Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Firm Proposes City Buildings On Rails

Lanxon writes "A Swedish architecture firm that came up with a plan to roll buildings through a city on rails has won third prize in a competition to develop the Norwegian city of Åndalsnes. The company, Jagnafalt Milton, suggested that existing and new railroads could be built to provide the base for buildings that could be positioned differently depending on the seasons and on the weather. It proposed designs for rail-mounted single- and double-berth cabins, along with a two-story suite, reports Wired."

223 comments

  1. Like birds by devxo · · Score: 3, Funny

    This also means that cities could just move south when the winter comes. It's not like some roadblock is going to do much when a whole city rolls in.

    1. Re:Like birds by gclef · · Score: 4, Funny

      I feel sorry for the mailmen in that town. (Wait, wasn't there a building here yesterday?)

    2. Re:Like birds by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Its only to move buildings around within a city, so I can't see much if any advantages to being in the weather on one side of town as opposed to the other. TFA says its because the city has different needs during the winter and the summer, but are tourists sleeping rough now for lack of accommodation? I can't come up with any reason why you'd want to do this at all, in fact, except for the awesome factor, which is lets face it, all the reason you need. I think Michael Moorcock had a great story where there was a city that rolled around the world continuously as part of his Elric series, the name escapes me now though.

    3. Re:Like birds by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's like how you torture blind people by moving all the furniture around.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    4. Re:Like birds by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      Humor aside, it's not that big a problem. You could just use a PO Box system. Mail gets puts in the same box everyday at a local post office, and the owners go to get it. Or simply number buildings per track. Address might read "Reading line, bldg 42" with that number clearly printed on the outside. In the US, mail routinely gets delivered to houses whose addresses include directions, like "go about 4 miles after the paved road ends and turn left at the crick."

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:Like birds by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      "... if you hear banjo music, you've gone too far."

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    6. Re:Like birds by SnarfQuest · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine the new ways people would live, and be shown on TV...

      You come home from vacation, only to find out that your house has already gone south for the winter?

      Your wife gets mad at you, and instead of throwing your clothes out in the front yard, moves the house without telling you.

      Two neighbors start fueding, and instead of a fistfight, start bashing their houses into each other.

      Survivor (what's it up to now, 856?), when you get voted off, they send you away in your house, pathetically waving "bye" from your bathroom window.

      Demolition derby, using houses instead of cars.

      House racing. Imagine the high octane flames spewing out the back and sides of a house during a drag race. Or the crashes (which is the main reason most of us even bother watching NASCAR).

      You hit the mid-life crisis, sell your old house and buy a high powered two wheel house, and a toupee.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    7. Re:Like birds by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      You can do a lot with orientation ... move these houses out of the shade of that big hillside in winter when solar radiation is at its most precious, make those houses face east in the morning and west in the afternoon, put these other houses near the forested park in summer so they don't need as much air conditioning, etc.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    8. Re:Like birds by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's still a dumb (albeit cool) idea, though. You can accomplish the same thing with older technologies far more efficiently and cheaply. Houses used to be built to the east of big trees, and indeed, often in a grove of them. The leaves and shade disappear in the winter when you need the sunlight. A central fireplace served to cool the house in the summer, etc.

      I could probably heat my house all winter long with the fuel it would take to move the damned thing closer to the trees.

    9. Re:Like birds by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Hell, my whole trailer park is built on this revolutionary new principle.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Like birds by davester666 · · Score: 1

      > "... if you hear banjo music, you've gone too far."

      and you are about to be shot for trespassing.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Like birds by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Dark City
      One of the best movies of all times.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    12. Re:Like birds by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for the mailmen in that town. (Wait, wasn't there a building here yesterday?)

      Especially this one.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    13. Re:Like birds by zindorsky · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true computer scientist: One more layer of indirection will solve everything.

      --
      If the geiger counter does not click, the coffee, she is not thick.
    14. Re:Like birds by masterwit · · Score: 1

      your comment about birds made me think of Airships. Castle Wulfenback anyone? I mean it is just as impractical...see comment further down. Plus an airship would be freakin' sweet.

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    15. Re:Like birds by fedos · · Score: 1

      ... "go about 4 miles after the paved road ends and turn left at the crick."

      When you start describing your address with muscle ailments, you're in serious trouble.

    16. Re:Like birds by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I'm an intelligence analyst. I guess that makes it worse.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    17. Re:Like birds by mikael · · Score: 1

      In the 1950's, the LA building codes were set so that homes could be lifted up and transported by truck to a new location should the land be required for a freeway or widened road. Even the streetlights were designed so that they could be swung out of the way.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    18. Re:Like birds by hydertech · · Score: 1

      You'd just send stuff via "rail mail".

    19. Re:Like birds by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 2

      Sure. Owner: Hmm.... wasn't there a post office here yesterday...?

    20. Re:Like birds by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Close the doors on all the "buildings" in Rosengård and move it all to Somalia or something ..

    21. Re:Like birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His wife needs it five times a day because you have a tiny penis? I find this intriguing. Can you go into a little more depth? Feel free to spell out every little detail.

    22. Re:Like birds by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Another simple idea, have two cities.Building the same or similar buildings in two cities is going to be far far more cheap than moving the same building over the years. Heck it might even be cheaper the first time. You could rent the spare city to less wealthy people. to recoup costs.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    23. Re:Like birds by MichaelKristopeit346 · · Score: 0
      "MichaelKristopeit360" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity, and criminally defame me.

      to the individual responsible: present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i'll bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.

      you are completely pathetic.

  2. Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like one of the reject ideas for Bioshock 3

  3. jet powered by saveonweb · · Score: 1

    not a bad idea. we've seen buildings have spring base. I can finally think about owning a house on a beach during summer and on mountain in winter.

  4. Aw Crap by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Aw crap, now the extension cord won't reach!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Aw Crap by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'Crap' might be another consideration of things that no longer get to their intended destinations when buildings start moving...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:Aw Crap by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      No problem, mate. We've got a couple o' thousand feet worth the flexible 'ose 'ere, and Billy over there, he's gonna put some duct tape on the joins, and your crappers will be up and running.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  5. There was an old cartoon that had this by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't remember if it was Felix the cat or Betty Boop, but it sounds a lot like this. The buildings were all on rails and moved around as needed, and people got on a stationary "train" car while the buildings came to them in a strange inversion of normal travel methods

    1. Re:There was an old cartoon that had this by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      That's pretty cool, and the idea is certainly fascinating. I can't see how it would be workable though.

      Sure you can put those houses on rails, but now you have tiny houses and no access roads. Or - as in the cartoon you mentioned - they'd have to essentially move the houses all the time in a loop - you get off somewhere and wait as your destination comes along. That would make for very slow access, since each time someone needs to get to the platform or into a house, the whole movement would have to stop. Also very expensive since the whole mass of the town needs to be moved over it's rail system.

      Anyway, they really where thinking more along the lines of a winter/summer movement, having more hotels and shopping in town in summer and "indoor activities" (which?) and "climate shelters" (don't know what that means?) in winter. It seems easier to have multi-purpose buildings - like a mall which sets-up an ice-rink in winter. There are probably nightclubs and pubs which do less business in winter (due to lack of tourists) but it doesn't really bring an advantage to move these houses out of the town. Questionable if a nightclub would fit on rails anyway.

    2. Re:There was an old cartoon that had this by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was Betty Boop and Grampy (I have that cartoon on DVD)

    3. Re:There was an old cartoon that had this by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some coal mines used to have an elevator system that comprised of a set of elevator cabs that simply moved up and down by one level. To go down a level you just hopped on the first available cab, then get off at the floor below and repeated the process.

      I've seen office blocks which had a elevator system which was comprised of a loop of elevator boxes that travelled in a slow loop. On each floor the left cab would go up and the right cab would go down. On the top and bottom floors, the cabs would loop round. New staff would always want to see what happened after going past the top floor.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:There was an old cartoon that had this by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 1

      The buildings were all on rails and moved around as needed, and people got on a stationary "train" car while the buildings came to them in a strange inversion of normal travel methods

      That happens anyway if you believe in Einstein's Relativity theory.

  6. Wow.... by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

    DHH's ego is getting REAL big! /jk

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  7. Growth in the Information Booth Market by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    Man, that would get confusing real fast!

    Meet me at the restaurant on the corner of 5th and Main (except every other Tuesday where it's at 116th street and 22nd Ave).

    Also we're switching to metric time so meet me at 75 minutes after 2.

    Also, also, don't forget to put on concrete wheels for the rubber roads...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  8. Cue the Ruby jokes by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, those guys can do absolutely anything on rails, and I'll bet it only took a few lines of code.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

      With rails you can easily migrate your buildings.

    2. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by Steauengeglase · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is great for prototyping your city, but beware the syntactic sugar, it can gum up the line.

    3. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by calexontheroad66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does not scale.

    4. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's...

      *sigh* Okay, that was great. Well done.

    5. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Funny but accurate, just how many sidings can you create for stationary buildings and what kind of log jams happen when people who like snow head north and those who like warm head south?

    6. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you had done it with _name_you_favorite_framework_or_language_here_, a city of the size of Tokyo doesn't scale

    7. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately the city would have to be restarted every few hours....

    8. Re:Cue the Ruby jokes by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      actually, it's more like the Emerald city on rails

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  9. Trailers by OglinTatas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They could be even more flexible if everyone lived in trailers. You wouldn't have to wait for all your neighbors to move when it was time to pull up stakes, nor would you be forced to move when your neighbors get wanderlust.

    It proposed designs for rail-mounted single- and double-berth cabins,

    Make mine a double-wide.

    What is old is new again.

  10. But can it scale? by tcopeland · · Score: 1
  11. Mrecury by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2

    One proposed method of colonizing Mercury is to build a city on rails that circles the slowly-spinning planet, always staying in the shady site where temperatures are cool enough for human habitats.

    With this story, such an idea doesn't seem nearly so far-fetched.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:Mrecury by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      I cannot envision the systemwide overpopulation you'd need to be forced to colonise Mercury.

    2. Re:Mrecury by LordNacho · · Score: 1

      What do you when the union strikes?

    3. Re:Mrecury by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      I recall this idea from Kim Stanley Robinson's trilogy beginning with Red Mars , but was it already a stock concept of science fiction before Robinson?

      The terraforming idea in that trilogy that I think is even cooler is using a massive solar sail to block sunlight from hitting Venus until the atmosphere freezes, and then start work on the surface.

    4. Re:Mrecury by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      This imaginary Mrecury sounds like a great place to live. What happens when, lets say, the rail needs maintenance or is damaged and needs to be repaired? The whole population gets cooked and then new people can move in once the rail is repaired and get free fried chicken? Sounds awesome.

    5. Re:Mrecury by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Let them fry?

    6. Re:Mrecury by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Strike back - with laser satellites.

    7. Re:Mrecury by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      Why rails instead of caterpillar tracks? A rail line circling the planet would be ridiculously long.

    8. Re:Mrecury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not that savvy on the melting point of various metals, but how would the rails handle the time spent exposed to the sun?

    9. Re:Mrecury by vlm · · Score: 1

      One proposed method of colonizing Mercury is to build a city on rails that circles the slowly-spinning planet, always staying in the shady site where temperatures are cool enough for human habitats.

      With this story, such an idea doesn't seem nearly so far-fetched.

      Charles Stross story? I read some sci fi story along those lines in the 80s.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    10. Re:Mrecury by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      A Mercury solar day is 176 days long. That's leaves enough time to fix a flat.

      By the way: you must be terrified of the Dutch. What happens if their dam breaks?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:Mrecury by vlm · · Score: 1

      This imaginary Mrecury sounds like a great place to live. What happens when, lets say, the rail needs maintenance or is damaged and needs to be repaired? The whole population gets cooked and then new people can move in once the rail is repaired and get free fried chicken? Sounds awesome.

      Park in the nearest tunnel. Sucks to spend that much time in the dark instead of perfect twilight, but it beats death. I don't remember if that was actually in the sci fi story, or some online discussion.

      The other thing is that Mercury rotates kind of slowly compared to the earth. Anything other than a major viaduct / bridge and a crane is trivially fast enough to haul a train past the damaged track, or just wait until the track is fixed...

      I would have to do the math to make sure, but at some latitude a human being could quite easily outwalk the sunrise... Heck on the equator I think a person could outwalk the sunrise, if you assume it rotates a hundred times slower and the circumference is quite smaller. On the earth you need to maintain a couple thousand miles per hour at the equator, but a factor of a hundred slower rotation plus a factor for smaller circumference, its doable. One trivial solution is not one really long train but many that shuffle back and forth and could theoretically be walked past in a disaster.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    12. Re:Mrecury by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2

      Overpopulation? Forced? You really can't imagine one group leaving home to colonize somewhere else without being "forced" to do so? Perhaps you should review your history books.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:Mrecury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wouldn't melt, but the would go through some impressive thermal cycling.

    14. Re:Mrecury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering the track would have to withstand the 300C-500C temperature change along 50% of its length, it would also not be easy to build!!

      Mercury-quakes also happen, because of crust contraction and expansion.

      This is what happened due to an earthquake,
          http://www.aucklandtrains.co.nz/2010/09/06/pics-souths-twisted-tracks/
          http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/11/new-zealand-earthquake-turns-train-tracks-to-spaghetti/

      As to the original story, railway buildings?? Sounds like the crap that happened in the 1970s with all the flying cars.. Bad ideas are just... bad.

    15. Re:Mrecury by vlm · · Score: 1

      I'm not that savvy on the melting point of various metals, but how would the rails handle the time spent exposed to the sun?

      Float them on pools of liquid lead... "strong enough" once it freezes, mushy enough at temperature to prevent kinks. This was discussed in the sci fi story, or online, don't remember. I always thought the story made more sense if you ran the train thru a tunnel with greenhouses on the roof of the tunnel, so you travel along as you eat your food. Cooling would be a problem, but you'd have nearly infinite solar power, so ...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    16. Re:Mrecury by genner · · Score: 0

      One proposed method of colonizing Mercury is to build a city on rails that circles the slowly-spinning planet, always staying in the shady site where temperatures are cool enough for human habitats.

      With this story, such an idea doesn't seem nearly so far-fetched.

      Until the train breaks down and the whole colony gets cooked.

    17. Re:Mrecury by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I would have to do the math to make sure, but at some latitude a human being could quite easily outwalk the sunrise... Heck on the equator I think a person could outwalk the sunrise, if you assume it rotates a hundred times slower and the circumference is quite smaller.

      Mercury's equatorial circumference is 9529.1 mi and it's day is 1,407.5 hrs. (Source)

      Divide and you get that Mercury's terminator moves at 2.08 mph at the equator. So sure, you could pretty easily outwalk that for some time.

    18. Re:Mrecury by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      But what is the average solar day of Mrecury?
      Obviously anything named after cury would be hot.

    19. Re:Mrecury by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Overpopulation? Forced? You really can't imagine one group leaving home to colonize somewhere else without being "forced" to do so? Perhaps you should review your history books.

      Mercury has none of the things people in the past sought.

      No air.
      No water.
      No food.
      No amenities.
      No freedom. You're going to be trapped in a small bubble forever, and you'll be the slave of whatever mega corp or government back on Earth sent you there.

    20. Re:Mrecury by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't melt, but the would go through some impressive thermal cycling.

      Lead-free solder strikes again!

    21. Re:Mrecury by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Obvious flaw: the rails would melt while on the day side. I suspect you'd have some serious expansion and contraction issues in the geography to deal with as well. Be much better to simply colonize asteroids -- there's a LOT more room in a ring circling the sun at close to the Earth's orbit than there is on the surface of Mercury.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    22. Re:Mrecury by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Why rails instead of caterpillar tracks? A rail line circling the planet would be ridiculously long.

      Caterpillar tracks are still going to need a road or road-like surface to roll on, like the crawlway at the Kennedy Space Center.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    23. Re:Mrecury by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The Inverted World, Christopher Priest, 1974.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    24. Re:Mrecury by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      You really can't imagine one group leaving home to colonize somewhere else without being "forced" to do so?

      I certainly can imagine that. I just have a hard time imagining why anyone would choose Mercury as their destination. Its about minus 170 celcius on the cold side, and that's as good as it gets. Surely almost anywhere else in the system would be a better fit for colonisation efforts. I mean what if your mobile city breaks down?

    25. Re:Mrecury by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Um apparently I can't use a calculator and my arithmetic result sanity check routines failed... 9529/1407 is 6.8 mph, not 2.08.

      So you could outrun the sunrise for a bit, but couldn't outwalk it.

    26. Re:Mrecury by ZerothAngel · · Score: 1

      One proposed method of colonizing Mercury is to build a city on rails that circles the slowly-spinning planet, always staying in the shady site where temperatures are cool enough for human habitats.

      With this story, such an idea doesn't seem nearly so far-fetched.

      Charles Stross story? I read some sci fi story along those lines in the 80s.

      When I saw the headline, the concept sounded vaguely familiar, but I couldn't remember where I'd heard it from. GP's and your post jarred my memory on the subject.

      The Charles Stross novel is Saturn's Children. Though you might be thinking of something else since Saturn's Children was published in 2008.

    27. Re:Mrecury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch this lecture and you will be able to envision it. Really, it is not as boring as it first looks and while the title might be an overstatement it is not that far from the truth.

    28. Re:Mrecury by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      It would be infinitely long. You would need to be perpetually laying down new track in front of you, as the track behind you rotates into the sun and melts.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    29. Re:Mrecury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mercury has almost no axel tilt, making its poles ideal for fixed colonies.

    30. Re:Mrecury by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      If my thumbnail calculations are right -- and I make no pretensions about my abilities, so they very likely are not -- that latitude (on earth) would be at 89.8 degrees.

      Work:

      The rotational period of the earth is 24 hours, which is about 15 degrees per hour (360 degrees / 24 hours).

      An average person can walk about 3 miles per hour

      That means an average person can walk about 72 miles in a day (assuming non-stop, which we all know won't happen long term, but I ignored that). Therefore the circumference of a circle that a person can walk non-stop in a day is 72 miles, and therefore the circumference of the earth at the latitude where a person walking would match the speed of the sunrise would be 72 miles.

      The diameter of a circle with a circumference of 72 miles would be 22.9 miles, and so the radius of such a circle would be approximately 11.5 miles (C=2 x pi x r, so r ~11.5 miles).

      Given a plane that intersects the earth such that the circle transcribed upon that plane has a circumference of 72 miles, let y1 be the distance from the center of the earth to center of the circle transcribed upon the plane, and let x1 be the radius of that circle (i.e., 11.5 miles).

      If x^2 + y^2 = 4000^2 (the equation for a circle, and r = the radius of the earth, or 4,000 miles), then let x1^2 + y1^2 = 11.5^2 be the circle transcribed upon the plane described in the last sentence. In this case, when y1=0, x1^2 = r1^2, so x1=11.5. From this, you can draw a triangle with the apex at the center of the earth, with the x axis being 11.5 miles, the y axis being the distance from the center of the circle x1^2 + y1^2 = 11.5^2 to the center of the earth and the hypotenuse being the radius of the earth, or 4000 miles. Therefore, the arc sine of (11.5 miles / 4000 miles) is equal to the latitude we are looking for. I think :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    31. Re:Mrecury by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Oops...I caught one error. The arc sine of (11.miles / 4000 miles) is actually 0.02 degrees. We have to subtract that from 90 degrees to get the latitude I wanted, sorry.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    32. Re:Mrecury by jeremylichtman · · Score: 1

      The Golden Globe by John Varley?

    33. Re:Mrecury by Pence128 · · Score: 1

      It would probably be easier to find the latitude at which the mean temperature is habitable, and then dig down until you have enough thermal mass around you to keep it stable.

      --
      404: sig not found.
    34. Re:Mrecury by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except the day on Mercury is much longer than the day on Earth? or were you answering another question. I don't know if I could walk all that fast at such a spot as almost the north or south pole of the Earth either.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    35. Re:Mrecury by Pence128 · · Score: 1

      That's like asking the number of hours in the average earth day.

      --
      404: sig not found.
    36. Re:Mrecury by mikael · · Score: 1

      If the daytime side is 350C and the night-time side is -170C, then the dawn/dusk time-zones are going to be somewhere inbetween. But with those temperature differentials, rails are probably going to twist and buckle before you've completed one cycle. Might as well just live underground.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    37. Re:Mrecury by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      exactly, considering they twist and buckle at 47 degrees in my town (true, 47 degrees C is pretty damn full-on), so i can't see it happening on Mercury.

    38. Re:Mrecury by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      The metals would also (likely) become embrittled, due to particle bombardment from the sun (esp.neutrons).

    39. Re:Mrecury by jarlsberg71 · · Score: 1

      Well if you get tired you could walk "North" or "South" so the path is shorter.

      --
      E8B8B
  12. I can see why it got 3rd place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fucking stupid. Sure they can change out buildings depending on what's needed for tourist season or during the winter, but what are they going to do with them when not in use? If they wanted a bunch of rail based accommodations, they could just lease some standard railway sleeper cars for the summer and then the railroads could use them somewhere else at other times of the year.

  13. Swedish guy fucks with Norway by ReallyEvilCanine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Film at 11.

    1. Re:Swedish guy fucks with Norway by ChinggisK · · Score: 1

      Best comment of the day. Well done sir!

  14. Recycling old infrastructure by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quoth TFA:

    The idea, says the agency, was to use the city's railway infrastructure -- left behind from the days when it was an maritime construction town, building oil rigs -- as a basis for its future. Konrad Milton, one of the partners in the company, told Wired.co.uk: "As we see it there are two major benefits. First, it's easier to put buildings on existing train tracks than to demolish the tracks and build regular building foundations. Secondly the city of Åndalsnes has different needs depending on season." ...

    Why rail and not roads? Milton says: "In this case the railtracks are in such abundance that it's the obvious choice, but the idea with rolling buildings could work very well in situations where roads and other hard surfaces are in abundance -- like old military airfields, harbors or over sized highways."

    Interesting recycling of old infrastructure. Reminds me of how Manchester England recycled a lot of its old inner city industrial warehouses and converted them to loft apartments. The population of the city centre boomed and and the already legendary nightlife of the city was given another boost as the place was gentrified. (Pity about the Hacienda nightclub though, it ended up becoming loft apartments too.) A lot of their old railways were recycled as tram lines. Trams running on the old railway tracks run at 50MPH which may not sound like much, but for travel in a built-up urban area it beats the hell out of anything you could do by road. The tram system (called Metrolink) combines that speed in the suburbs with the convenience of dropping you off literally at the doorstep of the shops and offices in the city centre. It's so popular that overcorwding was its biggest problem last time I was there.

    I'm not sure if Åndalsnes could re-use their old railway lines in that way but this mobile building thing is pretty innovative and exciting. Kudos!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Recycling old infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about that. A big chunk of the regeneration in Manchester city centre happened after some idiots from Northern Ireland decided that didn't like the area and carried out an unexpected demolition.

    2. Re:Recycling old infrastructure by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      That only accounted for a fraction of the total regeneration of the city. Castlefield, Canal St, Great Northern, Piccadilly Square, all areas that were untouched by the bomb. Metrolink was in place long before the bomb, and a lot of the area that was damaged would have been modernised anyway. (I'm glad the Corn Exchange survived, the Arndale badly needed a facelift.)

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Recycling old infrastructure by couchslug · · Score: 1

      ""As we see it there are two major benefits. First, it's easier to put buildings on existing train tracks than to demolish the tracks and build regular building foundations."

      Then don't fucking build regular foundations. Drill appropriate holes for reinforced concrete pillars, then set your structure of choice atop them. Less roadbed to remove, the remainder can be left in place, and the valuable rails recycled for steel or even used in weldments.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Recycling old infrastructure by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of how Manchester England recycled a lot of its old inner city industrial warehouses and converted them to loft apartments. The population of the city centre boomed and and the already legendary nightlife of the city was given another boost as the place was gentrified. (Pity about the Hacienda nightclub though, it ended up becoming loft apartments too.)

      It's the same old story everywhere, in San Francisco the Trocadero Transfer Club was lost.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. for after the fall of modern society by us7892 · · Score: 1

    I guess if you have a lot of unused railroads, you can move a bunch of buildings a few miles from the coast when a big squall is coming, and back to the coast when the weather clears. Throws some solar panels and wind turbines on each "house" to run a few appliances. Have a refuse and sewer collection building. And have some shower buildings with rain collectors.

    I'm assuming this is all for "after" the big apocalypse.

    1. Re:for after the fall of modern society by couchslug · · Score: 1

      There is no >>>>>need to live on the fucking coast in vulnerable-yet-valuable-enough-to-move structures.

      Build valuable structures out of steel and concrete, which are easy to recycle. Leave them in place for hundreds of years. If they become obsolete for some reason, abandon them if the land is not valuable enough to justify demolition. If the sea covers them, they will provide a breeding ground for sea creatures.

      Whoever thought the "buildings on rails" idea had any merit should have been beaten to death on the spot for such spectacular stupidity, likewise anyone who doesn't get WHY the idea was stupid. Not "gently corrected", but smashed like the victims in various Liveleak videos.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:for after the fall of modern society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a joy to be around...

  16. Take it from an architecture major... by arcsimm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As somebody who keeps up with this kind of stuff (albeit often with a rather quizzical expression), you should just nod, smile, say "that's cool," and move on. Don't think about how monstrously impractical this would be. Don't consider the long-term maintenance issues involved with the moving parts, the problems involved with things like plumbing and electrical service, or the insulation requirements of a floor raised up off the ground in a northern climate. Don't try to think about how much simpler it would be to achieve the same goals in a passive design. Don't think about any of these things, because if you do your brain will break from the glaring obviousness of the problems. Just take a moment to appreciate the zoomy science-fiction cool factor, and get on with your day.

    1. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It reminds me of a quote I heard in university: Architects make it pretty. Engineers make it work. Yes, it's a trollish quote but the more I deal with 'creative' types the more it's proven true.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    2. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by arcsimm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have no idea how many times I heard this line in studio: "Hey, you think like an engineer...!" followed by a question about basic structural issues or weatherproofing. It's very frustrating how few architects and designers actually know how a building goes together. I'm a far cry from an actual engineer (show me a load-transfer problem and my eyes glaze over and roll up into my head) but I like to have at least a general concept of how the things I draw actually translate into physical objects. That's a shockingly uncommon sentiment amongst my peers.

    3. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      As somebody who keeps up with this kind of stuff (albeit often with a rather quizzical expression), you should just nod, smile, say "that's cool," and move on.

      Pretty much. Even if this was practical, doable, etc, it's a major step backwards.

      Humans are historically bad at identifying anything actually good. Computers were good, major step forward in technological progress. Pocket calculators... not so good, on principle of use in schools (think Japanese Soroban up through Algebra 1.. Algebra 2 starts graphing, that is where you should start introducing calculators). Electric guitars, amplifiers, and radio were good. Television was good, but modern news broadcasting is horrible.

      But then you get beyond "well we shouldn't give second graders calculators" and "the news media is a fear-mongering panic machine" to shit that's just a bad idea. Internet TV... oh sure, we love the idea of not keeping a library of our own around, but rather pulling things down in real-time, every access, to watch TV ... never mind the huge bandwidth drain this causes. That can be fixed (lower resolution video/audio to stay below what the bandwidth can handle).

      And then you get into straight out stupid shit like electric carving knives, wtf? A vibrating knife to cut chicken? What the hell is the point of that? Keureg machines are another good idea... a french press or drip cup brewer (some people hate french press coffee, apparently) makes coffee in a few minutes, while a Keureg instant coffee brewing machine consumes much more resources to make and run (instant heating of water) and to produce the K-cups... for "convenience." I'm sorry, but spending 30 seconds fresh-grinding coffee and 4 minutes brewing it with a pot of boiled water doesn't speak of "desperate need to get a computerized programmable device to make coffee much faster and with much less effort" to me.

      We even screw up good tech. Look at washing machines. We have nice, low-water washing machines that don't expend a whole hell of a lot of energy to do their job now. They're pretty simple, so not incredibly complex and energy-hungry to manufacture. But we have this huge freaking electric dryer to deal with too! If you drop your clothes into a spin dryer, you can hang them and let them dry in an hour or so; or throw them in the electric dryer for 10 minutes. Spin dryers run at 3500-6000RPM, effectively squeezing the clothes against the outer hull and driving the water out. Spin cycle on your washing machine but a lot faster... it'd be nice to add this to washing machines, with a balance sensor to prevent spin out of control on an imbalanced machine. Overall energy usage to dry clothes would be a fraction of what we have now.

      A lot of stuff is on "cool factor" and just horrible failure at differentiating "high tech" from "shiny."

    4. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      I agree that this extends to pretty much all walks of life: the artsy fartsy folk put together some crazy idea and the engineers have to deal with the consequences.

    5. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by vlm · · Score: 1

      And then you get into straight out stupid shit like electric carving knives, wtf? A vibrating knife to cut chicken?

      Another application error. You cut leather-like ham with that, not "fork tender" barbecue chicken.

      You also missed some economic issues... like the kcup thing, at work if your labor is worth a buck a minute, homemade coffee is terribly expensive compared to practically any other non-drive-thru solution, unless you're making coffee as a hobby.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple car analogy: concept cars.

      Look how good we are at thinking outside of the box.

      You sure are. Cool...

      This proves that we must be very good at making minor improvements to existing products.

      Yeah, maybe...

      Please write about us.

      Uh-hu. Sure.

    7. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must outman them by designing a building shaped like a sail that is tethered to the ground by a single needle.

    8. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      It's not as if mobile buildings are a crazy idea that will never happen... many schools near where I live (in the US) use mobiles for extra capacity (in one school, they have no permanent buildings at all), and my employer uses them too (mostly for student interns, temps... yeah, they're not considered as desirable as the real office buildings). No, you can't just move them at any moment, due to electrical and plumbing hookups, but they do still have them moved from time to time.

      Then, of course, are RVs. John Madden has a famous refusal to fly and relies on a custom RV instead.

      So all we are talking about hear is moving around on rails instead of roads, since this particular town in Norway happens to have a lot of extra railways lying around.

    9. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your rant needs work.

    10. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's interesting to me is that my field, ASIC design, has borrowed the term architect to refer to the specification writers. They typically are intimately familiar with the details of the desired chip function(such as video processing algorithms), but necessarily chip design.

    11. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by arcsimm · · Score: 1

      I wish they wouldn't have. Along with the various IT "architect" positions, it makes sorting out job listings for building architecture incredibly hard. :)

    12. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      We have drip pots at work that make coffee in bulk; and I can get french presses that make some 12-15 cups of coffee in 4 minutes. Trust me, sometimes you need the giant fucking french press; it's way bigger than a regular coffee pot, and sometimes I've seen people hit the coffee area and brew 4 pots at a time, rebrewing after under a minute because the herd just took away ALL four pots of coffee. In mugs.

      Honestly, the 4 pots brewed at a time model is faster here than individual k-cups. Nobody has to fish around and examine individual cups for anything.

      But they sell programmable Keureg machines for home use, for about $200. My parents got one. Compare to this or this but do you drink that much coffee in 20 minutes? How about this for home? (Apparently a "Cup" is now 4.5 ounces)

      Amusingly, it takes longer to make a pot of coffee in the drip machine (about 2 minutes for it to fill water and heat it, then 5 more minutes to make the pot) than it does to make an 8 cup french press carafe. Keeping four of these carafes at work would work out pretty well for our extremely high volume coffee output, methinks.

    13. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Javajunk · · Score: 1

      Architects draw curves. Engineers straighten them. (My old structural engineering lecturer's favorite line)

      --
      "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." Douglas Adams
    14. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, have no vision. Or if you do, you prefer to hide it.

      So a complete rethink and redesign of current facilities infrastructure isn't possible? Where A/C requirements are minimal if not abandoned, and solar redirection and absorption are maximized to geographic positioning? Where water/ww recycling are all self-contained and engineered into these movable structures that require only a single annual checkup or maintenance repair. You really think we can't achieve efficiencies on the order of 10-100X what exists today? You sir, have no faith in humanity, or you've succumb to the myopic view that most capitalists fall prey: wait for the future with a profitable return, rather than inventing the future now.

      You're type of rhetoric is what stagnates what would otherwise be, our inevitable and accelerated progress. Go back to your engineering firm and punch the clock. Your usefulness as a possible innovator has passed.

    15. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most cases Architects design buildings to work on many levels - the 'make pretty' is just one more obvious things they do. The rest are more subtle and less quantitative problem solving like, planning, organisation - Engineers then consult on structural, mechanical, hydraulic Etc. issues. Important functions but as the architect cannot be the master of all things must consult on.

    16. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no cases of engineers messing things up, with possible consequences on the scale of non-intended collapse of a major skyscraper (sure, the requirements did fit under "crazy idea", but not exactly due to "artsy fartsy folk" / probably not in the way you meant it; it would be fine if not for engineering changes down the line; even better if the top structural engineer kept better oversight and did more calculations)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's not like using inherently mobile structures as housing (horse carts, rail carriages, barges, yurts, shipping containers ) is new, in general...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Vision and "inevitable" progress only gets you so far. How would you like to improve the efficiency of, say, ICE 10-100X if they are already around 50%? Or - remind me where are the ships defying Archimedes' principle (hey, it's over 2k years old, it shouldn't be a constraint by now...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    19. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by nyback · · Score: 1

      or the insulation requirements of a floor raised up off the ground in a northern climate.

      At least that part is not a problem. The common historical way of building farming houses in Sweden is to build the house foundation raised up off the ground resting on rocks lined up around the house base creating a crawling space under the house. In the centre would be a larger rock for the chimney structure to rest on. Its a very solid way to build in a northern climate solving several problems like moisture build up, insulating from a cold ground, making it easy to adjust the house foundation when the ground may rise or sink as the frosting of the ground comes and goes depending on the seasons. Electricity would not be that hard to solve. We do have electricity on trains... Plumbing could be solved same way as like we do on modern trains. Have a septic tank and a fresh water tank in each house. If its very practical and convenient is maybe a question. But its definitely possible to solve.

    20. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Oh god no - never! :P

      I will be the first one to acknowledge Engineers can epiccally fuck up. Lord knows I've done some big ones, although thankfully only money was lost, not lives. In fact, in Canada we have what is called The Ritual of the Calling of an Engineer for all graduating engineers which is to remind ourselves of the consequences of what we do. In fact, during this ceremony we are given iron rings which (according to legend) are forged from the iron from a collapsed Quebec bridge.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    21. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      I'm a mechanical engineer by trade, and I haven't seen a load-transfer problem in a decade or better, so my eyes would glaze over as well. And I believe everyword. In one of my previous jobs I saw some of the most unholy and unworkable structural designs I could have imagined. It scared me how anyone could think they were acceptable. I think the breaking apart of the two specialties was a epic failure. My university had the two faculties merged for the first 20 or 30 years of it's existence.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    22. Re:Take it from an architecture major... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And I suppose it has some hidden significance, how it's from a collapsed Quebec bridge, considering their sometimes slightly peculiar relationship with the rest of Canada... ;)

      A bit hard for engineers to immigrate and OTOH to outsource you, I imagine... ;>

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  17. one step closer.. by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

    ..to self aware cities that decide we are not worthy to live in them

    just read Greg Bear's "Strength of Stones".. not his best but not too bad.

    --
    -Lod
  18. FROM ERECTOR SET TO CITY PLANNING FOR DUMMIES !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A new book, due out from Swedish Press. 80 Kr.

  19. Choo Choo! by PingPongBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    When they're going down the track, they can say "We built this city on rock and roll!"

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  20. I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems like a gimmick, but I have a fantasy that might actually be feasible - not for me, but for truly rich people. The idea would be to convert old railroad cars into luxury traveling apartments. There is plenty of room in one of those things for very comfortable living if the interior is designed ergonomically. The way I picture it, cities could "beautify" some of their defunct freight stations into rail car parks - parking lots for luxury rail apartments.

    Occupants could then negotiate transport of their apartment by attaching it to various freight trains at competitive prices. Moving freight by rail is pretty cheap, so this sort of "migration" might actually be pretty affordable once you've bought/rented one of these rolling apartments. I picture this working especially well on a continent like Europe, where there is lots of rail and lots to see. Next year, the rail tunnel under the Bosphorus will mean that you can take a rail car from Scotland to the Middle East on standard gauge rail. If China comes through on its plan to build a railroad across Asia into Turkey, that would extend the mobility of these apartments even farther.

    Of course, you could argue that shipping container apartments might be more practical and less constrained geographically, but that's just much less romantic.

    1. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by arcsimm · · Score: 3, Informative

      This actually happens already, in a sense. I briefly worked for a company that was (tangientally - asbestos abatement is a big deal in older rail cars) involved in the conversion of old Pullman sleeper cars into high-roller wine-and-dine suites for companies and the wealthy. Once they'd been converted over, the owners could invite people aboard for a business trip, or rent them out to travelers looking to experience something new.

    2. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you grew up, but the small town in WV i grew up in had a number of olf passanger cars that had been converted. The people who lived in them typically weren't rich, they were quite affordable and periodically people would move them. Some even migrated with work (i know some went to FL and back) so it wasn't limited to WV.

    3. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by djlemma · · Score: 1

      Or you could just have a ship-based apartment. Check out Residensea....

    4. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by Animats · · Score: 1

      This seems like a gimmick, but I have a fantasy that might actually be feasible - not for me, but for truly rich people. The idea would be to convert old railroad cars into luxury traveling apartments.

      That's called "Private varnish". Some people own luxuriously fitted out private railroad cars. Many of them can be rented, because they're not used much. Amtrak will tow private card around on existing passengers trains for a fee, but you're limited to existing train schedules. It usually takes weeks to set up a car movement, so this is more of a recreational activity than a mode of transportation. Corporate outings to major sports events are popular.

      Renting a private car costs about $1200 to $7500 per day. Moving a private car costs $2.10 per mile on Amtrak, plus some other fees. Parking a private railroad car at a major railroad terminal costs $200 to $400 per day.

    5. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by aliquis · · Score: 1
    6. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It should hardly need to be said that if we had more trains running it would be more of a viable means of transport. Also, at the time this practice was in vogue the train was the only way to travel in comfort. Roads of the modern quality did not exist. If we have more trains then this probably will be viable again. Finally, I propose that trains should go hybrid and that every car should be driven. This can be a gradual switch. It permits switching of cars out of the middle of trains without stopping, which is even more desirable for passenger traffic than for freight. So far attempts to build hybrid locomotives have failed because of the massive power requirements involved. Hybrid tech is a good fit for something like a train where adding weight is not as much of an issue because of controlled grades and the relative lack of start-and-stop driving.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this information, I wish I could mod! Anyway, that's crazy expensive. Really, you could only justify costs like that if you had a day-long moving private party in that railroad car. Actually, that sounds like it would be a pretty fun part of, say, a wedding!

    8. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by Animats · · Score: 1

      So far attempts to build hybrid locomotives have failed because of the massive power requirements involved.

      Most locomotives are Diesel-electric (if not entirely electric) so they're already "hybrid". Electric motors have driven locomotives for over a century. Trains running into Grand Central Station in New York use true hybrids, locomotives which can run either electrically from third-rail power or in Diesel-electric mode when they leave the third-rail system.

    9. Re:I always dreamed of having a rail car apartment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most locomotives are Diesel-electric (if not entirely electric) so they're already "hybrid".

      Wank wank stroke stroke. I already know all this: it's clear from context that I'm talking about a hybrid system with power storage. Some locomotives even use the electric motor for braking... and then dump the energy into a carbon pile beneath the chassis.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Lutefisk by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    As someone who has spent a lot of time commuting on trains in central Europe, I would welcome this. If my office drove up to pick me up at the door. But if the train is only serving Lutefisk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutefisk , I'll pass. Now if I could only remember the name of the fish that they put into the cans, where the fermentation turns the cans into a hand grenade form . . .

    If the train went to Bullerbyn, that would be fantastic. I could invite Skrollan for a drink. Skrollan is the coolest Swedish name for a chick.

    The Norwegians are also top runners with their sheep head stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smalahove

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Lutefisk by audunr · · Score: 1

      Now if I could only remember the name of the fish that they put into the cans, where the fermentation turns the cans into a hand grenade form . . .

      You're thinking of Surströmming. I'd link to Wikipedia but ./ did not like the umlaut o in the URL.

    2. Re:Lutefisk by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Now if I could only remember the name of the fish that they put into the cans, where the fermentation turns the cans into a hand grenade form . . .

      You're thinking of Surströmming. I'd link to Wikipedia but ./ did not like the umlaut o in the URL.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surstr%C3%B6mming

    3. Re:Lutefisk by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      But if the train is only serving Lutefisk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutefisk , I'll pass.

      It wouldn't be. Too many Swedes dislike it. Why, I don't know. With potatoes, the right sauce and green peas it's delicious.

  22. Wasn't there a Rad Bradbury story like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds familiar....

    1. Re:Wasn't there a Rad Bradbury story like this? by BubbaDave · · Score: 1

      "The Inverted World" by Christopher Priest described a city on rails.

      Dave

    2. Re:Wasn't there a Rad Bradbury story like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea was also used in John Varley's "The Golden Globe".

  23. wait, don't we have these already? by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Trains have them, sleeper cars. There's even double story trains, so i don't see why there wouldn't be double story sleeper cars.

    seriously stupid fucking idea, unless sweden has really crappy ground to build foundations on. but then, putting all the weight on a couple of points is probably better, i'm sure.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:wait, don't we have these already? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Most Amtrak trains, at least in the western US have double storied sleeper cars. I'm not sure about the east coast, they might not due to height restrictions in the tunnels.

    2. Re:wait, don't we have these already? by mmkay · · Score: 1

      There are so called "residential cars" (sorry if I got the translation wrong) in Poland. Almost all are converted from old freight/passenger cars. You can even buy one for as much as $2.5k. They're mostly used to temporarily accomodate rail/construction workers. I saw many of them in use in tourist areas as cheap camping accomodation, available mostly for railroad staff. I found some pics of their interior (basic, but probably has everything that is needed - I pass some every day on my way to the university and one of them even has a satellite dish mounted). There is also a short photostory about the lady that bought one of the pre-WWII cars and converted it into a cosy living quarter.

    3. Re:wait, don't we have these already? by mikael · · Score: 1

      There are

      There are also Rotating homes

      So we just need someone to fill the gap in between and invent rotating container homes . Just rent an empty slot on the giant
      apartment block. When you need to move home, the owners disconnect your apartment and use an internal winch system to load the container home onto a truck or train.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  24. Brings a new meaning by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Brings a whole new meaning to "Home Theft".

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  25. Probably the most insightful post ever by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Well said, sir. As a practicing structural engineer, I see all sorts of very impractical designs coming from architects offices. It is somewhat amazing how elaborate artists can be when attempting to solve a problem. There's usualy some fantastically complicated, but elegant looking, solution which seems exceptionally cool, until you realize that for each problem solved, several more can be created.

    I don't know to whom this is attributed, but it certainly applies to many of these types of ideas: Creativity is the ability to allow yourself to make mistakes; Art (or in this case, Architecture) is knowing which ones to keep.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Probably the most insightful post ever by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I work for a firm that has both Architects and Structural Engineers. (I'm neither.) Often, the architecture department will submit a bid to build some awesome new building, while the structural engineer department quietly hopes that we lose that bid, due to the fact that no-one has any idea how to make the damn thing stand up!

    2. Re:Probably the most insightful post ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      due to the fact that no-one has any idea how to make the damn thing stand up!

      http://www.penispumpers.org/

      / ali as AC.

    3. Re:Probably the most insightful post ever by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Well played.

  26. Middle class convenience by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Just think how much easier white flight would have been with movable buildings!

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Middle class convenience by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but these days we have more trouble with the opposite problem. White folks moving into those neighborhoods and displacing the minority groups to the suburbs by pricing them out of the market.

    2. Re:Middle class convenience by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Is that really a problem? Concentrating the poor in the inner city hasn't really worked out that well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Oh No! by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Crimson Assurance!!

  28. Deployment nightmare by cskrat · · Score: 1

    The Rails framework may be nice to develop on but deployment sucks compared to PHP.

    They should stick with Zend Framework.

    --
    My God! It's full of eval()'s.
  29. If you watch the original "Wild, Wild West" series by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    They hopped about in their personalized Pullman car: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pullman_car

    That looked like cool living ...

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  30. Psychoactive drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just out of curiosity, is Sweden one of those countries where use of psychoactive drugs legal?

  31. Unlike birds by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    The cities probably won't fall out of the sky dead.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re:Unlike birds by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Of course not, they are rolling cities not flying ones.

  32. Boxes on wheels? by kulnor · · Score: 1

    They look like cereal boxes on wheels.... what's the top speed on these things? Can't wait for the first house crash headline.

  33. Underclass = No Sun by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    So, this will eventually create a class of citizen who doesn't get sun exposures because the rich will get the buildings that move to face the sun.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:Underclass = No Sun by mikael · · Score: 1

      You haven't worked for a corporation in a large office block . Staff with seniority would get the window desks. Junior staff would get the desks in the inner offices/office halls of the building. In winter, it meant junior staff wouldn't have seniority to see daylight during the weekdays between November and January.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Underclass = No Sun by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      Wrong, bucko. Worked for HP during the 90's where this kind of thing went on. Worked for General Dynamics, where this kind of thing went on. I've been dealing with it since the 70's. But...It does not make it right. Don't try to justify it.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    3. Re:Underclass = No Sun by mikael · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to justify it - I think it was terrible. Though, it wasn't much better for those with window offices. Knew one guy who got a peninsula office - windows on the South, East and West sides. In Winter, the room was comfortable, in Summer, the room was like a botanical gardens replica of a desert. Admins ended up with the offices underneath the air-conditioners - their office was like the Artic tundra - with a constant cold wild from the North.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  34. Obligatory South Park Reference by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
  35. consider the advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering how frequently the average person changes jobs, the ability to move your house to a place near the location of one's current job has an appeal. One would not have to endure long commutes every day to and from one's fixed house. Houses could be manufactured in a factory to tight specifications (low insulation costs), with much less labor. Some believed that housing bubbles in several states were due to restrictions on house construction.

    1. Re:consider the advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived through several housing bubbles - it was more of a case that all the workers wanted to live close to the workplaces or at least to the transport link to the workplaces. The minute the demand exceeds supply, the speculators jump in. Then, everyone gets so desperate they plead and beg to have zoning restrictions lifted so they can live under power lines, beside chemical storage and processing facilities, in flood plains, beside raised freeways. Then the housing boom recedes and everyone moves on. Then accidents happen, and everyone wants to know who on earth approved the construction in the first place.

  36. Equatorial surface temperature by amstrad · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(planet) shows the equatorial rotation velocity as 10.892 km/h. So the train would need to travel that fast to keep out of the Sun. That number is reduced by the cosine of the latitude so at 85 north, it would be just under 1 km/h. Of course teperature cycling would be enormous. Wikipedia gives the range as [100K 700K] at the equator and [80K 380K] at 85 latitude. What material can withstand that heat expansion and remain true? I wonder if a space station in mercury's L4 Lagrange point would be feasable? Is Mercury's L4 still withini Mercury's umbra?

  37. Rain on Parade by dragin33 · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry but I can't imagine this working.. As we all know buildings require a firm foundation. In order to have a rail system that could potentially hold the weight of the building at any given point the entire rail system would have to be build upon a foundation strong enough to hold the heaviest of buildings.. The costs would be astronomical; and for what? Miles of empty track?

    1. Re:Rain on Parade by sexconker · · Score: 2

      No, we'd have buildings along the entire track, except for one vacant spot.

      If you're at the top left, and you want to go to the bottom right, and the vacant spot is below the bottom right...

      [][]...[]
      [][]...[]
            |_|

      Every month we arrange the buildings to form a picture of an apple or kitty.

    2. Re:Rain on Parade by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As we all know buildings require a firm foundation.

      That depends on what your idea of a building is. Using modern materials you can build a house that is very lightweight and has controlled flex, and can basically flop around on top of the earth in case of earthquake. This sort of solution also addresses all of your other concerns.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. Bad? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    And you thought it was bad when people went "camping" with those huge campers.

    Now, when you "get away from it all", you can really "take it all with you".

    Honey, did you turn off the stove before you left? Hold on a second, let me check.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  39. Mayor Quimby figured it out years ago by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2

    The all-contingency plan B: move the entire city 5 miles down the road!

  40. Right by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Sure, that'd be cost effective. All you'd have to do is build a planet-wide rail network from 70 million miles away. Then keep the part of the tracks exposed to the sun for months at a time from melting. No problem.

    Here's a thought: if you want to colonize some other planet, why not pick one that stays cooler than, say, molten lead?

  41. municipal darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the first step in the Hungry City chronicle series of science fiction. Cities consume towns as the trundle across the post nuclear landscape. And it's a kids book! (by Reeve)

  42. All the places people chose to colonize before by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... had luxuries like air, water, and at least some food available for free on-site. Even much more hospitable places than Mercury had to be forcibly colonized (Australia, anyone?). I think the GP is pretty much right on target.

    1. Re:All the places people chose to colonize before by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Those places don't have effectively infinite solar power, a luxury which is valuable in its own right.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:All the places people chose to colonize before by sean.peters · · Score: 1

      You can't be serious. We've got effectively infinite solar power on Earth, and we're not using it... because it's kind of expensive even when you live right next to the solar panel factory. If you had to fly the solar panels 70 million miles, the cost would be right out the window.

    3. Re:All the places people chose to colonize before by Lord+Ender · · Score: 0

      When you can colonize other planets, you actually have more than 2010 technology. You also have industrial infrastructure on your own planet. Surprise!

      Simpleton.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:All the places people chose to colonize before by sean.peters · · Score: 1

      Simpleton.

      Ad hominem arguments aside, you've unconsciously revealed the real issue here: colonization of other planets is utterly infeasible in the absence of magic. The only way it becomes even remotely economically feasible is to postulate the existence of some kind of magical technology (such as anything that would let us cheaply transport the huge quantities of required stuff across interplanetary space) that would make it feasible. Just getting to low-earth orbit currently costs around $10k/kg. Slashing that by a factor of 10 would be an amazing feat (Falcon 9 heavy, if it's successfully deployed, would come in around $3.5k/kg to LEO) - and would still leave colonization of the solar system hopelessly expensive.

      And there's nothing to suggest that any such magical technology is coming - there aren't even any promising lines of research. SpaceX is basically just improving the efficiency of existing concepts, and is unlikely to produce any order of magnitude improvements in cost. The so-called "space elevator" is total pie-in-the-sky. Nuclear rockets are hideously expensive in their own right and are political non-starters in any case. And there simply isn't anything else even being discussed.

      Throw in the fact that other bodies in the solar system are made of the same stuff as the earth (silicates, ferrous metals, etc), and the answer is obvious. There's no reason to colonize other planets. The stuff about "infinite solar power" is nothing more than a red herring - we have infinite solar power right here. There's no need to go a quarter of the way across the solar system to get it.

  43. Bars by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Pick up lines could be odd.

    "So, are you from around here... currently?"

  44. Sigh... by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Problems :
    Using rail does not remove the problems you would have with the obvious alternate way : trailers. You basically have all of the disadvantages of using mobile trailers stacked with ADDITIONAL problems from width limits on a rail line. I'm not even going to go into the problems associated with mobile homes/trailers, other than to say that every single one I have ever been in sucked.

    And another additional problem : you can tow mobile homes and trailers over gravel and dirt roads that are dirt cheap to build and maintain (pun intended)

    Rail is VERY expensive : about $1 million/mile. Totally economically unfeasible to build the additional rail segments this plan would need to work, as well as to bring the old abandoned track up to code that this architect has in mind to use.

    1. Re:Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its nice to know that you didn't read the article before posting. =)

  45. Why not? by formfeed · · Score: 1

    Why not have a small vacation cabin sitting on rails, that can be hauled around according to season? Or an additional post office that follows the seasonal demand created by tourists. Or a police station..

    The technique exists for moving things as well as for flexible hookups:

    In the Netherlands they have house boats docked to facility hookups and a sidewalk next to it, complete with a flower pot and a mailbox.
    In the US, they apparently build up to 2 level houses which can be taken apart in the middle, put on the highway at night only to be reassembled somewhere else. I even heard, that some people -who obviously can afford such luxury- live in houses called "trailers" that have wheels permanently attached to the underside of the house!

  46. Neat, an Ikea town! by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

    Neat, an Ikea town!

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  47. And this is why we can't have nice things... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    you should just nod, smile, say "that's cool," and move on.

    Which, in a nutshell, is why this is such a backward country with appallingly boring architecture.

    Don't consider the long-term maintenance issues involved with the moving parts

    This is already a solved problem. See railroads for more info.

    the problems involved with things like plumbing and electrical service

    Also a solved problem: standard connectors, valves, and switches.

    or the insulation requirements of a floor raised up off the ground in a northern climate

    Every floor except the first in a multistory structure is raised off the ground. So now you have to insulate one more floor. Big deal.

    Don't try to think about how much simpler it would be to achieve the same goals in a passive design.

    Now there you have a valid point. That said, having mobile buildings makes it much easier to solve another problem with conventional cities: they're damn hard to rearrange in response to changing conditions. Rolling buildings along a dedicated track system is probably less expensive and definitely less time-consuming than remodeling or demolishing and rebuilding. Good buildings not have to languish when the area they're stuck in goes into decline.

    For me, the red flag in this scheme is seismic stability. Even if the structural integrity of the building can be assured -- as far as that can be done with any building in an earthquake -- what's the plan for getting a building back on the tracks if it's shaken off or worse, if the tracks are bent or broken?

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:And this is why we can't have nice things... by arcsimm · · Score: 1

      Don't consider the long-term maintenance issues involved with the moving parts

      This is already a solved problem. See railroads for more info.

      Just because railroads can and have done it doesn't make it a cost-effective solution for houses. There are added maintenance costs involved, and when you start adding moving parts to a structure that's usually expected to last 20-100 years with the occasional re-shingling and coat of paint, you start shortening its effective lifespan.

      the problems involved with things like plumbing and electrical service

      Also a solved problem: standard connectors, valves, and switches.

      Same issues as above. We can do it, and do it regularly with RVs, but most people don't want to live in RVs forever, and when something goes wrong with the blackwater tank, the maintenance gets... icky. There's also increased infrastructure costs when you have to place and maintain weatherproof hookups anywhere that somebody wants to park their house.

      Every floor except the first in a multistory structure is raised off the ground. So now you have to insulate one more floor. Big deal.

      Every other multistory structure typically has an enclosed and insulated ground floor with a thick foundation beneath it. That is to say, there's usually not direct exposure to the elements on the underside of every upper floor. You also lose the opportunity to take advantage of the ground's thermal mass. There's a reason raised construction is much more common in the South.

      For me, the red flag in this scheme is seismic stability. Even if the structural integrity of the building can be assured -- as far as that can be done with any building in an earthquake -- what's the plan for getting a building back on the tracks if it's shaken off or worse, if the tracks are bent or broken?

      You also have to anchor the building to keep it from tipping over in the wind, and have a workaround for when a wheel bearing seizes up or a pusher motor doesn't start after sitting for six months. I won't argue that the scheme is technologically possible, but the real issue is that given the initial costs, added long-term maintenance, and human expectations it's not really feasible, at least not within a sane budget. Don't get me wrong, the overall concept is *really* interesting. For my part, I have an unhealthy fascination with taco trucks -- it's a mobile restaurant! -- but at the same I'd prefer not to live in a motorized apartment block. It's not just a question of "can we?" but "should we?"

    2. Re:And this is why we can't have nice things... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      This is already a solved problem. See railroads for more info.

      That's good and all. But they where Swedish and we haven't solved the problems with our railroads ;)

      Kinda internal though, you must be Swedish or at least had traveled by rail the last couple of years, preferably during the winter, in Sweden.

      It used to work. But so did many things :)

    3. Re:And this is why we can't have nice things... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Rail car used as mobile home (it's not like that doesn't already happen) generally doesn't have to be in almost constant readiness, doesn't have to be technically capable of moving at typical speed of rolling stock.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:And this is why we can't have nice things... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Past & rose-colored glasses?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:And this is why we can't have nice things... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      For me, the red flag in this scheme is seismic stability. Even if the structural integrity of the building can be assured -- as far as that can be done with any building in an earthquake -- what's the plan for getting a building back on the tracks if it's shaken off or worse, if the tracks are bent or broken?

      If you're willing to give a free pass on maintenance then you should probably know that the railroad industry has equipment for getting derailed trains back on track.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. ISO containers on flatcars.... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    ...would get the job done with tough structures that would be cheap, versatile, transportable, and settable by crane on permanent foundations.

    That said, the reason container housing hasn't taken off is the form-factor of containers which is dictated by the form-factor of what transports them.

    The idea of moving living quarters about urban areas basically for shits and grins is fucking stupid, there is no nice way to put it.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  49. A bad trailer park. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    This is in every way shape and form, a suggestion of making trailer parks. The article even says that roads could be used instead of rail in places that have roads. There is nothing new or inovative about this. Heck, they don't even have good trailers. What they show in the article are closer to those crappy trailers they pull in for temporary office space. These guys shouldn't get an award. They should get laughed at.

  50. Re:FROM ERECTOR SET TO CITY PLANNING FOR DUMMIES ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll wait for the Swedish video thankyouverymuch.

    Amazing fact: All Swedish movies end with the single word SLUT. They do. Really.

  51. already done in Japan in a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked as an architect / builder in Japan.

    The irony of this idea is funny to me.
    In japan the rail companies buy huge areas of land, and then put in the railroad.
    Then they build huge houses development and town centers there.

    Its a double wammy.

  52. It's been done by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    True story from my local area - here on the seaside the environmental laws prohibit any permanent buildings some distance from the sea, in order to protect the dunes from erosion or something like that; so pretty much nothing larger than an outhouse can be built legally. So, one guy installed a single section of rails (30-40 metres? something like that) and built a summer cottage on top of a series of railroad chassis to get around the restrictions - it's legally classified as a vehicle, not as real estate.
    Quite reasonable houses can be built this way, as rails can support an order of magnitude more weight than trailer wheels.

  53. Nothing new, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea to mount a house on rails is not new. In Italy there is a beautiful example of luxury home built in 1935 and still working. Try google with the following keywords: villa girasole marcellise.

  54. Cederic Price proposed it in 1965 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And his proposal had wit and intelligence. More impportantly it was lacking the misplaced SAANA references.

    Search for "Potteries Thinkbelt Cederic Price" also separately search any of the above terms you are not familiar with.

  55. Is NERV hiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Åndalsnes 3

  56. New Excuse for Being Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry boss, I couldn't find the office this morning.

  57. You'd need some funky addresses by Xelios · · Score: 1
    My address? Sure, it's:

    switch (month) {
    case JANUARY:
    case FEBRUARY:
    case MARCH:
    print("31 12th Street");
    break;

    case APRIL:
    case MAY:
    print("22 8th Street");
    break;

    case JUNE:
    case JULY:
    case AUGUST:
    print("18 10th Street");
    break;

    case SEPTEMBER:
    case OCTOBER:
    case NOVEMBER:
    case DECEMBER:
    print("20 11th Street");
    break;

    default:
    print("My house seems to be moving right now, check back tomorrow...");
    break;
    }

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  58. Optimum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus begins the never-ending quest to reach optimum. While you all stay inside with the guilds, I'll be up future getting old.

  59. Evangelion anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just have the rails going down so the buildings are protected by the Geofront! lol

  60. Great novel by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Came here to make this reference :)

    --
    Blar.
  61. This winning design... by or-switch · · Score: 1

    ...is part of our town's 10 year plan to have a huge disaster.

  62. OT: Creek vs. Crick by sgtrock · · Score: 1

    As defined by Patrick McManus:

    First of all a creek has none of the raucous, vulgar, freewheeling character of a crick. If they were people, creeks would wear tuxedos and amuse themselves with the ballet, opera, and witty conversation; cricks would go around in their undershirts and amuse themselves with the Saturday night fights, taverns, and humorous belching. Creeks would perspire and cricks, sweat. Creeks would smoke pipes; cricks, chew and spit.

    :)

  63. Gold Rush Era Skagway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, basically they've rediscovered Skagway Alaska. During the gold rush era, they'd periodically reposition stores along the main road. A horse team would pull the old building away, and then pull the new building into place

  64. Ultimately, they're called "cars" by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Looking at today's headlines, this concept would work well in capital cities as new regimes come and go.
    In university towns, your apartment could roll in for however many semesters you were there. If it was small enough, you could attend class from your apartment.
    Your city could self-configure itself overnight based on social network "friend" settings.

    The home of the future is a freight container cube.

    1. Re:Ultimately, they're called "cars" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The home of the future is a freight container cube.

      I strongly agree. What's more, there's grips of these things lying around rusting. It literally costs more to move them anywhere interesting than it does to buy them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  65. Re:FROM ERECTOR SET TO CITY PLANNING FOR DUMMIES ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look here, son. If they can produce:

    1. A boob-a-licious ski team that defines what is blonde
    2. Abba
    3. Ace of Base

    then surely they can put a city on rail. Surely they can. I can dream of skiing with blonde boobs. Go Frida - I know there's something's going on! Malin, you're not as weird as you think! Take Cmdr. Taco. He IS weird.

  66. The golden age of the private railroad car by westlake · · Score: 1

    The golden age of the private railroad car was, obviously, the bright noontide of the nabobs who took pleasure in such ornate and often beautiful conveniences and could afford to possess and maintain them. The privately owned Pullman was, from the mid-Eighteen Seventies until the stock market crash of 1929, an accepted and conventional symbol of wealth. Only a few survive today.

    In the East they were cherished and maintained in gleaming splendor by entire generations and dynasties of Goulds, Harrimans, Vanderbilts, Fricks, and Wideners and rolled elegantly horn Palm Beach to the Adirondacks, to Bar Harbor and Louisville, as the season and occasion dictated. They clustered familiarly as late as the mid-Twenties in swarms of twenty or thirty at a time on the private car track of the now vanished Royal Poinciana Hotel at Palm Beach, and at Derby time the Louisville & Nashville's yards at Louisville saw their arrival at the end of every inbound varnish train for days at a time.

    In the Old West they were the affluential hallmark of the presence of silver kings from the Comstock, copper monarchs from Butte, the old bearded Silver Senators of Nevada and Montana, cattle magnates and all the departed generation of Emperors of Get and Satraps of Power. Success on the prairies and in the tall timber rode the private palace cars in frock coats and passed out dollar cigars to the reporters on arriving in San Francisco, Virginia City, or Fort Worth. It drank vintage champagne in jeroboams and delighted in gold-plated plumbing fixtures and brass-bound observation platforms rolling through the high passes of the Sierra or through the sagebrush night.


    There was almost no limit to the ingenuity of owners and decorators of private cars during their flowering. Rare inlaid woods were frequently imported for bulkheads, and solid mahogany trim and panels were commonplace. For her "Japauldin," Mrs. J. P. Donahue, perhaps the richest woman in the world, commanded quartered oak beams running the length of the drawing room ceiling, brocaded draperies at better than $100 a yard, solid gold lighting fixtures and plumbing appliances, and a wood-burning fireplace activated by an electric blower.

    Paderewski was another musician who owned a private car and his "General Stanley" was known to railroad men all over the continent. Often in the yards of Cleveland or Fort Worth, switch tenders and brakemen would gather around it as the maestro practiced at night. "Just as good as a five-dollar seat at the concert," they said. VARNISH FOR THE NABOBS

  67. There's no place like home by cstacy · · Score: 1

    You just click your Ruby slippers three times to get there.

    def canhaz_slippers
      headers["Status"] = "301 There's no place like home"
      redirect_to "http://www.home.se/"
    end

  68. I'm an Engineer! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Toot Toot!

  69. Charlie Stross already did it by XCondE · · Score: 1

    In his novel Saturn's Children. The city in Mercury is built on top of rails so that it can always be on the dark side of the planet.