Slashdot Mirror


DSL Installation Fail

An anonymous reader writes "Here's an example of fine Qwest workmanship. In our business park, they just installed a DSL connection for our neighbors, for which we share an exterior utility space. They left: a DSL modem stuffed in a cardboard box, wrapped in a Wal-Mart bag, sitting outside in what will be below-zero (F) temps, on top of a bank of ten natural gas meters in some of the driest air of the year. They also left it plugged into an exposed exterior power outlet above a snowbank, with network cables running around the building, through snowbanks, coupled and protected by zip-lock baggies, and into our neighbors office. Not to mention the hack-job of patching the phone cable directly into the demarcation box. And if you're wondering — I was told upon calling them that this is not their problem, and I need to contact my primary phone service provider."

371 comments

  1. Horatio Caine says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like Qwest thought they had this job *sunglasses* in the bag.

    YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

    1. Re:Horatio Caine says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like samzenpus blindly fat-pawed his keyboard *sunglassess* and approved this article.

      YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

    2. Re:Horatio Caine says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I see Digg has made its way to slashdot.

    3. Re:Horatio Caine says by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It's Idle, what did you expect?

    4. Re:Horatio Caine says by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, because memes from throughout the internet have NEVER made their way to /. before!

    5. Re:Horatio Caine says by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

      It was my master plan!

      1) introduce memes to /.
      2) ?????
      3) PROFIT!

      Wait...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:Horatio Caine says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or started here?

    7. Re:Horatio Caine says by JustOK · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, master plans you

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    8. Re:Horatio Caine says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd put money on this is not being a Qwest install.

      My bet is it is a Local wanna be Phone Service provider reselling qwest dsl/phone services that did the install.

      Call the fire marshal, building inspector or any municipal inspector that will listen to you.

    9. Re:Horatio Caine says by qmaqdk · · Score: 1

      +1 Epic lol

      --
      My UID is prime. Hah!
    10. Re:Horatio Caine says by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      No it hasn't because there's no pictures of cute kittens

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    11. Re:Horatio Caine says by mehemiah · · Score: 1

      It's slashdot idle, thats the point.

    12. Re:Horatio Caine says by Reed+Solomon · · Score: 1

      ummm......... that meme (and probably no meme) has never originated on digg. Also, nobody actually uses digg because it is a piece of garbage. This post is off topic, but I stand by its importance.

  2. Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the same work done last week and it cam e out great.

    1. Re:Eh? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had the same work done last week and it cam e out great.

      Except for the spurious spaces it inserts into your posts once in a while. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. Tell them your next call will be to the bombsquad by Tmack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Im sure they will remove the suspicious package right away...

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  4. Wow by Aerorae · · Score: 1

    *I* Could do THAT!!!! And I bet they'll pay me more than Starbucks!

    1. Re:Wow by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      Depends on if you work for an ISP or for a contractor company. An ISP, you'd make a little more starting out. A contractor company, you'd make enough, but you wouldn't have benefits and you'd pay your own taxes, so, meh.

  5. Call the Fire Marshal by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously. Call the Fire Marshal, tell them this is what Qwest did as electrical/phone work, and ask if it meets safety standards. Try to control your laughter as you ask.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
    1. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by nomadic · · Score: 0, Troll

      And then laugh as your neighbors come over and beat you down for killing their internet access.

    2. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure you could bring Qwest up on a lawsuit for installing the stuff improperly in the first place, and sue for a proper installation plus damages for the time there's no service.

    3. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The info on who calls in is priv. So the neighbors will not know.

    4. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, right, samzenpus is usually full of HYPERBOLE and crap. I fully expect this comment won't be posted because it's critical of a moderator. How on earth do you not know that it wasn't the USPS (United States Postal System that we all hate) that didn't leave it there? Actually, myself and many of my friends here in Florida have been TRYING really hard to get the RIDICULOUS BrightHouse/Comcast cable modem prices down here in Florida. $47.95 a month for 10mbps internet? And $32.95 a month for ONLY 1mbps speed? You get what you deserve. There is NO competition since the US federal government combined ATT and Verison, we all know that. We are all paying the price now, literally.

    5. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the neighbors would rather lose internet than see the natural gas main go "boom"
      (like happened in Philadelphia).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't work. They would just remove their equipment. As for lack of service, pretty much every ISP's contracts state that there is no guarantee on uptime. You MIGHT be able to get a month free out of the deal.

    7. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Slashdot editors don't screen comments, retard.

    8. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hell, Slashdot editors don't screen summaries!

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    9. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If an outdoor natural gas manifold goes boom because someone put a router on top of it, there are bigger problems than a clumsy network installation.
      Not that I'm letting the installers off the hook or anything.

      . o O { What if the investigators of the Philadelphia explosion find out it was caused by a router?! }

    10. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I'm sure the neighbors would rather lose internet than see the natural gas main go "boom"

      Qwest: Ride the shock front?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Call the gas company. We frown on people putting shit on our gas meters. Believe me, that stuff will be gone in no time.

      I've seen worse, though. I found a lightning rod grounded to a metal gas service. Thankfully we found it and had it removed before lightning hit it.

    12. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      When did the USPS start hooking up telco equipment upon delivery!?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ACMA would fine the installer $10k on the spot for that in Australia. Sadly there are far to many people who do dodgy installs like this all over the world. :

      Wonder how long it will take someone to 'recycle' the spare copper in the wires.

    14. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a crazy ranting lunatic.

      Now say something funny for your biscuit and make us laugh again!

    15. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They broke their end of the contract, in that electrical work done by a contractor has to be done to code. They didn't do the work to code, so they have to make good on it. They won't remove their equipment, either. Why would they forsake another customer that they're already, absolutely in the red on, when a small investment could easily mean that they'll move into profitability rather than be hit with an overall loss.

      I would even wager that when a higher tier customer support rep is threatened with a lawsuit over faulty electrical work, they would just send a guy out to redo it.

    16. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Skreems · · Score: 1

      It also sounds like somebody should lose their license over this. The entire reason we have licensing for electricians and such is so there's someone directly responsible for knowing that this kind of stuff is dangerous.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    17. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot editor: What does the word screen mean?

    18. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by bwayne314 · · Score: 1

      I think you're over-thinking it... its a simple case of successful troll being successful!

    19. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      Sadly, cable installers fall under low-voltage code and don't need to be licensed anything in most jurisdictions. That there's an AC box out in the snow, however, crosses the line, likely. Take a phone pic of it and email it to press@qwest.com. A truck ought to roll on that one.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    20. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Sadly, cable installers fall under low-voltage code and don't need to be licensed anything in most jurisdictions. That there's an AC box out in the snow, however, crosses the line, likely. Take a phone pic of it and email it to press@qwest.com. A truck ought to roll on that one.

      yes, and a few heads too.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    21. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by stimpleton · · Score: 1

      "Call the gas company. We frown on people putting shit on our gas meters. Believe me, that stuff will be gone in no time."

      I have been at the recieving end of this sort of thing. Utility companies have viewed it as "Dont care who did it, you are the property owner". Often the liability falls whoever is in their gun sights.

      Their attitude is we seek costs from you, whether you go after the infringer is your bidness.

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    22. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1957706&cid=34935542

      Come on guys. Read the retraction from the person that posted it originally.

    23. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does low voltage even have a code to follow? Isn't this why low voltage installs get away with so much poor work. If the Power adapter is inside and just the low voltage lead goes outside of the house.. I'm just rambling now.

    24. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2

      RTFS:

      a DSL modem stuffed in a cardboard box, wrapped in a Wal-Mart bag, sitting outside in what will be below-zero (F) temps, on top of a bank of ten natural gas meters in some of the driest air of the year.

      Obvious fire hazard, given the proximity to a starter (cardboard and plastic), flammable material (gas) and potential for sparking from anything leaking through the Walmart bag.

      They also left it plugged into an exposed exterior power outlet above a snowbank

      Another obvious fire hazard.

    25. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      Low-voltage doesn't apply under the same codes as electrical work, though there is some overlap. However, I've seen these contracts, and they never say anything about installation quality.

      If you THREATEN a lawsuit, they might fix the situation. If you actually FILE a lawsuit, they'll remove their equipment and terminate their contract. (Another thing they're allowed to do in almost all of these contracts.) Then you don't have any actual damages to sue over.\

      Also, they're barely in the red. They'll reclaim what they paid to their sub-contractor for the installation. The loss of customer service man-hours would be a drop in the bucket for most ISP's.

      NOTE: I'm a low-voltage technician specializing in commercial locations.

    26. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Unless something is drastically different between call centres in the US versus those in the UK, a "higher tier" customer service rep just means "one who can be trusted to continue breathing after they take off the headphones with the recorded message saying "breathe in.... breathe out..."".

      Threatening with a lawsuit is an extremely good way to get them to clam up and come off the phone - chances are they're not authorised to discuss anything concerning legal proceedings and so about all they can do is apologise and hang up.

    27. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by julesh · · Score: 1

      As for lack of service, pretty much every ISP's contracts state that there is no guarantee on uptime

      Note that what a contract says and what a court will decide it means are two different things. See any textbook concerning contract disclaimers and neglicence claims (e.g. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aGCYmYX4cZ8C&pg=PA150&lpg=PA150&dq=enforceability+of+us+contract+terms+limiting+liability&source=bl&ots=cW2rVzfFV5&sig=s0lK1frWbFowZsBe9QSieekD5lU&hl=en&ei=YQA4TZPuOoKyhAf-koXICg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&sqi=2&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false which says:

      As a starting point, liability disclaimers are likely to be construed narrowly (and therefore) as not applying to negligence conduct - at least in the absence of clear and express language to this effect. [...] It may not be possible to effectively disclaim a supplier's liability for gross negligence, irrespective of the language used.

      This case looks like gross negligence to me, and so the supplier is likely to be responsible for any damages caused by that negligence, regardless of what the contract states.

      This is not legal advice; consult a lawyer who is an expert on contracts in your local jurisdiction if you want to rely on it.

    28. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it but he doesn't say who's done it...

      Teun

    29. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      The problem is you're thinking like a logical person looking for what would be best in their situation. Not like some pointy-haired from a big corporation, who wants to have as little work as possible now, push the blame as far as possible and act as if nothing happened.

      Expecting sane reaction to a problem from a corporation is a very common mistake.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    30. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It's not out in the snow. It has a plastic bag over it. Lulz.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    31. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Read your contract and make sure you didn't give up your right to sue, in favor of "binding arbitration"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    32. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by lazybeam · · Score: 2

      My neighbour had their phone line coming out of the pit, over about a metre of council land, up a retaining wall, across the front garden and snaked into their house. I don't know if it was Telstra or Dodgy Bros, but it was like that for over a year. Of course, if they had DSL the modem would be inside the house, not outside! I wonder what would have happened if a mower had've gone over it?

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    33. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Lawsuit? Just cut the damn wires with a pair of wire snips and toss the thing in the dumpster.

      If I had seen that installation I would not have got as far as working out that it was a router. A plastic bag with wires coming out of it? That would be an immediate call to 911 to report a suspicious device even if it wasn't stuck on top of a gas manifold.

      If I had gone as far as to work out it was a router, I would have called the gas board and told them that there was a serious incendiary risk.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    34. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by ElecCham · · Score: 1

      That wasn't in Colorado, was it? Oh wait, never mind... that was just slightly different... Friend of mine worked installing mobile homes for a while, years ago, and caught a guy about to weld the ground for a house's electrical service to the same house's gas line...

      --
      Sig broken, watch for .finger
    35. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often the liability falls whoever is in their gun sights.

      Gun sights? Those aren't gun sights, those are surveyor's marks.

    36. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would even wager that when a higher tier customer support rep is threatened with a lawsuit over faulty electrical work, they would just send a guy out to redo it.

      And I'm sure if you say the word 'sue' or 'lawsuit' to a customer support rep you will be referred to the legal department and hung up on.

    37. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some states don't have any building code related to low voltage wiring, while others require a low voltage license for the installer and all sorts of other requirements. Depending on what state you're in you could have a code violation or none at all.

    38. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by operagost · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to the use of the outdoor receptacle. Most of those receptacles are only weather tight when not in use. They can't be used for a permanent installation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    39. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Call the Fire Marshal, tell them this is what Qwest did as electrical/phone work, and ask if it meets safety standards.

      Yes. I'm sure the neighbors would rather lose internet (temporarily) when the fire marshal disconnects the DSL from the gas mains, rather than risk a loud "boom" (like happened in Philadelphia).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    40. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by dnahelicase · · Score: 1

      Lawsuit? Just cut the damn wires with a pair of wire snips and toss the thing in the dumpster.

      If I had seen that installation I would not have got as far as working out that it was a router. A plastic bag with wires coming out of it? That would be an immediate call to 911 to report a suspicious device even if it wasn't stuck on top of a gas manifold.

      Seriously, if people get in trouble for hanging lights that look like cartoon aliens in Boston, why shouldn't a crappy installation of wires and electronics on top of exposed gas lines get people riled in the same way?

    41. Re:Call the Fire Marshal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a head to roll, you'd first have to decapi.... oh my god, is that what you mean? I'M NEVER GOING TO BE A CABLE INSTALLER!

  6. Right On... by VTI9600 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I often call to complain that my neighbor's DSL isn't set up correctly...oh, wait.

    1. Re:Right On... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, when you view one picture it says "Probably what knocked our Fax offline"

      If Qwest's crappy Installation knocks one of my services offline, I'd damn well complain.

      He's got every right to complain and demand they fix it.

    2. Re:Right On... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see you didn't look at the pictures. They strung UTP cable right across the snow-covered grass and entryway of the guy who's complaining! You can't even swing the door open without a likely network outage!

    3. Re:Right On... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you know it's not shielded twisted pair?

    4. Re:Right On... by arth1 · · Score: 0

      The pictures have apparently been taken down.
      One more indication that this wasn't true in the first place. Perhaps Qwest called him with a cease and desist?

    5. Re:Right On... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude, you jumped the shark on ethics when you decided to use other people's bandwidth. Just because a door is open doesn't give you the right to walk in. You SHOULD be telling your neighbors how to secure their WLANs.

    6. Re:Right On... by dex22 · · Score: 1

      In fact, offer to do it for them, and help them set the password ;)

    7. Re:Right On... by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      I did something similar from my apartment at the start of every year in university: find unsecured wifi, use default router passwords, set SSID to say "secure this wifi".

    8. Re:Right On... by garwain · · Score: 1

      Because my local cable company did a poor hack at installing the wire from the road (used the poles that the power company put in, at longer than normal distances, with a tension wire), the cable stretches , and about every 6 months I have to call them up and report that my connection is not working because a high wind basically caused the wires to break... again... and suggest that they might want to install 2 more poles... Looking out my window, I see 7 different wires that they have installed, and couldn't be bothered to rip down then they broke...

  7. But then what kind of asshole by mozumder · · Score: 1, Funny

    Calls to have their DSL installed in the middle of a snowy winter?

    ASSHOLES CUSTOMERS, that's who. /blame game.

    1. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Lunoria · · Score: 1

      Sure, blame the customer. Maybe the customer had an installation date sent some time in advance. The blame lies with Qwest Technicians. If the snow is too deep to do a good job, it's better to explain to the customer and reschedule.

    2. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Meshach · · Score: 1

      :But then what kind of asshole calls to have their DSL installed in the middle of a snowy winter?

      WTF? Would you rather have no internet until the spring thaw? If you offer a service that is "24 hour" then you have to support it in all kinds of weather. That is not being an asshole but being a customer.

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, so all installs are supposed to be scheduled in the other 3 seasons? u troll or qwest employee?

    4. Re:But then what kind of asshole by countSudoku() · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      YEAH!!1! Those fuckers probably want a phone line, cable TV, gas, electricity and mail service too! Why do people move in the winter? Shit, they're lucky to get DSL in the first place! Why can't people just stay where they are for the rest of their lives? This is just ridiculous. If the Tea Party were in power, this would be done RIGHT the first time!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    5. Re:But then what kind of asshole by gunner800 · · Score: 1

      Do you want installers to be unemployed 1/4 of the year?

    6. Re:But then what kind of asshole by mozumder · · Score: 1

      No.

      I'd send them to south america.

    7. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot, so +1 for injecting a reference to the right-wing in a topic that has nothing to do with politics. But -1 for failing to ask if the modem runs Linux, so you're back to zero, bucko. Better luck with the whoring next time.

    8. Re:But then what kind of asshole by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Seems like qwest technicians are too busy browsing slashdot to do their job right. There is absolutely no excuse for this, no matter how "assholish" the customer. Just looks bad on you the technician anyways.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    9. Re:But then what kind of asshole by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Calls to have their DSL installed in the middle of a snowy winter?

      ASSHOLES CUSTOMERS, that's who. /blame game.

      Sorry, but Construction is done year round. The fact they didn't run any PVC between the boxes and then brought out an entire set of enclosures to keep the weather from creating further damage, fire risk, etc., not to mention running a separate power conduit to expand the capacity is completely unprofessional. Furthermore, if the Building Management works with Qwest I'm sure they can provide a point of access to their wiring plan and there should be no wiring exposed. It's clear the Gas company had a tight and concise plan by those pictures.

    10. Re:But then what kind of asshole by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't government ownership of fiber be anti-business and against the Tea Party platform of smaller, weaker government? I expect the Tea Party to advocate government takeover of fiber lines around the same time they also advocate more stringent regulations on banks and insurance companies (i.e. never).

    11. Re:But then what kind of asshole by dgatwood · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hah! The Tea Party wants less government interference, not more. They would never agree to a public-owned wire service. Instead, they would eliminate the limits on the number of services with access to public rights of way. Thus, you would have eighteen different companies digging up your streets to run their own lines. Because they would not be required by law to repave the street, the streets would gradually be replaced by a patchwork of heavy steel plates covering the open trenches below. Because the open trenches would fill with water in the rainy season, you would have eighteen companies digging new trenches again the next year.

      Enjoy your train wreck.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Of course, if the Tea Party were in power, we would still be farming with ox drawn carts, and cowering in fear when our angry God blots out the sun during an eclipse, so internet ownership would be the least of our worries.

    13. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd be able to choose from dozens of Internet Companies, rather than just one, and lousy companies like quest would go bankrupt from lose of customers.

      Uh huh. Just like telephone dereguation brought me dozens of companies for my landline, and cable TV deregulation brought me dozens of companies competing to offer me cable TV.

      Chortle. Guffaw.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Duradin · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't the Tea Party version be: your street isn't profitable enough for anyone to run a line to because too few people live on the street due to the might-as-well-not-exist road conditions?

    15. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      straw man

    16. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that different from what Verizon/Qwest/Frontier/etc. do now?
      They don't put in ANYTHING that they think will not make a profit.
      They wait till some CLEC comes along, gets a market share, then they get undercut in price as the ILEC takes the market away.

    17. Re:But then what kind of asshole by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      They would never agree to a public-owned wire service. Instead, they would eliminate the limits on the number of services with access to public rights of way. Thus, you would have eighteen different companies digging up your streets to run their own lines.

      No; no, you would not. That makes absolutely no sense.

      Even now, you can lease line from other companies. Why would that not continue? In fact, it would likely accelerate: you might even have municipalities lay the fabric themselves and lease it to customers (to the benefit of the city/muni).

      Libertarians aren't against all government. Most of the ones I know are very much for government - just not federal and/or state government of excessive reach and application, the benefit of which largely goes to those in government. No, most libertarians would likely be very much for these kinds of things being orchestrated at the local level - or even the state level, in some cases.

      Hell, get rid of the burdensome state and federal taxes, and living somewhere like NY might actually become affordable and desirable.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:But then what kind of asshole by bkpark · · Score: 1

      Because they would not be required by law to repave the street, the streets would gradually be replaced by a patchwork of heavy steel plates covering the open trenches below.

      Never mind that you are describing neither mainstream Tea Party or (more likely what you were imagining) libertarian position.

      But *suppose* we lived in a world where we lived in some kind of world where anarcho-capitalist (which is closer to what you describe) view prevailed, then this is what would happen: every section of the street would be owned by somebody. And whoever dug up the streets and failed to repave or otherwise return them to good condition would get sued out of existence by whoever owned those streets.

      Tragedy of commons happens only in a world where there is such thing as a public (i.e. common) property. Private individuals usually protect their own property, even against huge corporations, tooth and nail.

    19. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. You wouldn't have 18 random companies digging up PRIVATE roads. You would have a few companies that had negotiated easement rights with the owner of the road. The road owner's vested interest is in earning money from a functioning road system. He's not going to piss off his customers to let a fly by night company tear up the road for any reason. The residents of the community would send the road owner into bankruptcy (they'd wouldn't be paying for a road that didn't work) if this happened. Because they have a vested interest in getting to work on time.

      You'd probably end up with some asshole running a geographic monopoly on roads in some areas. But without government bailouts, that wouldn't last long.

    20. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, government intervention is needed at times. I lived in Cleveland when the Cuyahoga River caught fire. I am happy that the government interceded and created the Clean Water Act. After seeing this installation job, I think that there needs to be some intervention.

      As for government waste, if we got rid of the mentality of government funded businesses that "we need to spend everything that was budgeted or we won't get the same budget next year," the cost of government would probably drop 20-30% right off the bat.

    21. Re:But then what kind of asshole by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      A) Utilities (ex:fiber) is a natural local monopoly. Sometimes it makes more sense for local municipalities to control naturally occurring monopolies. In this case, it's not anti-competition, but pro-competition.

      B) There is no "the Tea Party". There is a loose affiliation of many groups with vaguely similar goals, and there is the "Tea Party Express", an unofficial branch of the Republican party having nothing whatever to do with most so-called "teapartiers".

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    22. Re:But then what kind of asshole by 517714 · · Score: 1

      I am not a supporter of the Tea Party, but they favor limits on the Federal government which would have zero impact on the situation. The utilities would be answerable to the local government.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    23. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how you guys complain about the status quo, yet immediately shoot down any attempt to change it for the better. I guess in a democracy the people really do get the government they deserve, and no better.

    24. Re:But then what kind of asshole by cusco · · Score: 0

      Amen. People want simple answers to complex issues, and the Teabaggers don't have anything but simple answers to offer.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    25. Re:But then what kind of asshole by JacquesDemien · · Score: 0

      Actually, you make a good point, even though I get that it was sarcastic. I often have wondered, why DO people move in the winter? It seems like a really poor choice.

    26. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      There has to be some middle ground though. I resent the fact that only one of a particular kind of cable can be run, what that does is guarantee a monopoly over the specific type of services that use that kind of cable. Even a choice two DSL providers is better than just one.

    27. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is uneven deregulation. For example, uneven deregulation caused the S&L debacle, allowing S&Ls to pull all sorts of garbage and still be FDIC insured.

      In short, in this case, the right of way is still too tightly regulated to allow for competition, only one cable company is allowed to lay cable wire for example.

    28. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Polumna · · Score: 1
      ALERT! It turns out that you can disapprove of the status quo and still think another idea will either not improve, or even make things worse.

      I think you'll find that everyone who complains about the status quo has some notion of how to improve upon it. Miraculously, some people have different notions on what that improvement should or should not cover and how or how it should not be implemented. Of course, if you'd prefer to be the jackass with The Right Answer, congratulations on your inherent ineffectiveness.

      I don't believe you have the answer,
      I've got ideas too.
      But if you've got enough naivety and you've got conviction,
      then the answer is perfect for you.
      --Bad Religion.

      Jackass.

    29. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a pretty hysterical theory.

      What about how cell phone companies work?

      they just sell eachother access to their systems. That's also how patent holders tend to work. Mutually beneficial arrangments, instead of this silly mess of wasteful work.

      Only a crazy nutjob would think that's what this 'Tea Party' wants. The free market works quite well. You can still regulate it. You say people who tear up streets wouldn't be required to fix them because you're a demagogue.

      I'm pretty sure things would be marvelous if there was much more competition for my ISP.

    30. Re:But then what kind of asshole by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2

      The tea party wants less FEDERAL government interference. They believe state and local governments are more capable of determining such issues. There is no reason the federal government should need to decide for every state and city who gets to run cable down a street, and who gets to share with whom. Yes, it results in a patchwork of laws, exactly as the founders of this country expected it to. When the states do it, you get multiple different laws some of which work better than others. People can move if they don't like the laws in their state, or then can try and get the laws changed in their state because a neighboring state's laws seem to work better. By the time the Bill of Rights came out, there were 13 states with 13 different constitutions to study and choose from. The patchwork method works.

      Actually take some time to learn instead of listening to the BS on MSNBC and NPR

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    31. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      And if cities would require new street construction to contain pipes like the storm drains or sewer system, but for data lines, when new streets are built, and would put in pipes when the streets get dug up for maintanance, the city could rent the space for many companies to run their own cables to compete for data. The city would make more money. The streets wouldn't need to get dug up again. We would could have competition between providers. We would not have the city become the new monopoly on data access.

    32. Re:But then what kind of asshole by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, not really. The problem is that there are some areas of commerce that naturally trend towards monopolies, and no amount of deregulation can ever prevent them from degrading into a monopoly. Therefore, the only options are either harsh government regulation to prevent the monopoly from abusing its monopoly status or government ownership of that area of commerce.

      I've seen places where the government allowed a second cable company to move in. Invariably, the incumbent cable company, having the advantage of owning all of their infrastructure free and clear, cuts their previously exorbitant rates dramatically to undercut or match the cheaper rates offered by the newcomer. Competition thrives and everyone is happy with their lower rates... until two years later when the new cable company is still operating hopelessly in the red (despite raising rates once or twice) and is forced to cease operation, whereupon it sells its brand new lines, antenna tower, and office space to the incumbent cable company, and exits the market. On the plus side, everyone in those towns now have newer, higher quality coax with newer amplifiers, etc., but there's still no competition in any of those towns, and their cable rates skyrocketed almost immediately after the exit of the competitors.

      As for the S&L debacle, I wouldn't say regulation was "uneven", though. That implies that if you just removed a whole lot more regulations, we'd be in better shape. In reality, they merely removed the wrong regulations. Unfortunately, there really aren't a lot of regulations that are safe to remove.

      In general, regulations are put in place to prevent abuses that are already happening, so removal of any of those regulations almost invariably leads to bad things except when those regulations truly are no longer relevant due to some significant change in the landscape (e.g. laws about texting while driving will become irrelevant when cars drive themselves; if there were laws requiring cellular carriers to lease access to their towers, they became irrelevant now that we are no longer limited to one A and one B analog carrier in any given area; etc.).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    33. Re:But then what kind of asshole by glodime · · Score: 1

      We would not have the city become the new monopoly on data access.

      The City would have a monopoly on access to provide data access. Your solution kicks the monopoly problem back one level, but doesn't necessarily improve the outcome. I favor telecommunications corporations that are owned and operated as consumer cooperatives as a reasonably likely best answer to natural monopolies.

    34. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      sometimes you dont really have a choice,

      last august i signed on buying a house, but since the previous owners didnt have anything new yet, they would only agree on hand-over in november (or i didnt want to pay lots and lots extra for earlier handover), moreover, my first child is due in may, so having the moving in the spring would have been worse then it already was (girlfriend being unable to do just about anything). Not to mention we really hated our crappy rental-house we previously lived in, and once you chose a new place, you just want to move already.

      Autumn/winter did bring some shitty stuff though, one week after we got the key it started snowing, which limited us to using one car (the other one is an old dog without any sort of safety measures, i dont drive it in sub-zero conditions), lots of family help couldnt make it due to winter-weather...

      We did make it OK enough, but there is still a lot of left over work to be done in the new house, and the move was more stressfull on me than it could have been, but postponing it just wasnt an option

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    35. Re:But then what kind of asshole by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      >>>This is just ridiculous. If the Tea Party were in power, this would be done RIGHT the first time!

      If the Tea Party were in power, the optical fibers would be owned by the government (just as they own the road), and the lines leased to various corporations. You'd be able to choose from dozens of Internet Companies, rather than just one, and lousy companies like quest would go bankrupt from lose of customers. The Tea Party would support a free market, rather than a government-granted monopoly to Comcast (or Cox or Quest or whoever).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    36. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Zeinfeld · · Score: 0

      Hah! The Tea Party wants less government interference, not more..

      No, all they want is to be told that they are absolutely right about everything and that they have a complete and infallible system of the world that only morons and the corrupt could possibly disagree with.

      So really no different from Communists, Fascists, Moonies, and other cultists.

      And the fact that the Tea Partiers talk about freedom all the time means precisely nothing. Karl Marx talked about freedom. So did Lenion, Stalin, Hitler, Mao and pretty much every other demagogue. And before he became Chancellor, most Germans regarded Hitler with pretty much the same disdain as Glenn Beck is considered.

      When people talk about 'second amendment solutions' or the 'ammo box', what they are talking about is the murder of their political opponents. I don't draw comparisons with fascists and Stalinists lightly, but talking about murder of opponents crosses that line completely.

      Whether or not Loughner's action in Arizona was a consequence of Palin and Beck's rhetoric can never be proved or disproved. But what is beyond dispute is that 1) that type of rhetoric can lead people to murder, 2) there is ample evidence that Palin in particular intended to use that rhetoric in order to intimidate her opponents, 3) no member of the Republican party leadership had the courage or the principles to condemn the rhetoric when it was being used.

      So no, I don't think that the consequence of a tea party government would be less regulation or government interference. The people simply don't have the knowledge or experience to form a coherent policy, let alone implement one. What would result would be an increase in regulations that protect the interests of narrow cliques that can manipulate the party and a decrease in regulation that serves the public interest.

      People can be totally self-deluding. Back in the 19th century the power elites believed that 'rain follows the plough' despite ample scientific evidence to the contrary. Now they want to believe that free markets are automatically self regulating and that climate change is not occurring.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    37. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      In short, in this case, the right of way is still too tightly regulated to allow for competition, only one cable company is allowed to lay cable wire for example.

      Laying cable requires rights-of-way and easements. If I start my own cable company, do I get to dig up the street in front of your house? Or better, do I get to dig up your yard to run my cable to your neighbor?

      The physical realities (I know, not the strong suit of laissez-faire capitalists ;-) ) of utilities services dictate that a common infrastructure is best: one set of water pipes, one set of gas pipes, one set of power cables, etc. That infrastructure ought to be publicly owned. Sure, let private companies compete on contracts to build and maintain that infrastructure, and to provide services through it.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    38. Re:But then what kind of asshole by eth1 · · Score: 1

      This might have been the case back when you had to have a wire for the phone, another wire for the second line, another wire for cable from company A, another wire for cable from company B, another wire for data, etc.

      Now, you can have ONE fiber line to the house, and multiplex everything on that one line.

      These days it would make more sense for developers to put that in when the development is built, and have the lines owned and maintained by a neighborhood association-like entity. The municipality would then own the lines from the neighborhoods to a central location(s) where service providers could connect. In other words from the CO to the house should be treated like a generic utility pipe, and any service provider can connect to the other end. That would be LESS digging, not more.

    39. Re:But then what kind of asshole by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>This is just ridiculous. If the Tea Party were in power, this would be done RIGHT the first time!

      If the Tea Party were in power (or libertarians/jeffersonians in general), the optical fibers would be owned by the government (just as they own the road the fibers run under), and the lines leased to various corporations (just as various-type cars run on the roads).

      You'd be able to choose from dozens of Companies across the government-owned roads/optical fibers, rather than just one.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    40. Re:But then what kind of asshole by anyGould · · Score: 1

      When people talk about 'second amendment solutions' or the 'ammo box',

      .. Once, *just once*, I'd like to see a reporter turn to that person and ask "So, what are you advocating, specifically?"

      I'd even settle for it happening on a televised debate - but just once, I want to see the Tea Party called out and asked *exactly* what they mean by "second amendment solution". Make them confirm or deny that they're advocating the overthrow of the government by force.

    41. Re:But then what kind of asshole by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Cities already have a monopoly on access to provide data. Cities also have a means for the citizens to push for improvement. A city with a monopoly on access to conduit is DRAMATICALLY better than a corporations with a monopoly on access to actual data lines, and even better than a consumer cooperative with a monopoly on data lines. Of course, if cities would build out conduit, a consumer cooperative would be trivial to implement.

    42. Re:But then what kind of asshole by JacquesDemien · · Score: 0

      Heh, as soon as I posted, this sort of scenario came to mind, yes. :-(

  8. They are doing it wrong... by MoldySpore · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they forgot the duct tape! How do they expect it to stay up on those gas containers in strong winter winds?!

    --

    "I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."

    1. Re:They are doing it wrong... by blendergasket · · Score: 2

      Duct tape actually doesn't work in those temps. I grew up in Minnesota and had the glove compartment on my car duct taped shut. When it got that cold the sticky wasn't sticky anymore.

    2. Re:They are doing it wrong... by supersloshy · · Score: 1

      Woosh!

      --
      "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
    3. Re:They are doing it wrong... by MiniMike · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, they're coming back tomorrow with some power tools to screw the box thingy into those funny looking pipes it's sitting on...

    4. Re:They are doing it wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nothing shows poor workmanship more than ripples in the duct tape!

  9. Snip that cable. by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

    Just snip both ends of the cable crossing your office path and remove the health hazard from your premesis.

  10. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Do the worst possible job you can at work.
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Profit!

    1. Re:Um... by Surt · · Score: 1

      In step 2, you start a repair service that corrects the problems caused by 1.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 2: Be a union worker that can never be fired.

  11. Yep the fire Marshal and the town by lunatick · · Score: 1

    Agree with Daniel
    Call the fire marshal, and the town, I am sure there are codes regarding instillation of something like that.

    --
    The Lunatick, Carpe Corpus!
  12. For comcast that a ok job but for dsl / phone they by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    For comcast that a ok job but for dsl / phone they can do much better.

  13. Curious to find out by Rhadamanthos · · Score: 2

    Looks more like the business owners son's job then a paid for Professional Qwest installation. I am curious to see what comes of this, and if a Qwest employee was actually involved in the installation/setup--i doubt it...unless like the poster above me says: $55hole customers-- can definately lead to some shoddy jobs becuase they had to have service yesterday and their losing tens of thousands of dollars a day. Sure you feel bad because you can't help them out but my favorite quote for this situation is:: "Lack of planning on your part, doesn't constitute an emergency on my part."

    1. Re:Curious to find out by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this was "Lack of planning on your part, does constitute a destructive job on my part."

    2. Re:Curious to find out by green1 · · Score: 1

      There is another likely option. Many ADSL providers have a "self install" option, where they mail you a kit and you install it yourself (generally if you have phone jacks somewhere near your computer it's pretty easy, plug in the modem, put filters on all your other sets, and voilla). If the neighbour here did that I wouldn't be entirely surprised, I've seen some pretty creative installs done that way.

  14. Why submit anonymously? by echucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the picasa album has a real name on it?

    1. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, monkeedude1212, agree that it's silly. However, maybe he didn't want this to affect his karma.

    2. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Lifyre · · Score: 0

      Because maybe just maybe Benjamin Blakely isn't the one who submitted it. Some other /. reader saw it and just linked to his album would have worked the same way...

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    3. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everyone wants to have a Slashdot account?

    4. Re:Why submit anonymously? by glowworm · · Score: 2
      Krell Institute. Hmm

      Institute for the promotion of computational science, 1609 Golden Aspen Drive, Suite 101. Ames, IA 50010

      Sort of sounds like a place that a /. reader might work at.

      Let's hope there isn't a rash of pizza deliveries.

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    5. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the picasa album has a real name on it?

      Perhaps to prevent his /. handle and his real name being linked to each other?

    6. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, this piece of crap site... more of us aren't going here for "news" won't let us otherwise. This isn't "news" it's Samzepuss crap "news". Someone turn it onto the FOX channel. I want to see/hear more crap... LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

      i.e. This won't be posted because I'm critical of Slashdot and also I'm "anonymous". Freedom of speech my ass.

    7. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, freedom of speech doesn't mean some private website has to post whatever idiotic bullshit is submitted to it.
      Second, set your reading threshold to 0 (or better, -1) so you can read your idiotic posts.

    8. Re:Why submit anonymously? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Wait.. Krell, seriously?! As in, the lost civilization in the movie, "The forbidden Planet" that destroyed themselves with a telepathic wish-granting machine by dreaming about monsters?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean he doesn't want this posted?

      Benjamin A Blakely, bablakely@gmail.com
      3921 NE Gardenia Ln
      Ankeny, IA 50021
      +1(515) 306-3408

      Experience

      May 2004 - Present: The Krell Institute, Ames: Information Technology and Assurance Administrator
      January 2005 – August 2010: Internet-Scale Event and Attack Generation Environment, Ames: Technical Director
      July 2008, 2009, 2010: Iowa State University Office of Precollegiate Programs – Talented and Gifted, Ames: Course Instructor
      April 2009, 2010: Iowa State University, Ames: IT-Olympics Cyber Defense Competition Director
      November 2006; November, December 2007; November 2008; February 2009: Iowa State University, Ames: Cyber Defense Competition Director

      Considering that all the above were fetched from publicly available internet services posted by himself, and him being an IT expert, one can only presume that he wants this to be known.

    10. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Suite 101 = Mom's Basement ... yup sounds about right.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    11. Re:Why submit anonymously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was looking at it, and it is an institute that works with Info. Assurance ppl.... Really quite interesting...

  15. Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Qwest technicians on-site last October to get DSL working. They were knowledgeable and completely professional; the work was first rate. I don't believe this story is accurate. The "contact my primary phone service provider" bit probably indicates that some third party is involved and the submitter is falsely attributing this cockup to Qwest.

    Oh, and my DSL performance is excellent as well. If you have the choice between Qwest and Comcast, get the former.

    1. Re:Not buying it by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      I had Qwest for a few years with constant intermittent connections. This was almost certainly due to bad wiring in my apartment, but it's relevant because I called Qwest customer service at least 10 times, and had technicians come once or twice (never got it fixed or even figured out what was wrong before I moved). The technicians were good, like you say. But the customer service people are almost all horrible. They go through certain steps with you regardless of your previous experience... "yes, I tried power cycling the modem. Yes, it's in the LINE port. Yes, I know it's working right now, but it stops working every few minutes for a few minutes. No, I already got a replacement modem; it didn't change anything." etc. They aren't very trained, and just go through their workflow after every question you answer. If their workflow doesn't have an option for your answer, they have no idea what to do next. I honestly think they are in some call center that services multiple companies (one couldn't pronounce Qwest properly).

    2. Re:Not buying it by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Agree. This looks like either some idiot third party did the install, or more likely his neighbor did it himself, or they really really pissed off the installer.

      There was no reason for putting this box outside in the first place, as the phone lines already make it through the wall, so why the h**l isn't this installed inside. The cables would be shorter (much cheaper), safer, and more reliable. This looks like amateur hour work, and with the cable loose on the ground instead of nailed to the wall, I don't think any professional was involved in this install. The phone company always nails its cables down. They also make use of boxes bolted to the outside wall instead of plastic bags.

      You should really ask your neighbor if he did this himself. I'll bet he'll proudly tell you about how he overcame all the obstacles, and successfully did something the phone company said would take them a week to get to.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    3. Re:Not buying it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I had Qwest with MSN back in 2003, and their DNS was constantly going down. They tried to blame it on me for running Linux.

      I changed to Cox cable after I left that apartment, and never had such ridiculous problems again.

    4. Re:Not buying it by realperseus · · Score: 1

      I had Qwest technicians on-site last October to get DSL working. They were knowledgeable and completely professional; the work was first rate. I don't believe this story is accurate. The "contact my primary phone service provider" bit probably indicates that some third party is involved and the submitter is falsely attributing this cockup to Qwest.

      Oh, and my DSL performance is excellent as well. If you have the choice between Qwest and Comcast, get the former.

      I'm not buying it either. Must be some kind of a joke.. .

      --
      "Trusting every aspect of our lives to a giant computer was the smartest thing we ever did.." Homer Simpson
    5. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also work for Qwest and I agree with the parents statement!

    6. Re:Not buying it by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      my verizon install was easy, guy showed up, determined that the phone line i thought i had went down the outside of the apartment into a time warner box and then dropped a fresh line from the pole, took about a half hour or so and i only had to call service once, and it's not verizons fault squirrels like DSL wire

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:Not buying it by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Cause DNS is related to an allegedly installed modem outside?

    8. Re:Not buying it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, but it's another anecdote about poor Qwest service. It was so bad I never even looked at Qwest again to compare plans with Cox.

    9. Re:Not buying it by devjoe · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the broadband routers these days include a caching DNS server and send out configuration info to connected computers which includes using the router as primary DNS, so if the router is failing because it was installed outside in the cold/rain/snow, it might knock out the DNS.

    10. Re:Not buying it by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Actually, the problem is that they're over-trained. CSRs are expected to follow that script to the letter. And while some of them are secretaries who got the crash-course in IT, there's a lot of smart people who get in trouble if they jump over questions. And those questions are sorted from "cheapest to most expensive", not "most to least likely".

      Had a few friends in Dell tech support for a while - one was fired for being too helpful (as in, kept fixing the problem the first time using a more expensive part instead of making the customer jump through hoops).

  16. Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To that tech:

    Update your resume, you stupid loser.

    Either that or provide a case against unions.

    1. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Without union protection, the installer responsible can be fired immediately, without the company having to provide fully-documented proof of how many different ways this is wrong.

      Unions don't protect customers. Unions protect unions at all costs.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIGHT WING TEABAG EXTREMIST!!!!!

      How dare you insult the saintly Unions.

      Unions as American as Apple Pie....

      and extortion...
      and fraud...
      and cronyism...
      and corruption...

      Why... where would GM be without the Unions?

    3. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like it would work for at least a few months. Those modems are pretty rugged! ;-)

    4. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by potat0man · · Score: 1

      If he was in a union he wouldn't be in such a rush to get the next customer.

    5. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dick head, Unions are there to improve working conditions/wages thats why their members want them. this increase in expenses means company operators must increase prices or get rid of unions. service expectations like connection reliability standards and equipment installation should be governed by a competent authority. Since Joe Blow really only knows the price he pays, and each of these company operators tailor their price to costs and profit margin. it really depends on how much profit we want to give these companies.

    6. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by johnhp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the company has shit service and shit standards, and that's the union's fault instead of the company's.

      Those damn Reds just won't stop until they've ruined everything! I suppose we should just send in some union busters to beat their organizers to death with clubs like the good old days!

    7. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Unions don't protect customers. Unions protect unions at all costs.

      That is, of course, unless the customer has to work for a living, in which case he owes his health care, safety, retirement plan, reasonable hours, vacation days, sick leave, and overtime pay to unions.

    8. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unions protect employees from employers unscrupulous acts if they occur.

      If you want a consumers union - wait - there's already one of those.... tool.

    9. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who has never worked under a union ;). Trust me - they could fire this ass hat quite rapidly.

      Also - my union would at least argue to management that they should be given enough time, equipment and supervision (until he's good at this) to do the job right.

    10. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hate to break it to you, but Union folks get fired too.

      Unions are around to defend bad behavior. The are around to defend the employee from the idiots they work for.

    11. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Personally, no. I did work in the same building as union members (who had a completely different job), and watched the madness from a safe distance.

      One particular employee actually made his workstation explode. Ignoring all the logs showing the machine was maintained and the employee had screwed up before, the union still required further proof that it was his fault before he could be fired. It took almost a full month to show that the cause of damage was indeed operator error, during which time the company still had to pay him, but nobody with any sense would let him near a functioning machine.

      Then there's the teachers' union at a high school near my hometown, who fought for raises for teachers, despite rising dropout rates, failing state-mandated tests, and the district already falling into insolvency. An agreement was only reached after the state took over managing the city's finances, and it involved canceling a significant portion of the school's programs.

      Then there's the musicians' union on Broadway, which specifies the minimum number of musicians employed at each theatre, with little concern for whether they're actually needed. According to an actor I once met, a pianist played on Broadway and, per the terms of the union agreement, had his required musicians up on stage, in full formal dress, simply holding their instruments while he played. At one point between pieces he stood up, pointed to the seated and useless musicians, and introduced them: "Ladies and gentlemen, your union-mandated orchestra!"

      I'm sure there are decent unions out there somewhere, with efficient management and fair practices. I have yet to encounter any, so you'll have to forgive my opinion based on experience.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    12. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me, but instead of clubs let's use legislation.

      The installation company is almost definitely going to be the one paying for repairs. Having poor standards doesn't make sense for them. It looks more that it's just a bad technician who, in the words of the original poster, should update his resume.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    13. Re:Some weasel of a tech is now shitting his pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right, he was probably late for his 3 hour lunch break.

  17. Secure by TornCityVenz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well at least if you lock yourself out of the office you have open ports at the gas meter to hook up to.

    --
    I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    1. Re:Secure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No mater what, you always have "open ports" from the outside. If you don't put a firewall after the bridge on your end, you are looking for it.

      This instalation is full of shit. Hooking its "ethernet out" to your switch or hub make it worst.

  18. Joke? by superdave80 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I doubt this is real. The installation dude is smart enough to wire this into the junction box and wire a network cable a couple hundred feet long with a splice of some type. Yet he thinks that this modem will survive in the snow, with only a bag and box to protect it. And thinks that his network cable running the length of the building and across at least one walkway won't be tripped on/broken. And the business owner, when presented with a network cable popping in through his front door, said "Looks good. I don't even mind that I have to still run some type of cable to our router, which is NOT right next to our front door!" Oh, and this is from an anonymous reader.

    Sorry, I call bullshit.

    1. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This looks like an install done by someone who knows enough about the basics of installing DSL, but just wanted to get the fuck out of there. I completely believe this because I've seen similar installs.

      I once went to someone's house late at night for a trouble call (I'm a cable technician). All of the cable lines at this house were ran on the outside, just laying on the ground, not even close to the house. Even their splitters were just laying in the dirt. Water had gotten into everything and killed their connection.

      We later looked into this contractor's other jobs and found similar results, so we back-billed him for all the installations. Turns out this guy was just trying to do as many installs as possible, because he was getting paid by the install. Happens more than you'd think. I'd say this DSL installer spent a grand total of 20 minutes installing this, whereas a quality install could take half the day. Multiply that by $50 an install...

    2. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. In 'real life' the installer would've done all that and then been screwed because the power cable didn't reach.

    3. Re:Joke? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2

      Could be he possesses skills, but is deficient in the 'giving a shit' category. In other words, could be he took the quickest route that got boobies flowing through the intertubes.

      I could also see the owner hacking it together and totally blaming it on somebody else.

    4. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you never worked customer service at a telco or cable company, did you?

    5. Re:Joke? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Possibly the technicians could not gain access to some areas they needed so they just did a quick jjob just to get the customer online meaning to return later.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    6. Re:Joke? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      The thing that bugs me about this install is... why the hell is the modem OUTSIDE? Don't the modems plug into an existing phone jack INSIDE the building? And if you are going to take the time to run a long ass cable because you are lazy, why wouldn't you run the junction box/modem line INTO the building, so at least the modem would be safe and sound. It makes no sense to plug the modem in outside. I know there are crappy installers (I've ran into a few rat nests myself), but this install is just too many kinds of stupid that don't make any sense.

    7. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess you get what you pay for. $50 for an install?

    8. Re:Joke? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Crazy stuff like this really happens. When I moved into a recently remodeled rental house a few years ago, we noticed a mysterious wire that came down from a pole in the back yard, looped around in piles by the fence, coiled up into a pine tree, with the open tips of the wire resting in its branches. At a very quick glance it looked a bit like a power line. We called the landlord first, who blamed "the stupid electric company" and assured us it was normal and safe. I accepted the possibility of "safe" but couldn't believe it was normal, but nobody wanted to do anything about it, so we ignored it for a few days. Until they activated the cable at our house, and we weren't getting any signal. At which point a cable tech came out, discovered the wire in the back yard, and attached it back to the house to fix our cable. Apparently the remodelers had removed it when they redid the house siding, and just dumped it in the tree as a convenient storage place.

      That same house gave us a few other surprises, including phone jacks that had been installed in the walls, but not actually connected to the phone wires which were sitting uselessly in the wall next to the boxes, a kitchen sink U-trap which, instead of being the normal U shape did a complete loop, and an electrical outlet for the fridge which was set up with one of the circuit-breaker buttons (forget the technical term) which got triggered every few days by the fridge compressor, killing power to half the kitchen.

    9. Re:Joke? by greed · · Score: 1

      It is best, if at all possible, to keep the phone wire bit as short as possible to the DSL modem. Using a POTS splitter, you want to pull off the line for DSL before any other branching in the circuitry; have all the branches after the DSL filter. (Look up impedance matching and signal reflections and all that fun stuff for why.)

      So, there is merit to a really short phone cord and an up-to-maximum-spec Ethernet run. Ethernet is robust and reliable compared to the DSL modulation: partly because the Ethernet guys knew they were going to be carrying high-frequency signals where line and junction impedance matters, and the phone guys knew they were carrying voice-quality current-loop baseband analog audio--and no-one else was allowed to run phone service, so they could do whatever they wanted.

      But there's a right way and a wrong way to achieve that. This is an excellent example of "really really wrong".

    10. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea Capitol-fvck-ism! You paid him by the job, and he did the quickest job possible!
      What could be better?

      A Quality install could take half the day? Pay HIM FOR HALF A DAY.
      bet he is doing something else now!

  19. Responding professionally to bad customer requests by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Maybe the neighbor did request the installation some time before the snowstorm started, or maybe not, or maybe this was a repair job because their service had died during the snowstorm. If the technician didn't want to do the job until the weather improves, he could either be professional about it and say "sorry, got to reschedule, weather's too bad for a new install", or at least be unprofessional in some reasonably professional way, like claiming "customer wasn't home" or "couldn't get access" or something.
    '

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  20. I think a Qwest VP... by 0m3gaMan · · Score: 1

    ...is going to be polishing his résume soon. Along with all the speds downstream from him.

  21. Not Suprised by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Note: I'm a low-voltage tech.

    This kind of stuff doesn't suprise me. It's the nature of the industry. People don't want to pay $200 for a decent quality install, so a lot of the independent guys try to lowball where they can. Contractor companies will hire anyone to do the work, and they'll be lucky if they get a half a week of training. Most ISP's contract out their installs to these companies. (Mine is the exception to that fortunately.) This installer was probably never trained on this stuff, and his employer probably expected him to do it anyways or they wont use him anymore.

    Quest probably leases the lines and contracts the installations through AT&T, who then contracts the installs through someone else. (Can't confirm this though.) That's why Quest told the customer to call their "primary phone service provider", although I think Quest should have done this work for them.

    1. Re:Not Suprised by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Excellent points.

    2. Re:Not Suprised by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Australia had this too http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/telstra-users-left-holding-exposed-lines/2008/12/08/1228584743353.html
      "THOUSANDS of Telstra customers are putting up with crude, temporary phone connections with cables held together by tape and plastic bags and strung along fences, across lawns and through trees. In many cases the unsightly - even dangerous - cables are left in place for months and even years, despite repeated pleas to finish the job by burying them."

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Not Suprised by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      200 dollars is a lot for a decent quality install unless they are running cable through a couple walls. I knew a guy that was contracted out much like you mention for Comcast. He would do a complete professional install with CAT5 cable through walls for about 100-150. He wouldn't run a lot of cable, but he would wire up a room or two. He did it really fast so he made a killing. It could be he was just the exception to the rule.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    4. Re:Not Suprised by butlerm · · Score: 1

      Qwest probably leases the lines and contracts the installations through AT&T

      Qwest is the phone company here. They own the lines.

    5. Re:Not Suprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: I'm a low-voltage tech.

      This kind of stuff doesn't suprise me. It's the nature of the industry. People don't want to pay $200 for a decent quality install, so a lot of the independent guys try to lowball where they can. Contractor companies will hire anyone to do the work, and they'll be lucky if they get a half a week of training. Most ISP's contract out their installs to these companies. (Mine is the exception to that fortunately.) This installer was probably never trained on this stuff, and his employer probably expected him to do it anyways or they wont use him anymore.

      Quest probably leases the lines and contracts the installations through AT&T, who then contracts the installs through someone else. (Can't confirm this though.) That's why Quest told the customer to call their "primary phone service provider", although I think Quest should have done this work for them.

      Uh - you have no idea what you are talking about. You can't even spell Qwest correctly, much less make an assumption that Qwest leases thier data lines from someone else and then contracts out to thier competitor for the installs. Good grief. Stick to low voltage, please.

      Didn't ANYONE see the original poster make the retraction, and state that this wasn't Qwest?

    6. Re:Not Suprised by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Uh - you have no idea what you are talking about. You can't even spell Qwest correctly, much less make an assumption that Qwest leases thier data lines from someone else and then contracts out to thier competitor for the installs. Good grief. Stick to low voltage, please.

      Didn't ANYONE see the original poster make the retraction, and state that this wasn't Qwest?

      Wasn't there a story here earlier that facts only make people clench to their own opinion more strongly if the facts don't match the preconceptions? ^.^

      --
      It is what it is.
  22. Denver resident here ... by BrianRoach · · Score: 2

    This is pretty much what you expect with QWest.

    In fact ... they must have gotten the good installer given the plastic bag.

    1. Re:Denver resident here ... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      cept its not from quest, in fact if you click on the 1 picture link it looks like the op got a offer for a free education from SUE-U, and this was 2 hours before you posted

      so thanks for not reading the fucking article

    2. Re:Denver resident here ... by KmArT · · Score: 1

      On a tangential note, we recently started up an office/plant in the Denver area and ended up going with Qwest for the two landlines. The cable is underground from the road to the building, with no conduit and we had very intermittent service. A tech "diagnosed" the problem as the cable between the road and the building and said it needed to be replaced, at our expense. As an interim solution, he ran a cable above ground, which is lying on our driveway/parking lot (at least covered by a thin coating of snow, ha!). The tech claimed that in CO, their tariff states that for business service, the business is response for underground wiring; essentially their responsibility stops at the splice box at the road. I had already reviewed the tariff and couldn't find anything specific about responsibility, and its generally been my experience in other states that if the telco owns it, they fix it. Any CO telco/tariff experts here that care to chime in?

    3. Re:Denver resident here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree - QWest is a HORRIBLE phone company, and this doesn't surprise me at all. While we always used Cox for our internet, I know neighbors who suffered through Qwest DSL. I've seen technicians run cables through doors and windows. And these weren't the subcontractors, these were the guys driving the Qwest trucks.

      Their service is even worse. People would call me complaining that their DSL was barely faster than dialup. Speedtests would confirm sustained transfer rates at around 128k. If you paid for 1.5Mbps instead of the base 768k service, you MIGHT get 384k on a good day. Qwest customer service would always say that it was the customer's wiring. I would be like, No shit, your technicians ran an INSIDE phone wire through the window to the junction box on the outside of the house, and it goes all the way around the house, its a good 200 foot run!

      Truth be told though, the phone company was crap before Qwest bought them out as well. Qwest just seemed to acquire all the crap and just didn't bother to do anything about it.

  23. Bullshit by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    I agree. The whole thing is so "over the top:, clearly not real. At least, not from Qwest.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Bullshit by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but I believe it (except the connection on the ground). Looking at the photos I think I might be in the same Business park as the poster.

      I had to fight with Qwest to get DSL because they said it was a fiber only market.....except there is no fiber anywhere in that part of town. After the order went through, it took them 10 days to get a tech to come out an install it. The tech terminated the pair at the DMARC then didn't tag it. I had to have another tech come out and tag it. Then to make the cross connect I opened the box and was hit with a rats nest that took about 10 minutes to figure out what pair was mine. I ordered a second DSL line and had to go through the same Issues of convincing them I could only get DSL and not fiber. The pairs got connected but not tagged and were also in the wrong panel so I had to run wires from one end of the Suite hub to the other. On top of that, they left the modem on top of the Gas Main, in Iowa, in November.

  24. Re:Tell them your next call will be to the bombsqu by dch24 · · Score: 2
  25. This is a bad idea by Tanman · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you were dealing with some local company or something, this might be ok to give them one more chance to 'make it right.' However, you are dealing with a big corp. The best thing to do, to avoid unforeseen consequences, is to call the fire marshal and inquire as to who is actually responsible if there is a situation like yours (the installer or the building owner). If it is the installer, then you immediately report the situation and get an official record of it on a government piece of paper. You then take that report and fax it to them while on the phone with their secretary and tell them they need to fix it, as the fire department has documented the faulty job and you aren't sure if they are being investigated . . .but you have confirmed with the fire marshal that they would be the ones found liable in case fault is found in the installation job.

    1. Re:This is a bad idea by SHaFT7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am a local company, and if one of my guys did a 1/4 of a job as bad as this, I'd fire him so fast his head would spin, then I'd give the customer all kinds of free stuff and hope to god that 1.) they don't flame me to everyone they know and 2.) that I don't suck it up in the next hiring process :)

    2. Re:This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully you pay decent wages. Qwest and other companies cut corners sometimes on those they either contract with or employ.

    3. Re:This is a bad idea by Timex · · Score: 2

      ...and 1a) that they'd post about it in a public forum, like Slashdot? :D

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    4. Re:This is a bad idea by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      No, you're not usually dealing with a big company. You're probably dealing with a small sub-contractor who gets paid to do the install. Once he knows the service is up he has no responsibility for it. It may come
      back to bite him only if the customer tracks him down. I had this happen with a Large Satellite TV company recently. I switched from the "other" Large Satellite TV company and in three months I've had 4 service calls, the most recent being today. Why? The original installation. To install three TVs the guy was out there for 9 hours. His co-workers had to bail him out and then we had a mess. They straightened it out but we've had a receiver blow, wiring problems and other "strange" issues. The point here is that somebody here did a shitty job, they don't give a shit and next week they'll be making your fries and McDonalds.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    5. Re:This is a bad idea by inkrypted · · Score: 1

      I am a small contractor and I have a reputation that unlike these guys I actually care about. You should always report these kinds of incidences because it helps us to weed out the bad apples.

      --
      Chris Sheppard
    6. Re:This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Like, *you* personally *are* a local company? I guess this was inevitable since the Supreme Court ruled on corporate personhood.

    7. Re:This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. Are you saying that a BIG CORP. isn't going to go to great lengths to appease their customers, let alone a brand new customer?

      Hmm... Perhaps I should switch to AT&T.

    8. Re:This is a bad idea by julesh · · Score: 2

      The best thing to do, to avoid unforeseen consequences, is to call the fire marshal and inquire as to who is actually responsible if there is a situation like yours (the installer or the building owner).

      Neither, I suspect. The most likely candidate would be the tenant. If they have permission from the owner to perform the installation work, that permission is likely to specify that they are responsible for ensuring all safety rules are followed. If they don't have permission, then while technically it would be the owner's responsibility, the owner could then sue them for performing unauthorized modifications to his property and reclaim any damages that were in consequence of that.

      IANAL, nor am I an expert in this kind of law, but have seen enough of the law to know it normally works like this...

    9. Re:This is a bad idea by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      they don't flame me to everyone they know

      Yeah, they better don't, or one of the 4 gas-meters might explode...

    10. Re:This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no wonder so many people get sick from McDonalds fries.

    11. Re:This is a bad idea by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Wages have nothing to do with it. On the one hand there is professional ethics, and on the other hand there is wage. You can be a minimum wage worker and be highly professional at sweeping the floor, and you can be a multi-million dollar bonus earning CEO and run your company into the ground while destroying the environment at the same time.

      You attempt to draw a correlation between wage and ethics by implying that people who are paid more behave better. While to a certain extent this is true simply because people who are paid more tend to be better educated (and there IS a positive correlation between education and manners), it's not a rule. And it certainly doesn't work the other way around "my boss pays me a shitty salary, so I will do a shitty job".

      If you think your boss isn't paying you enough it's probably because you overestimate your skill set, attitude and your experience. Try to improve those or, failing that, find someone else who appreciates you more. Doing a shitty job benefits no one. The customer loses, the boss loses, and you lose. If all you care about is "but the boss loses" then you shouldn't be working, you should be training up on how to become a martyr for Allah.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:This is a bad idea by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      Why aren't you naming names? Afraid that DishTV and DirectTV are going to get in a tizzy of you calling them out?

    13. Re:This is a bad idea by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      Nope, it wasn't really their direct fault. It was their subcontractors. Ultimately they took responsibility but it was another subcontractor who had to come out and fix it. While anybody can be guilty of hiring a dumbass, their process should be to weed out those individuals who are more adept at the housekeeping or food service industries.

      Unfortunately the trend is to outsource as much as possible and when you do that you lose quality. In my case when the original dumbass was doing the install he even left some of his tools at my house because he left in a huff when his co-workers showed up. It was about 3 weeks when he came back to collect them.

      Professional? Definitely Not? Direct TVs fault? Only for hiring a contractor who hired a dumbass.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    14. Re:This is a bad idea by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      Let me fix it for you:

      "If you think your boss isn't paying you enough, it's probably because he's a greedy bastard"

    15. Re:This is a bad idea by NevarMore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then name the contractor or the sub.

      A lot of competent electrical/handyman types are looking for work now. Punish the bad ones so the good ones can get their foot in the door and get back on their feet.

    16. Re:This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and next week they'll be spitting on your burger at McDonalds.

    17. Re:This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and 3.) They don't post to /.

    18. Re:This is a bad idea by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I know many people who steal from their employers because they "don't pay me enough." Some of them got jobs paying more than $10/hr and stopped, or steal less.

    19. Re:This is a bad idea by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That's a little selfish of you isn't it?

    20. Re:This is a bad idea by damnfuct · · Score: 1

      "If you think your boss isn't paying you enough, it's probably because he's a greedy bastard"

      Or because he knows you are worth or will accept less :P

    21. Re:This is a bad idea by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You don't happen to play Eve do you?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  26. Morons happen... by mspohr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I once hired a "network technician" to install Ethernet (coax... it was a long time ago) in a doctors office. He said he was "experienced". I got a complaint from the office after he left. They had an empty office between the router and a workstation. This fool punched a hole in the middle of the wall on each side of the room and ran the wire at about neck height across the middle of the room.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Morons happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds surprisingly familiar. i'm pretty sure it was cat5, but if that happened in the 97-98 time frame I got a good laugh as I was the assistant on that job.

  27. Have some fun with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Put on gloves and unplug one of the cables. Wait for them to send some one out to "repair it". Call the police and report that a suspicious person is attaching a package with wires to the gas lines.

  28. They have posts on really bad installs here. by WarlockD · · Score: 1

    http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31711

    Most of these are remote hotspots to bounce a wireless signal accross Europe, but even in the middle of nowhere there should be standards.

  29. It's got a battery... and wires... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I take it this wasn't in Boston, or they'd have shut the entire city down, given that it has wires coming out of it. If there was a Mooninite on it, they'd probably hunker down for an invasion....

  30. I have a different story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The service I get from Qwest field techs in my Denver neighborhood has always been exemplary. On the other hand, talking to tier one contacts who reply vebatim off a half-assed script in a dialect of English I can barely understand... Well, that's a different matter. Oh, that and Qwest's slamming me for services I expressly refused. But the Techs I've gotten were cool.

  31. Call the phone service, huh? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're trying to help them out and they tell you to call someone else. I guess you did your job.

    I saw a fire hydrant spewing water once, called the fire department, they said, "call the water department." I said, "OK." Hung up and didn't think about it again. Until now, I guess.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a water department, and I'll second that. The fire department absolutely does not maintain the hydrants, they just hook onto them and hope there's enough water in the main. If a hydrant gets busted, WE have to fix it. Call us.

    2. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Evanston, IL, 311 routes to both fire and water, depending on what you ask for.

      911 is a mandatory squad car visit, so not recommended unless your house is being flooded by it or something.

      So next time call police non emergency number.

      Or move to a better city.

    3. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Hmm. The fire department *relies* on the hydrants far more than Joe Random. If they didn't still note the fault and follow it up themselves, they might be "technically right" but I would think also "doing it wrong". It would be more reliable to thank the caller and either take the details themselves or forward their call to the correct office within the water department.

    4. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by toiletbowl · · Score: 0

      I saw a fire hydrant spewing water once, called the fire department, they said, "call the water department.

      Well come on, it's not like there was fire spewing out of it!!

    5. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

      In my town the Fire Department routinely comes around and flushes/tests the hydrants. So ... seems like there's some maintenance going on there. I don't see the police testing the roadways.

    6. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Where I live the public works department does that hydrant flushing stuff every spring. The fire department has nothing to do with it, as far as I know.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    7. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless someone else reported it, I guess it's still spewing water. -though that was in the days when lake Michigan was still called 'Michigan valley!'

      -Addendum: Michigan means 'Big water' so I guess it was simply called 'dry valley.'

    8. Re:Call the phone service, huh? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the fire dept has anything to do with the water system? there just a user, like you.

      If there is a pot hole, would you call the police about repairing it? because, they use it to? Just to be clear: The fire Dept. was right. YOU were wrong.

      You clarity of protocol requirements reminds me of Franz Kafka International Airport.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  32. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No DSL or any other kind of electrical installation should be done outdoors unless it's in at least a NEMA 3 or NEMA 4 enclosure so it doesn't really matter what the conditions were outside that install is just all sorts of fail.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  33. And what's funnier still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is that whoever submitted the story is probably *still* fuming over it. Read the tone of the summary.

    Runny-nosed little whiner had his whole day ruined.

  34. Re:Hmmm by craigminah · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I was gonna call BS on this one...the OP prolly installed it as a joke but I highly doubt any professional would install this...unless Qwest is hiring out of work crack-heads and hookers to do their installs on the cheap.

  35. Re:Hmmm by don.g · · Score: 1

    Thirded. Srsly. Although the guy who submitted this is new to spamming slashdot, doesn't he know you're supposed to link to your google ad filled blog?

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  36. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News flash: service employee gives poor service. Film at 11.

  37. Wouldn't surprise me... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    When I had Qwest DSL, the tech who came out when my service failed happened to mention that my house was several hundred feet beyond the DSL spec from their office. He determined that the problem was in their office, but being a weekend he had no way to get into the office to fix it. But that didn't stop Qwest service from closing my trouble ticket, so I had to spend another hour going through their phone tree to get another tech to come out and go through the process again. And then when I terminated my service they tried to charge me for not returning the modem that I bought from them months earlier. They hire nice folks, but it's clueless bureaucracy hell.

    I hate Comcast, but when it comes to broadband I'll take evil over nincompoops.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:Wouldn't surprise me... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      My friend tryed to get ISDN from Quest back when it was still US Worst. They came out to hook it up couple times, utterly failed to get it working at all, but that didn't stop them from billing her for ISDN service for a couple months! She gave up and gave me her ISDN modem. I still have it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Wouldn't surprise me... by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Comcast is horrible in some areas. They do the same crap. Some areas here in Houston they have absolutely awful bandwidth but sell it to people anyway. Additionally, I bought my own cable modem at Microcenter and they tried to charge me for keeping "their" modem. I switched to AT&T and its been great. I think it just depends on where you are.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    3. Re:Wouldn't surprise me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast tried to charge me for a cable modem that was bought at Fry's :(

      Later they pushed a firmware update on it that locked out most of its features and crippled its speed :(

    4. Re:Wouldn't surprise me... by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Comcast techs aren't so hot either. I've had them erroneously disconnect me at the head, daisy chain me onto someone else at the head and refuse to replace bad coax because it involved trenching. On that latter point, I had 4 techs come out. They were each dismayed at line quality during initial testing and then wiggle/tweak till it passed on their equipment. Then they would proclaim it fixed and leave. An hour later service would drop again... Finally I called up surewest and they bent over backward to provide me their fiber.

    5. Re:Wouldn't surprise me... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Several hundred feet? You're lucky. We were TWO MILES beyond the DSL spec. Our connection would go down for days at a time, and speed was only slightly better than my 56k modem. After several visits by idiots we finally had a competent tech come by who actually had a meter with him. He said he was shocked that the service worked at all, since we were so far away from the office. I could almost hit the building with my spud gun, but for historical reasons the lines had originally been run from downtown so they made a huge loop. Finally gave up and had to go to Comcast too.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  38. "Some kids stole it" by FauxReal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just call Qwest and let them know you just saw some kids or crackhead steal it.

  39. anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They gave you a high quality high density polyethylene protective cover for free, what are you complaining about! :)
     

  40. probably but who knows by dlt074 · · Score: 2

    I had standing orders that no qwest people were allowed into our denver branch without somebody calling me. and they were NEVER allowed to touch anything without somebody watching them. every time they came into the building we'd lose something, most of the time it was our internet due to their horrendous wiring.

  41. I work for a telco... by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for a telco... your regular local phone techs would never do this. They have procedures they follow and getting some weird-ass setup to work is not their problem. They make sure service gets to the Demarc and then they leave. What happens however is a salesman sells the customer something that's nearly impossible. Or they sell them a package they think will work without ever visiting the site. Inevitably what happens is the tech shows up, drops service off at the demarc, which happens to be some closet or outdoor space in a huge complex... the customer is literally half a mile a way and would have to pay to have cable run through the whole building. But the sales guy wants his commission. So what does he do? He shows up in person and does something like what we see here. I've actually seen worse. Then the customer calls in to complain but according to the techs records he dropped off normal service at a normal demarc. There's no record of this mess... There's arguing back and forth... but in reality the sales guys just got to prevent the customer from canceling within 30 days and the commission is his. Qwest has no idea what any of that extra cable is, and as far as anyone in their facilities division are concerned they probably think the customer ran it themselves.

  42. Thanks for documenting this by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thanks for documenting this. I had a similar experience with cable a few years ago and I regret I didn't document it at the time. In my case we were renting a house next to a vacant lot, and on the other side of the lot was the curbside cable box that the installer had decided to use.

    They ran the cable straight across the vacant lot in the grass and into one of our ventilation conduits to get under the house. Then, one day the cable stopped working. I could see that they were starting to develop the lot next door and a tractor had run across the cable laying on the ground. I called the provider, they came out and strung another cable across the lot, on the ground.

    This was a regular occurrence in the weeks ahead. Once or twice a week I'd call that the cable was broken again, and someone would come out and patch it and drop it back in the dirt.

    Then one day it stopped working again and I called again and then watched what the guy would do when he came out. They had poured concrete next door, and the cable now went from the box down into a fresh sidewalk never to emerge on the other side.

    He scratched his head on that one, and just when I thought he was going to stretch a replacement cable across the new driveway, he instead went to the other side of my house, connected a new cable to the cable box over there, stretched it across part of my neighbor's lawn, diagonally across my lawn, and back through a different vent to the underside of the house, where he patched it in.

    I called and told the cable company about this, that I had to disconnect the cable in order for either me or my neighbor to mow the lawn, but they said there was "nothing they could do". They said it often, and eventually, when I got on their nerves, they said it at high volume.

    So we canceled the cable. I disconnected it on my side and wrapped the excess around the box. To this day I regret not documenting the experience through photos.

    Later we had DSL and then fiber optic service, which were quite satisfactory. I never got an indoor DSL box installed outdoors, but they did run the line along the ground on the side of the house before punching into the bedroom I was using as an office. I didn't notice it at the time, but did notice that the network failed about a month after the air conditioner was installed. The installers had poured a slab of concrete on the side of the house for the air conditioning unit and -- you guessed it -- the cable was now part of the slab. I'm surprised it worked for as long as it did.

    When we had fiber installed, I had them run it to the corner of the house closest to the curbside box (which fortunately was on my property) made sure they TRENCHED it this time, had them mount the fiber modem and router on the inside wall of the garage, and then did the rest of the network myself. So far flawless.

    What I learned from this is to be sure to meet the installer outside, be sure he's called the utilities and knows where to dig, be sure he intends to trench the cables he needs to run to the house, and make sure he intends to run all other cables either along the walls well above ground level, through the basement, or through the attic.

    And if they don't do these things, call the salescreature back and cancel the service. You can do that within 30 days, even if you signed a multi-year contract. By telling them you're going to cancel up front and why, you are then in a position to negotiate from strength. But if they don't fix it in a week or so, cancel in earnest and look for another provider.

    Under no circumstances should an installer be allowed to work unsupervised.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Thanks for documenting this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most cable providers installers install cable on top of the ground. Bury service is a 3rd party contractor different from the 3rd party contractor that ran the drop. Around here it typically takes a few weeks at least for the bury crew to get to you even longer in the winter. Really it's kind of ridiculous how many companies are typically involved in an install.

    2. Re:Thanks for documenting this by HereIAmJH · · Score: 2

      They ran the cable straight across the vacant lot in the grass and into one of our ventilation conduits to get under the house. Then, one day the cable stopped working. I could see that they were starting to develop the lot next door and a tractor had run across the cable laying on the ground. I called the provider, they came out and strung another cable across the lot, on the ground.

      Interesting story, I have been battling something similar with Comcast. My neighbor had trouble with his cable and they installed a new drop, running it across my yard. I asked him to call and have them hang it properly because it was a hazard, but nothing happened. For months I called and mowed around it, and it is still laying on the ground. I don't have any leverage because I'm not a Comcast customer.

      Their outsourced tech support tried to tell me it was not their problem because the local government was responsible for installing the drops. (?) Supervisors told me several times that the problem was it needed to be scheduled to be buried. I explained that it's an AERIAL drop, and if they think I'm mad now, just try to trench across my property. Which lead to promises to get it properly hung the following week. And the next. Etc.

      In the spring it will have been a year. The old drop still runs from the pole to the house, 20' above the ground. The new drop still lies on the ground, taunting the lawnmower.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    3. Re:Thanks for documenting this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On what planet does an installer even CONSIDER it okay to run a cable across the surface of SOMEBODY ELSE'S property? That just rings so many bells of stupidity that I'm flabagasted somebody could have even considered it okay!?

      Like... Wow... Don't you Americans have guns to solve that kind of problem?

      Customer : You ran the cable across the neighbours property! why?
      Installer : It was easier than connecting to that other box
      Customer : But they are about to build on that block and ...... Oh never mind *blam blam blam blam blam ......... blam* (maybe a few more just to make sure)
      Customer (on phone to telco) : Hi, I was wondering if you could send out a new installer, The last one you sent appears to have had an accident when he tried to run the cable accross my neighbours vacant property
      Telco : Certainly sir / mam let me see who is next available

      Rinse repeat untill installer gets it right.

    4. Re:Thanks for documenting this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      So mow it. They'll have to come out and lay another cable, so mow it again. Keep mowing it until they get tired of replacing it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:Thanks for documenting this by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      yea really YOU do not owe them anything, screw them and tell them its not your responsibility to babysit their cable on your lawn

    6. Re:Thanks for documenting this by danabnormal · · Score: 1

      Can you not charge them rent for it being on your property? I know that in the UK there is some provision in law for this...

    7. Re:Thanks for documenting this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only other place I've seen work as shoddy as this is in India many years ago. Is this really the standards that American workers set for themselves ?

      No wonder The US is about to go bankrupt.

    8. Re:Thanks for documenting this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I can't disagree with that.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    9. Re:Thanks for documenting this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter who does it as long as someone buries the cable comfortably inside 30 days, or I will cancel the service and go with a competitor.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:Thanks for documenting this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      This kind of reply makes me wonder what percentage of foreigners think we still ride horses on dirt streets.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    11. Re:Thanks for documenting this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I guess you can charge or bill them for anything but you would almost certainly have to go to court to collect.

      These days it appears to be more productive to ridicule them in public.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  43. Re:Hmmm by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wouldn't immediately dismiss it.

    I worked for an ISP for a while. And while our techies were at least halfway decent and didn't cause too many problems, the installations we outsourced to various companies were sometimes rather crude hacks. They got paid by the installation, so anything that required more than a "go in, assemble, turn on, go" would cut into their profits. And that in turn led them to quite odd practices sometimes, where cables were thrown across rooms because the installing technician didn't have enough cable with him at that time to move along the walls, network boxes that were tossed behind desks instead of being neatly screwed to walls, bent and twisted cables that weren't replaced when they accidentally dropped something on them and simply "stealing" power cables because they had two installations to do and only one working power cable with them (so they installed it at the first customer and simply swiped that cable to be able to install the other one).

    I have no idea what could possibly get a tech to do a hack like this, but I wouldn't deem it completely impossible without knowing the whole story behind it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  44. A submission to "thereifixedit.com" by mikael · · Score: 1

    Looks like something you would see on the repair blog "thereifixedit.com:

    Improvised heatsink

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  45. Re:Not so anonymous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can think of 2 different reasons to submit it anonymously.

    1: The anonymous poster wasn't him, just someone who stumbled across the pictures in the picasa gallery.

    2: He is Benjamin, but he doesn't want us to know his Slashdot username.

  46. FUD by BlueF · · Score: 1

    Seems so very unlikely a paid technician would perform this sort of "install" unless they were deliberately trying to get fired and/or cause trouble.

  47. Former Qwest by SnowDog74 · · Score: 2

    I worked at Qwest for ten years and because they contract independent techs in a lot of the CLEC regions (where they're not the incumbent carrier), and based on my own experience years ago fielding provisioning/repair calls, what you describe does not particularly surprise me.

    I'm checking with my former manager in the IPNOC to see who you might escalate this issue to directly. I'll get back to you if they can give me someone.

  48. NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by bablakely · · Score: 5, Informative

    Turns out this was not Qwest after all, but another ISP in our area. My apologies to Qwest for the error.

    1. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... you didn't have a problem with naming them and calling them out on their atrocious job, but you won't do the same with the "other ISP", and have now taken down the photos?

      Slashdot just got trolled!

    2. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by LodCrappo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's an example of fine Slashdot submissionship. In the idle section, they just submitted a picture for our readers. They left an anonymous submission that links to a picasa album displaying their own name , blamed the entirely wrong people, failed to identify the correct people despite apparently knowing who they are, and generally wasted everyone's time with a crap story. And if you're wondering — ah fuck it, thats as far as I can go with this.

      --
      -Lod
    3. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      I call "fake" on this post.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    4. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by arth1 · · Score: 2

      After slandering Quest on the front page of one of the largest tech blogs in the world, I think you might want to contact slashdot to get a correction up in the summary as soon as possible, not just a small notice far down on the blog page.
      Just my 2c...

    5. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      By that I mean bablakely's

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    6. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by arth1 · · Score: 1
    7. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

      Bablakely looks to be more like a puppet account. Furthermore, its not slander (or in this case libel) if you genuinely believe something to be true. It must be proven you are out to cause harm to the reputation of the entity and generally also fabricate a story.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    8. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Looks like you may be right after all. My apologies if you are.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    9. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by arth1 · · Score: 2

      (Yes, it's likely seen as libel and not slander, despite the informal tone of blogs)

      No, genuinely believing something to be true doesn't necessarily protect you from a defamation lawsuit, if I understand this right. If the accuser can show that you didn't make adequate research before publishing, you can still lose.
      And in this case, the person claims to be an information security expert, and the bar for "adequate research" is likely higher as a result.

      Then again, IANAL, but my recommendation to Mr. Blakely about asking /. to put a retraction in the summary still stands. It can't hurt.

    10. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      Which one? If you're going to name names, might as well let us know the responsible ISP.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    11. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      404 NOT_FOUND
      Unable to process request.

      is as legit a retraction as you can find.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the student who posted this has retracted both his Picasa account (after first posting the above referenced retraction) and his own webserver.

      My guess is that the Qwestweilers contacted him.

    13. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, its doubtful that Qwest would have got it working at all. But just to be sure, if your getting more than say 1.5 Mb/sec download it not Qwest.

    14. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not have been Qwest, but the workmanship is just about as shotty as Qwest..... One of the last buildings I worked in had a pretty decent group of growing businesses and Qwest was the primary phone company in that area, so we saw them a lot. It was a running joke in the building, not just in my IT dept, but all the IT departments in the building, if Qwest shows up for any of us, everyone else needs to check all their connectivity and equipment. We seriously had to inspect their work.

      At one point, we added a powerful predictive dialer system and needed 28 new T1 lines. The Qwest braniac disconnected the investment company downstairs and claimed "If I didn't disconnect somebody, you wouldn't be able to have all your new lines". The sad thing is, you could call Qwest and tell them what happened, but they always blamed our equipment. Even in this situation, poor Steve was told a technician wouldn't do something like that, he must have had a power failuer to his equipment. The funny thing is, none of us in the building ever had to pay them for a service call to "fix our equipment".... Hmmmm....

      While I do think Qwest needs some great improvement, I call BS on the picture and story. Looks like a qwest job, but they wouldn't have left it ON the gas mains.... They would have hidden it BEHIND the gas maines. Yeeesh.

    15. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 1

      Hear hear....

      Slashdot editorial staff does story vetting in very much the same manner that this story's submitter alleged that Qwest performed the DSL installation. Given that this story is still on the Slashdot front page without any update regarding the submitter's retraction (at least that of the Picasa poster that is), they make the Drudge Report look like a peer reviewed journal.

      Of course, clearly the Slashdot audience isn't much better on the whole either; Regardless of the average Slashdot reader's opinion of Qwest, Slashdot fucked up as did the submitter. It takes a big bit of intellectual dishonesty to continue to try and bemoan the evil Qwest, at least in this context. And for the number of comments that say the retraction was due to strong-arming by Qwest... I haven't seem that much paranoia since the National Truther/Birther convention hit town! Of course I've been here long enough to expect that sort of thing to be the mainstream perspective in these parts.

    16. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by qmaqdk · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. If all the news on /. was well researched, well cited, traceable, and factual there would be no need for the discussions.

      --
      My UID is prime. Hah!
    17. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

      And you must be new here if you're unfamiliar with the pointless poorly done parody post.

      Now that we have that established, I'd suggest our relative uids leave little doubt as to who is "newer".

      --
      -Lod
    18. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who is this other ISP? Why not post their name now?

    19. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by noidentity · · Score: 1

      And now the photo album isn't even there. But this is why it was in idle.

    20. Re:NOT QWEST AFTER ALL by thoughtprovoking · · Score: 1

      I am not surprised. A couple of years ago I worked for a network backbone company that provided the network access to various Internet Service Providers within the state. My job was Internet Technical Support for an number of these. One such provider offered a number of different internet services depending on the region of the state in which you lived. In one city they subcontracted through Qwest. How that worked was that they would use the Qwest network and equipment but they would provide their own techs to do the initial install and my office would provide the tech support. there was on occasion we had this customer call in because his DSL equipment kept failing. It turned out that he had no phone lines going into his home and so the Tech instead installed the DSL Modem/Wireless router under the wood deck behind his house and they required the home owner to only be able to connect through the wireless. Of course they did not install any kind of box to protect it with so every time it rain or snow the DSL stopped working. and they had to send the tech out to fix it. All the tech would do was replace the broken modem. This was likely not Qwest but some so called "Discount" Internet Service Provider that offer a service package that was probably "to good to be true." Now they are getting what they paid for. It is also possible that this is a temporary measure because the business demanded that they have internet right away but their build does not have a functional phone line for the DSL to run from so they had to connect direct from the Connection box outside. They might still come back and transfer everything inside as soon as they can resolve the issue that is keeping them from installing it inside. In many cases a tech may have to run a separate phone line for the DSL to prevent it from interfering with a fax or phone line as DSL introduces background static that will interfere with a fax machine even if the fax is connecting through a filter.

  49. Qwest fail fail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out this wasn't Qwest after all, but another (to remain nameless) ISP in our area. My apologies to Qwest for the mistake.

    Qwest fail fail!

  50. I guess someone complained by nateross · · Score: 1

    looks like QWest sent a Cease and Desist letter or something... the photo on Picasa has been replaced with an apology.... sorry Mr Corporate Attorney Sir: http://lh6.ggpht.com/_sU7dL3OFMpY/TTeLgGH6COI/AAAAAAAAM-E/lmPuM9IC_b8/QwestSorry.png

    1. Re:I guess someone complained by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

      Theres a Qwest social outreach rep down below your post trying to locate the person who posted these and another person who "apparently" posted the pictures with a miraculously similar name to the Picasa account apologizing saying it "wasn't Qwest afterall" even though the submission was anonymous. I would wager there is something fishing going on.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    2. Re:I guess someone complained by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I find it amazing that the entire thread can get this long without anyone asking about the make and model of DSL router involved and whether it can run DD-WRT, OpenWrt, Tomato etc. Things are slipping round here.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  51. Used to be USWorst, now they are Qworst. by MasterMynd · · Score: 1

    We have a Qwest network juncture in our back yard. When it was originally installed, there were phone cables laying on the ground for much of the neighborhood. Worked pretty good, so long as people had no plans to mow their yards.

    1. Re:Used to be USWorst, now they are Qworst. by gblues · · Score: 1

      Ah, used to work in one of their outsourced call centers. We made fun of their tagline: "US Worst! Life's bitter here!"

  52. Qwest by TalkToUs+at+Qwest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hello, this is Steve at Qwest. I am a manger in the social media group. We have tried contacting the poster trying to find an adress associated with this to no avail. When we go back to the posted links, the pics have been removed. If anyone knows where this is located, please let us know at talktous@qwest.com, Steve in the subject line, much appreciated! Regards Steve Q-TalkToUs www.socialmedia.qwest.com

    1. Re:Qwest by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      I suspect a troll shall come along shortly.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    2. Re:Qwest by bablakely · · Score: 4, Informative

      Steve - I replied about half an hour ago. I am unable to retract this from Slashdot.

    3. Re:Qwest by arth1 · · Score: 1

      This appears to be the person to contact: http://www.bablakely.net/vita/
      The name matches, but also one of the other albums in the Picasa account references the Krell Institute.

    4. Re:Qwest by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Until you can get a retraction added to the summary, you could perhaps reply to one of the TOP posts, so people wouldn't have to wade through hundreds of messages before (if at all) spotting your retraction. It'd probably be marked +5 informative rather quickly too.

    5. Re:Qwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://picasaweb.google.com/bablakely/QwestFail#

      by bablakely (1432959) writes: on Wednesday January 19, @08:11PM (#34934904)
      Turns out this was not Qwest after all, but another ISP in our area. My apologies to Qwest for the error.

      looks like the guy who posted it removed it as it was not Quest who was at fault here....

      Kudo's to Quest for looking for crazy shit like this, and trying to reach out and do something about it!

      On the down side, the fact that their P/R and Customer Relations have gotten so bad they HAVE to look for these things in these avenues speaks volumes as well...

      I would LOVE to do some anonymous QC work for Telco's Cable Co's and Sat Co's if anyone is looking for someone in a position, i could cover most of the central east coast. contact :entert[removethistext]hetruth (at) yaho[removethistext].com remove - [removethistext] - brackets included

    6. Re:Qwest by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Is this real? My god, the spelling in the comment above makes Qwest look even more droolingly retarded than the original post. Is this whole thing an elaborate hoax?

      You're a manger!?

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    7. Re:Qwest by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      Hello Steve, I am James, a Nigerian prince, if you give me full access to your bank account I promise I will deposit 500,000$ into your account for helping me with this issue

    8. Re:Qwest by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      It's kudos . For that reason, I'd think Qwest might want to reconsider your appointment to a "QC" role ;)
      (Ironically, even if there were such a thing as a "kudo" that you pluralised and attributed to another who deserved praise, you would not need the apostrophe, it would simply be "kudos".)

    9. Re:Qwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice troll guy

    10. Re:Qwest by chip_s_ahoy · · Score: 1

      Can you fix my internet first?

    11. Re:Qwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 going to be sued!

    12. Re:Qwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the only misspelled word and looks like the result of a typo. I admit it is a strange post but no need to be such a dick.

    13. Re:Qwest by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Apparently it wasn't Qwest but glad to see you guys are taking it seriously.

      Ref: http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1957706&cid=34934904

    14. Re:Qwest by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "That's the only misspelled word..."

      Not so; try again.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  53. QWest: Can't trust them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A former QWest CEO went to prison. In my experience, the new QWest CEO is no more honest.

    1. Re:QWest: Can't trust them? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1

      A former QWest CEO went to prison. In my experience, the new QWest CEO is no more honest.

      After a prosecution that seemed like it quite likely had more to do with Qwest having refused to participate in the Bush administration criminal wiretap program than what he was convicted of.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:QWest: Can't trust them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A former QWest CEO went to prison. In my experience, the new QWest CEO is no more honest.

      After a prosecution that seemed like it quite likely had more to do with Qwest having refused to participate in the Bush administration criminal wiretap program than what he was convicted of.

      Probably. You can get away with a lot if you're willing to give the powers that be a good reach-around. If you don't, then you might actually be held accountable for your actions.

  54. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by green1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or he could do like I do every single day, and just do the job, and do the job right.

    Unfortunately at this point the only picture to reference is the one in the slashdot summary as the original has been removed, however based on the summary description and picture, I just can't even imagine what they were thinking. I have seen some pretty creative installs though, and the usual culprit is contractors who are paid by the hour instead of by the job, if they can save 10 seconds they will, no matter what it does to the quality of the job. And management usually loves them for it, because their numbers are good... unless you include the number of repairs they cause...

    I install phone, internet, and TV, including ADSL, Fibre Optics, and Satellite services. I do it in Canada, and I do it year round. Weather is not a valid excuse. I have installed satellite dishes in blizzards at -25c, I have terminated fibre optics when I couldn't feel my fingers, and couldn't keep the snow out of the mechanical splicer, and I have terminated aerial service drops at the top of a pole while soaked to the bone and feeling the line voltage through my soaked gloves, and I have NEVER cancelled or rescheduled a job due to weather.

    Weather is part of the job, if you don't want to work outside in whatever the weather happens to be, you don't work as a telecommunication technician doing residential and small business installs and repairs. It's pretty much that simple.

    That said, I also get to work outdoors in the sunshine in the summer, I have worked on connection boxes on the side of the road not 5 meters away from a moose with 2 calves, and I have worked on rooftops and at pole-tops with views you could sell, and I get amazing variety and no managers watching over my shoulder, I never want to work a desk job again.

  55. Re:Hmmm by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

    Yeah it seems to be BS because the target source says "it wasn't qwest but another anonymous group". Sounds to me that they got threatened by Qwest for this joke.

  56. It wasn't Qwest by gratuitous_arp · · Score: 2

    If you check the website linked to in the article, they're now hosting an image that says: "Turns out this wasn't Qwest after all, but another (to remain nameless) ISP in our area. My apologies to Qwest for the mistake." Oops.

    1. Re:It wasn't Qwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Who WAS it?

    2. Re:It wasn't Qwest by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Funny how in the correction they name Qwest twice, and the actual perpetrator not at all.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  57. Dear god... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Dear god, that is horrendous. More pictures, please!

    Did the installer(s) by chance have accents which might suggest they came from Arabia or African proper? Rumour has it that kind of bumfuckery is common there.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  58. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by Imrik · · Score: 1

    Contractors who are paid by the hour wouldn't be the ones that try to save ten seconds, they would be the ones who take 4 hours to do a 30 min install. Its the ones that are paid by the job that will try to finish as fast as possible and get out.

  59. so am I the only one thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "unplug it and shuck it in a Salvation Army box" ?

  60. Re:Hmmm by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have no idea what could possibly get a tech to do a hack like this, but I wouldn't deem it completely impossible without knowing the whole story behind it.

      Quotas.

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  61. Fake by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1, Informative

    Fake...and he's already removed the pic from Picassa and backpedalled it being quest.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  62. Ok so what ISP is it? by turbogizzmo · · Score: 1

    So what ISP was it then? I mean you called out a national one, why not the local one?

  63. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by green1 · · Score: 1

    oops... I meant to say paid by the job instead of by the hour...

    I'm paid by the hour, but half our workforce is paid by the job. the difference shows, and finally management is admitting the same thing!

  64. Re:Hmmm by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

    It's not just internet installations. When our DirecTV was installed, the installer installed the dish directly above the cable box (pointing halfway into the roof) and connected the dish to the cable, letting him use the existing cable wiring. Of course, that meant only one of our dual tuners was actually set up, and the signal strength was 70% (60's the minimum) in good weather. Then, when Comcast figured out we were no longer their customers, they cut all the wires leading to the cable box, turning off our DirecTV.

    The main thing I learned from this was not to let my wife sign for the work of installers.

  65. CORRECTION by bablakely · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was not Qwest. Please +up this post. I cannot get Slashdot to retract.

    1. Re:CORRECTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:CORRECTION by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      So who was it...?

    3. Re:CORRECTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then can you please tell us what ISP this was, and make the pictures available again under the proper name? Please? I believe this is of interest and importance to everyone.

    4. Re:CORRECTION by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't Qwest then who the hell was it?

    5. Re:CORRECTION by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Says you. For all we know, you work for them.

      If you ARE the source, maybe next time you shouldn't submit anonymously.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:CORRECTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's Qwest, horrible company anyways... bleh!

  66. like they say by wan9xu · · Score: 1

    if you want s**t done right, do it yourself.

  67. Re:For comcast that a ok job but for dsl / phone t by socsoc · · Score: 1

    Comcast would have put the equipment in the snow.

  68. When in Rome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched as a crew hammer-drilled through an 18" thick brick wall of a >300 year-old building to install a single Cat-5 cable. Hole was dead center in my rented apartment wall. They shoved in grey conduit for the cable, duct taped it to the convenient handrail of a staircase, then down the wall to the receptacle. Job well done, they went to lunch. Some else showed up a week later to install the cable itself.

  69. 404 error code by mallyn · · Score: 1

    I am getting a 404 error code when I tried the link.

    Can people please validate the link before posting?

    Thank you

    Luv

    Mark

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  70. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I used to work for both cable and satellite companies, and would believe an installer did this FAR quicker than any one else... This is mild compaired to what ive seen.... satellite dishes mounted to the trunk of a car, a wire run waste height right accost the FRONT GOD DAMN DOOR, electrical wire run through creek beds.... HELL, id almost compliment the installer for not putting a self tapping screw into the gas main to ground the bitch, but then again, i wish installers like this would attempt that... it would fix the problem... well no it wouldnt, the problem comes from the contractor paying the installer shit to do a HELL of a job, and over booking by 200%... thats how our media company's roll these days.... over booked and under paid (with 0 accountability).... result: shit work.

  71. Your link has problems (404 Error) by mallyn · · Score: 1

    As of about 7:33 PM Pacific time, I am getting a 404 error on your link.

    Please check your links prior to posting!!!

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  72. Re:Hmmm by Ironhandx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldn't deem it impossible, and would likely deem it probable.

    I used to work for a large american ISP whom I am not at liberty to name. However I worked in support. We had everything from a call from a guy whose wife was in his bed at the time banging our technician to a call about a tech that took a shit while he was in the customers attic fixing some wiring.

    After having worked inside one of those companies where these things get reported... I'll believe damn near anything I hear about them at this point.

  73. Re:Hmmm by cusco · · Score: 2

    I highly doubt any professional would install this

    You have no idea what you're talking about then. I work in the physical security industry, key cards, camera systems, alarms, etc. Not homeowner crap, businesses and government customers. Our company has cleaned up stuff at least this bad left behind by our competitors more than once. In most states a DSL install doesn't even need an 06 licensed electrician unless a building permit has been pulled. The guy who did that "install" was probably changing oil at Quickie Lube last week and is flipping burgers this week.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  74. But did they arrive on time? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    If they showed up on time, hell I'd give them a call to set up my connection. And I will insist on the same level of quality as yours.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  75. and charged you for... by vaporland · · Score: 1

    and charged you for damage to company property

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  76. Re:Hmmm by adolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to work for a large american ISP whom I am not at liberty to name. However I worked in support. We had everything from a call from a guy whose wife was in his bed at the time banging our technician

    Customer: your!tech!is!banging!my!wife!in!my!bed!

    Support: Sir?

    Customer: !!!!!!!

    Support: Sir, he's a professional. So please just relax, and let him finish his installation.

  77. Mod Parent Up by dafing · · Score: 1

    Yer, Quit Yer Bitchin'!

    Back In My Day, we only got given PAPER protection covers!

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  78. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Not sure how it is in America but in many other countries doing a "temporary" job does not allow you to bypass the safety regulations, of which you have plenty to choose from here. You have electrical equipment not suitable for their environment, you have breach the API hazardous area zoning, and I wonder what the phone company thinks of this installation when an equipment fault sends a spike back up their line.

    Temporary installations need to be rendered safe before the worksite is left. In a situation like this it would mean that the power is isolated and locked out, and the equipment is not put in service.

  79. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

    You sir, are a credit to your job and i hope the installers i meet in the future are even half as dedicated as you.

    --
    People, what a bunch of bastards
  80. Step away from the lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, Americans... 200 comments demanding a lawsuit.

    How about you start with putting in another call, or sending an email, saying you want the matter escalated. Explain what's wrong and what you think needs doing to fix it.

    Really no need to involve lawyers just yet - learn to manage your suppliers a bit better.

  81. Woohoo Free modem by sven_eee · · Score: 2

    I would be removing it anonymously or getting the ground keeper to clean up the rubbish.

  82. Really Bad, but QWEST? by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    I've been in Telecoms for a long time, and I have a hard time believing that a Qwest installer really did that. Whoever did it should definitely not be doing installs. There must be more to this story than we are being told.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  83. Make a buck off it by NetServices · · Score: 0

    Take the sh!t and sell it on Ebay.

  84. Gas piping by Igarden2 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if the welded gas pipes in the photo are common? I don't remember seeing anything like it.

    --
    Normally I ascribe all life to intelligent design, but in your case I'll make an exception.
  85. who is this bablakely guy anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, the original poster of this article, aka "bablakely", has taken down both his picaso site and personal website in response to this. He's a PhD candidate at Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Don't you have better things to do with your time?

  86. I don't see the problem. by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

    Does it power on? Can you get on the internet? Then the installation was a success...

    --
    Loading...
  87. What? by giantism_strikes · · Score: 1

    At least it wasn't a Target bag.

  88. Well I've seen this before. by semi-old-geek · · Score: 1

    It looks to me like the tech told the sales person, "Well why don't you install it then!". And the Sales person said "OK I will!"

  89. Can trust Qwest by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.
    Who else in the telecomm industry stood up to the job-killing Bush administration?
    Vote with your wallet if you like privacy.
    We did, and Qwest is far better than our previous broadband provider (you know, the one with the 37% drop in direct subscribers).
    And, no, never have worked for Qwest, although I have worked for another telco.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  90. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Of course he should have done the job right. But this one looks over-the-top egregiously badly done, not just a regular-slacker bad job.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  91. Not qwest, but real ISP to remain nameless, WTF? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    He's removed the pictures (why?) and now put up a single one saying that it's not Qwest (shoot first, ask questions later, eh?), but that the ISP who did it will remain nameless. WTF? So if it had been Qwest, he would have been fine shaming them (a good thing), but since it's not, whoever did do it doesn't deserve to be shamed? I don't really care which ISP did it, anyway, I just want to see the pictures. Why are they gone?

  92. Sound like one of Qwest's own slogans: by plorqk · · Score: 1

    Service inaction.

    Really it's Service in action but it sounds like the former when you hear it outloud.

    --
    When travelling, it's ok if the airlines lose your emotional baggage.
  93. No access to images. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Picasa album link isn't working. 404 from Google. 1800 UTC.

  94. Re:Responding professionally to bad customer reque by Ykant · · Score: 1

    "All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain."

    --
    Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
  95. What a bad way for Ames to make the /. news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a resident of Ames, IA (Iowa State University student). My guess is the company responsible is ICS advanced technologies. They've got a horrible rep in the city for slow service and shoddy infrastructure (ie not capable of handling the off campus student traffic).

  96. "Not My Problem!" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Call the local government and a bureaucrat tells you effectively not to bother him because of their internal administrative divisions. This person makes an above-average salary, gets primo benefits and has a golden retirement package.

    Go to the local Walmart, ask the PFY stocking the cereals where to find a lightbulb, and he puts down what he's doing, brings you to the hardware section and helps you find the lightbulb if needed. He gets a bit above minimum wage, and probably no benefits.

    One of these two knows how to handle customer service. The other has a monopoly.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  97. ISP Question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who was this Ben? I thought the business park had fiber from the Univ.... Aren't the only ISPs in town Mediacom & Qwest??? or is there another one that I know nothing about?? Also, I thought you KNEW better then to post anon stuff linking back to your picasa account... I guess you can hit us back 30x harder though! DON'T MESS WITH BEN!

  98. Intel Engineers by m3741 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the Intel engineers in the story a few days back envisioned this use case scenario when they were testing their Base-T devices.