Slashdot Mirror


Soviet Image Editing Tool From 1987

nacturation writes "Three years before Photoshop 1.0 was released, computer engineers in the USSR were already retouching photographs using some surprisingly advanced technology. A video shows how the Soviets went about restoring damaged images with the help of rotary scanners, magnetic tape, and trackballs. No word on whether this technology was used to fake moon landings or put missiles in Cuba." Photo manipulation in the USSR (and elsewhere) had a pretty good jump on computers, though.

146 comments

  1. BT, DT by blair1q · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure I was cutting and pasting and cropping and rotating images on uVAXen a couple of years before this.

    1. Re:BT, DT by motorhead · · Score: 0

      Useful for adding and deleting bolsheviks

      --
      Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
    2. Re:BT, DT by Suki+I · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I was cutting and pasting and cropping and rotating images on uVAXen a couple of years before this.

      So you are outing yourself as part of the conspiracy?

    3. Re:BT, DT by JustFisher · · Score: 1

      do you remember the resolution and color depth?

    4. Re:BT, DT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Deluxe Paint preceded Photoshop 1.0 by 5 years...

    5. Re:BT, DT by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 2, Funny

      sounds more like he's outing himself as old.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    6. Re:BT, DT by andyi · · Score: 1

      I worked on the 3M Color Workstation in 1985 (I think). It used custom graphics processing hardware from a company out of Pasadena. I forget their name. It predated PS and was totally crushed once Photoshop added color support. I remember the laser scanner and workstations looking a lot like the ones in the video.

    7. Re:BT, DT by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      If his account was on kgbvax, then yes :-).

    8. Re:BT, DT by the_womble · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't believe it. Next you will try to tell me that Microsoft did not invent spreadsheets word-processors and windowing OSes.

    9. Re:BT, DT by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      I was doing astronomical image analysis on photographic negatives in 1985. Images were scanned using a (monochrome) photodensitometer attached to a PDP 11 and manipulated on a VAX 11-750 with a Grinnell display (512x512x8, IIRC). Nothing would have prevented you from doing most basic Photoshop type manipulations, and developing your own routines to do image manipulation was far easier than doing so for Photoshop is right now.

      By 1987, megapixel 8-bit displays would have been common in astronomy. By 1988, the undergraduate lab in Berkeley had a IBM PGA attached to an RT-PC. The grad students were using MicroVAX consoles (mostly grayscale). Shortly thereafter the switch to Sun boxes began.

      I'm sure national intelligence photo analysis and modification was far ahead of Astronomy the whole time.

    10. Re:BT, DT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds more like he's outing himself as old.

      ROFL!

    11. Re:BT, DT by Chuckie+Norris · · Score: 1

      I won't tell you, but then I'd be lieing.

  2. I would assume the Chinese had the lead in that by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 1

    And I'm not even joking. Aren't autocratic regimes the obvious clients for such techniques?

    1. Re:I would assume the Chinese had the lead in that by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So THAT is how Kim Jong Il was able to be the doctor doing the delivery at his own birth!

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:I would assume the Chinese had the lead in that by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Well, OTOH full-blooded autocracy might not even really need such methods all that much, vs. places where the "voice of people" supposedly matters.

      (really, it might have been almost a sport; coming from a place formerly behind the Iron Curtain, I'm pretty sure people were treating anything coming from the Party with a grain of salt anyway)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:I would assume the Chinese had the lead in that by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Chinese have the lead in a lot of things. And cadmium as well.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:I would assume the Chinese had the lead in that by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      And I'm not even joking. Aren't monochromatic regimes the obvious clients for such techniques?

      there. Fixed that for you.

  3. I would have been more impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But they were doing this stuff with deluxe paint on an Amiga in 1985.

    1. Re:I would have been more impressed by mikael · · Score: 1

      There were also 24-bit/32-bit color paint systems like the Quantel paintbox, and Tempra as well.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  4. Nifty by bchickens · · Score: 1

    Its nice to see that someone besides the super geek was using image editing back then!

    --
    ~Bchickens
    1. Re:Nifty by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Everybody was using it. With or without computers

      If you open a 70-80-es soviet book on photography there is always a BIG chapter on touching up pictures. There is a reason for it - if you see the zombies in charge (Brezhnev, Suslov, etc) faces without retouching you would probably lose sleep for the next few days from recurring nightmares.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  5. In Soviet Russia.... by Quantus347 · · Score: 0

    ...Photo's edit you!!!

    --
    Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      I clicked on the comments for this specifically to see how far I had to scroll to find the Yakov. (further than I thought)

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by LSD-OBS · · Score: 1

      Same here, about half a page further than I thought. I guess we must not be new here :)

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  6. [Insert Obligatory Soviet Russia Joke Here] by CdrGlork · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now the rest of you can concentrate on real, intelligent responses. Don't say I never took one for the team.

    1. Re:[Insert Obligatory Soviet Russia Joke Here] by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Soviet Russia the team takes one for you?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:[Insert Obligatory Soviet Russia Joke Here] by Illusion2269 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia the team takes one for you?

      No, In Soviet Russia, you take one after another, after another, for the glory of Mother Russia, and like it! Yeah, doesn't quite roll off the tongue as nicely though...

    3. Re:[Insert Obligatory Soviet Russia Joke Here] by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, photo edits you!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:[Insert Obligatory Soviet Russia Joke Here] by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Now the rest of you can concentrate on real, intelligent responses. Don't say I never took one for the team.

      YMBNH

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Er... yeah... and ? by MouseR · · Score: 3, Informative

    Earlier in the late 70s and early 80s, people around the globe used Crossfield and Hell drum scanners to retouch photos. Yeahs before computers were able to do it.

    I had pieces of a Hell drum scanner in my office in 1988 when I was building an image correction software to control it. By then, ImagePro had already been doing this for a couple of years, on computers.

    1. Re:Er... yeah... and ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't forget about the Dainippon Screen drum scanners and systems like the Sigmagraph 2000

      1981 The company's first electronic page makeup system, the Sigmagraph 2000, is introduced. This system is the forerunner of Dainippon Screen's subsequent page makeup systems.

      http://www.screenusa.com/history.cfm?section=5

    2. Re:Er... yeah... and ? by youngone · · Score: 1

      That's not quite right. I was a Photolithographer all through the 80's (and most of the 90's too), and as a "Colour Stripper" (cue jokes now), I took the seperated film from the scanner and did the actual retouching on a light bench with a paint brush and a retouching paste, (can't even remember what it was called now). It took a long time, as required a fair bit of skill, which is why we were paid quite well to do it. When Macs became fast enough, and Photoshop mature enough to do the job, we did it using those tools. Takes a lot less skill frankly, its just a matter of knowing what works and doing that again and again.

  8. "Damaged" images. by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And they used it for "restoring damaged images". Yeah. Sure.

    Images that were "damaged," for example, by having Trotsky in them.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:"Damaged" images. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1
    2. Re:"Damaged" images. by Quantus347 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And they used it for "restoring damaged images". Yeah. Sure.

      Images that were "damaged," for example, by having Trotsky in them.

      He has crazy eyes...

      --
      Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    3. Re:"Damaged" images. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      He has crazy eyes...

      Soviet image editink software works good, da?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    4. Re:"Damaged" images. by aekafan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, he did have crazy eyes. Fortunately, the icepick in the head solved that.

    5. Re:"Damaged" images. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Images that were "damaged," for example, by having Trotsky [wikipedia.org] in them.

      The same goes for pretty much every picture of Nixon that I have ever seen.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    6. Re:"Damaged" images. by mqduck · · Score: 1

      The same goes for pretty much every picture of Nixon that I have ever seen.

      They all had Trotsky in them?

      --
      Property is theft.
  9. This is nothing more than just a simple showcase by hazah · · Score: 1

    All this is is just the very basics of restoration tech. No conspiracy. Not even news.

  10. "Put Missiles in Cuba"? by fkx · · Score: 0

    "Put Missiles in Cuba"?

    Now that would be an impressive image editing software package.

    I'd buy it.

  11. DHMO Connection by Suki+I · · Score: 3, Funny

    The world's biggest killer, dihydrogen monoxide, is known in ultra-secret circles as a key ingredient in doctoring images.

    1. Re:DHMO Connection by Maritz · · Score: 1

      It's also the number one reason for homeopathic overdoses (drowning).

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:DHMO Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The di and mono parts aren't necessary. Hydroxylic acid is another way to put it.

  12. In Soviet Russia... by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    ...rotary scanners, magnetic tape, and trackballs Photoshop you!

    Wait a minute, at 1:11 is that Kip from Napoleon Dynamite???

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:In soviet russia... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I don't think anybody claims Photoshop invented photo editing, but nobody can deny that they invented the standard still used to this day for photo editing. Besides, the Russian one shown is just a French program that has been translated, so they didn't "invent" anything either.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  13. Looks like the footage has been ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    ... video shopped. Are you sure it is real?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  14. So what? by objekt · · Score: 1

    There were grayscale image editing programs for Macintosh at that time, and color image editing software for mini computers even earlier.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:So what? by McNihil · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure I used color imaging software in 87... even in 86 (DeluxPaint/ImageFX/AdPro) and I definitely saw 24 bit editing on a preproduction/very early version of Mac II in late 1985... yes that steak was VERY juicy on that highres monitor.

  15. Uncrop! by PatPending · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well, I'll bet they didn't have an Uncrop function!

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  16. Soviets just bought western technology by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    OK, so the Soviets could by western hardware (Pericolor drum scanner and an Apple ///). Big deal.

    1. Re:Soviets just bought western technology by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      OK, so the Soviets could by western hardware (Pericolor drum scanner and an Apple ///). Big deal.

      That's Yabloka Tre, you insensitive clodski.

  17. FUCK THEM COMMIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Too late !! They already fucked themselves out of existence !! In former-Soviet Red Commie Russia, they now have a full-fledge Putinocrocy !! Just goes to show if you squeeze a potato hard enough, you can get vodka !!

  18. the real story by mschaffer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real story is that the Soviets had clip art collections that made their job easier. This was years before clip-art was widely used in the West.
    People doctoring photos could choose from the "Still Popular Heroes of the Bolshevik Revolution" as well as "Accepted Images of our Beloved Leaders: Lenin through Gorbachev".
    What was little known at the time is that if you bought both sets, you would also get a free set "Communist Leaders of the world". This set had flattering pictures of Chaiman Mao, Fidel Castro, and Che Guevera.

    1. Re:the real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Collect 'em all!

    2. Re:the real story by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Time-Life Clip Art?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:the real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Guevara, you Insensitive Capitalist Clod

  19. from comments there by JustFisher · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not Soviet , it's French ! It's a PERICOLOR-1000 system with a software translated to Russian. They used to buy hardware and software in the West and change it a bit(translate) and present it as one developed internally in some scientific institute. Here is the discussion in Russian: http://habrahabr.ru/blogs/history/107465/

    1. Re:from comments there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. This is why I can speak Russian, in French. Stay thirsty my friends...

    2. Re:from comments there by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The computer they are using to control it to the right is an Apple /// with what appears to be a standard Roman layout keyboard. The floppy sleeve is covering the logo, heavens forbid they show they are using Western technology! I don't think the Russians would have bothered to clone that machine (which arguably was about as reliable as anything the Soviets made), they did clone the Apple II series though.

    3. Re:from comments there by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      It was reliable, you just had to drop it to reseat the chips every now and then

      --
      mod me funny
    4. Re:from comments there by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Its a shame the machine remains a rare footnote in history. They is no complete working emulator even to preserve it and technical documentation is scarce. At least parts of its advanced OS lived on to become ProDOS and GS/OS.

    5. Re:from comments there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an Apple ///. If you look, you can see the Open Apple key to the left of the space bar in one shot.

  20. Tooooo mannnnnyyy jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... must mock sovjet russia...

  21. Focus On The S/w, Not The H/w by cmholm · · Score: 1

    Granted, the equipment depicted looks to be a combo of imported (drum scanner), cloned (Apple II), Soviet (tape drive), and in-house (track ball) equipment.

    However, I'm going to make a wild-ass guess that the Cyrillic interface photo-editing software was home grown, and that's the significant value-add to the system.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  22. Photoshop 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    There were image manipulation before Photoshop?
    LIES!
    That the verb for doing image manipulation is 'to photoshop' should be proof enough! I mean OMGz LOL If teh wordz is to photoshop, how could you photoshop, before photoshop 1.0? with the beta release???!!!111oenenoene

    Seriously, kids, the shift of the millenium was not celebrated as the end of the stone age!

    1. Re:Photoshop 1.0 by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Next you're going to tell me that people were podcasting before the iPod.

      --
      Property is theft.
  23. Murrr by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    Unless the soviets helped the US fake the landing, I doubt that this software was used to fake one.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Murrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the soviets erased their moonlanding? After all, the moon is a very desolate place, and what is the glory in having been there?

  24. Dr. Baronovich says: by GeorgeFitch3 · · Score: 1

    You must think in Russian to use this software.

  25. SGI and the X Windows system by bobs666 · · Score: 1

    SGI and the X Windows system both existed in 1987.
    And the editing tools included 3D modeling.

    This is not state of the art in the day.

    Although I can see how important Censorship of images in the Soviet Union would be in the day... Its all about the propaganda.

  26. Good stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long live our Soviet motherland,
    Built by the people's mighty hand.
    Long live our people, united and free.
    Strong in our friendship tried by fire.
    Long may our crimson flag inspire,
    Shining in glory for all men to see.

  27. Any images of this? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    And yet there are no images in the article, just video. Is it just me who's annoyed at the growing number of stories with just a couple of sentences and a video? I just skip those. Oh well.

    1. Re:Any images of this? by lxs · · Score: 1

      You'll get used to them. Back in the '30s I felt the same way about talkies.

    2. Re:Any images of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were images in the articles, but those got edited out by the censors already. Their 1985 tools can't yet edit out the videos.

  28. In soviet russia... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Photoshop didnt invented photo retouching as most in the western world seem to believe.

  29. In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Elixon · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the Russian comments points out that the software is in fact French PERICOLOR-1000 translated to Russian.

    --
    Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
    1. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Didn't the Russians pretty much steal everything computer-related from the Western countries at that time?

      The most famous software product from Russia, Tetris, was originally developed on a russian-made DEC PDP-11 clone.

      I also remember reading that pretty much all their mainframes were IBM OS-3xx clones.

      I'm sure they had sufficient skilled engineers in Russia to do it themselves, but why pay somebody to invent it, if you don't have to respect copyrights and patents and can just steal it?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that the tasks of reverse-engineering an IBM OS-3xx AND producing a working clone out of the reverse engineering results would be orders of mangnitude more laborous than just making a computer from scratch.

    3. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I was living in former soviet block that could be true. They copied western technology on large scale adding stamp "made in USSR"

    4. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It went both ways. I know a guy who worked on spy satellites for the Americans during that era. In one project, the contractor required a metal plate to be drilled with zillions (technical term) of microscopic holes. For what usage, I don't know and he won't say. What he will say is that the technology to drill the holes wasn't available in the United States. So they shipped the plate to a Russian firm who had a laser driller with the required capability, of course shunting it through dozens of shell corporations, third world countries, and who knows what else. The Russian took the plate and drilled it, then sent it back through the same convoluted path to the Americans, who then took it, installed it in their satellite and proceeded to use it to spy on the Russians. Good times.

    5. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was more complex.

      Russia had its own pretty advanced computer technology till 70-s. BESM ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BESM ) computers were on par with Western Bloc models and there were original developments like Setun' computer with ternary arithmetic ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun ).

      Then came a 'bright' idea to partner with IBM. USSR actually paid for licenses for IBM hardware (IBM software was probably free at that time) so it was not pure piracy.

    6. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by estestvoispytatel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Up to mid-60s there was some quite good domestic computers in the USSR, but almost all of the developing teams (spare some military projects) were switched to, well, copying of the three unified systems from the West, mainly because Politburo's dumbfucks were educated not enough to effectively direct and support R&D. You know, command economy has no natural feedback and very skewed competition.

    7. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't the Russians pretty much steal everything computer-related from the Western countries at that time?

      Well we stole Tetris and made billions on it, so it all worked out in the end.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    8. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by galanom · · Score: 1

      yeah, bad guys, no respect to patents!!!

    9. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were just ahead of the curve on the free software movement.

      BTW, engineer Ivan had no incentive to create it when engineer Boris could get a dacha by just copying it (or if needed reverse engineer it.)

    10. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Helge9210 · · Score: 1

      Most of the new development was carried in Kyiv, Ukraine. But Moscow had a technology to grind x86 chips slice by slice to reverse engineer Intel technology. So they send a committee from Moscow to Kyiv to choose a path for the industry for the next decade. Due to enmity between russians and ukrainians committee chose to continue with grinding and reverse engineering and the development of own technologies was canceled. Some years later Intel launched 80386 with 3D chip structure and russians were unable to guess its schematics like it was with 8086/88 and 80286.

    11. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they had sufficient skilled engineers in Russia to do it themselves, but why pay somebody to invent it, if you don't have to respect copyrights and patents and can just steal it?

      So in slashdot terms, the USSR was in fact a pioneer in overthrowing the old-fashioned concept of intellectual property?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is impossible, as everyone on slashdot knows that the USSR was incapable of matching up to the West in any area whatsoever, except vodka consumption.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You know, command economy has no natural feedback and very skewed competition.

      Which is why they were so technologially backward, and why the US was the first country to get a man into space. Wait...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Not quite (your post comes out slightly ironic with the mention of Tetris, especially considering how it was copied without licensing; and don't forget the USSR was generally embargoed in the first place).

      Their mainframes of that time (not all / there were earlier lines) were compatible with IBM ones, yes (apparently the planners wanted "the standard"). But, as was done also by Hitachi or Siemens, they were reverse engineered, with quite original hardware; and later versions of OS also heavily modified. During detente of the 70's they had contacts with IBM, for cooperation (which did happen after breakup, with IBM cooperating in support services)

      But in some areas the engineers could have more freedom. Check Elbrus computers from that time, their properties (almost looks like the tech transfer was the other way around; Intel did buy a lot of that engineering talent). Or, in earlier times, Setun.

      "Copying" quickly led to their own ways, too - home computers of PDP11 lineage weren't really popular anywhere else (with many local OS, software, etc.)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could be first on the Moon without all the infighting, though... (a lot of people in "the West" don't realize how bitter the competition could be in the USSR, and how far taken - one lead designer simply refused to supply the engines needed by N1 to be successful; or - how many people heard about TKS spacecraft? You know, their other manned program, concurrent with Soyuz...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    16. Re:In fact it is French PERICOLOR-1000 Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam, is that you?

  30. Stalin was having people edited out for years... by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'd be written in and out of the "history" books.

    Zinoviev died, and was written out.

    Trotski was murdered in Mexico, and was written out.

    Hundreds and thousands were written out of existence, their tombstones chiseled clean.

    That was one of the points in 1984.

    Control the books and you control the history of a people. Winston Smith job was working as a "redactor", part of the problem, even as he sought, and failed, to find a solution.

    People who could recite the history of the lottery numbers chosen at what date could be counted on not to remember that a partner one day was an enemy the next, basically Stalin's form of control, a paranoid/schizophrenic view of humanity where the "others" are all pawns to be played and discarded.(Saddam Hussein was a Stalinist in more ways that one.)

    The Gulags were filled with them, and ultimately the cemeteries were filled with imaginary adversaries, by the venial the opportunistic; the survivors who felt less shame at their survival than they felt for their victims.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  31. This is just freaking amazing! by Oasiz · · Score: 1

    I don't care for the year but this just looks so much cooler than photoshop, I just love that scanline distortion happening during frame drawing :)

    I am a sucker for these kind of devices, just like the modeller that was used in making of the star wars 3d wireframe deathstar model.

    Soviet hardware design style rules, everything looks like from a sci-fi movie.

  32. This is violation... by elewton · · Score: 1

    Of many, many patents.
    We'll see you in court, USSR!

  33. What about Quantel? by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Quantel Paintbox beats them both, it was first launched in 1981!

    Quantel sued two companies, one of them being Adobe but didn't win the Adobe case, largely due to the existance of Superpaint, who's author testified in the case.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantel_Paintbox
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpaint

  34. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by AhabTheArab · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'd be written in and out of the "history" books.

    Zinoviev died, and was written out.

    Trotski was murdered in Mexico, and was written out.

    Hundreds and thousands were written out of existence, their tombstones chiseled clean.

    [citation needed]

  35. Family of Greedo rejoices by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Funny

    The family of Greedo was relieved to hear about this old technology especially about claims that the Soviet Union may have used this technology to frame their patriarch. When asked a spokesthing for the family remarked "For years we have said that George Lucas with the help of foreign powers altered footage to make it look like Greedo shot first. We've always believed that no good [beep] [beep] scoundrel Han Solo shot our Greedo in cold blood." The spokesthing continued "Well, in a way it's a good thing it has taken this long, because now that Han is married to Leia, we're talking about Intergalactic Princess money now." When asked if that meant the family intended to pursue a wrongful death lawsuit against Han Solo, the spokesthing only responded "CHA-CHING!"

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  36. Plus-good MiniTru-wise! by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

    I've often thought how much more Winston Smith could have got done (in his day job) in an on-line world. Maybe he would have been more content, and they could have saved making him rebel so he could be tortured for a later date.

  37. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by toddles666 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "The Commissar Vanishes" is a great book that documents the methods used by the Soviets to modify photos as various people fell out of favor with Stalin:

    http://www.amazon.com/Commissar-Vanishes-Falsification-Photographs-Stalins/dp/B00007D037/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1288900689&sr=8-1

    The methods used by the Soviets to manipulate and control the information consumed by the populace is pretty widely understood, and I'm sure that need to maintain control drove the use of this relatively sophisticated photo manipulation software.

  38. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by aekafan · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn. Can't think of of a better citation than this. Or search for the NKVD. Their specialty was airbrushing history. Oh, and shooting political enemies of the state in the head.

    Authoritarian tyrants are much the same whether their guise is communism, national socialism, or democracy. The best way to make people forget about enemies of the state is to not talk about them.

  39. Another leet commercial in the works? by dimer0 · · Score: 0

    TO THE CLOUD!

  40. Obligatory Standard Joke by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    And there it is.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  41. This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A special report for the tinfoil-hat brigade;

    Man Actually Did Land on the Moon

    The Soviets Actually Did Ship Nuclear-Tipped Ballistic Missles to Cuba

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled dementia.

  42. Wouldn't it be cheaper by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to rent the same studio that NASA used?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  43. Now that's for a responsive UI by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While the image repainting was slow simply due to memory bandwidths back then, one can't but be amazed at the instantaneous response from the right-hand menu system. It seems like it took one or two vsyncs for the new menu to appear in response to a keystroke. This is something that you still can't get on modern OSes simply because there's always the VM subsystem in the way. On OS X, working normally with few running applications and plenty of memory, I can get 100+ms lag when switching between menus. Sure, the median may be pretty good, but the worst case is annoying. It interferes with the workflow. Never mind the everpresent lag on the workspace of most applications, be it photo editing, spreadsheet, CAD, etc.

    I think that VM paging-induced lags are something that can't be overcome as long as we keep programming like we do -- with the assumption of infinite memory, more or less. I would really like to see a gradual shift towards realtime scheduling and applications where at least the core code and data is permanently wired. In the days of CP/M, WordStar was dealing quite well with slow links between the CPU and the terminal: you could type while it was trying to refresh the menus and the workspace. In the worst case, if you typed really fast, it'd only paint the characters you typed and nothing else. The timing was done such that it took into account the terminal baudrate, so things suitably improved when you'd switch the baudrate to something faster (38400 was a big deal back then, many systems only supported 19200 and defaulted to 4800 or 9600bps).

    These days there are plenty of applications where everything is unresponsive due to paging just a tiny part of the UI. You'd think that the hot path would be resident and responsive, and that the GUI systems would cope with multiple application threads all doing GUI operations. Alas, neither X11 nor winapi got that right, and I don't know offhand whether multithreaded UI operations are allowed by OS X. Heck, you'd think that message-based interthread/interprocess communications would enable one to queue messages in face of stalled threads (say disk I/O stalls), and let the core user experience stay on par with expectations circa 1980.

    Paging is the sole killer of user experience in modern applications, and it's not easy to work around it in environments where only one thread in a process can paint on the screen.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    1. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While the image repainting was slow simply due to memory bandwidths back then, one can't but be amazed at the instantaneous response from the right-hand menu system. It seems like it took one or two vsyncs for the new menu to appear in response to a keystroke. This is something that you still can't get on modern OSes simply because there's always the VM subsystem in the way.

      That's all very true, except that you're completely wrong. Seriously, what? I get those lags even on systems where I've temporarily disabled swap. I wholeheartedly agree that most X GUIs are painfully laggy - I hate that my 7MHz Amiga 1000 was much more responsive than my dual-core 3GHz desktop - but that has everything to do with the interactions between toolkits, X, and the apps using those toolkits and nothing at all to do with paging. And while you're at it, quit saying "VM" when you mean "paging". While you commonly see them together, they're nowhere near the same.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      I've got an i7 running at 4100 mhz, an SSD holding the apps and data, and 12 gigs of ram. I'm trying to replicate the delays of your post but having trouble. What programs, exactly, have a noticable latency on a machine like mine? I'm guessing that the extremely high memory bandwidth and clock on this machine is able to do all that overhead you are complaining about before my slow brain can notice a delay. (I noticed the machine did get snappier once I increased the ram from 4 gigs in dual channel to 12 gigs in triple channel)

    3. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said VM because he meant VM and not paging. Even when you've disable swap and have no paging, your address space for each application is still virtualized. Every application sees it's very own very large contiguous memory space even if, in reality, each application doesn't have it's very own physical memory space of that size.

    4. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      He said VM because he meant VM and not paging. Even when you've disable swap and have no paging, your address space for each application is still virtualized.

      I have a Boston Terrier. As long as we're listing things that have nothing whatsoever to do with the subject, I thought I'd toss that out there.

      Of course VM won't have any impact on human-observable latencies, so why even bring it up?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by tibit · · Score: 1

      Disabling swap doesn't disable paging. I don't know of any way of disabling page eviction to disk, not on Linux, not on Windows, not on OS X. That's what VM is about. You can have a process binary running, and only parts of its image will be in memory -- others are on disk, and the VM system will bring it in. The problem is that the VM is very bad at knowing what's the critical path and what are the priorities when it comes to page eviction. Any sort of hints given by the application are advisory, in the mainstream kernel trio (Linux, OS X, Windows NT-derived). This is in spite of the application always knowing best what its needs are.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by tibit · · Score: 1

      VM has plenty of impact on human observable latencies since apart from memory protection there is no way to have VM without also having paging. And there's no way of killing paging that I know of. Swap -- sure, paging -- no. Even if it was possible to disable paging, it takes one clever programmer who decided it's OK to mmap gigabyte+ files, and you are out of memory in no time flat. With paging enabled, VM lets you do mmap while keeping wired number of pages reasonable, at the cost of uncontrolled latencies.

      Without paging, VM's only purpose is address space mapping and memory protection -- in that case you're right that it doesn't introduce human-observable latencies, but at the same time it's next to useless in keeping most of current applications running.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by tibit · · Score: 1

      There is zero reason for this not to work like it should on a 2.5 year old MacBook with 4G of DDR2. You shouldn't need to have an SSD to have a modern paging VM system react 'instantaneously' to a human. We the people are slow. The fact that you can observe any sort of a UI latency at any point in time when running a modern OS is an abomination, and a statement of how lousy the widely used programming practices are. And I'm dead serious. Something is very, very wrong when a 100+ MHz CPU running a modern OS can be easily outrun, in terms of UI latency, by a system that's a quarter century old and runs on less than a 10MHz clock.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    8. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Disabling swap doesn't disable paging. I don't know of any way of disabling page eviction to disk, not on Linux, not on Windows, not on OS X. That's what VM is about.

      That's not what VM is about, and I think you know it. Paging and swapping are things made possible by VM, but are not the same as VM.

      But beyond that, there's an experiment you can run on many modern desktops: boot the whole system into a RAM disk and run exclusively off the motherboard DIMMs. No spinning rust, no SSDs, nothing but DRAM. Know what? You'll still see those latencies when clicking menus and other widgets.

      I mentioned the Amiga deliberately in my last post. It had a wholly different GUI concept where every app's interface ran in the same process. That is, there was one thread that handled all GUI elements for every running application, and it was always there managing the display even when individual apps were too busy with other stuff. Contrast with pretty much every other modern desktop where each app manages its own display, regardless of how much other work it's doing. While Amiga's approach probably wouldn't work very well today, it made for a wonderfully responsive GUI. Those are the types of design decisions that make all the difference between instant feedback and waiting to see whether your click actually registered.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all very true, except that you're completely wrong. Seriously, what? I get those lags even on systems where I've temporarily disabled swap. I wholeheartedly agree that most X GUIs are painfully laggy - I hate that my 7MHz Amiga 1000 was much more responsive than my dual-core 3GHz desktop - but that has everything to do with the interactions between toolkits, X, and the apps using those toolkits and nothing at all to do with paging. And while you're at it, quit saying "VM" when you mean "paging". While you commonly see them together, they're nowhere near the same.

      Agreed. However I don't see any lag in my Puppy Linux system which is RAM disk based, runs an accelerated X with JWM ( or ICE ) hey presto fast menu's and selection, it's very quick at launching apps and kicks ass. // end of advertisement!, give it a go it will make your 3Gig machine rock ...

       

    10. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      The reason for this is because with the latest OSes they have added many, many layers of abstraction. I've heard that Vista has at least 50 distinct layers. They also write most of this code in higher level languages.

      What all this accomplishes is that it allows one to have a system that has orders of magnitude more complexity than those old OSes you remember and to be MORE stable with fewer noticeable bugs than the software of the old days. I remember both Mac OS and Win 3.1 would system crash all the time.

      The layers of abstraction let a single programmer understand what "his" part of the code does with other people's code encapsulated away. Humans have extremely limited short to medium term memory capacity. The high level language improves readability and productivity.

      Internally Vista/Win 7 is more complex and has more lines of human level code than nearly any other piece of software ever created. Yet it is stable enough to run for several weeks without a reboot. (which is "good enough" for most desktop users. Yes Unix is better)

      I suspect OS X is similar internally : Apple has less programming resources than Microsoft does, so they have to add and support all of those advanced features but they don't have the staff to hand optimize their code line by line. That's one reason for why it feels sluggish on your machine.

      Anyways, get used to it. If you think programming is inefficient now, wait 20 more years. Have you ever studied neural nets? Do you have any idea how much redundant processing a biological brain does to work on a problem? (because of the high noise level of the hardware each problem gets solved a thousand times in parallel and the answers averaged)

      Once we start getting hundred and thousand core CPUs we'll need to write our code more like a distributed neural net just to take advantage of all the CPU power.

    11. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by tibit · · Score: 1

      I have been seen tests with DDR2-based ramdisks and running systems that don't use anything else: guess what -- CPU utilization bursts always reach 95%, and there's no latency to speak of.

      An acquaintance has a Mac Pro with 6G of ram, that he runs off a 64 GB DDR2 ramdisk dedicated to the OS and Applications, data files are stored on a separate RAID. The machine feels unreal. Running a purpose-made memory hogging process, that would cause it to swap for 1-2 hours until OOM handler kicks in when run off a spinning platter drive, merely causes a noticeable slowdown that feels like the CPU's clock was throttled back by a factor of 5, say. Zero beachballs, in OS X parlance.

      SSD could help somewhat, but since writes can be long and they do rob the read bandwidth, the SSD doesn't offer the benefits of a dedicated ramdisk.

      I don't think that there is a big problem with the fact that each app manages its own display, the problem is that the memory used for the pretty much critical-path UI experience code is mingled with memory used for stuff that could wait. Fixing it would require paying careful attention to having a UI thread (one or more), that accesses permanently wired memory only, and other threads that survive disk latencies without affecting the UI. It'd also require the core display system and all the libraries to be in permanently wired memory, too.

      I don't think that most language runtime libraries are ready to handle that: you really need to have communication done with a mechanism that ensures that the UI thread doesn't touch the unwired memory used by other threads. Messages sitting in wired memory queues are one way to enforce that, but not the only way, of course.

      IOW, it's a design challenge, and existing libraries and development environments are simply not supporting such a model.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    12. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's not like the layers of abstraction change over time. The latency one experiences is random: it depends on what pages are in memory at the instant you try to do something, and perhaps to some extent on the locks held by code currently paged out due to memory pressure (if there's such a thing).

      Basically, whatever is due to abstraction is the best case. If you can see that menus switch in 10ms, that's the best case, and to improve that you need to make the code more CPU-efficient. Everything else implies that you're I/O bound.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    13. Re:Now that's for a responsive UI by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Actually when they rewrote Windows for Vista they added dozens more intermediate layers in the code.

      An SSD and a ton of RAM mean that nothing is paged out to a mechanical hard drive.

  44. Collect 'em all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before they collect you.

    1. Re:Collect 'em all! by mavasplode · · Score: 0

      Because they are in Soviet Russia.

      --
      ACTUAL SIZE!!!
    2. Re:Collect 'em all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **rimshot**

  45. For the record... by billsayswow · · Score: 1

    It's not called image editing, it's called "correcting the truth". These images are here for the Premier's aid, to help him remember things. If he doesn't need to remember a troublesome commissar, why keep him in there?!

  46. Why do people forget ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the Russians were really good at math.

    1. Re:Why do people forget ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were also good at:
      -Putting the first artificial object into orbit
      -Putting a living thing in orbit
      -Putting the first man into orbit
      -Putting the first woman into orbit

      And generally beating the pants off the Americans. What's surprising is the amount of people who simultaneously think the Russians were a big threat but also had inferior technology... Even though the Russians had plenty other firsts.

      -First pictures of the dark side of the Moon (in 1959!)
      -First automated Moon sample return mission
      -First space walk

  47. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

    You'd be written in and out of the "history" books.
    Zinoviev died, and was written out.
    Trotski was murdered in Mexico, and was written out.
    Hundreds and thousands were written out of existence, their tombstones chiseled clean.

    [citation needed]

    What is it with people? You should not just be able to say Citation needed at whim. There are times in life where if you haven't done the research you should just not say anything at all. Go read a book. Go to a library. Get off your computer, and stop acting like you care if you actually do not. This is not wikipedia, this is slashdot. Stalin and Soviet history is not a hard topic to learn about.

    --
    "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
  48. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by trurl7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's actually quite easy to think of a better citation. The Gulag Archipelago is a work of fiction; Solzhenitsyn has in later life admitted that, especially in regards to the overall numbers, he had made things up. This is not denying reality of what the Soviet regime was up to in those years - simply that you don't want to use the Gulag Archipelago as your primary historical citation.

  49. Obligatory Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory it is!

  50. Translation Please? by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

    Could someone who knows Russian kindly translate the voice over in the video?

    --
    Love sees no species.
  51. Not impressed by Leon+Buijs · · Score: 1

    So what? Photoshop was not the first pixel manipulator, not by far even.

  52. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by AhabTheArab · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Citation needed" usually gets on my nerves, but in this case, I must say to you: WOOOSH!!

    Tip: If you're able to provide documentation of a person or event being "written out of history", then they weren't written out of history.

  53. Surprising technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only to people who are ignorant of the history of technology and of computers in particular.

    Contrary to what Space Nutters would have you believe, computers didn't magically appear overnight because of the Moon shot, but computers are useful for many things and have been in use for a long time.

    Yes, deluded fools like tomhudson for example who honestly think we only have computers today because of the few computers used by Apollo, completely ignoring and discarding the real, TRUE rich history of computing.

  54. Balls! We had way better gear in the 80s by martypantsROK · · Score: 1

    I was working for a defense contractor in the 80s. We developed a missile that used an imaging infrared seeker in the nose for guidance. We did image manipulations that would know your socks off. We developed most of it using Vax systems and later, with a few Silicon Graphics boxes for simulations. Even in the 80s our gear was way better than what that video showed of the soviets. Bah!

  55. Not that impressive by bubbageek75 · · Score: 1

    I was using tools/computers very similar, if not more advanced during this same time period.

  56. But the true message is... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the photos enhance you.

  57. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    A fine tradition dating back all the way to the pharaohs and probably before even them. Still goes on too, albeit in a more restricted form. Eg. Texas removing Thomas Jefferson from textbooks. History is malleable and, more often than not, written by the powerful.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  58. Haha that's new to know , Photochoppers xD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that's something I didn't know.
    Lol must be hard to edit on it, but what about the time where in 1969s and so NASA hired retouchers.
    what did they use??
    http://anime720.com/ tell me there in a comment or so, thanks

    1. Re:Haha that's new to know , Photochoppers xD! by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "http://anime720.com/" appears to be a bungled/bad site. Follow at own risk.
      Won't let you see Much but main page if ad-block is on. acts suspicious with a modal dialog or click through you can't get rid off otherwise. Might just be bad site design, or might be worse.
          It LOOKS like they're just trying to get add revenue for listing links to other peoples stuff, but it just sets off alarm bells when a site throws up a dialog box you can only turn off by clicking ONE of the two buttons. ANYTHING else just pops the box back up and you can't do ANYTHING else, even click on another tab in firefox untill you click the correct button. Just screams mall-ware to me, though I didn't bother trying to find out for certain.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    2. Re:Haha that's new to know , Photochoppers xD! by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      "http://anime720.com/" appears to be a bungled/bad site. Follow at own risk.
      Won't let you see Much but main page if ad-block is on. acts suspicious with a modal dialog or click through you can't get rid off otherwise. Might just be bad site design, or might be worse.
              It LOOKS like they're just trying to get add revenue for listing links to other peoples stuff, but it just sets off alarm bells when a site throws up a dialog box you can only turn off by clicking ONE of the two buttons. ANYTHING else just pops the box back up and you can't do ANYTHING else, even click on another tab in firefox untill you click the correct button. Just screams mall-ware to me, though I didn't bother trying to find out for certain.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  59. Removing people from photographs by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    No wonder they had advanced tools for retouching pictures. The Soviets were masters at removing officials from pictures (after they'd been thrown out of the party and/or sent to the gulags) almost from the beginning of their rule.

    Examples here:

    http://www.tc.umn.edu/~hick0088/classes/csci_2101/false.html

    Heh... Function follows need I guess.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  60. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Only if you assume that history is global. It isn't, however, it's merely shared between actors who can freely exchange information.

    History is not about what actually happened, it's about what we think had happened.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  61. Re:Stalin was having people edited out for years.. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Solzhenitsyn was a religious fanatic and writer of fiction, not a neutral historian.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it