Slashdot Mirror


US Military Commissions Sock Puppet Program

chrb writes "The Guardian and The Telegraph are reporting that US based Ntrepid Corporation has been awarded a $2.76 million contract to develop software aimed at manipulating social media. The project aims to enable military personnel to control multiple 'sock puppets' located at a range of geographically diverse IP addresses, with the aim of spreading pro-US propaganda. The project will not target English speaking web sites (yet) but will be limited to foreign languages, including Arabic, Farsi, Urdu and Pashto. The project will be funded as part of the $200 million Operation Earnest Voice program run by US Central Command."

217 comments

  1. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if we could just get internet to all of them...

    1. Re:Good! by suso · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Facebook is the Internet.

    2. Re:Good! by suso · · Score: 2

      Even though I was joking, I can't believe I just said that. You can ostracize me now.

    3. Re:Good! by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      I know that you were joking, but to many people - that is now the truth. When I talk to my youngest brothers and sisters and they say they're going to "go on the internet" they're referring to Facebook, Youtube and maybe an IM client. That's the way it is now.

    4. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      when my friend say's their going to watch T.V. it's a few soaps and a bit of news... that's the way it is now.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    5. Re:Good! by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      That's my point - when someone says they're watching TV you assume that they're watching cable channels because that's the overwhelmingly common usage.

      You don't assume that they're watching a DVD or any of the many other uses that a television can actually do, because the phrase "Watching TV" is synonymous with specifically using that TV to watch broadcasts or cable - exactly as "using the internet" is now synonymous with using Facebook for a new generation.

    6. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 0

      when my partner say's she's watching T.V. she's watching a film.

      When I say I'm watching T.V. my friends call me a bullshitter... I never watch TV.

      That's my point.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    7. Re:Good! by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      You don't really have a point, do you?

      I never used to feed the trolls, oops.

    8. Re:Good! by Omestes · · Score: 2

      When I say I'm watching T.V. my friends call me a bullshitter... I never watch TV.

      When I say I'm watching T.V., I'm sitting in the living room staring at the giant black monolith, staring carefully. You can never be too safe, those things are dangerous. It hasn't been plugged in since I go it, the last thing you want to do is give those damn things POWER. The sad thing is no one believes me either... my girl friend left me, I can hear my cats chitter with contempt and amusement... But I will continue my vigil, for the good of the humane and just society.

      I'm a hero. A hero damnit.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:Good! by ckeo · · Score: 1

      whats T.V. ?
      Is that something on the internet ?
      url please.

    10. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 0

      my point is that different people use different things for different things.... calling it 'the way' is pointless.... I said 'friend' not 'friends' aka a sample size of one. U really don't understand do you?

      I never really should feed idiots should I... opps.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    11. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      ahh..... well hopefully you got the TV link, and the 'my friend' ergo not me and a sample size of one.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    12. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you were a bit more eloquent I would understand your point - maybe it's my own failing, but I don't get it. If you're implying that my broad generalization based purely on personal speculation is a broad generalization - well then congratulations, you figured out that I was attempting to illustrate a point using allegory.

      It's kind of like that time I called this guy a troll to get a rise out of him and let him prove to everyone else that he was just griefing...

      Dance, puppet, dance.

    13. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Well.... it's more like watching the TV is the internet now adays, or talking to friends is the internet now adays.... but your still going to have your geek hackers. The internet has replaced or augmented lots of things, the only real thing that has changed (apart from a little in the way of easily getting noticed) is that a broader spectrum of people use it..... I think the internet still holds that magic it used to hold, just as computers still hold that kind of magical voodoo science stuff... less people are taking science afterall.

      I thought it was better to give some examples that related to your point and let you work it out yourself and then ask any questions so as to fill in the gaps between what you where saying / thinking and what I meant. Creating a more two sided didactic argument over a debate of consensus and who has the prettier english.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    14. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      my point is that it's still Magic to most people and they will use the Magic thing to do what they want to do and that I don't assume anything, but you do.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    15. Re:Good! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      The 'my friends '..... bit, I don't tend to keep friends who make assumptions about other people like you do.. I think they call that theory of mind... it's a well known medical condition.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  2. I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlords by Magada · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait... that didn't come out right.

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  3. Unbellythinkful by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, calling propaganda "Operation Earnest Voice"? I think a few braincells just exploded.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Unbellythinkful by Magada · · Score: 3, Funny

      What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    2. Re:Unbellythinkful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Operation 15/f/Kabul ;-)

    3. Re:Unbellythinkful by coinreturn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, calling propaganda "Operation Earnest Voice"? I think a few braincells just exploded.

      Actually, the name is perfect, since the name is also propaganda.

    4. Re:Unbellythinkful by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Know what I mean, Vern?

    5. Re:Unbellythinkful by Magada · · Score: 1

      I think you are mistaken. It's operation Kunduz Kandy you're probably thinking of.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    6. Re:Unbellythinkful by wjousts · · Score: 1

      I know. Somebody at the state department hasn't heard of irony.

    7. Re:Unbellythinkful by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?

      Operation "Rough Penetration" might describe its intended relationship with the truth (bend over and spread 'em, citizen).
      Plusgoodwise bellythinkful, verging bumthinkful. Approved fullwise.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    8. Re:Unbellythinkful by SplicerNYC · · Score: 1

      It's the importance of being earnest.

    9. Re:Unbellythinkful by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I vote for "Operation Inconvenient Truth". That would clearly mark it as a propaganda machine.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    10. Re:Unbellythinkful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^ the hardest I've laughed in a few weeks. ty. LOL.

    11. Re:Unbellythinkful by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Truthful is orthogonal to propaganda.

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/propaganda

      2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
      3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect

      Note that it doesn't say that the propaganda is necessarily lies. Ideas, allegations, and rumors may be either true or false; information and facts specifically imply that they're true (though they may still not show the whole picture, or both sides of the coin).

      Many propagandists in fact believe that what they are saying is the truth. And even if something *is* the truth, it doesn't mean it isn't also propaganda.

    12. Re:Unbellythinkful by codegen · · Score: 1

      What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?

      Operation Kafka.

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  4. The Irony of it! by pwinkeler · · Score: 1

    Calling the pro-US propaganda "Operation Earnest Voice". I wonder what is being perpetrated under the guise of "Operation Bald Faced Lies"? Seriously, how about doing good deeds and talking about them openly? Mom always said that worked best anyway.

    --
    PaulW, IT Consultant
    1. Re:The Irony of it! by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Operation Bald Faced Lies is on a four year cycle, the next one ending in November 2012...

    2. Re:The Irony of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, someone apparently took Minitrue as a blueprint. I'm hoping for an upgrade to the budget of Pornosec, of course.

  5. botnet.gov by SJHillman · · Score: 0

    So it's a government social media botnet?

  6. Secret op? by danbuter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shouldn't something like this have been kept Secret? Letting everyone know about it kind of defeats the purpose.

    1. Re:Secret op? by Magada · · Score: 1

      The operational secrecy seems un-compromised. It's not like someone provided Jihadi forum admins with a banhammer target list. I AM glad this has been exposed, mind you.

      I happen to live outside the US, you see, so I really do not appreciate the thought that the US military might be taking an active, covert role in my country's political and social dialogue.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    2. Re:Secret op? by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      "I really do not appreciate the thought that the US military might be taking an active, covert role in my country's political and social dialogue."

      Glad you could join us; Welcome to the world as it has been for the last 50 years..

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    3. Re:Secret op? by chielk · · Score: 1

      But sure they they are wery concerned with our safety.
      For what orther reason would they want to build a military basis in our country than to protect us?
      It seems that you hate your own people and want us to be unprepared when an evil dictator tries to take over our country.
      Do you really want to sacrifice your own? We need the protection of the United States! We've always been allies with the United States!

    4. Re:Secret op? by Magada · · Score: 1

      Direct US influence was not all that extensive in my country for at least 30 of the past 50 years, what with the Iron Curtain and everything.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    5. Re:Secret op? by commandermonkey · · Score: 1

      I believe the cat was out of the bag a month ago when ArsTechnics was reporting on HBGary?

    6. Re:Secret op? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      You mean 25 of the last 50 years, right? We are at 2011. Also, I still doubt the US didn't have a big influence behind the Iron Curtain.

    7. Re:Secret op? by Magada · · Score: 1

      I mean what I say. We were deep within Moscow's sphere of influence for a while after 1990. Some neighboring countries and territories still are.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    8. Re:Secret op? by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      There are lots of secret programs too. One reason they're not all secret is a lot of the people who work on these kinds of projects aren't qualified for high clearances, on account of being recent immigrants.

  7. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by cappp · · Score: 2

    Personally I think it's a fantastic idea, clearly indicative of a government that loves and cares for its people.

    Cappp...translate this into Farsi when you get a chance please.

  8. Earnest... by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

    "The project will be funded as part of the $200 million Operation Earnest Voice program run by US Central Command."

    This word you are using... I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Earnest... by clemdoc · · Score: 0

      Dear US military!
      Please be so kind as to include german speaking countries, especially Austria, in your oh so earnest puppet shows. I hope your sock puppets operate during normal US business hours which would mean I'll get a couple of great laughs with breakfast.
      Thank you.
      BTW: Why bother, just use Fox news and Google translate.

  9. nuclear by orange47 · · Score: 1

    Seems to me Mr Burns already did that with slashdot..

    1. Re:nuclear by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      What the binning of comment recommendations at the NYT's dotearth.

  10. Hanging with the popular kids by Sean_Inconsequential · · Score: 0

    This is certainly a better waste^H^H^H^H^H^H use of money than NASA or, I don't know... education?

  11. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by FatSean · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pro-USA propaganda is already planted in Iraqi news papers, this is a logical step. It's also despicable. Especially when the same government denounces these tactics when used by "the enemy".

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    --
    Blar.
  12. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every new spending bill or attack on individual rights is prettied up with a name that simultaneously (1) diverts attention away from the true objectives, and (2) implies that only radicals and lunatics would be opposed to it. See "PATRIOT Act" for a prime example.

    But let's not lose sight of what the executives in the business of government are really after: money. There's a reason why every year government spends more, borrows more, and rakes even more cash through the power pyramid -- and it's certainly not because "the people asked for it". The bigger and more ubiquitous the business of government, the more lucrative that business is for those who know how to exploit it for personal gain.

    A million here, a million there, and pretty soon you're talking about the most expensive, most powerful government AND world empire (with military bases in some 150 countries around the world) that has ever existed.

  13. OK for furriners by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another case of the US feeling that it is perfectly acceptable to treat foreigners in a way that would bring outrage if it tried it on its own citizens. Such things started, and were found acceptable: in cases of outright declared war (World Wars, Korea, Vietnam), it is OK to deceive and manipulate enemy civilians. But that has been translated to being OK to do the same to all except strong allies - and it would be a small step to apply it to them. The philosophy has become that war justifies lethal force, and non-war justifies anything except lethal force.

    What would the US do if another country started doing the same within the US?

    Hey - maybe they have. Maybe all the appalling right-wing bigots are really Chinese sock-puppets intended to discredit the US. I have never met an American who offered those views: all the ones I meet are nice people. Perhaps the bad side of America that I hear of but never see is just a huge cyber sock puppet! Damn!

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    1. Re:OK for furriners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another case of the US feeling that it is perfectly acceptable to treat foreigners in a way that would bring outrage if it tried it on its own citizens.

      You think they don't covertly spew propaganda at US citizens already?

    2. Re:OK for furriners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the second largest shareholder of News Corp is a Saudi prince. I'm sure if anyone bothered to investigate it would be easy to find other foreign owners of propaga^W news networks.

    3. Re:OK for furriners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The philosophy has become that war justifies OVERT lethal force, and non-war justifies anything except overt lethal force.

      Fixed it.

    4. Re:OK for furriners by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      Shocking. People will do something dishonest to get something they want - news at 11.

      I like to convince my superiors that if we don't upgrade a critical machine that a herd of trolls will attack the servers. (thanks Dilbert!)

      Simple fact is, people manipulate people. Let's not pretend that we don't.

    5. Re:OK for furriners by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Another case of the US feeling that it is perfectly acceptable to treat foreigners in a way that would bring outrage if it tried it on its own citizens.

      Waddaya mean, "if it tried it"? There's tons of propaganda from the US government aimed at US citizens, from the most obvious (e.g. White House news briefings) to the not-so-obvious (e.g. describing generals on Pentagon payroll as "independent analysts" who just happen to have a pro-war viewpoint), to the downright illegal (e.g. agents provocateur to start violence in otherwise peaceful protests).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:OK for furriners by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      You mean the US government thinks it is unaccetable to apply that to their citizens?! That is news to me.

      Also, read a bit of wikileaks if you can. Those you think are chinese's sock-puppets are in fact Saudi Arabia's sock-puppets. (They probably have some other overlords too, but it is not clear yet.)

    7. Re:OK for furriners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Communism, man exploits man. In Democracy, it's the other way around.

    8. Re:OK for furriners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in cases of outright declared war (World Wars, Korea, Vietnam)

      Neither Korea nor Vietnam were formally declared wars. The last formal US declarations of war were during WWII against Japan, Germany, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary and Rumania. See pages 83-89 of the pdf Declarations of War and Authorizations for the Use of Military Force: Historical Background and Legal Implications

    9. Re:OK for furriners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, I work with one (for one more day!) who has exactly those views. Trusts Fox news implicitly. The only thing I've found that he splits with them on is gay marriage. I finally convinced him the government shouldn't say who can't marry beyond what any contract requires, and that it makes no difference to his marriage either way. And that took 6 months.

    10. Re:OK for furriners by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The US has been subjected to this for a very long time. Having a "open" society certainly allows propaganda of all sorts to florish.

      The KGB had long running programs to "introduce the brighter side of the USSR to Americans". Before that, the NKVD has that program.

      I would certainly call anything published by NAMBLA and the Church of Scientology to be "propaganda". Anything at all. Both of these organizations are US-based. And the people that are suckered into believing their message are probably harmed for life. And sometimes imprisoned.

      And these are really simple public examples. Why would you think that certain magazines subscriber lists aren't used by foreign governments for their own purposes? That was something that could be easily done since the term "magazine" meant something besides where the powder and shot were stored.

      Now, not all governments engage in this sort of thing. Certainly after WW I the US did not. Probably the US is going to enter into a severe isolationist stance in the next few years. Between not having the budget for it and not having the balls for it, I'd say it is a virtual certainity that we tell China to shove their imaginary "debt" and the rest of the world along with it. Might bring back some manufacturing to the US, but probably not much. And I don't see much need for a big fence on the border - unless it is to keep people in.

      But heck, you get what you can pay for, and today with the US that isn't much.

  14. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by August_zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As distasteful as it is, this is hardly a new thing. Pretty much everyone in history has done this to some degree. The only real "news" is that a new mechanism is going into place, but the machinery has been there all along.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  15. Holy shit-snacks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the voice of Pam from "Archer" .... "no one will ever know."

  16. PROTIP: If you can understand the program name.. by amanicdroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you can understand an intended meaning to a US operation or program name then it's public persuasion / propaganda.

    MKUltra: WTF
    Operation Overlord / Neptune: WTF

    Operation Iraqi Freedom: propaganda

  17. MMM by MauiHawaii · · Score: 1

    What users think about this!? ...............

  18. Here come the "slippery slope" arguments. by chemicaldave · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And the negative mods for this post.

    1. Re:Here come the "slippery slope" arguments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's no slope. these fucks are already at the bottom.

    2. Re:Here come the "slippery slope" arguments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a slippery slope. This is the sticky flesh-dissolving marsh in the digestive organs at the bottom of said slippery slope.

  19. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    Yet you're perfectly happy to pay for a newspaper laden with dishonest advertisements and astroturf articles. What gives?

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  20. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can opt out of the newspaper market, I certainly have. Can't easily opt out of tax paying.

  21. For another viewpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is wrong with propaganda if you're telling the truth? Slashdot folks seem to be assuming that the word "propaganda" means that one is intentionally deceiving others. This is not necessarily true. Propaganda can involve deception, but not necessarily.

    1. Re:For another viewpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the summery? Deception is the name of the game.

  22. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

    Well, it's easier to opt out of newspaper buying than tax paying.

    Although I try as hard as possible to avoid both.

  23. Military Intelligence - the oxymoron strikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of couse, because we want people demanding democracy to be ignored as US sock puppets so that favoured Tyrants can stay in power - WTF??

    Then again, if they don't hurry up with this,
    the world will soon be one big happy family of democracies,
    holding hands and singing hosanna - and the Military will have no justifiable reason to exist.

    Yes, I can see why they might want this urgently - not so stupid after all,
    just self interested and a bit evil.

  24. Earnest? by severn2j · · Score: 1

    What exactly is so 'earnest' about creating multiple fake identities and using them to spread propaganda in order manipulate public opinion?

    1. Re:Earnest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe its just one of their puppet characters thats called Earnest (Or Earnie) There might also be Bert and Elmo...

    2. Re:Earnest? by Sean_Inconsequential · · Score: 1

      Ernest Goes To Foreign Websites And Tells People Good Things About America. It is certainly no Ernest Goes To Jail, but then again, what is?

  25. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasnt there some ideas floating around that they already were manipulating social media, maybe this is just to make us think this kind of thing doesnt already exist?

  26. The best propaganda... by boarder8925 · · Score: 0

    You know, there's a much easier way to get these people to stop hating us: Stop occupying their lands and killing their brethren.

    1. Re:The best propaganda... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That would help, but it's not going to remove the late a lot. There is just some natural cultural antagonism, particually with the more strictly Islamic countries. Even if the US had no involvement there at all, they would still consider it an abhorent and evil country for treating women as equals and allowing adulterers to live.

    2. Re:The best propaganda... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      There is just some natural cultural antagonism, particually with the more strictly Islamic countries.

      Not really.

      For instance, watch Jason Jones's reporting on Iran in his Behind the Veil series (yes, I realize this was done for the Daily Show, but it was some pretty good serious reporting, just done in a semi-silly way). You find out pretty quickly that average Iranian likes Americans, and like and use many American products. What they're not so keen on is American military forces building up on both sides of their country with American political leaders regularly threatening to bomb their country into oblivion.

      Or you can watch some of Al Jazeera's reports from Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. The mostly younger leaders of the pro-democracy movements are happy to talk about their online friends in the US, or their use of US-based Facebook to help organize. Again, they like Americans, they like a lot of American products. But what they don't like are tear gas canisters or grenades with "Made in the USA" written on them getting shot at them by a US-backed dictator.

      Even in the more conservative areas, the vast majority would be perfectly content to basically agree "you leave us alone, we'll leave you alone".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  27. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits

    Well, people are always saying they want the government "run like a business". Well, friend, "business" has been doing this sockpuppet thing for years. Go look at the web site for "New Media Strategies", the company that provides sock puppets for the Koch Brothers, among others. That's their entire business model - providing sock puppets for businesses.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  28. Budget by damicatz · · Score: 0

    And you wonder why the country has no money when they waste it on stuff like this. This is why people hate the US. It is the height of hubris to think that we have the right to go and tell other people what values they have to have. It is the height of hubris to think that the entire world should share in those values and that they should have to share in those. And people wonder why the US keeps getting attacked.

  29. I was hoping for muppets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here I was getting excited that the military was supporting the arts.

  30. Israel has been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever get those "Well, that's what happens when terrorists fire rockets at civilians" posts whenever someone criticizes the Israeli military for massacring civilians? Yep, that's the good old propaganda machine firing up its sockpuppets.

    I'd like to believe that all of the credulous posts (those like "Well, we should keep them incarcerated forever just in case they ARE terrorists!") are also coming from the propaganda machines, but some people really seem to be that stupid.

  31. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    This is true. You can look back in the old testament and find propaganda about Israel's enemies and the terrible things they apparently did, though there is no archaeological evidence to back the claims. Same for some of the ancient egyptian inscriptions. This is just adding a new level of sophistication.

  32. Are you paying US taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    An American would not spell "dishonorable" the way you did.

    1. Re:Are you paying US taxes? by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he's trying to set a good example for his peers?

  33. Why Such Strong Reactions Agains US Military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really think this whole idea may be misunderstood. I think we should give the US military some credit for trying to preserve world peace.

    1. Re:Why Such Strong Reactions Agains US Military by xmorg · · Score: 1

      preserve your version of world peace, except in
      Saudi Arabia
      Bahrain
      Iran
      Somalia
      Rwandana

  34. This is a good idea! by boristdog · · Score: 1

    And bully for the good old US of A, the bastion of democracy and goodness, for coming up with it!

    I, and all of my attractive, intelligent and clever friends agree with this! You should agree as well!

    1. Re:This is a good idea! by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      And bully for the good old US of A, the bastion of democracy and goodness, for coming up with it!

      I, and all of my attractive, intelligent and clever friends agree with this! You should agree as well!

      Absolutely. Let us all lay down our arms, convert to Christianity and promise to uphold copyright law.

    2. Re:This is a good idea! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Yes, I for one am going to lay down my arms, convert to Christianity and uphold copyright law. Lets all do it together.

    3. Re:This is a good idea! by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      And software patents. Don't forget the software patents.

      On a side note, Obama will is visiting my country today. It's creepy.

  35. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by crackspackle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pro-USA propaganda is already planted in Iraqi news papers, this is a logical step. It's also despicable. Especially when the same government denounces these tactics when used by "the enemy".

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    Ever heard of Voice of America ? Same thing, different media. These aren't subliminal messages, it's propaganda created to directly counter propaganda of those who would seek to continue doing harm in any form, not necessarily just against the United States but also against the interest of humanity - think Gadhaffi for a current example. Having a problem with this is just Naiveté on your part.

  36. GeorgiaStoneMasons, 'chosen ones', in cahoots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the GSM get their tiny (ie; selfish, stingy, eugenatic, fake math) .5
    billion remaining population, & the money/weapons/vaccine/deception/fake
    'weather' alchemist/genetically altered nazi mutant goon exchangers, get
    us? yikes

    the 'fog' is lifting? more chariots will be needed?

    ALL (uninfactdead) MOMMYS......

  37. If you're anti-american... by FlapHappy · · Score: 2

    ...you should probably ignore all of those friend requests you are suddenly getting.

  38. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is nothing dishonorable at all with the U.S.A. spreading pro-USA propaganda.

  39. Re:PROTIP: If you can understand the program name. by AHuxley · · Score: 1
    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  40. Re:PROTIP: If you can understand the program name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Operation Iraqi Freedom: propaganda

    I can't believe people write anti-American rubbish like this. You should be ashamed of yourself. Operation Iraqi Freedom was responsible for the liberation of millions and millions of Iraqi barrels of oil. Those barrels of oil were languishing, captive, until the US and UK and a few other assorted countries came to their rescue. How many were freed wasn't exactly counted - Haliburton and co pumped and filled, but accidentally forgot to record how many they pumped etc for a while. But it was millions and millions.

    Job well done, I say. Freedom for all Iraqi barrels of oil.

  41. So when should we expect sock puppets here? by morikahnx · · Score: 2

    Is site considered on US soil, or should we start expecting military trolls here soon?

    1. Re:So when should we expect sock puppets here? by FlapHappy · · Score: 1

      I doubt they'll ever make their way here. Slash-dotters aren't against the US, but against stupidity in many forms (that just tends to be our leading export)...and Apple.

    2. Re:So when should we expect sock puppets here? by cocoajunkie · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I am already skeptical enough of the security consultants calling Wikileaks "traitors" on LinkedIn and repeating the same tiresome Foxnews spew word by word. These folks might have been doing some tests on the field already. Or was that is just normally occurring obtuseness?

    3. Re:So when should we expect sock puppets here? by Abstrackt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, the military is way too busy defending our freedoms and improving the world we live in to spend time posting on Slashdot!

      (This message brought to you by the US military)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:So when should we expect sock puppets here? by FlapHappy · · Score: 1

      Maybe some of these people were/are looking for lucrative government contracts? I'd bet there is a lot of money being thrown around to 'consultants' over Wikileaks anyway.

  42. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is it dishonorable if the stories are true? People do not understand that propaganda does not have to be lies and frankly the best propaganda is the truth.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  43. I could have done it for by xmorg · · Score: 1

    One MILLION dollars!!!!

  44. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this all you're going to do about it? Express your chagrin on the internet?
    American citizen.... you suck

  45. Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but since he was railing about "dishonourable shits" spreading propaganda by pretending to be an American, I thought it would be rather ironic if he was pretending to be an American.

  46. The project will not target by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    The project will not target English language web sites. That is where the beta testing is done.

    1. Re:The project will not target by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The project will not target English language web sites.

      Well that's me avoiding Lolcatz from now on.

      I haz invadid ur cuntree and set u up da bom!

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  47. Budget problems? What budget problems? by osgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's $200 million that should come directly out of the defense budget.

    I know that this kind of shit can be done. I know that it could be useful to "win".

    But jesus fraggin' christ... do we have to go there first? Do we have to piss on our own credibility at every turn?

  48. Congress will put a stop to this. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    Congress will do its best to put a stop to this...

    as soon as the cheques from Facebook and News Corp clear.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    1. Re:Congress will put a stop to this. by Nameisyoung007 · · Score: 1

      That depends... A passed budget would be nice. I honestly don't think that a FY2011 budget will ever happen (It will just stay at Continuing Resolutions until the FY12 budget gets hashed out). Power of the purse is the best way for the congress to reign in the programs it doesn't like. (campaign donations don't seem to hurt what gets chopped/saved either)

  49. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But Voice of America is a branded product. You tune into VoA and it tells you you're listening to VoA. It's propaganda, but it's a million miles away from sock-puppeting -- sock puppets don't tell you they're sock puppets.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  50. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As distasteful as it is, this is hardly a new thing. Pretty much everyone in history has done this to some degree. The only real "news" is that a new mechanism is going into place, but the machinery has been there all along.

    I agree. And yet, when I say that the US population is massively propagandized by its government, I get called a conspiracy theorist. I know the program in question is aimed at only foreigners, but we know how that can go don't we? I once heard that the difference between Soviet and American propaganda was that the Soviet people recognized it for what it was; the Americans, not so much.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  51. Goatse Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (But, I must say, it certainly reflects the overall quality of the media and government.)

  52. Hey Vern, how ya doin? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    Ernest : Hey Vern, have ya heard how great that there US of A is? I mean I used ta think they were not all that but now they're gosh darn good neighbors. We should stop over with some cold ones, KnowhutImean?

  53. Re:USA government controls the media, news at 11 by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

    You bastard. I clicked on that at work.

    Think Goatze.

  54. Re:USA government controls the media, news at 11 by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    That wasn't very nice.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  55. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by plover · · Score: 1

    I, for one, am one of your new sock puppet overlords.

    --
    John
  56. Let's be fair by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    Considering the source, I think it's fair to assume that this news has an anti-military slant.

    Also, could this be considered "counter propaganda?" A lot of people get a lot of misinformation about the USA, often from official sources. There is no way for the US to defend itself in the government controlled media of those countries.

    I like this sort of action a lot better than dropping bombs, or rolling tanks.

    1. Re:Let's be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they weren't hiding who they were it could be counter propaganda. As it stands it is pure backhanded manipulation.

    2. Re:Let's be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people get a lot of misinformation about the USA, often from official sources. There is no way for the US to defend itself.

      Well that opportunity certainly slammed shut with this news -- anyone expressing support for the US now is assumed to be one of these fake accounts.

    3. Re:Let's be fair by Deefburger · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And think what fun it'll be to "argue" with a sock puppet in the forums! It'll be just like feeding a troll! Except the trolls don't generally come to your house to visit later with their guns drawn.....

      --
      Most people are mostly good most of the time.
  57. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Magada · · Score: 1

    VoA? The CIA-controlled pieces of shit that flooded the airwaves with official support messages for the Prague Spring and the Basra Uprising, only to then decry the resulting slaughters of innocents?

    The same VoA that was infiltrated by the KGB and the GRU, resulting in the death and imprisonment for dissidents who wrote letters to be published there? The VoA that is now illegally broadcast in the US and territories and on the Internet, in direct violation of laws stating that no military propaganda operations should be directed by the US military at US citizens?

    Fuck'em. Seriously.

    Also, fuck your propaganda and your mealy-mouthed "interest of humanity" bullshit. It would be in the interest of humanity if you fuckers could find a way to somehow reduce your nuclear arsenal and your military spending to sane levels and just leave everyone else right the fuck alone.

    Not that I have anything against the people in the US of A, mind you - it's just that I'm really tired of this born-dead American empire of yours.

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  58. I want them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I* don't care if it is fake, please make some of them(persona) with big boobs and probably naked(to make it look more real).

    Oh... and make them cute and nerdy. As for the non-English speaking part .. I swear to my last name that /.'ers are strictly non-English speakers(proof: "comments").

    * an excited non-English speaker.

  59. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are you sure you have an idea what the term "propaganda" means? For a start, it doesn't imply any commitment to truth...

    There is nothing to object to propaganda that is clearly marked as such (see above comments about "Voice of America"), but if it comes in disguise then it is, of course, dishonorable.

  60. Re:Budget problems? What budget problems? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    $200 million is dirt cheap. If this can prevent, even a very small amount of US military action, it's way more than worth it.

  61. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

    People do not understand that propaganda does not have to be lies and frankly the best propaganda is the truth.

    It's hard to see how undermining social media with thousands of fake personalities can result in a very honest and truthful endeavor...

  62. Is this like "Radio Free Europe?" by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    RFE/RL's mission is to promote democratic values and institutions by reporting the news in countries where a free press is banned by the government or not fully established. Our journalists provide what many people cannot get locally: uncensored news, responsible discussion, and open debate.

    Based on the conviction that the first requirement of democracy is a well informed citizenry, and building on over a half-century of surrogate broadcasting:

    1. RFE/RL provides objective news, analysis, and discussion of domestic and regional issues crucial to successful democratic and free-market transformations.

    2. RFE/RL strengthens civil societies by projecting democratic values.

    3. RFE/RL combats ethnic and religious intolerance and promotes mutual understanding among peoples.

    4. RFE/RL provides a model for local media, assists in training to enhance media professionalism and independence, and develops partnerships with local media outlets.

    5. RFE/RL fosters closer ties between the countries of the region and the world's established democracies.

    http://www.rferl.org/info/mission/169.html

    1. Re:Is this like "Radio Free Europe?" by amanicdroid · · Score: 1

      Does RFE prominently feature stories that could make the US look bad?
      No. It's a source US-positive news.

      Gate-keeping is a form of information control that falls under the broad propaganda umbrella. For a long-term influencing campaign it's important not to lie thus maintaining the source's credibility and that's where OP-EarVo separates from RFE. The EarVos can lie freely and once caught the identity is extinguished and repopulated elsewhere.

    2. Re:Is this like "Radio Free Europe?" by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      All good but propaganda non the less. The stories are all designed to make the US look good. Although it does provide a more balance reporting of stories into those territories that are not getting the stories because of controlled media. But then this is controlled media too. We should have something like that coming from other countries into our back yard to hold a mirror up to some of what the rest of the world sees that our country is doing at home and abroad.

    3. Re:Is this like "Radio Free Europe?" by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      It also should die in a fire.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  63. Spend Spend Spend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Pentagon spends about $4.7B a year on propoganda http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/05/pentagon-spending-billions-pr-sway-world-opinion/, while NPR gets about $3M a year from the US government.

  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Which probably explains... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    ... why your mom never was put on the candidates list by any party, much less elected, huh?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Which probably explains... by pwinkeler · · Score: 1

      You're right - and glad of it, too!
      One of the real problems with the "let the good deeds speak for themselves" approach is that it takes a long time to bear fruit. We are talking generations here; not weeks/months/years. The only good news about that with respect to places like Iraq and Afghanistan is that generational turn-over scales are a lot shorter while they're out there killing each other off.
      Nonetheless, the timeframes far and away exceed what most all elected officials worry about so all this jibber/jabber is really moot anyway.

      --
      PaulW, IT Consultant
  66. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by plover · · Score: 4, Informative

    The technical term for the whole process run by the rich to sway decision-makers is "astroturfing," because they're creating an artificial grass-roots effort. Sock puppetry is only one tool in their toolbox.

    Nicky Hager's book Secrets and Lies, has terrific detail on how such a campaign is run, documenting the New Zealand timber industry's bought-and-paid-for efforts to run roughshod over the environmentalists in order to log the islands.

    --
    John
  67. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    Considering you spell dishonorable with a 'u', I assume it actually isn't with your taxes.

  68. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by FatSean · · Score: 1

    The Bible does record the genocide of the Canaanites at the hand of the diety-led ancient Hebrews. I believe the people of Ai also got wiped out.

    --
    Blar.
  69. Closer to the bottom, not the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You make it sound like we have yet to fall down the "slippery slope". On the contrary, we're closer to the bottom, not the top. We've been sliding down the slope into Total Government Control for the past century. Or haven't you noticed that the US government of today absolutely dwarfs the US government of only 50, let alone 100 years ago, in terms of both revenue and power over the people? You DO realize we're talking about the most expensive, most powerful government AND world empire (with military bases in some 150 countries around the world) that has ever existed? Wake up -- you're beyond late with the "slippery slope".

  70. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Did someone hack your account? You're making sense!

    --
    Blar.
  71. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by FatSean · · Score: 1

    So you're saying that 9/11 was just tit for tat response to the CIA's meddling in Afghanistan?

    Come on man. Your argument sucks.

    --
    Blar.
  72. A lot of Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    have died for democracy and for your right to be speaking your mind.

  73. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

    You sound like a sock puppet.

  74. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, I'd say it would have been a good idea....if they could have kept it fscking SECRET....

    Now..wouldn't any pro-USA comments on any ME message board or whatever now be suspected of being a sockpuppet?

    I guess we now have a new meme: On the internet...

    All the men are men

    All the women are men

    All the kids are FBI agents

    And...all the pro-USA guys in foreign forums are CIA agents.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  75. everything's all Jamais vu all over again by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  76. They probably don't have to pay for it by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    You think they don't covertly spew propaganda at US citizens already?

    I think they don't have to bother all that much.

    For a start, you can always play the "patriotism", "supporting the troops", "if you have nothing to hide", etc, cards and have idiots chest thump for your side of the story just to not, God forbid, come across as unpatriotic. Groupthink at its finest, really.

    Or to quote Hermann Goering, "Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship. ...voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

    You've already seen it happen verbatim in the USA. If you're not for anything from war to no-fly lists to suspending habeas corpus and waterboarding suspects, you're unpatriotic and hating your country. Sound familiar?

    And if you get enough idiots doing that group think, it turns out that far from being a part of the checks and balances, a large part of the press just joins in the propaganda. Just to not look unpatriotic to their viewers.

    Net result: you don't have to pay 200 million for sock-puppeteers to post crap to every single site and brow-beat everyone who says otherwise. You get idiots doing it for free. Just, you know, to be "patriotic".

    Second method, make it a party talking point. There'll be enough fanboys who just have to be, you know, fanboys. Same net effect.

    Third, well, if you happen to be the party whose opinions suspiciously are those of the rich, and range from "let's take loans in a war so the rich can buy bigger yachts" to "let's have the poor pay more so the rich can buy bigger yachts", it turns out, those guys don't wait for the government to do their propaganda. They just pay their own lobby groups and "think tanks" and PR agencies and private armies of sockpuppeteers to do it for them.

    Not that they'd mind it if your taxes went into paying for that, instead of their own money, but the latter is for now more reliable.

    Fourth, be the party who lets one asshole gobble up almost all media. He'll sing you all the praises in the world... at least until he or maybe his successor figures out that he can just use that propaganda juggernaut to get himself elected instead of relying on others to get what he wants. See, Berlusconi.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  77. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by tophermeyer · · Score: 2

    Sure you can! Just head to any US embassy in the world and renounce your citizenship. There are lots of people all over the world that don't pay taxes to the US.

  78. Scientology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds straight out of the Elron Hubbard playbook for "handling" the media.

  79. Decade by Stargoat · · Score: 1

    This has been going on for at least a decade. I had a floormate in college that used to get drunk and brag about monitoring chatrooms for a private contractor.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  80. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

    The project will not target English speaking web sites (yet)

    We're not supposed to start yet.

  81. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by August_zero · · Score: 2

    Knowing it exists, will not tell you what is and isn't tainted with propaganda. For this reason, I don't think they are going to lose all that much sleep over the big secret getting out.

    Embarrassing? Well maybe a little, but remember this is the same nation that had a pretty damning video of a helicopter attack on civilian targets go public, and there was disturbingly little backlash from the public all things considered.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  82. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

    Welcome.

  83. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you have to be rich to do that, and I'm guessing the OP isn't.

  84. Arm the people,requires allowing anonymous posting by RichMan · · Score: 1

    The US constituition is founded on the belief that the populace is allowed to bear arms. The government/army has now declared that anonymous accounts are a valuable military asset.

    This would seem to indicate that US second amendment rights should apply to anonymous posting.

    I await the following legal battle especially given the legislative branches move to prohibit anonymous on line presence.

  85. Has been done for years on hollywood movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing new here. This has been done forever on hollywood movies exported all over the globe.

  86. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Magada · · Score: 1

    Why, yes, I was impersonating a lapping-dog lackey of the morally corrupt Jihadist mullahs! I congratulate you for your sagacity, citizen! No need to report for voluntary relocation, for now.

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  87. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Damek · · Score: 1

    Because people with power commonly do something bad, doesn't make it not bad.

  88. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by your spelling, unless you're an ex-pat, it probably isn't your taxes.

  89. Of course it's a business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Judge by their actions, not their words. Looking at history, the primary goal of government is growth -- expanding their business slowly but surely for the elite few who can exploit it. And it shows. The US government of today absolutely dwarfs the US government of only 50, let alone 100 years ago, both in revenue and power over the people. Every year government spends more, borrows more, and seizes more power over the people -- which will be leveraged as precedent for the next expansion of revenue and/or power.

    Let's put it this way. Imagine a government strictly limited in power and revenue (like the US government was supposed to be). A government that simply can't afford to spend money on pork like this -- what's in that for the career politician? What's in that for the elite who benefit personally from big, unaccountable government? Nothing at all.

    But now imagine a government that has their hands in every aspect of life, costs trillions of dollars per year, and has so much money passing through it that it's literally impossible to account for it all -- now THAT is a government fit for crooks.

    Finally, although government is run like a business in just about every aspect, there is one important distinction: government has the special right to employ coercion (meaning physical force) as their business model. Hence there is no penalty for failure -- in fact, failure in government is typically rewarded with yet even more revenue. For the career politician, can this possibly get any better?

    1. Re:Of course it's a business by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Judge by their actions, not their words. Looking at history, the primary goal of government is growth -- expanding their business slowly but surely for the elite few who can exploit it. And it shows. The US government of today absolutely dwarfs the US government of only 50, let alone 100 years ago, both in revenue and power over the people. Every year government spends more, borrows more, and seizes more power over the people -- which will be leveraged as precedent for the next expansion of revenue and/or power.

      All of the facts in the above paragraph are incorrect. They are all Glenn Beck talking points and entirely made up.

      You are living proof that the corporate sock puppets are getting the job done.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Of course it's a business by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      i didn't think it was terribly controversial that the federal government had expanded quite dramatically as a percentage of GDP over the past 100 years.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Us_gov_spending_history_1902_2010.png

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    3. Re:Of course it's a business by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      i didn't think it was terribly controversial that the federal government had expanded quite dramatically as a percentage of GDP over the past 100 years.

      A recession means GDP is shrinking, which means revenue shrinks (especially when you're giving tax benefits to the richest group. That would make the percentage of GDP used by government increase temporarily. "Spending as a percentage of GDP" is a very misleading measurement.

      You'll notice that currently we are not at the highest level of "government spending as a percentage of GDP" in our history. We reached that peak in the '40s, during WWII. Since our military presence in the world is much, much greater than it was during WWII, plus the two wars (three as of today) we're fighting, it should not surprise you that your metric is increasing.

      Further, by cutting taxes for the richest people at a time when incomes are down for everyone else, you are guaranteeing that the percentage of gov't spending over GDP is going to increase. We are currently at our lowest level of total taxation in almost 100 years, despite people's claims that we are being "taxed to death". Quite on the contrary, in fact.

      Finally, if you look at a graph of the top tax rates and GDP, you will find that GDP increased (thus lowering your "spending over GDP" metric), every single time the tax rates on the richest went over 50%. Also, whenever taxes for the rich went below 50%, our GDP shrank (not to mention that an economic bubble was created). Let me repeat that: when taxes on the rich went above 50%, we had growing GDP and no economic bubble. When taxes on the rich go below 50%, we get shrinking GDP and inevitable economic bubble. The shame of it all is that the exact same correlation exists between corporate tax rates and GDP.

      If you were to cut every single penny of the federal government's discretionary spending and zero the entire discretionary budget out, the federal deficit would only decrease by 1/3. What does all this tell you? That we cannot cut our way out of our economic woes. "Austerity" measures during slow economic times has never, ever helped. Poor women and infants did not get us into this mess. Teachers, firefighters and the police did not get us into this mess. We cut off our income source just as our bills were coming due.

      Your concern about "government spending" and the "deficit" is misplaced. You are being misled.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Of course it's a business by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      no, you are cherry picking a short-lived anomaly (WWII). we are spending more over a decade with arbitrary end dates in the 1990s - 2000s than we did for an arbitrarily ended decade in the 1890s - 1900s. We get more services in the current era than in eras past.

      also, GDP is a gameable number but it is what we have. it is gameable in that government spending is considered positive for GDP and in other ways. moreover, with monetization of debt, this is not a closed system over money, nor are its effects realized in a timely manner.

      my concern is not exactly the stereotypical one you place in my mouth. i was making a point of fact. spending has increased. it is reasonable to argue that it has been worth it. it is foolish to argue that it hasn't occurred.

      also, i am not in favor of merely cutting discretionary spending. i am also in favor of cutting military spending dramatically. and entitlement spending as necessary after the first two.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    5. Re:Of course it's a business by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      and entitlement spending as necessary after the first two.

      Why cut anything? Why not just return the tax rates to where they were during our most prosperous decades?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Of course it's a business by Transaction7 · · Score: 1

      Hush. You should be shut up. Do you think the First Amendment actually guarantees the right to tell the truth? You are ruining the movie by giving way the plot and ending. The Government, which is supposedly representative of us, engages regularly in a species of speech which the Supreme Cort itself calls "government speech," which is different from the speech of human being, and even corporate persons and, in part because of the doctrines of sovereign and official immunity, are subject to reviews and compensation for damages for falsehood by nobody. I've read one article in the New York Times, years ago during my law school days, about a large assembly and demonstration on my campus at Vanderbilt in Nashville that absolutely never happened. It would have been my job to cover it if it had, and it didn't. It would have been directly between my living quarters and my office on campus, and there was nobody there. I never could find even a leaflet or poster trying to organize it, in those pre-Internet days. When I had been state editor of another publication for students in undergraduate school, I was inundated with outrageously, and easily checked, defamatory information for publication, most of it generated by well-known left-leaning agencies of a church and several Establishment entities still regularly quoted in the liberal media to this day. I also got some propaganda that had been found libelous in courts long before. Pick any government or media source or sources you wish and tell me that any figure used by either party or candidate during the 2008 campaign, or the debate over the Obamacare bill, was either honest or reasonably reliable. I dare you. Every candidate nominated by either party since 2001 has told us that he, and only he, could and would catch Osama Bin Laden, too. Both parties, and the government under Presidents and Congresses of both parties, have been propagandizing us, which is supposed to be illegal, for years. A short-wave listener, I discovered during the Korean "police action (war) that U. S. sources would say the enemy lost a large specific number of planes and we didn't lose any, the Soviets would pretty much reverse these figures, and the BBC, Swiss, etc. would provide another set or sets of figures which I suspected then and now were closer ot the truth. Since the enemy knew how many planes they had lost, these figures had to be for home consumption. I am somewhat curious how our government, or the parties in control of the White House and Senate, and of the House, respectively, could have been so stupid as to permit the leaking and publication of a "defense" contract regarding deceptive propaganda, which should have been highly classified. Now if our intelligence in, or the responsible people's knowledge of the geography and history of, the Middle East and Muslim Crescent, except what we get from the Israelis, was any good, we would, or at least might, have avoided a lot of strategic and tactical blunders in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. You can have all the electronic bells and whistles you want,m but without very good intelligence, designing propaganda based upon a thorough knowledge of the target audience, you're going to blow it. Anybody who doesn't believe that, once perfected at government, i.e., our, expense, this technology would not be deployed in politics here at home, is dreadfully naive.

  90. 2nd w/ words of a respected OpenSource person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agreed, 110%, & it's called "std. disinformation protocol" (to confuse or convince people that "believe everything they read" because it's written):

    "Well, people are always saying they want the government "run like a business". Well, friend, "business" has been doing this sockpuppet thing for years. Go look at the web site for "New Media Strategies", the company that provides sock puppets for the Koch Brothers, among others. That's their entire business model - providing sock puppets for businesses." - by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Friday March 18, @08:57AM (#35528528) Homepage

    Per my subject-line above, here's the words of someone you all probably know & respect here, "2nd'ing your motion" in that regard:

    "I have been offered the online-perception-management services I'm talking about while managing at HP and Sourcelabs. If you are not aware of companys concern for their online perception and what they do about it, and won't take my word for it, there isn't much point in arguing about it with you." - by Bruce Perens (3872) on Friday July 30, @09:27PM (#33092398) Homepage Journal

    SOURCE -> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1738364&cid=33092398

    and

    "It just takes one Ubuntu sympathizer or PR flack to minus-moderate any comment. Unfortunately, once PR agencies and so on started paying people to moderate online communities, and to have hundreds of accounts each, things changed." - by Bruce Perens (3872) on Friday July 30, @03:55PM (#33089192) Homepage Journal

    SOURCE -> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1738364&cid=33089192

    (So given that - Do you think that "fake accounts" and "spam" or "technically unjustified mod downs" & the like in trolling posts of others that may "threaten the 'powers-that-be'" etc./et al doesn't happen on /. as it does every place else? Guess again, per the above...).

    In the end/bottom-line here:

    I suppose these people have been lying to each other, & themselves, as well as their public constituency SO LONG, they've forgotten the power of truth (where you win & do NOT have to "lie" in order to excel - that is, unless you're pulling SO MUCH BULLSHIT that you HAVE to lie! That's the price you pay, & it only "compounds it with interest" once your caught...).

    APK

    P.S.=> These people "in power"... they really haven't "changed their style" since the days of Mr. Desmond Fitzgerald & crew took the reins... & sad part is, it's getting OLD & no longer working vs. a more informed & saavy public... apk

  91. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by HBPiper · · Score: 1

    No, all the anti-USA guys on foreign forums are CIA agents. Otherwise, how do you attract potential anti-USA suitors?

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  92. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Sure. Any complete work of propaganda needs its glory moments. Importantly, though, the causes of those genocides can't be recalled exactly, they've been whitewashed into glory—heck, the parties listed may not even be responsible.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  93. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by mdm42 · · Score: 2

    "The diety-led Hebrews" - does this mean that Abraham was a really skinny guy? Or just that he had some books to sell "Smash Idols to Lose 60 Mina in 30 Days"?

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
  94. Re:Budget problems? What budget problems? by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

    You're assuming we have any credibility with the people of Afghanistan. That's your first mistake.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  95. The end justifies the means? by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    This is what we railed against with the godless Communists. Now with the neo-conservatives, they are bringing their business practices into the government and law enforcement realms. Look at Abu Grab, the recent Psy-Op's scandel from Afganistan. etc.

    Actually they could pick up some tips from the law enforment departments that have been trying to trap people online by posing as underaged children that want to go have sex with them. I think we are veering away from some basic core principals that used to make the world look up to us. Hell used to make us look up to us.

  96. Funny by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    This is right below a story about Microsoft investing a huge amount of resources to stop spam...

  97. What could possibly go wrong? by JobyOne · · Score: 1

    It's only people with vested interests pretending to be more people than they are who don't.

    --
    Porquoi?
  98. Nothing wrong with any of this by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    If anything it saves American lives and money by winning battles with words rather than bullets.

    This is a time-old tactic that goes back to the founding of this country (the Founders published tracts and newspapers, etc.)

    Besides, even if you find it distasteful, our enemies use of the same tactic necessitates that we use it as well.

  99. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, if you don't like money being stolen from you, just leave! Go learn a new language, find a new country that doesn't behave as egregiously as the US, jump through all their licensing and labor restrictions and other various protectionist schemes to get a job... what a fine solution!

    Would be no different than if a mafia set up shop in your neighborhood and upon complaining about it, someone else gave the advice to leave for some other neighborhood infested with their own local mafia. It isn't a solution at all, and even if it were, it doesn't address the initial problem raised. Taking peoples money and then devoting it to learning how to lie well to foreign people is not right.

  100. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually newspapers are complicit, working hand in hand with the government and the people, often voluntarily and of their own accord. so yes, they are killing innocent people. and yes, they publish false evidence, all day, every day, 24/7/365. and yes, they do represent you on the world stage.

  101. This will come back and bite... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    ...the idiots who thought it was a good idea. The Internet is nothing if not an effective filter for truth. It may take time, and it may not always work perfectly, but in general, bullshit gets tagged as such. It shouldn't take long before the Facebook account of "Uncle Samhed, from Kabul" is identified as a CIA mouthpiece. Every time.

  102. Surrender trust by pablo2garcia · · Score: 1

    (Pablo from Spain) You, most US citizens, are against this. But as with many other Big Government actions against your preferences, you can't or won't do much. It is like that here in Spain too. Actions like this unchallenged bring lies and public manipulation to the scene. Once lying is part of the legal business it will be done outside and inside. And for those that say "it should not be publicized to be effective", think that other systems not publicized might perfectly be on operation. And that the mission of this publicity might be to make the public accept lies and manipulation as the way power can deal with the public, the little people.

  103. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

    Sure, but if they decide you're renouncing your citizenship to avoid paying taxes, then you can't.

  104. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

    There were two major newspapers in the USSR, which were called "The Truth" ("Pravda" - I think this one is still around) and "The News." Russians used to say "There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth."

    Having said this, propaganda is easy to believe when life is working out for you. When you are dirt poor and only have left shoes because the factory that makes right shoes is broken down, you stop believing the bullshit. In the modern US, people are realizing that the lack of healthcare, poor education systems, etc, are causing America to lose its standing as a great place to live (for everyone here). So, while I love this country, I am less apt to believe a politician that says "This is the greatest country on Earth." I have never believed the jackasses that say we have the best healthcare system in the world.

    --
    There is more to science than physics!

    www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  105. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by kd5zex · · Score: 1

    I guess we now have a new meme:
    On the internet...

    All the men are men

    All the women are men

    All the kids are FBI agents

    And...all the pro-USA guys in foreign forums are low pay grade USAF personnel.

    FTFY.

  106. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

    There wasn't much backlash because the public didn't see what was wrong. If you watch the videos, you can see why they fired when they did. Had they turned out to all be insurgents no one would have given a shit (although shooting missiles at a building when a dude was walking along outside was questionable for sure). On the other hand, if they had destroyed the local market because a guy with an RPG ran into it, you may have had a bit of outrage on your hand. One could argue that "Collateral Murder" was more "Collateral Accidental Tragedy." The wikileaks people did a terrible job by making the incident out to be murder. Same thing with media pundits that said things like 'the pilots acted like they were racking up points in a video game" - untrue. All they said was 'through the windshield, nice shot' or something like that. I was expecting "Yeah, get some! You kill those fucking towelheads! yee haw!!!" There could have been outrage over bad rules of engagement, or many other things, but when you say "there was murder, they were psychotic!" and neither is true, most viewers just switch off.

    --
    There is more to science than physics!

    www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  107. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

    Dibs on next week.

  108. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

    I'll add to this: good luck finding a country with good quality of life and lower taxes!

    --
    There is more to science than physics!

    www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  109. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by davester666 · · Score: 2

    No. He either was God, or he rode a bicycle.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  110. Um. I think I found a program to cut by objectdisoriented · · Score: 2

    Republicans are on a tear to eliminate social programs.

    Lordy, this program is all about social (media) programs. Cut it, cut it, cut it.

    Bachmann, you are a self-described cutter. Cut it. Come on, cut, cut, cut.

    Maybe once we see Glen Beck crying about this on Fox the patriot citizenry will kill this outrageous social program.
    .

    --
    Performance must be inherent in every aspect of the system. It is not an afterthought, but always thought. - me
  111. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No you can't.

    The IRS can and will block you from giving up citizenship if they 'believe' you're doing it to get out of paying taxes. If you then fail to pay taxes to the US anyway, they'll use various treaties to get your assets seized and you extradited back to the US.

  112. That really Socks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't these be called "Socket Puppets"?

    Don't hit me, I can't help myself..

  113. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your question assumes that these accounts are going to deal exclusively with facts and not opinions. Were that the case the sock puppets would be unnecessary as facts would be easily verifiable by the reader. Sock puppets are used to create false consensus in matters of opinion by drowning out dissenting voices. It's absolutely dishonorable and the practice has no place in free society.

  114. godwin?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how to avoid godwins law?

  115. 45% of comments censored/'hidden' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just who(else)is a fauxking puppet? what does it 'smell' like? fear? deception? agenda (military_industrial.gov sponsorship) setting/modifying. all stuff that really matters?

  116. America by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Hello users of Slashdot.org

    America is really cool isn't it? Freedom, and Eagles and Stuff Like that.

    Hail America!

    S. Puppet.

  117. I for one salute our new asstroturfing overlords! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The technical term for the whole process run by the rich to sway decision-makers is "astroturfing," because they're creating an artificial grass-roots effort.

    Your spell checker is borken - its called asstroturfing.

    It only works in a society where freedom is outsourced to asstrotufing companies where the rich and powerful own you and your asstrotufing ass and you post their rants as though they are your own in exchange for money. Asstroturfing function is to leave a trail of deceived victims behind, and the law sez its ok to deceive and lie for money.

    It will be a terrible amount of horrible fun going along to one of these job interviews. The line managers who contracted you are sniggering to the bone when they realized what kind of idiot you were and how useful it would be to them. I bet they never had so much fun since hosting a tampon party.

  118. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    the disturbing part was the doublespeak, cover-up, and "losing" of the footage after the fact when asked for it by AFP in its investigation of what happened to its reporters. bad things happen in war. there are also bad apples in any force. the controversy (which never materialized in the US despite its merits) centers upon the premise of going to war to "liberate" people (a process which necessitates the goodwill and cooperation of the occupied people) and then undermining that goodwill and cooperation by shielding US forces from accountability, a policy that has permeated our actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Shortly, if we had admitted what had happened and retrained, reassigned, or prosecuted the individual military members acting outside their rules of engagement / international law then there would have been no controversy. (i would think the person cavalierly and unnecessarily driving over the bodies of those killed would be in the prosecuted category and those acting exhilarated would be in the retrain/reassign category.)

    Instead, we got lies and cover-up. It took the release of that video to give the lie to the propaganda spin developed after the fact. (Which is why the mix in of the military spokesperson claiming that "extraordinary care" was taken to avoid civilian casualties and desecration of the dead and wounded was particularly effective in the collateral murder video: it juxtaposes the fact against the spin, inducing cognitive dissonance.)

    The actual reason Americans didn't backlash against these actions is that it is less painful to confront the idea that our "heroes" aren't all above board all the time. it would require action. it would require dissent against the government, something that our political culture does not reward. one has only to look at the outcome of the financial crisis to see that it pays to break the law and punishes to blow the whistle on illegal activity or on government complacency in the face of such law breaking.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  119. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    The actual reason Americans didn't backlash against these actions is that it is less painful to confront the idea that our "heroes" aren't all above board all the time. it would require action. it would require dissent against the government, something that our political culture does not reward. one has only to look at the outcome of the financial crisis to see that it pays to break the law and punishes to blow the whistle on illegal activity or on government complacency in the face of such law breaking.

    oops. should read, "...it is painful..."

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  120. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    You do not understand that most people have no idea what is fact and what is opinion.
    For instance do vaccinations cause autism?
    How many people died because of 3 mile island?
    Should we worry about the radiation from japan that is now getting to the west coast?
    Best of all why are you posting this Anonymously?
    Maybe you are a sock puppet with our own agenda. Actually pretty unlikely but still it is a tool to influence people. It is a much less violent tool than bombs and bullets so I am not all that bothered by it.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  121. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by BadPirate · · Score: 1

    I see you've met the UK's sock puppets then...

    --
    - Holy crap, I've got MOD points! Who thought that was a good idea.
  122. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And yet, when I say that the US population is massively propagandized by its government, I get called a conspiracy theorist."

    Didn't something this already happen? I know Cheney leaked scary fake stuff to the NY Times and then in the following days pointed to the NY Times article as evidence that there was stuff we should be scared of.

    So, hypothetically, if our military puts out some fake facts in a foreign country and they are believed by certain foreigners and then our ambassador there (or even--dare I say it--our spy there), believes the false intel and reports it back to people in our civilian government, we could end up providing false information to our own decision-makers.

  123. Eggdrop? by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    Nice chunk of change to modify an Eggdrop IRC bot. Of course, the entire scheme will backfire and the story will unfold on WikiLeaks.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  124. I fear when fingermen come knocking by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    I fear when fingermen come knocking with a black bag that has my name on it...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  125. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Sabriel · · Score: 1

    Heh, maybe he's from one of the "fifty-first" states. :)

  126. Artificial Inantiy by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 1
    Who's read Anathem?

    This is step one in the creation of artificial inanity.

    --
    Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
  127. Yay! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Now all "dictatorships" (read: countries unfriendly to US) everywhere can teach everyone to dismiss everything on US-based social networking sites as US propaganda.
    And only idiots will disagree.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  128. Re:PROTIP: If you can understand the program name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good Observation. Can a rule-set that includes this and other similar observations coupled to a Gaussian Filter be made to successfully flag Sock Puppetry?

  129. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

    The best bumper sticker I ever saw said "You can't convince people you are killing them for their own good." Your points are all fair, but I still honestly think that most Americans could have watched the entire thing from start to finish unedited and saw nothing wrong. I definitely saw things in there that were wrong, but I didn't think that *everything* wikileaks tried to point out was wrong.

    --
    There is more to science than physics!

    www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  130. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. USCENTCOM is willing to spend $200 million on projects like these even when military pay could possibly be frozen next month.

  131. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take home more of my pay here in Finland than I would in the U.S. I'd pay lower rates if I moved to Switzerland, too. This is what makes me a little nervous to move back to the US: I feel like I get much less for my money there. Maybe I'm just in a bizarre tax situation (or looking at the wrong state...perhaps I need to move to WA), but I make a decent wage (certainly not high, but not low for a single person, either) so it doesn't make much sense to me. Did I mention that I'm covered by health insurance here, too?

  132. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. And the fact that you don't know what is and isn't propaganda means everything said anywhere will now be immediately suspect. Though to be fair, it may already have been.

  133. Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the US is involved in terrorism, big surprise...

  134. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sort of behavior is only effective if it is done without public knowledge. Clearly that is no longer the case. Now that this information is at the forefront (thank you Anonymous) the collective people know this is taking place. As a tax payer I'd be furious that my tax dollars are being spend on this sort of trash.