Slashdot Mirror
GameStop Offers $50 Certificate For Coupon Fiasco
First time accepted submitter milbournosphere writes "It appears that GameStop has a guilty conscience. They are offering a $50 gift certificate to any person who bought the new Deus Ex at GameStop. You may recall that GameStop has admitted to removing the OnLive codes good for one free game from new, unopened copies of the game. From GameStop's email: 'For your inconvenience, we would like to offer you a free $50 GameStop gift card and a Buy 2 Get 1 Free pre-owned purchase. We want to earn back your trust and confidence in the GameStop experience. Please bring in this email and your store receipt or order confirmation from GameStop.com and present it to a Game Advisor.'"
Please humbly accept our apologies. To make this better, we'd like to offer you the chance to buy more stuff from us.
Reminds me of class action lawsuits: "Hey there friend, sorry we fucked you so hard last time, here's a coupon for $10 off your next ass-fucking at any of our many locations."
Wait. Does that include the mail-in registration card? Also, does that mean there are game collectors who compare different registration cards sent out by companies and look for little differences, in the manner of these guys? Is that healthy? And couldn't you just view these as a "special GameStop edition"?
Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
Friends don't let friends buy from GameStop.
I haven't bought new from GameStop in years because of their general practice of lending new copies of games to employees and then later selling those games as new. Last time I tried to buy a new game from them, it looked like this guy's game, so I just walked away without buying. Now I only buy new from my local Target store, or online from Amazon.
I still go to GameStop to buy and sell used games, though.
well, technically, they are making a client to do just that, in practice they are making it for android tablets specifically along with ipad client. Add to that the UK release next month and I guess they are already quite busy.
Too much work for not a large enough audience (or rather not a loud enough audience who pays money)
All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
Maybe once you reach puberty, your vocabulary will expand to include other adjectives than "gay". For example, I would not use "gay" to describe you - more like, you are a retarded moron.
"Why yes sir, the rotting banana peel and a mummified female index finger were part of the original packaging."
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Why was parent modded troll? He may have been a little passionate about Sony, but he was right on most counts.
It sounds like a damn good deal, especially if the only people affected were already GameStop customers.
It really does seem like GameStop is trying to apologize for this mistake. so fucking let them already.
vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
It wasn't a mistake, it was a purposeful altering of a product prior to selling it as 'new' without telling anyone.
I believe that qualifies as a mistake. Not an accident, but a mistake.
vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
I understand the $50 as a sorry.. But how can they offer the Buy 2 get 1 pre-owned game, when that is a everyday sort of deal. Or at least Everytime I walk into my local gamestop they have signs posted about it.
I did not see many people taking Gamestop's side in all this. From their point of view publishers have been trying to ruin their business for a long time now. First they debate the legality of second hand sales. Then they begin offering their own distribution methods. Now they are specifically advertising for a competing market but using the old one that got them rich in the first place.
Does anyone else throw up in their mouth a little bit when they read a corporate euphemism for "store clerk" like "game advisor"?
do you think they bother to Shill slashdot when half the posts will always be about the lack of a linux client.
"We want to earn back your trust and confidence in the GameStop experience."
Sorry guys, you lost that when you sold me a copy of Sins of a Solar Empire without a disc in the case.
That was before I "trusted" digital downloads. Because of that, now it's the physical stores I don't trust. Ironic.
"...and a Buy 2 Get 1 Free pre-owned purchase."
So basically anything in the store then.
WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
(Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)
STOP OPENING MY GAMES. This is why I never buy from GameStop / EB, because you have the audacity to OPEN everything before I do. You know what shrink wrap is supposed to mean?, it means I'm guaranteed on getting an UNALTERED product.
ESPECIALLY with most stores not taking back opened copies.
Oh, when you hear about say,
selling used games as if they were new, or say, ripping off the customers, and then trying to distract them with a shiny gift card,
it makes me trust you even less then I did before.
1) Stop opening games. Sell them in their box. Even Bestbuy's game vault is better then getting an opened game.
2) Fork over $10 for the service they should have gotten in the first place, AND give them a gift card. I don't care how much the gift card is, that's not the issue, it's allowing you what you should have gotten to begin with, and then adding on an act of contrition.
3) Just stop your used game business. You are screwing over gamers and game companies. If you want, then buy the used games for 1/2 of what you sell them for, just don't act like trading 3 games in for a 5$ discount is a steal, especially when you sell each of the games for $5 under what you were for a new game.
Future Shop annoys me, Best Buy infuriates me, I hate the very concept of Walmart, and Gamestop / EB is STILL at the bottom of my list. I LOVED EB, it was the store for me, the store that seemed to understand the gamer geek, and you are lower then stores I hate even getting near.
It might be because of what I / we once had, but we can have it again, just treat me with respect, and carry stuff I actually need, (has anyone ever tried to get a PS3 cable to let their backcompatible PS3 read PS2 memory cards? 1, just 1 would have been good enough, and I might have kept caring).
There is this interview with the OnLive CEO. It mentions a Linux client someday...
This is wasteful corporate stupidity at it's best. First, pay employees to spend time opening factory sealed new games to remove a voucher for a free ~$50 game from a competing service included in something they are selling. Then, when people find out about it, claim to have done nothing wrong at first, alienating and forcing people to question their trust in GameStop, and then after people have ample time to stew over it, follow it up by sheepishly offering a free $50 game purchase AND a Buy 2 get 1 Free purchase to help "earn back your trust and confidence in the GameStop experience". Which winds up costing GameStop the original cost of the employees pay to spend time removing the vouchers PLUS the $50 game PLUS the possible additional free used game (which most won't use and will just use the Free voucher, thereby netting GameStop no positive sales from the offer), all to fight the THEORETICAL purchase of a game from OnLine.
Brilliant.
But really, anyone who still shops @ brick and mortar stores is asking for this sort of thing. Steam and NewEgg don't remove vouchers. Nor do they require gas $ to take a trip to the store. Or charge tax. Or require you to deal with annoying sales people. Used games and console games? Yea you can get those online too. *sigh*
"I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."
"It appears that GameStop has a guilty conscience." Simple answer is that, they do not have a conscience. The reason for this is not out of guilt but out of profit. This has always been about profit. Why did they remove the coupons in the beginning? Because it was aiding their competition, in other words their potential profit. And why did they decide to offer the $50? Obvious reason, profit in the long run. They realized the sheer amount of backlash from this and attempting to win people's hearts. All this is going to do is give people who decided to stop going to GS, to continue not going and get a $50 giftcard.
http://www.shamoozal.com/nerdlog/gfgames-the-last-copy/
We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
Which part of the EULA allows that, again? EA really doesn't want to see me in the courtroom again.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
There's plenty of collectible video games. For instance, if you have a World of Warcraft Collector's Edition? That thing is worth quite a bit on ebay.
That was the Left4Dead: Garbage Truck Edition right?
If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
Here is a link to the story about the data mining with a screen shot of the blurb: http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-backtracks-slightly-over-disturbing-data-mining-origin-eula/
Having no problem with selling things that have been opened and modified as "new" is exactly why libertarianism is bull.
Great Intellect...
Chalk it up to a bigger market, you mean.
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
I've totally changed though. Just don't leave, is all I'm asking, give me another chance. If you stay, I totally guarantee that I won't beat you up again, much, for at least a week, unless you do something dumb and get me mad again, or I have a drink, or I want to.
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
I got out the door and luckily checked what I'd bought they had given me and obviously used copy and charged me the full retail price, the UMD case was even cracked the manual was a mess after a second argument and a massive waste of my time I eventually got new shrinkwrapped copy.
I don't know how they can possibly believe stunts like this benefit them I haven't bought anything from them since.
The implication is: Buy 2 of our products, then take another one for free.
Yep, that looks like a clear violation of the anti-tying provisions set forth in the Magnuson-Moss warranty act.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
Yeah, kind of. Except I disclosed my relationship to OnLive.
I think it's a neat technology and I'm interested in what other people (would genuinely) think. Usually you get people saying "It'll never work" though they've never tried it. And it's trivial to try it. That bugs me. I hate people talking out their asses like that.
I also flog Perspectives every time HTTPS woes are mentioned. I have no relation to the project, but I think it's a great technology with some hope of doing something about the CAs-are-fucked-up problem. I want the Perspectives solution investigated and reviewed. Marlinspike thinks there's something to the method -- he created Convergence. There was precious little discussion about Convergence/notaries in the last HTTPS-related Slashdot article, which was really fundamentally about Convergence. That bugs me. I hate people failing to see what's relevant.
There's no conscience there, they're just p*ssed they got caught yet again, exposing their terrible business practices, I'm amazed honestly that anyone even shops there anymore, you don't even know if the game you're buying is new, legit, etc. I'll just stick with Steam, Amazon or even Best Buy.
Their management is running that company into the ground, the sooner the better I say. They deserve to die screaming and in flames.
'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
Neat technology? It's all about making it so you don't buy games, you rent a license to run the game on a central server from your dumb terminal (with the associated datamining, and the inevitable monthly demand to pay again for the same game). It's one step towards not actually owning computers, but simply dumb terminals that connect to servers run by giant conglomerates who shaft you with monthly fees - and that's not even counting the ISPs with their gargantuan per-GB fees making sure you end up paying twice to three times for the game. I'm not even willing to try a service built on such a craptastic premise, but I'll sure as hell continue to talk about how much I loathe it regardless.
For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
Please?