Slashdot Mirror


Top Reason for Facebook Unfriending Is Too Many Useless Posts

alphadogg writes "The No. 1 reason why friends dump friends on Facebook is when they get fed up seeing too many useless posts, according to new research out of the University of Colorado Denver Business School. Posts about polarizing subjects such as politics and religion as well as inappropriate and racist comments also sever many Facebook relationships, according to Christopher Sibona, a PhD student in the Computer and Science and Information Systems program. 'Researchers spend a lot of time examining how people form friendships online but little is known on how those relationships end,' said Sibona, whose research will be published in January by the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 'Perhaps this will help us develop a theory of the entire cycle of friending and unfriending.' Sibona surveyed more than 1,500 Facebook users to get to the bottom of why people dump each other. Not surprisingly, people who flood others with posts are at great risk of being unfriended. 'The 100th post about your favorite band is no longer interesting,' he said." Samzenpus likes this.

300 comments

  1. 100th my ass by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'The 100th post about your favorite band is no longer interesting,' he said."

    The first post wasn't interesting. It just took 100 for it to reach the point of "I'd rather not see anything from you at all."

    1. Re:100th my ass by Thing+I+am · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An example of the proper way to use Facebook: http://youropenbook.org/?q=still+drunk&gender=any You get much more interesting results this way.

      --
      That sucking sound you hear is my bandwidth.
    2. Re:100th my ass by elfprince13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Facebook friends are mostly irrelevant in terms of people you actually care about friendship with anyway. It's more like a unified contact list from my various lives, so anyone I might want to contact ever stays on the list. If they are annoying, I just block their posts from my feed. End of problem.

    3. Re:100th my ass by Larryish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dropped my Facebook account last month.

      Facebook is teh suck.

      Most of the people I "friended" were high school classmates who live in a different state and I haven't seen in decades.

      Maybe I am sort of cold (my wife calls me "Dexter") but I really don't care to see a constant stream of medical drama and pictures of people's inbred rodent children.

      (LOL@rodent)

    4. Re:100th my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear. We should hang out sometime. I'll bring the plastic wrap, you bring the knives.

    5. Re:100th my ass by retchdog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ditto. I wonder if these unfrienders don't know how to block (lol), or if they are so offended that blocking isn't enough (lol).

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    6. Re:100th my ass by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Neither, some people are so deluded as to think Facebook friends actually matter.

      I know, it shocked me the first time I heard it too. Try not to cry yourself to sleep.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    7. Re:100th my ass by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      teh suck

      (LOL@rodent)

      I think you managed to give a very good example of why people get unfriended....Really, dribble like that is why I don't have my 16 year old cousin friended.

      I find Facebook good for two things: Catching wind of social events that the group of younger people I hang around with organize. (I went back to grad school a lot later than those kids who just pushed on through. They grew up a facebook generation, I did not.) The other is keeping in touch with my relatives that all live 1000 miles away. If you're getting spammed with stupid crap, you have two very easy options: Unfriend them or block their status updates. It's really not hard. Nobody needs 400+ friends. Pick a close few, and viola, 95% of the crap is gone.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    8. Re:100th my ass by orange47 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I concur, its a waste of time. There is nothing useful about it and probably never will be.

    9. Re:100th my ass by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      if they are so offended that blocking isn't enough (lol)

      Blocking seems more severe than defriending, actually... IMO, anyway...

      In order of least drastic to most,
      ignore < hide from news feed < remove friend < block

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:100th my ass by Liquid+Len · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've dropped my FB account myself, about 3 months ago. It takes a short time to adapt (i.e. to stop checking out every 30 minutes or so) but after that, I found I didn't miss it at all. Good riddance.

    11. Re:100th my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes there are interesting pictures. I changed the feed so that it delivered only the images and not the public service messages. Ever notice broadcast messages are generally less likable than personal messages, even when from a friend?

      But then Facebook broke it so that I couldn't do that anymore. So now I just feed image alerts to my email account and ignore everything else. I might log in if I'm bored and there are photos I haven't seen.

    12. Re:100th my ass by retchdog · · Score: 1

      interesting. In the real-world, I guess that I would agree. It's pretty damned cold to just ignore someone rather than man up and break things off.

      Facebook feels different, though.

      I think of it like this: there are many people whom I am not totally indifferent to, and want to know how they're doing, &c. However, it doesn't mean that I want to subscribe to their 'zines.

      Notice, blocking only blocks posts; they can still chat and send messages to you.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    13. Re:100th my ass by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Oops. By "block," I was referring this whole time to "hide from news feed." I actually didn't know that you could really block someone entirely, which makes my post a bit ironic. :-/

      So with this new info, yes, I tentatively agree with you. Blocking is a bit sociopathic.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  2. outsourcing by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 5, Funny

    I delegated my facebook account to a third party. She can let me know if anything worthwile has occured in my social parabola. (also maintain any farms, etc. I haven't actually looked at facebook in months.

    --
    0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    1. Re:outsourcing by srussia · · Score: 1

      I delegated my facebook account to a third party. She can let me know if anything worthwile has occured in my social parabola. (also maintain any farms, etc. I haven't actually looked at facebook in months.

      Which reminds me, your directrix just called to tell me your latus rectum is about to be targeted by a burning mirror due to your lack of focus. Of course this may have been hyperbole on her part.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    2. Re:outsourcing by adamdoyle · · Score: 3, Funny

      I delegated my facebook account to a third party. She can let me know if anything worthwile has occured in my social parabola. (also maintain any farms, etc. I haven't actually looked at facebook in months.

      So you're married, then?

    3. Re:outsourcing by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      Of course this may have been hyperbole on her part.

      hyperbole or hyperbola?

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    4. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and can change your status to "searching for amorous goatboy" when she is pissed off and then change your password, contact emails, and put in a security question you can't answer.

    5. Re:outsourcing by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly the same here. My wife manages the family facebook account and I don't have to look at my sister's latest 500 pic upload. I swear, she is getting kickbacks from RAID array manufacturers.

    6. Re:outsourcing by treeves · · Score: 1

      You forgot to somehow work "quadratic" , "vertex", and "conic section" into your post. You might have even managed to get "elliptical" in there as well.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    7. Re:outsourcing by zafayar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hush... My partner will kill me if she realize that what she does for me is in fact "outsourcing"....

    8. Re:outsourcing by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I delegated my facebook account to a third party. She can let me know if anything worthwile has occured in my social parabola. (also maintain any farms, etc. I haven't actually looked at facebook in months.

      I dont recomend outsourcing your Facebook to China. Try the Philippines, the people there speak better English and are more familiar with western cultural practices.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I swear, she is getting kickbacks from RAID array manufacturers.

      Isn't it redundant to say RAID array?

  3. Still friends? by suso · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that mean that nobody is friends anymore?

    Ta dit boom.

    1. Re:Still friends? by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just click the little X in the corner of their useless status update. This hides everything they say/do without them feeling virtually offended. Win!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Still friends? by Shoeler · · Score: 5, Funny

      Coincidentally, I unfriended /. on facebook for this very reason.

    3. Re:Still friends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coincidentally, I unfriended /. on facebook for this very reason.

      And if I link to this /. article, will I get unfriended?

    4. Re:Still friends? by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

      And I revenge unfriended you because I like /. better.

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    5. Re:Still friends? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't feel the need to protect their feelings; I am like this with family as well, online or in person. If they can't keep it straight, I do it for them and it gives them a bit of feedback that people might just be fed up with their shit. I ESPECIALLY do this if I hear "tealiban", "demoncrat", "teabagger" or any other term meant to polarize politically/socially whether I support their view or not.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    6. Re:Still friends? by ryanov · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Pretty sure they were referring to THEMSELVES as teabaggers for quite some time, before they realized that it doesn't sound as good as they thought.

    7. Re:Still friends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, the No. 1 reason why friends dump /. is when they get fed up seeing too many idle posts.

    8. Re:Still friends? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Some still do.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Still friends? by mhollis · · Score: 1

      I unfriended /. when every post was sent to my account in quadruplicate. Needed to stop the madness.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  4. Oh come on by anonymousNR · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is news ???
    people dump/avoid/ignore stupid/selfish/trollish friends.
    be it on facebook or anywhere else.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    1. Re:Oh come on by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

      I just wish this kind of feature is available for slashdot instead of facebook, to un-friend or just hide stories that I don't care, I know there is a '-' , but that just isn't enough these days.

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    2. Re:Oh come on by Reilaos · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, this is Idle. Derp.

    3. Re:Oh come on by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Have you ever played WoW and been on trade chat?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Oh come on by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      Not for any longer than it takes to exit the channel.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
  5. OMG you guys! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I spotted this shirt at the mall that was just SOOOO amazing! I'm attaching pics, including some of my dog sitting the shirt. Isn't he just ADORABLE???!!! XO

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:OMG you guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dude! I just shit on the floor looking at that sexy shirt! Look at the shit's pic! Looks like a buddha!

    2. Re:OMG you guys! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Damnit, your friends are WAY more interesting than mine. Many of my Facebook posts are emo people posting song lyrics, or my cousin saying I LOOOVE THIS! I'm sure he's going to end up gay despite being part of a devout Christian family. Oh yeah and my Christian friends always saying how amazing god is gets old pretty fast too since I stopped believing in such things :p Just a shame that I actually still like some of the updates these people do. A smart politics/religion filter would be amazing.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:OMG you guys! by characterZer0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do believe in such things and I still get sick of Christians always saying how amazing God is.

      I know. I got it. I friended God on Facebook to get updates straight from him, I don't need you to re-post everything. What, God didn't send you a friend request?

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    4. Re:OMG you guys! by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I follow God on Twitter. http://twitter.com/god

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    5. Re:OMG you guys! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I like just posting my own Bible quotes when I see them starting to gain critical mass in my friends. Stuff like 2 Kings 2:23:

      (2:23) "As he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head."
      (2:24) "And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them."

      It's always fun to get the responses ;)

    6. Re:OMG you guys! by operagost · · Score: 1

      *shrug* I would just ask you why you posted it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:OMG you guys! by don_bear_wilkinson · · Score: 1

      So, I suspect that Christians would dearly hope that God's FB account is not limited to 5,000 friends....

      --
      In Nature, stupidity is a capital offense. In human society, too many get off with less than a warning.
    8. Re:OMG you guys! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      No. It's 6000 friends. One per year.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:OMG you guys! by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I loved when I was unemployed, and with severe medical problems on top. Seeing all the "god is so great you guys!" posts were annoying as fuck. I can at least grasp the lack of christian charity on their part. But it's seriously dickish behavior to essentially go up to a poor person, flaunt how great life is going for you, and then just walk away.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    10. Re:OMG you guys! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Hehe that's a good one.. I always remember one I saw about a guy having a cock the size of a donkey's, and "discharge" as great as that of a horse.. don't see that one quoted often.. ah, found it:

      "and lusted after her paramours there, whose members were like those of donkeys, and whose emission was like that of stallions." (Ezekiel 23: 21, NRSV)

      Fun stuff :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:OMG you guys! by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Considering what a sufficiently creative person *could* do with that account, I was really, really disappointed. I was actually expecting the "word of god" i.e. bible quotes, or whatever is considered the word of god, applied to current events (or whatever). Or, since I'm an atheist, I expected satire at the very least.

      Instead it's the same as any other random person's twitter - random crap no one's interested in. What a waste.

    12. Re:OMG you guys! by Binestar · · Score: 1

      Thou shalt not insult thine toupee! And seriously, 42 injured? First off, why were the kids roaming around in platoon strength? And beyond that, why were those kids so stupid that they stood still long enough for 2 bears to maul 42 of them? That's 21 per bear. To escape a wild animal chasing you you don't need to be faster than the wild animal, you only need to be faster than your friend. (Sorry Kris)

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    13. Re:OMG you guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is vs. 20, not 21.

    14. Re:OMG you guys! by wangerx · · Score: 1

      So, I suspect that Christians would dearly hope that God's FB account is not limited to 5,000 friends....

      Duh! Just ask any Johovah's Witness and they will tell that it is 144,000. If you want it in writing, see the Bible verse Revelation 14:1.

    15. Re:OMG you guys! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It's God, dude. He can do anything. Didn't you know?

    16. Re:OMG you guys! by Pezbian · · Score: 1

      Eerie parallel there. A friend was in the same situation at a party (ladder broke, so did his leg. Got fired as coverup.) Thumpers show up to gab about Christ and don't even offer him help. "I'll be praying for you.", etc. "Just remember Jesus is with you." and various Bible quotes spoken over the music of the band he came to see made me feel like I had just eaten a plague rat. The power of common decency compelled me. And after a "God will provide." coming on the heels of two dozen of these people doing zilch and wasting his night, I stood up with a "Yes, I will." and handed my buddy a couple Benjamins I got for a server install earlier that day.

      While I could have used the money, he needed it more than I did and it was worth every penny just for the irony of such actions coming from an unbaptised sinner like me when I'm supposed to be evil by nature, according to their book. I wasn't the only one offering actual help, though. Being in Utah, there are quite a few LDS folks around and they actually help in tangible ways. I don't go for organized religion in general, but anyone willing to roll up their sleeves and do actual constructive work is okay in my book. His lawn was mowed, groceries supplied for free, etc. The world needs more people who lead by example like that instead of shoving beliefs down your throat.

      The same guy with the broken leg recovered and now serves as a Paramedic after having his schooling provided at steep discount through connections. When he shows up to save your life, you'll be glad to see medical gear instead of prayer hands. He didn't convert to the LDS faith, and made it clear he never will, but he did play a part in saving the lives of quite a few members and still does.

      I don't understand how direct, constructive, effective action can be perceived as evil while lazy inaction is revered as godly. Something got screwed up.

      --
      In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  6. What exactly is the middle ground? by magarity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If stimulating debate over politics and religion are too "polarizing" (takes too much thinking?) and some topics are too banal, what exactly are the middle ground topics that keep 500M people addicted to FB?

    1. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cute pictures of cats and babies. Preferable pictures of both cats AND babies. And bacon.

    2. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't "stimulating debate" they find offensive. It's pointless, irrational ranting. How many times do you need to be told "[Glen Beck | Obama] is a turd" even if you agree?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like that would make a pretty good sandwich...

      What? why are you unfriending me!

    4. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah I think I lost a friend or too when I made my post along the lines of "80% authentic pork tongue? YES PLEASE!"

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by sirrunsalot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There really are some adorable videos of my nephew stumbling through the ABC's and talking about Lady Gaga, and I do love a good political/philosophical discussion, but ten posts daily on "What [religious zealot] says about Christian relationships" aren't exactly stimulating debate. In fact, I find that facebook stifles interesting conversation in favor of movie quotes/song lyrics/dumb quips/travel plans. That said, there are about three or four now-distant friends that I keep in contact with very tenuously via facebook. For me, that's the foot in the door that keeps me checking it daily, if only for lack of something better to do.

      Thanks for the wake-up call. I'm going to the library.

    6. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what exactly are the middle ground topics that keep 500M people addicted to FB?

      Who's sleeping with whom.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by 93,000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too polarizing= "God punished the ELCA on the day of their gay vote by sending a tornado that caused huge damage in Minneapolis where they held the vote. I hope that sends a message that HE doesn't want gays in HIS church!!"

      Too banal= "Thinking about making some scrambled eggs."

    8. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by sirrunsalot · · Score: 1
    9. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stimulating debate? Have you ever actually used Facebook? It doesn't sound like you have.

    10. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Stimulating debate? Have you ever actually used Facebook? It doesn't sound like you have.

      So, Facebook is the new Slashdot???

    11. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If stimulating debate over politics and religion are too "polarizing" (takes too much thinking?) and some topics are too banal, what exactly are the middle ground topics that keep 500M people addicted to FB?

      Themselves.

    12. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      "That's what the Facebook is going to be about!"

    13. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by ryanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was at the Unitarian Universalist General Assembly in Salt Lake City a few years ago. One of our campaigns is "Standing on the Side of Love," that stands in solidarity with oppressed groups like GLBT and immigrants, etc. The big banner we had hanging from the convention center was struck by lightning. Good thing I don't believe in god or I might have wondered if I'd misunderstood what Jesus would do.

    14. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Class reunions.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    15. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      The most stimulating debate I have seen on facebook was when someone I know forgot to sort out the naughty ones before she uploaded a whole folder of pictures.

    16. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by don_bear_wilkinson · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for those who are ill-equipped or disinclined (by disposition) to debate, an attempt to engage in rational and or critical analysis and discussion can be treated as if it were offensive. People who don't 'get' debate and or who do very poorly at it (against those who have the faculties and abilities) often get pretty steamed when you (perhaps) inadvertently make it clear how baseless and or ill-informed their positions are. :)

      --
      In Nature, stupidity is a capital offense. In human society, too many get off with less than a warning.
    17. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by ogar572 · · Score: 0
      The false sense of
      1. 1. Having a bigger social life than they really do
      2. 2 .Acceptance by a lot of people who won't even piss on you if you were on fire
      3. 3 .Thinking that people really care about what you are think, say, or do
    18. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Checking out the girls who wouldn't talk to you IRL back in highschool

    19. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for those who are ill-equipped or disinclined (by disposition) to debate, an attempt to engage in rational and or critical analysis and discussion can be treated as if it were offensive.

      The problem is with the person trying to initiate a debate. Most people, when having a conversation in real life or online, are not looking for a debate. Someone who fails to pick up on the actual wants of the other person in the conversation, and instead tries to initiate a debate, causes offense. This is because the social norm is to not engage in debate; absent cues that debate is actually desired, the default response should be something other than debate. Typically, this would be a "feeler response" to determine if the other person in the conversation really wants to debate, or if they're just broadcasting opinion, or something else entirely.

      Ironically, rather than send a "feeler response" here, I've entered into debate -- but there are cues in your post tell me that you won't be offended. :)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    20. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by don_bear_wilkinson · · Score: 1

      Thank you for expressing this so articulately.

      You are, of course, right about our cultural norm.

      I had written out a long response, but I've decided to not waste so much of 'our' time. It's a complex, philosophical topic and we will not conquer it here.

      Suffice to say, that I hold the opinion that not only are our cultural norms fairly absurd in many cases, but I think what you suggest leans a bit far towards the 'permission' end of the 'you can ask for permission or you can ask for forgiveness' spectrum for what I think would promote a well-adjusted and emotionally developed society. :)

      --
      In Nature, stupidity is a capital offense. In human society, too many get off with less than a warning.
    21. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      "That's what the Facebook is going to be about!"

      My friend's all "I didn't tell you I had a new boyfriend?"; turns out she'd set her facebook status and had deemed that "telling everyone". Who's bedding who really is what it's all about.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    22. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by eln · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jesus probably wouldn't have used those long metal poles to hold up the banner during a thunderstorm.

    23. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel dirty... I've actually commented on a bacon posting.

    24. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too offensive= "Thinking about making some scrambled gays."

    25. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Jesus himself, the six story version, and The movie version has been hit by lightning. My guess is Zeus got into the mead.

    26. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      That's true. He was a carpenter; he would have used wood.

    27. Re:What exactly is the middle ground? by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess it brings back bad memories...

  7. Isn't this just summarizing twitter? by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    Twitter is all posts.. all useless.....

    1. Re:Isn't this just summarizing twitter? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot comments are all posts.. all useless.....

    2. Re:Isn't this just summarizing twitter? by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out for all of us. All posts may be useless, but yours is clearly least useless of them all, second only to this one pointing out how less useless your post is.

      --
      Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
    3. Re:Isn't this just summarizing twitter? by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out for all of us. All posts may be useless, but yours is clearly least useless of them all, second only to this one pointing out how less useless your post is.

      no, this post is even MORE useless.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    4. Re:Isn't this just summarizing twitter? by Surt · · Score: 1

      But if I point out how useless your useless post is, is my post even more useless? Will we start a waterfall of uselessness that recurs to infinity?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  8. Just means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a lot of FB users too dumb to figure out how to hide and individual or an application.

    *hides alphadogg*

  9. If you don't like it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to unfriend me for what I post, that's fine. I'm not going to change who I am or try to put on some charade to have a bunch of "friends". They should take into account, "When's the last time, if ever, this person has communicated with you?"

    1. Re:If you don't like it.... by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I stopped speaking to my mum because her Facebook posts were too boring.

      Only kidding, her posts are usually way funnier than the rest of Facebook (unintentionally).

      --
      which is totally what she said
  10. I Think I Get It by rakuen · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is people don't want to be friends with people who babble on and on incessantly about nothing.

    What a novel concept! Maybe Facebook should implement a Useless button, lest they enable even more rifts between friends.

  11. Number 1 reason not to be on facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ALSO the same!

  12. Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook IS too many useless posts.

  13. What about those who refuse to join? by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can someone tell me the major reason as to why those capable of joining Facebook refuse to join?

    Disclaimer: I am one of those who refuse to join Facebook. My reason is simple: I do not see what joining this social network would do to improve my life. In fact, I believe it would simply complicate it. Am I wrong?

    1. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The complication you speak of is the very reason most people join and/or can't stay away from it...they love the 'complication' (should read 'drama').

    2. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have friends and family scattered about the US. After dinking around with a few different means of communication, I found Facebook to be the easiest way to keep in touch/coordinate get-togethers/share pictures, etc. I still feel dirty for using it, but it's not entirely without merit.

    3. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why would it complicate your life? If you get obsessed with it I suppose it would.

      I held off for some time but finally gave in because I got an invite from a friend overseas and decided this would be a convenient way to stay in touch. I've rekindled relationships with a few long lost friends. Nothing profound but it's nice to be in touch with people I haven't seen in a while. Not many, I'll admit; I ignore the vast majority of people on the list. It's simply another tool for facilitating communication.

      Fortunately, I don't have any people on my list who are compelled to make political posts. The worst I get are the usual inanities; idiotic comments that make no sense to anyone but those in the know and stupid inspirational messages that pretend to have figured out the meaning of life where countless philosophers over the last few millennia could not. Whenever the frequency of dump posts rises above my ability to tolerate them I simply block that individual's posts.

      A big peeve of mine are those who simply friend people to grow their list, like there's a prize for having a huge number of friends. I had a classmate I hadn't really seen since elementary school friend a cousin of mine he had never met and who's living somewhere in Europe. It's ridiculous, but then it's nothing to get worked up about.

      I will visit on a regular basis, but I don't post much at all. If Facebook has had any impact at all, I would have to admit it's been more positive than negative. Somehow I feel dirty admitting that, but it's the truth.

    4. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by adamdoyle · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me the major reason as to why those capable of joining Facebook refuse to join?

      Disclaimer: I am one of those who refuse to join Facebook. My reason is simple: I do not see what joining this social network would do to improve my life. In fact, I believe it would simply complicate it. Am I wrong?

      It only complicates your life if you use it in an unhealthy way. Check it maybe once a week and try and keep it halfway updated. Granted it's probably more interesting for people who had it starting out in high school because in twenty years they'll be able to see "X, from your highschool, just married Y, also from your highschool..." X and Y may not have been close friends of yours, thus you don't really keep up with them, but it's still interesting to see things like that. Also, maybe an old friend of yours just had a baby. You don't really keep in touch anymore but now you know about it because they put up pictures on facebook. Now that you know, you can call them or post on their "wall" and congratulate them, etc. It just gives you a few more options that you wouldn't otherwise have. Also helps keep you in the loop.

      Disclaimer: I do use facebook so I'm obviously biased.

    5. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by cowscows · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right on. Especially with a decent facebook client on my phone, it functions almost like a convergence of various online services that I've been using for years. Email, instant messaging, event planning, photo sharing, etc.

      While it's certainly got its own annoying quirks, there are relatively simple (if not always straightforward) ways of dealing with most of them, and if you aren't afraid of potentially offending a few people, then you can keep your friend list limited to what you find useful.

      Much of what my facebook friends post is irrelevant to me and gets skimmed right over, and I hardly ever post content myself. But with a little bit of care to how I've set it up, I don't find the signal-to-noise ration on facebook any worse than the most of the rest of the internet. And the fact that such a high percentage of people that I might want to get in touch with have an account, it can be incredibly useful at times.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    6. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by vlm · · Score: 1

      In fact, I believe it would simply complicate it. Am I wrong?

      I believe you are wrong. I joined as an experiment for 6 months. It was a complete waste of time. Burned about as much time as an addiction to at least two weekly tv series, which is quite an investment (in other words I took my trial seriously and worked hard) After 6 months, evaluated my results, which was zilch, and dumped facebook. Frankly, haven't missed it.

      At least on slashdot you can learn something occasionally, or get a valuable reference to something new or cool.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me the major reason as to why those capable of joining Facebook refuse to join?

      Kinda like joining a cult. Getting in is *easy* and peers tend to pressure you for the "joys" of it.
      Then you are bound to new "social" duties: hear/see things and respond to people you had little interest in seeing before. You're trapped at a IRL yearly family party, except the gossiping goes on 24/7 and you can't hide what you said.

      Some of us rather enjoy a relationship w/ people sans 500 million others sitting on the back row (plus advertisers and 5.5 billion others when leaks spring.)

    8. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      My major problem with facebook is that people expect YOU to use it as much as they do after you give in. I had an account for all of a month because of this. I'd get phone calls from people talking to me about shit I A) couldn't care less about and b) they expected me to be aware of because it had been posted on facebook sometime in the last 24 hours or so.

      I deleted my facebook account, I've lost touch with those people, and my life is better for it. If I still had a facebook account I would certainly know more about the happenings in my family and amongst my friends etc, but honestly, I work 70-80 hours a week and by the time I get home I'm fried and the last thing I care about is how cute cousin natalies new dog is.

    9. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by jburroug · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the main reason I joined and spend any time on there as well. I opened an account initially after leaning that an old friend I'd lost touch with was seriously ill and his wife was mostly posting updates on his condition via facebook. After that a few friend requests rolled in and I got pulled in. I've managed to filter out just about all the farmville and other game updates and just scan through updates every so often to see what folks are up to. I only get active on there when I have a need to communicate something to a general audience of people I know or if I'm actively looking for someone. I was pleasantly surprised recently when I was able to find a few old college friends before a trip home, some were still in town and some had also moved on but now I'm talking to people I haven't seen in seven years and had missed, so it's not all bad.

      Mind you FB has it's share of faults, in fact I pretty much hate everything about how FB actually works, it's saving grace is it's ubiquity, so many people use it that you usually find who you're looking for on there. But beyond being a directory of nearly every internet user in N. America (and yes a large portion of users globally but I think it's market penetration is highest over here) between the ages of 15-40 it's a pretty rotten tool for communication or expression. The wall post and comment system isn't very well suited for anything but short pithy (or more often facile) comments or links to recycled "lulz" the photo gallery feature is OK but not on par with Picassa or Flikr by a long shot. Let's not even discuss the privacy nightmare... But all told it's bad features are still outweighed by it's usefulness as a large global registry of people around the world that it's worth staying moderately active on.

      Cheers,

      Josh

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    10. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      Why did I join? To look at girls I'm interested in dating!

      Why else would anyone use Facebook?

    11. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just so hollow and ineffectual, for the most part, is our ordinary conversation. Surface meets surface. When our life ceases to be inward and private, conversation degenerates into mere gossip. We rarely meet a man who can tell us any news which he has not read in a newspaper, or been told by his neighbor; and, for the most part, the only difference between us and our fellow is that he has seen the newspaper, or been out to tea, and we have not. In proportion as our inward life fails, we go more constantly and desperately to the post-office. You may depend on it, that the poor fellow who walks away with the greatest number of letters, proud of his extensive correspondence, has not heard from himself this long while.

      -Henry David Thoreau, Life Without Principle, 1863

      Replace "newspaper" with "blog" and "post-office" with "facebook" and it applies perfectly today.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by ieatcookies · · Score: 1

      Having something complicate your life is a valid reason not do that something.. not doing something because it doesn't improve your life sounds ridiculous. I'm currently drinking a can of coke, I almost sure this is not improving my life, in fact it my result in the opposite, but man I enjoy a can of coke from time to time.. I don't care that it's not productive, that it doesn't improve my life, and that it doesn't contribute to me saving kittens and puppies in my spare time... Why anyone refuses to TRY Facebook is beyond me. If you try it and find it unsatisfying; stop. But to not try at all and then have any opinion on it is completely retarded.

    13. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Suggest you try it. Got my account in January, and quite pleased with how elegant and lightweight it is, how little time it takes, and how it fits into my lifestyle. It honestly makes me happy to get little blurbs from friends I haven't seen in a while, doing cool things with their families. Yesterday I saw friends planning to go to some local rock shows next week I didn't know about, maybe I'll go meet up with them there. Wouldn't have been efficient for them to email or phone about stuff like that, as I assume the response rate would be too low.

      I'm also kind of pleased that Facebook serves as a "honeypot" for people with personality disorders. If they're a whack job, it comes out fast, and I can de-friend them and move on. One "friend" went so crazy he added 800 friends and every app he could find, spent all day on it, self-imploded, and had to delete his account. It's a robust, self-correcting system.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    14. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't post every dang thing. Just a few things that interest me and a majority of my followers. It has allowed be to connect with long lost friends and family.

      Also a few groups I like keeping updated with use it.

      It's just a tool. Try it, if you don't like it after a few months, stop using it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Silverhammer · · Score: 1

      I'm a man in my mid-30s, and all of my friends are men even older than me. (I always was the precocious one...) Some of us have been friends for almost 20 years, since long before Facebook was created, so how would joining Facebook now improve our lives?

      I have no problem with using the Internet to meet new people and discover new things, but from what I've seen of Twitter and Facebook, the learning curve (or the signal-to-noise ratio, if you prefer) simply isn't worth it. It would just take too much time and effort to build a useful network from scratch, within the rather arcane rules of those sites.

      I'm sure it would be different if I was drawn into an existing network, but that's not going to happen for the reasons given in paragraph #1.

    16. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by znerk · · Score: 1

      Having something complicate your life is a valid reason not do that something.. not doing something because it doesn't improve your life sounds ridiculous. I'm currently snorting a line of coke, I almost sure this is not improving my life, in fact it my result in the opposite, but man I enjoy a line of coke from time to time.. I don't care that it's not productive, that it doesn't improve my life, and that it doesn't contribute to me saving kittens and puppies in my spare time... Why anyone refuses to TRY heroin is beyond me. If you try it and find it unsatisfying; stop. But to not try at all and then have any opinion on it is completely retarded.

      I think that about says it all.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    17. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll just go see the movie then.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    18. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Nothing profound but it's nice to be in touch with people I haven't seen in a while. Not many, I'll admit; I ignore the vast majority of people on the list. It's simply another tool for facilitating communication.

      Indeed. If anything, it's a great way to stay within shouting distance of people who "really, really want to stay in touch" -- but this way you don't actually have to go for drinks with them. In my experience, most of the people you don't really plan to stay actively in touch with don't have much to say to you either; but if something fun comes up it's nice to know you might hear about it.

      That said, I'm not really bothered by everybody's bullshit posts either. The way I figure it, if you're not interested in random chitchat from your peer group, Facebook really is the wrong place for you. To me, Facebook is essentially just one, long, never-ending night at the bar. Anybody who takes me too seriously or who expects me to take them deadly seriously on Facebook is doing it wrong. And "work contacts" can fuck right off.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    19. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me the major reason as to why those capable of joining Facebook refuse to join?

      1. The EULA
      2. It's made for people who think that who you talk to is more important than what you say.
      3. It's pretty much like 4chan with better design and (I know it's hard to believe) even less wit.
      4. I don't give a fuck about your make-pretend farm
    20. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The question was why people refuse to join Facebook.
      The quality of your reply being representative for Facebook is one of the reasons why we don't.

    21. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. its really all just noise. It's extroverts making themselves look cool and introverts reading it. It's people gossiping, and religious nuts commenting. I do facebook every day, and I'd say 1 out of 100 message are anything important ot truly worth logging in for that a phone call once a month couldn't summarize.

    22. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are right.

    23. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      At least people on FB can take a joke.

    24. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by paulmer2003 · · Score: 1

      You sound like a miserable prick.

    25. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well every party I go to is organised by Face Book events. If your not on face book I dont invite you to anything, and if I wasnt on face book, I wouldnt be invited to anything.

      People without it are basically completely ignored out of all my various socile circles. Although my social circles are tech/geek/gamer/anime circles so there is a high preference for technology.

    26. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the enjoyment you get from drinking it is the improvement. You pompous shit stain dunce.

    27. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I went back go grad school a decade after my undergrad career. I moved 1000 miles away to do so. Up until this point, I had seen no reason to use Facebook. It seemed pretty stupid. Here's where I am now:

      The younger generation uses Facebook in place of IM, Email, and in some cases, text messages. They use it in place of forums, fan sites, and other internet communities. They use it in place of google, notes in desks, graffiti on walls, and bullying in the halls. They use it in place of Craigs List, Ebay, classifieds, and pieces of paper with tear-off-strips with phone numbers on them.

      In short, the generation that was high school and college in the mid 2000s has ignored our internet, and instead chosen it poorly implemented in a single website. Yes, it's all poorly done. But it's largely there. As is everyone they know.

      I can't stand the bulk of Facebook. But there are a few things that are important. Now that I'm going to school with this crowd, they organize their social events through Facebook. BBQs, pick-up games, birthdays and other drinking events, outings, sports events, open mic nights, etc. It's all organized through Facebook. My choices were either ignore Facebook and not have a social life with my classmates, or suck it up. The other thing which I found awesome was friending my relatives I left 1000 miles away. It gives me a window onto their lives. How my autistic cousins are doing. How my grandparents' health is. How school is going for some of my cousins. My family's trips abroad. My sister's school career. My good friend's sons' sports activities. Stuff I miss, stuff I care about, but I don't have the time to call and ask about. When nothing goes on for my uncle for months, then he suddenly gets promoted, I know about it. If I called all my relatives every week, it'd be a massive time sink, and boring as hell 90% of the time.

      Facebook is an RSS feed for the important events in the lives of my friends and family a thousand miles away. That's the real value for me.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    28. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... just amish. ;-)

    29. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me the major reason as to why those capable of joining Facebook refuse to join?

      Disclaimer: I am one of those who refuse to join Facebook. My reason is simple: I do not see what joining this social network would do to improve my life. In fact, I believe it would simply complicate it. Am I wrong?

      If you don't have trouble keeping up with people in real life, there's not much reason to use Facebook. I've got friends who are scattered all over, so it's pretty useful to me. Also, there are a lot of people you can keep up with without being close buddies.

    30. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone tell me the major reason as to why those capable of joining Facebook refuse to join?

      Disclaimer: I am one of those who refuse to join Facebook. My reason is simple: I do not see what joining this social network would do to improve my life. In fact, I believe it would simply complicate it. Am I wrong?

      You are not doing anything wrong by not being on facebook. I refuse to join also. I take it you have been getting on with your life quite fine without it and just being on it will take up maybe 5 mins a day, then 10 mins and before you know it an hour a day; which you could spend doing far more constructive things with your life, either spending time with your family, building something in the garage or physically doing something whereby you have something tangible at the end of the day.

    31. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      I believe it would simply complicate it. Am I wrong?

      As a fed-up bored-with-it can't-get-away-from-it facebook user, I would say that you are not wrong.
      "Did you see my picture of the booger I picked out of my nose yesterday?"
        No, do I care to?
        "But I put it on facebook. Don't you care about me?"
        What does that have to do with anything?
      "Also, why haven't you been feeding my pigs on my farm garden thing? I've sent you 55 thousand requests?"
        Cause it's not a real fricken farm people. So... yeah, stay away from facebook. You'll be glad you did.

    32. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      Having joined I now wish I hadn't. My attitude is that if you've got something earth-shaking to tell me, you know where to find me, either on email or via telephone.

      The problem with Facebook, Twitter et al is that its too easy to post pointless banality, mostly because the most banal of people tend to have their Facebook open at all times, within easy reach of their electronic rodents. Adding some level of extra effort to the process of conveying life's little stupidities acts as an effective filter for the less important things.

      Cheers

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    33. Re:What about those who refuse to join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never joined TwitFaceSpace because of the simple fact that it is "cool" to be apart of it.

      That, and I'm anti-social. But mostly the "cool" part.

  14. Lowest Common Denominator by __aaasvk1266 · · Score: 1

    The Facebook environment really doesn't do much to encourage extended dialog or discussion, so LCD wins.

    And quitters never win.

  15. I don't unfriend, I just use Hide by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can always click in the top right of each newsfeed link, or assign people to lists.

    For example, I have different lists for each game, and have special ones for Family, the city I grew up in, the city I live in, people who go to film festivals with me, and people who have specific activities I do with them. Then I change the order of the lists so I mostly see the ones I want.

    And then, if someone posts a lot of useless stuff, I just Hide PERSON on the newsfeed from them - they're still friends, I can still see if they specifically refer to me, but I don't hear the useless blather. If they post about some game or app I don't care about, I just click Hide and select HIDE NAMEOFGAME or HIDE NAMEOFAPP and poof it's gone.

    What will get you dropped is spam posts. Or Tagging me in pictures that I'm not in. That is an automatic Defriend.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I don't unfriend, I just use Hide by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You can always click in the top right of each newsfeed link, or assign people to lists.

      Exactly what I do - but I'm guessing most people don't know much about Facebook except for friending and unfriending.

      To be honest, roughly 90% of my Facebook friends are now hidden because their posts are mostly insipid prattle. I'd probably just quit Facebook, except I have to manage my department's page - and I hate to admit it, but since I'm on there anyway I don't want to be friendless. Guess I'm just insecure...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I don't unfriend, I just use Hide by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Indeed. 95% of the people out there are using like ten different apps that post crap, so just hide those apps.

      And there will be the last 5% who seem to go through a new app every day, and they eventually get hidden entirely, with them none the wise. They can still send me messages or post on the wall, I just don't see status updates from them.

      i don't really understand people's attitudes towards facebook. No one's saying you have to read everything anyway. It's entire possible to login and read just the stuff directed at you.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  16. Seriously with the research by js3 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do researchers like stating the obvious.

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
    1. Re:Seriously with the research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. You must be a researcher as well.

    2. Re:Seriously with the research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, there's two of you! Is there a convention in town?

    3. Re:Seriously with the research by DragonFodder · · Score: 1

      ahh, but to get paid for stating the obvious, that is the perfect destination of a researchers quest.

      http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2010/08/15/
      http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2010/05/20/

      --
      Wherever you go... There you are. B.B.
    4. Re:Seriously with the research by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or do researchers like stating the obvious.

      I don't know - perhaps someone should look into that!

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    5. Re:Seriously with the research by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's you.

      not everything you think is true, not everything that is obvious is true. Sometime it is, but until studied it was only a guess. If we don't question, we wouldn't test the world around us, then we don't get anywhere and become backwards savages slaughtering goats to please the volcano.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. If By "Useless" You Mean... by pshumate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...a constant barrage of FarmVille/Mafia Wars posts then yes, that's why I unfriend/hide people. I don't care if you need eighteen Mystic Geegaws to complete your Undersea Mirth Palace, people.

    1. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by SirWhoopass · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article didn't seem to mention hiding. I wonder if they ignored it entirely? If FB did not have the ability to hide applications I'd have quit it a long time ago. Hiding would seem to be an entirely different issue than dropping someone as a 'friend'. There are many people whom I want to still see updates from, I simply do not care about the games/apps at all.

    2. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      You know you can selectively hide all updates from any give app, don't you?

    3. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by pshumate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll confess: I didn't even know about hiding until a few months ago. A lot of people seem to find out about it as if it's a "dirty little secret", which makes no sense. I'd like to see a warning for the first (and only the first) time you attempt to de-friend someone, asking you if you knew about hiding.

    4. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Whoops, saw that you mentioned "Hide". But why would you unfriend someone for their apps if you don't see them at all?

    5. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by pshumate · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I should have just said "Hide". I've not de-friended anyone solely over apps.
      However, if you still use caps lock and babble about stuff like we're still in high school...

    6. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by Spectre · · Score: 1

      See, it's people like you, that "use" Facebook but don't know how to use it, that give it a bad name.

      If you don't want to see Farmville, Mafia Wars, whatever, "Hide" that app, you'll never see another post about it.

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    7. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by sshore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoops, saw that you mentioned "Hide". But why would you unfriend someone for their apps if you don't see them at all?

      Some people make regular posts about items they need in their favorite games in their regular status updates too, which you see even if you've hidden their apps.

      You could hide their status updates or unfriend them. Since you'll no longer be seeing anything from them either way, it comes down to whether you want them to see your activity even if you no longer care for theirs.

    8. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      I've seen some of that, and mostly those folks have found their way into my "hide" category.

      The people whose updates I see aren't congruent with the people who see my updates - I have pretty selective filtering for my updates. But with very few exceptions, I keep the people on as friends even if I don't see their stuff (and they don't see mine) in case of real-world get-togethers, occasional private messages, etc. The only people I've defriended are those old school people from my past who turned out to be complete assholes, and it took Facebook to show me that.

    9. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by pshumate · · Score: 1

      I take it you didn't actually read my post? You know, the one above this one, where I specifically mention "Hiding"?
      See, it's people like you, that "read" a post but don't know how to comprehend it, that give Slashdot users a bad name.

    10. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by gmurray · · Score: 1

      Did you know you can just hide posts from a specific application? You don't need to use the sledgehammer unless warranted.

    11. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by gmurray · · Score: 1

      sorry for the dupe, rss version hid the other comments.

    12. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by mlts · · Score: 1

      What makes FB tolerable is the ban app button. Not just hiding the "Hey, blahblah needs help with getting fertilized" from one app, but making sure those apps don't have a chance to land on your profile.

      For people who rattle on about politics, the Hide button works well there. I don't care if someone is on the left or the right... I just don't care about rants from either side.

      For people who are too stupid to clean their profile out of spammy apps with fake like buttons and other crap in efforts to infect other people, I just drop them in a group with no access. This way, they still think they are friends, and I can undo the action later on without having to re-friend them.

      People who tag pictures that are not me also get the good old fashioned block. Life is too short to deal with flaming rectums.

    13. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by StuartHankins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some people use SO many apps... I have a couple of acquaintances who regularly install apps and it's becoming a real chore to constantly have to block each app. At some point you say "wow this is a lot of work just so I can occasionally hear something interesting about so-and-so".

    14. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by syousef · · Score: 1

      I hid all the farmville etc, and found that I was still not reading anything interesting - it literally wasn't worth the time so I don't bother with FB much anymore.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    15. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Click on the name of the application and click block app. Never be bothered again. It's nice and peaceful without all those time sinks.

    16. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's easy enuf to hide FarmVille/Mafia Wars posts, but when the idiot changes their profile pic every 2nd day and post about the next 'fabulous' cafe they had a donut at again, or how the weather's affecting their mood today...

    17. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People who do that are being rude. Maybe someone should tell them? I haven't seem that myself.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:If By "Useless" You Mean... by karnal · · Score: 1

      I think Spectre hid your posts here on Slashdot. Just sayin'

      --
      Karnal
  18. You learn diffferent things about people online by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are people I've known for years IRL who hold bizarre beliefs I'd never suspected they held, because they don't talk about them in person, but who will happily spout off about these beliefs on FB, LJ, etc. All that religious bigotry, racism, authoritarianism, etc. that people keep buttoned up in personal conversation comes out at the keyboard, even when the people making the posts know that their friends are going to be reading what they write. And yeah, that's been enough to end a few friendships for me, IRL as well as online. You want to post a hundred times about your favorite band? Okay, no problem, I'll just skip past it. You want to talk about how all Muslims are terrorists and all black people are criminals and Barack Hussein Obama is an al-Qaeda robot sent back from the future to terminate American liberties and ensure the rise of the Kenyan cyber-hegemony? Bye now, and don't let the virtual door hit you in the virtual ass on the way out.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Funny

      No kidding -- and I can't even unfriend my wife's family without it being awkward at holidays.

    2. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Barack Hussein Obama is an al-Qaeda robot sent back from the future to terminate American liberties and ensure the rise of the Kenyan cyber-hegemony...

      Wait! Is the Sarah Connor Chronicles coming back for a third season?!?

    3. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Wait! Is the Sarah Connor Chronicles coming back for a third season?!?

      I just wish.

      I've been watching on DVD recently, which is probably why that particular idea occurred to me ... but honestly, I'll bet you could post what I wrote on Free Republic and there are thousands of people who would believe it and repeat it far and wide, and it would be on Fox News within a week.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you end every friendship with everyone who has some nutty or controversial ideas, you're either going to end up very lonely or in an echo chamber where all of your friends just agree with you constantly.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by gknoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You want to talk about how all Muslims are terrorists and all black people are criminals and Barack Hussein Obama is an al-Qaeda robot sent back from the future to terminate American liberties and ensure the rise of the Kenyan cyber-hegemony? Bye now, and don't let the virtual door hit you in the virtual ass on the way out.

      Do you challenge them on these beliefs? Do you tell them that their beliefs (and hatred and bigotry) are why you're no longer willing to consider them a friend?

      While I doubt that your friends are deliberately trolling you (or others) by posting extreme things which they do not actually believe, it may be that they've never thought it through and seen the holes... or perhaps never had to defend the position. It's possible that challenging them may make them ignore you, or even re-hide their inner beliefs, but some of them might really be able to grow in their perception of the world.

    6. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by halivar · · Score: 1

      When you get down to it, everyone is a nutter. Except me.

    7. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I'll try to have a reasonable debate, if the opinion is being expressed by someone I like and respect. But all too often it just turns into a pointless shouting match.

      Slashdotters love to complain about the low quality of debate here, but honestly, in comparison to most of the rest of the internet, the tone here looks like a model of formal rhetoric. Facebook ... not so much.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    8. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like having friends who have different political and religious beliefs from mine. It keeps my on my toes, makes me examine my own beliefs, and can provide hours of entertaining conversation. But I do not enjoy being shouted at by crazy people. A big part of having an online life is learning when things have gone over that line.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful. I've unfriended several people because of their extremist beliefs, their lack of tolerance for others, and/or their association with offensive people or groups. I don't want anyone to think I share their views, and I don't like wincing when I see some of the stuff people are willing to post.

    10. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry but if you (not you "you" but the generic "you") seriously believe that Obama was born in Africa then trying to reason with you is like trying to reason with the crazy cat lady pushing her shopping cart. You can't reason with crazy.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    11. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe people don't really mean comments such as "Barack Hussein Obama is an al-Qaeda robot sent back from the future to terminate American liberties and ensure the rise of the Kenyan cyber-hegemony" to be taken seriously?

    12. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I was exaggerating, of course. But take away the science-fictional aspects, and there are people who believe the rest of it implicitly. Some of them used to be friends of mine; not any more.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    13. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you challenge them on these beliefs?

      Tried that. They unfriended me.

    14. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by operagost · · Score: 1

      Your use of comedic exaggeration tells me you've defriended a lot of people for much, much more minor "offenses". Like disliking having a mosque near Ground Zero or disagreeing with the President's policies.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    15. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I want to unfriend my Mom for the 3-5 biblical quotations a day. Posting anonymously just in case...

    16. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Do you challenge them on these beliefs?

      I do! In one case, it drove my wife's crazy cousin to learn to use Facebook filters such that I don't see any of her posts anymore.

      One of my personal flaws is that if someone posts something unambiguously ,factually wrong, I have to correct them. I can do it politely and diplomatically, but I can't not do it. Repeatedly, if necessary.

    17. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Like disliking having a mosque near Ground Zero or disagreeing with the President's policies.

      These things are on a spectrum.

      I have people on my Facebook lists who disagree with some/most/all of the President's policies.

      I also have people on my Facebook list who actually believe the President is secret Communist intent on literally transforming America into the image of Stalin's U.S.S.R., and very likely to succeed in doing so. Those people don't disagree; they're batshit fucking insane.

      One of those kinds of people you can have a discussion with, and one of those kinds of people you can't.

    18. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you could reason with crazy people, there would be no crazy people.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      minor "offenses". Like disliking having a mosque near Ground Zero

      Religious bigotry is no minor offense.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but, but..... 9-11 was an inside job man!!!

    21. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Jainith · · Score: 1

      My mother is on facebook.

      Over the last few years she her views have been trending more and more towards "christian fundamentalism".

      Every-time she posts one of those ... lets get a revolution started...repost if you agree... links I want to flame her.

      But its my own mother... what do I do?

    22. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of funny that Saudi Arabia, THE DE FACTO HOME OF RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY, funds those types of things...

    23. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by karnal · · Score: 1

      I had a person blacklist me from her profile because I challenged her opinion on a mutual friend's status update (had a fuck or ass or shit or something "evil" in it...) The woman was asking the mutual friend not to swear on facebook - and he's in an alternative/hard rock band. Which, if I recall, uses profanities in their lyrics on occasion - and I thought it was kind of interesting that someone that close to him would actually request him not to swear.

      She threatened to report me to facebook... of which I replied that me disagreeing with what she said didn't mean it was an internet bannable offense. I actually took a snapshot of the conversation because I found it so amusing. I wonder if I'll laugh at that as I look through my photo archives in 40 years.... lol

      --
      Karnal
    24. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really need to be reminded, more often than you already are via other means, just how much her parents disapprove of you? the safe, easy and preferred way to unfriend the inlaws on facebook is to delete the whole bloody account.

      too bad you can't just flip a switch to 'ignore' in real life.

    25. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      ...

      But its my own mother... what do I do?

      You shrug your shoulders and sigh; she's going to be dead in a few years anyway, and it's not like that stuff really matters.

    26. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being religious is no minor offense.

      Fixed that for you.

    27. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Do you challenge them on these beliefs? Do you tell them that their beliefs (and hatred and bigotry) are why you're no longer willing to consider them a friend?

      Is it my job to correct all the hatred and idiocy in the world?

      Nope, I agree with the OP, just get them out of your life. Some people just refuse to learn and will believe whatever it is they believe until the bitter end regardless of the truth.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    28. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Rantastic · · Score: 1

      Religion is no minor offense.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    29. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by bythescruff · · Score: 1

      It gets worse. The other day I found out this girl I like actually believes in homeopathy.

      (shudders)

      --
      Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
    30. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were a debate about something rational, it'd be worthwhile.

      He's talking about conspiratorial mass delusions. I don't blame him for not trying to sway them. Either you are the kind of person who falls prey to fortune-telling, or you aren't. People who buy into that stuff... you can talk to them until they're blue in the face. They'll still listen to Beck, get tarot readings, etc. It's a waste of breath and/or keystrokes.

    31. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I’m all for equal treatment. I say they have just as much right to build a mosque there as Americans have to picket it and draw caricatures of their self-proclaimed prophet, Muhammad (who we already know is a liar since he also claimed to be illiterate but managed to write a book, which should make him sort of the opposite of being illiterate, by definition).

      So, as soon as Muslims (at the very least, American Muslims) can come to some sort of semi-official general agreement that freedom of speech is not something that true followers of Islam punish with beheadings, I’ll be much more acquiescent to their desire to build a mosque a few yards from where a few of their loony nutjobs killed a bunch of my fellow Americans.

    32. Re:You learn diffferent things about people online by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      The inlaws, actually, aren't as much of a problem as the extended family.

      My father-in-law is super die-hard liberal, but he's not the kind of guy who gets in your face about it.

      The entire rest of his family, somehow, are the kind of people who not only believe everything Glenn Beck says is absolutely true, but generally think the truth is even more full of secret liberal conspiracies that make no sense and would no way even advance an actual liberal agenda. Basically they think every member of the Democratic party is a question-marked costume away from being the Riddler.

  19. It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if I unfriended everyone who posted inane junk on their wall, I'd have no friends. It's easier to just quit Facebook.

    1. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by vlm · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if I unfriended everyone who posted inane junk on their wall, I'd have no friends. It's easier to just quit Facebook.

      That worked for me. Oh, by the way, here is my 243rd post proudly declaring that I'm going to the gym to work out today.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by vlm · · Score: 1

      Hey world, I just typed "apt-get update" on one of my servers. Freaking amazing huh? Especially since I run testing and upgrade about once a week. Well you all stay tuned and I'll let you know next week when I run "apt-get update". Wasn't "Americas next top idol model" just super amazing last night?!! ?? I can't believe he said that to her after she said that to him.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by vlm · · Score: 1

      OK my little facebook minions, just posting my status from my IPAD YES MY MY MY IPAD NOT YOURS BECAUSE YOU DON"T HAVE ONE that here I am again at school dropping off the kids. Yes just like every day from the previous month where I posted each and every time. Oh my kids are so cute. You all stay tuned for the next 8 months or so for each time I drop the kids off at school, except for christmas holiday. Oh and by the way here is a completely irrelevant quote from $my_religious_diety or $my_political_party because mine is better than yours and obviously you want to hear all about that!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by vlm · · Score: 1

      Hi facebook pals, especially the kid that ate lunch with me once in the fall semester of 8th grade whom I haven't seen since, you know you are such a special friend to me. Well here we are at Wednesday hump day so I figured all 548 of my facebook friends, especially the ones that live more than 1000 miles away, want to hear that I'm going to eat dinner at McDonalds dollar value meal tonight! Any of you single ladies whom love a big spender, you just feel free to dress up and join me for dinnre. Yea for me. And heres a picture of me drinking a beer in the parking lot so that the crazy prudes in the HR department won't hire me, and/or the cops can cite me for public drunkeness. Isn't technology great? Anyway I'll be sure to post every time I go .. anywhere!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by vlm · · Score: 0

      Oh sorry Slashdot I thought I was posting in my facebook tab. Damn that firefox...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You need to find better friends.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:It was easier for me to just unfriend Facebook by The-Bobmeister · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if I unfriended everyone who posted inane junk on their wall, I'd have no friends. It's easier to just quit Facebook.

      That worked for me. Oh, by the way, here is my 243rd post proudly declaring that I'm going to the gym to work out today.

      My pet peeve is the salespeople. One of my former FB friends was a travel agent and sent daily status updates promoting the best travel deals, along with his agency's web site and phone number. One shamelessly promoted his wife's Tupperware business, and another used FB to advertise his home-based scented candle franchise. One friend even posted "Anyone interested in a two storey, four bedroom house?".

      ...and don't get me started on those stream-of-consciousness folks who contemplate what they thinking of having for supper tonight... and those who actually post photos of their meals!

  20. Useless posts ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of like Slashdot!

  21. Helpful? Not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    But perhaps good for a laugh; A group that bluntly attempts to address the problem.

    Shut up about yourself.

  22. True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only person i've unfriended was posting their political bullfooey 2-3 times a day. I don't talk to my friends about politics, that ish is personal and one-sided.

    1. Re:True by vakuona · · Score: 1

      All I talk to my friends about _is_ politics. What sort of friends do you have whose feelings you are afraid to hurt over some good political discussion?

  23. Now I can justify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being on Facebook on my lab time: researching!

  24. First... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Useless post!

  25. someone is studying this? by shadowrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone spent the time to determine that if you are a polarizing inappropriate racist you won't have many friends?

    1. Re:someone is studying this? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just checked Glenn Beck's facebook page and he has plenty of friends.

    2. Re:someone is studying this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave out all the details that the research is about. It is as if someone determined how much water a towel could hold, and you ridicule him by telling him that he just wasted his time determining that towels can hold water. That's not what he was doing.

    3. Re:someone is studying this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Au contraire. You could probably find a website for your polarizing inappropriate racist ideas and chat happily for hours with the other crazies on-line

  26. Events by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

    I tend to unfriend people if they invite me (and everyone else on their friends list) to stupid events that I don't care about.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:Events by pshumate · · Score: 1

      I've been getting a lot of these. In the past week, I've been invited to three yard sales in the town in which I grew up. Sure, I'll be there to rifle through stuff you can't quite send to Goodwill, never mind that I'm halfway across the continent now.
      Good grief, I'm pissed at Facebook a lot lately.

  27. This is why I don't get Twitter by melted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is why I don't get Twitter. There, uselessness of the post is not only encouraged, but also enforced by post length limitations, and by the lack of relevance-filtered feed. It's pretty much white noise.

    1. Re:This is why I don't get Twitter by AndrewNeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obviously you don't get Twitter, because you should follow things that interest you and aren't noise. Now it's very likely that people you friend on Facebook are friended because they are actual real life friends or family. I don't have a social obligation to follow my family on Twitter, but I can subscribe to accounts that I feel are not noise, and remove ones that are. If you're following noise on Twitter (or Facebook, really) it's your own damn fault.

    2. Re:This is why I don't get Twitter by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Insightful my ass. The fact that you don't find value doesn't mean there isn't any. I used it to track my eating habits and improve my health. It was great feed back and diary.

      If you look at everything everyone is saying is always going to be what noise. It's like putting all the book in a library together and saying is useless beasue it's just a bunch or random letters.

      I have no use for a street paver, but that doesn't make the useless.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:This is why I don't get Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter, used properly, is a giant IRC chatroom :) Only place I've ever used it is at conferences such as Defcon, where you tag posts (with #defcon in this case) and the feed is displayed on the main screens in the hall. It's actually pretty useful as people are talking about the lines, what's going in the rooms and where everyone is going out to eat.

      the other 360 days of the year...yeah..useless.

    4. Re:This is why I don't get Twitter by melted · · Score: 1

      >> people you friend on Facebook

      I have deleted my Facebook account due to it being too much of a time drain. Been a user for a couple of years. And Facebook actually doesn't show me every single irrelevant piece of drivel people post, it limits my feed to those messages that it thinks may be of interest to me, and generally it does a pretty good job.

    5. Re:This is why I don't get Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter is better for all the reasons you just listed. Post limitations keep people from ranting about irrelevant drivel, and make it A.D.D. friendly. You can setup timelines to have relevant feeds to your interests and I'm glad you're not using it, because it kinda sounds like you're uninformed and don't really have anything good to say anyway. =] Cheers!

  28. Reasons I unfriend people by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I get lots of friendship requests from people I knew in the past, such as high school classmates. I usually accept these, thinking stupidly that these people actually want to talk to me or god forbid, catch up on old times.

    Most of the time, I accept these and send a message asking what they've been up to and so on. These messages almost always go unanswered.

    Seriously, what's the point of "friending" (is that a verb now?) someone if you have no intent to communicate?

    Of course, we've already beaten to death the constant barrage of inane game and application request posts, which are equally annoying.

    1. Re:Reasons I unfriend people by inordinate · · Score: 1

      If I ever do something like that (I don't really friend much anymore unless I've hung out with someone a few times recently, although I'm thinking I might do at least one more eventually), my reason for friending is usually some sort of feeling of a lost chance, and the reason I don't say anything is fear of rejection (although if you send a message, I will probably respond, probably in at most a week) Usually when I friend someone, I have the hope that maybe we might catch up sometime or it might turn into an opportunity, but I know that it usually doesn't go anywhere. I can get afraid to actually send messages to people who I haven't talked to in a while (or much at all, often times). Thinking about it, it's a little irrational. It doesn't matter too much anymore, though, maybe, because I'm in a little better of a social situation than I was a few years ago.

  29. Social ego complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm probably very much in the minority, but in my own life, I have about 3 people (aside from my parents) who I would consider true friends (as in, if the shit hit the fan, they would be there).

    This, I believe, is the perhaps the problem with social networks (obviously, this isn't always the case). It tends to be less about a way to connect with your friends and more often a way to satisfy a persons own ego.

    Whether that's good or bad I leave up to the reader.

  30. Prawn by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1

    Facebemybospacebook friends aren't real friends, as they are usually violet/orange.

    You are a Prawnus Maximus.

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  31. All posts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All posts on Facebook are useless.

  32. Dislike button... by seanvaandering · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe Facebook should implement a "dislike" button... that might give those who feel that updating their status about their bowel functions every couple hours a day is really not that interesting and that yes, your actually losing friends over it.

    1. Re:Dislike button... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's really a problem, why not post a comment on the next "OMG, it's a huge one, made a big splash today!" with a simple "TMI!" or a short but eloquent comment to the fact that nobody wants to see those updates.

      A "dislike" button is just going to have them sending you a message going "why didn't you like that?" anyway, so you might as well just avoid the rigmarole and tell the exactly what the problem is right from the start.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Dislike button... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I see what your saying, but for some reason, people put a lot of value in things like the 'like' option. I would suspect dislike would be a quite way to let them know what kind of posts people don't like without needing to take a defense position. If they reach out to you for disliking them, then just tell them on the side.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Dislike button... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I actually wish Facebook had a Dislike button exclusively because it would reduce (but of course not eliminate due to human stupidity) the number of "Dislike button, really works, click here for a free iPad while you're at it!" apps that too many of my moron ex-friends-to-be keep clicking on.

  33. I just turn people's news feeds off for 2 reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. They keeping posting their game accomplishments over and over
    2. They just recently got married and keep posting how much in love they are (I'm single)

  34. Ignore user is easy by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Long ago I found some setting where you can set ignore posts from a person. No insult given and no more "I'm bored" posts( or more specifically "im board' posts.)
    I forget the setting but that is what Google is for.
    Although this is best for people who have nothing useful to say. The worst is when 1 post in 100 is critical.

    1. Re:Ignore user is easy by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Currently it's an "X" button that appears to the right of each post when you mouse over it. Click and you'll get options to Hide posts from that user, or from that application if it's an app-generated message (eg. Farmville crud).

  35. How can I "like" this??? by AndyAndyAndyAndy · · Score: 1

    This article's awesome! I want everyone I know to see it and also to know that I'm SOOOOOOooooo tired.

    --
    It's always confirmation bias!
  36. Friends by themerky1 · · Score: 1

    Lots of friendships die anyway. You win some you lose some.

    1. Re:Friends by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      Lots of friendships die anyway. You win some you lose some.

      C'mon, this is /. and the article is about Facebook, don't you mean "loose some"?

    2. Re:Friends by themerky1 · · Score: 1

      I like them tight.

  37. Gotta say... by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    I gave a little laugh at the "Samzenpus likes this" note at the bottom :-)

    Cute.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  38. Hidden by way2slo · · Score: 1

    De-friending seems harsh for only a constant barrage of drivel. Just use the Hide feature and most of the drivel is gone. Especially the Game related as you can choose to hide the game messages or the person. Just pick the game and you still get the real messages and keep your friend.

    Only De-friended someone once when a friend got divorced and I did not care to hear their ex's bs.

  39. Don't Delete by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    Just hide them. So now I don't have to read useless garbage from my young cousin and he can't complain that I unfriended his ass!

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  40. Unnecessary by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    It is possible to change your settings so it won't show posts from certain people in your news feed.

    1. Re:Unnecessary by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It is possible to change your settings so it won't show posts from certain people in your news feed.

      Sure. Just edit filter_innd.pl and then run
      ctlinnd reload filter.perl 'Updated filter to block certain people

  41. Acquaintances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ..FB doesn't separate acquaintances from actual friends. I friend a lot of people I know or have met so their numbers show up in my Android phone on the off chance I need to call them, when I don't *actually* maintain a close friendship with them. Some people don't friend acquaintances. Others friend people they don't know at all. FB needs to have a way to separate these people into groups so viewing and posting permissions can be appropriately and easily applied.

    1. Re:Acquaintances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the current "groups" system?

  42. People don't socialize to debate by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    People socialize to maintain relationships, to know what's going on in each other's lives, and provide support, encouragement, and a laugh or two. This works online and offline. It's not really complicated.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  43. News just in... by Eggbloke · · Score: 0

    You aren't friends with people who talk shit, in real live or on facebook.

    --
    I care not for your karma and your mod points.
  44. not meant to last by kwoff · · Score: 1

    I usually unfriend for reasons like those in the article. I rationalize it like this: yes, it's great reconnecting with friends from highschool or college, but if it was so important to remain friends, why did we not communicate for the last 10 years? We've grown apart, or really we weren't friends in the first place. Oh, you'd like us to pray to Jesus for.... right, the LORD Jesus.... yeah, okay the LORD OUR SAVOIR JESUS....

    Some things aren't meant to last. Have a nice life, byebye....

  45. "Friends" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish Facebook would make "App Friends" and "Friend Friends". My wife has like 4,000 friends, only about 20 of which are real friends. I'd love it if there was a clear easy way/toggle to show/not show posts from app friends, etc.

    1. Re:"Friends" by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      There is... they’re called Friend lists... and all you have to do is click the name of the list to see only the updates from friends in that list. Bookmark it or get it associated with “f...” in the Awesome bar.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  46. Useless Posts? by Anomalyx · · Score: 1

    Therefore we can conclude that if Slashdot were to be a Facebook page, it would have very few friends.

    --
    No, there is no "-1 I'LL NEVER ADMIT BEING WRONG!!!" mod.
  47. And riskiest is 'automatic updates' / i.e. Twitter by VoxBoston · · Score: 1

    So, a band I'm in signed up for "Tweet For A Track" - basically, a service that gives away a free song to folks to Twitter about the record. Mildly-bribed social networking. There are pros/cons to this approach, but we thought we'd try it. Of course, our twitter feed is linked to FB (tweets become FB Wall posts automatically). One day it dawns on us that Tweet for A Track had been sending the same, repeated, now-getting-quite-spammy promotional tweets every couple of weeks - and thus creating a host of boring, spammy FB Wall posts. Yikes! We had to go kill the TFaT / Twitter connection and then hand-delete all the FB posts. Not good. So, the moral of the story is be very very careful about any 'services' you sign up for that have the power to post stuff, directly or indirectly, to your FB Wall. You can automate the process of alienating your friends very easily via these handy-dandy services.

  48. merc by merc · · Score: 1

    liked this.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  49. Social Construction Theory by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

    Gaining an understanding of the way the network of friends morphs based on wants and needs is interesting. Using that insight to try and maintain a maximum number of friends is questionable at best. I would much rather use such information to let people know that they do not need to feel guilty about unfriending because it is normal, or if the results seem irrational we can know how "normal" people think so that we can be sure to avoid such behavior in the future, even if just for ourselves.

    TL;DR Now you know if you are normal on FB. Yay?

    --
    Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
  50. Accosted by Poor Taste by Alcoholic+Synonymous · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I defriended someone for movie reviews. Not because they were filled with spoilers. Because they were awful. I take movies and film making very seriously (even the low/no budget films). I used to work around low budget films, I have friends that still do.

    She would say stuff about how indy or arthouse films were hard to follow so she turned them off 10 minutes into them (or just avoided them), but in the next post would praise whatever summer blockbuster she saw that day. She actually said several of my favorite acclaimed films were stupid but then posted a raving review of how Transformers 2 was the best movie she ever saw.

    I thought she wasn't serious at first, but after several of months of seeing it, I realized she was the reason Micheal Bay keeps getting to make more movies. I didn't want to be a witness to that.

    1. Re:Accosted by Poor Taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic, but has to be said: Seconded. Glad I'm not the only one.

      And that's not to say everything from Hollywood is drivel, but it's definitely over-hyped. Yes, particularly recently Micheal Bay movies.

    2. Re:Accosted by Poor Taste by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      You unfriended someone because of their taste in cinema? Really? REALLY?

      I want you to take a few minutes to reflect upon what you've done. If you come to the conclusion you might be crazy, you're on to something.

      If not, shine on you crazy person.

    3. Re:Accosted by Poor Taste by Alcoholic+Synonymous · · Score: 1

      More like, I unfriended someone for their lack of taste in Cinema.

      Another way to look at it, and a bigger piece of the picture, is that the person was generally clueless and obnoxious. Someone who tore apart anything intellectual and thoughtful purposely to bring the conversations down to their level. Instead of admitting that didn't understand something, or that they had the attention span of a gnat, they were harshly critical of anything not catering to their limited capacities.

      It wasn't just movies, it was anything artistic or requiring thought. Don't dare discuss anything technical, political, or philosophical in their presence. No only were you unarguably wrong for unexplainable reasons, you were also an idiot for not agreeing with them.

      Movies were just the one thing constantly being posted to Facebook that emphasized how judgmental, stupid and tasteless she was.

      But hey, if you want to tolerate people who constantly insult and belittle your interests, thoughts, and ultimately feelings, feel free to surround yourself with them. I quietly cut this person off from my real life, and Facebook was the last arena in which I had contact with them.

      I personally don't need "friends" like that.

    4. Re:Accosted by Poor Taste by istartedi · · Score: 1

      You unfriended someone because of their taste in cinema? Really? REALLY?

      Maybe there are some Harvard professors out there who have friends that always talk about "shopping, hairstyles, and OMG did you see that dress???"

      I'm sure it gets old for the professor quickly. From the other side, maybe she wonders why he just blankly stares when she talks.

      Some people are "mass market". Other people are geeks. This is Slashdot. That he unfriended somebody who likes mass-market cookie-cutter movies doesn't surprise me. Why should he be forced to bore himself with someone like that?What's wrong with wanting to hang out with people who are on the same level? I say, nothing.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:Accosted by Poor Taste by Fatalis · · Score: 1

      I think he ultimately unfriended her for being quite dumb, not just for having a different taste in cinema.

      --
      Deus est fatalis
  51. You can just hide them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than unfriend them I hide people's posts. If I want to check up on what you're doing I'll go to your page. If not, I don't pay attention, but you don't know about it.

  52. Babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Favourite bands have got nothing on babies. Each time another girl I went to school with has a baby, another unending stream of crap photos and posts begins, and I mark the to not show in my newsfeed. If I had a child and turned into a photo posting retard, I'd at least have the decency to make a facebook account for the child and post the shit there; at least then only people who opted in would receive the barrage of spam about the midget

  53. when did "unfriended" become a verb? by LordBullGod · · Score: 0

    There is a simple way you won't get "unfriended"....don't subscribe to social networking, at all (any flavor). I have never been friended, unfriended, tweeted or blogged. Simple! Go game or something... Maybe I'm just getting old, or tired of hearing about the interwebs social anything.

  54. research results can not be the truth by MichaelKristopeit+25 · · Score: 1

    the top and ONLY reason for "facebook unfriending" is signing up for a facebook account in the first place.

  55. You know what pisses me off with FB? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you're trying to track down old female friends from school, but they've changed their surname since they got married, and now they have a picture of a baby up as their profile pic. How the fuck are you supposed to know it's them?! How are you supposed to know whether to add them or not? Grrrr! Attention, bitches! Not everyone thinks your baby is cute! We just want to get a look at you and see how well you held off the flab over the years so we can gloat about how we're living a more fulfilling life than you are!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:You know what pisses me off with FB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget to take out the trash out from the basement.

      Sincerely,

      Your mom.

    2. Re:You know what pisses me off with FB? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Don't forget to take out the trash out from the basement.

      Sincerely,

      Your mom.

      I don't live with my mom, I live with your mom. Remember? I must tell her to give you a good spanking after I bone her tonight. You need to learn some respect for your elders, you little scamp!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:You know what pisses me off with FB? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Actually this is one of the things that pisses me off, too. This, and changing your name to some made-up name that has nothing to do with your real name. Your profile picture should be really you. Your name should be really your name. This makes it so that people can find you, and it makes it so that when you show up in my friend feed I’m not sitting there going “who the fuck is this?” and forced to visit your profile and check the photos of them to figure out who they are. Yes, I actually know who all of my friends are, and if someone adds me and I don’t know who they are I won’t add them back...

      I currently have somebody with 8 mutual friends awaiting friend confirmation because I don’t know who they are. Rather than clicking ignore, I figured I might ask one of the mutual friends if they know who the person is next time I see them. In the meantime... they can wait.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  56. Yogi Berra by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

    No one uses Facebook anymore, it's too crowded.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  57. useless medium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You shouldn't put too much into anything you post on Facebook, because anything overtly personal can and will be used against you. Therefore, people only post endless streams of banalities, for fear that any hint of an opinion about something might offend somebody. However, banality is itself offensive, or at least boring, so why bother posting at all?

    Sometimes someone will post a picture or a link that is interesting, but otherwise Facebook posts are pure drivel. What's the last truly insightful or interesting thing you've seen on Facebook? I really can't think of anything, it's pure pablum. I enjoyed learning a bit about a few people from my past, but now the only reason I log in is out of idle boredom, and I always leave feeling wishing I could get that little bit of my life back. It's entertaining on the level of watching a soap opera. Maybe worse.

  58. half of it is facebook junk by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Half of the clutter is the stupid "someone commented on someone's status." I NEVER want to see that from ANYONE-- the first time I did, I thought, "oh, I didn't even know they were sick!". I can use a Greasmonkey script, but that's often inconvenient. Remove those, and that would be a huge improvement in the experience. It looks like someone left debugging turned on in the code.

    Also, I find the "hide" feature virtually never accomplishes what I'm after. I don't recall the specifics at the moment because I stopped using it some time ago because it was never useful.

  59. Narcisists and Advertisers by glatiak · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can relate to this. I eventually dumped Facebook because of the flood of inane posts and the dumping I got from news vendors when I 'liked' them. Oh, I read and enjoy the info from SciAM, the Globe&Mail and so forth. But finding my Facebook page becoming an unreadable dumping ground was too much. In the end I shut down my Facebook page because it was nothing but clutter. 'Liking' anybody was just an invite for a nonstop dump of everything they were flogging -- better off to stick with email. At least THAT could be controlled.

  60. Downfall of western civilization... by grepya · · Score: 1

    .... is foreshadowed by completely serious statements as follows:

    "Researchers spend a lot of time examining how people form friendships online but little is known on how those relationships end"

  61. The most useless by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... posts are those stupid likey-link-farm "likes". You can't comment on them, and you can't hide them unless you hide everything that your "friend" posts.

    1. Re:The most useless by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      I have mod points, but I must correct you.

      At the right of a linky-link-farm or me-so-bad-maffia posting, click on the "x". You have the option of ignoring the user or the app. Ignore the app, and all app postings from all users stop.

    2. Re:The most useless by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 2, Informative

      But likey farm links aren't apps, though. Your only choice is to hide the user, or report it as spam.
      Which actually sounds like good idea, now that I think about it.

  62. Define 'polarizing' by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

    Define 'polarizing'. Do you mean taking a strong stance; for example being strongly for or against a hot-button issue-of-the-day? I am against same-sex marriage and have posted this to FB many times. I got comments from friends who disagreed and even a nasty-gram from one, but no one unfriended me. Anyway, the big pet-peeve for me is people who never post anything at all but have signed up for apps that spam the bejeebers out of everyone. Block the app, rinse, repeat. Then you find their accounts have no activity at all.

    1. Re:Define 'polarizing' by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Normal people don't start spouting off their most controversial opinions in a group of their friends and relatives unless they're in the middle of an in-depth discussion that led to it. Why would it be OK to randomly post that shit on facebook?

  63. I thought that useless posts were the whole point. by aekafan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean what else is there on Facebook?

  64. Heck, I leave forums for the same. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Left MacRumors because of the religious hate there, the constant harassment and the like, why should facebook be any different.

    People don't stick around negative people for very long. Just like in real life, I tend to stay away from those who are sour.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  65. ObXKCD by sconeu · · Score: 1
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  66. That's the reason I didn't join by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the reason I didn't join facebook in the first place. I also didn't want to put anyone else in that position myself.

  67. trolling by raedeon · · Score: 1

    people delete me when i troll them too much. its really their own fault for posting so much stupid shit

  68. Alternative by idlewire · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't actually have to un-friend someone to stop getting their updates. Just click the X on your news feed by their status update and then "Hide" them. I've had to do this several times and it actually was due to the repetitive nature of their updates. But I'd still like to be able to keep in touch with them, should the spirit ever move me. Besides I only have 3 friends, if I went the un-friending route, it would just be me and my mother.

  69. Elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've defriended for really, really horribly boring photos. You know, the ones who go to cities and just take a bunch of pictures of themselves in front of various things. Granted, this was a girl I had met at a club and had only talked to once or twice.

  70. The implication is that ANY posts are useful by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    I have not found this to be the case, yet. Maybe I need new friends.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  71. funny nonsense :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fact is, you don't really need to unfriend anybody to stop seeing his updates.
    just click on the x mark in the upper right corner of the post and say yes to remove this users post from my news feeds, and voila, all the annoying posts disappear.
    all the contact info, and option to contact the person about topics you can talk about still stays as it was.

    this behavior is equivalent to stopping talking to anybody who has different view about politics or church or maybe sarah palin :)
    you would not have many friends left to talk to :)

    proof word: loners :D

  72. Why have a Facebook to begin with? by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    Lately, new people I meet always ask me if I have a Facebook account; or rather, they ask me what mine is, presuming I have one. I don't, and I tell them so, but offer them my email address and/or website URL instead; and they usually decline.

    I'm trying to figure out for what possible reason I would want a Facebook account. I've had a website of my own that I control and can give whatever functionality I want (and remove any I don't want) since before Facebook existed, so I have no use for it as a means of expressing myself. Anything I want to share about myself with the world, I can put up there.

    As for communication, there's still email and a variety of instant messaging and chat protocols that I make extensive use of.

    So what possible reason would I have for wanting a Facebook, and why would people want to know my Facebook account and yet have no interest in my email or website?

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:Why have a Facebook to begin with? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      why do you have a website?

    2. Re:Why have a Facebook to begin with? by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      So what possible reason would I have for wanting a Facebook, and why would people want to know my Facebook account and yet have no interest in my email or website?

      They want you to friend them so their friend count goes up by 1 and they can get the high score.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    3. Re:Why have a Facebook to begin with? by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      To have a place to put things that I want to share with other people (my writing, my art, whatever). Why does anybody have a website?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    4. Re:Why have a Facebook to begin with? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      So then have one. Drop FB.

    5. Re:Why have a Facebook to begin with? by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I already have a website (have since before FB existed), and I've never had a FB. What's your point?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  73. Filtering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually when I have had friends post too much, I have just filtered them for a while. After some period of time I unfilter.

    Then again, I actually have met and know the people on my list so I don't just delete someone on a whim

    1. Re:Filtering? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Same here (on both counts). One guy I filtered from my newsfeed because of the daily status updates about how happy he was about his girlfriend (yeah... okay dude, we get it. Where’s the obligatory XKCD?). As far as removing friends, I’ve only done that for certain fallings-out or if they made complete asses of themselves in arguments. If they want to post their opinion, fine, we’ll all post our opinions and then we can shut up. Some people can’t let it go, though. Seriously, arguing via facebook? I have better things to do. Like arguing via slashdot... at least here the article is locked after 2 weeks...

      As far as ignoring the majority of the pointless drivel, well, that’s easy enough... I ignore about 90% of the news feed updates anyway, only stopping to read the ones that particularly happen to catch my eye.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  74. Network Effect by ed.markovich · · Score: 1

    The only reason I prune my FB friend list is that having random people on there reduces the value of the system.

    I do a lot of college recruiting and I often connect with people I am interested in on FB. First, it just helps to connect faces to names when we try to remember later what we liked about a candidate. Second, it provides a easy way to keep in touch with them (eg: we didn't hire someone this year because they weren't ready, but maybe next year). But eventually the people from schools I recruit from became a hefty minority of my friends on FB, and FB started suggesting their friends to me. Which makes sense algorithmically but that's not people I know. Eventually I went back and removed all the candidates that didn't pan out, and FB went back to suggesting (occasionally) people I really did want to reconnect with.

  75. Re:I just turn people's news feeds off for 2 reaso by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

    2. They just recently got married and keep posting how much in love they are (I'm single)

    First boyfriends are vastly worse.

  76. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where the fuck are the doggie pics? informative, my ass

    MOD
    THE
    FUCK
    DOWN

  77. News for nerds and Stuff that matters by Temtongkek · · Score: 1

    This is news? Am I missing something?

  78. All social media by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    This is why I don't use any social media. Twitter has to be the absolute worst invention in the world. I don't get it just like I don't get people who respond to spam.

  79. Commercials by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Considering most "free" applications in facebook require you to spam commercials for said application to all your friends, I see this as no surprise really.

    I "hide" them as fast as I can, but new applications come out ever week to take its place. When you have some friends that seemingly that's all they do with their time, its just easier to "unfriend" than it is to keep "hiding" apps.

    Unemployed or stay at home females tend to be the worst offenders in my opinion. They seem to have a lot of time for "farmville, etc..."

    Stupid pictures of kids and pets I can deal with. Bombarding me with "Hey I am playing this app, you should to!" a million times is the line.

  80. Even worse than 'the 100th post about your band' by JonStewartMill · · Score: 1

    the people who begin every work week with a post reading "Aww crap, it's Monday" and end it with one that says "Yay, it's Friday!".

  81. rather than unfriending, simply filter by estobancrikey · · Score: 1

    faceboook doesnt have fine grained filtering, you either hide a person completely, or unfriend them, or put up with their junk posts. luckily theres a third party solutoin that does give you more filtering options: Facebook Purity FTW! http://www.fbpurity.com/