Slashdot Mirror


Virgin Mobile To Start Throttling Broadband2Go

Daevad writes "Virgin Mobile sent an e-mail today informing me of their plans to start throttling the Broadband2Go Plan. The web site doesn't seem to reflect the change yet, but here is the message they sent to me: 'Here at Virgin Mobile, our mission is to deliver an outstanding customer experience. Sometimes that means making difficult choices in order to provide the best possible service to the greatest number of customers. To make sure we can keep offering our $40 Unlimited Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting a speed limit in place for anyone on that plan who uses over 5GB in a month. How will it work? Starting February 15, 2011, if you go over 5GB in a month on the $40 Unlimited Plan: Your data speeds will be limited for the remainder of the monthly plan cycle. During this time, you may experience slower page loads and file downloads and lags in streaming media. Your data speeds will return to normal as soon as you buy a new Broadband2Go Plan. This change will only affect plans bought on or after 2/15/2011. How will it affect me? Keep in mind, 5GB is A LOT of data. To give you an idea, it's about 250 hours of web browsing or over 500,000(!) emails. So this change shouldn't affect you unless you're a heavy downloader/streamer/etc.'" Just when I was getting comfortable recommending it to people, too. I do prefer a slowdown to an absolute cap, but this sours me a bit on the (locked-to-Sprint) MiFi I bought to use the Virgin service.

183 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Bait and switch? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yup, classic bait and switch.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Bait and switch? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative
      From the summary: "This change will only affect plans bought on or after 2/15/2011."

      You even have a month to buy in to the old plan if you so desire, which I find surprising.

    2. Re:Bait and switch? by Veovis · · Score: 2

      From the summary: "This change will only affect plans bought on or after 2/15/2011."

      You even have a month to buy in to the old plan if you so desire, which I find surprising.

      Even so, it would only be good for 1 month.... You can't prepay multiple months like you used to be able to with AT&T prepaid data.

    3. Re:Bait and switch? by rayd75 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Far better than the AT&T bait and switch with iPad plans... remember that? Changed before the device was even available for a full month. Still, this is the fairest cap I've seen a wireless provider implement so far. Throttling users at their limit actually makes much more sense than cutting them off cold. Unless you are one of the people who thought cellular service would be able to truly replace landline service, (having no concept of the very finite bandwidth available via RF) 5GB is a lot of data. ...and if you run into it by accident, you can still use your service for less bandwidth-intensive things like email, light web access, or reloading your Virgin Mobile account.

    4. Re:Bait and switch? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Still, this is the fairest cap I've seen a wireless provider implement so far.

      I'm guessing you're in the US. I pay 299 SEK (about 45 USD a month) for my cell phone and subscription; granted that's not including free minutes or texts, but I get 10 GB data with that. Go over 10 GB and I'm throttled to 0.2 Mbit/s.

      And I'm fairly certain you can get even better and fairer deals than what I'm on.

    5. Re:Bait and switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The plans are month to month only, so You are only buying 1 extra month. The thing that they do not tell you is that most people are already throttled. I live in the Los Angeles area. When I connect I typically get 56k connections. For some reason all my data is routed through kansas and utah, so it is incredibly slow. With the speeds that I get, I could not hit the cap in a month.

    6. Re:Bait and switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I'm in the US where belief in the inherent right and corrective power of free market forces is only exceeded in devotion by the consensus that we are the chosen people of an angry, vengeful god. The argument of US carriers that caps prevent bandwidth hogs from bringing the network to its knees has always fallen flat with me. It seems obvious that at the first of the month, all your subscribers' accounts get a new transfer allotment (many providers have fixed billing periods) and your total network usage will skyrocket. If you can handle that degree of usage at the beginning of the month, why can't you at the end? That said, it's obvious that wireless networks have a much lower and finite capacity as compared to wired networks but that just means the lie is that much more blatant when wireless carriers attempt it.

    7. Re:Bait and switch? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Yup, classic bait and switch.

      Well, wait. Just to be clear. Virgin offers an "unlimited" plan for cell phones. The author of the article bought a MiFi (mobile hot spot) to use on this service that's sold for cell phones. And he's pissed that now they are going to slow down the data after 5 gig.

      Do I have it wrong?

      Would he still be mad if they had said "This service is now unlimited only for single cell phones, not for mobile hot spots"?

      Or maybe Virgin has been selling this service specifically for people who want to create mobile hot spots on it? I don't know. Can anyone fill in the details?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Bait and switch? by Graff · · Score: 2

      Far better than the AT&T bait and switch with iPad plans... remember that? Changed before the device was even available for a full month.

      I don't know about you but I got grandfathered on my plan. I still get unlimited data from AT&T for the same price as before. There was no bait-and-switch involved. If you got the plan before the change then you can have unlimited data for $30/month, if you got the plan after the change then you can get 2GB for $25/month and each additional 2GB is $25.

    9. Re:Bait and switch? by falconwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      You even have a month to buy in to the old plan if you so desire, which I find surprising.

      Not quite. Virgin's Broadband2Go is month to month, there is no contract. So if you pay for B2G service on 14 February you will not be throttled throughout the rest of February but after 14 March you will be throttled if you go over 5GB.

      I fully support this. Normal users won't use that much, however for businesses and such that need more bandwidth Virgin should offer higher priced plans with more bandwidth.

      Falcon

    10. Re:Bait and switch? by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, he bought a device on their broadband2go plan "the only internet you'll ever need" that has been and is still advertised as unlimited data for $40/month.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Bait and switch? by maxume · · Score: 1

      They sell the plan for personal use. Business users are probably pointed at Sprint.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Bait and switch? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Virgin Mobile has been selling a USB dongle and the Mifi for use with computers. They offer a couple of plans, a silly 100 MB one and a $40 one that currently offers unlimited use with no caps or throttling and is switching to being throttled after 5 GB. The devices come with Virgin Mobile branded software that allows you to activate them on the Virgin Mobile network (which is really just the towers that Sprint owns rather than buys time on).

      They also have plans for cell phones that offer unlimited cell phone data (last I looked, starting at $25).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:Bait and switch? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Virgin Mobile has been selling a USB dongle and the Mifi for use with computers.

      Yep, then it's bait and switch.

      Thanks for the clarification.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:Bait and switch? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Got it. Yes, it's bait and switch. Virgin sucks for doing this. 5gb per month for a service that's sold for mobile hot spots isn't even in the same neighborhood as "unlimited".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:Bait and switch? by RMingin · · Score: 2

      Far better than the AT&T bait and switch with iPad plans... remember that? Changed before the device was even available for a full month. Still, this is the fairest cap I've seen a wireless provider implement so far. Throttling users at their limit actually makes much more sense than cutting them off cold. Unless you are one of the people who thought cellular service would be able to truly replace landline service, (having no concept of the very finite bandwidth available via RF) 5GB is a lot of data. ...and if you run into it by accident, you can still use your service for less bandwidth-intensive things like email, light web access, or reloading your Virgin Mobile account.

      I dunno, I've still got my AT&T 29.99$/month unlimited data. I occasionally horse around and blow way past 5GB/month just to feel I'm getting my money's worth, too. It would be bait and switch if they pulled it from me, not just because they're no longer offering it to you.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    16. Re:Bait and switch? by hansg · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's better than many alternatives.

      But maybe, just maybe they shouldn't call it, i don't know, unlimited?

      /Hans

      --
      I don't have one
    17. Re:Bait and switch? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      FWIW, it's the same cap T-Mobile implements in the US.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    18. Re:Bait and switch? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Just thought I'd point out that the nice thing with the Virgin Mobile (at least with the Mifi anyway), you can use the device to fill up or reactivate your account even if you have exhausted it.

    19. Re:Bait and switch? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Send a legal notice back to Virgin Mobile stating that if you encounter a reduction in speed ant any time, you will a prorated price for the speed you get for the whole month.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  2. Where's that future I was promised? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

    Now how the hell am I supposed to get a full VR Metaverse pipe when I'm shreddin' the Santa Monica on my Smartwheels(tm) if I can't get any kind of pipe up to the Street? Totally lame.

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
  3. I use VM B2Go.... My connect notice by Veovis · · Score: 1

    NOTICE: Broadband2Go Terms of Service have changed which potentially impact download and upload throughput speeds on the $40 Broadband2Go Plan when monthly data usage exceeds 5GB. The new terms and conditions will apply to new and existing customers purchasing Broadband2Go Plans on or after 2/15/11. Read More: http://www.virginmobileusa.com/legal/terms-of-service-virgin-mobile#bb2g

  4. Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "To make sure we can keep offering our $40 Unlimited Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting a speed limit in place for anyone on that plan who uses over 5GB in a month."

    1. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

      " if you go over 5GB in a month on the $40 Unlimited Plan: Your data speeds will be limited "
      These creatures walk among us -- be wary - nay, RUN!

    2. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You still get unlimited data, it just comes slower after a certain point. Sounds reasonable to me, compared to some other plans.

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
    3. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by whoop · · Score: 2

      Just reply to the email with the, "You keep using that word, but I don't think you know what it means" line.

    4. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by lostmongoose · · Score: 1

      One of these things is not like the other, one of these things is not the same...

    5. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Lazareth · · Score: 1

      Just to play the devil's advocate, what they mean by "unlimited" is that there is no hard cap on the AMOUNT of data you may download. Only a SPEED limit when you hit 5gig. In truth, you would never have true unlimited data, as that would imply infinite transfer speeds. Your already finite transfer rate just get adjusted. So this change does not make the statement "unlimited plan" anymore false or true.

      The plan is still overpriced as hell compared to what they deliver, though. But the network they're offering it over is not really capable of handling what people want from it anyway.

    6. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by icebraining · · Score: 1

      So all plans are unlimited - some just drop the speed to 0bps. If they are limiting you in any way depending on how much data you use, I'm sorry but it's not unlimited. Which is fine, as long as it's not called that.

    7. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Lazareth · · Score: 1

      It is unlimited in the sense of "you may download as much as you want (unlimited) at these specified speeds." Sure, that is not unlimited in the sense of infinite volume, but in the sense of infinite use without having to pay extra.

      Getting your head in a bunch over the technicality of whatever marketing ploy a business is using is pretty much an exercise in futility. It is pretty implicit that "unlimited plan" does not mean "magic infinity +1 transfer rates forever" and if you ever thought so for even a heartbeat you're an idiot. Sorry to be blunt, but that is pretty much stupidity at its most fundamental.

      You could argue that this is a bad deal and I would totally agree with you. But your argument as it stands is pretty useless as far as discussing the plan. They are clear and up front stating what you're paying for and what they mean by what they say. That's actually a hell of a lot better than some other plans. That the rest of the package sucks is another story.

    8. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It is unlimited in the sense of "you may download as much as you want (unlimited) at these specified speeds."

      But that's the point! The specified speeds should not change depending on how much you consume.

      It is pretty implicit that "unlimited plan" does not mean "magic infinity +1 transfer rates forever" and if you ever thought so for even a heartbeat you're an idiot. Sorry to be blunt, but that is pretty much stupidity at its most fundamental.

      Except I didn't say that. I said that to be unlimited, using it shouldn't change the conditions - if you are supposed to have 5mbps, you should have 5mbps regardless of how much you use it.
      Saying that unlimited is "infinity" is definitively stupid.

      They are clear and up front stating what you're paying for and what they mean by what they say.

      I disagree - while I didn't expect unlimited to mean infinity, the current plan has nothing "unlimited" about it. It has a very real cap on usage. Unlimited should mean no conditions change - including speed - regardless of how much you consume.

    9. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by jhigh · · Score: 1

      So all plans are unlimited - some just drop the speed to 0bps. If they are limiting you in any way depending on how much data you use, I'm sorry but it's not unlimited. Which is fine, as long as it's not called that.

      That's like saying that an "all you can eat" buffet really isn't all you can eat because they won't let you spend a month at the restaurant eating. Unlimited, in the case of an unlimited data plan, is a reference to the amount of data that can be consumed, not the speed of consumption.

      --
      Social Engineering Expert: Because there is no patch for stupidity.
    10. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Graff · · Score: 1

      You still get unlimited data, it just comes slower after a certain point. Sounds reasonable to me, compared to some other plans.

      You never got unlimited data, you had the ability to use the service 24/7 at whatever data rate was available. That means you would have a finite amount of data downloaded. Now they are saying that at a certain point the data rate will be slower, thus you will be able to download less.

      Either way it's limited, it's just more limited now.

    11. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1
      It's even more like this:

      Is this all you can eat for $40.00?
      yes sir!
      forks over cash, sits down.
      waitress brings over egg roll.
      waitress takes plate away.
      Hey! I thought you said this is all you can eat!
      Yes sir, that is all you can eat.
      ALL YOUR BANDWIDTH ARE BELONG TO US

    12. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No, it's like saying that you enter the buffet and pay for "all you can eat". Then, after the appetizer and first course (the 5GB), the waiters start bringing the contents of the second course in 5g portions each hour until the restaurant closes.

      What I'm saying is that no conditions - including the speed of consumption - should be affect by the amount of data consumed, because the latter is unlimited.

    13. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Overpriced? OVERPRICED?

      I love how Americans complain about 5GB for $40 when some of the rest of the world are paying getting 1GB for $60.

      What Virgin is proposing isn't "overpriced". It's actually bloody cheap.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    14. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Man, I'm going to offer an "UNLIMITED" (c) (tm) download offer at 1 kbits/s. What do you think?

    15. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Actually, you never get unlimited data. Let's take LTE's theoretical max download rate of 326.4 Mbit/s. 30 days in a month * 24 hours in a day * 60 minutes in an hour * 6 seconds in a minute = 2592000 seconds in a month. 326.4 * 2592000 = 846028800 Mbits, / 8 = 105753600 Mbytes. Assuming MiB, not MB, that's about 101 TiB of data per month. A more than reasonable amount, clearly, but also nowhere near "unlimited". The shannon limit means that no "unlimited" plan will ever be truly unlimited.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    16. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Lazareth · · Score: 1

      I live in Denmark. Thank you for being prejudiced.

    17. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by Lazareth · · Score: 1

      The alternative at the other end of the ball is advertisement with the legal contract. Wonder how that will work out.

    18. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Unlimited, in the case of an unlimited data plan, is a reference to the amount of data that can be consumed, not the speed of consumption.

      If the speed of the consumption is throttled to dial-up speeds (a guess), that will most definitely affect the amount of data that can be consumed.

    19. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by AMDuser · · Score: 1

      I have seen over price before I was using Virgin Mobile for my Main ISP I was on Dial-up in a rural area that the modem only connected at 46.6Kbps and it was $70US for landline and $10 for Dial-up ISP. or there is always companys like WildBlue Satellite internet it is near $80 for 1.5Mbps down.and only 17GB a month or even Hughesnet that has a max Daily usage of max 500MB

    20. Re:Gotta love calling a limited plan unlimited by AMDuser · · Score: 1

      oh ya forgot in the area were I live it is there is only Dial-up, Satellite internet, or 3G there is no DSL or Cable internet available.

  5. A lot of data? by theaveng · · Score: 1, Informative

    I downloaded 100 GB last month (movies, tv shows, music videos) on my DSL. 5 GB is not much data at all.

    ALSO: Since VirginMobile US is subcontracting from another company (Sprint?), it's likely the limits are being imposed by them. (shrug). I still like the company. They give me my cellphone at $0.00 per month, and I only pay for my minutes used. It's nice and cheap.

    --
    FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    1. Re:A lot of data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      VM doesn't sub contract from sprint anymore. VM is now owned by sprint 100%. It has been a sprint brand for atleast a year I believe.

    2. Re:A lot of data? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      The real question is how many Library of Congresses could you fit in 5GB.

    3. Re:A lot of data? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Sprint is 100% owner of Virgin Mobile USA, they bought the company and the right to use the name several years ago.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:A lot of data? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Saying that capping at 5GB is necessary doesn't mean 5GB is 'plenty of data'.

    5. Re:A lot of data? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Re-read the summary. "Keep in mind, 5GB is A LOT of data." Or so claims virgin.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    6. Re:A lot of data? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I was replying to the AC, who was claiming it was "necessary", and I simply said that being "necessary" to cap at 5GB doesn't mean it's a lot of data.

    7. Re:A lot of data? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      You have no business calling your service "Broadband"-anything, when the only thing you can tout is "250 hours of web browsing" and "500,000 emails". Have these guys heard of streaming audio and video? Flash? If I just wanted to read my email and surf wikipedia, I wouldn't need a fucking "broadband" connection.

  6. Wow, 500,000(!) e-mails by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 2

    Or, printing (!) 1,789,569,706 times!

    1. Re:Wow, 500,000(!) e-mails by msauve · · Score: 1

      Your Epson MX-80 is still functional?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Wow, 500,000(!) e-mails by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Or 31,250,000 pings!

      (Depending on the exact definition of GB)

    3. Re:Wow, 500,000(!) e-mails by noidentity · · Score: 1

      With or without the parenthesis?

  7. Wrong by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Informative

    Virgin mobile is a no-contract company. If they locked you into a contract and THEN started to throttle, that would be a bait and switch. But with no contract, you can decide to stop buying more airtime if you don't like the new terms.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:Wrong by LordNimon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then what are you supposed to do with your $150 mifi device? What about people that bought it for Christmas thinking that they'd get unlimited mobile Internet for $40?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Wrong by Steveftoth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whine about it on the (slow) internet or sell it on ebay?

    3. Re:Wrong by falconwolf · · Score: 2

      Then what are you supposed to do with your $150 mifi device?

      Sell it on eBay.

      Falcon

    4. Re:Wrong by afidel · · Score: 1

      Except Virgin doesn't allow BYOD. If they did I would buy a decent unlocked Android phone for the wife, they only offer the awful Samsung Intercept.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Wrong by EEPROMS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WOW you guys in the USA really need to define the legal term for "unlimited' in court, here in Australia "unlimited" means just that, if you throttle the service you are not allowed to use the term "unlimited" any more.

    6. Re:Wrong by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Instead I'm going to offer to pay them an unlimited amount of money for their phone service, up to an acceptable-use policy limit of $5/month.

    7. Re:Wrong by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      That's not relevant. There is nothing stopping the transfer of a VM mifi device between different accounts. Selling or buying one on ebay is no problem.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Wrong by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Getting strong regulations for truth in advertising are certainly something to wish for, right up there with patent sanity. ("Impossible Dream" music playing in background)

      Figure out how to make the U.S. a member of the E.U. ?

    9. Re:Wrong by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Except now the device is worth even less than before. Just the announcement from VM that unlimited service is no longer available makes the device worth less than it was. Theoretically, VM should lower the price of the device to compensate for the reduced value of the service (I know they won't).

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    10. Re:Wrong by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      If I created a car that got unlimited miles per gallon that doesn't mean it can go the speed of light.

    11. Re:Wrong by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 1

      It is defined for people who are rich enough. This is due to the fact that poor people lawyers are congenitally incapable of making the same arguments as rich people lawyers.

    12. Re:Wrong by jc42 · · Score: 1

      WOW you guys in the USA really need to define the legal term for "unlimited' in court, ...

      Ah, but here in the US, that would be called "government regulation" of private corporations, which our current political leaders consider the cause of all the evils in the world. Those would be the political leaders who mostly ran their campaigns on contributions from large corporations, so it's understandable why they might take that approach.

      (Around here, government regulation is even worse than people who use mismatched quotes. ;-)

      Lately, I've been getting a fair amount of junk mail from the phone companies, loudly touting one of the latest smart-phones "FREE". Sure enough, the fine print inside says that accepting the phone signs you up for a 2-year service contract. Some years back, this was considered fraudulent advertising, but nowadays in the US, companies know that they can get away with such fraud, because no government agency is likely to bother taking them to court over it.

      OTOH, it does mean that a large part of the US population knows that any mail with the word "FREE" on the cover is a scam, and just tosses it in the trash unopened. But junk mail is still subsidized by the Postal Service, so if only a few victims succumb to the scams, it's still worthwhile to mail out millions of such "offers".

      The people who are so against "government regulation" don't seem to be bothered by government subsidies of corporate junk/scam mail.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  8. Throatled even more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I briefly had a Broadband 2Go plan and it was painfully slow at the best of times and cut out completely during the travel home time of 5-6 PM. I too it back to Best Buy after it died two weeks in. Turns out a lot of the early units were defective. The ONLY thing it had going for it was being unlimited. Don't waste your money and just get the Verizon. Oh by the way it isn't as hard as they make out to go over 5 gig. I have that cap now and I have to limit my videos to a couple of short ones during the day to stay within my cap. If you do normal surfing and try to watch a couple of movies a month you will go over the limit.

  9. Difficult choices by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    "Sometimes that means making difficult choices..."

    Virgin likes money. Customers are on plans. It's about as difficult as deciding not to slam one's genitals in a door.

    1. Re:Difficult choices by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      By "one's" do you mean yours or someone elses?

    2. Re:Difficult choices by mmcxii · · Score: 1

      Have you ever slammed your genitals in a door? No? Don't knock it until you've tried it.

  10. Files are getting bigger and bigger by tepples · · Score: 1, Informative

    So this change shouldn't affect you unless you're a heavy downloader/streamer/etc.

    The Windows SDK alone is a gigabyte and a half, and a six-month upgrade to a popular GNU/Linux distribution is nearly a gigabyte.

    1. Re:Files are getting bigger and bigger by icebraining · · Score: 2

      Uh, the whole point of the Broadband2Go plan is to use it by devices other than smartphones. That's why its website has a MiFi router in the front page.

    2. Re:Files are getting bigger and bigger by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      And you're doing this on your cell/SIM/mobile data plan?

      I've just been hit by the T-Mobile "unlimited" debacle, but for anything like that I'd be creating a new user and logging it in to a coffee shop WiFi (McGonads is free) to do crap like that, if I didn't have home internets.

      I'd never log my user in whilst on a hostile network. Downloading some RPMs/DEBs or (in my case) doing a "pacman -Syu" can be quite easily done from a temporary account, providing moody OS updates in a timely manner is a bit beyond your local coffee shop skiddie.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    3. Re:Files are getting bigger and bigger by Seumas · · Score: 1

      It's also maybe about 30 minutes of youtube per day (at lower quality). And better not think about using Steam. Buy Dragon Age and you'll have to split the download over about three months of time. If you like podcasts, you'd run through that much pretty quickly, too. You could download the weekly episodes of Diggnation for about 3gb/mo. I listen to a daily podcast that is about three to four hours and takes up about 200mb. That's almost 5gb/mo right there.

      Really, they just need to rename their service and advertise it as being as limited as it is.

    4. Re:Files are getting bigger and bigger by afidel · · Score: 1

      It's not a smartphone plan, it's for a MiFi or USB stick!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  11. Performance is already pathetic by chelsel · · Score: 1

    I bought one of their Broadband2Go MiFi devices and I have to say that the performance is already pathetic. I can't imagine them throttling it back! How can you throttle back 30kbps downloads?!?!

    1. Re:Performance is already pathetic by luther349 · · Score: 1

      sounds like your not getting 3g speeds more like edge. or this is why there imposing this limit there network performance has been suffering by not imposing any sort or limit.

    2. Re:Performance is already pathetic by chelsel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe most people want to use the service for "spurts" of downloading when they are away from their primary internet connection. I don't think the general case is for people to remain connected 24 hrs/day for 2 weeks straight.

    3. Re:Performance is already pathetic by chelsel · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. My T-Mobile "3G" data stick works flawlessly... but it needs a USB port to operate... right now I'm checking into phones that let me run a mobile hotspot. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind paying for bandwidth, but it sure as heck better perform well.

    4. Re:Performance is already pathetic by luther349 · · Score: 1

      most 3g modems regardless of the career well fall back to older networks of 3g is not available. my frend had the same issue at work the towers where still only edge so thats what he got there for a long time untill they finnly upgraded them to 3g.

    5. Re:Performance is already pathetic by afidel · · Score: 1

      Most likely he's in a margin coverage area and is falling back to 1xrtt speeds instead of EVDO, though even then he should see 60-100kbps.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Performance is already pathetic by LarryRiedel · · Score: 1

      If the throttled speed is 256kbps, that isnt much worse than I usually get on Sprint EVDOrA. And hopefully the (poor) latency doesnt get worse with throttling.

    7. Re:Performance is already pathetic by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the general case is for people to remain connected 24 hrs/day for 2 weeks straight.

      Actually, with cell phones, this is what most people do. Granted, they're on "idle" for 99% of that time, but they're still connected, and their phones will respond to incoming calls by ringing, etc. But very few people turn off their cell phones at night, or any other time.

      This might seem trivial, except that just yesterday we had an article about the latest Windows Mobile phone that uses so much bandwidth at "idle" that it would eat up 5GB just idling for a week or so. We might think that's not surprising, since MS is notorious for such wastefulness (and Vista can eat up an impressive part of your bandwidth when idling on a wired connection). But we've been watching the recent explosion of cell phone "apps", many of which like to phone home periodically to keep you up to date with their topic. The iPhone is becoming a bandwidth hog when idling, and other smart-phones are starting to show the same sort of behavior.

      This could be one of the reasons that various cell-phone distros haven't had flash. Adobe's flash viewer is somewhat notorious for heavy traffic when idling. I've watch the cpu and network usage of several browsers on several OSs, and see them go from near zero to a significant percentage when a flash-heavy site (such as youtube) is visited -- and stay much higher than zero after all the flash pages are closed. There are other apps that behave this way, but I don't know that they've been characterized. Any page that uses a meta refresh tag could be part of the problem, if its time interval is short enough. (Why don't browsers give you a way to say "Ignore meta refresh tags"?)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  12. A challenge to the complainers... by John+Whitley · · Score: 2

    What would you have Virgin Mobile do instead? So far, this is among the most reasonable takes on the problem I've seen to date. Let's lay down some assumptions:
    1) The cost-per-user for the service has turned out to be too high at the current pricing.
    2) Analysis shows that a small percentage of users are super-heavy traffic users gobbling up many, many GB per month.

    Virgin Mobile could then:
    1) Up the plan pricing for everyone to accommodate the upper-end of the bell curve's massive usage. This will penalize the overwhelming majority of users for a few users' overuse. (Isn't that just the same crap that everyone complains about with stupid no-differentiation rulemaking in schools? "It has to be the same for everyone.")

    2) Keep the same pricing, but impose a throttle that imposes a penalty only on those users who are breaking the pricing model. They still get service, but at a degraded level.

    3) .... ??? (Your Answer Here.)

    1. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by grimJester · · Score: 2

      3) Offer different plans at different prices for different users. People use a lot of their product and the only thought that comes to your mind is "punish them"?

      You use terms such as "overuse" and "breaking the pricing model". The users bought an unlimited connection at a given price. Why blame them? Also, how do you know Virgin has any problems with profitability? This only cuts their costs without losing many customers. This is the smart thing to do for them regardless of their profits.

    2. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Stop calling it "unlimited". The caps are fine as long as they're honest about them, and not hide them.

    3. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by robot256 · · Score: 1

      4) Not advertise it as an "Unlimited" plan.

    4. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3.) Upgrade the damn equipment.

    5. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here are some options that Virgin Mobile isn't doing:

      • shutting off a user's connection as soon as they reach the cap
      • throttling or blocking on a per-application (e.g. bittorrent and youtube) basis
      • charging a large fee for exceeding the quota

      Network capacity is a finite resource. It looks like Virgin Mobile is dealing with that in the most reasonable way. Good for them.

    6. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by CyberNigma · · Score: 1

      Well, nothing out there consumer broadband that I'm familiar with is truly unlimited in the first place. They usually have 3 characteristics that are limited: time available for use, speed available for use, amount of data available to download.

      In this case, 1 of those items is truly unlimited while the other 2 are not. You have an unlimited amount of data available to download during your plan. The speed and the length of time that data is available is up to the company. An alternative mentioned previously is the ipad plan. It is not unlimited (nor called that) because they changed the way it worked soon after release. It is limited in all 3 senses: their speed, maximum amount of time you can use it, and the amount of data is limited because when you use it up they either cut you off or you buy another plan. Compared to that, this plan has an unlimited characteristic. They do not cut you off early, no matter how much you use it or how often you use it. They merely adjust the speed at which you can use it.

      Realistically, I guess none of these are unlimited. I have multiple internet connections, all at 15+mbps down and load balanced. I would consider anything less to be limited.

      The real question is what criteria do you use to determine if something is unlimited? I don't believe anyone uses speed as a criteria nowadays as that's a variable spot to hit. B2B's normal 3mbps not unlimited but the slowdown of the new ToS is? Nah, 3mbps is pretty limited when you're used to faster. Obviously they do not cut you off so the access is not limited, whereas others cut you off completely. The time is obviously limited as it is in most cases where you pay for broadband - the lifetime of the plan, at which point you have to pay again.

      So, how does this change the service from unlimited to limited when it was previously time limited, you do not get cut off early for downloading x amount of data, and only the speed has changed (but still something above 0)?

      SPECIFICALLY, this question is directed towards those crying foul about it changing and 'no longer being unlimited'. NOT towards those that do not feel it should have been called unlimited in the first place. This is to cut off people arguing the other question about whether ANY broadband service should be called unlimited so long as it has any (time, speed, amount available to download) limits. I really hope there are mod points available for people that skim this response and reply that it should not have been limited in the first place.

      So, why does changing the speed, not changing the length of time of the plan, and not removing the ability to access the internet at all, change it in some folks eyes from unlimited to limited - people that thought it was ok to previously call it unlimited and not now?

      Several people mentioned things like downloading linux distros, or SDKs. Yeah, I download both, and more, and I can't even imagine doing those (simultaneously as I frequently do) on a 3mbps connection, so that really becomes relative to what the user is used to. Some people still download stuff like Runes of Magic (many, many GBs of data) on 128kbps connections and are perfectly fine with it. You, from the release, may still be able to do these things, just at a slower speed than you were used to.

      I may have read the post wrong. It just sounded like it was ok to call it unlimited previously, but now it is not. To be clear, it ALWAYS had caps. The only cap that changed was speed, and that change is triggered based upon how much is downloaded.

      LAST SECOND EDIT:
      As someone else mentioned, this is closer to a true "Unlimited Data Plan" than most others. Many others actually will cut you off cold-turkey. This one still gives you access to the data, but alters the already existing speed cap to a slower rate. The time cap is not altered at all (unlike other plans) and it remains the same - however long the plan was to begin with. No new caps are introduced. The speed cap was altered. Unlike other companies the time cap is not altered and the data access is not cut off.

    7. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Five gigabytes is not "many, many GB per month".

      Also, I would LOVE to start up a restaurant and charge everyone for their meals and then only give them part of their meals and when they complain, say "hey, this shit is expensive to make - you can't expect me to feed ALL of you a full meal!".

      Whatever solution one could choose, the WORST is trimming services and just throwing your hands up into the air and saying "golly, it's so expensive - what do you expect us to do?!". If you can't provide a certain level of service for a certain price, then don't offer it or advertise it. Pretty simple.

    8. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Ah, so option A - "up the plan pricing for everyone to accommodate the upper-end of the bell curve's massive usage" then. The battle cry of the greedy entitlement complex.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    9. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Except it is unlimited. They're not capping your data, and they're keeping it available to you regardless. You can keep on using as much of it as you want, whenever you want. If you're a serious hog, it slows down a bit when you've gone way past what normal customers use. This is completely reasonable as a way to keep prices down.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:A challenge to the complainers... by CarlosM7 · · Score: 1

      About 5 months ago here in Puerto Rico I checked with Sprint, AT&T, and Virgin and they all wanted $60+ for just 5GB. I did not bother asking what would happen after reaching this cap, because I switched to another company (Claro, a Mexican company) that has the following plans, among others:

      $40 - 5GiB, $0.0073 additional MiB
      $50 - 10GiB, $0.0073 additional MiB
      $55 - unlimited (never used more than about 14GiB, tho).

  13. Unlimited? by NickDangr · · Score: 1

    Its only *mostly* unlimited.

    --
    Fair is foul and foul is fair... and some are fairly foul.
  14. most important news story of the day... by drwho · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is important to me. I have my MC760 hooked up to Windows 7 (don't ask) running virtual-AP software (buggy as hell). I was considering going for a mifi but this story puts the kabosh on that idea. No more downloading 'criminal minds' episodes. More importantly, no more attending class online. Which means, for me, that virgin mobile has lost its value proposition. Oh well, I spend $50 on the device...good bye Virgin Mobile, it's back to Starbucks & McDonald's for me.

  15. Not a big deal by imemyself · · Score: 2

    Honestly, I agree with people that are saying that 5 GB is very little for a normal Internet connection. But who the hell uses mobile broadband for their primary internet connection. I've been thinking about getting VM's broadband to go to occasionally use when I can't get wifi since its so cheap. But I can't imagine using any kind of mobile broadband (regardless of carrier) as my primary Internet connection that I would use to download ISO's / movies / etc. For me, mobile broadband / tethering is something to use when I'm away from my house, and can't use wifi for some reason. Maybe this will change with Wimax, but we don't have that yet here...

    --
    Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
    1. Re:Not a big deal by maxume · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of people that just do email/web stuff and don't download isos and movies.

      For them, a plan that is $40 a month with no contract and faster than a modem isn't so bad. Of course, the cap won't hit those users very hard either.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Not a big deal by damnbunni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are lots of people who use mobile broadband for their primary internet connection:

      Those of us who can't get anything else.

      I live just outside a good-sized city. I'm not in the middle of nowhere.

      I can't get cable. I can't get DSL. I can't get FIOS. I can't get UVerse. I can't get WiMax.

      My choices are 3G or satellite, and satellite is even more limited and slower than 3G. And costs more. And is less reliable.

    3. Re:Not a big deal by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1
      To be fair, their website does say this,

      Great Reasons to Choose Us

      • The Only Internet You'll Ever Need
      • Unlimited Internet, No Contract
      --
      LRN 2 SWM
    4. Re:Not a big deal by luther349 · · Score: 1

      people that are out of reach of dsl cable. peoples lives are never in the same place for long. so there is a market for people who need a mobile connection. the problem is its far more then any provider was ready for. my buddy who works securty bought a 3g modem so he had internet at work and being hes not always in the same place many times they do not have wifi in range.

    5. Re:Not a big deal by luther349 · · Score: 1

      yea people like you get the short end of the stick due to everyone owing a smart-phone and leeching bandwidth for no good reason. thats the down side if there gonna sell 3g stand alone modems then you need to be placed on a sepret node then the millions of smart-phone users so they can handle someone using it as there primary connection.

    6. Re:Not a big deal by Seumas · · Score: 1

      You need a lot of bandwidth if, say, you travel on business a lot and use it to VPN into the office to get things done.

      And, again, if the claim is that no mobile user really *NEEDS* this much bandwidth, then why the fuck bother advertising it as a BROADBAND SERVICE and touting your speed? Look at this! You can download your email in four milliseconds! Zoooom! Also, if the average user doesn't use much bandwidth at all because all they do is check their email and read drudgereport, then there should be PLENTY of bandwidth left over for heavy users and nobody should be bitching, right?

    7. Re:Not a big deal by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Move to the city. If the city is over priced, you can move to the cheapest part of this country, Oklahoma, Kansas Arkansas. People are welcomed here, Otherwise, would you like some Merlot with your Swiss?

    8. Re:Not a big deal by afidel · · Score: 1

      Have you looked for a fixed location WiFi based ISP often called WISP's? My buddy in the Texas hill country that can't even get a cellphone signal from any provider uses a WISP and T-Mobile with UMA for calls.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Not a big deal by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same here. I had uberfast service via Uverse at my last home. Here, I moved between to small towns (40,000 and 3,000) there is 1/4 between the city limits, and I am halfway between on the main thoroughfare. There is fiber all over both towns due to some largish companies encouraging local ISPs and the muni's to pony up. There is a fiber line that runs through my front yard. However, I cannot get cable or DSL, so I opted for 3G... I snatched up a Virgin MiFi as soon as I noticed the rates, it sure beat Cricket Wireless. Now... I can either pony up for basically the same rates as Cricket... (except Cricket does have a 7.5GB cap available) or I can ditch my investment and try to solve the problem otherwise.

      Bunch of arseholes they are... I would've been happy paying another 20-30 per month... which would be exorbitant for the speeds that I was getting, but it would allow wife/son to see Kipper on NetFlix streaming without killing our limit.

      Not happy.

    10. Re:Not a big deal by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      .. isn't that supposed to be 'Would you like some cheese with your whine', not the other way around?

    11. Re:Not a big deal by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Well that sucks. As an idea though: Do you guys have prepaid plans with decent data packages these days? You could buy a bunch of cards and swap 'em out.

      I can buy 5GB for 15 on my prepaid card here in Germany, as often as I want (usually I just buy one per month, since it's only for my phone, and the package expires monthly - it's on vacation that I might buy 5 or 6 packages in the space of a week). Isn't there something similar in the States?

    12. Re:Not a big deal by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      and is a pain in the ass to maintain, gets wonkie when it rains...

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  16. Cell phone or satellite? by tepples · · Score: 1

    So, you're using your smartphone to download the Windows SDK?

    Should someone outside the reach of cable and DSL be using satellite instead?

    1. Re:Cell phone or satellite? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      satellite is crap. you think 5gb is bad try a 200mb cap. and they throttle you all the way back into the dark ages 56k. even capped 3g your probably looking at edge speed. might also shop around. cricket for 1 offers home 3g modems with no caps. maybe you have a simler smaller provider offering the same type of service.

  17. Meh by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1

    T Mobile does the same with their mobile wifi. I pay to tether my phone, and full speed caps at 5 gig, and slows after that. I'm quite happy with it. Now if they'd offer a plan to restore speed after 5 gigs for a price, I might even do that.

  18. Just started with Virgin Mobile last week by pgacv2 · · Score: 2

    I shopped around for a new cell phone plan for several weeks before finally deciding to go with Virgin Mobile, and it's thanks to the fact that I am travelling for my job, because they don't even have stores where I come from so I picked up a prepaid at a Sprint store close to where I am now. They have very sensible plans, and in fact seem to be the only ones who understand that it makes much more sense to limit voice than texts. (All their plans have unlimited text and data; you just get more or fewer minutes depending on how much you pay.)

    I'm disappointed that they would throttle back your broadband, but I like it much better than being cut off or charged extra. I just hope they're open about this "reasonable use" change and don't keep advertising it as completely unlimited. They could do better at mentioning the tax on their plans, too. I thought they were like MetroPCS, which includes taxes in its plans. To be fair, Virgin charges far less tax than other carriers, but it was still an unpleasant surprise. And I can't believe that a mobile company doesn't have a mobile version of its own website.

    Liking them so far. Let's see how the coverage fares when I go back home this weekend.

    1. Re:Just started with Virgin Mobile last week by lbgator · · Score: 1

      I recently switched providers too. I hate the idea of contracts that come with "free phones". I went with cricket and have been very surprised/happy with their service. $55/month for unlimited voice/text/data ($60/month after taxes). No contract and the service has been very reliable. Not as good as Verizon was but I was paying well more with Verizon for limited talk/text and no data.

      If you don't like the way that the big players treat you then put your money where your mouth is and give some of the up and comers a shot.

    2. Re:Just started with Virgin Mobile last week by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I would if any of them had decent coverage.

    3. Re:Just started with Virgin Mobile last week by maxume · · Score: 1

      I only pay sales tax (which is at least somewhat different than telecommunications taxes and fees). Some people get around it by purchasing fillup cards over the internet (but that's a lot of work to save ~$20 or $30 a year).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Just started with Virgin Mobile last week by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      And I can't believe that a mobile company doesn't have a mobile version of its own website.

      What I can't believe is that the "my account" icon on the phone just loads up their (non-mobile) website. I mean, if the thing's unusable on the phone (which it is), why have have a shortcut to it?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Just started with Virgin Mobile last week by pgacv2 · · Score: 1

      I'm happy with VM's coverage so far. They run off Sprint's 3G towers, so (according to the sales rep) you should have coverage anywhere Sprint does.

  19. Free Market by bky1701 · · Score: 2

    Hey, everybody! Don't worry about this. The free market will take care of it. The companies that shaft their customers will lose business. No need to worry.

    Right?

    ...Right?

  20. Re:Kudos to Virgin Mobile by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    5 GB is the soft cap just about every American Provider uses for "unlimited" service. Sprint has had the "throttle anyone who goes above 5 gb" policy in place for a while -- they're just finally closing this last "hole" in it (since they own the Virgin Mobile brand). Of course AT&T no longer offers "unlimited" data, but for those who still have it, it remains at a 5 gb soft cap. Rather than throttle you, they simply threaten to cut you off if you repeatedly exceed it.

    We have 4 wireless carriers in most areas but they all move in such coordinated lockstep you'd think we only had one. Customer service and prices are terrible no matter which you choose because they all act as if they were monopolies and all are making far too much money to challenge that status quo by offering consumers something better . . .

  21. Re:It won't affect you?! by icebraining · · Score: 2

    Are you retarded? The 'How will it affect me?' is clearly part of the message sent by Virgin, not Daevad's question. It's inside the quotes.

  22. They're Also Canceling The Plan Altogether by damnbunni · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you don't already have the $40 'Unlimited' level on automatic update/renewal, you won't be able to buy it in the future.

    They're not going to offer it at all. Just the lower level, much more limited data (and those ARE a hard limit.)

    http://www.virginmobileusa.com/legal/terms-of-service-virgin-mobile#bb2g_plans_expiring

    And they may cancel it completely in the future.

    1. Re:They're Also Canceling The Plan Altogether by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      No they're not. they clearly stated in the email to me that you still still get $40 unlimited, however you are throttled back. What kills me are the people that insist that Verizon's or AT&T's plans were ever listed any different. Their "Unlimited" plans have been this way for at least the last 5 years.

      Regardless, with this news, I think the Mifi I just bought at the end of December is now going back to Virgin Mobile. In a few months I'll have similar access through my iPhone either on Verizon or AT&T.

      I will give Virgin Mobile GREAT praise. I was on the fence for months because I was worried about service and when I finally got it, there were definitely no issues with service and it was roughly comparable to a friend's Mifi

      The problem with these plans is that they advertise true unlimitedness and then they get EVERY idiot jumping on killing that connection with downloads. They're forced to back off. What I don't like is the unreasonable level of service options thereafter. For instance 40$ for 5GB is HIGHLY unreasonable, as much as their $10 for 100MB is. To be fair, Verizon was charging $60 for "unlimited" that had a 5GB cap as well for the same device. Virgin is still cheaper when you factor cost of the device versus cost of being locked into a 2 year contract with Verizon as wel.

    2. Re:They're Also Canceling The Plan Altogether by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the link I posted?

      From http://www.virginmobileusa.com/legal/terms-of-service-virgin-mobile#bb2g_plans_expiring

      Until February 14, 2011, you may purchase or switch to the $40 Broadband2Go plan described below. If as of February 15, 2011 the last plan you purchased was the $40 Broadband2Go plan, you may continue to purchase the $40 Broadband2Go plan until further notice or until you switch to one of the other Broadband2Go plans. Once you switch to another Broadband2Go plan, you will not be able to switch back to the $40 Broadband2Go plan. If as of February 15, 2011 the last plan you purchased was a plan other than $40 Broadband2Go plan, you will not be able to purchase or switch to the $40 Broadband2Go plan.

  23. Re:Throttle or lower priority? by pkinetics · · Score: 1

    This assumes your smart phone is not randomly sending data on its own at a couple of MBs a day.

  24. English translation by noidentity · · Score: 1

    To make sure we can keep offering our $40 Unlimited Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting a speed limit in place for anyone on that plan who uses over 5GB in a month

    Translation: To make sure we can keep offering our $40 "Unlimited" Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting limitations on it, but still calling it unlimited. Simple, really.

    1. Re:English translation by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      To make sure we can keep offering our $40 Unlimited Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting a speed limit in place for anyone on that plan who uses over 5GB in a month

      Translation: To make sure we can keep offering our $40 "Unlimited" Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting limitations on it, but still calling it unlimited. Simple, really.

      $40.00 per month for unlimited mobile Internet (but not unlimited downloaded content) there are saying that access is unlimited connection is unlimited but the actual moving of bytes isn't. fair and reputable.

  25. All you can eat by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    Manager: I'm sorry, sir. You have to leave the buffet now.
    Customer: But it says "All you can eat for $10".
    Manager: That is correct. That is all you can eat for $10.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:All you can eat by Seumas · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, all-you-can-eat places often turn customers away if they consume an unreasonable amount of food. From tales I've heard, it usually involves giving the customer their money back, too.

      Of course, this isn't at all like saying "you're being too much of a pig, so we're cutting you off!".

      Five gigabytes is more like saying "$10 for all you can eat!" and then after you have a slice of bread, a coke, and a piece of ham, they tell you that you've had too much and need to go away, thanks for the cash. Sure, you thought you could eat all you want, but if we actually stocked enough food for everyone to eat all they wanted (or even enough for the average person to reasonably eat), then it would simply be too expensive for us to run our business!

    2. Re:All you can eat by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like: "Sir, would you mind eating a bit slower, so that the kitchens have the time to prepare the food for other customers also? At the rate you're going now, nobody else is able to get to the food before you do."

  26. Shouldn't call it by McTickles · · Score: 1

    "Unlimited"... its false advertising... they could be taken to court and fined heavily. (at least in Europe, now I dont know what half-arsed laws you yanks have...)

    Unlimited means UNLIMITED . period . ISPs and Mobile providers should open a dictionary once in a while, wouldn't hurt.

    5Gigs = 250Gigs yeah maybe in 1998... Nowadays with Flash spamming adverts and all that useless shit, client-side scriptings, cross-linking bullshit to social sites, more like 1 hour ?

    --
    www.twilightcampaign.net

    1. Re:Shouldn't call it by luther349 · · Score: 1

      there site may not have the change yet but on there lesser limited plans at least on sprint its printed in a huge font 5gb limit. im shure thers will say the same.

  27. Or get a device that doesnt block you. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If the device gives you enough control, then tethering restrictions dont matter.

    How could TMobile detect tethering if the device makes it look like a seamless, untethered connection?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Or get a device that doesnt block you. by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1

      HTC Magic with custom 2.1 ROM. I'm still looking for a seamless bit of software, but that still won't help me if I go over 5 gigs in a month.

  28. Re:Free Market by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Sure, if the customers don't idiotically support the companies they loathe. But keep sending them money each month for their crappy service and what do you expect?

  29. 5 GB is also... by cgenman · · Score: 1

    5 GB is a lot of data? 5 GB happens to be:

    1. About one hour of Netflix streaming, every day for a week.
    2. One fully-featured Linux install, with the bells and whistles.
    3. A Steam purchase of BioShock 2.
    4. About 20 minutes of uncompressed video from a decent camera.
    5. About 1% of a full system backup.

    1. Re:5 GB is also... by luther349 · · Score: 2

      yes but those thing your use your pc or a wifi hotspot for. they probably throttle you down to edge speeds, still useful for browsing but forget netflicks etc. i assume this is going to apply to there 25$ unimited data phone plans to. 5gb still could play wow all month long mmos use very little data unless theirs a update. we did wow for one month purely on 3g and used 250mb data. i still prefer that from being cutoff or being charged by the mb when i whent over if i ever did.

    2. Re:5 GB is also... by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      and Virgin Mobile is saying that they can't handle a lot of people doing about one hour of Netflix streaming, every day for a week. Or A Steam purchase of BioShock 2. I sympathize with you are so rural you have to do this to have any internet but none of the companies will. This will continue. Your choice will eventually be move or be the lowest level of internet.

    3. Re:5 GB is also... by luther349 · · Score: 1

      why would that sicken you didnt i just say mmos use very little data. minus the updates that can be sevrel gigs but we did those on his home hardline. mmos in genrel use very little data being they handel thousands of connections on eatch server. heck they got mmos on smartphones now.

  30. Cmon by Alarindris · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, 5GB is A LOT of data. To give you an idea, it's about 250 hours of web browsing or over 500,000(!) emails. So this change shouldn't affect you unless you're a heavy downloader/streamer/etc.

    So, if you use more than email you are a heavy user? If that's all people used the web for, I doubt it would even exist anymore.

  31. Re:Virgin Mobile, where? Which country? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Oh stop your sniveling. I'm in Canada, and I have no problem figuring out what they're talking about. If it were about a nation other than the US, it would say so in the summary. If it doesn't say, then they're talking about the US. It's not rocket science.

    I'm sure that you already understand this as well as I do - you've just got some kind of persecution complex which demands that everyone acknowledge your particular corner of the world. Well too bad. Do something notable, and maybe /. will have a story about you. "Dickwad in Greater Southeastern Bostwanistan consumes 5 keyboards rectally". Then you can feel all warm and fuzzy because your exploits got your country mentioned on Slashdot. Until then, chill the fuck out.

  32. Re:Virgin Mobile, where? Which country? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Uhhh you DO know that /. is an American site yes? it even says so in their TOS! So basically what you do doing is no different than me going to a Japanese site and saying "Speak fucking English!"

    As for TFA, who in their right mind hasn't figured every single thing an ISP says should be replaced by little word balloons that say "Bullshit" "lie" and "OMFG you actually BELIEVED that? LOL!". Hell their TOS might as well say "We'll do what we like, sell your data to anybody who'll give us a buck, fuck you every single way in every position we can think of, and if you don't like it please feel free to write us a nasty note and then burn it because we don't read those things anyway. Oh and we made deals with the other ISPs so you're fucked either way. Have a nice day!"

    You know, I thought politicians were bad, but ISPs have made bullshit and lies into an artform. Hell they would take the gold if BS ever becomes an Olympic sport. For those that bought those Mifi routers maybe you can find a sucker on eBay. But anybody who didn't know ISPs were kings of lie haven't seen any of the recent Hughes sat Internet commercials. Man those guys lie like champs!

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  33. Re:Free Market by damnbunni · · Score: 1

    Sometimes you don't have a lot of choice.

    Crappy service is better than NO service, and sometimes there isn't a non-crappy alternative.

  34. Re:Virgin Mobile, where? Which country? by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

    Do something notable, and maybe /. will have a story about you. "Dickwad in Greater Southeastern Bostwanistan consumes 5 keyboards rectally". Then you can feel all warm and fuzzy because your exploits got your country mentioned on Slashdot. Until then, chill the fuck out.

    Huh? Where did you get that from? You just sound like a jerk.

    Somehow you have interpreted my post to be "Oh I want this to be about me" - when it was "Oh I wish they'd make it clear what the hell they're talking about" - you seem to have comprehension issues - or was that just some other assumption you made...

    How hard is it to specify the location to which something applies? It is information that is useful to the reader.

    Hell why state any specifics at all, let's just leave everything to assumption.

    If it were about a nation other than the US, it would say so in the summary

    Why is this? I've already suggested as to why this is...

    --
    Never happened. True story.
  35. Re:Virgin Mobile, where? Which country? by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

    Uhhh you DO know that /. is an American site yes? it even says so in their TOS! So basically what you do doing is no different than me going to a Japanese site and saying "Speak fucking English!"

    Look, there is a story about a specific GLOBAL company that is being read by a GLOBAL audience yet the editor think that being specific about what who it apples to doesn't matter because the site is American?

    Your analogy is garbage - I referring to the content, not the language used. - I'm saying, provide the context that is required to make the story useful to those who may not be American.. I know, bizarre concept.....

    --
    Never happened. True story.
  36. Oh the irony! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    I Love how it says: "To give you an idea, it's about 250 hours of web browsing or over 500,000(!) emails."

    And that's exactly the example they use on their website to distinguish the $10 100MB "limited" plan from the UNLIMITED:
    100mb = 5 hrs web browsing, 10,000 emails without attachments
    UNLIMITED = UNLIMITED

    are they going to change UNLIMITED to being 250 hours of web browsing and 500,000 emails?

    My real problem is these devices are designed for PCs, not cellphones, and how incredibly easy is it to zoom past 5 gigabytes on a PC over broadband? With game downloads and updates measuring in the gigabytes now and the popularity of streaming HD video most users would probably exceed 5GB within their first day and not even notice it.

    I understand what they're trying to do but it's not right. They're trying to eliminate the top 10% of customers that actually bought this service for what it's suppose to be, unlimited wireless broadband, and keep the other 90% that never or rarely use 3G data. This is like offering $10 satellite TV and then limiting you to one channel if you watch TV more than an hour a day.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  37. Re:Free Market by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Q: When were the first US telco plans sold?
    A: When God put Broadband2Go in front of Adam and said "Choose yourself a plan"

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  38. Re:Free Market by sjames · · Score: 1

    The market can only "punish" the extremes of shafting the customer. With the DOJ and FTC asleep at the switch, we are racing to the bottom on many fronts, so shafted tends to be a constant. Only the degree of shafting varies.

  39. How to Lie Effectively: Virgin Mobile Demonstrates by skywire · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, 5GB is A LOT of data. To give you an idea, it's about 250 hours of web browsing or over 500,000(!) emails. So this change shouldn't affect you unless you're a heavy downloader/streamer/etc.

    An honest rendering of this would be, "We really only intended for you to do unlimited emailing and web browsing (defined as reading through html pages very slowly, mind you; certainly not as enjoying the kind of content that we all take for granted these days). This won't affect you unless you are a moderately heavy downloader of documents, or you try to watch videos. To give you an idea, you could burn through 5GB by watching just four two-hour movies."

    --
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  40. Think about it by bunhed · · Score: 1

    Trying to have any kind of long term relationship with an outfit called Virgin is bound to end in disappointment, one way or another.

    1. Re:Think about it by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      whew! i thought you were slandering virgins on slashdot. that would explain the lack of flamebait moderations.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  41. Not bait/switch at all, and no issue to most users by xenoc_1 · · Score: 2

    Except for three things:

    1. Most carriers have multiple billing cycles. I've got two separate T-Mobile accounts (3 devices on one and 2 in another area code on another) and they cycle on different weeks.They have had the 5GB and then throttle till next month "unlimited" concept on data cards for quite some time, BTW. I've seen the same thing when I was on AT&T with more than one account. So the un-throttling will happen spread across the month, at least in smaller cluster.

    2. Most users are not going anywhere near to 5GB of usage. /. users are totally atypical.

    3. It's not a cure to network congestion/oversell. It's a deterrent to keep the tiny proportion of potential customers who will go over 5GB from becoming customers, or for existing customers who regularly do so from remaining to be customers. It sometimes makes sense to "fire your customer" if said customer doesn't match your product offering and capabilities. If you regularly go over 5GB/month data, you are NOT the customer they want.

    And it probably isn't the product you want either, given that EV-DO Rev.A isn't all that fast. T-Mo "4G" HSPA+ or for that matter their 3G is faster than Sprint's EV-DO Rev.A (Virigin's network) - I've had both in multiple locations. Sprint's "4G" (actually Clear's WiMax network) is very fast and is unlimited with no throttling. Sprint sells it as 5GB 3G with unlimited 4G, and I think Clear does too, while also selling an unlimited 4G-only plan cheaper. If you're in a Clear WiMax area you're better of with this, and WiMax was actually designed as fixed-broadband replacement.

  42. What are the legalities? by RobDollar · · Score: 1

    Out of curiosity, do all broadband suppliers have different contracts or is there a standard in what you buy vs. what you end up getting after a few months?

    For example, if I get an "unlimited" (that word can't go without inverted commas when related to broadband) package, but end up a few months later with a revised cap, can I cancel the contract or am I still bound by a "we can change this at any time" clause?

  43. Re:I do! by thunderclap · · Score: 1

    I am sorry Mr. Amish sir but Its a nice try and all. I understand that the computer has to stay in the field house but really in the 21st century there are no actual farmers any more. There's you folks and the Mennonites and the big corporate farms. Anyone else has to make hard choices, and that's what a sacrifice is. You choose to leave in a rural area without basic services. (basic to us, electricity, TV and Phone) Well thankjs anyway.

  44. Tempus Edax Rerum by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

    > $40 Unlimited Broadband2Go Plan at such a great price, we're putting a speed limit

    It would behoove us to pay attention to words. Words matter. These plans are really _unmetered_ plans. Why not unlimited?

    Well, the number of hours in a day is a limit. The number of days in a week is a limit. The number of weeks in a month is a limit.
    Scilicet, if you decided to download the Internet you would not be on the meter, but you would be on a clock limit. That is before they start parsing the word "unlimited."

    Remember, a "speed limit" is a limit, and a limit is not without limits. Stop being fooled, or better yet coopted.

  45. There is an Alternative by atriel · · Score: 1

    I use my Sprint MIFI with Millenicom on their unlimited BYOD, and the offer TRUE unlimited service - I routinely burn through 12-15GB/month. I have no association with them, other than being a very satisfied customer.

  46. Unlimited it is not. by GoochOwnsYou · · Score: 1

    In Australia we would call that a 5GB plan. Doesnt happen so much on mobile data but on ADSL its very common that once the 'data limit' has been reached you will get throttled to 72k. Looks like Virgin is applying a similar principle to mobile data.

    --
    This sig has been distributed under the Creative Commons license.
  47. Re:Free market by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Hell yes! If you let the government interfere when companies lie and cheat then you'll be on the slippery slope to communism before you can say "socialized healthcare".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  48. How is it not unlimited? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The network you get is still unlimited. It's not like you could actually use an infinite amount of bandwidth before - unlimited simply means you can keep using the internet as much as you like. That remains true after you pass the (very reasonable) 5GB cap, it's just that it gets a bit slower at the end. I think they have hit upon the nicest possible way to offer "unlimited" internet with reasonable real-life restrictions to keep bandwidth hogs from chewing up way more bandwidth than they are paying for.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How is it not unlimited? by Znork · · Score: 1

      Which means it'd be perfectly acceptable if they offered it as a 20kb/s connection with burst capabilities, which is the actual usable bandwidth you have available over time.

      It's simply a matter of honesty; if they aren't offering unlimited use at a specific data transfer rate, then they shouldn't claim they are.

    2. Re:How is it not unlimited? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Shhh. Your entirely reasonable comment is how we do things here.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:How is it not unlimited? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Um, NOT how we do things here. See? You've got me all rattled.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:How is it not unlimited? by Hydian · · Score: 1

      But they are only chewing up the bandwidth that they are paying for. The devices aren't capable of using more. They are also using the data transfer that they are paying for as "unlimited" means "without limit" and therefore even if they max the connection 24/7 for the entire month, that is within the contract terms.

      If you offer an unlimited 3G internet connection, you can't throttle it back to Edge after some threshold is reached as that would no longer be a 3G connection.

      If they don't want to offer an unlimited plan, then don't offer it. Calling it unlimited and then putting restrictions on it is false advertising. Not that any of this is new or anything. They've been doing it for years now.

  49. Re:Free market by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    You realise that bandwidth isn't actually cheap, no? Actually, it's really expensive - if you buy it on a 1:1 contention ratio. The reason your ISP is able to sell it to you so cheap is that they actually buy it on a 1:45 or more contention ratio.

    You want unlimited bandwidth (and do note that bandwidth is charged on a commit throughput basis, not data quantity basis) you better to be prepared to pay many thousands of dollars more than you currently do - just call up Level3 or Equinix and ask them how much it'll cost to run an 8Mb/s committed fibre line to your house. Then you can go lease some spectrum, and build GSM/3G/LTE towers all across the country and run fibre backhaul to your house so that you can use that pipe anywhere with a cellphone.

    A few billion dollars should do it.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  50. Re:Free Market by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    If the baby bells that took hundreds of billions from the government and never delivered, then rolled out cell service, decide to hand that money back, it may entice a free market competitor. But you know that's never going to happen.

  51. Re:Not bait/switch at all, and no issue to most us by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    "2. Most users are not going anywhere near to 5GB of usage. /. users are totally atypical."

    WTF? It's ridiculously easy to blow this cap, for example by watching YouTube videos.

  52. In the UK, Three.co.uk is the only honest one. by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    Only carrier with their own towers and data infrastructure, which they are still investing heavily in.

    my plan is sold as;

    2,000 free minutes per month
    5,000 free texts per month
    "all you can eat" data per month (their quotes)

    For 30 quid a month, around 45/50 bucks, Samsung Galaxy S on android 2.2 included.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  53. is that ... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    5 gigi-bytes or 5 gigi-BITS per month?

    I wouldn't put it past them!

  54. over 500,000 emails?! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    the number of dipshits that try to attach an entire drive to an email because they don't know how the file system works has grown exponentially. the only emails small enough to divide into to 500K are spam. messages that small are always text now days.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  55. Re:How to Lie Effectively: Virgin Mobile Demonstra by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    i got a trial version from a reseller of those overdrive hotspots because he wanted to see if i could set up a bridge for his lan. i set up a windows machine just in case i would need ie to connect to the management page (which is annoyingly common). as soon as everything was up that machine started doing updates. needless to say, there wasn't anything left afterwards. it worked; but, assuming he is a good netitizen, 50% of his bandwidth will be lost first tuesday of every month. :(

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  56. hows that net neutrality thing working out. by __aavqan3009 · · Score: 1

    good i hope ...see, thats not unlimited. that plan has what we call in the field...a "limit"

  57. glapalom by glapalom · · Score: 1

    Much better than Clear Wimax. They throttle everyone all the time because they were never prepaired to handle even the smallest of loads. I have complained to the BBB about them because they have called me an excessive user when I watch 1 Netflix movie while my son plays on the XBox with XBox Live in the same evening. They advertised 6Mb/s download speeds and I am fortunate to get 1.5Mb/s down most of the time. Other than the first week of use, I rarely ever see 6Mb/s downloads, and I am only a mile or so from the nearest tower.

    --
    Joshua 24:15
  58. Definition of Unlimited by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I guess the word "unlimited" has a different meaning inside Virgin.
    I wonder how long it will be before we see a class-action suit for false advertising?

  59. Given that there's no contract by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... I can't really argue about this too much, but still - "Unlimited" Broadband2Go. For certain smaller values of "unlimited".

  60. Sure, if you have that available by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Trouble is, there are huge sections of the country that are not served by any form of broadband other than 3G. I understand that Virgin probably had to do something, but why can't they just offer a higher tier of service (at an additional cost)?

    1. Re:Sure, if you have that available by luther349 · · Score: 1

      yea people that are using it as a primary connetion get the short end of the deal.

  61. Re:Not bait/switch at all, and no issue to most us by Hydian · · Score: 1

    2. Most users are not going anywhere near to 5GB of usage. /. users are totally atypical.

    Are you thinking of phone users? People using hotspots are probably hitting 5GB pretty regularly. Aircard users have historically struggled with 5GB limits, so I don't see why hotspot users wouldn't also have this issue.

  62. First they take away my favorite plan, now this... by IronSight · · Score: 1

    I have been using broadband to go for quite a little while now, and even scripted up a way to use it in linux in python/pygtk (http://code.google.com/p/vmdialer) and this has been a rollercoaster with them as they keep changing their plans around. First they had an assortment of plans, the 10 dollar plan for when you just need it on a weekend trip, the 20 dollar for 250 megs (the one I used for just sitting in irc at work), the 40 dollar for 1 gig, and the 60 for "unlimited" 5gb. Then they changed it, and it was better for me, where the 20 dollar plan gave you 300 megs. All the plans received slightly raised caps. Then they took away my 20 dollar plan, and made it 40 for "real" unlimited and it was finally a deal really. But since they capped it back down, and I would want to switch back to my 20 dollar plan, it's now gone. I don't think it would be so bad, but they have had so many plan changes recently, and the last plan was actually what one would call a deal, it's upsetting. It kind of feels like when you were a kid, and some person would give you a gift, then take it back saying, "Nevermind, I can't afford to give this to you".

  63. Re:Free Market by kbradford · · Score: 1

    There are still unlimited options with Sprint. http://www.millenicom.com/ resells Sprint 3G for $70/month (plus $165 startup costs), so the same tower you used with VM will be the one you get with Millenicom. No caps, no contract, month to month, could change at any moment, yada^3.

    They also offer a 20GB package from Verizon for $60 (same $165 setup), as a January promotion.

    Note they don't tell you who the upstream provider is unless you ask. You can read real user comments about them at http://www.dslreports.com/forum/cover,3165

    I was a happy customer until my speed with the sprint service suddenly dropped to almost nothing, and no one could figure out why. After much gnashing of teeth and HW Upgrade$, I gave up and called Comcast to see if there was anything they could do. (They had quoted me $2000 to get on line a few years ago.) They hooked me up to the nearest neighbor's drop for nothing and now I am wired.

  64. Except Virgin doesn't allow BYOD. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Even if Virgin doesn't allow people to bring their own device (BYOD?) it isn't the only service provider that supports mifi 2200s. That eBay link I already provided listed them from Verizon and Sprint as well. The Wireless MiFi -A Product Review lists others such as ATT, T-Mobile, and Orange.

    However you bring up a valid point, locked hardware. These should not exist, buyers should be able to use whatever service provider they want when they buy a device. That is unless there was a contract such as providers offering free or reduced prices if the buyer signs up for 2 year service plans. Even then though after those 2 years the owner should still be able to use another service provider should they so choose.

    Falcon

  65. "Unlimited" by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    That's the problem, "Unlimited"! Such ads should either be banned or the services should really be unlimited. As I see it it's false advertizing, so users should be able to sue. Of course corporations sometimes think of these things so they include clauses in contracts that allows them to unilaterally change service plans.

    Falcon