Slashdot Mirror


Cooking With Your USB Ports

tekgoblin writes "Wow, I would never have thought to try and cook food with the power that a standard USB port provides, but someone did. A standard port provides 5V of power, give or take a little. I am not even sure what it takes to heat a small hotplate, but I am sure it is more than 5V. It looks like the guy tied together around 30 USB cables powered by his PC to power this small hotplate. But believe it or not, it seems to have cooked the meat perfectly."

188 comments

  1. Volt is not a measurement of power by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Watt is. The important is how much current he can get from supplied voltage. In any case why not just use the fucking stove.

    1. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I hear a lightbulb works just fine too.

    2. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "provides around 5V of power"

      I always knew Slashdot is full of uneducated freetards...

    3. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's hungry at work a lot, and they only have a fridge in the breakroom?

    4. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to Wikipedia, 500mA per USB2.0 port.
      15A * 5V = 75W

    5. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Each powered USB hub supplies a maximum of 0.5 A. Using two or four USB cables against the same hub won't increase that.
      The voltage in USB is a constant +5V.

      So from each powered hub, you can get 0.5 A * 5 V = 2.5 W. Eight of those gives you 20 W, which should be enough to crisp bacon if you make the frying area small enough.

      But hooking up multiple USB cables to each hub serves little purpose (well, you lower the overall resistance a tiny bit, and I guess HiFi freaks would say that it makes the bacon more open and airy).

    6. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Russ1642 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to climb a flight of stairs to get to the kitchen.

    7. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Watt is. The important is how much current he can get from supplied voltage. In any case why not just use the fucking stove.

      HA! Bitter much?

      I'm sure he was not looking for the simplest way to cook, but just for something new and fun. Looks like he got both. I say mad props to him.

    8. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      isnt the current limited to 100mA per port if the device doesnt identify itself?

    9. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hjf · · Score: 1

      USB supplies 100mA 5V, and after negotiation from the USB device and host, and if the host has available power, it can send up to 500mA (in some hosts, like Gigabyte 3x boards this is over 1A). This depends on the controller and drivers - some controllers just send 500mA if available, while others are more zealous and will cut the power if it's over 100mA.

      Assuming it's all standard, this guy is getting 30 ports x 100mA => 3A. 3A x 5V = 15W. or if the host is supplying 500mA per port, 75W. I'd like to know then what would be the temperature rise on that hot plate. Any EEs or physicists here that can make this calculation?

    10. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Vectormatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      per USB spec yes, but there are plenty of hubs/ports which supply the full 500mA regardless

      honestly though, this hack is pointless, you might as well get a cheap ass 350w computer PSU, hook up the 12v to a hotplate and hotwire the thing, much easier

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    11. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      You're right. That's much less pointless than just plugging the hotplate into the outlet the PSU is plugged into.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    12. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by arth1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Technically, yes, but there are plugs out there that say "hi, I'm a USB 2.0 device that needs high power". Commonly found on USB lava lamps and other desk toys, and presumably available from China for not much more than a regular USB plug.

    13. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by mayberry42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...In any case why not just use the fucking stove.

      Because some people enjoy the challenge of creating something fun, new, original and, yes, pointless.

    14. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roughly: (Assuming no losses in power-heat conversion)

      x W = m * c * (DeltaT/time)
      (DeltaT/time) = x / (m * c)

      For a 100g copper plate

      (DeltaT/time) = 75 / (0.386 * 100) ~= 1.94 K/s.

      Of course, now you must subtract how much heat the copper plate loses for it's environment due to convection and radiation to find it's final temperature.

    15. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by pem · · Score: 1
      It's not the "plug" that says that; it's the device.

      The device is allowed to draw up to 100 mA, then must negotiate for more.

    16. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by mac1235 · · Score: 1

      And leave my computer? No way!

    17. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Because some people enjoy the challenge of creating something fun, new, original and, yes, pointless.

      ...I'm sure it was fun and pointless, but as fo for the new and original...

      http://www.stylehive.com/bookmark/thinkgeek-usb-mug-warmer-hub-59352

      That's like saying 5 blades is "new, original" compared to 4 blades.

    18. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from the picture, apparently because he's Japanese, and he can.

    19. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      You could, of course, build such a USB "device" into the cable, if you're just interested in getting higher 5VDC current out. A small MCU in the cable does the negotiation for you, and a few ms later, instant current...

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    20. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by sirlatrom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because the fucking stove is for fucking?

    21. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Does he have an electrical outlet at his desk? I hear they make cooking devices that use those.

      There's nothing wrong with a pointless but look-what-I-did hardware hack. So there's no need to rationalize it.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    22. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Surt · · Score: 1

      Quantum watts, then?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    23. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a Peltier "cooler"?

    24. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Mirey · · Score: 1

      I really can't remember. I tried looking for watt it is, I just couldn't find its name! It really is shocking some of the stuff people have time for in their spare times. Still, some people find less resistance to learning if they go for a hands on approach. Well, theres enough puns faraday.

    25. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hitmark · · Score: 1

      With the recent interest in using USB as a universal charger port, there is also a added spec for 2.0 and later that allows upto 1.5A if there is little to no traffic on the port in question.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    26. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by arielCo · · Score: 1

      In any case why not just use the fucking stove.

      Better yet, use the regular one.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    27. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by marcansoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      None of those "plugs" actually say that, and none of them actually meet the USB spec. They just happen to work... most of the time.

    28. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hitmark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Err, no. If the hub is powered, it should be capable of delivering .5A to each port.

      If not, then the dual plug cables we see for some external drives would be useless.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    29. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by IICV · · Score: 1

      But this isn't pointless-cool, this is pointless-stupid. It would be cool if, say, he'd run power from, say, the PSU's 12v rail - you could actually hook that up, and maybe do a neat little case mod to expose the plug to the outside world. 30 USB ports, though? Where are you going to get 30 USB ports from? And plugging them all in has got to be a pain in the ass.

    30. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Not much to work with there--even the old Easy Bake Ovens used a 100 W bulb, although it probably wasn't that efficient.

    31. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hitmark · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it uses the recent battery charging spec, each port can allow 1.5A if there is little to no data traffic (and 1.8A if the data connectors at the female port is shorted with up to 200 ohm resistance).

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    32. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      "In any case why not just use the fucking stove."

      The fucking stove is for fucking, not cooking. Eww.

    33. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      In any case why not just use the fucking stove.

      You must be new here.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    34. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      whats the challenge of plugging a heater element into a power supply?

      also its not new (this article originally aired in 2006), its not original (you can get cup heaters and even a toaster commercially well before this, heck there is even a sandwich press), and fun in my book is not a blown mother board and food poisoning at the same time

    35. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Insightful

          Why go through the conversion losses at all? Just plug a hotplate into the wall.

        Every conversion has losses. That's why the power supply has heat sinks inside, and usually a fan. It's also why wall warts get warm.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    36. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Osgeld · · Score: 1
    37. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the world coming to? AC has to look up the maximum USB current and gets a response questioning the efficiency of the electricity-to-heat conversion in an incandescent light bulb. Both of you, hand in your geek cards!

    38. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because some people enjoy the challenge of creating something fun, new, original and, yes, pointless.

      it is just pointless

    39. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or even better, use a brazil nut. It was a favourite trick of ours in the Scouts - a single brazil nut contains enough oil (read calories/joules) to fry an egg and a couple of rashers of bacon.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    40. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      In a well insulated, very small, oven with a very,very long cooking time it is possible to cook almost anything.

    41. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not, then the dual plug cables we see for some external drives would be useless.

      They usually are - for a different reason.

    42. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      That's not the only thing that causes the Brazil nuts to heat things up...

      Brazil nuts are known to contain over 12,000 pico curies...

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Banana_equivalent_dose

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    43. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanna hook up my record player to the usb pinout now, GO RETARD TECH!!!

    44. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Only 100mA unless you handshake with the computer to request more which he probably didnt do.

    45. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by arth1 · · Score: 1

      In this case, the plug is the device. The sole function of the "device", i.e. a chip embedded in the plug, is to tell the USB controller "Hi, I'm a USB 2.0 device with ID XXXX, and I am a high power device, i.e. need as many units as you can give".

      This lets the powered device use more than 100 mA, up to the max of 500 mA per powered hub if nothing else is on the same powered hub.

      And yes, these USB chargers or desktop toys show up if you do an "lsusb" (or Device Manager in Windows). But all that's special is the plug, which has a chip that identifakes it as a high power device.

    46. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Restil · · Score: 1

      An incandescent bulb will, indeed. The heat from a typical bulb is enough to match the temperature of a stove on a lower setting, so certainly enough to cook on. However, the typical bulb is 60 to 100 watts. The USB port puts out a max of 2.5 watts. That's an order of magnitude less than even a CFL bulb, and those barely even get warm.

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    47. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      You should be ashamed of yourself. I, for one, strongly protest against burning brazil nuts. So what if they are mentally challenged (as I think is the correct term) and come from an underdeveloped country. They are people too, and therefore burning them to fry eggs and bacon is just cruel.

    48. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Wait, a lightbulb emits enough heat to bake on? You could package that and sell it to kids as a child's oven.

      All you require now is a name... simple-bake? Easy-bake?

      Yeah, let's call it the Easy-bake oven. Let me just run a quick GS to see if anyone has thought of this before... ...

      FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    49. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Thanks, AC, I was coming in here to say that, but not in so many words.

      /EE

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    50. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Assuming standard USB ports: 5V * (500mA * 30 cables) = 5V * 15000mA = 5V * 15A = 75W. 75W could very easily heat up nichrome or similar materials enough to cook meat (ever used a hot wire cutter? the ones for Styrofoam run on single 1.5V cells! nichrome!).

    51. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even going back a bit more...

      http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-mini/Coffee.html

      I think there is one that predates this as well. So, like you said. Not too original.

    52. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by GF678 · · Score: 1

      Because some people enjoy the challenge of creating something fun, new, original and, yes, pointless.

      I think there are enough opportunities out there for people to enjoy the challenge of creating something fun, new, original and USEFUL. We have tons of pointless crap done every day that gets attention. I like reading about useful developments more, if they came from a challenge.

    53. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Wot?

    54. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by whoop · · Score: 1

      Because the wall is full of plugs for all these hubs, duh!!

    55. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Umm...*sigh*

      As your AC replier said with less gumption: do you even know how an incandescent bulb works? I mean, you do know that when a circuit is inefficient the wasted power is HEAT right? And, you must also know of course, that with an incandescent bulb all of the non-wasted power is...HEAT, right? What I'm trying to say is that an incandescent bulb is nearly 100% efficient (or nearly 100% inefficient, since all power is radiated as waste heat).

    56. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Barny · · Score: 1

      Sir, you scare the living bajeezus out of me for knowing exactly how much juice you can drain from a USB port.

      Never, and I mean NEVER come anywhere near the computer store where I work please!

      Although at least you wouldn't be like the tool who run 3 unpowered USB hubs, plug in 3 ipods, a mobile phone and a USB powered toaster (who the FUCK though those were a good idea) and wondered why their computer doesn't work any more.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    57. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by serbanp · · Score: 1

      How ironic that the moron who modded your post as "Troll" just proves that you're right...

    58. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      When an egg is fried at 100,000 feet under a weather balloon. Brought back to Earth piping HOT in a three stage highly telemetrised model rocket going the wrong way, eaten in an egg sandwich, and then posted on YouTube accompanied by My Favourite Things from the Sound of Music then I will be interested.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    59. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      My Holly Happy Oven can do it too

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    60. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by DearOldDad · · Score: 1

      Yep. But there will be no more 100w bulbs in a couple year. They've been outlawed.

    61. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by PacoSuarez · · Score: 1

      That would be for a very large Brazil nut... The number is 12,000 picocuries per kg.

    62. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Thanks....forgot to follow up with that part.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    63. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I'm all in favor of public hangings for adults who can't get their units straight. It would have saved at least one innocent space probe.

      If you're wondering whether I'm sarcastic: I'm not sure...

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    64. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Heh, i read wikipedia...

      So your saying the hubs, ipods, phone and toaster where all plugged into the usb ports of the computer directly? As plugging them into the other stuff into the usb hub should result in nothing more then ignored devices if they asked for to much juice. At least if both the devices and the hubs where well behaved. I can't get 2.5 drive to spin up unless i plug it into the pc directly or a powered hub.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    65. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by ngg · · Score: 1

      (Physicist here) That's correct, though in practice most powered hubs will let you take 500 mA per port without negotiation, and the newer ones that support the USB 2.0 charging spec will let you take even more (~1.8A if you touch the data lines just right). The voltage is also allowed to sag, IIRC, 5% and still be in spec, so assume 4.75 V. That gives a power of 4.75 V * 1.8 A = 8.5 W per port. Times 30, and you could have around 250 W of cooking power. Some of the cheaper hubs (which don't follow the USB spec rigorously) will even allow you to take all the available current through one port, instead of cutting you off at .5 A per, like the better ones do; so, a cheap 4-port hub might have 2 A available on any one port, but not on all simultaneously.

    66. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by broomer · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, they invented 100W 'Heat bulbs' in Germany last month. They give off 99.9% efficient heat, and additionally also some visible light, and they fall outside the EU provisions for lighting equipment.

    67. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Yep. But there will be no more 100w bulbs in a couple year.

      Bullshit.
      You've been listening to the news, but not thinking about it.
      The manufacture (and import) of incandescent light bulbs has been banned in certain countries from last year, so retailers are selling off their inventory of incandescent light bulbs and switching to supplying non-incandescent light bulbs instead (CFLs, HIDs, W-Hal etc.). The reason for this is that these non-incandescents are much more efficient users of electricity for providing visible light than incandescent light bulbs are. But that doesn't prevent anyone from designing and marketing a 100W non-incandescent light bulb. With current technologies, that would be approximately equivalent to a 1400W incandescent light bulb.
      1400W light bulbs would be in the range used by stage lighting, warehouse and workshop illumination and that sort of thing. And they've always had problems with disposing of the excess heat, so I'd imagine that the non-incandescent equivalents would sell pretty readily. It's not as big a market as domestic lighting, of course, but it's a market.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    68. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      A rasher of bacon contains enough oil to fry an egg and a couple of rashers of bacon, and tastes better than a brazil nut :-)

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    69. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Barny · · Score: 1

      Are you using a single USB cable to run it or one of those split ones that lets it draw from 2 ports?

      Because no matter which, plugging both connections or a single connection into an un-powered hub means your trying to suck 2-3A from a 1.5A source, a source that as you know has over-current protection ;)

      If a single lead connector works on a PC but not the hub, likely the PCs motherboard is a little more tolerant of devices over-drawing (I know Gigabyte are now doing some motherboards that can pump quite a few amp into the USB).

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    70. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Single cable, never even bothered trying with a Y-cable as that will by definition not work if the hub is un-powered.

      And yes, it could be a case of the motherboard being a bit more tolerant. Hard to say without attaching a multimeter and perhaps running a protocol sniffer while attaching the drive to the hub, and then comparing that to attaching it to a motherboard port.

      Still, the drive in question specifically came with a non-Y cable. So it should not require a tolerant port, unless QA at the company sucks...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    71. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by adolf · · Score: 1

      Wrong assumptions.

      An unpowered hub is not just a ball of wirenuts -- there's logic in there that needs power, too.

      So, imagine it if you will:

      Assume that the drive wants 500mA to spin up, and works fine when plugged into a PC, or into a powered hub.

      Now, put a non-powered hub in series with it. Assume that the powered hub itself wants 100mA just for itself.

      And, voila! 600mA worth of current draw, from a port specified to only supply 500mA.

      Now, since in practice USB is all over the map with regards to available current, it might work, or it might not work.

      You're simply experiencing the "might not work" end of this uncertainty.

      I further question the merit of using an unpowered hub with a hard disk, anyway. The drive itself already wants all of the power that can be sucked out of a USB port, leaving none left over for even a simple mouse or keyboard.

      Quoth Wikipedia:

      USB current is allocated in units of 100 mA up to a maximum total of 500 mA per port. Therefore a compliant bus powered hub can have no more than four downstream ports and cannot offer more than four 100 mA units of current in total to downstream devices (since one unit is needed for the hub itself). If more units of current are required by a device than can be supplied by the port it is plugged into, the operating system usually reports this to the user.

    72. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Points well made, and something i should have thought of myself. Not sure why it slipped my mind.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    73. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      How many calories does it take to extract and refine the oil into a burnable format?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    74. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      The brazil nut already is in a burnable format, all you need is a match to ignite it.

      http://www.metacafe.com/watch/372823/burning_brazil_nut/

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    75. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by sqkybeaver · · Score: 0

      usb 1.1 is 50mA per port, and 2.0 is 500mA, or 0.25W and 2.5W respectively. you must be use a step down converter to get higher current with conversion losses, 1.5V *1.6A=2.5W somebody needs to brush up on basic electronics and math!

    76. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed. Preferably with video.

    77. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Dthief · · Score: 1

      1.5 * 1.6 = 2.4 dufus

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    78. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think a 2.5" drive sucks 2 to 3A? That would be up to 15W, which would be a lot for a 3.5" drive, let alone a 2.5".

      Laptop drives would be drawing down around 500mA to 1A, well within the tolerances of a 1 or 2 port cable.

    79. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Barny · · Score: 1

      Most drives will eat a little more at spin-up, hence why I said it will need a bit more than the usual.

      Also, you might want to check the power consumption of 3.5" drives (real ones, not the "green drives" or such), a lot of them will suck almost 2A of juice off the 12v rail at spin-up, meaning close to 24W of power just to get the ball rolling, drops to about 300mA after a second of course, but that doesn't excuse the fact that they need that much to work at all.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    80. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Barny · · Score: 1

      500mA was USB1.1

      But of course the rule still applies, a hub is likely pre-programmed to split the juice evenly rather than use something likely more expensive and do it properly (dynamic allocation).

      Bravo to Mr Adolf, good find sir :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    81. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by sqkybeaver · · Score: 0

      added 100mW for conversion loss, I do this crap every day. i should not need to quote my self! dufus

    82. Re:Volt is not a measurement of power by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I did not know that. That is very cool. Thank you for sharing that.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  2. Old old old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been around forever.

    1. Re:Old old old by trooperer · · Score: 1

      ^ this.

    2. Re:Old old old by YoshiDan · · Score: 1

      Like your mum

  3. Volts are not a measure of power by Scareduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Volts measure electromotive force, not power. Watts measure power. I would think nerds would know this.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Volts are not a measure of power by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many parsecs it takes to cook a whole turkey with this.

    2. Re:Volts are not a measure of power by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many parsecs it takes to cook a whole turkey with this.

      Only point five past lightspeed.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Volts are not a measure of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to nitpick, but voltage measures the electrical potential difference between two points. EMF is what can produce that difference. EMF has the units of volts because of this. EMF and electrical potential are not the same thing.

    4. Re:Volts are not a measure of power by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      Twelve, at least if you're making the Kessel run...

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    5. Re:Volts are not a measure of power by froggymana · · Score: 1

      But how many lightyears will it take to cook?

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    6. Re:Volts are not a measure of power by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Right. We used to melt rocks into Aluminium (or Aluminum) using 4.5V. The 400,000A of current certainly helped.

  4. Best Slashdot story evar! by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Where's my USB toaster?!?!

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    1. Re:Best Slashdot story evar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming right up, when someone figures out how much capacitance will be needed to store enough power to toast a slice of bread.

    2. Re:Best Slashdot story evar! by epedersen · · Score: 1

      here: http://www.crazypc.com/other/misc/toast.htm Ok, I know it isn't usb.

    3. Re:Best Slashdot story evar! by baegucb · · Score: 1
  5. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the ALL TIME stupidest use for a computer i have ever seen and the most useless Slashdot article as well

    1. Re:WTF? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      This is the ALL TIME stupidest use for a computer i have ever seen and the most useless Slashdot article as well

      Definitely some kind of record.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:WTF? by SpeZek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:WTF? by doesnothingwell · · Score: 1

      There's three or four hard drive power connectors just a couple of inches away. Was he blind too? What an accomplishment.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article deserves to be in a new section all by itself. Completely Retarded!

    5. Re:WTF? by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Indeed! Especially as this is a dupe. I remember seeing this on Slashdot a couple of years ago. It seemed a stupid idea then, and guess what, it seems to be a stupid idea now.

      I don't feel like this has much hack value really. Stringing $number of USB ports in parallel isn't particularly hard, it's not a particularly elegant solution (which is one of the things I put down as being key to calling something a "hack"), and it doesn't solve a problem in an smart way. I don't know if it was fun to do (because that is subjective) but it doesn't seem particularly interesting to me.

    6. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seemed a stupid idea then, and guess what, it seems to be a stupid idea now.

      It's far from stupid. Some LAN parties don't allow kitchen equipment, and what if I really want some homebrew coffee at the moment? You think I'm going to walk over to the kettle? If I didn't get up for the toilet, what chance does the kettle have?

    7. Re:WTF? by PenisLands · · Score: 0

      You are a real penis cocker. Listen, some things are done for fun, not for practical use. You are the ALL TIME most big cocker ever. I bet the size of your rod is less than impressive. BIG PENIS.

    8. Re:WTF? by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      This is the ALL TIME stupidest use for a computer i have ever seen and the most useless Slashdot article as well

      With the time it took him to cook the meal...how many porn segments did he watch?

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    9. Re:WTF? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      It all started with a Yes We Can chant.

    10. Re:WTF? by underqualified · · Score: 1

      There's also a cup of coffee inside his CPU.

    11. Re:WTF? by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Wire it up to a 5V line on the PSU? (or 12V line, if device supports it, but assuming it's USB-like, than 5V is enough).

      It will heat a hell of a lot faster than this, and be easier to make, while being easier to move around (you can even add a custom port just for your PC-kettle).

  6. what next? by slick7 · · Score: 1

    The secret ingredient on Iron Chef...Kobe Beef and 5 USB ports.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  7. 5 volts of power? by Sam+H · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I heard USB power was actually OVER 9000!!!

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
    1. Re:5 volts of power? by HelioWalton · · Score: 1

      What? 9000! That's Impossible!!!

    2. Re:5 volts of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not impossible if you have a 6 core CPU powering it, but you also need 3 channel DDR RAM. What you have to do is use one of those channels (which takes away 2 CPUs) to power the USB 2.0 ports (or preferablly 3.0). There is software to do it on Linux (look it up). With 2.8 GHz processors you will need to overclock it or use another DDR channel because it typically only gets up to 7500 or so.

      No shit, I've seen it up to 1100 with an overclocked rig! My jaw was on the floor! I tried not to drool because I was worried that I'd be electrocuted.

    3. Re:5 volts of power? by HelioWalton · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

    4. Re:5 volts of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

      Yes, that was the sound that was made when the liquid cooling unit burst when they tried to get to 12,000. The fools. 12,000 is impossible.

  8. Power is in volts? by bart416 · · Score: 1

    Actually USB ports can provide up to 500mA. So yeah assuming that was the case, 2.5W / usb port. So the guy built himself a 75W heating plate.

    1. Re:Power is in volts? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually USB ports can provide up to 500mA. So yeah assuming that was the case, 2.5W / usb port. So the guy built himself a 75W heating plate.

      It would have been easier to tap off one the power supply lines. But then, I suppose, he wouldn't have ended up on Slashdot.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Power is in volts? by mikehoskins · · Score: 1

      Without even looking into this, I can guarantee that the 75W hotplate is -
          a.) cheaper
          b.) safer to your computer
          c.) more efficient from plug to heat

  9. USB ports supply a maximum of 1/2 Amp, 500 mA by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Troll

    Power = Volts * Amps

    I am surprised that this story would be posted by a Slashdot editor, because I am surprised that the Slashdot editor would not have some sense that there is more to be understood.

    USB ports supply a maximum of 1/2 Amp, 500 milliamps. The current is limited by internal circuitry. If you short the port, the internal circuitry turns off the power.

    Can 2.5 Watts make something hot? Yes, if there is good insulation and little thermal loss.

    1. Re:USB ports supply a maximum of 1/2 Amp, 500 mA by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      If you short the port, the internal circuitry turns off the power.

      Unless you're using a powered no-name chinese hub (or many brand name ones that are just rebranded chinese hubs). In that case, the chance of the hub having current limiting capability is virtually 0. Results vary from the adapter handling it, through it crapping out, physically melting or catching on fire, to it shorting out to mains and taking your motherboard with it.

      Be very afraid of powered chinese hubs. I've yet to find one that even has the required diode to avoid sending power back from the adapter into the host PC. Unpowered ones are mostly OK, as then any short will just propagate to the host and it will shut off the power.

  10. In the words of Dr Ian Malcom by netsavior · · Score: 4, Funny

    "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."

  11. well done OP, a superb fail by wjh31 · · Score: 5, Informative

    not only has the gizmodo article disappeared at time of post, but there is no link to the original blog post (http://xe.bz/aho/24/) which is date-stamped for 2006. This is 4 years old!

    1. Re:well done OP, a superb fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was done far prior to 2006, I graduated from college in 2003 and remember reading this around 2001-2002

  12. Personally, I use graphics cards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boil water in minutes. Fries everything.

  13. Finally! by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

    They've finally found a practical use for USB! Was this USB 2.0, 3.0, or what? Has anyone investigated to see if Firewire will cook the meat faster?

    1. Re:Finally! by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Firewire would have worked, but there's the risk of charring, and it tends to set off the building's sprinkler system.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Finally! by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      Firewire would be a better option for this kind of experiment because it has a higher voltage and current per cord.

      Firewire is 12V and generally can supply 1A pretty easily to a connected device. A firewire heater would have been much better from an efficiency standpoint, in terms of number of cords and the amount of power being used per unit area.

  14. Overly elaborate setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without actually digging them out, I'm fairly sure that even my ancient, non-software-controlled AT power supplies could put out a respectable amount of current on the +5V rail. Why bother hooking up half a dozen USB cards and dozens of cables when you could just pull it straight from one or two molex connectors?

    For that matter, why not just use the hotplate unmodified?

    1. Re:Overly elaborate setup by ari_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many people desperately want to do the "hard hacks" that would earn them geek cred. They want to be the guy who builds a 5,000rpm pneumatic Lego engine or who converts a Roomba into an automatic dog-walker. The problem is that most of them are stupid and uncreative, so you end up with "hacks" like cooking bacon with power from USB ports.

    2. Re:Overly elaborate setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So say we all!

    3. Re:Overly elaborate setup by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

      Cooking bacon with USB is equally as hard/creative as a Roomba dog walker. In fact it's only a couple steps below perpetual motion or "I solved unified field theory" again. If you want something impressive it has to both require time and skill, while at the same time providing pretty pictures that let us drool about. The Moller flying car for example. Otherwise you might as well create USB powered desktop cold fusion with a boring glass of water that may release a buble every few minutes. -Sorry, NyQuil induced rant.

    4. Re:Overly elaborate setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that most of them are stupid and uncreative, so you end up with "hacks" like cooking bacon with power from USB ports

      We're talking about someone who puts a cup of coffee in their computer case. Stupid is redundant.

    5. Re:Overly elaborate setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people desperately want to do the "hard hacks" that would earn them geek cred. They want to be the guy who builds a 5,000rpm pneumatic Lego engine or who converts a Roomba into an automatic dog-walker. The problem is that most of them are stupid and uncreative, so you end up with "hacks" like cooking bacon with power from USB ports.

      There is at least one incidental benefit (to me any way); the humor in this thread's replies made me laugh harder than I had in a while.

  15. why? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    one word to describe this story from me: why?

    1. Re:why? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      two words: why not?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:why? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      why not? Because it is really stupid? Because preparing food this way is stupid? Because it's stupid in a number of ways? Because there is nothing interesting in it?

      I'd be more amused by seeing some sort of a smart stove device, maybe solar powered or some way that actually is useful, this was useless and stupid.

    3. Re:why? by gratuitous_arp · · Score: 1

      Good question. Here is the answer. People in any sort of hacking culture (hardware in this case) do things like this for fun. It's a completely ludicrous idea to take 30 USB ports and try to cook dinner with it -- but it would be amusing to do, and he might learn something in the process. It may not have practical value for other people -- that isn't the point.

      Refer to Stallman's article on hacking:

      "I went to lunch with some GNU fans, and was sitting down to eat some tteokpaekki (*), when a waitress set down six chopsticks right in front of me. It occurred to me that perhaps these were meant for three people, but it was more amusing to imagine that I was supposed to use all six. I did not know any way to do that, so I realized that if I could come up with a way, it would be a hack. I started thinking. After a few seconds I had an idea..."

      You get some idea of the thought process behind this. Although the subject of these two hacks are very different, I'm sure something similar was going through the mind of the USB cook.

      "...It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied as hacking, but I think what these activities have in common is playfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking means exploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playful cleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hack value"."

      http://stallman.org/articles/on-hacking.html

      HTH

    4. Re:why? by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      omg, relax with your explanations. Regardless of any 'hack value', this is retarded. There is nothing at all amusing, interesting or new or inventive about combining a bunch of wires that carry electricity together to get more wattage. There is nothing interesting about it, thus the question.

      There is plenty that can be done that is much more interesting, this is not it.

    5. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Useless and stupid" doesn't stop you from posting in the article about it. Unfortunately.

    6. Re:why? by gratuitous_arp · · Score: 1

      I took your first post to be sincere. You are now simultaneously asking 'why' and complaining that someone has given you an explanation. That is certainly inventive.

    7. Re:why? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it would've been a lot cooler to make a USB controlled hotplate. Then you could combine that with a temperature probe and maybe write some MATLAB scripts to cook a perfect burger every time.

      You're not going to ever get cookingly useful power from a USB port: either there's a plug nearby, in which case you don't need a fantastic array of USB ports, or there's no power nearby, in which case you're talking about using a laptop, or array of laptops, and using up their precious battery capacities for resistive heating.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that's not the way to do it. If you simply put several USB ports in parallel so that you can draw more amps, then you're making several mistakes: The first is that you're probably counting each port as 500mA. USB only allows a device to draw 500mA after the device has registered, asked for that much power and was granted permission to switch to a high power profile. The other reason why this isn't allowed is that there are usually several ports connected to an (unpowered) hub. In that case each port is limited to 100mA by the spec. The second big mistake is the way the power is combined: The current through parallel wires depends on the resistance of the wire. Only if the resistance is the same is the current evenly distributed. Without series resistors, the resistances of the cables and connections can differ by a small absolute value but still by a huge percentage. This causes a huge difference in the power that is drawn from the individual ports.

      The only reason why this works at all is that most USB hosts generously ignore the limits and supply whatever the device draws, negotiation and absolute limits be damned. But in that case, what's the difference compared to plugging the hotplate into the ATX PSU directly? A modern (read: massively over-powered) ATX PSU can provide enough current for spot welding. It'll cook dinner without problem.

    9. Re:why? by gratuitous_arp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it would've been a lot cooler to make a USB controlled hotplate.

      I agree -- maybe this will inspire someone to do it. That would be neat. (Probably been done somewhere, but it's the sharing of ideas that is important.) Taking that and adding some scripting to cook/flip a burger at the right time would be very neat to see!

      You're not going to ever get cookingly useful power from a USB port

      Yep. But 'utility' wasn't the reason this was done. Ditto for Stallman trying to eat with six chopsticks.

    10. Re:why? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I was very sincere, but have you ever heard of a 'rhetorical question' before? That's right, not every 'why' means the same thing.

      Mine 'why' was in the 'why oh why' category, I don't need an explanation on why people hack, but this was not useful even in a 'curiosity strikes' sort of way.

    11. Re:why? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I dunno, it not only doesn't have any utility, but it was kind of stupid, too. It's the kind of electronics project an art student would get involved in:

      It's got all the signs of the magical thinking that leads to the belief that a chain of megaphones could shatter windows miles away.

      Here on slashdot, we applaud people hacking stuff to scratch an itch, no matter how stupid the itch itself is. I just can't see the itch behind this project.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:why? by gratuitous_arp · · Score: 1

      I dunno

      I agreed with your last post. What is this in reference to?

      it not only doesn't have any utility, but it was kind of stupid, too.

      By calling the project "stupid", what do you mean? If you mean pointless, that is utility, which has been covered. If you mean uninteresting, well, not everything is interesting to everyone. Do you mean something else?

      Can you please give an example of the signs of magical thinking that you see?

      Setting something to a purpose for which it was not intended is a great way to see if you really understand how it operates. This leads to de-mystification; if it doesn't work, you have the opportunity to figure out why and then fix it. The process of getting a project like this to work is the opposite of magical thinking. The person may still have a misunderstanding about some part of the system, but how ever do you expect to cure that without making an attempt to learn about it?

      The person knows the amount of power that he can get from one USB port. He knows how much power he needs. He came up with 30 USB ports to get the right power. So he did it. And it does what he intended it to do. Unlike the megaphone analogy, this actually works. This is not a display of magical thinking.

      Here on slashdot, we applaud people hacking stuff to scratch an itch, no matter how stupid the itch itself is.

      I'm not seeing any such applause or admiration on this thread. Most of the posts seem to either completely miss the point of hacking -- and rather than asking, they immediately begin bashing -- or pretend not to know so they can heap on some derision anyway. Even *I* have zero interest in the USB cook thing -- I simply have no problem in understanding how someone else would find this interesting. It is a different sort of culture. If I didn't know, I hope I would ask; in the same way that I am asking about parts of your post in case I have missed something.

      I just can't see the itch behind this project.

      I don't see where you are going with this. The person who did it obviously had an itch to scratch for this type of project. I explained the general idea in my first post. Obviously, you and others do not see or share the itch. That's fine.

  16. haha, "techgoblin" submitter. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Was too busy texting his buddies when his highschool teacher was explaining Ohm's law, etc.

  17. "This device can perform faster ... by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    if you buy a new motherboard. Because you fried it with your cooking stunt. [OK] [Cancel]''

  18. Has anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has anyone considered that like many utube videos, this is faked? He either has 150Vdc at 500ma max, or 5Vdx at 15 amps max. it seems unlikely that a hotplate would be designed to run from either 5V or 150V.

    Besides, it would make more sense to jus use a standard 120Vac or 240Vac hotplate, as he would have to have standard mains power to run a desktop PC. C'mon don't be so gullable!

    1. Re:Has anyone... by pregister · · Score: 1

      Did you know: "gullable" isn't in the dictionary.

      One to grow on.

    2. Re:Has anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're right... almost.
      It's an alternative form for gullible:
      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gullable >

      gullable

      - 2 dictionary results
      gullible

      [guhl-uh-buhl]
      adjective
      easily deceived or cheated.
      Also, gullable.

      [[ insert *whoosh* here ]]

    3. Re:Has anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows at least that much.
      What they don't know is that "gullible" isn't in the dictionary.

    4. Re:Has anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Did you know: "gullable" isn't in the dictionary.

      One to grow on."

      Right, then how did you know how to spell it?

  19. Ladies and gentlemen... by choongiri · · Score: 1

    For the comfort and safety of all passengers, if you are unsure as to whether or not a specific device or periferal is approved for use during the flight, please check with your flight attendant before using it.

  20. "5V of power" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone failed their basic physics class.

  21. Yesterdays news by Tordre · · Score: 1

    I know this is idle and one should not care what is posted here but isn't this particular example a couple years old, i do believe when it was new it was posted to real slash dot, then again i am just going from the picture, because the link is broken...

    oh wait a bit of digging got me there and yes the page is date 2006,

    also why is idle not on the new comment system, i hate having to reload just to view a single comment.

  22. Unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you aren't doing this with the power over the phone lines, whats the point.

  23. 5V of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Volts are not a measurement of power, I am amazed at the number of people who don't understand this.

  24. What kind of a world do we live in... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    So we have an article on Slashdot about someone used 30 USB ports to cook some bacon?

    Wow. Have we stooped to a new low?

    What does this article tell me? I'll tell you what it tells me; USB is woefully underpowered. I won't stop campaigning until it takes only one USB port to do the same. If I want to have a bacon sandwich from my laptop without moving from the comfort of my easy chair, then it would take an electrocution from the flying spaghetti monster to stop me.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  25. Hmm.. and I thought this was a gag gift.... by grepya · · Score: 1

    USB Toaster . Apparently not.

  26. Re:why not just use the fucking stove by bsharma · · Score: 1

    That is what I feel every time someone talks about climbing Everest. Why not develop a high altitude Everest class helicopter. Then someone can even setup a penthouse on Everest and arrange tourists to visit ( like the Russians are doing with that "Most Expensive Motel" AKA International Space Station)

  27. Works for telco landlines, too by e9th · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those who still have landline phones, Mike Sandman, purveyor of genuinely indispensable old-school telephony gear, has some telco line powered goodies.

    Don't even try to order any of them, though.

  28. I knew slashdot was slow.... by ninjackn · · Score: 2, Informative

    but I didn't expect a story from over 4 years ago. For those of you who can read japanese the original blog post is here.

    --
    [FUCK BETA 2.6.2014]
  29. Why not use the CPU/GPU as heat source for cooking by RandySC · · Score: 1

    My graphics card is at 68C and goes up to 73-74C when it gets used by the games. It would be better to use the existing heat output from a computer to cook than to bother with USB. Maybe someone should build a custom case that looks like a hibachi grill on the top.

    --
    Organization: alphabetical, sometimes numerical or messy
  30. Re:Why not use the CPU/GPU as heat source for cook by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Back in my day during college when we need to warm up the dorm room, we just threw another ray trace at the Pentium. We also had to walk uphill both ways to reach the keyboards though.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  31. dumb ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A standard port provides 5V of power, give or take a little. I am not even sure what it takes to heat a small hotplate, but I am sure it is more than 5V."

    Reminds me of the quote "It's better to let someone think you are an idiot than to open your mouth and prove it"

  32. Firewire Pig Cooking by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Pft. Firewire can cook an entire pig - INSTANTLY

  33. Seems kind of wasteful since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...this is just a very specific use device that could be gained elsewhere as a by-product of its use.

    Wouldn't it be so much easier to pay for a fermi card, some heat transfer to a metal plate above that you can cook some food on?
    Last time i checked that thing hit high temps on _idle_.
    Even still, just a general GPU with a lot of heat coming off it, would do good after a lengthy gaming session, after you are done, some fried egg and bacon, nice hearty meal cooked with computing manliness.
    Same goes with CPU power recovery.

    This also reminds me of the few discoveries made recently with relation to recovering waste heat at very efficient numbers and speeds.
    Combining that with this could recover a good percentage of heat coming out the back directly rather than having to be connected directly.
    Water cooling with a heatsink made out of this material would be so much better. (with a sensor to turn on fan if temps go too high, of course)

  34. GFX solution may be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen Nvidia cards run over 100C during load.
    Put a couple of heatpipes on them instead, and you can cook bacon while your game.

    1. Re:GFX solution may be better by luther349 · · Score: 1

      they did that with a 360 gpu once. cooked a egg on it. they did it to prove a point that the 360 ran to hot. and yes it was a 360 that aruldy red ringed.

  35. The exception to that rule by PFritz21 · · Score: 1

    When it comes to bacon, you always should. There shouldn't even be a second thought about it, it should come naturally to you, like a reflex.

  36. Hover shoes! by reg106 · · Score: 1

    No. Everything on youtube is true. Especially hover shoes.

  37. all kinds of recipes come to mind... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Cooking With Your USB Ports

    They stir-fry and sauté nicely. Drizzle with rubbing alcohol, top with a dollop of thermal compound and serve.

  38. If you feel like doing this... by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    Don't forget your Thanko 80 port USB hub.

  39. You kids have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in my day we had to take the top off the computer and cook our food using the CPU

  40. hoax by luther349 · · Score: 1

    a pc does not have 30 ports. so unless he used a bunch of ac powered hubs theirs no way get got enough voltage from his pc ports alone. but at point its cooking with usb hubs. not to mention all the power wasted on the hubs and pc your electric stove probably uses less. its just imposable to pull that kind of wattage from your pc. the power supply would just choke and die. theirs plenty of cool ways to cook food like solar ovens.

    1. Re:hoax by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      If you look at the picture, you can see 6 PCI cards in the box with cables coming off of them. So 6X4=24 + 6 on the MB would be 30. Not a huge leap to accept that there might actually be that many ports on a PC build specifically for this stunt.

  41. Congratulations on Really Old News!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ThinkGeek used to sell USB Hotplates. A Google search will reveal other models that actually serve as a hub as well.

  42. Re:Why not use the CPU/GPU as heat source for cook by llamapater · · Score: 2, Funny

    your dorm was a mobius strip too?

  43. Sorry, George Foreman beat them to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it could be used for cooking hot grits.

  45. Re:Why not use the CPU/GPU as heat source for cook by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 1

    It's definitely been done. It's hot but small, so it lends itself to frying an egg or something, but definitely doable. On the other hand, I saw a George Foreman turned into a webserver once.

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
  46. Do or do not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no why.

  47. 5V? Bah! by naturaverl · · Score: 1

    I'm absolutely certain that I could cook the same food in just as much or less time with only 1 V.

    By the way, I'm getting ever closer to turning in my slashdot card. If the editors can't catch such a fundamental (and fundamentally simple) misuse of terms, E.G. if the editors don't understand these simple electrical principles that were discovered ALMOST TWO HUNDRED FREAKIN YEARS AGO, then I no longer want to be associated.

    This is a TECH site. The editor of this submission should know the difference between voltage and power. No, I'm not new here. It used to be better.

  48. sounds like a mess by Francofille · · Score: 1

    How much geek cred do you get for having a machine and desk area covered with grease spatter? There's a reason we have a separate room for cooking where surfaces are easily cleaned with a damp sponge and mop... Why not, indeed.

  49. Re:why not just use the fucking stove by hitmark · · Score: 1

    Iirc, there is not enough air density that high up for a copter to work.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm