Slashdot Mirror


Nokia and Microsoft Make Smartphone Alliance

pbahra writes "The smart money was right. Nokia has jumped into bed with Microsoft and will produce phones running Windows Phone 7. The cynics would say that, here, we have two lumbering dinosaurs of the technology world clinging to each other hoping that the other gives them a future. Optimists would point to two companies that need each other, both bringing vital components to the alliance. The big winner is Microsoft. Windows Phone 7, while reasonably well received by commentators, has not set the world on fire. An alliance with Nokia gives it access to the world's largest phone maker and its huge mindshare — in many developing nations a mobile phone is known as a Nokia. The biggest loser is MeeGo, the ugly, unloved step-child of operating systems." Nokia wrote to developers, "Qt will continue to be the development framework for Symbian and Nokia will use Symbian for further devices; continuing to develop strategic applications in Qt for Symbian platform and encouraging application developers to do the same."

33 of 479 comments (clear)

  1. Rest in piece, Nokia by Pecisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Enough said.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:Rest in piece, Nokia by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where did my link go? What the hell?

      Attn Nokia: Was nice knowing you

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Rest in piece, Nokia by dintech · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apple and also Android Manufacturers must be rubbing their hand with glee. Nice way you shoot yourself in the foot Nokia. Also, the patent trolls will be gearing up to sweep up the pieces.

  2. That new CEO... by mvdwege · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stephen Elop must be the best mole since Kim Philby.

    After Sendo en Palm yet another mobile vendor commits suicide-by-Microsoft. But this is the biggest yet.

    I really liked Nokia devices, but my E71 is probably going to be my last one.

    Mart

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    1. Re:That new CEO... by vegiVamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mole ? He worked for MS up to september. That's not MS planting a mole, that's Nokia dropping pants and bending over.

      I've also been a Nokia guy up until now; currently got an N97. Wonderful toy even with Symbian being a bit of a bugger at times; but I'll be keeping a very sharp eye on where this is going.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  3. Shocking by ThoughtMonster · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a good read on the whole matter. Writing's a bit crude in some parts but raises some good points.

    These charts also illustrate the point. Nokia is alienating both its development community and its customers. Qt is put on the sidelines. Who's going to develop for a dying platform? A lot of people I know buy Symbian because of the generally familiar UI, which is similar to the Series 40 phones. Windows Phone is radically different.

    Ugh.

    1. Re:Shocking by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The open letter from CEO to everyone has a *lot* of comments. I can paraphrase for you in case you don't want to read them:

      "WTF? Goodbye Nokia".

      Its a great pity all round. Microsoft *still* won't sell any more phones, Nokia will just destroy itself. Shares down 8% today and I'm sure will fall further.

    2. Re:Shocking by ThoughtMonster · · Score: 3, Informative

      This whole thing is even more crazy if you take in account that Nokia shelled out more than $400 million for two assets (Symbian and Qt/Trolltech) which are now pushed into irrelevance. Nokia even open-sourced the entire Symbian operating system under the EPL, a huge move unlike what has been done by any company, only to dissolve the Symbian foundation after Mr. Elop joined the company.

      What's more, Symbian and Windows phone are not perfect replacements. As some other posters have noted, the hardware requirements for Windows Phone are egregiously high, whilst Symbian is known to be frugal with hardware requirements because it was built from the ground-up to be an operating system for low-power devices. The user-interfaces are radically different.

      The main issue with Symbian is that it was hard to develop for. This was supposed to be resolved with Qt, but now what? Nobody will develop for a platform that's going to eventually die.

    3. Re:Shocking by tibit · · Score: 3

      Qt desperately needs to be spun off into its own company. It's a great cross-platform framework without any clear contender. I develop several applications at work using Qt and there is no alternative. I need my stuff to run on OS X and Windows, and I'm using pretty much all that Qt gives, at least when it comes to the graphics scene framework and model/view system. The oft-repeated alternatives of GTK and wxWindows just aren't anywhere near where I'd need them to be.

      We used to pay for Qt, but once Nokia took over we figured: why feed the beast? As soon as Qt would be spun-off, we'd begin paying again for two commercial licenses...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  4. Not so Qt by Skuto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nokia bought Qt not so long ago, presumably because they were aiming for embedded Linux based devices and Qt is one of the best toolkits for that. Now that they are in bed with Microsoft, getting a great Linux/crossplatform GUI toolkit hardly can be a priority any more, so it makes a lot less sense to spend money on developing Qt. Particularly as unlike Trolltech, they were focussing on making it as popular as possible even at the expense of the commercial version (GPL->LGPL license change).

    So now Qt just became an irrelevant, money losing division, didn't it?

    Or do they plan to keep Qt but just use Windows as the underlying OS? I can't believe MS will be entirely happy with that, having .NET as competition and all...

  5. My final Nokia by PARENA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always been a big Nokia fan. I'm currently using my 6th or 7th one since 1999. Stirdy, trustworthy devices (well, except for one clam type phone, but could be blamed on my abuse of it). The one I have now (E51) is the 'smartest' phone I have, but it will also be my final Nokia. Would have loved to see them jump to Android, but they chose this. No, I can't put this down with facts or figures, it's just a feeling: it will not help Nokia remain the biggest phone manufacturer and I believe their market share will decline more and more. Too little, too late, this move. Such a shame, as the N8 (Symbian) is such a gorgeous device (but seriously, no Ogg support?) and I really love many of their phone designs. From fun to casual to business. Thanks for 12 years of fun, Nokia, but this is one customer less. :(

    --
    Here's the secret to immortality: ...oh dang, I forgot.
  6. Sell sell sell by duncanFrance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any shares you have in Nokia.

    They put an ex-Microsoftie in charge of a consumer electronics company. I'd laugh if it wasn't such a tragedy.

    QT will be taken out and shot as soon as possible. Here's how it will happen: Microsoft will offer Nokia a Business Development Agreement which lets Nokia get discounts off the price they pay for operating system licences. The discounts will be related to Nokia doing one of a number of 'entirely voluntary' (hence not illegally coerced) things. Things like enhancing QT in some way to make it compatible with some pointless and unused feature of Windows PhoneOS. After a few of these it will be cheaper to just kill QT.

    Then KDE will be screwed.

    Any guesses how long Symbian will last?

    1. Re:Sell sell sell by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then KDE will be screwed.

      Nope.

  7. Re:Nokia's last gasp by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Innovate or die.

    And according to these charts, they are starting to innovate by cutting R&D spending.

    Nokia, you've come a long way from rubber boots and bicycle tyres to mobile phones. But I fear this is where the story starts to end.

  8. Minimum Requirements for Windows Phone 7? by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An alliance with Nokia gives it access to the world's largest phone maker and its huge mindshare — in many developing nations a mobile phone is known as a Nokia.

    I was a little confused by this quote as the minimum requirements for Windows Phone 7 far exceed the vast majority of those developing nation cellphones. I believe those are mostly the candy bar cell phones or "dumbphones." I was under the impression that developing nations had a vast population of users who weren't in the market for smartphones. That might be changing but I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that the current models Nokia enjoys widespread distribution hinge on a trim microkernel operating system with little to no system requirements and I'm unaware of a version of Windows Phone 7 that satisfies these hardware constraints. Simply put, it's going to be a long time before Microsoft's WP7 dominates the developing nations as the de facto operating system. And good luck piling those licensing rights of WP7 on top of the cost of the phone to people who struggle to find potable water!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Minimum Requirements for Windows Phone 7? by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't kid yourself about developing nations. I live in one. We have one of the most sophisticated cell phone networks in the world. Almost everyone here has a cell phone because landlines are unfordable for the majority of our citizens. Most phones here can at least run Java. The social network of choice here is called Mxit has been developed using Java for mobiles. Its cheap to communicate via Mxit (much cheaper than SMS) so a large portion of our nation does. Symbian will probably end up dominating this market segment for Nokia, while their smartphone segment runs Windows 7 for the meantime until they find a better strategy.

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
  9. Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by quantumphaze · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the IOS concentration camp, Android bootloader lockdown, and Windows Phone 7 copying everything that we hated about IOS it looks like a bleak future for anyone who wants to do cool stuff with their phone beyond the simple apps you get on the common platforms. If Nokia abandons MeeGo with this deal then any hope we have of being able to get new phones with the same freedom as the N900 will be fed to the meat grinder.

    Looks like I will have to take great care of my N900. It's the first and last of it's kind.

    1. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by bemymonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Android bootloader lockdown? What? Just stop buying Motorola devices and all will be fine... you've still got HTC and Samsung building decent phones with completely open bootloaders.

    2. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to the German Spiegel, Alberto Torres (responsible board member for MeeGo) just left the board. So yeah, MeeGo is basically left for dead.

    3. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by TiberiusMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apart from Google selling root friendly Android phones, as well as some small independent handset makers selling root friendly Android phones, HTC selling phones that can be rooted with a mouse click and the only actual handset maker to back up your claim of locking down the bootloader that I know of is Motorolla. Also Microsoft is embracing the hacker community over Windows 7 phone thus far. So yeah, other than all those phones.

    4. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think we all know what "microsoft embrace" is followed by.

    5. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by Merk42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as there are Nexus phones, and considering those are the phones Google itself uses, I don't see those going away any time soon.

    6. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with Android, IMO, is that the entire ecosystem composing it and much of what surrounds it is entirely insular, and to no great benefit.

      It shares no common libraries or interfaces with what you find in most Linux distributions. It uses a unique libc that no other distribution uses. It uses a file system layout that is not found anywhere else. Its GUI rendering subsystem is completely unique and incompatible with all others.

      The end result is that changes to Android stay within the Android system and do not benefit open source projects outside of it. And projects outside of it require heavy rewrites to work, at all, on Android. Not to mention that Android has no real repository type system, so you're left trading .apk files and latching on to the market, which is only available on the default builds of some devices and not at all on others.

      Maemo was developed with that compatibility in mind, and is a large part of the reason I bought it. It was most of what the OpenMoko Freerunner tried to be, and MeeGo only improved the openness aspect of it. MeeGo allowed mobile devices to retain continuity with the rest of the open source ecosystem you find in most desktop Linux systems, thus changes and improvements to both ends benefits everyone. In addition, it removed the non-device-specific closed bits and created a platform independent of any one handset vendor.

      Android leaves you a second (or more likely, third) class citizen in this effort, as the AOSP does not, last I checked, flow upstream into the Android core and the AOSP only receives the latest changes to Android after it's been delivered to device manufacturers (see Honeycomb and Motorola.)

      So this is very much a Microsoft victory against Open Source, if not Free Software, projects in the mobile space. And Android is not a way forward that is very fair to end users and non-corporate developers.

    7. Re:Rest in piece, hacker friendly mobile future by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not even close to the same thing. At least a Nexus has a reasonable open OS that can do real multitasking.

  10. The Register's view on this by ctid · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  11. Nail in the coffin by muzicman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess that the N900 is the last Nokia that I will ever own.

    Out of the choices of operating systems to go for, why on earth did they choose Windows over Android? What were they thinking? They would have hammered the iPhone in a year or two if they had chosen Android.

    They really need their heads examining.

    Glad I don't have shares in Nokia.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flamebait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  12. Free Cellphone Company for MS, nice work Elop. by guidryp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Elop will certainly go down as a Hero for Microsoft, he managed to give Microsoft everything it would want from a Nokia Purchase, but without spending a dime.

    No small coincidence that he is a former Microsoftie.

  13. Re:Nokia's last gasp by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would offer a different theory:

    Imagine you're a theoretical large speculative investor. You talk to microsoft and nokia leaders, through investing money in both. You make a deal where MS shill is hired as a nokia CEO when nokia is ailing, with the ultimate goal of dismantling the company, selling it's devices-making part to MS and putting the rest under hammer.

    How much would MS be willing to pay you off for the nokia stock that will allow you to get such shill elected as CEO and essentially save their dead on arrival WP7? I imagine we'd be talking quite a bit of profit. MS benefits from this in every way, nokia will likely get dismantled into pieces and sold off with those behind the deal walking off with hefty profit and execs with their golden parachutes.

    Just a theory of course.

  14. Re:"Alliance"? by menkhaura · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I hate to say it but $CURRENT_MOBILE_MICROSOFT_OS is great (unlike prior versions)".

    Time and again I read this, and time and again people don't ever learn.

    --
    Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
    Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  15. Re:Nokia's last gasp by contrapunctus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who's going to want a Nokia phone running Windows?

    Er...me?

    is it lonely?

  16. Microsoftâ(TM)s previous strategic mobile par by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This article gives a very good overview of Microsoft's previous strategic partners and how well each one of them ended.

    (it's currently missing Sendo and Ericsson although the author has indicated that he'll update it to include them soon)

    Personally I think it would be a good thing to have iOS, Android, WebOS and Windows Phone thriving in the marketplace as it means that each one will be forced to innovate to stay relevant - which can only be a good thing for the consumer.

    However on the basis of Microsoft's past performance, I wish Nokia the very best of luck as they are going to need a lot of it.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  17. Re:"Alliance"? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll come out and say Windows Mobile was better than WP7.

    Why?

    You could install whatever you wanted and develop freely for WinMo. WP7 is an iOS-like locked-down sack of shit.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  18. Re:Nokia's last gasp by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nokia's strategy was doing nothing be hemorrhaging market share and money for the past several years. They were pretty much screwed on the road they were heading down so moving over to another that may seem just as precarious doesn't leave them much worse off, especially if it works out in the long run.

    Here's an analysis of this along with some nice charts that show how iOS and Android have really eaten Nokia's lunch over the past few years. Their stock has dropped from around $40 per share in 2007 to $10 in 2011. The only people who had faith that they were doing the right thing were the /. crowd.

    MeeGo has already been plagued by serious delays and there was no indication that when it did ship everything would magically work. It's easy to point to this new deal and say that MeeGo got axed, but couldn't it be the other way around? It's just as possible that MeeGo was behind schedule and wouldn't be ready for a release for a few more quarters and even then would still need a lot of work to get it up to snuff. The /. crowd might have put up with that, but the mass market consumers would have hated it.

    I don't know whether this move will pan out for Nokia. From my point of view it's more beneficial to Microsoft. However, Nokia needed to do something because they were watching the rest of the market move past and weren't able to respond. Maybe this deal ends up killing them, but they were probably dead either way.