Slashdot Mirror


Free E-Books, With a Catch — Advertising

Velcroman1 writes "Barnes & Noble may kick off a fresh price war today for digital book readers, with its new Nook news. But the real news in digital publishing is a novel approach to the e-books themselves: Free books — with advertising. The basic idea is to offer publishers another way to reach readers and to give readers the chance to try more books — books that perhaps they wouldn't normally peruse if they had to pay more for them. Initially, Wowio specialized in offering digital versions of comic books and graphic novels, usually formatted as Adobe PDFs. So it was a natural step for the company to offer graphic ads that are inserted in e-books. 'We think we're creating a broader audience for some of these titles,' Wowio's CEO Brian Altounian told me. 'I think folks are going to download more books because they're saving the costs' of having to drive to the store or pay more for them. Would ads stop you from reading?" The new color Nook goes for $249, and comes with a browser, games, Quickoffice, streaming music via Pandora, and an SDK; reader itwbennett links to an analysis of how well it stacks up as a tablet.

194 comments

  1. oh boy by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It was a dark and stormy night.....in beautiful downtown Vegas!"

    1. Re:oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better McDonald's... I'm loving it!

    2. Re:oh boy by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cry 'havoc,' and let slip the dogs of war ...only at pets.com

    3. Re:oh boy by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

      "Call me Ishmael. Some years-never mind how long precisely-having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on shore, I thought I would sail about a little and see the watery part of the world. AND YOU CAN TOO WITH INSANELY LOW CRUISE RATES FROM TRAVELOCITY.COM!!!"

    4. Re:oh boy by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      To Be Or Not To Be...are you feeling blue? Ask your doctor if Cymbalta is right for you

      Seriously if they can use ads to get the price down to the magic $100 number I'll be happy to buy eBooks from B&N. Hell I'd even set up an account for my mom and she could buy all her fantasy and horror from them and she could try out ad supported new authors before deciding which ones she likes. I'm sure it won't be long before the Linux guys hack the thing so I'd have a cheap tablet to play with, and mom could have hers as just a eBook to carry when she is at the docs or waiting for her paperbacks to arrive. I would have said B&N would be DOA 6 months ago, but if they can get these suckers down to the right price point I could see them taking off. At $250 it is too close to netbook price, hell I can get a 7 inch Android tablet for $160, but if they got it to $100 it would be worth it as an impulse buy for me.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:oh boy by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      The ads are in the ebooks themselves, not the reader. So this won't have any effect on the price of the hardware.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    6. Re:oh boy by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Ye are funny but the summary said graphics ads, probably similar to the ads on Hulu right now.

      I would happily take a book with ads, especially if it's free. Since my money supply is finite, any opportunity I have not to spend that money is a good one. And it's not as if you have to pay attention to the ad..... oftentimes when hulu plays ads, I do something else during that minute.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:oh boy by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Why not? I'm sure B&N is gonna get a cut of the ad revenue, otherwise they are too stupid to be in business. The razor and blade model makes many companies a LOT of money, just ask HP how much they get on ink. My point still stands, if B&N can take their share of the ad revenue and use it to subsidize the device, thus getting it down to the magic $100 price point, they could fricking kill the Kindle and pretty much corner the market.

      After that they can simply enjoy the continuing revenue from the ads. Hell for $100 plus free comics they could ad spam me as bad as the 70s comics and I'd still be happy. I'm sure I'm not alone either!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:oh boy by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Call me Ishmael, on the new Motorola Droid 2.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:oh boy by dwhitman · · Score: 1

      The sky above the port was the color of a Sony Aquos HDTV, tuned to a dead channel.

    10. Re:oh boy by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, your mom isn't reading "fantasy and horror" books.

    11. Re:oh boy by davester666 · · Score: 1

      No, this will go the way of ads on TV. It'll start off with free books with ads, then the books will be cheaper with ads, then books will be only be available with ads...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Did the editors even READ the article? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    There is no price point set for the nook yet. The $249 was the "widely speculated" price, not based on anything but guesses at this point.

    1. Re:Did the editors even READ the article? by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

      And obviously I'm a fucking retard as well, the first article cites the "speculated price" but the second one actually links to the real nook. Maybe I should apply for a job as a slashdot editor.

    2. Re:Did the editors even READ the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And obviously I'm a fucking retard as well, the first article cites the "speculated price" but the second one actually links to the real nook. Maybe I should apply for a job as a slashdot editor.

      There, there ... there's the door, don't let it hit your ass on the way out!

      Just kidding. Anyone can make a mistake. It doesn't make you a retard.

    3. Re:Did the editors even READ the article? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

      "obviously I'm a fucking retard as well"

      Why "as well"? Timoth was right, you were wrong and presumptious. It was just you.

      "Maybe I should apply for a job as a slashdot editor"

      Based on the editor getting something right and you getting it wrong?

    4. Re:Did the editors even READ the article? by pacinpm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And obviously I'm a fucking retard [...]

      Because it's Slashdot you are probably just a retard.

    5. Re:Did the editors even READ the article? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Not only that, the article says Wowio has a whopping two PDFs available with ads.

      They're getting thousands of titles from Ingram that they will distribute as ePub.... but without ads.

      So the this is just a big bunch of fail.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  3. Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by dmorin · · Score: 1

    It'd be one thing if they just stuck a random graphic here and there. But I expect that the trend would go in the same direction as the multi-page web article. Namely, ads in between the pages that you can't skip. Can you imagine how annoying that would make your book? "I've discovered the identity of the murderer. His name is....." "...and now a word from our sponsor." Brings to mind archaic memories of old radio shows where you really had no choice. I suppose if it's still just another page, you can hit just as fast and skip it. But how long before an ereader has some sort of Flash-like ability to play a quick movie? And then you're stuck.

    1. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by the_humeister · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suppose now is a good time as any to mention Project Gutenber.

    2. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by niftydude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Project Gutenberg is excellent - but if we extrapolate the current rate of copyright expansion, books published this century may never enter the public domain.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    3. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I read your site. If this is, in fact, you, it sounds like a real shitty thing, assuming that you are telling the unvarnished truth.

      However, it has nothing to do with artists' rights in a general or policy sense. This is just plain old theft and fraud. It could happen in a world with "more" copyright, "less" copyright, or maybe even with no copyright protection at all.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True - but for the moment, at least, one can occasionally find texts for which copyright has been snatched by US publishing pirates by looking at Gutenberg sites under different jurisdictions. A case in point is Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four: copyright to Rosenblum in the US until at least 2044, but public domain in Australia (and probably Canada).

    5. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Project Gutenberg is excellent - but if we extrapolate the current rate of copyright expansion, books published this century may never enter the public domain.

      We just need an act of congress to reduce the term of copyright back to 20 years, and place all works published prior to 1990 in the public domain at once.

    6. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by yukk · · Score: 1
      While I haven't actually been able to find a free book on this service I have been getting "free ad-sponsored" music from Guvera and all they make you do is visit a sponsored playlist page within their site and the sponsor pays for your unencumbered MP3 music. The mp3s have no ads or DRM.
      Apparently this model is working for music so hopefully with books it won't be too much worse.

      On the other hand:

      "I've discovered the identity of the murderer. His name is....." "...and now a word from our sponsor."

      Sounds a lot like watching TV these days.

      --
      The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
    7. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by plopez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn... I can't imagine that. It's just like watching TV and having to sit through an ad. Something I don't do ever since I longer have a TV. Being forced to watch ads is becoming more of an alien concept to me. On the web I never read popups, popunders or sit through those ads they want you to see before reading. Once again they are reinventing the wheel, and remind me why I have abandoned TV.

      The simpler and sources forums are usually the best, and I begrudge a device which I pay (or paid) for being hijacked for ads.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    8. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Or the book could dynamically update product placement... depending on how fast advertisers change, your hero could be spending more time being indecisive about his favorite coffee shop than getting around to dealing with the plot.

    9. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by ratinox · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://manybooks.net/ and http://feedbooks.com/ are also excellent sources of free ebooks, providing published, unpublished and public domain titles.

      FWIW, personally I abhor ads and would seek to locate an ad-free copy of a given book before purchasing an ad-embedded copy.

    10. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Okay, that really confuses me. If a British novel is copyrighted in the United States, but publicly available in Australia, what are the legal boundaries? Is it legal to download it in the United States, as long as the uploader is in Australia? If not, then is it legal to purchase a copy of 1984 in Australia (where the copyright holder does not receive any royalties) and then transport it to the United States? ("I read it on the flight, Mr. Customs Agent!")

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    11. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Well I'm guessing that since it's about copyright as long as you create no copies within the united states you're good.
      but then that's applying logic which laywers don't like doing.

      So my guess is that if you ask a major copyright holder they'll tell you that anything up to and including mentioning that the work is out of copyright elsewhere is illegal and they'll happily push to try to get you punished.

    12. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Longer copyright terms wouldn't have helped you, by the sound of it you brought a knife to a gunfight and got screwed over.
      Did you even have your own lawyer?
        you didn't mention.

    13. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by digitig · · Score: 1

      Where would the money come from to buy that legislation?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    14. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gutenberg's great, but what we need is e-lending from Libraries. In the UK, this is sort of possible via Overdrive - if you have an "approved" device then you can borrow eBooks from UK libraries. For some reason they seem to be keeping this a secret despite having done it in some form since 2004.
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/oct/26/libraries-ebook-restrictions
      Only works on some devices, like the Sony readers.
      To me, this is the killer app and I'd buy an eReader that allowed easy borrowing (i.e. time-expired downloads ) of current fiction in a heartbeat...

    15. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      "Lending" digital works really completes the circle of absurdity. It's like a metaphor taken way, way too far.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    16. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by Methuseus · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is possible in many places in the US. I can "borrow" ebooks from multiple libraries in the area, some of them expiring on a certain date, not sure if there's any other scheme. This works with my nook, as well as the Sony readers, and others like those Borders sells. I don't believe they work with the Kindle, but the Kindle 3 might change that from what I read.

      I don't know how it works in the UK, of course.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    17. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Project Gutenberg, alas, only has public domain works afaik. However, there are other sources of free, legal, copyrighted books online. Cory Doctorow explains in Content why he posts all his books online:

      • Many writers have tried free e-book releases to tie in with the print release of their works. To the best of my knowledge, every writer who's tried this has repeated the experiment with future works, suggesting a high degree of satisfaction with the outcomes
      • A writer friend of mine had his first novel come out at the same time as mine. We write similar material and are often compared to one another by critics and reviewers. My first novel had a free download, his didn't. We compared sales figures and I was doing substantially better than him -- he subsequently convinced his publisher to let him follow suit
      • Baen Books has a pretty good handle on expected sales for new volumes in long-running series; having sold many such series, they have lots of data to use in sales estimates. If Volume N sells X copies, we expect Volume N+1 to sell Y copies. They report that they have seen a measurable uptick in sales following from free e-book releases of previous and current volumes
      • David Blackburn, a Harvard PhD candidate in economics, published a paper in 2004 in which he calculated that, for music, "piracy" results in a net increase in sales for all titles in the 75th percentile and lower; negligible change in sales for the "middle class" of titles between the 75th percentile and the 97th percentile; and a small drag on the "super-rich" in the 97th percentile and higher. Publisher Tim O'Reilly describes this as "piracy's progressive taxation," apportioning a small wealth-redistribution to the vast majority of works, no net change to the middle, and a small cost on the richest few
      • Speaking of Tim O'Reilly, he has just published a detailed, quantitative study of the effect of free downloads on a single title. O'Reilly Media published Asterisk: The Future of Telephony, in November 2005, simultaneously releasing the book as a free download. By March 2007, they had a pretty detailed picture of the sales-cycle of this book -- and, thanks to industry standard metrics like those provided by Bookscan, they could compare it, apples-to-apples style, against the performance of competing books treating with the same subject. O'Reilly's conclusion: downloads didn't cause a decline in sales, and appears to have resulted in a lift in sales. This is particularly noteworthy because the book in question is a technical reference work, exclusively consumed by computer programmers who are by definition disposed to read off screens. Also, this is a reference work and therefore is more likely to be useful in electronic form, where it can be easily searched
        In my case, my publishers have gone back to press repeatedly for my books. The print runs for each edition are modest -- I'm a midlist writer in a world with a shrinking midlist -- but publishers print what they think they can sell, and they're outselling their expectations
      • The new opportunities arising from my free downloads are so numerous as to be uncountable -- foreign rights deals, comic book licenses, speaking engagements, article commissions -- I've made more money in these secondary markets than I have in royalties
      • More anecdotes: I've had literally thousands of people approach me by e-mail and at signings and cons to say, "I found your work online for free, got hooked, and started buying it." By contrast, I've had all of five e-mails from people saying, "Hey, idiot, thanks for the free book, now I don't have to buy the print edition, ha ha!"

      A textbook I was assigned in an undergrad history course in the late '70s at SIU is now online, and it's not just informative, it's a good read, as well. That's not the only book virginia.edu has online, and I would imagine they're not the only college that posts books.

    18. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it would be better to have a page, or pages, at the beginning and/or end. My fear was the thimble effect like sites that have a small square in the middle with the content your wanting surrounded by blinking flashing and rolling ads. I guess interruptive ads every so many pages would be the eventual goal of advertisers wouldn't it. Oh well, even if the books and device were free l'd say no thanks.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    19. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There haven't been any increases in recent years

      1998 iinm. Copyright expands every time Steamboat Willy's copyright is due to expire. US Copyright was originally only for 14 years. Fifty years ago it was twenty iinm, it could be extended but there was more paperwork involved. Copyright has never contracted in its almost 300 year history.

      public opinion has been strongly for taking away creator's rights

      You have some scientific poll numbers? Har, I thought not. Most people don't give copyright a second thought.

      Copyright isn't a right, it's a privelege. Read the US Constitution or the original Scottish copyright law (the world's first). I don't own my copyrighted work (and I've registered two of them), they are owned by everyone. I only have a "limited" time monopoly on publication.

    20. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by andrewjj20 · · Score: 1

      If only there was a place where I could borrow copies of book for free, even recent ones. With out advertisements. Possibly people would contribute money and books to it to further the knowledge contained in it. I am not sure such a place exists.

    21. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Although I am not a lawyer, I would bet that the answer would ride on any copyright agreements between the US and the UK and have nothing to do with Australia. However, if you were to download it in a country that had agreements with Australia it would then be yours to bring into the US but not distribute (again, depending on the copyright terms and any agreeements between the US and UK.

    22. Re:Ewwww, imagine "can't skip" technology? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      It looks like Overdrive is the site that is working with a lot of local libraries in the US. I'd never heard of it before, but here is their ebook compatibility list. It sounds like their audio books are more widely compatible than their ebooks, because the ebooks use DRM'd PDFs that a lot of devices aren't setup to use. Their audio books work in a player that they've written themselves for many platforms called "OverDrive Media Console"

  4. Great. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, is the idea to turn novels, anthologies and reference works into magazines?

    Brilliant!

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Great. by froggymana · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course! And eventually they are going to want to put ads on your children to get rid of the cost of hospital bills.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    2. Re:Great. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      So, is the idea to turn novels, anthologies and reference works into magazines? Brilliant!

      Wait until scientific papers will be the same. I can already see:

      • "Goldbach theorem demonstration" proudly brought to you by Coca Cola
      • "Heart diseases correlate weaker with regular tobacco smoking than with a fast-food diet" proudly brought to you by Reynolds.

        Errr... hang on...
      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:Great. by metlin · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, it would depend on what kind of books (and readers) you're talking about, right?

      Your average reader of Clive Cussler and Twilight probably wouldn't care - and may even enjoy it. For them, reading is probably like watching TV or something. On the other hand, folks who read something a little substantial would probably care. A lot.

      I can almost see someone advertising Glenn Beck and Palin to a Chomsky or Satre reader.

    4. Re:Great. by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, so you've read the fine print in the Obamacare packages?

      Actually, ads in ebooks is a natural progression, it's just returning to how literature used to be published. A lot of literary works have been published or serialized and published in magazines supported by ads.

    5. Re:Great. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the other hand, folks who read something a little substantial would probably care. A lot.

      Thereby providing a rationale for further monetization: well, if you don't want ads you need to pay for the privilege, because, you know, you're costing us money by not directing your gray matter to absorb our advertising. This on top of whatever you paid for this "book" in the first place. Greed knows no bounds, and book publishers are among the most vampiric operations in our society.

      It always amazes me how the business mind works. Like the phone company charging you for the service of not listing your phone number. Eventually, it becomes income to which they feel entitled.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Beg to differ, Sir - ads in ebooks are most definitely not a natural progression (obviously). Otherwise, why would Wowio (stoopid *** name as well) be in process of being granted a "very broad patent" (link in summary above) for such?

      You, Sir, are merely jealous that you never discovered this groundbreaking text+ad = Wowio patent license fee invention.

    7. Re:Great. by plopez · · Score: 1

      The only purpose for TV programmes, newspapers, magazines, news web sites, radio programmes etc. is to sell ads and make money.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    8. Re:Great. by metlin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure. Ask your Mom.

    9. Re:Great. by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow. I knew Chomski fanboys were fairly rabid, but you just go above and beyond.

      Thanks for proving my point, btw.

    10. Re:Great. by Yoozer · · Score: 1

      Ads should be a means, not an end. However, broadcasters would feel cut out f you could only pay the creators directly to get TV a la carte; thus, ads are now also the end.

    11. Re:Great. by Mitreya · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It always amazes me how the business mind works. Like the phone company charging you for the service of not listing your phone number. Eventually, it becomes income to which they feel entitled.

      It always amazes me when people are looking for ethical or exotic behavioral explanation behind buisness decisions. The buisness mind works just fine. The phone company charges you for the services of _not_ listing your phone number because they essentially sell the access to your phone number by publishing phone books with ads. They make money from you either way (indirectly through ads or directly by charging you). Being a localized monopoly helps, of course.

    12. Re:Great. by digitig · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, why would Wowio (stoopid *** name as well) be in process of being granted a "very broad patent" (link in summary above) for such?

      You must be new here.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    13. Re:Great. by cherokee158 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It always amazes me when people are looking for ethical or exotic behavioral explanation behind buisness decisions.

      It saddens me that so many people think that by enshrining a human activity as 'business' automatically excuses unethical behavior. Business is a human activity, and no human activity should be exempt from human virtue. If morality is optional, then it is largely meaningless, and I might as well shoot you and take your money.

    14. Re:Great. by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      heh, i'd preffer it to the current model where the only people who can access scientific literature are those in academia (who have access to most journals though bulk agreements with thier university) or those prepared to pay substantial subscriptions or per-paper fees.

      In my experiance you don't really know if a paper will be useful/interesting until you have read a fair chunk of it. If you were paying by the paper you could easilly run up a bill of hundreds of pounds in a few hours of checking through papers to see which were relavent. That is a lot of money if you are just reading for interest or other noncommercial purposes.

      So the general public is effectively excluded from reading the primary sources of our knowlage.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:Great. by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Oh, my kingdom for mod points. You have mentioned one of my pet peeves, and indeed, I have spent thousands of dollars on irrelevant papers from some of these sites. Alas, there is no option.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    16. Re:Great. by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to make sanse. It only has to make money. - James Gosling

    17. Re:Great. by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Hate to be a stickler, but you're killing me bro. Two stories now and you've used "experiance" in both posts. No sir. Its "experience."

    18. Re:Great. by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Informative

      arXiv.org helps.

  5. FFS by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Can we escape from the pervasive ads? Sure, people can choose to do whatever they well damn please, but I just don't want this to become the dominant mode of just about every business.

    Don't we have enough weaseling in our life as it is?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:FFS by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Can we escape from the pervasive ads? Sure, people can choose to do whatever they well damn please, but I just don't want this to become the dominant mode of just about every business.

      Don't we have enough weaseling in our life as it is?

      Pay your book and be free of ads!!

      (but not free to lend it to others. No, the book is licensed to you, you don't actually own it, you only pay for us not pestering you with ads... for now).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:FFS by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind buying a limited book-reading license. But I'm not so keen on paying the same price as an actual book. Also, it should be advertised as such. "License to read with unlimited re-download access. Expires three months." or "tied to device, one download only" or whatever.

      But those things are less valuable to most readers than a perpetual, transferrable license would be. The price should therefore be correspondingly lower.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:FFS by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      That's the model that library ebooks currently follow: free, but they self-destruct in two weeks. Which I'm fine with, because I didn't pay for them. In general, I'll tolerate DRM on a rental because it simply enforces a rule that would exist anyway on a non-digital copy.

      What I'm not fine with is DRM of any kind on books that I pay more than a trivial amount for, or ebooks that cost more than the paperback would (after subtracting a reasonable printing and shipping cost).

    4. Re:FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, just let me crank up my disassembler.

    5. Re:FFS by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Indeed; I seee this morphing from "ads in free ebooks" to "ads in all ebooks", just like cable TV -- cable networks didn't use to have advertising, only free (OTA) networks.

      Now they have ads while the damned program is playing, the bastards!

  6. DO NOT WANT! by zippthorne · · Score: 2

    Gah. Looks like I'll be switching to kindle or sony when I get tired of my current reader. Hopefully I'm wrong about the jump to the backlit bandwagon, but it sure looks like they're trying to be an iPad, only less useful.

    Advertising.. sure, why not. no-money books will be good for everyone. But why does the choice have to be between way-overpriced in terms of money, and overpriced in terms of time - advertisements. Why not just price the books at what they're really worth, and make it up in volume. Especially as the marginal cost of an eBook is almost entirely licensing. If eBooks couldn't be shared or copied, but were all between $1 to $3...

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:DO NOT WANT! by molnarcs · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Exactly my thoughts here - when it comes to price. I wrote that review specifically for Vietnamese students (tried to simplify the language as well as the issues I touch upon). The prices set by the publishers for the digital versions is just fucking ridiculous. The average salary around here is $300/month, but even if that was not the case, 13-15$ for a shitty novel by Danielle Steel? WTF?? Give me out of copyright classics for $1 (already freely available, but I would pay for the convenience of a one stop shop), $2-3 for contemporaries, $5 at most for real gems - and I wouldn't bother with piracy. Of course I know the reason for these (probably don't want to compete with their own established traditional distribution chains, ie dead tree book business), but that's besides the point.

      Also, the stuff I wrote about e-ink vs. LCD - I know that many would find no difference between the two technologies, in other words, some people can read just fine on an LCD. I'm not one of them. For me, e-ink is far more pleasant to look at. Moreover, I started to go out for reading to breath a bit of fresh air and just be outside - sitting on the terrace of a cafe, in a park, on the beach beneath a shade... and that's where e-ink readers really shine and LCDs, including the iPAD, sucks balls. Indoors, in dim light/no light LCDs have an advantage, but I still find it better to use my Sony Reader with a lamp than reading on a screen with backlight.

    2. Re:DO NOT WANT! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      You may well already know about it, but Project Gutenberg is an excellent 'one stop shop' for out of copyright literature. Combine that with online library access and it becomes pretty easy to keep an eBook reader (legally) filled without paying to do so.

      That said, I quite agree with you that current eBook pricing is too high, and I think there's a lot of room for improvement in the market.

    3. Re:DO NOT WANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be wrong, it's been a while since I returned my Nook. (I couldn't get to grips with it being virtually impossible to take my physical library and put it on there. Even with the help of some less than reputable sources, some of those books are impossible to find digitally.) However, the classics were pretty cheap, around the dollar price point you mentioned. For example: http://preview.tinyurl.com/2ar45z3 95 cents for the complete Wizard of Oz collection.

    4. Re:DO NOT WANT! by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      but it sure looks like they're trying to be an iPad, only less useful.

      But also much less costful. I dunno ... root this baby, get an active developer scene and you've got a tablet at a price point where even I might buy one. It's a great pity B&N didn't allow access to the Android Market, and it does rather make me wonder why ... (You have the option to sell an ipad-killer at half the price, and yet you cripple it. Why??)

    5. Re:DO NOT WANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $5 each, I would buy contemporary textbooks in biology, genetics, chemistry, obscure areas of engineering/mechanics/medicine, etc. As a teacher, whenever we are reviewing textbooks for adoption, I would just buy them all, with my own money (we usually only look at 5 or 6 per course). I would recommend to my students supplemental textbooks, and expect that they buy them (unlike the current situation where they can neither afford the current edition ebook or hardback). At $2-3 each, it gets really interesting...I would really start to waste money...buying books out of the bibliography to the books I read.

      I would go from spending $0 for ebooks per year, to buying a device, and spending *at least* $20 a month on books. So publishers... am I the exception, or the rule? Under which scenario (cheap and plentiful vs overpriced and rare) do you make more money?

    6. Re:DO NOT WANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and that's where e-ink readers really SHINE and LCDs, including the iPAD, sucks balls.

      Sorry

  7. it was.. by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    only a matter of time. now if they could just get the hardware costs down a bit.

    i really like regular books over staring at a screen, but even i might be tempted to try an e-reader if the price was right.

    1. Re:it was.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a B&N Nook for $149. So far, I really like it a lot. If you ask me, the price is already right.

      I know the Kindle is $10 cheaper, but it doesn't support epub format, which is the future of ebook formats. The Sony Reader doesn't have expandable memory and the Sony Reader Touch has a LOT of glare due to the touchscreen (which defeats the purpose of having an e-ink display). The Kobo is featureless and costs as much as a Kindle or Nook. The iPad is too expensive and lacks e-ink.

    2. Re:it was.. by Barny · · Score: 1

      Nope, you will drag me away from my collection of dead trees when I am a cold dead corpse.

      Speaking of which, I am down to only a few books in my buffer, time to buy some more :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  8. Just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wowio specialized in offering digital versions of comic books and graphic novels"

    Just what the new Superman graphic novel was missing, a Viagra ad.

    1. Re:Just what we need by digitig · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I read the Superman comics back in the 60s the ads were for x-ray glasses and muscle building courses. So what's new?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    2. Re:Just what we need by Necron69 · · Score: 1

      Well obviously you will now be able to ogle the breasts of the Sea Monkey women in MOVING COLOR! Thank God for technology!

      - Necron69

  9. meh by jhoegl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ~$250 for a color e-book?

    What am I gunna do with it, read "Go dog, go" and "wheres waldo"?

    For $250, there better be a happy ending, and I dont mean a kids happy ending, I mean a massage parlor happy ending
    Dont spend your money on crap, the Dollar is still worth something!

    1. Re:meh by T+Murphy · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the color adds so much to the experience- it allows my pages to age and yellow like a real book! Not to mention how it should be able to display far more realistic coffee stains...

  10. Let me be the first to quote John Gruber by sribe · · Score: 1

    The Nook Color is slow painfully slow it makes me embarrassed for Barnes and Noble. Horrendous scrolling and zooming and touch responsiveness. Just horrendous.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to quote John Gruber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And let you be the last, dear god please make it stop

  11. Good Grief by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are we not all surrounded with enough ads yet? About the only place they're not yet is tattooed on the inside of our eyelids.

    To the advertisers: STFU already!

    1. Re:Good Grief by DeadPixels · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about other people, but if an ad is particularly annoying, I make a note to remember that company so as not to buy their products. Granted, it works the other way as well; if I see a particularly unobtrusive form of advertising or hear about a company doing something good, I make a point to check out their products and suggest them to friends. Word of mouth for me is much more effective than annoying popups and obtrusive, pushy ads. Those just make me hate you.

    2. Re:Good Grief by sjames · · Score: 1

      Same here. It's not advertising itself I object to, it's the excess of it. I also appreciate if they actually entertain. Of course, I have also seen attempts to entertain that fall so flat they become annoying.

    3. Re:Good Grief by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite agreed. Unfortunately, many people are morons, and will thus respond to adverts of that type. Not only will they respond, their aforementioned idiocy makes them more likely to be talked into buying inferior, overpriced products that they quite possibly don't even need.

      What surprises me more is not the bad adverts, but just how much our economy is based on advertising. TV, newspapers, sports & the majority of the internet all basically run on the assumption that the marketing is actually working. The advertisers keep paying with little tangible method to measure results, and I can never quite bring myself to believe the payoff is as good as they seem to think. Maybe I'm wrong - they're the millionaires, after all - I don't know, it just doesn't seem plausible that advertising can actually have enough impact to justify that kind of outlay.

    4. Re:Good Grief by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      I just want the advertisers to cut out the middle men and pay me to see their ads. I will happily wallpaper my hovel with their billboard ads if I get paid for it. Stickers on the shaving mirror, whatever. Who knows, if I save up the advertising money, one day I might buy one of their products.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    5. Re:Good Grief by noidentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To the buyers: stop buying things with ads already!

    6. Re:Good Grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theres an interesting venture, ad supported contact lenses

    7. Re:Good Grief by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

      Actual example: I purchased NCAA 11 for the Xbox. Well, at the end of every game, there is an unskippable 'Highlight of the game' which features a large, prominent ad for Reese's candy bar. As a big fan of teh NCAA dynasty mode, I play nearly nightly. And when I finish a game, I want to save it and move on. But you can't save until the commercial is complete and it's unskippable. Every night, I get angry at Reese's candy.

      As a result, when I actually see Reese's candy on a shelf, the association has been made. I just see it, and I'm angry and frustrated. I tell people not to buy it. I bought my Halloween candy making a point to deliberately avoid anything from Hershey. And all this could've been avoided by just letting me skip the 'Highlight of the game' when I'd already seen it far too many times.

      And the funny thing is that NCAA 11 will be gone in a few months. But I fully expect my angry at Reese's to go on for much longer.

    8. Re:Good Grief by Sirusjr · · Score: 1

      Yes an un-skippable video ad in a video game is not a good thing. I would probably end up boycotting the publisher if I found out such things were in a game I bought. However, I can see the advertisements on free e-books to be more akin to magazines where you have ads every other page which I wouldn't mind. Throughout 700 page book they could show me quite a few advertisements and I wouldn't complain.

  12. A smart move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would happily read books or comics with unobtrusive ads if it meant I didn't have to pay, and if obtaining them was simpler and faster than finding a pirated copy.

    This is pretty much the only way the publishing industry will survive. The TV industry will eventually have to do something similar for streaming TV too.

  13. Pengun patent? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Penguin paperback books hold a patent on advertising inside novels?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Pengun patent? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Well, if they do have a patent on this, at least they've had the decency to not use it. At least, I've never had a paperback novel with any advertising other than maybe on the inside cover or a few pages at the end. There, the advertising is at least out of the way of the body text.

    2. Re:Pengun patent? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I've got some books from the 1940's that have full color glossy ads (cigarettes, usually) in the middle and some that have b&w ads whenever a plot twist happens.

    3. Re:Pengun patent? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I have lots of Penguins from that period, but have never seen such adverts. Are these titles from a single genre? (Examples?)

    4. Re:Pengun patent? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I don't have them handy, but mostly westerns and space-fiction.

      If you switch "raygun" and "pistol", they read about the same.

  14. great, now all we need by LSDelirious · · Score: 1

    is adblock for Nook!

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
  15. Wowio? by Cidolfas · · Score: 2, Informative

    The same Wowio who managed to not pay the webcomic authors whose work they were selling?

    --
    I am become /dev/null, destroyer of data.
    1. Re:Wowio? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yup, the same in fact that limited their sales to US/Canada and screwed the few they did pay out of a large chunk of their reader base.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  16. Nothing new about books with ads by davidwr · · Score: 1

    For decades one of the most-read reference books in my house was 50% ads and was free for the asking.

    It was the city phone book.

    Before you say "yeah, but you paid for it in your phone bill" you could get a copy for free without a phone by walking into the phone company office at the right time of year.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Nothing new about books with ads by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia, I still get hard copy of both white-pages and yellow-pages delivered, despite the fact that I haven't had a Telstra phone for over 15 years, and always use the online directory. There doesn't seem to be any way to make them stop. In fact, I had such a delivery just yesterday: yet another large pile of paper that went straight into the recycle bin.

    2. Re:Nothing new about books with ads by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      They delivered two to my house just last week. We moved in in August, and the previous owners had phone service shut off back in January, so nobody has paid for the phone service to this address in almost a year. Still get the book.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  17. Yes by pitterpatter · · Score: 1

    Ads would stop me from acquiring materials from that source.

  18. Hope it's better than the Cruz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This sounds alot like the Cruz reader at Borders. The device isn't even beta quality and shouldn't even be on the shelves. No access to the Android market. Crazy limited Cruz market with nonfunctioning search. Downloaded books errored out when trying to read at times. Turning the unit off and back on would reset my email prefs for sound and how often to check. Touch screen missed almost half my presses. Unable to install android apps using SD card. It complained no mem was available when the 4gb internal was largely untouched. I could go on. I even updated it to a very current firmware. You can't even create a borders account using the built in borders app without errors. I want to like android. I don't know if this is typical for these new android tablets or android in general. The iPad costs more, but if a trouble free user experience is what the user is after then it's worth it.

  19. Actually this sounds alright to me. by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

    I don't know.. I hate advertising too, but think about it.. all the books I could read, legally free, and all I have to do is skip a few pages every now and then? This doesn't sound like a bad deal at all. Just like reading magazines, in fact, which everyone's already pretty accustomed to. If this means more books for everyone, bring it on!

    Speaking of magazines, it only makes sense that mags would eventually start encroaching on the ebook platform. Heck, the fact that I currently can't read magazines on my reader kind of sucks, so again, bring it on!

    1. Re:Actually this sounds alright to me. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound too horrible, until you think that eventually they'll get the idea to force the display of the ad for a minimum amount of time.

      While I might not mind it flashing in between page flips or even taking up a constant amount of real-estate like a banner ad, being forced to twiddle my thumbs for 2 or 5 seconds every so often would tick me off.

    2. Re:Actually this sounds alright to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it time.

      "skip a few pages every now and then" will quickly change to "be unskippable, and you will have to stare at it or set it down for 60 seconds".

      And then will come the animated ads. Colour Nook? Colour ads. Bright, flashy, moving colour ads.

      And after that, the underlined keywords in the novel. It'll pop up a little box, covering half of the rest of the page, showing an ad related to that word. You'll have to click on a tiny X in the corner to make it go away. Clicking anywhere else on the screen will bring you to the order page!

      Oh, and let's not forget... there will also be the bottom 1/4 of the page permenantly dedicated to showing ads. Or maybe the top 1/4. Or both. Animated of course. And bright.

      And god help you if it has speaker capability.

      Yep... sure is a good direction to be going.

      With a real magazine, you actually CAN skip the page outright. For particularly annoying looking ones, I'll fold the back page around so that I can't see it (because it seems all the really annoying ones are full-page ones anyway).

  20. iPhone/iPad uber alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, folks, is why Apple rules. Better hardware. Better software (faster, more secure, more apps, more EVERYTHING) etc.

  21. How about free books? by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know I found Robin Hobb's Assassin's apprentice and it's subsequent trilogies after it was put up for free on the publishers website. So for giving me 1 free book I bought 8 more and am still reading her latest stuff to come out since then. If I'd not of seen that free book I'd of never bought the rest.

    1. Re:How about free books? by Barny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Great series, I found them by referrals from friends. You know, switching off the computer, getting outside and, uh, talking to people :)

      We regularly catch up and swap books around so that we all have something new and a little different to read.

      Sometimes the best answers to these sorts of problems, isn't to make another computer solution.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:How about free books? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I bought Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom after reading the ebook edition; Doctorow posts all his books on the internet for free (GPL license).

      I checked out Thud from the library after recommendation from a friend. I need more than a recommendation to shell out cash; I have to work for my money. But now there are three Pratchett books on my shelf, and there will be more.

    3. Re:How about free books? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I work for my money too...

      And I do indeed highly recommend Sir Pratchett's books, I now have about 15 of them :)

      Also, the more you trade recommendations with people, and they learn your tastes (and vice versa), the better everyone will be able to pick books that each other may enjoy. It's also great if you swap books, as I said, because then you don't have to fork out quite so much, and you end up reading things you may otherwise have not.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    4. Re:How about free books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "not of"?! Dear god(s).

  22. Real Books by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    I *will not* pay for eBooks that are any more DRM encumbered than a PDF with a password. But then, I *like* reading actual books.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Real Books by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I think most people probably prefer paper for the actual reading experience (I know I do), but ereaders do have their advantages - the combination of a vast array of free classic content, the ability to download instantly from both local and international libraries and have the books 'return' themselves automatically, and, perhaps most importantly, the ability to carry a whole collection in a small, light unit was enough to convince me to get one. Considering what I'd end up spending even on out of copyright novels it's already working towards paying for itself surprisingly quickly.

      I'm with you on the DRM issue, though. Fine for rentals/library borrowing, but totally unacceptable for something that I'm supposed to own.

    2. Re:Real Books by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The problem for me is that the prices they want are way too high for a book you don't own. Now, if they were just a few bucks, I'd buy hundreds of them maybe.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  23. No. Just no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read books to escape the monotony of real life. I do NOT want to be forcibly reminded of the outside world while trying to lose myself in a novel. So, in short, NO THANKS. I'd rather pay for my books.

  24. Lending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why not loosen the restrictions on lending ebooks and just insert ads into the lent copies? It allows the title to be passed further while still netting some revenue?

    That's the one thing I don't get about the digital publishing arguments. It's like both sides don't seem to understand the other is required. Publishers seem to just want to magically print money and charge ridiculous prices, while consumers want everything handed to them on a gold platter for free. It's a co-op game guys, bout time it was played for a win-win.

  25. AdBlock by definate · · Score: 1

    Awesome! Can somebody link me to AdBlock for Nook?

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  26. Would ads stop you from reading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES! Ads are a deal-breaker. Period.

  27. Tablet maybe... terrible book reader though by sgent · · Score: 1

    If you look at the spec's, it claims "up to" an 8 hour battery life with airplane mode, which is drastically shorter than current eInk based technology (I routinely get 25-30 hours of reading out of a nook easily with airplane mode on).

    It is also backlit, which contributes to insomnia for those who read late at night or in bed (see La Times).

    I'd love to see a color, eInk based technology, but if I wanted a tablet instead of a ebook reader, I'd buy one. They both have their places, but LCD screens are not a substitute yet.

  28. Already trying to happen by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    Apparently, a week or two back, an ad agency contacted Neil Gaiman to see if they could get product placement in his next novel. He was aghast in the way that only mild-mannered, scary trousers authors can pull off.

  29. Android by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why block the Android market? If I could install Android apps, then it would be a cheap tablet and I'd gladly buy it. Without Android market, it is a one-off gadget and overpriced. Why intentionally limit a feature that would otherwise be a selling point?

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      low powered processor means that more complex apps will be epic fails.

  30. No kidding by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    The whole thing that makes eReaders so brilliant is the reflective screen. I'm fine with backlit screens, but for laptops and desktops. For reader things, a reflective screen is the way to go not only for battery life but for all purpose readability as well. The Kindle really does look "like paper" they aren't kidding. That is what makes it nice.

    1. Re:No kidding by swillden · · Score: 1

      The whole thing that makes eReaders so brilliant is the reflective screen. I'm fine with backlit screens, but for laptops and desktops. For reader things, a reflective screen is the way to go not only for battery life but for all purpose readability as well.

      I disagree. I've avoided the e-ink screens so far for exactly that reason -- no backlight means I can't read in the dark. I do much of my reading in bed at night and a nice backlight, turned way down, is perfect: great visibility, no extra light to muck with and dim enough that it doesn't keep my wife from sleeping.

      So far, I've gone through a Rocket eBook, a couple of RCA REB-1150s and now I use my iPod Touch, until I get an iPad -- or maybe the new Nook. A backlight is essential. Battery life really isn't that much of a problem; my iPod Touch only runs about 10 hours, which is marginal but acceptable, while the dedicated readers were 20+ hours on a charge.

      Oh, and all of the above were perfectly readable in full sunlight as well. A backlight doesn't mean the screen can't also be reflective. Laptop screens aren't, but that's because they're generally intended to be used indoors.

      As for "looking like paper", who cares? Paper may be what we're most accustomed to reading on, because it was the best mass-produceable printing technology we had for centuries, but that doesn't mean it's the only option, or even the best option.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  31. Good Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've come to this situation because people don't want to pay for content. Put two plates of cookies side by side, both identical except one is free and the other $0.99. Which will be emptier by the end of the day? All else being equal the only way to even attempt to make money off the free crowd is to apply psychologically refined messages liberally till they lose the will to live and viola, a sale.

    1. Re:Good Sale. by sjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or they could try producing things people would actually pay for and foster an economy where people have enough money to do so...

  32. Reviving an old concept by Reziac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You young whippersnappers wouldn't remember this, but back in the Olden Days most deadtree books contained advertising. Paperbacks typically had a glossy insert in the middle (most often a cigarette ad), and hardbacks had several pages of ads in the back, usually something at least vaguely relevant to the book's content, and also sometimes ads for other books (and not only from that book's publisher).

    It occurs to me that if ads were placed at the end of the ebook (much as ads in hardbacks used to be at the back of the book) there's incentive to improve content, to get the average reader to finish the book and see the ads.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Reviving an old concept by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I have seen a few related ads in books, but I was thinking more generally: the "free with loads of ads" concept is not new or unique. :)

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    2. Re:Reviving an old concept by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      I'm all for ads in ebooks, provided that I can read the ebook on an open ebook reader where I've installed my choice of adblocker.

      The problem I see is that advertisers naturally want to prevent people from filtering out the ads automatically, and the only realistic way to do that is to lock down the hardware so that people can't easily run their own OS and preferred software. And that approach is generally bad for open source.

      If publishers expect to distribute free ebooks with ads embedded in them, they'll soon learn that there are armies of dedicated people out there who will strip those ads out and share the ebooks far and wide. The Ad model worked with dead tree books because there was no simple way for readers to strip them out quickly and professionally, but digital ebooks and file sharing culture are a different ballgame.

      If I were a publisher, I'd go back to the drawing board with this one.

    3. Re:Reviving an old concept by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Uhm, how come? Browsing through my book shelves, I can't think of ANY book with advertising other than excerpts/cover photos of other books at the end. Neither for books from the 19th century which I have just a couple, not those from 21th. Cigarette inserts? Where? Is the situation on the left side of the pond that much worse than here?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Reviving an old concept by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually you could strip the ads out of deadtree books, all it took was 5 seconds with a scissor or razor blade, and halfway-fair aim. (When you see an old book with a bunch of the last few pages missing, that's probably what happened.)

      But the real point was that other than noticing they were there, you weren't forced to view them. Nothing prevented you from turning the page and totally ignoring them, or never going that far in the first place. (Tho the insert in paperbacks was a bit obnoxious because it made a stiff spot in the book, and sometimes a weak point at the spine.)

      If we can ignore or bypass ads in ebooks, then who cares, let them advertise. But if they're thrust into our faces like it or not and before we can read the rest of the book -- that's a great way to either fail, or as you say, incite the legions of pissed-off coders.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Reviving an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you've not seen a paperback with a cigarette advertising insert is not at all surprising. I know there were paperbacks with cigarette ad inserts in the 1970's and 1980's (possibly even the late 1960's). By the early 1990's the anti-smoking trend was underway so I think it unlikely that any publishers would have bothered with them.

    6. Re:Reviving an old concept by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't know, maybe it was an American-publisher thing, but it used to be more routine than not. I have a bunch of older books (1900-1920ish) with ad pages in the back, and a ton of 1950s/60s/70s paperbacks that have (well, had, I removed them all) the glossy insert ad page.

      Magazines used to have their ads more confined to one area in the back too, rather than every other page being either an ad or a thinly-disguised infomercial.

      At any rate, my point was it's not a new concept.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Reviving an old concept by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How old are you? I've been reading since 1958 (1st grade) and I never once saw an ad in a hardback book, even cheap ones, and I read LOTS of books; I practically lived at the library, usually read* a dozen books a week. Paperbacks had ads in the back sometimes, usually for other books, but I never saw an ad in a hardback book.

      *past tense; why is the past tense "read" spelled the same as the present tense "read"?

    8. Re:Reviving an old concept by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm of 1955 vintage and have been reading since I was 3 or 4... but maybe I've just got an older collection of books. I first noticed the ads with older dog-training reference works (which is what I've got the most of, going back to the 1920s) but have seen it in old novels too (back into the 1880s or so). Some of these are old enough that the ads are for patent medicines.

      And I learned that the past tense of "lead" was also "lead" but if you write that nowadays, no one understands what you meant. Don't know what the origin is but at a guess something Anglo-Saxon. I expect in another generation we'll have to write "read, red" for the young punks to grok that we meant the past tense. Red meaning the colour will be right out; you'll have to say "cherry" or "strawberry" or maybe even "#ff0000" to be understood. ;)

      Coincidentally, someone just emailed me a gripe about ambiguous punctuation, which I responded to with a reference to "Eats, Shoots and Leaves". :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Reviving an old concept by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's why Led Zeppelin didn't call themselves "Lead Zeppelin", although lead (the metal) was what they meant.

      I suspect that the old "dime novels" may have had ads in them, but even the Hardy Boy and Rick Brandt books (a buck each, hardcover) didn't.

    10. Re:Reviving an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I picked up a few used paperbacks with cigarette ads in them. They were bound in in much springier paper, nearly cardstock, and in the middle of the book, so it took me about thirty seconds to get so exasperated at them I took them out with a razor blade. The ads in the back for more and different books? Printed on the same paper as all the rest, and out of the way. I never removed a one. Even read a few, although I've never actually bought anything advertised there.

      I imagine, if the ads are obnoxious enough, they'll get ripped out almost as swiftly (barring draconian efforts on the parts of the publishers, both technical and legal (DMCA? Oh dear)).

      Advertisers still have a lot to learn about how not to be annoying.

      AC

  33. This is cheesy to put ads in what you read. by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Books should be free if they're in e-format. Trying to charge for them when they can be distributed for free is cheesy. This is Cheetos cheesy, with one crunch you can't get enough, so stick a cheetah in your mouth. If books were free, education would be cheaper. I'm talking as cheap as Natural Light Beer. A cheaper education would mean more people would be educated. They'd be educated more than Leap Frog ever did with all their proprietary hardware. Look we got the hardware, because Intel, AMD and Apple are awesome inside. So the software should be free. People think things wouldn't be created anymore, and we fret that that another great song from Justin Bieber wouldn't be released. Yet if someone discovers something new like Newton, of Fig Newton fame.*end cheesiness* Who are going to keep the information to themselves? People are going to share new knowledge and become famous. And if they want to be as much of the corporate shill as the people trying to make the laws today, they can use their fame to make money. But I think the future is bright for people who share information and make it free. If education was free, the world would be vastly smarter. A smarter world researches diseases better. The downside to a smarter populace is they don't buy into corporate BS. There are people with a large amount of wealth to be lost if books were all free. This is the only reason it doesn't happen. Because some people are greedy. People don't say all books are free because there is a minority who wants to oppress the majority. Sure free books and free software would let 3rd world countries have education on par with universities, but greedy people would rather make money on their books. And a lot of the money isn't on innovations. This isn't really a rant as much as this is reality. We can change the future by donating time and money to free software. We can change the future by writing our own books and giving them out for free. This is my plan. I plan on making a couple bucks on Flash games, then I'll move on to re-writing books (similar books, just not plagiarized completely) for education. Finally I'll write custom software to help people learn.

  34. This worries me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this catches on at first it will be good. People will be able to read books for free in exchange for advertisement. But eventually people will become accustomed to it and then sellers will realize they could make more money if they just charged a little bit for the book. Then this model becomes the much greater profit maker and more and more sellers adopt this model until it's hard to find a book without it.

    Finally, now that ads have become the industry standard there's no longer a reason to keep price low, so price slowly climbs back up to it's original level and now books cost the same as they did originally except you have to look at advertising.

  35. As long as the ads are on the left page.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have no problem with that as long as the ads are on the left page..

  36. Direct Sponsorship by SpectreHiro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems most folks here are pretty disgusted at the idea of advertising in books, but how would you feel about direct corporate sponsorships conducted in a tasteful manner? Let's say your favorite sci-fi author's books were all released as Intel Presents or AMD Presents, similar to the old anthology shows from the '50s & '60s such as The Alcoa Hour, Kraft Television Theater, and the Westinghouse Desilu Playhouse; would that inspire the same level of disgust?

    I'm very interested in finding a way to distribute fiction for free without DRM, thus maximizing the value to readers, while at the same time raising some profit for the writer. Advertising seems to be the optimal way to get it done. The other leading contender would be the Ransom Model, but that has some inherent weaknesses that are rather difficult to work around. If you have other ideas, I'm absolutely all ears.

    --
    You can't win, Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Direct Sponsorship by charleylc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your idea has merit. It's much better than the more invasive ads that take up space and cause the reader to shift away from reading to looking at the ad because it just flashed or changed. I personally detest ads. The constant bombardment of ads for every imaginable product is annoying to say the least. Google has done a pretty decent job with the text ads that take up little space and are non-flashing. However, I much rather pay for a book than to have to suffer through advertising. Even watching Hulu annoys me with the ads that are placed in the shows. Although, that's better than regular TV, which not only has more advertising, but ads that blare at a volume much louder than the show that I'm watching. It drives me nuts and stirs feelings of wishing physical harm on those that perpetrate such underhanded, devious, and annoying tatics just to get their products noticed (or ignored because the volume is immediately turned down or muted). I guess it really has become a pet peave of mine. I personally feel that there needs to be more restrictions on what is and is not allowed with advertising. I'm positive that if any such measure were attempted that they would immediately scream about freedom of speech rights. I have seen the legislature efforts requiring the volume of television ads to be the same as the programming it accompanies, which I highly applaud - a nice step in the right direction. I guess I'm saying (albeit, in a round about way) that I would be willing to give something like you suggest a try. The less invasive it is, the better. It comes down to weighing pros and cons of being annoyed by ads but getting something without monetary cost vs paying for the product to be free from the pain of ads. If it's a toss up, then sure, I'd go for it. If the ads are too annoying, then no, I'd rather buy the book straight up.

    2. Re:Direct Sponsorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everything right, I would be very happy with this model. However, I can easily envision those corporate sponsors then deciding that those works represent the company. And this is a nice family company, so, Mr. Author, maybe that sexy scene on chapter 4 shouldn't be so graphic. And the way you kill off the Republican Senator in the ninth chapter, maybe that should be a Democrat Senator. Also, Mr. Author, our studies show that our customers love funny cartoonish characters with large, floppy ears and a speech impediment. Maybe HE could be the Senator, and maybe get his tongue stuck in an engine for laughs. Wait, where was I going with this? Dammit, I hate Jar-Jar!

    3. Re:Direct Sponsorship by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You could follow Cory Doctorow's method.

  37. Depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a time and a place for both substandard "e-readers" and advertisement-laden crap.

    I really don't give a crap what an O'Reilly book is presented on - I'm mining it for data, and frankly, digital is better since technology is constantly changing. Dead tree tech books are a stupid idea.

    Donaldson? Tolkien? O'Brian? Anything else I'd choose for a cold winter afternoon in front of a fire, coupled with a mug of coffee that has been roasted to perfection?

    GTFO, with both your e-crap and your advertisements, before I tell you where you might shove them, good sir.

  38. At least it will be free... by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 1

    Unlike "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo". That "novel" (since it was really just one long advertisement) was full of product placements, including an advertisement for a Swedish word processing package - complete with URL and price.

    At least this way, when I'm blasted with advertisements, I won't have paid for the experience.

  39. would ads bother me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends...if they are between pages, then probably not. If they are woven into the text of a page I'm trying to read? Screw that.

  40. not novel.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this a novel approach? Almost all content that is "free", does so by putting in ads. This is nothing new. Broadcast tv, iphone apps, radio, websites, etc. Is it really an innovation to do this with ebooks? I guess I should have patented the obvious.

  41. Inventing some new concepts by AlbionTourgee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Meanwhile there are some new really interesting concepts in the ebook world, like free online reading coupled with new approaches to low-overhead publishing. See for example Libertary, www.libertary.com, some more varied and interesting books and less hype. Libertary's developing a low-overhead publishing model that uses free online reading to generate interest in books as well as a bit more highly featured free reading model. Or, if you have good Chinese, check out www.read-novel.com, probably the largest book site in the world. Or of course there's always Safari. And Boing Boing opened their own book site today. So there actually is some really interesting stuff going on in the free books field.

    1. Re:Inventing some new concepts by Reziac · · Score: 1

      All to the good. Thanks for the references. Goes to show there's more than one way to do ebooks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Inventing some new concepts by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile there are some new really interesting concepts in the ebook world, like free online reading

      We used to call that a library; B&N and Borders extended it by putting Starbucks coffee companies and chairs in the store where you can read anything for free off the shelves.

      coupled with new approaches to low-overhead publishing.

      Don Lancaster, back in the Apple ][ days, extolled the virtues of desktop publishing on an on demand basis; complete with laser printer and thermal or ring binding.

      So there actually is some really interesting stuff going on in the free books field.

      There is, but ebooks expanded the market for older ideas and eased distribution. As with much technology, it has enabled a broader application of an old idea.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  42. 20 != The Answer by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I have only half-jokingly suggested reducing copyright terms to 42 years. Yes they ought to go down, maybe further eventually, but 42 seems like a good first step.
    I wouldn't make it retroactive (ex post facto), but at least stop the extensions.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:20 != The Answer by Zumbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that the extensions of the copyright term were applied retroactively, I don't see the problem with retroactively applying a shorter copyright term. Particularly w.r.t. those works that has had their copyright term extended.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    2. Re:20 != The Answer by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      42 is still far too long. People should be able to freely create derivative works while the material is still at least kind-of fresh. It'd be nice if artists who were inspired by works in their childhood were able to directly use or re-imagine those works no later than their 30s, rather than in their 50s or later.

      I think the original 14 is plenty, personally. 14 years is a pretty damn long time when you think about it.

    3. Re:20 != The Answer by Yoozer · · Score: 1

      The optimal term is actually around 14 years. See http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2007/07/research-optimal-copyright-term-is-14-years.ars . And yes - of course it should be done ex post facto. You don't get to continue having free rides when the sign at the door says no more free rides.

    4. Re:20 != The Answer by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence. 14 years is how long the original US Copyright Act endorsed. If they author was still alive, he could "renew" the copyright for another 14 years for 28 total, but records show most authors didn't bother.

      In any case, the copyright should never last longer than the original laborer. His children should not be profiting when they did not do any work. That's why Jefferson had originally proposed 19 years - it was the average lifespan from creation of the book to the author's death (in 1790).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:20 != The Answer by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      14 years is a pretty damn long time when you think about it.

      It is when you're 15, not when you're 45, and certainly not when you're pushing sixty.

      That said, 14 years is reasonable. I'd even go so far as 20, but longer than that is unreasonable.

    6. Re:20 != The Answer by mysidia · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't make it retroactive (ex post facto), but at least stop the extensions.

      It's not ex post facto or retroactive. Congress has the power to change the duration of copyright, whenever it wants, and already did increase the term for existing works and take works out of the public domain.

      Congress has the power (but not the obligation) to secure for authors rights for limited times. They can change what type of rights and who/when they are securing them for at any time. There is no contract with congress; they can grant additional rights, or take away existing ones at any time.

      Retroactive, would be passing a law requiring users to pay royalties for a copyright work, and demanding people who used the work when the law was not in force, pay the royalties.

      Retroactive, would be passing a law extending the term, bringing a public domain work back into copyright, and declaring anyone who distributed the previously public domain works as criminals to be fined or jailed for their acts of distribution, before the law came into force.

      This was not ex post facto, because people who were distributing works that had been taken from the public domain back into copyright were not made guilty of infringement, for their actions that were taken when the works were in the public domain.

      I am not suggesting congress retroactively forgive the copyright infringement of anyone who pirated a work, when the longer term was in force.

    7. Re:20 != The Answer by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if two wrongs would make a right.
      I'm perfectly OK with adjustments going forward, though that strictly speaking would lead to some newer works hitting the public domain before some older works.
      So, I'd perhaps say:
      "X years for new works, no more than X more years for existing works - if an existing work would have hit the public domain before X, at least let it hit like normal."

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    8. Re:20 != The Answer by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      The linked paper (http://www.rufuspollock.org/economics/papers/optimal_copyright.pdf) reminds me in concept of Landes & Posner’s “Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law”, also an economist taking a refreshingly different look at the structure of IP law without discarding the concept.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    9. Re:20 != The Answer by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I admit I was speaking of 'ex post facto' less literally that you were.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    10. Re:20 != The Answer by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Yes, copyright is indeed a limitation on the creation of future works, as older works are often an input to new ones. How powerful this limitation is depends on strength of copyright as well as length.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  43. but not in our dreams. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?
    Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines. And movies. And at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts and written on the sky. But not in dreams. No siree!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:but not in our dreams. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Boy, they really messed up with the "Leela" character. First, they spelled her name wrong, Leila has two eyes, and it's her sister that's the mutant, not Leila. And it's one kidney, not one eye. And they didn't even give her a cyborg dad!

      Gees, can't cartoonist get anything right? Well, Fry was an accurate depiction at any rate.

  44. only for the ads by Thraxy · · Score: 1

    Well, given that the article says "books that perhaps they wouldn't normally peruse if they had to pay more for them", I might consider getting these books, only to see the ads. One can only speculate on the quality of the written works...

  45. ad block? by batistuta · · Score: 1

    Someone will eventually make an adblock either by hacking the format or by blanking the ad content fed via the network connection. I can't really guess how, but I'm sure someone will do it.

  46. Or... by Geminii · · Score: 1

    You could ask the nearby library (remember those?) to get a copy of the book in, and then read it both free and ad-free.

  47. The adds are already there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Stieg Larsson's Lisbeth Salander trilogy ("Girl of the dragon tattoo", etc) the tiresome description of all the gadgets includes specific brands.

    The books are great, but that bit about the unnecessary whorish product placement left a bad taste in my mouth...

  48. An author's opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a registered user of Slashdot, but I read it every day. When I read this headline, I felt compelled to comment.

    Free ebooks with advertising? I don't think so. I would never agree to that. Books are a form of art like film and music and there's absolutely no reason advertising should pop its head out of the hole to popularize it. Books stand on its own merits.

    If my publisher said it was going to do this to my novels, I'd gladly rip up my contract with them, gladly pay off the contract (a great loss for me) and tell them to go fornicate themselves with a retractable baton. My agent will have fifty new publishers lined up for me to sign with.

    The concept of getting ebooks for free with included ads is complete bullshit. Publishers should be ashamed of herself.

  49. I want AdBlock by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    I haven't even seen the first one, and I already want AdBlock. Heck, I want AdBlock for my whole life.

    Sure, the ads aren't intrusive...yet. If ads are not intrusive, the advertisers are not getting their money's worth, and they will demand that the ads become intrusive. Look at other media. Commercials DVDs now have unskippable ads at the start - horrible. Ads in web pages also started out pretty harmless. Now, without AdBlock, many sites are practically unusable.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  50. I wonder... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this version of the nook will delete all of your non Barnes & Noble books too?

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  51. You can keep your e-books by kheldan · · Score: 1

    ..and I'll stick by my nice, ad-free, bullshit-free printed books, that need only my eyes and some light to read, that can be read as many times and as often as I want, that I can loan out to as many people as often as I like, that can't be altered or erased after I've purchased it (short of being physically destroyed, anyway).
    But by all means, please do use your e-book readers for your textbooks, newspapers, magazines, PDF files, and all other otherwise printed matter than before too long ends up in the recycle bin. That's a great use for them, I think.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  52. Only a matter of time before ads will be removed by johanw · · Score: 1

    Is is only a matter of time before ads will be removed by some nice piece of software that's available for free download. Just as with DRM "protection".

  53. Maybe ads might not be so bad by voss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the ads added value to the book.

    Imagine a science fiction book with ads for science fiction magazine or a book about learning about
      computers that came with ads for newegg. Technology doesnt have to suck just because it can.

  54. But a more insidious side effect... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

    I doubt advertisers will want to just pony up blindly for the ads and cross their fingers that people are actually seeing them. They will probably want statistics - including knowing what you are reading so they can better target their advertising dollars.

    And sure, they will remove any identifying information - like IP address, serial number of the device, or even the registered name of the device owner from those records. There is no chance they would want that information to be able to target you directly or sell that information to someone else.

    Sure, B&N and Amazon already know what you buy and read but the recent attempt by North Carolina to get information on what NC residents bought at Amazon instead of only the dollar figure shows that people's reading history can have organizations try to get at it.

    I think advertisers would just sell it instead of defending their "customers" right to privacy.

    1. Re:But a more insidious side effect... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>There is no chance they would want that information to be able to target you directly or sell that information to someone else.

      Nice sarcasm.
      But these things don't cause me to have fear.
      I get to read the latest Tom Clancy or Higgins Clark for free.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  55. Where are these free ebooks? by Quirkz · · Score: 1
    I'm horribly confused by the summary. Where are these free ebooks? I'd gladly accept a few ads, assuming they're just embedded in pages and I can keep flipping through.

    However, despite that being the title and mention of one tiny site I've never heard of that does it for graphic novels, does this invention *actually* exist anywhere? Because I'd go out and download a bunch of those books right now.

    And why's that headline blended in with a bunch of details about the leaked product? It implies they're related, when they don't seem to be at all.

  56. oh great ... by nblender · · Score: 1

    "Continued on page 82." "Continued on page 27." "Continued on page 35." "Continued on page 98." "Continued on page 12."

  57. The next logical step by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Full price e-books that contain ads.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  58. Terminology issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    We have a term that describes something that is "free but with advertising." People (especially the media) should learn to use it. The word is SPONSORED. It isn't free.

  59. Atlas Shrugged by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Presented by Rand McNally!

    ((Shrugs))

    Who needs Atlases when you have GPS?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  60. How does it stack up? by smchris · · Score: 1

    Baby steps -- a sandboxed "Aspire One" in tablet format with a touch screen (and a less glaring screen?) OK. Whatever.

    Is this an admission that e-ink isn't cutting it and responsive, color e-ink isn't happening any time soon?
       

  61. Yeah, OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why you can't go on the Barnes & Noble website and buy it right now for .....drum roll please...... $249.00! Crash! Bang! (Now don't you feel silly?)

  62. uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and what exactly prevents me from stripping the ads from the pdf file?

    captcha: lisped (as this comment should be read)

  63. Up Against the Wallmarts of Your Mind by grikdog · · Score: 1

    You can have my book-without-advertising when you pry it from my cold dead brains. Fahrenheit 452.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  64. Regurgitated press release by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    Better submissions please.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  65. No ads here! by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    I've made eBook editions of my book, "Chasing the Runner's High", available without ads, and you can name your own price. Well, no ads except for this one....