Underwear Invention Protects Privacy At Airport
Thanks to Jeff Buske you don't have to be embarrassed while going through the full body scanners at the airport. Buske has invented radiation shielding underwear for the shy traveler. From the article: "Jeff Buske says his invention uses a powdered metal that protects people's privacy when undergoing medical or security screenings. Buske of Las Vegas, Nev.-Rocky Flats Gear says the underwear's inserts are thin and conform to the body's contours, making it difficult to hide anything beneath them. The mix of tungsten and other metals do not set off metal detectors."
When you obscure genitalia, only the outlaws will have genitalia.
A hell of allot of good that do anyone. Its not like if the TSA sees anything remotely out of the ordinary with the scanner you are not going to then get the pat-down or some other intrusive search as a result.
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
Frisking bad as it is, is unlikely to give you cancer, deform your eggs/sperm, or sterilize you. So there's that.
"If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff."
This will just get you an enhanced pat down, which you could opt for in the first place.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
If they can't see ALL of you, then they take you aside and pat you down. So with this device, instead of seeing you, they are going to take you aside and feel you up.
I was just thinking about something like this last night. I wonder why aluminum foil couldn't just be folded and inserted in a similar manner?
"On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
And thus the underwear arms race began.. .. did I tell you about the nuke I'm hiding in my boxers? *wink wink, nudge nudge*
http://www.bcbin.com/
These will be popular among those who like stragers to grope them.
I wonder what your odds of dying from TSA-induced cancer vs. an airline crash are?
He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
http://j.mp/cancer-ray
Not good for breast cancer survivors, adolescents, or young children.
From the article: It's unclear whether it would lead to an automatic, more intrusive pat down by federal Transportation Security Administration officials.
No, if the image is unclear, the TSA's reaction is not. If you are not sure, check out what Dave Barry went through when the image of his groin was "blurry" http://www.npr.org/2010/11/15/131338172/humorist-dave-barry-and-the-tsa
Death looks every man in the face. All any man can do is look back and smile. - Marcus Aurelius
This is a solution that causes all sorts of problems. The reason they are scanning and ball-tapping is because they're afraid of underwear bombs. If you don't think this'll get you cavity searched, you're out of your mind!
Dave Barry's already gotten that experience.
http://www.npr.org/2010/11/15/131338172/humorist-dave-barry-and-the-tsa
Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
"Body scans and genital fondlings would save more lives if our government was paying to have them done in hospitals rather than airports."
This of course assumes the scans are safe, but you get the idea...
Living With a Nerd
Apparently Omar Mohammad al-Talibani al-Q`aidi of Yemen just placed an order for one million of this new fangled thing.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
yeah, if it is your private parts you are worried about... people might be embarrassed about their general shape.
You know they will start giving people flack about this kind of underwear if people start using these regularly. If they do that, people should use the excuse this is a religious thing. Heck, isn't there a religion that already requires special underwear? (lol Mormons)
Parents should be sure to get these for their kids to so they don't go to hell for letting them go through those scanners.
Oh, and watch out for the TSA underpants gnomes.
I wonder if you could use this material to write messages on your body?
So now we're making a readily available concealing device that doesn't set-off metal detectors. I can guarantee that if they can't see what's in your underwear with the scanner then it will throw up red flags and they'll see what is in your underwear themselves. All this does is add an extra step and frustrate TSA agents.
how about a "fuck the tsa" lead paint t-shirt? Maybe some leather-studded chastity underwear and crotchless chaps, too.
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
4th amendment protects you against unreasonable search. Seems like it would apply at the airport. TSA claims that you are contractually obligated to put up with search when you enter the secure area and that your air travel ticket states this and as such is a contract. But, you aren't able to sign away your constitutional rights implying, at least, that this component of the air travel contract is illegal. How does this all square up?
Why can't a person just fold their hands in front of them while going through the machine, thereby covering up those sensitive parts? Last I checked, the hands pretty much hang down at the same height...
A woman could use an 'underwear insert' in the shape of a humongous cock and balls. Question is, would that mean she is more or less likely to get groped? And would she be groped by a male agent or a female one?
Am I the only person in the world that has no problem with this?
personally, the idea of getting into a flying metal bullet and being propelled through the air at hundreds of kilometers per hour with a hundred+ other people that COULD have an implement to kill anybody on board or prevent the aircraft from being able to land without anybody even bothering to check if the passengers have said implements on them: just sounds like a bad idea.
If you have issues with what your junk looks like, I feel terribly sorry for you. give your parents a smack sometime (unless they are no longer around.. then maybe just give yourself a smack so as not to be an asshat!) and ask them why they decided to raise you to be afraid of who and what you are.
we're all human. If somebody criticizes your bits, grow a pair and get the fuck over it.
World coming to its end!
I haven't flown in many months, but I was thinking about next time I go through airport security I could use packing tape to attach strips of aluminum foil to my chest spelling out FUCK YOU. This would be clearly visible in the X-ray, but would not be visible otherwise, and an agent could not even feel it during a pat down. It furthermore would not provide any security threat, and could not possibly conceal any weapon. It would be a pure speech opportunity. How could or would TSA respond to such a thing?
it was only a matter of time.
Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
The only real solution to by-pass the uncomfortable pad down and see thru scanner is castration.
There has not been enough study of ionizing radiation risks to form a clear consensus. I have a genetic immune disorder and will not subject myself to this, nor will I subject myself to being molested by a government agent.
When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
What I would like is some sort of marker or tape that would allow me to spell out "F*CK YOU" on my ass so the TSA goon running the scanner knows just what I think of him and the secret police organization he works for.
One advantage to doing this is that such an image would no doubt be widely distributed around the internet thereby proving that scanner images can be saved and redistributed.
if you wear it on the outside.
About 1 billion passengers fly every year in the USA.
Assume very conservatively that extra security measures are adding about 5 minutes to the time taken for each flight (it's probably a lot more owing to the extra time-safety margin generally required to ensure you get through security on time) and that's 100 million hours.
Now given that you spend about 400000 hours awake during an 80 year life that is the equivalent of about 250 lives being wasted on this excercise every year in the USA.
It's even worse than that if you think of all the money wasted on it that could be more efficiently spent on reducing life lost in other areas of genuine need (eg health care for the poor).
Don't worry, if you're just wearing underwear made of weird metals, there's no chance whatsoever they'd escort you to whichever emphatically-not-Gitmo site in Eastern Elbonia that is in operation this week.
How about cutting some metal foil into letters, glue them onto your undies, and spell out a message for the TSA?
You know, tell them what to do with themselves?
Haha, why not just read playboy before entering scanner.. that way picture should be clear and solid.
As in, "Fig Leaf UGLY." Has anyone actually bothered to look at the image in the article? Seriously? A fig-leaf design for men and "clasped hands" for women? WTF?
Dude. I'd sooner let the agent grope me than be caught wearing something like that. Especially if he's cute. (I kid, I kid)
I think the solution is simple--force everyone to wear a standard skintight full-body lycra uniform prior to entering the security area, and have designated changing areas once past security. Sure, the TSA agents would eventually go blind from the abject horror that is American obesity, but hey, that's their problem, not ours.
That sounds like "Smooth Operator". A good sade song could be made out of this. Oooh shhhy traavellleeerrrrr ... Shhhhhy traavelleeeerrr * Pat me down with your genitaliaaa * Unnderweaaring att thee aiiir poort *
Read radical news here
someone pls mod parent up
Read radical news here
I was wondering if it is acceptable to the TSA for me to request a private room, and strip naked to let them do a visual only examination to prove that I'm not carrying anything dangerous. They can look as closely as they want, as long as they don't touch me.
I have no concerns about privacy, but I do have a problem with xrays and a person feeling me up.
But I have no problems about getting naked. Is that an acceptable for the TSA? I will try it next time I go through an airport.
That Chertoff's company, Rapiscan Systems (no that's seriously the name, what the fuck, right?) is one of the two producers of this bullshit. The guy couldn't run national security at all and we're apparently STILL LETTING HIM DO IT. Protip: If given the chance, at least ONE American on board a flight will attempt to stop any possible terrorist. That bullshit that Bush yammered on about, "American Exceptionalism" (I forget if he called it that or if that's what his detractors called it) doesn't come from America itself, because our systems currently in place are pretty crappy. It does have an inkling of truth in it, though, in the form of the people. The same people whose rights are being trampled by this garbage. This will accomplish nothing, except set the precedence so they can do worse things. And to not only head off, but invoke Godwin's Law, the Nazis never could've even hoped for such willing corruption. We even tell people about torture, which they were unwilling to do. And what about what they're not telling us? I'm not saying the past is better. I'm just saying our current system is bad.
There is no -1 Disagree.
Honestly, coating your underpants in thermite is going a bit far...
Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
We're doing it wrong ....
The solution here is to better engineer planes so they dont sustain critical damage when a small explosive is applied. In other words, a terrorist may sucessfully kill the 20 people in his immediate vicinity, but he cant cause the plane to crash.
I dont know what technology could help here.. maybe blowout panels... but terrorists like planes because with a relatively small explosive you can kill everyone .. to them, it's impressive to blow up a plane because it makes the news... if we take away their ability to cause the plane to crash, they'll get bored with this line of attack relatively quickly because the risk is not worth the now small reward....
But could the titanium be arranged in some kind of microwave-scale freznel ring design that makes the overall package seem more impressive ? After you pass through the machine the TSA goons all touch their earpieces as they listen to the comments of the backroom screeners, it would be great to seem them keep a straight face if a guy with (apparently) a 3' dick went through. They'd have to pull me aside and ask if I planned to use it as a weapon.
Nullius in verba
...has discovered the problems inherent in this approach.
Have gnu, will travel.
I'd like jeans and shirt, and as long as we're at it, a long coat (duster) and a hat with this stuff. It'll drive them nuts.
:)
What's wrong? Everyone knows that these flights expose you to increased levels of radiation, and my doctor says I need to avoid that, so I'm wearing environment appropriate clothing. I'm sorry your xray operator can't get his jollies off, but it doesn't say he's allowed to see anything. Besides that, you don't want me turning into the thing or human torch do you? (Mister Fantastic would be too much fun, and Invisible Woman would require a gender change as well.) Sorry, couldn't resist the comic book based radiation crack.
That (and this whole story) reminds me of this lovely bit from Spinal Tap.
And what about the initiated Mormons with their lead-lined underwear?
mark
Why not just stuff your tinfoil hat in your pants?
The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
Wouldn't a body augmentation prosthetic make more sense? Would you rather be seen as a Unic or a potential John Holmes?
Haha, why not just read playboy before entering scanner.. that way picture should be clear and solid.
For added effect, put a metal ruler in your pants, for handy scale reference.
Bow-ties are cool.
So I'm supposed to wrap these around my genitals in order to hide...my genitals?
Comfy!
How does one get to and from most airports?
If there was a way to get something specific to show up on the scanners. I could see a market for shirts that tell the TSA just what you think of them.
You want a "fisting" go ahead and wear something that the illiterate TSA drone hasn't seen before and then try to explain it to somebody with an IQ of 90!
Unless you have to, DON'T FLY!!
I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
A hot woman wearing this underwear hits a scanner and
TSA Agent: *snickers* "Ma'am I'm afraid there appears to be an anomaly with your underwear. I'm going to have to ask you to take them off."
Woman: "Take them off?!?!"
TSA Agent: "Yes please go right over there behind that one way see through privacy shield and oh don't mind the cameras they aren't HD capable."
FOX News: "Local woman arrested for refusing to take off her bomb concealing underwear for the TSA. She must be a terrorist otherwise she would have cooperated like and good American. It is Un-American to keep your underwear on."
As a non-American (I don't even live in the USA) what options are there for tourists to the US? I see a lot of arguments about this whole issue involving 4th Ammendment Rights, etc. So as a visitor to your country can I refuse the backscatter scan? Are there any rights that protect me? Some argue that air travel is voluntary well yes and no. Sure I voluntarily entered the US as a visitor but in order to leave I need to fly out...especially if I live on the other side of the world. Driving obviously isn't an option. So where do non-Americans fit into this? Should we just keep our heads down our mouths shut and submit to the gate rape?
I fully expect the TSA to ban underwear on commercial flights in the U.S. as a result of this. Can't be too careful, right?
In addition to still having the rest of your body subject to backscatter x-rays without your consent without a warrant, this method is still ineffective in doing what we claim to be doing in the first place.
Catching terrorist attacks.
Because even the TSA admits that 4 out of 5 attempts to get thru their security screening are totally successful.
EPIC FAIL! ... now, back off and move to Russia if you want to touch my junk!
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
200 years ago they probably would not have been hanged, but rather they'd definitely have gotten at least tarred and feathered.
If it contours to your body, what good is it? That's like saying if you put a condom on your willy, then people won't be able to see it.
...and wizard hat.
All this is going to do is get someone pulled out of line and back-roomed.
I'm going to start flying a lot, now that I can get free pat-downs bonus with my flights.
Only question, which airports should I choose for the best pat-downs out there?
Also, do they do naked pat-downs as well? where? where?
I'm wondering how these new search procedures were authorised.
Was there an act of congress or is the TSA an uncontrolled rogue agency that can just apply these rules themselves?
Either way conservative America is going to blame Obama for this but if he demands the TSA stop he'll be blamed for taking the side of the terrorists. From the other side of the ocean this looks like a nasty little political game with possibly a bit of graft and corruption involving RapiScan thrown in.
Someone pay for and mail me one of these and I will document my experience flying across the border from Canada to the US to visit my folks for christmas. On second thought dont.
And this has been another installament of Captain Obvious!