Slashdot Mirror


Man Calls 911 To Fix Broken iPhone

tekgoblin writes "For some reason Michael Skopec of Illinois thought that calling 911 would get his broken iPhone fixed. It got him arrested instead. From the article: 'After the five calls were made police traced the calls to his home in Illinois where they found him drunk and belligerent. He was arrested because he would not follow the police officers orders. It has yet to be made clear what he was actually trying to accomplish by calling 911 to get help with his iPhone. Although he was arrested he only faces misdemeanor charges and has to be in court next week.'"

160 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Hey! by cmv1087 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A broken iPhone really is an emergency! That means I can't play Angry Birds!

    1. Re:Hey! by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      A broken iPhone really is an emergency! That means I can't play Angry Birds!

      So that's why he called 911... he wanted to throw things at pigs.

    2. Re:Hey! by No,+I+am+Spratacus! · · Score: 5, Funny

      If only that guy knows how to jailbreak, he'll be fine, right? Right??

    3. Re:Hey! by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if he could actually prove the Gizmodo editors were there...

    4. Re:Hey! by taoareyou · · Score: 1

      Technically you can play Angry Birds for free via Google Chrome app. Just sayin.

    5. Re:Hey! by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but with so many good games out there, why would you want to?

    6. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't phone repairs 411?

    7. Re:Hey! by TaggartAleslayer · · Score: 1

      Zing!

    8. Re:Hey! by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 4, Informative

      411 is information, I think 611 is repairs.

    9. Re:Hey! by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      I guess nobody interferes with his bird chucking time.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    10. Re:Hey! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Angry Birds is a good game. It's just a very simple game, like Pac-Man or Joust.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    11. Re:Hey! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Are you "ha ha", or "serious"?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:Hey! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, on the scale of public insanities, that's relatively sane. I see a lot of "may" in there, which is going to make it a bit hit and miss depending on your area, but that's worth re-reading if I find myself sent to Canada again.

      1-1-1 is not available in the NANP, because 11 is the prefix used to access ...

      More significantly ... when you've got a broken line (the typical excavator bucket going through a line type of accident), you're going to generate a lot of [pulse-pause-pulse-pause-pulse] signal trains from random contacts, and that is going to generate a flood of "calls" when there is an incident. When the EU mandated the use of "1-1-2" as a pan-European emergency services number they missed this possible failure mode, which has led to such incidents since then. "1-1-1" would be even more subject to the problem.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. What's more sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's play what's more sad!

    Which of the following is more sad?

    1) A man calls 911 to fix a broken iPhone.

    2) Slashdot decides to report on a man calling 911 to fix a broken iPhone.

    Stay tuned for the answer after this commercial break.

    1. Re:What's more sad? by moozey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say "sad" a lot :(

    2. Re:What's more sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      3) I came here to see what other slashdotters were saying about it :/

    3. Re:What's more sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You say "sad" a lot :(

      Well, maybe he's a sadist. :-)

    4. Re:What's more sad? by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Answer is obviously 1), because 2) gives us all a good laugh. Do you not like to laugh?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:What's more sad? by arielCo · · Score: 1

      "B-but, it's about Apple, and an iPhone! It's what geeks care about, isn't it?"

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    6. Re:What's more sad? by somersault · · Score: 2

      Yet again, idiots jumping to "reducto ad absurdum" conclusions.. sometimes, the news can be entertaining as well as informative you know.

      Perhaps stories like this will cause someone to think up a method for tech support that even drunk people can understand.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:What's more sad? by The+Askylist · · Score: 2

      3) A man owns an iPhone?

    8. Re:What's more sad? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      No, he's sad.

    9. Re:What's more sad? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Lighten up, Francis.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:What's more sad? by Shazback · · Score: 1

      Isn't that why the Genius Bar was invented in the first place?

    11. Re:What's more sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's sadder is that there is a perfectly good one-word comparative form for the adjective 'sad'.

    12. Re:What's more sad? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      So Slashdot editors know exactly as much about geek interests as our grandmothers.

      Actually I feel a little better about the editors now. I mean they're trying, it's the thought that counts right?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    13. Re:What's more sad? by broomer · · Score: 1

      ...

      5) Profit?

    14. Re:What's more sad? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Could be intended to express surprise rather than indignation.

      This is Illinois, where almost everything is a felony.

      Heck, they made possession of SALVIA a felony, possession of raw DXM a felony and I think they might've made nitrous a felony.

      But abusing 911 isn't.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  3. Locked screen? by MDMurphy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article was short on details.

    I could see it not being that he was truly calling 911 to fix his phone, but rather the screen was locked. While I don't have an iPhone, my phone does allow 911 calls if the screen is locked, so I'm guessing the i-thing is similar. If he was too drunk to remember his unlock code he may have drunkenly hit the emergency call button multiple times.

    Of course that's still pretty stupid sounding, but not as bad a confusing the police with a Genius Bar.

    1. Re:Locked screen? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Droid2 here. I too have an Emergency Call button located just below the locked screen keypad. I'm guessing you have a Android based phone too?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Locked screen? by Script_God · · Score: 1

      You still have to actually dial "911" after hitting the emergency call button. All it does is give you a dialpad (which pretty much only lets you dial 911, or whatever the local emergency number is).

    3. Re:Locked screen? by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      BlackBerry phones allow this too. In fact I cant think of a device that doesn't allow it, probably some sort of federal regulation, like any phone with a signal can dial 911 regardless of whether or not it has a valid SIM.

    4. Re:Locked screen? by imunfair · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they changed it, but back on Android 1.5 when I first got my phone it was a direct call to 911 - I know, I tried it. I figured there would be a few more steps - I mean no developer would be stupid enough to put a direct 911 button on a lock screen that is supposed to prevent you from accidentally pressing things...

      Yeah, that 'feature' made the lock screen useless for me - and at the time the only way to remove it was to pay for a special lock screen app that did the same thing without the 911 button.

    5. Re:Locked screen? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      It was only some phones that did this, not all. The original G1 didn't, but the Samsung Moment did- I called the cops 3 times one day. Luckily in 3 separate cities. They fixed it in the first firmware update.

      You didn't need to pay for a lock app though- there were plenty of free ones on the market.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:Locked screen? by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative

      That seems unlikely. I think pretty much all GSM devices have the capability (apparently it's in the spec, "112" should work globally). The N900 just doesn't advertise the feature. It's mentioned in the manual, though: http://www.nokia.co.uk/gb-en/support/product/nokia-n900/userguide/?action=onlineuserguidepagechange&pFile=GUID-67F9E8D2-51A2-4A60-B635-69F60530E852-139_FILE001.html

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Locked screen? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason all GSM phones have it is because it's a US requirement. Having developed the feature for the US market, the easiest thing is to have it on all phones, no matter where they are sold.

    8. Re:Locked screen? by pyrosine · · Score: 1

      "112" is just for European emergency services. I find that phones have all of the emergency numbers for all of the countries they are being sold to (so me being from the UK, I get the US codes) which I suppose is easier than customising it based on destination.

    9. Re:Locked screen? by black3d · · Score: 1

      Dial 112 from the lock screen. Emergency call, almsot every phone, every carrier.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/112_(emergency_telephone_number)

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    10. Re:Locked screen? by black3d · · Score: 1

      Sorry Mdmurphy, I misread - thought you'd said your phone does NOT allow 911 calls when locked. While it's true that some don't, almost all allow 112 while locked. Which, isn't really relevant as that wasn't what you said. Apologies!

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    11. Re:Locked screen? by icebraining · · Score: 2

      The EU has a similar requirement, defined on the Directive 2002/22/EC.

    12. Re:Locked screen? by xaxa · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason all GSM phones have it is because it's a US requirement. Having developed the feature for the US market, the easiest thing is to have it on all phones, no matter where they are sold.

      I think you'll find its a European requirement. GSM originally meant "Groupe Spécial Mobile", which is a clue to its origin.

      My extremely old (early 1990s) GSM phone allowed dialling the emergency number even if the keypad was locked -- either 999, the normal UK number, or 112, which works in every European country (from landlines, too) and every GSM phone.

      The European law is from 1991.

    13. Re:Locked screen? by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      My Nokia N900 does not have this capability. If it is locked, all you can do is try entering codes or turn off the device.

      Let's test that. Try dialing 911 five times ...

    14. Re:Locked screen? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When the device asks for the code, enter the emergency number for your present location. The Emergency call icon appears.

      I wonder what it does if you set your pin as 911 (or 112 or what-ever your local number is). Would it unlock or present the emergency number?

      Seems like a stupid way to implement the feature if you ask me.

    15. Re:Locked screen? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's probably harder on an iPhone than on phones with actual buttons. I had an old Ericsson phone that let me dial the emergency services number when the keypad was locked (apparently, as required by EU regulations). In the UK, this number is 999, and it's really easy to accidentally dial when the phone is in your pocket - if something presses against the corner of the phone three times, you've accidentally called it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Locked screen? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Lack of localization is because of travel. People from one continent can travel to other and still need to contact emergency services.

    17. Re:Locked screen? by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      False at least for Finland. I suspect it's also false for the rest of the continent.

    18. Re:Locked screen? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find its a European requirement. GSM originally meant "Groupe Spécial Mobile", which is a clue to its origin.

      I know very well that GSM is a European Standard. But that's not what I was commenting on. I only mentioned GSM at all because the parent did. The requirement for all phones to be able to make emergency calls without hindrance is a US requirement.

    19. Re:Locked screen? by DnaK420 · · Score: 1

      My MOTO ROKR allows dialing of 911 when locked and i do NOT need to hit any button to start, just need to dial 911 twice and the second time it goes through the lock.

    20. Re:Locked screen? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      The manual (or maybe the Nokia 5800XM manual which I also looked at) actually has a parapraph saying "don't use your local emergency number or 911 or 112 in your PIN", or something to that end.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    21. Re:Locked screen? by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 2

      Are you sure it's 999? I heard that was changed a while back to 0118 999 881 999 119 7253

      --
      No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
    22. Re:Locked screen? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      My Treo 650 had the same problem. On the lock screen, the Unlock button was about 3mm away from the "1-Click dial 911" button.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    23. Re:Locked screen? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Huh, I was double-checking what the GP said, and my first thought was to try entering "911" as an unlock code, but I figured it would only be safe to test if I could pull the battery real quick, and that could mess up my filesystem...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    24. Re:Locked screen? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Not on the Samsung a740.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    25. Re:Locked screen? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because everyone reads the manual......

  4. Why the hell is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Worthy of Slashdot, this is not.

    1. Re:Why the hell is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yoda! Is that you?

    2. Re:Why the hell is this here? by Zen+Punk · · Score: 5, Funny

      When 911 you reach, be more polite you will, hmm?

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    3. Re:Why the hell is this here? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      What the hell does this story have to do with the competence of the government? Or did you just copy/paste the wrong file into your comment...?

    4. Re:Why the hell is this here? by wkcole · · Score: 1

      It is here because tekgoblin wanted traffic and because /. has no actual editors. The original story which tekgoblin ripped off (with a link, so I guess it is OK...) was posted at The Smoking Gun 4 days ago. (Not Actually) News for Nerds: If you want to read sordid trivial examples of what substance abuse can lead to, TSG is the place to find it. Not tekgoblin. Stuff That Matters: 20 years into its free-market life, the Internet is so stuffed full of worthless junk and stupid money that incoherent aggregation sites like tekgoblin can survive on the revenue from robotic ad sales paying for traffic they get by posting summarized TSG stories to /. If 2000-2001 was the bursting of the "Internet Bubble," I guess that what we have now is more of a sclerotic "Internet Pustule."

  5. As an iPhone user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... InB4 : no, not all iPhone user are that stupid.
    (anticipating cunning remarks from self-declared "superior" android users)

    1. Re:As an iPhone user... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... InB4 : no, not all iPhone user are that stupid. (anticipating cunning remarks from self-declared "superior" android users)

      It's true, though: No android user would call the cops while drunk and belligerent. We all leave such mundane tasks to unique hardware and software that we are free to develop in the open android ecosystem, unlike the pitiful iSerfs.

      When I want to get my ass kicked by the cops, my BeagleBoard-based(runs linux, of course) automated kegerator sends me a text message when it hits a threshold deltaBeer/deltaT value. The IOIO attached to my phone uses its breathalyser sensor and firmware to verify my state of inebriation and then sends a GET to the local server that my custom libpigs interface provides. Libpigs dials 911 and uses the Google text-to-speech mechanism to read Markov-chain generated pseudorandom rants based on mashups of obscure punk that you wouldn't have heard of and the lesser known speeches of 19th century radicals until they show up.

      Once the accelerometers verify that I'm getting beaten down, my phone automatically uploads to youtube and starts Googling for personal injury lawyers!

    2. Re:As an iPhone user... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      read Markov-chain generated pseudorandom rants based on mashups of obscure punk that you wouldn't have heard of and the lesser known speeches of 19th century radicals

      Don't you mean Markoff chains ?

      (come on, throw me a frickin' bone here)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  6. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    No thank you on connectorless. If I want to transfer data, I want USB speed not bluetooth. And if I want to charge it, I want it to charge in minutes, not hours.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  7. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by tsa · · Score: 1

    WiFi is fast enough for transferring data.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  8. pet peeve by korendir · · Score: 1

    "obscruction" of justice? News sites should spell-check..

    1. Re:pet peeve by tsa · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like a spell from Harry Potter. "Obscruction!" he shouted. He pointed his wand at professor Umbridge, who fainted instantly.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:pet peeve by syousef · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a spell from Harry Potter. "Obscruction!" he shouted. He pointed his wand at professor Umbridge, who fainted instantly.

      Hey careful with that spell! It gave me a headache all the way over here. I'm pretty sure I lost brain cells just reading it! But JK Rolling-In-The-Money is happy....it increased her merchandise sales by 0.5%

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:pet peeve by tsa · · Score: 2

      Well, she deserves it, so good for her.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:pet peeve by tsa · · Score: 1

      Those people also deserve it but they do not get it. Life is unfair like that.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:pet peeve by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 2

      Why not? I can think of lots of people, most of them would be scientists though, rather than authors but I see no reason why people shouldn't be allowed amass vast wealth if they do something to better society. Especially if it's something like a book, where it's not exactly being greedy or anticompetitive and it's getting kids reading, that deserves lots of money :p

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    6. Re:pet peeve by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If everyone who bought a Harry Potter book got a hour's worth of enjoyment from it, I'd say that she deserves a fairly large recompense. Maybe not quite as much as she has, but I certainly don't begrudge her a few million. The fact that other people may be equally or more deserving yet not rewarded doesn't affect my assessment.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:pet peeve by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Why not? I can think of lots of people, most of them would be scientists though, rather than authors but I see no reason why people shouldn't be allowed amass vast wealth if they do something to better society.

      If they keep it circulating, it doesn't matter. It helps to keep things going.

      On the other hand, if they're allowed to sit on it, that's bad.

  9. Face by tsa · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why does this man's face have to be all over the internet for something as little as what he did? I hope for him he isn't looking for a job or something like that.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  10. What's The News Here? by Nukedoom · · Score: 3

    I don't understand what's so important about a drunk man dialing 911.

    1. Re:What's The News Here? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand what's so important about a drunk man dialing 911.

      He did it with an iPhone, and it gives Slashdotters another chance to act smug and feel superior.

      I'm sure Android users never get drunk or do stupid things.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:What's The News Here? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Android users never get drunk or do stupid things.

      To be fair, I don't know of any Android developers who have lost their expensive, super-secret prototype phones after a night at the bar. Twice.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:What's The News Here? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Sure they do, they purchase Android-based phones! ;)

      Disclaimer: I own an Android-based phone.

    4. Re:What's The News Here? by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Ofcourse not there are even apps for android that discourage drunk dialing by making you solve math problems before you phone/text people :)

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    5. Re:What's The News Here? by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Android users never get drunk or do stupid things.

      Nope. We never do.

      Never.

  11. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    You assume it's available. I don't have a wifi router (my computer is wired). Neither does every hotel I go to (many are wired). Nor do my parents (their single PC is wired). Plus I then have to send my data via the internet, which I may not wish to do. And I'd need a program on the target PC to connect to it.

    Nope. Still want a USB connector.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  12. For how it looks, you have a problem... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Break resistance does cost more than the very lowest of the "Does it boot? Most of the time? Ship that fucker!" school of engineering; but the reasons for the vulnerability of contemporary iDevices and their ilk pretty much come down to what people want, however dubious their priorities.

    They want very slim, they want shiny, they don't want bezels, they want max battery life without increasing thickness. Boom: You have a phone whose case and chassis are a mixture of glass and metal practically calculated to crack and/or transmit shock to circuit boards(at least the Android units tend to only be entirely glass on one side...). Absolutely nothing to give you an elastic collision, no replaceable exterior sacrificial components(remember those now-traumatically-retro Nokia units, whose entire outer casing was a slightly loosely fitting ABS+Polycarbonate replaceable shell with a bit of crumple space between it and anything important? That design probably added more mm to the phone than certain modern devices have; but it meant you could drop the thing, crack the fuck out of it, pick it up, and get a new shell for $5 at the nearest seedy kiosk.)

    The people who care primarily about durability are, unfortunately for them, not quite large enough a market to get the really good stuff. They do pull Real Serious Cases for iPhones, and reasonably ruggedized variants of some of the more widely model-numbered Android designs; but the ones done from the ground up to be rugged tend to be a bit retro.

    1. Re:For how it looks, you have a problem... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      remember those now-traumatically-retro Nokia units, whose entire outer casing was a slightly loosely fitting ABS+Polycarbonate replaceable shell with a bit of crumple space between it and anything important?

      I remember, but at the time I was more carrying the phone than using the phone. Okay for texting I needed a working set of buttons and a screen good enough to read but I didn't need or want a huge interface. On my iPhone I want my maximum size screen so I can surf the net or play games and so that my touchscreen controls are as accurate as possible. The only reason I want to limit is so that it still fits my pocket and talk to it like a normal phone. It'd be the same for an Android.

      I do have a case for my phone, the good thing about that is that I don't have to use it all the time. Or if I'm using my phone for extended periods of time, I can take it out of the casing. That flexibility is worth it to me, and if I screw it up - and I almost did, but my iPhone survived hitting the asphalt with no case from a speeding bike, so it's not that fragile either - then that's a risk I took. Same as if I didn't bother to put on the wriststrap on my Wiimote and it went flying, the solution was obvious but I chose not to use it.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:For how it looks, you have a problem... by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Except oddly enough, my iPhone has lasted longer than any previous cell I've owned. My first gen iPhone is still banging along. I went through 2 Razr's (bad hinges), and a sony (cracked screen).

      Except for some scuff's on the glass, they seem just as durable. Hearsay of course, and I can only judge by what I've owned, but I don't find modern phones to be any more or less durable than my first cell phone, and certainly far more flexible, powerful, and useful.

    3. Re:For how it looks, you have a problem... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Realistically though, does it have to be THIN for that? That's one thing I really don't understand about modern phones - the thinness fetish.

      Think about it. When you hold the phone in your hand(s) for a prolonged amount of time, your hand is shaped to grab it. And the most comfortable shapes for that are found on various handles - fairly thick, rounded at the edges.

      I remember comparing my current cheapo nokia 5230 with several android variants and ip4. In all cases I found that thinness actually detracted from comfortability of holding the phone.

      Funnily now I use my phone primarily as a mobile video playback device when walking (I like to take long walks), where I hold my phone in outstretched hand in front of me for duration of entire walk. I find that weight is not as important (as in a hundred grams here or there, I now use fairly heavy winter gloves and they didn't make a noticeable difference) as phone being properly easy to hold, because the first thing to get tired is not the arm, but the fingers. So my next phone when this one dies will also have to be reasonably thick, so I can grab it naturally and have it fill my hand.

  13. Dear Slashdot by sunr2007 · · Score: 2

    There are many other things to post on science, hardware, tech, linux other than people calling 911 to fix broken iphone. really of all things iphone is so important. WTF has happened to /. . You're just posting stuff related to apple stuff for clicks n traffic. I'm so disappointed.

    1. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Indeed, its pretty pathetic, even below idle. This kind of crap should never be on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      oh come on, slashdot suckage happened years ago while the Taco was on board; he stopped giving a shit long before he left

  14. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    I disagree with the GP for many reasons, but connectorless phones would be awesome. And my inductive charging unit goes nearly as fast as my cable - full charge in an hour or two.

    However, he does forget that phones need holes for audio and mic. And if you have any holes, what's the point?

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  15. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    WiFi is fast enough for transferring data.

    Not for the initial multi gigabyte sync.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  16. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by jmottram08 · · Score: 1

    waterproof mics and speakers are -easy-.

  17. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

    What about a flexible 'phone that you wrap around your wrist and wear as a watch, but it can fold out into a keypad and a flexible screen or just a large touchscreen. Sort of like this idea: http://www.gizmowatch.com/entry/nokia-4g-designer-phone/ maybe you could find a way to charge the 'phone using the swinging motion of walking around to charge the mobile phone.

    --
    liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
  18. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    However, he does forget that phones need holes for audio and mic. And if you have any holes, what's the point?

    Isn't that what bluetooth is for?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  19. No More Apple Bashing! by rueger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously the problem has NOTHING to do with the iPhone or its owner. The issue is why the 911 system is badly designed that this happens.

    An emergency system like 911 really needs a solid and intuitive user interface that will prevent errors like this.

    I look forward to the introduction of i911 on the upcoming iPhone 5.

    1. Re:No More Apple Bashing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i911? sounds complex.

    2. Re:No More Apple Bashing! by rueger · · Score: 2

      I see your activistpost.com and raise you Paroxysm.ca. Amazing fun with Freedom of Information requests!

    3. Re:No More Apple Bashing! by Shikaku · · Score: 2

      LEAVE STEVE ALONE

    4. Re:No More Apple Bashing! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      A solution has already been provided.

      Behold

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    5. Re:No More Apple Bashing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The issue is why the 911 system is badly designed that this happens.

      You jest but, the 911 system is rather strange (at least in Montreal). I have to admit that I haven't had much cause to call the police in my lifetime (lucky I guess). But several years ago I went to Montreal with a friend of mine and he parked his car in a rather iffy place. Sure enough, when we got back to it, the window had been smashed and a few small things had been taken.

      We figured we should call up the police and report it, but as it was hardly an emergency I looked up the telephone number of the local police station and called that. They told us to call 911. I asked them if 911 wasn't supposed to be an emergency system. The person agreed but said that they couldn't handle our request from the normal telephone line.

      Well, it wasn't such a big deal to us because my friend had a very high deductible on his car and wasn't going to use insurance anyway, but just as we were going to give up, a police officer walked by. We waved him over and explained the problem. He was actually in the area because someone had complained about cars being broken into. However, he couldn't handle our request so he told us to call 911.

      We just didn't think it was worth interrupting potentially busy emergency operators to deal with such a small (and unresolvable) problem, so we told him we were going to drop the whole thing. Well, I have to hand it to the dedication of the police officer because he wasn't having any of it. He asked us to wait and *he* called 911. After about 5 minutes he got a call on his radio from the dispatcher asking him to talk to us. At which point he happily took our details.

      It's nice to have a process, but this one kind of blew my mind.

  20. Enough about 911 by tsa · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can turn this thread into a thread about something more interesting. For instance, I always wonder how humans managed to make very straight lines when in the beginning all they had was sticks and stones.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Enough about 911 by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      The quality of our sticks have gone down in the past 10,000 years. Poor quality control.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:Enough about 911 by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Do you mean straight lines in drawings, or straight lines in large works, or in things like blocks of stone? It's quite easy on the small scale, all you need is something string-like you can apply tension to. If you didn't have some sort of fiber, you could use a piece of stretched animal intestine. For larger scale things, you just put marker sticks in the ground and visually line them up. All you have to do is close one eye and look to see if they all disappear behind the front one if you stand in the right spot. Not that I'm claiming that it's easy to do in practice, but the ideas are quite simple. For blocks of stone, if you pick the right stone, and know what you're doing, you can get it to cleave along a very flat plane. If you're chiseling or wearing down the edge, you can use the previously mentioned stretched piece of gut as a guide and work your way along. Or, you can use a pre-existing hard flat surface and some hard grit, and grind down some sort of softer rock on it. Aside from those suggestions, I'm sure there are plenty of other ways to do these things if you're imaginative and good with your hands.

    3. Re:Enough about 911 by tsa · · Score: 1

      That is all true, but how do you get to something as simple as a ruler from there? The problem with the stretched piece of gut or hair is that it bends as soon as you touch it.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Enough about 911 by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      You could carve a straight enough ruler just by eye. If your any bit decent at art you can easily draw incredibly straight lines and pick the half way point almost exactly. I can pick the middle of a small item like a 2 foot bit of timber to within a couple of millimetres. Once you have a couple of semi-accurate markings it's a simple process to refine your measurement incrementally.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    5. Re:Enough about 911 by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Let say you want to have a wooden ruler. First, you get piece of wood in the desired length (or more) which is think and wide enough. Then you produce a mostly rectangular object which can be done without any measurements. Second, you make the surface smooth by rubbing a stone on the desired surface. Third, you get two sticks and a rope (or rope-like thing) knot each rope end to one of the sticks, and use some powder e.g., powdered char and dip the rope into it. Make sure the whole rope is full of char.
      Fourth, now hold the sticks in a way so that the rope is stretched and hold it above the surface of your wooden piece. You have to be very close to the surface. Now you have tow options: a) you use your third hand to pick or twitch the rope which gives you a straight line of char powder on the wood. b) you can lower the rope a little bit so it makes contact with the wood.

      Preferably in construction work today, people you normally option one to do so. So it might be the best method.

      With a straight line, on the wood, you can start to cut the wood accordingly and you get a ruler.

    6. Re:Enough about 911 by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Under enough tension, a stretched piece of gut or hair won't bend much. Prefec2 gave a pretty good process below. That's exactly what tilers, for example do today, use a stretched line coated with colored chalk, pull it up and snap it against a surface. Makes a good, straight line. You could carve a stick into a roughly straight, flat piece, then use a method like that to mark a line, then carve along the line.

      f()rk()_Bomb is completely correct that you can also just do it by eye. Either just by approximation, or, to do it precisely, by closing one eye and looking at it along the edge as you carve.

      Also, you can use the same method I mentioned for blocks of stone with wood and bone. Find an existing flat surface that's harder than what you want to shape, then grind your piece of wood or bone across it. You can also find in nature some quite large rocks that have broken along a cleavage plane to form a perfectly straight edge. You can press your piece of wood hard against that edge to make an impression, then take the piece of wood and carve along the impression. For that matter, maybe you can find a long enough piece of light rock with a naturally perfectly straight edge, such as a long quartz crystal, and use that as your ruler. As for measurement marks on the ruler, that's traditionally done through subdivision. You make two marks, approximate a halfway point, then get a length of something else and mark on it the distance between one edge of your ruler and the halfway point, then you compare that against the length between the other edge and the halfway point. Then you adjust the halfway point accordingly and repeat. Once you've made one measuring stick that way, you can use it as a template for others.

  21. I think I know why he did it: by globalist · · Score: 1
  22. Did they fix it? by Intropy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, did the first-responders fix the phone or not? TFA doesn't say.

    1. Re:Did they fix it? by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They had to jailbreak it.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  23. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    It would certainly carry a premium over standard boring USB(and essentially zero power); but I'd be interested to see how fast an optical link you could (economically) achieve under 'near optoisolator' conditions: emitter/receiver pair in the phone, behind the little window, matching emitter/receiver pair in the dock/dongle/whatever.

    Given that the RONJA-link guys manage to get 10Mb/s out of an LED over multiple KM of free air, I suspect that you could get a decent slice of USB throughput through a liquid-impermeable chassis with a fairly cheap optical mechanism...

  24. Arrested for a call by slasho81 · · Score: 2

    The true absurdity of this story is that in the US non-violent drunk people are being arrested for petty stuff like that. Fine the guy and be done with it.

    1. Re:Arrested for a call by tsa · · Score: 1

      It's not that absurd. Here in the Netherlands we had many people abusing 112, as 911 is called here. This can cost lives, so t's now punished severely.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Arrested for a call by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      You think this drunk guy was rationally weighing the consequences of him dialing 911 and concluding to himself that the punishment is not that harsh so he'll just do it?

    3. Re:Arrested for a call by tsa · · Score: 1

      You can not punish individual people differently for the same crime.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Arrested for a call by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should think twice before getting drunk enough to do stupid things like this? Seriously, drunkenness as excuse is disgusting.

    5. Re:Arrested for a call by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm talking right there. In the US, it's so natural for common people to be arrested. "I've had friends arrested" is not something you hear outside the US from a regular guy unless he's in organized crime. "I got arrested" is not something you hear from someone in the same levity as "I had a flat tire". Outside the US, being arrested is a big deal and the police doesn't arrest people for petty stuff.

    6. Re:Arrested for a call by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Abuse the emergency services line like this guy did, in the more-civilized country of your choice, and see what happens.

      "Okay, we're going to fine you now" doesn't stop a guy that's repeatedly calling and tying up emergency services.

      Not defending the US's draconian imprisonment policies in general, but I have to agree with the police here.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    7. Re:Arrested for a call by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I'm not for the tasing of normal people, but these brainless two-legged carbon sacks that tie up 911 lines for frivolous reasons should have the anterior portion of their rectum tasered.

  25. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Any surface that vibrates can, if you can measure the vibration, serve as a mic(take a look at the hilariously sneaky story of the Soviets using radar to observe the vibrations of some metal plaque they had "politely" donated to the American embassy on some occasion, or the contemporary bouncing-IR-lasers-off-windows devices that achieve the same ends). Similarly, any surface that can be vibrated can be coaxed into being a (on average terrible) speaker.

    It would be unlikely to do as well as a conventional mic and speakers, and would cost more; but you could implement a 100% sealed chassis and still get audio in and out.

  26. Re:This story is posted on slashdot... by Z34107 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    He's some dirtbag who thinks that freedom should be for everybody - except for pregnant women. Those, he believes the state should force into involuntary servitude.

    He's an OBGYN. He won one of his early elections because he had delivered just about every baby in a county:

    His successful campaign against Gammage surprised local Democrats, who had expected to retain the seat easily due to the Watergate scandal. Gammage underestimated Paul's popularity among local mothers: "I had real difficulty down in Brazoria County, where he practiced, because he'd delivered half the babies in the county. There were only two obstetricians in the county, and the other one was his partner."

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  27. Why is this on Slashdot? by ThePeices · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How exactly is this news for nerds?

    In what possible way is this serious news of a technical nature, or anything that would interest the sort of people this website is supposed to be aimed at?

    This should at the very least be in the Idle section.

    Come on Slashdot Editors, do your job properly!

    1. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by georgesdev · · Score: 2

      well, it's attracted lots of comments from slashdot nerds, so somehow it fits slashdot

    2. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      You fed the trolls, YHL, HAND.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      In what possible way is this serious news of a technical nature, or anything that would interest the sort of people this website is supposed to be aimed at?

      Many of us are charged with making technology foolproof. As to the old adage, file this one under the know-thine-enemy dept.

      Plus, we can rant about how some people want one call to the government to fix all their problems.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by microbee · · Score: 1

      We all know nerds don't drink. At least are never drunk. So when a drunk man gets to be laughed about, we seize the opportunity.

      It's like supermodels always laugh at fat asses. Same thing.

  28. Re:611? by duggoc · · Score: 1

    upside-down phone + AT&T support = 911 So it's AT&T's fault!

  29. Re:This story is posted on slashdot... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    wrong.

  30. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by sjames · · Score: 2

    It is possible to have connectors as well as a user changeable battery and still be water tight.

  31. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by tsa · · Score: 1

    And if you measure the frequency response of that vibrating thingy beforehand you can in the software compensate for the lack of quality of the analogue part of the device.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  32. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2

    I like being able to use Bluetooth. I wouldn't much like being forced to.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  33. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could, but how well would it work? Presumably you'd connect the voice coil right to some sort of waterproof diaphragm, in which case it's just a super-durable speaker, but wouldn't that severely dull the frequency response - regardless of compensation?

    More troubling, there's a lot less force pushing on that microphone than there is (potentially) on the speaker. And you can't really compensate for what you lack to begin with.

    My usage of "need" was imprecise. You can wrap a phone in cellophane and it'll still work just fine, so it's not a necessity... but that's not really what I meant.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  34. Re:Only deserved a fine by tragedy · · Score: 1

    But that would scare people away from calling 911. People often need to call the police about things that aren't immediate emergencies, but still need to reach them quickly and don't have the police phone number on hand. Sometimes those situations can turn into emergencies. So, generally what actually happens is that people calling 911 for non-emergencies don't get in trouble unless they keep calling and ignore warnings to stop.

    What happened here is unclear. It's possible that this person really did call 911 for help with his phone. That seems unlikely though. It's more likely to be hyperbole on the part of those reporting it. Probably what happened is that he was trying to dial 611, or some other assistance number as others suggested and kept getting it wrong. Or, there might have been some sort of automatic emergency call feature that he kept accidentally activating and, when the 911 operator asked him why he was calling, he drunkenly explained that he was having trouble with his phone.

    Personally, I'm always uncomfortable when I hear that someone was arrested for not following a police officers orders. The authority of the police to give orders to people is supposed to be very limited. If they had simply arrested him for making false emergency calls, I could see that. The fact that they didn't use that reason to arrest him suggests that they probably couldn't due to the circumstances. More likely, they were ordering him to come out of his house to talk to them or ordering him to let them into his house to search it, etc. Probably they have a policy to treat 911 hangups, etc. as emergencies by default (for example, kidnap victim managed to call 911 and the kidnapper snatched the phone away and hung up), giving them probable cause to search his house, etc. Still whenever I hear that someone has been arrested for the sole crime of not obeying police orders or resisting arrest it rankles me.

  35. Reason by Dokterdok · · Score: 1

    It is likely that he tried to call 911 to carrier-unlock his iPhone 4. This is apparently necessary with the Gevey Sim Unlock technique.

  36. Yes... of course by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The apologist is strong in this one. The police of course don't know the difference between but dialing and someone harrassing 911. They can't just show the difference because these messages are recorded.

    Really, to often slashdot posters just try to find an excuse for everything no matter how silly.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  37. RTFA by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the pertinent quote;
    "He was arrested because he would not follow the police officers orders."
    He was not arrested for making the calls; he was arrested for being a drunken idiot when the police responded to the multiple 911 calls. They may have even taken him into custody for his own protection if he was that drunk.

    1. Re:RTFA by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      This is an absolute misrepresentation of what happened in this incident. From another article that is more complete than the cited one, the man called five times and talked to an operator five times demanding that his phone be fixed. That was no drunken accident.

      The law that 911 can be dialed from behind a lock screen is a good one. It allows anyone to get help in an emergency. Would you want someone to die because they forgot their pin in a stressful situation like bleeding to death?

      Even if it was your scenario lets take an alternate path. You hack on you phone in a very drunken state. Accidentally call 911 five time. The police come, you do not respond and they leave. You puke in your lungs and die. Your survivors sue the police. Or alternately, the police come, you respond in a very belligerent and drunken state. The police go away. You pass out, puke into your lungs and die. Your survivors sue the police. Either way you are dead and the police are fired for not doing their job.

  38. Re:611? by wygit · · Score: 1

    That was actually my first thought. It seems like a really obvious mistake for someone drunk and a bit confused who wanted support for his phone.

  39. Re:Still doesn't beat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  40. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no reason that Apple's products need to be so fragile.

    The problem is people feelings.

    Whenever the debate over breakable phones happen, I inevitably hear the words "$ANDROID_PHONE _feels_ cheap and plasticy, like it's going to fall apart and Iphone _feels_ solid" I facepalm.

    If I drop my phone our of my pocket, 1 metre onto concrete, HARDNESS IS NOT YOUR FRIEND. The more flexible plastic which has more tensile strength so it will adsorb the impact, not to mention the components that are meant to come apart (I.E. battery cover) which serves to dissipate the kinetic energy. Tensile strength is what will save a phone in an impact, the hard casing of the iphone works against it's durability. If only people stopped relying on their "feelings" and used their brains when considering survivability.

    I've dropped my HTC Dream and Motorola Milestone. The back came off the Dream but apart from that, it still works fine. The Moto was the same the first time, but the second time the slider for the keyboad broke, the phone itself still works, no cracked screens of cases, but the keyboard will eventually come off. Haven't dropped my HTC Desire Z yet, I guess it's because nothing better with a physical KB has come out :)

    I've got an old Nokia 6500 C, metal and plastic case, survived half a dozen drops. 3 years and still working.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  41. Re:News! by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Worthy of Slashdot, this is not.

    Are you kidding? First definitive proof that the iPhone is not idiot proof? This is indeed news.

  42. would not work here by georgesdev · · Score: 1

    Here we don't have emergency calling when the phone is locked (at least not on iPhone). So it would not happen as easily.
    People do get drunk here too, but calling emergency is so well hidden in our phone system that it would be hard to do for a drunk guy.

  43. iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This proves that people who buy iPhones are too stupid to live.

  44. Idiot by JohannesJ · · Score: 1

    I dont know who said it , but there is an idiot born every minute?

  45. Re:This story is posted on slashdot... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    He's a US Presidential candidates who believes that having unpolluted land and food that is fit for human consumption are privileges, not rights, and that the government has no business interfering with businesses' God-given rights to dump waste wherever they want.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  46. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by tyger_purr · · Score: 1

    My iPhone can be submerged for hours and still work, in fact it can work while submerged.That is because I put my iPhone in a case that it appropriate for my level of use and abuse.

    The way I look at it Apple makes the insides and I put on the outsides that I need.

  47. don't drink and iphone by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    don't drink and iphone

  48. Re:Only deserved a fine by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Yes Alexander (APK), I must have issues with authority figures. I think I also have issues with creepy, crazy cyber-stalkers.

  49. Re:News! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Idiot proof? The iphone got a drunk moron in jail.

    Maybe I should fear siri now...

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  50. Re:For what it costs, it shouldn't break. by Animats · · Score: 1

    However, he does forget that phones need holes for audio and mic. And if you have any holes, what's the point?

    Kyrocera, Casio, and Motorola have all solved that problem. They have waterproof speakers and mics, and their ruggedized phones can withstand immersion in water.

  51. I don't buy it by residieu · · Score: 1

    If his iPhone was broken, how did he call 911? I call shenanigans!

  52. When in doubt, alcohol by Machtyn · · Score: 1

    It has yet to be made clear what he was actually trying to accomplish by calling 911 to get help with his iPhone.

    Does it matter? He was drunk. He wasn't actually trying to accomplish anything.

  53. Re:Only deserved a fine by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Posting with a link to the parent post. Alexander, you really have gone off the deep end.

  54. Apologies first: I didn't RTFM by pkinetics · · Score: 1

    iPhones don't get drunk morons in jail... drunk morons get drunk morons in jail!

  55. Re:iStupid, iDumb, iBelongInJail by pkinetics · · Score: 1

    iOccupyJail?

  56. Re:Still doesn't beat... by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

    Ummm, why is the guy pictured in that link the same guy pictured in the iPhone story?

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  57. IOS 5 beta by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I ran the IOS 5 beta. Whenever I checked for updates after the official IOS beta came out, I was told that my phone was up-to-date.

    A few weeks afterwards, I went to use my phone and it was locked with some kind of "can not connect server" error. I could only make 911 calls. I had to connect my phone to a computer and completely restore it. At the time I needed to make an important phone call. I ended up making the call two hours late due to this problem.

    I could easily see a drunk guy accidentally dialing 911 because of this.

    Needless to say, I will never buy another another iPhone, and I will strongly discourage anyone from using an iPhone beta. My cell phone is my primary communication device, and I refuse to pay money for any phone that would disable itself without any form of warning whatsoever.

  58. What confuses me most is... by drb226 · · Score: 1

    ...if his iPhone was broken, how did he make the call?

  59. Re:Let Tom Cruise tell you what YOU need, lmao by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Ok. So you've posted the same copy and pasted reply here, here, here, here, here and here. Both to threads you've been signing in as APK, and those where you were pretending to be some random AC with a grudge against me and a massive admiration for you and sympathy for your goals. Thankfully, this seems to cap off this mess. I'm posting this reply (also copy and pasted) to each of those posts to focus things again. Just in case you feel you need to post again, no need to carry on each of these frayed ends, just reply to this post.

  60. Never rely on wireless by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    From the manual for the cell phone:

    You should never rely solely on any wireless device for essential communications like medical emergencies.

    Remember that everyone who doesn't have a landline phone, or worse yet, wants to dismantle the public switched telephone network.

    If you have an emergency, you want to have an non-IP landline phone! Or a good life insurance policy!

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!