Slashdot Mirror


Are We Too Reliant On GPS?

RedEaredSlider writes "A new report from the Royal Academy of Engineering in London suggests developed nations have become too reliant on GPS systems. The report from the Academy focuses on global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) and their vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities include deliberate or accidental interference, both man-made (such as jamming) and natural (such as solar flares). While most people equate GPS systems with the tiny screens which get drivers from point A to point B, the report says society's reliance on the technology goes well beyond that. The Academy says the range of applications using the technology is so vast that without adequate independent backup, signal failure or interference could potentially affect safety systems and other critical parts of the economy."

325 comments

  1. Yes absolutely by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    VOR/DME is still the way to go. ADF will get you by in a pinch, but it can throw you a real curve ball sometimes.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Yes absolutely by ghjm · · Score: 1

      I don't see why we ever upgraded from four course radios.

    2. Re:Yes absolutely by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      Too many VORs are getting dismantled in order to save money. I don't think there ever was sufficient ground level VOR coverage to act as any kind of a GPS backup. Nation/world wide LORAN coverage might be an option, but gridded WAAS might be better.

    3. Re:Yes absolutely by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Yeah, LORAN was the option back in the day. The thing is now we can use whatever we have and use inertial nav as a very reliable backup. I see no real problem, except for military targeting. The rest of us should be able to find our way home. At the same time, I can imagine the yuppie panic in the city, getting lost on the way back from the 7/11. That'll teach 'em not to leave bread crumbs.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    4. Re:Yes absolutely by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Funny

      We used a compass, road map, and a watch, in an open cockpit flying through a snow squall.. at night.. and we liked it!

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    5. Re:Yes absolutely by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I don't see why we ever upgraded from four course radios.

      Those seem like a clever idea for the time.

    6. Re:Yes absolutely by Bucc5062 · · Score: 2

      As a backup yes, but the genie is out of the bottle and if the FAA gets its way, you'll see VOR being phased out. What would be interesting is if we could get navigation via CPS, Cell Positioning System. Everyone one of those cell tower out there puts out radio waves. Why not a receiver that can triangulate on multiple towers to determine a position, ADF on steroids. It strikes me that the basic technology is out there to process the signals into a position. The receiver may need to have a database of tower locations, the towers would need to send out a ID signal, but with that I figure the accuracy would be damn good. As a long time inactive pilot I have not seen the inside of a GA airplane, but more and more panels are phasing out dials and nav radios.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    7. Re:Yes absolutely by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "VOR/DME is still the way to go. ADF will get you by in a pinch, but it can throw you a real curve ball sometimes."

      Youngsters with their fancy gadgets.

      Back in my day we had a Perspex astrodome, a sextant and a compass and we were GRATEFUL for them.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Yes absolutely by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      What would be interesting is if we could get navigation via CPS, Cell Positioning System. Everyone one of those cell tower out there puts out radio waves. Why not a receiver that can triangulate on multiple towers to determine a position, ADF on steroids.

      Google Maps has used this method of geolocation for phones that lack GPS for a long time now. The problem is that it's not terribly accurate. It's usually sufficient to narrow you down to within a block or so, but not much better than that. It might work for general navigation, but it's not good enough to correctly identify the address of the building you're in, for example.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:Yes absolutely by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult to get VOR/DME or even ADF over the ocean. LORAN was turned off on August 2010 so limited but the last global terrestrial radio navigation system shutdown . eLORAN is active in UK but that is limited to that area now. We need another method of global terrestrial radio navigation system to augment GNSS if there was some problem with satellites due to solar activity or other issues.

    10. Re:Yes absolutely by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Also, I think navigation via cellular triangulation only works to pinpoint you on a 2-D map. It tells you nothing about elevation. A quality GPS receiver could tell you which floor of a building you're on, for example.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    11. Re:Yes absolutely by IICV · · Score: 1

      The receiver may need to have a database of tower locations, the towers would need to send out a ID signal, but with that I figure the accuracy would be damn good. As a long time inactive pilot I have not seen the inside of a GA airplane, but more and more panels are phasing out dials and nav radios.

      As long as you're hard-coding an ID signal, why not have them send out their exact position too? After all, GPS works most of the time, so there's no reason not to set the cell's current location using it. No frequently updated database needed in devices, no need for device providers to interoperate with carriers.

    12. Re:Yes absolutely by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      This is where I disagree. GPS in phones in not accurate because business has not seen the need, nore the cost to build that level of capability into a device. With GSP, when you got three Sats back when it was a big deal to be /- 100 ft, today we pull many more signals and got accuracy down to tens of feet; enough for gps displays to adjust the visual to always keep you on the "road".

      With the number of towers visible by a receiver, I would postulate that a dedicated receiver could multi-angulate to a rather precise position. It could even do this in 3D. We think 2D because that is all we are use too with cell *phones*. A cell positioning device could have more capability via programming to do the same thing as GPS. Besides, altitude with GPS is absolute, not relative to pressure which is how it is reported and designated on aviation maps. ( as I remember, one number tells you the altitude you'll hit the tower, the other tells you how far you'll fall).

      Like anything these days, innovation is driven more by money or necessity, not curiosity. I freely admit I do not have the knowledge, capability, or capital to try this out, but in my gut, I know it would work and work accurately.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    13. Re:Yes absolutely by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Yes! and the receiver can store that so even if the GPS went out, it has that last known position. If the system queries and sees change it can then update the internal DB.

      See, get enough smart people thinking of solutions and all sorts of things can be solved. Dang, I would love to have money to try this out. It is a cool idea and uses two disparate technologies in complement to support our systems.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    14. Re:Yes absolutely by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      Compass? we used a magnetized pin pushed into a cork floating on water to navigate!

    15. Re:Yes absolutely by skids · · Score: 1

      A quality GPS receiver could tell you which floor of a building you're on

      If GPS worked reliably indoors.

      Really all cell phones need is a better suite of gyros/accelerometers to give high precision dead reckoning along with the tower system for continuous calibration. I'd say that you'd want to watch the wifi survey equipment makers to see that tech coming down the pipe, but incredibly, they don't seem to be working on it.

    16. Re:Yes absolutely by msauve · · Score: 1

      Meh. The reliance on NAVSTAR GPS is why Russia is working to complete GLOSNOSS, Europe is deploying Galileo, and China is building COMPASS.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    17. Re:Yes absolutely by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      A quality GPS receiver could tell you which floor of a building you're on

      If GPS worked reliably indoors.

      Which it does for a quality GPS receiver.

      I have a unit that works just fine indoors, although it's got a slower time to first fix than when it has stronger signals. Once it has good signals, though, nothing seems to bother it. It's only real fault is that it is just a GPS receiver (no software), so it's at the mercy of the software for many things (like getting a fix after it has been turned off and moved thousands of miles before being turned back on).

      It's wasn't very expensive, either. Look for any GPS with the "Sirf Star III" chipset.

    18. Re:Yes absolutely by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "It might work for general navigation, but it's not good enough to correctly identify the address of the building you're in, for example."

      You might try to look at the number on the front door for that.

    19. Re:Yes absolutely by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Compass? we used a magnetized pin pushed into a cork floating on water to navigate!"

      And a pendulum clock, don't forget the pendulum clock.

    20. Re:Yes absolutely by lgw · · Score: 1

      Actually, that would still be a great fallback except for one tiny thing: that compass doesn't work reliably any more. Areas of "magnetic anomoly" are large and growing, as the Earth's magnetic field starts to reverse, and as unreliable as GPS might be, magnetic North is becoming even less reliable.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Yes absolutely by lgw · · Score: 1

      Clock? We navigated the oceans using only rum, buggery, and the lash!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Yes absolutely by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      So you're the crazy SOB who decapitated the neighbor kid's snowman!

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    23. Re:Yes absolutely by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The lack of accuracy is a timing issue: You navigate by timing the radio signals from each tower to calculate distance, but to measure the time delay you need to know when the pulse was sent from the tower- only you don't because the computer directing the transmitter has other tasks that affect pulse timing. For this to be used as an accurate navigation system you've got to add a precision timer circuit, with some sort of central control to coordinate them. Also note that some regions don't have cellphone coverage (losing nav feed at night in a storm, could be a problem).

    24. Re:Yes absolutely by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      You might try to look at the number on the front door for that.

      Ah, but then you've gone outside, and you've fallen into their trap!

      Seriously, though, when I said "for general navigation," I mean the kind of thing where I want to find the nearest Pizza Hut, Point A to Point B. But for other kinds of geolocation applications, you might want a finer-grained result. The military and law enforcement applications are obvious (can't exactly check the number on the front door once you're chasing somebody through a building). But there are commercial applications, too. Suppose you're in a mall, and you want to know how to get from where you are now to the Old Navy store. A forward-thinking mall might provide an app for that. But if your location data is only accurate to within 1,000m and it doesn't include elevation, that application won't work -- at least, not any better than looking at the big plastic map in the courtyard. (Mind you, my phone gets pretty crappy GPS reception most of the time, but when it's working well it can pinpoint me to within 4m.)

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    25. Re:Yes absolutely by petman · · Score: 1

      Suppose you're in a mall, and you want to know how to get from where you are now to the Old Navy store. A forward-thinking mall might provide an app for that.

      Nah, I don't think any mall would do that, even though I believe it's possible with current technology. The thing is, malls want their customers to look around and stumble into multiple stores instead of staring at your PDA/smartphone screen and going straight from store A to store B, bypassing all the other stores in between.

    26. Re:Yes absolutely by petman · · Score: 1

      I put this down to the number of satellites that a particular GPS receiver needs to see in order to get a location lock. My previous SonyEricsson phone needed only 4 satelites to get a location lock, but my current Android phone needs a minimum of 6. I'm curious to know why.

    27. Re:Yes absolutely by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      How about Wide Area Multilateration? It is being used in the Sydney terminal area for high precision tracking.

    28. Re:Yes absolutely by Sparrow1492 · · Score: 1

      Actually, GPS is designed to work with 4 satellites. More just get you a better signal.

    29. Re:Yes absolutely by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      Yup. All of which will be toast courtesy of the same solar flare which takes out GPS. Any other bright ideas?

    30. Re:Yes absolutely by delt0r · · Score: 1

      You have a citation for that? Because from my Geo physics courses, the reversal is quick on geological timescales... ie 1000-10000 of years. Its not expect to "flip" in anything under the order of 10000 years.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    31. Re:Yes absolutely by delt0r · · Score: 1

      The very definition of common mode failure. However a flare of that magnitude is exceptionally rare. These are hardened sats. For the most part a flare will reduce there operational lifetime rather than destroy them outright. A few days of missing GPS will not be the end of the world.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    32. Re:Yes absolutely by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Is that why women are so comfortable shopping whereas men hate it? A woman goes to the mall to shop spends three hours, and comes home with 10x what they went to buy. A man goes to the mall, spends 15 minutes and might come home with 2x what they intended. Different personalities.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    33. Re:Yes absolutely by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Also, Cell signals, as they are traveling at a low angle to the ground (nearly parallel) run into multi-path and more interference (trees, buildings, etc.) then do GPS from overhead. This has a drastic effect on the signal timing and causes most of the positional error. Also, you don't know the signal strength that is set on the tower, so timing advance can be rather tricky as well. You can get some accuracy, but there is only so much.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    34. Re:Yes absolutely by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Like this?
      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/12/1215_051215_north_pole.html

      - not a reversal. But it's being blamed for some of the recent migratory bird mass deaths.

    35. Re:Yes absolutely by delt0r · · Score: 1
      1,100km over 100 years is hardly matching the statement

      that compass doesn't work reliably any more. Areas of "magnetic anomoly" are large and growing.."

      now does it. In fact even with the current level of "acceleration" it is still only .36 deg a year. Sure you can't go 10000km on a single bearing with that. But then regardless you never should.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    36. Re:Yes absolutely by macpacheco · · Score: 1

      WAAS is great, but it's even more vulnerable than GPS, since WAAS GEO broadcasts run at 5x higher bit speed (250bps versus 50bps), without a stronger signal broadcast.
      The true only solution that would be able to really mitigate jamming/spoofing would be a ground based signal, like LORAN or Pseudolites.
      With the availability of CSACs (Chip Scale Atomic Clocks), pseudo autonomous Pseudolites become a very, very interesting alternative. Those Pseudolites would maintain accuracy even a couple hours after a jamming/spoofing starts, and even 24hrs after would still be broadcasting with better accuracy than VOR/DME, since with an onboard compact atomic clock they would be able to detect spoofing and go autonomous in case of spoofing/jamming (using its internal atomic clock) resuming clock updates after the spoofing/jamming goes away.
      Since a pseudolite is in a fixed position on the ground, all it needs is an accurate clock synched to GPS time to operate.
      Since their signal would have no ionospheric interference, and their much stronger signal would allow for less multipath issues, they could offer sub meter accuracy as a normal accuracy standard.
      If those pseudolites were to be collocated with cell phone towers, they could conceivably use ground based means to receive UTC time, like using cell companies fiber to receive clocking from a central atomic clock source.
      Some of those studies have been made, but they don't reflect the availability of relatively cheap chip sized atomic clocks. They base themselves on pseudolites that don't have an internal atomic clock.

    37. Re:Yes absolutely by macpacheco · · Score: 1

      True unless you need to land using an LPV approach (ILS like approaches using WAAS or EGNOS).
      Once GPS signals go dark, accuracy goes out the window very fast.
      Most INS degrade at least a half a mile after one hour.
      If jamming/spoofing is localized, if weather is bad, they could be redirected.
      Right now aviation isn't a critical issue as VOR/DME/ILS are still 99.9% there.
      It looks like the FAA isn't going to decommission a lot of VOR and DMEs until GPS L5 is fully operational.

    38. Re:Yes absolutely by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      GPS will also work with signals from just 3 satellites if the software makes some assumptions about where you are (usually based on where you were when it had a full fix).

  2. Of course.... by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 0

    We relay on Technology to the thinking way to much these days. GPS is just another way to not take person responsibly.

    1. Re:Of course.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      What are you trying to argue, that people shouldn't be using tools? One of your distant ancestors could have just as easily claimed that flint knives are just another way to not take responsibility for mammoth killing.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Of course.... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      the engadget pictures speaks for itself
      http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/08/early-mid-week-shocker-research-says-we-are-overly-reliant-on-g/

      I have traveled down some roads which the GPS says are continuous state roads but are closer 4 wheeler trails.
      The GPS makes no claim to accuracy of the maps they provide. There is nothing quite like being out in a storm only to find out that the short cut your GPS maps show as roads are really dirt trails.

      It happens far to often. It is why I don't rely on GPS. Useful yes, but in a jam I have two eyes, two ears and a brain between them

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Of course.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Mind repeating that in English?

      It is not my first language either, but I have no idea what you are trying to say.

    4. Re:Of course.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That is a problem with the maps you were using not GPS. GPS is Global Positioning System, it just tells you where you are and that is it.

    5. Re:Of course.... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      This is nothing to do with road navigation.

      It has everything to do with all the other systems using GPS: the thing that tracks the location of your important parcel, or keeps the "Next train in 5 minutes" indicator accurate, or synchronises the clock on something.

    6. Re:Of course.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that's a problem exclusive to GPS. You could just as easily be following directions from a gas station map that has the same trail labeled as a state route. GPS didn't invent map errors.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    7. Re:Of course.... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2

      Geez dude. Maybe you should learn to rely on spellcheck.

      "relay" should by rely.
      Technology is not capitalized.
      "to the thinking way"... I think you left out the word "do".
      "to much" should be "too much".
      "person" should be "personal".
      "responsibly" should be "responsibility".

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    8. Re:Of course.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me. With corrections, I believe that was: "We [rely] on technology to [do] the thinking way [too] much these days. GPS is just another way to not take [personal responsibility]"

    9. Re:Of course.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We rely on technology to do the thinking way too much these days. GPS is just another way to not take personal responsibly.

      It's either clever or ironic that your comments illustrate the problem so well. Good job either way.

    10. Re:Of course.... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      What are you trying to argue, that people shouldn't be using tools?

      Tools should be used, but assumed to sometimes be fallible. Now live by that and you'll probably be fine. :p

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    11. Re:Of course.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez dude. Maybe you should learn to rely on spellcheck.

      Spellcheck wouldn't actually catch any of those

    12. Re:Of course.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Thank you

    13. Re:Of course.... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Phone networks - both landline and mobile - use GPS. Without GPS, there's no way to precisely sync up timeslots in TDMA backhaul.

    14. Re:Of course.... by vlm · · Score: 1

      Without GPS, there's no way to precisely sync up timeslots in TDMA backhaul.

      That sounds a little pessimistic. You mean at this moment there are no deployed time sources that will work.

      To keep our morse code circuits aligned (just kidding) we had Cesium clocks, Rb clocks, etc. Cough up the dough and you can have very accurate time.

      I'd have to look at the specs, but a really good ovenized xtal might be good enough for TDMA. By really good I don't mean the cheapest dip oscillator money can buy from the cheapest vendor. Think more like the "frequency west bricks" of ye olden days.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    15. Re:Of course.... by jefe7777 · · Score: 2

      You forgot the period on the end of your sentence. Maybe you should learn to rely on spellcheck.

    16. Re:Of course.... by SuperSlacker64 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean grammar check?

    17. Re:Of course.... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's Satnav, not GPS. Regardless of what the sign says.

    18. Re:Of course.... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That is a problem with the maps you were using not GPS. GPS is Global Positioning System, it just tells you where you are and that is it.

      Well, there you go again trying to inject facts into a perfectly good discussion about why "technology" is to blame.

      Say, is there an open source project for creating road maps? Since GPS information is pretty much available for free, and lots of Android devices have GPSes built in, it seems like the wiki approach would be great for this purpose. Of course, it would require users to be aware of the risks of people vandalizing maps and putting in roads where there are no roads, but I'd be willing to handle that risk. There are ways for increasing the dependability of open source information.

      I bet there's already something like this going on, but I'm just too clueless to know about it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Of course.... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You just made me google "ovenized", "frequency west bricks" and "xtal".

      Thanks.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Of course.... by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Which sentence is missing a full stop? Or am I missing a pun or reference or something?

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    21. Re:Of course.... by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      We relay (sic) on Technology to [do?] the thinking way to (sic) much these days. GPS is just another way to not take person (sic) responsibly (sic).

      Grammar checkers are just another way to not take responsibility for our engrish.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    22. Re:Of course.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a great general rule but it really has nothing to do with GPS.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    23. Re:Of course.... by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      The GPS makes no claim to accuracy of the maps they provide.

      This is why it would be cool to put trackers on all the cars so that very accurate maps could be automatically drawn and redrawn indicating traffic flow. Oh, but there's that thing...

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    24. Re:Of course.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yep, openstreetmap.org.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    25. Re:Of course.... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I read these types of stories more along the lines of, "Did you know how much you use GPS?",

      This is a useful question with lots of technologies as they become ubiquitous. Its a good gut check for some people who don't think about things like what happens if GPS won't work for some reason? Its stupid to not use a tool, after all if you are not going to use it why have the tool at all. Still if you drive places you are not familiar with and use the GPS to get you there that is great but it might be a good idea keep a road atlas under the seat just in case, the sat nav stops working for any reason.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    26. Re:Of course.... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

      I believe you are looking for:
      http://www.openstreetmap.org/

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    27. Re:Of course.... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      whoooooooosh!

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    28. Re:Of course.... by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      According to another fine article I saw yesterday (don't recall where but googling yesterday's news should turn it up), when GPS goes down or gets jammed, cell phones stop working. Apparently they use GPS time signals to synchronize hand-offs between towers or something. Also ATMs stop working (they rely on GPS time stamps for transaction codes, and may use encryption dependent on timestamps obtained by GPS). Also entire electric grids can be brought to their knees (GPS time is used to synchronize phase between different grid segments).

      I guess I'll now read TFA to see if it mentions any of this stuff that AFA talked about....

      --
      Will
    29. Re:Of course.... by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      That there are no alternative time sources currently deployed that would work as a backup for GPS strikes me as being a little too optimistic about the situation. Simply knowing that such solutions could be put to work does nothing to bring the level of optimism down to a realistic range.

      I suggest that in addition to brushing off the ancient ways of doing things, a little more pessimism needs to be injected into the system.

      And remember that Murphy was an optimist.

      --
      Will
    30. Re:Of course.... by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is using (sic) becoming more and more snarky? Nah, must just be me, I can't imagine grammar and spelling nazi's being snarky.

    31. Re:Of course.... by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      (they rely on GPS time stamps for transaction codes, and may use encryption dependent on timestamps obtained by GPS).

      i don't think this is true. ATMs often sit on the bottom level of a multistory building in which they can't get GPS signal. so i doubt its a requirement for most ATMs.

    32. Re:Of course.... by sphealey · · Score: 1

      > It has everything to do with all the other systems using GPS: the thing
      > that tracks the location of your important parcel, or keeps the "Next train in
      > 5 minutes" indicator accurate, or synchronises the clock on something.

      Synchrophasor measurement units, which are being integrated into the power grid for a number of reasons ("smart" and old-fashioned operational as well), are heavily dependent on a GPS timing signal.

      sPh

    33. Re:Of course.... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Why not? I've had an axe head fly off the handle, a blender motor burn out, and a GPS receiver take 30 minutes to figure out my location. The respective workarounds are to make sure nobody else is near the axe, keep a wire whisk handy, and know how to use a map & compass.

      Using secondary solutions is a basic part of robust engineering. With regards to GPS, each piece of GPS-using technology can use an appropriate backup system. For something that only needs to know its approximate position, like tracking a shipped package, the cellular phone network can be used. For ships, LORAN may be acceptable (if not for the fact that it's being shut down in North America). For trains or other vehicles on a fixed route, local beacons or even visual recognition may be sufficient. For all such applications, it may even be acceptable to simply use another satellite navigation system in the future. Regardless, all engineers working on a GPS-using project should be asking themselves "what happens if this fails?" constantly. The results of not asking such questions can be lethal.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    34. Re:Of course.... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      technology is not capitalized.

      FTFY

    35. Re:Of course.... by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Duh and/or hello, being snarky is 90% of the reason to use this site.

    36. Re:Of course.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean it didn't apply to GPS at all, just that as general rule it doesn't apply to GPS any more or any less then it applies to things like axes and blenders.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    37. Re:Of course.... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      This is not really correct. CDMA for example is not really affected. GSM doesn't need it that accurate and for the most part does not use GPS time signals, not to mention that they do have good local clocks and PPL. There are some methods that use it, but IIRC they don't really *need* it.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  3. Uh, no. by Rurik · · Score: 0

    GPS is just the latest iteration of navigational assistance. Before it was Google Map printouts. And before that was AAA trip books. And then hand-written maps and directions given over the phone. And it goes on. Think of "Go down about two sees and look for a red barn, then turn left." How are any of these different from a GPS? What happens if the barn fell down, or was painted, or was too dark to see?

    Each has the same issue of the driver not intelligently understanding when things go different from what the directions in front of them say. Overall, GPS does help because it means no longer stopping to ask for directions.

    I can't see it being a bad thing to become reliant on a technology to help you from getting lost.

    1. Re:Uh, no. by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will make the same comment I make every time we debate technology's superiority to paper:

      I cannot remember the last time my map crashed. It may be inaccurate (but so may GPS), it may be out of date (but so may GPS), it may not be intuitive (but so may GPS). But when I turn too fast and pull the plug out of the lighter socket, my paper map will still work. When some jerk is driving next to me with non-FCC licensed equipment drowning out the GPS band, my paper map will still work. It doesn't call out turns a mile ahead, it doesn't show up-to-the-thirty-minutes-ago traffic, all it does is show me where I am and I can use my brain to figure out where I'm going.

      A GPS is superior to a map but does not replace it, and becoming reliant on a GPS to the point where I do not consult or bring a paper map is foolhardy.

      --

      Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    2. Re:Uh, no. by Duradin · · Score: 1

      You don't see any problems with becoming reliant on receiving realtime directions while having no personal knowledge of where you are and how to get where you are going?

      The person who walked into traffic because the GPS didn't tell them they weren't in a safe area for pedestrians to waltz across the road should be a warning not an example to follow.

    3. Re:Uh, no. by BrianRoach · · Score: 1

      They key word you used is "assistance". If that's all it is to you, you're fine. I actually rarely use it, even though I have it on my phone. My biggest use is to center the map on my location because that's convenient.

      If you don't know how to read a map, or figure out which direction is North, it's no longer "assistance". It's the only method of navigation you understand.

    4. Re:Uh, no. by dkleinsc · · Score: 0

      The problem (which was discussed in great detail yesterday) is that people are using GPS for, among other things, reliably ascertaining the time of day. So it's not just the latest iteration of navigational assistance like it should be.

      And as somebody who used to write software for GPS units, they most definitely have their flaws: Among other things, they can't distinguish between "really pleasant parkway" and "next to a sewage treatment plant".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:Uh, no. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      GPS receivers break, their batteries die, they are subject to interference. I use them all the time, but I also have a paper map in the trunk.

      The difference between the spoken directions (lowest tech) and the GPS is that if the GPS breaks I have no idea where I'm going from there, and probably can't find my way back because I've been focusing on a GPS screen and not viewable landmarks. In your example, if I've driven five sees and I haven't encountered a barn, I can backtrack about three sees and look more carefully for a barn. And if the barn is torn down, chances are I can try the two or three roads at the second see and start looking for the next landmark.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:Uh, no. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      A GPS is superior to a map but does not replace it, and becoming reliant on a GPS to the point where I do not consult or bring a paper map is foolhardy.

      And this is exactly why society or the economy won't come crashing down if GPS fails. In most cases we can and will switch to less convenient but more reliable tech.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:Uh, no. by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you had, y'know, read the article (or even the summary) you would've seen them point out that the issue is not whether John Q. Driver can get from place to place, but how there are a lot of invisible applications, like synchronizing the US power grid, that have grown to rely on GPS. Those are the things that are in danger from intentional or unintentional jamming, no one cares about navigation.

      The worst part about this is that the solution is not as easy as this article makes it out to be. GPS signals have to be as weak as they are by design- you just can't get much more transmitting power into those satellites, and while LORAN might help, I don't think it has the accuracy either in positioning or in timing that a lot of applications need. It does highlight the necessity for these devices to "fail gracefully" instead of catastrophically though.

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    8. Re:Uh, no. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The exact argument is we're becoming too comfortable with tech and leaving off old-school thinking.

    9. Re:Uh, no. by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      Not to be a total ass, but a map doesn't actually show you where you are. You have to determine your own location on the map.

      I agree that a map won't fail in the same ways a GPS unit will fail, but your argument isn't really a fair argument. An outdoor GPS works in the rain, a map gets wet and turns to mush. A GPS takes much less room to store more map data. A GPS won't have small tears at the edges and folds.

      Each method for location has its' own strengths and weaknesses. Use the correct tool for the job.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    10. Re:Uh, no. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Meh, as long as you don't blindly follow GPS directions it's fine to rely on it for driving. Now for situations that could endanger my life (backwoods hiking or mountain climbing or sea kayaking) I don't even start with GPS but use a simple compass and waterproof map that I've studied before starting my trip (should I lose the map).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Uh, no. by cdrguru · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I guess you haven't heard about all of the things that are actually reliant on GPS. Sure, it is used for consumer navigation and that could easily be replaced with a paper map.

      But, did you know that the 60Hz synchronization of electrical generation in the US is reliant on GPS clocks? Lose GPS and the synch will drift and this results in disconnecting from the grid. I.e., power failures. I believe the previous synchronization systems were primarily manual tuning which was happily thrown out completely when the GPS clocking was available. No, nobody can go back now. At least not without some pretty significant down time.

      And of course we are working up to a aircraft navigation and control system that will be 100% reliant on GPS. No GPS = planes do not take off. Not just passenger planes but also all air cargo.

      Ships at sea used to use LORAN but the US Coast Guard has been dismantling the LORAN system they maintained. I believe it is gone now, so there is no going back.

      Most of the stratum-1 NTP clocks (keeping the Internet clocks synchronized) are driven from GPS today. Not atomic reference clocks and not radios receiving WWV signals but GPS. Think about how much fun it is to synchronize databases when the system clocks aren't in agreement.

      Are you getting the picture? GPS is used for way, way more than consumer navigation in cars. Lose the GPS system and today there is no backup and no possibility of continuing without some pretty major hiccups.

    12. Re:Uh, no. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I believe LORAN is gone. The US Coast Guard used to maintain the system worldwide - a friend of mine was stationed at a LORAN station in both Alaska and later in Japan, but they have shut down so many of the stations (if not all of them now) that is it unusable in many placed. If not all of them.

    13. Re:Uh, no. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      A GPS is superior to a map but does not replace it, and becoming reliant on a GPS to the point where I do not consult or bring a paper map is foolhardy.

      Are you in danger of using a GPS so much you'll forget how to read a map?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Uh, no. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Except that GPS is used for a bunch of other things, one of the biggies being time synchronisation - it's a cheap easy way to know the time. The basically same story from yesterday linked to http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20202-gps-chaos-how-a-30-box-can-jam-your-life.html?page=1 which has this gem:

      In 2010, he conducted an experiment in the North Sea, aboard the THV Galatea, a 500-tonne ship. The Galatea is the pride of its fleet, with all the latest navigation equipment. Last wanted to find out how it would cope without GPS. So he used a simple jamming device that overwhelmed the GPS signal by broadcasting noise on the same frequency as the satellites.

      When Last activated the jammer, the ship went haywire. According to the electronic display on the ship's bridge, the Galatea was suddenly flying at Mach speeds over northern Europe and Ireland. Then alarms sounded. The ship's navigation backup – its gyrocompass – crashed, because it uses GPS to provide corrections. The radar did the same. Even the ship's satellite communications failed, because GPS points the antenna in the right direction.

      So the backups failed, because they relied on GPS in ways nobody had bothered to think about.

    15. Re:Uh, no. by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      You need a compass and landmarks to determine where on the map you are. Maps are available both laminated and printed on water proof material. This will also be resistant to tearing. Not every map is like the one you got at disneyland last summer.

    16. Re:Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot remember the last time my map crashed.

      I've been using in-car satnavs since 2004. I've never had one actually crash on me. I've never used one of the cheapo off-brand models though.

      But when I turn too fast and pull the plug out of the lighter socket, my paper map will still work.

      As will the satnav. Even the earliest models I've used has had at least an hour of life on its internal battery, and most recent ones have much more. Even if I didn't notice and it went flat, it's not like it's permanently dead. I can still connect it back in, and do so with less attention diverted from driving than reading a paper map.

      When some jerk is driving next to me with non-FCC licensed equipment drowning out the GPS band, my paper map will still work.

      Again, in 7 years I've never had this happen. Even if it did, how long is he likely to be in jamming range? I can always pull over if I'm totally lost without it.

      Being able to read a paper map is still a useful skill, but a lot of your concerns about satnavs are completely unfounded. Yes, there'll always be idiots that follow the instructions to drive off a cliff, but that's less likely than a driver getting into an accident by having a paper map unfolded across the dash and blocking their view. I'd like to see some statistics for how many accidents that caused 10 years ago compared to now, I bet it's less than GPS related accidents.

    17. Re:Uh, no. by MDMurphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I will make the same comment I make every time we debate technology's superiority to paper:

      I cannot remember the last time my map crashed. It may be inaccurate (but so may GPS), it may be out of date (but so may GPS), it may not be intuitive (but so may GPS). But when I turn too fast and pull the plug out of the lighter socket, my paper map will still work. When some jerk is driving next to me with non-FCC licensed equipment drowning out the GPS band, my paper map will still work. It doesn't call out turns a mile ahead, it doesn't show up-to-the-thirty-minutes-ago traffic, all it does is show me where I am and I can use my brain to figure out where I'm going.

      A GPS is superior to a map but does not replace it, and becoming reliant on a GPS to the point where I do not consult or bring a paper map is foolhardy.

      It's obvious that you're part of the group who incorrectly thinks GPS is that magic box which tells you were to aim your car. If you'd read ( and understood ) the article you might have seen this one sentence:

      In the U.K., on top of satellite navigation, GNSS is used for data networks, financial systems, shipping and air transport, agriculture, railways and emergency services.

      The biggest problem if GPS were disrupted would *not* be hoards of tourists stopping to ask for directions.

    18. Re:Uh, no. by vlm · · Score: 1

      while LORAN might help

      Only via a seance. LORAN is dead. Omega too. Omega was cool. Still have WWVB and WWV out in Colorado.

      There is no particular reason why you couldn't re implement GPS using ground mounted atomic clocks and a bunch of towers. Conveniently, we have an infrastructure of cellphone towers neatly mapping with civilization, also providing coverage to big cities.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    19. Re:Uh, no. by GigG · · Score: 1

      I believe you are wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LORAN

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    20. Re:Uh, no. by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      You need a compass and landmarks to determine where on the map you are.

      You've grown too reliant on technology if you need the compass.

    21. Re:Uh, no. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No, it is just the next step down, after that you can fall back to stars or just landmarks, etc. Each step back gets you a little less accuracy and easy of use.

    22. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      A satnav (which is what you mean, not GPS) safely gives you navigational information whilst driving. A map doesn't unless you have a passenger. You have to stop to safely use a paper map. And that's a problem on a motorway.

      For sure, it's a good idea to have a paper map in the glove box in case the satnav lets you down. But so far the satnav has never let me down. Well at least once I worked out that it was best to set it for "fastest" or "most economical", not "shortest".

    23. Re:Uh, no. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Critical infrastructure could just use a more sensitive and precise antenna.

      I'm not sure what in the grid would require synchronizing based on GPS. It's not like the stations and control centers ever move.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Uh, no. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "that will be 100% reliant on GPS"
      no they wont.

      There are technical solutions for everything thing you mentioned. In any case they should be implementing them now.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      A compass and landmarks MIGHT tell you where you are. But most of the time you'll have to travel a bit before the landmarks give you certainty of where you are. GPS will give you your position where you are far more often.

      And that goes 100 fold for people at sea.

    26. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Stars will only give you your latitude, not your longitude. For longitude you also need an accurate time... or a GPS.

      And for most parts of the sea there aren't any landmarks.

    27. Re:Uh, no. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      A satnav (which is what you mean, not GPS) safely gives you navigational information whilst driving. A map doesn't unless you have a passenger. You have to stop to safely use a paper map. And that's a problem on a motorway.

      Satnav is just another way to say "GPS":

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gps

      a navigational system using satellite signals to fix the location of a radio receiver on or above the earth's surface; also : the radio receiver so used

    28. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You don't see any problems with becoming reliant on receiving realtime directions while having no personal knowledge of where you are and how to get where you are going?

      Not really. If there is a freak occurrence and GOS disappears *and* by chance I don't have a map in the glovebox, then I'll just take a best guess until I find somewhere with a map.

      The person who walked into traffic because the GPS didn't tell them they weren't in a safe area for pedestrians to waltz across the road should be a warning not an example to follow.

      Lets not pretend it takes a GPS for an idiot to get run over by a truck. WIthout a GPS they are even more likely to find themselves lost on a freeway.

    29. Re:Uh, no. by profplump · · Score: 1

      I will make the same comment I make every time someone posts this idiotic "rebuttal" to a statement that says "the old version is more reliable".

      First, GPS as commonly used by individual, still requires maps. Based on your discussion I'm assuming that you're excluding GPS as a position-fix system and the use of external maps (which may be paper and which function without the GPS unit). Also note that on most GPS units with integrated maps the maps still work even if GPS position fixes are not available, they just lose the "you are here" feature -- i.e. they lose some functionality already not present in paper maps.

      So really you're just comparing paper vs silicone as a storage and playback system. This is an argument that's been had many times, and I think most everyone would agree that both forms of storage are have their own advantages and disadvantages, and that both forms of storage are susceptible to some forms of damage or loss -- you can lose or burn both, both need protection from water and other forms of surface abrasion or staining, etc. Silicone requires an external, powered reader. Paper has a much lower storage capacity. If you're going to talk about which one is more reliable you really need to pick a specific scenario. If your requirement is "I cannot be dependent on a powered reader" then paper wins. If your requirement is "I need to store reasonably detailed maps for all of North America in my glove box" than silicone wins. If you have both requirements neither paper nor silicone is appropriate.

      Also, a compass can be jammed with a bit of iron and a paper map can be jammed with a bit of jam. And paper maps don't work in the dark, whereas GPS-based system generally include their own illumination.

      So if you want to play this "know how do do things the old way" game, try this view of all maps (paper or otherwise) as new and unreliable technology:
      Maps can get lost, stained, ripped, burned or otherwise become unreadable or unavailable, but dead reckoning cannot. Dead reckoning can be done without any batteries or light source, while maps and GPS both require some power/light source to be usable. Maps/GPS only work when people have been sent ahead to scout the area, while dead reckoning works so long as you know the relative position of your endpoint, even if you have to go around unknown obstacles. Maps/GPS require the ability to see landmarks or otherwise get a position fix, whereas dead reckoning requires not such external reference.

      Clearly anyone using maps instead should also know how to navigate via path integration or some other fully-internalized navigational system, or they risk becoming lost when their fancy new "map" technology fails in some way. Plus I'm not sure this whole "paper" thing is going to catch on anyway, since it's so susceptible to damage compared to other, more established inscription technologies like stone.

    30. Re:Uh, no. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Clocks do exist. Even very accurate ones, they get pricey though.

    31. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No it's not. And your link does not back you up. GPS just gives you a position on planet earth - Latitude, longitude and possibly elevation. Satnav adds navigation (i.e. maps and routing) to the functionality.

    32. Re:Uh, no. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Critical infrastructure could just use a more sensitive and precise antenna.

      It's difficult to create an antenna that has good gain straight up and to the horizons (where you find GPS satellites), and no gain at all to terrestrial sources (which could be in a nearby tree or hill that's above the horizon line). At ground level, a GPS signal has a strength of 1 x 10^–16 watts - a 100W (or 10W or even 1W) transmitter a short distance away can easily mask that signal.

      I'm not sure what in the grid would require synchronizing based on GPS. It's not like the stations and control centers ever move.

      GPS isn't used just for positioning, but also as a "reliable", highly accurate time source.

    33. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      If you've stepped back in technology as far as the compass, as the thread had, then no, clocks do not exist.

    34. Re:Uh, no. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I believe you are illiterate. Reading the contents of links is even more important than posting them:

      "The current LORAN system has been phased out in the United States and Canada. The United States Coast Guard (USCG) and Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) ceased transmitting LORAN-C (and joint CHAYKA) signals in 2010."

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    35. Re:Uh, no. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      No it's not. And your link does not back you up. GPS just gives you a position on planet earth - Latitude, longitude and possibly elevation. Satnav adds navigation (i.e. maps and routing) to the functionality.

      I don't know if you happened to read the definition I provided, but it does include navigation:

      a navigational system using satellite signals to fix the location of a radio receiver on or above the earth's surface

      Tell me again what the difference is between "GPS just gives you a navigational system using satellite signals to fix the location of a radio receiver on or above the earth's surface" and what you just said: "a position on planet earth [from satellites] plus navigation (i.e. maps and routing)"

      Is navigational system different than navigation?

      Perhaps English is not your native language, m-w.com also gives a definition for English learners:

      http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/GPS

      a radio system that uses signals from satellites to tell you where you are and to give you directions to other places

      Or maybe your dispute is with the dictionary definition of GPS? That's a valid dispute as I don't believe m-w is the reference standard for English language.

    36. Re:Uh, no. by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the marines. A paper map with a bullet hole in it is still a map (slightly less detail). A computer with a bullet in it is a paper weight. Pack accordingly.

    37. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Perhaps English is not your native language, m-w.com also gives a definition for English learners:

      I'm English. The fact that you are questioning that means you know you've already lost on the facts.

      a navigational system using satellite signals to fix the location of a radio receiver on or above the earth's surface

      GPS fixes location most certainly. It is a tool to be used for people who are navigating for sure. So long as they also have a map or chart. It does not navigate. However you want to interpret the link you googled.

      GPS is a US government system on satellites, and the receivers that give a position. Nothing more. When third parties use the GPS position to give a location on an electronic map, then its sat nav. GPS and sat nav aren't synonyms, and as we're on slashdot, 99% of the people here know that. You're the 1%.

      Or maybe your dispute is with the dictionary definition of GPS? That's a valid dispute as I don't believe m-w is the reference standard for English language.

      No indeed. It's not even English.

    38. Re:Uh, no. by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      At sea you take special care not to get lost. It's pretty easy actually. First, if you left coastal waters we can assume you have charts, a compass, and a decent clock. This is in addition to any technological measures you have on board. The rest is just good piloting. You mark your starting point and time, and plot from there on out. If you ever fail to do so... you are a dumb ass, which is now lost. If you are old school, you can get by with a sextant and some knowledge, but that's a dying art.

      I can't tell you how many times I've heard about someone getting "lost at sea" while still less than 5 miles from shore. The problem isn't reliance on (unreliable) technology. The problem is people are fucking stupid. Like the guy in the slip next to me that has a $250,000 yacht, with every electronic toy you could ask for, 3 radios and a satellite internet link, and he gets lost going from SF bay to the ocean. No, I wish I was kidding, but I'm not. It's happened TWICE.

    39. Re:Uh, no. by sphealey · · Score: 1

      > GPS is a US government system on satellites, and
      > the receivers that give a position. Nothing more.

      Actually, GPS is also a system that provides an extremely precise timing signal synchronized worldwide. I realize that the availability of such a signal is an essential ingredient of navigation, which is why the US Navy was originally going to call its satellite system "Navstar" (Nav = Navy = Navigation; I hope someday the real story of how the Air Force grabbed control of the project is told). But the precise timing signals, once made available, were and are used for many many things besides navigation. Operating continental electric grids is a good example.

      sPh

    40. Re:Uh, no. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I didn't Google any link, I looked it up the largest American dictionary. If you want to say "Well, that's not true in the U..K.", then that may be a valid point, but that's not what you said.

      Perhaps you'd like the Wikipedia definition better:

       

      GPS: The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a space-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) that ...

      GNSS: Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) is the standard generic term for satellite navigation systems ("sat nav") that provide autonomous geo-spatial positioning with global coverage.

      Or, to paraphrase: GPS is a GNSS, GNSS is a "sat nav", therefore GPS is a "sat nav".

      If you really want to be pendantic, then wouldn't it be more correct to say that GPS is a system of orbiting satellites and controlling ground station that provide positioning information to receivers on the ground? Therefore, GPS doesn't provide your position, it's your GPS receiver that provides your position? After all, not all GPS receivers provide your position, some only provide a time signal.

    41. Re:Uh, no. by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      Chose you to respond to, although i could have chose many in this thread. You know, even with the satellites off line, I'd use my gps, just for the map! Always around, searchable. What detractors of gps are missing is that we'd have similar units *even if we had no positioning* //Gps's are the coolest tech out there. Takes almost every branch of science. An everyday modern miracle! Let's not look the gift horse in the mouth too much.

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    42. Re:Uh, no. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      For longitude you also need an accurate time

      Or measure the distance to the moon. With a pre-calculated table(put it on the back of the map) and a sextant(which we used to measure the stars for latitude), it only takes 10-20 minutes.

    43. Re:Uh, no. by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      And of course we are working up to a aircraft navigation and control system that will be 100% reliant on GPS. No GPS = planes do not take off. Not just passenger planes but also all air cargo.

      Yeah they can and will take off they will just have to navigate the old fashioned way with a compass and a watch and a weather briefing that includes winds aloft. EVERY pilot is still taught that basic navigation skill to this day, just the same as I was when I got my pilots certificate.

      Ships at sea used to use LORAN but the US Coast Guard has been dismantling the LORAN system they maintained. I believe it is gone now, so there is no going back

      Yes LORAN is gone but sun still rises and the stars are pretty much where they should be. All I need is a clock with a known error rate, sextant, chart and a copy of Bowditch.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    44. Re:Uh, no. by lgw · · Score: 1

      "GPS" only tells you where you are. It has no map. You're probably thinking of SatNav, which combines a map with a GPS.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re:Uh, no. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "GPS: The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a space-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) that ..."

      Well, to be true, GPS is obviously *not* a global navigation system or else it would have been GNS; GPS is a global *positioning* system. Of course, being GPS both global and fast makes the transition from positioning to navigation a triviality but it's still not the same.

    46. Re:Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will make the same comment I make every time we debate technology's superiority to paper:

      I cannot remember the last time my map crashed. It may be inaccurate (but so may GPS), it may be out of date (but so may GPS), it may not be intuitive (but so may GPS). But when I turn too fast and pull the plug out of the lighter socket, my paper map will still work. When some jerk is driving next to me with non-FCC licensed equipment drowning out the GPS band, my paper map will still work. It doesn't call out turns a mile ahead, it doesn't show up-to-the-thirty-minutes-ago traffic, all it does is show me where I am and I can use my brain to figure out where I'm going.

      A GPS is superior to a map but does not replace it, and becoming reliant on a GPS to the point where I do not consult or bring a paper map is foolhardy.

      You are wrong. A paper map does NOT show you where you are. There is no symbol on the paper map saying "You are here". You have to know that some other way. One of the biggest problems people face with paper maps is working out their current position accurately. I have seen (and been thoroughly amused by) someone waving a paper map around, but using a GPS to find out where they were on the map.

      Getting a position fix without GPS can be extremely difficult. It's easier on land, especially if the terrain is distinctive, but really quite difficult at sea, and even more difficult in the air.

      Feel free to proclaim the advantages of paper maps, but don't overdo it.

    47. Re:Uh, no. by lgw · · Score: 1

      OK, "lost" in the sense of not knowing your position I can see, but "lost" in the sense of "can't find land" is just crazy, unless you can't see the sky, or you're more than a day trip out to sea.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    48. Re:Uh, no. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure what in the grid would require synchronizing based on GPS. It's not like the stations and control centers ever move."

      Time. GPS provides not only positioning but accurate time too. And bastardly cheap, for that matter, so it's seen as horridly cost-uneffective to provide a backup, which is exactly the point of the article.

      Of course there are known methods to substitute GPS signals but the problem is that they are not in place. Imagine a strong Sun flare brings down the satellites for a week without previous notice. Probably the power grid, wireless communications, international navigation and a lot of others would take quite a strong hiccup with no fast backup in place.

    49. Re:Uh, no. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "There are technical solutions for everything thing you mentioned"

      Yeah. But are they in place? How much time/money would take to provide with them? Do you think those having to take money from their pockets to provide the backups will willingly do it?

      Now, you see the problem, don't you?

    50. Re:Uh, no. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      A computer with a bullet hole may be a paperweight, but it will deflect/absorb a bullet much better than a paper map.

    51. Re:Uh, no. by froggymana · · Score: 1

      But pendulums do!

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    52. Re:Uh, no. by mini+me · · Score: 1

      GPS is about more than just finding your way. The John Deere DB120 seed planter, for example, requires GPS to operate. There are still plenty of conventional planters around today, but as farms continue to expand the technology will be adopted by more and more farmers. What happens if GPS goes down in the spring and large acres of land are not able to be put into crops? That will have a profound affect on your life.

    53. Re:Uh, no. by petman · · Score: 1

      , all it does is show me where I am and I can use my brain to figure out where I'm going.

      Err, how does a paper map show you where you are?

    54. Re:Uh, no. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      In a boat it's not enough just to find land. As you approach land there are lots of underwater obstacles such as rocks, and if you hit them, you're going to damage and possibly sink your boat. So you need to know which bit of land, and either have a chart, or know from experience where the local hazards are.

    55. Re:Uh, no. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The ITAR regulations also prevent the design and manufacturing of GPS receivers which reject interference through beam or null steering.

    56. Re:Uh, no. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      One of the easy technical solutions is beam or null steering which ITAR happens to forbid. As usual, politics is the largest problem.

    57. Re:Uh, no. by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Um, what? Marine chronometers have been around since the 1700's. These are clocks accurate enough to be used for navigation. This technology was not replaced until GPS (although radio solutions were in wide use too - but not always practical at sea - and before that, calculations from the position of the moon). So there's a pretty large time in there where compasses were used for navigation, and clocks existed.

    58. Re:Uh, no. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Even slashdot is filled with narrow-minded fools. GPS is used for air navigation (they're pulling other guidance systems out of planes, even; if the GPS goes down they fall out of the sky, autopilot sure as hell won't work), power grid synchronization (for the love of god why? Everything here is in a fixed location!), and God knows what else. There's a lot of "do we really need this?" going on, or "This is nice but what about a failsafe?" as we rip out all traces of old methods because the new method is so cool.

    59. Re:Uh, no. by delt0r · · Score: 1

      But, did you know that the 60Hz synchronization of electrical generation in the US is reliant on GPS clocks?

      Sounds like BS to me. First it makes more sense to synchronize to the power lines them selfs, via a PLL or what not. Second we had power grids long before GPS. Third, its trivial to show that the 60Hz single from the socket is only very approximately 60Hz. It has high levels of drift, which means you *can't* synchronize to with a different timebase, you should sync to what you need syned... a PLL(Phase Locked Loop) on the 60Hz grid signal itself.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  4. Young'ns don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was on a shuttle bus with a set of Marine veterans going to Vietnam. They were reminiscing about training and someone threw in that a group of recruits were kicked out for cheating on their basic fieldcraft/map reading. Apparently, the defence used by the guys who were caught is that basic fieldcraft isn't relevant because they know where they are from GPS. I found it unbelievable that the thought even crossed their minds.

    All it takes is the US GPS system to be jammed, and they are in a hell of a lot of trouble...

    1. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Desler · · Score: 1

      Maps!? Baww! In my day we didn't have maps and we liked it! We found our way by reading the stars!

    2. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In my day, we did have maps, but all they were good for was for finding where the world ended and where the giant sea monsters were located.

    3. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      Codswallop! Back in my day we didn't have any of your fancy "stars"!

    4. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by cvtan · · Score: 1

      You had stars? You were lucky...

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    5. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Maps!? Baww! In my day we didn't have maps and we liked it! We found our way by reading the stars!

      Stars!? Baww! in my day we didn't have stars and we liked it! We found our way by having everything localized in the same infinitesimal dot!

    6. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      GPS satellites orbit at 20,000 km and are therefore VERY hard to take out. We have bigger problems if that happens.

      Jammers that are strong enough to disrupt aircraft are strong enough to locate and destroy (AGM-88 HARM). Perhaps the trickiest situation would be small jammers in dense, civilian locations. In that case use them as a beacon a la Skyhook.

    7. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You had days????

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Maps!? Baww! In my day we didn't have maps and we liked it! We found our way by reading the stars!

      I think this is true, I was talking with someone who was in the Marines, he mentioned his group was on some training exercise (on foot, no vehicles) and they couldn't figure out where they were. And the maps were not much help. He said there was this one guy who grew up in the back country, was not that smart with people and technical stuff. But he could look up at the stars and point to the map, "this is where we are and we need to go this way."

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    9. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trouble can be much simpler. E.g. they are in a jungle. Their GPS units have flat batteries or maybe the humidity broke a new model that wasn't field tested properly. All they have is a map and compass.

    10. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by capedgirardeau · · Score: 1

      I am afraid have to call bs on this one. He might very well have been able to look at the stars and get the direction they needed to go, but he sure as heck couldn't tell where he was with any great resolution.

      People spent centuries trying to find a way to use the sky to locate themselves longitudinally and failed for the most part. At best even with the proper instruments and a table of star positions it took hours and had a +/- of 50 miles.

      Please see: Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time, Dava Sobel

      --
      Wax on, wax off baby!
    11. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      I think every grunt has a GPS these days - so they would ALL have to have flat batteries. And mil-spec GPS that can't take jungle humidity? laugh... again, one of the units would work. Orienteering should still be taught but it isn't as critical as it once was. Too bad, the world feels awful small when you can't get lost in it.

      The military is working on inertial systems that take advantage of the fact that one or both boots of a soldier is normally on the ground. Networking a platoons boot heels turns out to be a very decent way of figuring location from the last available absolute position fix. It's great inside concrete structures where GPS signals can fail to penetrate. Firefighters are a likely civilian beneficiary.

    12. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my day, maps were only good for finding naked women, or were those men's life magazines? I can't remember anymore.

    13. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      God?

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    14. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Maybe the hick had a Timex.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>In my day, we did have maps, but all they were good for was for finding where the world ended and where the giant sea monsters were located.

      To be fair, they were also useful for steering around those giant compass roses in the middle of the Atlantic.

      Those sharp edges could gut a ship like a marlin spike on a, uh, marlin.

    16. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      You had stars? We had to throw dead heros and assorted wildlife up into the sky to serve as location beacons.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    17. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "You had days????"

      No we haven't. We just had one day, and it happened to be Monday.

      And we couldn't send the youngsters out of our lawns since they weren't invented yet, either.

    18. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by petman · · Score: 1

      Well, I imagine knowing the direction would, in certain cases, help to identify location if you have a map. Imagine you're on the edge of a lake. You don't know whether it's the north edge, or the south edge, or east or west. However, if you can look up at the stars and determine the bearings, you can have a good estimate of which edge of the lake you are at.

    19. Re:Young'ns don't understand. by petman · · Score: 1

      I think every grunt has a GPS these days - so they would ALL have to have flat batteries.

      Well, if they all start with their GPSs fully charge, and they all keep theirs on the whole time, then the batteries would run out at around the same time.

  5. The only solution is to move back into caves by spoon00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are also too reliant on electricity, computers, cars, airplanes, ships,...

    1. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 0

      We are also too reliant on electricity, computers, cars, airplanes, ships,...

      The difference is that those things are not trivial to disable compared to GPS.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by b0bby · · Score: 1

      But I can't buy an airplane jammer for under $100 on dealextreme... unless you count the green lasers I guess!

    3. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by siddesu · · Score: 1

      It is a lot easier to have some nut drive a truck with a bomb into the local substation and leave half of your town without power than to scramble the same bomb into orbit and nuke a GPS satellite, causing the next available to become offline. It is also a lot easier to hide afterwards if you just send a truck than if you develop and launch a big enough rocket.

      Having nuts sabotage a large enough number of substations to cause serious disruption in the US is much harder, but still a lot easier than knocking out enough GPS satellites from orbit.

      The only feasible scenario that can kill the GPS is a US war with a power that has both rockets and nukes. The likelihood of such a war is close to zero, from the left hand side.

    4. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by joocemann · · Score: 1

      I think the point of all this is that for many it is not trivial when GPS fails.

      From my observation, yes, many people are far too reliant on GPS and would greatly benefit from applying mental exercise to the purpose of knowing where they are on earth. I use landmarks, assumed compass, and the path I recently traveled so as to 'know' where I am. And from what I can tell, I'm better than the GPS on my phone, lol.

    5. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 0

      You have not been following the news. According to at least one recent report, the GPS signal is trivially easy to jam. I don't have to knock out the satellite if I can get a jammer into a key location. In addition, a solar flare could function as a worldwide signal jamming device. Somebody with a $50 GPS jamming device could cause a lot of havoc, and they could walk away to do it again.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    6. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is worse than that. There are many automated systems that rely on GPS where there is little or no provision for human intervention should GPS fail. Although you make a good point, people should be able to find their way to routine destinations without GPS, but all too many cannot.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    7. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Actually the bigger difference is we have backups in place for most of those things. We expect the power to go out, if it does most systems that lives depend on kick over to battery backups and generators. Cars, well we generally have more then one vehicle for anything that depends on transportation, in life and death situations. Secondly they aren't talking about someone blowing up the GPS satilites, but maybe designing a high powered jamming device, knowing the location of the GPS recievers for a city grid combined with the ability to jam signals within a 500 yard radius, strategically placed someone could take out power to several cities and possibly keep it down for a long time, or park the same thing in a truck in an airport parking lot. Sure hypothetically the same could be accomplished by driving a truck through the plant or something to an extent, but generally even terrorists haven't been known to sacrifice thier lives for attacks that don't directly kill (that or they just don't make the papers, much easier to keep something under wraps without dead bodies you have to explain).

    8. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but for $30 you can buy a GPS jammer that works quite well (smaller than a pack of cigarettes) and kill GPS for a few hundred feet out in the open. It's funny as heck to watch how GPS devices react to it, usually one of three things happens 1) loss of signal and it gives up or 2) it starts to drift slowly in a random direction or 3) it starts flying at several hundred/thousand miles per hour in a random direction.

    9. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is not anti-technology. It's just good engineering to avoid a single point of failure like that for so many safety-critical systems.

      Other navigation systems are possible. We've made a half-hearted attempt to use the mobile phone network as a backup navigation system. If we decided to do that properly, I'm sure we could get much better accuracy. If we have a standard for low-power radio navigation beacons, would it not be fairly cheap and easy for companies and governments to install them? Just something broadcasting a UUID, it's long, lat and alt. Link it to an online collaborative database giving further details about known patterns of interference and such for improved accuracy and, provided you can pick up signals from several of these things, you should have a fair idea of where you are. It would be nice to have something that worked indoors.

    10. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Get some sense of perspective.

      The GPS signal is trivially easy to jam if you're close to the jamming device (or in a deep valley), or if it is a really powerful one. If you're close to one (or if you can't see enough of them satellites), all you have to do is look at the map, find one or two landmarks, and proceed on your merry way. If you're close to a really powerful one, it is more likely than not that your government will be providing a fix shortly.

      Recovery from a proper bombing of a substation would be far harder on you and will take a lot longer to rebuild ;)

    11. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by petman · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's either a US citizen, or an ally. For the rest of us, there's always the possibility of getting into trouble with a the US or a US-allied country and having the US military simply turning off the GPS satellites we're using.

    12. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Then stop complaining, and roll your own. I hear GLONASS is working in the Antarctic, and the European GPS is right around the corner. Or learn how to use a clock, an astrolabe and a map, it ain't that hard.

    13. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you could build an AA device for 100$.. for 2000$ you could buy enough parts to do automatic tracking for it. this is 2011, get used to it.

      anyways, if gps broke, alternative navigation services would spring up pretty fast. if there was a global meltdown, even then, by building radio beacons or some other solution. navigation with the stars is also much more easier to realize in high precision with computers too, if you have some cameras available.

      techniques for measuring distances, creating maps etc.. they're all very well known and spread now, that genie can't be put back into the bottle.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. About $300 for an airband transmitter.
      2. Find a local frequency that's highly populated with jet traffic.
      3. Transmit the teletubbies theme on a continuous loop.
      4. ???
      5. Prison!

    15. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Again, you don't seem to understand the nature of the problem being discussed. This is not about a person getting lost because their GPS doesn't work. This is about a machine of some sort failing because of its GPS being jammed. If the machine is reliant on the substation, it just stops when the power goes out. How does a machine that relies on GPS behave when all of a sudden it doesn't know where it is?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    16. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only solution to allowing systems to become to reliant on GPS is to move back into caves. Really?

      We're really equating the importance necessity of GPS to our society to that of electricity? Computers? (you get the idea) Really?

      And you get modded +4, Insightful. Oh, Slashdot, what happened to you?

      Don't worry, I'm heading back to my cave now.

    17. Re:The only solution is to move back into caves by siddesu · · Score: 1

      How does a machine that relies on GPS behave when all of a sudden it doesn't know where it is?

      A properly engineered machine will gracefully downgrade into a mode that avoids the reliance on GPS. For example, it could use alternative orientation means (dead reckoning or machine vision or whatever), or call for an operator.

      A machine without power, on the other hand ....

      I'm sure you can see the difference now ;)

  6. The Solution. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    Let's just fly it all in to the sun, and mate with cavemen!

    1. Re:The Solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Worst TV series ending EVAR!!!

  7. DR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dead Reckoning for life.

    PS) CAPTCHA: insight

  8. Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by mirix · · Score: 1

    I was cleaning the basement the other day and came across an old compass of mine. It got me thinking, I wonder if future generations are even going to be able to operate the things.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I was cleaning the basement the other day and came across an old compass of mine. It got me thinking, I wonder if future generations are even going to be able to operate the things.

      Check with people in your own age group; you may be disappointed with the small number of people in that group who are able to use a compass or find their way unassisted with minimal aids. The number of such people is most probably declining with each new generation, but it wasn't very high to begin with.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time I tried (a cheap) one, there were too many magnets and waves around for it to work.

    3. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      If the magnetic poles move any farther, future generations may not be able to operate the things as they were intended. :)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    4. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by miserere+nobis · · Score: 1

      If changes in the magnetic field of the earth keep accelerating, chances are that the answer may be no.

    5. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by butalearner · · Score: 1

      You dropped the acronym I was looking for, but proceeded not to say anything about it.

      The summary itself says that they're not just talking about GPS in your car or your phone, but the whole GPS system. But GPS isn't the only game in town. GLONASS is the Russian version of GPS, already covers most of the world, and is expected to provide global coverage this year. The EU is building up Galileo, only a couple test satellites in, with the first four operational satellites being launched this year. The Chinese are building COMPASS/Beidou-2, also only a couple satellites in.

      And those are just the global systems. Many countries have or are building systems to provide regional position data. The Chinese already have Beidou-1, the Japanese are building QZSS, and India is planning on launching the first satellite of IRNSS this year. I'm sure I'm missing some.

    6. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I got news for you:
      Most of the past generations can't use the thing either.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by mirix · · Score: 1

      Yeah I lost my train of thought there.

      I suppose GLONASS is just as susceptible to the things the TFA mentions (jamming, interference). AFAIK the system is essentially functional (again) now, but I recall there are a few bald spots occasionally.
      There used to be a website, live, showing a map of earth and glonass signal quality / available sats accordingly.

      There are dual mode receivers out there, but not being a uh, consumer item I guess, they cost more.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    8. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I spent this past weekend accompanying a group of Cub Scouts on an outdoor skills challenge, which included orienteering.
      Proper map-n-compass orienteering, not glorified geocaching.

      These kids are 8-10 years old, and that know how to read a map, and use a compass to get from here to there. And start a fire, build a shelter out of sticks, rope, and a blanket, makeshift a stretcher, etc, etc.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    9. Re:Lucky I've got GLONASS. Pfft GPS. by Synn · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm saving up for a decent sextant. The suckers are pricey though.

  9. If it's there people will use it by cvtan · · Score: 2

    First of all, why are the Slashdot abbreviated comments using gray type on a gray background! This is painful. Secondly, given human nature, if the GPS info is reliable for more than a few days at a time someone will make an app for that... After a while it will end up controlling our nuclear arsenal. It's the same reason people live on the sides of volcanoes. If it hasn't blown up for a while, someone has to move there.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  10. I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by sconeu · · Score: 1

    He's an inertial nav test guy, I'm a former avionics developer.

    We both agreed that we can understand the financial incentives to remove inertial nav from planes, but that it's misguided.

    You *NEED* a backup in case GPS fails (and dead reckoning has a good chance of leaving you just that -- dead).

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Compasses do not work in airplanes? Maps do not work at altitude?

    2. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      He's an inertial nav test guy, I'm a former avionics developer.

      We both agreed that we can understand the financial incentives to remove inertial nav from planes, but that it's misguided.

      You *NEED* a backup in case GPS fails (and dead reckoning has a good chance of leaving you just that -- dead).

      Considering how relatively cheap LORAN was to maintain, I don't think we should have retired it. In a war with a peer enemy... say China just for illustration here... one of the first things they'll do is fire off ASAT's at our orbiting assets like GPS and communications satellites. Something other than a compass and a map would be nice to have as a backup in cockpits and quarterdecks.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    3. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Thus ruining space for everyone and making me finally realize humans in general are worthless shitheads.

    4. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by vlm · · Score: 1

      You *NEED* a backup in case GPS fails (and dead reckoning has a good chance of leaving you just that -- dead).

      As you aviation guys probably know, the most likely failure mode is not the GPS satellites being shot down or jammed, but the single GPS antenna getting iced over and cracking or the single feedline falling off or the single GPS "engine" overheating or the DC power to the GPS shorting out or open circuit, or

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by vlm · · Score: 1

      Compasses do not work in airplanes? Maps do not work at altitude?

      Take a small plane up and find out. Pretty much, the answer is "no". Occasionally, in smooth air, when you're flying straight and level for awhile, you'll get a snapshot fix of where you're probably pointed, within 10, maybe even 5 degrees. Its not quite like on a large boat where it mostly just works.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      GPS sats are too high for current gen Chinese ASATs but that may well change at some point. GPS is WELL above LEO.

    7. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I never have tried it. I was actually asking. So how did they do it before GPS and fancy inertial nav?

    8. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You do realize that type of tactic means they won't be able to use satellites as well, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by vgerclover · · Score: 1

      Thus ruining space for everyone and making me finally realize humans in general are worthless shitheads.

      You are going to wait for full out world war for that? I passed my threshold quite some time ago.

    10. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until Feb 2010 we had a less accurate but still, for many purposes useful, backup system called LORAN C http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LORAN. In order to save the princely sum of 35 million a year, the system was turned off. Substantial effort was then made to render it impractical and expensive to bring the LORAN system back online (e.g. the destruction of transmit antennas). NO competent engineer (or navigator) would willingly design a or use known-unreliable system for life- or mission- critical functions without backup. This decision was made politicians, not by engineers --- or navigators.

    11. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always RNAV for navigating over continents.

    12. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      In a war with a peer enemy... say China just for illustration here... one of the first things they'll do is fire off ASAT's at our orbiting assets like GPS and communications satellites.

      The Chinese are nowhere near a "peer-enemy", and unlikely to become one for several decades at least. Meanwhile, what do you think this bad-boy is for?

    13. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Maps are fine, if you can see the ground. The compass is great, but if there's any sort of crosswind component (not uncommon), you won't be flying in the direction that the airplane is pointed.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    14. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maps aren't very useful over the Atlantic.

      And do you have any idea how exhausting it is to conduct dead reckoning for six hours? No, you probably don't

    15. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they just like the oldschool autopilot nav system. it's not perfect by any means and an expensive to manufacture and very complex compared to the simplicity of gps.

      it'll make a comeback once the miniaturised gyroscopes that are cheap are good enough for it, maybe spread a field of them all over the airplanes. they're good enough for a ride around the neighborhood already.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      WTF? I have navigated planes with a compass and dead reckoning a bit. I have to be able to or you don't get a PPL in my country. Every small plane I have ever flown has both a magnetic compass and a set of corrections for the airframe, and a gyro compass which you set on the ground. Quite a lot of us at the aeroclub still don't use GPS sets.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    17. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      You know that pilots have thought of that.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    18. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acceleration, deceleration, changing direction, climbing and descending all screw with magnetic compass readings.

      The faster the aircraft, the greater the error.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_compass_turns

    19. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      You'll always have an inertial nav on an aircraft. It'll just be GPS-aided for when GPS is available, and then when not it's still orders of magnitude better than what's currently in aircraft.

      I mean, a nice GPS-aided inertial nav system that is good enough to go in fighter aircraft is ~$40,000. Cheaper, less accurate versions can be had for half that. When most planes are in at least the double digit millions of dollars price range, this isn't a huge cost driver...

      I seriously have no idea why so many people talk about this so much; I guess it's interesting. But the problem is not on the technical side of things, but rather in the implementation-side. You have to get it certified, tested, airports upgraded, new approaches and flight corridors set up to take advantage ofit, air traffic control, etc, etc. Then someone sees all of these articles, says "Oh no, GPS on planes, but GPS is easily jammable!" Yea, like that hasn't been thought of....

    20. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      The GPS constellation is about halfway to geosynchronous, so they perform a complete orbit about every 12 hours. Something like 6.5 Earth radii out.

    21. Re:I was talking to a friend in my CCNA class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "bad boy", if you had read the beginning of the article you linked you'd have seen that the USAF has not requested any more funds for it because it is not operationally viable (i.e. it doesn't work well enough and probably never will).

  11. Pole Reversal? by CloneRanger · · Score: 1

    With the South Atlantic Anomaly getting bigger, going back to compass readings might not be reliable during a pole flip either. GPS might need some hardening to prevent spoofing. But I thought it would be a good system to have in place when magnetic poles move.

    1. Re:Pole Reversal? by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      They's why you use redundant systems. If you go boating out at sea you do not go out with only a magnetic compass to navigate. You leave with a magnetic compass and a gyrocompass. That minimizes the chance that some random magnetic anomaly will get you lost out at sea. Only an idiot would go out and navigate by GPS alone.

      And your Pole Reversal has zero affect on a Gyrocompass unless you also think that the crust slips when a pole reversal happens, and I hope no one still buys into that hair brained scyme.

  12. street address, not cruise missile coordinates! by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Well all I got to say is I'm yappin' with someone on how get to where I want to go and they say, "I'm at 37.655, -121.998."

    dammit how about a street address? and a cross street will be helpful as well. and if you got brain one, how about Thomas Guide page/grid number?

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:street address, not cruise missile coordinates! by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Nephew? I thought being in college you'd translate to the street address in real time. Guess all that edumacation aint what it use to be

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  13. original report is online by at10u8 · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:original report is online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend the report. There's a nice picture on the front of the British Standards Institute Dildo Testing Laboratory at Harwell.

  14. Why does the Railroads need GPS when they by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Why does the Railroads need GPS when they they have FIXED TRACK and like 30-40 year old systems for keeping track where trains are at.

    1. Re:Why does the Railroads need GPS when they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because rolling stock rolls

    2. Re:Why does the Railroads need GPS when they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its for the network operators to know where on the fixed track the trains are to avoid collisions

    3. Re:Why does the Railroads need GPS when they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use it for better efficiency and safety. The track is in a fixed location, but knowing where the train is located along that track is a whole different proposition.

      In areas with heavy traffic, the track is partitioned into "blocks", with very reliable signaling equipment able to detect the presence or absence of a train. But at that level you can't tell whether the train is at one end of the block or the other. Using GPS allows them to run closer together, yet maintain safety.

      There is also the issue of inspection and maintenance equipment such as "hi-rail" pickup trucks. These are able to jump onto or off of the track at any roadway intersection, and their railway wheels are insulated in order to avoid setting off the occupancy detection. It's REALLY important to know where these guys are: it matters a LOT whether they are at one end of the block or the other. If they are at the far end of a block or siding, the dispatcher can let a train approach them at low speed. If they are at the NEAR end by mistake, well, that's a bad thing. The dispatchers work carefully to make sure they are out of the way when needed, but things are always subject to human error.

    4. Re:Why does the Railroads need GPS when they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... because GPS enables centralized dispatch and monitoring of train positions, allowing the railway to be operated more efficiently than would otherwise be the case.

    5. Re:Why does the Railroads need GPS when they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To locate vehicles both on and off the track for various reasons, ie. worker protection.

  15. GPS Kills! by doghouse41 · · Score: 1

    There was an article a few weeks ago on how people have died through following their GPS into Death Valley, then getting into trouble - no water, no cellphone coverage, very high temperatures. Go figure.

    1. Re:GPS Kills! by basotl · · Score: 1

      Same thing has occurred with maps in the past. People taking shortcuts that falter off to nothing and getting stranded.

      --
      HTC EVO 4G LTE w/ CM 10.2 | NookColor w/ CM 10.2 | Samsung Epic 4G w/ CM 10.1
    2. Re:GPS Kills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation? If you're hiking in Death Valley it's hard not to know it. It's in a HUGE park. If you're driving into DV, there are plenty of warnings.

      Yes, people die in DV; but it's not because they don't know where they are. It's usually because they underestimate what it can do to you.

      BTW, water may not help you. I had to turn back on the dunes because I could tell my body wasn't handling it, even though I had 2L with me and drank 1.

      When you go there, you have to respect the fact that it's not an ordinary place. Be prepared, and at the first sign of trouble, TURN BACK or otherwise make GETTING HELP YOUR FIRST PRIORITY.

    3. Re:GPS Kills! by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Citation? If you're hiking in Death Valley it's hard not to know it. It's in a HUGE park. If you're driving into DV, there are plenty of warnings.

      Yes, people die in DV; but it's not because they don't know where they are. It's usually because they underestimate what it can do to you.

      Citation:

      http://www.vvdailypress.com/articles/death-26078-valley-becoming.html ...

      In the SUV, Nattrass found Sanchez’s lifeless 6-year-old son Carlos on the front seat. “She told me they walked 10 miles but couldn’t find any help (and) ... had run out of water and had been drinking their own urine,” Nattrass wrote.

      “She turned down a wrong road,” Nattrass said in a recent interview. “She said she was following her GPS unit.”
      ...

    4. Re:GPS Kills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, good citation.

      Point taken. Following GPS was indeed her first mistake.

      Her next mistake was driving on a road that her vehicle couldn't handle.

      Finally, she walked from the site instead of staying put and making a signal for aircraft (big Xs, SOS in the sand, HELP spelled with rocks, etc). There's no telling how much longer her resources might have held out if she had simply stayed put.

    5. Re:GPS Kills! by stummies · · Score: 1

      There was an article on boston.com (can't find the link) last summer. They were interviewing people in the area (mostly NH) who worked for the US Forest Service, AMC, people who volunteer rescuing people, etc. They were saying that lots of hikers were bringing GPS, cell phones, etc. but forgot to bring their common sense with them. They were hiking up these mountains without the proper gear, no food or water, no concept of the time it takes to get up and down the mountain, and an almost disregard for the effects of weather. It was funny in a way. They made it sound like the hikers packed their gadgets and figured that was all the needed.

    6. Re:GPS Kills! by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Its called "Death" Valley for a reason..

  16. Anybody got a sextant? by mmell · · Score: 1
    Star charts? Oh, and a timepiece (your average spring-driven wristwatch will do, I can shoot noon with the sextant to keep it accurate)?

    I've got a slide-rule, if that helps with the math and trig.

    1. Re:Anybody got a sextant? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Star charts? Oh, and a timepiece (your average spring-driven wristwatch will do, I can shoot noon with the sextant to keep it accurate)?
      I've got a slide-rule, if that helps with the math and trig.

      Perhaps you're jesting, but it seems that with modern imaging and computer technology, it'd be possible to take a snapshot of the night sky and as long as the stars are not completely obscured by clouds, it'd be possible to get a pretty accurate idea of where you are. Maybe you could even get a good fix with an accurate clock and the position of the sun in the sky?

    2. Re:Anybody got a sextant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your average springdriven wristwatch will *not* do for calculating longitude.

      Just ask John Harrison.

      (Mind you, an atomic-clock-linked wristwatch would do nicely)

    3. Re:Anybody got a sextant? by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      This is possible. Its called star tracking and was how the U2 spyplane navigated. However most camera/operator combinations won't be able to take a photo of the night sky well enough. It too little light that would need 1sec camera exposure times and the camera pointing direction will need to be know well.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  17. GPS usage by stewbee · · Score: 1

    As an American that has been to the UK (the apparent location of the authors) and has driven around with both a GPS and just a map, I will take the GPS hands down! The signage in a typical UK town is bad. You generally need to look at the buildings to find out what street you are on if you can spot it before you pass it. The roundabouts seem to tell you what town you are going to end up in if you take that particular road instead of what street that you are turning onto. Navigating with a map was painful!

    Now it could just be because I am not used to it. I know that there are parts of the US (Maryland and NY come to mind) that I have been to that can be similarly difficult to navigate, but not to the level that I experienced in the UK. So I am curious if there are any Brits that have driven in the US and what their impressions were on driving here compared to the UK. Would you take GPS over a map also?

    1. Re:GPS usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from Ireland which is a hundred times worse than the UK. I drove in Seattle for the first time last month and it was a dream to navigate.

      What I did find weird was the way U-turns are encouraged, and that you go from the slow lane to the fast lane to an inner lane and out onto the fast lane again. Here we build bridges so you can turn your car around (or have roundabouts).

    2. Re:GPS usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Brit who has driven in the US a few times, my experience pretty much mirrors yours. The signage in a typical US town is bad... signs often tell you which road you're turning into instead of where you are going to end up. Navigating with a map was indeed painful, though I improved with practice. Having to drive on the wrong side of the road didn't help, as I'm sure you can appreciate. Also, the writing on the signs is small and the colours are often wrong (i.e. not what I'm used to).

      The grid system used in most US towns helps somewhat, but that's not a consequence of the signage.

      When I drive from A to B, I need to know that I'm heading for B, and the names of some of the waypoints. I can then set out in blissful ignorance of the street names, and follow any sign that says "B" or, failing that, one of the places that I'm supposed to pass but haven't yet. I find that this rarely fails in the UK, but doesn't work too well in the US. Perhaps you have developed a mental strategy more appropriate to US signage?

      On my last visit, a storm cancelled my internal flight, leaving me with a few hours to drive 200 miles to Chicago, and locate an airport. I got a rental car with a satnav. Not a very good one; for the first 30 minutes it did little better than "at the turning you are just passing, go the other way". But I made my connection with plenty of time; without it I'd probably still be trapped in a maze of toll roads around Chicago.

    3. Re:GPS usage by radish · · Score: 1

      I'm a Brit who has lived in the US for the past few years. Navigation certainly is different, but much of it is just what you're used to.

      There are really two systems of signage working in parallel. The first is what I'd call "long distance" signage - that's what you see at intersections where it indicates the towns that you'll reach by going one way or another. The assumption here is that knowing you're headed towards your destination is more useful than knowing the name of some minor street on the way to it - which is true if you're trying to get somewhere some distance away. One thing that you will notice is that major roads have both a name and a number (e.g. A40) - and those numbers are displayed on signs. This is useful because the "local" name of the street (e.g. Main St) might change a number of times along it's length. This is similar to the Route/County Route system used here (at least in my part of the US). People can give directions like "take the A40 for 30 miles" rather than list out all the different names.

      Then you have the local signage, which is basically the street name signs. You're right that they're much less consistent that in the US - but a lot of them are also hundreds of years old :) I also find the US style of hanging the names on traffic lights or on poles visually less appealing - not an issue in some places but it would ruin towns with a lot of nice old buildings to put those giant green signs everywhere.

      As for the question - of course I'd take a GPS over a map - regardless of where I'm driving! Assuming equal map accuracy between the two it's really a no brainer, especially if you're driving alone (can't read a map and drive at the same time).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:GPS usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't tend to use street names for navigation except for the last mile or so of the journey (with London as the big exception). Trunk roads are signposted more clearly by road number than name, with M-prefixes being motorways, A-prefixes being major routes and B-prefixes usually being country roads. Signposting on roundabouts is fairly redundant, the idea is you should know what exit you're taking before you join, so you take the correct lane around it.

      Signposting of street names does depend on what area of the country you're in. In the midlands, they tend to be on freestanding signs about 3 foot off the ground, but down south they're on wall plaques mounted about 15 feet up. They're fairly distinctive though, almost always black on a white background, and in London they'll have red letters/numbers in the top left to indicate what postcode area you're in.

      Also, GPS routing tends to be of a pretty high standard here, simply because our road network is well mapped out (I've heard horror stories of US drivers being sent down roads that were closed 20 years ago, that just doesn't happen over here). The only place I've run into big problems is in London, and that's mainly because they keep rerouting traffic to try to ease congestion. A one-way road might well have traffic going the opposite direction to the year before! I hate driving in London, and I've lived on the outskirts of it on and off for 5 years. I wouldn't recommend it to tourists, it's a pretty stressful experience unless you've got a local in the passenger seat telling you what lane to be in.

    5. Re:GPS usage by stewbee · · Score: 1

      Intersting points about the signs in the US vs the UK. I would think that while the green signs in the US aren't 'beautiful', it is pretty much universal across the country. I would think that in a place like the UK, where the buildings could be significantly older, the last thing that I would want to do is put a street sign on it. In other words, I would preserve the aesthetics of the old building and have a green sign on the corner instead.

      The one instance I got lost in the UK, I was on a business trip with someone else and I was navigating and he was driving. We were going to a customer's site in Chester. The best we had to go by were some Google maps, that quickly became useless after we missed a turn, so the best we had to go by was a brochure type map and where they only show some of the main roads. Eventually we stumbled upon the place, but it wasn't easy.

      Thanks for the reply.

    6. Re:GPS usage by Izeickl · · Score: 1

      IMHO Being a vastly older country UK towns tend to be "mishapen" or even circular unlike the simple grid/block system that is so common un the US, and yes it can be very hard to spot road signs. To e blunt our towns/cities just were not planned well from the start and now grown too large to fix them. As a Brit who has been driving in the US multiple times, visiting an unknown area is far easier in the US than the UK..

    7. Re:GPS usage by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Travelled around CA, NV, UT, AZ, MA and NH for 3 months. Whilst street and road signs are better displayed in the US, the level of local knowledge is just as assumed. My favourites were freeway on-ramps, which can be tucked away with just a little black and white sign to indicate the entrance to a major road network (they're not always near the freeways). It reminded me that the US were building these things in numbers 20 years before the UK, and we (usually) learned the hard lessons from your experiences. Also LA for car-driving visitor without a GPS; intolerable. Other bugbear- same bloody street names in neighbouring conurbations, so you end up somewhere down by the docks rather than at Disneyland. Shouldn't navigate without both background maps and GPS.

      Which reminds me of a trip to Yosemite in 1993. We stopped in Jamestown and were trying to cut across country the next morning via some small town. Asked a local for directions and she had never heard of it. The only maps we could buy in the UK (which were from a German company) didn't include the two-decade old reservoir that flooded the valley we were trying to cross.

      The other problem to get your head around in the UK is the almost complete lack of a road-grid system. We loved that coming back here, it makes a tremendous difference to the milieu of town. Something to be celebrated.

  18. Time synchronization by mirix · · Score: 1

    A lot of people think of GPS as only positioning, but a lot of embedded things pull time through GPS (either PPS for real time, or 10MHz for use as a timebase).

    I'm sure there are plenty of things with sloppy code that doesn't exactly fail gracefully when losing GPS, especially for long time periods.

    Anyway, another aspect to think about.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:Time synchronization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know if Motorola's Canopy system (that a lot of wireless ISPs use to deliver bandwidth) or cell phone sites degrade gracefully under prolonged loss of GPS time synch?

  19. Per Submission or Per Word? by macraig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder whether IBTimes pays RedEaredSlider per submission or per word for his work?

    In his brief time on Slashdot, RedEaredSlider has submitted many dozens of articles; every single one of them references IBTimes and only IBTimes. I could even forgive a little Roland-Piqepaille-like self promotion, but this pattern of behavior screams paid promotion.

    I ask a question in rebuttal: has Slashdot become too reliant on corporate media promoters?

    1. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

      Yes. It. Has.

      --
      My other sig is a knife wound.
    2. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 0

      Does it matter?

      The topic interests you or it doesn't, and that's completely separate from who posted it or what their motives are. The article itself is not behind a pay wall, nor is it one of those craptastic articles spread out three sentences per page over 27 pages to increase ad views.

      I'm failing to see why I should care if the guy is getting paid for his submissions even if he is -- an accusation you've done little to support in any event.

    3. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by mariocki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, another example of the dumbing down of /. the tag line really ought to be changed to 'old news for wannabe nerds, stuff that's paid for'.
      This story hit the BBC at least 21 hours before IBTimes published and, unlike IBTimes, they had the good journalistic principles to link to the original report for us all to read: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12668230

      --
      Yes, madam, I am drunk. But in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ask a question in rebuttal: has Slashdot become too reliant on corporate media promoters?

      Yes. Next question?

    5. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you`ve ever come here for the news, then you`re doing it wrong.
      I read the BBC article for the facts, but I`ve come here for the comments and discussion. Just to get "durr, it`s 21 hours old". Tool.

    6. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the heads up. I will create several sock puppets to obfuscate my shenaniga.s.

    7. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but it smells like fraud to me. Then again, I'm starting to smell a few different rats with multiple identities by their posting styles. But then again, I find the whole thing highly amusing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Per Submission or Per Word? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      This apparently constitutes flamebait on Slashdot.

      Whoever moderated this, you're a fucking joke. Grow up, move out of your mom's basement and get some perspective on life. You're not nearly as smart or important as you think you are, I promise.

      You want flamebait? There it is.

  20. nails all chewed off, still not getting ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    relying on your gov to 'work? there's a book for that too. better yet, consider joining us at any of the scheduled million baby+ play-dates, consciousness arisings, georgia stone editing(s), & a host of other life promoting events. be there or be scared. gauaranteed to activate all your senses.

  21. Too much infrastructure is using GPS by Animats · · Score: 1

    First, there's no reason why a cell phone tower or an ATM should need GPS data to operate. There are many other ways to get timestamps, and in neither case is the facility likely to move much.

    Anything important should have a GPS smart enough to tell when its data is no good. If you can receive from four satellites, you have enough information to tell if the data you're getting is bogus. Life-critical applications like aircraft should receive from GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo, and cross-check.

    GPS satellites fail occasionally, and there are occasional gaps in coverage. Also bear in mind that GPS control is very centralized. It's run from Colorado Springs, and if the control center goes down, the constellation becomes inaccurate after a week or so.

    1. Re:Too much infrastructure is using GPS by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Also bear in mind that GPS control is very centralized. It's run from Colorado Springs, and if the control center goes down, the constellation becomes inaccurate after a week or so.

      That's not entirely true. Yes, the primary C2 facility for GPS is in Colorado Springs (Schriever Air Force Base, to be precise), but the Air Force has alternate facilities in different parts of the country that they can spin up in less than a day, should the need arise.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:Too much infrastructure is using GPS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      um, then how did Russia use it?

      I suspect there is more then one place that has a control center.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Too much infrastructure is using GPS by Chirs · · Score: 1

      GPS is used because it's a simple way to get a stratum 0 clock. Would you rather put an atomic clock on every cell tower?

    4. Re:Too much infrastructure is using GPS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      First, there's no reason why a cell phone tower or an ATM should need GPS data to operate. There are many other ways to get timestamps, and in neither case is the facility likely to move much.

      There are no other ways to get timestamps which will work in as many situations as GPS. On the other hand, if GPS goes away, you shouldn't be helpless. There should still be a RTC in there. And, not coincidentally, the GPS has to have a very, very accurate clock to work. If the GPS were used correctly then there is probably no cheaper or better way to add timekeeping and reception available today.

      Life-critical applications like aircraft should receive from GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo, and cross-check.

      Now there is something with which I can heartily agree. However, it's not inconceivable that some type of space weather would render them all inoperative at once... I think the message is that you can't rely solely on satellite-based positioning any time it is really critical.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. of course we are by Nyder · · Score: 1

    we are too reliant on all technology.

    If it all breaks down or stops working, we are fucked.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:of course we are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except from people who can actually live life by their own work.

      survival of the fittest

    2. Re:of course we are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WE ARE ALL FUCKED

  23. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is just another desperate intellectual struggling to find something to talk about.

  24. Re:Of course....WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on! The above commenters all seem to be under the impression that the only GPS application is the maps systems in your fancy new car. There have been several stories running around the net for the last few days, including here on /., about the havoc wreaked by simple GPS jammers. Many technologies rely on the accurate time signals from the GPS system. Recently the US Navy was conducting an excersize off the coast of San Diego in which they jammed GPS for a few hours. During that time various systems failed including cell phones, pagers, aircraft landing guidance, and ATMs! Several dozen $30 GPS jammers scattered around a city could shut down all sorts of critical services. I would say that we are undoubtedly too reliant on GPS.

  25. "It's the Backup, stupid" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emphasis required:

    The Academy says the range of applications using the technology is so vast that without adequate independent backup, signal failure or interference could potentially affect safety systems and other critical parts of the economy.

    GPS isn't the problem, it's the lack of backup.

    Just like how communities in earthquake areas have developed earthquake plans, we need to develop GPS-Down plans.

    The RAE correctly points out that GPS has become a near ubiquitous solution, but without backup plans in place.

    Which is an excellent technical question for /. -- what is a good, economical, backup plan for emergency services and industry? This thread shouldn't be drowning in water-cooler 'told-ya-so' and 'get-off-my-lawn'. It ought to be one of the better Ask Slashdot threads.

  26. GPS and its competition by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

    Is the Royal Academy of Engineering in any way involved with Galileo, the European counterpart/competitor to GPS?

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  27. Silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you ride horses? Do you make your own shoes? Do you make fire with flint and tinder? Probably not. Why? Because it extremely unlikely you will ever actually need those fallbacks—technology is reliable. That is why it persists, despite these original solutions.

    1. Re:Silly. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I have ridden horses, I have made clothes and probably could make shoes, I have made fires with flint and tinder and the bow method. Why? Because each of those things taught me something, and it was fun to do. Plus I can fall back on it if I have to.

    2. Re:Silly. by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Oh dear. I think you just put yourself on a terrorist watch list.

    3. Re:Silly. by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, you just gave them an idea. Stop that before you get promoted.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  28. Spirit of God navigation system by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Stars? Luxury! When I was a young'n the earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters.

    So we had to develop a Spirit of God (SOG) navigation system. And He kept moving over the surface of the waters, which made it even more difficult. This is still in use today, as some US soldiers will tell you that they are assigned to SOG, but are not allowed to tell you exactly what they do.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  29. GPS and IP address shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me both these problems can be solved by something at the same time. Doesn't exist yet but here's the spark.
    I so public domain this.

  30. GPS alternatives do exist (thanks, Putin!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Functioning GPS alternative, Russian: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLONASS

    European system which will launch its first satellites in 2011, with network to be completed over the next several years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation)

  31. graceful fail is key, as well as backstopping by Chirs · · Score: 1

    All these systems should have a decent local clock to fall back on. Calibrate a local clock based using gps, and they'll be able to go for a long time before degrading significantly.

    1. Re:graceful fail is key, as well as backstopping by hawguy · · Score: 1

      All these systems should have a decent local clock to fall back on. Calibrate a local clock based using gps, and they'll be able to go for a long time before degrading significantly.

      That depends on the price of your local clock, and your definitions of "long time" and "degradation". Some of these applications need millisecond or better clock accuracy, and without an expensive temperature controlled clock they can't maintain that accuracy for long. Which is why they used GPS clocks in the first place - they get accuracy close to an atomic clock for very little cost.

      When my NTP server was down for a week, the 100 servers that I managed were already off by plus or minus a few seconds in a week, which makes it hard to reconcile log files. If they were in remote sites without good network connectivity, a GPS time source sounds ideal.

    2. Re:graceful fail is key, as well as backstopping by petman · · Score: 1

      When my NTP server was down for a week, the 100 servers that I managed were already off by plus or minus a few seconds in a week, which makes it hard to reconcile log files.

      Not being able to reconcile log files hardly seems like a show-stopper.

    3. Re:graceful fail is key, as well as backstopping by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Not being able to reconcile log files hardly seems like a show-stopper.

      I was pointing out that local clocks drift quite quickly unless you use a high quality local time source.

      But in any case, clock skew between servers is actually a serious problem when you have a regulatory requirement to consolidate log files to accurately track user activity. Having someone perform some action *before* their login timestamp is not supposed to happen and shows that our controls and monitoring are not compliant...

      It's also a problem when you're dealing with multiple DVR's that record security video for a facility - trying to view suspicious activity across hundreds of cameras is much harder when those camera images aren't all timestamped consistently so you have to broaden the time period your searcing on. There's also a credibility issue if using the security footage as evidence.

  32. beg to differ by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I lived in what was then Zaire for three years back in the late 80s. Flew in a significant number of small planes using visual sight rules, maps, compass, etc. Had some close calls when the weather socked in over a dirt airstrip right before we got there, but for the most part it worked just fine.

    1. Re:beg to differ by sycorob · · Score: 1

      Heh. I grew up in Kananga in the 80's, I probably met you. Still nostalgic about Cesna's and dirt airstrips. Beats driving.

  33. compass, maps, and landmarks by Chirs · · Score: 1

    just as you thought

    1. Re:compass, maps, and landmarks by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So then why is that not a viable option now?

      I am confused.

    2. Re:compass, maps, and landmarks by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Maybe this article will give you a better understanding:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12668230

      It is not just the excellent positioning that GNSS affords but the very precise timing information these systems deliver that has made them so popular.

      The navigation problem, not really the biggest problem. It's the fact that so many systems rely entirely on GPS for timing.

    3. Re:compass, maps, and landmarks by sycorob · · Score: 1
      Because using that approach, you used landmarks, updated your position on the chart, aimed as good as you could, and went for it. You'd have to account for wind speed all the time, drift of the aircraft, visibility issues, etc. This was OK when the air wasn't full of planes going 500+ mph, when you could land in random fields if you needed to, etc. And still a lot of people misjudged and ran into mountains and hills they weren't expecting.

      Dead reckoning is not a reasonable way to steer a jet full of passengers, I would think. Having a backup to GPS that doesn't involve my pilot squinting out the window while clutching a map seems like a good idea to me.

  34. Are we too reliant on electric motors? by sillivalley · · Score: 2

    Three main uses of GPS -- nav, position, and standards (time and frequency).

    I can connect a GPS antenna on the roof to a small box in the lab and have frequency and time references at an accuracy that previously were limited to national laboratories! (search for Trimble Thunderbolt). When the green lights are on, I've got accuracy on the order of ten to the minus eleven or better.

    To the over-reliance claim, when the green lights go off on that box and the red lights go on, I'm back to using the references in each of my lab instruments. More important, the red lights let me know I'm not operating at those higher, known, levels of accuracy.

    The "over-reliance" argument is more an argument against not having a Plan B to put into action when Plan A goes down the tubes. Am I "over-reliant" on electric motors because I use an electric shaver in the morning rather than a straight razor? Or because I use a motorized coffee grinder rather than some manually operated device? No, it's a trade-off, and hopefully one I have made knowingly.

    1. Re:Are we too reliant on electric motors? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I just use a seconds pendulum in the lab... measured to a metre using a plastic ruler.

      My error bars are... slight. ;)

      (although, hilariously, right now in the physical chem lab I use the temp is being measured with a freebie LCD promotional alarm clock/calendar/thermometer thing from Fisher Scientific - one of those things they give away when they are trying to flog you glassware and HPLC machines. The properly accurate thermometer is broken right now).

    2. Re:Are we too reliant on electric motors? by lewko · · Score: 1

      Seems like a whole lot of trouble just to know when it's time to go home each day...

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    3. Re:Are we too reliant on electric motors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like over-reliance on your electric shaver coupled with the fact that no one even makes straight razors anymore (or at least they're rare). It's that disconnect that is a major _potential_ problem. It's the intervening period, complete with its problems, and potential cost of switching (back).

      Obviously, you do not see the risk as significant enough to do anything about and I have no comment in this regard. This is not a risk assessment so much as a broad overview or "Where We Are Now" statement. TFA's job is to inform society that there is a risk. Society will make the decision as to whether or not the risk is worth it.

    4. Re:Are we too reliant on electric motors? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The paper is more about commercial systems that rely on accurate time keeping than stuff people use themselves. Say your bank has a secure server that needs to keep within 1 second of another secure server. That is easy enough to do with a GPS disciplined clocked on both ends but once you remove the GPS time base what is the backup? The internal clocks on motherboards are not particularly accurate, maybe a few seconds a day and probably worse in a hot server room. They need to spend some money in more accurate network time servers at either end, but "well theoretically one day GPS might stop working" doesn't tend to convince management to splash out on new kit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  35. Secure GPS by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Its important to note, the military has authenticated GPS.

    Its only commercial/civilian GPS that can not authenticate the signal.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Secure GPS by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Not any more I don;t think - I thought the newest bunch of sats that went up were lacking that feature, essentially making it useless.

  36. avoid collisions that the job of the signals! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    avoid collisions that the job of the signals!

  37. Grey backgrounds just amplify the suckage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

    Grey type sucks already. Grey backgrounds just amplify the suckage.

  38. Welcome to North Carolina by ncmathsadist · · Score: 1

    Here signs are illegible, missing, misleading or nonsensical because of our highly competent (heh-heh) DOT. No road goes in ANY direction here and, as a result, all navigation is point to point. Businesses and people do not put numbers on their houses or buildings. You are screwed without a GPS here.

  39. Re mod to +6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent post should be first post seen by anybody reading comments about this article.

    I wish I could upvote you, but alas Slashdot is stuck with an outdated moderation model.

    Signed, a 10-year /. AC reading his last /. story and posting for the last time.

  40. Gps, into the lake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yyKrS8jwSY

  41. Also don't forget SONET/SDH by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Also don't forget SONET/SDH, they need very precise timing signals too. Though in this case atomic clocks might be used, as they are getting cheaper and smaller.

  42. FCC approved GPS interference by ProfM · · Score: 2

    Came across a couple of articles recently here and here specifically talking about GPS interference and "dead-zones".

    Curious part, is that this technology is APPROVED by the FCC. The frequencies used by LightSquared (1525 MHz—1559 MHz) is just below the GPS frequencies (1559—1610 MHz). While it SHOULDN'T interfere, the power levels used by LightSquared is much higher than the signals from satellites.

    1. Re:FCC approved GPS interference by CompMD · · Score: 1

      I've watched the experiments. There is interference. An FCC and FAA certified GPS receiver for aircraft loses fix more than 5 miles away from a Lightsquared transmitter.

  43. cell towers and wimax uses GPS by e3m4n · · Score: 2

    cell towers and wimax towers use GPS for timing and synchronization.

  44. Galatic GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There may be a better system evolving. There is a project on mapping all the known pulsars, this will allow a mapping system to be created in space and by useing the radio signals from the pulsars called the Galatic GPS

  45. I like the idea of a society reliant on GPS by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...because when GPS inevitably goes down, stupid people will be that much clearer to identify.

    --
    -Styopa
  46. Pulsar Triangulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar#Applications
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar#Significant_pulsars

    As far as I can tell, this entire article is really just a scare tactic to push an agenda but it was thought provoking.

    I was recently having a conversation with some classmates talking about pulsars when I suggested that they could potentially be used as natural alternatives to GPS satellites. Sure enough, this is discussed in the wikipedia article as one potential application of Pulsar astronomy.

    For space travel outside of the earth's orbit, the options available for navigation seem to be computer vision star mapping, precision accelerometers to find significant gravity wells, or potentially, using pulsar triangulation.

  47. Fortunately. . . by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    No megalomaniacal media baron would screw up GPS to cause Britain and China to go to war. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120347/

  48. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that what your mom told you?

  49. Yes out dependency on GNSS is very serious ! by macpacheco · · Score: 1

    Most industrial dependence on GNSS is as a frequency standard. Standard atomic clocks are too expensive, a good dual frequency GPS received costs about 20% of an atomic clock and outputs a 10MHz clocking source more than good enough. That goes for GNSS dependency on telecommunications, financial institutions. GNSS = All GPS like systems (GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Compass, ...).

    Now we have Chip scale atomic clocks which seem to be just as accurate as dual frequency GNSS receivers as a frequency standard. That should eliminate some dependency on GNSS.

    WAAS/EGNOS augmented GPS gives 20ft or better accuracy all the time.
    In a decade with L5 fully operational, it will give 8ft accuracy all the time.
    VOR is dead. DME/DME is worth something, but won't give time, and its only useful for aircraft. But it's accuracy is about 600ft, and lateral positioning only.
    What we really need is a ground based GPS pseudo lite network that gives GPS accuracy regardless of GPS signals. Each pseudo lite should broadcast on L5 for line of sight users and on a much lower frequency for non line of sight users.

    Killing eLoran was the dumbest decision the Obama administration did in my opinion.

  50. Re:Yes absolutely. App? by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

    But there are commercial applications, too. Suppose you're in a mall, and you want to know how to get from where you are now to the Old Navy store. A forward-thinking mall might provide an app for that.

    A forward thinking mall would provide a map for that and not assume that everyone uses the why!?Phone.

  51. seems terorist contest winner. by leaen · · Score: 1

    This seems to be winner at best terrorist attack with upto 30 people and 500000$ 30 terrorist just dispersed in USA launch meteorological baloons with 30$ GPS jammers and see power grid collapse. It is even better than winners 1. Genetically modify corn to produce botulitoxin, plant it at several field and watch americans die as they refuse eat corn 2. Buy copper wires and throw them at power/rail lines. 3. Donate 500000$ to republicans

  52. GPS Based Ticket Systems by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    (Unrelated to parent post)

    Using a GPS jammer will really screw up GPS based ticket system at public transports, at least in some cities.

    The ticket system for the public transport in Gothenburg, Sweden uses GPS to determine how much a trip costs, and in general people lose money on a frequent basis in that system. A great rip-off since they claim that GPS is infallible.

    Another limitation for GPS is that it's not that good when you are in polar regions, the precision is not as good as in warmer areas.

    However GPS is a great system too - especially if you are going somewhere the first time. A side effect is that it doesn't take into account that roads may be closed and stuff like that so you may sometimes need to take a detour. And having a real paper map works fine as a backup, but even paper maps has their limit since the resolution is often rather crude.

    But to some extent we are getting reliant on GPS as a technology - it doesn't have common sense, and it does contain bad or conflicting information from time to time causing delivery trucks ending up in a backroad in a neighbor town and all kind of stuff like that.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  53. GPS alternatives by AG+the+other · · Score: 1

    I guess we should go back to looking for moss on the backs of trees.

    --
    Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  54. My pizza dude is too dependent on GPS by jjohn · · Score: 1

    Since Google Maps does not accurately place my house on my street, pizza dude takes an extra 20 minutes to get my food to me.

    For the record, it's not that big a street.

    Me? I use paper maps.

  55. just don't rely on another nation's tools... by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I think the subtext of the argument is "don't rely on another nation's tools". Not an issue if you're from the USA, but if you're not from the USA this is a bigger issue of concern. Your shipping, military, directed vehicles etc are all dependent on another government's political and military preferences. If you have a different opinion from the USA, you could be in big trouble. And you don't have a vote in how the USA wants to guide its policies.

    This is one of the big reasons why the EU and Russia want to build their own GPS-like systems, they want sovereign control over satellite guidance, not to be dependent on how much the Americans like them on any particular day.

  56. a fact's a fact... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    self-reliance is treason against the corporate state.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  57. Not so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiots are too reliant on GPS!

    Recently in quebec, a Woman failed to program her GPS correctly and let her GPS switch her to an alternative road, that road (up north) proved to be barely used by anyone during winter time.

    i mean what's next? A pitfall but if your GPS says it's ok,,,,,go ahead anyway?

  58. 28904 Fairview Ave, Hayward, CA 94542 ? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    What is that, some sort of telecom microwave repeater site?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:28904 Fairview Ave, Hayward, CA 94542 ? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      I just randomly chose those numbers! I had no idea what exist at that location. Reminds of a story where someone ficticiously published an address which in reality was a house used by an intelligence agency.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  59. A couple thoughts by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    We had Omega on a couple of ships I was on, and... it never worked. LORAN was cool if you were close enough to shore, Transit was (usually) good for a couple of fixes a day, but I don't recall ever, ever getting an Omega fix.

    There is no particular reason why you couldn't re implement GPS using ground mounted atomic clocks and a bunch of towers. Conveniently, we have an infrastructure of cellphone towers neatly mapping with civilization, also providing coverage to big cities.

    This wouldn't be world-wide, though, unless you could convince a bunch of other countries to play along. And that might be a hard sell: countries interested in their own nav systems are already building satellite constellations (GLONASS, Gallileo), or just free-riding on GPS.

  60. Position isn't really the issue by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Most of these effects don't have anything to do with the position of the equipment involved - it has to do with timing. Keeping power stations all in the same phase is critically dependent on knowing *exactly* what time it is. GPS does that very well.

    In a way, I agree with the GP, though - a sense of perspective is warranted. GPS is relatively easy to jam... over a small area. So sure, maybe your local airport will have schedule disruptions, or maybe your local power plant will go offline. Those are indeed bad things. But individual power plants and airports have problems all the time, and life goes on. What's not easy to do is bring down the ENTIRE GPS system. Jammers can screw things up locally, but it's not as if our entire national air traffic system will go on the blink after being attacked by a few soda-can GPS jammers.

    1. Re:Position isn't really the issue by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the possibility of a media magnate villain modifying the GPS signal so that a British nuclear sub can be diverted from course, kidnapped and made to shoot its rockets at China ... So that there is breaking news coming :)

  61. Highly unlikely by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The US military can't simply "turn off the satellites you're using". For one thing, I'm not sure it's even possible to switch them off. Further, the satellites are not geosynchronous, so they'd have to continually be switching satellites on and off as they rose over your home territory, and that would blind huge swathes of the world (including the US military itself). The only conceivable thing they could do is turn selective availability back on, and that doesn't degrade the position all that much. The DoD has also agreed that they will not use SA anymore because it pisses off the FAA too badly.

    I think you can breathe easy with respect to continued use of GPS - denying it to certain parts of the world is such a pain in the ass that I doubt it would ever be done.

  62. Oh, right by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    That must be why we've never had a train collision in the age of signals! Dude, seriously. Signals are not that great of a way to prevent collisions.

  63. That's how Polaris SLBMs navigated by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Polaris had an inertial nav system that was initialized by a star fix. I believe some of the Russian ICBMs worked the same way.

  64. Works great, except... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... when it's cloudy. My first deployment in the Navy we had a casualty to our Transit system while enroute from Hawaii to Samoa. No problem, we'll just do celestial nav. Except it was cloudy... for days. We had to dead reckon for like 3 days before we got a fix. Luckily we weren't too far off track, but you can get really screwed up.