And "in theory" cheaper, more compact(not much), more reliable(from the seldom snafu putting a proc in or mounting a heatsink), in addition to being potentially faster
Not that I am advocating kindles, but the cheapest kindle is I think $79 now, the price of perhaps 5-6 new books. If the pricing of books shifts to favor the reader with amazons efforts then the kindle would pay for itself. There are trade offs of course, such as not have physical copies, but you also have your entire library with you.
I use ancestry.com from time to time, it is best used for researching your ancestors, by which I mean those non living. The US census data is delayed by ~70 years so very little info on anything in the past 70 years will come up. I have been able to track back to 1500 AD on several ancestors on both sides of my family in ancestry. In my experience census data is key, and maiden names, you will notice that it will quickly become impossible to determine maternal ancestry past a certain point.
your arguement only holds true for any event where the artist/host venue is not hoping to make the real profit on the alcohol, food, and souvenirs. The people who originally sell the tickets make money off of the greatest number of people entering their event, scalper sell tickets at an artificially inflated price, that not as many people are willing to pay, nd the original seller in the worse off for it for making the investment in the venue and performers in the first place.
Necessity is the mother of invention. Our race will at some point in the future develop a source of energy that makes what we can produce today trivial so that we can manufacture whatever type of substance we need. Until that happens they may be wars for resources, countries may be wiped out merely for their natural resources. Even past that point, our ability to produce relatively huge amounts of energy from some future technology will cease and the cycle may repeat itself.
I foresee that in the very distant future our descendants will have the technology to build stars for energy, an extremely refined fusion technology or some tech that is centuries/millenniums beyond our current capabilities. The rate of growth of our technology is at least directly proportional to the rate of growth of our population, the more people that are alive the more opportunities that exist for discovery and advancement.
Humans will survive to some extent short of some intentional trying cause extinction or a planet leveling event. Our numbers may greatly decrease but as long as we can produce energy we can create the conditions however limited to carry on.
Microsoft and Apple have market caps something like 220 and 260 Billion respectively, and apple looks to have made profits in excess of 15 billion in just the last 2 years, http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/20results.html. This could just be Adobe trying to spark an interest in Apple to look into buying them. I think that it would have some potentially positive effects, mostly that there would be the king of creative production suites. However, flash would most certainly be killed off which can be taken different ways depending on you camp. If MS acquired Adobe there is again potential for a comprehensive software suite, gosh I wish you could merge acrobat and word.
Self-indulgent, possibly in certain respects, religious zealot, nope. I do not understand how this has become a matter of 'peer pressure' for you. I have taken fire from people who are very similar to yourself it seems, since I first got a mac for myself. If I conformed to what you think of me then I should be using windows 7 if I was going for 'peer approval' that is. Using macs for my family makes my life easier(and my family's).
Now I'll add to the fire, I use and iphone(big surprise, I know) have an iPad and use an airport extreme. In many respect Apple products make my life easier, but I'm not so naive as to not recognize their limitations.
My router to the internet is a wrt54g with ddwrt, I only use the aebs as an access point and to use time machine wirelessly. Back to the self indulgent remark, yes I spent a nice bit on my mbp, but there is no way in hell would I pay for another mac just to use it as a htpc. I use ubuntu and boxee(i
I did not force anyone to purchase a mac, I moved them to what was an easier to use system for them and easier to maintain for me, I did not want to have to learn a new operating system just so that I can support other people. I have setup a system that requires virtually no maintenance short of hardware failures(yes my mac is not indestructible, apple's superdrives in the early mbps are shit).
This is not a perfect system, there isn't one but this is the best I have come up with for my family.
I suppose one could argue that the only reason that heart disease is above cancer on the list is because we are 'curing' cancer in enough people now that their hearts are giving out before cancer rears its ugly head again. I have no number in front of me so that is just speculation.
To build upon the post above mine, something has to kill us or rather something has to wear out. I imagine that if treating cancer becomes a semi-trivial procedure and people start taking better care of their hearts then all the research is going to go into brain disease. Eventually we will have a increasingly large elderly population that is mentally incapable of taking care of them selves, based on my family history the only thing I have going for me is that the men die ahead of the women but if I do live long enough I get to look forward to Alzheimer's, but i cant quite remember how long that is.
Not that I would expect any less from this crowd (myself and virtually every one I know included), it seems that every family, sometimes it rolls over to aunts/uncles, grandparents, cousins, too, has an computer person in their family who has almost complete power over what computer they will be using because thy do not know anything about it. Perhaps instead of marketing to the individual with the 'i created windows' shit, they should have aimed towards the family IT guys with something that makes their lives easier. Myself and my cousin told our families that we would not support them if they used windows, so now all of our family members use macs and the only issues I have are helping them figure out how to use MS office. Like previous commenters have said that they did not want to support multiple operating systems, I certain was not going to learn the quirks of 7 just for my family.
So there is a shittier ISP than AT&T, i can get either 200 MB for $15 or 2 GB for $25 wirelessly. I understand using less than 200 MB on a cell phone plan, but with multimedia all the shit that you have to deal with on sites these days it is fucking insane to think that 200 MB is enough, software updates alone just for windows or mac I am sure exceed that on a monthly basis.
It does do a good job of playing most everything, retrieving media info from online and is easily controlled from android/iphone with the free app-no more lost remotes;)
the Boxee box: http://www.boxee.tv/box is perfect for you, although it wont be here till November. I also have an ubuntu server with a few terabytes of media that I have the exact same problem with, so I am anxiously awaiting for the release of the Boxee box. Im running boxee(which I love) on my ubuntu box fyi, but again basically the same deal as you.
In reality it needs to be at no more than 1/18 to be sure, 1 defendant, 12 jury, 2 lawyers(minimum if not defending yourself), 1 judge, 1 bailiff, 1 of those people who records everything said, and usually some spectators. At 1/13 there must be at least a co-conspiritor in the room!
Well, that was the first thing that came to mind, but on second thought this would be awesome in smart phones, assuming the power reqs are low enough. Not that the flash memory in smartphones is that slow(relatively speaking), but I am sure that somebody on/. can find a reason to justify why they should be as fast as SSDs. Or really, start putting esata on all computers or put a usb 3.0 controller on this thing and we might actually have a use for usb 3.0
Im an engineer, i suck at bio so excuse my assumptions and lack ok knowledge. I believe I am correct (more or less) in saying that the genetic code for the brain is 'compressed' already and expands via creating proteins and some physical processes that ultimately create the brain. So not only is are the 'blueprints' to our brain already compressed, when expanded it requires trillions of times more physical space to completely 'unpack', by this I mean 23 pairs of chromosomes versus the physical size of the brain. So very optimistically, lets say we can bring that code to build the brain down to 100 MB, your still looking at in excess of 100TB of space needed for it to expand to and all be accessible at the same time to run. This is all apples to orange so even my analysis could be grossly wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
And "in theory" cheaper, more compact(not much), more reliable(from the seldom snafu putting a proc in or mounting a heatsink), in addition to being potentially faster
--
lazy
Sent from my iPhone
'when' is not
Not that I am advocating kindles, but the cheapest kindle is I think $79 now, the price of perhaps 5-6 new books. If the pricing of books shifts to favor the reader with amazons efforts then the kindle would pay for itself. There are trade offs of course, such as not have physical copies, but you also have your entire library with you.
Geiger counters do detect ionizing radiation, but do not differentiate between isotopes, hence they are not useful for spectrometry.
I use ancestry.com from time to time, it is best used for researching your ancestors, by which I mean those non living. The US census data is delayed by ~70 years so very little info on anything in the past 70 years will come up. I have been able to track back to 1500 AD on several ancestors on both sides of my family in ancestry. In my experience census data is key, and maiden names, you will notice that it will quickly become impossible to determine maternal ancestry past a certain point.
your arguement only holds true for any event where the artist/host venue is not hoping to make the real profit on the alcohol, food, and souvenirs. The people who originally sell the tickets make money off of the greatest number of people entering their event, scalper sell tickets at an artificially inflated price, that not as many people are willing to pay, nd the original seller in the worse off for it for making the investment in the venue and performers in the first place.
Im playing a flash on my laptop right now and its running just fine, TFA is a conspiracy by Steve Jo
Thank god that human females cant do this yet, otherwise none of the lucky few on here would ever get laid.
Necessity is the mother of invention. Our race will at some point in the future develop a source of energy that makes what we can produce today trivial so that we can manufacture whatever type of substance we need. Until that happens they may be wars for resources, countries may be wiped out merely for their natural resources. Even past that point, our ability to produce relatively huge amounts of energy from some future technology will cease and the cycle may repeat itself.
I foresee that in the very distant future our descendants will have the technology to build stars for energy, an extremely refined fusion technology or some tech that is centuries/millenniums beyond our current capabilities. The rate of growth of our technology is at least directly proportional to the rate of growth of our population, the more people that are alive the more opportunities that exist for discovery and advancement.
Humans will survive to some extent short of some intentional trying cause extinction or a planet leveling event. Our numbers may greatly decrease but as long as we can produce energy we can create the conditions however limited to carry on.
ipad = 6 months barely, I agree with coldwetdog while still sharing the sentiments of JonySuede.
Microsoft and Apple have market caps something like 220 and 260 Billion respectively, and apple looks to have made profits in excess of 15 billion in just the last 2 years, http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/20results.html. This could just be Adobe trying to spark an interest in Apple to look into buying them. I think that it would have some potentially positive effects, mostly that there would be the king of creative production suites. However, flash would most certainly be killed off which can be taken different ways depending on you camp. If MS acquired Adobe there is again potential for a comprehensive software suite, gosh I wish you could merge acrobat and word.
Self-indulgent, possibly in certain respects, religious zealot, nope. I do not understand how this has become a matter of 'peer pressure' for you. I have taken fire from people who are very similar to yourself it seems, since I first got a mac for myself. If I conformed to what you think of me then I should be using windows 7 if I was going for 'peer approval' that is. Using macs for my family makes my life easier(and my family's).
Now I'll add to the fire, I use and iphone(big surprise, I know) have an iPad and use an airport extreme. In many respect Apple products make my life easier, but I'm not so naive as to not recognize their limitations.
My router to the internet is a wrt54g with ddwrt, I only use the aebs as an access point and to use time machine wirelessly. Back to the self indulgent remark, yes I spent a nice bit on my mbp, but there is no way in hell would I pay for another mac just to use it as a htpc. I use ubuntu and boxee(i
I did not force anyone to purchase a mac, I moved them to what was an easier to use system for them and easier to maintain for me, I did not want to have to learn a new operating system just so that I can support other people. I have setup a system that requires virtually no maintenance short of hardware failures(yes my mac is not indestructible, apple's superdrives in the early mbps are shit).
This is not a perfect system, there isn't one but this is the best I have come up with for my family.
I suppose one could argue that the only reason that heart disease is above cancer on the list is because we are 'curing' cancer in enough people now that their hearts are giving out before cancer rears its ugly head again. I have no number in front of me so that is just speculation.
To build upon the post above mine, something has to kill us or rather something has to wear out. I imagine that if treating cancer becomes a semi-trivial procedure and people start taking better care of their hearts then all the research is going to go into brain disease. Eventually we will have a increasingly large elderly population that is mentally incapable of taking care of them selves, based on my family history the only thing I have going for me is that the men die ahead of the women but if I do live long enough I get to look forward to Alzheimer's, but i cant quite remember how long that is.
Not that I would expect any less from this crowd (myself and virtually every one I know included), it seems that every family, sometimes it rolls over to aunts/uncles, grandparents, cousins, too, has an computer person in their family who has almost complete power over what computer they will be using because thy do not know anything about it. Perhaps instead of marketing to the individual with the 'i created windows' shit, they should have aimed towards the family IT guys with something that makes their lives easier. Myself and my cousin told our families that we would not support them if they used windows, so now all of our family members use macs and the only issues I have are helping them figure out how to use MS office. Like previous commenters have said that they did not want to support multiple operating systems, I certain was not going to learn the quirks of 7 just for my family.
So there is a shittier ISP than AT&T, i can get either 200 MB for $15 or 2 GB for $25 wirelessly. I understand using less than 200 MB on a cell phone plan, but with multimedia all the shit that you have to deal with on sites these days it is fucking insane to think that 200 MB is enough, software updates alone just for windows or mac I am sure exceed that on a monthly basis.
This is especially a better option for not having to test new hardware in critical systems and simply 'pressing a button' to make it faster.
It does do a good job of playing most everything, retrieving media info from online and is easily controlled from android/iphone with the free app-no more lost remotes ;)
the Boxee box: http://www.boxee.tv/box is perfect for you, although it wont be here till November. I also have an ubuntu server with a few terabytes of media that I have the exact same problem with, so I am anxiously awaiting for the release of the Boxee box. Im running boxee(which I love) on my ubuntu box fyi, but again basically the same deal as you.
I really wish slashdot would actually find articles that I did not already read about on another site some days ago
In reality it needs to be at no more than 1/18 to be sure, 1 defendant, 12 jury, 2 lawyers(minimum if not defending yourself), 1 judge, 1 bailiff, 1 of those people who records everything said, and usually some spectators. At 1/13 there must be at least a co-conspiritor in the room!
I've never heard of a more gullible group either.
Well, that was the first thing that came to mind, but on second thought this would be awesome in smart phones, assuming the power reqs are low enough. Not that the flash memory in smartphones is that slow(relatively speaking), but I am sure that somebody on /. can find a reason to justify why they should be as fast as SSDs. Or really, start putting esata on all computers or put a usb 3.0 controller on this thing and we might actually have a use for usb 3.0
Im an engineer, i suck at bio so excuse my assumptions and lack ok knowledge. I believe I am correct (more or less) in saying that the genetic code for the brain is 'compressed' already and expands via creating proteins and some physical processes that ultimately create the brain. So not only is are the 'blueprints' to our brain already compressed, when expanded it requires trillions of times more physical space to completely 'unpack', by this I mean 23 pairs of chromosomes versus the physical size of the brain. So very optimistically, lets say we can bring that code to build the brain down to 100 MB, your still looking at in excess of 100TB of space needed for it to expand to and all be accessible at the same time to run. This is all apples to orange so even my analysis could be grossly wrong.