Slashdot Mirror


Best Open Source Genealogy Software?

An anonymous reader writes "I'm looking to build a family tree for a holiday gift. Do the Slashdotters of the world have any recommendations on open source genealogy software? I did try a 14-day free trial of Ancestry.com. What a scam! I submitted the personal information for my parents, grandparents, and me. Then, I received a pop-up telling me that if I would like to get information on my family, I would have to upgrade my subscription for $29.95 US. So, I took the chance. Turns out that the only information they had was my previous addresses for the past 20 years." The venerable GRAMPS is still actively developed, and its site lists several other possibilities, too. Any favorites, or anti-favorites, out there?

292 comments

  1. GRAMPS by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

    GRAMPS is my favourite, though I haven't needed to go trying any of the other options as yet.

    --
    Cheers, Chris
    1. Re:GRAMPS by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Ancestry.com also has loads of military records from colonial times to WWII and later, and lots of records from overseas censuses and such as well. Overseas data requires the pricier World Subscription. If you keep an eye out, they occasionally offer free access to some databases for limited periods of time. This year they had free access to all military records for about a week around Veterans Day.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    2. Re:GRAMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, a lot of times your local public library will have a subscription to Ancestry.com, and other databases as well, and as long as you're on their network, you get free access.

    3. Re:GRAMPS by dm1407 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Same here. Anyone wanting to try Gramps on windows should download the portableapps.com version so you don't have to bother with installing the dependencies. http://gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Download

    4. Re:GRAMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm been using GRAMPS for some years now, and is very happy with the program. Easily with the latest version for Ubuntu, all the bugs are gone. And if there is a problem, the support-panel is fast to respond!

    5. Re:GRAMPS by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I used it long ago (or rather, my mom claimed she wanted some genealogy software but practically never used it after I installed her and showed her how to use it) and decided to go check it out and the marketing is just poor. Like the top new feature being described now is "gramplets". After clicking my way down to the actual screenshot, I get this. A phyton shell, a blank calendar, a bit of meaningless statistics and logs and perhaps the only semi-useful looking gramplet is the Surname cloud. It looks much more like an early proof-of-concept, which is probably what it is. You don't have to sell very hard to impress more than this...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:GRAMPS by shtrom · · Score: 1

      GRAMPS is my favourite, though I haven't needed to go trying any of the other options as yet.

      Yes, I wouldn't look any further. I've seen GRAMPS at work (for lineage tracking of horses) and it has an impressing list of features and data fields. I couldn't find any missing relation that I could think of. I'm not sure about data export, though, but it seems to support a wide range of formats.

    7. Re:GRAMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIn the "Godfather Part II" the immigration officer is in a hurry and mixes up the last name and town of origin, in a few seconds with a stroke of the pen the family's name is changed.

      That didn't just happen in the movies. Thats how my family name originated
      (you insensitive clod)

    8. Re:GRAMPS by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      The baby issue with repeat names is actually fairly common.

      Butchered name spellings - all the time. One of my ancestors' surname is Wuornos, but I've found census data with the same family names, ages, and city as Warnos.

    9. Re:GRAMPS by jvin248 · · Score: 2

      My parents have been collecting genealogical records for 30 years. For a long while they were keeping records on BrothersKeeper, but I think that was an old-mac only program. I switched them to Gramps (and Linux) a few years back. Btw, the only help I've had to give them was updating OS.

    10. Re:GRAMPS by frisket · · Score: 1

      I used to use FTree (http://www.ftree.org/) which is simple but reliable. Then I found Gramps, which is slicker and prettier. The problem with all these programs is they seem to consider it obligatory to provide extensive reports for the professional genealogist, but the views of the data available for domestic use are very limited (displayed trees only give 3 generations, and only give forebears, not descendants, I think), and the printout facilities provided are restrictive to say the least (I want my ENTIRE tree as a single PDF, please, shrunk to whatever microscopic font size is needed to make it fit on ONE page).

    11. Re:GRAMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different people, different interests. Moving along...

    12. Re:GRAMPS by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      In the "Godfather Part II" the immigration officer is in a hurry and mixes up the last name and town of origin, in a few seconds with a stroke of the pen the family's name is changed. All kinds of things happen - birthdays are changed by purpose or accident, people flee Europe to avoid military draft, family memory often trumps official records.

      It happened to me. My material grandfather came from the Netherlands and coming through Ellesmere Island the ship's manifest was misread - the 'ij' at the end of the name became 'y'. There had been rumors about the name change but this was the only real proof of what happened. It also allowed me to track down my Dutch ancestors all the way back to 1800.

      Side note: The Dutch trump even the Germans when it comes to anal retentiveness of keeping family records. They have births, deaths & marriages for the entire country back to 1800. And the best part was that it was (is?) all searchable circa 2003. I haven't looked at my family tree at all since that time.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    13. Re:GRAMPS by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      It is interesting to see where the roots of your family are... Especially with my wife and I we can trace our roots back through the UK, Europe and the Middle East. This leads to researching history and coming to understand the circumstances in which our ancestors lived. History usually doesn't interest me, but when I feel a connection with that history it becomes far more interesting.

      If you don't care for your ancestry, that is fine, but your kids may one day wish to pursue this line of research. Would you deny them the knowledge if they asked you for it? (My mother-in-law pretty much refused because thinking of the past reminded her of all she had lost, but her brothers were far more at peace with their lot in life, so I can understand why some people may not care for their family history).

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    14. Re:GRAMPS by gustgr · · Score: 1

      BK also runs on Windows. My old man has been using it for 13 years for his genealogical records. I've tried to get him going with GRAMPS, but still no success.

      Maybe it is worth a shot again.

    15. Re:GRAMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything has to become a hate statement nowadays, eh mate?

      Learning about your roots may spur your interest in history, teach you a couple of interesting things, and even get you to know some people which are related to you and you didn't even knew about. It's a nice hobby.

      My Father began researching our genealogy about 15 years ago. He has almost 1800 nodes in our genealogy graph already, and has found people from all over the world which can be traced back to the same ancestry as we. We've contacted some of this people even from different countries. We have visited Argentina and Italy, met pretty interesting people with different stories to tell.

      As said, it is a matter of interest. It's a nice enough hobby.

  2. webtrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want it online or even locally, webtrees is the most current open package. active development team and community based forums will assist you where required. www.webtrees.net.

    does everything you need and more!

    1. Re:webtrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you should try 'webtrees', a php and MySQL-driven web-based collaborative software package that forked off phpGedView. It is up-to-date, fast and has no compromises. It protects privacy better than any other online program I know, and is quite flexible in configuration. There is an easy to use test demonstration installation where you can review its many features, both as a user and as an admin. http://www.webtrees.net

    2. Re:webtrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent -1 Redundant with a +/-1 Advertising modifier?

    3. Re:webtrees by dingfelder · · Score: 0

      Instead I reccomed using PHPGEDview.

      Free, full featured, web based, and gedcom compliant.

      http://www.phpgedview.net/

      I would post a link to my online family tree but dont feel like gettiing slashdotted :)

    4. Re:webtrees by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I appreciate that it told me a little about itself amid the fluff.

    5. Re:webtrees by gnapster · · Score: 2

      I can't tell which AC is the advertiser, but yes, this is definitely better than (for instance) the Dropbox article that popped up a couple hours ago.

    6. Re:webtrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Re: "Instead I reccomed using PHPGEDview. " - I wouldn't. PhpGedView hasn't had an updated release for almost a year, and has no active development. webtrees is a branch from phpgedview so similar in many ways. webtrees is now far more advanced, and VERY active.

    7. Re:webtrees by ichthius · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclaimer first - I am the project manager of webtrees, and was previously the project manager of PhpGedView, from which it forked at the start of 2010....

      You have three real choices.

      (1) a desktop application
      (2) a web-based application (under your control)
      (3) a web-based application (managed by someone like ancestry)

      I'd be tempted to steer away from (3). Most make it very difficult to apply proper sources/citations to your research, and genealogists tend to get pretty obsessed with their sources.

      I tried ancestry once, but found it very limiting. For example, it only allows you to enter "simply connected" trees, so if any of your ancestors married their cousins, you cannot link the common ancestors. It is also difficult to add sources that do not come from ancestry itself.

      If you are going to publish on the web, privacy is pretty important. In some countries, privacy laws apply only to living people. In others, privacy extends for a certain number of years after death. The online services tend to operate with the privacy rules of their host country - which may be different to yours. So, check what options are available before signing up to any provider.

      This leaves (1) and (2).

      Whatever you do, pick an application that can read/write to the (de-facto standard) GEDCOM format. Bear in mind that many applications will either extend the specification or lose some data when saving to it, so interoperability is rarely 100%.

      Web-based solutions offer the obvious advantage that the whole family can work on this together. You'll get far greater commitment from the rest of the family if they can update it diretly, rather than send updates to a central person for data entry.

      Even if you use a desktop application for your main research and data entry, you'll probably still want a web-based application to publish it.

      A web-based system also allows you (presumably the geek of the family) to maintain the site, perform backups, etc., while allowing your (presumably less IT literate) family members to do the fun part - researching your history.

      For all its faults, ancestry.com does have a huge amount of data. So, buy your relative a subscription, and set them up an open-source, web-based system on your favourite web-hosting provider.

    8. Re:webtrees by kletus · · Score: 1

      Before buying a membership to ancestry.com check and see what resources are available at your local library. My library has Ancestry.com Library Edition for free use AT the library. They allow full access to HeritageQuest.com at the library and at home. At home I have to go to the library's genealogy page and login from there with my library card number. If you haven't been to HeritageQuest lately you might not know they are in the process of adding Obituaries, War Pensions and other records. If the library in my little town in Arkansas offers this surely libraries most everywhere do the same. We also have an Obituary Index of our area that took over two years to create that has over 269,000 entries from 1866 to present day. I myself made a small contribution by working 20-24 hours a week for over a year going through old newspaper microfilm page by page looking for obits or any references to deaths. It was particularly difficult to gather information in the older papers because obits were not always grouped under a heading but instead scattered throughout the paper. This made it necessary to scan every page of every days paper column by column to find as many death references as possible. The older microfilm was so poor that we were limited to four hour shifts to avoid headaches and fatigue. Check and see if your local library has taken the initiative to provide this kind of information. Here's a link to the genealogy sources page including a link to the obituary database. http://goo.gl/IzERY Might be useful to anyone who had an ancestor who lived (or happened to die) in Arkansas. The Library Director also writes a genealogy blog that is very informative. It can be found here: http://goo.gl/XhZwc

    9. Re:webtrees by Tomato+Soup · · Score: 1

      That's not true, Ancestry.com lets people have more than one entry in the tree - perhaps your experience with it is quite old. It's also relatively straightforward to add anything you want as a source, though you get extra bells & whistles if it comes from a database they've got all mapped out.

  3. Geneweb by Imabug · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've used GeneWeb and really liked it. Written in OCaml, but appears to be dormant. Nothing much has happened with it for a few years now. Still a pretty good program though.

    --
    "For I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and Long Words Bother Me"
    1. Re:Geneweb by nathanm · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly! Currently, I use ancestry.com for my main family tree, but regularly download a GEDCOM file and import it into GeneWeb (locally hosted) for offline access. I've tried several other programs, both open source and proprietary, but GeneWeb is my favorite by far. It doesn't make the prettiest family tree website, but it's easy to use and its functionality is great.

      Even though the primary developer, Daniel de Rauglaudre, isn't developing it further right now, it has more features than I use regularly, and it's highly customizable. I'm somewhat tempted to learn OCaml, just to be able to modify this software.

    2. Re:Geneweb by BalrogZed · · Score: 1

      I'm with Imabug on this one - I've been using geneweb since forever and haven't any complaints. It imports .ged files too (which seems to be the standard file format for genealogy sw), which is always a good thing.

  4. How about geni.com ? by davejenkins · · Score: 5, Informative

    Geni.com is an online service, not open source software per se, but it's free to use, useful, and there's a lot of data there already. I found my ancestors going back to the 17th century after matching up my own tree back to my grandparents. http://www.geni.com/

    1. Re:How about geni.com ? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it.

      Go ask the Mormons. They maintain the most extensive set of genealogical records on pretty much everyone.

    2. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Stay away from Geni. Once you give them information, you can't cancel it or retract it. It's not for anybody with any desire of any privacy.

    3. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it. .

      Damn straight. They should provide the service for free and there should be no quid pro quo. Who do those arrogant f*****rs think they are - asking for an email address? Do they have any idea how hard it is to get an email address in the first place?

    4. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1

      A relative of mine signed up and started adding our whole family - I refused to sign up, but my parents still get "spam" from geni.com telling them about anniversaries of people they've never even met...

    5. Re:How about geni.com ? by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean like this?
      https://familysearch.org/

    6. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "not open source per se"... Geni.com is not even slightly related to open source and their privacy policies leave a lot to be desired...

    7. Re:How about geni.com ? by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

      Love geni.com ....easy & makes it quick to set things up and share it with other family members. Also, you can export GEDCOM files from it, to use in other genealogy software, or import GEDCOM files you've already got or made.

    8. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://new.familysearch.org/en/action/unsec/welcome

    9. Re:How about geni.com ? by westlake · · Score: 2

      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it.

      You are tracing your ancestry - on sites where others are trying to pin you and your folks into place - and you are worried about an e-mail address?

    10. Re:How about geni.com ? by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Go ask the Mormons. They maintain the most extensive set of genealogical records on pretty much everyone.

      Not only that...but if there's a Mormon temple in your area...they will also have one of their genealogical center in the vicinity.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    11. Re:How about geni.com ? by jonathonjones · · Score: 2

      Geni.com is barely free. Once you get to even moderately useful functions like being able to match members of your tree to other trees, they start charging.

    12. Re:How about geni.com ? by hendrikboom · · Score: 2

      The Mormons' specific interest in genealogy is that they believe a Mormon can save his deceased ancestors by baptizing them posthumously. That's why they build the data base. Your main risk is that one of your remote descendants might become a Mormon and baptize you after you're dead.

    13. Re:How about geni.com ? by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      Thereby running the risk of someday suddenly being yanked away from Hell? ;)

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    14. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay away from Geni. Once you give them information, you can't cancel it or retract it. It's not for anybody with any desire of any privacy.

      Neither is the rest of the public internet.

    15. Re:How about geni.com ? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      they believe a Mormon can save his deceased ancestors by baptizing them posthumously. That's why they build the [genealogy] data base.

      One's eternal salvation depends on Oracle not crashing?

      Perhaps they should worship Larry Ellison, not Joseph Smith.
         

    16. Re:How about geni.com ? by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they should log in, disable the notifications, and then never see them again?

      --
      - Chuq
    17. Re:How about geni.com ? by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it.

      I always just give "suckMyHairyPaleAss@FuckYou.com"

      Sometimes they let you in anyhow and don't do a mail-back registration.
       

    18. Re:How about geni.com ? by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      here's the little secret... even if you are baptized by the Mormons after you are dead, you still have the right to reject that baptism when you wake up after death and find out there is more. If you don't wake up after death, then does it really matter? The Mormons are just wasting a lot of time and water.

    19. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ask the Mormons. They maintain the most extensive set of genealogical records on pretty much everyone.

      Not only that...but if there's a Mormon temple in your area...they will also have one of their genealogical center in the vicinity.

      Some of their ward houses and 'stake' houses have minor libraries, as well. Just ask. It's not like they'll get offended.

    20. Re:How about geni.com ? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 0

      The Mormons were my first thought. Tho some would find their reason for collecting this information to be somewhat distasteful.

    21. Re:How about geni.com ? by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      The Mormons' specific interest in genealogy is that they believe a Mormon can save his deceased ancestors by baptizing them posthumously. That's why they build the data base. Your main risk is that one of your remote descendants might become a Mormon and baptize you after you're dead.

      Wasn't going to bring that one up...but you're right. They've even gotten into trouble several times for baptizing the dead from the Holocaust.

      As for their main genealogical repository...it's built better than Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado Springs. Forgot the location...but it's built into a mountain...only I don't think they have a Stargate located there...except for missionary work. Makes it easier than riding a bicycle. ;)

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    22. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't really see the harm in this if i don't believe in it in the first place! really, who cares?

    23. Re:How about geni.com ? by Goghit · · Score: 1

      Looks like they want money before they'll let you see possible matches. Smells like Ancestry.com

    24. Re:How about geni.com ? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      A better question is what tools, open source, free, or otherwise, produce non-proprietary formats? Something that if if it's not easily exchangeable with another program can at least be deciphered without too much effort. Say a text or XML format.

    25. Re:How about geni.com ? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Aside from your pejorative conclusion, you're spot on. It's even in the theology. A dead guy who doesn't want LDS to "do their temple work" is no more a Mormon after than before... by Mormon standards and teaching.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    26. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that...but if there's a Mormon temple in your area...they will also have one of their genealogical center in the vicinity.

      Ask in the Visitor's Center, most of the time it's in the same building.

    27. Re:How about geni.com ? by petes_PoV · · Score: 2

      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it.

      Just toss 'em a disposable email address. I don't know why people make such a big thing of it - surely you have more than just one, single, lousy email address? don't you?

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    28. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually geni.com is kind of strange virus. You can get infected (and probably already are) without any contact whatsoever kind.
      Only stay away from it if somebody hasn't added you into geni.com system already. But eventually that doesn't help. There are
      chances you have distant relative who adds you there anyway (with embarassing images from the party held 20 years back). And
      the only mitigation is to embrace the system and join the site and try to control and limit the damage.

    29. Re:How about geni.com ? by SimonHova · · Score: 1

      geni.com is good, not great (missing some advanced features from the old-school Family Tree Maker software). Their primary advantage is it is very collaborative, as many family members can add to your tree and you can connect to other parts of your family and their independent trees. The rub is to connect those disconnected trees, you will _both_ have to pony up for a $60/yr premium membership. I have cousins in Canada who are named in three different trees. When I finally broke down and paid for the membership, I found out that only one of the three other tree managers had paid for the membership, so I could only find out a third of the information out there. I now need to wait for two strangers to pony up their money to find out the rest of the information that has been entered on them.

    30. Re:How about geni.com ? by hicksw · · Score: 1

      email address?

      Javascript!

      FLASH!!!

      The horror! The horror!

    31. Re:How about geni.com ? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I combined with a few trees and am back to 121AD. Pretty darn good considering I only had info back to around 1750 on one side and 1850 on the other. Problem with Geni is, if your tree starts getting too large, it stops showing you the links you have with certain people unless you choose the pay option.

      But I started out on Ancestory, attached all my records and stuff, so it only took me about a month, exported to GedCom, imported into GENI, and disabled my Ancestory account, then use Geni's social networking thingy to combine trees. Its awesome!

      Basically, Ancestory got me started, Geni helped me to continue. Ancestory is a great place to start, though, and found them much more helpful than the Mormons.

    32. Re:How about geni.com ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I have a bunch of domains, so I have no problem creating email addresses on the fly.

      However, its' simply not worth it for me.

      -- Barbie

    33. Re:How about geni.com ? by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Little Cottonwood Canyon just south and east of SLC, it's cut into a nearly solid block of granite. Nearly solid because as they got near the back of the area they wanted to cut out they cam across a small fissure with water running through it. This now supplies the vault staff with incredibly pure spring water to help them and the millions of rolls of microfiche survive the coming nuclear war.

      This vault was inspired decades ago when one of the larger repositories of such records burned to the ground in the UK. The church decided they wanted a more secure storage location.

      There is now a second set of vaults cut into the same mountain of granite, that is used as a commercial offsite sensitive storage facility.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    34. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      said by an anonymous coward.

      Where's your email address? Oh ya.

      Quid pro lol.

    35. Re:How about geni.com ? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Won't somebody think of the pixels!?!?

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    36. Re:How about geni.com ? by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Couldn't remember the location...but I remember that the place made Cheyenne Mountain look like a Disneyland cut into the mountain by comparison.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    37. Re:How about geni.com ? by owski · · Score: 1

      There is now a second set of vaults cut into the same mountain of granite, that is used as a commercial offsite sensitive storage facility.

      Perpetual Storage. I used to work for a software company that used them for offsite archiving.

    38. Re:How about geni.com ? by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it.

      I have 700+ email addresses on spamgourmet.com. I get mail on the ones that I want to, and throw out the mail on the other addresses. I can turn them on and off through a web interface.

      Why doesn't this work for you?

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    39. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. They should ask for something less private like my SSN or my detailed genome. It's unbelievable these days who thinks they are entitled to have my email....

    40. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1992 called.. it wants its website back

    41. Re:How about geni.com ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I have no interest in tracing my ancestry. I know who my parents were, and that's good enough for me. The only reason I went there was idle curiosity. In other words, they offer nothing that I value, so why bother giving them an email address?

    42. Re:How about geni.com ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Any site that asks for my email address right away, forget it.

      I have 700+ email addresses on spamgourmet.com. I get mail on the ones that I want to, and throw out the mail on the other addresses. I can turn them on and off through a web interface.

      Why doesn't this work for you?

      Because a genealogy site - ANY genealogy site - isn't worth the 15 seconds of my time it would take. So if you want me to look at it, you have to make the barrier to entry pretty much zero.

    43. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ancestry.com is the mormons.

    44. Re:How about geni.com ? by bikeidaho · · Score: 1

      Ancestry.com is owned by the LDS Church. They want your money and first born child.

    45. Re:How about geni.com ? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      Are you an idiot sir? Or just astoundingly bad at time management? :)

      You state you have no interest in web based geneology sites, your time is to precious to even give a fake email address or create on on your multi-domains. In fact, you state you have no interest whatsoever in geneology.

      Why pray tell are you then not only reading comments about geneology and geneology software, web based or not, and actually commenting and complaining about how you don't want to waste your time?

      Pardon me if you have no life or friends and so just comment on any slashdot story just so you can talk with your *friends*.

    46. Re:How about geni.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very expensive when trygin to connect to ohter trees.

      Poster view also pitiful.

      Stay away

    47. Re:How about geni.com ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Maybe because it was a discussion about open source software?

      Maybe because it was interesting enough to spend 15 seconds opening it in a new tab, but not an additional minute to create a bogus email?

      Your argument is the excluded middle.

      Here's a bad car analogy. I might be interested in buying a car at $20k, but not at $2,000,000.

      -- Barbie

  5. First, try the living if possible by novar21 · · Score: 5, Informative

    My grandma has givin me sooooo much skini on the family its not funny. Didn't cost me a dime other than my time. Trust me... they don't hold back and will give you info can not find anywhere. They are the source.. if they aren't available, talk with the gossip of the family. Each family has one. Find them, then prepare yourself for A LOT of bad news.

    1. Re:First, try the living if possible by lisany · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! My grandparents have died.

    2. Re:First, try the living if possible by ATestR · · Score: 1

      Novar21 is right though. I didn't get interested in the genealogy thing until my dad passed away, years after the grandfolks left this world. Obviously I couldn't talk with them (barring a seance, for those of that mind), but as Novar21 said, there is always someone. I DID still have a living Aunt (paternal) who came to dad's funeral, and she did know a lot of the information that the grandparents might be mind for. I also wrote letters to several older cousins and others who added to the basic information.

      Yes, I did try using various online sources to add to my tree. I think I found one record that I could add, but I provided a whole lot more information than I got. Since it might help the next person who was doing research, I was happy to provide it.

      How far did I go back? I think my tree goes back at most 6 generations, although I only have a name or two for the last generation. Undoubtedly, there is more information available somewhere if I really got interested in it, but as with many things, it was a passing interest. I'll hold on to the chart I developed, just in case my kids/grand kids ever want to know.

      --
      âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    3. Re:First, try the living if possible by maddog2o_2o · · Score: 1

      I think my tree goes back at most 6 generations...

      *G*

      Oh... I'd wager it goes back farther than that.

      All the way back in fact...

      -K

    4. Re:First, try the living if possible by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      You've made an important point. If the anonymous poster of the question had talked to more family they would likely have gotten farther back in the tree and had more success with Ancestry.com.

    5. Re:First, try the living if possible by reiisi · · Score: 1

      Absolutely!

      Half of the purpose of doing genealogy is getting to know your living relatives.

      The other half is getting to know the people whose culture, idealogy, genes, etc. you have inherited.

      You really don't know much about yourself until you know where you came from.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    6. Re:First, try the living if possible by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Did you find anything interesting though?

      One of my relatives (my dad's cousin?) has been making a family tree for the past few years. About once a year I see her, and she shows it round. But no one is really interested in any of it -- I can't meet the people that died before I was born, their names mean very little to me, and I don't know anything about them.

      My mum's method is better. She has a small file of newspaper clippings and birth certificates. It's a little more interesting to know that several of my grandmother's relatives died in a storm on a lifeboat (there's a Wikipedia article, I should scan everything and add it).

    7. Re:First, try the living if possible by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      Oral history is an essential start, but it must be verified using written documentation. My grandmother gave me exact names and dates of arrival of our ancestors, but my subsequent research revealed her memory to be quite flawed... :/

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
  6. GEDCOM by Okind · · Score: 4, Informative

    For basic usage, any program that supports GEDCOM (the de facto file format all good genealogy software support) will do, and your choice should be on your personal preference. So try them out first, of find your local genealogy association and ask around. Personally, I have good experience with Gramps (you already found that one) and ProGen (a dutch commercial program). The latter not being open source, it'll probably not be interesting to you.

    For more advanced usage, you should know that some programs assigns a different meaning to some standard fields, and most programs have their own way of filling in custom fields. If you find yourself using such features, please consider who you'd be sharing your GEDCOM files with, and use the same. Note though, that it'll likely not be open source.

  7. hum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ancestry.com is not by any means a scam. Like any thing else you have to know what your doing in order to research your family history. Genealogy research is time consuming and often leads to a dead end after years of research. However the fact that you paid to use Ancestry.com is amazing to me :-) Check out your local library and see if they have a subscription. Also take a look at familysearch.org or even the LDS Family search centers for more resources library.familysearch.org/ (to find your local center). Good luck at finding your roots.

    1. Re:hum... by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Another Library possibility is a database called HeritageQuest. My local library doesn't have Ancestry.com, though I've requested it, but they DO have HeritageQuest which sometimes has better document images, sometimes not.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    2. Re:hum... by nathanm · · Score: 1

      However the fact that you paid to use Ancestry.com is amazing to me :-) Check out your local library and see if they have a subscription. Also take a look at familysearch.org or even the LDS Family search centers for more resources library.familysearch.org/ (to find your local center).

      I pay for ancestry.com because they have a huge database of sources online, and probably the largest number of users out of any other family tree websites. It's much more convenient for me to search and view their literally billions of records from the comfort of my own home than going to my local library or LDS center. If I did that, I'd have to copy their records and scan them myself. Ancestry's already done the legwork for me. Also, since they have so many users, I've connected to several other people doing research along the same family lines, which saved my quite a bit of time.

  8. PAF by greg.collver · · Score: 3, Informative

    not open source, but the mormon's offer a nice little program for free: http://www.familysearch.org/eng/paf/

    1. Re:PAF by ve3oat · · Score: 1

      I have used PAF for many years. Tried other programs too but always came back to PAF - straightforward, bugfree, and free. Like all the good programs, it can import and export data in the standard GEDCOM format. There is also a companion program (also available free from the LDS) called 'PAF Companion' that will print all the basic charts that you might need to display your family tree. But in the end it doesn't matter much which software you use. Good genealogy comes from carefully collecting and evaluating your information. Getting there is more than half the fun.

    2. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... PAF is actually not recommended anymore because it is so old. It is available but the family history gurus at my church (yes I am Mormon) say to stay away from it. RootsMagic (http://www.rootsmagic.com/) is a very popular program. It is not open source but there is a free version. They do have an upsell paid version if you want some fancy features that are not necessary.

      - 'Nony. Coward

    3. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use PAF ( a free program for windows) to gather my genealogy info. Then I export the data from PAF as a GEDCOM file ( a genealogy standard file format) and import it into PHPGEDVIEW ( an open source project) to publish as a website.

    4. Re:PAF by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Here's a good reason to move beyond PAF (it's not been actively developed for a long time): http://genealogysstar.blogspot.com/2009/01/beyond-paf-lineage-linked-database.html

    5. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not sure what exactly you need the software to do for you, but I remember with PAF my parents printed out a big ol' pedigree chart, found out we were related to some kings back in the dark ages, pretty crazy stuff."

      Oh, there you are. We'll be along shortly with the ancient horror your lineage has battled across the ages. We have been starving it of virgins for the last three centuries on the off chance you'd end up being a slashdotter. Look sharp!

    6. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the apostrophe denotes possession, then who or what is the "it" in "it's complicated" that owns "complicated"? Pshaw, you can keep you're medicine and you're nuclear physics.

    7. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er...that'd be 'cause it's representing missing letter(s) in a contraction: "it is". I've used the apostrophe several times in this way in this post.

      An apostrophe is used to indicate possession, or as a placeholder where letters have been dropped in a contraction. This in no way complicates the situation any further than the GP (amusingly) suggested, as they are two completely different scenarios that you shouldn't really be getting confused between.

    8. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While the linked article makes some good points, this isn't one of them:

      You may wish to begin looking at using an alternative before the current PAF program no longer works with the current operating systems of the computer.

      Rest assured that the Mormons will always have genealogy software that is compatible with current operating systems, and will not break backwards compatibility. In other words, despite the age of PAF, it will not be left in the dust without some ready transition. Genealogy is central the the mormon belief system and isn't going away any time soon.

    9. Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea. PAF works great. And what's better is that it works flawlessly under WINE in Linux too.

    10. Re:PAF by CyberDong · · Score: 1

      Excellent tutorial, now let's move on to the Oxford comma.

  9. PAF by toddwashere · · Score: 2

    I remember my parents doing some genealogy stuff, they used a program called PAF (Personal Ancestor File), I think it was free. There's also https://www.familysearch.org/, where you can look people up for free as well. These are both free even if you are not an LDS member. Not sure what exactly you need the software to do for you, but I remember with PAF my parents printed out a big ol' pedigree chart, found out we were related to some kings back in the dark ages, pretty crazy stuff.

  10. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by kent_eh · · Score: 1

    And also, what OS?
    When my uncle did our family tree a few years ago, he did it in PAF, which is free (as in beer), and seems to have every option that was needed.
    It's a Windows program, but it does work under Wine. It can export to ceveral standard formats.
    Some people may take issue with the fact that it was created by the Mormons, but they do make it freely available to anyone to download and use free of change.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  11. I use this by zellfaze · · Score: 2

    I personally use PHPGEDview. If you need something web-based, this is a great piece of software. It lets my whole family, all around the country, work on the tree.

    http://www.phpgedview.net/

    1. Re:I use this by barneyzang · · Score: 1

      +1 for phpgedview. I've used it extensively for my family as well. The interface is a little quirky but once you get it up and running, it's pretty powerful.

  12. Software by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    You mean like FamilySearch's Personal Ancestry File software?

    http://www.familysearch.org/eng/paf/

  13. Ancestry.com is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ancestry.com is great if you know what you are doing. : ) I use it regularly.

    Also try https://labs.familysearch.org/ which provides a lot of the same data but for free.

    Also try Genweb which is free. http://www.usgenweb.org/

  14. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

    Maybe the poster wants to be able to freely distribute the software and resulting files to family members?

    It sounds pretty reasonable to me, especially after being boned paying for something.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  15. LDS Church, Personal Ancesteral File software by SubComdTaco · · Score: 1

    http://www.ldsgenealogy.com/ "The LDS Church offers free genealogy software that you can use as you do your genealogy research. It is called Personal Ancestral File (PAF) and is one of the best software programs for genealogy. It helps users organize their family history records. It can produce, either on screen or on paper, family histories, pedigree charts, family group records, and other reports to help users in their search for missing ancestors."

    1. Re:LDS Church, Personal Ancesteral File software by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they offer it. But PAF is about the worst software out there now for this sort of work, in my opinion. LDS is great for collecting and hosting the data, don't get me wrong, but they really need to ditch PAF and make a modern software.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    2. Re:LDS Church, Personal Ancesteral File software by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      The LDS Church probably won't make new software because there are a lot of other good alternatives now and it's not worth the effort to recreate what's already being done commercially. There are some really nice alternatives to PAF now.

    3. Re:LDS Church, Personal Ancesteral File software by ddillman · · Score: 1

      I agree! Which is why I can't believe how many people are suggesting PAF as a viable answer to the OP.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    4. Re:LDS Church, Personal Ancesteral File software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAF is not the worst software out there. I have seen much, much worse. PAF is old, but it's reliable and pretty decent. Ironically, many years ago it was the best anywhere, and most of the major advances in the program were made by the team who wrote the Mac version, which no longer exists. Along those lines... if any of you happen to be Mac users, you'll have to run a Windows VM to use PAF or go with some other program that's native. I finally found a program I think is awesome - probably what PAF would have eventually matured to be had they not scrapped the Mac version. This one is definitely not free, but it's well done: http://www.syniumsoftware.com/macfamilytree/ It fully supports the standard GEDCOM format, but it also allows tons of customization. The interface rocks.

  16. Ahnenblat by Loscha · · Score: 2

    http://www.ahnenblatt.com/ Ahnenblatt is free, but I don't recall it having the source available. My housemate has used this program solidly for 3 years and has found it good and easy to use.Hasn't been updated for about a year on the website, but I think a newer version on their forums is available.

  17. You probably need more info to start with. by Rhalin · · Score: 2

    For sites like Ancestry.com, you really need to have a good few generations (4-5, minimum) to start getting good results back, since quite a bit of it is crowd-sourced links from distant relatives. Even at that point, there are a few points in history where the records / links just suck, and it usually takes quite a bit of digging to find another link. Over the course of roughly a month, and with some good spots of luck, we were able to trace back several lines of my family through Ancestry.com, and other sources for several hundred years.

    Fortunately, there's a standard file format for genealogy data, and Ancestry (and other sites) usually support exporting to it.

    Unfortunately, my data yielded a genealogy chart that most of the current open source or free software couldn't render very well. I've been considering writing one myself, that at the very least could render out multiple pages at once for printing, rather than manually forcing the user to set things up correctly for each sub-branch...

  18. Longevity Award Re:PAF by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 2

    PAF aka Personal Ancestral File.
    Weirdly, this software, developed by a church, wins my award for the very BEST Macintosh software ever, in the category of Compatible With The Most Versions of Mac OS.

    Originally, this program cost money, but not very much. I bought it for the Mac 512 or thereabouts. It came on floppy disk, probably about 1985. Years later, when Macs had color, low and behold, the PAF screens were in color. They had followed the compatibility guidelines, and put in simple color years before anyone could see color on a Mac. The SAME version of software continued to work for decades, through major system and processor revisions that broke almost everything else. I think it finally stopped working with System X, (about 5 computers later, for me) when it wouldn't work under Classic for some reason.

    Pretty much everything else became incompatible once or more during that time, including Microsoft and Apple. Amazing!

    --
    Computers obey me.
    1. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      My mother uses Reunion, and has been doing so for 10+ years now. I've migrated it across mutiple machines and OS architectures without issue. I think she started on a LCII and is now on an PPC iMac, I will be moving her to an Intel iMac sometime soon.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    2. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by Tromad · · Score: 1

      You just sold me on it, family tree software won't amount for shit if it isn't available in 5 years.

    3. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Then let me disabuse you of it. PAF has been around for a long time, but it hasn't been updated in quite a while. I think its current form is its final form. The LDS church is embracing centralized servers and web gateways for genealogy.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    4. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by Tromad · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I did download it and it seems like a win98 app. I figured it would feature some mormom "find all my ancestors" button but it looks like it is all manual. My grandma uses some proprietary software and my grandmother in-law uses something completely different, and I doubt there is any way of merging the data without starting from scratch. I'd like to do this before they die but it looks like I'm going to have to do more research into it.

    5. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Look into the GEDCOM file format. That seems to be the de facto standard. If you can't easily merge them now, you'll eventually find a tool that can.

      I figured it would feature some mormom "find all my ancestors" button but it looks like it is all manual.

      If only... There are pay-for services (much like private investigators), and there are volunteers willing to help. A lot of work is being done to automate the process, but it's much harder than it sounds. For now, all work is leg-work. If you're lucky, someone has already done a huge chunk of work that you can simply tap into. (like your grandparents have started)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    6. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      almost all genology programs will support the GEDCOM file format, it's the defacto file layout/data structure for family history. So it should be possible to extract data from all your family's various software packages into the same GEDCOM format and merge them into a package of your choice.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    7. Re:Longevity Award Re:PAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Reunion as well for all local storage of GEDCOM information. I also use ancestry.com to get access to scanned in sources. Ancestry.com isn't worth crap on living people, but it's a wealth of information on deceased people, so you've got to get that far in the family tree for it to be useful. Family is the most useful information - talk to anyone living first - go to any family reunions that your family hosts and talk to people. Then start scouring church, land records, etc for information. If anyone in your family came through Ellis Island, they offer those records for free.

      The software isn't going to help you, you've got to learn how to search for the information you need/want first. Anything that supports GEDCOM will keep the information "free" to move to some other software.

  19. Very simple one by houghi · · Score: 2

    Make directories with all the names and use `tree`

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Very simple one by gnomeza · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fine for many. But some families I can think of need a directed graph.

  20. GRAMPS by br00tus · · Score: 2
    I use GRAMPS mainly, as all I want at this point is a GED file and an application to manipulate it. There are a bunch of web-based packages like PhpGedView out there as well but I haven't had much need for them at this point.

    As far as research, Social Security Death Index, Ellis Island Records, US Censuses up until 1930 (1940 will be released on April 2, 2012), European censuses and so forth have all been useful. Ancestry.com has scanned ship manifests on it, with the names OCR'd, which was useful for me. It also had draft cards, passport applications and other things.

    Records don't tell everything. I told my mother I found her mother's birth on a European census form, which said 1 month old or something. She told me that her mother's mother had a girl that died shortly after she was born, soon after which she became pregnant and had my grandmother, who got the same name as the baby who died. I had never heard about this before. If I hadn't been told that, I would assume a girl born in that year with that name would be my grandmother for sure. So family memory can often trump records. In the "Godfather Part II" the immigration officer is in a hurry and mixes up the last name and town of origin, in a few seconds with a stroke of the pen the family's name is changed. All kinds of things happen - birthdays are changed by purpose or accident, people flee Europe to avoid military draft, family memory often trumps official records.

  21. Many Good programs are free by cachemagic · · Score: 1

    https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/Windows_Genealogy_Software Most of the better genealogy programs (Legacy, Ancestral Quest, Roots Magic) have a free version that lets you do everything you need as a beginning genealogist.

  22. Ancestry.com by DERoss · · Score: 2

    My daughter is using Ancestry.com to create a great genealogy. Through it, she has accessed old immigration and census records and more recent death records. Although all her grandparents are dead, she has been able to extend the genealogy back to her great-great-great grandparents and include many 2nd, 3rd, and 4th cousins. By granting read-only access to cousins, my daughter has also been able to get details from them about current and past relatives.

    1. Re:Ancestry.com by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      250 sounds a bit limiting, especially when you populate your databases with cousins.

    2. Re:Ancestry.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the family tree becomes very complicated when you've had children with many of your cousins

    3. Re:Ancestry.com by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it is, but for a rank beginner it lets them get in and figure out if the software and system will work for them for free. The first paid level ups that to 2500 people.

      I started with MyHeritage back when it first came out. It was completely free for several years, and I got a pretty large database going before they moved to fee-based. So I'm stuck. I like their software, and the services they have are worthwhile in my experience. When I can afford it, I'll pony up the money to keep going. My data is still there, just no one can access any more than 250 people. The software on my PC still works fine and I have local access to the full database, in fact I can keep adding to it.

      I would recommend it even though the service is now fee-based.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    4. Re:Ancestry.com by ben_kelley · · Score: 1

      Probably the advantage of something like ancestry.com (or its counterparts in other countries) is the easy access to source records. Depending on how serious you are with this, this can be much bigger factor than the cost for the service storing the data.

      Of course what source data you can get depends on where your ancestors came from, and when.

      If you are concerned with accuracy, how much you use the ability to link with trees from others will depend on how accurate you think their trees are.

    5. Re:Ancestry.com by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Occasionally, interesting patterns do show up. My seventh great grandfather and his wife shared the same surname even prior to marriage. I think they were third or fourth cousins.

      A more common form of intermarrying is two sisters marrying two brothers. If you aren't in the habit of recording all the sons and daughters of a marriage, you'll miss the quaint little details.

      And if all the firstborn females in a particular branch are named "Mary", and all the firstborn males "Daniel", knowing that particular Daniel had 12 kids by three wives helps to differentiate him from the other Daniel who had five kids and only married once (before he was killed in battle).

      Of course, this all happened in the late 17th century, and most people who have traced back their roots that far will have bumped up against the 250 person limit even without a policy of recording every child.

    6. Re:Ancestry.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey OP, if all you found was addresses on Ancestry.com, then you're not making any effort to find information. They do have metric boatloads of data of all sorts for your money, but you do have to have a clue about finding it, and make the effort.

      That said, I do agree Ancestry.com is a pricey service. Check out MyHeritage.com. You can do a free 250-person tree, or add more with payment. The software is a free download and use, and is pretty thorough. The online piece includes the ability to match to other people's trees and import their data to your tree.

      Here's how these places work. They go out and find as much info as they can without paying anybody any money. Once they get enough to 'seed' their database, they start pushing "Free" promotions, where you have to enter your info to sign up. Then you discover that until you pay, you really can't get any info. So whether or not you sign up, they just got a bunch of free data from you they didn't have from elsewhere. Then you pay them, and now get to access other data they got from other people who fell for the same scam.
      I call it a scam because these places don't actually do research. They just mine other people's research, or trick you into doing it for them (and them paying them on top of it).

      Go check with the Mormans, they actually DO research and attempt to record original documents. And most of these sites used the Morman archives as their point of reference anyhow.

      You should be cautious about those sites:
      There are assholes out there, like myself, who delight in signing up bullshit accounts on those services, dating services, etc. and polluting their databases with intentionally false information. I did that a couple years ago when my naive mother gave a huge pile of family history and heredity info to one of those places. Next thing I know, everyone in the family is getting badgered by mailing lists, salesman calling the phone, etc. so I went in an updated my database. Apparently the solicitors will stop calling when they see their information claims that the entire family descended from King Arthur, who had six siamese twins out of wedlock with a Dragon and a Unicorn named "Mandy D. Unicorn". I also don't think they liked how it works when I claim to be the father of someone who died well before I was born (Abe Lincoln, in specific) or when two White-Ass Crackers have 3 biological children end up Black, Mexican (prior to the 'discovery' of America, no less), and Japanese.

    7. Re:Ancestry.com by ddillman · · Score: 1

      If I had points, I'd mod you up. Spot on.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    8. Re:Ancestry.com by nathanm · · Score: 1

      Hey OP, if all you found was addresses on Ancestry.com, then you're not making any effort to find information. They do have metric boatloads of data of all sorts for your money, but you do have to have a clue about finding it, and make the effort.

      Definitely agree, the anonymous reader didn't try very hard. And records for living people are necessarily scarce because of privacy issues.

      That said, I do agree Ancestry.com is a pricey service. Check out MyHeritage.com. You can do a free 250-person tree, or add more with payment. The software is a free download and use, and is pretty thorough. The online piece includes the ability to match to other people's trees and import their data to your tree.

      Actually, just creating and editing your family tree on Ancestry is completely free. And there's no limit to the number of people, AFAIK. The paid service is just for accessing their database of sources and connecting with other users who might have overlapping family trees.

    9. Re:Ancestry.com by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Actually, just creating and editing your family tree on Ancestry is completely free [custhelp.com]. And there's no limit to the number of people, AFAIK. The paid service is just for accessing their database of sources and connecting with other users who might have overlapping family trees.

      Creating and editing the tree might be free, but Ancestry.com's whole appeal lies in the huge range of data they house, much of it gleaned from public records. I'm not against them charging some for the service of having scanned and indexed that data, and for operating the servers to host it, but in my opinion they're overcharging for that service based on our public data by a fair margin.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    10. Re:Ancestry.com by nathanm · · Score: 1

      Creating and editing the tree might be free, but Ancestry.com's whole appeal lies in the huge range of data they house, much of it gleaned from public records. I'm not against them charging some for the service of having scanned and indexed that data, and for operating the servers to host it, but in my opinion they're overcharging for that service based on our public data by a fair margin.

      Some of the data itself is from the public record, but compiling all of it yourself would be prohibitively expensive. It would take many trips to various libraries, churches, courthouses, etc. in lots of far-flung places in different cities, states, and countries. And that's all before you start indexing, searching, copying, or scanning any records.

      Then consider they're hosting all those billions of records, have developed decent software for both building family trees and documenting them with their database of sources, and continually improve their software and increase their database holdings. The only reason they can charge so little is the economy of scale based on their huge userbase.

    11. Re:Ancestry.com by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Some of the data itself is from the public record, but compiling all of it yourself would be prohibitively expensive. It would take many trips to various libraries, churches, courthouses, etc. in lots of far-flung places in different cities, states, and countries. And that's all before you start indexing, searching, copying, or scanning any records.

      Then consider they're hosting all those billions of records, have developed decent software for both building family trees and documenting them with their database of sources, and continually improve their software and increase their database holdings. The only reason they can charge so little is the economy of scale based on their huge userbase.

      Look again. I said I thought it was reasonable for them to charge something for the service of having collected, scanned, indexed and hosted the data. What I did imply was that I thought the charge was excessive for what they're doing. What you may not realize is that much of the work done to transcribe and index the data is done by volunteer labor, people who do it for the love of genealogy, or to help make data available, or because they then get some level of free access to it in recompense. It's not like Ancestry is paying people salary to do most of that work.

      They incur expense in collecting each piece of data once. There is some small ongoing expense for hosting it, making it available, but they collect revenue for this endlessly on the same data. They're making sufficient profit to be able to buy out other companies on the market (most recently, Footnote.com was picked up) so I can reasonably assume they're fairly flush with cash.

      It would be much more expensive to me to travel or snail mail to all of the places that hold data I am looking for, I'll grant. However, Ancestry's fees are high enough that I still can't afford to maintain a subscription, so the data is lost to me anyway. Couple that with my local Library's subscription to HeritageQuest database, which contains some of the same data sources, and now Ancestry gets no money from me at all instead of what they might get if the fees were lower. Yes, I miss some of what they have available that other sources do not, but this is a hobby, after all.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
  23. BYOB by moehoward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do it yourself. There is no substitute for creating your own database/worksheet. Why in the hell would you even trust what was given to you by a subscription fee? Just because you pay you trust it? In my experience, it is much more rewarding and valuable if you do the work yourself. We took a ton of time and effort, but our family has the real truth with real documents (copies) and contacts thousands of miles away.

    If your ancestry is important to you, do it yourself. Don't take shortcuts. The risk of being misled/wrong are too great. Even doing this ourselves, we were taken down false leads. Imagine someone who does not have a stake doing something so important for you.

    Moe

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:BYOB by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      I wonder if a data exchange standard exists? Possibly in the form of an XML schema?

    2. Re:BYOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      GEDCOM is what you're looking for there.

      OT, anyone know why won't chrome paste into the slashdot textboxes?

    3. Re:BYOB by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Then I would suggest that individuals post whatever genealogical information they can scratch up, and a crawler stitch it together.

    4. Re:BYOB by ThatsLoseNotLoose · · Score: 1

      Why not do it yourself? One answer would be reports. There are standards for properly publishing your family history - and getting the footnotes and the TOC and indexes right takes a lot of work. There's a lot to be said for having a program that automatically gets those right after you've compiled the data.

      There's also a stack of standard report types that you'd have to reproduce if you wanted to roll your own program and then share the results. Take a look at the report list for The Master Genealogist

    5. Re:BYOB by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the problem is with a subscription service. You should not take any source at face value, and that is true if you get it from a service or if you go hunt up the original document yourself. Ancestry has lots of copies of real documents, and I'm glad I did not have to hunt all over to get them. They also have less reliable data, like personal trees and stuff from books, but that does not mean the information is useless, it is just a lead to be examined. Part of being a genealogist is figuring out what sources are reliable and which ones aren't, and working with what you can get. A service like Ancestry can save a lot of work.

    6. Re:BYOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a great-aunt who was wealthy enough do to that kind of thing. It took a lot of time and much money to trace her particular branch of the family tree back to London in 1400 ...

      If someone else has already found the info and made it available online, I don't see anything wrong with using it.

    7. Re:BYOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do it yourself. There is no substitute for creating your own database/worksheet. Why in the hell would you even trust what was given to you by a subscription fee?

      I trust you wrote your own spreadsheet application in assembler which runs on a PC you designed and made from scratch. I mean - why in the (sic) hell you would even trust what was given to you by a subscription fee?

    8. Re:BYOB by reiisi · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, it would be a fun project, but it would also be a lot of redundant effort.

      Redundant effort is not inherently bad, but you need to recognize that you're re-inventing the wheel and understand your reasons.

      I assume your reasons would be something like wanting to manage your own files.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    9. Re:BYOB by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it doesn't work like that. It's been tried several times before and it's basically a disaster. Problem is that there is a lot of disagreement about lots of things. It makes it hard to resolve the "right" one.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  24. Sadly by Kjella · · Score: 1

    My interest in genealogy has gone from "cool trying to trace your ancestors" to mostly creepy genetic profiling possibilities, with the ever increasing trend of wanting DNA records to larger and more DNA registries, and every so often someone wants to do DNA records of everyone in a national database. With sufficiently many records and the family relations - which are a lot easier to get hold of - it might not matter that they don't have your DNA sample. You're pretty well defined by your family's lineage anyway. We have some family records but I actually prefer they'd stay family records.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  25. Ancestry.com by ddillman · · Score: 1

    Hey OP, if all you found was addresses on Ancestry.com, then you're not making any effort to find information. They do have metric boatloads of data of all sorts for your money, but you do have to have a clue about finding it, and make the effort.

    That said, I do agree Ancestry.com is a pricey service. Check out MyHeritage.com. You can do a free 250-person tree, or add more with payment. The software is a free download and use, and is pretty thorough. The online piece includes the ability to match to other people's trees and import their data to your tree.

    --
    Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
  26. Holiday gift? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm looking to build a family tree for a holiday gift.

    To be presented in what year?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Holiday gift? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I'm looking to build a family tree for a holiday gift.

      To be presented in what year?

      This year: text.

    2. Re:Holiday gift? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reading Comprehension, meet my good friends Sarcasm and Stark Reality...

  27. The Master Genealogist by cob666 · · Score: 1

    I've been deeply involved in my family genealogy for over 20 years. At one time or another I've used every software package that was available as well as a system that I designed myself. One of the biggest flaws with a lot of the software I've used is that are far too simple and don't take into consideration that not all the data you get is accurate. I ended up using a software package called The Master Genealogist (TMG for short), its available at http://www.whollygenes.com/ TMG is by far the best software package for tracking genealogy. It is fully GEDCOM compliant but is able to track much more information than is supported by GEDCOM. One of the most key features is the support for multiple tags such as, somebody says that Uncle Ted was born in July, 1940 but somebody else says he was born in July 1941. You are able to have both Birth tags with one flagged as primary and have surety flags (to indicate how sure you are that something is true, a birth certificate would have a pretty high surety rating.) The software is currently at version 7 but V 8 is due out. I would try to steer away from online repositories because you really have no idea what they are doing with your data and if they go belly up what happens to all your research.

    There are some nice add on tools to TMG to generate web sites (Second Site is the best one). You really should check out TMG before you make any decisions.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    1. Re:The Master Genealogist by Hrdina · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with the praise for TMG. I've been using it for several years now (version 4 then version 6). I have found it to be incredibly flexible in handling conflicting evidence, and it also generates some nice reports. I had moved my data from Family Tree Maker, so it did take me quite a while to "clean up" my database to change from a fact-based system to an evidence-based system, but I think the results have been worth it.

      To be clear to the OP, it is definitely not an Open Source program in that it costs money and the file formats are (IIRC) proprietary as well (but there are plenty of export options so you are not locked-in).

  28. My experience with ancestry.com by f00zbll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't work for ancestry.com, and they don't pay me. I recently signed up ancestry.com to research our family geneology. My biggest complaint is the search functionality often returns way too much data. Their search/matching algorithm is quite eager. The service isn't cheap, but then again how much would it cost to manually do the research yourself? How much time would you have to spent going through dusty census records? How much time do you have to spent tracking down the geneology going back up the tree? It took me a few days to understand how their search works, but once I got a hang of it, it was easier to find records for people in our family tree. It's not perfect, but it does quite a bit. If I had to search census records going back to 1910, it sure as heck would cost more than a monthly subscription.

    1. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by mrcheesyfart · · Score: 1

      I agree with the other posters that ancestry.com is a bit pricey, but sometimes it can be worth it. They have a lot of information that you can search through all in one place. Its good to try out for a month or two, then cancel your subscription and load all the information you got into one of the open source solutions that people have mentioned. I their search is pretty good actually. It does return a lot of irrelevant information sometimes, but it will also do some guessing if their is someone with a similar name or birth date. It is nice if someone made a mistake and misspelled the name on a census report, the search will probably still return it. Sometimes you get a connection that you never would have found otherwise.

    2. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's exactly the problem with Ancestry.com: They have no problem stealing/plagiarizing the data of 10's of thousands of researchers and then selling it at a profit.

      Some years ago Ancestry took over a free service called Rootsweb. At the time, Ancestry promised to keep Rootsweb's data free in perpetuity. What they didn't say was that they had imported every scrap of data into their own systems, specifically the OneWorldTree, and then removed every citation tying the data back to the original researchers. I and thousands of my colleagues, watched the data that we'd pieced together over years, sometimes decades, at costs running into the thousands of dollars, get resold for the benefit of a company that seems to be headed by ethical pipsqueaks.

    3. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      I didn't know the whole history, but ancestry.com seems to make it hard to associate the source with the fact in question.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    4. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. I have used ancestry.com for about a year now and have got amazing results. From my experience you have to put in your family to about your great grandparents then it starts doing a lot of the work for you. And it gives you access to copy of the real records and genealogy experts. Definitely worth the money.

    5. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      booo, u work for them. ancestry.com is a scam, just like the op pointed out.

    6. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      I've been very successful with ancestry.com after a pretty shaky start. I think if you are a newbie, it can mislead you into thinking that finding true links is a piece of cake and that anything it suggests is likely to be true by default. You have to use common sense to reject the many, many false positives it offers, and as so many people don't it means that by my estimate, 90%+ of the trees lodged there are incorrect to some extent. For example, people don't bother to check the most basic feasibility of a date, that would for example suggest that someones mother was 8 years old at the time of their birth, or that they had children aged 60 or more. Even worse is placenames - people frequently seem to assume that a village in England is the same place as another place in the USA with the same name, causing tress to suddenly jump continents for no good reason. When much of what makes Ancestry.com work is matches with research done by others, you end up having to be very skeptical about nearly everything it throws at you that comes from another person's tree and not from an official record (and even then it's still very loose with its matches).

      Nevertheless it's got a lot of good data if you are prepared to be careful and painstaking and work like a detective (and are able to confirm links independently). I've now traced 5 generations reliably and many more in some branches after about 6-7 months of fairly persistent work.

    7. Re:My experience with ancestry.com by nathanm · · Score: 1

      My biggest complaint is the search functionality often returns way too much data.

      Too much data is far more preferable than too little. Back in the old days, before many sources were available online, most searching had to be done by hand, paging through entire paper records until you found a possible match. The earliest online sources were often just indexes to paper records. It made it much easier to find the records, but then you still had to travel to a library, courthouse, church, etc. that might be in another state or even country.

      Their search/matching algorithm is quite eager.

      The reason the algorithm is so promiscuous is that it's probably using Soundex to match names. That's a good thing though, as I've found some of my ancestors names spelled in lots of different ways.

  29. GRAMPS, and maybe PhpGedView by Shadyman · · Score: 3, Informative

    GRAMPS is the best OSS piece of software I've found so far. You can also export it to PhpGedView (a very nice OSS web-based application)

    Pro tip: *Always* record your sources, for every scrap of info (GRAMPS lets you do this), that way when (Not "If") you have conflicting pieces of information, you can figure out which one to trust. GRAMPS also lets you assign a 'reliability' to each piece of information.

    The only problem is that exporting to GEDCOM format loses a lot of this kind of 'extra' data. (IE, exporting is a lossy process, so use GRAMPS as a master, and if you want to put your tree online, use that as a secondary source for family members to add to.)

    As far as resources go, Ancestry.com has a bad habit of suggesting that they have a ton of matches in all these different databases, when in fact most of the matches returned don't have any relation to the names you entered. Don't base your decision to subscribe solely on that.
    That being said, many public libraries offer free access to some, or many, census records and other public databases.

    If you have Swedish ancestors, GenLine is EPIC: Digitized church records (Swedes often had data recorded annually instead of every 5 or 10 years, and also recorded moves into and out of parish districts.)

    1. Re:GRAMPS, and maybe PhpGedView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to have a go at GRAMPS on windows, I strongly recommend you use Portable GRAMPS (google it to find it). You'll install it in no time on your computer, without having to install Python and all the right dependencies.

  30. Familysearch.org by dw_g · · Score: 1

    In addition to offering PAF, the Family History Library runs the web site www.familysearch.org. The library is in the process of digitizing their over 2 million microfilms and making the data available on-line and for free. There's a long way to go, but it's worth looking at. If you decide to use PAF, the add-on program PAF Companion produces nicer looking reports of your data that the built-in PAF functions, and the cost is quite low. And since PAF will export a gedcom (a genealogy data transfer protocol that all genealogy database programs recognize), if you decide later to try a different program, you can easily move your data.

  31. Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emacs

  32. GRAMPS, PHPGedView and Legacy by c41rn · · Score: 2
    I've been researching my family tree for over 10 years now and I've tried very many genealogy software programs. Choosing an open source genealogy program was extremely important to me since all the research I've done could be lost if it were locked up in a proprietary file format that is inaccessible 20 years from now. However, it is equally important that my genealogy database be easily accessible by as many family members as possible - family members who may not be very computer literate.

    GRAMPS is an outstanding piece of software. When I first began using it a few years ago, it was a little rough and it was difficult to install on Windows. This made it great for me while running Ubuntu, but difficult for me to recommend to family members. It seems to have much better support now under Linux, Windows and Mac. It also uses an open XML-based file format that at least one working group is looking at as the basis for an updated standard to replace the aging GEDCOM format. I think this is definitely the candidate for best OSS Genealogy.

    PHPGedView is another good, open-source, web-based genealogy package. This is a good one to use if you're planning to build your family tree collaboratively among several family members. My biggest complaint about it is that it's a little clunky looking and some family members seem a bit intimidated by it, so they don't make changes or additions when they could. I began building a new theme and layout for it, but I put it on hold when I felt like it was taking time from working on the family history itself. Of course, it also requires that you have a server to host it on.

    A similar online family tree is Wikitree.com. It looks promising, but I haven't yet found a good way to sync changes between it and my local genealogy software. It's still in its infancy though.

    All that said, my favorite genealogy software is the closed-source Legacy Family Tree. The standard edition is free and the full "deluxe" version is inexpensive. Unfortunately, it's Windows only (I've had mixed luck running it through WINE). It's advantage though is that it's very easy to install and use and has some powerful tools for sourcing and merging trees. It also creates some very impressive, customizable family tree charts that can be saved in a variety of formats or printed through their mail-order service. It also saves your genealogy database in several formats including GEDCOM.

    Ancestry.com is the necessary evil of the genealogy world. They have many records on their site that aren't available elsewhere on line, but they have made quite a few business decisions over the years that don't sit well with many family historians. They also produce the "Family Tree Maker" software which I recommend avoiding.

  33. TNG Is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One that I have used is called TNG. It is a PHP/MySQL web based site. It is very nice and fairly simple to use. It allows you to manage your own site.

    http://lythgoes.net/genealogy/software.php

  34. Lifelines by catsidhe · · Score: 3

    Lifelines

    It's console based, but it's fairly powerful for that. Once you learn the navigation keys (and there's a help window at the bottom of the screen), then you can walk up and down your family tree with ease. It reads in GEDCOM, allows you to edit those records as GEDCOM (so you have a lot -- perhaps too much -- freedom in record structure and normalisation), and it exports in GEDCOM as well, as well as a scripting language which allows for all sorts of reports and outputs. You can even tell it to keep records in UTF8.

    It is a record/database manipulation program: you will need to gather your data yourself, and enter it by hand. While the actual entry process is tedious (which, to be frank, will always be the case, flashy GUI or not), it is a good opportunity to go over the data and discover incongruities and patterns.)

    --
    "This is a Hollywood movie: when it comes to the Laws of Physics, they're lucky if they get Gravity!" --- my wife
  35. Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ancestry.com has a few good resources, but you have to go to your public library to get to them.

  36. only 20 years by hydromike2 · · Score: 1

    I use ancestry.com from time to time, it is best used for researching your ancestors, by which I mean those non living. The US census data is delayed by ~70 years so very little info on anything in the past 70 years will come up. I have been able to track back to 1500 AD on several ancestors on both sides of my family in ancestry. In my experience census data is key, and maiden names, you will notice that it will quickly become impossible to determine maternal ancestry past a certain point.

    1. Re:only 20 years by nathanm · · Score: 1

      The US census data is delayed by ~70 years so very little info on anything in the past 70 years will come up.

      Census records are released 72 years later, to be exact. Also, although the US Census isn't available until then, many state listings of much more recent births, marriages, divorces, and deaths are available.

  37. Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by unity100 · · Score: 0

    i dont get why americans are so obsessed with genealogy, ancestry and so on. maybe it is because it is a country of immigrants, and everyone is trying to have an identity extending to their past ?

    where i live, in anatolia (turkey), history goes thousands of years past into 8-9000 BC. actually, it was discovered that, the villagers living near the site of a recently discovered mummy that is dated 6500 BC or so (8500 years ago) had 100% exact dna with the mummy. (western anatolia) basically, those people lived there since that time, seasoning all that has happened around those parts.

    yet, ordinary people dont give 2 flying shizz about their past. people just live on.

    1. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Yes, you have grasped a big part of it. Nearly everyone in America is descended from immigrants at some point, and on top of that, we have been the most "mobile" society on Earth; families moving from home to home on the average of every few years.

      This makes keeping track of genealogy a particular problem.

    2. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by unity100 · · Score: 0

      the thing is 'keeping track' part. the people here, dont know their genealogy. they dont care about it either. i dont see that in many other countries either, except britain, and somewhat in france.

    3. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Genealogy is popular here in Australia. My wife's family are Malaysians, originally from China. They have a lot of interest in their origins. My son has friends with immediate family from Europe, north and south America and Asia. Pretty much everywhere in fact. What is the next generation going to look like?

    4. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      What is the next generation going to look like?

      in case you havent noticed, generations everywhere are starting to look alike each other, even without no interracial marriage happening.

    5. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by jaq1an · · Score: 1

      Its not just Americans. I'm Irish (not Irish-American, born, raised and still living in Ireland) and I'm interested. In some ways the USA is luckier as being a country of immigrants they have had to keep good records whereas many of the records in Ireland have been destroyed delibertly by the govt. or in war by anti-govt or just never created. It was a great way to reconnect with lost family members and to learn more about the family history.

    6. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by nathanm · · Score: 1

      Nearly everyone in America is descended from immigrants at some point...

      Actually, every person on the planet is descended from immigrants if you go back far enough.

    7. Re:Why are you so obsessed with genealogy ? by nathanm · · Score: 1

      i dont get why americans are so obsessed with genealogy, ancestry and so on. maybe it is because it is a country of immigrants, and everyone is trying to have an identity extending to their past ?

      For me it's mostly just a hobby. I love history to begin with, and my family history is specifically interesting to me personally. Finding out where my ancestors lived, what their lives would have been like, and why they immigrated to America is fascinating to me.

      I've read that genealogy is the second most common hobby in America, after gardening. Of course, that depends on how a hobby is defined. I consider reading my favorite hobby. However, for some people, i.e. Mormons, genealogy has religious significance. That's why Salt Lake City, Utah is the biggest destination for many people doing genealogical research.

      where i live, in anatolia (turkey), history goes thousands of years past into 8-9000 BC. actually, it was discovered that, the villagers living near the site of a recently discovered mummy that is dated 6500 BC or so (8500 years ago) had 100% exact dna with the mummy. (western anatolia) basically, those people lived there since that time, seasoning all that has happened around those parts.

      I've also read that, which really interests me. Don't you find it fascinating that your (or at least some modern Turks) ancestors possibly spoke Hittite or another Indo-European or even Semitic language? I recently paid for a genealogical DNA test, which will tell me more specifically where my ancestors came from. My paternal ancestors immigrated to America from Germany in the 1880s (then Prussia), but there are several clues which point to them actually being ethnically Lithuanian. The area where they lived has been part of Lithuania, Poland, Russia, and Germany in just the last few hundred years.

  38. phpGEDview by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    It's web-based and written in PHP, obviously, which doesn't suit everyone. It's also a latecomer to the ajax stuff and (while it does dynamically load content) still considers pop-up windows a valid part of a web UI. Not pretty. However, I've had great experiences managing a genealogy database with it, as well as printing some nice charts.

    1. Re:phpGEDview by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      It's web-based and written in PHP, obviously, which doesn't suit everyone. It's also a latecomer to the ajax stuff and (while it does dynamically load content) still considers pop-up windows a valid part of a web UI. Not pretty. However, I've had great experiences managing a genealogy database with it, as well as printing some nice charts.

      Where are my mod points when I need them?

      Forget the stand alone crappy apps, just put it on the web. We have been using this for years and I
      Can't find enough good things to say about it.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  39. @ellogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you tried http://www.myheritage.es/ here in mexico it doesnt find a lot of info about family related for me, but maybe in the us you can get a better approaching to a real crowd sourcing family tree

  40. Software or data? by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

    I've been researching my genealogy for almost a decade at this point. It's a lot of work, but I find it fun and enlightening.

    Now, there are really two questions here. First, software. There are many different programs out there, the one that I have the most experience with is Legacy. The free version is quite powerful, even if it's closed source.

    The second question that wasn't really asked though is regarding the data. You could have the best genealogy software in the world, but it's useless without the data. I'm afraid that simply adding you, your parents, and your grandparents isn't going to do much for you, no matter the website or software. Part of the problem is that the most useful source of information for ancestry, census records, isn't available for any census later than 1930 in the U.S. due to privacy concerns. Most likely, you'll have to find some great-grandparents (ask your parents or grandparents about them) and from there it's relatively easy to bootstrap your family tree back to the 1850s. Unfortunately, the most complete census records are found on Ancestry.com, which is a pay site of course, but there are so many other records that they have that it can be worth it to pay the monthly fee (I do). In addition to that, you can also piggyback on other peoples' research through their community.

    If you don't feel like paying, there are plenty of other sites out there with free data and the number grows constantly. Familysearch.org is probably the best. Rootsweb (owned by Ancestry) is also free and has the World Connect function that will show you family trees (secondary sources). Be persistent. There are plenty of sources out there.

  41. WebTrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started doing genealogy in the mid to late 90's. First it was with Famly TreeMaker, which served me well for many years. However, when I wanted to publish some of my data on the web I was left in a bind and had to manually do some indexes and the like. When I switch off of Windows to Linux, I tried Gramps and a VM version of PAF -- both fine desktop products. However, along the way I decided that i wanted others to contribute and the only way to do that was to move fully to the web. I dove into PhpGedView about two years ago and really liked it. I have now switched to WebTrees, another 100% eb based solution that draws it heritage from PhpGedView. A web based solution takes some getting use to. However, the security -- in Webtrees is great and its sophistication is top notch.

  42. gedcom.el by AntEater · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Emacs with gedcom.el. I haven't used it but if it runs in GNU/Emacs it must be great.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
  43. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are just lame.

    Maybe he is running Linux? Maybe he doesn't want his computer loaded with crapware? WHO CARES?

    He is asking for a legitimate question which deserves a legitimate answer.

  44. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gd2shoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    PAF is obsolete, but still viable.

    If research is what you need, don't overlook Family Search. It works best if you can start with someone long dead. If you want one-on-one assistance (for free), stop by an LDS Family History Center. Yeah, we're "Mormon's", but the family history advisers must not be overtly preachy (if they are, they're not following instructions). Just bring everything you've got.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  45. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meds, dude, meds.

    Sounds like you forgot to take 'em this morning ... and a chill pill while you're at it ...

  46. Definitely check out the Mormons by Clomer · · Score: 2

    Any software you find is likely just going to be a database entry/maintenance type software tool for storing your genealogical information, but itself will not give you any information; it just provides a place for you to keep track of information you do find from other sources.

    If you are stuck on open-source, I'm not sure how to help you, but if all you really care about is that it is free, I can strongly recommend Personal Ancestral File from here. While it has some fields for Mormon ordinances, you don't have to use those features and it will do nicely to maintain your records.

    As for doing the actual research, again I recommend looking into the Mormons - they maintain branches of their main family history library at various church buildings around the world. The volunteers who staff those branches are instructed to not proselyte, they simply are there to help you do the research. The only time you'll have to pay for something is for obvious things like using the copy machine, or if you want to have records shipped in from Salt Lake City you'll have to pay postage, but that's it.

    Disclaimer: yes, I am a Mormon, so I may be biased on this matter, but as far as I've seen, the Mormons are the premier experts in the world when it comes to family history research.

    --
    Intelligent responses welcome, flames will be met with marshmallows.
    1. Re:Definitely check out the Mormons by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      Windows only, if I recall.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    2. Re:Definitely check out the Mormons by Dynetrekk · · Score: 1
      (Disclaimer: I am not from Iceland.)

      Mormons are not the premier experts. On Iceland, family records go back virtually to the original settlement, way before the US was populated by europeans. Of course, their records are mostly confined to Iceland, but it is nonetheless impressive.

    3. Re:Definitely check out the Mormons by TJNoffy · · Score: 1

      Been using PAF for years to document my genealogical research. Excellent tool! And I'm not Mormon, so no bias here. ;^)

    4. Re:Definitely check out the Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? The Mormon database is full of errors. They have my grandparents as being the parents of twelve children because someone submitted it to them that they had twelve children. What they don't know is that two of those children were my grandmother's nieces who were taken in rather than be sent to an orphanage, but because the idiot who sent them this info also had these children "sealed" to them, they cannot change it, but the information is not legally correct.

    5. Re:Definitely check out the Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also note that many of the Mormon Family History Centers have subscriptions to Ancestry.com, which you can use for free.

  47. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by supertrinko · · Score: 0

    Was his question not just as legitimate as OP's? Does he not deserve the same respect you expect of him? Is this how everyone that questions open-source gets treated?

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
  48. try this by jrkotrla · · Score: 1

    simple family tree
    http://jdmcox.com/

    --
    In God we trust,
    everyone else we firewall!!
  49. Ancestry is actually a good database service by Lemuel · · Score: 1

    The question covers two things. Ancestry is both a genealogy database service and a genealogy program in the cloud. It is actually a pretty good database service, and the best single repository out there, but you have to get back to WW II for veterans or 1930 for people in the US to start getting good info. If you have younger grandparents you might ask to find out about their parents and search for them. This will be an issue whatever source you use, as 1930 is the most recent Census released.

    As a cloud-based genealogy program Ancestry is just average, and not something you would normally use unless you want the service behind it.

  50. Ancestry is for dead people... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1

    The FIRST problem with your post (regarding the availability of your information) is that YOU ARE STILL ALIVE! The Ancestry database contains data on dead people - otherwise it would be a database to facilitate identity theft. The ancestry databases contain birth and death records, including Social Security Number. Census records do NOT include data for the most recent 70 years... so today you can search the census records from 1930 and prior.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  51. Same sex marriages by gringer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just something to take into account, many programs don't allow for same-sex marriages (or partnerships) -- a child *has* to have a male parent who is partnered with a female parent. This is a problem for my wife, who has one parent in a male/female partnership and the other parent in a same-sex partnership, and makes finding appropriate family tree programs difficult. The most common "hack" is to make one or both partners of the same sex marriage unknown gender, but often you need to enforce the male/female parts of marriages.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Same sex marriages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      News flash: biological parents still come in heterosexual pairs.

    2. Re:Same sex marriages by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      For now. Also, genealogy documents more than just biological relationships. It's more about how families are put together and interact. After all, good genealogical software should allow for adoptions, no?

  52. Gramps is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used several programs over the years, commercial and free and open source, and I will say that I find Gramps to be the best of what is out there. Personal Ancestral File is also really good, but the development seems to have stalled and it is Windoze only. I also used Lifelines for a while but find I prefer the GUI of Gramps.

    A better question is "where are all the free online resources for researching?" Many sites have some info, but a great deal require some sort of payment and their data is usually not worth the price. The Mormons seem to have the largest repository BTW, and regardless of what you think of their beliefs or principles they are providing this service to everyone.

  53. phpGedView by MrWin2kMan · · Score: 1

    Helps you organize everything and put it on the web.

    --
    Nothing to see here but us trolls...move along...
  54. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by skine · · Score: 1

    I think it's an issue of OP not understanding the difference between free and open source.

  55. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this how everyone that questions open-source gets treated?

    Wow, you must be new here.

  56. GenerationX, Mac OS X genealogy software by paulschreiber · · Score: 2

    A month ago, I found GenerationX, an open source Mac OS X GEDCOM editor. (GEDCOM is a standard genealogy file format.) Unfortunately, the version I found was very old. It was PowerPC-only and crashed on launch on Snow Leopard.

    I took the source on SorceForge, fixed many of the compiler and static analyzer warnings and removed the expiry code.

    You can find my fork on github:
    https://github.com/paulschreiber/generationx

    Be careful — this is still beta quality.

  57. Genealogy v Family History? Alone v collaborative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The right software depends on what you're really trying to track. One the one end of the spectrum you have parental lineage -- simply parents of parents with dates and places -- this would be referred to as genealogy. At the other end you get the stories, photos and other facts surrounding the ancestors, and that's family history.

    Genealogy VS. Family History
    If you're just going for genealogy, then PAF, GRAMPS, Geni, FamilySearch etc. will all do the job just fine. Some programs (eg. GRAMPS) lets you add photos and additional information, others (PAF) are more "just the facts". For my genealogy I really like the New FamilySearch, however it's only open to Mormons during the beta phase. It should be open to the public some time in 2011. I haven't currently found a solution I like for tracking my family history. I have photos, scanned books and documents, and lots of ripped VHS and 8mm home videos and no good solution for that yet.

    Alone VS Collaborative
    A question you have to ask now is how you want to work. If you use one of the online programs (New FamilySearch, Ancestry.com, Geni, etc.) your tree isn't just yours. If you're lucky you can tap into parts of your tree that someone else has already added. To collaborate using stand-alone programs you will have to export PAF files and exchange them with others.

    The down side to collaborative genealogy is that it's collaborative. You end up trusting other people's work, which might be based off of secondary sources (serious genealogists will often only accept government or church records!), or which might be guess work ("I think grandpa said..."). It can lead to edit wars if one line of the family spells a name a certain way and you feel strongly about it being spelled another way. These collaboration issues are still being worked out. Still, I think collaboration is the future and recommend finding an online system you trust enough to share your data with!

  58. What day is this? by nick357 · · Score: 1

    "I'm looking to build a family tree for a holiday gift."

    Real men wait until the 24th before tossing together mom's gift.

  59. GRAMPS still a little rough... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... at least on a Mac. For one thing, the interface is a little difficult to figure out if you're not already familiar with it, and if you try to access the help... instant crash, every time. For starters, I was trying to figure out how to indicate that my parents were, you know, married to each other at the time of my birth, and that proved to be a lot more difficult than you'd think. And the auto-crashing help was no help at all. Also, there are lots of weird little problems: I found that when I tried to enter birthdays, various number keys would mysteriously become mapped to keyboard shortcuts - so, for example, when I tried to enter my brother's birthdate, which is in 1970, I could get as far as 197... but the "0" had become mapped to the "Go" menu item, so then the only choice was to use the combobox tool to scroll the year all the way from 197 AD to 1970 AD... which is tedious, to say the least. The problem would be temporarily cured by exiting and restarting the program, but then it would come back. I also had problems with the "1" key becoming mapped.

    The bottom line is that I'm finding this to be all but unusable on the Mac. I do like the idea of an open source genealogy program, though, so I may give it a try on the Ubuntu box and see if it's any better.

  60. Software vs Sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used Open Source software for family tree stuff myself. I have tried a few commerical ones and the one I liked the most was iFamily for Leopard (www.ifamilyforleopard.com) . It's Mac only but it does everything you could need and it's not expensive at all including HTML output. Even better is that the database used in the program is sqlite so you can crack it open and pull out the data yourself.

    Now on to sources. As other commenters have pointed out, your best start is talk to your family. You can choose to map out your family tree and you can layer in stories. The further you go back, the harder the stories become. For the first couple generations you can get it all (hopefully) from your family. As you go back you need to start layering in detail from census and BMD certificates. In my case, one of my ancestors was a worsted weaver. That meant research in to weaving industry in North England in order to build up a picture.

    Ancestry.com is an excellent research tool for indexes. It won't give you nice print out of certificates but for finding birth/marriage/death, census and other info it's brilliant. Most libraries also have it available so you c get it that way. LDS at familysearch.org is free but not as useful but they're making huge strides with their indexing projects. Some places also have pay-per-view or purchase of credits for the casual user as well.

    Good luck on your journey!

  61. Browser based PhpGedView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.phpgedview.net/ Actively developed under GNU license and supports GEDCOM.

  62. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by jcaldwel · · Score: 0

    I'd be careful using the Mormon version, unless you want great grandpa to be baptized for the dead. That's what they use their vast database of genealogy for.

  63. Best Open Source Genealogy Software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used Gramps almost exclusively for several years and really like it. The database is much improved. It is well thought out and quite flexible. Reporting could use a little window dressing, but is quite functional. GEDCOM output works well.

  64. a litttle too late for this year, bub.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the 4-5 days you've got left ain't gonna cut it.

    these things take considerable time, effort and commitment to put together.. ask any of the millions of people that make it their life's passion.

  65. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Machtyn · · Score: 0

    For those who only hear about Mormons through their detractors should understand that they believe that all people are sons and daughters of God. Which means that we are one big family. As such, family is a major part of the lifestyle. As such, they have one of the best resources, along with software, for finding genealogy information.

    As one post above mine has stated, if the History Center advisors become preachy, they are not following instructions. I know that the local genealogy society (not LDS related) in my area (Louisville, KY) have donated to the LDS History Center because they have members of their society use the resources and material a lot.

  66. Research, Publishing and Storing are seperate by thejahn · · Score: 0

    Our local library has a subscription to Ancestry.com and the site is Extremely useful. I use it and sometimes only donate a few bucks here and there in support of my local library. I am certain to sign the visitor book to ensure they get more funding from the local gov. The site is worth every penny but this is only obvious after you spend some time understanding what to expect from it. This site is to help with researching data stored in specific archived sources transcribed by volunteers and other paid staff. They also house submitted family research done by your family embers or distant relatives. For someone to do research specifically for your close family, epxect to pay roughly 10-50 dollars and hour for some volunteers to look up specific information.You usually have to find the volunteers yourself in the county you suspect your relative was from. No software like Graps or Family Tree maker will just do research for you. It will help document your findings and it will help publish your findings neatly into various trees, books, charts, timelines... whatever. Family Tree Maker attempts to match your recorded data to what has already been submitted and rate the returns for you however that info is not always so easy for a beginner to determin the accuracy. Finally, I suggest asking your local hostorian or fellow family history center patron what they use, which local library has a subscription and what software they use. My local library even provides computers to access the site and Family Tree Maker to store you found data to a file you can take with you on a USB stick for later use.

  67. http://www.familysearch.org by pgacv2 · · Score: 2

    You mean like this? https://familysearch.org/

    Mod parent up. It's a free service, frequently updated from various sources, goes back centuries, and even includes a series of online lessons on how to do your family history. Backed by Mormons, but that doesn't make it any less of an awesome service. (Disclaimer: I am a Mormon)

    1. Re:http://www.familysearch.org by gnapster · · Score: 2

      Backed by Mormons, but that doesn't make it any less of an awesome service.

      That sounds just like something a Mormon would say...

      Oh, wait. :c)

  68. Documenting your sources by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    Although, I agree that TMG is better than most other software packages, it is still not the correct approach to really sound genealogy, because sound genealogy is all about documenting your sources. Every fact stored in your software package should have a source. Also, every assumption (such as that person A mentioned in birth certificate B is the same as person C mentioned in birth certificate D) should be entered as such with a source as well (even if it is you yourself). In that way, it is always possible to derive on which facts and assumptions a certain relationship between two persons is based. Actually, This approach is especially important when you exchange data with other genealogists. Just adding an author to a collection of facts, is not good enough, because you can never see if a fact from two sources isn't actually based on the same (possible incorrect) source or assumption. In such a system, it would also be possible to quickly fix errors, such as you discover that person A and person C are not the same.

  69. LDS Church by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    They've got a freebie that works nicely on Windows and uses the standard GenCon file format. If you need to do more in depth research, then you can go to any LDS Church and access the family history branch for more information. Note that any links to the Middle East is going to require more effort such as heading to Utah and the main LDS Geneology Repository to investigate.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  70. Data portability by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If not, then why would you want it to be open source?

    If I was going to be spending a reasonable amount of time inputting data that I want to access for an extended period of time I would want it to be an open source program. That way you can always get the data out of the program again (possibly with some effort) and you are not stuck with regular upgrade fees for the latest version with the bug fix neeed to make it work with the latest OS version.

    1. Re:Data portability by Okind · · Score: 1

      If not, then why would you want it to be open source?

      If I was going to be spending a reasonable amount of time inputting data that I want to access for an extended period of time I would want it to be an open source program. That way you can always get the data out of the program again (possibly with some effort) and you are not stuck with regular upgrade fees for the latest version with the bug fix need to make it work with the latest OS version.

      Of these two items, the data portability is (luckily) moot: the more knowledgeable users (about genealogy, not software) of this kind of software are actually familiar with its problems, even in the paper world.

      The second item, paying for upgrades, still exists though. And sometimes even more than average.

    2. Re:Data portability by nathanm · · Score: 1

      If I was going to be spending a reasonable amount of time inputting data that I want to access for an extended period of time I would want it to be an open source program. That way you can always get the data out of the program again (possibly with some effort) and you are not stuck with regular upgrade fees for the latest version with the bug fix neeed to make it work with the latest OS version.

      But that's really a non-starter with ancestry.com, they let you export your family tree as a GEDCOM file any time you want, which is the de facto standard file format for genealogy.

  71. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by SuperSlacker64 · · Score: 2

    While this is true that one of the main purposes of the Church's work in genealogy is to perform baptisms for the dead, the way you've said it ignores a key point. The LDS (Mormon) Church's policy is to only allow baptism to be performed for the dead when a family member specifically requests it. If you are not comfortable with this, then you don't have to allow it. And PAF itself doesn't upload to the Church's main databases. FamilySearch.org and its tools can be used to locate information about ancestors, and if you want, you can only take things, and not submit additional information. Speaking as a Mormon, we don't want, nor ever have wanted, to offend anyone, either of our faith or not. And as the Church has invested lots of time and effort, we'd like to share that with anyone that would like.

  72. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gnapster · · Score: 1

    Clearly, the submitter wants to audit the code to make sure the software is not phoning home, allowing the software authors to steal his great-great-grandparents' identities.

  73. Genealogy Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not spend money on a subscription until you exhaust free resources. It should be noted, that while the amount of records being put online is growing rapidly, there are millions of records that will take decades to get online.

    Rootsweb.com is a free site. It is owned by Ancestry, but they have committed to keeping it free.

    Be careful of the Genealogy information that you find online. Of all the information that you find, there is no guarantee that it is accurate. It may be useful to point in the right direction, but whether an online source, or a book, one should always verify the information. My father sent information in to some company 25+ years ago that has since been found to be in error, and is on many CD collections and places online. I post a correction where ever I find this, but many have not gone back to check, so it keeps being perpetuated.

    The best way to start in genealogy is to record everything you know, then ask your oldest living relatives. Then start finding the records and documents to back it up.

    GRAMPS is good, they have a live CD with other offerings.

    Lifelines is console based, but is very powerful, and is still under development, and is cross platform. The reporting engine is very powerful.

    PHPGEDView is web-based and therefore cross platform.

    Whichever program you choose, make sure it can support GEDCOM (GEnealogical Data COMmunication). GEDCOM is far from perfect, but it is the standard for sharing genealogy information.

    Surname DNA studies are helpful if you run into a brick wall on the paternal line, but only if others who match your line also happen to participate. The same would go with a maternal line study. DNA leaves out all the ancestors that are not your father's direct paternal line or your mother's direct maternal line. Even if you find someone you are related to via DNA, you still have to find the documentation to figure out how. It is not as neat and clean as they make it sound, but it has it's place.

  74. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Baptisms for the dead don't happen unless a family member submits the name for that specific purpose.

    I find it humorous that people get so put off by this. If our faith is false, then nothing happens. Absolutely nothing. If our faith is true, then we believe they are given an opportunity to accept it. Nobody is forcing dead people to be Mormon. It's just silly.

    And as SuperSlacker64 points out, PAF doesn't upload. It was originally written pre-Internet. Church members use a special web portal to submit names of family members.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  75. yeah. by unity100 · · Score: 0

    murdered millions of armenians, while the entire eastern anatolia had at most 700,000 population, only a percentage of which were armenians.

    morons. you americans are really easy to fool. all it takes is a private lobbying firm spending some money into fud, and you all buy whatever you are told.

    do some research.

  76. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by nbauman · · Score: 1

    Is Tony Kushner one of your detractors? I thought Angels in America gave a pretty sympathetic view of Mormons, and even some Mormons agree. http://www.unc.edu/~jcduffy/angels.pdf

  77. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by jcaldwel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Baptisms for the dead don't happen unless a family member submits the name for that specific purpose.

    Not true. Historically the Mormon church does them for anyone they have genealogy details. They came under a lot of controversy in the recent past by doing baptisms for Jewish people killed in the Holocaust.

  78. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Monchanger · · Score: 1

    Given no argument was stated on why you shouldn't want open source genealogical software, no, the question was not legitimate.

    Are you planning on modifying the code or examining the source somehow? If not, then why would you want it to be open source?

    This betrays a lack of understanding of why, all other things being equal, open source is a superior choice (and for many, still the better choice given only a somewhat inferior enough piece of software). For that reason, the AC should not be responding to this topic, but doing their homework on why those of us who do use open source make that choice.

  79. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by dargaud · · Score: 2

    This 'baptism for the dead' thing annoys me for one reason: If I have an offspring who, long after I'm dead, adheres to the LDS and wants to baptise me, he can. And that something I do not want. Maybe there's a way to opt out while I'm still alive, but if I wanted to be a mormon, I would. And I don't.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  80. Not Open-source but still a type of solution by Hucko · · Score: 1

    What about Personalbrain? It is a multi level mind-mapping software, which is flexible enough to be used for a graphical tree of the family. Doesn't have the genealogy stuff built in but makes it easier to do funny and interesting anecdotes if you are trying to put together a living memory family history. 'course in that case you could also just use freemind for purely in OSS. Genealogy is hard and lengthy. 4 days to do it? eep.

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  81. Mormons by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Mormons have a powerful religious incentive to discover the complete family trees of everyone, because, IIRC, Mormons believe in baptising the dead so they can also go to Heaven. Makes no difference to me (I'm not especially interested in either LDS or genealogy), but they have amassed a great deal of archival information, and also have some pretty fair software for free.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
    1. Re:Mormons by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

      I think this misses the larger point in part. I'm a geek, and a coder, and a Mormon too. There is a much more fundamental philosophy held by the Mormons, for which the practice of proxy baptisms, is easily the most sensational lightning rod of amusement/ridicule/fillin-your-adjective here.

      The philosophy is founded in a belief/concern regarding Malachi 4:6.

      "And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse."

      It plays very prominently, repeatedly, in the original Joseph Smith experience. You may disagree with them on the details, but the ultimate goal is to get families, across generations coupled more tightly. It plays out in their emphasis on strong families, emphasis on cross-generation relationships, doctrine about life-after-death, various ordinances/rites which reinforce. Genealogy is far from just "get your dead relatives dunked", it's really about getting to know your forefathers, getting to appreciate them.

      --
      One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
  82. ctp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i agree with those on the mormons option. PAF has been pretty easy to use.

    for help with running under WINE - http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=1706

  83. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gd2shoe · · Score: 2
    That author's not biased. Not at all. No sir, not one bit...

    The wrongful baptism of Jewish dead, which disparages the memory of a deceased person is a brazen act which will obscure the historical record for future generations... We will continue opposing this wrongful act which assimilates our dead to the point where it will not be possible to know who was Jewish in their lifetimes.

    ...

    A commentator on this topic said that anti-Semites who desecrate Jewish cemeteries want to destroy even the memory of Jews by breaking their tombstones and other symbols whereby we honor and remember them. He concluded that baptism of the Jewish dead is just a more sophisticated form of breaking tombstones.

    I'd call him an idiot, but I don't think he is. Though his argument lacks all merit, it skillfully manipulates emotion and fights to demonize his admitted adversary. No, I don't believe he's an idiot. I think he's a troll. It's either that, or he pays a lot of attention to them.

    Have mistakes been made?* Sure. The only side effects are some accidentally bruised egos and extra ammunition for Mormon haters. Has history been revised? That's ridiculous to the extreme. Nobody's going to claim holocaust victims were Mormon because of vicarious work. Are we going to claim 15th century nobility were Mormon because their work has been done? How about signers of the American Declaration of Independence? What about census records? Do they think that we'll eventually revise history to say that the entire US was Mormon in the 1900's? Will we ever be able to say that every immigrant through Ellis Island was Mormon?

    There is no way to look at this that doesn't quickly devolve into the absurd.

    *(From published records which shouldn't have been used in the first place. PAF doesn't phone-home or any such.)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  84. GenoPro by edibobb · · Score: 1

    GenoPro is not open source, but it's the best I've found.

  85. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Do you believe that death is the end of existence?

    Here's the dilemma: If death is truly the end, you won't be uncomfortable with it in the least. You'll be dead and gone. If your consciousness persists, then maybe you'll decide to change your mind at some point. That is what vicarious work is all about, after all. We don't believe that such baptisms are binding, or that most dead accept them. Until they're accepted on the other side, they remain null and void.

    If you believe you're already heaven bound (and I won't dispute the point), then you'll just need to become a guardian angel to protect your progeny from those dastardly Mormons. ;)

    (Such opt-out programs might conceivably exist in the future, but I doubt it.)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  86. Depends on what you're looking for by serutan · · Score: 1

    Are you mainly looking for software to catalog your family history or software to search out your ancestry?

    My wife is a long-time user of Family Tree Maker (which is sold by Ancestry.com) to compile her mother's voluminous genealogical research. From what I've seen of the Family Tree Maker software it seems pretty robust. I know it can generate Word docs and interact with other software. Sorry to hear that Ancestry.com's research feature seems like a ripoff, but I don't think you should judge Family Tree Maker by that. The idea of most genealogy software is to organize and display your family history, not to discover it for you. That kind of research tends to involve using a wide variety of resources that haven't been digitized yet.

  87. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    (I haven't seen the movie. I have no reason nor desire to.)

    Is Tony Kushner one of your detractors?

    From that write-up, it sounds like it. Maybe he see's himself as teasing the church on a principle where he disagrees? It's still a rebuke, and one that comes across as unfriendly.

    Frankly, it sounds like a play/film about Mormon characters in a decidedly non-mormon universe. Based on this second-hand report, it doesn't even attempt a farcical interpretation of Mormon views. (God, Angels, Devil, Heaven, and Hell all sound more Protestant than Mormon.)

    Angels in America—first the play and now the film—is going to be a significant source for how non-Mormons visualize Mormons (much as Fiddler on the Roof is a significant source for how Mormons visualize Jews)... The fact that Kushner finds much about Mormon beliefs and politics abhorrent makes it all the more striking that he found Mormon motifs worthy to be woven into his postmodern mythology.

    "Like it or not..." Not. That's going to be clear, and probably close to unanimous. Frankly, I have no desire to be "visualized" by a vast, vast majority of Mormon produced films. "Abhorrent"? Why would I want people judging me by a film produced by this kind of person?

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  88. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And if you have offspring who, long after you're dead, offer sacrifices and prayers to Moloch in your name, they can. Welcome to America! We have freedom of speech and religion here.

  89. Why not a Git-backed wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the genealogy programs are basically hypertext databases, and some of them allow arbitrary text to be added, but most of them are very constraining to some extent or another. Why not just sidestep it and and use a wiki stored in a git repository. That way, you can share it with your geekier relatives, and you're not limited to what kind of documents or structure you use. You could indicate the strength of evidence for different possible connections between two people for example.

  90. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by hebertrich · · Score: 2

    BTW the wife which is a most serious genealogist ( 55000 people in her tree ) and has documents and photos or paintings for most of them received a lot of help from the LDS centers.Whether you share their ideals and ideas is besides the point.Their research units are fantastic we have been to 2. They welcome genealogists from all over and from all confessions. And before you ask i'm a an atheist without ties to LDS.

  91. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why can't any discussion here happen without people talking about their invisible friends.

    It's exhausting for us people without delusions.

  92. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting that there are concepts of afterlife which are not in any way related to the Christian/Mormon concept of the afterlife.

    Your point does stand, in that if I were to believe that the soul would float around for 42 days before it finds another host and I am reincarnated, then it really doesn't matter if 100 years from now my great-grandchildren decide to hold a baptism for me. Buddhism may be a bad example, here, but there are faiths which believe that you only get one go at this world, then your soul/spirit moves on to the next world where it continues to do the work it needs to do... and some of those faiths are wholly incompatible with the notion of going to heaven, and would probably be offended by the idea that my kids were performing a baptism for me.

    (and no, I'm not here to start an argument. my personal take on the question is simple: believe whatever sits well with your conscience, and as long as you're not harming anybody (including animals/the natural world around us), I don't really care. It won't affect me, or the practice of my beliefs.. though I would point out that I consider evangelism to be harming somebody... if a person wants to learn about your faith, they're quite capable of approaching you to do so. in trying to teach somebody who doesn't want to, or isn't ready to learn, you're doing them a great harm)

  93. trees you say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best software to organize tree structured documents I know is Emacs' Org-mode. Neither bells nor whistles just pure usability. http://orgmode.org/

  94. free dutch genealogy software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You could try aldfaer.nl. The program is free and development is open to anyone. No commercial shit which you find a lot on American websites. Languages are available.

  95. PhpGedView by misfit815 · · Score: 1

    I deployed PhpGedView to a LAMP server, and have been extremely pleased with it. I'm an old MS admin, who has to Google a lot to get anything running in Linux, yet I was able to get it up and running fairly quickly.

    Pros: A lot of features, not terribly buggy, easy install, and - most importantly - since it's a site, it's multi-user.
    Cons: There are a few quirks to the interface, but once you get a feel for it, I think it's fine.

    --
    Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
  96. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by micheas · · Score: 2

    Clearly, the submitter wants to audit the code to make sure the software is not phoning home, allowing the software authors to steal his great-great-grandparents' identities.

    Mothers maiden name is a common security question.

    Trojaned Genealogy software could help with that aspect of identity theft.

  97. GRAMPS, TRIBALPAGES.COM by jaq1an · · Score: 1

    1). GRAMPS is the only real OpenSource genealogy software, everything else is out-of-date and crap. If you used any other software like FamilyTreeMaker before it takes a little getting used to but great software. 2). TribalPages.com is a good site that for $20 will create reports/family tress that you can download as a *.pdf. All the work on Ancestry should not be in vain. Export your family tree as a *.GEDCOM file and can be imported into GRAMPS or other sites. Bit of advice stay away from GENI.com as once someone connects their tree to yours you NO LONGER CONTROL THE DATA and cannot delete the tree.

  98. GRAMPS Now Portable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gramps, mentioned above, is now also available as a portable app. So if you're using Windows you can take this with you on a USB drive.

    "...Gramps Portable 3.2.5 has been released. Gramps is a genealogy program that is both intuitive for hobbyists and feature-complete for professional genealogists... It's packaged in PortableApps.com Format so it can easily integrate with the PortableApps.com Suite. And it's open source and completely free." (http://portableapps.com/news/2010-12-10_-_gramps_portable_3.2.5)

  99. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That author's not biased. Not at all. No sir, not one bit...

    LOL - neither are you. ;-)

  100. GenealogyJ by fragus · · Score: 1

    GenealogyJ can be found at: http://genj.sourceforge.net/ This free software works on Linux, Windows, Mac. It supports the Gedcom standard.

  101. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That AC sounds like a bastard love-child of unity100 and Khyber who was touched in a no-no place by commodore64_love

  102. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Baptism for the dead? I've never heard of this, it sounds silly. So, do they offer communion for the dead, too?

    Evil-X just converted to Mormonism. Sheesh, sounds like the perfect religion for her.

    *shakes head*

  103. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by spikenerd · · Score: 1

    Open source protects one's time investment. If you are going to spend your valuable time learning to use some software, do you really want the organization that developed it to have the power to say "now you must pay us money to continue using your own skills, or to get newer features, or to use it on a new platform, or to integrate with some service, etc."? Long ago, I helped to develop the software that eventually became PAF, and I will tell you not to use it. Why? Because it has been abandoned. I have the source code, but I cannot legally distribute it, nor can I add new features or fix all the problems that bother me with it. I've tried to persuade them to let me, but there is way too much red tape. Any time spent learning to use PAF or any other proprietary software is time spent chaining yourself to the whims of an organization that will certainly have different priorities than you. No, don't use some polished-up proprietary piece of software. Spend your time learning an open source product. Even if you learn software of lesser quality, at least you develop a talent that fully belongs to you.

  104. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

    Bearing in mind that religions usually prefer their own version of events and therefore debunk all other religions, it doesn't matter if a non-Mormon is baptised in death as the baptism literally has no effect. If it did have an effect, it would mean that Mormonism is the right religion, as was said in South Park - The Movie, and the person who was baptised would be redeemed.

    However, as it's all rubbish, it is fair to say that people can do what they like with no effect whatsoever. If someone tells you to "go to hell" do you take it literally? If so, perhaps a reality check is in order.

    Slightly off-topic, I always wondered why some religions insist upon sending people around to spread the word of the Lord. If the Lord is omnipotent and people receive a 'calling' why is it that this cannot always be delivered directly? I find myself faced with such ‘postal workers’ who deliver the message of the Lord to me – how do I qualify for direct delivery – a firmware upgrade perhaps? Or is it a bandwidth issue?

  105. Doing it wrong by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    I'm looking to build a family tree for a holiday gift. Do the Slashdotters of the world have any recommendations on open source genealogy software? I did try a 14-day free trial of Ancestry.com. What a scam! I submitted the personal information for my parents, grandparents, and me. Then, I received a pop-up telling me that if I would like to get information on my family, I would have to upgrade my subscription for $29.95 U.S. So, I took the chance. Turns out that the only information they had was my previous addresses for the past 20 years.

    If you are paying for Ancestry and it does not have any information on your family except previous addresses for the past 20 years, then you're not doing your research properly (or you don't live in the US, UK, or a couple other countries).

    At a minimum, they have basically every birth record in the US for who knows how long. You should have at least been able to find that. Then, if you're including anyone who lived in the United States in 1930 or prior to that, then you can also find all federal census records showing siblings, ages, race, frequently the type of job the person had, parents or parents' nation/state of birth, etc.

    I could go on about it (Ancestry has been so helpful to me and others I know), but the long and short of it is, if you're doing a family tree, you paid Ancestry, and can only find residence locations, then you're either (1) not in the US; (2) the first immigrant to the US from your family; or (3) not doing it right. Considering Ancestry had your residence locations, it's most likely (3).

    Well, I suppose there's a fourth: you've already got an encyclopedic knowledge of your family history, so no amount of research would turn up anything new.

    In fact, I'll go so far as to say that if you want my help during your 14-day trial, OP (or anyone else w/Ancestry), respond to this message or email me at ancestrymasterman@gmail.com (new semi-throwaway email addy).

  106. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, don't delude yourself in believing that you have no delusions...

  107. tried a few.... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    but i didn't like their interface's or they had issues with the database size i needed....
    i settled on Legacy for a while, and now use FTM.

    i've been a member of Ancestry.com for about 4-5 years now and haven't found any other site which allows access to so many resources.
    my parents divorces when i was 3 and i hardly knew anything about my father's family's history....

    through Ancestry.com i was able to track back to ireland in the 1800's, found my 3rd great-grandfather's naturalization papers, and found distant cousins living a few miles away i'd never known about.

    i am not a mormon, but i have found them (as a rule) to be generous, helpful and not at all preachy, no one has tried to convert me to "the dark side" (which was a concern when i first got involved in my searching...)

    i'm a recovering cathoholic, my family has all already been baptised in the catholic church, if the mormons want to do any baptising, eh... let 'em, it's not my belief, it's not my family's belief, so it doesn't matter what they believe *shrug* and it shouldn't matter to anyone else.

    *also*

    the mormon church sent missionaries out to pretty much every country on the planet to gather historical records, and they were doing this a hundred years ago.... and continue today, they are probably the single greatest resource for genealogical information out there.

    you have to take what you find on ancestry.com with a grain of salt (if posted by other members) and you have to be careful searching the records and documents, but if you're smart and careful, you can find an immense amount of history.

  108. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody is without bias, if they claim to be they are lying!

  109. Re:Ask the Mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    familysearch.org is definitely a solid resource, and you should be able to download and use the latest version of the Personal Ancestry File (PAF) software free of charge.

  110. A little late in the game by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    It's a little late in the year to be putting a tree together. It sounds like you're underestimating the time required to do the work. Also, the software you're using has nothing to do with it. The best software for you to use right now is a plain old text editor. Genealogy software isn't going to make things any easier when you're just starting out. When you *do* start putting the data together, just make sure you can export to GEDCOM. It's far from perfect as a file format, but it's universally used and will serve your needs until you start getting over 100 names. Only then start thinking about committing to a piece of software. It's hard to switch later.

    Like others have said, go find a FamilySearch center https://library.familysearch.org/ and get some help. They're very nice.

    And if you didn't get information from ancestry.com, you're doing it wrong. It's a very good site. You should think twice before you disparage a website you had very little time with.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  111. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    I'm an atheist (= "without religion," not "anti-religion") and you're more than welcome to baptize me when I'm dead. In fact, I'd prefer that to having your missionaries knocking on my door. I'm also quite happy for the Navajos to make sand paintings for me when I'm dead, and for fire departments to erect crossed ladders.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  112. GenJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of the best packages I've ever used.

    http://genj.sourceforge.net/

  113. Life Lines by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I would check out life lines. If I remember correctly it has a slightly steep learning curve, but it's very powerful. It saves the info in an open format called GEDCOM and can generate some really nice output with family trees and family histories. I used it a while ago and have always wanted to go back and really flesh out my family tree.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  114. PHPGedView by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    I've been using PHPGedView for years. Slick interface. GEDCOM export. Unfortunately, the script keeps getting flagged as a trojan.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  115. Pay some money, do it right by pgdave · · Score: 1

    Forget the holiday gift. You can't do genealogy quickly. (or do it for next year, or 20 years after that). Ancestry is very useful, but it's not genealogy software - they're much more useful for the information in their databases. But the info in their databases will cover your great grandfather, not your recent relatives.. If you want open source, then GRAMPS is pretty good, but falls flat on large files. It's rather complicated, too. If you want free, then PAF from familysearch.com is OK, but legacy free version is better. If you want to do genealogy seriously, then pay some money. Rootsmagic is way better than all the above, and only costs 30 dollars, worth every cent. Legacy paid version is pretty good too.

  116. Two Questions in One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi there

    When looking at tools to build a family tree as a holiday gift, there are two types of tools you need. One is a resource for finding genealogy information (the good stuff that fills in the tree), and the other is a resource for printing out your tree and displaying it nicely.

    In terms of online resources for genealogy, my favorites have always been www.rootsweb.com and www.cyndislist.com. I did Ancestry.com for awhile but that was because there were some deep collections that they have that I don't. But for a beginner, I would try rootsweb or cyndislist.

    Other posters are correct that the best starting point is your family. They can give you names of people, even an estimate of dates is better than searching blindly. I didn't do that as often as I should have, so I wound up searching more than I needed to. If your ancestors are immigrants through Ellis Island, tracking down that information is a great treat to share with the family.

    In terms of apps for genealogy, my favorite is Reunion. They have a beautiful iPad app, and their print out options are very nice. Also consider just doing your own design for the family tree -- I still have some handwritten family charts from my ancestors, they are very nice to keep.

    Genealogy is slow going, don't get your hopes too high.

    I'm not an Anonymous Coward, just tired of registering everywhere.... :)

  117. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say it's *all* rubbish, just that it's an assertion which, by definition, can't be proven. At least, not to the satisfaction of the sceptics.

    If somebody tells you to go to Hell, you could always take them literally and ask if they're willing to pay for your trip to Norway

    As for the upgrades so he can talk to you directly? Maybe you need to plant a bush in your front yard, so he can set it on fire?

  118. You used Ancestry.com wrong by sshirley · · Score: 1

    Yes, seriously. Most vital records have a privacy policy where they can't be searched for a certain period of time. The U.S. Census isn't available for 72 years for example. The 1940 census will be available in 2012. Vital records (births, deaths, marriages) have similar periods. I mean, you can go to the vital records department of any state and get your own but you can't get other people's. What Ancestry.com has is what is PUBLICALLY available. So you wouldn't find much for yourself or even your parents. Grandparents is even a stretch unless they are sufficiently old (80+ years). Great-grandparents and back, you should have much better luck. I've been using Ancestry for years and it's a great service. Like most computer systems, you have to know HOW to use it. It's not going to blink neon letters on the screen and tell you everything you wanted to know. :-)

  119. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think as baptisms for the dead as more like opening a door. You still have the choice, in the next life, to step through it.

  120. Try TNG by Bob+Fornal · · Score: 1

    I've used TNG as my primary source for working on my family tree for years. It's not open source; there is a cost, but it is worth the MINIMAL cost and is an incredible tool. http://lythgoes.net/genealogy/software.php

  121. What is all the fuss about? by doodlebumm · · Score: 1

    One of the things that most interests me in this type of discussion is the fear that people have of Mormon baptism for the dead. Let's look at this for a second. If the Mormons are right (God exists and accepts that baptism for entrance into "heaven"), then the baptism might be helpful (if the dead person accepts the baptism). If the Mormons are wrong, then what harm did it do the dead person? It certainly can't condemn them (since they weren't involved). So the fact is - it is either valuable, or inconsequential. There is NO other possibility. So I ask, why all the fuss? Really!!

  122. Legacy Family Tree by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

    This isn't open-source, but it is free (standard version): Legacy Family Tree. I used that and eventually upgraded to the deluxe since it's only about $30 USD. Yes, it's from LDS. You get a lot of choice to customize things to your taste--a really serious amount of options. One thing I really like is it will warn you if you put in a county that didn't exist during the year in question (and will tell if what year it came into existence.) Also has some nice defaults, like marking someone as deceased if say, they were born in 1830, if you forget. You can turn these on and off. But what's really nice is the reporting features (may be in the deluxe only) that nicely put the information together in a story-styled book. You can also make wall charts (although they usually get too complicated in large families so it's easier to do the book.) The deluxe version also gives you access to the databases which makes it easy to research straight from the program, although from what I can see, most are available anyway from your browser.

    Check out what's online for free before you jump in and pay. You can also get a lot of free access to Ancestry.com and other paid sites from the library. I did end up joining Ancestry because, while you can add your tree for free and you can get access to documents via the library, the one thing you can't do is contact a member (which you may want to do if you have questions or find a second cousin.) Libraries are a great source of free access to sites you'd otherwise have to pay for. I second FamilySearch.org. They have a beautiful search engine and often it links to actual scanned files, not just transcribed. RootsWeb is owned by Ancestry, but provides free access to other family trees and FreeSurnameSearch is a good starting place.

    One caution--do your own research and go with scanned documents over transcriptions. You'll be amazed at how many transcriptions are wrong and how many people are sloppy and just copy what someone else has. We've got an issue in one branch where someone made statements about one ancestor being a full-blooded Indian who was adopted. All nonsense with no facts to support it, but you wouldn't believe how many people are jumping on this and adding it to their trees.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  123. Good resources by ColoradoDon · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to speak to the open source applications. Instead, I'll point out a couple of resources.

    First of all, ancestry.com is definitely costly, but at the same time, it can be free. Go to your local library and they will likely have a subscription to ancestry.com that you can use. My local library also has HeritageQuest ( ) available on their website.

    Dick Eastman ( ) has a fantastic blog about Genealogy and technology. He is technically literate and is constantly reviewing various genealogy programs.

    You may not believe it, but Google Books is also another great genealogy site. I've found several books there that specifically address family lines of mine and gave me context of the area where my family lived.

    Plenty of people have already mentioned the Mormons. Definitely make use of them.

    One thing you should know about genealogy. While a ton of information is on the web now, it is only a drop in the bucket. To really understand your history, be ready to spend time in libraries, county courthouses, and talking to family. The reason groups like Ancestry charge money is to help defray the costs of continuing to digitize paper records as well as to further application development.

    Final tips - cite your sources, keep tons of notes about where you found information, and spend time with family.

  124. Charts by Merdalors · · Score: 1

    If you're going to use the free Personal Ancestral File, don't forget PAF Companion for neat charts & reports.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  125. Ancestry dot com by nblender · · Score: 1

    My wife is doing my family history as well as hers... All of my history is in europe and most of hers is.. She's been able to find some helpful information through ancestry but in my opinion, not enough to justify the cost. Fortunately, the local public library has Ancestry.com accounts so if you go to the library and use their computers, you can camp on ancestry all day long... The librarian has to come over and log you in but one day the librarian was busy and recognized my wife, so wrote the username/password on a sticky note and handed it to my wife. My wife logged in with it and used it. Later that day she tried the username/password at home and it didn't work... Next time she went to the library, she brought her laptop and tried the username/password there and it worked... So they've got some sort of IP block or something associated with the library... So now she drags her laptop down there, uses Ancestry, print's info to PDF files and brings them home to print them out...

    Just a thought.

  126. Re:Why is OSS A Criteria? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    I'm an atheist (= "without religion," not "anti-religion")

    I get the distinction. I wish you didn't need to preface your remarks as such, but there are bigots on both sides of the issue (unfortunately).

    In fact, I'd prefer that to having your missionaries knocking on my door.

    Sorry for the inconvenience. It should be suitably rare, at reasonable hours, and they should leave promptly when you tell them: "not interested". Otherwise, you should feel free to tell them they're doing more harm than good.

    I'm also quite happy for the Navajos to make sand paintings for me when I'm dead, and for fire departments to erect crossed ladders.

    Me too. Sounds like fun... On second thought, I'd rather not die in such a way that gets the fire department's undivided attention like that!

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  127. Who cares? by pavon · · Score: 1

    Some people might perform a ritual for my relatives that makes them feel better and doesn't hurt anyone? That must be stopped! Seriously, how is that any different from christian relatives praying that I will go return to the church, or the Navajo folks performing a traditional blessing to protect our school group from harm when we went out of town? It is harmless.

  128. Geneaology software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints provides a very well done software package. It also provides a massive store of records which can allow you to cover all of your genealogical ancestry needs.

    It's free to any one to use.

    They have hundreds of thousands of individuals indexing birth, death, christening, records from all over the world. You won't find a finer offering. It is part of the requirements for their members to create a full ancestry for all of their posterity.

    http://new.familysearch.org/
    http://indexing.familysearch.org./

  129. GRAMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go get GRAMPS -- http://gramps-project.org/

    Builds for a bunch of common distros and Windows builds too.

        - pascal