Slashdot Mirror


Linux Radio

An anonymous reader writes "This might very well be the nerdiest site we'll ever encounter... Linux Radio is an online radio station broadcasting the Linux kernel! Each time someone visit the site, a random source file is selected and read loudly by a virtual speaker materialized through the open source speech synthesizer eSpeak. Will it prove useful to anyone is probably a difficult question to answer, but the excitement provided is worth experiencing at least once. However, this concept proves once more the advantages of open source over proprietary software making such achievements impossible : whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?"

141 comments

  1. i don't understand by Mister+Pedant · · Score: 0

    could you repeat that in binary please?

    1. Re:i don't understand by maeka · · Score: 3, Funny

      whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?

      I like my Autechre just fine, TYVM.

    2. Re:i don't understand by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Well, probably in hex, it's more interesting. You can also get by a little bit more with leet speak. 0xBAD 0xCAD 0x15 0x5AD :D

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    3. Re:i don't understand by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?

      All the music I listen to is binary files. How else would I keep them on digital storage?

      Of course, I don't listen to them by having a voice read the ones and zeroes, but interpreted to analog via the proper codec.

      Still, I don't know that listening to a computer voice reading source code is much more useful or pleasant than a computer voice repeating ones and zeroes.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    4. Re:i don't understand by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      All the music I listen to is binary files. How else would I keep them on digital storage?

      Ternary?

    5. Re:i don't understand by arisvega · · Score: 1

      Of course, I don't listen to them by having a voice read the ones and zeroes, but interpreted to analog via the proper codec.

      Speaking of which, this is what I get when I try to stream it;

      Connecting to server www.linux.fm[69.164.211.221]: 80...

      Cache size set to 320 KBytes

      Cache fill: 1.70% (5580 bytes)

      Win32 LoadLibrary failed to load: avisynth.dll, /usr/lib/codecs/avisynth.dll, /usr/lib/win32/avisynth.dll, /usr/local/lib/win32/avisynth.dll

      I guess this is whhat makes it nerdy (as opposed to geeky) ...

      On a lighter note, the file I got served was panic.c -nice, eh?

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  2. It's a bit too fast by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    They need to slow it down a bit even if seems to mainly be saying asterisk, slash and sync for my file (mm/msync.c).

    1. Re:It's a bit too fast by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling—I lucked out and got init/main.c. Check out the text version: it's nothing but includes for the first three minutes.

      The "Linux Radio" name should be reserved for something that does, say, interviews with kernel developers, distro maintainers, and summaries of mailing list results. I'm sure there are enough people in the community to garner a worthwhile audience.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  3. Useful? Not too difficult a question actually by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Informative

    No.

    See? That was easy.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  4. Holy cow !!! by unity100 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For some fscking reason, this thing actually sounds appealing and coherent to me. Not to mention relaxing and understandable.

    1. Re:Holy cow !!! by fuego451 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Glad I'm not alone. I even added a little brown noise to give the illusion it is coming from light years away.

    2. Re:Holy cow !!! by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      its as if someone is whispering very fundamental, existential information from aeons away, from the back of your head.

    3. Re:Holy cow !!! by plover · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed. When you get into some of the blocks of repeated stuff, such as #includes, it builds up a bit of rhythm, then breaks arrhythmically into code, which sounds like it evolves its own rhythm. It's not unlike a techno or electro percussion line. Throw some lines of synth along the top of this, and you'd have an album.

      And I just followed the advice on the page: "if you can't get enough, you can always open Linux Radio in two or more different browser tabs". Ooo! It makes me feel all cybery inside! :-)

      --
      John
    4. Re:Holy cow !!! by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thumbs up. There are emergent patterns with little "comment breaks" overlaid for spice. I genuinely find it comforting and calming. It's like Vulcan poetry.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Holy cow !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait til Linus starts selling advertising space in the kernel:
        What follows is a disgusting hack... now for a limited time, get a Taco and a Pepsi for only $1.99, only at Taco Bell.

    6. Re:Holy cow !!! by ZosX · · Score: 3, Funny

      I honestly don't quite see how farting could possibly give the illusion of distance.

    7. Re:Holy cow !!! by mrsurb · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think we've just solved the mystery that Dr Rush on the Destiny has been working on.

    8. Re:Holy cow !!! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not alone. I even added a little brown noise to give the illusion it is coming from light years away.

      Wouldn't that be red noise?

  5. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously...there aren't any real people with enough time to carry out such an important task? What _is_ everyone doing?

  6. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is stupid, period. This statement can't be bargained or reasoned with. It feels no pain, or remorse, or pity, or fear..and it absolutely will not stop...err ok enough.

  7. Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by haruchai · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean, c'mon, does Stephen Hawking really have time to read all this? And, this has to be the most tedious method of mirroring the kernel sources that I've ever "heard"

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I think I remember that in one of the Captain Kirk Star Treks, that the computer got repaired, and refitted with a sultry female voice. He was annoyed, and got it fixed back to the non-emotional female robot voice.

      Your choice: listen to the sexy computer, or go off to fight the Klingons .. . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      actually it was an episode of futurama

    3. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need the voice from MoanMyIP.com.

    4. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by plover · · Score: 2, Funny

      They need the voice from MoanMyIP.com.

      http://www.moanmyip.com/

      OMFG, I thought you were kidding! Then I thought it was a hack of some sort, but Blitzableiter didn't complain about the flash. It really does moan your IP!

      --
      John
    5. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I thought it was Red Dwarf.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by Lennie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does she do IPv6 too ? ;-)

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    7. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by froggymana · · Score: 1

      I'd love to have her come by 127.0.0.1 and give me a more visual demonstration.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    8. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      ROFL! :-)

    9. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by process · · Score: 1

      Man was I dissapointed when I clicked that link.

      I had lights dimmed and set myself up for half an hour of Perverse Protocol Proclamation and all I get is my assigned numerical value!

      I could have done that on my own.

      --
      computers let you make more mistakes faster, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila.
    10. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I'm strangely reminded of the movie "The Book of Eli".

    11. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "Tomorrow is Yesterday" - ship's computer voice was changed during an overhaul on Cygnet XIV
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomorrow_Is_Yesterday

      Wow, that takes me back a few decades. I haven't seen any of TOS since the mid-eighties.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    12. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fighting is often the *only* way to achieve peace. When your enemy has chosen war, you cannot chose peace. Your choice is to submit or to resist. The most effective means to prevent yourself from being attacked to to make it clear to aggressors how much it will cost them to attack you.

      Passive resistance works against aggressors who aren't truly evil. The Brits no longer had a taste for brutality and so let India go with less of a fight than they did the US. But evil is unphased by protests, civil disobedience and diplomacy. They want what they want and will do whatever they please to get it. For instance, Germany and Japan were unmoved by diplomatic paperwork. The only way to get them back within their own borders was to kill em until the survivors decided it wasn't worth it.

      A rapist isn't going to stop because "it's wrong" or because "ow that hurts, Mr. Rapist". They might stop if she removes one of his eyes or crushes his balls.

      More often than not, conflict/confrontation avoidance is resolution avoidance. See: Korea. The brutality in the North has gone for 40+ years because we are avoiding conflict, and therefore resolution.

    13. Re:Can we get a sultry female voice instead? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Good God! Did my .sig set you off(topic) much?
      Anyway, you do have some valid points but there's a lot you're overlooking.

      For example, why couldn't Japan simply have been blockaded? They're remote and didn't really have much left to throw at the Allies.

      As for your rapist scenario, I wouldn't count on that strategy working on someone who's much bigger and stronger. Trying something like that will likely get your head smashed against the pavement and still get ass-fucked. If fighting back gives you room to run and scream or otherwise attract attention, go for it. If not, all it'll likely get you is a pat on the back for fighting back - too bad you now have a concussion paired with a torn-up asshole.
      By the way, how many years, lives and dollars have been wasted in Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq and Afghanistan? What would all that effort have accomplished at home?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  8. "Binary files"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?

    Presumably that's why they offer only source files (there are binary blobs in some drivers, though).

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"Binary files"? by arielCo · · Score: 1

      I guess the binaries would sound a lot like its sister station, White Noise FM :

      White Noise FM is an online radio broadcasting white noise, a sound known to improve concentration by covering background noise. It also helps relaxation, and can aid people to sleep. Although we're focusing on white noise at the moment, we have plans to add more colored sounds to our programs in the future : pink noise, brown noise, and grey noise. We aim to become a fully featured white noise generator!

      It also features pink and brown(ian) noise, though they all look like pre-generated samples in a loop

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    2. Re:"Binary files"? by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      White and pink seemed a bit too distracting, but brown seemed pretty decent. Has a wind/rainy sound.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    3. Re:"Binary files"? by Genrou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I started using computers, they used K7 tapes to store programs. You know, they were mostly used for audio, but since they were cheap, it was a perfect media for home computers of that time -- bits were converted to sound, mostly using some sort of frequency modulation. There was no Internet then (I know, how can one imagine a world without the Internet), so the only source of information about computers were magazines and an occasional TV or radio program. Well, there was a weekly radio program where I lived that broadcast computer programs -- the binary files themselves. You just pressed "record" in your tape recorder, hoping the transmission was good enough, and then you could load it in your computer. Sometimes, they broadcast ZX Spectrum, sometimes it was MSX programs. They usually worked well, but sometimes the noise in the transmission would cause a lot of errors. It was a very nice way to distribute the programs

    4. Re:"Binary files"? by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 1

      grey noise is even better, like a waterfall far away heard in a rain wikipedia has recordings, pick your favorite noise: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colors_of_noise

    5. Re:"Binary files"? by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Gosh Grandpa! You are like a zillion zillion years old! MOMMY, GRANDPA ISNT WAKING UP!

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    6. Re:"Binary files"? by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      An interesting yet pointless experiment is importing various binary files into Audacity as RAW audio. Interesting because some file types produce sometimes similar, sometimes predictable, and sometimes catchy sounds.

      Notably file types that contain header and other structured meta info. It's also a great way to procrastinate.

  9. Hell... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's still better than at least 90% of what counts as "music" today.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Hell... by nnet · · Score: 1

      Amen.

    2. Re:Hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is a proper word for that, you are getting old.

    3. Re:Hell... by hoytak · · Score: 1

      Do you live in Texas?

      --
      Does having a witty signature really indicate normality?
    4. Re:Hell... by Genrou · · Score: 1

      I think there is a proper word for that, you are getting old.

      Correct! After all, the words recited from the Linux kernel are not very different from the babbling and mumbling from the last Lady Gaga success!

    5. Re:Hell... by sorak · · Score: 1

      It's still better than at least 90% of what counts as "music" today.

      How long before someone autotunes it?

    6. Re:Hell... by vivek_bye · · Score: 0

      its music to geeks i guess.. but which genre: linux ?

  10. Wow there are a lot of asterisks! by roll_w.it · · Score: 1

    the free asterisk software foundation

    1. Re:Wow there are a lot of asterisks! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, one could easily mistake it for the Asterisk source code.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Wow there are a lot of asterisks! by arth1 · · Score: 2

      This just goes to show that this was set up by amateur wannabes. It's pronounced 'splat' or 'times', depending on context.
      With no desire to follow TFA to the actual radio which must be slashdotted by now, do they say 'octothorpe' and 'exclamation mark' too?

      shebang whacka-bin-whacka-essage

    3. Re:Wow there are a lot of asterisks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      it seems to promote the use of drugs, all i can pick out is "hash include".

    4. Re:Wow there are a lot of asterisks! by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You missed the obvious...

      Oh my God... It's full of stars.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  11. Not nearly nerdy enough by dangitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it were being broadcast on a shortwave radio band rather than internet radio, it might classify as one of the nerdier things ever. The internet is just so conventional.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Not nearly nerdy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it takes the average programmer 5 minutes to do it again. It's not nerdy enough if you don't work hard to achieve it.

    2. Re:Not nearly nerdy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that but I was initially excited when I saw the words "Linux Radio" and thought that someone had finally made some interesting ham-radio stuff for Linux...

      like for example a software defined radio - preferably could handle raw IQ via multiple channels on open sound cards with AD-DA upto 192 bps ... for a start

      or that someone had finally made an open implementation of STANAG 5066 ...

      and what about open mobile base stations?

      or write some open FPGA code to to get wider bands of actual RF and electrically tuning steering the antenna array...

      trouble is nice development hardware is expensive ...

      Anyone got an extra 100,000 USD for a fun open radio project?

    3. Re:Not nearly nerdy enough by tusam · · Score: 1

      If it were being broadcast on a shortwave radio band..

      It was -> http://lwn.net/2002/0207/a/radio-free-linux.php3

      Actually it was surprising that on the dozen or so times I saw linux.fm mentioned on IRC for the past week no one seemed to be aware of it being "old news".
      Is this the span of our cultural memory?

    4. Re:Not nearly nerdy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and if these audio files were given as input to a speech recognition software, would one get the original source code back? I wonder ...

    5. Re:Not nearly nerdy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ELF, now *that* would be nerdy!

    6. Re:Not nearly nerdy enough by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      ELF, now *that* would be nerdy!

      Especially if the submarines replied.

  12. Binary by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    "whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?"

    I think you've finally solved the mystery of the 'numbers stations': it's not Russian spies sending secret messages, it's the oldest method of P2P file sharing!

    1. Re:Binary by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      "whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?"

      I think you've finally solved the mystery of the 'numbers stations'

      If you have the right "one time pad" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_time_pad ), listening to a numbers station ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_station ) could save your life. "Yo. Bad news, your cover has been blown . . . "

      If you were a spy, living illegally in a foreign country.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Binary by sourcerror · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, around 87-89 in Hungary it wasn't uncommon for radiostations to broadcast homebrew C-64 programs. The C-64 casette-tape only used the audible spectrum by spec anyway.

    3. Re:Binary by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Oh, and there were "choose your own adventure" games in Teletext too.

  13. I understand by Johann+Public · · Score: 3, Funny

    wanting to prove that it's possible to install and run Linux on (nearly) any computer imaginable, but something tells me you're going to need a little more work in the patching, drivers, and other modifications department to get it running on H. sapiens wetware computers...just saying

    1. Re:I understand by Genrou · · Score: 1

      Since they're broadcasting via electromagnetic waves, I suppose they are trying to install Linux in the Universe. It will take a little while for the changes to propagate, but maybe -- only maybe -- the Universe might make a little more sense from now on. I heard they were trying BSD instead, but the drivers weren't available...

  14. Source in binary broadcast isn't exactly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the eighties Dutch radio broadcast software in binary, so yeah, some people were actually enjoying listening to binary broadcasts :)
    The idea was to tape it, and you could simply load the program in machines that used audio casettes for storage like the Commodore 64. IIRC there was some kind of encapsulation that maybe did parity or checksumming so you needed another program to get at the software. The software itself was BASIC sourcecode, so the broadcast was slightly more efficient than someone speaking the sourcecode out loud :) See wikipedia for the gory details.

    1. Re:Source in binary broadcast isn't exactly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to mention: it was called Basicode.

  15. Why synthesized voice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously...there aren't any _real_ people with enough time for such an important task? What _is_ everyone doing?

  16. Binary? by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [quote]
    whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?
    [/quote]

    Good thing it's actually reading the source code, and that I have a volume nob.

  17. nothing but includes for the first three minutes. by wagadog · · Score: 5, Funny

    lol it's like the begats in the bible.

  18. really????? by schnikies79 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You have got to be kidding.

    --
    Gone!
  19. Human Brain booting linux anyone? by rangans · · Score: 1

    Implanting Kernel Source into Brain, Please Wait............ Finished downloading source using ear:// connection, building kernel source.... Rebuilding initramfs........ Booting Linux Kernel, rootfs=/human/head/brain console=/dev/mouth First Successul HUMANDRIOD booted droid:/>

    1. Re:Human Brain booting linux anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What shell are you using, man? Clearly that would be
      droid:~#

    2. Re:Human Brain booting linux anyone? by arielCo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      sudo make me a sandwich

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  20. Um well,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... just heard:

    slash slash asterik asterisk THIS NEEDS TO BE FIXED asterisk asterisk

    1. Re:Um well,... by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Gives you a warm tingly doesnt it

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  21. Flash yes Rhythmbox Banshee Amarok no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they could give us Linux users a link to the streamed file so...., you know, we could actually play it in our music player.

  22. Final goal by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Make all kernel developers to give some time to improve eSpeak and/or getting new voices for it. Will give a whole new dimension to that radio if is the Linus Torvalds voice the one reading the kernel source (and probably more interesting, the comments attached to it).

    1. Re:Final goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asterisk don't know asterisk. mm/mempool.c had a asterisk asterisk decided British asterisk sound to it. asterisk asterisk

  23. linuux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i love how it pronounces /linux/random.h as lin uuu x

  24. Re:nothing but includes for the first three minute by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

    The voice ruins it. For the real deal, just type "cat /boot/kernel/*" (in FreeBSD) or "cat/boot/vmlinuz". I actually do that from time to time, not sure why...

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  25. What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  26. FU by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    I'll bet Cee-Loo Green could make a great song and video from it......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pc0mxOXbWIU

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  27. Turn it into music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be cool if they wrote something to generate some funky electronic beepbeepbeep music from the source files.

  28. Along the same lines: by arielCo · · Score: 1

    Linux.fm links to its "sister station"White Noise FM :

    White Noise FM is an online radio broadcasting white noise, a sound known to improve concentration by covering background noise. It also helps relaxation, and can aid people to sleep. Although we're focusing on white noise at the moment, we have plans to add more colored sounds to our programs in the future : pink noise, brown noise, and grey noise. We aim to become a fully featured white noise generator!

    It also features pink and brown(ian) noise

    And WhiteNoise.fm in turn links to none other than Vuvuzela Radio !!:

    Vuvuzela Radio is a station dedicated to playing the sound of the vuvuzela, the famous South African blowing horn the whole world learned to love (or hate) during the 2010 World Cup. We are broadcasting non-stop, without commercial breaks, so you can get your full daily dose : anywhere, anytime.

    Though, I'm pretty certain that the four "streams" are actually pre-generated samples in a loop.

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    1. Re:Along the same lines: by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      Linux.fm links to its "sister station"White Noise FM .....

      Wow, 'White Noise FM' seems quite big around here. It's being rebroadcast almost everywhere on the dial where a music station isn't.

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  29. listen to binary files loudly? by WetCat · · Score: 1

    listen to binary files loudly?
    listeners of numbers stations usually do it.
    I don't know, with pleasure or not, though.

  30. Re:nothing but includes for the first three minute by haruchai · · Score: 1

    Have you tried piping the output to /dev/audio?

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  31. Vuvuzela radio by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Damn, at least it is better than both Spam Radio and Vuvuzela Radio.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  32. Dumbest thing ever. by bradgoodman · · Score: 1

    This is a joke, right? I searched for "Dumbest" and was surprised to find no comments with the word in it. This is supposed to be useful why? If you're going to "troll" me - at least please explain how you think this would be usefull, first!

    1. Re:Dumbest thing ever. by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1

      If you're going to "troll" me - at least please explain how you think this would be usefull, first!

      Nice try!

      We all know that if we explain how it's useful first we can't "troll" you.

      wait...ugh...too late now.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
  33. You know you might be an autist when . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . you find Linux source code read by a text to speech synthesizer appealing and relaxing.

  34. Is the OP insane or on drugs? by KingFrog · · Score: 2, Funny

    I quote: "However, this concept proves once more the advantages of open source over proprietary software..." WTF??? You could have a machine read ANY pointless information into a 'net radio. It's not like this is useful in any way. If Open Source needs to have its source code read over internet radio to demonstrate an advantage over proprietary software, it needs to crawl into a nice quiet corner, lay down, and die. You want real advantages? Get reliability, scalability, security. Those are Open Source (potential) advantages. Reading source code on the net radio station? What a waste of time.

    1. Re:Is the OP insane or on drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a reading comprehension problem? It's a joke -- you can't read the source code to proprietary software because it's not available to read. The OP even emphasizes that with the /rest/ of the sentence that you half-quoted.

      What a waste of time.

      The article is friggin tagged IDLE. You clicked through, you read it, you posted, and /you/ complain about wasting time?!

      Good god man, maybe it's heroic that you're not hiding your failings, but please stop drinking decaf.

  35. Difficult question? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    "Will it prove useful to anyone is probably a difficult question to answer,"

    No it's not, this is completely worthless to EVERYONE. Simple test: Can you name a single way this could be useful? I can't.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    1. Re:Difficult question? by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could write a speech-to-text program and get the source code for the linux kernel that way.
      Not sure why you would do it, but you could.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    2. Re:Difficult question? by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Potentially, a kernel developer could debug code while away from the computer. Perhaps this hypothetical kernel developer is out for a jog and would like to debug code at that time. Perhaps this developer needs to mow the lawn, or is on a long trip. It may also come in handy for someone learning how the code is structured and is in the same situation. It's a giant stretch, and certainly not the purpose of this, but could potentially serve some use.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  36. Listening to the kernel in real time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have noticed if you hold an older am radio next to a laptop computer, and tune it to very low and sometimes higher frequencies you can have a bit more realistic "radio broadcast from the kernel".

  37. News for nerds... by ztij · · Score: 0

    News for nerds? Check. Stuff that matters? ...

  38. My evil plans by L053R · · Score: 1

    Step 1: write a automatic speech recognition app to ping that site and translate the words back to text.
    Step 2:
    Step 3: take over the world.

    --
    L053R
  39. espeak is cool. by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    Fah, anyone can do it over the internet. I broadcast a weather report from a python weather script (found in the debian repo) and espeak on a dedicated debian xen domU through the sound chip into a ramsey fm10C and into the very exclusive FM cloud. The downside is my FM cloud is only about 1/2 mile across.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  40. Re:nothing but includes for the first three minute by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

    That works in Linux, but not in FreeBSD -- system permissions won't allow it, even as root.

    What this might say about the security of permissions in Linux vs BSD is left as an exercise for the reader. :)

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  41. Battlestar Galactica hybrid speaking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they have tapped to the cylon that controls their ships. I hope that in the next kernel filles they will inglude bits of profecy in the comments.

  42. five years old "news" by La+Gris · · Score: 1

    And maybe older than that:
    http://digg.com/news/technology/Linux_kernel_source_--_on_radio_

    It was even discussed here (can't find the original submission though).

    --
    Léa Gris
  43. It won't compile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cant believe I wasted all of that time...

  44. lol by Jeian · · Score: 1

    "whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?"

    About as many people who want to listen to source files, I imagine.

  45. Flash alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only _______s use flash to serve audio.

  46. Exciting. by Lucky75 · · Score: 1

    All my computer has been saying for about 5 minutes is "Hash include .h".

    --
    DNA -- National Dyslexic Association
  47. zZzZZzzzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zZzZZzzzzz

  48. Re:Useful? Not too difficult a question actually by icebike · · Score: 1

    Its just Linux trying to comply with the ADA so blind people "access" the code.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  49. Has anyone managed to compile this? by Dalzhim · · Score: 1

    Anyone has been able to make a program which translates the speech back to text in order to compile this kernel?

    1. Re:Has anyone managed to compile this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. So true by BlindBear · · Score: 1

    Yes who would want to listen to loud binary files? I like mine a little softer with the treble down a bit.

    --
    I prefer Classic Slashdot.
  51. Re:Useful? Not too difficult a question actually by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Access it? I'm pretty sure they wrote most of it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  52. I clicked out of curiosity by stevie.f · · Score: 1

    After listening for a minute or two I started to find it strangely relaxing. I think I'd prefer a different voice though.

    1. Re:I clicked out of curiosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started listening to it backwards, and I could swear it said "Linus in disguise with dime ends".

  53. Re:Useful? Not too difficult a question actually by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    For some reason, after months of having mod points out the wazoo, I haven't had mod points for a couple of weeks, This comment deserves +15 funny. Could someone get on that while I clean coffee out of my keyboard?

  54. Modern, cool and therefore hip by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Modern, cool and therefore hip. Something I could, for obvious good reasons, ram down the throat of my teenage daughter?

    How I hate the amorphous drivel coming from the main stream radio stations nowadays.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  55. froggy bastard by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    When I started using computers, they used K7 tapes

    I think I remember those. Was it before C10s came in?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  56. Bazinga! by antdude · · Score: 1

    "This radio station is dedicated to the best scientist ever : Dr. Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory." :D

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  57. Listening to binary files... by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

    whoever in his right mind would listen to binary files

    You mean like an MP3?

  58. Break out the MREs by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    It's a sign of the End Times

  59. Needs to go analogue by horza · · Score: 1

    We need to put up a transmitter broadcasting this. In 1,024 years when the electromagnetic radiation hits Microsoftopia, the people will finally receive a beacon of hope.

    Phillip.

  60. BASICODE by Haxamanish · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, they broadcast ZX Spectrum, sometimes it was MSX programs.

    The Dutch NOS radio created BASICODE to transmit BASIC binaries over radio. It was used in several countries until the early 90s.

    BASICODE could be understood by almost all computers at the time, including Exidy Sorcerer, Colour Genie, Commodore PET, VIC-20, C64, Amiga, Sinclair ZX81, ZX Spectrum, QL, Acorn Atom, Micro, Electron, Tandy TRS-80, MSX, Oric Atmos, Philips P2000T, Grundy NewBrain, Amstrad CPC, IBM PC, Apple II, Texas Instruments TI-99/4A & Mattel Aquarius.

    It only used a minimal subset of BASIC command, all system-specific commands were replaced by GOSUB calls, for example GOSUB 100 to clear the screen. The program itself would then start at line 1000.

  61. This could be useful for making funky techno beats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I right *high five*

  62. That makes sense, really. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    All of the other Numbers Stations have been shutting down. They had to go somewhere.

  63. Simply beautiful by Clopnixus · · Score: 1

    This is the poetry of the 22nd century!

  64. Re:nothing but includes for the first three minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But that's my favorite section of the Bible! Not much action, but what a cast of characters! :-D

  65. What were they thinking? by hackel · · Score: 1

    I realize most people are thinking the same thing, but it needs to be said... What were the creators of this site thinking, using Flash? It just makes no sense to me. Was there no thought put into it at all? Are there actually Linux users/advocates out there who do not hate Flash?

  66. I want to listen to binary files by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

    whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?

    I don't remember where (probably here on Slashdot, actually), but I once saw something from someone who took several binary file formats and cat'd them to /dev/dsp just to see what they sounded like.
    I think his favorite was actually a filesystem, because of the patterns in data.

    Go ahead, try it. But turn down your speakers' volume first, it'll be a bit loud.

  67. Re:nothing but includes for the first three minute by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure how he did it exactly, but a friend of mine piped parts of his BSD kernel to his speaker, just for the fun of it.
    As root you should have read acces to the device, so I'd try the commands:
    • play /boot/kernel
    • cat /boot/kernel | /dev/audio
    • dd if=/boot/kernel of=/dev/audio (warning: this may remove all audio devices. I am not sure. Do not try it on any machine you can't miss. Hell, don't try anything with dd or things you found on the internet on a machine you can't miss, unless you have tried them on a clone first.)

    Have fun!

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  68. Decoded! by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    I got crypto/deflate.c, so much of deflates, asterisks and cmp!

    This reminds me of www.codeorgan.org

  69. Who indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > whoever in his right mind would want to listen to binary files loudly?

    Indeed, I prefer to listen to mine quietly.

  70. Mind Hacking by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    With the right wording, we can hack into your brain!

  71. For the audio impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad they don't scroll the text for us who don't hear so well.

  72. wot ? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    Oh come, on, this is ancient stuff.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  73. Bassline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they just added a bassline this would be amazing

  74. Okay, This is just a Stupid Waste of Time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This took some work by someone with some talent. Could not this/these talented person/people do something more usefull?

  75. Nice by agg23 · · Score: 1

    This is Xtreme ... I'm gonna use this as a lullaby to put me to sleep!!!