Slashdot Mirror


Increased Power Usage Leads to Mistaken Pot Busts for Bitcoin Miners

c0lo writes "The Canadian town of Mission, BC has a bylaw that allows the town's Public Safety Inspection Team to search people's homes for grow ops if they are using more than 93 kWh of electricity per day. There have allegedly been reports floating in IRC of two different cases of police showing up at a Bitcoin miner's residence with a search warrant. Ohio police and the DEA file at least 60 subpoenas each month for energy-use records of people suspected of running an indoor pot growing operation. DEA Agent Anthony Marotta said high electricity usage does not always mean the residence is an indoor pot farm and has surprised federal agents. 'We thought it was a major grow operation ... but this guy had some kind of business involving computers. I don't know how many computer servers we found in his home.'"

411 comments

  1. Jokes on them by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude's probably buying drugs with his bitcoins.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Jokes on them by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I got a GPU, don't make me use it, Cop!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Growing pot is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Better use of the electicity

    1. Re:Growing pot is better. by errandum · · Score: 1

      How does the electricity to bitcoin ration pay off? Anyone knows?

    2. Re:Growing pot is better. by naz404 · · Score: 2

      Badly.

    3. Re:Growing pot is better. by errandum · · Score: 1

      what's the point then? :)

    4. Re:Growing pot is better. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Investing for the future. If bitcoin ever really takes off the deflation will be massive.

    5. Re:Growing pot is better. by Time_Ngler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know somebody that has a rig that does 1700 million hashes per second and uses 1000 watts (using 4 ATI 6970's). If you plug it into here, you'll find he nets an average of $1450.89 per month considering electricity at $0.15 per kwh

      http://bitcoinx.com/profit/index.php

      I decided against doing it myself because the miner growth rate is so high right now. It's around 5% a day, which means if it continues at the same rate, in 3 months it'll be more like $170 per month for his rig.

      Here are some charts showing the growth rate: http://bitcoin.sipa.be/

    6. Re:Growing pot is better. by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      Some believe that eventually the bitcoins they mined today will be worth more than they cost to mine. It's a lot like the stock market in that regard. Nobody can know right now if they ever will be, so some are betting on that.

    7. Re:Growing pot is better. by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Informative
      There are some bitcoin mining calculators that can give you an idea based on present mining difficulty and your electric rates. Eg: http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php
      Go to http://www.mtgox.com/ to see the present USD exchange rate.

      Right now mining is profitable since the value of bitcoins has recently gapped up from a buck to $7. But as more people mine, the algorithm must solve harder mining problems so in the longer term it is a self-regulating process. I have contemplated giving it a shot. To make a profit you have to build the machines as cheaply as possible and also live in an area with very cheap electricity.

      As a side note, the whole affair is a big waste of resources, just like gold mining. However, it's this intrinsic cost to create the currency that makes it sound money - as opposed to fiat money, which can be made at no cost to the person authorized to print it.

    8. Re:Growing pot is better. by thsths · · Score: 0

      > Investing for the future. If bitcoin ever really takes off the deflation will be massive.

      Fair enough, but what is it backed by? Currencies are strong if they are either backed by some other value (gold standard or more likely another currency basket now), or they are used by an economy with decent inflation control.

      I can see neither for the bitcoin. And scarcity alone does not create value.

    9. Re:Growing pot is better. by fuzzytv · · Score: 0

      No, not really. The currencies are strong when the government / FED can't play with them and do crazy things like 'quantitative enrichment' etc. One way to achieve this is to bind the currency to some rare thing - it may be gold, in this case it's bitcoins. The "value" is a bit abstract term, but it just means that two parties agree to use something (papers printed with a green ink, bitcoins, pieces of gold, ...) to pay for real goods and services. The scarcity does not create the value, but it makes sure none of the parties can create it on their own. Although in some cases it's clear one of the parties can do that and even be proud of it - e.g. FED is printing sh**loads of money, but when you try to do the same there will be suits with guns knocking on your door.

    10. Re:Growing pot is better. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Well, inflation control I think can be accounted for by the fact that bitcoin production is strictly limited. It approaches a total of 21 million bitcoins in the next few decades. About a third to a half of this amount is already in circulation.

      This is why I say that it's a huge deflation risk, if it goes anywhere. This is because the number or people actually using it as a currency right now is miniscule. Bump the number of users up a couple of magnitudes over the next couple of years and even though the currency could still technically work (due to being divisible to quite a few decimal places), the value of 1 bitcoin goes through the roof because there are only 10 million or so in circulation. This, of course, is a nice dividend to anyone that got in early, when the (controlled by consensus) creation rate was far, far higher.

      Yeah, interesting idea, unfortunately I don't think it can work as a currency, even if they got enough people involved.

      And the fact that the first people that came up with the scheme stand to make a huge profit if it does work... that leaves a bad taste.

    11. Re:Growing pot is better. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well, at least he'll have a nice gaming rig, which kind of paid for itself, depending on what happens with BitCoin. I was wondering about buying some coins directly, but I'm not really one for gambling on stocks and such, can't bring myself to invest in anything yet. BitCoin would have been a nice thing to get into a few years ago, but right now I'm happy earning money rather than speculating.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  3. Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "I don't know how many computer servers we found in his home. Seizing them has really put our department's IT unit on the fast track though. God Bless lax asset forfeiture laws."

    1. Re:Servers by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Are those like ATM machines?

  4. Re:One more nail by mpoulton · · Score: 2, Informative

    You realize this was in Canada, right? High power consumption alone is insufficient to obtain a search warrant in the United States.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  5. Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, this is getting annoying. Editors, you guys need to knock it off. The bitcoin fanatics are using you as an advertising push. It is getting annoying. Leave off it already.

    1. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So they should have suppressed the story because BitCoin was peripherally involved. Right.

    2. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by diamondmagic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This story only happens to involve Bitcoin. Bitcoin or not, this is Your Rights Online. The notion you could get raided just because of what you do with your own time and money is outrageous.

    3. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by cyberworm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I can see your annoyance at the recent spade of bitcoin articles, this is interesting outside of bitcoin. What if you had a beowulf clusters or stacks of machines running folding or other, arguably, more useful applications. High energy usage or a sudden spike in power consumption shouldn't be probable cause in and of itself.

      I dread to think what would happen if a sudden and consistent spike in energy usage were probable cause where I live. I went two years without a television, with my main drains on electricity being my laptop, speakers, and my fridge. Once I picked up an older 50" plasma monitor and started playing my PS3 I noticed a considerable increase in cost/use. Should I have my door kicked in because I might be growing weed, even though the reality is much more innocuous (smoking weed and playing video games)?

    4. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pragmatically, this whole ordeal should be a non issue. If people want to grow pot in their homes, let them. Big fuckin' deal!

      The only reason pot is so demonized is because it's easy to identify and prosecute. It is, by far, the least damaging "drug" in the western world. I'm way more worried about getting a heart attack from too much Advil, unsurprisingly due to the stress caused by all these conservative idiots trying to tell people how to live their lives. The pothead next door, while annoying with his brain-damanged music tastes and lack of valuable employment, is far less harmful to my existence than the trillion-dollar pharmaceutical industry that wants me to be sick 24-7 so I can consume their overpriced filth.

      I think the Bitcoin thing is a very short-lived fad. The more people get in on it, the less valuable it becomes. The guy who's getting raided this week, well next week would have dropped out anyway once the mining "difficulty" doubles and he's suddenly spending more on hydro and Radeon 5970's than he's getting back in funny money. Big whoop!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    5. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      this is Your Rights Online.

      Looking at the location bar, this seems to be idle.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Bitcoin thing is a very short-lived fad. The more people get in on it, the less valuable it becomes. The guy who's getting raided this week, well next week would have dropped out anyway once the mining "difficulty" doubles and he's suddenly spending more on hydro and Radeon 5970's than he's getting back in funny money. Big whoop!

      The growth curve seems to indicate that the more people get in on it, the more valuable it becomes. Although right now, 'mining' bitcoin is a fool's errand; it would be cheaper to just buy them than to spend the power mining them.

      Odds are the currency will crash and be forgotten, but it's not a foregone conclusion.

    7. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      What if you had a beowulf clusters or stacks of machines running folding or other, arguably, more useful applications. High energy usage or a sudden spike in power consumption shouldn't be probable cause in and of itself.

      Why not? It's a "probable cause" standard, not a virtual certainty standard. You're envisioning corner cases and then saying that the corner cases must be addressed by something other than a search.* What proportion of people who have high and consistent electricity usage, particularly as a result of a sustained spike, are going to be running a beowulf cluster or a folding farm? What proportion of those people are going to be growing DEMON WEED?

      Leaving aside the war on drugs debate, you can't seriously argue that the computer geeks outnumber or even equal the potheads. Correlation is, in fact, cause for investigation in both science and the law.

      *Note: The search must be directed toward what is suspected, it cannot become a fishing expedition and remain valid. That being said I'll freely admit that the "plain view" exception, even though logical, is often abused.

    8. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There are some other hobbies that get into similar trouble. Tropical fish breeding, for it's use of heated buildings. A recuring one is intensive horiculture, espicially growing of orchids. Given that it involves the accelerated growth of plants, the procedures are exactly the same as those for pot-growing - same power consumption, same thermal signature, same equipment requirements. That's where pot-growers get their equipment - they go to companies that supply orchid-growing equipment. For this reason a lot of those suppliers are on police watch-lists and their customers likely to be investigated.

    9. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      What if you had a beowulf clusters or stacks of machines running folding or other, arguably, more useful applications. High energy usage or a sudden spike in power consumption shouldn't be probable cause in and of itself.

      The lesson from this is that, if you want to have a grow room, you should put it in an office building containing a large server farm. Make sure it's hidden directly off the farm in its own enclosed area surrounded by a circle of "storage/equipment closets" so that the extra space won't be noticed by the cops. Take the product out in trash bags post harvest and use the HVAC system to control humidity for the best hidden grow-op ever!

      --
      That is all.
    10. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The THC appears to be harmless, but the most common delivery mechanism isn't - breathing smoke from a burning plant will ruin your lungs, be it from pot or tobacco. Cigarettes are actually less damaging, due to the invention of the filter tip. Though there are many alternatives to smoking it that pose less risk.

    11. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is ongoing debate just for this reason due to digital power meters being installed in California

    12. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      True, it's much better to have the FBI leave a trail of destruction in your house because you're running a Tor exit node.

    13. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Ultra64 · · Score: 2

      Or you could just not click on stories you aren't interested. (It's hard I know, but I bet you can do it)

    14. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people want to grow pot in their homes, let them.

      People say that, but they all vote strenuously against that position. 99 out of a 100 people who walk into a voting booth, decide they would rather anyone involved with pot spend time in jail. Talking tough about liberty is so fucking easy outside that booth, but no one has the balls to really take the pro-liberty stand.

    15. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If u smoke, u deserve guantanamo torture

    16. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Don't think you have anything to dread. Charge 1 or 2 electric cars nightly (or a family with driving-age teens, or someone whose lifestyle fits charging twice a day) and suddenly the whole neighborhood gets usage extremes and variations that will drown out mere growlights. Especially LED units -- my wife got one recently for sprouting tomatoes.

    17. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The pothead next door, while annoying with his brain-damanged music tastes and lack of valuable employment"

      I now you were just being colorful and hyperbolic, but I feel that I should let you know that, if I am the pothead next door to you, it is statistically probable that I make more money, work harder and am in better shape than you. If people like me were safe to "out" themselves as potsmokers, your stereotypes would crumble.

    18. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Do you have any actual evidence that pot is the least damaging drug or are you just spreading that as a "fact" to rationalize your personal worldview?

      I can't help but notice that much of this point is paranoid and lacking in any actual evidence as well.

    19. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      In Mission, BC it's got a bit worse than this... growing pot has become so profitable that people will rent a home, gut it, and turn the entire inside into a grow op. When these are finally detected and shut down, the house is a write-off and needs to be destroyed. Not good for the community, not good for the people owning the home.

      Of course, if the US didn't have this war on drugs, Canadian Pot wouldn't be so valuable, and stuff like this wouldn't happen.

    20. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by trappa · · Score: 1

      Although right now, 'mining' bitcoin is a fool's errand; it would be cheaper to just buy them than to spend the power mining them.

      Actually, that's not true, at least not in every case.

      Currently I'm mining on my gaming rig for about .5 bitcoins a day using about 8 kWh a day. Electricity hear is about 14 cents/kWh. The current bitcoin exchange rate is about 7 USD to 1 Bitcoin. Thus I recieve 3.5 USD worth of bitcoin for electricity costs of 1.15 USD. A three-fold increase over what I would get if I just purchased bitcoins outright.

      However, I'm running on a gaming rig with decent graphics cards I already had. If I had to first purchase the items for the sole sake of mining, There'd be no gaurantee of ever being able to make back that investment.

    21. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " all these conservative idiots trying to tell people how to live their lives."

      Now I'm seriously confused...I'm not American so probably I have many aspects of your political landscape all wrong, but I thought that for you it was the "progressives" that were into telling others how to run their lives...?? (Not trolling, I'm genuinely surprised!)

    22. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not into bitcoins but I thought TFA was more amusing than average. Furthermore, this is America- if you don't like all the Bitcoin articles, then pay for an overpriced undergraduate education and get the balls you need to become the Slashdot editor you've always wanted to be and CHANGEEEE the system. Or go read something else.

      creamyfish

    23. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      Granted smoking anything is bad for your lungs in the long term, but the point is that if someone wants to do something in their home that is mildly dangerous to their lungs and essentially benign to the neighborhood around them why force them to abstain?

      Nanny state's are annoying. I can forgive the intentions when laws are enacted to protect people from others, e.g. public smoking bans, or cell phones and driving laws, but some guy smoking in his house should not be stopped.

      BTW, when did BC even begin to care about pot growing? It been a while since I was down that way, but I was under the impression it was pretty much tolerated. Am I thinking of Vancouver only?

    24. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Filters are for pussies, real men smoke cigars.

    25. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by moortak · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    26. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you spell "you" as "u" then you deserve Guantanamo torture.

    27. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real slashdotters smoke cock.

    28. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I picked up an older 50" plasma monitor and started playing my PS3 I noticed a considerable increase in cost/use. Should I have my door kicked in because I might be growing weed, even though the reality is much more innocuous (smoking weed and playing video games)?

      Please. That is not going to use 93 kWh a day.

      You need some serious gear to reach that level.

    29. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by mestar · · Score: 1

      The more people get in on it, the less valuable it becomes.

      Wait, are you claiming that the thing that has a network effect, has less value the more people use it?

      That makes no sense.

    30. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? The people voting for the drug war are not the same people who argue against it in public. The ratio is nothing like 99 to 1, more like 4 to 1 and falling.

    31. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's rare to see an orchid enthusiast use every single room of the house filled wall to wall with plants in their own residence. Sure it may happen but warrants are granted on "probably cause" not "absolute certainty". If you grow orchids and you're worried, then please tell your power company why you're using twenty times the amount of power as your neighbors.

      Actually many pot growers just bypass the electric meter. They'll take over a large unused house (plenty of these due to the mortgage crisis) grow for a month or two, then move on. So the electric utility often doesn't know what's going on until they try to swap in a smart meter and notice the bypass.

    32. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by superwiz · · Score: 1

      FOSS too. The pricing scheme of getting people to "work for software" gets way too much advertising on Slashdot. Hey, I occasionally like FOSS software and I do get annoyed by Bitcoin evangelism. But a scheme is a scheme. And this one does involve computers. So I find it hard to complain.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    33. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow ops like that happen all throughout Canada and the US. That's not new and it's definitely not unique to BC.

    34. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by superwiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But he wasn't raided. It just gave a probable cause for a search. Generally high correlation with criminal activity does seem like a justified probable cause. It's not like he got jailed or, worse, convicted on something. In fact, the "probable" in "probable cause" can be interpreted to mean correlation. If you set the bar any higher, you would actually be demanding to show actual cause (rather than probable cause). How's that for a rant derived from "correlation does not imply causation?"

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    35. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if it were legal you could just grow it outdoors in some place that has lots of sunshine, instead of wasting so much electricity on indoor lighting and ventilation. Won't somebody please think of the carbon!

    36. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "recent spade of bitcoin articles"

      spate, spaTe, SPATE

    37. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2

      Even if smoking a joint is worse than smoking a cig how many people do you know that smokes 20-40 joints a day? Also you need to back up your claim because I'm not sure you are correct.

    38. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by straponego · · Score: 1

      While I can see your annoyance at the recent spade of bitcoin articles, this is interesting outside of bitcoin.

      Here's a guy who calls a spate a spade.

    39. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not outrageous! Osama bin Laden too "worked" on his own time and money.

    40. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      I've seen similar data to the reference the other replier posted. It's not very addictive, it is short-term non-toxic. Many other drugs, including many sold over the counter, if you overdose, you can easily die. I don't think there is even one death attributed to marijuana overdose (I did a little Googling to see if I could refute this, and turned up a bunch of zeroes and a parody). Long-term, if you smoke it, it's not optimal for your lungs, no, but the last person I saw smoking dope, smoked a pinhead's worth (modern dope is very strong) which is not very much smoke to inhale.

      And you also have to be careful to distinguish between "use" and "abuse". Alcohol is not a "safe" drug, judged as an abusable drug (it is slightly addictive, it can kill you in overdose, it can trash your liver with long-term overconsumption), but moderate consumption is judged to be good for most people.

      I'm also pretty skeptical of nanny-state arguments -- if you think it's okay to make me not smoke dope "for my own good", I think it's okay to force you to exercise four hours each work "for your own good". My (hypothetical) nanny-ism will result in many more lives saved than your (hypothetical) nanny-ism (need a reference? Here, bicycle commuting cuts mortality by 28%.)

    41. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Anyone in the US that votes Rep olr Dem is voting to keep the drug war going.

      Anyone in the UK voting labour or conservative (maybe liberal too) is doing the same.

      Same situation in Australia and other countries.

      I can think of no more important issue. Other people either put a much lower priority on it, or don't vote for what they actually want, having identified with some aspect of a major party or against another.

      Democracy in the west is broken.

    42. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, how about this - is it profiling?

      Well, MOST folks who use a lot of electricity are growing pot, so EVERYONE who looks like that must be doing the same thing!

      I thought profiling was a bad thing.

    43. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Lanteran · · Score: 1
      In the US, everyone tells you how to live your lives. Conservatives want you to conform to a Christian lifestyle, plus war on drugs and shit like that. Not to mention blatant corporatocracy /facism. The other conservatives (Democrats) want you to accept government interference in every aspect of your life, more blatantly, and corporatocracy more subtly. Basically, they're two sides of the same coin that emphasize different points of the same philosophy. And people just keep voting them in. This comes to mind:

      "It comes from a very ancient democracy, you see..." "You mean, it comes from a world of lizards?" "No," said Ford, who by this time was a little more rational and coherent than he had been, having finally had the coffee forced down him, "nothing so simple. Nothing anything like to straightforward. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people." "Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy." "I did," said ford. "It is." "So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't the people get rid of the lizards?" "It honestly doesn't occur to them," said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates to the government they want." "You mean they actually vote for the lizards?" "Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course." "But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?" "Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in. Got any gin?" "What?" "I said," said Ford, with an increasing air of urgency creeping into his voice, "have you got any gin?" "I'll look. Tell me about the lizards." Ford shrugged again. "Some people say that the lizards are the best thing that ever happened to them," he said. "They're completely wrong of course, completely and utterly wrong, but someone's got to say it."

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    44. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      life not lives. And sorry for the various typos and misspaces, slashdot comments are totally whited out for me due to theme conflicts and I'm too lazy to fix it, so I just blindly type.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    45. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      [pot] is, by far, the least damaging "drug" in the western world. ... The pothead next door, while annoying with his brain-damaged music tastes and lack of valuable employment...

      emphasis mine

    46. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I dunno man, I'm a daily-drinkin', hourly-billin', trend-followin' I.T. consultant. I like to think of my consulting career as a means to fund my beer geekdom.

      But I do agree with you, if we can get rid of this prohibition nonsense, I think people would be more comfortable with pot, and as a direct result they would "abuse" it less. I have no shortage of friends who consume recreationally, and I'm perfectly cool with that. I mostly take issue with the types who are going absolutely nowhere, and treat pot - or any drug, for that matter - as a crutch to coast through life, selfishly, even parasitically. Much like my taste for microbrews, I think pot should be a well-earned reward, not something so cheaply acquired as to be mindlessly habitual. This is why I don't term myself an alcoholic: I'm not about getting drunk, I'm about enjoying the beverage. If there's only cheap skunky beer available, I'll drink water.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    47. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by billcopc · · Score: 1

      That graph is anecdotal bullshit. Cocaine isn't anywhere near as addictive as heroin. It's FUN, but you don't go through hell when you decide to quit. By comparison, cigarettes are much harder to quit.

      The worst drugs are the legal ones, which shouldn't be surprising since they're the most profitable ones, by far.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    48. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by dryeo · · Score: 1

      There has been studies done that show smoking tobacco and marijuana is safer then smoking only tobacco. I'm not aware of any studies that show smoking marijuana by itself is very harmful.
      Also we have perhaps 3 million years of evolution of breathing smoke.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    49. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by billcopc · · Score: 2

      Amen, brother! Our governments prevent people from dulling the monotony of servient existence, but they don't prevent anyone from eating their way to the ICU for a triple-bypass. I'll take a stoner over a 400lb scooter-riding welfare case, any day.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    50. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pothead next door, while annoying with his brain-damanged music tastes and lack of valuable employment

      I can see why policy makers would be against pot. It wouldn't take long for a nation of these fuckwits to go down the shitter. I wouldn't be surprised if that is one of the reasons the Western world is in such a sad state of affairs.

    51. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd describe myself as a progressive, so conservatives make no sense to me. Our current PM, Stephen Harper, is an "americanophile". He is the Canadian George Bush. He loves selling out to corporate interests, and restricting personal freedoms to further that fascist agenda.

      If "conservatives" were about minding their own business and keeping government down to the bare necessities, I'd be cool with it, but that's not the case up here. Our conservatives are about conservative values, which means pantheistic, libertarian, socialist free-thinkers like myself are portrayed as the enemy, to be legislated out of existence. The only reason Harper is a conservative is because it leaves more money leftover for backhanded tax funnels. Liberals spend it all on public crap, some of which we don't even want. Conservatives spend just as much, but they do it behind closed doors. It's all just a game.

      If pot becomes legalized, the first thing they will do is tax it to oblivion, so much that people will continue purchasing it in the black market. Just look at our cigarettes and gasoline... The worst crooks of all are our elected leaders!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    52. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by billcopc · · Score: 1

      In the last week, the bitcoin mining difficulty has doubled. That means it takes twice as many CPU/GPU cycles to find a coin as it did a week ago.

      There is a limited number of bitcoins available, by design. The more people pound the system to score free coins, the harder it is for each person to get any. The nominal value of each coin rises, sure, but that's only good if you already have some, or are buying them with cash. For miners, the prospect of using hardware and electricity to mine coins is losing value with each passing day.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    53. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Millions of dollars spent trying to find something harmful about marijuana with nothing besides "shouldn't operate heavy machinery under the influence" published in a peer reviewed journal.
      Compare with aspirin, 3000 deaths a year just in the States or acetaminophen which is always in the top 10 killers of children. Horrible death as well as it destroys your liver.
      Even water (not counting drowning) kills more people, remember the WII contest where the woman drank enough to die. With Marijuana you have to have enough to suffocate or a large amount dropped on you to kill.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    54. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anti-pot propaganda alert!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Yes, maybe it is possible that cigs are "less damaging" than weed, when compared toke for toke. But how many cigs does the average tobacco addict smoke every day, 10? 15? Many smoke much more than that. Pot is strong these days, right? So how much, by weight/mass/joints, do typical potheads smoke every day? A hell of a lot less than 10-15 joints. If it is of high quality, probably less than the weight of one cigarette. Ounce for ounce, yes, MAYBE ganja is worse than tobacco, but aside from rastafarians no one (not counting all the wannabe gangsters who claim to smoke 75 blunts a day) consumes THAT much herbage a day.

      Think about it: heavy tobacco smokers light up every 30-60 minutes if they can, while dope aficionados don't get high more than a few times a day, often less, and shouldn't need a fat cigarette worth per person every time, so this is not an apples-apples comparison.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    55. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I've heard a good move is to set up a tomato grow-op, phone crime busters on your self a couple of times, get searched, then switch to pot. If the cops show up to many times without finding anything, then you can argue harassment so the cops become reluctant to show up.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    56. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by dryeo · · Score: 1

      there is ongoing debate just for this reason due to digital power meters being installed in California

      They've decided to spend a lot of money in BC to install digital power meters as well, probably for basically the same reason.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    57. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should I have my door kicked in because I might be growing weed,

      Ummm.... Did you have your Plasma TV on for exactly 12 hour cycles?

    58. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Why does the house need to be destroyed? Does converting a house into a growing operation make it structurally unsound somehow? I suppose someone could rip out a bunch of supporting walls to make a larger space, but, if the house is still standing, couldn't you just jack those areas up and build new walls rather than demolishing the house? Or is the house just destroyed because it has been "tainted" by pot growing? Just more of the standard circular reasoning you get in drug war debates?

      "Why is pot bad?"
      "Because houses with pot growing in them have to be destroyed! Won't someone think of the houses!"
      "But why do they have to destroy the houses?"
      "Because they had pot growing in them and pot is bad."
      "Why is pot bad..."

    59. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pragmatically, politicians benefit more from special interests that keep pot illegal through prisons, judicial system, police, corrections, and other agencies. The public opinion is still roughly half and half last I checked. So with the swing 'vote' of lobby influence, they are making the pragmatic choice.

      The moral, logical, universally consistent choice however ... not so much.

    60. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

      This is something that people do all the time; everywhere.

      As a matter of fact, living in CA, it has its' own lingo associated with it

      called 'blowing a house up'.. it's when you rent a property for the sole purpose of growing pot in every square inch possible

      As a matter of fact, I see a good handful of property owners who advertise properties on craigslist/budtrader for the sole purpose of doing this.

      Then again, this is California where it is BIG BUSINESS. People make millions upon millions from legal pot here, so of course a market will spring up around places to grow it, it's only natural when so much $ is involved

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    61. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The purpose of setting up an indoor operation is to keep the supply close to the customers... and to avoid the hassle that comes with trying to ship the product past "security checkpoints" that can get it confiscated. Marijuana is a rather bulky product in terms of how much stuff you need in order to get a "high"... much more so than cocaine or heroin which can be highly concentrated for trans-shipment across larger distances.

      Sadly, it is being grown in places with lots of sunshine too. One of the more interesting locations is to set up a pot growing operation in a national park or other wilderness area where even fairly sophisticated irrigation systems are set up to keep the plants healthy. Since it is an organized criminal activity, it becomes dangerous to even go camping or hiking near some of these "farms", where even park rangers try to avoid going except when heavily armed with DEA backup to shut down these operations. Because they are being set up in wilderness areas, they tend not to get noticed for awhile until somebody happens to wander by "accident".

      I get your point here, but the issue is that it has become so profitable even with the potential for doing time in prison that there are many folks who are willing to make the effort to set up an operation like this.

    62. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Teancum · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that those growing the pot are sticking to just that kind of farm operation and not also setting up a meth lab or doing other kinds of illegal activities where they really don't care about the landlord or the consequences of damaging the house.

      Furthermore, most homes aren't really set up to become greenhouses, where such an operation would also be incredibly messy and the water damage alone would seem to be sufficient to cause a total loss to the house. Having leaky "irrigation" pipes running through a house and running for a couple of months non-stop would be more than enough to start warping and damaging the floorboards and wall studs, not to mention the build-up of mold and other issues where you would have to peel back everything to the basic frame of the house.

      Yes, I can see how it would be much easier to simply demolish the house and move it to a toxic landfill area (aka a "superfund" cleanup like cleaning up a chemical factory) rather than trying to do some "simple" repairs. If the "farm" is kept relatively low-key it wouldn't be a problem but rarely is that the case when being used in the manner described.

    63. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but there's plenty of things you can do to get a high electricity usage, as demonstrated here. Absolutely ridiculous. Unless they had some actual proof that he had pot, they should not have been able to do this.

    64. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pragmatically, this whole ordeal should be a non issue. If people want to grow pot in their homes, let them. Big fuckin' deal!

      Its not that simple. Agricultural operations in a residential area, with the accompanying fumes and smells, do have downsides. Now nobody here likes taxes, cops or the man or anything (And we all are total beatles fans and chatting up a girl with âoehey want some free loveâ totally works. Also: Enron, Exxon and multinational bankers are the best and the cold war? bad idea and we should really stop it) the thing is that sometimes having the government keep an eye on things is just the practical thing to do. Its what works.

      These places could easily end up being an industrial fire hazard. Many might think a fire at a pot growing operation would be hilarious, but you know, kids and asthmatic people people might live nearby and lose homes and stuff. All because some idiot screwed up their electrical systems.

      Since the stuff is likely to be meant for human consumption and the average consumer doesn't have the capacity to do health and safety testing having the government keep an eye on production to make sure no dangerous corners are being cut would give me peace of mind. It seems to work for salad. What if I had a kid that smoked and some idiot decides to experiment with a crazy choice of pesticides with no short term but disastrous long term health effects?

      Small organisations producing a luxury good with a history of cash payments and money laundering expertise... As someone who does pay taxes it would sure feel nice to know that these people pay their taxes too.

      There is plenty of legitimate reasons to monitor pot production and if things get really bad to close one of these industrial operations in residential areas. If they screw with the neighborhood badly enough they have to fix things or be closed.

      All of these problems are easier to deal with if its not an illegal undisclosed underground operation in the middle of the city next to my school.

      If countries like Canada, but especially the US got off their ass and adopted sane drugs policies and updated the international drug eradication treaties then maybe here in the Netherlands we can get proper pot production going. That way I, a never-smoker like 80% of the people here, don't have to live/go to school between these crazy indoor operations. Its kind of unfair that our politicians are bound by crazy eradication treaties that keep production illegal eventhough 40% of Americans say they smoke or smoked pot and from my personal experience at least that many Americans try to sell you the stuff if you are a young white guy walking in the wrong part of town. Thankfully a nuisance I don't have to deal with here.

    65. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story only happens to involve Bitcoin. Bitcoin or not, this is Your Rights Online. The notion you could get raided just because of what you do with your own time and money is outrageous.

      Um, yes we understand that, but that story is Old News. This article is an attempt to tie an IRC rumor to the well-known fact that using a massive quantity of electricity at a residential location generates attention. And the whole bit about the Ohio DEA is taken completely out of context in the slashdot summary, it was months ago and had nothing to do with bitcoin, and to address your point specifically they state that electric usage is only supporting evidence to get a warrant when they already suspect a grow operation for other reasons.

      Here's the IRC 'log' (http://twitpic.com/51ipav/full)

      [23:39] black888: my friend that's a miner got raided by the police
      [23:39] black888: yeah they thought he was growing weed
      [23:39] srsOni: problem the massive heat/energy bill
      [23:39] srsOni: probably**
      [23:39] Xenland: they can legally do that just by massive power consumption?
      [23:40] black888: apparently
      [23:42] black888: they didnt know what to think they searched the house and left
      [23:43] black888: his power company reported him or something like that

      Which is an entirely different story than the summary and the article try to make it into.

    66. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by mrrudge · · Score: 1

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11660210

      Harmful to, harm to others around you.

      Iirc, Prof. David Nutt was the former UK government drug adviser until his arguments about the relative harmlessness of cannabis we're ignored by the government.

    67. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I've seen photos of similar houses in England. They don't need to be completely demolished, but do need to be stripped to the outside walls and re-built inside. As American houses tend to be built to the same standards as English garden sheds, I could well imagine that it is cheaper to demolish the whole thing and start again.

    68. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cigars are absolutely pointless. Real men smoke weed!

    69. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by qpqp · · Score: 1

      20 - a couple, when the weed-quality around here is at another low and there's only this ammonia-laden, spoiled shit from Albania that you roll one after the other and that was stored in a plastic bag in an earth-hole for over a season, just because a plastic bag's free with any purchase around these parts. And they even warn you that it "fucks you up" (as opposed to "gets you high"). Should still be better than smoking tobacco. At least there's a point to it.

    70. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      You mean other people's lives? Fail.

    71. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - but only total idiots actually inhale the cigar smoke.....

    72. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] while dope aficionados don't get high more than a few times a day, often less [...]

      You mean, they get high once, and then catch up - who really gets high, never comes back.

      Obligatory: "Remember kids, do something cool: don't smoke acid!" (Zodiac Youth - Don't smoke acid)

    73. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      "Also we have perhaps 3 million years of evolution of breathing smoke."

      Excellent point, but be careful here. Evolution doesn't necessarily equate to being beneficial to your long-term health. You have evolved towards being an efficient means of genetic propagation, which implies that smoking will help you spread your genetics This might be good or bad depending on the circumstances and your objectives.

      Your personal goals might not match those that your genes would prefer.

    74. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You underestimate bitcoin. Mining != bitcoin. I don't blame you, you most likely had a very poor introduction. More bitcoin users _increases_ the value of each bitcoin because there are more people willing to accept it as payment. There is a small, but rapidly growing economy of actual goods and services that can be purchased with bitcoin. This is what gives it value. As for mining: yes, difficulty will increase until mining is barely profitable. It will be like any other business: profitable if you are knowledgeable/experienced, unprofitable if you aren't. Mining exists to process transactions on the network... the 50 BTC reward is merely a temporary means of bootstrapping the currency in a semi-fair way.

    75. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by SamuliZip · · Score: 1

      Actived carbon filters work fine with smoking weed, you shouldn't try them out sometime (that would be illegal). There's Tune and some knock-offs. Also a piece of glass pipe with rolled-up metal screens on end and actived carbon in-between them works fine as a tip. Don't inhale the garbage, focus on the THC.

    76. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Alsee · · Score: 1

      68.58% of the readers here have some level of OCD.
      Slashdot could run a story on some guy who says his turd looks like Jesus, and most Slashdot readers would have no choice but to click on it.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    77. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course "outing" themselves would require getting up off the couch. And we BOTH know that ain't happening.

    78. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Yes. We evolved to run away from it.

    79. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Yes, I should mention that standard building practice in the area is wood-frame construction, stucco exterior. Because it's a temperate rainforest climate, molds and mildews grow well, and conversion to a greenhouse pretty much destroys the integrity of the wooden joists and beams.

      Add to this that it's cheaper over here to rebuild than to strip and remodel (we have 5 year old homes that get demolished to put a new home in when someone buys the property here) and you can see why demolish is the way to go.

    80. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cigarettes are actually less damaging, due to the invention of the filter tip.

      There's nothing to stop you using filter tips with weed; it doesn't seem to reduce the effect noticeably, and the tips cost next to nothing if you bulk-buy. Once you've seen the about of crud they filter out you probably won't want to go back to unfiltered.

    81. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make more money, work harder and am in better shape than you.

      That's what he was talking about. You sound like an annoying person to me.

    82. Re:Shut up with the bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Bitcoin thing is a very short-lived fad. The more people get in on it, the less valuable it becomes.

      I don't think you fully understand the way bitcoin works. The more people get in on it, the more valuable each bitcoin becomes. As the demand goes up, and since the supply is steady, price will also go up. Basic economics.

  6. Funniest thing is... by Bieeanda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They spent more on those machines, and on the electricity to run them, than they ever will 'mining' bitcoins.

    1. Re:Funniest thing is... by SaroDarksbane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I assume you meant "than they ever will gain mining bitcoins."

      If that's the case, it's hard to say what their expected ROI will be. I know that in my case, I already had a 5850 in my machine (a very good mining GPU) and thus, with a little bit of luck I've 'mined' 150 coins in a month. At the current exchange rate, those coins would we worth ~$1000 dollars if I cashed out now, and I really only paid for electricity. Depending on the hardware they bought, and when they started (the difficulty has really ramped up in the last couple weeks), they could be sitting on a nice payout, assuming they aren't dumb enough to try dumping them all onto the market at once.

      For my part, I'm interested in bitcoins as a viable currency and not just as some bizarre experiment in cryptographic "stock" to dump when I need some extra spending cash, so I expect I'll be holding onto mine until I can get some actual goods with them.

      (Also, I hate the term 'mining'. It's really more like 'accounting', but it's probably too late to change anything.)

    2. Re:Funniest thing is... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It really is a lot more like mining, though... you're looking through piles of stuff, testing to see if it matches a given criteria that is determined by the network.

    3. Re:Funniest thing is... by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      What would be real nice is an ARM SoC with circuits specially for the bitcoin mining process.

    4. Re:Funniest thing is... by gox · · Score: 0

      They spent more on those machines, and on the electricity to run them, than they ever will 'mining' bitcoins.

      Link? Or are you making this up on the fly and still getting +5 Insightful?

      I'd be surprised if the investment hasn't paid itself off on the second month. It's not that mining is such a good idea (IMO it's not supposed to be very profitable, and I expect it to get less profitable soon) but the value has risen so much that I purchased a 3 year dedicated hosting service with the coins I mined with my crappy old video card in two months (and kept for a few months more).

    5. Re:Funniest thing is... by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2

      This is just from the ridiculous inflated exchange rate.

      The article even said he was going to buy 10,000 BTC .. if he would have done that instead (with the current exchange rate) he'd be sitting at $70k

      As you can see, mining is a fool's errand. Now.. buying a thousand or so BTC might have seemed like a smart move on my part right about now, wish I did. Bitcoin seems akin to a pyramid scheme. The early adopters get insane amounts, this leads to a huge increase of people 'using' and 'valuing' the currency because of interest in generating money, in turn exponentially increasing the value of said currency.

      The real people benefiting are the super-early adopters who have 10,000+ BTC who have been using custom build GPU mining software from the start. Everyone else just pretty much helps add value to their insane amounts

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    6. Re:Funniest thing is... by Discrete_infinity · · Score: 1

      I assume you meant "than they ever will gain mining bitcoins."

      If that's the case, it's hard to say what their expected ROI will be. I know that in my case, I already had a 5850 in my machine (a very good mining GPU) and thus, with a little bit of luck I've 'mined' 150 coins in a month. At the current exchange rate, those coins would we worth ~$1000 dollars if I cashed out now, and I really only paid for electricity. Depending on the hardware they bought, and when they started (the difficulty has really ramped up in the last couple weeks), they could be sitting on a nice payout, assuming they aren't dumb enough to try dumping them all onto the market at once.

      For my part, I'm interested in bitcoins as a viable currency and not just as some bizarre experiment in cryptographic "stock" to dump when I need some extra spending cash, so I expect I'll be holding onto mine until I can get some actual goods with them.

      (Also, I hate the term 'mining'. It's really more like 'accounting', but it's probably too late to change anything.)

      I am waiting for the botnets to start pillaging this "economy". Talk about return on investment, lol.

      --
      Windows Haiku Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return.
    7. Re:Funniest thing is... by gox · · Score: 1

      Why -1 Flamebait? I'm telling something that can be verified easily, and the poster is deliberately spreading false information. It would take less than a couple of minutes to check the validity of both accounts. The outrage is that false information gets +5 Insightful, since it matches the political view of the majority here.

      Alas, there's no honour left in mods, I'm out of Slashdot for good now...

  7. Re:One more nail by EllisDees · · Score: 1

    Didn't even bother to read past the first sentence?

    "Ohio police and the DEA file at least 60 subpoenas each month for energy-use records of people suspected of running an indoor pot growing operation."

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  8. mine bitcoins then grow pot? by wmbetts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So if you want to grow pot mine a bunch of bitcoins and get the police to inspect your house. Once that's done setup your grow operation, because the suspicion has been relieved?

    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    1. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Or leave your AC on 65 for a month, or say you have SAD and have a ton of lights on in your house for months without pot.

      Sort of an investment. But they may not do anything for months before hitting you.

      It's odd because with LED and CFL grow lights it seems to me your power consumption should be 1/6th to 1/3rd what it used to be.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > It's odd because with LED and CFL grow lights it seems to me your power consumption should be 1/6th to 1/3rd
      > what it used to be.

      I thought you couldn't get LED etc lights of the correct colour for growing plants indoors?

    3. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by rhook · · Score: 1

      LED and CFL bulbs make for very poor grow lights. Growers who know what they are doing use high-pressure sodium and metal halide bulbs.

    4. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      RGB LEDs and PWM: any color is craftable. I'm no pot-grower, but I read a long time ago, that red-blue light is the best for increasing growth and yield. This was for a zero-g hydroponic garden, though, so it might not apply to marijuana...

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    5. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want High Pressure Sodium or Metal Halide (depending on whether your in a growth of flowering phase) for the best results. They use a lot of power.

    6. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by noc007 · · Score: 1

      LEDs can be used, however they must emit certain frequencies of light in order to work. Most off the shelf LEDs won't work. IIRC, different stages in the grow cycle respond only certain frequencies; so it responds to one frequency at one stage and then a different frequency in another. There are LED light arrays that only do one frequency requiring you to either move the plants or the lights. There are other products that have LEDs that do all the needed frequencies.

    7. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's why the discussion is about LEDs.

    8. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plants care about the specific frequencies of light available, not the qualia as produced by the human trichromatic vision system.
      A RGB system uses just three frequencies, with varying intensities for different colours.

    9. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by westlake · · Score: 1

      So if you want to grow pot mine a bunch of bitcoins and get the police to inspect your house. Once that's done setup your grow operation, because the suspicion has been relieved?

      You don't know small towns and you do not know cops.

      The suspicion never goes away and the police will just wait you out, let you get comfortably settled in.

    10. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about compact fluorescents, but 200W of circluar fluorescents ( 4KWh per day) makes an excellent grow room.

      At $4/day for 8 weeks, or about $250, you can grow an ounce worth about $6000, six times a year.

    11. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I do know that it is very embarassing for the police to raid someone and not get a conviction. If they don't find you guilty of whatever they suspected, they'll just search until they find something else. Everyone has broken some law, somewhere, some time. Just a matter of finding it.

    12. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      you can grow an ounce worth about $6000/> Cop math?

    13. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by stonewallred · · Score: 1
      Actually good results are obtainable using CFLs. While the yield is not as large as HPS/MH, nor the buds as tight, the quality is there. The set up and operating cost for a grow for personal use, utilizing CFLs is much cheaper.

      A small proofing box or a 8x10' walk in cooler, conditioned by a 1.5 ton ultra-high efficiency mini-split system will add maybe 100 bucks a month to your electric bill in the area I live in. If you use CFL or tubes.

      I actually was planning on going out to CA and selling the box and equipment if they passed the pot law out there.

    14. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you couldn't get LED etc lights of the correct colour for growing plants indoors?

      You can, but many of the cheap Chinese LED grow light manufacturers don't bother using LEDs with the correct spectrum, just whatever's cheap that day. Buy from a trusted manufacturer (Chinese or USA, whatever) to ensure getting LEDs with the correct spectrum.

      Although LED grow light technology is still under development, the results are promising as low power and long life grow lights.

      Having said that, the majority of serious growers still use HID MH or HPS lighting.

    15. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      It's Canada.

      It's generally too cold for most of the year to have leave the AC on for an entire month except maybe in July or August.

      Secondly.... 65? Again... it's Canada. Try about 18.

    16. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I doubt that would work. What surprises me about this screw up is that they apparently didn't have any other evidence to go on that this was a grow operation prior to searching the premises. I doubt very much that there would be no other evidence to back the suspicion if this had been a grow operation, especially a massive one..

    17. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Get an electric space heater and run that all winter. Hmm... I guess I have no idea what the normal heating fuel is in BC, but I use natural gas in Alaska and running electric heat for a couple months would put the electric bill through the roof.

    18. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      High intensity bulbs are more efficient that fluorescent. LED's are too expensive for anything other than a light supplement on a small scale.

    19. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not true. you can get much lumen higher density from blue/red led arrays than from any hps or mh bulbs. additionally, you don't need to invest in cooling, your lighting lasts much longer, its much easier to incorporate with battery/off grid systems.

    20. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about compact fluorescents, but 200W of circluar fluorescents ( 4KWh per day) makes an excellent grow room.

      (Posted as AC for obvious reasons) Yep. All you need for a small scale operation is about three 48" shop light fixtures. (@ two T-8 or T-12 bulbs apiece) My grow area is nothing more than a spare bathtub with the lights suspended from a wooden frame I built. It's got water, drainage, everything I need. Shop light fixtures are cheap ($9 each) and the wood for the frame isn't more than a few dollars. The only drawback about fluorescent bulbs is that they aren't very bright for their size compared to HID fixtures, but they run fairly cold and use way less power.

    21. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Even during the winter, heating a 120 square meter home electrically (that's roughly 1200 square feet or so) uses *MAYBE* 40kwH a day... at most. Less than half of what the threshold where the power companies report excessive power usage to the police.

    22. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      I F***N wish.
      I have a relatively uninsulated 100m^2 home.
      1.6Kw raises the internal temperature by around 3C or so.

    23. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't seem that way any more; a quick google search reveals LED to be quite competitive with other lighting solutions. With the added bonus of not having to worry about setting your plants ablaze or spending more on power than rent.

      Sounds like if you know what you're doing, LED is the way to go, but you have to be selective to ensure the correct color and intensity.

    24. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the best of both worlds: run those bitcoin-mining CPUs white-hot and use emanated heat and light to grow marijuana trees? :-)

    25. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can grow an ounce worth about $6000

      LOLWUT?

    26. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The equivalent values printed on CFL boxes don't count with pot.

    27. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, you have to rinse and repeat once or twice before you can accuse the cops of harassment so they back off.. But yeah, that's the idea.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      From what I understand here in Canada, 3 raids without finding anything is enough to accuse the cops of harassment and perhaps win.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    29. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The whole summary is bullshit (I didn't read TFA but do live in Mission). In Mission they have a bylaw that allows them to send in an inspection team (with notice) and charge you $5000 for the inspection. If the inspectors find anything then they can get a warrant. If they find a loose wire or loose banister they can charge you the $5000. I guess if you refuse the inspectors access they can get a warrant and when the inspectors show up they do bring the cops who sit outside the property unless you do something stupid like attack the inspectors.
      Currently Mission is getting sued for this blatant run around our civil rights and the inspections are suspended.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    30. Re:mine bitcoins then grow pot? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The problem is the price.

      You get a lot more light for your money if you buy HPS and MH lights (I'm not talking power consumption here, I'm talking about purchasing the lights).

      For a professional grower it might make sense but overall HPS lights just give you more of a bang for your buck.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  9. Re:One more nail by Niris · · Score: 2

    Second word of the summary is Canadian...

  10. Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Informative

    You realize this was in Canada, right? High power consumption alone is insufficient to obtain a search warrant in the United States.

    If you had read all the way to the third sentence, you would have seen:

    Ohio police and the DEA file at least 60 subpoenas each month for energy-use records of people suspected of running an indoor pot growing operation.

    Ohio is part of the US, and the DEA is a US Federal agency.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you knew what you were talking about, you might understand that subpoenas and search warrants are not the same thing. That post isn't nearly as useless as you make it out to be, so please, quiet down, grumpy slashdotter.

    2. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by PraiseBob · · Score: 5, Informative

      To be fair, the people in Ohio are suspected first, and THEN their electricity records are being pulled to confirm suspicions.
      Whereas in Canada, it looks like any random citizen's electricity usage can be monitored by the government.

    3. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Ohio is part of the US

      Well I can only think of one way to solve that problem.

    4. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by rhook · · Score: 2

      And if you knew anything about the way police raid homes you would know that they use those electricity bills as justification for a search warrant, absent any other evidence.

    5. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      You realize this was in Canada, right? High power consumption alone is insufficient to obtain a search warrant in the United States.

      If you had read all the way to the third sentence, you would have seen:

      Ohio police and the DEA file at least 60 subpoenas each month for energy-use records of people suspected of running an indoor pot growing operation.

      Ohio is part of the US, and the DEA is a US Federal agency.

      This is exactly what I said. The warrant based on power usage alone, thus searching a bitcoin miner's house, was in Canada. In the US, other evidence is required in addition to power usage to obtain a warrant. Note that the DEA isn't even obtaining power usage information, nevermind a search warrant, without prior evidence.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    6. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In the US they've served no-knock raids against homeowners who have broken no law and had less than that for a reason to invade. Oh, and in multiple cases, they killed the homeowners they invaded. It's better that way because the dead can't sue, and if all the live witnesses are cops, no one ever did anything wrong. And all that without any "evidence" to speak of.

    7. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the people in Ohio are suspected first, and THEN their electricity records are being pulled to confirm suspicions.
      Whereas in Canada, it looks like any random citizen's electricity usage can be monitored by the government.

      In America, they ruled the DEA scanning for heat signatures from random houses violated the 4th Amendment.

      In Canada, I'm surprised they care at all, given that when I was in Vancouver last week, I saw no less than three people smoking pot openly on the streets. One of them was while I was trying to eat sushi outdoors, which was rather annoying. Pot may decrease violence in its users... but there might be a Conservation of Rage principle at work.

    8. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      It's either that, or the cops can just claim they smelled weed and heard some noises coming out of your house, which obviously indicates that you're flushing your stash down the toilet. Then they'll send in a SWAT team who will shoot you 70 times and deny you medical care for an hour. Have a nice evening.

    9. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      In the UK, we had an incident some years ago in which an armed assault team raided a guina-pig shed. The heatlamps that were installed to keep the guina pigs warm looked a lot like a pot-growing shed on the helecopter thermal camera, and policy in cases of suspected drug production is to send in the big guns to bash the door down and get everyone cuffed as quickly as possible in order to deny suspects of any chance to destroy evidence.

      This being the UK, it ended with the family not just getting compensation but a personal appology from the officer in charge.

    10. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by neoform · · Score: 1

      >in Canada, it looks like any random citizen's electricity usage can be monitored by the government.

      In Canada electricity is provided BY the government through 'Crown Corporations'.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    11. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Nuke the entire site from orbit?

    12. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      If you knew what you were talking about, you might understand that subpoenas and search warrants are not the same thing. That post isn't nearly as useless as you make it out to be, so please, quiet down, grumpy slashdotter.

      Huh?

      The grandparent post said "Just another nail in the coffin of the Bill of Rights."
      The reply to it by mpoulton said "You realize this was in Canada, right?"
      My reply to that said "You realize that the third sentence of the article is about Ohio, which is in the US."

      What do you suggest is the correct answer to the question "You realize this was in Canada, right?"? Is it a trick question? Part of "this" was in Canada. Part wasn't.

      If the snarky reply by mpoulton had said "You realize the part of this dealing with search warrants was in Canada, right? The part that was in the United States was about subpoenas, which are different than search warrants, and thus (according to Anonymous Coward) don't involve the Bill of Rights at all," then my reply would have been different.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    13. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      citation? link?

    14. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are scads of no-knocks on the net.. but check this 'regular' raid out.

    15. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/169/modesto.shtml

      A 7th grader was shot in the back while laying on the ground face-down on police orders. No drugs found (father of the boy charged anyway, probably to hurt his case for a wrongful death that everyone was expecting to follow).

      Or is one not enough? Do you need the meta-sites that gather up hundreds (or thousands?) of innocents dead during drug raids? Because they are prominent on Google. That just happened to be the very first result for my particular search, but I saw many many others.

    16. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the US, they would have shot the guinea pigs.

      I wish I were joking.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    17. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1
      "Ohio is part of the US"

      As anyone who lives in a bordering state knows. Unfortunately yes Ohio is part of the US. Get out of the fucking fast lane.

    18. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you kill yourself for being such a retard.

    19. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Not quite "homeowner", but police killed their mayor's dogs a few years ago. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/08/national/main4331948.shtml Google mayor dogs shot raid for more.

    20. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > guina pigs helecopter

      You fucking retard.

    21. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by dryeo · · Score: 1

      One of my neighbours, here in Mission, BC, has twice had the pot inspection team show up due to them using a heat lamp to keep their chickens and goats warm. At $5000 a shot it is very irritating and one of the main examples being used to sue the town.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    22. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I live in Mission. There is a bylaw that allows them to inspect your home for safety (at least that's what they say) if you are using too much power. Generally the police show up as well but stay off the property. I guess if you refuse to let them in, then they have grounds to get a warrant though I haven't heard of it happening. They also give you notice that they are coming (day notice I believe) so all they ever find at the worst is signs that the house was used as a grow up.
      They also charge about $5000 for the 20 minute inspection usually.
      The inspections are currently suspended due to the civil rights issues and the town is being sued about it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    23. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      which is the fault of the judges issuing the warrants, not the cops for doing their job.

      The Judge is supposed to... GASP! judge if it warrants a search or not.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    24. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guinea cops helicopter

      Happy now?

    25. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      "In America, they ruled the DEA scanning for heat signatures from random houses violated the 4th Amendment."

      Now that IS news. I didn't realize we still had Fourth Amendment rights.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    26. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Wow.. All this infighting over irrelevant details. The sentence said against people suspected of running an indoor pot growing operation.

      This sentence alone makes the entire bill of right gone statement and all justifications for or against moot as it's impossible to suspect someone of an indoor pot growing operation in order to issue the subpoenas just to have the subpoenas as the only evidence to get a search warrant. The subpoenas provides only one more piece of evidence that already exists for whatever reason. They are supposed to use the courts in this way according to the bill of rights.

    27. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by somersault · · Score: 1

      You no English? Me laugh.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    28. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

      How about an interactive map?

    29. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by unitron · · Score: 1

      In the US, they would have shot the guinea pigs.

      I wish I were joking.

      In the US the humans living there would be lucky if it were only the guinea pigs getting shot.

      Jose Guerena Killed: Arizona Cops Shoot Former Marine In Botched Pot Raid

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    30. Re:Ohio is in the US [Re:One more nail] by unitron · · Score: 1

      In the US, they would have shot the guinea pigs.

      I wish I were joking.

      In the US the humans living there would be lucky if it were only the guinea pigs getting shot.

      Jose Guerena Killed: Arizona Cops Shoot Former Marine In Botched Pot Raid

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. Re:One more nail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the United States, you just have to say you thought you smelled some dope for cars. Standards are a teensy bit higher for houses due to some quirks of our legal structure, but not that much higher. If you want to go for the extra bonus points, bring a drug dog and surreptitiously order it to bark.

  12. Re:One more nail by EllisDees · · Score: 1

    Oops. That was meant for the guy responding to you.

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  13. Re:One more nail by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Canada does not have a bill of rights. They have a Queen.

  14. Has this actually happened? by artor3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Rumors floating around IRC" strikes me as somewhere between Fox News and Homeless Guy on Street Corner in terms of credibility. This is exactly the sort of story that someone would make up as a joke, and people would repeat as though it's real.

    1. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *confused*

      Which one is more credible?

    2. Re:Has this actually happened? by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      I assume that the spectrum goes:

    3. Re:Has this actually happened? by ustolemyname · · Score: 0

      HTML ate my arrows. Grrr. less credible - fox news - Rumors floating around IRC - Homeless Guy on Street Corner - more credible

    4. Re:Has this actually happened? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I assumed it was made up by the Bitcoin guys to get them some more publicity and to make it look like people actually took them seriously.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Has this actually happened? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know of anywhere that allows city statues(bylaws) to trump provincial and federal legislation in Canada(there are a few exceptions for Toronto at the provincial level but that's it). Something isn't right in this story, and I think it's the entire thing. In Canada you need to have reasonable and probable grounds to get a warrant, power usage isn't enough for that. And I can't see some city trying to pull a 'safety inspection' pile of crap, being that any lawyer here will tell them off the bat that it's a charter violation to have something like that. Plus then there comes the question of legally obtaining the amount of power used, mining that information is a violation of the privacy act. And I'm pretty close to my up and up on case law here.

      Yes BC has a serious problem with grow-ops, but they're pretty much to the point of being a soft crime. Meaning that people are fined for far less than in other parts of the country, and jail time is close to non-existent.

      From the canuck angle? The article stinks of crap, nothing more nothing less.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Rumors floating around IRC" strikes me as somewhere between Fox News and Homeless Guy on Street Corner in terms of credibility. This is exactly the sort of story that someone would make up as a joke, and people would repeat as though it's real.

      Funny, that describes the credibility and worthiness of Bitcoin itself pretty accurately, too.

    7. Re:Has this actually happened? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes BC has a serious problem with grow-ops

      In what way are grow-ops a problem? The only possible problem I can conceive is that there aren't enough of them. I know that's not the case in BC.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Has this actually happened? by IshmaelDS · · Score: 2

      It is in fact a "safety inspection". I believe they do need a warrant to get into your home unless you let them in, I don't know if the would need extra evidence to get the warrant or not. here is a link. BCLocalNews. There is also a $5200 that can be charged to you regardless of if you have a grow op or not, though it is not always charged. here is another link Globe&Mail

      --
      letting an idiot know they are an idiot is not a game... it's a responsibility. - by Kristopeit, M. D. (1892582)
    9. Re:Has this actually happened? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You mean the man traps, electrical code violations caused by, bypassing mains, and cutting through everything in order to run ducting, and in turn causing structural damage? I guess none of those are problems.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Has this actually happened? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Yes BC has a serious problem with grow-ops, but they're pretty much to the point of being a soft crime.

      Tell that to Marc Emery.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    11. Re:Has this actually happened? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Warrants require more than 'excessive power usage' in Canada in order to get one. That's covered in case law. Doing a bit more searching(reason it wasn't in my latest journal is because it's still in the courts), there's actually a rather large class action suit going against several cities, and a couple of counties for charter violations for the use of this bylaw. Bylaws like this aren't legal here. You can't skirt the charter to get something done quicker(which is what they've done). And in order for that to be legal, this will end up all the way to the supreme court you can count on it. But the cities and counties will have to show that there's demonstrative harm to public safety, much like the s.1 exception for drinking and driving.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:Has this actually happened? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      I assumed it was made up by the Bitcoin guys to get them some more publicity and to make it look like people actually took them seriously.

      Considering this is the third or so story about Bitcoin, I'm guessing someone has hired a marketing firm/intern to get these stories out there.
      That's the only real explanation for how these stories are getting planted around the web.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    13. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the sort of story that someone would make up as a joke, and people would repeat as though it's real.

      Exactly. I can't say I've ever heard of someones @Home farm being raided because of the electricity use, and some people go nuts with setups for that.

      Shenanigans?

    14. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a rehash of old stories told about Folding@Home and such projects, hell, ATI even did a joke advert about nVidia cards using it.

    15. Re:Has this actually happened? by westlake · · Score: 1

      "Rumors floating around IRC" strikes me as somewhere between Fox News and Homeless Guy on Street Corner in terms of credibility. This is exactly the sort of story that someone would make up as a joke, and people would repeat as though it's real.

      Not to mention that the 100 kWH mine makes Bitcoin look like just another Ponzi scheme.

    16. Re:Has this actually happened? by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      Right, it couldn't possibly be news people are interested in.

    17. Re:Has this actually happened? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Arn't all of those things a result of the need to conceal operations from police?

    18. Re:Has this actually happened? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, the horror, gainfully employed neighbors who bend over backwards to not cause any sort of disturbance that might attract attention.

    19. Re:Has this actually happened? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's not the grow ops fault, that's the governments fault. Hydroponic tomato "grow ops" (aka farms) suffer none of these problems. The ONLY problem here is Prohibition.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Has this actually happened? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      In Canada you need to have reasonable and probable grounds to get a warrant

      True.

      ...power usage isn't enough for that

      You are mistaken. At least in BC.

    21. Re:Has this actually happened? by future+assassin · · Score: 1
      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    22. Re:Has this actually happened? by alannon · · Score: 1

      Marc Emery was running a business selling goods across the border, into the US, that the US Federal Government considers to be extremely illegal. He was extradited to the US after the Canadian government couldn't come up with a reasonable excuse not to. Personally, I feel that this makes Emery a very poor spokesperson for the effort to legalize in Canada, since his arrest and conviction would have likely gone unchanged even if it was completely legal in Canada. I wish that all of the attention going to his 'plight' would instead be focused on changing the laws here in Canada instead of trying to free a man who was essentially daring a foreign government to extradite him while he was running an illegal export business.

      Furthermore, what does the BC provincial government have to do with the situation?

    23. Re:Has this actually happened? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      "Warrants require more than 'excessive power usage' in Canada in order to get one."

      Not in BC... since about 2006 or so, when the bill was passed.

      I believe it's been challenged on constitutional grounds before, but the grow-op prevention program which monitors power usage and sends inspections to homes using abnormally high power still remains.

    24. Re:Has this actually happened? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Sounds like, if they weren't illegal, those problems wouldn't be problems.

    25. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow-ops are a problem because police raid them. Simple really.

    26. Re:Has this actually happened? by DavidWeight · · Score: 2

      I assumed it was made up by the Bitcoin guys to get them some more publicity and to make it look like people actually took them seriously.

      Considering this is the third or so story about Bitcoin, I'm guessing someone has hired a marketing firm/intern to get these stories out there. That's the only real explanation for how these stories are getting planted around the web.

      I'd just be impressed if they managed to find a marketing company that were willing to be paid in Bitcoins...

    27. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTML ate my arrows. Grrr.

      less credible - fox news - Rumors floating around IRC - Homeless Guy on Street Corner - more credible

      html spews lame comments too?

    28. Re:Has this actually happened? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      There is some truth to it, but not very much.
      Mission has a bylaw that allows safety inspections for excessive power usage. It is possible that a bitcoin farm would trigger this off. If they refused the inspection then perhaps it would be cause for a warrant. If they had electrical violations or other violations like a loose stair banister then they may have been charged for the inspection, $5000.
      Living in Mission I've heard a lot of bullshit about these inspections, but none have involved a server farm. Mission is currently getting sued for these run arounds our rights and are probably going to have to pay.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    29. Re:Has this actually happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Considering this is the third or so story about Bitcoin, I'm guessing someone has hired a marketing firm/intern to get these stories out there.

      Yes, it can't possibly be because of hundreds of strongly politically motivated bitcoin users who vote them up on Slashdot and other nerd controlled sites.

    30. Re:Has this actually happened? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      One of the "Homeless Guys on Street Corner" in my neighborhood was a former college professor. I don't know how exactly his life fell apart, but he'd occasionally snap out of whatever haze he was in and we could have a very insightful conversation.

    31. Re:Has this actually happened? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      All of which are because the operation is illegal.

      If the gov made bubble gum/shoes/xyz illegal (and there was a demand for said product), the same issues would be there, regardless of harmfulness/harmless of bubble gum/shoes/xyz.

      Attempt logic much?

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  15. Bitcoins as currency by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    So I watched the little video in the article but I don't understand why or how anyone would accept bitcoins as currency. Can anyone explain to me how running an application on your computer to 'make' currency produces anything of value?

    1. Re:Bitcoins as currency by obarel · · Score: 1

      Apparently if you run a social network application on your computer it makes you worth 50 billion dollars.

    2. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is a scam. The bitcoin production difficulty is exponential, so the first few people who designed the system easily produced a big percentage of the total possible bitcoins (Over 6 million out of the total 21 million scheduled to be produced until the year 2140 are already taken) and now they are doing everything they can to give them value. So, those that "accept" bitcoins as currency are those that have a vested interest in them gaining value.
      Basically you are using more and more power for the chance to produce a virtual "coin", so you are not producing value, just hurting the environment and if enough stupid people follow your example you will make a few scammers rich.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:Bitcoins as currency by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I understand it, the process doesn't create anything of inherent value, but it serves to limit supply - same way that gold is difficult to find and mine, is of limited industrial use (and thus limited intrinsic value), and tends to just sit around in vaults once it's been refined, but is still traded and invested in.

      The key difference, of course, is that the value of gold has more 'inertia' since there are far, far more people who buy into the notion that gold has value. Bitcoin is pretty volatile because there are far fewer people with a vested interest (in the most literal sense of the term) in its maintained value, and because people find it easier to accept the value of a shiny metal with thousands of years of history than that of a cryptographically signed set of data.

    4. Re:Bitcoins as currency by MoonBuggy · · Score: 0

      I don't see why an initial 'gold rush' leads to the conclusion that it's a scam - sure, the first guys are getting rich, but that doesn't necessarily imply anything negative about the currency once it does stabilise somewhat, as far as I can see.

    5. Re:Bitcoins as currency by SaroDarksbane · · Score: 1

      So I watched the little video in the article but I don't understand why or how anyone would accept bitcoins as currency. Can anyone explain to me how running an application on your computer to 'make' currency produces anything of value?

      It's not so much that you "make" currency, as it is that the system rewards you for utilizing your computer to do the accounting work for the Bitcoin system. Currently, this reward system is in the form of a payout that steadily decreases as time goes on, to be gradually replaced by voluntary transaction fees that people can pay to have their accounting done first.

      People make a big deal about the early adopters having a large advantage over later adopters, but really the system of initial currency distribution for Bitcoins is still much better than that of the dollar, where the government prints them all and then spends them all. At least with Bitcoins, the early adopters only have an advantage once (until they spend their coins). The US government can print to its heart's content with no end in sight.

      So if Bitcoin is a scam, it's less of a scam than the US dollar (although that might not be saying much).

    6. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Hatta · · Score: 2

      The same way running a press to 'make' currency produces anything of value. It doesn't. The machine makes the item, but the value comes from us.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is of limited industrial use (and thus limited intrinsic value)

      Gold is handy for jewellery, electrical contacts and, of course, killing Cybermen.

    8. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason it is of a limited industrial use is because it is so scarce and friggin expensive. Gold does 10x better than copper in electronics. Until recently they also made gold teeth for rich customers, who would wear those in their mouths as jewelry.

    9. Re:Bitcoins as currency by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      It doesn't. It creates a medium of exchange that all players on the network agree upon, and cannot change unilaterally.

      You think your US government backed cash has any actual value to it? It has as much (or as little) value as the people who hold it believe it does. Same with bitcoins. It's effectively a cryptographically secure, peer-to-peer financial system. It doesn't contain value, just like no monetary system since the gold standard actually contained value.

    10. Re:Bitcoins as currency by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's been a valuable trade good and currency since long before any industrial use.

    11. Re:Bitcoins as currency by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right which brings us to the key difference between bitcoin and regular government money.

      Government money has value because you HAVE to use it to deal with the government and dealing with the governement is basically unavoidable. Many private sellers don't take anything other than government money (or bank credits that are effectively equivilent to government money) either.

      OTOH bitcoins can only be spent at a relatively small number of places most of which take government currency (or bank credits that are effectively equivilent to government currency) as well. So there is far more chance of it becoming worthless in a relatively short time. Especially if governments start trying to crack down on users.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way putting pictures of presidents on paper produces something of value.

      In short, it doesn't. It's the community/social trust in the currency as a medium of exchange that gives value. The "trust" that if I accept your bitcoins for a loaf of bread, I'll be able to exchange that bitcoins for something I want.

      Bitcoin's claimed advantage are two-fold. First is anonymity. Not sure how that works with this. Second, they're difficulty/impossible to forge-- Supposedly the crypto magic done by computers making bitcoins can't be duplicated, or something.

      It all sounds like BS to me. Basically the crypto is just acting as a "proof of work" to limit the currency supply and make forgery difficult, but there's plenty of ways this could be done without the CPU cycles. I'm not sure if the people running bitcoin are scammers or just people with a moderately interesting idea that the 'net happened to convince them was better than it is.

    13. Re:Bitcoins as currency by mestar · · Score: 2

      It would be something similar to Paypal, just without somebody telling you what you can do or can't (poker) do with your money. Also nobody can freeze your account. Also, free or very low transaction fees.

      Also, you can't buy them directly from a company, you have to use trading exchanges to buy and sell them, so the price fluctuates.

      If you accept Paypal as something you can use to buy stuff with, you can accept bitcoin, or at least I don't wee why not.

    14. Re:Bitcoins as currency by mestar · · Score: 2

      "The bitcoin production difficulty is exponential"

      Difficulty can go down as well.

      Production difficulty is not set by anybody, it is just that right now bitcoin is becoming very popular so lost of people are mining. In fact, production of bitcoins is linear, 50 bitcoins each 10 minutes or so on average, but this will go down every 4 years. Nothing exponential about it.

      Would you say e-gold was a scam as well? About $600 million was put into e-gold until US government shut it down. Only difference is that bitcoin is p2p, and thus, similar to bittorrent, unstoppable.

    15. Re:Bitcoins as currency by mestar · · Score: 2

      It all sounds like BS to me. Basically the crypto is just acting as a "proof of work" to limit the currency supply and make forgery difficult, but there's plenty of ways this could be done without the CPU cycles.

      Plenty of ways? Name one.

      Bitcoin does it in a distributed fashion, without central authority. When I read about how it all works, I thought it was ingenious.

    16. Re:Bitcoins as currency by hedwards · · Score: 2

      One issue is that it's illegal in the US to create ones own currency, and I'd wager that it's not just the US that takes that view. Prior to that being made federal law, states and even banks would have their own currency leading to all sorts of confusion. Gift cards get a bit of a free pass in that they're sold and drawn upon legal tender and really just represent a promissory note.

      Additionally, because of the way that the system is set up, it looks a bit too much like a Ponzi scheme for my comfort. There's something unsettling about a currency which isn't based upon anything tangible and that doesn't come with any claims or guarantees about getting to use it either.

    17. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Does it produce anything of lasting value? If not, it's a scam.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    18. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Gold has intrinsic value in the fact that it has high malleability, ductility and is resistant to corrosion. It is also pretty and can be made into jewlery.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    19. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Abreu · · Score: 1

      The US Dollar is backed by a country with a large army and a lot of nuclear explosives. What do you mean you don't accept it?

      Who backs bitcoins? How are they going to compel people into accepting them?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    20. Re:Bitcoins as currency by brit74 · · Score: 2

      > "Falkvinge from pirate bay party"
      You realize you're not helping your argument with that, don't you?

    21. Re:Bitcoins as currency by mestar · · Score: 2, Informative

      It produces an ability to send "money" around for a very low cost. And as long as somebody is willing to buy them from you, bitcoins will have value.

      If it's a scam, price on exchanges will go to zero, and you will have digital play money to send around.

      Then, perhaps some multi-player online game will start to use it and price will again rise from zero to 0.01 per bitcoin, perhaps more.

      After all, people are buying Zynga poker chips that you can never cash out. And Eve ISKs, and Wow gold.

      The name of that online game for bitcons will be called "Economy online."

    22. Re:Bitcoins as currency by mestar · · Score: 2

      "How are they going to compel people into accepting them?"

      Pokerstars and Full Tilt Poker will start to accept bitcoins, so that even people that are not part of the free world could play.

    23. Re:Bitcoins as currency by mestar · · Score: 2

      What it produces in an ability that I can send you "something" from my computer to your computer without any central authority, so that you can be sure that I don't have that same thing anymore. And I can't cheat.

      If you think about it, it is an interesting problem, because, how can you be sure that I indeed do not have that "something" on my computer. What happens if, after I send you that "something", I restore my computer from backup?

      That is what the application produces, and that is what have value for some people, because, it basically becomes electronic cash, that mimics the real world gold, without the hassle of the real gold, and also without real world uses that actual gold has.

    24. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Who backs bitcoins?

      The network of computers running the Bitcoin software (and in particular, the (alleged) cryptographic security of its algorithms).

      How are they going to compel people into accepting them?

      They aren't. Nobody is going to compel anyone to do anything.

      People might voluntarily choose to accept bitcoins for their own reasons, however.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    25. Re:Bitcoins as currency by SilentChasm · · Score: 2

      The fact that nobody can effectively freeze your account/restrict who you send money to is, IMO, one of the main strengths of Bitcoin. Think of stuff like Wikileaks losing paypal.

      There's also the fact that transfers are one way (no withdrawals). People can't take bitcoins from you, only you decide what to do with it.

    26. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you. Finally someone else who sees bitcoin for what it really is.

      It's an elaborate ponzi scheme designed to generate insane interest at the very beginning (due to people starting getting crazy amounts of BTC).. in turn these people become huge vested in increasing bitcoin's value.. so much so that they becomes fanatics and thus you see stories like this EVERYWHERE these days... more interest is generated by seeing people with 1000s of coins and a $7 exchange rate, leading to a huge influx of more people looking to generate coins, so on and so forth
      i've said it before and i'll say it again

      In the beginning of BTC mining, the FEW people who programmed/used their own personal GPU miners on huge farms (while everyone else was still using CPU) are the only ones who are going to benefit (See more that a couple thousand dollars) from this crap... everything else is just increasing value for these guys.

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    27. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      You are either a bitcoin shill or you don't understand some things. The usage of a sophism would steer me to the first. There is nothing "radical" about bitcoin transactions. Easy and cheap or even free electronic transactions are already done with real money. The difference is that usually the facilitator asks for a transaction fee. This is not always. For example, most banks will allow my employer to electronically send me money for free. Citibank allows me to send money (Citi Global Transfer) for free from certain countries to any person on certain others (e.g. it is free from Greece to the US, but there is a charge for the reverse), and in fact the transactions are instantaneous. Most merchants will allow me to send them money (note no quotations) for a very low cost, which they will bear (through a CC fee). On the other hand, according to the designers of bitcoin itself, the way they are going to keep people interested in bitcoin and mining is to have transaction fees distributed along the miners. As bitcoin production goes down, they hope that transactions along with their fees will go up.
      If you don't like me calling it a scam, I can humor you and call it a "get rich quick scheme". The invertors are hoping to cash out at some point.
      But most will agree that if I invent my own money out of thin air and I get some fools to give it value, it will not be legal in most jurisdictions and most would call it a scam. Now, if I told you that with my own invented money you can buy 3d models I build for an online game, it does start to get a little more kosher.

      I downloaded the bitcoin client a few weeks ago. I had read somewhere that you solve math problems with your gpu and get awarded bitcoins for it. Having a fast ATI card I assumed this was something like renting computer power to solve useful math problems - a sort of folding at home where you get a bonus that might have some value. I started the gpu client and started reading the bitcoin FAQ to see what it was all about. Once I read about how bitcoin generation works and how the "problems" I was solving were made up just to be awarded a probability to get a bitcoin based on your processing power, I closed the client never to open it again. I am not an environment nut, but I would start using electricity for the chance to get some guys rich.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    28. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      You think I am only referring to this: http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ which is at least exponential and will only go down if bitcoin loses its popularity (and "value" obviously). What I was also referring to, and is more important because it is by design, is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Total_bitcoins_over_time.png.

      Very funny that you should compare it to e-gold. E-gold is an even more old-fashioned currency that our modern fiat money, since it was backed by gold bullion. But even so it was heavily involved in fraud, and that's why they were closed down and pleaded guilty to fraud charges.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    29. Re:Bitcoins as currency by slim · · Score: 1

      Since there are markets which will buy bitcoins from you for dollars, I don't see why you would refuse to accept bitcoins for an ad-hoc business transaction. You might make it more expensive for the buyer, to cover the extra hassle and the exchange fees you're going to pay.

      Let's say you're, um, an itinerant gardener. You offer to mow someone's lawn for $10. They ask if they can pay in Bitcoin. You check how many Bitcoins you could sell for $11, quote him that price, do the job, take the Bitcoins, and sell them immediately.

      The only risk to you is that the market value of a Bitcoin collapses, between the time you quote him the price, and the time you sell the Bitcoin proceeds. Even now, just looking at the historical prices, that seems like a low risk. The longer you keep them, the greater the risk -- although there's just as much possibility that the value will increase. As confidence in Bitcoin increases, people will feel more comfortable keeping their Bitcoins rather than exchanging them, right up to the point where they earn them and spend them without ever converting into a "real" currency.

    30. Re:Bitcoins as currency by nhaehnle · · Score: 2

      You think your US government backed cash has any actual value to it? It has as much (or as little) value as the people who hold it believe it does.

      This is incorrect because of taxation. By taxation, the government forces a debt nominated in US$ on you. This implies that you have to get US$ from somebody else. Thus demand for US$ is created, giving them value.

      Almost everybody believes that the US government taxes people so that they get money to spend. This is completely false, however. Think about it: the US government is the one who *creates* the US$. Saying that they need income from taxes to be able to pay out US$ is as silly as saying that Blizzard needs income from somewhere in order to be able to pay out WoW gold.

      The primary purpose of taxes is to remove purchasing power from the private sector, to create a gap in aggregate demand that can then be used for inflation-free government spending. You may be interested in some of Prof. Mitchell's writing on Modern Monetary Theory, starting e.g. here.

    31. Re:Bitcoins as currency by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Well the inability to perform a chargeback of any kind is interesting. It certainly changes the dynamic of long distance transactions.

    32. Re:Bitcoins as currency by LucidBeast · · Score: 1

      Could an analogue to collectibles such as art or antiquities be closer than gold?

    33. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What inherent value does gold have that US dollars (or any currency) can't? The idea "It has as much (or as little) value as the people who hold it believe it does" applies to gold just as much as it does US Dollars or Bitcoin. Attaching a currency to the gold standard is just a level of abstraction, nothing more, in the end the gold only has as much value as the people perceive it to have.

    34. Re:Bitcoins as currency by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Xbox points.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  16. That *is* a pretty high amount of power by gman003 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The average US home uses about 30kWh per day. Checking on people using triple that amount seems reasonable. I wouldn't justify a search warrant, or even a subpoena, but sending an officer to politely ask a few questions would be reasonable.

    1. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

      Why should the police be involved?

      Though not surprising to see such comment ... many people have become conditioned to the police state and not fully aware of how omnipresent it is around them.

      Seems to me the only people who should be asking questions, if anyone, regarding 3X average household usage would be the power utility to ensure the customer is aware of it and is able to pay.

      And perhaps, especially in older developments / rural areas, sending out a utility tech to verify the drop and transformer are up to the task - likely there's going to be plenty of extra capacity available and hence no issues.

      Ron

    2. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post, especially given the context of TFA, is one of the more depressing, discouraging, and disheartening things I've read on the internet in quite some time.

      Anyone who pays for extra juice, eh? An electric furnace, a home business -- heck, even some hobby project -- are "reasonable" grounds for "a few polite questions." Awesome. And will refusal to answer these polite questions then be grounds for a warrant?

    3. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by agm · · Score: 1

      Why? So long as they pay their power bill what's the problem?

    4. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> 30kWh per day

      Holy kilowatts, Batman! I thought you slipped a digit, but you're right!

      WTF are people doing, leaving their hair-drier on while they're at work? My wife and I both work from home and we use a quarter of that.

    5. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by BLToday · · Score: 1

      Charging their plug-ins? AC on 24/7 in hot states? I have friends in TX that leave their AC on pretty much throughout the summer. Or the obvious answer, lots of pot growing operations.

    6. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another unwarranted "disagree" Troll mod, I see. Seems Slashdot is indeed being taken over by lame kids.

    7. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I would politely ask him to go away, would that be a reason to search my home?

      By the way, polite would be staying the hell off my property. Never talk to the police, they will try to pin something on you. If they want to speak to all you know are your name, address and that you need a lawyer.

    8. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by gman003 · · Score: 2

      Look, I'm not going to argue on whether or not marijuana should or should not be legal. Let's just accept (for this argument) that it is, and continue on the presumption that stopping a crime is, in and of itself, a worthy goal.

      Let's also assume that "exceptionally high electric usage" has a correlation (but not causation) with said illegal activity.

      There is a huge fucking difference between "getting a search warrant" and "asking some questions". Get this straight. Not every cop is a power-obsessed Nazi just waiting for the chance to oppress everyone. Most of them, surprisingly enough, are human beings, not monsters. There's laws. They enforce them. Most laws, in fact, are just laws - murdering people is wrong, robbing people is wrong, raping people is wrong, all the way down to "playing music way too loud at four in the morning and causing a disturbance" being wrong.

      Knocking on someone's door and asking a few questions ("We noticed your power bill was kinda high, we were just checking to make sure you knew. You happen to be doing anything really electricity-heavy? Arc welding? Homemade tesla coils?") is pretty much justified when you have something generally suspicious. It would be like "that driver just veered rather erratically, there's a decent chance he's drunk, might want to go check".

      This is, of course, predicated on police, too, following the principles of the law. Refusing to talk to police in this case should not be evidence of anything other than not liking to talk to police. If that gets used as justification to later come back with a warrant, that's not good. Don't like that. But a polite status check is arguably a good thing - it lets any misunderstandings get cleared up before anything remotely serious happens, and it would probably be enough to get some exceptionally wasteful people to start using less electricity.

      Now, understand this: I do not like how the police have become in the US. Or elsewhere, actually. There's many, many cases where police are clearly and flagrantly violating laws. There are far too many judges issuing free search warrants, far too many laws being misused, and more unjust laws than should be tolerated. Normally, I side with /. on issues like this. But sometimes, /. gets too caught up in it's own hatred of the establishment, and starts taking irrational positions. Blindly hating anything involving the police is just as bad as blindly defending anything involving the police.

      If this ever does become a full-on police state, I'll be one of the first to grab my rifle, fill up some molotovs, and start taking back our rights. But until then, let's be reasonable - on both sides.

    9. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by gman003 · · Score: 1

      That would not be reason to search. If you suspect (or are just paranoid), let the police know that you will have a lawyer on file to argue as such should they return with a warrant that has no actual evidence.

      And I'm concerned about this growing culture of "never talk to cops, they hate freedom and will pin anything they can think of or even imagine on you". Mainly because of the implication that "the organizations dedicated to protecting the people are in fact the greatest threat to such". That is not (yet) the case. There are signs we're headed there, yes, and I am concerned about that as well, but this is the county police we're talking about, not the Gestapo or the Spanish Inquisition.

    10. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Pollution of the planet we live all live on?

      That alone is a reason to politely ask why the neighbor uses so much power.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    11. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by rossdee · · Score: 1

      I am not sure what size an average US house is (in sq ft) but the power usage would be very dependent on the number of people living there, and the weather/climate. In summer a house in the southern US will use a lot more power to run the A/C and in the winter a house heated only by electricity here in the northern midwest will use more just to remain comfortable.

      The other main usage of power for people not involved in pot farming or running a server farm would be hot water used for showers and laundry. Especially if there are more people living there and their ages. (babies can cause a lot of laundry especially for people that don't use disposable diapers.

      Of course the average slashdotter living in mom's basement wouldn't use much power for washing and laundry...

    12. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by MimeticLie · · Score: 1

      If this ever does become a full-on police state, I'll be one of the first to grab my rifle, fill up some molotovs, and start taking back our rights. But until then, let's be reasonable - on both sides.

      At what point do you cross that line? Suspension of habeas corpus for non-citizens? Detaining American citizens without charge? Detaining Muslim Americans as they try to legally enter America after going abroad? Spying on Americans without warrants? Using National Security Letters to avoid what little oversight still exists?

      In regards to this specific case, how is en masse monitoring of everyone's electricity consumption not an abuse of power? We're not talking about a cop seeing something suspicious from the road and using that as probable cause for a search. We're talking about monitoring the records of everyone with no probable cause or warrant and then using that as the basis for a search. Granted, Canada is not subject to the same laws as the United States, but this seems pretty damn abusive no matter where you are.

    13. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by gman003 · · Score: 1

      All those abuses are federal level - many not even federal police. Guantanamo is military. NSA is intelligence (in the political sense, not the mental sense).

      Yes, the federal police-like agencies (FBI, DoHS, Customs) are at the level where something needs to be done. Not quite a casus revolutionis, but definitely at the level that major, actual change needs to happen.

      However, this case was local police. The worst they usually do is unfairly ticket people for speeding. (Note that I said usually - given that there's over a quarter billion people in this country, I'm sure you can cite a dozen other cases of cops being assholes, but that's statistically insignificant).

      Also, even the summary states that the DEA needed a subpoena just to get the energy use records. So they were not, in any way, spying on absolutely everyone's power use. Getting a subpoena for this (since there was no active case involved) requires evidence. So they already had at least one other thing suspicious about the bitminer.

    14. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by agm · · Score: 1

      Pollution? I suppose that depends on how your electricity is generated. If using a lot of power is a problem for the power companies, then they should charge more for higher usage.

    15. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by MimeticLie · · Score: 1

      You're mixing up two different cases. The DEA is in the United States, the "we noticed you're using too much electricity, mind letting us have a look?" case is in Canada.

      WRT the federal agencies, my point was that saying that there's no point questioning the actions of the police until they cross the line into blatant tyranny is a dangerous position to take. As to federal agencies not counting for abuses of police power, there we disagree. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and arrests people like a duck, I'm going to call it a duck. Pointing out systemic abuses in local agencies is more difficult because each state (and even each municipality) have different laws. But if you want to go down that road, the new Arizona-style immigration laws springing up across the nation are certainly worrisome, especially if the don't get slapped down by the federal courts.

    16. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get this straight. Not every cop is a power-obsessed Nazi just waiting for the chance to oppress everyone. Most of them, surprisingly enough, are human beings, not monsters. There's laws. They enforce them.

      Except when they don't enforce them. On their own members in particular.

      Look, you need to get this straight, and now: There are no good cops.

      So long as there is a "blue wall" of silence where is "good" cops protect the dirty there are NO good cops.

      And for the love of god, don't talk to the police. The life you save may just be your own.

    17. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm concerned about this growing culture of "never talk to cops..."

      I'm far more concerned about the mammoth volume of laws that exist on the books.

      Did you know you can go to jail for being in possession of a lobster? I'm guessing not. But it's true. It is illegal to possess particular species of lobster, live or dead. But now that you do let's suppose you had a lobster in the trunk of your car for whatever reason, and the police pulled you over and asked for permission to search the vehicle. Does your new knowledge of the law effect your answer to the police officer's question? I'd say it damn well should.

      There are too many laws on record for anyone to be aware of them all, and you may at any time be in violation of an unknown law. The 5th amendment exists to protect the rights of the innocent as much as the guilty. Fail to exercise your rights at your own peril.

      Dont Talk to Police

    18. Re:That *is* a pretty high amount of power by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      And I'm concerned about this growing culture of "never talk to cops, they hate freedom and will pin anything they can think of or even imagine on you". Mainly because of the implication that "the organizations dedicated to protecting the people are in fact the greatest threat to such"

      Bullshit. When they pull people over the first thing they do is ask "Do you know why I pulled you over?". That question is asked just to get you to admit to another thing they can ticket you for or use to arrest you. If you are unlucky enough to be interacting with them in another way it gets worse. For anther fun example in NYC police will encourage suspects to hand over marijuana in public with promises that they will ignore this minor fine-able offence. The reality is they are inducing these suspects to commit the crime of displaying these drugs in public, moving a non-crime fine only offence into misdemeanor territory. They are actively encouraging the commission of actual crimes so they can make more arrests.

  17. Re:One more nail by PraiseBob · · Score: 2

    Canada has a bill of rights too, and a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, both of which are focused on protecting personal property from unreasonable search and seizure.
    But it looks like using "too much" power automatically means somebody is treated like a criminal and subject to being searched to prove otherwise.

  18. Nice side effect to come? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Seems to me as these "probable cause based on power usage" continue and more and more intrusions of this nature should lead to law suits against the police and hopefully disallowing power use as a criteria for determining probable cause. That's a bullshit way of doing law enforcement. I run a server at my home. I'll be damned if I am going to sit idle if I were to have a search warrant against me based on stupid crap like that.

    1. Re:Nice side effect to come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll be damned if I am going to sit idle if I were to have a search warrant against me based on stupid crap like that.

      I doubt you'll be "sitting" anywhere, as it's tough to do after you've been tased and had a broomstick shoved up your ass. Also, how will you pay for the lawsuit after they take everything you own and all your bank accounts with civil forfeiture?

    2. Re:Nice side effect to come? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I get your point, but a search warrant is required by the constitution to specify what is being searched for and where. They aren't allowed to start searching for other things just because they happen to be there. If they were looking for marijuana and found servers, they are not allowed to search the hard drives. Why? Because there is no reasonable expectation that marijuana would be found in the data contained there. They could seize the computers... theoretically, but even that would be likely challenged and won by a defending attorney on constitutional grounds.

      And to seize everything you own without having illegal substances present would mean they wouldn't be working under tyrannical anti-drug laws which permit that activity.

      So unless there was OBVIOUS cause for them to believe that other laws were being broken, the officers serving the warrant would have to walk away empty handed after not finding what was specified in the warrant.

  19. No You shutup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go crawl back under your rock

  20. Another nail in the coffin for solar energy. by stoicfaux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Great, just great. I can see the calls for banning solar energy technology since it allows drug lords to escape detection via electric meters.

    Just imagine the rhetoric: "Only pot-farmers use solar energy." "Support HB123 to place export controls on drug energy technology to Mexico!" "Off grid, on drugs!" "Tell the police if your neighbor has gone wireless!"

    1. Re:Another nail in the coffin for solar energy. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Great, just great. I can see the calls for banning solar energy technology since it allows drug lords to escape detection via electric meters.

      Entirely possible, but in most areas I'd simply go for extensive sun-roofs instead. Solar-electric panels are expensive. The install costs for a sun-roof might be higher, but the panels/windows are a lot cheaper, even if you can only get sun for half the day that way.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Another nail in the coffin for solar energy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not know how to grow weed. The do it effectively, you need to precisely control the light conditions. The sun isn't sufficient. Crappy outdoor weed isn't going to fetch as high a price.

    3. Re:Another nail in the coffin for solar energy. by DCFusor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't laugh at this one. My computer consulting firm, deep in the boonies, was raided as a drug operation. It wasn't but in talking to them we discovered that having solar panels was part of the profiling done on us, as it indicates "pot growing". Which of course is stupid. We do run on solar, but it's way not enough to grow pot in any amount worth it. That's what they make the rest of the boonies for -- outdoors. FWIW, the profiling was: Has domestic disputes (I prevented a suicide and they knew that) People come and go (employees) People at all hours (we called it flex time) Those people look rich and happy (it was a great place to work, and high pay) Owner rarely leaves (no need, my business is on the same campus as my house) Owner is rich (see above) Just because the DEA is stupid, doesn't mean it doesn't cost a lot in court fees to make them go away, and the damage they do they never pay for. And due to all those rarely enforced laws on the books, they'll by golly find SOMETHING to bust you for once they've done their "dynamic entry" - count on it.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    4. Re:Another nail in the coffin for solar energy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe having too many solar panels would pose a concern to authorities. Maybe, if they think you have more solar panels than would probably be necessary to power your residence or business, then they feel they better check it out.

      Just think how inefficient that would be though.... a pot grower has to grow his stuff indoors so that it isn't seen by police so he needs artificial UV light....so then he doesn't want to be detected for using too much energy so he provides his own from solar panels.... so now, he has inefficient photovoltaic panels converting sunlight into electricity which, in turn, is converted back into UV light inside his house to grow plants. HAHA how funny.

    5. Re:Another nail in the coffin for solar energy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar panels and lamps are better for growing pot than frosted glass skylights?

  21. Great place to grow pot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch the meter. Now you know not to use more that 92kWh/day you can safely grow pot.

    BTW, that's about 250 CFL's (15W), so keep the number down under about 200, you should be OK.

    1. Re:Great place to grow pot. by mlts · · Score: 1

      My question, as I have never done a grow room... what keeps a pot farm from actually getting their electricity from after the meter?

      If they just cut a connection before the meter and manage to hide it, there are no power worries whatsoever. Cheaper utility bills to boot as well.

    2. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Probably because electricity is dangerous and if you know how to safely tap in, then you can find a better job than growing drugs. Or the ones that do it don't get caught and published in the news.

    3. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If they just cut a connection before the meter and manage to hide it, there are no power worries whatsoever. Cheaper utility bills to boot as well.

      It's harder to do than you might think. The utility owns and reserves the right to inspect any/all wiring before the meter, and they DO have meters upstream. If the upstream meter is reporting more consumption than normal compared to the sub-meter consumption, they know something is up - either they have a short or somebody is stealing electricity. Then they have various means of testing individual homes.to determine the culprit.

      Plus, it's dangerous to be choppng into live 200-400 amp 240V wires.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Nothing, it happens all the time. But eventually, someone will notice the splice.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      HID lamps (high pressure sodium or metal halide) yield more lumens per watt than fluorescents. Google tells me quickly that cannabis requires around 50 watts per square foot.

      92kWh/day = 3800 W or 76 square feet of growing space, assuming all the power goes towards lighting. Again Google tells me that Cannabis yields about .5 oz/square foot estimated generously.

      That figures to 38 oz per grow cycle. Let's say it's really primo buds sold at a festival for $50/eighth or $400 an oz. Ridiculous prices, but people do pay them for high quality stuff. Then you're looking at $7600
      per flowering cycle.

      At 8 weeks per flowering cycle, there's 6 flowering cycles per year. That nets you a maximum of $45,600 per year. That will have to cover everything from food to water to nutrients to power.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

      This topic came up several days ago in another thread on here ... another poster pointed out that often it's not the amount one steals that gets one caught, but rather unbalanced loads.

      Regardless of whether one is paying or not, it's always important to balance the load between both 120v legs ... electricians when installing / upgrading a panel will stagger breakers so that both 120v legs are tapped roughly equally (not by the number of breakers, but rather in regards to expected loads).

      On a related note, it's often greed that gets people caught - the utility is definitely going to notice, and will investigate, if one's average usage substantially drops to near zero - that's often a sure sign of wire problems and/or meter being bypassed.

      Ron

    7. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a common tactic. It is something to look for when buying a new home as it is evidence of a fairly large scale grow op (nobody goes to the danger and trouble for something small, which wouldn't be detected anyway). I suspect it was less common before law enforcement started using electric bills to find grow ops though.

    8. Re:Great place to grow pot. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There was even the case of a man who tapped into high voltage power lines without a physical connection. And they tracked him down and prosecuted him. But my understanding was that he was doing that for quite a while.

    9. Re:Great place to grow pot. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Plus, it's dangerous to be choppng into live 200-400 amp 240V wires.

      It is if you don't know what you are doing but afaict the electricity companies round here chop into live 240/415 three phase mains cables all the time to tap off new properties.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    10. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, part of his being caught was that he boasted about it.

      But yeah, he set up a sort of air-gap transfer coil in his barn.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:Great place to grow pot. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Do you expect the pot growers to know what they're doing that well? Or have the proper tools?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  22. Electric car owners, onto the barricades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proletarians of the world, unite! Electric car owners, bitcoin miners - join us in the struggle! Anarchy for the win! Nobody is free until everybody is free!

    1. Re:Electric car owners, onto the barricades! by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Anarchy? Then don't tell me what to do!

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  23. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by tepples · · Score: 1

    If Canada doesn't have a charter of rights, then what's this?

    1. Re:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by billcopc · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's what Harper wipes his ass with, every time he has a "great idea".

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  24. More Bitcoin? Seriously? by mothlos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Three Bitcoin articles on the front page in as many weeks? Sure, this one is a bit sideways, but seriously, the number of people involved with Bitcoin is insignificantly small and should remain that way. Stop hyping this project which is either an ill-fated experiment or a scam.

    1. Re:More Bitcoin? Seriously? by mestar · · Score: 0

      "...an ill-fated experiment or a scam"

      It could also be an open source replacement for:

      paypal
      moneybookers
      e-gold,
      credit cards

    2. Re:More Bitcoin? Seriously? by mestar · · Score: 1

      Hey, a little competition is always good for everybody.

    3. Re:More Bitcoin? Seriously? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      unicorns could fly out of your butt

      Oh god no, that sounds extremely painful... With the horn and all.

    4. Re:More Bitcoin? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro.

  25. Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole article is an Ad. It didn't have to go into detail about Bitcoin and make it sound exciting. Just say lots of computers in home doing stupid stuff raise pot op suspicion

    1. Re:Ad by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      An Ad? For what?

  26. Waste by fermion · · Score: 2
    Someone needs to tell Julian and Ricky that they can cover their pot growing operation with servers. Cops bust in see the servers and never look for the pot. Of couse I doubt that anyone would be competent to set up the serves. Maybe J-Roc.

    But seriously, this is the kind of thing that has really killed the world. Here we have a weed that is one of the most perfect and useful plants in existence. Because of fundamentalist faith based lawmaking and general greed it is banned for most purposes. Of course some would say that it damages kids, but how about the legal drugs? The Pfizer commercials tells kids they can only be happy with drugs. Someone like Rush Limbaugh can afford to be a prescription drug addict, and maybe old people in the US with medicare part D, but the average person has to go with the unregulated stuff. It would be nice if kids were not told that drug use is good, and I certainly believe that drug use in general is a losing game, but there we have it. Corporate drugs good, plants are bad.

    On top of the insanity of jailing people for growing plants or using plants simply because that plant has not been awarded the special corporate status of tabacco, is just the beginning. So we now have these indoor operation using huge amounts of dirty power that contributes god knows how much to global warming, killing the future even for the kids that aren't addicted to Zoloft. All this waste because growers are forced indoors. Of course in canada part of the problem is the short growing season, but really, it is arguable that the time of the police would be better spent arresting doctors for frivolously doping kids so that they don't annoy their parents.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Waste by zanian · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Ricky and Julian have their methods. For example, the hash driveway.

    2. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spin more rhymes than a lazy susan and I'm innocent till my guilt is proven
      - J-Roc

    3. Re:Waste by gknoy · · Score: 1

      How do they handle hash collisions?

    4. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck yeah, my favorite show!

    5. Re:Waste by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      >> Someone needs to tell Julian and Ricky that they can cover their pot growing operation with servers. Cops bust in see the servers and never look for the pot. Of couse I doubt that anyone would be competent to set up the serves. Maybe J-Roc.

      J-Roc? Of all people? And not Bubbles? Oh come on!

    6. Re:Waste by WATist · · Score: 1

      I assume police would bring drug sniffing dogs so bitcoin mining or any other cover story should not work.

    7. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Montana, and so I've had to deal with all kinds of BS flying around about it. My favorite argument that keeps coming up is "Well, if we allow pot, then next thing you know people will be walking around with Meth cards and then our kids will be exposed to that as well."

      They get really, really, really pissed off when I point out that Meth is already available by prescription and does not require a card, registration, two doctors, or have a limit to the on-hand quantity. Oh, yeah, and it's most commonly prescribed to children to treat ADHD.

      So much for the "save our children" B.S.

  27. Fake Story by diablo-d3 · · Score: 2

    I'm going to repeat the comment I made on the Time story covering this 2 hours ago:

    I hate to tell you, but it never happened. This is an AMD TV commercial (available on Youtube) saying, basically, run Nvidia and get raided for running a pot growing operation due to excessive power usage.

    Oh, and a side note, in the US, the power companies DO regularly report users with sudden spikes of excessive power usage that are indicative of grow ops. This data is volunteered by the power companies, and the police do not need a warrant to collect it.

    --
    Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || http://AdTerrasPerAspera.com
    1. Re:Fake Story by maxume · · Score: 2

      OK, so it isn't a legal problem, the problem is that the people running the power companies are douche bags.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Fake Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A joking commercial about the same thing is not evidence to the contrary.

  28. This is all based off of claims from IRC by harks · · Score: 1

    I can't remember exactly where, but someone suggested that this might be a possibility on one of the Bitcoin forums. A day later, someone said in an IRC channel that they had been raided. I'm pretty sure they made it up based on the previous day's speculation. And now a website has picked up the IRC claim, and now Slashdot picks up that website's claim. As far as I can tell there's no backing that this supposed drug bust ever happened, but it's pyramiding into bigger and bigger news based on nothing.

  29. I don't know about the Bitcoin connection... by squeegee_boy · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...but the grow-op "inspections" in Mission, B.C. are quite real:

    Article

    It's an attempted end-run around obtaining a search warrant, which would require more than just higher than average power consumption. The way it works is the municipality sends a bylaw inspector to a home for a "safety inspection" after someone notices that the power consumption at the residence is higher than it should be.

    The inspector can't force his way in, but a bit of bullying and a stern "What have you got to hide?" or "I'll come back with a warrant and make your week difficult" is often all that's necessary, especially if the homeowner in question isn't actually doing anything wrong, and isn't used to dealing with stuff like this. The inspector brings along a police escort for "safety and security." Convenient.

    The inspector looks around, and if he finds a grow op, well, hey, lookee here, the police just happened to be down the hall! Now they don't need a search warrant because it wasn't "a police search."

    If the inspector finds nothing illegal, he (often but not always) presents the homeowner in question with a bill for the inspection, which can range from $5k to $10k.

    Good news though: A few days ago, the BC Supreme Court has issued a giant "fark you" to the practice:

    Article

    1. Re:I don't know about the Bitcoin connection... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Damn, I just read the link.

      The couple wouldn't let the "inspector" in, so they shut off power to the house. The family had to move into a hotel.
      At least they didn't have a SWAT team smash the door in at 4am and start shooting dogs. That what they do here in the USA.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:I don't know about the Bitcoin connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What needs to really be done is to arrest (yes, arrest) the officers who performed all the searchs and bullied the power companies into shutting off the power.
      These perps need to be made a very, VERY clear example of what happens when you act like dicks under a blue uniform.

    3. Re:I don't know about the Bitcoin connection... by yayotters · · Score: 1

      Good to see the courts doing their jobs and enforcing the law properly for once.

    4. Re:I don't know about the Bitcoin connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find this difficult to believe, to be honest. Oh, sure, someone who doesn't actually do anything illegal might let the inspector in, but why would someone who GENUINELY grows pot? Also, why would people who turned out to not actually be doing anything illegal be presented with a five-digit bill for an inspection they didn't ask for? That seems like a good way of encouraging people to fight back, which would be precisely what the ones behind this scheme would NOT want.

      And of course, wouldn't the police still need a search warrant to search the place? If police could enter your house and search it "because some random dude said something", they'd not futz around with the whole "inspector" thing, anyway, but in reality, it doesn't work that way. Sure, the cop might enter your place illegally, but the evidence should be thrown out then - fruit of the poisoned tree doctrine and all that. (If you actually *allowed* the cop to enter after he merely asked, that'd be a different thing, but again, why would most pot growers be that stupid?)

      Indeed, the article you link to mentions none of this, too; rather, it talks about a situation where an inspector AND a cop wanted to enter the place at the same time, were turned away (and did indeed leave), and where the public utility company then shut off the plaintiffs' power to coerce them into cooperating. THAT is what the BC Supreme Court ruled is not acceptable. It's obviously the right decision, but after all the crap you wrote above, I can't help but wonder what YOU have been growing and smoking.

  30. Re:One more nail by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    It's enough in the US to get a subpoena for the records, and that is enough to start an investigation. And, the average bitcoin miner will live a life similar to a grower (lots of usage with no light output) which, added together, is more PC than on most search warrants.

  31. Useless Eaters!! by hackus · · Score: 2

    You should only have enough electricity for your Television to watch IDOL, FOX and CNN and that is all!!

    Anything more and you are a terrorist!!!!

    We will send the TSA immediately into your home to grab your balls, your breasts or open your kids diapers!!!!

    That will show everyone that we just need to keep people safe to stop these terrorists!!!

    Mr. Goldstein is _everywhere_ but with your sacrifices we _WILL_ _GET_ _HIM_!!!

    Report anything you see to your local threat fusion center immediately!!!

    Keep an eye on your neighbors so we can keep you safe!

    -DHS

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Useless Eaters!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should only have enough electricity for your Television to watch IDOL, FOX and CNN and that is all!!

      Oh shit! American Idol has its own channel now?

  32. You just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now people will be growing pot inside computer cases. lol

    1. Re:You just wait... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 2

      Now people will be growing pot inside computer cases. lol

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pc+stealth+grow+box

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  33. Kinda wondering by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Does the return on bitcoin mining equal or better the return on stock in the local utility? In the US, many utility stocks yield 5%. There's always some risk of the stock going down, but computer equipment is guaranteed to depreciate.

    As with any money-making scheme, "show me the numbers".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Kinda wondering by mestar · · Score: 1

      Mining profits will tend to go to zero, simply because anybody can do it. Miners enable transactions, so you can send currency around, and very soon mining itself will stop producing new coins. So, no, it is not a money-making scheme where you will get your 5%.

  34. Re:One more nail by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

    Umm - actually England (which is ruled by the Queen) has a bill of rights too, which was written a full 100 years before the US got it's Bill of Rights.

  35. Re:One more nail by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Are you related?

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  36. I would assume not by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Read the story, most of it is about Bitcoins and how amazing and dangerous they are and all that shit we've seen so much of lately. To me, it seems like the Bitcoin heads trying to generate more interest/advertising, and evidently succeeding since /. picked it up.

    Would not surprise me at all to learn it is 100% bullshit.

  37. Right to bear technology. by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it's high time we think about extending the 2nd amendment (Right to bear arms), to include technology.

    I know they're not busting in to raid a Bitcoin factory, but that doesn't mean they wont in the future.

    I'm a coder, and occasionally I write ciphers. Lately I wrote a block cipher system that takes any hash algo, data stream, and a pass-phrase, and produces encrypted output via a type of Cipher Block Chaining on hash-length sized blocks (MD5=160bit, SHA1=256bit, SHA512=512bit encryption, and beyond; Bonus, any new hash comes out, implement it and bingo, stronger encryption).

    I came very close to being in violation of federal law when I posted my program on my blog. Fortunately a friend told me that my program was considered extremely dangerous to the government, and that if anyone outside of the US downloaded it, I could be heavily fined and/or jailed. I immediately removed the code, and checked the server logs; Fortunately only my friend had downloaded it.

    I didn't know that all strong encryption ciphers have to be registered with the US government (like firearms!? -- Strength at or above 64bit symmetric or 768 asymmetric, or 128 for elliptic curve), and that export of software that can perform encryption must be approved by the government before you put it online, or else it could be considered trafficking illegal controlled software.

    I was told by some that if your code was open source, you could just fill out a form, and you were pre-approved, but I don't think that's the case anymore.

    I've been tinkering with ciphers since I was 10 -- I don't think anyone outside the US got a hold of my tinker-code, but who knows? We swapped code at HAL-PC SIG's all the time...

    With today's government's lack of respect for our freedoms and esp. digital privacy, I think it's time we added the right to bear technology & math, esp. cryptography to the Bill of Rights.

    Hey, If I can be prosecuted for distributing my ciphers under the "munitions export restrictions" laws, then does that mean I already can assert my 2nd amendment privileges to USE MY PC TO TWIDDLE BITS? Does freedom of speech (1st amendment) not give me the right to post some byte-code hex to my blog? (Looks like it's illegal to sell your Beowulf Cluster on Ebay too.)

    1. Re:Right to bear technology. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It appears to have escaped your attention that this event did not happen in the USA..

    2. Re:Right to bear technology. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      2nd Amendment? Seriously? I don't even follow the thought process. One is to protect your ass from being killed, and yours is to hide stuff on a computer/network.

      I really don't know where you get the idea that you have a right to distribute whatever you want digitally. Would it be OK if you sent some hardcopy top-secret codes to another country?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:Right to bear technology. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      Because strong encryption software is covered under munition export laws.

    4. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you're so cool... are you sure it's safe to say those things? please continue, i must admit i'm getting a little moist just hearing about it

    5. Re:Right to bear technology. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I did not know that was what it was covered under.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:Right to bear technology. by cbope · · Score: 1

      Knock, knock. Hello citizen, how are you today? ...

    7. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One is to 'protect your person (physical body) and property (physical property, home, car etc.) the other is to 'protect your person and property' where person could refer to digital identity, or even physical body could be argued depending on the info you hold, and property refers to the imaginary property that our Government has already recognized the validity of (I don't, but if we're going to play their game we're hold them to their own rules).

    8. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Junger v Daley, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held software source to be protected by the First Amendment.

    9. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Junger v Daley, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held software source code to be covered by the First Amendment.

    10. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe xkcd did this. Yes.

      http://www.xkcd.com/504/

    11. Re:Right to bear technology. by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      There's only a few cryptology related things on the munitions export control list: militarized encryption equipment, TEMPEST equipment, custom cryptographic software, and cryptographic consulting services. Non-military cryptography does supposedly need to be registered with the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, although given that the 6th and 9th circuit courts have both rules that software is free speech it would probably be very difficult for the government to make a case that it can require someone to register their speech with the government. Yes, there are theoretically countries, groups, and individuals that you can't export to, but for all practical purposes you don't really have much to worry about.

      PGP has been distributed for years and AES has implementations in C, C++, C-Sharp, Java, and Python that are freely available and are, barring some huge discovery, unbreakable until after the sun goes nova. Basically, unless the NSA has some cryptographic secret or a computer that violates the laws of physics, your code is a drop in the bucket to them.

    12. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thx for the idea, I don't live in the US ;)

    13. Re:Right to bear technology. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      possibly a little too vague of an xkcd reference there.

    14. Re:Right to bear technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no encryption whatsoever in the bitcoin software. Only hashes and digital signatures. It is quite different.

    15. Re:Right to bear technology. by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      You can pry my copy of Applied Cryptography out of my cold dead hands!

      Also, I've always found it funny as hell that I'm not allowed to take the contents of my head with me when I leave the country. Which probably explains a lot about how foreigners talk about US tourists online.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  38. Read the article by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first four paragraphs are nothing but gushing about bitcoins, no mention of the bust at all. The 5ths finally makes a mention of the power thing and then there's a bit of talk about the alleged bust from the wonderfully reliable source of "IRC". Then more shit about how bitcoin is a cool "P2P" currency then a video about bitcoins.

    The fucking thing is a bitcoin promotion and just more of the "Oh look at how awesome and scary it is!" crap. I have serious doubts the event in question ever happened. This is astroturfing.

    Any journalist will tell you that you lead with the most important stuff. Each subsequent paragraph is less likely to be read. So if this was about rights and a real event the first paragraph would go more along the lines of:

    "What was supposed to be a bust for a pot growing operation went wrong for police when the discovered a house with nothing but a large number of computers working overtime. Police obtained a warrant for the house of $some_guy due to energy company records showing an unusually high amount of usage, often a sign of a marijuana growing location. However no drugs were found, instead just mean computers which were engaged in a process called 'bitcoin mining."

    Then maybe a paragraph about bitcoins, then one about drug ops and power usage and so on. That it starts with bitcoins and goes for 5 paragraphs tells you that the article is all about that, not the supposed rights issue.

    1. Re:Read the article by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Luckily no one reads the articles.

    2. Re:Read the article by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Not only what you said, which I agree with, but the way it works in Mission is they have a bylaw allowing them to do an inspection, electrical etc, which they give notice for. If they find enough evidence then they could get a warrant though by that time the evidence is gone or it turns out the person is federally licensed as a medical grower. (feds don't share info with the municipality). The RCMP do show up but stay off of the property unless you do something stupid like attack the inspectors.
      The punishment is the $5000 inspection fee and if your house is legal, no bad wiring, loose banisters etc then you don't pay. This guy probably had all his hardware unsafely hooked up to the mains and that is what they got him for.
      Living in Mission and reading lots about these inspections in the local paper, I never heard about this. Just people with lots of yard lights, screwed up hot tubs, heater lamps for their chickens, and growers. Our equivalent of the ACLU is suing the town over this as well and inspections are currently stopped.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:Read the article by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      If the important information was in the first paragraph, you'd read it then leave the site. That's bad for Ad revenue.

      Expect more sites to be laid out like this.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Read the article by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      It isn't possible to be in such complete compliance with the secret, proprietary, expensive, rigid and potentially self-contradictory building codes that a motivated inspector can't find something to cite you for. Appealing the citation, even if possible, will cost you about the same or more as just paying the danegeld. Such a system creates a bounty rewarding violating privacy and property rights and picky bureaucratic interpretations of secret laws, resulting in effective $5000 fines for using ones own property in ways that are quite reasonable and safe.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  39. 93 kWHr/day? seems pretty low. by dougmc · · Score: 1

    The average price of electricity in the US for residential customers is 11 cents/kWHr".

    So 93 kWHr/day works out to an average electric bill of $312 -- which is likely on the high side for a house in the south using A/C (or perhaps a house in the north with electric heat) but far from excessively high.

    I imagine that this bylaw gives them the right to inspect a significant percentage their customer's houses at least once a year ... at least the larger houses, anyways.

  40. It is the same for "real" money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe even worse. You think it costs one penny to make a penny? And making one penny costs more than just the material used, there is also the overhead of the labor, equipment, R&D, administration, maintenance. distribution, recovery, etc. Hadn't thought about all that, right? Of course you didn't. The costs involved in making and enforcing the legality and convenience of a U.S. penny make Bitcoin look quite cheap.

    1. Re:It is the same for "real" money. by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      You do realise the penny isn't the only currency, right?

      A $100 bill does not cost more than $100 to make.

    2. Re:It is the same for "real" money. by artor3 · · Score: 1

      I would love to see the amortized cost, on a per-penny basis, of R&D. If it's more than a millionth of a cent per penny-year, I'd be amazed.

  41. Re:One more nail by metacell · · Score: 1

    Canada has a Queen of Rights?

  42. Re:One more nail by Truekaiser · · Score: 2

    That's why when you get pulled over by a cop the first thing is not to reach for you license and registration but to shut off your engine, roll up your windows and prepare to get out of your car with your license and registration. once out you lock your car. The police can't break and enter your car but if you have the windows open they are are allowed to make shit up to stick their head in the car or search. leagaly speaking if your stopped by the cops and have your window open you have forfeited your right to demand a search warrant can be more easily seen or searched. same with being asked to open the trunk of your car, you need to ask them if they have a warrant first.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqMjMPlXzdA&feature=related

  43. "lack of valuable employment" by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i think that marijuana should be legal, but if marijuana is interfering with his ability to work, then that's an argument people will make against marijuana legalization. either a drug is harmless, or it isn't. not being able to hold a job while using a drug means its harmful, it means society has to pay for the guy's food and housing. society doesn't want to pay for some asshole to get high all day, why are we underwriting that lifestyle? he needs to get a job. and i'm not saying potheads can't work, you are: " lack of valuable employment."

    employed, productive potheads: an argument for legalization. potheads sitting around all day unemployed supported by society: an argument for continued criminalization

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could make the exact same argument against alcohol. Alcohol is way more harmful than pot, both in terms of addiction, and in terms of overdosing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2

      that argument only works if
      1: it being illegal actually prevents people just getting high all day
      2: throwing them in prison was less harmful/costly to society than accepting that lifestyle.

      there are other options of course, you could legalise it but have mandatory rehabilitation classes or something that tries to get them back into the workforce, which would probably have low success rates but be spectacularly more useful than throwing them in jail.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    3. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminalized cannabis: Employed, productive potheads have great incentive to be very discreet, with the result that you'll only notice the hippies. Of course the productive ones rely on you having enough brain capacity to finally figure this out and legalize it already, instead of abusing the violence monopoly (police) to harrass everyone who wasn't born with your perfectly balanced endocannabinoid system.

    4. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      When alcohol was made legal again in the US it reduced a lot of violent crime. Today pot is involved in a lot of violent crime, smoking dope is by no means a victimless crime. So I can see that legalizing it could solve some problems.

      However we still have laws and regulations about alcohol, it's not a "sell and drink all you want" anarchy. So if pot were legalized it would also be highly regulated and monitored (and thus not the libertarian dream it seems at first glance).

    5. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 4

      All drugs should be legal.

    6. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by billcopc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Smoking dope is victimless. Acquiring it is a nightmare.

      Legalization solves the acquisition problem. Personally, I don't smoke, but I have absolutely no problem with someone who smokes recreationally - a lot of my friends do, and that's perfectly OK by me. To me, alcohol is just another recreational drug, and they should all be treated the same. Anyone can choose to allow drugs to dominate and destroy their well-being, and legality has no influence on that behaviour. I'd rather have someone get chilled on pot, than high on violent greed as we're seeing in many big american cities. At least the stoner just chills out in his living room, appreciating music :)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    7. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

      really? you want something like meth to be legal? what the hell is wrong with you?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    8. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The same argument can be made about so many things. Since this is Slashdot, lets talk about gaming. Some people get addicted and can't hold a job as they spend all their time in front of the computer/console. Should we illegalize gaming?
      There are also many drugs that are legal with the caveat that it is illegal to operate heavy machinery including cars. I'd expect the same with pot.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe he just prefers liberty to tyranny, theoretical consequences be damned.

    10. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

      let's put it in a way that might make you think a little more, and rely less on blind thoughtless idealism: the most orwellian tyranny possible is less of an imposition on your liberty than something like meth, cocaine, or heroin addiction. well, that's not entirely true: the most orwellian tyranny possible would make heroin use compulsory, thereby ensuring we are all addicted slaves to the state

      please understand that the greatest destroyer of freedom in the history of mankind, way more than all governments put together, is drug addiction. a constant interrupt switch on your thought processes, insisting you find and consume something you don't need. a force greater than your willpower. the bars in your mind are greater than any bars in a prison. understand that, or understand nothing about what you are talking about. addiction, you ignorant fool, is the true enemy of liberty

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    11. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      Yes, because it's none of the government's goddamn business what we put in our own bodies.

    12. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by doccus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It amazes me that so many people who advocate control of drugs think that the way to achieve this is by criminalizing them.. Since the government , or related industry , is not allowed to sell or manage illegal substances they basically have handed over control to the underground. And.. considering the profits to be made in the current illegal drug trade.. it is certainly NOT in the best interests of the underground trade to have *anything* legalized..it's been implied in the past that some of the stiffest political support for keeping the status quo has been *supported* by the 'underground'.. and I'd believe that one... as regards Meth.. for better or worse.. when it was still legal and in the hands of physicians.. it's been implied that it *won* world war 2 (!)

    13. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Meth is still legal, it just isn't produced by legitimate pharmaceutical companies anymore. It's the liability for a product with so many ugly side effects that ended production, not banning it outright.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    14. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by cobrausn · · Score: 1

      Smoking dope is victimless. Acquiring it is a nightmare.

      Legalization solves the acquisition problem. Personally, I don't smoke, but I have absolutely no problem with someone who smokes recreationally - a lot of my friends do, and that's perfectly OK by me. To me, alcohol is just another recreational drug, and they should all be treated the same.

      Right on.

      Anyone can choose to allow drugs to dominate and destroy their well-being, and legality has no influence on that behaviour. I'd rather have someone get chilled on pot, than high on violent greed as we're seeing in many big american cities.

      Sigh. 'High on Violent Greed'? Seriously? I can't decide which is more ludicrous, this, or the anti-pot propaganda messages I see on TV all the time.

      At least the stoner just chills out in his living room, appreciating music :)

      This is actually the only reason I don't smoke pot. Alcohol makes you drunk and stupid temporarily, giving you a bit of relief from the daily grind. Then you wake up, feel horrible, regret it, and move on to doing productive things until the next time. Pot turns you (at least it turned me) into a brain-dead consumer without the hangover. It makes sitting around 'appreciating music' seem like a good use of your time. I would actually rather be doing something productive with my time. It's why I got into programming in the first place.

      --
      How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
    15. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody forces you to take drugs. Becoming a drug addict is a choice.

      You also grossly overestimate the addictiveness of illegal drugs, at least in comparison to, say, nicotine, but that's a side issue.

    16. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      All drugs should be legal.

      I have to disagree here. The stronger stuff, cocaine and heroin in particular, are so addictive that the vast majority of users don't have any chance to quit using them without intensive care. There may be a case for supplying them to people who are already addicted, in order to reduce the black market and relation to crime, but they are hardly even comparable to things like pot, which is at best only mildly addictive.

      That said punishments should be proportional to the offence. "Hard on crime" doesn't work very well.

    17. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Well now, I'm a prorgammer who's also in the business of appreciating (and promoting) music. For me, music IS the drug, but I can respect people who need a little psychoactive help to get into that mental state. That said, I am a hedonist by nature... If someone's goal in life is to enjoy themselves, I think they're my kind of person, as long as it's not to the detriment of everyone around them.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    18. Re:"lack of valuable employment" by cobrausn · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I am of the opinion that everyone should be able to do whatever it is they want so long as they aren't directly infringing on someone else's rights. But I will say that greed has a better chance of getting us off this rock than hedonism does. We need both.

      --
      How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
  44. EconTalk by jrivar59 · · Score: 1

    EconTalk (a great podcast) has an interview by a real economist and a BitCoin founder: http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2011/04/andresen_on_bit.html. Interesting listen.

  45. Re:One more nail by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    If a cop pulls you over and you get out of the car without being asked, prepare for a world of hurt.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  46. Cops are fools by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    They are growing the pot plants -inside- the tower machines! What, you think all that bling lighting is for show?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  47. Re:93 kWHr/day? seems pretty low. by brit74 · · Score: 1

    Just an FYI: the average house in the US uses about 930 kwh of energy per month. So, 93 kwh works out to about 3x the national average. Energy use in the US is highest in the US' South (because AC uses a lot of electricity), and we're talking about Canada here, so 93 kwh/day is probably more than 3x than average consumption for Canada.

  48. Government money == legal tender by l00sr · · Score: 2

    Anyone owed a debt in the US (for instance), must accept US dollars as payment. That's what the notice "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" means on dollars. The same is not true for bitcoins--I can freely refuse payment in bitcoins, and the government can do nothing about it. That's a large component of the reason why people like dollars.

  49. Re:One more nail by drsmithy · · Score: 1

    If a cop pulls you over and you get out of the car without being asked, prepare for a world of hurt.

    Which can lead to some pretty scary situations for tourists (or immigrants) from countries where you're _expected_ to get out of the car after being pulled over.

  50. Now Canada.... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Looks like it isnt just the USSA thats becoming a police state, but Canada as well.... With Australia getting the same way, we're gonna run out of places to emigrate to....

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  51. Yeeash! by brit74 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw some of the comments saying that the article reads like an advertisement for bitcoin, so I took a look. Holy crap! They even embedded a promotional video for bitcoin in the article. The bitcoin guys are really, really trying to make millions off this, and they're obviously pushing these pseudo-news-articles to drum up fame and fortune. And, just to be clear, the claim that the police raided a home was based on a rumor seen on an IRC chat ("Blogger Mike Esspe captured an IRC chat that supports the rumor floating around that at least one bitcoin miner has been arrested."). Uh huh. That's news now. And despite the claim that "at least one bitcoin miner has been arrested", the IRC chat actually says the police showed up, looked around, and left. Apparently, "has been arrested" has a totally new meaning in the pseudo-news-article world of bitcoin.

    1. Re:Yeeash! by twebb72 · · Score: 1

      The headline should read "BitCoin mining almost as cool as growing weed!", but the BitCoin monarchs had to put a spin on it somehow to make it sounds remotely believable.

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. mod parent FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent FUNNY!

    For people using other mod points, you see, plants grow in light. Light comes from the sun and such energy is called. .... SOLAR energy!

    If the parent was serious, he would mention any other, cheaper alternative, like wind.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  56. LED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LED grow lights used much less power

  57. An article about a rumor floating on IRC? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, seriously stop it. You just look like tools repeating garbage like this.

    Go back to pretending Second Life is popular or something.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  58. Re:One more nail by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Canada has the equivalent of the 4th amendment which, at least in some ways is stronger then the American one or at least in the way our Supreme court has interpreted it is.
    In this case they are not showing up with a search warrant. There is a municipal by-law that allows them to do a home inspection if you have high power consumption and if they find anything, like one neighbor who had a loose stair railing, they charge you about $5000 ispection fee. The RCMP do show up as well but stay off the property.
    The by-law is currently not being enforced as so much shit has been raised about this and the town is being sued.
    And yes, I live in Mission BC.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  59. I'm confused... by asylumx · · Score: 1

    The Canadian town of Mission, BC has a bylaw...

    Ohio police and the DEA file at least 60 subpoenas each month

    Ok, I must be missing something... but is the summary implying that Ohio Police and the DEA are acting on Canadian bylaws?

    1. Re:I'm confused... by DarkofPeace · · Score: 1

      glad someone else caught that. I was wandering.

  60. Re:One more nail by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Not searched, a home inspection for you know, bad wiring, loose banisters (neighbor got caught with that as they used too much power running a heat lamp 24 hrs for their chickens) and signs of a grow op without a license. Just to make it interesting, the federal government does not share with the municipality who can legally grow medical marijuana. .
    They do give you notice and if you refuse the inspection then they get the warrant. I live in Mission.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  61. "perfectly balanced endocannabinoid system" by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    please don't post on slashdot while stoned, thanks

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  62. Sooo... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    What this tells me is that high electricity usage is no longer probable cause.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  63. Nothing is off limits once they enter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it looks like you are running a business out of your house the police notify the municipal tax collector to make sure you have the proper business permits and paying taxes from the revenue. Even if your legal in all ways, this assault on civil rights needs to be stopped.

    Why would an innocent person deny cooperating with the police? Because anything they collect can be used later; even if not covered by the warrant.

    Angered Republican

  64. 5000 reasons by jeko · · Score: 2

    They started caring when every inspection began to net them 5000 dollars. If I could get $5000 for knocking on doors and harrassing people, no one from here to Pacoima would be safe...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  65. Payer and payee by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    How does the electricity to bitcoin ration pay off? Anyone knows?

    Depends. If your mom is paying for the electricity, while you're collecting the bitcoin, then the ratio for you is pretty good. For your mom, it's not so good, but she's presumably inured to suffering with a geek/nerd/dweeb cluttering up the basement.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  66. Re:93 kWHr/day? seems pretty low. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recognised unit for time in hours is h. You don't have to make yourself look like an idiot with bullshit like Hr. Idiot.

  67. Simpsons Did It! by mikelieman · · Score: 1

    Homer Simpson: Okay, boy. This is where all the hard work, sacrifice, and painful scaldings pay off.

    Employee: Four pounds of grease... that comes to... sixty-three cents.

    Homer Simpson: Woo-hoo!

    Bart Simpson: Dad, all that bacon cost twenty-seven dollars.

    Homer Simpson: Yeah, but your mom paid for that!

    Bart Simpson: But doesn't she get her money from you?

    Homer Simpson: And I get my money from grease! What's the problem?

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  68. Just like any other digital currency, but better by Morgaine · · Score: 1

    Stop hyping this project which is either an ill-fated experiment or a scam.

    Do you realize that the "real" currencies in your pocket and in your bank are all equally a "scam"? They are all abstract fictions that we use as tokens to avoid the unwieldiness of direct barter.

    Ostensibly bitcoin is less of a scam than the currency that you seem to think is "real". Bitcoin is tied to a scarce computational resource which prevents its supply being manipulated, unlike the money that governments can print arbitrarily. Ever since "real" currency left the gold standard, its actual value has been evaporating steadily, and Fractional Reserve Banking has turned over 90% of its original value into pure debt. If you're looking for unsound currency practices, look there.

    There is nothing "real" about the dollar as a currency except the fact that people are willing to give you goods in exchange for them. And that reality happens to be exactly the same with bitcoin.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  69. Good by LocalH · · Score: 1

    The sooner this notion of "using too much power, must be doing something wrong, send in cop thugs" is eradicated, the better.

    --
    FC Closer
  70. Re:93 kWHr/day? seems pretty low. by dougmc · · Score: 1

    Thanks Anonymous dad!

    Side note: from wikipedia --

    Hour ...
    The hour (common symbol: h or hr; also known as a stound)

    If you're going to go out of your way to call somebody an idiot for being wrong, the least you could do is make sure they're actually wrong, and ideally make sure they're wrong about something that actually matters (if your beef is Hr vs hr).

    Do you correct people for going "6 sec" rather than "6 s" too? I'll bet you're great fun at parties!

  71. Re:93 kWHr/day? seems pretty low. by dougmc · · Score: 1

    Yes, but if you're singling out the outliers for police involvement, you should probably look for people several standard deviations away from the average. I don't know what the standard deviation would be in this case, but I'll bet a significant percentage of the households in Canada use over 930 kWhr per month. Especially the wealthy with larger houses.

  72. Backed by by k2r · · Score: 1

    > Fair enough, but what is it backed by?
    Mathematics.

  73. Does the electrical company take bitcoin? by foregather · · Score: 1

    Because that's a lot of ongoing expense to get a bunch of bitcoins.

  74. spare some change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spare some change, anyone?

    129YpUXry4w6kQPHgEQgyzhjeUn5ZMbvNW