Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Looks to Reinvent the Toilet

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the German government are working on a $10 million project to provide innovative sanitation facilities to 800,000 Kenyans over the next five years. From the article: "The goal is to find 'innovative solutions' for sanitation in poor urban areas. Gates says it's time to move on from the era of the classic toilet. He points out that, despite all the recent achievements, 40% of the world's population, or some 2.5 billion people, still lives without proper means of flushing away excrement. But just giving them Western-style toilets isn't possible because of the world's limited water resources." I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is.

64 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm just curious how someone will find a way to spin this as a bad thing. Will it be "Gates will probably insist they use only Windows toilets!"? Or maybe it will be "This is just a ploy for him to sell more Windows copies to the poor people after they take a shit!" Or perhaps "I'll be he'll ban Linux and Apple from these shithouses!"

    Come on, I know there are plenty of Slashdotters just ACHING to find SOME way, ANY way to bash him some more. Forget that Steve Jobs does NO charitable activities (Steve don't do charity) or that this has nothing to do with Linux. Someone will find a way. He's the guy with the Borg picture, after all.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by DemonGenius · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real question is... will those toilets run Crysis?

    2. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The bashing began before you started typing. Did you read the summary?

    3. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm just trying to figure out why he wants to violate the KISS methodology. You have few options for feces. Put it it into a treatment facility (flush, carry...) to be treated with bacteria that live on that sort of thing, use it for fertilizer or burn it.

      The use of toilets in "western society" simply facilitates the first step in those methods be it an out house, a ceramic bowl, or fancy plastic. I don't understand what he wants them to do. Maybe learn how to use sea shells for less paper usage? There's only so much waste you can get rid of with a small amount of water, and any breakthrough in toilet technology that would make it cheap enough for the third world and use little water will likely be patent encumbered for the next 50 years (probably by Bill himself.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by bmo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Forget that Steve Jobs does NO charitable activities

      Steve Jobs isn't public about whether or not he does charities. He thinks it's none of your business.

      And I tend to agree with him on that point.

      Some people use charity as a means of self-promotion.

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      Disclaimer, I am a lapsed Episcopalian. I can fake my way through a Catholic Mass for weddings and funerals, but that's about it.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Funny

      "He doesnt know what the three sea shells are for!"

    6. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by femtoguy · · Score: 2

      My only complaint is with the headline. It should read "Bill Gates looks to give money to people to invent a new toilet". I am pretty sure that he will not be involved in the actual development. I think that his foundation does a lot of good work, and respect the fact that he isn't just hording his money, but it should also be recognized that the actual work is done by people in the field, and not by him personally.

      Actually, it kind of reminds me of a recent, very bad decision, at work. We hired a firm to develop a new web site. We checked their previous work and it looked good. As we got more deeply involved with them we discovered that the "company" was actually a couple of business front guys who wrote the contracts, and then farmed out the work to a bunch of contract college student programmers. When we ran into implementation problems, the couldn't help us because they didn't know any of the technology, and their contract workers had moved on and so couldn't help us either. But they still maintain that they are the key players in the complany, despite having no expertise in the work that they are doing.

    7. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not have a dual system?

      Liquid waste goes into a liquid recyc system, to be chemically cleansed and reused in future flushes. Doesn't need to be electric powered; you should be able to pump up a couple gallons into a reserve flush bin by a hand-crank pump fairly easily. Solid waste filters out into a bin to be taken away for treatment later (carried or otherwise). That way, you don't have to worry about wasting good, potable water on your flushes.

    8. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not like there haven't been all kinds of methods devised for getting rid of waste. Hell, NASA probably researched a million different chemicals and methods for getting rid of such waste. I'm sure they didn't just blow all that money on a single toilet.

      Also, there no need for name calling. So I went a little wordy with my sentence... big deal.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    9. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      The non-vocal person helping society does nothing for the hegemony of the church.

      Sure he does, if the people he is helping know he is with the church.

      But remember, it's not about the church, it's about taking care of other people because it's the right thing to do.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Pope · · Score: 2

      How amusing. Another story of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that includes the obligatory Steve Jobs bash. Last I checked, Steve was running a very successful multi-billion dollar company full time. Maybe ask again when he's retired?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the small villages in Pakistan can figure out that they need to go to "x" location on the other side of the hill when they need to dump their waste, why can't someone in Africa designate an area that people will go to do that?

      Why do they need someone else to come in and dig a latrine for them? Do they lack the knowledge on digging a hole? ... building a stick/rope structure to hold up a person? Why is there really an issue with people squatting anywhere they damn well please in Africa if all the other places all over the world figured this out already? There are remote places all over the world that have figured out that this waste is bad and they work with it just fine. How is it any different in Africa? They don't know how to mix the feces with dirt and/or bury it?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      So do what westerners did when they were poor and had no water and power. Outhouses with properly sized leach fields. I would imagine the folks who need these facilities don't own the land and so can't build such things. The people who do own the land have another place to potty.

    13. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Coffee+Warlord · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the real question is...how the hell will the three sea shells work?

    14. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure where my joking starts or ends. Could you clarify where you think I'm joking?

      You've listed a solution that may work for them. Why hasn't this billion dollar fund heard of these toilets then? What sort of solution is Mr. Gates looking for if these compost solutions were not sufficient enough for his solution?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    15. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh... No...don't need to do that... A composting toilet breaks it down and renders the hazardous bacterial aspects of it largely harmless over time- typically a shorter period than the bulk wastewater treatment systems take to do it.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    16. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is there really an issue with people squatting anywhere they damn well please in Africa if all the other places all over the world figured this out already? There are remote places all over the world that have figured out that this waste is bad and they work with it just fine. How is it any different in Africa? They don't know how to mix the feces with dirt and/or bury it?

      This was my first reaction too---
      Step #1 - Dig a hole
      Step #2 - Place outhouse over hole

      Every month or two...
      Step #1 - Temp. move outhouse
      Step #2 - Dig new hole, placing dirt in old hole
      Step #3 - Please outhouse over new hole, mark old hole so as not to dig there for a while

      Then just make sure you aren't placing your outhouse holes somewhere that they contaminate your water supply (well), garden, etc...

      But, I'm guessing there must be some reasons they don't do this... maybe--
      - Population density? Too many poeple in a small area?
      - Soil issues? Maybe the soil consistency or water supply dynamics make it impossible to locate an outhouse hole close enough to be practical?
      - Lack of tools? Maybe things like shovels, hammers, etc are too scarce? Tho it seems like a larger supply of these items would be easier/cheaper to provide then new toilets...
      - Lack of knowledge/intelligence? Maybe Bill thinks African's are not intelligent enough to be able to learn, implement and pass-on this type of knowledge... I'm kidding of course, but it is odd...

      I know it's somewhat cruel and elitist, but I often can't understand the dynamics of these places in Africa... if you have these millions of desperately starving children, WHY do they keep having children?? And, if "we", the outside world, keep providing food don't we realize that we're just creating an unmanageable problem? If you have 10M people that can't feed themselves, so you feel sorry and give them food, you'll just end up with 20M that can't feed themselves on the budget of 10M persons worth of food you provide... thus you must provide even more food...

      Give a man a fish, feed him for a day... teach a man to fish, feed him forever. In this case our compassion to save millions of starving people will only serve to create TENS of million of future starving people........unless the dynamic there radically changes... but considering most of those commercials I see on TV show kids who are wearing loin cloths and lying in the dirt, it seems like there is a huge learning and cultural curve to overcome...

    17. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      "Your toilet has performed an illegal operation and will be closed. Please remove all poop and reload it again to continue."

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    18. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 2

      You're going to have to extract the liquid from the waste to do that- and unless he's focusing on efficient water purification systems that don't require much or any power, that's not going to be happening.

      Like I said. Let gravity filter the waste - liquid goes through, solid catches in a trap of some kind (removable bucket? Flip-to-clear lid?). Put a crank in the right spot, hand-pump enough liquid into a reservoir for a flush, and the system can be more or less closed until it's time to refresh the water cleaning chemicals or empty the solid waste catch.

    19. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by hey! · · Score: 2

      I'm just trying to figure out why he wants to violate the KISS methodology. You have few options for feces. Put it it into a treatment facility (flush, carry...) to be treated with bacteria that live on that sort of thing, use it for fertilizer or burn it.

      That's only simple for you, the homeowner, because somebody has invested HUGE amounts of money and engineering into infrastructure that makes it possible. Think about it. You take water that has been purified to drinking water standards and moved tthrough a water distribution system, often hundreds of miles. You shit in that drinking water and send it through a separate water collection system, where the shit you put into it is removed and processed and the water treated AGAIN before being dumped in the environment.

      That's what you call simple?

      Let me tell what's simple: a composting toilet like a Clivus Multrum. My wife's beatnik (proto-hippie) architect uncle had one in his remodeled 17th C farmhouse. You put your waste (including food scraps) in the hole, along with an occasional handful of sawdust. Electric fans (sometimes solar powered) encourage non-smelly aerobic decomposition and prevent the collection of odors. The waste slides down an inclined plane where it emerges as rich, unsmelly compost a few months later. It's not much more mechanically complicated than the infrastructure you need in your house for a flush toilet. You don't even need running water. It's a *hell* of a lot simpler than the whole infrastructure you need to do it the first world way. And cheaper too. A sewage treatment plant for a major city costs *billions* to build, not including the water and sewer networks and installing plumbing in everyone's house.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 2

      No, I consider simple being a hole in the ground with a place to sit above it. I grew up on a Midwestern farm and we had an outhouse that was no longer used by us... but I understood it's purpose. I even went camping, a lot, as a kid and had to dig holes where I would bury my waste. It's not something I needed a degree in biology or waste management to understand.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    21. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      >> It should read "Bill Gates looks to give money to people to invent a new toilet".

      or

      "Bill Gates Puts Money Into Toilet"

    22. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by hey! · · Score: 2

      OK, let's take your dig a hole in the ground routine and apply to a city like Dhaka, Bangladesh, with a population density of 118,000 per square mile. Let's stipulate that part of the job is keeping diseases like cholera from spreading. "Simple" only counts as a virtue if it gets the job done.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    23. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      I'm an atheist, but: it's simply not true.

      Wars are generally fought for resources, especially land. "Religion" is just one of the features by which different ethnos and cultures differentiate themselves from each other. When there is no conflict over resources, religions seldom fight. When two different power-groups/ethnicities/polities are struggling over a resource, religion seldom matters.

      The Nazis were generally Christian (both Protestant and Catholic) and invaded Christian countries. Some of the most violent wars of the 19th century were fought in Latin America with Catholics on all sides (the War of the Triple Alliance killed about 90% of Paraguay's male population.) Religion was not a factor in Japan's Imperial expansion - they weren't trying to convert anyone to Shintoism, even if state Shintoism was used as a way of reinforcing national identity.

      Your mistake is that you think that religion has always been separate from culture and politics: the idea of "a religion" as something distinct is a recent one, so in pre-modern conflict - the expansion of Islam, for example - you might think that "religion" was the motivation. It seldom was.

    24. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by ZackSchil · · Score: 2

      They stopped producing music that appealed to the current youth.

    25. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      NASA had the advantage in that their methods had to be efficient when used, but still very expensive to manufacture and maintain. What he needs in this case is something that can be cheaply implemented and not wasting any more resources than needed when used.

  2. This won't be his first shitty idea.. by backslashdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    but I think we can all agree it's a damn good one.

    1. Re:This won't be his first shitty idea.. by snspdaarf · · Score: 5, Funny

      find a way to weaponize the toilets

      It's called a bidet

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The last comment in the story about BSoDs is disappointing. I like to poke fun at Windows and Microsoft software in general as much as the next person over but I have genuine respect for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They're doing more to solve world problems than most countries are. I can recognize a good thing when I see it and making BSoD jokes when it comes to the foundation just belittles the work they do.

    1. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      They're not as separate as you might think. The B&MGF offers medicines to countries where Microsoft has a limited presence and piracy is rampant. Just one catch: they pharmaceutical companies won't provide the medicines unless the recipient government signs an IP treaty with the USA. A treaty that, purely as a side effect, happens to require them to enforce Microsoft's copyright. The Economist had a good article describing the link a couple of years ago.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Making fun of gates by Dyinobal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We all might make fun of gates but he's putting money into something that is worth while and often over looked. Having a safe place to poo is a pretty big deal, as it stands now a lot of places that don't end up draining into rivers and other water sources and making people sick.

    1. Re:Making fun of gates by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about Composting sawdust toilet I'm sure the locals have something they can use in lieu of sawdust.

      You could even create a dehydration toilet Urine is collected separate (where it could easily be evaporated off and the urea used as fertilizer). After dehydrated the human waste could take place of animal dung used for heat.

      I think a bigger and better use of this money would be something to sanitize. Something as simple as soap or the 'waterless' alcohol based sanitizers.

    2. Re:Making fun of gates by snemarch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong.

      "I've said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that. No one involved in computers would ever say that a certain amount of memory is enough for all time I keep bumping into that silly quotation attributed to me that says 640K of memory is enough. There's never a citation; the quotation just floats like a rumor, repeated again and again. "

      - http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
  5. Didn't he already do that by SteelKidney · · Score: 2

    With Vista?

  6. Get a sense of humor by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    It still will be a BSOD, the Brown Screen Of Death.

    It is called humor dammit, even though it may be shitty humor.

    1. Re:Get a sense of humor by operagost · · Score: 2

      The Linux version will be called the Core Dump.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. BSoD will be replaced by famazza · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blue Screen of Death will be replaced by Blue Splash of Death, probably chemical.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  8. BSoD? Really? by fsck! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what you want about Microsoft, but that's no longer the same thing as Bill Gates. I've been a /. user for around a decade and have certainly made my share of bad Bill Gates jokes, but the guy is literally trying to save the world now. He has the money and the connections to do it, and the projects he's working on are incredibly selfless. Let's give him a break. OP was being very immature IMHO.

  9. Limited water resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I checked most of the surface area of Earth is water. Why not flush toilets with saltwater when 38% of the population lives within 100km of an ocean? Tidal driven pumps could be used for energy efficiency and in desert areas, solar desalinization is a possible source of drinking and irrigation water.

  10. Simple composting toilets by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2

    Why re-invent the wheel, just make it low cost and difficult to block up..

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  11. TeePee by Nanosphere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi my name is TeePee, think of me as your potty assistant! It looks like you're trying to go #2...

  12. Toilets not the issue by Tx · · Score: 3, Informative

    While many of the comments so far are focussing on the issue of toilets, as does the summary, it's the whole sewage infrastructure that's the issue. In the African cities I've been to, large areas don't have proper underground sewers, and sewage is carried in stinking open gutters at the side of the road; having any kind of toilet doesn't help if it's flushing into those open sewers. TFA talks about supporting construction of pit latrines in slums that lack any form of sanitation, so it seems they are being quite practical about working with the existing infrastructure.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  13. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think he has finally went over to the nutter side. a flush toilet that wastes precious water is NOT the answer.

    Did you even read the summary? He's not trying to give them flush toilets. He's aware that it wastes water. From the SECOND LINE of the summary: "The goal is to find 'innovative solutions' for sanitation in poor urban areas..." What do you think "innovative solutions" might mean? Could it possibly be something along the lines of "a way to deal with waste in a sanitary way that doesn't involve water"?

    Yeah. Try reading at least the summary before you post.

  14. Re:Silly Gates.... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

    By not crapping in their drinking water they might actually have a source of clean water. A proper outhouse might go quite far in accomplishing this.

    I do wonder why something like the basic outhouse won't work. You dig a hole, put a tank* in, built the structure around it. When it gets full either have a truck come and empty it or build a new one. Also when planning an outhouse the best place for it is down stream from your water supply and usually 100' (30 meters) from the well. This way even if the tank leaks it won't contaminate your water supply since it is down stream and a way from it as the dirt acts as a filter.

    * The tank can be pretty much made of anything, like an old metal barrel, old plastic barrel, concrete, special formed plastic tank. I have seen all of these used for outhouses.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Re:This is a solved problem by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2

    What do they do with the waste, as far as I can tell they use it for compost, but using human waste as compost for edible products, or even being in contact with it can lead to several diseases

  17. Outhouse? by retroworks · · Score: 2

    I lived in Africa, and built outhouses. We dug a deep hole. Then, we made a shallow square hole, about 6 inches deep, in the soft pile of dirt. We placed a bucket on the ground inside the square, poured cement (and rebar) around the bucket, and when the cement dried we removed the bucket and had a floor with a hole in it. We put the floor with the hole over the hole we'd dug. Then we required people to sign a EULA agreement that by peeing in the outhouse, they agreed not to copy our idea. Wait, no we didn't. Kidding aside, I don't see that water has ever been part of the toilet equation in the developing world.

    --
    Gently reply
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Re:This is a solved problem by heydan · · Score: 2

    Incorrect handling of human waste can indeed spread disease. But with proper composting, you can kill 100% of the pathogens and have no risk of spreading disease at all: http://weblife.org/humanure/

  20. Re:Silly Gates.... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    In some locations, it's not QUITE that simple. As for contaminating the drinking water...heh...a composting system can actually fill the bill without needing a classic outhouse, fill the same role, and do it for decades while being able to be placed in locations that would be otherwise impossible for an outhouse.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  21. Re:Kudos to Mr. Gates! by jojoba_oil · · Score: 2

    Also, this project is a much more noble cause than Gates' misguided drive to immunize the world's population. The world's health care systems would collapse unded the weight of all the new cases of Autism if successful.

    I may be dense, but I sure hope that's sarcasm. Autism has no relation to vaccination.

    The article spurring that whole belief has been outed as a fabrication. Andrew Wakefield was attempting to push single-disease vaccination shots as a means of boosting pharmaceutical profits, so his "study" showed that only multi-disease vaccinations caused autism. I know it's Wikipedia, but check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy for a brief overview. Note the many citations to non-Wikipedia sources such as BMJ and the CDC.

    Someone please tell me this was a Whooooosh moment and I missed the joke.

  22. Re:Silly Gates.... by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not quite sure what this problem looks like in your imagination, but the fact is, we're approaching the stage where most of the world's population live in cities.
    Population density without the infrastructure to remove the waste is the problem. It's a very hard logistics problem.

    You can't just dig a hole 30m down the road in an urban environment.
    Also, "planning an outhouse", yes that's another problem since lack of infrastructure, poverty, filth and improvised shelter, ie slums, are all part of the mix.

    Lots of perfectly functional, albeit hippyish solutions like composting toilets do not scale to urban environments.

  23. Re:Silly Gates.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Not only did i read the summary but I read the FA as well. they are trying to apply technology that will not be fricking used for a problem that a solution was discovered several thousand years ago.

    You dont crap where you drink and eat. A proper outhouse is the solution. they talk about children playing in sewage, that is because these people are just crapping randomly or in open pits. where a proper outhouse IS the answer.

    Blowing money to find a solution that has existed forever is dumb.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  24. Re:Silly Gates.... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    The summary specifically mentions urban areas. Downstream of your water supply probably isn't downstream of your neighbour's in a city. So you need some innovation to make sure it doesn't leak. Just digging a hole and covering it up when it's full isn't sustainable in a city. You need some way of getting the waste outside city limits where there's more space for storage or to a central location for treatment. Either of those solutions could use some development to make a system that's efficient and reasonably priced.

  25. Re:Silly Gates.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    The funny part is that history already has those answers to draw upon. with minor changes that can easily be done you can upgrade what we used to do in cities before the flush toilet existed.

    Look at london, NYC, etc... a lot of the world had large cities without plumbing and sewage answers for a very long time.
    But there are no answers for dense populations without having a way of sewage removal, unless they invent the portable black hole and give them away for free to everyone.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  26. First Maleria now this! by random+coward · · Score: 2

    I am impressed he's found something else to do good with.
    But I suggest he look at what Nepal did:
    He could fix the sanitation issue and solve a large part of their energy issues very cheaply. He just needs to push some startup money to modify the designs for the different areas and some startup money for a micro-finance so people will be able to buy them.

    Here is an article on how nepal did it:
    http://www.michaelyon-online.com/gobar-gas.htm

  27. Re:This is great and all... by devleopard · · Score: 2

    I'd recommend you read up on his foundation. One of their largest focuses is education. He's given to plenty of other state-side causes, such as the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (largest gift the CFF has ever received, no less).

    Reality: money is good at quickly fixing infrastructure issues. It's far less efficient at fixing behavioral issues. I think it's a given that much of the US's problem are behavior based: racial bias, drug dependency, broken homes, and more (and often many of these causes).

    It's a matter of impact. Where can his (or yours, or mine) money make an impact? I think Bill thinks beyond "his backyard", as I think is a far more enlightened approach. "How can I best help humanity today?" rather than "'Mericans first!"

    I have no doubt that he will tackle domestic issues as well. After all, he's pledged to give away half of his income. That's an undertaking. Our problems will require significant planning - they aren't issues you just write a check for. For now, he's tackling the low hanging fruit.

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
  28. Me thinks it is like a weasel... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2

    You're over thinking the problem. The bashing will be real toilet humor, heh. Something about them being full of shit, or about what floats, or you can't keep a good gates flushed down.

    That's far easier than sinking a joke about windows or getting potty mouthed. But, fighting the urge is just pissing in the wind. When mother nature calls with a joke, Just go with it and let it flow.

    Thank you, thank you, I'm here all week folks!

    --
    I8-D
  29. well.. by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been to Ethiopia and the clean water issue was pretty much the biggest problem there. Their cities are the very definition of "ancient" I doubt there's any place on earth that's had humans living in large numbers for as long. Buildings are packed so close together there is hardly room for new ones, and the space between the buildings is filled with "homes" thrown together out of cinder blocks, Joshua tree timber and corrugated steel (this is where the middle class live.) Underneath all of this is the plumbing of the city... it's very... very... very old. When a water main brakes, a city truck comes with shovels and a replacement pipe. Ethiopians flock to the truck and grab shovels, dig out the pipe and replace it. The government dudes then hand them cash for their trouble. All the sewer pipes lead to the same place... the river. Where do they get water? You guessed it, the river. there is no simple solution to this system. There are millions of 100+ year old sewage pipes draining into that river. All the pipes are so old they likely all leak and exchange contents between themselves all the time. So even if you could get clean water to begin with it'd likely not be clean when it arrived. You can't dig up the old pipes because they all run under buildings literally older than Jesus in some cases and there are simply no utility records at all.

    On top of every building thats owned by anyone with money is a water tank. They pay other companies to come and fill that tank dailly or weekly. Showering with this water would be too expensive so this is your drinking water and you shower in the tainted water and keep your mouth closed. Another problem is the way bathrooms are designed in Africa and the middle east. In every place I stayed there was a bathtub with no shower head. Instead they had a sprayer on a hose that was part of the tubs faucet that could hang up high if you wanted it. I was told this has something to do with the muslim religion or something, I dont really know. But this sort of setup is against code in the US. Why? Because you can lay the hose down into the tub. If you have the tube full of water, and wash yourself in it... now the water is dirty. If the hose is laying in the water it can now siphon the dirty water back into the water supply. Every single tub is like this.

    The only thing that I saw that was really working there was bottled water. It was plentiful and it was cheap. I could get a liter of good bottled water for about 10 cents. That's still a lot for the poor there, but, with a little more effort it could be made even cheaper.

    Despite all this, the fact of the mater was water born illness was so common they didn't even bother to treat it in most cases. They wait until it becomes a real health problem. We adopted our son there and when we got back our entire family were basically on antibiotics for a full year afterwards. The stuff is so easy to spread, especially when you have a child in diapers that you cure one familly member and a week later another gets sick... in the end the doctor got fed up and just put everyone, even our dog on antibiotics at the same time for 6 weeks strait and finally we were rid of it.

    1. Re:well.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I was told this has something to do with the muslim religion or something, I dont really know.

      FWIW, vast majority of Ethiopians are Orthodox Christians, not Muslims.

  30. No nice way to say this by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But there is a difference between not having a degree in biology or waste management and living under the control of people that tell you to pray for rain in a massive drought. Or who believe raping a baby (or any virgin but easiest with a baby) cures aids. Or eat albino people to gain their powers. And don't act so high and mighty, it wasn't so long ago in the west we burned people alive for voodoo, oops witchcraft or killed people for their faith and made lampshades out of them.

    Civilization, you never truly appreciate it until every last bit of it has been stripped away from you. There are still houses in western Europe where you can see the design for crapping out on to the street. The London sewer system isn't all that old (compared to civilized man capable of building a toilet) but us modern humans still rely on it because we are no longer capable of the massive engineering it took to build it to upgrade it to modern needs.

    A hole in the ground that is all? What about leach area, the radius around the hole in which you shouldn't dig or grow crops etc? How do you know? For thousands of year NO human knew. We thought smell kept evil spirits away. You and I can drink purest water from the tap for less then the cost of a peanut but drink instead poisoned water from plastic bottles at outrages prices and waste most of it for flushing the toilet.

    I sit here within easy reach of enough food to last me a week, pure water how ever much I want, power for a dozen gadgets, in building that doesn't even budge in the worsed storms. Maybe you are too, but I don't pretend that my state in the norm in the rest of the world. Am I grateful for it? Hell no, I am a spoiled westerner but at least sometimes a story like this reminds me there are other places in the world. Maybe you should too. Even knowledge we consider basic is not universal. Just because you had over a decade maybe even two of education doesn't mean everyone has.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  31. Why not by Strych9 · · Score: 2

    If the toilet was nicknamed the crapper due to the invetor
    do we now go to the bathroom and take a giant gates?

  32. Similar to Maimonides by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Very similar to Maimonides Eight levels of Charity. From highest to lowest:

    1. Teaching the needy so that they scan support themselves
    2. Anonymous giving without knowing who will be the recipient
    3. Donor knows who receives, recipient does not know who gives
    4. Donor does not know who receives, recipient knows who gave
    5. Giving directly to recipient, before being asked
    6. Giving directly to recipient after being asked
    7. Giving willingly, but insufficiently
    8. Giving unwillingly
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  33. yes it will run crysis by goombah99 · · Score: 2
    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.