Slashdot Mirror


ChromeOS Laptop-Smashing Ad Equation Solved

An anonymous reader writes "Google's latest marketing video for Chrome OS is interesting to watch for the laptop-smashing amateurs or the slow motion fans, but the real fun may be at 2:24 in the video where a X=G/(CHROM-3) equation is displayed on a chalkboard. Only 20 hours later, it has already been cracked by Jamendo founder Sylvain Zimmer and his team. They posted details on how they did it and won a Cr-48 netbook, which may not even be delivered because they are not in the US."

164 comments

  1. cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you mean solved... and, well, it's not exactly a challenge to anyone who's had highschool calc, unless I'm missing something.

    1. Re:cracked? by Laxori666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They had to figure out what the numbers meant.

    2. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see how to solve that at all.

      All I see is that "G" means Google, CHROM-3 is the l33t way of writing Chrome (Chrom3) disguised as a substraction and X is the usual generic algebra value for the other side of the equation.

    3. Re:cracked? by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 2

      You are. And most other people are missing something as well. Their highschool calc. If they're not using it regularly, it tends to leak into oblivion. It's worse than that actually - I work in the tile/flooring industry, and you wouldn't believe the number of people who call in telling me the dimensions of their bathroom floor, and could you please tell me how many square feet that is?
      Actually, that's not entirely accurate, "please" is generally excluded. ...You see my point.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    4. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True. Really the biggest point was noticing that 900.91 == goo.gl. The rest follows trivially.

    5. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And most other people are missing something as well.

      No, apparently something else is missing since the "solution" was to convert the digits to letters and go to the matching goo.gl url.

    6. Re:cracked? by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I have to guess, what they first did is solve for the various letters; in the video, each letter is given an equation, which resolves down to a number. Then they plug those into the equation at the bottom, resulting in X = 900.91/191605050401140404051920181525. Someone then had a flash of insight, noticed the 900.91 is similar to goo.gl, and thought that it could be a URL. But, just typing that in by itself would yield nothing. They had to get the random string of numbers to mean something. So they split it into 2 digits per character, 19 16 05 05.... and made the realization that those corresponded to a position of a letter in the alphabet. 19 is S, 16 is P, 5 is E, and so on. The final URL becomes: goo.gl/speedanddestroy. It's not impossible, it just takes some careful thought and attention to detail. I would have probably made it to the 900.91/number here stage if I had seen this beforehand, but the 900.91 is goo.gl insight probably would have eluded me, let alone dividing the numbers up like that.

      --
      SSC
    7. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google the world "algebra" and take a closer look at the equations on the blackboard.

    8. Re:cracked? by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not all of it is high school calc. IIRC the integral of 4sin(x)/x has to be solved with Taylor series, and I only got those in the second semester of university calculus. One then has to take the limit to infinity of the resulting series, which may or may not be doable for a high school kid (not sure how hard the limit is; I'm too lazy to solve / look up the series)

      --
      SSC
    9. Re:cracked? by jmerlin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually quite basic math there too. Why did solving this come with an award? I can point to several thousand problems in various books on my shelves that are orders of magnitude more difficult than that entire problem, all of which are commonly assigned as nothing more than homework problems. Hell, I just did it in Wolfram Alpha in 5 mins. The only really tricky part was the URL bit but EVERYONE does that these days so it's assumption #1. Old puzzle methodology is old. Come on Google, be original. And to the winnars, enjoy the Chromebook.

    10. Re:cracked? by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 1

      That's just geekiness. l337sp34k and all that jazz.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    11. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you

    12. Re:cracked? by jmerlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This has become the de-facto standard for e-puzzles these days. Step 1 - provide puzzle that results in very large number of some kind. Step 2 - have some kind of splitting and/or decoding step that's somewhat obvious that will convert the result to text. Step 3 - set up url, award prize of some kind to first N visitors. It's old and worn down, I would've expected better.

    13. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this puzzle instead.
      http://toyingwithtradecraft.org/

      theres an initial teaser followed by a "real" puzzle- which is fairly well defined and almost given away, but still interesting.

    14. Re:cracked? by JayRott · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know why exactly but I really really want one myself. I registered for the pilot program, but at this point I think I just need to get in touch with one of the Google people and offer a hand job. I really have hit gadget rock bottom... is there a 12 step program or something?

    15. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why did solving this come with an award?

      Because publicity. There's no point in requiring a significant contributions to the sciences for a giveaway.

      Though I was hoping for something a bit more interesting when I clicked the link, I don't see the point in criticising Google for lack of originality here. It may be a familiar setup by this point, but it's still a cool thing to do. It's just a small bonus, it's not like we're entitled to have everything they do be completely awesome.

    16. Re:cracked? by ronocdh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's old and worn down, I would've expected better.

      IOW: you didn't win, so you deride the contest rather than congratulate the winner.

    17. Re:cracked? by jmerlin · · Score: 0

      Read the comments again. I congratulated the winner. I still reserve the judgement that the contest was trivial. This is simple observation.

    18. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So were you also bummed out as a kid when you figured out the "Drink More Ovaltine" cipher? Well, hopefully you didn't go out and try to shoot someone's eye out with your Red Rider bb gun.

    19. Re:cracked? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Despite the many who will criticize and berate you for stating the obvious, I was thinking the exact same thing as I was reading the article. It seems like even an aspiring geek would have figured this one out in a matter of minutes. Sure, it's harder than your average "skill-testing question", but hardly something to brag about. I mean, a lot of us decode (or create) far more intricate cyphers every day. Realistically, Google wanted it to be solved quickly, as it is a very inexpensive publicity stunt. Of course, the prize being a single $199 Google netbook, the bragging rights are quite minimal. It's not like Distributed.net was going to be involved...

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    20. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that must be it. Not getting excited about YAMP (Yet Another Marketing Puzzle) can't possibly be caused by the lameness of the puzzle. It's GOOGLE after all. Google doesn't DO lame. You solve crossword puzzles to participate in the raffles, don't you? Oh wait, you don't, because you can't show off your leet high school math skills in crossword puzzles...

    21. Re:cracked? by severoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually quite basic math there too. Why did solving this come with an award? I can point to several thousand problems in various books on my shelves that are orders of magnitude more difficult than that entire problem, all of which are commonly assigned as nothing more than homework problems. Hell, I just did it in Wolfram Alpha in 5 mins. The only really tricky part was the URL bit but EVERYONE does that these days so it's assumption #1. Old puzzle methodology is old. Come on Google, be original.

      ...says the one who didn't win...

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    22. Re:cracked? by smash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you think to go do the effort to solve the problem before realising what the consequences of doing so may be? The fact that someone bothered to go to the effort when seeing it on the ad is "worth" just as much, if not more than the actual ability to solve it.

      It shows that they're a person who is willing/eager to work on problems "just because" (they have an active mind) rather than being forced to by an employer or similar.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    23. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the comments again. I congratulated the winner.

      Uhh...

      "This has become the de-facto standard for e-puzzles these days."
      No congrats there

      "Step 1 - provide puzzle that results in very large number of some kind."
      None here either

      "Step 2 - have some kind of splitting and/or decoding step that's somewhat obvious that will convert the result to text."
      Nor any congrats there

      "Step 3 - set up url, award prize of some kind to first N visitors. It's old and worn down, I would've expected better."
      Nope, still no congrats (Thou credit for not saying 'profit'!)

      So reading again and again does not change the fact you did not congratulate the winner, and if anything attempted to put down what they did (and what you obviously couldn't and didn't do) as well as try to insult Google for providing a puzzle you couldn't figure out

    24. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't say I see the word "congratulate" or any conjugation of it. As a matter of fact, you didn't even use "winner".

    25. Re:cracked? by julesh · · Score: 1

      This is what I get for making a factual and relevant comment.

      No, it's what you get for thinking somebody's sexuality is (1) relevant to the conversation and (2) can be guessed based on what kind of portable computing device they like.

      Or maybe it's for implying that /b/tards are gay. Not sure which.

    26. Re:cracked? by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Why did solving this come with an award?

      To generate PR, obviously. Why else do you think we're even talking about it? It probably amounts to some pretty dirt-cheap advertising.

    27. Re:cracked? by julesh · · Score: 2

      Not all of it is high school calc. IIRC the integral of 4sin(x)/x has to be solved with Taylor series, and I only got those in the second semester of university calculus

      My integration is a bit rusty, but I suspect it can be integrated by an appropriate substitution chosen to allow simplification using standard trig identities. OTOH, the Taylor series approach is probably easier.

      At least here in the UK, BTW, Taylor series are part of the "further maths A level" syllabus, which is essentially equivalent to the last year of high school for students taking the most advanced maths courses possible.

    28. Re:cracked? by jmerlin · · Score: 0

      Those problems I mentioned, I do those just for fun sometimes too. Can take 6+ hours to days for a problem, no way to validate your answer is correct outside of asking other people to review it. That just makes me a math major, and I've done my share of these puzzles too. So there are much more engaging problems available, none of which comes with an award unless it happens to be one of those few famous unsolved ones. I still don't get it.

    29. Re:cracked? by L473ncy · · Score: 1

      If they encoded the resulting equation with base64 would that have made it a bit more challenging? I doubt many people would make it past that step, even I would find a message encoded in base64 meaningless.

    30. Re:cracked? by Shikaku · · Score: 0

      While troll is not the correct mod in my opinion (for direct insults I would rather do flamebait), you phrased it wrong. If you wanted to be able to talk about gays AND /b/ AND get modded up, here's how I would have done it using GP as the subject:

      Oh man, sometimes to get what you want that's what it takes. I know some amount of people in /b/ that would go gay to get into a company like Google, and we can be anonymous about it so nobody would associate your name with willing to give a handjob for it. There are like minded people there where you can rub it all out.

    31. Re:cracked? by johanatan · · Score: 2

      Social engineers need not apply.

    32. Re:cracked? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      which is essentially equivalent to the last year of high school for students taking the most advanced maths courses possible.

      I don't know about UK schools, but at the school I went to such people would have numbered in the single digits.

    33. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same over here. There were about 100 students in my year in 6th form, and only 3 of us did Further Maths. Taking it was probably a mistake, I barely scraped a pass (despite getting an A for the regular mates course) and it took a lot of time that should have been spent studying for my other A levels.

    34. Re:cracked? by smash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK let me spell it out for you. The guy watched the ad and paid attention. Enough to actually go through and work out the easter egg. Google wants to encourage people to watch, and pay attention to their ads.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    35. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My integration is a bit rusty, but I suspect it can be integrated by an appropriate substitution chosen to allow simplification using standard trig identities. OTOH, the Taylor series approach is probably easier.

      I don't think there's an appropriate substitution, at least with high-school maths. OTOH, there's a way to do it that's even easier than using Taylor series: sin(x)/x is a sinc function, for which the Fourier transform is just the rectangle function - so to get the integral of the sinc function over the entire domain, you just take the value of the rectangle function at zero. I didn't really understand Fourier transforms until third-year, though.

      Actually, I think the thing that would have stumped me in this problem solving sequence is the conversion from pure abstract maths (working out the value of C.H.R.O.M) to representing it as a truncated series of base-ten digits. It's probably natural for a computer scientist, who's used to the idea of casting between floating-point and integer representation, but I don't think I would have got it.

    36. Re:cracked? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Yeah it isn't like placing that few seconds in the video or giving away a single netbook for figuring it out is gonna cost Google squat, and it seems to be getting press, so hey? it looks like it did its job. So does anybody know what the actual specs of the thing are? All I've found is it is 12 inches and has flash. I'm assuming it is some sort of ARM CPU, yes? Anybody know which one? How fast? Because this thing MIGHT be fun to hack around on, key word might.

      I've played with some of the low end Android tablets and frankly there gets a certain point where the specs get so low as to make the thing pretty much unusable. Try the $99 special they have at Walgreen's and you'll see what I mean. The thing is slower than molasses in January and even surfing the web on it is about as fun as a root canal. Since the video shows him hitting the web pretty quick I'm gonna assume it isn't as bad as that, but since they are going for the low end from what I've read it'll still be probably pretty anemic.

      Anyway I'm sure the FLOSS guys will hack the hell out of it if it is at all possible and then we'll see what it can do. If the Linux guys can get a small and light Linux distro on this thing with VNC support I may have to go pick one of these suckers up. Being able to watch my videos and access my apps on my desktop via VNC on this would be pretty sweet if it is cheap enough.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    37. Re:cracked? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

      err... Or you can just google for the answer...

      The first result is Wolfram alpha.

      Where, if you put in the integral, you can pick out the answer: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+of+(4+sin+x)%2Fx

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    38. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because publicity."

      Yes?

    39. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd start from: integral(sinc(x*pi), -inf, inf) = 1.
      (not really high school stuff, but who hasn't played enough with interpolation to know that?)

    40. Re:cracked? by makomk · · Score: 1

      In the few UK schools that offer it, the number of Further Maths A-level students is indeed usually in the low single digits. It works out as quite a good class size, actually.

    41. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is essentially equivalent to the last year of high school for students taking the most advanced maths courses possible.

      I don't know about UK schools, but at the school I went to such people would have numbered in the single digits.

      At the school I want to, such people did number in the single digits. There were 1500 people in that school, about 150 in my year, and there were three other people taking further maths. It's a small wonder they even ran the class.

    42. Re:cracked? by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      Sheldon?

    43. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember distinctively going over the Taylor Series for the sine function. In fact, we even did a Taylor polynomial expansion for sin(x)/x. This entire thing could be using Wolfram|Alpha in about 5-10 minutes if you take the time to get parenthesis correct.

    44. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, integral of sin(x)/x is one of the canonical examples of non-elementary functions, so no, it can't be solved by a substitution

    45. Re:cracked? by pla · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's for implying that /b/tards are gay. Not sure which.

      Heh, inorite? Silly GP.

      At 11, I still considered girls "icky"... Tough to know your sexual orientation at that age. So to call them "gay", well... At best, they might have an unhealthy interest in yaoi.

    46. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sin(x)/x is a non elementary function, i.e. no elementary substitution can be used to reach it. This integral is slightly beyond an A level student, though not by much.

    47. Re:cracked? by owlstead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could you run that by me again?

    48. Re:cracked? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Hey, no cheating! Using Google to solve a Google puzzle. Shame on you!

      Seriously, it is amazing how much time we (old) folks forget how much is on internet.
      * I just looked up how long I can store stuff in the freezer on-line
      * how to get rid of bugs (and which friggin' bug is this? hell, you've got bugs that walk & eat paper?)

      Those are just things that I looked up lately. Most people even don't know that most manuals are online - I'm trowing out manuals each time I receive them after retrieving the digital version online.

    49. Re:cracked? by edumacator · · Score: 1

      The reward is that we are all sitting around talking about Google Chrome OS, and the winner is...Google.

    50. Re:cracked? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      ...says the one who didn't win...

      I didn't watch the advert, so I think I won. Unfortunately, I only won round 1. I lost in round 2 by clicking on the slashvert.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    51. Re:cracked? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming it is some sort of ARM CPU, yes?

      Nope, Atom. If it had an ARM CPU I'd be tempted to get one and put a real OS on it. As it is, it's uninteresting hardware running an uninteresting OS. And yet, in spite of that, we're all talking about it.

      And some people still claim that Google isn't an advertising company...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    52. Re:cracked? by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      An Atom? Really? Hell it just jumped up twenty points in my book! If it runs Atom then once the FLOSS guys figure out how to hack it I can replace the OS with "TinyXP Beast Edition" which runs quite comfortably on a P III 500MHz with just 96MB of RAM (it actually uses just 40MB of RAM running) which means if it has an Atom single core and 256MB of RAM that sucker will fly!

      If you are like me and have extra XP Pro keys lying about (and if you're not go by your local mom & pop repair shop, they'll be happy to sell you one) all you have to do is swap a good key for the one the Beast Edition uses and voila! A pre-customized XP for netbooks that not only flies on low specs but is sharp looking to boot. They even strip out IE and replace it with FireFox so you won't need the bazillion IE patches to keep from getting pwned. Hell if the specs are halfway decent, like say 512MB of RAM and a 4GB SSD, it might run Tiny Win7 just as nicely, as it only uses 145MB of RAM and 2.4GB of HDD space. Again just replace the key with your legal one and voila! Custom netbook edition with low resources while letting your run your programs no problem.

      So while YOU might not be happy it is running Atom, for me it just makes it sound sweeter. Of course it would have been a slam dunk sale if it had been running an AMD Neo with its decent Radeon IGP, but hey, can't have it all, right? Anyone know what the MSRP is gonna be on the thing?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    53. Re:cracked? by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      hey anon what are u doing out of the /b/ cages?

      --
      warning pointless sig
    54. Re:cracked? by k8to · · Score: 1

      I did this stuff my 3rd year in high school (not my last) in the united states. We called it "math seminar" and there were four of us total in the class, two 3 year students, and two four years.

      The class size was useful for ensuring everyone was following a long, but worked poorly for maintaining focus. I would have traded it easily for a group of around eight or ten.

      My fourth year in high school I simply stopped taking math. It would have been a class of two, which seemed awfully silly. I learned a great deal more taking more history classes and a theatre class than I could possibly have learning esoteric math I'd probably have never used again.

      --
      -josh
    55. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had 12 in my Further Maths class at an all-girls school. People are usually a bit surprised to hear how big a class we actually managed...

    56. Re:cracked? by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      the integral of 4sin(x)/x has to be solved with Taylor series, and I only got those in the second semester of university calculus

      Fortunately (as is mentioned in the blog post), (working) knowledge of college level calculus is not actually required. You can pretty much plug and chug with wolfram alpha - it's got Mathematica baked into it.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    57. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a "highschool calc kid", and I could do it after only 1 semester of calculus.

    58. Re:cracked? by JayRott · · Score: 1

      Geeze! This is apparently what I get for trying to be funny around here. Some of you really need to stop taking yourselves so seriously. It isn't good for the psyche.

    59. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think that looking at a problem on a chalkboard and figuring it out requires paying attention to the ad. I could be wrong though. A precedent has been set, and that precedent is NOT to pay attention to the ad, in fact it's one that very specifically draws your attention away from the ad. Slow motion destruction is awesome. Putting puzzles in ads and offering prizes for them is just going to result in people finding the puzzle and solving it, that has fuck all to do with the ad.

    60. Re:cracked? by Skidborg · · Score: 2

      In other words, Google was nerd sniping.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    61. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My integration is a bit rusty, but I suspect it can be integrated by an appropriate substitution chosen to allow simplification using standard trig identities.

      No you can't. The function is called sinc and its primitive cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. You can still compute it with Taylor serie however.

    62. Re:cracked? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Highschool calc? I've yet to encounter a problem outside of the classroom that needed Calculus to solve.

      It's sad that people can't figure out square footage though.

      Want a fun question? Give people a cubic meter of concrete and ask them how much area that would cover. I've asked 4 people and have gotten 4 complete different approaches to it.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    63. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got all of them in about 10 minutes except for M (I haven't done any calc in about 15 years) and got stuck on limits hitting infinity. I got all the other numbers though, and had 900.91 staring at me, but at the time it didn't exactly look like google (mind you I have been only working on it for 10 minutes). The prize is won and gone, and I don't know if I would have dug into the physics of isotopes of chromium and uranium. I had to watch the video in high res, then screen capture the video at the right place, and even then parts of the equation are hard to read (its hard to tell if C=2^8 -10 or C=2^8 * 10)
      anyway, C=2144362260040, G=900.91, H=269462689, O=694079, R=249616, and M=552
      So you get 900.91/191605050401140404051920181525 giving (roughly) 4.7 x10^-27
      Which is a ruse: you really get 900.91/ 19 16 05 05 04 01 14 04 04 05 19 20 18 15 25 (its not ascii, but 19 is the 19th letter in the alphabet...etc) so
      google/speedanddestroy yadda yadda.

    64. Re:cracked? by tkalfigo · · Score: 1

      Not all of it is high school calc. IIRC the integral of 4sin(x)/x has to be solved with Taylor series, and I only got those in the second semester of university calculus.

      It's 2nd semester univ.calculus if you are from the US. In some countries it's indeed high school math.

    65. Re:cracked? by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      You referenced an Ad (the Ad) 5 times...

      How do those Google psychos DARE to make us talk about their product, are they on an advertising campaign or something? /sarcasm

    66. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the blog you would realize that they didn't even solve the equation (via taylor series or any other means), they just plugged it into Wolfram Online.

      Their big contribution was figuring out it was a url and that the second half of the answer was a numeric representation of letters

    67. Re:cracked? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains your comprehension problems - you just had to tell us upfront you were a math major! Now we know not to expect any understanding of pop culture, social interaction, or fun; nor should we attempt to explain it...

    68. Re:cracked? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that this netbook is a proof of concept and developer device, not intended for wide release or resale. Presumably they just went with something they could get supplied quickly and cheaply.

      I'd be surprised if there aren't ARM models in the line-up when these things are actually on the shelves.

    69. Re:cracked? by dgriff · · Score: 1

      Not all of it is high school calc. IIRC the integral of 4sin(x)/x has to be solved with Taylor series, and I only got those in the second semester of university calculus. One then has to take the limit to infinity of the resulting series, which may or may not be doable for a high school kid (not sure how hard the limit is; I'm too lazy to solve / look up the series)

      Or you could just look up the answer on Wikipedia. Which is probably what the creators did when they were trying to come up with an alternative way of writing Pi.

      BTW how did they find the factorials for such a big number?

    70. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lends some credence to the belief that more women don't do math/physics not because it's too hard, but because male nerds with no social skills are too misogynistic to enjoy being around. Just look at /. for further evidence of that.

      On the other hand, could just be a statistical anomaly.

    71. Re:cracked? by PowerKe · · Score: 1

      The problem of factoring a large number is hard when it's a semiprime where both factors are very large numbers around the same magnitude as the square root of the semiprime. In this case 191605050401140404051920181528 can be factored into 2^3 * 3 * 23 * 222647 * 694079 * 8335727 * 269462689 which is easy to factor as the one but largest factor is only ~= 8 million. A naive program that just divides by 2 and all odd numbers up to 8335727 can give you the answer in less than a minute on a moderate computer nowadays. After finding the 8335727 factor you know that you will not have any more factors in 269462689 since sqrt(269462689) ~= 16415 which is the largest divisor you'd have to try to factor it.

    72. Re:cracked? by bberens · · Score: 1

      Solving the puzzle doesn't seem nearly as difficult as having come up with it in the first place.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    73. Re:cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving oily dudes hand jobs for cash money, I'd imagine.

    74. Re:cracked? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Or selection bias... Unless the all-girls school in question was the only option, GP went there by choice for a specific purpose, and likely had to meet certain academic requirements to do so. That a school full of students who are strong academic achievers who take enough interest in their education to attend a special high school at demonstrable social cost (teens tend to like being around the opposite sex, tend to place high value on time spent thusly, and tend to place negative connotations on those who choose not to do so) would have an advanced academic course with well above-average enrollment is, frankly, unsurprising.

      Of course, that all flies out the window if my earlier assumption that going to the all-girls school was entirely voluntary proves false.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    75. Re:cracked? by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      2 can be guessed if you have an iBone.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  2. Er, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read that summary three times now and I still cannot figure out what the fuck it is talking about. Except it's probably some kind of advertising for something called a Jamendo, whatever the hell that is.

    Truly a new low for Slashdot "journalism".

    1. Re:Er, what? by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 1

      Try watching the video.

      --
      I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
    2. Re:Er, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should try reading the article.

    3. Re:Er, what? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 0

      I've read that summary three times now and I still cannot figure out what the fuck it is talking about. Except it's probably some kind of advertising for something called a Jamendo, whatever the hell that is.

      Truly a new low for Slashdot "journalism".

      "I demand to be spoon-fed."

    4. Re:Er, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A decent summary is too much to ask.

    5. Re:Er, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read that summary three times now and I still cannot figure out what the fuck it is talking about. Except it's probably some kind of advertising for something called a Jamendo, whatever the hell that is.

      Truly a new low for Slashdot "journalism".

      "I demand to be spoon-fed."

      That, or perhaps spooned.

  3. Structual integrity by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 0

    It's fun to watch the lappy get trashed in creative ways, but especially with the tea/toaster/kitchen sink I think the machine really showed itself to be a bit flimsy. I'm all for cheap and light, but I don't want it to feel cheap. That kind of sheet plastic has a weird feel and look to it, and speaking strictly in terms of aesthetics, it's hard to catch on when the product looks and feels cheap. One of Apple's hallmarks has been being able to create a light product that still feels very structurally sound and rigid in your hand.

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
    1. Re:Structual integrity by angloquebecer · · Score: 2

      Considering the Cr-48 is just a device Google is giving out for free to get user feedback, I don't think the structural integrity of the machine matters much. Google may sell them later on as developer machines but I hope nobody buys one to test whether it survives the kitchen sink falling on it.

    2. Re:Structual integrity by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First look at the CR-48:

      http://www.pcworld.com/article/213168/google_cr48_first_look_at_the_first_chrome_os_laptop.html?tk=rel_news

      Working on the CR-48 can feel like walking a tightrope without a net (pardon the pun). If you're not connected to the Internet on this laptop, you're dead in the water. I wrote this article in Google Docs on the CR-48 during my commute. I should have been fine, because I had a Verizon Mi-Fi card for connectivity (our CR-48 arrived without a SIM card, so I couldn't test out the built-in 3G connection). But halfway through my commute, Chrome reported that it couldn't reach Google Docs. On any other laptop, this would be no problem. I'd copy my existing text into Word and continue working there. But on the CR-48, my options were severely limited. I pasted my changes into an Evernote note instead and hoped that I wouldn't lose my connection to that service.

      That's the problem with the cloud. Any problems on your end, at google, or anywhere in between, or if you forget to pay your cellular bill, you're not getting that proposal out to clients, you're not getting your tax returns in on time, you're not getting your paper in on time, etc.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Structual integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Where's the -1 misinformed rating. People see "cloud" and they think OMG! Internet connection required! When in fact it's more of a background synchronization process. Android phones are very similar. I can destroy mine right now and I'll lose basically nothing. I buy a new phone, log into my Google account, and nearly everything is automatically restored. Pictures, apps, bookmarks, passwords, email, calendar, contacts, messages, background, et cetera. All this on a device that had 'cloud' features tacked on -- not built-in as a core concept.

    4. Re:Structual integrity by angloquebecer · · Score: 1

      Any problems on your end, at google, or anywhere in between, or if you forget to pay your cellular bill, you're not getting that proposal out to clients, you're not getting your tax returns in on time, you're not getting your paper in on time, etc.

      I agree that the Google Apps definitely all need 100% working "offline mode" to make the CR-48 useful for the few periods when you don't have internet (and if you spend more than a small amount of time offline then cOS is definitely not for you). I don't have a device but I'd assume when you lose connection, Google Docs reacts about the same way as it does on any other OS/browser. The textbox remains editable and you can keep typing into it (unless the textbox suddenly becomes read-only or something crazy...). I realise it's not safe to keep working on something if you don't know when/if you can save it though, which is why offline mode is badly needed. I suppose the issue with the article's writer was that he didn't have the document open, then realised without internet access he couldn't open it. But the same issue would occur with any OS/browser that didn't have internet access.

    5. Re:Structual integrity by tpstigers · · Score: 2

      Where's the -1 misinformed rating. People see "cloud" and they think OMG! Internet connection required! When in fact it's more of a background synchronization process.

      So what you're saying is that in this case synchronization can occur without a connection.

    6. Re:Structual integrity by angloquebecer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're describing how the "cloud" should work. Unfortunately for Google, a lot of the core apps for cOS don't have an offline mode. Until web apps get to the level of only using your connection to sync with local storage, we're still in the "cloud == internet connection" stages.

    7. Re:Structual integrity by kevinmenzel · · Score: 2

      Though on any other OS, you would have an offline word processor available.

    8. Re:Structual integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Synchronization is transparent. It doesn't get in the way of getting work done. If a web app for future ChromeOS halts over connectivity issues, then (a) that app was programmed poorly, or (b) the user requested an uncompletable action (e.g. pushing a file to a remote address).

      ChromeOS frankly isn't release worthy without full offline support in all its main apps, and Google knows it. They've been working on this issue for years, and the final step (offline actions, i.e. editing) is only right around the corner.

    9. Re:Structual integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Let me know when ChromeOS is released to public then, will you? You do know it's in testing phase yes?

      BTW, Docs at least has supported limited offline interaction for quite a while. It just doesn't allow any meaningful actions yet (viewing, editing, renaming).

    10. Re:Structual integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To take an example from the GP, Android was (is) poor for game development until the later 2.3 Gingerbread release. Offline mode isn't a technologically blocking issue -- neither were games really -- but it will see eventual focus. Fortunately for you, most of the support work is already done. Google probably didn't want to do the boring app legwork until the fundamental issues are ironed out.

    11. Re:Structual integrity by dissy · · Score: 0

      If you're not connected to the Internet on this laptop, you're dead in the water

      I also noticed that without an Internet connection, I can't seem to view any web pages!
      Someone really needs to fix this flaw in the internet program.

      Requiring internet access to use the internet is just plain stupid! Now excuse me while I go write up an article about it for PC world... /sarcasm

      Seriously, when one of the first and primary requirements of this machine is an always on internet connection, why is it a downside or news worthy when they discover that fact is true?

    12. Re:Structual integrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about Gears?

    13. Re:Structual integrity by julesh · · Score: 2

      You're describing how the "cloud" should work. Unfortunately for Google, a lot of the core apps for cOS don't have an offline mode.

      It's been a while since I worked with Google Apps (because I think the file management UI is shit), but when I tried it all the apps I tried were perfectly able to work offline once I had downloaded Google Gears. I assume Chrome OS comes with Gears preinstalled...

    14. Re:Structual integrity by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is no google gears anymore. It's all in HTML5 now.

    15. Re:Structual integrity by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems the point is that "always-on" isn't as reliable as you might think it is. In this case the author of the commentary expected to have continuous service, and ended up not having it.

      I do agree that a netbook really isn't suited for travelling businessmen in general. However, when you consider being ultra-light, long battery life, and fully automatic backups and data sharing they would be the most to benefit if it actually worked.

    16. Re:Structual integrity by dissy · · Score: 0

      Well, it seems the point is that "always-on" isn't as reliable as you might think it is. In this case the author of the commentary expected to have continuous service, and ended up not having it.

      Now that would be a valid complaint. As most of us here know, always-on isn't 'always', and ChromeOS needs to be able to handle outages. There appears to be plenty of room for improvement still in that area, and I imagine that is exactly the type of thing Google would want to hear about as part of the current testing process.

      Now I don't know what this reviewer told Google directly, but in his review to the public he clearly is stating a different problem, namely that requiring internet access is a downside to the device.

      I read that akin to stating that a problem with cell phones is that they do not have a wire connecting them to the phone company, simply because in his experience it lost signal.
      In that example, yes it should be improved to try and not lose signal, but not having a wire should not be the stated problem.

      I assumed on a technical site such as slashdot this would be an obvious difference, but clearly others and at least one moderator agree that an internet appliance has a problem for requiring the internet, and that a normal PC is a better solution because it can have an offline word processor, despite the fact a regular PC does not help with any of the other problems ChromeOS was designed to address.

      A good next step for Google to take would be a more complex and smart 'offline cache', one that can sync in the background like ChromeOS does now, but also will cache locally everything in your Google apps storage.
      Obviously having a PC destroyed and replaced like in the commercial will be a rare occurrence for most of us, but jumping from machine to machine and having access to the same 'desktop' and data so to speak will be a very nice feature.
      If available local storage is used to stay in sync in a smarter way, it should still be possible to edit documents you are working on, and even open a document you haven't yet touched today all while offline, yet synced to the cloud as so you can get to the data from any other computer signed in on your account. It could probably write to both at the same time even when online.

      I however still think all of those implementation details can be fixed, all without having to address the 'problem' that the device needs an internet connection.

    17. Re:Structual integrity by falc · · Score: 1

      What he said. I just read that pc world article and saw a couple of web apps from that I hadn't noticed before, like the Evernote web app. I added it to chrome and logged in. My internet connection is just fine, but all I got was a message that the web app couldn't be reached right now (or something like that). I can't help but compare this to Nevernote (nevernote.sourceforge.net) running on my linux machine or the real Evernote running on my Mac, which are both working quite nicely right now, thankyouverymuch.

      There are, however, a few reasons why I would otherwise consider a cheap chrome notebook. First, this would be the perfect computer for when my toddler wants to see Dora or Diego on my or my wife's laptops, which means watching videos or playing silly little flash games online. Second, I would get one for my mom, who wants to do basically four things with a computer: email, basic web browsing, sharing pictures with family and playing solitaire. For myself, this would be great as my "lunch break" computer at work - something I could leave at the office and use during my lunch break when I want to get other things done that require a computer (staying at my desk is increasingly fruitless - people just can't seem to stop asking me about work when I'm eating!)

    18. Re:Structual integrity by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      SSH, you might be telling the emperor he has no clothes!

      How hard is it to let the computer work using the offline copy of the actual software, and then simply realtime-save documents online (unless the Advanced Mode Opt Out is chosen)?

      Does no one see the problem with "let's charge by the megabyte" merged with "we'll burn your cap pushing software internal data"?

      Is it time for us to get out the Total Recall movie where some tycoon charges for air?

      (Joke) I'm really starting to think the Year of the Linux Desktop will be like 2017, as a rebellion against the Now-Rainy Cloud. Take back your work! Use Linux! (/Joke)

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  4. solution by roaringone · · Score: 1

    It looks like the board has the equation X = G/(CHROM - 3). Each of the variables is defined on the blackboard. So it's just simple calculus to get the numerical values. The url just came from the numerical answer, where the numerator references goo.gl, and the denominator gave the shortened url in letters represented as pairs of numbers (a=1 b=2...) The bit about Chromium and Uranium was interesting, as it gave meaning to what X meant, but it wasn't important to finding the prize.

  5. I solved it too! by jkmartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    To: alicethesurfer@gmail.com
    From: alf@nbc.com

    I found your cat. It was delicious.

    1. Re:I solved it too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA!

  6. Missing Missy by PatPending · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speaking of a lost cat: Missing Missy

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:Missing Missy by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing I've read since I don't know when. Mod parent up!

    2. Re:Missing Missy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of a lost cat: Missing Missy

      Thank you so much for posting this. I've been looking for a link to this site for a while now.

  7. Not so difficult by ray-solomon · · Score: 0

    If I had known about the contest, I would have easily solved it in 5-10 min. Any competent high school graduate could do the same.

  8. 25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    25 computers were harmed !!!

    Think of the computers !

  9. Year of Linux desktop by peterindistantland · · Score: 1

    After seeing this video, I'm finally convinced that Chrome OS has absolutely nothing to do with the cause of desktop Linux adoption, except in a technical sense. Another blow to those endless advocates.

  10. Let's have more of this in ads by PatPending · · Score: 2

    Surely other "high-tech" companies shouLd hide puzzles in their AdS--let us Have some Daily fun Out There--it's a clever and inexpensive way tO get tech-savvy people to pay Really close attention to ads, and Garner free publicity.

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:Let's have more of this in ads by angloquebecer · · Score: 1

      For some reason I just can't shake the idea you think Slashdot would be prime for this....

    2. Re:Let's have more of this in ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are either so easy that anyone can do them or so hard that only a select few could do them. Also The novelty would wear of quick considering there are also already tons of riddles on the internet that you could already be doing...o you want free stuff well I want to sleep so gtfo.

  11. Free Replacements as-needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what the promo is saying is that if I break or lose my ChomeOS laptop, Google will automatically replace it for me?

    That sounds like a sweet deal.

  12. I dunno by Crash+McBang · · Score: 1

    When I solved it, I got 42.

    --
    To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
    1. Re:I dunno by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      When I solved it, I got 42.

      Actually you didn't solve it. You forgot to convert to ASCII, for which 42 = * . So the real answer is *, which as we all know is a wildcard for "everything". So maybe you did solve it. Creepy...

  13. Contest Incentives by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    They posted details on how they did it and won a Cr-48 netbook, which may not even be delivered because they are not in the US"

    This reminds me how free-trade lobbyists claim that the US is losing jobs because we are "not educated enough" as allegedly demonstrated by our programmers not winning international contests.

    However, they fail to mention that the prizes are worth far more under third-world salaries. Thus, a third-world programmer has a much bigger incentive. A laptop may be equivalent to 2-days' wages in the US, but a month's-worth overseas. Thus, contest rankings are a poor metric of national skill.

    1. Re:Contest Incentives by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      I tend to think we are undereducated, why else would they be selling 300$ netbooks with dinky storage, laughable ram and a gimped keyboard to us?

      cause were stupid, that's why

    2. Re:Contest Incentives by haderytn · · Score: 1

      So tempting....

    3. Re:Contest Incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tempting...

      i nos how u feel 300$ is cheap lol omg i gots to get one

  14. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The 'cloud' is dumb. The only point is to take away your ownership of anything so it makes it cheaper for a company to sell you something. They don't have to produce any cd's or dvd's or packaging, they just send you your copy which ofcourse you can't make into a hardcopy that you can save somewhere.

    How will anything ever be saved from here on out? No one owns anything they just have a license to use bits....40 years from now what if I want to listen to one of my iTunes songs? Won't be possible...and it's pretty likely that it won't exist anywhere because it only existed with digital copies with super drm....

    You can keep your cloud, I like to be able to own something I paid for...

    How to use the Cloud:

    Buy a device that can access it
    Pay a monthly subscription for a connection
    Pay a monthly subscription for storage

    They just turned a single transaction for a set price into monthly charges forever....thats the cloud

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 'cloud' is dumb. The only point is to take away your ownership of anything so it makes it cheaper for a company to sell you something. They don't have to produce any cd's or dvd's or packaging, they just send you your copy which ofcourse you can't make into a hardcopy that you can save somewhere.

      How will anything ever be saved from here on out? No one owns anything they just have a license to use bits....40 years from now what if I want to listen to one of my iTunes songs? Won't be possible...and it's pretty likely that it won't exist anywhere because it only existed with digital copies with super drm....

      I don't know which iTunes songs you're buying but all of the ones I'm purchasing don't have DRM.

      Perhaps you should look into that.

  15. Stunned... No, I'm not. I lied. by bitbucketeer · · Score: 2

    How long, exactly, did it take Google to re-invent the X-terminal? Good thing they aren't hiring old-farts like me, or they'd fire me for laughing at their history-repeating ignorance.

  16. Re:Stunned... No, I'm not. I lied. by jkmartin · · Score: 4, Funny

    No no no, it's the X-terminal with WIRELESS!

  17. If this is "winning" I want my million dollars too by UBfusion · · Score: 1

    I faintly remember from school that "winning" means actually getting ownership and physical access to it, so according to Google's thin print he can't and didn't "win" anything, and probably won't in the future ("would you perhaps a like free Google account instead?").

    I don't really get why he'd actually want that netbook in the first place, I am betting its EULA says "you are allowed to use it only within the USA border and only if you have an American passport".

  18. Wolfram|Alpha by pgn674 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's what the whole thing looks like in Wolfram Alpha all at once: (9*10^4+3^4+10)/100/((2^8-10+4*6!+17^4+11!/5+integ(3x^5,x,1,9))(2*23^6-((2^28+4)/10-(22^4+3*70-sqrt(81))))(3*17^4-(sqrt(256)+31*30^2))(17*8!+93^2-10)(12*(11^2-6)/(5*pi)integ(4sin(x)/x,x,0,inf))-3) - Wolfram|Alpha

    The 200 character limit in the input box is annoying, and it seems that you can't get around it by creating a URL manually. Managed to get it from 220 characters to under 200 by using valid shortened stuff like "integ" instead of "integral", and removing * and () where possible.

    1. Re:Wolfram|Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wolfram|Alpha needs more time to respond to your query..."

    2. Re:Wolfram|Alpha by isorox · · Score: 1
  19. Re:Stunned... No, I'm not. I lied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume you mean Xnest or something. :)

    Anyhow, there is a huge difference between something being in 'the cloud' and something being 'on the server'. The server may crash. Or someone might spill coffee in it. Or drop an ice cream into it. or something.

    The point of an OS authenticating you against the cloud instead of single servers is that you'll have your data no matter what.

    (Except if you break the AUP/ToS, or Google somehow manages to lose your data.. which doesn't happen often, but .. heh .. )

  20. Re:Stunned... No, I'm not. I lied. by julesh · · Score: 2

    How long, exactly, did it take Google to re-invent the X-terminal?

    An X terminal requires a central X server to run your apps on. AIUI, on a chrome OS device, the apps are downloaded and run locally (as they are essentially javascript on web pages). It's a pretty fundamental difference.

  21. Re:Stunned... No, I'm not. I lied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long, exactly, did it take Google to re-invent the X-terminal?

    An X terminal requires a central X server to run your apps on. AIUI, on a chrome OS device, the apps are downloaded and run locally (as they are essentially javascript on web pages). It's a pretty fundamental difference.

    Wrong at several counts.

    First, the X terminal is (or rather, runs) the X server. But that's the nitpicking part. The more important part is that while having an X terminal connecting to a certain central server may have been a quite common setup, it's far from a requirement. Indeed, the only X terminal I've ever worked on did not connect to a central server, but allowed me to connect to any of a set of ca. 100 workstations throughout the institute, and in addition allowed me to give an explicit hostname, which enabled me to log in to a Linux computer which was located there, but not properly integrated into the pool. The only ways the X terminal would have become unusable would be if either the terminal itself were broken, the network was down, or all the workstations I were allowed to log in were down.

    Also, with web apps, only part of the apps runs on the local computer (although I'll grant that it's still a difference to X terminals, where almost nothing runs on the local computer). But apart from performance, this doesn't make a big difference from the user's point of view: If the network is down, you cannot work using either web apps or X terminals.

  22. SME here, all my docs are Google Docs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, I wonder how far back in the stone age a lot of posters here are. I've got a stupid, cheap, no-guarantees (like, say, no SLA), low-end consumer ADSL connection here for my SME... And I've got a hard time remembering when was the last time I couldn't reach the Internet. All my taxes + invoices + project tracking and whatnots are *all* done using Google Docs. No more versioning issues (still stuck in the "doc created with Word version 'x' won't open unless the people you send it too also have Word version 'x' ?), I worry way less about backups (sure, once in a while I still download the docs and burn them to archive), I can *TRIVIALLY* share any of them with colleagues.

    The only reason not to work with Google Docs is if you're doing top-secret research / development containing way too sensitive data (and, no, neither your SME's work nor most of your Fortune 500's work ain't top secret enough to warrant worrying about storing at Google and having competitors/gvt gain access to it).

    I can see a few valid concerns, but living in 2010 and saying "but you need an Internet connection" or "but it won't work when I don't have Internet access" is really retarded. You may be living in the stone age but most of the world ain't. There's freaking ADSL and freaking (free) WiFi connection covering, what, 90% of the people having Internet access 99.9% of the time.

    So the "but you need Internet access" argument is really, really, utmostly retarded.

    No sh!t Sherlock, you also need Internet access to mod this flamebait ;)

    1. Re:SME here, all my docs are Google Docs by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is what a good troll looks like.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:SME here, all my docs are Google Docs by rdebath · · Score: 1

      Sure the internet is reliable in your basement and there's loads of open wifi's in the student block next door.

      My DSL is pretty reliable too; no basements or students round here though so Wifi is in short supply. You could notice it too if you went further than the local Starbucks; not everywhere has internet connection in fact some of the best places to visit you don't get any internet connection for days.

      Personally I thought the first GoogleOS netbook was going to be a Wavebox for just this reason.
      But joined up thinking was never a corporate strong point.

    3. Re:SME here, all my docs are Google Docs by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      what happens if you lose access to your google account? good luck getting a human at Google to help you out with it. Expect multiple days of no access...

    4. Re:SME here, all my docs are Google Docs by rdebath · · Score: 1

      That's the point; by a 'wavebox' I mean a machine that runs the wave locally so 90% (asstat) of the traffic doesn't even touch Google's servers. Google would be used mainly as the trusted third party to startup a wave.

      That way when you lose access to the Google account it actually can be a few days before it gets to be a problem.

      Though, that was probably the bit I wasn't thinking through. Expecting Google set up a communication link that they can't monitor ... what was I thinking, I'm not usually that dumb!

  23. cheating wont work by mshenrick · · Score: 1

    confirmed: this doesnt work on google calc, or bing/wolfram alpha

  24. he didn't win anything by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

    the form clearly says you must be in the US to get the chrome pc. they are in France. FAIL!

  25. Another ad begging to be made fun of by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Like the ancestry.com ads that beg for a joke version where a person finds that their ancestor was not the town doctor, but perhaps a war criminal or slave trader, this Chrome ad is begging for a version where Google's offices are burned down or raided by the authorities.

    "Unfortunately this Chrome laptop stores everything on the web, so you're absolutely fucked and there is nothing you can do."

    Also it's chilling how they consider eveything between the computer's OS and Google to be "extra baggage."

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  26. Only one of the three Easter Eggs found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job on finding one of the Easter Eggs, but there are still two left!

    Best of luck everyone!

    1. Re:Only one of the three Easter Eggs found by bberens · · Score: 1

      Speaking of spoon feeding, I'm still not getting where all of those constants come from.. I can't find any reference, for example, of G = 900.91. Much less the rest of the constants. I sort of expected them to be universal constants, but apparently not. Perhaps someone could inform a moron?

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
  27. If you really can analytically integrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cardinal sine, you have my respect - you just beaten mathematics and won the level.
    I suggest you work on beating Turing's thesis then

  28. All your documents are stored safely online! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fnarr, fnarr, fnarr. Really? How about:

    "All your documents are stored online, and available to you according to our whim"

    I think Franklin needs are re-write

    "Those who would sacrifice ownership for convenience deserve neither"

  29. ...and for those of us not living in the US? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Good job on finding one of the Easter Eggs, but there are still two left!

    So what? For the vast majority of the world not living in the US we apparently can't win anything. In terms of a marketing campaign it is a really great way to alienate the majority of your customers.

    1. Re:...and for those of us not living in the US? by Skidborg · · Score: 2

      Go for the win and be satisfied with the fact that you're denying a netbook to an American somewhere?

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    2. Re:...and for those of us not living in the US? by kgwilliam · · Score: 1

      The alternative is that a company who wants to do a marketing campaign with a prize has to spend hundreds or thousands of hours of legal time to research and comply with local laws in every country. In your scenario no company could afford to do a marketing campaign like this. Perhaps the local Google office (or name any other company) in your contry has run some sort of contest there? Shoud I be upset that I live in the US and can't win?

  30. Re:Stunned... No, I'm not. I lied. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    It's closer to NeWS than X11. It runs code for defining the UI locally, rather than on the server, and only does the back-end processing on the server (not sure if it still does, but the Google spreadsheet used to evaluate formulae on the client too, meaning that everything was treated as a double because that's the only type of number JavaScript understands).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  31. Physical danger by Livius · · Score: 1

    Wait, isn't 48Cr a radioactive isotope?

  32. Re:alicethesurfer by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Yeah, is that another easter egg?

    I really wanna know who's behind that email address!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  33. Re:Riddle by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    However, there is one Riddle who shall not be named.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  34. http://goo.gl/speedanddestroy by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Now it says:

    Chrome
    You deserve a Chrome notebook.

    Thank you for your interest. The form you are trying to access has either expired or reached its maximum registration limit.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  35. NerdOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mom and Dad will be so impressed by this. Keep up the incredible, marginalizing work, Google. Let us know when you're ready for the mainstream.

  36. why did they not do the most important step? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Will the bloody thing survive a thorough blending?

  37. Well, he clearly won't get the laptop. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    It says in black in white that they only send laptops to people in the United States. If he's not in the US, they won't send one to him.