Motorola Sticks To Guns On Locking Down Android
jeffmeden writes "'These aren't the droids you're looking for' proclaims Motorola, maker of the popular Android smartphones such as the Droid 2 and Droid X. At least, not if you have any intention of loading a customized operating system. According to Motorola's own YouTube channel, 'If you want to do custom roms, then buy elsewhere, we'll continue with our strategy that is working thanks.' The strategy they are referring to is a feature Motorola pioneered called 'e-fuse', the ability for the phone's CPU to stop working if it detects unauthorized software running."
Hundreds of thousands of potential costumers go "ok."
A company who tells its clients to go buy from someone else is usually on the way out...
Fine I will.dumbasses
The ones who know what they're doing aren't the masses. They're the ignorable minority.
Let 'em fail. It wasn't that long ago that motorola could barely GIVE their phones away.
This is not locking down Android, this is locking down a Motorola Handset.
Hardware lock down, not software. Pretty big distinction.
But Motorola has jumped the shark. HTC are offering better handsets and MotoBlur is a complete joke. I liked my Milestone too, but due to Motorola's insistence on locking it down I wont be buying the Milestone 2. HTC Desire Z looks a lot better.
Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
Seems that sentiment was pretty quickly retracted. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=495971028278
But if you want to waste electricity, you can sign up for the efforts to brute force Motorola Milestone - their first phone to feature this draconian lockdown.
Go for the Nexus S - they're the most dev friendly. You'll also find that HTC phones are also supported pretty well, even though they have a similarly draconian nandlock in place. It's just been cracked :)
e-fuse doesn't stop you from rooting your phone and installing wireless-tether. e-fuse is there so that Motorola can stop releasing kernel updates when the droid 3 comes out so that you are forced to buy a new phone if you want the latest version of android.
Without free software to do the heavy lifting, the phone manufacturers wouldn't be able to compete at the same price point in the market, so free software developers actually have some leverage to prevent lockdowns in the future.
But for that, the community must be smart and use the right kind of license, eg GPLv3, but not BSD. If the Linux/embedded systems developers drop the ball and continue to use the wrong kinds of licences (GPLv2 is not good enough), then the future you talk about will certainly happen.
The strategy they are referring to is a feature Motorola pioneered called 'e-fuse', the ability for the phone's CPU to stop working if it detects unauthorized software running.
Oh not this bullshit again. This was first published by an ill-informed "hacker" a while back and regurgitated by every blog in the world with no fact checking.
Motorola has even stated very clearly that they never intend to completely brick a device if it detects an unauthorized ROM. It'll just need restoring. The SoCs Motorola uses are in no way pioneering e-fuses. Someone just read a gigantic amount of conspiracy into the tiniest of press release. This is OLD technology. Can this lie please go away?
Without free software to do the heavy lifting, the phone manufacturers wouldn't be able to compete at the same price point in the market, so free software developers actually have some leverage to prevent lockdowns in the future.
Here's a newsflash for you: Google created Android to make sure they have a presence in the lucrative mobile market and could care less about "open" and "free." The reason Android was released as open source is to take advantage of the geek word-of-mouth (or geek internet press) and the geek anti Apple backlash. There won't be any "leveraging" done. I guess this is the point where a a bunch of disillusioned geeks get together and vow to create a 100% pure open(tm) alternative (ETA: 2015.)
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
Nexus S
Android's core is composed of the Linux kernel and the Apache Harmony libraries. They don't get to decide the license of those - and any code of the kernel they modify and distribute _must_ be released under the same license (GPLv2).
If Torvalds et all changed the kernel's license to GPLv3, Google and the phone manufacturers would either have to comply with it or stop upgrading.
So thinking that Google holds all the keys is wrong.
Dilbert RSS feed
This article needs an update. Motorola has already officially apologized for the youtube admin's tone.
That isn't what they are saying, it is just what the 0.0000000000000003% of users that might want to install their own OS
Got a little carried away with the zeroes there did we? Even if everyone on the planet owned a Motorola phone that would be about 20 billionths of one user who is understandably going to be rather upset when several thousand brain cells attempt to install their own OS.
We've been over this. Torvalds can't change the kernel to GPLv3, because the copyright is owned by a thousand different contributors.
i get quite annoyed at the constant arrogance and elitism on /.
sorry to burst your bubble - this isn't an elite site, and the "99% of the masses" argument is pure shit that i hear everywhere all the time, in many different disciplines.
whenever someone asks me to recommend them a TV, the conversation will lead to "nobody would ever notice that", but yet we're talking about it and a choice about what to buy is being made based on it.
what do the masses do when they need advice? they ask that nerd friend of theirs. if the nerd has communication skills slightly above the lower end of the Autism Spectrum, the masses will even get a useful answer.
be honest, how many times have you heard a friend say something to the effect of "i'm looking for a smartphone but i don't want an iPhone... what should i get?".
consider each time someone asks that as a lost sale for Motorola...
i don't think it'll kill their business, but their overall crap products certainly are having an effect, and political issues such as this (yes! political! not technical and therefore outside the grasp of the average simian on the street!) will certainly make a large dent in the long run.
That link is for the old project.
Here is a link to the new AndrOINC Project
Motorola does not want to lock them down, the carrier(s) are forcing them to. I have inside info from a dev about this, and I've argued with him about it at length angrily. Unfortunately, their hands are tied, it's the carrier's way or the highway.
If you want to be upset at anyone, be angry at e.g. Verizon. People need to fight the carriers on this, it's about our freedom!!
Quite the opposite, we're very uninteresting as customers.
Do we buy ringtones? No, we know how to make our own (provided we care about them altogether).
Do we buy background pics? No, same applies.
Do we buy applications? Rarely. More often than not, we'd know a free alternative.
We're not really the dream customer of someone trying to peddle phone crap.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Motorola plays in the commodity Android space. You know, where features rule and competition is fierce.
Apple doesn't play by those rules and makes up their own... but they write their own OS, design their own chip, and create a unique product out of the whole mess.
Apple "gets away" with their arrogance because they have something other companies don't... and consumers like what they have.
What has Moto done lately that HTC or Samsung can't match?
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
Androids big advange is that is is open (compared to iPhone). All apps can run upon i without approval from the apple app store border. That does not make iPhone bad, it can still give a very good expierence.
But if you have an adroid phone, that is supposed to be open , and then you start locking a (big) part down, then you are limping: You don't have the advantage of an completely open platform and you don't have the advantage of closed expensive controlled fantasy environment of the iPhone.
If you do a thing, do it good. iPhone is a good closed platform.
Android is a good open platform.
Motorola is good at ?? making deals with carriers???