survival rate.

      The oft-cited report about infant mortality in the US leaves out some important factors -- namely that socio-economic diversity in the US, and racial heterogenoy correlate with and explain some of our increased infant mortality.

      You could say the same about Britain. (From the article, we know this is a teenage (17) mother with an older (24) father, they aren't married, and they all have stereotypical working-class names.)

      Finally, we measure mortality much differently here than do most other places.

      Yet your own government (see here) "concluded, however, that the differences in reporting are unlikely to be the primary explanation for the United States’ relatively low international ranking."

    5. Re:Is the Story Real? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You've got to ask yourself, when you do a cost/benefit analysis is spending tons of money keeping preemies alive really worth it? There's a point at which it's not cost effective to save them, and the right thing for the parents to do is try again next year, or choose adoption. While a personal tragedy, miscarriage isn't really a problem society needs to be spending lots of money on. Money spent on saving preemies could be better spent saving older children who have unique personalities and who society has already invested a lot in raising. Infants are fungible. If the repair cost is more than the replacement cost, it just doesn't make sense to care for them.

      You might think this a callous viewpoint. But imagine if your daughters had died. It would be traumatic, but after you work through it you can try again. That child would be just as precious and loved as the children you have.

      Either way you do it, you are sacrificing the existence of a precious child. Why not go the way that costs less?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Is the Story Real? by fiddley · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the UK's IMR is more reflective of their society as a whole because the UK is full of middle class wealthy people walking around in bowler hats. What's more, they only have a tiny immigrant population, of which 98% are billionaire refugees.

      --
      If medicine were ever perfected, we'd all be the same.
    7. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1

      You've got to ask yourself, when you do a cost/benefit analysis is spending tons of money keeping preemies alive really worth it? There's a point at which it's not cost effective to save them

      Well, as long as I am paying the costs, I'd prefer to make that decision.

      I don't authorize you to decide for me, and I don't ask you to bear the costs.

      The main reason that I reject any government intrusion into my medical care is precisely this point of view. When society pays, society decides what to pay for. That is fair and reasonable, but it's not what I want.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    8. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your use of sarcasm to give me a good skewering, but correct me if I am wrong, but the UK isn't highly segmented by race into socio-economic strata, at least not to the same extent the USA is.

      here are some links you might find interesting
      http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2008/r081015.htm?s_cid=mediarel_r081015
      http://www.birthactivist.com/2009/11/cdc-releases-new-report-comparing-us-and-european-infant-mortality-rates/

      (you'll note, btw, that premature infant mortality is lower in the US than the UK for all gestational age ranges up to 37 weeks)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    9. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I am afraid I don't understand the relevance of your response.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    10. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. So in the US there are levels of NICU facilities (there are 3, i believe), and it works similarly in that a level foo facilitity cannot really support a child born earlier than a certain gestational age, or with certain difficulties.

      The place our children stayed was a "we can do anything" level facility, and one of the reasons it had a helipad is that they went and picked up babies from all over the state that couldn't be handled in the facilities they were in. Many of the nurses that worked on my kids had special "FLIGHT NURSE" badges that basically meant they were trained to keep 20-something week infants alive in a bumpy helicopter.

      There was also a special flight-rated isolette unit (incubator + semi-sealed environment with respiration support) parked in the lobby of the NICU area.

      So how it would work is that the chopper from my town was usually en-route as the mom was going through pre-delivery, and the staff would pick mom and baby up and bring them back.

      Regarding the demographic issue.. i saw lots of families come in (and out) of the NICU that didn't appear, from my prejudicial eyes, to be in a position to pay the bill. Their children were treated the same way by the same people.

      Part of the issue is that pre-devliery care breaks down across economic strata, and in the US, there is a high correlation to racial demographics. If you look at the CDC report, you see that aggregately, african american babies have worse outcomes than white babies in the USA, who are marginally worse than hispanic babies. Part of that is socio-economic, and part of it appears to be genetics. The NICU nurses are very aware of which genders and which races seem to, correcting for other factors, appear to mature and survive at which rates. Premature Girls, as a rule, mature faster than boys, and our boy-girl twins, our daughter was much stronger and healthier from the get go than our son.

      None of this explains why the doctors would claim they had never seen a 1lb 26 week baby "survive". 26 weekers regularly survive. It may have been a mischaracterization of what was said by the patient.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    11. Re:Is the Story Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States medical system is very good at intensive=expensive=high-profit-margin interventions. It's not so good at routine, basic, low profit margin care, which is one reason the premature birth rate is so high to begin with here. The big drug companies spend billions on erectile disfunction cures, but have no new antibiotics in their pipelines. There is not much money in drugs that cures diseases as opposed to ones that treat chronic conditions. The profit motive creates uneven health care with spectacular results for a few but mediocre results on average. The U.S. spends twice as much per capita on medical care as European countries that show better overall results.

    12. Re:Is the Story Real? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "The oft-cited report about infant mortality in the US leaves out some important factors -- namely that socio-economic diversity in the US, and racial heterogenoy correlate with and explain some of our increased infant mortality."

      Interesting. I look at that statement and think makes poor performance worse. You seem to look at it and reach exactly the opposite conclusion.

    13. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Oh - I don't necessarily disagree with you. I bring it up because there is a tremendous degree of diversity: racially, economically, culturally, etc that most european nations simply do not have to contend with.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    14. Re:Is the Story Real? by ydrol · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit confused about the motivation of your response.
      You say

      "he oft-cited report about infant mortality in the US leaves out some important factors -- namely that socio-economic diversity in the US, and racial heterogenoy correlate with and explain some of our increased infant mortality."

      Can you provide any *evidence* that this is contributing significantly to the US relatively high figure? ie do the maths and see how much difference it makes. Or are you just grasping at straws.

      You say "Finally, we measure mortality much differently here than do most other places."

      But the report you mention says , explicitly ,

      "However, it appears unlikely that differences in reporting are the primary explanation for the United States†relatively low international ranking."

      I'm pretty sure similar things have happened in the US in hospitals. Where some quick-wittedness has saved the day when some particular item of equipment was not to hand - yet I would not use *that* as a way to disparage the US health service. Especially as pointed out to you, it was simply that the hospital with the right equipment could not be reached in time.
      But you seem to thing that this one story is grounds enough to do the reverse - whilst trying to sound very intelligent about it.

    15. Re:Is the Story Real? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The problem is that infant mortality is not counted the same in every country. So those figures are probably meaningless with a detailed explanations of how they were collected.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    16. Re:Is the Story Real? by tibit · · Score: 1

      So you say you pay all the costs out of pocket? Because your argument just flies in face of how insurance works. The more the insurer has to spend, the higher the rates for everyone, not just you.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    17. Re:Is the Story Real? by ydrol · · Score: 1

      "Part of that is socio-economic, and part of it appears to be genetics."

      Er will the report you are quoting mentions the socio-economic but there wasnt anyting about genetics. Are you qualified to make such an assertion. Are there any papers or reports anywhere that correlate infant mortality to a particular genome (as genetics != race).

      I guess a lot of things you are saying are just annoying me
      1. making the mistake of looking at a story that *made the UK papers* and then wondering if that is normal (an oxymoron)
      2. using that particular isolated incident (of all things) to somehow fuel a US vs UK medicine debate. - like shit never happens in the US
      3. Quoting from a report ("sociao-economics) and then added your own "unfounded" conclusions? (maybe its genetics that black babies die more than white ones - to paraphrase).

        I am intrigued to understand your underlying motivation for your posts.

    18. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Beacuse it is hard for me to reconcile two apparent contradictions:
      - this is an accurate portrayal of medicine in the UK
      - people in the US would want this level of care for themselves.

      Here the specific things i find problematic:
      - the survivability rate for 26 week babies in the USA is much higher than what this article claims
      - the doctor(s) in question, unless they are operating in Sherwood Forest, should have familiarity with babies of that gestational age
      - i'm not even sure what they are using the plastic bag _for_. They were respirating the baby already; the two key issues with premies of this age are warmth and moisture retention. For the latter, my children simply had a burn ointment rubbed all over their body which supplemented the immature skins moisture barrier effectiveness. I suppose you could use a plastic bag for same, as if often done when curing concrete, but the bag didn't even appear to cover the child. Was there really no burn cream available?

      For warmth, skin to skin contact with the mother is more than sufficient, even in incredibly small babies.
      - they couldn't relocate the child for _3 days_ ? Why not?

      I just find it hard to beleive that this passes for modern medicine in a developed country. Yes, kudos to the doctors for being quick witted, and most importantly, it appears the baby is in good health.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    19. Re:Is the Story Real? by ydrol · · Score: 1

      "I bring it up because there is a tremendous degree of diversity: racially, economically, culturally, etc that most european nations simply do not have to contend with."

      So London 1993-1997 - Infant Mortality rate 6.0 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_health/DS16/DS16_cap07.pdf
      US 2004 Infanct Mortality rate 6.8 ? http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db09.htm

      Does London's SocioEconomic and Cultural diversity measure up for you consideration?
      (Ignoring that fact that the London figures are from last century.)

      Still think it's because black babies have some kind of genetic thing going on?

    20. Re:Is the Story Real? by ydrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > this is an accurate portrayal of medicine in the UK

      It was a national UK newspaper *story*. What do you think?

    21. Re:Is the Story Real? by bmajik · · Score: 1

      The point is that infant prematurity doesn't explain the entire difference. Nor does the different means of measurement. My claim is that the US demographic differences need to be considered as a point of difference as well. That's all.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    22. Re:Is the Story Real? by moterizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they all have stereotypical working-class names

      Please enlighten me. Perhaps this was meant tongue-in-cheek. On this side of the pond we can deduce precisely nothing from someone's name regarding class, socio-economic niche, etc. Are you suggesting that \caste\ class distinction is still divided along familial lines over there? I mean, really? You guys still do that?

    23. Re:Is the Story Real? by ydrol · · Score: 1

      Well the study did consider the difference, but it didnt leap to the same conclusion as you.

      London has a great degree of diversity, and still comes out almost 1% lower a decade in the past.

      I personally think the Socio-Economic factor is amplified by the nature of the US health care system.
      But that's just me pissing in the wind and not trying to sound like I know any more than anyone else.

    24. Re:Is the Story Real? by internettoughguy · · Score: 1

      Sort of true, but that's why insurance companies let you choose the amount of coverage, and change your premiums based on risk factors.

        It's an interesting question though, should people really be able to kill a child to save themselves a bit of money?

    25. Re:Is the Story Real? by uglyduckling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a third option which you neglect: it's a stupid newspaper article full of hyperbole, from which you would be really silly to draw sweeping conclusions about the whole of neonatal care in the UK. Also, if you look on page 34 of this report, it seems like the WHO don't agree with your figures, at least for 2006.

    26. Re:Is the Story Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they all have stereotypical working-class names

      Please enlighten me. Perhaps this was meant tongue-in-cheek. On this side of the pond we can deduce precisely nothing from someone's name regarding class, socio-economic niche, etc. Are you suggesting that \caste\ class distinction is still divided along familial lines over there? I mean, really? You guys still do that?

      If you can "deduce precisely nothing", that says more about your powers of deduction than reality.

      Here's the result of a five-second Google search: http://babynamesworld.parentsconnect.com/forum/topic88623.html

    27. Re:Is the Story Real? by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't say that doctors said they hadn't seen a baby that premature survive, the article says that mum says that the doctors said it. There's a big difference. Mums often don't take in all of the information they're given in the first few hours, and often fixate on one thing said by a junior member of staff, or even just don't understand at all. There's no way that none of the doctors in that centre had seen a 26-weeker survive. We know none of the other details - what was the cord pH? Was there a prolonged resuscitation with cardiac massage, drugs, etc.? What was the baby's progress over the first few hours? It's very common practice to paint a bleak picture for parents if the picture is bleak, and often they understand the bleakness but not the real reason. It's entirely possible that this is what has taken place.

    28. Re:Is the Story Real? by uglyduckling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Delivering into a plastic bag is standard neonatal practice in order to minimise insensible fluid loss. Ointment is not the best treatment by any means, and the plastic bag is a stopgap before getting the baby into an incubator with proper humidity control. You need to re-read the article: the baby was born at Worcestershire Royal Hospital because there wasn't time for an in-utero transfer to to Birmingham Heartlands (the tertiary centre); the baby was transferred ex-utero to Birmingham Heartlands and stayed there for 3 days, then downgraded to a less advanced unit.

    29. Re:Is the Story Real? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I'm not joking. Class is much more divisive than race (or gender, or age) in Britain today, and can be very difficult to escape/change -- especially if it's your name.

      People my age (born in the 1980s) might have middle class names: William, George, Daniel, Ben, Charlotte, Helen, Lucy.
      Or upper class (posh) names: Gregory, Oliver, Toby, Victoria, Mary
      Or working class names: Ryan, Lee, Chelsea, Darren, Stacy, Kevin, Shane

      Fashions change though. My mum says when she was a child my name was "posh", and she'd never have considered naming her son with it. But by the 1980s it was middle class, and not so common with upper class parents. By the 1990s it had a common short version, which my mum didn't like ("too lazy, I called you _________") and she refuses to use it. In the 2000s it's occasionally used by working class people. You can sometimes tell class by the choice of Benjamin/Ben/Benny, Alexander/Alex/(n-a), Katherine/Kate/Katie, Jonathan/John/Jonny/Nathan -- especially if someone introduces themselves as the first or last of those.

      The woman in the story is Chelsea. Stereotypically, she's named after the famous football club (according to dad) and the exclusive area of London (according to mum). The man is Lee, which is simply too short and sounds too much like an American wrestler (sorry!) to be a "nice" name.

      Brooklyn Beckham is a celebrity example of a working class boy with a working class name. And yes, Brooklyn Beckham may have a really rich mum and dad, but in British eyes he's still working class, because dad's a football player, and mum was a pop singer. Forgetting that he lives in the USA, if Brooklyn's parents want him to be considered middle class they should encourage him academically (starting by reading with him) so that when he's 12 he can get in to a private (costs money) school. Learning a classical instrument will help, and reading books in his spare time, and taking family holidays to a quieter beach, or the wilderness/countryside, or a historic town.
      Money is much less important than aspiration, inclination, and other peoples' perceptions. A cheap camping holiday in the British countryside is middle class, a caravan holiday (anywhere) is working class, so is going to a big party resort in Thailand, or Disneyland Florida.

      Earlier this year someone introduced herself to me as "Caitlin. Oh, I'm named after my great aunt, she's Irish-American." See that on Wiki there's only one famous Brit with this name, yet it's quite common. This girl didn't want to be mistaken as lower class by her name -- although I didn't need the hint: she was a goth, liked metal music, had long hair, a "BBC" accent, could play the piano, went to a girls-only private school, had done well at her exams, was going to study art at university, had an old BlackBerry phone from her dad, etc etc. (Since I knew at least some of this before I knew her name, when she said Caitlin I probably looked surprised, hence her explanation.)

      The class system is awful, since its the root of so many prejudices and barriers, but even though I'm aware of it I often find it difficult to ignore it. Big parts of my identity are linked to it, from the way I dress to what or where I eat, from where I choose to live to the kind of pub I go to, and since I obviously spend most of my time with people with similar tastes, it's reinforced by the things around me.

      I'm reading a book called Watching the English, which should answer any further questions, such as the kind of garden you can expect a lower, middle and upper class person to have. (L: Neat and ordered, with the soil showing around the lines of plants. M: Messy, with big plants growing together, no soil visible. U: A combination, depending on whether the lower class gardener or the no-need-to-work housewife did that part.)

    30. Re:Is the Story Real? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "It's an interesting question though, should people really be able to kill a child to save themselves a bit of money?"

      Is there any doubt as to how a Randroid would answer?

      No. Didn't think so.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    31. Re:Is the Story Real? by squizzar · · Score: 1

      That's more detailed than I expected... I thought you were referring to parents who call their kids things like Chardonnay, Mercedes or Blade (that's responsible parenting, innit?). My personal favourite is the parents who wanted to name their twins Benson and Hedges. Everything has to be mispronounced with over-emphasis on some of the syllables, in the same fashion as McDonald's staff (in the UK at least) refer to a fillet of fish as a 'fill-A'. A quick search for 'chav names' brings up numerous other examples.

    32. Re:Is the Story Real? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't really "a bit of money".

      My friends had a son that was born 2+ months premature and he had to spend ~3 months in the NICU.

      The bill sent to the insurance company was on the order of $1M. And that was really on a lower end, at about $12k per day. Had he had more surgeries, it'd be more like $20k per day, on average, or so I'm told.

      Due to various agreements insurers have with hospitals, they ended up covering almost half of that. Friends were left with, oh well, about $100k to pay out of pocket. This amount of money generally buys you small house where they live.

      I'm not saying "be able to kill a child", but one has a choice: treat the kid no matter what the cost, or just let go. If I knew I'd face a bill of that magnitude, I'd say "well, sorry, we'll need to [have|adopt] another one instead". The fact that "modern medicine" can cope with a lot of things doesn't mean that you have to bankrupt yourself. Maybe "modern medicine" needs to grow legs and figure out how to shed costs. By an order of magnitude, give or take.

      It's slightly ridiculous that an outpatient laparoscopic surgery that takes maybe 50 minutes in all, would be billed for $12k. Or that a delivery would be billed for $30k.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    33. Re:Is the Story Real? by tibit · · Score: 1

      I should have been clearer: the insurer got the hospital to slash the bill by half, then they paid ~$400k, leaving $100k to be paid out of pocket (10% of the original bill).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  27. Tempting Bag by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

    A life-saving technique, or a handy container for a delicious baby sandwich? Hmmmmmmmmm...

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  28. So sometimes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it really is ok to put a plastic bag over your head.

  29. BEHOLD by Iburnaga · · Score: 1

    SCIENCE. Now wait for people to come out of the woodwork claiming that the sandvich bag was placed there by god etc etc.

    --
    iburnaga.blogspot.com
  30. Human brain activity fetus by schwit1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If human brain activity exists then I don't see how the child can be called a fetus.

    At what point in development does human brain activity typically begin?

  31. I had a baby sandwich once by JackSpratts · · Score: 1

    Too bony.

  32. Added Bonus by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    Then there's the added bonus that she's also protected from freezer burn.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  33. Mmmm by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Sandwich

  34. That's nothing.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Babies in sandwich bags only sound impressive until you consider that there was an old lady who lived in a shoe.

  35. Wait till Ziploc gets sued. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    The baby is so small, they are able to keep it alive technically. But it is likely to have a malformed or underdeveloped brain and deficient organ development. If it survives to be a vegetable some shyster will convince the parents to sue the maker of the plastic bag.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Wait till Ziploc gets sued. by whoop · · Score: 1

      The chances the baby will be normal are actually pretty good. The big worry after they are first delivered is bleeding on the brain leading to cerebral palsy. By the time the baby is going home, they would have done numerous ultrasounds and know if that were the case.

      I live near a fancier hospital, they used bubble wrap as a blanket over our daughter (born 2 pounds) to maintain body heat. It's amazing how many tiny premature babies like this do actually go home and lead normal lives. Aside from being skinny, our daughter is a normal hyper four-year-old.

    2. Re:Wait till Ziploc gets sued. by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      If it survives to be a vegetable....

      Then they can keep it fresher longer...

      --
      Everyone who laughs or giggles as a result of this comment is coming with me to hell

    3. Re:Wait till Ziploc gets sued. by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 3, Informative

      The brain and most of the internal organs develop relatively early during gestation. The lungs are the last major organ to mature and they are frequently what gives very premature infants trouble. Infants born before 32 weeks gestation don't produce surfactant (the stuff that keeps your lungs open so air can get in and out) themselves and can basically suffocate. Once you have them properly ventilated and such, they tend to do okay as long as they don't catch an infection. The immune system also is immature in a baby, but it generally doesn't really kick into gear until about 6 months of age for a normal infant, so it's not specific for premature infants.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    4. Re:Wait till Ziploc gets sued. by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      If the baby turns out to be a vegetable, At least it will keep well.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
  36. So is this girl considered an actual human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing we don't kill children this young the the womb...oh wait.

  37. Will they bill $100 for the bag? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Will they bill $100 for the bag?

    1. Re:Will they bill $100 for the bag? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      My twins spent 64 days in a NICU. $100 wouldn't be noticeable on the bill - it's a rounding error.

    2. Re:Will they bill $100 for the bag? by thewise1 · · Score: 1

      You're not kidding. My daughter's 3 month stay cost more than my house.... but it was worth every penny.

    3. Re:Will they bill $100 for the bag? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.

  38. Forget the shoes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... bronze the bag!

  39. Re:Human brain activity fetus by poliscipirate · · Score: 1

    Depends. What's their political affiliation?

  40. Re:Human brain activity fetus by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

    I think it depends on how you define "brain activity". I believe that fetal movement (willful movement, that is) starts around 15 - 16 weeks of gestational age. Commanding movement would have to involve brain activity by definition. Involuntary movement starts around 10 - 12 weeks.

    --
    --Insert catchy .sig line here--
  41. Re:Human brain activity fetus by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 2, Informative

    It depends on your definition of brain activity. The neural tube closes at about week 6. There is movement by 8 weeks. Brain activity controls movement (unless the movement is only spinal reflex, but that would be difficult to determine). In any case, there is rudimentary brain function very early in development.

  42. Re:Human brain activity fetus by Chowderbags · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some would say it takes a couple decades..

  43. Re:Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

    Third trimester abortions ARE illegal except special cases currently. Roe v Wade was basically 1st trimester it is the mother's choice. 2nd it is the state's. 3rd it is not allowed except in special cases.

    At least that is how I was led to understand our laws on the topic.

  44. Re:Human brain activity fetus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At what point in development does human brain activity typically begin?

    Well, if you mean human brain activity along the line of "what make us human and separates us from the animals?", you are looking at late childhood and more likely teen to adult years. There are many "people" who never make it to "human". Of course again once we look at "begin" then it is time to break out the beer and get ready to have a philosophical argument.

    If you are angling more towards the "life begins at conception!" direction you can find incredibly simple neural activity early on in the development cycle. Of course for this definition you have to be crediting something less functional than a flatworm as human, just due to DNA.

  45. Re:Human brain activity fetus by izomiac · · Score: 1

    IIRC neural activity starts when it's an eymbro, so before becoming a fetus. Brain development is completed around the 25th year. So your distinction can't really be used. There are no good cut-offs, language is learned before birth, but infants aren't all that intelligent (less than many animals).

  46. Glad I read this AFTER lunch by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    My boss gave me a ziploc bag full of pulled pork from his church barbecue that I took home for lunch today. NOT the imagery you want...

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  47. Baby.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the other other white meat!

  48. Lunch by srobert · · Score: 1

    Allright lunchtime. Let's see what do we have today ... AAAAAAAAAAAGGGHHHH!

  49. haha by jmpeace · · Score: 1

    google ads suggest better bags

  50. Simpler approach by noidentity · · Score: 1

    She was so tiny the only thing they had to keep her body temperature warm was a sandwich bag from the hospital canteen

    They could have just put the thermometer in the bag. Would have kept her temperature warm just fine.

  51. Re:Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Special cases? Let me help you define that...

    Special 'spe-shul (n): Cases in which a doctor determines, in his/her professional opinion, that a full-term pregnancy would pose significant health risks to the mother.

    In other words, special means normal.

    Every pregnancy poses significant health risks to the mother... you don’t even have to find a doctor who’ll lie about that! You just have to find a doctor who’ll write you the paper saying that this case poses significant health risks so that you can abort.

    Same goes for doctor-recommended sick leave, but that’s another issue entirely...

  52. Mommy mommy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mommy mommy! It's hot in here and my neck is feeling chafed!

    Shut up and stay in your sandwich bag, preemie!

  53. Re:Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by NiteShaed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh for crying out loud, where do you people come from? Seriously. Do you really believe that there's this big group of people out there who just like killing babies for sport?

    In other words, special means normal.

    No. Special means cases where risk to the mother is significantly higher than would normally be expected. There are no doctors out there just rubbing their hands together and laughing maniacally about how many otherwise viable children they intend to kill off in needless third trimester abortions. If a woman is told at a late stage in her pregnancy that it looks like it's going to be either her or the baby, but not both that will survive, that's a horrible moment in her life. Some may choose to risk it all for the sake of the baby, but you have no right to act all superior and expect that she'll lay down her life for that child, who may not live either. You don't even have the courage to post under anything other than Anonymous Coward, so don't expect me to believe that you're so brave that you'd forfeit, or even risk, your life without a second thought.

    Further, do you really think that pregnant women typically carry a baby for 6 or 7 months and suddenly decide, "naaah, I don't want one of these after all". There are not swarms of women in the last stages of pregnancy flocking to abortion clinics just for the fun of having an abortion. I won't say that it can't or doesn't *ever* happen, but a woman experiencing a healthy pregnancy, with a healthy baby is not at all likely to seek a late term abortion for no apparent reason.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  54. The US has the best health care in the world... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...if you are wealthy.

  55. I see the ugly head of socialism. by Deputy+Doodah · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "She rang the maternity suite at Worcestershire Royal Hospital in Worcester but was told it was nothing to worry about and to go back to sleep...
    ...Miss Rowberry said: ''It was frightening. I rang the maternity suite and they just told me to go to sleep."

    Socialized medicine at its finest.

  56. The kid's lucky by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    If this had happened at my workplace, where there's an asshole who can't wait to prey on whatever other people have brought for lunch, things could have got ugly.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  57. Well okay by Kenoli · · Score: 1

    News for... hmm
    Stuff that... ah, nevermind.

  58. Re:Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://reproductiverights.org/en/document/the-federal-abortion-ban-supreme-court-hearing-for-gonzales-v-carhart-faq

    Only 40 states and DC, so that leaves 10 states, or 17 if you are Obama, that do not ban it.

  59. Doctors can often be overly pessimistic about this by thewise1 · · Score: 1

    They told us my daughter had a disorder that is incompatible with life and scheduled the abortion without even asking us. They said she had trisomy 18 before they even did an amniocentesis. She was born with some abnormalities - She is missing an arm, and her liver was in the umbilical cord - but surgery fixed the latter, and people live with limb deficiencies all the time. Some people's challenges are just more visible than others. She didn't have trisomy 18 either - there are no chromosomal anomalies. She was born 3 years ago yesterday, and spent 3 months in the NICU as she grew strong enough to breathe on her own after the surgery put the liver in her stomach (thus compressing her lungs somewhat). Today, she spent her first day at a Montessori school. She is a normal, well adjusted little girl, just with one arm. Sorry, but the doctor simply isn't always right and I thank God every day that we ignored him, because that sweet little girl wouldn't be here today if we listened to him.

  60. it happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who put mustard on the baby again!?

  61. Cue hospital mixups by Cymeth · · Score: 1

    "I'll have whatever that is.."

    --
    Can anyone recommend a good therapist for me.. er.. my schizophrenic network card?
  62. Re:Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are no doctors out there just rubbing their hands together and laughing maniacally about how many otherwise viable children they intend to kill off

    I couldn't get into medical school. :(

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  63. Re:Pffft, it's just a mass of cells ... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

    dammit, I want to mod that funny so badly. I LOL'd.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  64. Weird Story by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    "Her mother Chelsea Rowberry, 17, said: ''The doctors told us they had never known a baby born as prematurely as Lexi survive."

    So, underage kids having babies... Then we have.

    "Miss Rowberry and her partner Lee Lacey, 24, feared she was having a miscarriage when she suffered agonising stomach pains when she was 26 weeks pregnant on the evening of June 26. "

    What? So she has a 24-year-old "partner"? I'd be in jail right now if that were me.

    And considering they are the same gender, this seems like it could be a planned pregnancy.

    What a weird world we live in

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Weird Story by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      And considering they are the same gender

      “Lee” could be a male’s name (I’d wager that it usually is, actually), and “Lacey” is obviously his last name. I can’t say I envy him it though.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Weird Story by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Further digging show that you are indeed correct. In the US, the term partner is almost exclusively reserved for same sex relationships. Not that I am worried about lesbianism... just that it seemed like it meant this had to be planned.

      17 is way to young to have a kid in today's society. It might have worked a century ago, but there is so much fun to have.. so much growing to do. And considering that she had to be sixteen when she got pregnant with a 23 year old... it is just wrong.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Weird Story by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      And considering that she had to be sixteen when she got pregnant with a 23 year old...

      No, she could have also been 16 when she got pregnant with a 24-year-old, 17 when she got pregnant with a 24-year-old, or 17 when she got pregnant with a 23-year old...

      And as far as growing up goes, this will either be a learning experience which few others would rival, or it’ll be a disaster. “Just wrong”, though, is not something I’d automatically call it... yes, there’s a good chance this will be one of the most, if not the most, difficult and significant process in her entire life, but worthwhile undertakings are rarely painless and easy and the outcome of this could be either positive or negative.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.