Slashdot Mirror


Razer Announces Dedicated Gaming Laptop

An anonymous reader writes "After recently running a full-page ad in the WSJ saying, 'PC gaming is not dead,' Razer has now announced a new laptop, the Blade, for the express purpose of playing video games. Its most distinctive feature is what they call the 'Switchblade' UI, which is an area next to the keyboard that has a multi-touch LCD screen and 10 dynamic keys. The screen can receive and display information from games, and the keys can show unique icons particular to the game you're playing. The requisite hardware for a gaming laptop makes it weigh almost seven pounds, but it's less than an inch thick. Another distinctive feature is the price — at $2,800, they price a lot of gamers right out of the market. As the article says, 'It's a gamble, but an exciting one.'"

140 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. PC gaming is not dead, by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but "gaming laptops" where never alive. The concept is kind of silly given the rate at which gamers upgrade hardware and how static a notebooks configuration is.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      Who cares about that?
      They apparently made a highend quality PC with a decent design, and something which has no marked yet.
      That alone deserves a large salute.

    2. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by chill · · Score: 1

      Which is absurd. The only thing you really need to upgrade is the graphics card every now and then.

      Which games are 64-bit and can (and do) take advantage of more than 4 Gb of RAM? Do they sell machines with less any more?

      I haven't bumped into a lot of games that really tax my CPU if it is relatively recent. Just buy a good one for the initial machine and let it sit for 3-5 years until you actually do replace the whole machine.

      Graphics cards are a different story. When the cycle come around and some new top-end card is released, the price drops on all the others. It is a great time to buy last year's top-end card. And if you stick with the same chipset maker (nVidia or ATI) you probably won't have anything more to do than pop out the old card and pop in the new one. Unified drivers make it that simple.

      Swapping the graphics card is massively simpler than replacing all your software and stuff because you got a whole new machine.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      It's only silly if your definition of a "gamer" necessarily involves "graphics whore," a lot of disposable income, and only playing the latest games. Which I'd suggest is a silly definition.

      I have a laptop with a Core i5-450M and a GeForce 310M. Far from cutting edge even when I bought it, but I play plenty of games on it. It handled New Vegas fine. Definitely not at top-level graphics, bushes were visible at a mile instead of ten miles or whatever. But for my budget, it works better than the 360.

    4. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      I concur.

      My wife and I built gaming machines right after the Core 2 Duo e8400 hit it big. Last year we really wanted to upgrade our computers, but we took a look at the current state of the art, and determined that unless we wanted to spend many hundreds (each) to get the top-of-the-line i7 extreme edition cpus, the current crop of cpus were no faster at gaming than what we had.

      So we just doubled our ram and replaced our GTS 8800 512s with GTX 470s. Later on we got 28" 1920x1200 monitors and razer mice. Those last three upgrades have done more for our gaming enjoyment than a mobo/cpu upgrade ever could. CPU work-per-clock has been almost stuck in neutral since the core 2 chips came out. They just keep adding more cores.

      The overclocking ability on the i5 2500k is finally making me think about upgrading... but just thinking about it, it's certainly not necessary. It's not that much faster for gaming than what I already have.

      note, I understand that it would speed the hell up out of my video transcodes, etc. I'm speaking gaming only.

    5. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but gaming rigs are hitting the plateau that office PCs hit years ago. I'm still running a pair of GTX 260 video cards from back in the day and an old quad-core AMD processor and I can max out the graphics quality settings on most games no problem at 1920x1080. That's going to be true for just about ever PC game as long as publishers are cranking out the same titles for both PC and consoles. I could build a new gaming rig with killer specs but it wouldn't make my games any better. Maybe if I wanted to set up a triple-head 30" display combo but that'd really be pushing for an excuse to spend money.

    6. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Next time get an SSD. Probably a bigger improvement than doubling the ram.

    7. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by vux984 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And I'd seriously buy one tomorrow if the touchpad was in the center instead of the right side...see Razer, I'm left handed... and precision mousing is like handwriting, drawing, pointing... I can use a mouse offhand for point-and-click stuff... but gaming? Sure I'll play you offhand... if you do too.

      Too be fair they do have some abidextrous stuff and a left handed death adder which is actually not complete garbage... so they aren't the worst company, but a lot (although not all) of the RH only stuff could be ambidextrous with just a bit more effort.

      The blade for example, could possibly have been engineered to let the end user swap the places of the keypad and mouse.... its a $2800 laptop, a few bucks to support this wouldn't have broken the bank. And it might have boosted sales by another 10%...

    8. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      I actually, completely disagree. I bought an Asus "Gamer" laptop, 2 weeks ago. The thing is a BEAST. But, if my desktop is ANY indication, it is future proof enough, I won't have to replace it for 4+ years.

      The tech has changed. We are not seeing the crazy upgrade cycles we used to, unless you have some SERIOUS money to spend on BLEEDING edge components.

      Maybe in a few years, there will be enough market penetration to get this thing down in price, and an updated model will be my next machine. Oh, and where is the SSD drive!? :-)

    9. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      I have an Acer 6920g, it plays lots of modern and recent games, and if you've played games you'd know that movement is mostly achieved with the WSAD keys.

      On this model, the touchpad IS in the center, and I'm forever brushing it with the right side of my left palm, causing my aim to swing blindly. I, among many gamers, who are the people who are going to buy this machine, would definitely prefer to have the touchpad to the right, enabling more natural postures and higher kill rates...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    10. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Or you could just press the button that disables the touchpad?

      Or does yours not have one?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      And you know what's funny? They're actually charging MORE than Apple for a similarly-specced laptop. 2.8ghz dual i7 vs 2.2ghz quad i7, 320GB drive vs 750GB drive, the video cards are roughly equivalent, although Razer does have the advantage of 2GB of memory. Still, that probably won't give you much advantage over 1GB as the GPUs themselves aren't all that fast to begin with.

      When you're actually charging MORE for specs than Apple then maybe it's time to reevaluate your business strategy.

    12. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that the creators of AlienWare would respectably disagree. They make quite a business of cramming desktop parts into mobile cases and powering them from a battery which lasts about 20 minutes.

      The fact is there are plenty of people out there who need to have only the one PC and don't want to give up their gaming life as a result. This is quite common for many Uni students living on campus in tiny little boxes, and my experience with hosting/admin medium sized LAN parties (biggest was 150 people) is that over the last 5-10 years the percentage of people bringing a laptop to a LAN party has steadily increased.

      It's still small but it could be a viable market.

      Especially when you look at this thing. Most gaming PCs are massive monstrosities weighing only slightly less than their desktop counterparts. This one here may have some real appeal.

    13. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by TekJannsen · · Score: 1

      I used to think so as well, however:

      1) The vast majority of titles today are developed for consoles that are 5-6 years old. Today's gaming laptops will be able to handle these games equally or better than their console brethren for a long time, and the upgrade cycle is much longer than it used to be.

      2) When the time comes when you need to genuinely upgrade your graphics card, it's probably a good time to upgrade everything else in your system as well. Getting a new system upgrades everything all at once.

      3) Some laptops (Sager) are actually built to be user-upgradeable.

      4) Laptops offer obvious portability advantages, even if it weighs a ton. I can't even count the number of times I've moved my laptop from my main gaming desk/monitor setup to my living room and hooked it up to my home theater system to play console-style on my plasma. Having a blu-ray drive is icing on the cake.

      5) Having a battery plugged in has saved me from power outages on a few occasions.

    14. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 2

      To be fair, they're targetting serious gamers, a market Apple gave up on back in the 1900s.

    15. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The i5-2500K won't do anything for your gaming, as long as you've got 4 cores already. 4 cores is really starting to be useful for games, though.

      That said, I have an i5-2500K clocked at 4.89GHz, and DAMN does it encode fast. Standard profile H.264 at nearly 200FPS for DVD resolution. It'll hold about 20FPS for high profile 1080p.

      I also agree... get an SSD for your boot/main drive. That'll make everything on the machine snappy. I put my steam folder on spinning media, though. I may have to upgrade to a Z68 mobo with an SSD for caching one of these days, though.

    16. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Most things about a PC that feel "slow" any more are due to hard drive accesses. At least everything I've run into.

    17. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I think part of that is because people just don't know how to build desktop PCs properly. Lots of people buying too big of PSUs and too big of cases, and then doing crappy airflow management and such. I've got dual overclocked 6970's (flashed 6950 reference cards) and an i5-2500K@4.89GHz running in a mid-tower that weighs maybe 30lbs. Max. Stuffed it all into a CoolerMaster Storm Scout, GPUs never go over 88 or so, CPU never over 75, and that's with only having a swamp cooler, no actual air conditioning.

      But I only bring it to LAN parties. I still have an HP Envy 15 for being productive when I'm not at home, and it's actually pretty darn fast for mobile gaming as well.

    18. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      to be fair, I'm a serious gamer and I'd never buy a "gaming laptop"

    19. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Gaming desktop PC's are really not that expensive, especially when you consider that most everyone has an ordinary PC anyway. The difference is a $150 graphics card.

    20. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Entropius · · Score: 1

      There are lots of gaming PC's that are plenty portable. I just bought a 5.7 pound machine that's got the same GPU as this one (and nearly the same CPU; I bought a slightly slower i7 to save money).

      They get a lot smaller than this, too.

    21. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by mastershake82 · · Score: 1

      While the percentage of left handed people in the world is estimated at 10%, the percentage of left handed people that don't use a mouse with their right hand is much much lower.

      I'm left handed, and at this point, I'm much less proficient at using a mouse with my left hand than my right. And I've personally only ever met one other leftie (out of many) who actually used a mouse on the left hand side of their keyboard.

      I honestly just don't see it as being a financially sound decision to invest in ambidexterity for this particular application.

    22. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but serious gamers can get a better laptop for half that price.

    23. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      A mechanical HDD is pretty much always the biggest bottleneck.

    24. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Sucks for Southpaws, yes, but having a trackpad on the side instead of down front and center is great for your wrists when you're using the device on your lap. Since the marketing paints this device as the first gaming laptop, it makes sense that they would try to improve the ergonomics for this kind of use...

      I always get cramps when using a touchpad with the laptop on my lap... trackpoint, not so much, because it's at home-row height. I'm assuming this touchpad would be similar...

    25. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Razer claims this is the first one though ...

      So considering this there can't have been any failures earlier!

    26. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a button for that. My HP tx2530ea tablet did, but the graphics card in that isn't as good as my Acer.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    27. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Actually, they say GT555M, which is on the low end of the high end and seems like an odd choice for gamers. The emphasis seems to be on CPU, packing an 2.8GHz Intel® CoreTM i7 2640M, which is the fastest clocked dual core mobile CPU (but not necessarily fastest performing). I would agree that is a design mistake - I'd stick in an i5 and a Geforce GTX 580M or 590M because GPU is more important to gamers than CPU, but perhaps the 555 conserves battery much better than those other ones (nVidia claims it is a good tradeoff of performance vs battery life), so they may be aiming for longer battery life.

      I have a suspicion that the 7200 rpm drive is an error, but I could be wrong. I would guess it is a 7200 rpm hybrid drive like the Seagate Momentus XT, which combines a 320GB HDD with a 4GB SSD drive and costs around $100, and they claim it is around 80% as fast as a SSD, wheras an SSD at that size would be about $500 for 20% more speed.

      That GPU also supports 3D Vision, so there is the possibility that it may also include 3D glasses.

      As for the $2800 price tag, Razor anythings are always expensive - looks like standard price doubling over cost, so they are going Apple-like or Alienware-like margins. I have friends with Razor mice and I have a logitech performance laser mouse and I've tried both and I don't really see any improvement in gaming (in fact, I like mine better). On the other hand, their keyboards roll mine for gaming - one has a $200 (at the time - I think they're $160-170 now) G19 Logitech keyboard and the other has a ~$130 Razor keyboard (the WoW model). My non-gaming keyboard has 5 programmable macro keys, their keyboards have... many, many more. I also only paid only $30 for mine (I don't really play a lot of games that need macros, anyway).

    28. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm curious how that correlates to gamers and artists vs office work.

      I won't blink at using a mouse with my right hand if I'm doing word, excel, installing software, troubleshooting, etc... I work at other peoples desks all the time and if the mouse is on the right, which it usually is, I'm perfectly comfortable with it there for almost everything I do, to the point that I don't even realize I'm using it off-hand.

      But fire up an FPS game, or start drawing curves in Ilustrator, and suddenly using the mouse off hand is completely out of the question.

      I don't know a lot of left handed gamers, but the few I do do use their mice left handed.

    29. Re:PC gaming is not dead, by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

      You forget about the large market of pre-pubescent teens with access to their parent's credit cards. Your product does not have to make financial or functional sense as long as you can convince said teens that they need it. See Furby, Tickle me Elmo, etc. Incredibly overpriced but parents buy them because it makes the kids happy. $2800 for a year's worth of the kid spending time playing games instead of getting into trouble or doing other annoying stuff is not a stretch.

      There are plenty of kids with rich parents who will buy them pretty much whatever they want if they pout long enough.

  2. Looks cool by kakyoin01 · · Score: 2

    It's spec'd at around a $1400 normal gaming rig (that's being generous). It sure looks cool though. Thin too. You have to wonder how good the cooling system is on that thing...

    I'll stick to gaming on a desktop for now, thanks.

    --
    The more you know, the more you have to say and the more you should listen.
    1. Re:Looks cool by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

      You have to wonder how good the cooling system is on that thing...

      I'd be concerned about this as well. Look at the cooling on one of the big bulky Asus gaming laptops: http://usa.asus.com/Notebooks/Gaming_Powerhouse/G73Jh/

      I've spent the past few years using a workstation Thinkpad (T61p) as a gaming machine -- they're simply not designed for that purpose like that Asus is. With a small external cooling stand in an air conditioned room, playing WoW for half an hour has clocked my video card (Quadro FX750M -- basically a GF8600M GT) at 97 C. That being said, the Blade appears to have about as much ventilation as my T61p. However, given the positioning of the vents, it IS possible that there are two fans like in the G73.

  3. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too expensive, but damn that is a badass looking laptop. You could bring it to the hipster coffee shop and look cooler than all the mac users.

    1. Re:hmm by royallthefourth · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can hear the girls swooning now.
      "Oh, this? I paid 3x as much as anyone else pays for their laptop so that I can play lots of video games."

    2. Re:hmm by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I can hear the girls swooning now.

      Well, atleast _I_ would be drooling at a laptop like this :P

    3. Re:hmm by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      There is one teeny tiny flaw in your comparison. you see, smart phones other than the iPhone? Were just kinda...well shit. Their UI sucked the big wet titty, the battery life was a joke, slower than watching paint dry, they were just really really bad.

      Now compare that to PC gaming, where they are all running Win 7 X64, no difference there, i can build a damned nice AMD quad core gaming PC for a customer for around $600 loaded to the brim, or get a gaming laptop for less than $1500, again loaded to the brim. The reason Apple still sells laptops is the network effect, people get hooked on the iShiny and want iEverything. i've seen it happen, they start with the pod, then get the phone, then the pad, then finally the Macbook. While i think the price is too high for the iShiny folks like how it all integrates so if it makes them happy? Good for them.

      So thinking you can get iShiny money for a gamer PC is kinda nuts. There really isn't anything to separate this from a top of the line Envy or even a nice DIY gamer PC from someone like me. Well except the price, like I said fully loaded quad for $600 and no nut cooking? But then again frankly I haven't figured out the whole laptop thing. I know customers that have spent crazy money on a laptop and then never go anywhere with the thing! WTF? Why waste money on a laptop that is never gonna be away from an outlet?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:hmm by Splab · · Score: 1

      Erm, since he is at a hip cafe, the others are likely using MacBook Pros, which happen to have even more costly than the Razor thing, when matching the specs. (Apple doesn't come with same 2.8Ghz CPU, but choosing their high offer + 8GB gives you a price tag of 2900 for the 17").

    5. Re:hmm by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]
      =D

    6. Re:hmm by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'm a gamer, and I bought a higher spec laptop than that one because I work away from home. Monster PCs are fuck all use if they're 110 miles away.

      The market exists, I just don't think that laptop's well designed.

    7. Re:hmm by unami · · Score: 1

      yeah, you'd look like someone who painted his macbook pro black. waayyy cooler.

    8. Re:hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this looks better than the MacBook Pros.

  4. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by Lisandro · · Score: 1, Informative
  5. Did I miss something? by Haedrian · · Score: 2

    "320GB 7200rpm SATA HDD"

    For a gaming laptop? With games now taking 10-20 GB of space each? You'll either need a hell of an connection and stay deleting/redownloading using steam or whatever, or an external drive which will ruin the look.

    1. Re:Did I miss something? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Well, its better than the 256GB (pretty much at most) SSD that many people are complaining it doesn't have. Also, I've never seen a 7200 RPM laptop drive before. But 320GB isn't too bad, you'd want an external for mass storage anyways.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:Did I miss something? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Marketing. It's for the little kid who wants to talk mom and dad into buying him a "gaming laptop" for Christmas, or for the new college kid who wants to show off to all his friends in the dorm when really he has no idea what he needs. Laptops aren't for gaming, period. Tell me how you are going to upgrade the video card when next year's uber "must have" game comes out? How about the CPU. How hard is it to swap the motherboard in a laptop. Oh, you can't do any of those things? But a decent high end laptop for half the price so you can play whatever game on the plane or away from home, and invest in a desktop that you can keep cutting edge.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Did I miss something? by rsborg · · Score: 1

      "320GB 7200rpm SATA HDD"

      For a gaming laptop? With games now taking 10-20 GB of space each? You'll either need a hell of an connection and stay deleting/redownloading using steam or whatever, or an external drive which will ruin the look.

      Yeah, that sounds really weak. If it were the ultimate gaming laptop, it would have SSD + HD and load all the OS/Apps on the SSD and HD for things that won't fit on the SSD... even a 60G/500G combo is quite stellar and cost effective.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    4. Re:Did I miss something? by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      what games are these? the biggest space hog on my drive is WoW @ around 20GB, the next closest might be Fallout NV + DLC which is only around 8GB. Most other games (CoD, MoH, HL2) come in under that fully installed. I suppose if all you play are MMO's then 20GB could be a common size.

      Anyway, what you suggest is exactly what I do, I don't see the need to have 50GB of games sitting on my drive when I can reinstall from Steam whenever. Particularly with an FPS since now days they tend to have damn little replay value (HL2 excepted). I keep probably 5 or 6 games permanently installed and the rest get downloaded when I'm in the mood to play. Granted I have 35Mb internet so that may not be practical for everyone.

    5. Re:Did I miss something? by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Well right now I'm playing Empire:Total War which according to steam has Disk Usage of 15,091MB
      Napolean:Total war is over 20GB.

      And these aren't latest games. At all.

      Of course YMMV depending on what you like playing, but I usually keep them installed in case I feel like playing a quick game of something or other.

    6. Re:Did I miss something? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Also, I've never seen a 7200 RPM laptop drive before. But 320GB isn't too bad, you'd want an external for mass storage anyways.

      Really? 7200RPM drives have been around forever - heck my old PowerBook has one and it dates to 2003.

      And given it's a 17" laptop, it should have plenty of space for a dual-drive configuration, of which you can fit an SSD + 750GB HD quite easily. Heck, some 17" laptops are large enough to hold those fancy 12mm drives so you can do 1.5TB+1.5GB with RAID if you wanted.

    7. Re:Did I miss something? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the 0.88" thick part makes it harder to for a dual-drive configuration and fit everything else. That and the 2nd display/track pad.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:Did I miss something? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      The Seagate Momentus XT drives are all 7200RPM. Western Digital Scorpio drives are 7200RPM, and the OEM Toshiba drive that came in my Dell XPS M1730 was 7200RPM. In most cases, you can get them for not that much more than the 5400RPM drives. However, many laptops don't come with them by default (unless they're higher end like this Razer machine or an Alienware or the high end MBP's) because the difference in battery life is generally more visible than the difference in I/O between the two technologies.

    9. Re:Did I miss something? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I like keeping my games installed, even more so on a laptop because you never know if you'll have a solid, fast internet connection if you're traveling. It may be enough to play multiplayer, but not enough to download a game you and your friends play. My steamapps folder is 220GB currently... that's a little excessive, but on my laptop it's still a solid 100GB or so with just my most commonly played games. Add in movies (2-10GB each) and music and other stuff you'll want to carry with you in a laptop and 320GB is nothing.

    10. Re:Did I miss something? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      I am only now running into games that don't perform acceptably on a first generation 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo with a Radeon 4890.

      Now that's not to say I don't enjoy the option, and that's not to say I'm normally this far behind the curve (gaming has not been a priority the past couple years).

      But the idea that a bleeding edge machine will suddenly *need* to be upgraded to play next years game is absurd. The worst that happens is you have to turn down a setting to get a better frame rate, or perhaps a new DirectX effect is unavailable.

      This isn't the way I would go, but I can see how a gaming laptop would appeal to some. Particularly those who are uninclined to ever open their case to begin with.

  6. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  7. Hmm, beautiful, but no. by nege · · Score: 1

    Its gorgeous. Simply beautiful. I know I won't buy it. I like games, but if I want to PC game, I can get a great experience for so much less money with a desktop. Also I don't have to worry about switching out hardware nearly as much. If I wanted to spend that much money on a good-looking laptop I would get another Macbook Pro... then it will have the added benefit of running OS X. Of course it wouldn't be a gaming laptop then, but who really needs a gaming laptop AND has almost 3 grand to spend on it? My guess is this is SUPER niche.

    1. Re:Hmm, beautiful, but no. by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the Blade has a weaker CPU than the MacBook Pro and only a slightly better GPU.

      It's hardly a "gaming" notebook by today's standards; they compromised performance to get that sleek design. The trackpad display is interesting, but I can't imagine too many game developers will bother to support it. The custom buttons could be nice for MMOs, but all in all I can't really see why I'd want to spend hundreds more on this over a 17" MacBook Pro.

      Still, if it's a quality machine on the inside, I wish them well. It's nice seeing companies break out of the race to the bottom and put out well-built hardware.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  8. Laptop gaming has its niche by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I own and use a gaming laptop. I travel for business on a regular basis, and spend about 20 weeks a year living in various hotels. Being able to play a few rounds of Starcraft or TF2 with my friends in the evening is well worth the $1400/3 yrs I end up spending on hardware.

    It's a niche market, to be sure, but I'm glad it's being served. (Although this particular laptop is well outside my price range.)

    1. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by cephyn · · Score: 2

      but you can get a MORE powerful laptop for LESS money. this thing is crazy.

      --
      Moo.
    2. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That weighs less?
      Citation needed.

    3. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      At 1 inch thick?
      With laptops, you pay a very high premium for every millimeter thinner you want it..

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      With version 3.0 of Awesomesauce installed?

    5. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I got an alienware gaming laptop, the build quality is very good, the whole things feels really solid. One thing to note - be aware that the advertized Razer machine uses Optimus tech which means you would not be able to use Nvidia GPU in Linux at all. I specifically got a version of aliwenware mx11 that uses pre-Optimus GPU switching.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    6. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I purchased fairly high end ($1k+) laptops for gaming myself while in school. I bought one that lasted me all through undergrad (allowed me to work/play on my bed/wherever, and also easily bring my laptop home, as I went to school about 4.5 hours away from where I lived) and a second when I started graduate school. I needed to be able to work/take notes in class/at school, but still be able to play at home. It was well worth the money, too.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by Entropius · · Score: 2

      I just bought one this week, actually -- the Sager 5165. It's 5.7 pounds, and has the same GPU in it. You can get a faster GPU with a newer Sager model (the 8130) that still weighs less.`

    8. Re:Laptop gaming has its niche by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Do you own a gaming laptop or a gaming desktop replacement? There's a pretty big difference...

      This Razer looks like a black MBP 17" with different controls, and looks pretty comfy to use too.

  9. The touch screen + dynamic buttons are cool. by dreemernj · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they are especially useful for all those times you are looking at your keyboard while playing a game. I know I spend at least 50% of the time I play video games staring at the keyboard thinking "What does W do again?" Now it'll change to an arrow or a picture of a person walking or something.

    Up until now, gaming computers really dropped the ball because they were only displaying beautiful game content on the screen. Razer has stepped it up a notch by bringing game content to where your eyes are always looking: the keyboard.

    I take back everything terrible I ever said about Razer. It is now obvious that they have a firm understanding of how gamers use their input devices.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    1. Re:The touch screen + dynamic buttons are cool. by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

    2. Re:The touch screen + dynamic buttons are cool. by Grygus · · Score: 2

      The best satire leaves you wondering whether it is.

    3. Re:The touch screen + dynamic buttons are cool. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      My Dad always looks at the keyboard while he's playing games. Then tells me that he doesn't know how I did (whatever I just did) and he didn't even see it. No matter how many times he does it, it's still funny.

  10. Not going anywhere by omnichad · · Score: 1

    What's going to convince a game developer to spend significant resources to develop a second-screen interface for the limited number of people who buy this laptop? It's doomed to live in the same world as Aureal A3D or other hardware sound accelerators, non-HID joysticks, or any other technology that never had a big enough market to be worth developing for.

    1. Re:Not going anywhere by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Its a large multi-touch pad. Even if it spends all its time showing a static image or nothing at all, it will still be useful.

    2. Re:Not going anywhere by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Well - you can buy Apple's "Magic Trackpad" for $70 to get multi-touch in Windows. Still, are games even adopting multi-touch in any significant way? $70 vs. a $1000 premium on a laptop for a few games that might put a picture on that little screen seems silly even for a gamer.

    3. Re:Not going anywhere by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Your thinking about it too much as a gamer thing.

      I'd like a powerful but small windows laptop with a large multitouch pad...

      Hell.. this is why i bought a macbook pro.

    4. Re:Not going anywhere by omnichad · · Score: 1

      A Macbook Pro is CHEAPER than this one!

  11. Giant Mistake by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    $2800 bucks and they didn't even think it out? Most gamers are right handed, and PC gamers still predominately use a mouse in their right hand. so the special keypad should have been on the left, not on the right side of the keyboard (or for $2800 bucks I would expect to see a keyboard system that would let the special keypad be moved to either side).

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Giant Mistake by andreasg · · Score: 1

      Who games with a touchpad?

    2. Re:Giant Mistake by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      I actually know a few... especially for MMOs. Personally, my TrackPoint(cl*t mouse) is actually decent for FPS, but it takes a bunch of getting used to. These days, I'm using a standard mouse usually, but I used a Trackpoint exclusively for years before I got my first desktop.

    3. Re:Giant Mistake by chispito · · Score: 1

      Look closer: it also happens to be the touch pad for the laptop.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Giant Mistake by Jeng · · Score: 1

      It's funny, in many articles random people will talk about how the manufacturer made some obvious mistake. 90% of the time those random people are just fucking stupid, with this article they are right.

      You make a very good point, and definitely one that a gaming mouse manufacturer should have known.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Giant Mistake by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      The keypad is the mouse/touchpad.

      Doesn't matter. I have two laptops in front of me right now, both have touchpads, but I have wireless mice attached by USB to both. And I'm not even gaming on them, mice are just easier to use for many people. And when I play on-line games I always use a mouse.

      Having a touchpad on the laptop is fine. But for $2800 I would demand that they should consider how the user will use it. At far less than $2800 I would have expected not only the touchpad but also built in Bluetooth to work with an (included) wireless mouse without wasting a USB port or having something that had to stick out of the side of the laptop. And so I would still have a configurable keyboard and touchpad system so that the user could position the touchpad on whichever side he felt suited him best.

      Some gamers might try to use a right side touchpad. (Heck, a few even try to play FSP shooters with a joystick.). But most will want to use a mouse, and could benefit from a extra gaming pad on the left side (even if they don't actually look at the screen), much like the Logitech G-15 gaming keyboard or and of several other gaming input devices targeted for the left hand.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    6. Re:Giant Mistake by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      You mean 90% of the time, those random people disagree with you? And this time, they agree with you?

    7. Re:Giant Mistake by eeyoredragon · · Score: 1

      I see it more as an expensive laptop only usable by right handed people :-/

      I like my trackpad in the middle, as I like to easily use either hand to control it.

    8. Re:Giant Mistake by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I figured if you're going to be portable with a gaming laptop you might not bring a mouse. Or stuck somewhere with limited space like an airplane. However in the direction I'm seeing PC games headed, you won't be able to play many of them without an internet connection soon.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    9. Re:Giant Mistake by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      For the longest time, I actually played using the touchpad on my laptop. At that point in time I was in a BF:2142 tournament, and using the touchpad I was actually one of the best infantrymen/snipers in the whole tourney. I couldn't drive aircraft/tanks to save my life though :)

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  12. Re:The extra displays by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    The dual mode is interesting. I don't game enough to have an opinion but how many gamers need to look at the screen in display mode?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  13. Exploitation by SpeZek · · Score: 1

    "PC gaming is dying! Quick, save it by giving us all your money!"

  14. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

    Also, as far as I know, pillows don't block electromagnetic radiation.

    No of course not. You need pyramids to do that.

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  15. How's the GPU performance? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Gaming on a laptop with a "mobile" GPU sucks compared to the discrete GPU, unless there are some FutureMark 3DMark numbers that show otherwise ...

    1. Re:How's the GPU performance? by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, directx11 content would probably suffer, I'd still buy it in heartbeat if I had the cash. http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GT-555M.41933.0.html

  16. Oxymoron by netdigger · · Score: 1

    Gaming is not an adjective to describe a laptop. Anyone that is willing to spend that much for a gaming computer, they will build their own desktop that would put their laptop to shame.

    1. Re:Oxymoron by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      So, nobody ever will have 3k$ to use on a gaming rig, yet still need to travel a lot? Why not?

      --
      What?
  17. I think it's cool. by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    I think it's cool. Gaming PCs have always been expensive. This one looks pretty good and should avoid sneers and giggles if you take it out in public. I won't be buying one, of course, because I don't have that kind of money to drop on games, but I WANT it.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  18. Real gamers use desktops by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    That's all I have to say. Show me a laptop that will let me run video cards in 3 or 4 way SLI. Oh, and my water cooled screaming 4 monitor system costs less than your shitty laptop. About half as much.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Real gamers use desktops by Literaphile · · Score: 1

      That's all I have to say. Show me a laptop that will let me run video cards in 3 or 4 way SLI. Oh, and my water cooled screaming 4 monitor system costs less than your shitty laptop. About half as much.

      OK, now pack up your gaming rig and take it to your friend's house for your LAN party. I'll pack up my laptop, and we'll see who gets there first and with less hassle.

    2. Re:Real gamers use desktops by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      for me it doesnt matter, I end up having to drag some old shitty p4's around with me cause my looser friends cant find a pc for sale anywhere

    3. Re:Real gamers use desktops by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      You don't speak for all "real gamers", no.

    4. Re:Real gamers use desktops by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Gamers never leave the basement. Friends? What are those? God, you really don't understand the demographic, do you?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Real gamers use desktops by Literaphile · · Score: 1

      Gamers never leave the basement. Friends? What are those? God, you really don't understand the demographic, do you?

      Have you ever heard of a LAN party?

    6. Re:Real gamers use desktops by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is so last century. You've heard of the internet, right? Think of it as one big LAN....

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Real gamers use desktops by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is so last century. You've heard of the internet, right? Think of it as one big LAN....

      Yes, but there are some of us out there who would rather have the added benefit of being able to crack open a case of Wild Cherry Pepsi and tortilla chips, fire up a copy of Unreal Tournament 2004/UT3/Counterstrike/HL2:DM/CoD4/Starcraft, and enjoy social interaction with our friends without having issues with ping times. Seriously, my friends and I have one every so often; it's a LOT of fun. You should try it sometime.

  19. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

    I would like to take that cancer-and-subluxation-reducing pillow and put it over your face and smother you with it, Bob.

  20. Better alternatives for less money by MBraynard · · Score: 1

    I have an Asus G73JH-A1 with one of the HD's upgraded to a SSD from http://www.xoticpc.com/.
    It has a better processor and cost $1000 or so less.

  21. 2800 dollars and doesn't even have an SSD by caxis · · Score: 1

    Amazing. They are awfully proud of something that doesn't even include an SSD, thus bottlenecking the entire system.

  22. Alienware m18x still my dream GL by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    The setup I'd want is even more expensive than this one though.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:Alienware m18x still my dream GL by CtownNighrider · · Score: 1

      Posting from my m17x with a core i7 and the cheaper GPU (only two options, this one is still plenty for me) and it's pretty awesome.

  23. So expensive by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    Damn that's expensive, but it looks really sharp. I really like the idea behind the multitouch panel to the right of the keyboard.

  24. Re:Bad mouse... by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

    I dunno, their mouse *hardware* seems of good quality. My left-handed Deathadder's seen many many drops onto a hard floor, and it still works.
    The Windows drivers however... I've heard they can be poor. I've had little trouble with the Linux drivers(once I got razerd compiled and working) over the last year+ I've used it.

  25. ASUSTek G-Series by ZeroSerenity · · Score: 1

    With moderate sucess, they managed to pull it off with great fun. But they are a little more modest with an average $2,000 pricepoint and nothing too rediculus.

    --
    For those who seek perfection there can be no rest on this side of the grave.
  26. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by Jeng · · Score: 2

    You know that Dr. Bob can cure your laptop of viruses by carefully manipulating the hinge. In fact you should entrust your laptop to Dr. Bob on a weekly basis to keep your laptop virus free and in good health.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  27. jeez by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

    That thing is hot. Actually just the keyboard is hot! I want that keyboard in standalone form!

    --
    Balderdash!
    1. Re:jeez by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      There is one, here.

    2. Re:jeez by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      thanks!

      --
      Balderdash!
  28. Problems by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Now, I'm actually in their target market - I generally game on a laptop, and I'm actually looking for a replacement (current one is ~3 years old, starting to run current games badly). But this one isn't good. Why?
    1. Heat. There's barely any vents on this, and a LOT of hot gear on the inside. I wouldn't be surprised if this has actual problems functioning like it is.
    2. Battery life. 60Wh sounds like a lot, but there's a TON of stuff trying to eat that battery. The CPU draws 25 watts, the GPU 35, 7200RPM hard drives tend to eat battery quickly, and I don't even want to think about how much power that big backlit screen draws. My laptop lasted about 2 hours with 40Wh, and it drew about half that much power. I'd put money on this thing lasting under an hour under a heavy gaming load.
    3. Specs too low. The GPU is good, and the amount and speed of RAM is good, but the CPU is really lacking. Dual-core? Not good - for $3K, I'd expect quad- or even hexa-core. Sure, it's clocked well, but remember, half the time a laptop CPU is running at a reduced clock to save power.
    4. Hard drive space. 320GB? My laptop from 3 years ago had that much, for half the price! There's no excuse not to have at least 500GB. Hell, put a Momentus XT in there - 500GB of hard drive, and a 4GB SSD in the same package. Or do it yourself - there's laptop-sized terabyte hard drives out there now, put one of those in beside a 16GB SSD and you'll still both impressive performance and capacity. And trust me - gamers need a lot of hard drive space. Some games I've played will suck up 20-40GB, and I haven't seen a non-indie release in years that was under 10GB. So that's AT MOST 30 games, possibly as low as 10. Not going to happen.
    5. Gimmicky. The touchscreen/buttons that replaced the number pad are honestly just tacky. You'd need to get game devs to specifically support it in their games. If you had made it compatible with the G19 or G15 keyboard, you might have gotten somewhere, but at this point, it's a gimmick that won't get much dev support unless it sells REALLY well. It's not even positioned well - most games use the left half of the keyboard, where the WSAD is. Reaching over to the touchscreen would be like putting key macros on the number pad - slow, hard to hit accurately, and difficult to use. It should have been on the left of the keyboard, or maybe in that big empty space below it. On my current laptop (and most others), the trackpad is below the spacebar; I often use it with my thumb when gaming, mainly to turn faster in the tanks in BC2. You could move it to the bottom, and then have room for a proper number pad as well.

    1. Re:Problems by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      I think they intend the touchscreen to be used in place of the mouse. Which'd actually work well, if the games had direct support for the hardware. But that's the kicker, getting game-dev support.

    2. Re:Problems by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      You missed one. 802.11 b/g/n. WTF?

      b/g/n is for weaksauces and cheap low power wireless networking (it.s 2.4GHz only). Modern laptops that aren't low end come with dual band a/b/g/n.

      I don't think even the dual band cards and antennas are THAT expensive. Especially for a laptop that costs as much as Apple's.

      I wonder if the Macbook Pro 17" compares. It won't on graphics (MBP has a 5750 or something), but the MBP has a nicer 1920x1200 screen... and quad core too, i think?

    3. Re:Problems by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'm also in their core target market, and 4-5 months ago I paid a comparable amount and got a laptop with
      - quad core i7
      - faster graphics card
      - 250gb SSD + 750gb 7200rpm spindle disk
      - touchpad where I can actually use it
      - erm, one extra USB port. And yeah, I use four at times.

      I actually do love the idea of making the touchpad a screen. I'm not sure what I'd _use_ it for, but I _like_ it and I want it. But not over there, not in place of a numpad, particularly not in place of cursor keys.

      As designed, it's an expensive gimmick. I hope the people that do buy really love it and get value from their purchase, and I hope other manufacturers take inspiration from the trackpad and buttons - but retain their boring old "put the physical interaction capabilities where they're useful" design too.

    4. Re:Problems by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Getting it to work as just a mouse should be simple - doing drivers like that is easy.

      The problem is taking advantage of the display portion. The default drivers will probably offer something similar to what my dumb trackpad does - tapping one corner will turn on a simple menu, letting you do common things like change the volume, pause/play a media player, or change the screen brightness. Maybe they'll have little applets, that do stuff like display CPU usage and temps, or maybe a music visualizer.

      But as far as gaming, this will not take off naturally. You won't see many games doing anything with it, and most of those that do will just be duplicating HUD stuff. Just simple stuff like HP/MP displays, or a minimap, or something one guy can whip up in an afternoon. You'll probably see a lot of shared code with games that support the G15/G19 display, which ISN'T a touchscreen, so actual input is going to be rare.

    5. Re:Problems by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Macbook Pro 17" compares. It won't on graphics (MBP has a 5750 or something), but the MBP has a nicer 1920x1200 screen... and quad core too, i think?

      Current 17" Macbook Pros start with a quad-core, 2.2gHz processor. It's the same subfamily (Sandy Bridge i7) as the Blade's, so the numbers are comparable. So, with the exception of the few games that are singlethreaded, it will perform better. Graphically, the Macbook uses a Radeon 6750, which is about on par with the GeForce 555M based on the benchmarks I saw. It's weaker, but not by much.

      The Macbook also has less RAM (4gb instead of 8), but at the same speed. Storage is weird - the default hard drive is bigger but slower, but they also have options for a faster AND bigger hard drive, or even a bigger SSD. It even has a bigger batter - 95 Wh instead of 60.

      Wow, I never expected I would be recommending a Mac over a gaming PC for gaming purposes.

  29. How to make it less of a gamble by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Whatever library they are giving to game makers to make that keyboard display happen, let it ALSO display the same control surface on a smartphone or iPad with custom app... then game makers would be a lot more inclined to add support.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by silentbrad · · Score: 1

    Depending on the pillow, of course. Looking at wikipedia, I see that light falls under EMR, which I probably knew. But still, how much light does the bottom of your laptop give off that you need a pillow to block it?

  31. Overpriced Garbage Laptop by greymond · · Score: 1

    Description from the article:
    2.8GHz Intel® CoreTM i7 2640M Processor
    8GB 1333MHz DDR3 Memory
    17.3" LED Backlit Display (1920x1080)
    NVIDIA GeForce® GT 555M with NVIDIA® OptimusTM Technology
    2GB Dedicated GDDR5 Video Memory
    Built-in HD Webcam
    Integrated 60Wh Battery
    320GB 7200rpm SATA HDD
    Wireless Network 802.11 b/g/n Compatible
    16.81" (Width) x 10.9" (Depth) x 0.88" (Height); 6.97lbs (Weight)
    It will ship in the fourth quarter of 2011 for $2,799.99.

    Cost of an actual gaming laptop with a GTX and SSD $2400 http://www.cyberpowerpc.com/system/Xplorer_X7_Xtreme_S2_Notebook/

    While some may or may not like CyberPower, my main points are that you can't sell "gamers" a gaming system without a GTX card, the GT's just don't cut it and while a 320GB 7200 rpm drive is alright, you can get a 128GB SSD for about the same price, maybe around $30-50 more. No one uses anywhere near 320GB on their primary drive. I have Win7 with Office 2k10 Pro, Adobe CS Design Suite 5, LOTRO HR, DDO HR, WoW, Rift, EVE, STO, CO, PotBS, LoL and numerous web/net apps installed on my laptop and I'm using only 140GB of space.

    1. Re:Overpriced Garbage Laptop by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "No one uses anywhere near 320GB on their primary drive."

      Dude, I have information from the beginning of the 90s till now. 38TB of information.

      Maybe *YOU* don't need that much space.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  32. $2800.00???? Are you kidding me?? by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

    Who do they think they are? Apple?

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    1. Re:$2800.00???? Are you kidding me?? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Compared to a 17" MBP, this Razer has an older generation i7, slightly faster GPU, slightly thinner, about a pound heavier, and $300 more. So almost but not quite an Apple.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  33. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod... my laptop is nuclear powered! It glows green in the dark... ;-)

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  34. Re:a laptop.. seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Oooh, I can throw an xbox, keyboard, mouse, monitor, a terabyte of storage and a standalone power source into my bag along with all the clothing I need for a week away at work and use it to play Napolean: Empire War or Football Manager 2011?

    Or maybe it would be too fucking heavy, inconvenient, slower, unable to perform the general purpose computing tasks I also use my laptop for and still suffer a red ring of fucking death.

    Yeah, those serious gamers with their xbox really showed me.

  35. 2800 usda and no ssd by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

    They on crack.
    Makes apole look value

  36. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by jhoegl · · Score: 1

    The best part is, pillows actually block heat from escaping from laptops, causing them to overheat.

    I am surprised he didnt mention a cure for this low sperm count by recommending you see a "crack doctor".

  37. Re:not THAT bad by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

    A Macbook Pro has a better CPU and a hard drive over twice as large as this thing. The GPUs are roughly equivalent. Upgrade to 8GB of RAM aftermarket on the Macbook Pro and you actually get a better-specced laptop for less. They ARE off in lala land if they're actually exceeding what Apple charges for a lesser laptop.

  38. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by silentbrad · · Score: 1

    Yikes. I'm sorry to say, you might have a little more to worry about than just the temporary sperm count reduction.

  39. Re:Not unreasonable by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    I have one of those lying around, too. Awesome machine. I don't have the Blu-Ray option, but I do have the SLI and the Ageia PhysX card in it. What amazes me about that thing is how quiet it is, even under super heavy loads.

  40. Razer build quality by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

    I spend about that much for a Macbook Pro every 2-3 years, so the price isn't crazy.

    What is crazy is spending that much money on a Razer product. Razer gear is real hit and miss in terms of build quality.

    They know ergonomics better than anyone else in the business, but no fucking way I'd spend that money on a Razer. As a long time gamer, I have lost confidence in their ability to build a quality product. I know down in my gut that the trackpad's going to lose a lot of it's functionality in a few months, when it decides to actually work.

    Fuck that, Razer. You've taken too much of my money and then gave me shitty service. I pay Apple prices to Apple because of their customer service. Razer customer support? HA HA HA.

    1. Re:Razer build quality by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this laptop's keys will begin to break after 2 weeks, like the last (and only) Razer mouse I bought. Probably.

  41. What's with the teeny tiny hard drive? by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    3000 dollars and its only a 320 GB hard drive? WTF?

  42. mouse by purpleque · · Score: 1

    If i am gaming on a laptop i am using a mouse and not a touch pad. You don't think there is enough room in the laptop bag for a mouse do you? right or left handed even.

  43. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    You know, us because i's called a "laptop" doesn't mean you have to put it on your lap.

  44. If Apple went after Samsung then what about this? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    It's like someone took a macbook and customised it for a teenager from 1996 and it comes complete with the shitty "i'm so manly" name of Razer Blade it's like it could be a graphics card. I'm hoping they'll make an extreme version.

  45. Thats still 15-30 games, but probably a lot more.. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Most games are around 8-10GB, because they have to fit on a DVD. WoW is my biggest at about 30GB, that and starcraft II (about 12gb) and are on my main drive (74gb raptor). I have another 74gb drive for my steam folder and i have, as far as large modernish games...

    Borderlands
    CS:S
    DoD:S
    L4D2
    ME2
    Portal 2
    TF2

    and about 20 other smaller games installed. Unless you cheaped out and have like an 80GB SSD or something, space isnt really an issue for your average gamer for games at least.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  46. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by beckett · · Score: 1

    Dude, it's doctor bob. you must be new here.

  47. Re:Use a pillow for your health. by luigi517 · · Score: 1

    it appears we have a serial, long winded troll in our midst.