Slashdot Mirror


Golden Gate Bridge To Eliminate Tollbooths

Hugh Pickens writes writes "The San Francisco Chronicle reports that tollbooths and toll collectors, a fixture at the Golden Gate Bridge since it opened in 1937, will be eliminated starting in 2012 as the bridge moves to an all-electronic system, cutting 34 jobs and saving $19.2 million over the first eight years. The bridge will move to a toll collection strategy that combines the existing FasTrak system with one that photographs the license plates of cars going through the toll plaza and mails a bill to the registered owners. Other structures and bridges have successfully gone to all-electronic tolls, including the Sydney Harbor Bridge in Australia and the Leeville Bridge in Louisiana, but not everyone is happy with the change. 'This is a world-famous bridge, and you need a human face,' says Philip Hynes. 'You need people in those toll booths to greet people.'"

349 comments

  1. Electronic tolls way faster by Loomismeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd much rather cruise through tolls without having to stop, and I really have no desire to see these human toll booth operators.

    1. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know how sad and lonely someone would have to be before they're disappointed by the lack of human interaction at a toll booth.

    2. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy whose license plates I have copied because he has the same make and model car I do will strongly disagree with you.

    3. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Absolutely .... but the problem, as usual, is that people aren't comfortable with change. They get used to things being a certain way and feel it's better for everyone if it's just left alone.

      EG. My mom's community finally started a curb-side recycling program where you pay $20 per month or so more for your trash pickup, but they give you a big green can on wheels that's assigned to your house address. Instead of driving to the next community over, to voluntarily drop off your recyclables in big holding bins at their site (where you had to separate everything out manually first), you can now toss all the glass bottles, paper products and plastic milk jugs in the green can, wheel it to the street corner once a week, and you're done. Well, her next-door neighbor was really angry about the changes. Why? Not because she doesn't recycle, but because she "got so used to taking all her stuff over to the old facility, she didn't want to have to pay $20 per month for doing things the new way, when she planned on continuing to do things the old way anyway"!

      When you think about it though? Aren't your trips in the car usually ones you expect to make with as FEW interruptions as possible? Why people would PREFER having to queue up at toll booths where they have to roll down a window and interact with some person sitting in the booth is beyond me..... This isn't like arguing that you miss the human interaction when doing business at your local bank or something. In those cases, those places are your DESTINATIONS -- not impediments to travel artificially placed in your way to collect money from you!

    4. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by idji · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for those poor people who sit in those booths, enduring every weather, and breathing in the fumes of every car that accelerates away. I could never do a job that I know a webcam and boom gate could do better.

    5. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you fag. I was crossing the bridge and let some tourists that were stranded in the wrong lane (FastTrack only) into mine and the taker told me they paid my toll. Think a robot would do that? Go suck your cock fuckface.

    6. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're human!?

    7. Re:Electronic tolls way faster by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      'This is a world-famous bridge, and you need a human face,' says Philip Hynes. 'You need people in those toll booths to greet people.'"

      What part of "The 21st Century" do they not understand?

      The only part I don't like is tracking people who cross the bridge, but then again if they don't the terrorists will win. ~ (denotes snarky comment)

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. rental car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so how does that work?

    1. Re:rental car? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      so how does that work?

      Or a brand new car without plates yet?

    2. Re:rental car? by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, it's tremendous fun to go through an automated toll with a rental car. First the toll authority sends a bill for $1 to the rental company. Then the rental company charges your card (that's still in their system) for $15 based on the fine print in the rental agreement. A run through a lengthy toll road with five or six toll monitors results in individual bills for each one and can get you a bill from the rental company for a hundred or more.

    3. Re:rental car? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      You can legally drive on the road without plates?.......

    4. Re:rental car? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you just have a small (temporary) tag in the windshield until your plates come in.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    5. Re:rental car? by whovian · · Score: 1

      I used to see "LAF" (License Applied For) signs in the plate frames or showing through the rear window. If it is legal, I'm sure there would be a temporary registration card that should be kept in the vehicle.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    6. Re:rental car? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      You can legally drive on the road without plates?.......

      I know a lot of states give you temporary license plates bearing your number, but California just makes you keep your registration application folded up and taped inside the windshield and that is valid for 60 days I believe so you have time for your permanent plates to arrive.

    7. Re:rental car? by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      With a temporary tag in the rear window you can.

    8. Re:rental car? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      Oh... you get bright orange stickers the size of a license plate here that are to be placed where the license plate would be.

      Like this:
      http://media.photobucket.com/image/pr%2525C3%2525B8veskilt/AtleNorsteb/Diverse/21052009350.jpg

    9. Re:rental car? by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Depends what state/province you live in. Some let you have a printed licence taped to your window. Where I live you *must* be plated and you have to order your plate when you buy your car and have it installed at the dealer. Or if its a private sale you have to bring your plate you want to use with you.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    10. Re:rental car? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's tremendous fun to go through an automated toll with a rental car. First the toll authority sends a bill for $1 to the rental company. Then the rental company charges your card (that's still in their system) for $15 based on the fine print in the rental agreement. A run through a lengthy toll road with five or six toll monitors results in individual bills for each one and can get you a bill from the rental company for a hundred or more.

      Which is why I just looked into buying stock in the various rental companies that have large presences in California.

    11. Re:rental car? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The EZPass/FastLane system is a little more friendly. The rental car has an RFID transponder inside a metal box, which can be opened by the driver before a toll. They simply add the tolls to your bill, plus a daily charge for each day the transponder was used. The box lets you bring your own transponder and avoid the daily fee (by holding up your own and leaving the box closed).

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    12. Re:rental car? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      lol @ $1 tolls in California. Isn't the GG like $5 now?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    13. Re:rental car? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Nearly every state has some form of EZPass in place these days.

      I wonder how long it will be before the all learn to read each other's passes and bill accordingly? A transaction from California to Washington State would trigger a lot fewer tin foil hats than a Federal system.

      On the other hand, I'd like to see the whole thing disbanded and force states to put people in the toll booths.

      Why?
      Using people raises the cost, reduces the efficiency, and discourages the practice all together.

      The Golden Gate was paid for 60 years ago, and like most roads was and continues to be funded by fuel taxes. Even those not traveling over it benefit from its existence, and it is something that should be funded out of highway funds. The practice of charging money here and there all across the country to drive on publicly funded roads is not a step forward. There is no reason to expect the funds collected will be used for bridge maintenance, that lie has been exposed in every state that uses toll roads.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:rental car? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Yup. 6 dollars to 3 dollars depending on time and number of passengers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Gate_Bridge

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    15. Re:rental car? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Which is why I just looked into buying stock in the various rental companies that have large presences in California.

      Yeah because this is going to affect their bottom line more than a handful of people saying "yes" to the loss damage waiver on the spur of the moment...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:rental car? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I just looked into buying stock in the various rental companies that have large presences in California.

      Yeah because this is going to affect their bottom line more than a handful of people saying "yes" to the loss damage waiver on the spur of the moment...

      Let me rephrase my post for you...

      Which is why I just looked into buying stock in the various rental companies that have large presences in California. ;-)

      Or perhaps I should have ended it with [/endhumorattempt]? :-)

  3. "You need a human face" by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No you don't.

    You need to eliminate the 5-minute backup at the toll booth, and thereby save yourself ~2000 hours over a lifetime. You don't need the human face, just as you don't need an operator asking, "Number please?" on the telephone.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:"You need a human face" by theaveng · · Score: 1

      No you don't.

      You need to eliminate the 5-minute backup at the toll booth, and thereby save yourself ~2000 hours over a lifetime. You don't need the human face, just as you don't need an operator asking, "Number please?" on the telephone.

      +1 insightful.

      I too hate waiting in toll booth lineups.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    2. Re:"You need a human face" by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Have to agree.

      Though it's going to be very, very interesting the first time some guy gets a bill and the photo shows that it was either (a) a stolen car or (b) some asshole from a valet service taking a joyride.

    3. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now how about doing it in such a way that there isn't yet another record of your travels that law enforcement, attorneys suing you, jealous significant others, etc. can get hold of. Handing cash to strangers is relatively private. None of this was designed with any sort of privacy in mind. It could be, but nobody even considers it when thinking up these privatization schemes.

      Maybe this isn't the particular job function to have the argument about, since tolls of any kind are generally evil, but at some point we have to decide if we want money going to real humans who live and work (and spend) in their communities, or money vacuumed off to large corporations far away.

    4. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you started off with a great point about privacy (which I agree with), then devolved into a rant about how users of bridges, roads, etc. shouldn't have to pay for use and then into something silly about corporations. You do realize that the tolls on the Golden Gate bridge go to pay for maintenance of the bridge, right? I know there are private corporations running toll roads in places like Houston, TX - but those roads you drive on by choice; most roads in the area are public and free. Let's just ignore your rant about tolls and focus on your solid point about privacy.

    5. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you don't.

      You need to eliminate the 5-minute backup at the toll booth, and thereby save yourself ~2000 hours over a lifetime. You don't need the human face, just as you don't need an operator asking, "Number please?" on the telephone.

      You also don't need jobs that exist solely as political favors.

      It works like this: you're very wealthy and you have some worthless offspring or in-law, and this person being homeless would make you look bad. So you contact a politician and promise to donate money if he can find this cretin a job.

    6. Re:"You need a human face" by Prarthana · · Score: 1

      Here in Seattle Washington, they are implementing toll on WA-520 to reduce the traffic on the bridge.

    7. Re:"You need a human face" by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      No you don't.

      You need to eliminate the 5-minute backup at the toll booth, and thereby save yourself ~2000 hours over a lifetime. You don't need the human face, just as you don't need an operator asking, "Number please?" on the telephone.

      I always call the operator for that personal touch.

      Number please?

      Operator, please connect me to Bensonhurst 0-7741.

    8. Re:"You need a human face" by sznupi · · Score: 1

      ...and if only one could be moderately certain "the human face" greeting you, at the end of the wait, will be in any way a pleasant sight.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? Number please? Please. The operator asks you for a business, person, location, and then GIVES you a number. That's not as trivial a task to automate as you think.

      Wow I hate douches like you that lie and twist reality to make points.

    10. Re:"You need a human face" by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 2

      Wow, you started off with a great point about privacy (which I agree with), then devolved into a rant about how users of bridges, roads, etc. shouldn't have to pay for use and then into something silly about corporations.

      What the OP said was that tolls are generally evil. And that is true. Whether you have toll collectors or transponder equipment, you end up wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on a revenue collection method that is strictly inferior to the alternative: Raising the gas tax.

      We already have a gas tax, so the cost of increasing it to offset the revenue lost by eliminating tolls would have zero government overhead. Meanwhile you eliminate the cost of transponders, readers, collection and enforcement costs against those who don't pay, etc.

      And as an added bonus, the privacy concerns entirely disappear.

    11. Re:"You need a human face" by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except this does nothing to change to hinder privacy, as the cameras have already been in place for some time. I remember that story of the guy from Wired that tried to "disappear" and there was a photo of his car for at a toll booth.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    12. Re:"You need a human face" by josepha48 · · Score: 1
      One problem I see is that in CA when you buy a new car they do not give you license plates, they give you a sticker on the front of your car. The cameras take pictures of the back of your cars, like the ones on the bay bridge when people run through the fastrak lanes without the fastrak going off or without a fastrak device.

      So there is potential for people who get a new car to get a free bridge ride!

      The second issue and they dealt with this in England was differences in license plates and the love 'borders' that people put on their plates that obscure the numbers. Thus there is potential there to loose revenue.

      My guess is that the tollbooth toll taker people are way over paid. What should be a minimum wage job probably pays 100k a year or something ridiculous like that.

      I will say that I am glad that they are looking at cutting expenses, maybe they can cut the hikes on the tolls or at least stop increasing them.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

    13. Re:"You need a human face" by Digicrat · · Score: 2

      What the hell are you talking about? Number please? Please. The operator asks you for a business, person, location, and then GIVES you a number. That's not as trivial a task to automate as you think.

      Wow I hate douches like you that lie and twist reality to make points.

      Whoosh?

      I believe the OP was referring to the jobs that were eliminated back when phone companies went from human operators connecting calls on a switchboard (where you had to give them the number) to electronic switchboards that enabled actually dialing a number (though they still required human operators for many years after that to connect long distance calls).

      If you think about it, for both telephone switchboards 50 years ago, and toll booths today, we are:
      - eliminating menial jobs with human interaction (oh no, lost jobs!)
      - adding efficiency to the system (no more waiting in line/hold to get through/connected)
      - reducing privacy through an expanded paper trail (in neither case was there no paper trail before, just more of one now)

    14. Re:"You need a human face" by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

      You took the words out of my mouth. The toll system on the GGB has always been a nightmare ever since I can remember. I wonder when the last time Philip Hynes actually commuted over the bridge and had a meaningful conversation with toll booth operater who informs you the bridge toll is $6 and stares at you while you try to scounge the change together stuck inside your ash tray whith 50 cars behind you wondering why you are taking so long.

      </end rant>

    15. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the tolls on the Golden Gate bridge go to pay for maintenance of the bridge, right?

      Normally, I'd agree with you, but the people who manage the Golden Gate Bridge are either incompetent or corrupt. Now I realize that maintenance on a bridge that receives constant sea breezes can be expensive and that tolls also cover maintenance on the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, but with that many people paying $5-$6 to cross the bridge, there's no way in hell they should be running an ~$80m/year deficit.

      One huge mistake they made is to purchase a huge insurance policy on the bridge after 9/11. It's costing tens of millions of dollars each year and yet will only cover around 10% of the replacement cost of the bridget in the event of a terrorist attack. If the state of California is large enough to cover 90% of the cost of rebuilding the bridge, it's large enough to cover the whole thing...there's absolutely no reason why we should be wasting money on an over-priced insurance policy.

      According to their own figures, they're taking in just over $100m/mo in tolls...it seems perfectly reasonable to me that people would question why that amount of money is necessary to upkeep the bridge and why tolls need to be as high as they are.

    16. Re:"You need a human face" by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      Or do it like the Swiss, have a yearly pass.

    17. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to eliminate the 5-minute backup at the toll booth, and thereby save yourself ~2000 hours over a lifetime

      You can't add up small slices of time like that. Sure if it was 15 minutes then you could, but 5 minutes isn't going to gain me much in a day and that's the time period I care about.

    18. Re:"You need a human face" by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>What the hell are you talking about? "Number please?" The operator GIVES you a number. ..... Wow I hate douches like you that lie and twist reality to make points.
      >>>

      And I hate people who think insulting is a valid method of communication. Perhaps in face-to-face arguments when tempers are boiling, but it's really not acceptable in a posting where you can re-read what you wrote, and then decide, 'I think I'll act like a mature adult and delete the insults.'

      But then again, maybe you're not a mature adult. What's that noise? Mommy calling you to dinner? Run along little teeny-bopper.

      Oh and yes: Back in the days before self-dialing, people picked-up their handsets and an operator said, "Number please?" and you would provide the number for whoever you're calling. JEEZ. Haven't you ever seen old black-and-white movies?

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    19. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ".there's absolutely no reason why we should be wasting money on an over-priced insurance policy."

      Yep. That's why nuclear reactors have no valid insurance either.

    20. Re:"You need a human face" by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      He's not referring to the information operators of today. He's referring to the antiquated switchboard operators back before you could dial the number yourself.

    21. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Strictly inferior" - as in "inferior in all possible ways"?

      You know that's not true. It's especially not true in this case. A bridge is an expensive and inherently limited resource, and a usage charge is one of the best ways to manage it.

    22. Re:"You need a human face" by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      We have this same system where I live. The tool booth takes a picture of both the front and back of the car. They send you a nice crystal clear picture even when driving 75 mph.

      Here if you set up an account and get a quick pass they'll give you 20% off your tolls.

    23. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as you don't need an operator asking, "Number please?" on the telephone.

      Dunno about you, but I miss women asking me for my number....

    24. Re:"You need a human face" by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      A bridge is an expensive and inherently limited resource, and a usage charge is one of the best ways to manage it.

      Nonsense. If this was the goal of toll collection, tolls would only be collected during times of traffic congestion, since collecting a toll at any other time would be mismanaging the resource by discouraging use at times when there is plenty of capacity, and would encourage motorists to not distinguish between times of congestion and other times. However, congestion pricing creates significant perverse incentives for governments: If they act to relieve congestion, even where doing so is highly cost effective and beneficial, they stand to lose the congestion charge revenue when the congestion disappears.

      In addition, it is highly questionable whether tolls significantly reduce congestion anyway. Certainly toll booths do not -- they contribute to it by backing up traffic and grossly mismanaging the "inherently limited resource." And while transponders may not necessarily contribute to congestion, they make the psychological effect of paying the toll highly attenuated by separating the act of crossing the bridge from the act of paying the toll. If the goal is to discourage use then working so hard to hide the cost is self-defeating.

      On top of all that, although bridges are expensive, they only need to be built once. The cost of maintaining a four lane bridge is not outrageously more than the cost of maintaining a two lane bridge. So if there is more demand for bridges than there are bridges, the optimal solution would seem to be to build more or wider bridges, rather than to use tolls to artificially suppress demand.

    25. Re:"You need a human face" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I hate people who think insulting is a valid method of communication. [...] But then again, maybe you're not a mature adult. What's that noise? Mommy calling you to dinner? Run along little teeny-bopper.

      Pot, allow me to introduce you to Kettle.

  4. Can we have it for the Severn Bridges as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will make it easier to go to Wales and back.

    1. Re:Can we have it for the Severn Bridges as well? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      It's already easy to go from Wales. There are only tolls entering Wales, to keep the riff-raff out.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Can we have it for the Severn Bridges as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a Severn TAG and you no longer need to stop at the toll booth, dumbass GP

  5. Works great in Dallas by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    Personally I love the tollway system here in Dallas (not that I use it much, public highways are FREE so to speak). Drive on, drive off, you get a bill at the end of the month with a summary of the charges. For someone who doesn't regularly use cash, it makes my life just a little bit easier. The other alternative is keeping a transponder in your car... not really my cup of tea.
     
    But yeah, long story short we've had the system in effect on portions of Hwy 121 now for about 6 years and it's just recently gone live on the main "Dallas Tollway" with zero issues.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Works great in Dallas by wkk2 · · Score: 1

      These systems are nothing but trouble if you find yourself on a road without booths and you are in a rental car. You either pay a high daily rate plus usage, to get a car with a transponder, or you really get zapped if they forward a bill a month later

    2. Re:Works great in Dallas by humphrm · · Score: 2

      Yeah but it works out great if you don't rent a car and drive an out-of-state vehicle... they don't bill out-of-state plates at all!

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    3. Re:Works great in Dallas by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      That not billing out of state plates thing varies by toll agency.

    4. Re:Works great in Dallas by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      These systems are nothing but trouble if you find yourself on a road without booths and you are in a rental car. You either pay a high daily rate plus usage, to get a car with a transponder, or you really get zapped if they forward a bill a month later

      Not in Dallas. The cars are charged based on license plate number and they just add tolls to your rental cost.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Works great in Dallas by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      Not in Dallas. The cars are charged based on license plate number and they just add tolls to your rental cost.

      What if the car rental company only gets the bill a couple of days after you've brought back the car and left back to your home country...?

    6. Re:Works great in Dallas by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      >>>The other alternative is keeping a transponder in your car... not really my cup of tea.

      So, you pay 150% more than a tolltag customer because...well, I'm not too sure. They know who you are and where you live (obviously), so why would a tolltag not be your "cup of tea"?

      If you really relished your privacy, you simply wouldn't use the NTTA tollroads...

    7. Re:Works great in Dallas by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      They've got your credit card number and your signed authorization for them to charge you for it.

    8. Re:Works great in Dallas by rhook · · Score: 1

      They'll do what they do when you get a parking ticket in a rental, bill your credit card.

    9. Re:Works great in Dallas by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Because cities and the state are allowed to put transponder readers at free city intersections, for starters. In addition to "toll booth" transponder readers, here are transponder readers along the toll roads that track vehicle speed and direction as well. Who knows what happens to all that data. The toll roads are worth the $1.25 the one time a month I am running late and really need to be there NOW. The $15 credit a year I put on there is well worth it.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    10. Re:Works great in Dallas by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Zero issues? Hardly. There is too much incentive to screw up nearby roads and stoplights to make the tollway more attractive. It's competition by calculated neglect.

      You haven't heard of a little trick some drivers used in the early days? As they approached a tollbooth that could take cash or read toll tags, they slowed way down in front of a driver who had a toll tag, hoping to be tailgated. If that happened, the system couldn't distinguish the car with the toll tag from the other, and the toll tag user got billed twice while the cash payer got a free ride.

      121 is a state highway and should not be tolled at all. They weaseled around that by having incredibly wide service roads, and designating those as 121 while the tollway is "121 toll". The service roads are 3 lanes wide, speed limit 55 or 60 mph, and have stoplights every mile. A lot of people run the service roads rather than pay the tolls. The heavy traffic on the service roads makes it more difficult for the people using the tollway, and locals who just want to go to the grocery on the corner. The whole point of such a highway is spoiled by an arrangement like that. But Texas has this attitude that we have space to waste. Everything is big in Texas. Especially the highways.

      When 121 toll first opened, they screwed up quite a few things. They originally billed on a monthly basis no matter how little the usage was. I got a bill in which the postage and handling was triple the toll amount because I'd taken the tollway just once the previous month. At least that got better. Now looks like they wait until you've built up some minimum amount. They also went crazy with the penalties. Didn't give a reasonable amount of time for any problems that might arise before they started massively penalizing people. They were so afraid people might not pay up. Or more like they were greedy. So we had a number of cases where some poor car owner had no idea anything was owed until they were hit with a huge penalty. The mail was slow, or there was some confusion with the license plate number, or something else innocent. And of course rental car drivers got screwed big time.

      We know this is all about money. There are all these cheap little things they do to make driving that road more expensive, and alternative free routes worse, but not so bad that there is a public outcry. Right now, the worst has to be the feed of northbound business 121 on the north side of Lewisville. Southbound is free. But although the service road is 3 feet away, and was connected during construction, they removed that and routed the northbound bridge so that you will pay a toll if you take it. To avoid the toll, you have to turn right onto another road that intersects the tollway 2 exits before that feed, then wait around at more lights for the absolutely dismal arrangements they made for turning left onto the service roads.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    11. Re:Works great in Dallas by AngryDill · · Score: 1

      I don't use toll roads regularly, and don't have a toll tag. I might be tempted to use the North Tollway or the 161 every so often, but I hear there is a $10 fee for them sending you a bill. Paying around $11 for a one-time use of a toll road is ridiculous, IMHO.

      -a.d.-

      --


      I'm Erwin Schrodinger and I approve of this message, and I do not approve of this message!
  6. Who would pay that bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're going to *mail* bills? Seriously? So, those that haven't got a FasTrac basically get across the bridge for free... A lot of the time anyway.

    1. Re:Who would pay that bill? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      They're going to *mail* bills?

      Works pretty well here (Vancouver, Canada). You get a bill, you go online, enter your license plate and CC # and pay the bill. Of course the toll is $4, so it makes more sense to mail out a bill.

    2. Re:Who would pay that bill? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      They're going to *mail* bills? Seriously? So, those that haven't got a FasTrac basically get across the bridge for free... A lot of the time anyway.

      No, because if you don't pay your bill you will have bigger problems than the $6 charge to get across the bridge. Also, FasTrak is still $1 cheaper on the GGB, so there's some incentive there to get it.

    3. Re:Who would pay that bill? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      They're going to *mail* bills? Seriously? So, those that haven't got a FasTrac basically get across the bridge for free... A lot of the time anyway.

      If by "for free" you mean "your right to drive is suspended until you pay these tolls plus late fees, service charges, etc" then yes, they get to go across the bridge for free. At least that is how it works in this state - even for one toll you're mail-billed for and forget to pay on time.

  7. Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by hazee · · Score: 2

    So, $19.2 million, divided by 8 years, divided by 34 people equals...
    The toll-collectors get paid $70K per year?

    1. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, $19.2 million, divided by 8 years, divided by 34 people equals...

      The toll-collectors get paid $70K per year?

      benefits aren't free - health insurance, retirement benefits, etc.

    2. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, $19.2 million, divided by 8 years, divided by 34 people equals...

      The toll-collectors get paid $70K per year?

      That cost probably includes their medical insurance, the employer's portion of SS and other taxes, vacation time, etc.

    3. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Salaries aren't the only cost. Don't forget health insurance and pension plan. Plus the cost of maintaining the actual booths. Plus the armored trucks that have to carry a few tons of quarters every day.

    4. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by scosco62 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that makes sense. Usually, you bundle in a 30% bump for those items, for budgetary purposes. Plus workman;s comp ins. etc etc

    5. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The cost of an employee is usually around double that employee's salary (benefits, substitute cover when they are off, equipment, and so on). They're also going to be saving a lot if they're not handling cash anymore.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in NJ an experienced toll collect can make upwards of $30/hr, so $62400 a year before taxes, plus health insurance, the employer SS tax, etc would probably push them over $100k a year in costs. That's also why they are phasing out toll collectors here too.

    7. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by hazee · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Honestly curious Brit here - I know that US employees suffer lower levels of personal income tax than in the UK (or Europe) but I'm wondering if your employers pay more?

    8. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you get paid $50k a year your employer is paying close to $70k to keep you as an employee.

      or do you think that health insurance, workers comp, 401k, etc are all magically free?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    9. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The employer part of SS tax is around 6%. I can't imagine workers comp payments are very high for tollbooth collectors, even in California, but depending how much the employer pays for health insurance, it could be between $5k and $12k USD on top of that for health insurance.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      The employer usually kicks in for half of the employee's Social Security payments (7.some percent of the income, I think?), and pay for some, most, or all of the health/dental/vision insurance premium payments, which can vary. There are employers (quite a few, actually) who pay no insurance, but it is often done as a benefit to attract talent, so most usually pay for at least some of it. Employers will often also pay a percentage towards an employee's 401k (personal retirement fund) up to a set percentage (it's usually a 1:1 match of the employee's contribution, up to anywhere from 2-8% of the employee's total salary, maximum). For many companies, there are also bonuses to figure out as well. To top all of that off, companies have to pay a Workman's Compensation (long-term disability) insurance premium for each employee, which varies from state to state, and can even vary between industries (for instance, office workers are probably cheaper to insure w/ the state's WC board than ironworkers would be).

      It would be almost to give a set percentage that would strictly apply across all companies, but usually it comes to around 30% above salary (or hourly rate) as a rough estimate.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    11. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      That was around the average in my state for highway collectors. It's not really an immodest salary compared to cost of living, though it might seem so compared to the private sector, which often demands hard work for meager pay--living be damned.

    12. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quarters? It is currently $5-$6 But all of those bills do need to be taken to a bank somehow. And they have to collect up some number of $1s and $10s to make change before the shift starts.

    13. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, $19.2 million, divided by 8 years, divided by 34 people equals...

      The toll-collectors get paid $70K per year?

      So, $19.2 million, divided by 8 years, divided by 34 people equals...

      The toll-collectors get paid $70K per year?

      A toll-taker's base pay starts at $48,672 a year and tops out at $54,080. Reading the article would be too much obv.

    14. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      + their overseers, maintaining the booths they sit in, maintaining their break room, administrative costs WRT taxes and payments.

      Usually the cost per employee calculation is 2-3x... 1$ goes to the employee themselves, 2$ goes to location, benefits, tools, admin overhead, taxes, etc. The toll collectors probably get 50k per year, but cost the state something like 100k.

    15. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have said, there are non-salary costs associated with employees.

      But consider also that:
      a) That's over the next 8 years, so even it if was $70K/year, that would be an average over the next 8 years and $70K/year in 2018 may not be as attractive a salary as it is today.
      b) This is the bay area...it's expensive to live here.
      c) Toll-takers on the bridge have received additional training in the wake of 9/11. They wear bullet-proof vests on the job and I believe they're armed too. Overreacting to terrorism costs money.

      Frankly, the $70K number you arrived at seems bizarrely low to me.

    16. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quarters? The bay area bridges are all $3-$5.

    17. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If that's their total compensation, that's very reasonable. (especially as there are certainly going to be some managers in there who make more than the average...)

      On the other hand, it doesn't matter how reasonable it is if you don't actually need the job they're doing. (and you really don't. You don't even need the transponders, really: just take the camera that reads the tags for people who "run" the booth, and make that the mechanism for everybody. Except instead of a fine, just a regular bill.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    18. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by twakar · · Score: 1

      I did read TFA, and I truly apologize for that, but in there was this little tidbit:
      A toll-taker's base pay starts at $48,672 a year and tops out at $54,080

      Does it strike anyone else that this is a ridiculously high salary for the work involved? Is it possible that pay structures such as this for snivel servants are part of the problem with Californias' budget?

      I say this from Vancouver, where the cost of living is higher than S.F.

      --
      Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity!
    19. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by gblackwo · · Score: 1

      $30 an hour? Why am I an engineer again?

    20. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't affect the cost of an employee, specifically, but American corporate tax rates are quite a bit higher than in much of the rest of the world.

    21. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is their unemployment going to cost?

    22. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by ormondotvos · · Score: 1

      Minus the cost of the fancy new photography equipment, no doubt owned by a politically connected supplier. You DO know that a million people a year fail to pay, are photographed, and can't be contacted because of rules protecting officers of the court, parole officers, teachers, blah blah blah. So they're written off. And don't forget the cost of all those mailings, at $1/toll, unless you can pay through PayPal, and have your account hacked by the slugs at the DMV... and then it'll just happen to turn out to be too expensive, and the toll will have to be raised to handle the corruption.

    23. Re:Saving $19.2M over the first eight years...how? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Toll collectors get health insurance and pension? Maybe that is why California is going bankrupt.
      Most jobs that I have worked in have advertised that they provide health insurance, but in most cases, what that meant was that they allowed you to pay for your own health insurance through the company program with pretax dollars (which Obama will be ending shortly). So the health insurance doesn't actually cost the company anything. And pension? Apparently only jobs that don't required a college education offer pensions.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  8. When will they and the other us systems go ezpass? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When will they and all the other us systems link up with ez-pass?

  9. Um....No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    u need people in those toll booths to greet people.'

    No, you don't.

  10. Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Further, what these idiots fail to realize is that all those cars idling at and then accelerating away from the tollbooths add up to a huge emissions source - something which California says they're always concerned about.

    In the last decade they added "Open-road tolling" on the tollways around Chicago - the air quality was measurably improved in the areas near the toll-collection sites.

    The bridges in the bay area are also major commuter routes - eliminating the requirement for every car to stop at a toll booth can only improve traffic flow.

    For everyone who loves the toll collectors, I bet there are hundreds who hate them. I remember a story in one of the Chicago papers about all the bad things people would do to the toll collectors - like heating up coins using the car's cigarette lighter before giving them to the collector. The exhaust gasses those folks have to breathe all day can't be good for them either.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  11. Isn't that public infrastructure? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

    This isn't a political rant, but I'd have thought the landmark bridges where owned by the state? Or is it common for the state to have road/bridge tolls in the US, to pay for upkeep?

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Try driving to/from NYC - the bridge tolls are ridiculous. There's at least one route without a toll, but all the most commonly-used bridges have tolls as high as $8 (one way). Gold Gate Bridge is similar, not sure what the price on that one is right now though.

    2. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Here in Dallas they're just money machines. Politicians see the need for new roads (especially in fast-growing Texas) and use state funds to pay for the highways, and then lease the toll-road rights (a 99 year lease!!) to private companies for a lump sum, which they can then use for other purposes. The NTTA toll company has been so successful with this State-Backed venture that they were lobbying for a multi-billion dollar 10 lane highway between Dallas and Mexico through west Texas under the same agreement framework. If you look at this map and the big fat line between San Antonio and Dallas, you can see why that appears to be such a lucrative idea. I-35 is way overcrowded 24/7, especially with freight truck traffic.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess as long as the contract inescapably says that the road goes back to the state if the company fails to manage it properly or lets it fall into disrepair, it could work.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    4. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by garcia · · Score: 1

      It was commonplace for tolls to be required to pay for the bridge/road system under the guise that the tolls would be removed after the bonds were paid. Unfortunately, as with any tax, the government never has any intention of making them temporary and does whatever it can to justify the influx of dollars they have done nothing to prepare for a time without.

      I avoid toll roads, like the god awful ones in Chicago, like the plague. In fact when I drive from Minnesota to any states east of here, I drive down to I-80 in Iowa and across rather than go through Chicago. Sure it adds 50 miles but I end up saving time, gas (no traffic), and the aggravation of seeing tolls continue to allow for awful roads.

    5. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try as high as $13 dollars for the Verrazano Bridge.

    6. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Try driving to/from NYC - the bridge tolls are ridiculous. There's at least one route without a toll, but all the most commonly-used bridges have tolls as high as $8 (one way). Gold Gate Bridge is similar, not sure what the price on that one is right now though.

      The Golden Gate is $6 right now, $5 if you pay with FasTrak. The Bay Bridge is $6 during rush hour, $5 on the weekends, and $4 on off-peak. All the other bridges in the Bay Area are $5. Cars with those douchey "Clean Air Vehicle" decals are $2.50 everywhere.

      Anyway, my point is it costs me $100 to get to work every month, and some people even have to cross TWO bridges to get to San Francisco in less than 2 hours.

    7. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Most bridges don't have tolls, mainly very large bridges. Toll roads are rare, especially in the west, where they are mainly developed as a way to deal with congestion, if they exist at all.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      If it works like I think, I'd say it's a good thing. The Øresund Bridge between Sweden and Denmark is entirely user financed, despite being built by the respective governments. It seems fairer to let actual users pay for infrastructure like this than to take it from taxes that can be better spent on other things that can't pay for themselves so easily.

    9. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only trouble is... at $56 (370 SEK) the cost of passing that bridge is rather discouraging to casual users. (Commuters get a discount.)

    10. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Golden Gate Bridge is owned and operated by the Golden Gate Bridge District. They also run the Ferries between Marin and SF as well as the Golden Gate Transportation Buses from SF to Marin and Sonoma counties. The bridge gets no state money everything is paid for by the tollspaid by motorists using the bridge.

    11. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Depends where you are. We're going to be getting a new tunnel downtown which will be funded in part via tolls. We're also replacing a bridge which is partially paid via tolls. It's a way of charging for use rather than making everybody in the state pay the full price. It's an avoidable tax and the tolls will go away once they've been paid off.

    12. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Depends where you are. We've had time limited tolls in WA state and they've all been retired when paid off.

    13. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      They may be crossing two bridges to get there, but unless they're lost, they aren't going to be paying two tolls. Or do people commute from the Richmond area by going over the GG? Otherwise, I fail to see how you can pay two tolls going into SF.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    14. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by DJ+Particle · · Score: 1

      Didn't the NW tollway (I-39/90) just finish going through a major refit to increase traffic flow? I'd say that's toll money well spent.

    15. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      They may be crossing two bridges to get there, but unless they're lost, they aren't going to be paying two tolls. Or do people commute from the Richmond area by going over the GG? Otherwise, I fail to see how you can pay two tolls going into SF.

      Sacramento, CA to San Francisco, CA - Google Maps There is a toll on the Carquinez Bridge and a toll on the Bay Bridge. They could get around the Carquinez Bridge by going down through Stockton, but we have to be at work by around 6AM to get free parking and I don't think they want to leave home at 3:30.

    16. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      1. Commuting from Sac to SF is absurd. If that is seriously you're commute, I feel sorry for you.

      2. I remember the Carquinez Bridge having the toll booth on the northbound side of the bridge, so I'm assuming this is now changed and people can loop the Benecia bridge one way and the Carquinez the other and avoid tolls entirely.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    17. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      1. Commuting from Sac to SF is absurd. If that is seriously you're commute, I feel sorry for you.

      2. I remember the Carquinez Bridge having the toll booth on the northbound side of the bridge, so I'm assuming this is now changed and people can loop the Benecia bridge one way and the Carquinez the other and avoid tolls entirely.

      In the construction industry, you pretty much have to go wherever your company wants you. If you were living and working in Sac and that job is over and now they want you in SF, that's where you have to commute until you can find a place (or forever if you like your place in Sac). And the Benicia and Carquinez Bridges are both Northbound tolls, so there's no getting around it.

    18. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Bridge tolls are pretty common in the US for bridges above a certain size. If it takes more than 30 seconds to drive over it, there is probably a toll associated with it.

      Toll roads are more common on the east coast and drop off as you get west. Massachusetts is glued together by an absolutely essential toll road (90). But Los Angeles had a failed experiment with toll roads several years back, going nearly unused and costing the state millions.

      Ostensibly these are about upkeep and paying off initial bonds. But frequently they go to the general transportation fund. I-90 paid itself off several years ago, but with the transportation department being in such debt over the Big Dig they haven't removed any tolls.

    19. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Uh.. what's the other option? No highway?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    20. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by transwarp · · Score: 1

      Didn't they remove all the tolls in the western half of the state? AFAIK you only pay for the distance you covered in the Eastern half.

    21. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      The GG Bridge was built approximately 75 years ago. Surely the cost of construction was paid off in full by the end of the 1940s?

      Hence suspicion this is purely a revenue raiser.

    22. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how the one impugns the other. Everybody involved admits that the 10-lane highway would be useful: the existing roads are overcrowded, and the greedy toll operator thinks there's a lot of profit to be had. They can be greedy and taking advantage of the situation without being wrong.

      You need to get better politicians so they don't make bad deals, and maybe investigate the ones to do make bad deals. Corruption seems like a pretty valid way to void a contract, to me.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    23. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they did not, and when confronted about the illegality of the tolls the politicians here spew the usual doublespeak without answering the questions.

      Nothing will ever be done about it. Remember this is the state where income and sales taxes came up for referenda and stupid voters elected to keep them because politicians threatened to raise other taxes and user fees if we vote to end those taxes. Of course, the other fees and taxes were increased right after the election.

      There is good reason many of us refer to the commonwealth as Taxachusetts.

    24. Re:Isn't that public infrastructure? by healyp · · Score: 1

      I agree that the NY tolls are batshit crazy, but at least the $8 one's you reference(The GW, Outerbridge and Goethals) are one-way tolling, controlled by the Port Authority. It's the TA bridges & tunnels that are the real gotcha, the whitestone/throggs may only be 5.50(or $6 now?) but they toll both ways, so you end up paying $11 all in all.

  12. That quote from Mr. Hynes sounds like... by lcba · · Score: 1

    Like taken from one of Ayn Rand's book (you know the bad guys that represent all the same BS), if there are systems that would make it easier, faster and cheaper, why the hell would you ever want people there? I you don't like that, you should be filing a hurt feelings report (http://www.eatliver.com/i.php?n=2026)

  13. Eliminate tolls by Dan667 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is really no reason to have all the additional expense of toll roads.

    1. Re:Eliminate tolls by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Mod up. That bridge was paid for decades ago. Upkeep is in tye budget for all roads and bridges in the state. The only reason (and a poor one) to keep tolls is to have jobs for people. Eliminate the jobs, then continuing tolls on such projects is fleecing the locals. I call this municiple greed.

    2. Re:Eliminate tolls by westlake · · Score: 1

      There is really no reason to have all the additional expense of toll roads.

      The toll road or bridge can be privately financed, constructed and maintained.

      The "bridge to nowhere" does not get built because private capital won't fund it.

      [That always means you might not get the transcontinental railroad or the Alaskan highway. That you are flying Pan-Am's Clippers or Count Zeppelin's s airships because no one can afford the price of a mile-long concrete runway.]

      The entrepreneur can experiment - and probably go broke - developing techniques that are not likely to be government funded - aerial tramways, people-movers and so on.

    3. Re:Eliminate tolls by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Mod up. That bridge was paid for decades ago. Upkeep is in tye budget for all roads and bridges in the state. The only reason (and a poor one) to keep tolls is to have jobs for people. Eliminate the jobs, then continuing tolls on such projects is fleecing the locals. I call this municiple greed.

      Maintaining a suspension bridge the size of the Golden Gate with exposure to sea breeze is extremely expensive. Take a look at NYC's free East River bridges vs. the toll ones. Deferred maintenance is not a pretty sight and California is also pretty much broke.

    4. Re:Eliminate tolls by chispito · · Score: 1

      There is really no reason to have all the additional expense of toll roads.

      Sure there is. This way the bridge is (at least partly) paid for by those who actually use it.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  14. License Plate Flipper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's time to buy one of those James Bond style license plate flippers.

    1. Re:License Plate Flipper by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Except they're illegal everywhere in north american, and if you're caught using one in most places, it's an automatic arrestable offence.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  15. Just get rid of tolls completely. by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tolls waste a lot of time and money in an attempt to spread the cost of the road to the people that 'use' it, but this doesn't work. Everyone benefits from the road system. Even if you don't own a car, the goods and services you use rely on them. Adding tolls just increases the cost of those goods and services, so the entire toll industry is a waste of time. Just tax people evenly for the roads we all rely on and skip the wasteful toll booths and electronics.

    1. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Bazman · · Score: 0

      Tax people evenly or tax usage evenly? How do you tax usage evenly? Legally-enforced odometers? Or tax fuel? That also encourages fuel economy.

      Of course there will be riots if the price of gas in the US reaches anything like half the price of petrol in the UK....

    2. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You misunderstand the reason for toll booths on the golden gate bridge. It's about reducing demand.

      By having a toll on the bridge, a certain percentage of the population is going to decide that it's not worth it to cross the bridge, and will plan their trip using an alternate route. This reduces the number of cars crossing and reduces congestion. By implementing a toll, you help insure that there is at least one non-congested (or relatively quick) path by car into the city, so that those who need to get there in a hurry can. If you need to get into the city 15 to 20 minutes faster, the toll is worth it.

      With the toll, the bridge is useful to some people (or all people some of the time). Without the toll, the bridge becomes just as congested as any other road, because people choosing between the bridge and the alternative will favor the bridge until congestion makes them indifferent between the two.

    3. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tax fuel in many states, ostensibly for this reason. It's not exactly even because if I own a motorcycle that gets 60MPG I am not paying the same per mile traveled. However, I am arguably doing less damage to the road as well.

    4. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't follow your logic. If shipped goods are more expensive, then people will buy more durable light bulbs and buy food from closer farms, which overall require less transportation and reduce road traffic.

    5. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone benefits from the road system.

       
      And extending the same idea, everyone benefits from the existence of the Internet, therefore people who don't have access to it should also pay a share of your ISP bill, right? Not everyone benefits from the road system equally. People who drive more benefit more personally and also cause more damage to the roads and they should pay more for the maintenance. The gas tax that we have now is one way to do it but its imperfect. The most fair way to finance roads is to pay by the mile traveled with the weight of the vehicle factored in, which is pretty much what the tolls do. The only problem with tolls is the practicality, the delays they cause etc but it seems like technology can fix that.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    6. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your argument that this doesn't work to spread the cost of the road to the people that "use" it is just flat out wrong. Even if you never drive over the bridge yourself you still pay the cost of the toll incorporated in the fee that you pay to the UPS driver for your package, supermarket for your food delivered over the bridge by truck, etc.

    7. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 5, Informative

      You misunderstand the reason for toll booths on the golden gate bridge. It's about reducing demand.

      By having a toll on the bridge, a certain percentage of the population is going to decide that it's not worth it to cross the bridge, and will plan their trip using an alternate route. This reduces the number of cars crossing and reduces congestion. By implementing a toll, you help insure that there is at least one non-congested (or relatively quick) path by car into the city, so that those who need to get there in a hurry can. If you need to get into the city 15 to 20 minutes faster, the toll is worth it.

      With the toll, the bridge is useful to some people (or all people some of the time). Without the toll, the bridge becomes just as congested as any other road, because people choosing between the bridge and the alternative will favor the bridge until congestion makes them indifferent between the two.

      You misunderstand the reason for toll booths on the Golden Gate Bridge. It's about revenue.

      There ARE no alternate toll-free paths into San Francisco unless you want to add nearly three hours to your drive. They also strategically planned the toll booths so that most people cannot avoid paying a toll by picking and choosing different paths to take and running the toll-free side of a bridge in the morning and the toll-free side of another bridge on their way home. You must not be from the Bay Area, so I'll forgive you, but there simply is no feasible way to bypass the Golden Gate Bridge to get into the city.

    8. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whilst reading TFA (I know, it's embarrassing, but I still do it) I noted the bridge "operates with a $89M deficit" ... um, how the hell does it manage THAT? The bridge itself must be long since paid for, and maintenance can't be all THAT high -- surely they don't do a total resurfacing every year? So how much of the deficit is a direct cost of running the toll system itself? Or is it just more of the vaunted California gov't economy's ability to spend at a rate 3x its means?

      Also:

      "A toll-taker's base pay starts at $48,672 a year and tops out at $54,080."

      Holy shit, where do WE sign up to make that kind of money for sitting in a booth?? (Yeah, I know that's barely getting by in San Francisco, but still...) Plus benefits and retirement, no doubt.

      BTW, we already do get taxed evenly, based on usage -- that's what the gasoline tax does. You're taxed in direct proportion to miles driven and weight on the road surface (which translates into wear and tear) because that's the reality of a given driving distance and a given vehicle's weight-to-MPG ratio. Yeah, it gets harsh if you're forced to commute long distances, but I've yet to see a fairer system.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolls provide an economic incentive to live closer in to cities. Living further out increases your commute cost and making the decision to move closer in decreases your cost. Some people cross 2 bridges in the Bay Area so it really adds up.

    10. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without the toll, the bridge becomes just as congested as any other road, because people choosing between the bridge and the alternative will favor the bridge until congestion makes them indifferent between the two.

      When did efficient equilibrium become a bad thing?

    11. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are able to buy food at the store because a truck delivered it. So yes, nearly everyone benefits from the road system.
      Maybe the Internet benefits everyone, but I think that is open to debate.

    12. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by mikael · · Score: 1

      There are several bridges in the Bay Area - Dumbarton bridge (84), San Mateo bridge(92). Whenever one of these bridges was blocked by a road accident, or for road maintenance, traffic would just route to any one of the other bridges. One day, they raised tolls for one of the bridges, and traffic patterns completed changed as commuters just routed round to the cheaper ones. Next day, the other bridges had put up their prices and traffic patterns returned to normal.

      If anything, commuters will favor the bridge that doesn't slow them down with toll booth charges.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    13. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I may not know precisely how it is done in the US, but don't you pay taxes and get roads built and maintained by the government? Comparing it to the Internet is a straw man fallacy: while it may have been started by the US government, most ISPs maintain and extend their own networks with little or no subsidies from the government.

    14. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And extending the same idea, everyone benefits from the existence of the Internet, therefore people who don't have access to it should also pay a share of your ISP bill, right?

      No, but everyone should pay to get internet (and road) access to everyone. If we can count on everyone having internet access we can scrap older less efficient ways to do things. This benefits everyone.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, where do WE sign up to make that kind of money for sitting in a booth??

      and getting yelled at, getting people throwing money at you, getting people throwing cans at you, getting people who drop their money and trying to explain to them that due to regulations people have to pick up that money themselves and no that's not just because they're lazy but because they don't want to get the living crap beaten out of them and/or gotten run over by impatient people, and not exactly being able to just stretch your legs when you feel like it or when your body tells you that you really should if for no other reason than that you have to take a piss, sitting in the exhaust fumes all day long in a shack that's either too hot or too warm pretty much any given day, etc. etc.

      All of us can do it for a few hours, a day, even a week.. but try doing it the whole year or even having it end up being your entire foreseeable career path. The people in them are generally misanthropes during their work hours for a reason.

      Yeah, no.. you go "sit in a booth" if you really think it's such a dream job.

    16. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by superdave80 · · Score: 1
      The Golden Gate Bridge toll is mainly used to subsidize the mass transit system (Golden Gate Transit). http://www.goldengatebridge.org/research/facts.php#Why5Toll

      Currently, 50 percent of bus and ferry operations are funded by Bridge tolls,...

    17. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Socialism!

      I now reserve the right to refer to your opinions as something Hitler would approve of and that means you approve of Hitler which makes you not an American.

    18. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by endymi0n · · Score: 1

      You are ignoring the very significant cost of maintaining a bridge of this size and complexity in an earthquake and wind risk zone. The tolls (along with bus and ferry fares) collectively bring in $156 million per year, all of which goes directly back into the bridge. It has 1.2 million rivets, 27,500 strands of wire -- All of which must be checked by trained engineers periodically. It has to be repainted frequently (salt spray is hell on structures). The GG Bridge District pays for a fleet of buses and ferries, which take tens of thousands of people from Marin County into San Francisco, reducing the car traffic on the bridge. On top of all that, the district has to finance several major capital projects-$400 million into retrofitting the bridge against earthquakes, $50 million for a suicide barrier and another $75 million to replacing the southern approach roadways. I agree that everyone benefits from having a bridge like this--but with the continuing costs of a structure of this magnitude, it makes perfect sense to charge a user fee.

    19. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If toll roads made sense for that reason, then they would make sense on every single road in the nation. Your logic dictates that it is a problem that there is not a toll on the road that runs in front of your house.

    20. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by spongman · · Score: 1

      yay, roads for the rich!

    21. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you stupid fuck. The cost of the road is ALREADY covered by taxes.

      Tolling is just illegal privatization to avoid double taxation.

    22. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      Well, you can take a bus, or a ferry. So there are two reasons. Revenue, and the fact that San Francisco totally hates cars.

      (Some of it is justified concern about overloading the place with traffic, but some of it is definitely philosophical. If they had a choice between making things easier for traffic and a punch in the face, I'd expect the government to take the punch in the face every time.)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    23. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good argument for eliminating BART fares as well!

    24. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maintenance can't be all THAT high -- surely they don't do a total resurfacing every year?

      No, but they are continuously re-painting it. This is a large steel bridge in a humid, salty area. Fog. Salt spray. The worst thing you can possibly imagine. By the time they are done painting it, it's time to start again. I'm not sure how big the crew is; but they are San Francisco unionized painters, guaranteed.

    25. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

      A little known fact- The Golden Gate Bridge is a privately owned bridge. They can charge whatever they wish really.

    26. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by jopsen · · Score: 1

      True, and if they've had a toll both since 1937, you would hope that they had payed for the bridge already...

    27. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 2

      Well, you can take a bus, or a ferry. So there are two reasons. Revenue, and the fact that San Francisco totally hates cars.

      (Some of it is justified concern about overloading the place with traffic, but some of it is definitely philosophical. If they had a choice between making things easier for traffic and a punch in the face, I'd expect the government to take the punch in the face every time.)

      You have a solid point, and I would absolutely love to take public transportation to work. Unfortunately, even with as much environment-friendly bullshit as we spew around here, the public transportation SUCKS, and people refuse to make it better. Our bus networks have no money to improve the way they work because people don't use them because they're horrible. I would have to get on a bus at 4:21AM to get to work at 6:11 -- 50 minutes early. Twice have the citizens of Marin County struck down legislation that would utilize the existing railroad tracks that run all up and down every North Bay city on the 101 for a light rail system because they're concerned about the NOISE. It's the typical Marin mentality of "I want things that will help the environment but I don't want to have to LOOK at it."

      Oh well. That's my rant for the day.

    28. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by parlancex · · Score: 1

      I agree. One thing that angers me is that our system of dividing the costs for road maintenance fails to accurately take into account the fact that different classes of vehicles cause vastly different damage to the road surface. One large truck can cause almost a hundred times as much damage as a single car driving over the same piece of road.

    29. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like many cash cows, I don't think the tolls are going to *just* pay for the bridge and its attendants.

    30. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assure you, there are communities that DON'T like large roads and bridges nearby because they increase local traffic congestion. Inflicting development on them and then asking them to pay for it is quite insulting.

      Everyone benefits from the road system.

      There are a few million island residents that would disagree with this. I would definately support a $20 toll onto Cape Cod every Friday from 12:00pm to 11:59pm, primarily because I lived in Wareham.

    31. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I used to have a daily commute from Sunnyvale to San Rafael for a badly underpaid night job. If you circle from 101 over the golden gate bridge north, to the Richmond bridge on 580, and down again on 580 -> 880 to Sunnyvale, you have a full circle that has no tolls. If you choose your highway and time of day carefully, that can be a 2 hour loop total.

      That having been said, there are alternatives to driving into the city (which is hugely overpopulated with cars already). There is BART. There is the ferry. There is telecommuting. Anything that can be done to get cars out of SF is a benefit to everyone.

    32. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone benefits because music exists. Therefore everyone must pay a music tax even if they don't listen to music at all.

      -The music mafIAA

      Quit stealing our ideas.

    33. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow this is BS. Not everyone uses the roads the same amount. Some people drive 100 miles a day in a commute. Others walk to work. Vehicles that bring my goods to me pay tools and is captured in the price of goods I pay

    34. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bridge is repainted constantly, as in as soon as they reach the end they start back over. Perhaps you don't live near an ocean but the thing is subject to continuous ocean spray, which is incredibly corrosive.

    35. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by twakar · · Score: 1

      from your comment..

      The most fair way to finance roads is to pay by the mile traveled with the weight of the vehicle factored in

      so does that mean government odometer checks every few months... being required to keep a logbook (as truckers do), or have some monitoring equipment in the car (that you of course can't hack)?

      Also, the criteria you describe 'pay by the mile' and 'weight of the vehicle' are exactly how gas taxes work..

      more distance > more gas > more tax
      more weight > more gas > more tax

      It already works that way.

      The one question I have, especially from the non drivers/environmentalists is.

      When all personal vehicles are electric, and gas tax revenue drops by 50% or more, are you willing to make up the difference on your personal taxes?

      --
      Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity!
    36. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by isorox · · Score: 1

      They tax fuel in many states, ostensibly for this reason. It's not exactly even because if I own a motorcycle that gets 60MPG I am not paying the same per mile traveled. However, I am arguably doing less damage to the road as well.

      There's no argument about it. Road damage increases by the 4th power per kg axel weight.

      Trucks get off easily because

    37. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      From experience with them (detailed in this post: http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1972312&cid=35044794)...

      They deserve all the abuse they get and plenty more besides. We were absolutely polite and completely civil with the goon we got. He didn't even bother to utter a word and then screwed us over.

      Yes, you can make the argument that he took months or years of abuse and that's why he's that rude. But, here's the thing... Perhaps people are that rude because people like him have treated completely polite people the way he did us. The guy we got was either the source of the problem or contributing to it with people who weren't. Whatever the case, he at least contributed and, in doing so, lost all sympathy from a formerly polite and respectful person. He is not innocent and lost the right to sympathy in my eyes.

    38. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by mgoff · · Score: 1

      There may no viable alternate car routes, but I think the GP meant there are ferries, buses, and formal and casual carpools which are all valid alternatives to a solo driver crossing the bridge. These are the alternatives the toll is meant to encourage.

    39. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      There ARE no alternate toll-free paths into San Francisco unless you want to add nearly three hours to your drive.

      Stay off the roads when everyone else is trying to use them, and your toll will be lower. Maybe not 100% free, but close enough.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    40. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... deficit from just sitting around and collect free money, that's too much. I too want to have such deficit-inducing business.
      Turn out, they also operate other complementary transportation modes (ferry and bus) at loss and use the auto's toll to supplement these loss-producing activities. Check out page 17 of this report: http://goldengate.org/organization/documents/fy10-cafr.pdf

      It's a disease of government in the U.S. that every agency want their own welfare system, with themselves as the conduit, to channel revenue from a productive activity into some inane, senseless loss-making venture under the guise of public service. On the way there, they would build a bungling bureaucracy and entrenched interest group that feed on the system until it become purposeless zombified institutions like this GGBHTD!

    41. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It's about reducing demand.

      So why bother building a bridge in the first place, if you don't want people to cross it?

      will plan their trip using an alternate route.

      So instead of using an efficient, short route, you are saying the government is consciously scheming to make people choose a longer, inefficient route that increases congestion on alternate roads in already overcrowded population centers, and wastes fuel. While I would certainly not put your points beyond the reach of government's ability to waste resources and inconvenience people as much as possible, I suspect that the simplest answer is true: it has nothing to do with what you are saying, and you are incorrect. I suspect that you are partly right, demand has something to do with it. But what government is trying to capture is the inelasticity of demand. They realize that people are willing to pay quite a bit to save that 25 minutes, the wear and tear on vehicles, the fuel, and the wasted productivity, so they will charge as much as possible. Why? Because they are bankrupt, cash starved spendthrifts who are constantly on the verge of bankruptcy. They have no choice. But it's not, as you say, to "prevent" people from crossing. They will charge as much as they can. If people stop using it at all, they will drop the rates very quickly. Maintaining those alternate roads is not much more expensive than maintaining the bridge, when you subtract the toll.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    42. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by erice · · Score: 1

      A little known fact- The Golden Gate Bridge is a privately owned bridge. They can charge whatever they wish really.

      Not exactly. Quoted from the annual report of the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation district:

      "On December 4, 1928, the District was incorporated as a political subdivision of the State of California as the entity
      that would design, construct, finance and operate the Golden Gate Bridge. The District is a special district of the State
      of California formed under the Bridge and Highway District Act of 1923 and is subject to regulation under this Act, as
      amended. The City and County of San Francisco, the counties of Marin, Sonoma, Del Norte, and portions of Napa and
      Mendocino counties comprise the District. A 19-member Board of Directors (Board), with representatives from each
      of the six member counties, sets policy for the District."

    43. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by mobets · · Score: 2

      According to some I saw documentary a while back as soon as the painters finish they have to start over again due to where and tear.

      http://www.goldengatebridge.org/research/caretakers.php

      The Golden Gate Bridge (Bridge) is one of three operating divisions of the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (District). The operating divisions include: Golden Gate Bridge, Golden Gate Transit and Golden Gate Ferry. The Bridge Division employs about 200 employees that operate and maintain the Bridge under the direction of the Deputy General Manager, Bridge Division. The Bridge Division captures the true meaning of the words "team effort", with all of the skilled crafts and trades working together to accomplish the job at hand.

      A revered and rugged group of ironworkers and painters battle wind, sea air and fog, often suspended high above the Golden Gate Strait, to repair corroding steel. Ironworkers replace corroding steel and rivets, make small fabrications for use on the Bridge, and assist painters with their rigging. Ironworkers also remove plates and bars to provide access for painters to the interiors of the columns and chords that make up the Bridge. Painters prepare all Bridge surfaces and repaint corroded areas.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    44. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt it takes a lot of maintenance, but I'll bet the budget for same is a fine model of union, er, efficiency at peeling money out of the system...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    45. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parent was talking about hiking the gasoline tax a cent or two to get rid of the ridiculous tolls, dumbass.

    46. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I do know they repaint it constantly. That's got to be expensive as all hell. Can you imagine the insurance and salaries of the guys who have to do that work?

    47. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ( same anon commenter here )

      Oh absolutely - that's basically the flip side of the coin.. the job does also -attract- people who are just rude in general and think they can be rude because what's the motorist going to do.. not go through the toll booth? often not a reasonable option (as mentioned in another comment, that definitely applies to SF). File a complaint? hah.

      I'm definitely not making excuses for those who are miserable, though I can understand why many would become so even though they start out with enthusiasm.

      My point was merely that if the GP believes it's such a great job, they really should think again.

    48. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you find an apartment in San Francisco for less than 1500.00 a year, then you can make as little as you want. Also - the bridge isn't made of diamond. All of the rivets are replaced as well as other maintenance every year. But hey - you're the motherfucking expert on bridges. You know they don't need maintaining at all. They just let them collapse and build a new one right?

      ----

      Slashdot is sucking cock of moron.

    49. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      there simply is no feasible way to bypass the Golden Gate Bridge to get into the city.
      That's assuming you're coming in from the north (San Ramon, etc.). I'm pretty sure they don't call the Bay Bridge from Emeryville/Oakland the "Golden Gate"; and those from the South Bay will go for the 92 highway bridge.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    50. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turns out maintaining the bridge is pretty expensive. It pretty much needs to be constantly repainted and steps taken to ward off rust.

    51. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Tolls waste a lot of time and money in an attempt to spread the cost of the road to the people that 'use' it, but this doesn't work. Everyone benefits from the road system. Even if you don't own a car, the goods and services you use rely on them. Adding tolls just increases the cost of those goods and services, so the entire toll industry is a waste of time. Just tax people evenly for the roads we all rely on and skip the wasteful toll booths and electronics.

      Why don't we just skip the wasteful cash registers and money in general? That's simplify things. Everyone could pay the same amount, regardless of what they get. Indirectly evreyone uses the things anyway, for example the guy that stocks the shelves at the supermarket goes home and relaxes by watching TV, therefore you should pay for part of his TV.

    52. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Tolls are the fairest system. If you use it, you pay for it, either directly on in the price of the products you use that were shipped over it.

      Otherwise the bridge is paid for by general taxation, which means people get to cross an expensive bridge, subsidised by people who live more efficient lifestyles.

    53. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      This bridge needs constant maintenance, it never stops getting painted that particular red. Once they finish painting across it it is time to start again at the opposite end. It is also over turbulent seawater, foundation is constantly getting beaten up, constant suspension cable auditing/replacing (not cheap), lights for night driving. Not only do cars pass over it but sea vessels underneath it so the water thoroughfare has to be clear and watched for sediment build up near the pillars, maritime lights, aviation lights.

      I'm sure I'm missing a ton of other costs.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    54. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS on the "deficit-operating" bit. The GG is privately owned and was fully paid for decades ago. Any costs incurred are operating costs and overhead (as in director salaries). The operating costs aren't all that (yes they constantly repaint the bridge but they also have chosen in the past to use the same lead paint from the 1930s rather than a more modern but like colored paint that lasts for 20+ years).

      What's unclear is how out-of-staters, rental cars and even California cars that don't have mailing addresses manage to co-exist with this system. There's no word of toll-taking machines (which they have in places like Illinois). I'm one of those who probably won't ever get the bill (fine by me) - I still register my car but I don't have a residence or address in CA any more. And what about if you have "temp tags" with no license plate? Guess they just slip through as a loss.

    55. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      An AC says,

      I call BS on the "deficit-operating" bit. The GG is privately owned and was fully paid for decades ago. Any costs incurred are operating costs and overhead (as in director salaries). The operating costs aren't all that (yes they constantly repaint the bridge but they also have chosen in the past to use the same lead paint from the 1930s rather than a more modern but like colored paint that lasts for 20+ years)."

      I was wondering about that myself. Marine paint for oceangoing ships still needs upkeep, but not to the degree described -- and it wouldn't surprise me if there's some of that typical California "job insurance" going on, where a deliberately poorer grade of paint and other repair materials are used, much to the delight of the paint/repair contractor(s) AND the paint/parts salesmen.

      Los Angeles County does this kind of shit all the time (you should see the crap "repaving" they do on county roads, guaranteed to last one season at most even in areas of relatively light traffic; and now some tree service has a $500k/year contract that amounts to basically kill-and-replace all the healthy trees along county roads -- roughly half the trees they've "trimmed" out here in the desert have died from this abuse, in just the first two years of the program). I expect given its greater age and more left-leaning politics, San Francisco has a longer history of such shenanigans and the relevant union has 'em down to a fine art.

      I do find it telling that there were a bunch of responses that rudely screamed about all the maintenance needs, rather than explaining politely. Not to mention the horrors the toll-takers "endure" ... well, other jobs that are equally lousy are not paid $25/hour plus benefits; why are tollbooth workers special?

      You'd think it would make sense to have one human-operated lane, but the losses on untollable cars probably are less than the cost of one attendant, given what they're paid. Of course, the more you pay the attendants, the less money is left for directors' bonuses, which I suspect is more to the point.

      Not to mention that yet another contractor will benefit from installing automation.. the lobbying for that would probably make fascinating reading, much akin to that from automated redlight camera companies.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    56. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by MacTenchi · · Score: 1

      It's not the bridge as much as the district that's running a deficit. The bridge tolls help to subsidize public transit (buses and ferries), so I imagine that's the reason they're losing money.

    57. Re:Just get rid of tolls completely. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Considering how many municipal busses I see with just one or two passengers... no wonder.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  16. Wait a minute by scosco62 · · Score: 1

    A toll booth attendant who actually greets people? C'mon........maybe I've been on the East Coast too long......they wouldn't make eye contact if you rolled through the booth in an Abrams tank....

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, I'm a pretty friendly guy but if I were a toll booth operator and you rolled through in an Abrams tank, I wouldn't make eye contact either.

    2. Re:Wait a minute by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't make eye contact if you rolled through the booth in an Abrams tank....

      Shit, I wouldn't either. Who would want to risk looking at a crazy person in a tank the wrong way?

    3. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would tend to avoid eye contact with somebody driving a tank too.

    4. Re:Wait a minute by spongman · · Score: 1

      actually, most of the golden gate booth attendants are pretty friendly, for the 5 or so seconds it takes for them to give you change.

  17. Toll Attendant Anecdote by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    I've driven from NY to CA and back a few times. The last time, driving to NY, I did it in 2.5 days. I wasn't driving while tired - I always took breaks at the first sign of drowsiness - but as you can imagine I wasn't in the friendliest and peppiest state. In Indiana, I waited in a large line for the cash toll booths - it was something like a 50 cent toll - how hard can it be?

    I get up to the booth, and the middle-aged lady notices my California license plate and starts chatting me up. "Oh, you're from California? Where are you going?" "Really! What are you studying?" etc., all while I'm holding my hand out with the toll ready, and with a grimace on my face as I gave my curt responses. Meanwhile cars are piling up behind me.

    In other words: you do not "need people in those toll booths to greet people"!

  18. Switzerland has a nice system by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

    You buy a sticker to put on the inside of your windshield. It costs ~32€ and is good for a year. With that, you can drive anywhere, without any further tolls. Switzerland has butt-loads of tunnels and bridges that they have to maintain, and their autobahns are some of the best I have ever driven on. They are probably cleaner than most surgical operating room in the world.

    In Italy, they have some kind of electronic subscription sticker system that lets you get through the toll booths fast. Or you can just shove in your EC bank card or credit card at unmanned booths. They do have folks at a few toll booths. On my last trip there, I saw that a lot of tourists would hold up maps, and ask the toll collector for advice. So maybe tossing the human element out is not such a great idea.

    In Germany there are no tolls, and on a lot of the autobahns, no speed limit. Their autobahn motto is: "Drive fast, die young, leave a beautiful, mangled corpse."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Purely technical question: what do you do with the expired sticker?

      A sticker that goes on the license plate can be replaced with a new sticker; you just put the new one on top. But a sticker that goes on the inside of a windshield won't be seen.

      I suppose you have to scrape the old one off. Do they make that easy? The ones my garage uses to remind me of my next oil change just peel off, though I suspect they may want ones you have to destroy to remove (to prevent theft).

    2. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by toetagger · · Score: 0

      THIS!

      I hate this system! I drove to Switzerland for a weekend trip in December, and had to pay for the whole year sticker. Now, 2 years later, I still have the sticker, b/c its a pain to take it off where they put it - On the insight of your windshield, maybe 25 cm^2, in bright yellow!

    3. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still trying to decide who is more stupid and annoying, the "THIS^" people, or the "FTFY" people. In either case, I'm not sure the death penalty is too extreme.

    4. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The ones my garage uses to remind me of my next oil change just peel off, though I suspect they may want ones you have to destroy to remove (to prevent theft).

      It's easy to peel of, but "self-destructs" in the process, so you can't peel it off, and put it in another car. Of course, the folks at Wired and Make probably know a process to do this. Most likely involving some nasty chemical solvents.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I still have the sticker, b/c its a pain to take it off where they put it

      I bought the sticker before I drove through Switzerland, which I would recommend to anyone planning on driving to or through Switzerland. There was a diagram on the sticker of three places that it could be placed on the windshield. So I chose a convenient place to put paste it, and that was that. It peals of easily, but self destructs in the process, so that you cannot "loan" the sticker to friends. Of course, with enough work, you might be able to do it, but is it really worth 32€? That's chump change for me.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always mod "THIS" people as troll or flamebait.

      FTFY are sometimes funny and/or insightful.

    7. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by rrohbeck · · Score: 2

      The autobahn is the safest road in Germany in terms of person-km. The mandatory driving school includes x hours of supervised autobahn or similar driving.

    8. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Or quite simply a thin translucent film that you stick the sticker onto. Cut to size, then attach the other side of the film to the inside of your windshield with some post-it glue.

    9. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      You buy a sticker to put on the inside of your windshield. It costs ~32€ and is good for a year. With that, you can drive anywhere, without any further tolls. Switzerland has butt-loads of tunnels and bridges that they have to maintain, and their autobahns are some of the best I have ever driven on. They are probably cleaner than most surgical operating room in the world.

      That's interesting. In Slovenia, although it's a very small country with just over 500km of highways, these stickers cost 55eur a year and are expected to go up. Our neighbors already hate us for that.

      In Italy, they have some kind of electronic subscription sticker system that lets you get through the toll booths fast. Or you can just shove in your EC bank card or credit card at unmanned booths. They do have folks at a few toll booths. On my last trip there, I saw that a lot of tourists would hold up maps, and ask the toll collector for advice. So maybe tossing the human element out is not such a great idea.

      The Italian automated system once didn't take my Maestro card, so I pressed the Help button and it let me go without paying. It said they will mail me a bill, but they didn't, I suppose they don't mail to other countries.

      And to the people asking: It's a pain to remove the sticker.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    10. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wish I had mod points to mod you up.

      They also pay special attention to tailgating. I have heard stories about automatic tracking of car-car distance on bridges in Germany.

      Tailgating and lame-ass changing lanes is the main reason for accidents, not the absence of the speed limit.

      Instead of putting emphasis on driver education (stricter driving tests, for example) they toll the economy with their stupid speed limits, increasing amount of time people spend in traffic unproportionally to the speed limit reduction. /rant

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    11. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper way to cleanly remove the swiss "Vignette" is to apply some hand cream before attaching it. It won't self-destruct, and any residue is easily wiped away, with soap, dishwasher or window cleaner.

    12. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In France most highways are private, but virtually nobody pays cash at tollbooths anymore. Most of the lanes are automated, you either pay with your debit card (no need to type in the code so the whole deal takes less than 10 seconds if you're quick to insert the ticket and your card) or with a transponder which is mostly used by businessmen, truck drivers and other frequent travelers (however you still have to pause for a second in front of the barrier, and I think they might be specific to one of the half-dozen companies managing highways in various parts of the country).
      Spanish transponders are kind of scary, they allow drivers to drive through the toll barrier at almost full speed. Well, I don't think you're supposed to do it but the guy who drove me once did not really slow down!

    13. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You usually have to remove the old sticker, but you can also place the new one next to it.

      Removing the sticker is quite a pain. They have some really strong adhesive and the sticker is perforated so it breaks apart during removal.
      The new "vignette" (this is what it's called) has to be in place starting february 1st. The police will be everywhere on that day and hand out lots of tickets to drivers who failed to do it. /swiss //really needs to remember to attach that sticker before tuesday

    14. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Well, to relate to this, there has been this expensive system implemented in Germany for the toll on the Autobahn (used only for truck drivers so far).

      But why is an expensive, technical solution needed at all if it could also be done with a sticker and the police which checks for its existence from time-to-time? They are already doing their patrols anyway.

      Just make not-having-a-sticker-when-checked expensive enough with an appropriate fine.

      All these sophisticated technical systems smell like corruption/ 'subvention' of the companies profiting from this stuff to me. Technical toll systems are simply unneccessary.

    15. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably have to scrape it off. Here in NY, our registration stickers paste to the inside of the window, and you have to scrape them off. The glue they use won't just come off if you rip it off, so the next one won't stick right (bits of paper and crap from the last sticker)

    16. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      You buy a sticker to put on the inside of your windshield. It costs ~32€ and is good for a year.

      It is a bad system, for many reasons :

      • Approx. 20%-30% of the money collected goes in the distribution system for the stickers (e.g. margin to the stores who sell them), the additional checks that the police has to do, etc...
      • You pay the same amount (40 CHF, roughly $40) if you drive a lot or not.
      • Foreigners are overtaxed, for instance if they only cross the country once.

      It would be fairer and more cost effective to simply raise the tax on gas by approx. 2 cents per liter.

      PS : I am Swiss

    17. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't hard to peel off, but getting them off without ripping them apart is very hard because they are (designed to bevery fragile.

    18. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by blincoln · · Score: 1

      "You buy a sticker to put on the inside of your windshield. It costs ~32€ and is good for a year. With that, you can drive anywhere, without any further tolls."

      That is great for residents. What about visitors? I've visited cities with extensive toll systems that require a monthly/annual pass, and I decided not to go there again, because several times I literally had to drive for multiple hours in heavy traffic (on more than one occassion) to get around short sections of freeway that required the pass. No, there was not an option to pay cash, or receive a bill in the mail, or buy a one-day/one-week pass.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    19. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expired sticker are removed. It's relatively easy to peel it off (but it depends on the year and the glue quality), and it is effectively destroyed so that you cannot peel it off and stick it on another vehicle.

    20. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Kakari · · Score: 1

      I use this for any sticker that goes on my car (that I apply) - mostly because I hate having to take a razor blade to the nasty gunk that's left over.

      The various sticker providers might not like it, but frankly unless I go the extra step and actually do something to defraud them, I don't care.

    21. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You peel it off at the end of the year. It has a double layer so if you try to remove early (e.g. to put it to another car) it it will print 'tampered' over it.

    22. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Bredero · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I am not swiss and i pay a years taxes for only going there once or twice a year. I think we should tax the swiss similarly in our country out of spite :P

    23. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by Geminii · · Score: 1

      I like the system in Perth * ====, Western Australia. You buy absolutely nothing to put anywhere in your car and you can drive wherever the hell you want for free, because the city and state administrations recognize that giving people more free road access means better, faster, and cheaper access to labor, goods, and services all around. New roads pay for themselves.

    24. Re:Switzerland has a nice system by gbeagle2112 · · Score: 1

      From someone that lives in Switzerland. Most people leave on the old one and then place the new one next to it (in Geneva at least). I think I have seen cars with over ten years worth of stickers on them...

  19. He wants to be greeted on the bridge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You need people in those toll booths to greet people

    And you need people waving red flags in front of the cars, too.

  20. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This will happen once the DHS decides they need to track you everywhere you go and makes the EZ pass mandatory. But don't worry, it will be 'free', paid for by productive Americans i.e. taxpayers.

  21. 19.2 million? by fuzzygerbil · · Score: 0

    $70,000 per worker is a bit excessive. I can't come up with $30,000 in operating expenses per worker either.

  22. Out of state plates & non-US plates. by CrAlt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And how about all the people who don't update their registration when they move? Rental cars?

    And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration? Cali can't do that to out of state plates or plates from Canada/Mexico.

    I wonder if the added bureaucracy and paperwork for collections is going to nullify the gains they make by not collecting at the bridge.

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
    1. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When on vacation in Vancouver, they have this system; however the cameras shoot license plates from the front. In my province the license plates are on the back only. Thus, we had full access to toll bridges without cost. In practice the small percentage of people who can get through without paying is not worth going after: it would cost more money to try to get the $5 toll than it is worth. However due to the 99.9% of other cars who can / do pay easily, it is still worth it.

    2. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not be from a state that has any form of ez-pass type system. All those issues have been solved 10+ years ago.

      California should take their head out of their butt and join EZ-Pass instead of making their own incompatible stuff. Currently you can drive on any toll road in Illinois, Ohio, Indiana, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Maine, Massachusetts, Virginia, and probably a few other states that I've forgotten all using the same account and same transponder.

    3. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      What happens when you write a parking ticket for cars with those plates? I suggest something similar happens here. It's a system that works fairly well in other parts of the world, like London and Stockholm. There's no reason it can't work in the US as well.

    4. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by jvonk · · Score: 1

      And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration? Cali can't do that to out of state plates

      Using similar reasoning have you ever tried ignoring a traffic ticket that you got out of state? You will discover that your own state will revoke your license.

      45 of the 50 states belong to the Non-Resident Violator Compact. So, while California can't yank your license, they can report you to your own state who will. Check out the very creepy & insidious v2.0 of the NRVC: the Driver License Agreement. Ugh... if it is fully ratified, then the "or Canada/Mexico" part of your point could also become an issue.

      Admittedly, I haven't done the specific research to determine whether ignoring tolls in California using an out of state vehicle would cause them to issue a citation against the registered owner. The scenario doesn't seem far-fetched, because that's what stoplight camera operators do.

      Now, to parody a slashdot stereotype, I will attempt to acquire an Inisghtful mod by posing a speciously witty consideration that was obviously discussed by the system engineers in the first 10 minutes of the initial design meeting for this system:

      "LOL, I am just going to splash my license plates with mud 'accidentally' and then I can drive for free! Hahaha, stupid designers! I teh smartest!!1!"

    5. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how about all the people who don't update their registration when they move? Rental cars?

      And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration? Cali can't do that to out of state plates or plates from Canada/Mexico.

      I wonder if the added bureaucracy and paperwork for collections is going to nullify the gains they make by not collecting at the bridge.

      We have had this system in Colorado for some time and these questions have been sorted out.

      If you didn't update your registration(address) when you moved, you still are attached to the license plate. Most of the time when you move your mail is either forwarded for some time if it goes to the old address or returned to sender where they can look you up. I'm not sure about how often you need to update registration in CA(expiration dates on tags) but presumably you'd use your new address when you do that. In CO you must update your vehicle registration in 30 days or if you get pulled over for another reason you can be fined. Let's say you move and don't update your registration for a couple months, and the bills don't find you until you do. When that bill does finally come it'll have all the previous fees on it for you to pay.

      Rental agencies know who has what plate number, and will add tolls to your rental fee.

      Out of state plates are billed just like in state plates. I don't know how out of country really works, perhaps just the same. but you don't really see that many running around. I'm guessing you would in south TX, AZ, san diego, etc. however.

      like all things, if you fail to pay your bill you're turned over to a collection agency and it'll go onto your credit report.

    6. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount they lose to things like rentals and can't collect won't add up to that one 40-55k salary, plus all the benefits. You write it up as a loss and move on.

    7. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how about all the people who don't update their registration when they move? Rental cars?

      And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration? Cali can't do that to out of state plates or plates from Canada/Mexico.

      I wonder if the added bureaucracy and paperwork for collections is going to nullify the gains they make by not collecting at the bridge.

      Here's the thing. The number of people that don't update their registration information is actually quite small, and for good reason. Most states demand that you change your plate over to a state plate after 6 months of living there. Those that don't are either ticketed, which shows up that the car has been in X state for Y time and is not up to date in the DMV systems, helping them locate the owner. Some states go as far as to tow the vehicle if it's registration is out of date or not valid.

      Should they not pay the bill, it keeps garnering further and further penalties and fines. Just like any bill, should it not be paid it'll eventually go to a collection agency, which reports it on someone's credit. Now, this won't discourage everyone, but it happens. They have most likely taken it into account.

      Plates from Canada and Mexico are also going to be such a small portion of the plates going through the bridge that the 'loss' of missing anyone will be small. Most people are more than happy to keep their paperwork in line and up-to-date.

      So long and short is that the number of people that will slip through this system is so small compared to the 'waste' they're putting into keeping the system physically manned that they still will come out ahead.

    8. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the California DMV, there are many people with new cars that still have no plates have 3-4 months, what about them?

    9. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "And how about all the people who don't update their registration when they move? Rental cars?

      And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration?

      Rental cars will get the toll added to the bill. People who move leave forwarding addresses. As for the rest, that is such a small percentage of the total traffic it isn't worth it to hunt them down.

    10. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rental cars?
      Rental agreements usually say the renter will pay for tolls, plus some convenience fees, with bigger inconvenience fees if you don't opt for the service at the beginning. Some toll roads go by license plates alone, so this issue is already resolved by rental companies.

      And what do you do if the bill isn't paid?
      Likely the same as violating the electronic tolls lanes now. Fees, and later, a hold placed with the DMV.
      http://bata.mtc.ca.gov/faq.htm

    11. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How big of a problem is this really? (The Canada/Mexico/out of state plate thing).

      The system doesn't need to be perfect, it just has to save money compared to the present system.

      As for people who move and don't change their registration, eventually they will either get in trouble for this some other way or they will have to change their registration for some other reason. Sure some fraction of drivers will get away without paying the toll for up to a few years, but that's a small price to pay in the long run if you can avoid paying for human toll takers and their legacy costs.

    12. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by pla · · Score: 1

      And how about all the people who don't update their registration when they move? Rental cars?

      The former counts as your problem, not theirs. As they would see it, they sent a bill, you didn't pay it. End of story.

      The latter already have means in place for charging you after-the-fact for any incidental expenses incurred while you have the car (such as red-light camera tickets). They'll just forward you the receipt for the charge (plus a "small" processing fee in the ballpark of 50x the actual toll charge), already applied to your CC by the time you get the receipt.


      And what do you do if the bill isn't paid? Suspend the registration?

      Why bother? You need to re-register again every year... "That'll be $25 for the registration and $50 in unpaid toll charges, plus a $9.95 penalty per use per month, coming out to... $672 even. No, we don't take credit cards."


      Cali can't do that to out of state plates or plates from Canada/Mexico.

      For other US states, they may or may not have reciprocity agreements. For Mexico and states that don't have traffic violation reciprocity, no, they can't do much, but pray that you never get pulled over for a routine stop in CA four years down the line.

    13. Re:Out of state plates & non-US plates. by DERoss · · Score: 1

      New cars do not get their plates in California for about a month or two. Will they be allowed to cross the bridge for free?

  23. Tourists vs residents by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's a question of tourists versus residents, one of the long-standing San Francisco tug-of-wars that's only been escalating of late since the city's budget fell apart. San Francisco is very much a place of "soak the tourists for all they're worth". A one-way cable-car ride is $5. (Residents can get a monthly transit pass that lets them ride at no additional cost.) In Golden Gate Park, they just fenced in the Conservatory of Flowers last year so they could start charging money to people without a driver's license which says they live in the city... i.e. soak the tourists. There's complaints that the planned streetcar/subway expansion for the T-Third light rail line is all for the tourists.

    Take a look at Locans and Tourists #3: San Francisco, a map of geotagged photos of San Francisco based on a 'tourist' vs 'resident' heuristic (tourists take photos all at once; residents take them over a period of months). San Francisco is a divided city.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Tourists vs residents by TheLink · · Score: 1

      As a tourist I may care about visiting the Golden Gate Bridge, but toll booths aren't going to be one of the attractions at all.

      What I'd probably care about are the high rental car toll charges that other people have been mentioning.

      So that person saying tourists would need toll booth people to greet them is silly. Toll/Ticket booths etc are just stuff tourists put up with in order to see the actual tourist attraction, whether it may be the Golden Gate Bridge, the Grand Canyon, the Pyramids.

      --
    2. Re:Tourists vs residents by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      As someone who lived in SF for four years, believe me when I say they soak the residents, too.

    3. Re:Tourists vs residents by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I was in SF as a tourist, and did never go near the toll booths on the Golden Gate bridge... because i walked over it.

      The toll across the bay bridge when doing the SFO - Berkeley tour was annoying enough.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  24. Allegedly on its way in NYC area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MTA is removing the barrier gates at E-Z Pass lanes on the Henry Hudson Bridge this month, and there was some chatter in the NY papers about that bridge going to totally electronic toll collection sometime in the next 2-3 years.

    Personally, I think the union will fight it tooth and nail, and they'll bring up the Homeland Security angle of having human eyes at toll booths to catch bad actors.

    1. Re:Allegedly on its way in NYC area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the union will fight it tooth and nail, and they'll bring up the Homeland Security angle of having human eyes at toll booths to catch bad actors.

      Come on, mods! Do your jobs! This is comedy gold!

    2. Re:Allegedly on its way in NYC area by rich3rd · · Score: 1

      Like I really want the security of my city depending on someone who's been huffing exhaust fumes and performing a mundane, repetitive task all day. Also, having humans touch currency that is then going to be shuffled in with other currency and redistributed to countless other humans passing over the bridge seems to me an ideal vector for any number of terrorist chemical or biological attacks. Other than that, the Homeland Security angle sounds like a great argument.

    3. Re:Allegedly on its way in NYC area by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      they'll bring up the Homeland Security angle of having human eyes at toll booths to catch bad actors.

      "Booth 23 to headquarters... Booth 23 to headquarters... The operator of the black Lincoln Navigator at this booth has been positively identified as Keanu Reeves. Awaiting further instructions."

  25. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by houghi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For everyone who loves the toll collectors, I bet there are hundreds who hate them.

    Why? What have they done. Or is it because they are the minions of the people who put the rules in place? In that case, is it OK to hate the military people for doing the same?

    Because then I am confused, because I admire what they do but hat why they do it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  26. Borrowed License Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what happens when someone decides to borrow other peoples plates? The problem I see with this is a transponder you choose to put in your car, otherwise you go through the toll booths and pay your money. Either way it's hard to get incorrectly charged. Now borrow someone else's car or just their plates and drive back and forth across the bridge repeatedly. If I recall correctly CA only requires a rear plate, but most the neighboring states require front and back, so you could get away with borrowing someones plate for the duration of your vacation, then return their plate. At the end of the month they get the bill when they were never even in the state of CA. And when they fight the charges the photographed vehicle is one they've never owned. Therefore this should be unconstitutional because you can't prove the owner of the vehicle actually drove across the bridge. It's too easy to spoof.

    1. Re:Borrowed License Plates by mikael · · Score: 1

      So what happens when someone decides to borrow other peoples plates?

      You end up with tractors and combine harvesters being issued for speeding violations in downtown during rush hour.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  27. Actually, it might be easier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a tip from that transporter guy. Doesn't his car flip license plates or some nonsense at a press of a button?
    Camera snaps the picture.... and the bill is mailed to.... no one! :D You save money AND time.

    I love when movies actually teach us something.

  28. Need to pay for the mo's deviant lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean sex changes for mentally ill people (mo's) aren't free. I've drove through SF/G. Gate a few times and its nothing special... other than a deviant utopia.

    Saving all the money means more union bosses get a raise, more mo's get chop-a-dick-offa-me's... why would you NOT want to drive over that bridge 50-60 times a day??

  29. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1, Troll

    What's wrong with hatting the military?

  30. What bullshit by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    No, I don't need a human face or to be greeted by somebody who's been sitting in a cramped booth and mechanically greeting people for months. Ew.

    It's a frickin' bridge, not a hotel.

  31. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by coolmadsi · · Score: 2

    For everyone who loves the toll collectors, I bet there are hundreds who hate them.

    Why? What have they done. Or is it because they are the minions of the people who put the rules in place? In that case, is it OK to hate the military people for doing the same?

    Because then I am confused, because I admire what they do but hat why they do it.

    I don't drive (or live in the USA), but I would assume its less what they've done and more the simple fact that they are the person who is there preventing them from getting to work/home/other faster because they have to stop and wait. It is the toll collector who is slowing down their journey (or it may be perceived that way). I wont try to think of an example of a soldier's action that you would dislike them for doing for risk of hyperbole.

    TL;DR: I doubt its personal, its just they're the one who is there doing it (like how people get annoyed at someone in a call centre).

  32. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But don't worry, it will be 'free', paid for by productive Americans i.e. taxpayers.

    Free? Where's the profit in that? In Germany we recently had an increase from 8€ to 29€ (plus another 8-16€ for pictures that can only be used for IDs) for our ID card, which is mandatory to have by law. Just imagine the benefits to businesses with ties to corrupt politicians if they can force citizens to pay them as much as they want by law!

  33. The unknown Secret about Electronic Tolls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It costs more to collect the money then it does to hire employees to collect the fares.

  34. Dallas Texas toll system - awesome by netsavior · · Score: 2

    We have boothless tolling now, and here are the directions to get anywhere: First, find the shortest route to the tollway, then go wherever you want. It is amazing, cut my commute from 1.5 hours to 24 minutes. Speaking as an entitled middle class asshole, I 3 tollways.

    1. Re:Dallas Texas toll system - awesome by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Amen. Houston eliminated the tolls on the Beltway after Ike to get more people off the surface roads with the stoplights out. I don't even believe in God and I was praying nightly for the return of the tolls. All those extra idiots tripled my commute time. I will gladly pay $9 a day to shorten my commute an hour each way.

    2. Re:Dallas Texas toll system - awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think its awesome at all.
        I can understand charging extra to use an expensive and high-maintenance item like a bridge, but wouldn't it be better to just not have to pay twice (once in tax, then a toll) to use an otherwise normal road?

    3. Re:Dallas Texas toll system - awesome by netsavior · · Score: 1

      Toll roads in Texas are privately funded and constructed, privately maintained. That is why they are so fucking awesome. Because if there is a pothole it is magically fixed overnight, instead of shutting down part of the highway for 10 years to fix it. If someone has a blowout, the privately funded "courtesy patrol" comes and gets the traffic blocking car off the road within 10 minutes. It is amazing. Texas funded roads take 15 years to build, toll funded roads take a year.

      The private sector is just way more effective than the state government at this, so I gladly pay to drive on a private road, even though public ones are available.

  35. FastTrac by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tracking your every move, inside our coast-to-coast prison.

    Your papers, please!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:FastTrac by nightcats · · Score: 2

      As Dan Rather once said, Americans will put up with anything as long as it doesn't stop traffic...

      --
      Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
    2. Re:FastTrac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse. They already know where you are ALWAYS. Any problem and they can go after you.

  36. You Dont Understand Politics & The Human Condi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No what would happen if your suggestion was honestly considered by politicians is this. They would eliminate toll roads, and add a new tax on all of the citizen incomes to cover the roads than they are now. However, with even more money available than before, the roads would be maintained even less than they are now for some odd reason. And, over time the money would get mismanaged and re-appropriated to their own private projects, completely unrelated to the road system, and funnel that money to their best buddies for favors, positions, perks, etc. Then, they would decry that the roads have no funding and would reinstate toll roads to solve it but in the process fail to remove the road tax itself. As a result, you now get double taxed for more poorly maintained roads, and the politicians in the meantime have three or four homes in several vacation states and ownership in various golf courses, oil companies and sports teams. Congratulations on solving the problem buddy.

  37. Higher tolls to come...... by murph · · Score: 0

    Once the tolls are automated, the tolls can be increased more frequently and with less outrage from the motorists. Of course the politicians like the idea. They'll sell the idea on convenience, and then soak people later.

    --
    I don't care about your karma, I don't care about what's hip. --Weird Al
  38. New bridges, new tech by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    The newest bridge here in Vancouver, the Golden Ears Bridge, uses electronic tolling. It's the first toll bridge in these parts since tolls were abolished on other bridges in the 1960s. I don't use it enough to justify a transponder. Translink send me a bill for a few dollars every 3 months. Since it goes from nowhere to nowhere, nobody uses it much at all: it's almost always deserted. It's a handy landmark for the Pitt Meadows Airport, though the actual reporting point when approaching from the east is Hammond Mill, on the river right by Port Hammond.

    The new Port Mann Bridge will use the same setup. Unlike Golden Ears, it is a major part of the road network. It only took them 40 years of gridlock to decide it needed upgrading.

    I don't mind electronic tolling, actually. It saves having to fumble for change. My company's head office is in Dallas, not far from the George Bush Turnpike. Last time I got a rental car with a transponder, but the system didn't seem to recognize it.

    ...laura

  39. Not front page worthy - Sorry Guys by nefus · · Score: 1

    Is local news something that Slashdot wants to seriously put on it's front page? It's sort of like saying the WW2 history museum in New Orleans is going to repaint the building from one shade of gray to a different one. It's just not front page news and a low point for this site.

  40. Visitors by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    That's all good as long as they make it visitor friendly. I hate being relegated to the non-FasTrack ghetto while passing through Orange County California.

    I think the situation is different with a national landmark unless they want a bunch of rental car companies getting bills in the mail everyday.

    Overall I dislike FasTrack and the ability of a private company to give out traffic fines.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Visitors by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The rental companies will just get tags for each of their cars and put it on your account when you return the car. That's what I was told the last time I was in Houston.

  41. Don't stop with the 34 layoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's such a good idea of the Golden Gate Bridge board of directors by saving so many millions of dollars, they left out what they can contribute to the good of the Golden Gate Bridge. They can lay off themselves as well, and hire 1 single director, keep the entire maintenance crews, rehire the laid off toll takers as maintenance personnel. These people are heartless shits, saving money on the backs of the workers and commuters only to support a heavily subsidized and totally failing ferry system. This is America folks.

  42. tolls moderate use of saturated roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tolls waste a lot of time and money in an attempt to spread the cost of the road to the people that 'use' it, but this doesn't work. Everyone benefits from the road system. Even if you don't own a car, the goods and services you use rely on them. Adding tolls just increases the cost of those goods and services, so the entire toll industry is a waste of time. Just tax people evenly for the roads we all rely on and skip the wasteful toll booths and electronics.

    Quite the opposite. After a certain point roads start being congested because, while it takes time in traffic to move, the road is "free" and so people use it. There's been a growing voice in Toronto, Canada saying that tolls should be introduced: we have some of the worst traffic jams (worse than LA), and stretches of Highway 401 get over 500,000 cars an hour (the busiest in the world).

    The cost of all the delays of traffic, and the increased commute time for people, is coasting the economy several billion dollars in productivity. And given that Toronto is the largest economic area in Canada, it probably has some consequences nation-wide.

    So tolls are probably are unnecessary on most roads, but after a certain point you need them to moderate road use to below saturation levels.

    The same is true of parking: check out the book "The High Cost of Free Parking" on numerous examples of how introducing paid parking improved the situation for drivers (available spots), pedestrians (less pollution from people circling the block), and local businesses (more turn over of spots allow more customers to get in and out).

    1. Re:tolls moderate use of saturated roads by rale,+the · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite. After a certain point roads start being congested because, while it takes time in traffic to move, the road is "free" and so people use it. There's been a growing voice in Toronto, Canada saying that tolls should be introduced: we have some of the worst traffic jams (worse than LA), and stretches of Highway 401 get over 500,000 cars an hour (the busiest in the world).

      How about the situation where people use free roads to avoid expensive tolls, resulting in more congestion on the free roads, while the toll road remains underused? One might expect the toll to be lowered to balance this out, but it seems the tolls only go higher.

    2. Re:tolls moderate use of saturated roads by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      So, you think the solution to better roads is to keep people from using them? By that logic, the best roads would be the ones that are never built. 0 congestions! The correct approach is build roads that can handle the capacity. Building only enough roads to handle the trips that people have no other options than to take, and forcing all other cars off the road is a nightmare. The idea that no matter how much road capacity you make, it will just get filled is stupid. (I know you didn't say that, but it goes hand in hand with what you did say). There are only so many people in the world. Our cars do not drive themselves. Thus there are only so many cars that can be on the road at a time.

      I have not read "The High cost of Free Parking", but the points you draw out imply that it is a one sided book that did not take into account important factors. For example, more turn over. From the businesses standpoint, they might collect less money, but from the customers standpoint free parking allows them to pay less money for more product. I'm not talking the cost of the parking either. If you go to a coffee shop, you are not going their out of need. It is an entertaiment expense. If paid parking drives you out of the shop faster, then you got less entertainment for the same amount of money. In fact that happens in exactly the same ratio as the increase that the shop owner gets. It isn't an increased cost. It is just a shifting of wealth. Pretty close to the broken window fallacy.

      People circling the block is not a sign that free parking is expensive, but a sign that the goods (one of which is just being at the location) is in high demand, and there isn't enough parking to handle the demand. The suggestion that you drive away customers so that the ones that are left can be handled efficiently from the providers point of view is absurd. That would be like a grocery store reducing the number of cash registers to the point that there is always a long line. That would get them better turn over in the checkout lines. It would look good in the short run. It would not help their bottom line in the long run. It would just drive people away.

      There is s certain kind of store that might be able to increase profits by forcing people to shop quickly and get out. Most businesses profit from people who are out 'shopping', and form impulse purchases.

      The pedestrian example, if I am understanding it correctly is particularly silly. Either the author is suggesting that they can force people to move from their homes so that they can shop, or they are suggesting that the parking just get moved out of sight.

    3. Re:tolls moderate use of saturated roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a thought - don't go anywhere. Buy everything online, shop within walking distance and don't give money to restaurants bars or shops - for a year. See how fast the govt panics when there's a wholesale boycott because infrastructure is waging war on the public and the public refuses to play. I've cut down on a LOT of useless travel over the last year. Fuck-em. I'm making and saving more money to boot.

  43. Where's all the money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    34 jobs over 8 years at around 20k/year each is ~5.5M, do maintenance and power costs really make up the other ~14M? Where does the rest of the money from the 19.2M go?

    1. Re:Where's all the money? by rockout · · Score: 1

      20k/year? Try 70k a year, average.

      The bay area is extremely expensive to live in and unions in the area are fairly powerful. Wouldn't surprise me one bit to learn that the average toll collector is (was) making 70k/year, and that seems to be borne out by these numbers.

      At 20k/year there, you're living in your car. And you wouldn't be able to afford gas.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  44. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's wrong with hatting the military?

    Nothing really. A bit redundant in all, they already have hats. But if you insist....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  45. Tool booths are antiquated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Near Toronto, we use an all electronic toll system for the "407" highway. It has no toll booths but requires a transponder or the system photographs the plate and sends you a bill. Of course if they have to do the photo thing, then they charge you extra so it can be argued that you are forcing people to either pay extra for a transponder or extra for a photo toll, which of course is a bad thing. But like any big steel bridge over salt water, it needs alot of maintenance in order to keep it from rusting into a heap. If they can save money by implimenting this system its probably better in the long run. The cheaper the overall bill, the lower the taxes for the guy driving over the bridge (and hypothetically lower tolls as well).

  46. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    But what if you'd rather pay in cash? This option sounds like now, it is not going to be an option.

    What if you're a visitor with an out of state car, or a rental car?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  47. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by haystor · · Score: 1

    In a lot of places it is also a highly unionized job. They can't be fired and often can't be bothered to do their job. It makes a slow process of driving through a toll booth even more painful when you have to wait for someone to get off their phone call to bother with your fare.

    --
    t
  48. California has an abusive system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every year in California we buy a sticker to put on our car, and it costs on average $220 (depending on the car). Plus we have to pay gas tax. Plus we have to pay tolls (electronic and manual). Plus we have to pay ticket tax (parking, red light and jaywalking fines given out in excess of $300. literally millions of tickets issued a year)

    In Germany there are indeed tolls for many of the private roads. Plus they do have tolls on public roads for commercial vehicles.

    1. Re:California has an abusive system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Germany there are indeed tolls for many of the private roads.

      No, there are not. There are virtually no private roads in Germany.

      And yes, I am a German.

    2. Re:California has an abusive system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a well traveled German I guess. Germany is a big country.
      I've been on private roads where you had to pay at the entrance.
      Even the UK television program "Top Gear" used one of these roads in their travels. I'm guessing, from your comments, they are something your average city Germany hasn't encountered.

  49. Cost too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    70 grand a year sweet government gig gone

  50. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

    For everyone who loves the toll collectors, I bet there are hundreds who hate them.

    Why? What have they done. Or is it because they are the minions of the people who put the rules in place? In that case, is it OK to hate the military people for doing the same?

    Because then I am confused, because I admire what they do but hat why they do it.

    First, when since does anyone need a rational reason to hate someone else? I am not saying that's right - but it is sadly the way this reality of human existence works. That aside, (and to the irrational), there are people who take out their frustration on those they idiotically think are responsible for such. So, waiting on line for minutes to pay a toll, and the toll collector becomes the target of the person's ire - kinda like shooting the messenger. It does not make sense, but it does happen.

    One should never judge how someone else is going to act by attaching rationality to the incident. Not in such an irrational world filled with so many irrational people. Heck, look at the people who loved Microsoft BoB and Windows ME... ;-)

  51. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

    In a lot of places it is also a highly unionized job. They can't be fired and often can't be bothered to do their job. It makes a slow process of driving through a toll booth even more painful when you have to wait for someone to get off their phone call to bother with your fare.

    I am pretty sure it's unionized here too (at least in the NYC Metro Area where I live). But, ironically, some of the nicest and friendliest people I have met have been toll collectors. Whether it's because I needed quick directions, or they simply took the time to smile, say hi and wish me a good morning, that has generally been my experience. Combine that with the fact that we are talking the NYC area, where being miserable and treating other people like dirt is every New Yorker's God given right, and their (friendly) attitudes are actually pretty impressive.

    waiting on the whooshes directed at some of the responses I am sure I am going to get... ;-)

  52. In Soviet Russa... by carpefishus · · Score: 1

    aw, nevermind.

    --
    Facts take all of the premium out of arm waving - T. Reynolds
  53. Just because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you're necessary doesn't mean you're important and You probably have a very easy job. The kind robots will be doing soon.

  54. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Yes, but how do they prove that the owner was responsible for the toll? I think that's a very important point seeing as the owner isn't the one that's necessarily driving and it's the driver that's responsible for paying. Beyond that there's always going to be issues with lost mail.

  55. Technical FAIL by jvonk · · Score: 1

    So, while my point about the NRVC is accurate, I missed the obvious issue that California is not a member of the NRVC. However, they do belong to the Driver License Compact. Most states belong to both the DLC and the NRVC:

    Map of DLC/NRVC Member Jurisdictions

    As you can see from the linked map, the net result is that your home state will yank your license if you ignore a traffic citation from California unless you are from Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Tennessee, or Wisconsin. If you live in one of those states and receive a citation from California you will find that you will likely have to post bail to the Californian police officer at the time of your citation.

  56. One national transponder by Animats · · Score: 1

    The US toll industry needs to standardize on one national transponder. There's a multi-state one for trucks, but the California system pre-dates it and isn't compatible.

    Does the EU have a EU-wide toll device? At least the Schengen Area should have one.

  57. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

    Yes, but how do they prove that the owner was responsible for the toll?

    Simple. Change the law. Now, the registered owner is responsible for paying the toll.

    Be sure to file those papers right away when you sell a car, and keep a copy to prove that the transfer occoured before the toll was incurred. Rental agencies will simply add a clause to the agreement allowing them to bill your credit card for any tolls incurred while you were renting the car.

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
  58. The fuel tax system has its limitations by alispguru · · Score: 1

    I can think of two in the US:

    1. We tax diesel fuel more heavily than gasoline, because most of the diesel users in the US are trucks, which are heavier and do more damage to the roads. This has unfairly discouraged diesel for smaller vehicles.

    2. Any vehicle that doesn't use taxed fuel is not paying for the roads. Very small problem now, will get bigger as all-electric cars become more practical.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  59. "Needs a human face".. by spasm · · Score: 1

    So.. Some asshole wants another human being to spend their working life sitting in a small filthy booth sucking exhaust fumes and having people grumpily throw change at them so *he* can have the ego boost of having a peon "greet" him before he zooms across the bridge? Wow.

  60. $70K/year to be a toll collector? by defaria · · Score: 1

    By my calculations ($19.2/8 year/34 people) that's $70K/year!

  61. It's a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The toll collectors there have an attitude! I profoundly thank them every time I give them my money, and they do not say thank you at all. One yelled at me: "Too far": I guess it meant that she thought my car was to far from her. It was actually absolutely convenient for her to take the bill, since I reach out of the window and was handing it to her. I told her: I am handing you the money, ma'am, please take it! - since I was afraid she'd send me an $30 ticket for toll evasion. The rudeness that I have to face handing my money and being their customer to them is increasing, proportionate to the speed that America is sinking into a 3d world country status.

  62. About damned time by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I understand the "human face" issue, and agree partly. I get a human checkout person at the supermarket if at all possible, for instance. But there's two issues here:

    1) The GG bridge has been running at capacity for years, and a redesign to carry more traffic (a second deck, for instance) would ruin it's value as a symbol and monument. And it'd be ugly.

    2) As anyone who lived in the area can tell you, toll booths are SLOW. It's the major cause of the twice-daily jam on the bridge.

    I think losing the booths trumps redesigning the bridge or putting up with the traffic. I'm sure there's some other low-training high-paying government job they could be doing.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  63. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Lots of US systems link up with EZ-Pass, especially here in the Northeast.

    That having been said, there isn't that much incentive for a nation-wide system, especially when the technology remains proprietary. If we don't have competition between the systems, we're going to get massively gouged. Similarly, while it would be nice to have nation-wide standards, the benefits for me as a Northeasterner of anything west of New York being on the same system are incredibly minimal.

  64. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by m6ack · · Score: 1

    If they were naughty hot Asian minxes wearing next to nothing at the booth... OK, I'm happy with that... I'll gladly stop on my way to work for a wink, and a "hey, baby -- put your money in here..."

    But, these are not the kinds of people that sign up for toll booth jobs. Instead, we have humpty dumpty, or some old woman with either a confused or grumpy expression on their face... And why wouldn't they be grumpy... They flat-out /know/ that their job requires absolutely no creative thought and can absolutely be done better by a robot... The moment of enlightenment that these poor people experience when they finally understand that they have thrown their lives away on a job so mechanical and worthless -- that has to be a soul-crushing.

    So, I'm all for this. Maybe the people who sat on their lazy butts not only contributing a pittance to the human condition, but actually wasting others time and energy in the process, will learn to redeem themselves and take upon themselves the challenge of bettering society.

    "I see the strongest and the smartest men who have ever lived... and these men are pumping gas and waiting tables." ~Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, Chapter 19

  65. no speed limit is kind of a myth by Nowhere.Men · · Score: 1

    There are portion, short, with no speed limits that but they are surrounded by random portion with limits.

    So you can't legally travel from one side of Germany to the other at 240 km/h.

    About the Swiss stickers. Some people collection them on their car. Putting the new one next to the old ones. Others remove them. Like the car tax sticker in UK, they are designed to destroy themselves during removal.

    Belgium will probably introduce a sticker like Switzerland for cars and a kind of GPS tracker for Trucks.

    1. Re:no speed limit is kind of a myth by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There may as well be no speed limit. Two examples come to mind:

      1. Driving 190 in a 110 zone one day the cop never caught up to me when I whizzed passed.
      2. Driving 185 in a 130 zone through a fixed speed camera cost me less than a quarter of a tank of a gas in fines.

      Compare to my home country in Australia where it's $100 for the first 10km/h over the limit, $300 for the next 10km/h it is essentially like there's no law at all.

    2. Re:no speed limit is kind of a myth by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      Like the car tax sticker in UK, they are designed to destroy themselves during removal.

      Huh? The UK tax disc is just a circle of paper. You have to have a holder stuck to the windscreen to keep it in (dealers usually take the opportunity to put one in the car with their branding on the back, in case you forgot where you bought the car from...)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  66. Already doing this in Dallas by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Tollways in Dallas-Fort Worth, TX have done away with all toll booths and replaced them with cameras too. They'll mail you a bill for the tolls on a periodic basis, though you can still get a toll tag (RFID?). We don't live there but were driving on the tollways over the holidays. We have yet to receive a bill as we live out of state. So, depending on how accurate the system is, you may or may not get a bill. We'll pay it if it ever shows up.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  67. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

    Be sure to file those papers right away when you sell a car, and keep a copy to prove that the transfer occoured before the toll was incurred.

    I don't know how it works in California, but in New York you keep the plates when you sell a car. If that's the case in California then the system is going to have a pretty hard time photographing your license plates when they're sitting in your garage waiting to be returned.

  68. Employer taxes by dereference · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Honestly curious Brit here - I know that US employees suffer lower levels of personal income tax than in the UK (or Europe) but I'm wondering if your employers pay more?

    Probably not.

    US employers don't contribute anything toward the personal income tax of the employees. This is obfuscated by the fact that employers in most cases are required to withhold from payroll several taxes that are obligations of the employee. These include estimated* personal income tax (federal, plus state and local as applicable) plus the actual Medicare tax and actual employee's share of the Social Security tax. Instead of being paid directly to the employee, all such taxes are withheld from gross pay, and paid directly by the employer to the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of each employee.

    The employer's only payroll tax liability is its share of the Social Security tax for each employee. For decades this has been split 50-50 between employer and employee, although just this year the employee's portion was reduced. Employers must also pay for several statutory insurance policies, including federal and state unemployment programs, plus in most cases a workers' compensation plan, but none of these is strictly a tax.

    (*The fact that it's an estimate greatly confuses people on a mass scale, as they've been conditioned to believe that the interest-free return of any overages withheld is a gift from the government, and thus some even attempt to deliberately increase withholdings to achieve a bigger return, but that's another story entirely.)

  69. Australia - Flow Toll for the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first I resisted the e-Toll/FlowToll system in Brisbane, Australia, not wanting to pay for previously cheaper trips, however, after a bunch of massive cross city tunnels where built, with my hands held behind my back, I ordered a visa debit card so that I could then subscribe to the Flow system.

    The fuel/frustration/time saved on bypassing the city via tunnel, particularly during peak hour as well as the gateway bridge and the other toll ways around Brisbane, is *sometimes* worth the $4-5 toll. As a matter of fact, to justify the rediculous cost of the drill bit used to make the CLEM7 tunnel, there are at least a couple of other tunnels now in the works along the cities major arteries. In Brisbane, it has certainly been too little to late. Our public tranport infrastructure, while improving over the past 5 years, is still a long way short of the highly efficient light rail solutions working so well in overseas capitals, so any tunnel to get more cars off the congested CBD roads is now welcome as far as I am concerned.

    Additionally, my Flow tag can be used on the tollways in Sydney and Melbourne, so regardless of the state I am driving in on the eastern coat of Australia, I can pay my toll with my Flow tag, without stopping.

    http://www.flowtoll.com.au/page/Home

    Come on SanFran, get with the times :)

  70. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by isorox · · Score: 1

    Free? Where's the profit in that? In Germany we recently had an increase from 8€ to 29€ (plus another 8-16€ for pictures that can only be used for IDs) for our ID card, which is mandatory to have by law. Just imagine the benefits to businesses with ties to corrupt politicians if they can force citizens to pay them as much as they want by law!

    If it's mandatory, then it's a tax. In this case, a flat tax (which hurts the lower paid more)

  71. Get rid of tolls - use the gas tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What stupid nonsense is this "needing a human face." As other posters have mentioned it is a waste of time, a waste of money, not to mention the pollution caused by idling. And we don't need a police state where Big Brother knows where we are at all times. Let's get rid of these tolls on bridges and collect the money via gas taxes.

    Let's make the gas taxes pay for the roads and bridges. There was an interesting spoof I read about this fanatical desire to keep irrelevant jobs that harm the economy. Do a search on the ditch-diggers fallacy.

    I just did: http://theclassicalliberalblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/ditch-diggers-fallacy.html

  72. And what about the tourists? by TheMidget · · Score: 1

    cameras to read license plate numbers of cars lacking the cards.

    Will people with non-US cars (Mexican, Canadian) get to cross the bridge for free? And what about rental cars?

    Why not have a number of dedicated FasTrak toll lanes, and a couple of lanes with human toll collectors (like is done on French motorways, and probably elsewhere too). Moreover, this will allow for a gradual reduction of the toll collector's workforce, rather than having to fire everybody at once...

    1. Re:And what about the tourists? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

      And what about rental cars?

      The rental agency, who already had your credit card on file, sends you the bill. That's what happened to us in Sydney. There was no way to pay on the road at the time and Hertz sent us a bill several weeks later.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    2. Re:And what about the tourists? by Sanat · · Score: 1

      Used to be that the Sydney harbor bridge only took tolls going one way and charged twice the amount thus assuming you were bound to return sooner or later. I worked in Milson Point right where the bridge started. My office had a window that overlooked the bridge and I always enjoyed watching the cars and lorries. I lived in Kirribilli so would walk to work on some days. times sure does fly... that was 30 years ago... yikes.

       

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  73. Saving 19.2 million by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    So glad to hear they will be lowering tolls to reflect the savings!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  74. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not everyone grows up to be an astronaut.

    Not everyone wants to.

    There is nothing soul crushing about doing the job to which are best suited.

    We are currently overcompensating some segments of our society because the wealthy have (temporarily) built a ring around certain jobs and then are passing them on to their children. It won't hold. There just is no value to paying a CEO 100 million dollars when the similar CEO in china or india is doing just as good a job for 1 million dollars a year.

    Overcompensating them makes people envy them even tho they would be unhappy in those jobs.

    There are lots of people of low to average IQ who are happy with a relatively mindless job surrounded by pleasant work buddies.

    But you are right- those jobs can be automated. (and are being automated). The end result will not be that those people suddenly become smarter, talented, and capable of doing jobs that require high intelligence or talent.

    So what happens to them when their jobs are automated away and there are no other jobs to go to?

    They can vote or swing a club or shoot a gun perfectly well. They'll get unhappy when they have nothing to do- no money to spend- and folks act like it's their fault.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  75. James Bond License Plate by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    So all I need is a little shutter curtain that drops down over my plate that the instant of crossing and I'm home free. Or a James Bond style revolving license plate on my Lotus (ha).

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  76. The Real Crime Here by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0

    The REAL CRIME here is that the Golden Gate bridge is still collecting tolls at all, let alone such high ones. The original mandate to collect tolls to pay off the bridge construction and maintenance expired long ago. However, this was such a lucrative pot of money to the San Francisco liberals that they felt the unquenchable need to Do Good with, that instead of reducing or eliminating the tolls once the need for them was met, they RAISED the tolls and dumped it into a shush fund of liberal activism. A sane society would have thrown the bums out long ago, but this is San Francisco that we're talking about.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  77. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by grommit · · Score: 1

    But what if you'd rather pay in cash?

    When the bill arrives in the mail, put cash in the reply envelope.

    What if you're a visitor with an out of state car,

    States have access to the license plate data from other states. The bill will be sent to the owner of the license plate.

    or a rental car?

    The rental car companies will deal with this the same way that they deal with parking tickets and red light tickets. Forward the bill/ticket to the person who had rented the vehicle on that particular day.

  78. cutting jobs ? by cdxta · · Score: 1

    "cutting 34 jobs" but wait that is a bad thing according to every politician. They are always saying we need to create more jobs

  79. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by trigpoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or a rental car?

    The rental car companies will deal with this the same way that they deal with parking tickets and red light tickets. Forward the bill/ticket to the person who had rented the vehicle on that particular day.

    After adding a massive handling charge.

  80. Mod parent up by turing_m · · Score: 1

    Some asshole wants another human being to spend their working life sitting in a small filthy booth sucking exhaust fumes

    I remember reading "toll booth operator" as one of the top 20 worst jobs to work in. Sitting in the middle of fifty idling cars will wreak havoc on your lungs. (Although if the authorities really gave a shit they could pipe in air to each toll booth using air sucked in from a more remote location. Or give them a mask connected to said air line.)

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  81. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    As much as I hate the "user pays" toll system at least this is one thing they got right in Australia. I can drive for 20 hours down the highway into a different state / city, using a transponder from a different company than the one running the toll road, on a bridge owned by a different private or public entity and it will just happily beep. I travel a lot and haven't seen a toll booth in about 3 years (I think the Gateway Bridge was the last to go electronic 3 years ago).

    Apparently when electronic systems were first rolled out it was utter chaos with no interoperability.

  82. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by briareus · · Score: 0

    Why? What have they done. Or is it because they are the minions of the people who put the rules in place? In that case, is it OK to hate the military people for doing the same?

    Either you've never experienced them or your experiences have not been the norm.

  83. Unhelpful Knuckledragger != Human Face by nick_davison · · Score: 2

    'This is a world-famous bridge, and you need a human face,' says Philip Hynes.

    My personal experience was:

    No signs warning it was a toll. When we got right up to it, we saw there was a toll and it was cash only. We didn't have any cash so looked for somewhere to turn around. There wasn't anywhere. We pulled up to the booth and explained the situation, the knuckledragger didn't actually say a word to us. He just noted our license plate and waved us on.

    OK, we figured. That's not too unpleasant a system. They'll send us a bill for the couple of dollars in the mail, maybe a website we can go to pay it on.

    No. We got a $30 fine for running the toll. The toll we stopped at, explained we didn't have cash but were happy to pay any other way or would turn around if that wasn't OK.

    Not only that but the fine notice allows you to not pay for a first offense IF you sign up for their automatic payment system... a system that deducts the first month to cover that alleged infraction and insists on pre-billing you, keeping more than the cost of the fine for future payments.

    So, after we talked to the knuckledragger, thought we were just being offered an alternate way to pay, got waved on by him, then FINED for toll evasion? I, for one, will be dancing to the thought of his lost job. I'm sure he's well qualified for a role with the TSA so he won't be unemployed for long.

    Yes, without a human there, there'll be no way to explain situations like that to an unfeeling machine. But when the humans were worthless examples of the species to begin with, monosylabic and leading you in to fines when you thought you'd simply asked for help? Precisely nothing will be lost.

    Bitter? Me? ;)

    1. Re:Unhelpful Knuckledragger != Human Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we had the same thing happen. Except we had cash, were in the cash lane, and tried to pay the guy. But he turned down the money and waved us through.

      Not so long later, we received that same fine you got for running the toll with the option of buying a fast trak device.

      I am also bitter about that.

    2. Re:Unhelpful Knuckledragger != Human Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, moron,

      That had NOTHING to do with him. Maybe he didn't have a hand in creating that policy, YA THINK?!

      Dumbfuck.

    3. Re:Unhelpful Knuckledragger != Human Face by DeathSquid · · Score: 1

      Just following orders? Ask Eichmann how well that defense flies...

    4. Re:Unhelpful Knuckledragger != Human Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I was totally going to link to a google street view image showing all of the signage about the tolls.

      I think the toll signage starts AFTER you pass the last exit, and the last exit doesn't have a "LAST EXIT BEFORE TOLL" on any of its signs.

      Holy shit.

  84. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by xelah · · Score: 1

    There's no shortage of things worth doing out there - always someone who'd like their house cleaned, or to have a massage, or a have a wall painted or their dog walked. People don't end up jobless because there's nothing worth doing any more, they end up jobless because the economy has failed to arrange for useful things to be done and for someone to be given the right incentives to do it. That doesn't mean it's easy to solve, but having people do something fundamentally pointless instead isn't going to get you there.

  85. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy Mackarel! It's the 21st Century already. We've had EZ Pass in the Philadelphia area for at least 8 years now. No one ever missed the toll booths. Then EZ Pass was installed in the length of I-95 to Baltimore and Washington DC. It must of cut out a good 30 minutes off of that horrendous trip.

    Whatever happened to all that crap about San Francisco being so forward looking?

  86. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

    In California, the plates go with the car -unless they are special vanity plates or the like.

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
  87. Say Cheese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone mind if I take a picture of your license plates?

  88. Adelaide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Adelaide, South Australia we have no tolls, something we are used to here.

    Whenever tolls are talked about with a new project everyone cries and it gets scraped. The downside is that we pay quite a lot in fuel (tax) and registration (insurance mostly) but if you ride a bike your laughing.

    Anyway aren't they suppose to take away tolls once the project is paid for?

  89. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Well then, save even more money and remove the tolls all together, zero cost solution. It will save even more pollution as people do not need to drive further to free bridges to avoid tolls. Unless of course the real idea is to sell all US bridges to private interests so that an automated maximum profit system can be implemented on every bridge in the US. The Republicans will love it, think of all those campaign donations those billions in profits could pay for (real trick is to do zero maintenance and then on sell the sell the bridge just prior to collapse).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  90. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    We currently have bastard red light/speeding cameras in our area. The registered owner, local or not, gets the ticket. It is not a criminal ticket. The only negative is that they throw it to a collection agency. No big deal for me as I don't borrow any money anyway.
    http://thegazette.com/cameras and you can peruse the database to see all the out of state tickets. It has been a gigantic moneymaker for the City, and for the company that does the cameras.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  91. uhhh... in 2000 by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Newsflash: SF Bay area has had transponder based tolls since 2000 (see FasTrak). They still have cash lanes for those of us that dont drive over the bridges enough to justify getting the thing (it requires you to associate a debit card/account for reloading, and have a minimum balance in your fastrak account at all times (ie: money sitting in an account not getting interest), and for tourists and others in rental cars or whoever else is driving through without the box.

    What TFA is about (going from the newspaper article I read about it this morning, not TFA) is getting completely rid of the toll collectors and toll booths and just billing everyone by license plate.... which doesnt work for new car tags, rentals, people borrowing/stealing someone else's car or altering their tags, or out-of-state travelers driving through (I doubt they have authority to track down their address from the other state's DOT for billing). I agree with the motion, need to move to fully automated booths, but mailing bills is not the answer. Put up kiosks that take bills, coins, or credit card swipes, they would work faster than the toll booth operators we have now, that sometimes will let you sit there while they count out bills and swap stacks around before taking your exact change...

    Whats not mentioned is the other bay area bridges, the golden gate is only the most famous of them. The oakland/bay bridge (the one that collapsed in the Loma Prieta quake), San Mateo hwy 92 bridge (once the longest bridge in the world, now 25th), Dumbarton, and Richmond bridges are also toll, and will also probably see the same elimination of toll booth operators.

    -Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  92. Not cutting jobs... by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

    The San Francisco Chronicle reports that tollbooths and toll collectors, a fixture at the Golden Gate Bridge since it opened in 1937, will be eliminated starting in 2012 as the bridge moves to an all-electronic system, freeing 34 people to do more useful work and saving $19.2 million over the first eight years.

    Much better way to put it.

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  93. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    The moment of enlightenment that these poor people experience when they finally understand that they have thrown their lives away on a job so mechanical and worthless -- that has to be a soul-crushing.

    Most of the world works in such jobs. Having a fulfilling job that earns you respect is an ideal that few attain. And I can think of many, many worse jobs than toll collector.

  94. No human toll-takers will raise overall costs by twasserman · · Score: 1
    I'm mystified about how the Golden Gate District is going to save money by eliminating human toll takers on the Golden Gate Bridge. Here are some questions that immediately came to my mind -- each has negative financial implications for the District.

    1) How will the District be able to collect tolls from drivers in new vehicles? There is no license plate available to the cameras.

    2) How will the District collect tolls from out-of-state vehicles? If I have an Oregon or Florida car, I'll just sail right through and ignore any bill that I receive.

    3) Who's going to send out the bills to the people whose license plates were captured by photo driving through the toll area without a FasTrak? Apart from the postage, how much will that cost per driver? Will they have to hire back the toll takers to send out these notices? The number of cars without a FasTrak is pretty high.

    4) Who's going to open up all of the envelopes that contain the payment checks? Toll takers can collect about 5-6 fares per minute. It takes longer to open and sort envelopes.

    5) Who's going to follow up on the bounced checks? That takes time, too.

    In all, my sense is that the switch away from human toll takers is likely to result in lower revenues and higher costs for the District. They'll have to hire all of the toll takers for the manual tasks, and then some more people. Overall, it looks like a terrible business decision, even apart from the human costs.

  95. International Plates by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Never mind other states, what about non-US registered cars? I'd imagine this mainly means us Canadians but I have seen the odd European number plate on US roads. Since they won't be able to find out who owns the vehicle thanks to Canadian and European privacy laws does this mean we get to cross for free?

  96. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by m6ack · · Score: 1

    Then, they are /forced/ to be creative! Right now they are undoubtedly "overcompensated" by your own admission. But I disagree with you -- damn it! I disagree! I think it is a shame that people who are innately gifted in some way throw their lives away at sucky jobs like this. And sucky -- so sucky that it WASTES OTHERS LIVES IN THE PROCESS!!!

    There are /always/ other more creative or beneficial jobs out there.

    You know who is the most valuable person in the Wal-Mart store? It's the greeter. No Robot could ever take that job! That person should be the most coveted person in the store. Why? Because it's that person that is the first person that you see and it's that person's job to make you feel welcome to come in and spend your money for whatever crap they sell there.

    Does it take great skill to do that job? Well, it SHOULD. It takes skill to be that happy smiling person that you want to see -- that tells you exactly where to find a person find your crap wherever it is in the store -- that knows what you are buying is crap and that you the customer know is crap, but it's darned cheap crap and you're happy to buy it because, after all, it's darned cheap crap.

    Some of these people as well could be artists. And some.. some could be scientists... What was Einstein before he became a world renowned nuclear genius of relativity? He was a patent examiner. Truly a step above booth babe/bozo... but really.

    I truly thing you underestimate people. I think you need to take a long look in the mirror and ask yourself why you don't believe in people, and why you don't believe that the market will have a place for them. You think that they are so stupid that they will never amount to anything more?

    Wow, I thought I was bad just for saying what I felt.

  97. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by m6ack · · Score: 1

    You know... I have some experience here. I worked in Asia as an Expat. Here's what I learned...

    Companies outsource for "cheap labor." But there are some companies that outsource jobs that take "skill" or "education." You know what you find out about the companies that do this? They invest in what ends up to be a "revolving door." They end up getting what they paid for in terms of support. They get the bottom of the barrel. Why? Because, when a person that works in that environment for any time learns something valuable, they CHANGE JOBS SO FAST THAT YOU CAN'T FIGURE OUT WHAT HIT YOU.

    I think it's not that people work in dead end jobs out of choice... I think it's their political systems that cage them in those jobs. People should fight to be creative, but they are told that they should just do what they are told by their government that they will get a pension and be all right.

    Well, excuse me but that's _not_ all right. People are meant to do more than let me screw a widget in this piece of crap the same way over and over again! People shouldn't be satisfied to mechanically do anything! Robots do that. Humans DON'T -- for very long, unless they are brainwashed into it, or overly compensated into doing it!

  98. Re:Who pays for the bridge? Tourists or commuters? by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    San Francisco is a major tourist attraction, there is no doubt. The toll booths are just another way of getting more money from the tourists. But there is another aspect to this. Lots of people want to live in moron county, and commute to SF or even to Silicon Valley. I don't know what the toll is these days. I do remember once it was $3. Lets see 5 days a week, four weeks a year, that $60 a month. As if gas wasn't enough of an expense for the hardworking locals, with the strained economy, a $60/month additional expense just worsens the pain. And add to that the cost of parking in the city. Now employers in San Francisco have to pay their employee more to offset the travel, toll, and parking fees. That doesn't make SF as attractive a place to have a business. Having lived and operated a business in SF before, a remember vividly commuting from the North Bay, over the bridge, and working my way to Noe Valley to do my days work. Eventually I just burned out on the commute and started working from home in Tiberon. The company grew and relocated to South San Francisco because business locations were prohibitively expensive in SF, on top of everything else. The lack of a BART transit from the North-West Bay to the City causes massive commuting by automobile. Ride sharing helps, but it is still a glut of cars doing the daily transit, and the time wasted at the slow toll area is just more overhead time the employee has to tolerate for the sake of being employed.

  99. One way or round trip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what I want to know is if they will replace the one toll with one set of cameras/Fastrak (which basically covers a round trip across the bridge and back) or put one in for each direction. (Yes, in the old days, we had to pay each way until someone got the bright idea of charging double, but just at one end.) If you want to travel from say San Jose, to Santa Rosa and back, and you don't care which way you go, you can pay no tolls at all. By going north through San Francisco and the Golden Gate bridge, and coming south through the Richmond/San Rafael bridge and Oakland, you get the "free" direction on each of those bridges, sort of a toll loop hole. I hope they don't decide to close that.

  100. It's really simple. by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Many people resent paying to use a road that they have already paid for. People resent being lied too more.

    For example, the expressways around Chicago are almost without exception "Tollways".

    When the roads were initially opened, the public was told that the roads would only be toll roads until the construction had been paid for, and then after that the roads would be free to use.

    It was a bald-face lie. Decades later, the tollways are still collecting money, and Tollway Commission fatcats are still being driven around in limos which don't have to pay tolls.

    Who wouldn't hate that?

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  101. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Yes, they could do all those millions of vacant jobs that employers are desperate to fill.

  102. Increased collection rates too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard an urban legend that when automated toll booths were added to a certain highway that runs north from Montreal, eliminating toll booth operators, that their revenues went up by 30%. That's not too shabby.

  103. Re:Who pays for the bridge? Tourists or commuters? by twasserman · · Score: 1
    I live in SF, and have also run a business here. We were at 2nd and Market, very close to all kinds of public transportation, including GG Transit from Marin (bus and ferry). We couldn't do much about the absence of BART, since that issue was decided in 1962 when only San Francisco, Alameda (Berkeley, Oakland, Fremont), and Contra Costa Counties voted in favor of BART. The other counties didn't want to spend the money and were afraid that criminal elements from the urban areas would use BART to reverse commute and rob them and their homes. (Really!) My current commute to Mountain View from SF can be pretty painful, again because of that long-ago vote.

    Back to the subject at hand, though...

    The GG Bridge toll is now $5-6, depending on the time of day. A fair amount (15%?) of that is out-of-staters and drivers of rental cars, many of whom drive across the bridge Northbound to the vista point on the Sausalito side, then drive under the bridge to return to the City Southbound through the toll booths. The word will quickly get out about the toll system, and most of those revenues will be lost. So I still think that taking away the human toll takers is a bad idea in every sense.

  104. Re:When will they and the other us systems go ezpa by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    I agree that toll collection is extremely inefficient. This is just like parking meters. At first they were planned to help make extra money for inner city infrastructure, but now the parking meters basically just cover the cost of the parking meter enforcement and maintenance, so it became just a makework project.
    If only there was a way to collect a tax in a centralized location base on the amount of wear and tear that a vehicle does and how many miles they drive. Oh wait, there is, we could charge a tax for every dollar of fuel sold. The more heavy vehicles buy more gas, and the ones that drive farther buy more gas, There is no need for expensive toll collectors or electronic pass infrastructure. All that crap needlessly escalates the cost of maintaining the roads, but they justify it as making jobs for people, basically middle class welfare.
    Of course, by collecting taxes on fuel, electric cars get a free pass, but they usually are smaller cars and don't cause as much damage, so I am willing to give them their free pass. Perhaps in the future, there could be a tax on "fast charges" at electric fueling stations.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  105. Are bicycles disallowed on the bridge? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Just curious...

    1. Re:Are bicycles disallowed on the bridge? by theBuddman · · Score: 1

      Yes, along the walkways.

    2. Re:Are bicycles disallowed on the bridge? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      So how is the automatic system going to charge people riding a bicycle? I'm pretty sure that bicycles don't typically have license plates with which you can trace their owner.

  106. Re:Clean air anyone? Traffic jams? by trentblase · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the "real idea" is for people who actually use the bridge to pay for its construction and maintenance.