Slashdot Mirror


Sheikh Carves His Name In Desert So It's Visible From Space

While it isn't as cool as carving his name on the surface of the moon with a giant heat ray, Hamad Bin Hamdan Al Ahyan's enormous signature is quite an accomplishment nonetheless. Measuring 1,000 meters high and two miles long, the sheiks name is now visible from space. From the article: "And rather than allow the writing to be washed away by the ocean, the letters actually form waterways that absorb the encroaching tide.The ruler's name is even visible on Google's map service. Hamad dreamed up the idea and had his workmen toil for weeks to craft the enormous piece of sand graffiti. It is not known how much it cost to make."

336 comments

  1. First Post by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can see this from summary-level!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I doubt it will absorb and form channels out of incoming moderation, however.

    2. Re:First Post by ep32g79 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fail, It's upside down

    3. Re:First Post by hesiod · · Score: 2

      Looking at that, I would hardly say it's "visible from space" In fact, I would say that without a decent telescope and exact instructions, no one in space would have a chance of seeing that.

    4. Re:First Post by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      FAIL!

      All that money and the contractors still fucked it up.

    5. Re:First Post by mrops · · Score: 1

      That is because he didn't write his full name, "Hamad Bin Hamdan Al Ahyan'"

    6. Re:First Post by BinarySolo · · Score: 1

      The enemy's gate is down.

    7. Re:First Post by dmmiller2k · · Score: 1

      That's picking nit. It's certainly visible via a satellite, which is in fact orbiting in space.

      --

      "No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up." -- Lily Tomlin

    8. Re:First Post by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Up" probably has to be aligned towards Mecca, or some similar retarded reason.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:First Post by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Please: I can see my house from space with a satellite, but to proclaim it's "visible from space" with a Slashdot headline is pretty damned misleading.

    10. Re:First Post by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      The higher-resolution Google maps imagery is actually taken by aircraft, so linking to it there doesn't imply anything about visibility from space.

    11. Re:First Post by vorm · · Score: 2

      Fail, It's upside down

      No, Arabic is read south to north.

    12. Re:First Post by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      In opposition to the natural form of writting names on the terrain. Every one knows that when you write names on the ground so you can see them in the map, North is "up", so he should have written it that way.

      Imagine that the writting of his name crosses with the writting of his country.

      Now without sarcasm, what surprises me is that he chose to write the latin (westerner) form of his name.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    13. Re:First Post by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What's worse is it's all in capitals, instead of CamelCase.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:First Post by flyneye · · Score: 1

      If it truly forms waterways, then a well timed MASSIVE Jell-O powder air-drop right before tide would yield sticky sweet results. The glistening issue of this action would eventually draw more bugs than a turd in an Entomology dept. This could be visible from space.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    15. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I suspect it's aligned to South instead of North because Abu Dhabi is directly north of it: there's probably a very tall building directly north, whence once can see the name spelled out. Notably, the palace is due north of the writing.

    16. Re:First Post by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Nah

      At the size listed in the article, all an observer in LEO would need is a decent pair of binoculars

    17. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Mecca is west of this... and why is "up" North?

    18. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean South East. There are five similar structures there. Looks like a long (water-bound) commute to Abu Dhabi though.

    19. Re:First Post by jojoba_oil · · Score: 1

      No, all capital letters is appropriate: His name is a constant.

    20. Re:First Post by aurashift · · Score: 1

      You've got it all wrong. The text isn't upside down. This is what happens when you cut the NASA budget, ALL OUR SATELLITES ARE UPSIDE DOWN IN SPACE NOW! Damn you republicans!

    21. Re:First Post by scubamage · · Score: 2

      Actually, google originally utilized aircraft photography from assorted surveyors (NOAA, USAF, etc). However three years ago they helped launch what was at the time the worlds most powerful imaging satellite. While not the primary users, I'm pretty sure they take it for a spin every now and then.

    22. Re:First Post by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He shuns the birthplace of the prophet (pbuh)! I keel heem!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:First Post by tragedy · · Score: 1

      It's two miles wide. That should certainly be visible from 70 miles up. True, it wouldn't be visible from the moon, or from Alpha Proxima, or from somewhere in another galaxy, all of which are "in space", but from the edge of space, it should be visible to the unaided eye.

    24. Re:First Post by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      His name is not a symbol, it's a value.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    25. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up or Down is subjective. When in space there is no up or down, it's just our historical view of maps that makes people think the northern hemisphere is up and southern hemisphere is down. I'm from DownUnder but really if you turn your "traditional" map around I'm from UpOver! Turn it sideways and I'm around the corner, hehe

    26. Re:First Post by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      What's odd is that it's in English, not Arabic script.

    27. Re:First Post by SudoGhost · · Score: 1

      According to the scale on Google Maps, the name appears to be only one mile long, not two...what's with the discrepancy there, is Google Maps just off?

    28. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must be over-compensating for something else.

    29. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why he didn't write it in the Arabic Alphabet...

    30. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this is frickin far from being 'visible from space'.

    31. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you fail. the universe doesn't necessarily have to view 'HAMAD' from North to South. Something tells me you're not bi-pedal and scoff at the idea of juggling.

    32. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When short people cast long shadows, it means that the sun is setting.

    33. Re:First Post by korgitser · · Score: 1

      The arabs have south facing upwards on the maps, had it that way long before we even dreamed of maps.

      --
      FCKGW 09F9 42
    34. Re:First Post by metacell · · Score: 1

      I think "visible from space" is usually taken to mean "visible by the naked eye when outside of Earth's atmosphere".

    35. Re:First Post by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It is way too small to be seen with the naked eye from space, which is the generally accepted definition of "visible from".

      In fact the only man-made object on the planet big enough to see unaided from orbit is the artificial island that was built for the Kansai Airport in Japan. They needed an international airport but didn't have any suitable land available, so they made a new island in the bay. A few years back they expanded it with an extra runway. I have landed there once and it is a bit strange flying so low over water.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re:First Post by databaseadmin · · Score: 2

      It has been common for astronauts to pick out runways from space. LOTS of man made objects can be seen from space. Seeing someing 2 miles wide from 70 miles away is the same angle as seeing something 1/2" wide from 35" away. So, about the size of your thumbnail with your arm stretched out.

    37. Re:First Post by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      In fact the only man-made object on the planet big enough to see unaided from orbit is the artificial island that was built for the Kansai Airport in Japan.

      I'm pretty sure my co-workers pr0n collection would qualify as the second man-made object visible from space. It's starting to bend light towards it as well...

    38. Re:First Post by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Looks like they reclaimed some land for the top left corner of the H. I know a few people called HAMAD so I suppose they all get to claim it.

    39. Re:First Post by cripkd · · Score: 1

      How exactly is a name "in English"?

      --
      Curiously yours, crip.
    40. Re:First Post by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Referring to the script (the letters), not the name per se. I suppose a comma would have made that clearer:

      What's odd is that it's in English, not Arabic, script.

    41. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've missed the point.
      It's not "English", to call it so is arrogant. There is no English alphabet or English "letters".
      It's the Latin alphabet.

    42. Re:First Post by memyselfandeye · · Score: 1

      Referring to the script (the letters), not the name per se. I suppose a comma would have made that clearer:

      What's odd is that it's in English, not Arabic, script.

      Latin characters, but whatever, close enough for me.

    43. Re:First Post by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Latin characters, but whatever, close enough for me.

      I didn't say "English characters" I said "English script". The one we use to write English. Which happens to be derived from Latin. Very good, you were paying attention in primary school. I really don't think the Sheikh said "carve my name in Latin letters into the desert" though. And if you think we use Latin characters (as opposed to ones derived from it) you've missed a couple of thousand years of updates.

      And why anyone wants to make a post in a two-week old topic, and misquote me, to score such a trivial point, I don't know.

  2. Meters and miles? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1,000 meters high is a kilometer, yet the length is given in miles.

    Didn't NASA have a problem when they didn't convert from metric to standard?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Meters and miles? by VolciMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      1,000 meters high is a kilometer, yet the length is given in miles.

      Didn't NASA have a problem when they didn't convert from metric to standard?

      They're just using metric feet per second

    2. Re:Meters and miles? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=hamad&hl=en&ll=24.342718,54.36636&spn=0.139665,0.264187&sll=24.342718,54.36636&sspn=0.139665,0.264187&t=h&radius=9.98&z=13](http://maps.google.com/maps?q=hamad&hl=en&ll=24.342718,54.36636&spn=0.139665,0.264187&sll=24.342718,54.36636&sspn=0.139665,0.264187&t=h&radius=9.98&z=13)

      Whatever it is, they need to make the URL available ;)

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    3. Re:Meters and miles? by Conditioner · · Score: 0

      All that work and money, and they got it up-side down !

    4. Re:Meters and miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Meters and miles? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But using the Google provided scale, the text is only one mile wide, not two. Also the height is only 500m.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Meters and miles? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Tsk, that's not impressive at all.
      Mr. Hamad should be ashamed of his feeble attempt.
      It's a miracle the satalites picked up anything at all of this miniscule bauble.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Meters and miles? by Threni · · Score: 2

      You'd have to be hamad to mix metric and imperial!

    8. Re:Meters and miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      standard being imperial? I'd say metric is pretty standard around the world except one country.

    9. Re:Meters and miles? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting you used Markdown syntax for your link. May I ask why you chose to?

    10. Re:Meters and miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and someone needs to tell them which way is up. I'd be asking for a refund if I was him!

    11. Re:Meters and miles? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      But did they complete construction is less than twelve parsecs?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:Meters and miles? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      If it's 1,000 meters HIGH, then how can it hold water?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    13. Re:Meters and miles? by enjerth · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. It can't be 1000 meters high, it's clearly at sea level.

    14. Re:Meters and miles? by BKX · · Score: 1

      No, standard is not Imperial. In the US, standard is the common name for the US Customary System, which is different from the Imperial system of measures. While I believe the units for distance are the same between the two systems, the units for volume and large masses are quite different. Particularly, fluid ounces and gallons.

    15. Re:Meters and miles? by Shemmie · · Score: 1

      Or this one?

    16. Re:Meters and miles? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Gallons are a 20 (or 25%) out, but only because pints contain a different number of fl oz.

      The fluid ounce itself is within cooks' or bartenders' accuracy.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Meters and miles? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      The lettering appears to be a kilometer high, not 1000 meters in elevation. Don't be a dimwit, you knew what they meant, or you should have. Or were you both trying to be clever?

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    18. Re:Meters and miles? by orange47 · · Score: 1

      metric is standard.

    19. Re:Meters and miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric is 'standard'.
      Standard is for measuring d

    20. Re:Meters and miles? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Interesting you used Markdown syntax for your link. May I ask why you chose to?

      If I had to guess, it's because he hangs out on the SE family of sites

    21. Re:Meters and miles? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Or maybe Reddit.

  3. TFS is so PC by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    1000m high and 2 miles long - now everybody can complain about the units of measurement!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:TFS is so PC by VolciMaster · · Score: 2

      1000m high and 2 miles long - now everybody can complain about the units of measurement!

      1000m high? That's quite an achievement in just "weeks" - the Freedom Tower is only going to be 1776 feet (541m) high, and is taking *years* to complete. We need to hire this guy's workers!

    2. Re:TFS is so PC by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      I guess they meant "wide", considering this is horizontal.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    3. Re:TFS is so PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digging a ditch in the sand by whoever will work a trackhoe vs. building a 1776 ft tall building, up to code, in a major city, for occupants, with union laborers... two very different things.

    4. Re:TFS is so PC by blair1q · · Score: 1

      My only complaint would be if it's not 1000 meters and 2 miles.

      As long as it's right, it doesn't matter if it's inconsistent.

    5. Re:TFS is so PC by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I intent to complain about the dimension damn it.

      Its a channel. It has length, width and depth, not height.

    6. Re:TFS is so PC by Altus · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's text, its size should be measured in points!

      The text is written in 2,834,645 point font.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    7. Re:TFS is so PC by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      whosh

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    8. Re:TFS is so PC by Chemisor · · Score: 2

      > It has length, width and depth, not height.

      It may also have a significant value of the seldom mentioned dimension of debt.

    9. Re:TFS is so PC by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      True, digging down certainly is a lot easier than digging up.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    10. Re:TFS is so PC by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Being consistent does matter. Its the difference between successful and failing restaurants, the difference between successful and failed scientific experiments, and its the difference between whether or not someone will continue to pay you money for your effort.

      The article is simple enough that the inconsistency is forgivable, but it is potentially a tell of bad character traits that are prone to cause failure. And while not everyone feels the need to improve self, not everyone garners high regard from others and the positive benefits that come with refined skills (promotions, great jobs, success in interaction, trust, etc).

      In short, little things do matter.

    11. Re:TFS is so PC by joocemann · · Score: 1

      No way... font points is probably one of the most inconsistent things I've encountered!

    12. Re:TFS is so PC by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If it's 600 meters by 1 mile, I want to know it's 600 meters by 1 mile, because 2400 by 5280 feet is not the same thing.

    13. Re:TFS is so PC by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      My only complaint would be if it's not 1000 meters and 2 miles.

      As long as it's right, it doesn't matter if it's inconsistent.

      Complain away. I measured it with Google Earth's measuring tool. It's actually 1.6km long and 0.48km high. Both measurements are out by a factor of two.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    14. Re:TFS is so PC by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      only on a 72 ppi display, what if you were on an 96 or 120 ppi?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    15. Re:TFS is so PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it looks like arial font...
      not sand serif...

    16. Re:TFS is so PC by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      only on a 72 ppi display, what if you were on an 96 or 120 ppi?

      You are confusing points with dots or pixels. Points are a font metrics unit. Dots/pixels depend on the resolution.

      On a 72ppi display (note that "ppi" means "pixels per inch"), you have one pixel per point. On a 96ppi display, you have 1.5 pixels per point.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    17. Re:TFS is so PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the scale on the bottom left corner of Google maps it is only about one mile wide/long

      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Al+futaisi+island&hl=en&ll=24.379623,54.36327&spn=0.111012,0.127373&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=50.69072,65.214844&radius=15000.000000&t=h&z=13

    18. Re:TFS is so PC by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      So it uses a surface of 2000 meter*miles... amazing! Or was it 20 KW/J/Amp?

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    19. Re:TFS is so PC by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      Reality is at most 96 ppi.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    20. Re:TFS is so PC by enjerth · · Score: 1

      It may also have a significant value of the seldom mentioned dimension of debt.

      I was thinking of saying that debt is typically described as a depth, and so that's already covered. But then I figured there is another way of expressing it.

      Here in the good old US of A, we've gone from being deep in debt to being high on debt.

    21. Re:TFS is so PC by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      I guess they meant "wide", considering this is horizontal.

      Keine Sheisse, Hauptmann Offensichtlich?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:TFS is so PC by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Schlecht gemacht, Hauptmann Döspaddel.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    23. Re:TFS is so PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. The spec would not have been mixing units. Plus it demonstrates unclear thought process by the writer of the article. Nothing new there.

    24. Re:TFS is so PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because Google is the owner of the absolute truth.

      Moron.

    25. Re:TFS is so PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's right, it doesn't matter if it's inconsistent.

      That must be the motto of the ones responsible for the GUIs in Microsoft products.

      But seriously, inconsistancy is never right in any user interface and language is a user interface.

      If you want to compare 1000 m with 2 miles, you likely have to make a conversion inside your head (and then you also have to make an educated guess what "mile" is used as an unit, see next paragraph).

      Also, making information easy to understand and unambiguous is important, a large part of the people on earth have a mental image of how long 1000 metres (1 km) is. Comparatively, there are very few people who have a mental image of how long 2 miles is, and that mental images varies widely since there are several "one mile" used in different contexts (one mile can mean 1.000 m, 1.609 m, 1.852 m, 1.500 m, 1.600 m, 1.479 m, 1.925 m, 10.000 m, 12.000m, 9.864 m, 7.536 m, 7.586 m, 7.532 m, 2.087 m, 7.468 km (!) and about 10.000 (!) other units of length (although half of them is not currently in use and you only see them used in old documents)), at least a metre is always a metre in any context (that's one of the most important reasons to use the metric system, it's standardised the same all over the world).

    26. Re:TFS is so PC by joocemann · · Score: 1

      You didn't convert properly, so yes, its not the same thing. If you converted properly, which requires about 10 seconds of effort, not only would you be correct, but you'd be consistent.

  4. Sounds like a Clash to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard the sharif didn't like it and is planning to rock Hamad's casbah shortly.

    1. Re:Sounds like a Clash to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who cares what he thinks... it's written in a sans-sharif font.

    2. Re:Sounds like a Clash to me. by EnsilZah · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why, did he feel excluded due to the use of a sans-sharif font?

    3. Re:Sounds like a Clash to me. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Oh ma! That was a terrible pun that you just dune.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Sounds like a Clash to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sand-Sharif, methinks

  5. Well now by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I guess some people still haven't learned the lesson from Arab Spring.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Well now by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, one thing I note is that he didn't write it in Arabic letters ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Well now by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

      If they were paid to do the work, who cares how pointless it seems?

      Now slave or indentured labor is another story.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Well now by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would.

      "This man is so vain, so rich, he would spend on writing his name. The first thing this tells us, is that he has too much. The second thing this tells us, is that he works very little for it - only a man who does no work, would value his resources so little. The third thing this tells us is that he is a weak, wasteful fool. Why should we not rise up, and take what he has, when we can make so much better of it?"

    4. Re:Well now by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Pretty much everybody in Dubai speaks English.

    5. Re:Well now by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      Porbably would have been a damn bit more difficult than that very simple font. Besides, if Hollywood has taught us anything its that aliens read and write in ENGLISH and that's obviously who this is written for :)

    6. Re:Well now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if this was the typical middle eastern boss who profits off a state monopoly or off of his connections to the leaders while 99% of the population has to lump it.

    7. Re:Well now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Substitute out "writing his name" for almost anything, and you sound just like a common thief trying to rationalize.

      Examples: "his house", "his car", etc...

    8. Re:Well now by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt that many people speaks English fluently, but there is always a difference between your mother tongue and a foreign language. I somehow doubt that the sheik signs his documents with the western letters...

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    9. Re:Well now by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think it lost some nuance in the translation from the original Klingon.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Well now by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If it isn't a quote, why did you put quote marks?

      If it is, then who the fuck said it, you spastic.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Well now by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Too expensive. English (PRINT CAPITAL LETTERS) tend to favor straight edges, and rounded part are often just a basic Circle much easier to engineer then Arabic letters.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:Well now by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      He should have gone all out and played pharaoh. With that kind of cash, he could practically re-create the ancient Egyptian pharaoh quest to build the largest pyramid on Earth. The rules are as follow.

      1. Must be made with the same materials and techniques
      2. Must use the strongest men by the thousands to manually cut and move the stone blocks into place.
      3. There must be a throne to sit upon and watch all the men sweat profusely at high-noon.

      Bonus: 72 virgins stand in line to give him a blowjob while he observes his little kingdom being built (until the money runs out).

      Hey, he can mix the cultures up if he wants to. It's his party.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    13. Re:Well now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      This is a country where every citizen gets a fat check every month from the government - enough for comfortable middle class lifestyle - just for being there. Revolution? Hah.

    14. Re:Well now by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Why should we not rise up, and take what he has, when we can make so much better of it?"

      Because being poorer than him is still better than being shot dead by his guards I would imagine.

    15. Re:Well now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We should not. Because that's not how freedom works.

    16. Re:Well now by metacell · · Score: 1

      I substitute "writing his name" for "buying slaves".

    17. Re:Well now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when idiots acquire wealth without earning it.

    18. Re:Well now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because we are all stupid sheep that cow down to our governments because its that much easier, that is why we do not rise up.

    19. Re:Well now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of what you said is true up until "weak, wasteful fool", well he is certainly wasteful, but it doesn't necessarily mean is is also weak or a fool.

  6. Oh no... by jimmerz28 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope he didn't infringe on a copyrighted font for that project!

    1. Re:Oh no... by VolciMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope he didn't infringe on a copyrighted font for that project!

      He's using a Sands Serf font

    2. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't copyright a "font" in the sense of the actual appearance of the letters; just the "font" software itself.

    3. Re:Oh no... by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      Notice that he is using our alphabet, not the one used in Arabic.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    4. Re:Oh no... by blair1q · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Oh no... by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      At least he didn't use Papyrus.

    6. Re:Oh no... by pavon · · Score: 1

      I think the AC is saying the same thing as your link. The scalable font formats (like TrueType) are Turing complete programming languages, in the same way that postscript is. Thus those font files are often referred to as font programs or software, although that easy to misinterpret as meaning the software that renders the font files.

    7. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we use his numbers.

    8. Re:Oh no... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least it wasn't Comic Sands...

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:Oh no... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      However the text at that link also says that this is true only for the U.S., and in some places in Europe the typeface is copyrightable.

      Of course in this case, neither the U.S. nor the European right is relevant. But who knows the relevant Arabic copyright laws?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    10. Re:Oh no... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      He's almost saying the same thing.

      Non-scalable fonts are software, too. The distinction between data and instructions as "computer programs" is somewhat artificial.

      And, in some places, everything about typefaces is copyrightable. Which means they might as well be copyrightable everywhere, if your code that emits them doesn't know where not to.

    11. Re:Oh no... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      He's Phoenician?

    12. Re:Oh no... by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      You mean the ones invented in India (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals)? Yes. But the difference is that everybody in the west uses those numerals. OTOH, Arabs still use their own alphabet for almost everything.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    13. Re:Oh no... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      ITYM Indian.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Oh no... by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      The alphabet started in Phoenicia, but that only means that the Arabic alphabet and the Latin alphabet are cognates. The letters look very different, the direction of writing is opposite, etc. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_alphabet).

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    15. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jest, but this is a good opportunity to remind people that font faces as such cannot be copyrighted. Specific files (e.g. a TTF font) can be, but the shape itself cannot; the reason for this is that otherwise, everytime you used a font in a document, your document would be a derivative work of that font.

    16. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because it's the language God(tm) uses.

    17. Re:Oh no... by snowgirl · · Score: 2

      And we use his numbers.

      No, we use an "Arabic numeral" system, but the glyphs that they use are actually quite different from ours. I would include the numbers from 0-9 here, but I imagine that slashcode will maim it to the point of it being fruitless.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    18. Re:Oh no... by Decollete · · Score: 1

      At least it wasn't Comic Sands...

      Clippy: Did you mean Cosmic Sands?

    19. Re:Oh no... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      God® used Hebrew, and King James just translated it.

      Assuming you believe all that tripe.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    20. Re:Oh no... by metacell · · Score: 1

      The New Testament is written in Greek, and Jews/Christians don't believe the holy scriptures are written by God, only inspired by him.

    21. Re:Oh no... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The New Testament is written in Greek, and Jews/Christians don't believe the holy scriptures are written by God, only inspired by him.

      Not the old testament (which is common for jews and christians), and I would strongly disagree about "written by" and "inspired by", as MANY christians will flatly tell you it IS the word of god and man was just writting it down for him. MANY.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    22. Re:Oh no... by metacell · · Score: 1

      You're probably right about that. I guess there's a huge difference between what theologicians say and what the "Christian on the street" believes.

    23. Re:Oh no... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      It was written for King James, not by him.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    24. Re:Oh no... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I said: "King James just translated it." Just like my boss can say he installed several new servers, and anyone that isn't being pedantic would understand that he hired someone to do the work but it was at his direction, that he paid to have it done.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  7. Rename Post Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Largest reason for alternative energy visible from space.

    As if you needed another reason why the people getting our oil money are absolutely insane. Just look at Dubai.

    1. Re:Rename Post Title by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, I love it every time a sheikh does something extravagant like this because disgust at the wealth of non-American oil barons is the only thing that motivates US right-wingers into supporting alternative energy.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Rename Post Title by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Not true.
      Most "Right-Wingers" are fine with alternative energies as long as they make sense.
      Taking away cheap corn to feed people to put into your tank is stupid.
      Doing it when it is very expensive is worse.
      Using taxpayer money to subsidize the effort is something that the retarded can tell you is a really bad idea.

      As oil becomes more expensive and alternatives mature and become less expensive move in the market will take place.
      Trying to force the move by use of Government is a horrible idea.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    3. Re:Rename Post Title by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      True, I love it every time a sheikh does something extravagant like this because jealousy at the wealth of non-American oil barons is the only thing that motivates US right-wingers into supporting alternative energy.

      FTFY

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Rename Post Title by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like this is the only reason. These people are slavers and it's an outrage the west supports these regimes. I mean just read this article about Dubai :

      "It is an open secret that once you hire a maid, you have absolute power over her. You take her passport – everyone does; you decide when to pay her, and when – if ever – she can take a break; and you decide who she talks to. She speaks no Arabic. She cannot escape.

      In a Burger King, a Filipino girl tells me it is "terrifying" for her to wander the malls in Dubai because Filipino maids or nannies always sneak away from the family they are with and beg her for help. "They say – 'Please, I am being held prisoner, they don't let me call home, they make me work every waking hour seven days a week.'"

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    5. Re:Rename Post Title by Amouth · · Score: 1

      but using government to force oil companies (or any squatter) to either use or give up their patent rights to alternative energy methods would put a good dent in the problem.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:Rename Post Title by demonbug · · Score: 2

      True, I love it every time a sheikh does something extravagant like this because jealousy at the wealth of non-American oil barons is the only thing that motivates US right-wingers into supporting alternative energy.

      FTFY

      Obviously the disgust is for the fact that the oil barons are non-American, not for what they choose to do with their money.

    7. Re:Rename Post Title by couchslug · · Score: 1, Troll

      That's the local culture.

      Who are we to judge any of the areas outside EUSia?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Rename Post Title by enjerth · · Score: 1

      but using government to force oil companies (or any squatter) to either use or give up their patent rights to alternative energy methods would put a good dent in the problem.

      Or, recognizing that things move faster since the industrial age, shorten the lifespan of patents.

    9. Re:Rename Post Title by Medievalist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not true.
      Most "Right-Wingers" are fine with alternative energies as long as they make sense.
      Taking away cheap corn to feed people to put into your tank is stupid.
      Doing it when it is very expensive is worse.
      Using taxpayer money to subsidize the effort is something that the retarded can tell you is a really bad idea.

      Riddle me this then! Why did a "right wing" US administration create corn ethanol subsidies despite fervent opposition from every credible "green" organization on the planet? Are you saying Bush, Rove and Cheney are "left wing"? 'Cause I ain't buyin' that corn...

      I personally have participated in a letter-writing campaign opposing corn ethanol, and while it's true I was the only Republican I know that was involved, I can tell you that corn ethanol isn't a right/left issue or even a green/brown issue - it's a corporate pork issue, politicians from both parties favoring corporate short-term profit over long-term societal benefits.

      As oil becomes more expensive and alternatives mature and become less expensive move in the market will take place.

      There's several big problems with that.

      One is that oil is used for more than just fuel - it's an extremely important resource for lubrication, for example, and largely recyclable in that application. Since the market has been historically distorted to favor the exhaustion of oil resources, you've got the same problem you pointed out with corn ethanol; the US government's continuous intervention to keep oil prices artificially low has always been a really bad idea. Every US administration since Jimmy Carter has interfered with the oil market to prevent $10 a gallon gas, and that's why the free market has not already solved our oil addiction.

      Trying to force the move by use of Government is a horrible idea.

      That's not really true. Certainly corn ethanol subsidies (and farm subsidies in general, for any purpose other than national self-sufficiency) are a bad idea. You're absolutely right in that one specific context! But only government intervention (or civil war) can deal with the twin problems of corporate cost externalization and regulatory capture.

      As long as any organization is free to socialize costs and privatize profits, the major corporations will be driven by darwinian market forces to impose the cost of burning carcinogens and depleting critical resources on the bodies of the powerless. A properly structured capitalist market uses regulation to level the playing ground by imposing strict and fair standards on all players in a marketplace - for example, by making it illegal for me to secretly put addictive drugs in my food products, and by making it illegal for me to keep illegal Mexican immigrants as virtual slaves in meat-packing plants.

      The problem is not that our government imposes regulations, it's that our government is catastrophically corrupt, at nearly every level. During the last presidential campaign both major candidates rushed back to Washington to reward banks for failing to do business profitably, and to exempt telephone companies from prosecution for federal crimes. The problem is corruption and while the Obama adminstration is clearly smarter than the Bush administration, it doesn't seem to be any less corrupt.

    10. Re:Rename Post Title by ganhawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Who are we to judge any of the areas outside EUSia?

      We are humans. Being treated as slaves is not something any human would want to happen to them.

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
    11. Re:Rename Post Title by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the local culture.

      Who are we to judge any of the areas outside EUSia?

      It's called the universal declaration of human rights for a reason. Like the americans say "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights." This is actually one of the few achievements of western, and indeed human, culture worth fighting for.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    12. Re:Rename Post Title by Amouth · · Score: 1

      very true

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    13. Re:Rename Post Title by jojoba_oil · · Score: 0

      Thank you. If I saw your post before I dropped a comment on a previous thread, I would've mod'ed up.

    14. Re:Rename Post Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem fairly intelligent and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
      No riddle is needed. Most "Right-Wingers" are not politicians.
      Most "Politicians" should be murdered in front of their families and any who wish to enter politics.

      Yes. Government should have a limited role in our lives.
      National defense, Control of the borders, Regulating commerce (To stop Monopolies from using their position unfairly and to ensure safety), and making sure that all those under the care and protection of "The United States of America" have an equal opportunity at pursuing happiness.

      What government seems to do is ... Fight badly and late while ignoring real national defense problems, Regulate EVERYTHING TO DEATH, Subsidize your pals, and pass laws that attempt to guarantee that everyone gets to be a little happy (Lazy bastard or not) by limiting the happiness of those who work for it.

      Governments is too involved in our lives.

      Mostly though you seem to have a good grasp on what is wrong and what direction we need to move in.

    15. Re:Rename Post Title by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I've been told that we cannot police the world. I've been told that America must not project its power, culture, and philosophy. To do so isn't politically correct and that all cultures are of equal value. As such, we should scuttle the US Navy and send out troops home. All money and power should be given to Hollywood and the Ivory Tower elites. How DARE YOU question their nuanced and sophisticated intelligence! -end sarcasm-

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    16. Re:Rename Post Title by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Look up "Cairo declaration of human rights on Islam", and particularly its history and relation to UDHR.

    17. Re:Rename Post Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, what about Vietnam then? you treated people there not as slaves, but as napalm targets..

    18. Re:Rename Post Title by metacell · · Score: 1

      I don't think all cultures are of equal value, but I think we should think twice before pushing our culture on others, or we may end up doing more harm than good.

    19. Re:Rename Post Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is an open secret that once you hire a maid, you have absolute power over her. You take her passport – everyone does; you decide when to pay her, and when – if ever – she can take a break; and you decide who she talks to. She speaks no Arabic. She cannot escape."

      Sounds... interesting. Can you also have sex with her?

  8. Chairface Chippendale? by XanC · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before this guy buys the world's biggest laser and writes his name on the moon. http://www.popgunchaos.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/chairface-moon.jpg

  9. 1,000 meters high by pahles · · Score: 1

    I sure hope there are warning lights mounted on top, to warn the airplanes...

    --
    Sig?
  10. The Bedouin Hillbillies by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    Come on, granny, we're trading in our goats for a flashy island! This oil's gonna let us spend our money in ways so obscene and ridiculous that no one will ever guess that that we're really just bedouin trash that can't read and write!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The Bedouin Hillbillies by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

      Uh, what? This is photographic evidence they can write.

      Of course, it does seem to take a lot of them a very long time and some heavy machinery to complete one word...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:The Bedouin Hillbillies by retroworks · · Score: 2

      Interestingly, the bedoins of Saudi Arabia really are the equivalent of "Ozark Hillbilly" in Muslim history. The most backward and least educated of Islamic culture, by sheer luck, struck the oil (but did not move to Beverly). American images of Islam are, in a way, as inaccurate as if Jethro Clampett were the popular image of Western Culture. If the Beverly Hillbillies really had struck billion dollar oil, we'd probably be dealing with Jihadist Pentacostals. Osama Bin Laden with corncob pipe. And the Buffalo River, twisted into the name "JED", would be visible from space.

      --
      Gently reply
    3. Re:The Bedouin Hillbillies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, the bedoins of Saudi Arabia really are the equivalent of "Ozark Hillbilly" in Muslim history. The most backward and least educated of Islamic culture, by sheer luck, struck the oil (but did not move to Beverly). American images of Islam are, in a way, as inaccurate as if Jethro Clampett were the popular image of Western Culture. If the Beverly Hillbillies really had struck billion dollar oil, we'd probably be dealing with Jihadist Pentacostals. Osama Bin Laden with corncob pipe. And the Buffalo River, twisted into the name "JED", would be visible from space.

      s/Pentacostal/Baptist/

    4. Re:The Bedouin Hillbillies by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's photographic evidence that he can afford to hire someone who can write. He didn't dig that himeslf.

  11. The actual location on Google Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here it is.

    1. Re:The actual location on Google Maps by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Seriously? He did it UPSIDE DOWN?!

      What a maroon.

      And according to the scale on that map, it's only about 600 meters by 1 mile.

    2. Re:The actual location on Google Maps by meloneg · · Score: 1

      He really should have gone to the trouble to do it right-side-up.

      BTW, if you zoom out a few steps, you can see a work-in-progress version. It's a little clearer on the US version of gmaps.

    3. Re:The actual location on Google Maps by nschubach · · Score: 1

      All that planning and he didn't even get it right side up?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:The actual location on Google Maps by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      Maybe a bastard product of an unholy union between rtl Arabic and ltr Latin scripts...

    5. Re:The actual location on Google Maps by metacell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what an idiot. The letters should OBVIOUSLY be written so we can look at them from satellite, instead of so they can be viewed from the nearest city.

      After all, he did write them for geeks on Slashdot, didn't he?

    6. Re:The actual location on Google Maps by metacell · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, are you American?

      I'd like to know if I can put it on my list of American quotes...

  12. In 2000 years ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    In 2000 years people will have violent disputes whether this was a message to god, or a message to extraterrestrial visitors, saying "welcome" or "land here".
    And some will say the extraterrestrials were the gods.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:In 2000 years ... by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      This is written in sand. In 2000 years, if it's visible at all, it's probably read "Dowap".

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    2. Re:In 2000 years ... by Hermanas · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the violent disputes from those who claim the message is from God (an ancient Thetan, perhaps)...

    3. Re:In 2000 years ... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1, Informative

      Those Dubai artificial "World" islands are already sinking back into the sea and they're what, 3 years old now ? I doubt this'll last 50 years beyond the arrogant asshole's death.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  13. Good thing by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

    Good thing he didn't try to spell out his entire name. He'd run out of desert. Besides, if you look this up in Google Maps, you can read "Futaisi Island" right next to it and it didn't cost a thing.

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
  14. Obligatory Shelley quote by cthlptlk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ozymandias
    I met a traveller from an antique land
    Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
    Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
    Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
    And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
    Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
    Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
    The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
    And on the pedestal these words appear:
    `My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
    Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
    Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
    Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
    The lone and level sands stretch far away".

    1. Re:Obligatory Shelley quote by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      A very ambiguous one, that.

      Was Ozymandias, king of kings, a narcissistic asshole who hopelessly overestimated the duration of his pitiful little civilization, and who intended the "mighty" to despair in the face of his superior might? Or was a a forward-thinking sort of chap who urged the "mighty" of the era reading the inscription to despair when they looked upon the oblivion that had become of his civilization and considered the likely fate of their own?

      Either way, the Sheikh is a dumbass.

    2. Re:Obligatory Shelley quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Always loved that poem. The double meaning really makes it.

      It was written in competition with Horace Smith, whose poem is more forgettable:

      In Egypt's sandy silence, all alone,
      Stands a gigantic Leg, which far off throws
      The only shadow that the Desert knows:
      "I am great OZYMANDIAS," saith the stone,
      "The King of Kings; this mighty City shows
      "The wonders of my hand." The City's gone,
      Nought but the Leg remaining to disclose
      The site of this forgotten Babylon.
      We wonder, and some Hunter may express
      Wonder like ours, when thro' the wilderness
      Where London stood, holding the Wolf in chace,
      He meets some fragments huge, and stops to guess
      What powerful but unrecorded race
      Once dwelt in that annihilated place.

    3. Re:Obligatory Shelley quote by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes.

      That's why it's a famous poem.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Obligatory Shelley quote by metacell · · Score: 1

      I've always assumed Ozymandias intended the first meaning, but the visitor can read the second meaning into it if they wish. I.e, Ozymandias unwittingly created an ironic statement on his own might.

    5. Re:Obligatory Shelley quote by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Entropy is really a PITA.

    6. Re:Obligatory Shelley quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't seen that full quote before. It puts the inscription in a totally different context.

  15. Needs appended ... by drpimp · · Score: 1

    WAS HERE!

    --
    -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    1. Re:Needs appended ... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      WAS HERE!

      How about "sucks"?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Needs appended ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I think he'd hesitate to write "was here" :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Needs appended ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "place a comma between the A and the M", as suggested by a comment under TFA.

  16. Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by Normal+Dan · · Score: 1

    Maybe I don't know enough about Arab culture, but I find it a bit strange that the letters are all from the Roman alphabet.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    1. Re:Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by straponego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Astronauts don't read Arabic. He should have written it in... Cyrillic? Mandarin?

    2. Re:Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian. Duh!

    3. Re:Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      All those curves in the arab letters would've made the project infinitely more complex. Latin block letters are nice and easy though, just straight canals.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    4. Re:Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's going to read it in Arabic? Only a handful of those camel fuckers are literate at all. If you want people to read it, you write it in English.

    5. Re:Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Hence the Cyrillic

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    6. Re:Shouldn't this be in the Arabic alphabet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a lot more complex, but it would have looked a hell of a lot better, those block letters look ugly.

  17. Did nobody tell him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that it's upside-down? Check out the google maps view: http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&t=k&ll=24.34328445750892,54.32608366012573&z=16

    1. Re:Did nobody tell him... by metacell · · Score: 1

      Because obviously, he intended it to be read through satellite images by people in other countries, not from the nearest city.

  18. No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by engineerofsorts · · Score: 2

    This HAMAD thing looks to be old news compared with the Lueke ranch--check on googlemaps or googleearth for Smithville, Texas, and pan north a bit.

    --
    Life is tough. Life is even tougher when you're stupid.
    1. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly spent at least 8 minutes scrolling around slightly north of Smithville and I couldn't see anything.

      Finally I zoom out a bit and BAM, huge fucking word out of nowhere.

    2. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      Here is a google maps link. Much larger.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=30.08588,-97.136478&spn=0.108876,0.209255

      That's cool an' all, but stick with the program American. Sheik HAMAD - and that name sounds a lot like Sheik MAD MAN - Sheik HAMAD has the oil. Our oil.

      He's taking our money and he's a spending it on fancy parking lots. Do you like fancy parking lots?

    4. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by ahecht · · Score: 1

      Caterpillar (the bulldozer company) used to have their logo carved in the dessert at their proving grounds west of Phoenix, AZ. Unfortunately, that area is now a housing development, and the logo is no longer visible.

    5. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      "Hamad" and "mad man" sound nothing alike.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    6. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least the Luekes got it 90 degrees closer to upright. The HAMAD is upside down.

      captcha: 'fortune'

    7. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by DrKyle · · Score: 1

      But it is so much easier to cut down trees and leave letters remaining than it is to dig a very big hole in the ground.

    8. Re:No big deal--check out the LUEKE ranch by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I carve my name in dessert all the time. Ice cream works well.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  19. Re:Write it on the Moon? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Launch and series of charcoal power filled probes at the Moon and writing his name in dot matrix letters.

  20. Love the use of mixed units by shreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    " Measuring 1,000 meters high and two miles long,"

    Other interesting facts
    It took 3 fortnights to build
    The length of all the letters is 2.3 leagues
    The entire name can hold 1000 mega hogsheads of seawater
    The estimated cost of the monument is 500 Million Drachmars

    1. Re:Love the use of mixed units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, for a mod point! ;)

    2. Re:Love the use of mixed units by Intropy · · Score: 1

      I can't fathom how deep it must be if they expect it to last even a decasaeculum.

    3. Re:Love the use of mixed units by thygate · · Score: 1

      Well, from google maps, the thing is ~1.2km by 500m, so nothing close to 1,000 km ... somebody switched the decimal symbol perhaps ?

    4. Re:Love the use of mixed units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My narcissistic sand art gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I like it.

    5. Re:Love the use of mixed units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us still on the imperial system:

      It took a month and a half to build.
      The length of all the letters is 41,925 feet.
      I have no idea what a mega hogshead is and neither does google.
      The estimated cost of the monument is $2 million USD.

    6. Re:Love the use of mixed units by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that it is visible from up to 500,000 fathoms above.

      That said, how many dozens is in that "mega" of yours?

    7. Re:Love the use of mixed units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your google-fu must be weak, mega=1,000,000 and Google tells me a hogshead=52.4584519 Imperial gallons, therefore the entire name can hold 52458451900 imperial gallons of seawater.

      And I didn't realise the USD was an imperial unit.

  21. North is ... which way? by GoNINzo · · Score: 2

    http://maps.google.com/?ll=24.344281,54.333744&spn=0.042071,0.092869&t=h&z=14 He somehow managed to write it upside down too. Whoops.

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:North is ... which way? by Intropy · · Score: 1

      He's always pandering to the Australians.

    2. Re:North is ... which way? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, he wrote it for the Australians.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:North is ... which way? by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      For a sphere floating in outer space, what is the universal reference for "up"?

    4. Re:North is ... which way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you see, the way the water connects and highlights the first part of the name, if it were flipped "MAD" would be highlighted.

      And you wouldn't want anyone to think you were crazy after making a project like this, right?

    5. Re:North is ... which way? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine it's related to the direction the sphere rotates, or in which it orbits.

    6. Re:North is ... which way? by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Well, given that the whole point was a vanity attempt to have his name show up on satellite photos, he should've considered that in most representations, those photos follow the convention which is north up.

    7. Re:North is ... which way? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a rotating sphere, which singles out a certain axis in space. Therefore there are only two sensible directions to define "up". If using the ordinary definition of angular momentum, and declaring the direction it points to as "up", we get the usual up direction. Of course one could also use "left handed" coordinate systems, in which case the south direction would be "up".

      Note that this definition fixes the "up" direction of any rotating object in the universe.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:North is ... which way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is north up? Seems like it's just as valid the other way around.

    9. Re:North is ... which way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said north is at the top? This is just a convention.

      So says the guy from Australia.

  22. Writing Name in Snow by AioKits · · Score: 1

    Be slightly more impressed on several levels if someone could write their name in the snow so it is visible from space. Not sure I could drink that much water though...

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Writing Name in Snow by drpimp · · Score: 1

      Even more impressive would be yellow snow. ;-) I definitely don't recommend drinking/eating that!

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    2. Re:Writing Name in Snow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely! Doesn't the saying go: "Don't eat the yellow snow" ...

  23. From space? by durnurd · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that "visible from space" thing. Sure, anything is visible from space if you have a powerful enough lens, but even the Great Wall of China isn't visible from space to the naked eye, and even zooming out a little bit on the map shows how small it really is...

    --
    --Edward Dassmesser
    1. Re:From space? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      This. Hell, my car is visible from space on Google Maps if you zoom in far enough, doesn't really mean much. Whole thing is a giant PR stunt (yeah, I know, duh, I mean calling it "visible from space" when it quite clearly isn't), and it seems like it worked pretty well.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:From space? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that while labeled as "sattelite" that the higher quality imagary on google was aerial photography and quality drops significantly when you move to an area where they only have sattelite data.

      At least that is what it was like a few years back, i'm having trouble finding any such areas now (other than offshore but it's much harder to determine quality there).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  24. Visible From Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't pretty much everything visible from space?

    1. Re:Visible From Space by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Isn't pretty much everything visible from space?

      The center of the earth isn't.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Visible From Space by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      About half of space isn't, though it's not always the same half.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Didn't they do this on South Park? by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    I could swear I saw an episode where Cartman did this. Didn't I? Am I wrong? How?

    GOD DAMN YOU SHEIK HAMAD!!!

  26. Upside Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've only gone and done it upside down:

    http://goo.gl/ptrDV

    Do it again, and do it properly this time.

  27. "Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by FunkyELF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone wrote "Wash Me" on my car.
    Pretty sure that its visible from space as well.

    Lately visible from space doesn't really mean anything.

    1. Re:"Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wash Me?

      Try - "I wish my wife was this dirty"

    2. Re:"Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visible from space? Unlikely unless you're talking military hardware that the public will never see.

      You do realize most of the "satellite" imagery on sites like Google Maps are actually taken from a plane flying over, correct? It's only when you zoom out past a certain point that it shows the low resolution satellite imagery.

    3. Re:"Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by BetterSense · · Score: 1

      Even the military can't break the laws of physics. Diffraction limiting ensures that it's impossible to read "wash me" written on someone's car from space.

    4. Re:"Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? Aren't you making unstated assumptions about the aperture the military has? Can you say with absolute certainty that they don't have a 10m optical telescope in LEO? (Which would have a diffraction-limited resolution 1 inch.) Anyway, diffraction isn't your main issue for visible wavelengths, the atmospheric boundary layer fucks you over quite nicely. And conventional adaptive optics (relying on a reference star to measure atmospheric distortion) doesn't work from orbit looking down, though I suppose alternative solutions are possible.

    5. Re:"Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      Yea, there's no chance you'd see this from orbit with the unaided eye.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    6. Re:"Wash Me" on my car is visible from space by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      What if you had a voice activated display and kept saying "enhance" over and over?

  28. And What Are We Compensating For? by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How small does your penis have to be for this to compensate?

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
    1. Re:And What Are We Compensating For? by vlm · · Score: 2

      How small does your penis have to be for this to compensate?

      Naw, thats the guys who buy 5 mpg trucks and send him their gas money.

      Most likely they're compensating for having no arable land, and too much money floating around too many unemployed people.

      Its only funny because he's in another culture. Over there, he's probably laughing at our makework projects like "bridges to nowhere" etc.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:And What Are We Compensating For? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      How small does your penis have to be for this to compensate?

      Naw, thats the guys who buy 5 mpg trucks and send him their gas money.

      I think he has them beat too, from TFA:

      The Arab sheikh has a taste for doing things on a large scale. He built the world's largest truck - eight times the size of the Dodge Power Wagon, with four bedrooms inside the cabin.

    3. Re:And What Are We Compensating For? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Maybe the inverse? 1/1000= 1 millimeter?

  29. The larger the lettering -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --- the smaller the pencil

  30. I'm sure sombody died by alta · · Score: 1

    Once he realized that they wrote it upside down!!!!

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=uae+hamad&hl=en&ll=24.344281,54.325955&spn=0.013939,0.030899&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=49.223579,93.076172&t=h&z=16

    Or is that standard in Arabic, like right to left, or top to bottom writing...

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:I'm sure sombody died by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Who says North is up?

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    2. Re:I'm sure sombody died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says North is up?

      Odin.

  31. Of Morons and Mobsters by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

    In case you were wondering where a lot of the cash that gets gouged out of your wallet when you buy gas. It goes to mobsters who are so colossally unimaginative and dimwitted that their Big Idea is to carve their initials on the earth. Really, really big ones.

    1. Re:Of Morons and Mobsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent my money on a professional ball-washer.

  32. LOL, U MAD BRO? .. oh.. HAMAD.. Nevermind. by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 1

    That pretty much takes the wind out of my griefing sail.

  33. Ego! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People starve around the world and this tosser wastes how much money to satisfy his enormous ego, scum!

    1. Re:Ego! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not a vanity project. With a few dams & sluices he could use it to produce salt.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. What is it with these knuckleheads? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Saddam Hussein built the "Mother of all Battles" mosque, now called "Mother of all Cities." It was supposed to have an artificial lake and an island with the shape of his thumb - so big "God could see it from space." Don't know if they actually got around to making the island, tho the mosque is there.

    1. Re:What is it with these knuckleheads? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Saddam Hussein built the "Mother of all Battles" mosque, now called "Mother of all Cities." It was supposed to have an artificial lake and an island with the shape of his thumb - so big "God could see it from space." Don't know if they actually got around to making the island, tho the mosque is there.

      What? Was he planning to hitchhike to heaven?

    2. Re:What is it with these knuckleheads? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Saddam Hussein built the "Mother of all Battles" mosque, now called "Mother of all Cities." It was supposed to have an artificial lake and an island with the shape of his thumb - so big "God could see it from space." Don't know if they actually got around to making the island, tho the mosque is there.

      What? Was he planning to hitchhike to heaven?

      Sure. He knows that he won't get there the official way.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:What is it with these knuckleheads? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what is it with "these knuckleheads"?

      I mean its completely different from when a Texas rancher carves his named out in the forest on his ranch 3 miles long so that its visible from space.

      And I'm sure only crazy people would carve a mountain into a memorial of its leaders right?

      Ironically, it was never finished due to lack of funding, so only the heads were done. This is what it was supposed to end up like.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gutzon_Borglum's_model_of_Mt._Rushmore_memorial.jpg

      I just strikes me as odd that we have so much contempt for the arrogance and hubris of anyone else does something big and pointless, while taking fierce pride in our own equally "big and pointless" endeavors.

    4. Re:What is it with these knuckleheads? by GeekZilla · · Score: 1

      Well, remember, you are comparing some of the most revered people in United States history with some guy who just has a lot of money. What did Hamad do that would justify such a monument? And usually, monuments are erected by future generations as a tribute to someone. This is just some rich knucklehead who was bored.

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
  35. In other words... by jongalbreath · · Score: 1

    Man with world's smallest penis writes name in world's biggest letters.

  36. Eco friendly version (in trees) by kfsone · · Score: 1
    --
    -- A change is as good as a reboot.
    1. Re:Eco friendly version (in trees) by city · · Score: 1

      Ha, I doesn't look like he planted trees to make this one to me. Looks more like clearcutting. Not very eco friendly.

      --
      I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
  37. Poor font choice by bdkraem · · Score: 2

    He should have used Comic Sans.

  38. Units Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Measuring 1,000 meters high and two miles long,

    And thus the /. editors reached "measurements and units fuck up" nirvana.

  39. And they still got his name wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither the article nor the summary didn't even spell his name right. It is Hamad Bin Hamdan Al Nahyan not "Ahyan".

    I kinda see what drove him to do this.

    1. Re:And they still got his name wrong by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Neither the article nor the summary didn't even spell his name right. It is Hamad Bin Hamdan Al Nahyan not "Ahyan".

      I kinda see what drove him to do this.

      How's that? By reminding everybody of the right way to spell the part of his name they already get right? That's almost as absurd as the old Get Smart joke with "The Claw".

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  40. He got duped - Only 500m high by 1 mile long by Clifton+Beach · · Score: 1

    ...according to the Google Maps measuring tool.
    Or in real measurements, 500m high by 1.7km long.

    --
    42 hidden comments
  41. I know this insn't the most insightful comment by liquidweaver · · Score: 1

    The first thing that came into my head - "What a douchebag"

    --
    mov ah, 4ch
    int 21h
  42. Time for the Hamads of the world to rise up! by Grymlorde · · Score: 1

    Time for the Hamads of the world to rise up!

  43. Or feed the poor.. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Or he could have, I don't know, fed the desperately poor people in his country...

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Or feed the poor.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Emirati aren't poor. Not even close. They got jobs in the government. A house when they marry. Wherever educational costs they have paid for. They are also less than 10% of the UAE population.

      The millions of poor workers from the Subcontinent? Ah, that's another story...

  44. Douche.bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too much money, zero class

  45. Wow- Nazca? by way2trivial · · Score: 2

    Not a single post mentioning the nazca lines?

    It's been DONE BEFORE! even before there were satellites to see it...

    1500 years before!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_lines

    all of ya, turn in yer nerd cards now..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  46. Let's get this right by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 1

    Using the Google Maps ruler lab, it's:

    1.67km (1.04mi) long
    494m (1621ft) wide

    Nowhere near as large as the summary makes it out to be.

  47. Compensating by gubers33 · · Score: 1

    I thought along those lines, but I thought more along the lines that he was compensating for something smaller he had.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  48. Here's the google maps link by wikdwarlock · · Score: 0

    Shortened to this: http://goo.gl/E8WJI

    --

    "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
  49. Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now everybody can see, even from space, what a pathetic ego this moron has got.

  50. A waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste of time and money...

  51. You can't find good "help" these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "H" and "A" looks good, but everything from the "M" on looks like crap. Sand washed in, and it looks rough. He should definitely "take it up" with his "employees".

  52. "Preacher" comic anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the "Preacher" comic. The part where a man in the desert wrote some text in order to be visible from the space shuttle... (much funnier than "Hamad" by the way..)

  53. Not done in weeks. (Google knows all) by Beorytis · · Score: 5, Informative

    On Google Earth, I checked image history at the area (Coordinates 2420'39.79"N, 5419'38.43"E) and found:

    Jul 13, 2004: Nothing

    Oct 7 2005: H, most of A

    Sept 12, 2007: HA, part of MAD

    Jul 13, 2009, All letters excavated, but water not in MAD yet.

  54. Space Douche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After thinking about the money wasted on this I can further understand what fueled the Arab Spring.

  55. What a douche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The palm tree sandbar island thing was cool. This is just douche-baggery at its finest.

    1. Re:What a douche by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      At least it's not a giant Ed Hardy shirt.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
  56. 1/2 Scale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I measured the letters in Google Maps and they appear to be only 1 mile wide from the H to the D and about 500 meters "tall". So either the article is wrong or my Maps measuring tool is off by 1/2.

  57. Lazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There used to be a time when people spent their resources on things like giant pyramids. This is pretty weak if you ask me...clearly an example of the start of the downfall of man....

  58. HA -- MAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the way the "HA" part is filled with blue water, and the "MAD" part is filled with sediment-filled/brown water.

    Nicely sums it up.

  59. visible from space by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Um, the license number on my car is "visible from space" if you use the right satellite. Can we retire this phrase now?

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  60. Hamad's neighbor by mswhippingboy · · Score: 2

    If I was Hamad's neighbor, I'd pay my team to write "<-- is a dumbass".

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    1. Re:Hamad's neighbor by sjames · · Score: 1

      Where's the art in that? Clearly this calls for one of those Calvin peeing things.

    2. Re:Hamad's neighbor by Geminii · · Score: 1

      "<-- I'm with stupid"

  61. Everything's Bigger in Texas by JoeD · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Everything's Bigger in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That shack outside La Grange!

    2. Re:Everything's Bigger in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth can you decide that "LUEKE" is larger then "HAMAD", just judging from google maps the characters seem to be almost exactly the same size, perhaps the fount used in LUEKE is slightly wider. Measuring with a ruler on my screen, LUEKE is roughly 1 km x 3 km and HAMAD is 1 km x 2.3 km and the difference in length is mostly from different kerning (both that the all character stand closer to each other in HAMAD and that the white space in the A:s require surrounding characters to stand closer). On the other hand, if you also measure the surrounding channel system around HAMAD (likely made to fill the characters with water), then HAMAD is clearly larger in both length and width.

    3. Re:Everything's Bigger in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth can you decide that "LUEKE" is larger then "HAMAD", just judging from google maps the characters seem to be almost exactly the same size

      You're comparing them at different zoom levels, dimwit.

      Side-by-side, rotated 180 degrees (South is up), at the same zoom level this time:
      http://ompldr.org/vOWtpMw/Untitled.png

      (Note that since LUEKE is ~6 degrees farther north of the equator than HAMAD, even at the same zoom level the scale is slightly different due to the warping produced by representing a sphere on a flat map. But not by enough to matter very much, and Google's scale meter at the bottom adjusts to reflect it.)

    4. Re:Everything's Bigger in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And funnily enough, that was spelled with trees, not concrete.

  62. That's Nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  63. Wrong font by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have done it in Comic Sans.

  64. Re:Not done in weeks. (Google knows all) by LibRT · · Score: 1

    Given the nature of the project, they might as well have skipped the "HA"...

  65. Re:Not done in weeks. (Google knows all) by yurtinus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh come on now, don't pretend you wouldn't if you could. Only difference is I'd throw down the extra cost to add "wuz here"

    --
    +1 Disagree
  66. The Cost . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article ends: "It is not known how much it cost to make."

    Today that should be: "It is not known how many jobs the Sheik's project created."

  67. I guess he's not a programmer... by BlogTheHaggis · · Score: 1

    ... because then we would have a 10 km "Hello World!" visible from space

  68. Cryptic advice to Hamad Bin Hamdan Al Ahyan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    life Hamad a Get. (anag 4 words)

  69. Vanity Desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Did you check out that vanity desert I got my boy for his sweet 16?"

  70. He is not the President of the Emirates. by mano.m · · Score: 1

    Nor is his personal fortune 'second only to the King of Saudi Arabia'. Has the Daily Mail been tipped off about Wikipedia yet?

    --
    Karma fed to this user will be promptly burnt. Be warned; be wary.
  71. Re:Wow- Nazca? by GameMaster · · Score: 1

    A real nerd would know that all the BS about Nazca only being visible from the air/space has been debunked long ago.

    --

    Rules of Conduct:
    #1 - The DM is always right.
    #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  72. Why is it in Roman Alphabet by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    and not in Arabic script?

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Why is it in Roman Alphabet by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It is so that people who ultimately paid for this - yes, you too, dear American slashdotter - could properly enjoy it.

  73. Re:Meters and miles? - to walk.... by brindafella · · Score: 1

    > 1,000 meters high and two miles long...

    Yes, and I wonder how much time it would take the Sheik to walk around that, say at a rate of 2,245 furlongs per fortnight?

    What?????

    Well:
    a. a man's walking pace is "3.5 miles per hour" (a woman's is 3 mph) = 5.6 kilometers per hour (f: 4.8);
    b. but, as this is sand, I estimate the actual rate is 2/3 (66.66%) = 3.733 kph (f: 3.2);
    c. the letters measure approximately 21 km around the outside (not including the middle of the As or D);
    * If the H is 1,000m high, then the upper oblique strokes of the As, M and D are ~1,000m when the cross-over is taken into account;
    * the under-part of the A is ~1,000m;
    * the curve of the D is ~1,600m -- think of half a circle;
    * take into account the 'joining pieces' between the letters...
    d. a furlong per fortnight is ~1.663^-4 metres/second, so walking pace is ~2,245 furlong per fortnight;

    Hence, at walking pace, in sand, the seemingly spritely 63 year old Hamad would take about 5.6 hours to walk from beach to beach at the top of the H, and (although I can find no mention of her) his wife might get there in about 6.6 hours.

    If he had a hard walkway constructed, it would take around 3.75 hours (4.4hrs).

    However, he'd probably drive.

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
  74. Re:Not done in weeks. (Google knows all) by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    If I could do that. And had a palace near a suitable place, as this guy does.

    I'd write "LAND HERE"

  75. There goes the neighborhood--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paint over that graffiti soon, or next it'll be broken windows and stolen bycicles.

  76. Claim checks on society: Buffet by crazyvas · · Score: 1
    Warren Buffet's quote below seems very relevant here:

    I don't have a problem with guilt about money. The way I see it is that my money represents an enormous number of claim checks on society. It's like I have these little pieces of paper that I can turn into consumption. If I wanted to, I could hire 10,000 people to do nothing but paint my picture every day for the rest of my life. And the GDP would go up. But the utility of the product would be zilch, and I would be keeping those 10,000 people from doing AIDS research, or teaching, or nursing. I don't do that though. I don't use very many of those claim checks. There's nothing material I want very much. And I'm going to give virtually all of those claim checks to charity when my wife and I die. (Lowe 1997:165–166)

  77. Someone can't measure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's ruler measures it at just on 500m high and 1.66 km (Just barely over a mile) long.
    That's only a quarter of how big the story says it is.

  78. Dubai was a yuppie dream by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The entire idea behind all of Dubai's development from a western point of view was to gain a tax paradise to avoid paying taxes made on money "earned" in the west. Dubai itself had little else to offer, it is not the place the money making itself happens and it is to far away to even do business deals in. To islamic too, who wants to do a business deal if you can't have drinks after wards? Dubai is extremely Islamic and while they allowed some alcohol they also introduced mandatory dry spells. Not what you want when showing a potential client around.

    When money was growing on trees, yuppies had pipe dreams of being able to move all financial trade somewhere were the tax man couldn't touch them... how realistic it all was is simple to see. Did Warren Buffet invest in it? No? Then it wasn't viable. This truly was poor rich man's dream. What is a poor rich man? A man who has enough money that he shouldn't have to worry about money anymore but still does. Buffet is not one of them, to him it is just a way of keeping score and he has long pledged to simply donate his score card upon his death. He lives in a fairly ordinary house, spending a fairly ordinary amount of money and thinks taxes for the rich should be INCREASED.

    Dubai was for the likes of that british old far magician, made his fortune under a tax supported umbrella, then runs when it is his turn to pay.

    I have had dealing with Dubai myself and the culture there is very intresting, they got ZERO local knowledge, even simple knowledge on how to spend money. If Dubai had been less ambitious and simply build up slow like the asian tigers did including some real production to at least have something of a normal economy it might have worked. It wouldn't be the first time a city sprang up out of nowwhere.

    But they basically wanted to create a massive monaco and wallstreet in one. Guess, what, those roles are filled. And neither Monaco or Wall Street got to deal with insane Islamic law.

    What is even more intresting if you want an insight into the true nature of Islam is to see how much money Dubai spends on say the current famine affecting muslims in Africa... or the flooding in Pakistan... suddenly all that money seems to flow a lot more slowly.

    Yuppies in the sand.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  79. Re:Not done in weeks. (Google knows all) by cwtrex · · Score: 1

    Just in case someone is actually looking for a link to take them straight to the location in Google maps: http://maps.google.com/maps?...

  80. How to Monetize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a shrewd business move. Depending on where the water rests, I see advertising revenue from the AMA, "Mad Men", and the United Ham Council.

  81. Erosion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! Erosion!

  82. Basic English by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    Do you see where I wrote "a lot of them"? This is called a "plural", which is used in a situation where more than one person or thing is involved. Since one person is not more than one, the use of a plural makes it obvious to the astute reader that "he didn't dig that himself".

    In short: "Whoosh!"

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    1. Re:Basic English by sjames · · Score: 1

      Unless you are also sure he hired exclusively Bedouins to do the work, it really says nothing, so whoosh right back.

  83. And done again . . . .and again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/12/13/1165685690455.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

    Just north of the Melbourne-Perth standard track way back then - seems to have been relaimed by Ma Nature, as I can't find it (It was about Caiguna.

    Ah, tempes fugit

  84. Re:Wow- Nazca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is somewhat bigger than any single of those Nazca images, this is also somewhat more labour intensive to create.

  85. Yeah, ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of kids write their names on some freight trains, get busted, and all of the sudden are facing federal charges.. This cocksucker, just because he can afford to "commission" his work, gets nothing but a pat on the back.

    Fuck capitalism, and fuck Hamad.

    Fucking punk ass mark ass bitch ass trick.

  86. Arabic vs Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odd that he didn't use Arabic.

  87. In the name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it amusing that he used western letters for this instead of proper Arabic. Clearly he understood who was likely to be looking down on it. Pathetic...

  88. fuck hamad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone really needs to write FUCK right above it.

  89. Look-alike by handshake,+doctor · · Score: 1

    Is it me or does this guy look like W in a sheik costume?