Slashdot Mirror


Sculptor Gives a Hint For CIA's Kryptos

omega_cubed writes "The New York Times reports that Jim Sanborn, the sculptor who created the wavy metal pane called Kryptos that sits in front of the CIA in Langley, VA, has gotten tired of waiting for code-breakers to decode the last of the four messages. 'I assumed the code would be cracked in a fairly short time,' [Sanborn] said, adding that the intrusions on his life from people who think they have solved his fourth puzzle are more than he expected. So now, after 20 years, Mr. Sanborn is nudging the process along. He has provided The New York Times with the answers to six letters in the sculpture's final passage. The characters that are the 64th through 69th in the final series on the sculpture read NYPVTT. When deciphered, they read BERLIN."

151 comments

  1. Shucks! by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Funny

    All this time I thought it said "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine."

    1. Re:Shucks! by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do they call it Ovaltine? The mug is round. The jar is round. They should call it Roundtine. That's gold, Jerry! Gold!

    2. Re:Shucks! by PatPending · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why do they call it Ovaltine? The mug is round. The jar is round. They should call it Roundtine.

      Blame US Customs:

      The story of OVALTINE®, or should we say Ovomaltine, begins in 1904. Ovomaltine was originally developed in Switzerland as a recovery drink for skiers returning from a long, active day. (For some reason it was never poured into little kegs and hung on the necks of St. Bernards for roaming the Alps.)

      As it grew from a recovery drink into a popular chocolatey beverage, Ovomaltine decided to see the world. When it went through customs, however, a printing error forever changed the name of the chocolatey treat. And the world was introduced to OVALTINE. (Our thanks go out to customs!)

      Of course, if this had happened today, it would be called... OBAMATINE

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    3. Re:Shucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or VOMALTINE

      which sounds a bit like my visceral reaction to an inane attempt at political humor tacked onto an otherwise informative post.

    4. Re:Shucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it was a Republican responsible, in which case it'd be Reagan's Happy Fun Time Drink for Kids.

      Not to be confused with Reagan's Happy Fun Time Drink for Adults, but remarkably similar to Reagan's Happy Fun Time Drink for Senior Citizens.

    5. Re:Shucks! by AfroTrance · · Score: 1

      Why do/did they call it Ovomaltine?

    6. Re:Shucks! by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Well, that sure got changed for the better. Old name sounded too much like "OVUM-altine", which gives weird and creepy connotations. 'Course, maybe I'm parsing it wrong.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    7. Re:Shucks! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, compared to BECKSPERM. Millions of people chug that goopy mess every day.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:Shucks! by Knuckles · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess it has something to do with eggs and malt.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    9. Re:Shucks! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you're not parsing it wrong at all. Ovum = egg. It has (had?) eggs in it. So you had it quite right. But just in case: we ARE referring to chicken eggs.

    10. Re:Shucks! by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I sense a -5: Redundant in my future! Anyways, I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't picture chicken egges when they hear "ovum", hence my continued horror at the name.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    11. Re:Shucks! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come now. You may weigh as much as 4 normal people but you are hardly "millions".

    12. Re:Shucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not - it's called Ovomaltine (they certainly still use that name here) because it contains egg and malt, at least in the original Swiss version (I understand that the recipe was changed in other countries). Not sure what's weird or creepy about that, though.

    13. Re:Shucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it might be Ovo-Maltine, or egg malt. which still sounds pretty gross.

    14. Re:Shucks! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      A similar story is allegedly behind the cosmetics product line which in different countries are named "Oil of Olay" / "Olaz" / "Ulay" / "Ulan".
      The story is that when first exporting it to Europe, the representative typed in the name on a German QWERTZ keyboard, and Olay became Olaz. After that, the company decided to do the cat thing[*], and gave it a new name for the next couple of countries.

      [*]: You know, pretend it skid into the wall intentionally, and is just fine, thank you.

      (And in the bad spirit of you adding a political pun to the end of your post, I guess it would be called "Oil of Palin" in Alaska.)

    15. Re:Shucks! by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      I'd call that a fortuitous error. Who would buy a drink which includes a series of letters strikingly similar to "vomit?"

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    16. Re:Shucks! by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine. There are starving children in Berlin who'd do anything for a nice glass of Ovaltine like that."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:Shucks! by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Wait, how does the sculptor know? Did they give him the plaintext and say "oh, btw, here's the ci[her you have to use, we want it encrypted".

      Is he a sculptor that did a lot of "commissions" in South America and Eastern Europe?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    18. Re:Shucks! by foxylad · · Score: 1

      Good point. I always thought the same about Vimto (a fizzy drink popular in the UK) - either the inventor was spectacularly bad at anagrams, or they had a wicked sense of humour.

      --
      Do as you would be done to.
    19. Re:Shucks! by Meski · · Score: 1

      At 3am when you are blind drunk & you decide to go home with a guy ITS NOT FOR A CUP OF MILO! [1] (Aussie for Ovaltine, although you can get that here too) {1] attrib to Spida Everitt

    20. Re:Shucks! by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      glennbecksperm ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    21. Re:Shucks! by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Damn right they do

  2. Encoding NYT URL by PatPending · · Score: 1

    Oh, I see some may have to play this "game" with the NYT's URL:

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/20/us/code.html?ref=us

    Add '&r=2' to the end of the URL.

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  3. First time, eh? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1, Informative

    At least, that's what I'd guess from how excited you sound about it. Congratulations, kiddo! Hope it was good for both of you.

    Just a thought though, but I'm not entirely sure Slashdot is the best venue for bragging about it. A good chunk of us are old enough to have found out what sex produces (i.e. children), another chunk of us are (contrary to stereotypes) actually female, and some more of us have no idea what this "fucking" is all about anyway. Perhaps your friends would be more appreciative? Assuming you have any, of course, what with posting as an AC on Slashdot to give the world the news...

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:First time, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A good chunk of us are old enough to have found out what sex produces (i.e. children)

      Only if you do it wrong.

    2. Re:First time, eh? by VTI9600 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I did the only sensible thing and entered it into WolframAlpha for analysis. So, at this point, I have determined that "fucking" is a very colloquial, informal intensifier with a Scrabble score of 17 that corresponds to the telephone keypad digits, 382-5464. I give up.

    3. Re:First time, eh? by Niris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ha, that was a pretty elegant way to say "tits or gtfo."

    4. Re:First time, eh? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      the second, I'm afraid, will require empirical evidence to be proven as fact.

      Well, it's slightly more polite put that way than "Tits or GTFO", but really, save that for 4Chan.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:First time, eh? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      sorry, but your right hand does not constitute a sexual partner, nor does use of it for self-gratification constitute sex.

    6. Re:First time, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm left-handed you insensitive clod!

    7. Re:First time, eh? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Then the right hand would fall under the "stranger" for you.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. No! Don't solve the puzzle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you do, the[NO CARRIER]

  5. It's the CIA guys. by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    They aren't code crackers. That's the NSA's job. The CIA assassinates people, and uses very expensive satellites to watch weenie-roasts in countries you can't pronounce, which are started with very large heavy metal cans and ended very suddenly with a bang and a cheer. They also made the CIA World Factbook... which in my humble opinion may be the only thing they've done for the internet that was useful.

    So lay off on them being given a really complex soduku in their backyard and then being upset because they didn't have time to screw with it.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:It's the CIA guys. by PatPending · · Score: 1
      A couple of questions then:

      1. Since it's contrary to the CIA's mission, why was it installed in the first place? (It should have went to NSA instead.)

      2. Someone in authority at CIA knew what all the messages were ahead of time, right? Otherwise they risked the possibility of one (or more) of the messages being damaging in some way.

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    2. Re:It's the CIA guys. by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

      The US government used to work hard to keep the NSA out of the public eye. Though the existence of the organization wasn't a total secret, press coverage wasn't welcome at all until after September 11. I remember when I arrived at Defense Language Institute in late 1999 as a fresh Navy recruit, some among my supervisors, old hands in SIGINT and some of whom had served at Ft. Mead itself, were very upset at the recent Baltimore Sun coverage of DLI and the NSA. "The public doesn't need to know any of what we do."

      Also, the CIA's spies had to use encryption. Their lives depended on it, and the organization grew out of earlier military units concerned with cryptography and codebreaking.

      So when it came to putting up a monument like this, one that would attract the public to figure out its secrets, better to put it outside the CIA's headquarters, because by this point the existence and general purpose of the CIA was known to everyone.

    3. Re:It's the CIA guys. by warGod3 · · Score: 1

      Does it matter? There are 16 government intelligence agencies. Supposedly the CIA is the only independent agency. NSA and NRO report to the DOD, plus all the other agencies report to various departments (mainly DOD), but there are representatives from DOE, DHS, DOJ, etc...
      I'm sure that you can try to pigeonhole various agencies and say that their function is x, but even though all those agencies fall under the same umbrella as part of the US intelligence community, the sharing of information between agencies is, well, limited. As with typical government agencies, the more you know and the more can you hold over someone else's head, the more "power" you have.

      --
      "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
    4. Re:It's the CIA guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The US government used to work hard to keep the NSA out of the public eye. Though the existence of the organization wasn't a total secret, press coverage wasn't welcome at all until after September 11.

      The existence of the organization was not only not a total secret, but no secret at all. Who ever wanted to know would have easily learned about the NSA years before because it was very much visible in things like the skipjack encryption of the clipper chip (1993, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip). It was also named in popular culture e.g. movies (1992 movie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneakers_(film) for an example).

    5. Re:It's the CIA guys. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Not just better, but also more appropriate. The NSA and its purposes have been corrupted; best that it go away entirely.

    6. Re:It's the CIA guys. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just better, but also more appropriate. The NSA and its purposes have been corrupted; best that it go away entirely.

      And the CIA is a factory which produces rainbows and puppies?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:It's the CIA guys. by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      dead puppies and rainbow-colored gut piles, yes

    8. Re:It's the CIA guys. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      The CIA does not spend the majority of its time and money spying on innocent American citizens. Some, maybe. But not like the NSA at all.

    9. Re:It's the CIA guys. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Right, it spends its time assassinating people in the name of American citizens.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Poor Cryptographer? by Beardydog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Why hasn't anyone solved my one-time pad encrypted puzzle?"

    1. Re:Poor Cryptographer? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

      They have: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VENONA_project

      The Soviet planners were so impressed with one-time pads that decided that they needed to be copied:

      Somebody who was working for the manufacturers of Soviet secret-communication materials had reused pages of some of the "one-time" pads in other "one-time" pads, which were then used for other secret messages. This defeated the purpose of the one-time pad, which provides ideal security when each page is used exactly once and then disposed of.

      The article continues:

      It is unclear as to why this fatal mistake was made, or by whom.

      I would guess that he, who made the mistake, is pushing up the daisies in Siberia now . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Poor Cryptographer? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I heard this mentioned on a Discovery Channel special once. It blamed the typists, whom it said were tasked with the random number generation.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Poor Cryptographer? by alchemy101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Poor sculptor actually, since Sanborn chopped off a letter in one of the codes to make it more aesthetically pleasing but as a result led everyone to an incorrect answer for one of the puzzles

    4. Re:Poor Cryptographer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VENONA_project

      The Soviet planners were so impressed with one-time pads that decided that they needed to be copied:

      Somebody who was working for the manufacturers of Soviet secret-communication materials had reused pages of some of the "one-time" pads in other "one-time" pads, which were then used for other secret messages. This defeated the purpose of the one-time pad, which provides ideal security when each page is used exactly once and then disposed of.

      The article continues:

      It is unclear as to why this fatal mistake was made, or by whom.

      I would guess that he, who made the mistake, is pushing up the daisies in Siberia now . . .

      Silly girl, daisies don't grow in Siberia...

    5. Re:Poor Cryptographer? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Because it's so easy to decrypt a one-time pad encrypted message, it's boring.

      What, you say *my* plaintext doesn't match the message in the ciphertext? Well, that's what *you* say.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  7. I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Ich bin ein Berliner"

    1. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by JustOK · · Score: 0, Troll

      you are a Jelly-Filled Doughnut?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a Jelly-Filled Doughnut?

      WRONG

      It is a common misconception that Kennedy made a risible error by saying "Ich bin ein Berliner." According to this idea, Kennedy referred to himself not as a "citizen of Berlin", but as a "jam doughnut", which is known in parts of Germany as a "Berliner".[3]

      Kennedy should, supposedly, have said "Ich bin Berliner" to mean "I am a person from Berlin." By adding the indefinite article ein his statement, supposedly, implied he was a non-human Berliner, thus "I am a jam doughnut".[citation needed]

      The indefinite article ein is omitted when speaking of an individual's profession or residence but is necessary when speaking in a figurative sense as Kennedy did. Since the president was not literally from Berlin but only declaring his solidarity with its citizens, "Ich bin Berliner" would not have been correct.

    3. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Germans are incredibly tolerant about their language; if you try to speak it they will lend helping hands. I guess they figure that if you have the courage to try to learn it, and speak it, you don't need to prove any valour beyond that. (German is not my first language).

      I have seen the film clip where Kennedy says, "Ich bin ein Berliner!", but all of the crowd knew what he wanted to say, and so it was no problem.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      No, no, it's nothing about Cold War tensions in Germany, it's a quote from Irving Berlin.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    5. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by VTI9600 · · Score: 1

      Germans are incredibly tolerant about their language; if you try to speak it they will inform you that they actually speak fluent English, and that it would be easiest for the both of you to continue the conversation in your native tounge.

      FTFY

      I've always wanted to become fluent in German, but decades of compulsory English education at all levels of German secondary school mean that most Germans already speak my language. It's kind of hard to motivate myself to learn their language when I know it would be a mostly academic exercise. :-(

    6. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you walk up to someone and start the conversation in German, it can continue in German. If you need to conduct business and aren't comfortable concluding it in a language you struggle with, you can always switch to English and be successful.

      I was able to use quite a bit more German than I thought I would when I visited Austria and Germany for a few weeks in 2008; it had been almost a decade since I had studied German in college.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by udoschuermann · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, "ich bin ein Berliner" is not wrong. The creative re-interpretation of JFK's words rests solely on the fact that "Berliner" is also the name for those jelly-filled doughnuts. If he had given the speech in München (Munich) and had said, "Ich bin ein Münchner", nobody would have thought to make anything more of it.

      --
      --Udo.
    8. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Skylinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I am German and there is a game we play with little kids called "Teekesselchen". This is a game where the goal is to find the meaning or a word which is pronounced the same but means different things. The opponent needs to figure out the word by me describing the item without using the actual word.
      One Example is Boxer which can be a human fighter or a dog.

      Same goes for Berliner, most Germans with a basic understanding of German/English know that JFK was not talking about a jelly doughnut.

      --
      Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    9. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a game where the goal is to find the meaning or a word which is pronounced the same but means different things.

      In English, this is called a homonym: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homonym.

      As in, "Can you see the sea?"

      English is my first language, but I am also fluent in German. One time a colleague asked me to translate an email that he had inadvertently been put on CC, in German. The whole department laughing their asses off over the word: Fehlerbehebungsmaßnahmen.

      I told them that the meaning for me was crystal clear, but you would need a whole sentence in English to describe what it meant.

      My girlfriend, who is a native German speaker, claims that Unterwasserseebootbeleuchtungsautomatik is a valid word, which is used by a Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän.

      So we should cut JFK some slack about getting his articles wrong, or using one, where none should be used. At least he didn't try to wrestle with these words.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    10. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      My girlfriend, who is a native German speaker,
      claims that Unterwasserseebootbeleuchtungsautomatik is a valid word, which is used by a Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän.

      If you tried to fomalize German language rules, you would find the rule
      [Noun] := [Noun] + [filler]? + [Noun]

      Thus, you can combine the two words into Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänsunterwasserseebootsbeleuchtungsautomatik, and still have a valid German word.

    11. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you at least learn to read German you will be able to read a lot of things from literature/music and the sciences. Before the 2nd world war German was sort of the language of mathematics and certain branches of philosophy. I guess it would be interesting for someone into art and science to be able to read some of the greater/greatest achievements in original form. Sort of like learning certain words in English to be able to read scientific texts written in English.

    12. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Unterwasserseebootbeleuchtungsautomatik is a valid word, which is used by a Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän.

      Thus, you can combine the two words into Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänsunterwasserseebootsbeleuchtungsautomatik, and still have a valid German word.

      Ah, but, Sir, you added an "s", which indicates that you understand the German Genative . . . as opposed to Promis who pop up on television in Germany . . . I'm talking about you, Verona!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    13. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can you see the sea?"

      Bad example. See and sea are not homonyms, they are homophones – pronounced the same but spelt differently. A better example would be "The rest may rest".

    14. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      "Can you see the sea?"

      Bad example. See and sea are not homonyms, they are homophones – pronounced the same but spelt differently. A better example would be "The rest may rest".

      Brilliant! That's what I love about Slashdot . . . we can be pedantic, in the pedantic sense of the word.

      Up next, "Sesquipedalians, do we know what the fuck they are talking about, or what?" "Live, on Larry King . . . "

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    15. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't being pedantic. It was be pedantry if the OP was generally correct. He was not. He was completely off base, and the poster told him so. That doesn't make him a pedant. It makes him correct.

    16. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a "whole sentence in English" to describe Fehlerbehebungsmaßnahmen, you just need one little word: fixes.

    17. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by stirz · · Score: 1

      I guess they figure that if you have the courage to try to learn it, and speak it, you don't need to prove any valour beyond that.

      I suppose it stems from the fact that German is known to be pretty complicated to learn, especially when English is your mother tongue.

      I have seen the film clip where Kennedy says, "Ich bin ein Berliner!", but all of the crowd knew what he wanted to say, and so it was no problem.

      Actually, JFK had a quite remarkable pronounciation. He could not entirely conceal his American accent, but managed to get his tongue round very well. However, the crowd reacted with such enthusiasm because two years before JFK's speech, the East Germans had started constructing the Berlin Wall isolating West Berlin. And at this climax of the Cold War, an American president declaring his solidarity in such an emotional way was something West Berliners were really pining after.

    18. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is simply incorrect. I have been in Germany for 5 years now and let me tell you, it is all dependent on the kind of people they are talking to, and the kind of Germans you are talking to. It is a cliché but let me tell you, as an Indian I have gone through a lot of humiliation at work when my German was not that good, while my American Indian friend had no trouble communicating to same people in proper American English and no interest in learning German.

      I guess being American helps :) It also didn't help that I look like an Arab while the girl was black.

    19. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by careysub · · Score: 1

      you are a Jelly-Filled Doughnut?

      WRONG

      Having spent some time researching this story years ago - here is the bottom line.

      What Kennedy said was the only correct way to say what he intended to say - there was literally no error at all in any way.

      But German, like all other languages, has ambiguous syntax and constructs - ESPECIALLY - when you mix colloquialisms into formal language. Interpreting Kennedy as saying "I am a jelly doughnut" is not a serious criticism of what he said, it is instead a rather weak and juvenile Germany joke. The joke is actually based on a colloquialism from other parts of Germany (in Berlin they didn't call the confections Berliners - only non-Berliners did).

      Treating this childish joke as if it was a serious criticism is an urban legend in English.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    20. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by BaronElectricPhase · · Score: 1

      BabelFish would disagree. ;)

    21. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -"Entschuldigung, ich spreche nur ein bisschen Deutsch"

      -"Aber sehr gut!"

      Me and a cab driver a few weeks ago. Little did he know that was my best sentence in German ...

    22. Re:I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is a homonym, more specifically a homograph.

  8. Intrusions? by Lewah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to say that the geeks don't geek, but c'mon... what intrusions? My guess: he just wanted someone to care again.

    --
    Good karma is like social intolerance; apparently everyone has it but me.
    1. Re:Intrusions? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. Somebody showed up on his doorstep with a binder full of claptrap, and they still weren't right.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:Intrusions? by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      ... a binder full of claptrap, and they still weren't right.

      Got me through 'B' school.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:Intrusions? by pthisis · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was part of their plan to decode it. They know that social engineering is often a much more effective way of getting at encrypted data than an attack on the algorithm; by pestering the author with a bunch of claptrap, they've already gotten him to reveal part of the plaintext.

      Next phase: Stand outside of his apartment with a stereo held overhead Say Anything-style, blasting Achy Breaky Heart. The remainder of the message will fall in days.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    4. Re:Intrusions? by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be fair, the sculptor made it too easy to find himself when he listed his address in the phone book as "94o8sror3q9nso23n4430q0898s78q00".

  9. Why is this news? JFK said it a long time ago ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    When deciphered, they read BERLIN.

    "Ich bin ein Berliner!"

    In Soviet East Berlin, Erich Honecker eats your jelly doughnut!"

    And James Jesus Angelton provided the orchids from his private garden. I am still kicking myself for not attending a book signing session by Markus Wolf, that took place near where I live . . . hell, then I could claim, "I saw the face, of the man without a face!"

    A real cryptographer would have written something on the side of his notes saying, "Oh, I have found a really simple solution for this cipher, but I don't have enough room to prove it here. Get back to ya' later on that!"

    Meanwhile, poor Günter Schabowski, couldn't decipher the notes from the East German Politburo, and inadvertently opened up the Berlin Wall.

    Those politicians and spies say the darnedest things . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  10. They sentenced me to 20 years of cryptanalysis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I was going to do a funny parody of Leonard Cohen's serious parody of our Cold War adversaries (unfortunately, "Berlin" gets you only to the mid-30s character-wise), but the first line of the song and the timing of the NYT article jumped right out at me.

    There's no crypto behind this guess. Just a leap of intuition from a reference to Webster to King Tut. And the fact that Cohen's First We Take Manhattan was published in 1988, which would have been current around the time the puzzle was being designed for construction in 1990. And the first line of second verse would be a pretty neat thing to slip into a puzzle like this.

    123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123BERLIN012345678
    theysentencedmeto20yearsofboredomfirstwetakemanhattanthenwetakeBERLIN

    There's just a few dozen big problems with this sort of guessing. First, second, third, and fourth, I'm cheating. I used the first line and the last line of the first verse in order to make it fit. I'm really cheating, since you don't have digits in the solution set, and would have to encode "20" as "XX" in Roman numerals. And knowing all this, I still felt a flash of "WOW" as I measured the characters. Funny thing how the brain works.

    That's the fun part about conspiracy theories - you can be completely wrong (the words don't line up!), you can be completely wrong (the words line up just fine if you pick the right lines, except you can't put digits in the message...), you can be completely wrong (fine, replace "20" with roman numerals!), and eventually (I'm sure if I'd been off by one character, I'd have said "start at zero", but I didn't have to for purposes of this post), you'll find a solution that fits.

    What the thinker thinks, the prover proves.

    But it was a fun diversion for a Saturday evening. Given that a material chunk of the plaintext has been disclosed, and that we can now assume the plaintext to be in English, I'm looking forward to the real solution in a few months.

    There are no shortcuts, and good luck to those in the business who actually know what they're doing: starting with the math, and let the solution reveal itself.

    1. Re:They sentenced me to 20 years of cryptanalysis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking about this lyric as a solution too, great minds eh ;-)

    2. Re:They sentenced me to 20 years of cryptanalysis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I solved the puzzle, but my submission was rejected by Slashdot's lameness filter ("Dude, it seems like you are shouting"). But here is a mixed case approximation, with letter counts in parentheses:

      There (6)
      is (3)
      no (3)
      business (9)
      like (5)
      crypto (7)
      business; (10)
      apologies (10)
      to (3)
      Irving (7)
      BERLIN (6)

      (Total: 69 characters)

    3. Re:They sentenced me to 20 years of cryptanalysis. by evanism · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    4. Re:They sentenced me to 20 years of cryptanalysis. by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      don't ask don't tell! I love the music of Irving Berlin! fabulous!!!

    5. Re:They sentenced me to 20 years of cryptanalysis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's great, sort of like my solution:

      OBKRU - October
      OXO - Gravy
      GHULB - Gulp
      SO LIF - So life
      BB - Gun
      WFLR - Waffler
      VQQ - Very crying
      PRNG - Pseudorandom number generator
      KSS - Kiss
      OTW - On the way
      TQS - Tea cues
      JQS - Jacques
      SEKZZ - Sexy
      WAT - What
      JK - Just kidding
      LUD - Load
      IAWIN - I have won
      FBNY - Fabulous New York
      PVT - Private
      TMZ - Timezone
      FPK - First person kill
      WGD - We're good
      KZX - Crazy ex
      TJCD - Texas judicial county disrict
      IGK - I've got crabs
      UHUA - Uh huh
      UEKCAR - You're weaker

      Oh, and umm Berlins in there too somewhere I guess.

  11. OK, so now we know that.... by dohzer · · Score: 5, Funny

    N = B
    Y = E
    P = R
    V = L
    T = I
    T = N (if it's preceded by another 'T'),

    It shouldn't take too long to solve now.

    1. Re:OK, so now we know that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be serious.

    2. Re:OK, so now we know that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, good one!

    3. Re:OK, so now we know that.... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      53305))6*;4826)4.)4);806*;488
      60))85;1(;:*883(88)5*;46(;88*96
      *?;8)*(;485);5*2:*(;4956*2(5*—4)8
      8*;4069285);)68)4;1(9;48081;8:8
      1;4885;4)485528806*81(9;48;(88;4
      (?34;48)4;161;:188;?;

      I love cryptography ... and I love cryptography thanks to Edgar Allan. I was obsessed with The Gold Bug as a kid. That got me into cryptography, which eventually got me into programming. Now, get me Jupiter, we have work to do :)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    4. Re:OK, so now we know that.... by SEE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember to ID by rows.

  12. if someone did crack these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that if someone developed some combination of algorithms, mathematics, novel distributed processing techniques, or hardware that could easily crack public crypto challenges, and posted the results to claim credit, s/he might get attention beyond the "attaboy/girl, come work for us" kind. There could be consequences.

    1. Re:if someone did crack these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. I thought the idea was that the solution was an open secret designed to see who had not yet separated themselves from their ego and had to report their findings to superiors or whatever... A net to catch bad recruits that had failed to understand that the answer means nothing in real life compared to the timing of the delivery.

      The maker coming out with hints... What to make of all this?

  13. What's sad/scary about this... by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
    The first three pieces of the puzzle were just very simple, basic, textbook hand-cyphers - two were Vigenère and one was a Transposition cipher - and it took them that long to do the first three - and the last one remains unsolved.

    You'd think that with people from the CIA and NSA - they'd be able crack these things with their eyes closed.

    It doesn't give me a lot of confidence that the government could crack anything strong than the ciphers encoded by a Capt'n Crunch decoder wheel...

    Furthermore - any time someone claimed to have decoded a section of it - the NSA and/or CIA would claim that they had already figured it out...RIIIIIGHT...

    1. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing sad about this. It just illustrates that cryptanalysis is very hard when there's not enough context.

      In other words, you too can keep your messages secret for 20 years if you (1) keep your messages short and seemingly random, and (2) don't reuse the same cypher.

      The three letter agencies have a better chance of decoding the Voynich manuscript than this statue, simply because there's more to analyze in the manuscript.

    2. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      the ciphers encoded by a Capt'n Crunch decoder wheel...

      Holy Draper, CryptoMan, now everyone knows about that.

      Its a lyric by Irving Berliner.

    3. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You'd think that with people from the CIA and NSA - they'd be able crack these things with their eyes closed.

      What makes you think they have not?

    4. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean a lyric by Irving "NYPVTTYP"?

    5. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A large part of the problem is that the sculptor wasn't meticulous enough, and introduced _errors_ to the cyphertexts. That makes the decryption all the more complicated, because you have to brute-force all the possible errors he could have made and try each of them against your proposed solution. For a linear encryption scheme, you can find out where the errors are and cut down on the time, but for a matrix type encryption, even if you had the key and the cipher, you will get gibberish out with a single typo or left out character.

    6. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by havokca · · Score: 0

      It doesn't give me a lot of confidence that the government could crack anything strong than the ciphers encoded by a Capt'n Crunch decoder wheel...

      It's because they don't have to. The spooks have backdoors in most algorithms, there's no need to crack anything when you can simply decode it because it was sent using an algorithm whose creators were strong-armed by you.

      Some fun reading if you're the skeptical type:Here and here.

    7. Re:What's sad/scary about this... by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

      not reading your links, because schneier is an asshole, but you are right. the fourth part was encrypted by an algorithm without backdoors. the man that help 'invent' the algorithm was well aware of backdoor how and whys. BTW any and all public encryption algorithms have back doors including schneier's. maybe he said that in those links?

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  14. Depends whom you ask by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Informative

    FWIW, my high school German teacher was a teenager in Germany at the time, and her grandmother scolded her severely for busting a gut laughing at Kennedy when he uttered this line. And just to be clear, she comes from an old Prussian family -- this was not a case of an American military family having one over on their president. While folks in Berlin might not have made much of the turn of phrase, folks elsewhere in Germany, at least some of them, had a grand old time.

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Depends whom you ask by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 1

      It's true that "Ich bin ein Berliner" is ambiguous. It can refer to someone who is from the city of Berlin, or who feels he is a jelly filled doghnut. As with all ambiguous sentences, you usually assume the meaning that seems correct given the context. Thus, Kennedy's use of the sentence was completely correct. (It's quite possible that your then-teenage German teacher believed it was funny, kids that are trying to misunderstand someone to creaty funny situations are not exactly unusual)

      I'm a German. Kenedy's sentence is still pretty famous here, but until now I've never ever heared about anybody who tried to misinterpret that sentence.

    2. Re:Depends whom you ask by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think the fun part arose from quick logic.
      There is, as you said, two types of Berliner, it's either someone from Berlin, or the jam-filled doughnut. Since the Amerikaner obviously wasn't from Berlin, the conclusion must be...

    3. Re:Depends whom you ask by Georules · · Score: 1

      That's really interesting, because it's a pretty common joke that he made that mistake in the USA.

  15. The remaining 64 characters by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember a night we walked along the Seine riding on the metro

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:The remaining 64 characters by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Dude.

      You take my breath away.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  16. I win by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

    William H. Webster owes me $20. I TOLD him it was the lyrics to "Take My Breath Away"!

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  17. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The artist is a stroke.

  18. Something jumped out at me by Dracos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not familiar with Kryptos, and I'm not one for cryptography. We know there are (at least) two layers here, the encryption and the resulting riddle. Obviously Sanborn is being coy.

    The word IQLUSION stood out to me. At face value this seems to be a misspelling of illusion, but also obvious is the beginning IQ: intelligence quotient. If that is abbreviated to intelligence, and you read through the rest, you get intelligence illusion. Perhaps a reference to counter-intelligence? This is Langley, after all.

    Maybe this is old news, or nothing, or part of the second layer riddle. Just something I thought of after a few minutes. I didn't have any insight about UNDERGRUUND, though.

    1. Re:Something jumped out at me by guruevi · · Score: 1

      He intentionally misspelled some words to confuse cryptographers and not make it too simple.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Something jumped out at me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not familiar with the text, but is there a pattern to the misspellings? as a basic example, the number of characters between misspellings could be a way to encode something. Alternatively, the difference between the misspelled character and the 'correct' character in context could be used to encode - or some combination of the two.

  19. Re:i just fucked a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ironically, this is actually the message encoded in Kryptos.

  20. Leonard Cohen fan? by sootman · · Score: 1

    First we take Manhattan
    Then we take Berlin!

    (Kick-ass song, btw.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  21. Kryptos -- Section 2 - Coordinates by BearGriz72 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    -- BearGriz72
    1. Re:Kryptos -- Section 2 - Coordinates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to get directions for that from where I live, Melbourne.

      Turns out it involves a lot of kayaking

    2. Re:Kryptos -- Section 2 - Coordinates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are the letters in the 4th puzzle are from a one time pad, and the plain text can be retrieved at these coordinates. Maybe it's buried there, or given the earlier references to "transmitted", the plain text might be retrievable by using a radio signal (eg RFID)? It seems fitting that a puzzle for a spy agency would include a dead man's drop. --- JWD Sydney AU 2077

    3. Re:Kryptos -- Section 2 - Coordinates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also did another installation, which is at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, named "Cyrillic Projector". It uses an interior light source to project the Cyrillic characters on the surrounding buildings at night. Pretty cool. This one has already been fully solved. IIRC, it contains text from a KGB training manual.

      35.306193N, -80.729346W

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=University+of+North+Carolina+-+Charlotte,+Charlotte,+NC&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=34.587666,84.375&ie=UTF8&hq=University+of+North+Carolina+-+Charlotte&hnear=University+of+North+Carolina+-+Charlotte,+Charlotte,+Mecklenburg,+North+Carolina+28262&ll=35.306193,-80.729346&spn=0.000544,0.001287&t=k&z=20

      It's the round object in between the buildings. Here's a pic:

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/84602957@N00/3435124031/

  22. It's a cookbook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT'S A COOKBOOK!!

  23. Re:i just fucked a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just fucked a girl in her pussy! more than you loser-ass fucking neckbeards will ever do.

    She's your mother AND your lover!

  24. All spy agencies use encryption. by elucido · · Score: 1

    And they all have code breakers, this includes the CIA and FBI.

  25. Kryptos from the word Kyrpton ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Wikipedia:
    Krypton is inert for most practical purposes. Krypton can also form clathrates with water when atoms of it are trapped in a lattice of the water molecules.

    ------
    The water in front of the sculpture is showing that the final part is a Lattice-based cryptosystem...

    Just my two cents...

  26. Re:i just fucked a girl by VTI9600 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, that's clearly not right, see:

    I just fucked a girl in her pussy! more than you loser-ass fuckBERLINckbeards will ever do.

    get some sunlight you stupid fuckers!! hahahaha

    Go back to cryptanalysis school, n00b.

  27. Everybody already knew it was Berlin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's not the least bit helpful. Everyone knew those letters were Berlin. If only he had told us whether it is Irving, East, or New Hampshire.

  28. Slashdaughters, and link by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    On the first point, might I suggest looking at the posting histories of Slashdot users such as Macgrrl, AriaStar, xirusmom, and girlintraining, among other possibilities (though admittedly the username "girlintraining" might suggest someone not born to femininity; I'm honestly not sure).

    On the second point, may I direct your attention to this most informative link, as requested. ;)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  29. Re:Why is this news? JFK said it a long time ago . by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Well, if nothing else, thank you for the tour through Cold War spymasters. Schabowski deserves a dozen medals for what he did for humanity, even if it was inadvertent.

  30. dig! by MagicM · · Score: 1

    So Solution 2 gives some coordinates that identify a point near the sculpture, yet I can't find any mention of anyone taking a shovel to that location.

    Has anyone been out there rooting around in the dirt?

    The answer has to be a blindingly obvious "yes", but the internet fails to give me that answer...

  31. Too Busy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, we're all too busy getting paid 6 figures to write Perl scripts to scan your SIGINT networks for insecure services, bypassing your IDSs/IPSs and attempting to try default passwords on behalf of foreign governments or 'private organisations' to do your stupid puzzle.

  32. Why try? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nothing sad about this. It just illustrates that cryptanalysis is very hard when there's not enough context.

    Not only that, but there's little incentive to solve these cyphers. It's not like he's hiding a Swiss bank account or ICBM launch codes.
    The best a cracker could expect would be some kudos and maybe a job offer.
    Not something anyone is going to spend supercomputer time on or build a botnet to crack.

  33. Re:i just fucked a girl by VTI9600 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just a friendly reminder to potential mods out there:

    Treatment of the absurd as if it were rational is one of the many devices used by comedic practitioners to create their comedy, particularly that of the self-deprecating variety. Furthermore, regarding a person's sense of humor, Wikipedia has the following to say:

    People of all ages and cultures respond to humour. The majority of people are able to experience humour, i.e., to be amused, to laugh or smile at something funny, and thus they are considered to have a sense of humour. The hypothetical person lacking a sense of humour would likely find the behaviour induced by humour to be inexplicable, strange, or even irrational, and would probably consider it trolling (I added that part)

    In other words, there's no -1 mod for "I don't get the joke". Thanks for your time.

  34. Cracked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin"

  35. Misdirection ? by Rollgunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The guy is a cryptographer... I'd consider "Berlin" as being both a clue *and* a misdirection.

    The message might well read something like : rememBER LINcoln's birthplace...

  36. It's not in their best interest . . . by bedouin · · Score: 1

    They need to maintain a facade of incompetence so their opponents will continue to underestimate them.

  37. just wondering by Eil · · Score: 1

    I just have to say, shouldn't the CIA be just a tad bit embarrassed that they can't crack a piece of artwork that they commissioned and sits right in their own damn courtyard?

    1. Re:just wondering by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope. The greatest fool can ask a question that the wisest man cannot answer.

      It's incredible easy to make a cipher so convulated and impractical (e.g. encode by the phase of the moon determined by the fourteenth character, then transpose all vowels, add up the number of strokes within each letter using the Arial font, multiply those numbers by the number 10 places ahead of it, then look those up on a ceasar cipher) that it's boring and uninteresting to decipher it and pretty much "impossible". Unfortunately, it also becomes incredibly useless as a cipher then because it becomes tedious to communicate using it, and the security of a cipher has nothing to do with its difficulty of encryption or decryption procedure - you'll probably find that a couple of supercomputers could find enough patterns in the above "cipher" that they could find the right answers without having to even KNOW the phase of the moon.

      The thing about mathematical ciphers is that the method is public and yet they are still incredibly difficult to decrypt. This isn't an interesting cipher, mathematically speaking, because the method is closed so it could be anything. All we have is some jumbled text and (presumably) a sensible answer that we're not privy to. It's more a children's puzzle than a cipher, just a very difficult one - because nobody actually uses this cipher to communicate (so the cipher can be unnecessarily complicated without actually being *secure*, the plaintext could well be complete junk, the message may even be erroneously encoded, and there's only a single - non-militarily-important - instance of an encoded text).

      In short - nobody cares. It's like the book-competitions where someone buries treasure and publishes a book which "gives the details" of where it's buried. It's pretty much chance if you find it or not because there is no requirement for the answer to be logical, practical or even decryptable. The one I saw, you had to draw a line from the eye of a character on each artwork-strewn page, through their index finger, to a particular letter in a word on the outside of the page border, then interpret those clues which narrowed things down to an entire field somewhere in the UK - the "winner" was the author's former-flatmate's girlfriend.

      The importance of a ciphered message is more related to its origin, the probability of it being an unintentional leak, the probability of it being militarily important, and other non-mathematical factors. Then, if you have the impetus, running it through a supercomputer with what little you know or (infinitely better) getting a couple more messages that use the same scheme and are likely to reveal commonalities. That's how we beat Engima. This is just a puzzle-book, and quite boring because it can actually just be gibberish and nobody would really care.

    2. Re:just wondering by NevDull · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the same reason Lost appealed to the masses, but not the thinking folk -- if you can throw arbitrary impossible bullshit in to "explain" something, it's not really an explanation. It became more like a bunch of kids playing Cops and Robbers with the one kid who decides he's got an alien spacecraft with a freeze ray that he can use at any point to immobilize his enemies. Call it a black swan if you want, but it certainly affects how interesting a story is.

    3. Re:just wondering by gonz · · Score: 1

      This isn't an interesting cipher, mathematically speaking, because the method is closed so it could be anything. All we have is some jumbled text and (presumably) a sensible answer that we're not privy to. [...] This is just a puzzle-book, and quite boring because it can actually just be gibberish and nobody would really care.

      Err... so how was it possible to decode the other three sections then? Obviously it's not gibberish, it's intelligible English text encoded using familiar algorithms. And people have cared enough to invest the time to solve three of the four sections, including people from the CIA and NSA.

      Being located on actual CIA grounds, this sculpture is also an artistic statement. It highlights just how much cryptography has changed since the old days when cracking codes was top secret and required expensive supercomputers.

      But then, you wouldn't know anything about art, would you? You called the Kryptos sculpture a boring children's puzzle, versus your ideal of a "militarily-important" message encoded using AES. AES never would have been invented if everyone had your pragmatist view. Math is fueled by puzzles with no obligation for usefulness.

    4. Re:just wondering by ledow · · Score: 1

      Wow. I think I just touched on the *weirdest* nerve in existence.

      Nobody was talking about the art of the sculpture. And in that respect, why on Earth would anyone really care if the code was "real" so long as it was representative? Also, the sculpture *did* have errors in its transcription - quite serious ones that the sculptor had to admit to - so it was probably never even double-checked as being a valid cipher (and therefore could easily be unsolvable due to a silly, simple transcription mistake). And just because 3/4 are intelligible (substitution and transposition ciphers don't really count as "encryption" anyway because their solutions are essentially mathematically trivial and subject to exactly the interpretation of the message described in my post rather than something more concrete) doesn't mean that the fourth isn't complete and utter gibberish. If it were a message intercepted from a sworn enemy not only would you put effort into seeing if that were true, you'd also assume that it could be complete bollocks too - and *THAT* sort of thinking is probably why we *didn't* piss away thousands of man-hours on "encryption" dead-ends, red-herrings etc. in the past. The German's sent fake messages in WWII too, you know.

      Don't give me shit and get snotty because you think art surpasses maths... nobody really cares about such things and they're certainly not relevant to, of all things, a slashdot comment concerned the mathematical decryption capabilities of the FBI. We're talking about a cryptographic puzzle on a statue - a puzzle that relies on artistic and fundamentally human interpretation to make any sense, not mathematics - Nobody said there was anything wrong with that or to get snotty but to a *mathematician* the puzzle is uninteresting - that doesn't mean the artwork is. Thanks for dividing everyone into either life-long "logical" or "artistic" mindsets within a single comment. So, to answer the post I was commenting on, this means it is nothing more than a slight distraction and, with authorised supercomputer time, wouldn't be a challenge (because it's purely substitution / transposition ciphers so far). It's a toy, something to occupy a mind not encode a country's military secrets, and we were discussing why "nobody" has yet "cracked" it.

      Because if you wanted the artwork to be appreciated, it would probably be better off *not* being decrypted at all. Having such a puzzle solved effectively limits the lifespan of the artwork. But if you *really* wanted the artwork to be appreciated, you couldn't possibly get quite so snotty at someone discussing the biggest and most important element of its basis - that the "encryption" on it is more puzzle-like than some proven mathematics on a bit of paper.

    5. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, the book you are thinking of is "Masquerade".

  38. patent troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by the way, i didnt see it mentioned anywhere and although it is not relevant, the cia guy who helped the artist, owns the company that sued microsoft for using encryption and settled. he now is suing sun, oracle, eBay any anyone else who use encryption. as accomplished in cryptography as he obviously is, his cryptography company, TecSec, couldnt make a dime without patent trolling.

  39. Shaken, not stirred. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    And, alas, my "on the second point" link was an extension of your joke. Dry humour so seldom finds a truly appreciative audience these days...

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  40. Alternate pop-music reference by Jay+L · · Score: 1

    No, the rest of the message is "It's goin' down, y'all - like the wall of Berlin". Cleverly, the entire ciphertext is also the proper pronunciation Prince's old glyph.

  41. Re:Why is this news? JFK said it a long time ago . by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    Schabowski deserves a dozen medals for what he did for humanity, even if it was inadvertent.

    This guy saved the world and ought to get a medal or two.

  42. Solved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    After working nonstop since the hint was published, I was able to decode the entire fourth message.

    Unfortunately, it's written in all caps and has no spaces, so the Slashdot filters will not allow me to post it.

  43. how ironic by slick7 · · Score: 1

    The fact that the clue had to be "leaked" to the intelligence(?) community, truly seems apropos.
    Wh*n will th*s* p*opl* g*t a clu*?







    Leaked hint: It's a vowel, not a, not i, not o, not u, and not sometimes y.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  44. Re:i just fucked a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One might argue that 'funny' is in the eye of the beholder. To be more concrete, if you attempt to make a funny post, and your post gets more mods down than it gets '+1 Funny', then obviously the majority of the audience was not amused and you failed to be funny in the context of that audience, that is, it wasn't funny.

    While treatment of the absurd as if it were rational is indeed one of the devices used by comedic practitioners to create comedy, that doesn't automatically make all instances of doing so funny.

  45. Re:No! Don't solve the puzzle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did it! First we take Man[NO CARRIER]

  46. being pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not in front of the CIA it's in a courtyard

  47. Re:i just fucked a girl by VTI9600 · · Score: 1

    I suppose you're right in that I shouldn't lecture people about what they ought to find funny. I was just frustrated that some people would interpret my comment as hate-speech rather than simply being a bad joke.

    Ironically, at the time of this writing, my original comment has received just one "-1 Troll" mod, followed by three "+1 Funny" mods. I'm not quite sure what to make of that...*ugh* I really just want this thread to be over.