Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Working As an IT Contractor In a War Zone?

Capt. Picklepants writes "I have been feeling malaise about the IT and technical job market in the United States. I'm interested in doing some IT work for our government in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Africa. I've heard it pays very well. Got any advice, or pointers, aside from the usual combing corporate websites and social networking?"

352 comments

  1. Why explicitly war zone? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's lots of world to see outside US and its war zones. Go to China, Thailand, Cambodia, Singapore or Philippines. It's extremely easy for a westerner to find jobs in Asia if they just know something, especially in IT. Life is generally more relaxing too. I've done just that, but I don't work for anyone, I work as freelancer over the internet.

    However, there's a huge amount of employers that can hire you, if you rather take a stable paycheck. This includes both westerners who have set up companies and moved there and also companies by locals. IT is huge in Asia. The funny thing is, it's also a job widely appreciated by local women, and often you find women working in IT. Really knowledgeable ones, too.

    On top of that you get great weather, nice people and relaxing lifestyle. You might get marginally lower wage, but then again the cost of living is insanely smaller too.

    1. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by epdp14 · · Score: 1

      I am actually pretty interested in this. I have been looking in Southeast Asia but I am having a hard time finding job postings... any recommendations? I only speak English and Spanish (which I assume is useless there), is that a problem in finding a job there?

    2. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      local women from aphganistan, or Iraq ;-) ????

    3. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.. I don't have any problems finding jobs in places like China, but almost all of them require Mandarin or Cantonese as a spoken language.

    4. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is it common to request work in a warzone? Are those requests ever fulfilled? I'd expect some extreme security checks, since other than specifying exactly which warzone you want to go to, there's not much more of a spy-like activity you could take.

      If I were running a war, as a general policy, if someone wants to work somewhere, my answer would be, "No, and by the way, follow the nice man with the sunken knuckles into that extremely bare room." Either that, or "Oh yeah absolutely" and then bugging the everloving crap out of everything you do for the rest of your life.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As far as languages go, only speaking English shouldn't be a problem in most places (except for China, I don't really know how it's there). Philippines and Singapore is really good place if you just know English, and most people working in IT in Thailand also speak good English. Of course it always helps if you look for companies run by other westerners. There's actually lot of them, especially in Bangkok. Most are also expats who wanted to move there just like you and then set up their own company, so they are generally more relaxed people too.

    6. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by sureshot007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with wanting to work in a war zone? The pay is usually better, and some people like the daily excitement.

    7. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's lots of world to see outside US and its war zones. Go to China, Thailand, Cambodia, Singapore or Philippines. It's extremely easy for a westerner to find jobs in Asia if they just know something, especially in IT. Life is generally more relaxing too. I've done just that, but I don't work for anyone, I work as freelancer over the internet.

      However, there's a huge amount of employers that can hire you, if you rather take a stable paycheck. This includes both westerners who have set up companies and moved there and also companies by locals. IT is huge in Asia. The funny thing is, it's also a job widely appreciated by local women, and often you find women working in IT. Really knowledgeable ones, too.

      On top of that you get great weather, nice people and relaxing lifestyle. You might get marginally lower wage, but then again the cost of living is insanely smaller too.

      I've also been interested in this, but find it incredibly hard to find reliable postings. I don't know where to begin networking and wish there was a source of reliable recruiters. Please post how you did this.

    8. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by jmauro · · Score: 2

      Is it common to request work in a warzone?

      Yes, mainly because it pays really, really well compaired to other jobs in the IT industry for the same level of work. Granted the hours are usually horrible (12 on/12 off for months at a time).

    9. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by goarilla · · Score: 5, Informative

      A friend of mine was almost recruited to do this a few years ago (2005 iirc). The pay was 600 $/day in Iraq.

    10. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Almandine · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, it's not common to request work in a warzone. In general, the companies involved will put out job postings for internal and external candidates. Those job postings will specifically spell out which warzone and the type of work involved. They will also point out the hazard pay for taking that risk.

    11. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      > I work as freelancer over the internet.

      Sounds very nice, but how do you find and get those jobs? I've been freelancing a bit too, but I only get local gigs through people I already know.

    12. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by sureshot007 · · Score: 1

      For $600/day and the ability to quit and go home when I'd had enough, I'd consider it too.

    13. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With your living expenses paid for too... If you are single, and willing to take the risk, that is good solid money, You can save up/invest a boat load of money. When the US picks up you can get a good job there too and with 200/300k saved up you will be on good standing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Garybaldy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a friend who just got back this year from doing IT in Iraq. He loved it (well not the heat). He gave it up to be with his new baby. The money he made was stupidly high.

    15. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      I've lived in Thailand for 3 years over my career. It's harder now than it used to be, but you can get legitimate work locally (although telecommuting is much easier and better paying). The last year, I made a US salary (plus a little), only needed to work 40 hours a week. Down-side was my hours were 9PM-midnight and 4AM-8AM six days a week, and I was back in the US at least once a month. (Not that bad, except it was 48-hours door-door from the island I was living on.)

      Singapore offers much better pay; easiest way to find work is to get on with a US company that has a presence there (oil industry is easiest).

      Hong Kong is interesting as well; worked there for a year. Be prepared for liver issues later in life though...

    16. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with wanting to work in a war zone? The pay is usually better, and some people like the daily excitement.

      Because gleefully exclaiming that the money is worth the risk is probably an indicator of an unstable personality at best, if not a depressed/suicidal disorder. People are *supposed* to fear death, it's what makes them generally live longer and therefore be a more reliable employee. A competent manager would have the same reservations about hiring someone who drove a 1000cc sportbike to work every day with no helmet on because they were "a busy person".

      More deeply, by and large someone who has never worked in a "warzone" who says "i want to work in a warzone" should be directly enlisting in the military, as they have the resources to protect n00bs from killing themselves too easily. Someone who says "i want to freelance in a warzone for the kicks!" who has never done it before in all likelihood has NO idea what they are actually getting themselves into, and will be a risk to themselves and others until they have a significant amount of experience.

    17. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by david.a.judge · · Score: 2

      Thailand? Cambodia? Philippines? Seriously???? Local rates of pay are around 800 USD per month are the average. There is no shortage of local talent. There are major language barriers. I've lived in Thailand for 20 years and I get asked the same question once a week by some hopeful who has come for a holiday and 'likes the lifestyle' (i.e. the women) Forget it unless you are sent on an ex-pat package by a company you are already working for, in which case it's great, but those postings are highly sort after.

    18. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's wrong with wanting to work in a war zone? The pay is usually better, and some people like the daily excitement.

      Yeah, a friend just got back from spending most of the last two years in Afghanistan.

      Apparently the rocket attacks and periodic deaths on the base were really exciting.

      He said pretty much after someone got killed 75 feet from where he was standing, if he heard the warning sirens he'd hit the deck even if he was in the latrine -- he figured crap washed off, but dead didn't. One of his co-workers rattled off the number of rocket attacks, suicide bombers, and other nasties that happened while he was there -- it didn't sound like a recruiting pitch to me.

      He did get well paid, but I think he's pretty glad it's over now. They call it 'danger pay' for a reason.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    19. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by delinear · · Score: 1

      Likely because the pay and infrastructure are better. It's difficult to relocate to a country where you don't know the language or the local customs. If there's a big military presence there, you have a handy home away from home environment built in (albeit with bullet dodging thrown into the mix); there will either be plenty of other contractors from your country there, or there will be support in the form of translators, etc that you wouldn't get elsewhere (not unless elsewhere was really serious about hiring in foreign contractors).

    20. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by sureshot007 · · Score: 2

      People drive sport bikes without helmets all the time in states that don't require it. Nothing unusual there.

      Just because you don't fear death, that doesn't mean you have a death wish, nor does it make you an less stable. If someone came to me and said, "I will pay off all your student loans and credit card debt, buy you a brand new house, a new car, and all you have to do is work in Iraq for a year"....well if I wasn't gainfully employed, I wouldn't be crazy for considering it.

    21. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am actually pretty interested in this. I have been looking in Southeast Asia but I am having a hard time finding job postings... any recommendations? I only speak English and Spanish (which I assume is useless there), is that a problem in finding a job there?

      English would do you well in Singapore and the Philippines. Also in Tokyo or Seoul. Spanish would also come in handy in the Philippines as a lot of the Tagalog vocabulary is based/borrowed from Castillian. Spanish and English (and/or Portuguese and English) would also come in handy for many Japanese companies that do business in Latin America. My wife (she is Japanese) used to work for a Japanese company that did a ton of business in Latin America (and a lot of its business was conducted in said languages.)

      From an IT perspective, English would help you a lot. And if you want to explore business opportunities, Spanish might prove an invaluable asset depending where you go.

    22. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      local women from aphganistan, or Iraq ;-) ????

      Good way to get beheaded. Seriously.

    23. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 1

      I work in SEO and webmastering, so I don't really need to find jobs from other people. Sometimes I do work for clients, but most of the time I run my own portfolio of websites that bring income from affiliate networks and advertiser deals. And signing up to those is much easier, as they aren't obligated to pay anything else than the commissions you generate based on your sales or leads.

    24. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      600.00 $US (even in 2005) wasn't a lot (even with the tax breaks)
      to work in a potentially life-ending environment.

    25. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's wrong with wanting to work in a war zone? The pay is usually better, and some people like the daily excitement.

      Start with taking a "great job" at an office in your local neighborhood inner city and see how you like it. That's where I am. Two shootings within the last 6 years within 200 feet of our lot although no one died (as far as I know), and they pulled a dead body out of the river just a couple months ago, just a couple feet from my window, theres a sight I didn't need to see. Smashed glass everywhere and riots after the annual street festival, which was finally cancelled after two years in a row of shootings (shootings not near my office). Anyone who leaves anything in a car can expect smashed windows... I park underneath a security cam, near the door, work in the daytime, never keep anything in the car, all good so far... Siege mentality gets tiring after awhile, but at least I only have to live it for about 40 hours a week, you'd be stuck there 24x7.

      There tends to be pretty intense "blame the victim" attitude in slums, maybe war zones too. She shouldn't have been wearing that outfit, walking in the parking lot after dark, he shouldn't have left anything to steal inside his car, they should have known there would be racial incidents after the street festival like every year, the victim is always to blame, that's why I personally have no reason to fear, right? Its a defense mechanism. An annoying one.

      My wife and kids are categorically denied to visit me at work under any circumstances except maybe during sunlight in the winter and even then watch your back at all times, and they would only live/work in a slum over my dead body. Speaking of which, you may find family members threatening to chain you up in the basement to prevent you from going to a warzone, hard to say.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    26. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like what... 180,000 a year? Definitely good pay, but I'd want twice that much for a warzone. I make more than that and I don't have to leave my house that often

    27. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's pretty simple really. The next time you get an email from Nigeria, Sierra Leone, the Ivory Coast, or just about any country you might be interested in working in just write back asking if they need an IT person to maintain their email server. Be sure and get them to front you the cash for the plane ticket.

    28. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      People drive sport bikes without helmets all the time in states that don't require it. Nothing unusual there.

      Just because you don't fear death, that doesn't mean you have a death wish, nor does it make you an less stable. If someone came to me and said, "I will pay off all your student loans and credit card debt, buy you a brand new house, a new car, and all you have to do is work in Iraq for a year"....well if I wasn't gainfully employed, I wouldn't be crazy for considering it.

      There is certainly room on the spectrum for risk-takers who don't want to die outright; but there is a big difference on that spectrum between contemplating a lucrative job offer that involves risk, and saying "i am hard up for money so give me the riskiest thing possible". The latter kind is probably prone to unaccountably risky behavior when it comes to carrying out their job functions as well.

    29. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Malties · · Score: 1

      Really? Most of the soldiers over there would be happy to make that in a week.

    30. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look into the philipines they speak english and spanish (and more, but at least it gets you started)

    31. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Yes, mainly because it pays really, really well compaired to other jobs in the IT industry for the same level of work. Granted the hours are usually horrible (12 on/12 off for months at a time).

      Before I really got into IT, I worked as a deckhand on an offshore oil exploration (seismic) crew. We worked 12 hrs/day 14 days straight, then 7 days off (including transport back to home base). The company put us up in motels every night, everything was paid for. The hourly rate didn't seem too great - but I got time and a half for 4 hours a day, and had nothing to spend money on but the beer after work. For a single guy it was great - you didn't really even need a place to live, just go on vacation every third week.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    32. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Go work on camp bastion. Next to nothing happens there. And I worked as a logistics contractor there for 2 years.
      In those 2 years we had no rocket attacks, a couple of bomb threats but they are mostly an inconvenience rather than an actual threat (unless it's your job to go out and investigate/defuse the thing). But the place is so huge you'd be INCREDIBLY unlucky to get caught in a mortar strike (Which happened to me in Basrah but that's another story). Kandahar or Kabul though, they're always getting hit with all sorts of crap.

      Get to Bastion if you really must work in a "warzone" BUT don't do it if you are anything less than 101% sure you want to do it.
      Good money though. You don't need to spend much while you're out there and you're getting quite a bit more cash than even the soldiers out there with you (been on that side of the fence as well).

    33. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Spoken like a person who has never been to warzone. There's a great number of things wrong with your post, so I'll enumerate them:

      1) Contractors are rarely killed in warzones. There've been a few high profile incidents, but it's a very uncommon event. Moreover, of the contractors that *are* killed, the vast majority are either trucking contractors or security contractors. People that spend a lot of time "outside the wire" (basically not on our bases). I'd be shocked to hear that the number of IT contractors killed in Iraq/Afghanistan goes above the single digits. You're probably as safe as you would be driving a half hour to work on the highway every day.

      2) Lots of people ride motorbikes to work without helmets in places that it's legal to so. People perform various other risky activities too. they have unprotected sex in non-monogamous relationships, they climb mountains, they go cave diving... There are an endless variety of things that people do, some of them explicitly because they are, or seem, dangerous.

      3) The pay in the military sucks by comparison to what contractors make. You also spend years in training, can't always guarantee that you'll be doing the job you signed up for (several of my "IT" soldiers spent their tour in Iraq on guard duty assigned to one of our line companies), and you can't quit if you decide you don't like it. On top of that, while it's true that soldiers are better trained than contractors, they are also often doing far more dangerous jobs. The number of contractors killed in action pales compared to the number of troops killed in action.

      4) IT contractors aren't breaking down doors and rushing into combat. They're doing IT. Usually on a base. The chance that they'll ever see an enemy combatant, let alone have a chance to be "a risk to themselves and others" is small. If they do see action it will be on a road traveling between bases, and likely the driver will be a soldier and know what to do. Contractor's job is: get low, stay low, don't freak out any more than you have too.

      There are thousands of contractors working on every base in every conflict zone. It's a perfectly normal and accepted part of the gig. Nobody thinks they're nuts, soldiers are mostly jealous that they make so much more than we do.

      I will caution the original poster on a few things though. Contracting work in a hot zone is not fun and games. The pay is good, but there are lots of downsides. You often work 12 hour days, 6-7 days a week. What leisure time you do have is constrained: you usually can't leave base, there are no movie theaters, no restaurants beyond a Burger King or Pizza Hut (and then only on larger bases), Internet connectivity is extremely chancy, and TV is limited to AFN (Armed Force Network, pretty good mix of programs but only a couple channels). While what i said earlier about it being fairly safe is true, it's not completely safe by any means, and even when they aren't aimed at you hearing explosions in the distance all the time can get... disconcerting. On the bright side, on any decent sized base you have cell service so your family is easy to stay in touch with, unlike in earlier wars.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    34. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      IT worker means, I assume, never going over the wall (or berm, fence, what have you). For people stationed strictly on base a warzone can be safer than many parts of the US. Hell, it can be safer than a 45 minute commute every day. It's a calculated risk to earn 3-4x the money, often with significant tax breaks; if student loans and a home mortgage are the prison some slashdotters make them out to be, a year or two of this will earn you a get out of jail free card. Now maybe I'm wrong and the Poster is looking for a job in the field dodging bullets and roping out of helicopters, but the fact is they don't give those jobs to desk jockeys because, guess what, they're not physically and emotionally prepared for it the way a trained soldier is.

    35. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Don't they only punish the women?

    36. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by cmholm · · Score: 1

      There's obviously not a meeting of minds between you and the people who actually run a war. ;) If you surf through the jobs sites for the major defense contractors, they are advertising explicitly for locations in IQ and AF. The State Department and other civilian agencies generally have to twist arms to get people to work in theater, so as far as they're concerned, qualified individuals who want to go just make their job easier.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    37. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add less chance for being a target for some group looking for hostages. Civilian contractors usually make easy targets for those looking to take a hostage or two. With a technological background that may make you more attractive as both a hostage and possibly them being able to gather intelligence from interrogating you. "What type servers are they running, what version, what OS, how many users, what's the average server loads"
      Contractor Casualties
      Jobs in Danger Zones
      Google Doc Link to PDF of what you may expect working in a war zone
      Thousands of Civilian Contractors left behind in war zones

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    38. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, you're a spammer.

    39. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it sounds better at the funeral when they say, he stepped on a landmine while dragging a cable( to get his daily fix of quake ) rather than he accidentally choked to death on some 3 day old pizza and wasn't found until his mother checked up on him a week later.

    40. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I skydive and BASE jump in my spare time. I don't want to die, am not suicidal, and if you met me you would have no idea about my hobbies unless I told you.

      Some people are just set up biologically with different risk/reward calculators. It doesn't make us poor hires (in fact, I do quite well). You should learn to accept that.

    41. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Bardwick · · Score: 4, Informative

      My brother did something similar. The company he contracted to kept 20% of his pay in reserve. If he stayed for 1 year, he got all that money back. If he left before, he forfiet... He was pulling $140,000 as opposed to $90 in the states. Not bad for construction.

    42. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      There is certainly room on the spectrum for risk-takers who don't want to die outright; but there is a big difference on that spectrum between contemplating a lucrative job offer that involves risk, and saying "i am hard up for money so give me the riskiest thing possible". The latter kind is probably prone to unaccountably risky behavior when it comes to carrying out their job functions as well.

      There's also the case to be made for risk takers applying their attitude toward their work. You probably won't get awesome innovation if you're incapable of adapting or fear change. I don't think that someone who rides a motorcycle without a helmet should be summarily rejected... but at the same time, I'd have a backup plan in case the eventuality of an accident finally meets up with them.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    43. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by archont · · Score: 1, Funny

      1. Where should I send my CV?

      2. Is free pot a perk?

      3. Is speaking Spanish a requirement?

    44. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Thailand... low crime, they like Americans, (assuming from English and Spanish) the food is great, cell phone and internet access everywhere, high speed in any moderate sized city.

    45. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some people might just crave the adrenaline. that's not a cause for suspicion, or at least it shouldn't be. I know when i'm at my desk, i day dream of more exciting pastures, at least...! I've actually investigated the logistics involved in visiting some of those war torn countries (iRAq, afghanistan, pakistan, etc). But, to my limited budget and really, my sense of self preservation, both of those have dictated that visits to those locale's should probably be put off for some time! But if i saw an ad in the paper advertising the need for someone with my skills to go there, i would be writing them immediately. And that shouldn't end me up on a watchlist.

    46. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      You sound scared, do you realize that no matter what you do, you will die?

      There's a quote about a roller coaster somewhere in here...

      think about it, life is different with 6 figures saved up, money isn't everything, but it's certainly a propellant to get you places.

      My issue w the contractor pay is that doesn't it come out of taxpayer dollars?

    47. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What city is this? I've lived in a number of cities all across the US, and this seems a bit exaggerated.

    48. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thailand... low crime, they like Americans, (assuming from English and Spanish) the food is great, cell phone and internet access everywhere, high speed in any moderate sized city.

      As an added bonus there are plenty of ladyboys.

    49. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by flanders_down · · Score: 0

      people have been skinned.

    50. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by flanders_down · · Score: 0

      Being a westerner, and being a geek, you probably wouldn't be toting any protection beyond a cellphone. That places you in a very precarious position. You'd be a prime target for kidnapping and easy meat for a drive-by or casual sniping.

      You wouldn't really be safe outside of a compound, and possibly not even there. I spent most of 40 years in combat zones. It's a damned hard place to live if you aren't armed and don't have team mates to cover your ass. IMHO, people who like "daily excitement" don't generally need to worry about having piles of money for later. Mainly because they don't get a "later," just dead.

    51. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's why so many don't re-enlist, and instead join a private security firm... to be deployed in the same country! Much better pay, less rules... don't expect them to worry as much about leaving you behind in a firefight, though. Cross your fingers.

    52. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by mlts · · Score: 2

      I'd say there is an exception... Working in a war zone for very high pay for 6-12 months and knowingly taking the risk to life and limb... then banking the money and sitting back for 5-10 years in a semi-retired state working on stuff you would like to do.

      In this economy where for someone without a lot of IT experience has few options on jobs, working overseas in a combat area is very risky, but the payoff is big too. Take a $150,000 contract for six months (which for some things is at the low end of the pay range). A person who knows what they are doing can live frugally through the contract, then arrive back in the states with a sizable nest egg that can be used to go back to college with, or even use as seed money for a good business venture.

      So, blindly working in a war zone just for a war zone is foolish, but someone who is being an educated gambler and taking the risk so they can choose what they want to do in life from then onwards might be worth it.

    53. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 2

      One of the things I would recommend, which I'm doing myself, is find a company that has international operations now and see if you can get transferred to one of their other countries of operation after a certain amount of time working here in the US. Currently waiting out my time to go to Ireland for a couple years.

    54. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad, honestly. I worked in Iraq for a year and it's a normal Secret clearance check. Half the time you can go over and work with a temp Secret clearance and not get a clearance in a year or two.

    55. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not uncommon to double or triple your US salary over there.

    56. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Contract work in a warzone is ok, but not for everyone. Of the approximately 100 folks we've sent over for work there, only 1 actually got off the plane and then got back on the SAME plane to come home. Most of the others did their tours.

    57. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by vipw · · Score: 1

      They don't actually pay as well. YMMV

    58. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like most of Newark, NJ these days. I used to commute there daily for school, the conditions sound about right. Its gotten much worse in the past 2 years.

    59. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by vipw · · Score: 1

      That's not spam. He's just doing what he can to make the world a worse place.

    60. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Go to China, Thailand, Cambodia, Singapore or Philippines. It's extremely easy for a westerner to find jobs in Asia if they just know something, especially in IT.

      You are right about Singapore, this is one of the good spots in Asia for western IT specialists. Malaysia is also pretty good. But China, Cambodia, Thailand or the Philippines... pretty low salaries and overall bad working conditions.

      The richer countries (South Korea, Japan) are also a bad choice; people get ripped off frequently by local companies, and jobs with western companies are usually not well-paid, people underestimate the cost of living in those places.

      This being said, getting a job in Asia usually requires a work visa, and those are hard to come by. In many countries, such as those you mention, getting caught working while having a tourist visa can lead to a really bad situation, including (but not limited to) jail and heavy fines.

      For someone looking to work abroad and make money, the best place is still the middle East, like Qatar or UAE. A while ago Dubai was the sh*t but now they are broke and many projects have gone belly-up.

      It is possible to find a job abroad by dealing with a small fly-by-night shop, who basically give you a plane ticket, a time and place to show up, and a good handshake. However I strongly suggest to deal with a more reputable company (such as IBM Global Services or a major oil/mining company), they will provide a better package, including housing and whatnot, and they have people on the field to help for the relocation. Some will even open a bank account and get a phone and internet connection for every new hire, because that stuff require a lot of paperwork and local access.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    61. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      Messed up thing is most of the "IT" workers he worked with had more connections then knowledge. Not being able to manage much more then reinstalling windows.

    62. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by lucm · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine is a crane operator out there. He has a 3 weeks work, 3 weeks off schedule, and he gets a lot of free plane tickets. The only problem is that while he works, he is basically in jail, he has to stay in the compound, where there is little enterainment, etc. He is making a lot of money but he is also spending most of it while on vacation.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    63. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 2

      Yeah, we had two people do that on the plane of 300 that I went over on. Was funny as hell since one of them was so gun-ho about going. Soon as that Kuwaiti heat hit him, he turned around and damn near had to be arrested because he refused to get off the plane.

    64. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by lucm · · Score: 1

      600$ a day is like 75$/hr. As a contractor one can get more than that anywhere in the USA where most of the time people don't lay IEDs on the roadside.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    65. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      First $93,000 is tax free.

    66. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 2

      Number one cause of death is birth.

    67. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      People drive sport bikes without helmets all the time in states that don't require it. Nothing unusual there.

      Just because you don't fear death, that doesn't mean you have a death wish, nor does it make you an less stable. If someone came to me and said, "I will pay off all your student loans and credit card debt, buy you a brand new house, a new car, and all you have to do is work in Iraq for a year"....well if I wasn't gainfully employed, I wouldn't be crazy for considering it.

      There is certainly room on the spectrum for risk-takers who don't want to die outright; but there is a big difference on that spectrum between contemplating a lucrative job offer that involves risk, and saying "i am hard up for money so give me the riskiest thing possible". The latter kind is probably prone to unaccountably risky behavior when it comes to carrying out their job functions as well.

      Maybe it is just optimism/lack of imagination about what may happen if things go wrong...

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    68. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, a job with great pay for working in a war zone. There's a phrase for that: war profiteering.

    69. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, a job with great pay for working in a war zone. There's a phrase for that: war profiteering.

      Feel free to help to correct this injustice by offering to work in the war zone for less than the going market rate. Because, you know, there's absolutely no reason they might have to offer more than domestic pay for jobs where you risk being killed and have to spend months away from your home and family.

    70. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My techs in the war zones are fobbits. They do not leave base, have 24/7 force protection, and get to work to help our armed forces return safely from their trips. Why a war zone? The pay is better, yes, but so is the proximity to those you are helping. You get to eat with those who are outside the gates. You gain a different perspective on the role of contractors than you will hear in the main stream media.

      It is not for everyone. For someone who has never traveled more than a hundred miles from home, and then only with the family on vacation, it may not be what they were expecting. There is a change in living accomodations, but that too is an education.

      To that end, a war zone is no different from any other position where consultants must spend extended periods on rotation in locations far from home. Yes, there are drawbacks. But for someone who can adapt, someone who can work in high stress, fast paced environments, it is a viable job.

    71. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many IT consultants have been killed in Irak? compare that to the number of IT consultants that died in the US from every day causes, like a car accident, I bet you more IT consultants die in the US than any other country or war zone in the world.

    72. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by cusco · · Score: 1

      What's wrong? Essentially the whole idea that you're there to support the slaughter of thousands of people for no other reason than corporate profits. If you're all right with that then go for it. When you get back I understand that the tobacco and asbestos companies pay pretty well, too.

      Mercenary scum is mercenary scum, whether they're carrying the gun or providing the email that the gun-carriers get their orders through.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    73. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you entirely.

      Though I thought it was worth pointing out, at least with the job I was offered, it was somewhere well away from any real danger. I don't think they had any real reason to send IT guys anywhere genuinely hazardous... they put you somewhere in a base the size of Chicago and you don't leave. Soldiers are for fighting... IT guys are for typing.

      The only rough part (aside from being away for so long) is that... all there is to do, for a year, is work. You do work all day, every day... which doesn't much matter since there's nothing else to do, but you're doing this for a year. And you're meant to complete the whole contract term, as someone else pointed out, or there are financial consequences.

    74. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, knowing the slashdot stance on advertisements, I didn't exactly expect a good response to that. There are, however, positions on good SEO. Most of it comes improving both user experience, and what the robots know about the site (via tags, special coding etc). Google itself has quite an guide about good SEO practices.

    75. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any recommendations of where to look? I'm fluent in Spanish, English, and Portuguese, work in IT, and am working on an MBA...

    76. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i make almost that now, fucking rip.

    77. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Because gleefully exclaiming that the money is worth the risk is probably an indicator of an unstable personality at best, if not a depressed/suicidal disorder.

      Money isn't worth the risk, it's a bonus on top of the risk. You do realize that there are many people who make a career out of risky situations for the risk itself, not the pay, right?

      People are so damn risk averse these days they hardly live. If you've got nothing holding you down, why not live a bit and do something different? Lots of people take the yuppie way out and go work in Asia or Europe; not many do something different, like work in a war zone.

      There are too many pussies in today's Western societies.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    78. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tqk · · Score: 1

      My issue w the contractor pay is that doesn't it come out of taxpayer dollars?

      Consider all the other ways it can be spent, and don't kid yourself - it will be spent on something. It's not like passing it up would be getting some taxpayer a refund.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    79. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      So people like me who do rope access, high steel rigging, tower construction etc are suicidal and have deep seated personality disorders? hmmm, ok, whatever.

    80. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by HBI · · Score: 2

      IF you are out of the country 330 out of 365 days of the calendar tax year.
      That caveat is vitally important.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    81. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 0

      People are so damn risk averse these days they hardly live. If you've got nothing holding you down, why not live a bit and do something different? Lots of people take the yuppie way out and go work in Asia or Europe; not many do something different, like work in a war zone.

      There are too many pussies in today's Western societies.

      Spoken like a true armchair general. Why do you want to kill people? Go fuck yourself.

    82. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Really back when I was unemployed (having just done my CCNA (the proper cisco classroom one) I would have taken an entry level cisco job in Baghdad or Afganistan. The bonus was huge and full expat status.

      . And to be honest there is the buzz of doing something different.

      I would suggest the OP look at big contractors like Haliburton, Bechtel or even my old employers Dar Al-Handasah or look at the civil service or if they meet the nationality requirements and would go through the security clearance the CIA or NSA employ more than a few it types.

    83. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Where did GP said anything about killing people?

    84. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the military pays less than contractor jobs

    85. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can easily do it. I know a good number of federal contractors (Such as SAIC or USIS) that list positions in Afghanistan on their recruiting page all the time. That being said, most of these usually require you to have a TS/SCI already.

    86. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Courageous · · Score: 2

      Because gleefully exclaiming that the money is worth the risk is probably an indicator of an unstable personality at best, ...

      Your post did not deserve the "Insightful". Three things are wrong with it:

      1) You gamely attempt to play armchair psychologist without much working comprehension of psychology, and
      2) You have no idea at all what "warzone" like work for an IT worker is in a "warzone," and
      3) You appear entirely unacquainted with the market for IT workers supporting the front

      To wit" you had no "insight" to provide at all.

      The work does suck, though. Just not for any reason you've written about. You simply don't have a clue.

      So why post?

    87. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      While it is for sure still possible to find work in the IT sector in Tokyo with only English, it is getting increasingly difficult. Almost all job advertisements require some level of Japanese, and increasingly wants Business level or higher. Tokyo is also damned expensive to live in, and there isn't any relaxed atmosphere either. So all in all, I think there are other places in Asia ( suggested by parent, that will serve you better).

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    88. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. A friend of mine just returned from a year and was rarely outside of the base for ANYTHING and when he was, he was under armed escort with several vehicles.

      And like you said, the hard part was getting used to the bombs going off outside the wire. He never reported anything happening within the base.
      He stock piled movies and shows and would have his family send things along the way. He caught up on a lot of movies/shows and was able to finish up a book in the mean time.

      He also used some of that spare time to actually run and work out. Something most of us could probably so too :-)

      He is trying to get me to go there and I am considering it as well.

      Being prior military, I know the risks.

    89. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      May I ask, what kind of IT work do you do over the internet  this way?  It sounds great, but I wonder if my skills are what is needed.

      Programming?  And if so, what kind?

      Thanks!

    90. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      lol check out Halliburton's or Brown and Root's Jobs pages.

      Seriously.

      You are very naive :-)

    91. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear there's plenty of waterfront property right about now.

    92. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by painehope · · Score: 1

      Can you provide a referral or contact address?

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    93. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      Bad troll is bad.

      But thanks for calling everyone in, or involved with, the US military "baby killers". I mean, we didn't need another reason to ignore you, but it always helps.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    94. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      That's the stickler. But it's pretty easy to do.

    95. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not try South Africa? We have a burgeoning IT industry (It's never taken me more than 4 weeks to find a new job), low cost of living, plenty to see and do and the crime here is vastly over-hyped.

    96. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is a perfect example. I work in Afghanistan as a Server Admin Lead. Yes they pay is nice, but there are things that I give up to be here.

      I eat at the chowhall, where I know every Tuesday at one chow hall is ceaser salad day. I sleep in a large tent with "individual rooms" that has a cold floor right now (winter time), that has dust over everything. I work in an office with limited desks and chairs. I work 6 days a week, most of the time 10 hours a day, but that seems to be pushing to 12 most, with all the stuff I have to do after work. I have a Post Exchange (PS; much like a ghetto wal mart) where I have to buy my soap, bottles ahead since we run out a lot here. I run out of water in the showers and toilets on a weekly basis.

      Oh and the biggest thing, my wife. She is at home running our family there. Am I doing this because I am unstable? Am I suicidal like a previous poster mentioned? Not at all. There are things that my wife and I want. There is no where in the world that will pay me as well as they are to be here and do my job. When I get done and go back home after my year here is over, I will be debt free. I will have the life that wife and I want. I am not one of the people who think the world owes me something, again like previously mentioned. This is something that my wife and I decdided on to do.

      I do not go outside the "wire" unless I am flying on a government sanctioned air craft. I do not go on patrols. I do not go to the gate for fun to see what it is like. I do my job. I follow my rules. I accomplish my goals.

      We do get mortar attacks.There are safeguards and procedures in place. Follow the training you are given (which is common sense) and you will survive.

      I have seen a lot of turn over. One person was here for a month and quit. Another was here for 6 months and quit. It happens.

      We have a lot of prior military. I myself and a US Marine, who got out and went to do this as a contractor. We have a lot of no military experience. They are doing just fine. They are surviving just fine out here.

      Would I recommend this to everyone? Nope. It is hard, but it is also easy when you make friends with people here. When you find a hobby to do out here (there are 5 of us that play Dungeons and Dragons twice a week for a couple of hours).

      If you have issues with contractor pay you need to do one of the following:

      1. Suck it up and come out here. Until you are a contractor here, you do not have a full understanding of what is out here. Are we over paid, probably, but why would I come out here for 75k when you can pay me 200k+? Why would I sacrifice my life back home for a year for low pay? I wouldn't.

      2. Get with your representatives and get it changed. Again, who here would come out here for 50-70k?

      There are sacrifices made out here, and there are benefits. You have to decide what is best for you. This, Afghanistan, is the best for me right now. Then I can have my life, the way that I want it.

      Louis Markham
      markhamla1979@gmail.com

    97. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by sentimental.bryan · · Score: 1

      That's the most retarded shit I've ever heard. None of the US's 'near peer' states could care less about the manner in which the day-to-day war of occupations are waged. IED's, propaganda, tactics, torture, etc, haven't changed since the 50's. What they would be interested in - is some of that tasty info that comes from getting some slut to hook up with a policymaker, scientist or prominent economic figure. War zones provide good wages, at a (somewhat)* increased risk of disabling injury or death. But, apart from the potential for socio-political scandal there probably aren't an awful lot of strategic technology on the ground, when you consider it was brought there to use against a third world enemy. *While the west still maintains it's military/technological advantage over the enemy/rest of the world.

    98. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Not if you're an infidel.

    99. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      You sound like you have first hand experience, have you done contract work in Iraq? What are the laws regarding employment? Do you work for an American company under American laws, or can a non-American get work there?

    100. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      I think he was implying that by working for the army in Iraq (regardless of what it is you do) contributes towards killing.

    101. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Giving a word that has "strong negative connotations" [citation] doesn't mean that the person is actually doing something bad or wrong.

      Profiteering are usually reserved to people who profit from a war who are not allied with any side except for the one who pays the most. The poster didn't say nor did I say in my post that he should also take bids from the local opposition too and take the highest bidder, get into a contract where you are working for both sides, or get a job in a war zone that isn't really involving the United States.

      You shouldn't judge ethics by looking up the definition of words and if someone is doing something that is defined under a word that has a negative connotation without really understanding all the issues involved, because there are also words with the same definition with a positive connotation.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    102. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Really? Maybe in Silicon Valley, not however, "anywhere in the USA." Most IT jobs in the USA don't pay anything close to $75/hour. Usually its closer to $30/hour. If you are making $75/hour then don't ever leave that job. You wont find another like it in the imediate future.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    103. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I was actually a deployed soldier. I was an officer in the National Guard and my unit got deployed for a year. I've done contract work since I got out, but all of it has been on US soil. I know enough to answer your questions reasonably accurately, but you may want to double check some of it. You typically work for an American company under America laws if you're doing anything that involves direct contact with any kind of sensitive information. There are what we called "TCNs" (Third Country Nationals) who do contract work either for American companies or even some foreign subcontractors, but they do mostly menial work. Cooks in the Dining Facility, workers in the PX and PX restaurants (usually a Burger King or Pizza Hut, we had a Cinnabon at one PX), barbers, laundry workers were all mostly TCNs. I talked to several of them, and from what I understand their conditions were not as nice as the skilled US contractors, and they made less; but still outrageous amounts of money compared to what they could get in their home countries.

      If you're a citizen of a NATO country, you might be able to find something with your own government's contractors. Like The US, all the NATO countries require that you be a citizen of the country in question to get the security clearances you'll need to do ay kind of sensitive work. That's the main blocker to non-citizens getting these kinds of jobs: doing almost anything that involves contact with US government systems in the war zone requires a clearance, and you have to be a citizen to get one.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    104. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      I had a feeling that might be the case. So that's Iraq out, since Norway never did have much presence there, and certainly do not anymore. Possibly there could be some stuff in Afghan then, since there is still a sizeable Norwegian presence there. Thanks for the insight.

    105. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Bad troll is bad.

      But thanks for calling everyone in, or involved with, the US military "baby killers". I mean, we didn't need another reason to ignore you, but it always helps.

      A lot of people strongly disagree(d) with the Iraq and Afghanistan interventions. The fault lies with the politicians, but if you are are a soldier engaged in what is perceived as an unjust conflict, you are not exempt from criticism.

      I feel sorry for the individual miilitary personnel in Afghanistan who are risking their lives, but I still don't see why they're there in the first place.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    106. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with wanting to work in a war zone? The pay is usually better, and some people like the daily excitement.

      Just become a mercenary then, you also get the chance to kill unarmed civilians with impunity. Allegedly.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    107. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      With your living expenses paid for too... If you are single, and willing to take the risk, that is good solid money, You can save up/invest a boat load of money. When the US picks up you can get a good job there too and with 200/300k saved up you will be on good standing.

      Love of money is the root of all evil. One of the few sensible things in the Bible, and one that conveniently gets ignored by money-grabbing right wing twats.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    108. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone so impressed with earning a lot of money?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    109. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by IhateMonkeys · · Score: 0

      Spot on. I spent two years in the "suck" as contractor (non-IT). There are inherent risks with any job. Understanding and evaluating those risks and basing your decisions on that evaluation is the key. With greater risk comes greater reward. A lot of people came over with the expectations that they would be living in hotels, dorms etc and were shocked when they ended up in a modified shipping container with a bunk bed and a fat smelly roommate.
      What I missed was privacy. Being in a small office with 4 other people 12 hours a day 7 days a week and then sharing a hooch doesnt allow for much privacy. I learned a lot about myself in those two years. Sitting in a bunker while mortars fall around you gives you some time for personal reflection. I also saw parts of the world that most people never will. And yes, I did make some cash. Its also a great conversation starter (yes chicks dig it!). People love to talk about it, and I have hours of stories and thousands of pictures to go along with my experience.
      Would I do it again? Absolutely. Would i recommend it? Depends on the person. Not everybody is built to handle it. The stress, the austerity, the separation from family can do crazy things to people.

    110. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When I get done and go back home after my year here is over, I will be debt free.

      I find it hard to believe you can pay off an entire mortgage on a house, as well as other accumulated debts, with one year's salary, but even if you could a whole year away from my family is more than I would sacrifice.

      As the ethics don't bother you, why not go to somewhere like Dubai instead? Equally hot but at least it's not dangerous and you can go out a bit.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    111. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      IF you are out of the country 330 out of 365 days of the calendar tax year. That caveat is vitally important.

      Surely if you're earning as much as people are saying you could have a month's holiday easily enough?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    112. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      think about it, life is different with 6 figures saved up, money isn't everything, but it's certainly a propellant to get you places.

      The thing is, 99% of people have quite happy and fulfilling lives without having six figure savings in the bank. And most even manage it with quite large debts, or else hardly anyone would own a house.

      The Puritan thing abut not owing money and always paying your way as you go seems rather out-dated to me, maybe that's because I work in finance where almost all businesses live off borrowed money.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    113. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So people like me who do rope access, high steel rigging, tower construction etc are suicidal and have deep seated personality disorders? hmmm, ok, whatever.

      Perhaps you should ask yourself how come you're doing that work and not an Iraqi/Afghanistani engineer?

      That is the problem that a lot of us have with the US involvement in those countries.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    114. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Why were the Wehrmacht in Poland?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    115. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You are right about Singapore, this is one of the good spots in Asia for western IT specialists.

      And in direct contrast to working in a war zone, you'll get bored to death there.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    116. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Really? Maybe in Silicon Valley, not however, "anywhere in the USA." Most IT jobs in the USA don't pay anything close to $75/hour. Usually its closer to $30/hour. If you are making $75/hour then don't ever leave that job. You wont find another like it in the imediate future.

      30$ is a rate for a salary job (employee), not for an independent contractor. And it's not a rate for the Silicon Valley, where someone getting 75$ won't find housing they can afford.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    117. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by lucm · · Score: 1

      You are right about Singapore, this is one of the good spots in Asia for western IT specialists.

      And in direct contrast to working in a war zone, you'll get bored to death there.

      Clearly you never worked in a war zone. It's nothing like Call of Duty, you know; IT contractors are no mercs, they have to live in compounds where there is nothing to do and where there is a very limited amount of social opportunities. One might hit the jackpot and work near/with an NGO that has a few female employees, but there is plenty of guys competing for their attention and usually they are not that attractive to start with.

      In Singapore there is the typical asian entertainment: karaoke, video games, malls, cute expats from the Netherlands...

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    118. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they do not have enough since housing bubble?

    119. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afghanistan is much less dangerous than my high school was. The physical requirements for IT folks and soldiers are vastly different. Most IT work in these war zones is done at major bases and your life is more like life in prison than life on a battle field.

    120. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I can't answer for GP on the family thing (it's a choice he's making, I went to Iraq because I got deployed, I doubt I'd have made the choice to do so), but he can definitely pay off all his debts on a years salary, especially if he doesn't have a mortgage (possibly even then). Think about it. Let's say you're an IT guy in Middle America (obviously not on one of the coasts, our costs of living run higher, as do salaries). You make... 60K a year, more like 50K after taxes. A reasonable salary outside of Cali, New England, or the Mid-Atlantic states. You take a job for a year in Afghanistan for 185K (not unreasonable for a contractor in a combat zone).

      The first 93K of your income -per year I believe- is tax free. If you split things just right (starting and ending in June) you might manage to pay no taxes at all on 185K, but even if you work January to December that's a huge thing. Remember, not only are you not paying taxes on the original 93K, it's like it doesn't exist at all for tax purposes. Your income tax bracket is the same as if you made 92K a year. You're paying, worst case scenario, 20K in taxes on 185K, so that takes it down to 165K. That's roughly 115K more than you make in your "real job".

      Now houses in Middle America sell for a lot less than they do on the coasts. It's possible that your whole mortgage is 100K, it's certainly possible that if you've been in a place for 5 or 10 years, that you're payed down to 100K or even less. It's also possible that GP rents or inherited a house and doesn't even have a mortgage he needs to pay off. 115K is a pretty fair amount of money. If I'm guessing close to right about GPs annual salary, he's basically getting three years pay in one year. That will pay off almost anyone's debts completely less mortgage, and make a huge dent even for someone with a significant mortgage

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    121. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by HBI · · Score: 1

      If you have an employer who is patient enough to tolerate months at a time disappearances.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    122. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      My reading comprehension is failing me. If you are asking why i am not in those places. Its because i don't have the connections. There are many reasons my country is on every other counties shit list. Unfortunately most of the people in this country could care less.

    123. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, and by the way, follow the nice man with the sunken knuckles into that extremely bare room."

      let me guess your an American

    124. Re:Why explicitly war zone? by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      There's a very large difference between fair criticism and calling people "baby killers".

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  2. What your mum said. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    She always advised you to wear clean underwear when you went out.

    In a war zone, don't bother -- the first time you hear a backfire you'll know what I mean.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:What your mum said. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      Get a good custom fit bullet proof vest, and keep your head down.

      Also, pretend to be from Canada, they might not kidnap you quite as readily.

      You also might not want to wear that crucifix...those peace loving muslims don't care much for other religious stuff in their towns.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:What your mum said. by SoTerrified · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Also, pretend to be from Canada, they might not kidnap you quite as readily.

      As a Canadian... STOP DOING THAT. Look, you Americans have messed things up, stop trading on our good name. Proudly proclaim that you're American so you can take the kidnapping/beating you deserve.

      It's just getting really annoying when I go abroad, mention I'm Canadian, then have people assume I'm American.

    3. Re:What your mum said. by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      It's just getting really annoying when I go abroad, mention I'm Canadian, then have people assume I'm American.

      From my recollection, that's been true for a long time, before any recent wars - at least back to the 1950s. Folks elsewhere, especially uneducated ones, are a bit unclear on the geography. Kinda like folks here confusing various Asian countries. It's probably a bit over the top to use "Japan? Isn't that part of China?" as an example, but you get the idea. Big, white guy from North America == 'American' for lots of people. Sorry! :P

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    4. Re:What your mum said. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Look into getting a 'joke' passport from the Conch Republic. These sell in Key West, FL* for a few bucks, but a lot of people seem to take them seriously when you travel, and the US government apparently turns a blind eye to them. You can basically tell most overly inquisitive people in exotic locales that you are from a small, innocuous Caribbean nation that no one is at war with.

      *Full name: The People's Republic of the Florida Keys.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:What your mum said. by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      Besides, it never comes back clean from KBR.

    6. Re:What your mum said. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Don't be so selfish. Even if we spoil Canada's reputation, you can always pass for French, whereas we have nothing to fall back on. (As Bubba Sparxxx would say, "[we] don't speak no other languages.")

    7. Re:What your mum said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if the US Gov loses their sense of humor using another "country's" passport is technically equivalent to giving up your American citizenship unless you are recognized as a dual citizen.

      Now, using it to go to Cuba, that's another matter. And could you pick me up a box of cigars and a case of rum on your way out?

    8. Re:What your mum said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But aren't Canadian's just Americans with maple leafs sewn on their packs?

    9. Re:What your mum said. by tqk · · Score: 1

      ... pretend to be from Canada, they might not kidnap you quite as readily.

      IUDs do not respect nationalities. That's how one of our Canadian guys got it recently.

      You also might not want to wear that crucifix...those peace loving muslims don't care much for other religious stuff in their towns.

      So he'll be seen to be an atheist. Check out the meaning of the word "infidel."

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:What your mum said. by Courageous · · Score: 1

      You mean Canada isn't a state?

    11. Re:What your mum said. by khipu · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian... STOP DOING THAT. Look, you Americans have messed things up, stop trading on our good name

      Well, hold the presses! What an impressive achievement! A nation that, for practical purposes, borders no other nation than the US, has a wealth of natural resources, and relies for much of its defense, wealth, culture, technology, trade, and security needs on the US. What a beacon of hope to the world! What a shining example of human superiority and triumph of the human intellect and spirit! Let the poor of the world eat maple syrup covered butter tarts like Canadians do and rejoice!

      It's just getting really annoying when I go abroad, mention I'm Canadian, then have people assume I'm American.

      Believe me, we don't want to be mistaken for Canadians either. But we'll both just have to live with geographic realities.

    12. Re:What your mum said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're far too mean to be Canadian.

    13. Re:What your mum said. by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      No, it's a hat.

    14. Re:What your mum said. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Surely once you open your mouth people can tell straightaway you're from Canada? I'm from the UK and I find it easy enough to spot the difference having worked with both..

      Same as between Kiwis and Ozzies, but it's even more fun to deliberately call an Oz a Kiwi when you know they're not. Boy do they get pissed off.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:What your mum said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guilty of telling people I'm from Canada. Sometimes they tell me to prove it, and I tell them of how when I was younger, we got on SkiDoos and went out on the ice to hunt seals, just outside of Vancouver.

      Actually last time I went to the border above New York, I was surprised the rental places didn't have SkiDoos for going out on the ice with. When I'm in Jordan or the Middle East, I can rent Camels, so why can't I get a SkiDoo when I cross above New York is beyond me.

      And, don't hate on me, I like hockey and fighting just as much as you hosers do.

  3. be prepared... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...for someone to need to execute your will.

  4. Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The money isn't worth it if you wind up kidnapped and looking at a video camera while they cut your head off.

    Look at working in Europe or if you want to try the language China, even better Australia routinely hires for IT and they speak English (sort of).

    1. Re:Stay out of warzones by tgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The money isn't worth it if you wind up kidnapped and looking at a video camera while they cut your head off.

      Look at working in Europe or if you want to try the language China, even better Australia routinely hires for IT and they speak English (sort of).

      Is the money worth it if you're killed in a car accident during rushhour traffic on your way to work in *insert city here* USA?

      Life is a risk, death is always a risk, and the statistics about risk are often pretty far off what people estimate in their gut.

    2. Re:Stay out of warzones by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 0

      The money isn't worth it if you wind up kidnapped and looking at a video camera while they cut your head off.

      Look at working in Europe or if you want to try the language China, even better Australia routinely hires for IT and they speak English (sort of).

      Is the money worth it if you're killed in a car accident during rushhour traffic on your way to work in *insert city here* USA?

      Life is a risk, death is always a risk, and the statistics about risk are often pretty far off what people estimate in their gut.

      Comparing the risk of getting killed in a car accident with the risk of getting (most likely violently) killed in a war zone (in particular in a war zone where foreigners get kidnapped and forced to watch a video camera while their heads get brutishly sawed off with a butcher knife), that's pretty retarded to say the least.

    3. Re:Stay out of warzones by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      The money isn't worth it if you wind up kidnapped and looking at a video camera while they cut your head off.

      Look at working in Europe or if you want to try the language China, even better Australia routinely hires for IT and they speak English (sort of).

      Is the money worth it if you're killed in a car accident during rushhour traffic on your way to work in *insert city here* USA?

      Life is a risk, death is always a risk, and the statistics about risk are often pretty far off what people estimate in their gut.

      Except in a warzone, you have to worry about the car accident AND the roadside bomb AND the sniper AND the suicide bomber... You are exactly right that humans tend to misunderstand risk, but in this case you will find that those seeking to work in a "warzone" are grossly underestimating the risk they are taking.

      To put it numerically, every day in the US approximately 1 person in 3,400,000 dies in a car accident (the rate for all accidental causes is approx 1/1,000,000). Compare that to a warzone consisting of less than 250,000 Americans where the avg daily death rate is 2 per or higher, or 8 in 1,000,000. So by making this choice, you are taking a risk that is at least 8x greater than most activities found stateside.

    4. Re:Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life is a risk, death is always a risk, and the statistics about risk are often pretty far off what people estimate in their gut.

      So take an insurance on both. I'm not sure if anyone sells death insurance, but you could always hire a hitman.

    5. Re:Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe? Have you been here recently? Our economy is tanking on a scale that makes the US look like it's booming.

    6. Re:Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're right that it's a dumb comparison. You're far more likely to die in a car accident than get your head cut off even if you're working in a war zone.

    7. Re:Stay out of warzones by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      The money isn't worth it if you wind up kidnapped and looking at a video camera while they cut your head off.

      Look at working in Europe or if you want to try the language China, even better Australia routinely hires for IT and they speak English (sort of).

      Is the money worth it if you're killed in a car accident during rushhour traffic on your way to work in *insert city here* USA?

      Life is a risk, death is always a risk, and the statistics about risk are often pretty far off what people estimate in their gut.

      Comparing the risk of getting killed in a car accident with the risk of getting (most likely violently) killed in a war zone (in particular in a war zone where foreigners get kidnapped and forced to watch a video camera while their heads get brutishly sawed off with a butcher knife), that's pretty retarded to say the least.

      Sorry but getting killed in a car accident is a rather brutal and painful event and can be slow. A beheading (even a crude one) is still relatively quick.

      That said, the risk of going to work in Iraq and mostly staying in the green zone is probably as safe or safer than living in a higher-crime area in the U.S (NY or Chicago for example). If you doubt me (and you probably still do), take a look at the Top Gear Christmas Special from last year. They drove around the northern countryside in convertibles and eventually decided it was silly to wear their helmets and flak jackets. Yes there might have been some armed security with them off camera, but they were mixed in with the locals pretty well.

    8. Re:Stay out of warzones by tokul · · Score: 1

      Is the money worth it if you're killed in a car accident during rushhour traffic on your way to work in *insert city here* USA?

      Cars are not actively trying to kill their occupants.

    9. Re:Stay out of warzones by hypergreatthing · · Score: 2

      Cars are not actively trying to kill their occupants.

      Have you ever driven a pinto?

    10. Re:Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but a car accident is precisely that. An accident.

      Getting slaughtered over political alignments and ethnicity is anything but. ...but sure, if you'd like to also hem and haw over how many traffic fatalities are REALLY accidents, and how many warzone deaths are frequently accidental "collateral damage", be my guest.

    11. Re:Stay out of warzones by tgd · · Score: 1

      Compare that to a warzone consisting of less than 250,000 Americans where the avg daily death rate is 2 per or higher, or 8 in 1,000,000.

      And how many of those are non-combatant contractors in that particular theater?

      Much lower. Vastly lower. And you'd be making 5x+ the amount of money. And even at an 8x increase in risk, the risk is still *tiny*, but its not even remotely as high as you quote.

    12. Re:Stay out of warzones by tgd · · Score: 1

      Is the money worth it if you're killed in a car accident during rushhour traffic on your way to work in *insert city here* USA?

      Cars are not actively trying to kill their occupants.

      And yet 30,797 people (in 2009, according to the US Census Bureau) found out otherwise... the hard way.

    13. Re:Stay out of warzones by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      In Boston other cars are actively trying to kill you.

    14. Re:Stay out of warzones by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Compare that to a warzone consisting of less than 250,000 Americans where the avg daily death rate is 2 per or higher, or 8 in 1,000,000.

      And how many of those are non-combatant contractors in that particular theater?

      Much lower. Vastly lower. And you'd be making 5x+ the amount of money. And even at an 8x increase in risk, the risk is still *tiny*, but its not even remotely as high as you quote.

      It's either as high or it's not as high... Since data on "non-combatant contractors" is hard to come by I would be honored if you would share your source with the rest of us.

    15. Re:Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup. In fact, the #1 killer of soldiers in Iraq has been...traffic accidents.

    16. Re:Stay out of warzones by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Good news! There are thousands and thousands of contractors making absurd sums of money and if you're in a dangerous area you are escorted to and from the work site by armed military escorts. You're more likely to die in a car accident on the way to work in the US than you are to die as a contractor in the middle east.

    17. Re:Stay out of warzones by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      Life is a risk, death is always a risk, and the statistics about risk are often pretty far off what people estimate in their gut.

      I would say that death is more of a certainty than a risk...

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    18. Re:Stay out of warzones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: Boston . . . Amen. Its the only place I've come to a "roundabout" where there was no central barrier, just 17 different roads fanning out and crossing each other. I never knew if I was going "in" an "out" lane on the other side. I did get to see MIT though. (Didn't want to, but got trapped in the wrong lane and forced into the 'taxi only' tunnel to the other side. Lots of kind-hearted looks going through there.) Yes, drivers/cars are actively trying to kill you in Boston.

    19. Re:Stay out of warzones by kcbnac · · Score: 1

      Yes, a quick Google search will show some articles proving just that.

      https://www.google.com/search?q=iraq+afghanistan+chicago+deaths

      Living in Chicago is more dangerous than Iraq or Afghanistan.

      Also, in Iraq families can own a fully-automatic AK-47 for personal defense. In Chicago, you can't even keep a gun outside a safe.

    20. Re:Stay out of warzones by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      All risks are not equal. The likelihood of dying by being kidnapped, tortured and beheaded is vanishingly small for most civilians in civilised Western countries.

      It's like saying that, because x number of people die by slipping in the bath/changing a lightbulb at home each year, you might as well not worry about using condoms or looking before you cross the road, and that you might as well breakfast on crack cocaine and drive everywhere at one hundred and fifty mph, because you're going to die anyway.

      Yes, in the long run we're all dead. That is not a helpful guide to life.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:Stay out of warzones by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Sorry but getting killed in a car accident is a rather brutal and painful event and can be slow. A beheading (even a crude one) is still relatively quick.

      Oh, what utter bollocks. In a fatal car accident, you'll most likely have a few seconds of panic and terror, although the adrenaline rush will largely dull these, and then you're dead. As a hostage you'll have suffered days (probably more) of psychological and physical torture.

      I know which way I'd rather go.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:Stay out of warzones by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Living in Chicago is more dangerous than Iraq or Afghanistan.

      Also, in Iraq families can own a fully-automatic AK-47 for personal defense. In Chicago, you can't even keep a gun outside a safe.

      Yes, it's undoubtedly the lack of guns that makes Chicago so dangerous.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:Stay out of warzones by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And you'd be making 5x+ the amount of money

      So what? No doubt if you're a clever and ruthless enough criminal you could make even more.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    24. Re:Stay out of warzones by IhateMonkeys · · Score: 0

      Yeah that was in areas controlled by the Kurds. There were no insurgents or pro-Saddam forces in these areas.
      The Kurds dislike the Arabs and Persians. They just want to be independent and left alone.

      In fact during the height of the action in Iraq you could eat lunch at a sidewalk cafe, go to the mall and catch a movie in Erbil while suicide bombers were blowing themselves up in Baghdad.

  5. yeah by geekoid · · Score: 1

    start your own company.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  6. Iraq English teachers getting full convoys by peter303 · · Score: 2

    NBC showed a piece on this Monday night. Even lesser employees were getting tons of security. The employees seemed to welcome it out of nervousness. The NBC piece was part of a series on the official withdrawal from IRAQ. Even after that about 20,000 embassy employees and contractors remain in a Baghdad and Basara consulates for "diplomatic" reasons. There are several tens of thousands of troops on bases in the area that could move on short basis for an aided evacuation or such.

    1. Re:Iraq English teachers getting full convoys by v1 · · Score: 2

      I was just thinking that - just another good example of the media only showing the extremes. 1 in 30,000 getting kidnapped or killed, and that's the 1 they'll show. You have worse odds of being involved in violent crime in a lot of big cities here in the states.

      I think I'd worry less about people with guns that may be interested in me when I'm surrounded by armed guards. You don't get that when walking to your car in the middle of a parking garage late at night after working some OT.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  7. Don't get advice on Slashdot for this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You'll get 95% negative USA/Military comments from a bunch of people whose lives depend upon USA and its military.

    1. Re:Don't get advice on Slashdot for this one by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Working for one of the military's private-sector IT contractors isn't exactly the same as enlisting in the military.

    2. Re:Don't get advice on Slashdot for this one by dmomo · · Score: 1

      Reading these replies, so far you are wrong. The only negative comment that stands out is this one.

  8. Need security clearance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You won't find many positions unless you have security clearance already. Companies do not want to pay for the cost of a background investigation, hence their preference for former government (military) employees.

    1. Re:Need security clearance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Few companies ever pay for a background investigation - that aspect is a myth.

      However few companies are wiling to let you sit on the payroll for 6-12 months while the investigation completes (with no guarantee that you will be favorable adjudicated).

  9. Middle East $$$$$$$ by cosm · · Score: 1

    If you like $$$$$$ and can deal with ~12 months in a shithole (but generally not on the FOB or at least far from action), its a good way to pay off a mortgage (on DoD money that is). I've known folks working help-desk style roles with basic A+/MSCE/Linux/Cisco knowledge paying easily north of 100K USD.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Middle East $$$$$$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in the middle east, but not in a war zone. Good money, mostly tax free, living expenses paid, free travel, lots of perks. But that's because it sucks and in a war zone, you could be hurt or killed. So, if you want to make good money for a while, pay off debts, or save up, and you think the risk to personal safety is worth it, go, and maybe you'll have fun. But, remember you could be somebody we see on the news, kidnapped or killed.

    2. Re:Middle East $$$$$$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's true. I was once there (Saudi) and paid my rest of my house loan over 100k then back in 6 months. Not a bad deal. Stayed there about two years till bubble bursted, got back to my university position and enjoy my life without debt since then. Didn't have to pay even a cent taxes, which was superb :) Oh, and it was not a *it hole, pretty decent actually. Did 60 to 48 hour weeks, depending on the project demands.

    3. Re:Middle East $$$$$$$ by mlts · · Score: 1

      There are some areas of KSA such as Riyadh where there are a lot of foreigners. The money isn't as much as AF or IR, but it is there, and because the areas one works in tend to be mainly people from other places, the Sauds tend to look the other way for the most part. There is good money to be made there if you follow basic cultural instructions.

      Working in the Middle East isn't all bad -- it is almost guaranteed that nobody is going to be breaking into your house in Saudi Arabia (well, nobody that values their hands that is, as they will chop them off.) The trick is to get to know the culture, and not be an asshole. The work week is a bit odd, but you get used to it. You work Monday through Thursday, have Friday off, work Saturday, and have Sunday off. Some people just end up with a permanent three day weekend in some jobs.

  10. Malaise by MarkvW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd consider that your "malaise" problem might be greater in a war zone. Your freedom of movement is constrained; you're limited to corporate-cartoon-kitsch America; and you're surrounded by an alien culture that (for safety reasons) you are unable to freely immerse yourself within.

    If you were a dude that liked to save money and read books in your spare time, then it might be a good thing. But if you've got malaise now, just imagine what you'd get in Afghanistan.

    1. Re:Malaise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a positive note, you're making twice as much money (and working twice as many hours)

    2. Re:Malaise by Almandine · · Score: 1

      Base life isn't all that bad. In addition to books, many people watch pirated DVDs. For those who like to socialize, they can visit the MWR to go online, play console games (shooters and football are especially popular), play pool, play poker, watch TV/movies on a larger screen, etc.

    3. Re:Malaise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a great time working in Afghanistan. Quite a vibrant social scene with people you share a lot in common with (you all live and work somewhere a little crazy). I'd recommend it. What can really suck it getting stuck on an army base without much freedom of movement and you're pretty much living and working in a large prison. Though for those jobs you can get paid very well and civilians can get plenty of time off (4 weeks in / 2 weeks out) so for some it works. I'd suggest staying away from that, learning some of the local language (Dari in Afghanistan is quite easy), and spending time with the interesting people, both local and expat, that you'll meet.

    4. Re:Malaise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I'm here in Okinawa and it's getting pretty old. Don't get me wrong, the Japanese people are great, and it's beautiful, but getting around is a bitch and I've had enough Japanese food to last me a lifetime. Did I mention it seems to rain whenever I'm out in the field?

      The beds here suck, as does the Japanese only TV. The 13 hour leg from Newark to Tokyo is a killer, and I'll be more careful of what I eat in the future. :)

      Crane Indiana is sounding pretty good about now. :)

  11. Good clothing by Strider- · · Score: 5, Informative

    As someone who's been over there a number of times, my advice is to invest in some good clothing for there. As crazy as it seems, the best way to beat the heat in the desert is to cover up. Long, loose pants made from lightweight fabric and similar for shirts (along with silk-weight polypro undershirts) will keep you significantly more comfortable than your typical cotton t-shirt. Also, a good wide-brimmed boonie hat is worth it.

    Basically, the idea is to keep the sun off your skin, the air flowing, and wick the sweat away from your skin.

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    1. Re:Good clothing by Almandine · · Score: 1

      The Under Armour brand seems pretty popular there. The desert nights can get quite chilly too

    2. Re:Good clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about staying comfortable in cold climates?

    3. Re:Good clothing by Strider- · · Score: 2

      The answer to cold climates is layers. As a field Engineer, I've also worked in the arctic. The key for cold weather is to have multiple layers so that you can adjust the amount of clothing as required. Goretex shell outer layer, fleece, maybe a fleece vest, shirt, polypro underwear. Basically you want to be just warm enough that you're comfortable, not so warm that you sweat. Sweat makes you wet, wet means cold.

      Also, when it's cold, if you keep your head and your feet warm, the rest of you has a better chance of staying warm as well. Finally, if you're going to be sleeping where it's cold, make sure to take a leak before you go to bed. Nothing worse than waking up in the middle of the night with a full bladder, and dreading going out.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    4. Re:Good clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this will really help in afghanistan thanks

    5. Re:Good clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a good set of BOOTS. And a LEATHERMAN.

  12. And mind the spiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear the spiders get pretty big there.

    1. Re:And mind the spiders by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I hear the spiders get pretty big there.

      You mean solifuges. They're pretty viscious alright.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:And mind the spiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viscous or vicious?

    3. Re:And mind the spiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The latter until you step on them, then the former.

  13. Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Of course, Germany is not a warzone at the moment (and has not been since WW2), but the economy is currently going very good (especially due to massive exports to emerging economies), which means there are lots of open positions for engineers and scientists but also technical writers. You have to accept quite high taxes and social security/healthcare/retirement insurance contributions, though.

    There are quite a few english-speaking professionals working in many German companies, so it should be easy for Americans to find work here. The federal employment agency has a quite useful search engine with hundreds of thousands of openings:

    http://jobboerse.arbeitsagentur.de/vamJB/stellenangeboteFinden.html?execution=e1s1&d_6827794_p=1

    You can used Google translate to get a rough idea about the jobs. Just send in a header letter (why you apply), a tabular CV and your formal certificates (school, college diplomas, MCSE diplomas and the like) and statements of previous employmers (if you have such) in a big PDF file. I am sure many companies here would love to hire qualified Americans !

    1. Re:Germany by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

      Given the parlous state of the entire Eurozone at the moment you'd have to be a shill or blinkered by the propaganda of your country's press to consider the economy of any of the Eurozone countries as "going very good". Whilst Germany is probably in a better state than most of the Eurozone, it would only take one default from one of the smaller nations to result in a long-term down cycle.

    2. Re:Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >it would only take one default from one of the smaller nations to result in a long-term down cycle.

      I don't think so. Germany is selling world-wide and not just inside the EU. German products are sought after by Chinese manufacturers and wealthy Chinese individuals. The same applies to many other countries such as India, Brazil and of course America. We might have to dump the Euro, but that will not reduce the demand for high-quality products from our factories. There is a big difference between the broken Greece system and the German economy. Probably as big as the difference between China and Laos.

  14. Not all war zones are created equal by hakioawa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked in Qatar (not in IT), which is technically a war zone by USG standards. It is also the wealthiest country on the planet and obscenely safe. I didn't even bother to lock my door. The pay there was good, but not insanely good. I looked into IT work in Afghanistan and would have made ~$300K. That job would require two things. 1) A USG security clearance and 2)willingness to literally be on the front lines and get shot at. Not all war zone are created equal. Pay will reflect that.

    Now you will probably hear a lot of folks talking about the danger etc. Yes, it is a war zone, but your odds of being killed are very low. I'd say your two biggest concerns in a place like Iraq are: 1) dying in a traffic accident, which would be just as likely in India of SE asia. 2) Dying of boredom. THAT is the big issue. These places are boring. And the security you are forced to endure will piss off most geeks. You see it, it is designed to slow you and everyone else down. There is a lot of theater and it can get tedious.

    That said, If you spend all your free time indoors reading obscure tech blogs, then I say go for it.

    1. Re:Not all war zones are created equal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any tips/resources on how to actually get into this?

    2. Re:Not all war zones are created equal by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      +1 This.

      As others have noted if you jump straight into a hot warzone (i.e. Afghanistan) or even a warm/cooling one (i.e. Iraq) with no experience you are likely to get yourself or someone around you killed. If you really want to give it a go, then there are much better places to to dip your toes in the water and see if it really is for you - i.e. where people getting shot at or killed by IEDs is not a daily occurance.

      One way to get started would be to look for a position with a large international IT/Comms consultancy, civil engineering, or mechnical engineering company specifying you want overseas work. Don't forget about satellite/radio/cellular/PMR type stuff in the comms sector, or BMS/SCADA stuff under mechanical engineering; both can involve quite a lot of IT. Most projects like that tend to involve lots of other similar companies all fighting for a place at the trough, so there's plenty of opportunities to network. And that's the key, really. Once you've got some contacts, you'll it turns out to be a very incestuous business with people moving back and forth between companies all the time depending on where the work is and what they want to do.

      Money's usually very good, through excellent and out into la-la land (and sometimes tax free as well, although I don't think USians get that particular break) depending on where you go and what you do. Make sure that you talk to an accountant with knowledge of expat working before you go though, there are lots of loopholes and gotchas in tax law and overseas working regulations. Again, networking is important; find out what your colleagues are doing and screwed up on and learn from their experiences.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:Not all war zones are created equal by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      I actually got recruiters on LinkedIn trying to pitch me to work in Qatar ; specifically, for healthcare related IT purposes. I was too nervous about leaving my comfy government job in exchange for uncertain contracting work, and upsetting my wife and daughter by moving to another country, however temporarily, but I was sure tempted ; £500 per day is nothing to sneeze at, especially when it's virtually tax free. A couple of months of that would have paid off the residual capital on my mortgage ; a few more would have set me up nicely to build my own house.

      This is because I have a few key technologies on my CV that are not in widespread demand, but are in short supply. Specifically, HL7 - "Health Level 7", a healthcare interoperability protocol.

      So the advice would be
        * Learn some really obscure technologies that the Qatar government want.
        * Post your CV on LinkedIn and as many other places as possible.
        * Try and find recruiters that specialize in Qatar.

      They're building a whole city just to host the World Cup, so I'm sure they have need of a lot of IT contractors.

    4. Re:Not all war zones are created equal by stating_the_obvious · · Score: 1

      US citizens are eligible for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion of up to roughly $92,000 if you are either permanently residing outside of the United States or have been residing outside of the US for at least 330 days during the previous 12 months.

      US Government contractors are eligible, but US government employees (State, USAID, etc.) are not.

      It's a good deal if you can get it; and if you are close to the threshold of 330 days, take a vacation anywhere outside the US -- you don't need to be working all the time, you just need to not be in the US. Also, if you have a touch of the OCD, ask the immigration people to stamp your passport chronologically instead of randomly when you travel. This makes it super easy to show your dates outside the US if you get called on it.

      I am not a tax advisor.

    5. Re:Not all war zones are created equal by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Why is Qatar a "war zone"? Per Wikipedia, there are no ongoing armed conflicts there, nor anything that happened recently. Last I can find is their participation in the Gulf War in 1991.

  15. War Zone? Check by Wingsy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought that working in IT was, by definition, working in a war zone.

    --
    If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
  16. Re:My advice by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    Ok. I'll stick to having them build roads, schools, kill oppressive dictators, kill terrorists, and make the world a better place. I'd rather that we didn't have to kill to accomplish these goals, but thats what it takes.

  17. This isn't the place to ask by kriston · · Score: 1

    This isn't the place to ask. Network around and be aware that you're going to need a security clearance. If you don't already have one, and you somehow do get the job, be prepared to sit on the bench from three to twelve months doing busy-work while you wait your clearance to be adjudicated.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:This isn't the place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A security clearance can be a big career boost. Until I found my current job, most IT interviews went as follows:

      HR rep: "Do you have a TS/SCI clearance?"
      Me: "No."
      HR rep: "Do you have a CISSP?"
      Me: "No."
      HR rep: "Interview over. Next in line please!"

  18. Stay away by slasho81 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stay away from war zones.

    Jobs in these areas are glamorous - they seem exciting and adventurous, but in reality they are extremely boring and needlessly dangerous. If that's not enough, you'll feel socially excluded because you're not a soldier in a place where almost everyone else is and you're disconnected from "real life" where civilians like yourself thrive. On top of all that, working in rigid bureaucratic organizations like the armed forces can drive people up the wall. You'll feel like you're immersed in stupid. Watch Generation Kill for a very credible illustration of that.

    In summary, don't do it.

    1. Re:Stay away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to have to disagree. I'm currently working in Afganistan as a contractor, and statistically, I'm safer here then I would be driving to work every day back home. Believe it or not, there is a decent social life out here, and most soldiers make a real effort to avoid treating civies like second class citizens. The bureaucracy is, IMHO, easier to deal with then civilian management, because even though it is more rigid, it's more consistant as well. Expectations are explained clearly and ahead of time, and I haven't had idiots changing their minds on project specs, design methods, etc half way though a task. It is tough to be away from my family, but with internet and phone connections, its not to bad. That being said, there are good spots and bad spots. If you end up going over, try to end up at a major base, not a forward patrol.

    2. Re:Stay away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's your perspective, but mine is different. I had the time of my life in Afghanistan. I saw and experienced things that most people never will. Socially excluded? Hah, hardly. Contractors are the life of the party over there. We get paid well and have to put up with 1/10th of the bullshit. I was a tech worker with a security clearance but even the ditch diggers are doing just fine. It's like one big family over there and there is no shortage of things to do and people to socialize with. I met and got the opportunity to work with people from many different U.S. states and countries from around the world, both military and civilian. In my last stint I got paid six figures for a job that took realistically 30 minutes of work *per week* most weeks, and with the occasional travel opportunity to some new and exotic FOB to fix a satellite terminal and chill with the dudes there.

      Yeah, some of these places were hot and got attacked repeatedly. One FOB got mortared daily, though the enemy were horrible shots since our guys had long since taken out their good mortar crews, so they were reduced to firing a few blind shots over the nearby mountain, then splitting before our guys could land rounds on their heads. I could understand why some people would be stressed out. I'm not the stressing sort though. I remember sitting with like 10 other guys (soldiers) on this cramped ass little picnic table in the tiny "chow hall"/"MWR room", laughing and joking, and just digging into eat when a mortar suddenly landed maybe 20 feet away on the other side of a barrier. BOOM! We all looked at each other for a split second then everyone just jumped up and ran to their posts. I went to a different spot to observe that day....and a round landed well within shrapnel range of the old spot, where my ass would have normally been, and blew dirt and rocks all over one guy sitting nearby.

      Finally the suspected terrorists emerged from behind a mountain in an old pickup truck, which we targeted and blew to pieces with a Javelin missile. This is basically a modern day, "fire and forget" version of a Sidewinder-type weapon, a shoulder fired missile launcher built for killing tanks. The missile comes in a disposable tube which you slap a targeting computer on the side of to target and fire it. The missile has a nose cone camera that gives the operator a live feed of the missile at it soars far above the target, then turns and hauls ass straight downward toward the target, impacting it at point the attacker chooses, selectable via the control module in real time up and until the actual impact. The soldier picked the vehicle cab so when the 50-foot high explosion ripped the truck in half in a really wicked explosion, the guys inside surely must have died instantly. We sure whooped and hollered about how exciting it was. Later it turned out that half the truck's flaming wreckage rolled down into a nearby field, killing one man and severely maiming a teenage girl. As I recall she lost and eye and a limb or two.

      Yes, war is fucking horrible. This was horrible. But the experience of getting to see and meet a new people, whom you may never get the opportunity to meet ever again, is a positive thing. Putting military dollars in your pocket to jumpstart yourself in life is a positive thing. If I had it to do over again, I definitely would still go.

  19. Ask to work from home by drunkahol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Works for me.

    Seriously. They have interwebs and everything out there. Leave the kidnappings to the oil engineers and charity workers.

  20. Advice by strikethree · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked in the Middle East as a contractor for six years. Two and a half of those years I was under fire in Iraq. Here is some advice:

    Be prepared to live well outside your comfort zone. If you are working in a nice place, you will have shower trailers and restroom trailers... but most places are not nice.

    Temperatures are extreme. I saw multiple thermometers claim a temp of 142F one day (July 2005 Baghdad). None of the official reports mention temps that high. Afghanistan is not so hot but it gets MUCH colder.

    Be prepared to keep your wits about you as the explosive devices start flying over barriers and blowing shit (and humans) up nearby. I was able to put up with it for two and half years at which point I knew that if I stayed longer, I was going to change (permanently?) mentally in ways that were not desirable. You can only ignore the possibility of getting shredded for only so long... One of my coworkers died in Fallujah in... 2006 I think. He was the only employee from my company to die. A mortar round essentially landed on his head. His coworkers had to clean his brains and bone fragments out of the equipment to get it operational again. Could you do that?

    You will not really be making that much money even if it seems like a lot compared to what you are used to. Do NOT spend all of your money. There will be some surprises down the road and you want the cash to be available.

    More about money: You will not be making that much money forever. I knew several people who bought $600,000+ houses and then were not offered to be recontracted (either due to the company losing the contract or that person was just not wanted). Live a lifestyle like you have now and when everything is done, you will be well off. If you choose to live the high life, expect a harsh period of ... ahem... "lifestyle readjustment".

    Take a durable laptop with you. If you do not play 3D video games, see if you can find one without a fan (dust buildup). Bring lots of large capacity laptop style external drives with you.

    I am sure there is more. If you want, I can even refer you if you send me your resume. I have done that with two people from Slashdot already. One died (statistically very very unlikely but the real world does not care about statistics). :(

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    1. Re:Advice by Almandine · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty helpful post. One doesn't miss potable water until only non-potable water is available. Skin moisturizers are also pretty important I think. Bring some in case there isn't any in the BX/PX.

    2. Re:Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want, I can even refer you if you send me your resume. I have done that with two people from Slashdot already. One died (statistically very very unlikely but the real world does not care about statistics). :(

      Strikethree Please send me an email so that I can forward my resume....millerc@mmoinc.com

    3. Re:Advice by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Sent.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    4. Re:Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of this, do SSD's last longer there? I haven't been on the road since the prices got reasonable, and didn't care enough to try to swap the drive out last time I went.

    5. Re:Advice by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I did not notice any difference in hard drive behavior between here and there. An SSD is nicer because it is lighter and less power hungry.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    6. Re:Advice by nbntek · · Score: 1

      I did a contract (civilian) in iraq and would be very interested in going back - what address can I send a resume to you? a referral would be fantastic. thanks

    7. Re:Advice by strikethree · · Score: 1

      remove animals: dogdaddy67@mulegmail.com

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    8. Re:Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent two years in Afghanistan. All of the above is excellent advice, especially about not blowing your money. You are taking a risk to make that money....so put it to good use. I blew most of mine, but at least I learned a good lesson from it, so next time I get my hands on that kind of money I won't be so stupid.

  21. Work in a war zone. by GungaDan · · Score: 2

    I hear Zynga will be hiring soon.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Work in a war zone. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Zynga ugh Id work for Blackwater or Sandline first :-)

  22. Re:Die in a fire. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2

    I considered a contract that would involve IT work in Iraq, a few years ago. I saw it as a way to help rebuild and atone for my nation's stupidity. Don't judge the guy asking the question too harshly without knowing his motives.

  23. Lots of opinions by muddyh2o · · Score: 1

    I'm with the OP. What are the best ways to find these jobs for someone with some skills, but perhaps not a government clearance or experience in the shit? Lots of replies and opinionating (which is why we love the /.ers) but give me some solid pointers please.

    1. Re:Lots of opinions by arkenian · · Score: 2
      getting one without a clearance, and most contractors have a marked preference for someone with prior military experience (because it demosntrates you're mentally and physically up for it). But beyond that, if you're willing to go, just send your resume to a defense contractor that does these things, indicating clearly your willingness to deploy to afghanistan. L-3 or Mantech have some of the biggest contracts I am personally aware of, but there are many others. However, its always hard to get your first job requiring a securtiy clearance, because many companies simply can't use you to do ANYTHING until you have it.

      Some things to bear in mind: The money is good, but only with the completion bonus -- if you don't think you can do it, don't bother applying. The hours are BRUTAL (and that's part of why the money is so good. Even if you're 'salaried' you get paid by the hour and its 84 hours a week until your R&R. Oh . . . and don't assume you'll have an internet connection, although I know several people out there who banded together to buy their own satellite connection while in theatre, and in Baghdad, at least, they had their own private (free!) WoW server at one point . . .

  24. Job postings by slashdoter · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a good source for IT work in places that would dictate high pay? I know a guy looking for a contractor for Afghanistan but it is a sub contract on a sub contract of a contract and everyone is guarding who they work for. I'd love a place that listed dangerous jobs that pay real well.

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
  25. Alot of the good jobs are gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the USG most of the $200K IT jobs are gone. With all the wars being ended they are being consolidated and needs are shrunk.
    Also the pay was not really that high, it averaged in $120K range, if you had experience and did not want to worry about bullets being fired all the time, more if in a bullet flying area and depending on skills. What gave the people the really nice salaries was working huge hours overtime, 12-14 hours/6-7 days a week. What else are you going to do.
    Some of the higher paying salaries are still there but the overtime is gone you are now on a working standard 40 hour weeks.

  26. Don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a former active US Marine nothing is more irritating than a private contractor, or generally any civilians in a battle space.

    1. Re:Don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gets in the way of committing atrocities, does it?

    2. Re:Don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself.

    3. Re:Don't do it by swilly · · Score: 1

      Having been a contractor in Iraq, I understand this sentiment. There are some who happily sit on the FOB and boast about the money they make in front of the soldiers. Personally, I found that to be rather tacky. It isn't fair that I got paid more for an easier job, so I tried to not rub it in and not get offended when someone was a little resentful. I didn't always succeed (money and taxes are a natural topic of conversation), but some people didn't even bother trying. The soldiers and marines who went outside the wire deserve respect, and the EOD guys deserve even more.

    4. Re:Don't do it by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It can't be a battlefield 24/7 - after all, it's also a country, where people are trying to live their lives.

      Anyway, if not private contractors, then how would you suggest handling all the multitude of jobs that they're currently doing over there?

  27. I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by IDtheTarget · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a Major in the National Guard, a Signal Officer currently deployed to Afghanistan. That whole thing about getting kidnapped is B.S. All of the contractors here fly on the same helicopters that we do, or drive in the same convoys that we do. They get the same security and eat in the same DFACs. The only real difference is that they don't go around armed, unless they're the Law Enforcement Professionals (LEPs) or security contractors.

    For the most part they stay on the Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) just like those of us not actually out on a mission. They work six months and go home on leave (I can't remember if it's 2 weeks or a month). It's all in their contract.

    When I finished my Iraq tour, I was offered $250k per year to take over managing the I.T. section at a major Iraqi FOB. I was bone-weary from the deployment and just wanted to go home, so I didn't take them up on it. One of my soldiers here was offered $125k to come back and work in the I.T. department at BAF after the tour. She's still thinking about it.

    Ignore most of the B.S. that's being posted here, they have zero idea what they're talking about. The pay is high, as is the security. The downside is the hours that you work. 12-18 hour days, with no days off is the norm. It gets to you after awhile.

    Believe it or not, one of the things that really gets to you over here is the lack of GREEN. At least the FOBs I've been to, I am SICK and TIRED of sand and gravel, tan and grey. My wife emails me pictures of our lawn so i have something green to look at...

    1. Re:I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, concur with all of the above... deployed as well. He knows what he's talking about. The comment about the lack of GREEN is completely true, a couple contractors starting painting murals on the concrete blast barriers just to break things up.

      But a couple fresh out of college, working together for $500K/year combined with zero expenses... wow... work for 2 years, then come back and buy a house with cash... talk about setting yourself up for the rest of your life. And like has been said, the risk is no where near as high as people say. Chances of death in the commute through LA is higher than dying inside a FOB in afghanistan (that's an old stat I mention it as anecdotal now).

    2. Re:I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      125K is nothing for IT nowadays.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    3. Re:I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by mraudigy · · Score: 1

      It is when the first $92,000 is tax free and you literally have no where to spend your money.

    4. Re:I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally thought this post was written by someone with serious overseas experience. until I read that first line again and saw national guard.

    5. Re:I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You do realize that National Guard was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, right?

    6. Re:I am a Signal Officer currently in Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 tours here to date - engineered much of the comm infrastructure that you're using. Agree on all counts. Even with the combat pay as an O-4, the long hours made me miss the cushy cube life back home. Strange how much you miss what can be insignificant at home. My wife still sighs when I joke about how nice it is to walk into the bathroom from the bed.

      You just can't tell someone what it's like to have a bubble-gut attack in a Baghdad porta-potty - in the middle of summer. It's something I always thought they couldn't pay me enough to do again.

      But you'll have some bragging rights, and many of our comm guys fought over each other to come back as contractors. Just like wives, some people are good with it, not the best for others.

  28. Picklepants! by na1led · · Score: 1

    With a name like that, I'm sure Drill Sergeants would love having you!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Picklepants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like that, I'm sure Drill Sergeants would love having you!

      Are you sure you don't mean Dill Sergeants?

  29. Nuremberg precedent: you will be a war criminal by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The precedent from the Nuremberg trials is that if you participate in the military aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq, this makes you a war criminal. Indeed the Nuremberg defense that you are following superior orders doesn't even apply because you are going there voluntarily.

    And while I don't believe you will be held accountable for your crimes in a court of law, I see no compelling reason for you to do this. It is dangerous. As others have said you can work in plenty of countries. You can also find many lines of work like financial planning that only require minimal additional training and certification.

    So my advice is there are plenty of other better opportunities to pursue, and you would be wrong for doing it. So your proposed plan of action is completely illogical.

    1. Re:Nuremberg precedent: you will be a war criminal by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      War Crimes only get applied to the losers. Not really a problem for an American at this point in time.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Nuremberg precedent: you will be a war criminal by MLease · · Score: 4, Informative

      In order to be a war criminal, one has to actually, y'know, commit a war crime. Merely working for or serving in the military, even if the overall action is deemed illegal, doesn't meet that standard. You referenced the Nuremberg trials; you should familiarize yourself with the Nuremberg principles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Principles), paying particular attention to Principle VI and to the ruling from the Canadian Federal Court near the end of the article. The only one of the elements of Principle VI that could possibly apply would be the "Crimes against Peace", if we grant that the actions in Afghanistan and Iraq were illegal under international law (and that is not a given; I personally disapproved of US involvement in Iraq, and had mixed feelings about Afghanistan, but I don't think it's entirely clear that either was manifestly illegal). The Canadian ruling states, "An individual must be involved at the policy-making level to be culpable for a crime against peace ... the ordinary foot soldier is not expected to make his or her own personal assessment as to the legality of a conflict. Similarly, such an individual cannot be held criminally responsible for fighting in support of an illegal war, assuming that his or her personal war-time conduct is otherwise proper."

      Not every soldier or civilian auxiliary who participates in a war that is determined to be against international law can or will be held liable for war crimes.

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
    3. Re:Nuremberg precedent: you will be a war criminal by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Really what planet are you from? Its under a UN mandate.

  30. Good opportunities if you can find them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent three years working as an IT contractor in Iraq. I would expect that the opportunities in Iraq are dwindling due to the troop withdrawal, as the majority of those contracting opportunities were in support of the U.S. military. First question: Do you have a DoD Secret or better clearance? It will be much easier to find work if you do. You may be able to find opportunities in Afghanistan and Kuwait, and also in Bahrain and Qatar, as those are the theater command locations for remaining operations in southwest Asia and Afghanistan. Fluor, ITT, DRS, and most all of the beltway bandits (Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, etc.) have or have had contracts in SWA. Unfortunately, unless you have networked with folks who have worked there, your best option is to comb the job sites. Search their job sites for jobs in those countries. If you are less adventurous and the job is in a combat zone (Afghanistan)and your safety is a concern, be sure to determine where the job location is (they may not tell you exactly where due to security concerns,) and whether it requires regular travel outside of the wire.

  31. Personal Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pulled just over 3 months in Djibouti at Camp Lemmonier (Africa 10KM from Somalia border - 40KM from Yemen coast) back in late 2009-2010. First you need a clearance...very little IT work takes place without at LEAST a Secret clearance. Second... go look at the web sites for the bases over there. If it looks bleak, remember that is the positive spin...it is most likely much much worse. I hope you don't have privacy issues...you'll most likely share a shower/bathroom with 100 other guys. No beer allowed in Iraq and Afghanistan...Djibouti allowed 3 beers a day max on base. Hard liquor is forbidden.

    Get used to the idea that your life is always at risk in some way. Iraq and Afghanistan bases get infrequent rocket and sniper attacks that kill military and civilian alike. Djibouti hosts it's share of nasty poisonous reptiles. Nothing like Australia, but finding a Death Adder under the Help Desk front stairs will wake anyone up.

    Camp Lemmonier was the primary support base for all of Africa when I was there. The wireless public access for the base operated at dial-up speeds (no joke). There was very little on-base entertainment. A bar for beer and wine, a movie theater, a lending library, and a TV lounge were about it. They were adding some lines to the CLUs (hee hee...containerized living units - look them up). Speaking of CLUs those are the best you can hope for housing... the unlucky go into those huge tents like the ones you see on TV.

    That covers it...if you can stand doing without a lot you take for granted. The pay can be awesome...

  32. Be prepared... by Simulant · · Score: 1

    I did IT work for the military during a war but not in a war zone and it was the worst job of my life. Military IT is a nightmare even without the possibility of being shot at. The bureaucracy will probably kill you first. Then there's the moral dilemma of the war itself. How 'patriotic' or mercenary are you?

    Finally, be warned that the Mil IT jobs are rarely as described. I was quite shocked at how different the reality was.

  33. Jealousy by vlm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Expect jealousy from the non-contractor types, like enlisted soldiers. I was in their boots (admittedly stateside) and we treated the contractors with exactly the required level of professionalism and otherwise not a droplet more as we hated them for doing our jobs for "ten times the pay" (actually it was probably only twice, but no reasoning with jealousy) ... Its a difficult workplace environment. If you make 10x what a grunt makes, expect them to really onload on you if you make a microscopic mistake. Also expect to listen politely and agreeably like a bartender, about how they are stuck there for years whereas you could theoretically stand up, walk out and leave; 19 year old soldiers don't understand the whole concept of "contract" and "having to pay the mortgage back home" and "having to pay for food and medical care" very well, so they really do think you can do that...

    On the other hand, in a warzone, maybe there is more camaraderie?

    The most important thing you can do to make friends, is figure out what the grunts are not easily able to do and then "help them out" in a way that gets no one in trouble, untraceable, is more or less legal or at least "blind eye" situation, and makes you friends. Back in the day, civilian contractors were "expected" to provide us with warez for our personal laptops in the pre-wide public availability of internet access (note personal laptop in Army speak, is like "personal weapons", things you own and paid for and use solely in your downtime, not personal as in merely army issued "work laptop", it would be dumb to mess with army issued hardware). Also they were expected to provide us with alcohol for all party reasons, not sure how well that works overseas in Islamic countries, but the "rich contractors" were expected to buy us rounds at the bar, not the other way around. On the other hand don't do anything stupid with serial number items or or using classified rated hardware to run unclassified level software. Also be aware of certain army traditions, like you'd share ammo with your buddy if he was out, or you'd share food if he had none, or you'd share medical supplies if he had a sucking chest wound, so expect near violent response if you don't share your mp3 files with anyone who asks, thats just kinda how it is in the Army. Same with pr0n jpegs and movie files. Also paperback books. If there is a paperback book in your possession, and you are not currently reading it, its a major social error to not instantly hand it to someone who wants to read it, so don't bring your signed 1st edition copy of LOTR or something and expect to hoard it until you return home, unless you do literally read it over and over the whole time.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Jealousy by Strider- · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the other hand, in a warzone, maybe there is more camaraderie?

      In my case, at least, that was my experience. Back in 2006, I spent 3 months bouncing around Iraq and Afghanistan fixing and upgrading satcoms gear for PAO shops all over the place. It really was an excellent experience for me, as the soldiers and marines I worked with really did seem to appreciate my presence. On more than a few occasions, I got invited out to unit barbecues etc... (and yes, I always made sure to bring something to the party, even if it was just a case of coke from the PX). The real key is that I was more or less immersed with the troops, living with them, and eating with them. I wasn't working for one of the big contracting firms, so I was living in the transient tents just like they were.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  34. The pay isn't actually better. by danguyf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Offers to work in combat zones initially look great. They'll back a dump truck full of money up to your house and all you have to do is go have an adventure overseas for 12-18 months. Woo!

    The reality is that you'll be working 7 days a week, 18 hours a day. It's expected of you, everyone is doing it, and if you did try to work 8 hour days you would quickly go nuts from boredom because there is nothing to do. There are only so many magazines and videos and games around. Your office will be hot like an oven from all the desktop machines. If you're lucky the server closets will be a little cooler. You will be working harder, in those 18 hours a day, then you've ever had to work before.

    If you want that kind of life, get an IT job on an oil rig. Or take a break from IT and go work on an Alaskan fishing boat. The hours, money, boredom, and stress levels are basically the same.

    1. Re:The pay isn't actually better. by danguyf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ugh. I forgot to return to the title. So that $150-160k/year they offered you, when you work it out for 18 hours a day 7 days a week, comes to $22-24/hour.

      That's like making $50k/year at a regular 9-5 job.

    2. Re:The pay isn't actually better. by strikethree · · Score: 2

      I never met a single person who routinely worked more (or less) than 12 hours a day. Other than that, your point still more or less stands.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    3. Re:The pay isn't actually better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the people I worked with were more hardcore than the norm. ^_^

  35. Nonsense by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    When was the last time your government engaged in an operation on this scale to help people? Did the US drop trillions on Haiti after US installed governments didn't want to make strong building codes? Do they spend trillions on developing clean drinking water solutions? No. They do these things when they want explicit control of an area. So they use military force.

    Likewise, you can apply your talents to many projects that help people and involve zero killing.

    1. Re:Nonsense by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      They didn't even move a finger to help New Orleans, and those where US citizens!

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:Nonsense by marnues · · Score: 1

      Neither of the projects you listed are things the US government should do. Drop trillions on Haiti? Even given such a thing would take a back seat to other financial priorities, what exactly would be accomplished? Foreign hand-outs to a people without an economy on promotes further abuses. Those trillions would be collected into the various social structures and fought over tooth-and-nail. The Mexican drug cartels would be jealous of such depravity.

      Then there's clean drinking water. Why throw money at something that exists? As in all modern convienences, the problem is not one of R&D, it's logistics. How can we support sanitation in places that we have no jurisdiction? This returns back to the Haiti problem. Without local support (incorruptible government) the plan is completely useless. NGOs are the only method of supporting such systems, and the US is quite deft at promoting them. So leave the government out. Otherwise we'll just be back to propping up more 3rd world dictators.

      Now, hate war all you want, but military action _is_ something the US government controls, should control, and (usually) knows how to use effectively. Perhaps everything looks like a nail when all you have is a hammer (and certainly there were better options for Iraq). But using the military is sometimes the best course of action (removing the Taliban).

    3. Re:Nonsense by marnues · · Score: 1

      Actually, they did send in the Army. It seems to have been under the table though. And it didn't work out. My friend was terrified by how much more brutal the streets of New Orleans were than Fallujah. The army left soon after it arrived since they realized it was only going to become more of a warzone if they stayed much longer.

    4. Re:Nonsense by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

      First of all, you think the need for drinking water is not a real and pressing problem!? Your ignorance is astounding. Don't you know how much water is used in the production of electricity, food, and other industrial processes? Do you realize that your morning shower is just a tiny percent of your daily water consumption? Development of technology that made clean drinking water ubiquitous would be possibly the greatest accomplishment man has ever made.

      Second of all, Haiti has problems because we keep interfering with their governance with our military power. We should have left Aristede in place and because of his "socialism" he would have actually enforced building codes. The idea that we can't rebuild Haiti with trillions of dollars is nonsense. If the money was horribly abused and misplaced, we could still build every Haitian a house for that money.

      If you argued that it would simply be a poor application of money, you'd have a better point. However, the Iraq war is a much worse application. There have indeed been hundreds of billions misapplied and stolen from corporations like Haliburton. Furthermore, what did we really accomplish in these places? Life in the war zone is worse that life under Sadaam Hussein.

    5. Re:Nonsense by painehope · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has lived, worked, and been imprisoned in Orleans Parish (that's New Orleans for anyone who hasn't lived in the only state that is more or less the same as when it was French, at least in terms of government), I could give a fuck about that city. The best thing they could have done is just blockade the place and require three references from people who aren't named Shaniquefa and have a job in order to be let out, and then leave the rest of those bastards to kill each other for bread crumbs and wide-screen TVs that they couldn't use anyways. As soon as it was all over (meaning all the scum that have since poisoned my city (seriously, I was living w/ my ex-wife in some apartments after Katrina, and all the "refugees" moved in and started stealing everything that wasn't bolted down - my neighbor put some frozen hamburger on a plate on his porch to defrost and it was gone 5 minutes later...they even took the paper plate!) and all the surrounding states would have been dead), just bulldoze some levees, let the bodies drain out into the gulf, and then start the cleanup. Bye-bye Chocolate City! Hello to a cleaner and safer New Orleans!

      Don't speak on that place until you've eaten grits three times a day (with a lump of cold cheese in it if you were lucky), had to carry a shank everywhere you went, and all the White prisoners pooled their blankets to tie their cells shut at night (because most of the cells wouldn't shut and you can't stay awake all the time, and you can't fight back when someone holds a wet towel around your head while five of his homies beat the shit out of you and take your food or whatever else they feel like (remember, Louisiana is under the Napoleonic code, so some poor schmuck who got drunk and pissed off a cop is in there with guys who raped and killed little old ladies). I felt sorry as hell for the middle-class Whites in there. The rest of us Whites had to practically hold their hands and explain to them that they weren't going to see a judge for at least three days, they'd be lucky if they just got a fine (I got 10 days just because I was standing there while the cops jacked up my friends and searched them...to this day, I have no clue what I was charged with, I just know that not only did I have to sit out bullshit time in a hellhole [and I've done real time in Texas prisons, which are supposed to be some of the worst in the country], I also had to pay a fine or sit another 20 days just because I asked the judge what I was being charged with), there was no way they could get a bond before they saw a judge, and crying on the phone to their wife was just going to make them a mark.

      Fuck that city and fuck that state.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    6. Re:Nonsense by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      You are a white supremacist who has done time in at least two states, you have piercings and tattoos on your cock, and you claim OTHER people is garbage?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    7. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree but he's still better than anyone from south america. that place is a shithole.

  36. Re:My advice by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    Simple and to the point. Great advice.

  37. Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I strongly agree with the recommendation to work internationally in non-war zones, doing work that either makes the world a better place or at least makes cheap consumer junk or entertainment but doesn't make the world worse. It's possible to see the world, meet interesting and exciting people, and not help kill them. I'm not just saying this as a peacenik hippie - I used to work for the military-industrial complex, security clearances and the whole bit, and it does mess with your head even though you get to work on interesting problems*. Don't do it. If you do want to work in a partially-American English-speaking enclave environment, oil companies are a way to do high-tech work in wild and crazy places.

    The reasons to work in a war zone are either that you approve of the war or that you think you'll make a big pile of money at the risk of getting killed. So if you are going to do that, you should look into working for a contracting company, not for the US Government themselves. A friend of mine did that for a while in Iraq and then started his own company, providing computing and satellite services. You have to be a real generalist, able to handle anything from hardware installation to electrical generation in addition to the computer stuff.

    (*Back in the 80s and 90s I'd have recommended working for drug smugglers in preference to working for the military, but the current cartel wars in Mexico make Blackwater and the Taliban look like friendly moral non-crazy people.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by marnues · · Score: 1

      Some of us really are concerned with supporting our troops. For instance my best friend fought in Fallujah years ago. He is a soldier at heart but injured beyond picking up a weapon again. He's been in civilian networking since then and his heart breaks when he hears of poor contracting near the front lines. If you can't understand his desire to do engineering in a warzone, I find you closed-minded and heartless.

      Now I have aspirations to join him and my fancy degree and fully resume should help me out. I'm the kind of guy that was happy to be in college when talk of a new draft floated around post-9/11. I could just as easily head to Africa where my mom has done work in Uganda and Kenya for orphans from the Lords Resistance Army and AIDs. Maybe it's because I've lived around bleeding-hearts all my life, but I see my skills going to waste in that kind of environment. I also have seen my skills go to waste in a traditional engineering job here at home, although my current gig is awesome. In a warzone there are expectations of excellence and ability that I have not found elsewhere. These may not be the people of highest caliber, but I'm more interested in getting people's best. Plus I want to see my friend's best. This is my justification, perhaps not to your liking, but I've grown used to disappointing bleeding-hearts.

      Is there value-free version of the phrase "bleeding-heart"? I mean it as a descriptor rather than a pejorative, but I know that it won't be heard that way. But I am drawing a blank for a better phrase.

    2. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      Is there value-free version of the phrase "bleeding-heart"?

      Yes.

      Chest wound.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    3. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by cusco · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I never thought that the term 'bleeding-heart' actually applied to just everyone who didn't support slaughtering civilians by the thousands to improve corporate profits. Damn, what's your euphemism for the scum that work for Blackwater and DynCorp? Yeesh.

      Perhaps a better phrase would be 'rational human being', or 'non-bloodsuckers'.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    4. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Damn, what's your euphemism for the scum that work for Blackwater and DynCorp?

      Just a soldier, but paid what he deserves. PMCs and normal enlisted, they both work to serve corporations' interests. The difference is, PMCs know that, and opt to at least make some decent money from it. Soldiers do it because they think they are serving their country.

    5. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just join the army if it's all so fucking great out there?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if that's a troll as it managed to annoy me (and I'm not in favour of the military interventions in Iraq and Afghsnistan) and presumably also all the pro-military-at-all-times readers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Not a troll at all. Do you believe soldiers are defending their home country? If not, I do not see why you would object to PMCs any more than normal soldiers.

    8. Re:Contracting vs. Direct US Gov't Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ther term you are looking for is humanitarian worker.

  38. Saw "Buried"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and now I'm scared to work in a war-torn country.

  39. clearancejobs.com by Quila · · Score: 1

    But it's hard to jump right on, get a clearance and go to a war zone.

    Better to find a local job that requires a SECRET clearance, get it and they get you your clearance. Then get another local job that requires upgrading to TS. Then put yourself in clearancejobs.com and go for the $$$.

    1. Re:clearancejobs.com by kriston · · Score: 1

      War zone, yes, it is still great paying job.
      State-side, though, the differential between cleared jobs and regular jobs in the private sector isn't that great anymore. In the Washington DC area the extra pay a cleared job gets fell below 10% in 2008 and hovers around 5% today. For my current career situation it was no longer worth the extra headaches that come with working at cleared positions.

      Strictly speaking, in a war zone, you might considering comparing that pay with the expense and salary of simply moving to the Washington DC area. It's a fair bet you'd be earning more while living comfortably in Nothern VA and still be saving the world by working in the intelligence or homeland security communities.

      --

      Kriston

  40. Don't take off your flac jacket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVER!

  41. Re:My advice by erroneus · · Score: 1

    "Terrorists" are people that oppose government will and interests. At the moment, "OWS" protesters are considered low-level terrorists.

    I've served in the US military. I am a war-time veteran starting from Operation Desert Shield and ending with Operation Desert Storm. I know what goes on in the military (generally speaking) and I know how these things are viewed. It's all a lot of work they (we) would rather not be doing and quite a bit of it is HEAVILY doubted. You will not find many, if any, "spirited patriots" in the U.S. military service.

    So from your comment, I can guess with a high degree of certainty that you have never served in the military, let alone during war-time. And if you did, you were an officer of some sort and have lost your ability to tell truth from bullshit.

    Most of what the US military does is wait for orders and execute them. Now take a few steps back and look at how the military forces of the US are used and why... I mean the REAL reasons why. The US military is used to push US business and US banking interests around the world. Sometimes when the troops get too idle, they have them build stuff or do things for the children of that region, but don't believe for a second that is their primary mission.

    I used to believe what you believe. Then I saw and did very different things. I know nothing I say will change your beliefs... that's what beliefs are all about after all. But since you haven't really been to those places or done any of those things, please at least preface your crap with "I have never served nor been there to see what really goes on, but..." Because I've gotta say every time I see "patriotic flag wavers" "supporting the troops" and crap like that, all I see is a parrot repeating the crap they were fed.

  42. Get on while the gravy train is still in service by Ponga · · Score: 2

    I've worked in the defense sector and although I have not signed up for one of these gigs, I know plenty of people that have. It's true that if you are worth your salt (or look good on paper), can obtain a secret clearance and willing to sacrifice a year of your life working 15 hours a day, every day... you can make $250 in a year in Afghanistan. Good places to look are the company websites: L3, SRI and STG - there are many more. Also job fairs in military towns. HOWEVER, if you really want to do this, get on while the getting is good. As you may know, the US trying to fold up it's many operations in SWA and other combat theaters, plus while the government is going broke, it's going to be hard for the DoD to justify paying a quarter million a year for each contractor working in these places... knowing what I know from my days in the DoD, I suspect this gravy train will come to screeching halt... and soon.

  43. You're not qualified. by BitZtream · · Score: 2

    I know this, because you're asking the question on slashdot.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  44. Been There, Done That by swilly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Working in a war zone is not for everyone. The money is great, the weather is terrible, the hours are almost as bad as the weather, and not everyone can handle the stress of the occasional rocket hitting the FOB (Forward Operating Base). The good news is that you will probably never leave the FOB except to get in and out of country, so you are almost as safe as in the US. When I worked at Camp Victory, the joke was that it was safer there than Detroit, but I don't know if that was true. The biggest cause of death was traffic accidents, so it could have been true. Keep in mind that it's one thing to know that intellectually, but another thing to experience it.

    Iraq is being spun down, so you will get to miss out on 130F heat (only 110 at night!), the most bizarre rainy season I've ever seen (the mud is unbelievable), and dust storms must be experienced to be believed. I've only spent a few weeks total in Afghanistan, but my impression is that Khandahar was like Iraq but a little milder and with mountains. Bagram is even milder and seemed like a decent place to be.

    The facilities will vary wildly depending on where you live. Major bases like Khandahar and Bagram have very good facilities, but smaller bases will be much more primitive. The food is surprisingly good but the internet even worse than you think it will be.

    Bring a durable laptop, preferable with a large screen. This will probably be your only computer. You will make good money, so don't focus on price and just get the best one you can. Not every place can have a TV, I had to use a USB TV-in to hook up my XBox to my laptop, which worked surprisingly well. Don't bring anything you truly care about, as the dust ruins everything. When I came back I opened up both my laptop and XBox and they were so caked with dust I'm surprised the 1st gen XBox survived (it had heat problems in the best of situations). Find the lightest, coolest shirts you can, cargo pants, good sturdy boots, and a good pair of sunglasses. I also found a large, floppy hat to be useful. I looked like a dork, but I was a cool dork whose head was always in the shade.

    If you have ever been in the military or worked for them, then you know a little of what to expect. If not, then be prepared for a very different office experience than exists anywhere else. Even if you are familiar with the military culture, a war zone is unlike anything else. Everyone is armed and there is a level of intensity that doesn't exist here in the states. It's very different, but I have found that people can get used to almost anything and even a war zone can become eventually become routine. The days will drag on forever, but the weeks will fly by.

    The money is great, but you only make it while over there. I suggest getting some investment advice, set up a plan, and follow it. That is what I did, but unfortunately 2007 wasn't the best year for throwing over a hundred thousand dollars at the stock market. Even the best plan can be sabotaged by poor timing. Even with the bad stock market, I'm still looking at cutting several years off my retirement age.

    Consider the tax benefits of staying a whole year. 330 days out of the US, and your first $85,000 (guess, I don't know what it currently is) is tax free. Less than 330 days, you don't get the tax break. Some shady or misinformed tax preparers have been known to try to pro-rate the break, but I've known a few people who got in trouble with the IRS for this.

    I mentioned the stress of constant attack, but it bears repeating. I still jump when I hear a dumpster lid shut (it sounds spookily like a mortar hitting), and I've been home for four years now. Just relax, and remind yourself that you are inside the wire, the bad guys are outside it, and treat those soldiers and marines who go out on patrol with the respect they deserve.

    Good luck! You are considering something that very, very few people will ever have the opportunity to do. I think of my time as an adventure and I'm very glad I went. If you have a security clearance, getting over there should be easy, but I'm not sure how things look if you don't.

    1. Re:Been There, Done That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soldiers, Marines, and... Airmen and Corpsmen (Sailors). Don't forget the Air Force goes beyond the wire. Believe it or not, I spent more time in combat in the medical service, flying in HH60's and riding ambulances, than I did in communications setting-up wires and antennas.

      Don't believe the recruiter when they say medical never does anything risky... especially if the word "Operations" appears anywheres near your facility.

    2. Re:Been There, Done That by IhateMonkeys · · Score: 0

      Ahh Camp Victory.

      Home Sweet Shithole.
      At least you could hit golf balls into the lake, go fishing, and there was a bowling alley for a time.

      I too still jump at loud unxpected noises and wonder how long before that reaction fades. Nothing freezes you in your tracks like the sound of a mortar coming out of the tube.

  45. Re:My advice by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    Oh, incredible! The LHC must have ripped a hole in the fabric of space-time and we are communicating with an alternate universe, people is actually posting on /. from over there!

    How's the weather on your side? Does it rain candy every day?

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  46. Malaise is not solved by a Government Job by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

    The premise here is that somehow you will be happier with the job if it were a government job in a war zone. The US Government is actually the most depressing places I have ever worked (I actually had a pretty _cool_ job). With the exception of being in the military, it was not _the most_ depressing places. Malaise will not be resolved by a switch to the government, I would say it would get worse... Now if you simply want to do it for the money then more power to you, but make sure you know why you are doing it...

    -matt

    --
    $diff terrorists hippies
    $
    $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    1. Re:Malaise is not solved by a Government Job by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I had a civilian job in the DC area, and yeah, it drive me nuts. it was my 1st government job, and my first tiem working as many hours for wahtever employer...maybe I'd be more used to it the 2nd time around.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  47. War zone IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you have on SAT link xray delta echo down up up down? Your response I will fix when the soldiers fight somewhere else.

  48. Working for the MAN! by arcite · · Score: 1

    It is true that you can get a lot of extra danger pay and post differential working in 'war zones', however as has been stated, the US is pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan (and they are shitholes). Pakistan is another country that receives a lot of American AID, one can receive 60% on top of their base salary if they work in country -- as noted though, Pakistan is not very safe anymore.[p] Forget working for the military, they pay peanuts. What you really want to do then is work for a consultant firm (see www.devex.com), American consulting firms that receive their funding directly from the American Government will pay the best. European firms come close, but their benefits aren't nearly as good (and who wants to get paid in Euros???). Forget Asia. Forget China. Austerity is in the air and cutbacks are happening. One must find their niche. The international development community is actually quite small, make a name for yourself and you can work for anyone. Work in a POST-conflict country or developing nation, helping with poverty alleviation, IT, health, commerce, and agriculture. Focus on MENA and sub-Saharan Africa, central asia, and SE Asia - these are Obama's focus areas. Sub-Saharan Africa has the most development AID from the US. For example, South Sudan is receiving a tremendous amount of money. Among my associates, there have been incidences of kidnappings and even killings in Afghanistan. One guy was ransomed, another was shot dead (and these incidences are kept hush hush for all concerned). One must evaluate the level of personal risk and danger they are willing to accept before they accept any assignment. Working overseas can be stressful and not all personalities are suited. You must learn fast and rely on yourself- support systems can be nonexistent. Attrition rates are high for a reason. But one has to start somewhere, get a gig in a friendly African country and work your way up the chain. All things considered, the marginal amount of danger pay one can get in a 'warzone' is not worth it long term. ---that said, I know several people who became millionaires in the early days of the Afghan occupation. To each his own --- IMO now it is a whole new ball game. Those golden days of endless piles of money are coming to an end.

  49. easy work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was in Afghanistan a couple years ago and a group of guys were working next to our FOB setting up a RAID camera, a thermal cam on a big ass tower. I was talking to one and he said he got 150,000 a year. i saw them do literally nothing. A boot working party set the whole thing up me included.

  50. Indeed.... by Flaming+Cowpie · · Score: 1

    All that I'm coming away with from this is a whole lot of people saying, ..."my advice to you is...." and they probably don't have a freaking clue about either their "advice" or any credible experience. I think the active duty postings probably get it closer to the truth.

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no steekin Sigs!
  51. Africa is a CONTINENT by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 1

    If you consider "Africa" a warzone then it may be better to brush up on your geography before you look into moving. Africa is huge. I live in Mozambique and just this country has a coastline 200 miles longer than the western coastline of the USA. Mozambique is an average size country for Africa.

  52. Not so easy... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    In my experience it's not that easy to find a job overseas, at least not a conventional field.

    Let's consider local companies first... It's true that it's not that difficult to find English speakers, that's not always the case. And the thing is that in day to day business the ability to speak the local language is pretty much mandatory. Sometimes you'll luck out and find a company that's interested in hiring you as the token foreigner, but don't expect to be doing anything particularly fulfilling. Also expect pay comparable to what a local would be earning, which is usually paltry compared to what you'd get as an ex-pat at a big multinational. In a lot of cases you'll just be getting by and will have to save carefully.

    So then you've got American companies with international offices. The catch is landing a job that will enable you to travel where you'd like to go. Good luck with that. The people I've known who've been so fortunate tended to be in management or finance. And you never really get the proper experience of living overseas anyway. They generally set you up in a really nice place in the best part of town and in countries where safety is a concern they stick you in an isolated, often guarded community. And the circles ex-pats inhabit are usually separate from other foreigners.

    I know there are options via defense industry and US government, but not having had much experience with that I can't speak to it. I know someone who was in Japan for a while and is now in Germany, working with the government, but he doesn't really have a say in where he's sent.

    There are a couple of other surefire ways to get a job overseas. The first is to do charity work, although more than likely you'll be looking at the third world. The pay isn't necessarily good, but the work is definitely fulfilling. The second is to teach English. It's fairly easy to get a job teaching in Asia, even Japan, given how big they are on learning English. The pay isn't great, but in a lot of countries it's actually marginally better than what your average local makes. Also, if you end up at the right company they may even have arrangements for room and board which will help cut down on expenses. And the thing is that may afford you the opportunity to look for the kind of work you're actually interested in doing.

  53. Working abroad by john82 · · Score: 1

    I would not recommend working in that environment as a newbie civilian. It would be one thing if you had a military background and knew what you were getting into. I will assume that is not the case given the questions you are asking.

    Rather, I suggest that if you really yearn to see another part of the globe (an educational and eye-opening experience for most Americans) go somewhere other than the countries you mentioned. While you are deciding where that might be, consider perusing the State Department Travel Alert system (or whoever maintains that data today). That will provide you some idea of which locales might be safer than others.

  54. As an IT Professional in a WarZone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently work as an IT professional in Kuwait, and will be cycling back to the states for about six weeks, then off to Afghanistan. I am also a combat-deployed Army veteran, having served six years in the US Army.

        Unless you have at least a Department of Defense SECRET clearance, you will not work in IT in a war zone for anything associated with the Dept of Defense. Most companies that hire for these positions want their prospective hires to already possess said clearance--this is a MAJOR barrier to employment for most people that have IT skills. That SECRET clearance investigation costs quite a bit of money (thousands of dollars). Then, most IT professionals working in DoD are being required to have certifications (A+, Net+, Security+, CCNA, CISSP)--this is also a barrier to employment, because many people in the civilian world have "grown-up" in IT and learned by doing, not by testing. There are also health tests and fitness requirements that are not waiverable, and you simply will not deploy if you do not meet those health and fitness requirements.

        So, *if* you have these core pre-requisites, or you find a company that is willing to pay for them, then you *might* consider it. Do your research--a LOT of research-- into the Company that might hire you--there *are* a LOT of bad-reputation DoD contractors out there-- some deserved, some not. Then, do some soul-searching. --worst case scenario type soul-searching, first...do you have a wife and kids? what happens if i get killed? --That type of soul-searching.
        Then, don't assess yourself: ask someone you know and trust, that has been in the military AND deployed to assess you. Do *they* think you can deal with the stresses involved? I know a LOT of IT and communications professionals in the US, both former military as well as pure civilian IT and communications folks--and most civilians will suffer horribly in a combat zone, even in the relative comfort and safety of FOB's and main bases. It *is* a war zone, and most civilians possess neither the training to function in, nor the situational awareness to survive in, a combat zone in any capacity. There is a reason people that are trained in the military get out and come over here--and it isn't necessarily for the money, although that's nice. WE ARE TRAINED TO LIVE, WORK, AND SURVIVE in this environment and come out on the other side a whole person. If you have not had that training and experience, my personal opinion is that you simply ought to stay out of the combat zone: leave it to the people that really do know what they are getting into--because they've already done it. the best of the worst case is you get yourself killed...the worst of the worst case is you get someone else killed.

        This applies to Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Southern Philippines. There are other places (Kuwait, Djbouti, Qatar, Bahrain among them) that have more subtle--and potentially as deadly--consequences, as well. Don't think that just because there isn't an active conflict going on that you can't get killed in Kuwait just as easily as you can in Iraq...and don't let appearances fool you. If you have never left bum-f**k Pennsyltucky and lived and worked overseas in any capacity, the above-stated places are probably NOT the places in which you want to cut your teeth. Try Europe, Japan, or Korea.

    1. Re:As an IT Professional in a WarZone... by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      Some companies will get you that clearance, which is nice. I had mine within 3 months of landing in Iraq. I know ITT and Raytheon will both do it, not sure about anyone else.

  55. I wasn't talking about high pay here by Quila · · Score: 1

    Most of the war zone contractors want you to already have a clearance, so those jobs are hard to get without one.

    But it's a lot easier to have a contractor get you a clearance for a job in the US. So you work here for a few years getting your clearance, then go for one of the high-paying war zone jobs.

    But look carefully at the specifics. Some jobs have you sitting in a relatively safe compound the entire time, others have you in another country that's safe, but still gets paid war zone wages. Other jobs require at least weekly excursions into the field where you get to brave IEDs and getting shot at, not to mention just plain dying in a car crash (there are a lot of those over there).

  56. My response: Fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've only got one response to that: Fuck you.

    No really. It is your way of thinking that had created untold suffering to thousands of innocent lives and probably exacerbated the current global recession.

  57. A starting point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a place to get started in the community.

      http://specopsnet.org/mailman/listinfo/jobs_specopsnet.org

  58. Re:My advice by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I would argue that your home nations troops should generally be supported even if you disapprove of the politicians motives in sending them there...

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  59. Probably not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was offered such a job a few years ago - I'd have been working in a Forward operating Base (FOB) in Iraq or Afghanistan as tech support. the pay being offered was good, but not itself exceptional. However, it came with VERY substantial bonuses, both as retention bonuses and travel allowances, not to mention room & board. I figured that even after taxes I would have come out with over $100,000. And that's assuming I paid taxes in full; I'm given to believe there are ways to avoid a good amount of taxation.

    So, the money's pretty good. But you'll be working 60 hour weeks, at minimum. FOBs are often placed in rather inconvenient, or at least uninteresting, places - meaning that it's not like there will be a great night life. And for all that you'll be supporting the military, you won't *be* military which means, notwithstanding the social consequences, that you wont' get certain important benefits - like medical care.

    And there have been a lot of contractor deaths. At least some sources indicate that more contractors have died in Iraq than military personnel; not sure how that really breaks down, but you will certainly be at risk.

    Some people do choose to take these jobs. The money is definitely good. And if you're in a situation in which it makes sense to leave things behind for a year or more, it's not without value. Just know that you'll be working your ass off, you'll spend a lot fo time being pretty damned bored, and social opportunities might be pretty limited. Oh, and there will be people trying to kill you.

    1. Re:Probably not worth it by creature_shock · · Score: 1

      Most of the contractor deaths in Iraq were due to private militaries (think Black Water or Dyncorp) protecting civilian government.

  60. Re:My advice by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    Your assessment is correct. I have not served.

    I do have several friends who have served and many more who have family members serving now and I resent hearing people I respect and like called government murderers. I think in this case I responded hastily to a troll. I do have concerns about how, why, and where politicians deploy my friends.

    "I know nothing I say will change your beliefs." You'd be surprised. I struggle with this, I don't want a government that represents me abusing the military but I do recognize that having a force like the US does is sometimes necessary. I know the job that my friends do in the Army sucks and I want to understand what they do in the vain hope that I can make is suck less.

  61. Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about how you negotiate your contract. Make sure everything is in writing before you sign it. Make sure all bonuses, 401k contributions, etc are based on gross pay, and all living conditions, time off, vacation and sick leave are in writing as well as overtime compensation (not straight hours) is documentated. Make sure that all USG hazardous duty ect (35 %) bonuses are in writing and based on gross pay not base pay.

    IRS exemptions are a matter of law, however there is a form to fill out prior to going OCONUS that will stop taxes till you hit the exemption ($92,900). The 330 day rule only applies if you vacation back in the US. If you leave the AOR but stay outside US that time still counts towards 330-days.

    Document all trips to the medical clinic, keep all copies of paperwork- why? Post-deployment workers compensation for injuries or PTSD.

  62. Yeah, it was worth it. by creature_shock · · Score: 1

    I just got back from 13 months over there, so I'll give you what I can about it.

    The positives, for me, are:
    1) Money. Every US contractors over there will tell you the money is pretty damned good (save for the Ugandan security forces, they get screwed). I made a little over $130,000 in 13 months. And because of that money, I work because I want to, not because I have to.
    2) Study time. Most IT contractors work 10 hours day, 6 to 7 days a week, so you've got a lot of time to study. Even on the job, you've usually got a decent amount of study time.
    3) Travel time. Vacations to Europe are pretty easy to do, since Kuwait International Airport has pretty much ever major EU airline in and out of it. You can explore Europe and the rest of the Middle East pretty easily. I recommend KLM flights to Amsterdam or Gulf Air to Dubai. Once there, the rest of the region is open to you.
    4) People. You'll meet a LOT of new people, military and civilian, that you'll form some damn good friendships with.

    The suck, for me, was:
    1) The heat. Worst day in Iraq was 147F. The upside was my sinuses were seared open so I got maybe half the sinus issues I did. Afghanistan is better as far as the weather goes, since they have more then two seasons.
    2) Explosions. No matter where you are, you'll hear suicide bombers every now and then. Afghanistan is probably worse, depending on where you go. Get used to the idea that your life is in danger, but don't let the knowledge screw with your mind too much.
    3) Away from family. Most IT contractors have to be in country for 5 to 6 months before they can take a vacation, so you might not see your family for 6 to 7 months.
    4) Normal corporation BS. IT companies in war zones still BS you and will mess with your pay and other such. Read your offer letter over a couple dozen times before you agree to it, and know everything they can screw you over for. Talk to the other guys on site once you get there or at CRC and see if any of them know any of the normal dirty tricks they company will pull.

    Now, all that being said, I can't say if you should go. It was the right thing for me to do. Gave me the ability to be relaxed in ways I've not been able to in years because now I don't worry about money. Check out all the IT companies over there, some pay better then others, some have better benefits then others. Once you decide to do it, go hit the gym. You'll need to be in pretty decent shape to deal with 75lbs worth of gear.

  63. Some meaty answers for you by dethkultur · · Score: 1

    "Extremely easy" is hardly informative as said in the top comment... I think what you're asking for is how to find an opportunity, and work.

    Antarctica public opportunities are handled through here: http://www.usap.gov/

    They need IT people, but it is mostly infrastructure, WAN and LAN related work, and it's usually for 6 month or 1 year contracts. I applied many years back (when Raytheon handled all the contracting through polar.org) but got no response... I met someone later that had done a couple of tours there and he described it as that with something with as tight a community as Antarctica you need an "in", or network your ass off to get to one. It's an environment of trust in an extreme place, and most of the positions are filled by people that already have a relationship with a decision maker.

    Positions in dangerous places, if that's the adventure you're looking for, are nearly always managed by an NGO or government contractor responsible for all hiring, etc. So for Afghanistan, as a contractor, you'd probably look to something like SAIC, or even Blackwater/Xe, and once again, you need to network your way to a relationship with someone that could vouch that you're a sane person. These positions are in demand, and they don't lack for peeps through those channels. Again, nearly all infrastructure work. A clearance, if you have one, is a plus, and you'll be required to pass a secret clearance regardless. (which means, some people from the government will ask everything about your life, anything illegal or of bad character you've ever done, drug use, where you lived. The key here is be truthful - it's not necessarily an attempt to eliminate you from getting a clearance, but just to not let anybody blackmail you for skeletons in your closet. They'll ask some questions of your neighbors too, just to verify anything they suspect might be a lie.)

    For the rest, in a functioning, growing economy in Asia or South America or Russia vicinity, etc, there are headhunters/staffing firms much like in the US. Best bet is to go local as possible to the hungry, commission only recruiters, vs going through a big multi national. And like the US, don't just work through one, but half a dozen, as they all have knowledge of different opportunities. They do look for real world talent of all kinds, and you can probably bring a lot to the table with the experience you have in more mature environments.

  64. DMZ by tobiasly · · Score: 1

    Just keep in mind that if your boss asks you to set up a new server in the DMZ, he may mean something different than what you're expecting.

  65. Please consider this by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    If you were a national of a country that had invaded mine, for no lawful reason, and had murdered hundreds of thousands if not millions of my fellow countrymen, not just soldiers trying desperately to protect it, but innocent civilians as well, sometimes for sport, I would advise you very strongly not to come here, and if you were already here, to leave at once. You may not consider yourself to be part of the invading/occupying force, but trust me, there are enough people there who will, and will consider you a completely legitimate target.

    Even if you are OK with the risk of dying, consider that you might not die, but maybe lose a few limbs, maybe your eyesight, maybe a part of your brain. Maybe you'll live 60 more years but in constant, agonizing, unbearable pain. Maybe you'll need dozens of expensive surgeries that will bankrupt you and everyone around you. War is not exciting, glorious, pretty, or fun. It is the sum of all evil. Avoid it if you can.

    Others have pointed out that there are plenty of interesting, exciting and safe places in the world where you would be welcome, provided you behaved yourself, and would have little trouble finding gainful employment. There are banking, tax, and of course cultural issues to consider, which I'd strongly recommend researching in advance. But it still can be a tremendously enlightening and rewarding experience.

  66. Re:My advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I resent hearing people I respect and like called government murderers"

    Stop respecting and liking people who murder for the Government then.

  67. My advice: don't do this by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    Working in a war zone might sound exciting, but even if you never see combat, there are bad guys out there trying to kill you. All. The. Time. This is why a lot of non-combat veterans end up with PTSD. I frankly don't think that's worth the paycheck. If you're looking for adventure, you can get more than enough for a lifetime working in Europe or Asia in places far away from any war zone.

  68. It does not pay well enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked at some of those positions. You get a little extra pay for the warzone, but it's not nearly enough. It's like a 8% incrase in normal pay. Just because the government thinks that is enough does not mean you need to think that way.

    Fact is, the IT industry is growing, and skills are in high demand. It's an experiance driven industry that pays well already, so tell the Military you would need at least $150,000 per year.

  69. What about Emergency Zones by Bob535 · · Score: 2

    I've had an interest recently in either Volunteering or Working in Emergency situations (like earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, etc.) around the world? Any tips on how to find that kind of work?

  70. Safe Unless You are the Wrong Religion or Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of these places named -- Iraq, Qatar, Afghanistan, etc. might be fine and great money, but use common sense. If you can stick to a base and are working for the US government, fine. I'm sorry to say I would never lift a finger to help the actual people on the ground. You may think this is a cold sentiment, but if you are a Jew, Druze, Bahai, homosexual, etc. then you are only helping people that hate you.

    It's true that there are probably some good, tolerant people that deserve your help, but note that many of these people, especially in Muslim countries would gladly kill you if given opportunity if they knew you fell into one of these groups. It's also well known that even Muslims who you might be friends with, if they are commanded by a Sheik or other leader to kill you, they will. Your life and supporting people that persecute you are never worth it.

    I am deeply saddened by people like Daniel Pearl and Warren Weinstein. I also feel they as humans needed to escape idealism and dedication to the job in favor of common sense. There are plenty of people in this world to help, and our troops certainly deserve your support, but the people they are helping and protecting who aren't you may not want your help or you in their country.

    Btw, as someone who has fought in wars and will be soon moving back to a country that is always under the threat of war, I find it distasteful that so many people here look at it as purely a way to profit. If you must come, be humble and realize you are there to help and those people are the reason why you are taking home a big pay day.

  71. Grow a beard. by forkfail · · Score: 2

    Honestly. It'll lower the chance of your getting shot somewhat.

    --
    Check your premises.
  72. Tips: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    1. Duck
    2. Duck again
    3. Make lots of backups
    4. Profit, if you survive

  73. Advice on pointers by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0

    My advice on pointers is once allocated, to free memory eventually. Consider using a language with garbage collector.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  74. Your link explicitly disproves argument by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 0

    Your link ((http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Principles) says waging a participation in a war of aggression is a war crime. And it does not exempt you based on superior orders, as your link states.

    The "Canadian ruling" was a ruling in 2006 made by a Canadian court on whether Canada was going to accept a US war resister as a refugee. That ruling just applies in Canada, the Nuremberg principles do not give the Canadian federal court jurisdiction to interpret them. I think it is clear that Canada had a biased position on this issue because of it's close relationship with the US.

    1. Re:Your link explicitly disproves argument by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      History itself disproves your argument. Wehrmacht soldiers were not judged guilty of war crimes, nor was Wehrmacht as a whole judged to be a criminal organization (unlike SS) - even though those soldiers fought in several clear-cut wars of aggression. There were individual army units convicted of war crimes, but only when they have directly perpetrated them.

      So, clearly, the Nuremberg tribunal itself did not interpret those principles the way you seem to be doing.

    2. Re:Your link explicitly disproves argument by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 0

      I already said I don't think he will have to face a court of law. But it is clear that the reason they weren't held liable was pragmatics. As you said they engaged in clear-cut aggression. So they were guilty under the Nuremberg principles which explicitly denies that they get a "following orders" exemption.

      But on the other hand, do you really think that at the end of the war they were going to imprison every soldier who fought for the Axis powers? That would clearly be impossible.

    3. Re:Your link explicitly disproves argument by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, you changing the terms of the debate. We are talking about a man who is making a moral choice to participate. Not someone who was drafted by the Nazis. Principle IV states: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him".

      The asker of the question is saying he wants to participate in a war of aggression, not that someone is forcing him to.

    4. Re:Your link explicitly disproves argument by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I already said I don't think he will have to face a court of law. But it is clear that the reason they weren't held liable was pragmatics. As you said they engaged in clear-cut aggression. So they were guilty under the Nuremberg principles which explicitly denies that they get a "following orders" exemption.

      A common soldier cannot be reasonably expected to judge the legality of war, especially in the circumstances where there is convincing government propaganda that describes the war as just, and provides some reasonably sounding casus belli to support its argument. Hence why it is universally held that common soldiers crossing the border or engaging enemy units are not guilty of waging war of aggression, and can only be charged with war crimes (and cannot invoke "superior orders" defense) if their immediate conduct on the ground is in violation of international norms - shooting civilians or surrendering POWs, that kind of thing. Only the ones making decisions on a level where such a decision directly constitutes an initiation of the war of aggression - i.e. senior military personnel and politicians - can be so charged.

      There have been a number of court cases, in different countries, where Nuremberg principles were applied in practice since WW2. None of them have made any rulings that are consistent with your interpretation. Neither - as I have already noted - did the Nuremberg tribunal itself. We're talking about decades of precedent here. The burden is therefore on you to prove that all those courts were wrong.

  75. You need a lesson in history by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    The precedent from the Nuremberg trials is that if you participate in the military aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq, this makes you a war criminal.

    No it doesn't. You become a war criminal by committing war crimes. The mere participation as a combatant in an military confrontation - let alone as an auxiliary - does not constitute a war crime, with the Nuremberg trials that you so ignorantly quote as precedent of this fact. There is a very clear definition of what a war crime and a war criminal are under international law. Anything else, including your interpretation, is rhetorical bullshit.

  76. It gets worse... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Because gleefully exclaiming that the money is worth the risk is probably an indicator of an unstable personality at best, if not a depressed/suicidal disorder.

    Apparently, it is also highly likely that such a person uses Internet Explorer.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  77. If you are young and have Top Secret Clearance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and no family, I would do it in a heartbeat. I had the opportunity a few years ago (when my skills were relevant, had TS clearance, and no family) but didnt take the opportunity when I was seriously considering going to Qatar on a headhunter tip...might have been interesting! :)

  78. Afghan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just got back from a deployment to Afghanistan, those contractors live pretty well and really do make bank... I spent a lot of time talking with them, seeing as it's something I'm considering doing when I get out of the Marine Corps - I say hell yeah, go for it - great experience and they keep contractors pretty damn safe. You'll probably be working on a well established base somewhere in less danger than you would be in a big city back in the states.

  79. Got any advice, or pointers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...aside from the usual combing corporate websites and social networking?"

    Yeah, don't get killed by insurgents.

  80. UN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might try the UN, they have their own IT service workforce (I forgot their name but you will find out).

  81. Or maybe look at it another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't do it because war is f**king WRONG.

    I'm 52 and the USA has never been attacked by another country in my lifetime, and yet we're always going off killing people somewhere.

    Don't give me 9/11, that was a bunch of Saudi's funded with Saudi money, and UBL left Afghanistan years ago and everyone knew it, why are we still there?

    We murdered over 2 million Vietnamese by the time I got to high school, and the whole time all I heard was the Soviets are the bad guys. Grenada, Panama, Iraq, and dozens of other military undertakings no one seems to care about, all in the following years.

    The murdering won't end until we stop helping them do it.

  82. IT in a Warzone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The one thing I have yet to see is the following comment.

    Getting into a war-zone IT position has both pros and cons. However, getting a job in that location with a DOD contractor is going to be extremely difficult without a security clearance. That is a process that can take years depending on the requirements. Without the right clearance, the starting point is blocked.

    It is not as easy as interviewing and shipping out the next day. Best of luck if you have the qualifications. I hear there is stiff competition for the few IT positions with the contractors.

  83. Been there, done that (twice) by aggie113 · · Score: 2

    I've worked with two companies for contracts in Iraq. The first was ITT and it paid around 130K a year with bonuses. The pay was low but they give plenty of time off (which you shouldn't take if you want to max out your $) and are a good company to start with as they will hold your hand in getting you from the states to the AOR. If you don't have a military background and haven't worked overseas before then they might be a good option. Generally everyone else will pay more than them, so do look around for other companies. My second contract was also for work in Iraq (nearly identical work in fact) but paid over 250K a year. It was also nice that no pay was tied to completion bonuses so I wasn't stuck with any loss of pay if I had decided to go elsewhere. Speaking of, feel free to network like crazy when you get in country, and also to jump ship for another contract if you want. If you are wanting to work in IT then you will almost certainly require a security clearance. A Secret can be had in as few as 2-3 months if it's just a simple records check and you don't have anything too sketchy in your past. If you want more info on clearances and what can keep you from getting one then http://www.clearancejobs.com/ is a good site (run by DICE now I think). Also note that while you are earning a good salary (30-38$ an hour) you are also possibly working seven days a week twelve hours a day. You should also check on the uplift that the country you are looking at will get you. Uplift is a percentage of your pay that is added on to the hours you work (capped at the first 40 hours if you work with ITT) and will make a big difference in your take home pay. The State Dept sets these rates and currently the rates for Iraq and Afghanistan are the same at 70% but this may go down if Iraq becomes more stable after the troop withdrawl. Speaking of specific locations, your company will probably not be able to tell you where they are going to place you because they may not know where the openings will be by the time you finish your training and go through CRC ( http://www.campatterbury.in.ng.mil/NationalDeploymentCenter/tabid/1101/Default.aspx ). They may not even be able to tell you what country. If you want to maximize your chances of getting to Iraq (the lesser of two battlefronts) then you may want to stick with companys that are hiring for jobs with the Dept of State and not the Dept of Defense. If you really want to come away with something after your contracts are over then you should look for a company that is willing to sponsor you for a Top Secret position. It will take much longer to get (possibly more than a year) and you won't want to quit your current job until you have it but it is a great way to seperate yourself from others in a tough job market that is still going to be tough in a year or two when you get tired of working in a war zone :)

    --
    MooCow
  84. I WuRkD In Da LaST NuKLeeR WoR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can U Tell? Dated 2039 (Unix has a problem)

  85. Been There, Done that Thrice by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

    (Sorry MooCow, I couldn't resist) Haiti, Iraq, and Afghanistan. as funding dries up and the major withdrawals start to happen, these jobs are going to become rarer and rarer until the next SHTF event. The pay sucks anymore and the hours are 12x7 on most contracts now a days to maximize profit, leave is limited and can be expensive as 130K doesn't go far if you have a family. My experience was great pay with travel where I got to see the nice and not-so-nice parts of the world and now, after 3 deployments in 5 years, I'm divorced father of 4. Not a sob story, but a cautionary tale about good money, time away, and doing this with a family. Seriously, don't do it if you have young or teen kids or you're taking off to get away from your spouse on a 'working vacation' in a combat zone; do it with a set of goals in mind (save money for school, house, paying off debts, etc) and do it for the clearance and then move your butt straight to DC afterwards - that's where you can use your SECRET clearance and maximize any sandbox experience as well. Feel free to PM me if you have any questions. -Doc-

  86. years by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    This topic has made me wish that I was 15 years younger more than I have for awhile. Not only my age, but I would hate leaving my family at this point.

    One thing that I haven't seen any single post mention is the (sexual) social life. I assume there is none, and that's partly how money is saved. Or is there a satisfactory amount of females to make it not totally a sausage party? Spending the best years of my life surrounded by dudes could leave one rich, but lonely. True?

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:years by IhateMonkeys · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of women there. Both contractors and service women. But obviously the ratio of men to women is off the charts.
      And due to such a ratio your date could be "high mileage". If she's willing with you, it is very likely that she was willing with others.

      As for social life, there isnt much to due outside of work, eat, sleep and hit the gym. There is no booze on base (the Turkish truck drivers can get it for you) so those type of social events are non-existent.

  87. Valuable skillsets? by sleigner · · Score: 1

    What kind of IT skills that are sought after in warzone? Does software developer have a good chance to work in warzone?

  88. Secuirty Clearance and a Pulse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you need is a valid security clearance and a valid pulse. You don't need to know anything about IT.

  89. I throw the Bu!!$#1t flag on this one by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

    I've been in Afghanistan, now going on my second year. There are NO "periodic deaths on base," in any context a IT Contractor would ever experience. If he's a Blackwater security guy training ANP, maybe, but again, NOT on base. Monkey's flinging poo are more effective than the Talib with rockets and mortars. Furthermore, when they ARE stupid enough to approach a base: They get their azz handed to them 50 yards before they even make it to the wire/front gate. A .50 tripod mounted machine gun, manned by a guy with binoculars, lights them up before they ever even see the guard that's shooting at them. They're not dumb enough to do that more than 1-2 twice a year. Suicide bombers, "other nasties," are again, off base. I'm probably one of the more exposed because I travel to all the Regional Commands, and I take frequent MoveCons across Kabul.

    What there isn't a shortage of, it appears, are people trying to scare you. I won't drop numbers but you can count on making easily in the mid 100,000s your first year. Your second year will be closer or over 200,000. You will need a security clearance. A few replies back someone commented it seemed more who you knew than what you know. Yes in some cases. I've seen people that should never have been there (from a knowledge point), and then, some who should and knew the right people but got caught in politics. It's really like anywhere else.

    Since I threw the flag, I'll ante up what I know first hand. In the last 2 years, no one on KAIA has died on base. KAIA is the IJC 3-Star HQ. On Khandahar, once last year a worker in the laundry facility was wounded, not killed, and a second person was wounded (not killed) when they decided to continue a volleyball game (that I was walking towards to watch) after 4 rockets, and not follow procedure to proceed to a bunker (which is where I went). That's it. I would not classify that as periodic.

    And agree on Camp Bastion, no one in their right mind would attack there. It's in the middle of nowhere and you'd get lit up a half mile before you even saw the base. And let's say for argument sake you didn't, there's a couple thousand armed Marines that are bored and would love to be your Huckleberry. It'd be sniper/shooting range nirvana for them. Actually, I'd prefer they do that to what they actually do: Kill hundreds of innocents with IEDs every month. If anything turns this war, it will be the local populations recent trend at being pissed off and tired of Talibs planting roadside bombs everywhere, barely getting us in comparison to the Local Afghans.

  90. Why not Africa? by RubberMallet · · Score: 1

    Everyone here seems to be focused on SE Asia and US warzones. Why not look a little closer at Africa?

    Africa as a continent is huge... with well over 1 billion people living there. There are loads of expat job opportunities around in various countries... although, the competition for the jobs is intense. A LOT of people want to live there... and take advantage of high expat salaries and often tax free income.

    Where to look though is the challenge. Try the UN. The UN is always hiring skilled people to work in Nairobi (one of the biggest UN centres in Africa). AMREF often has IT related jobs available (again, mostly Nairobi). I see loads of jobs popping up for Ghana, Nigeria, Zambia etc. Just take a poke at http://www.careerjet.com/ and pick a country... search on Ghana for example, or Kenya... and you'll get an idea of what's available just from a simple search... you have loads of options if you are not locked into one specific country.

    I've lived in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, and Rwanda while on job postings there for a non-African based company I worked for at the time. I loved it. Great weather, awesome people, amazing food. I had to leave in 2009 - but am definitely going back... this time to stay (I hope). I've also had the opportunity to live/work in China, and while it was interesting, Africa wins out by a huge margin.

  91. Basic advice is basic by CSMoran · · Score: 1

    Got any advice, or pointers, aside from the usual combing corporate websites and social networking?"

    Do not get killed.

    --
    Every end has half a stick.
  92. Re:My advice by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

    I struggle with this too. I support the troops, because in my naivete I believe they are just doing a job, and did not choose their deployment, and indeed have an actual desire to do good. For this reason I donate to Help4Heroes, which helps wounded soldiers recover. I do all this, whilst opposing both wars. My would-be brother in law is enlisted, been briefly to Afghan. My best friend did two tours. I see them just as people doing a job. What I don't like is the attitude by some that the soldiers should be treated as gods, because they sacrificed so much. What I think about that is, there is no draft, they do this because they want to not because they have to. Essentially the same as a fireman or policeman.

  93. Get small arms training first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should add to the stress, boredom and general fun level.

  94. Re:Die in a fire. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I considered a contract that would involve IT work in Iraq, a few years ago. I saw it as a way to help rebuild and atone for my nation's stupidity.

    Yeah, so obviously you were thinking of working for a charity of some sort, right?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  95. My .02 from a recent overseas tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just left a company after 7 years of service working in Iraq, Afghanistan, Djibouti, and a couple odd Western African nations. Basically, pay rates vary significantly from company to company as well as location. If you have a current and active clearance the pay is generally better. But basically the gist of all the comments is correct. i.e. The hours suck ass, remember you have no where to go so you basically have no off time. it's 12 hour days some are even longer when you take into account "Staff Meetings" and such with your US Counterparts that happen well after 5 PM your time. The jobs are boring, the technology isn't cutting edge, no one is working on OC-192's in Iraq... Be happy with your 1/2mb VSAT connection (if it's even that big). Gaming... Forget about it. Think Skype (audio maybe video if your lucky) and browsing. Torrents... HAHAHAHA... But you can also buy just about any movie or game for around 3 bucks at the local Hadji shop so that balances out.

    Food Sucks, People resent you or don't understand you, it's boring, and you'll miss everything from the real world.

    All that said, I loved my time. I met amazing people that I'm friends with today. African's, Iraqi's, and Afghani's are all just like everyone else. They can be total asses or the coolest person you know, just depends on the person.

    Good luck

  96. a little more first hand words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I find it hard to believe you can pay off an entire mortgage on a house, as well as other accumulated debts, with one year's salary, but even if you could a whole year away from my family is more than I would sacrifice. "

    Umm...If you don't live in California lets estimate your home mortgage is $150k? That seems very very fair and gets you a nice home in most of the midwest. If you make $200k in AFG, there's nothing to spend it on here except for Amazon.com. So... I say you should net around $190k. Less taxes (93kdeductable) I say you net (walk home in your bank acct) with around $155k. The only debt I had was $15k in student loans and a mortgage (California sized). I'm not wasting my time paying off my mortgage. I'm more interested in investing it elsewhere and building up assets so I never ever ever have to come back here again. My home I consider an asset and rent it out while I'm out here. So...more tax breaks. Live and breath to seek out tax breaks!

    While in AFG I've studied and received my CISSP, GCIH, CCNA, CEH, and am now studying for my CCNP. You should see the library of books I've been through in just six months while I've been here. I figure I'll top this adventure off with a trip to a CCIE bootcamp in Thailand on my way out before heading back to the US.

    To break it down...I've only been here six months and I've accomplished far more in certifications and finances than I would have in 3-4 years living in the SF Bay Area. Yes I'm from the Valley and was paid just fine at around $120k salary/stock/health/etc.. before leaving for this lousy adventure. My life was amazing and always full of entertainment. I had the best work-life balance in the Silicon Valley and I dream every day of returning back to the amazing work/life balance the valley provided me.

    I have traveled around the world while out here and it's a great feeling knowing that I was being paid more than I was spending while on vacation. Did I mention riding a blackhawk lights out to your next flight is pretty damn awesome too?

    Shit, I make more money while I sit on the toilet than the 99% make in a month! BUT! My work life balance is useless and I wouldn't wish it on anyone who has a passion for life. I signed my contract and made a promise to fulfill it....otherwise I would be out of here like a light!

    Anyways, to each there own. Life is a bitch, suck it up and go make some money while it's here. One year of pain is worth not having to work for 1-2 years after leaving and being able to follow your true passion without having to worry about going broke.

  97. I will give you a fact based history lesson by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 0

    The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war "essentially an evil thing...to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

    If you missed the all the talk of the Nuremberg principles, once again, they say that if you participate in a war of aggression, you are guilty. Maybe you should look up the Nuremberg principles.

  98. IT jobs overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in Afghanistan presently, working as an IT contractor. I found the job on a site called-"Nerd of Fortune". They have listings of almost everyone who is offering work here and elsewhere. The people here are kewl, for the most part, no real issues--just gotta watch your back--like being in Crenshaw--LOL. Anyway--Nerd of Fortune.......if you want an IT job overseas or domestic--not just war-zones...Nerd of Fortune is the place I would suggest--it worked for me (making 165K presently--YEAH BABY!!!)

  99. other ways by geoffaus · · Score: 1

    I considered this and emailed off a few places but not being American probably didnt help. I have since found another industry that pays well and has similar perks such as travel, food, accommodation and tax free pay and you are in a hell of a lot nicer locations - sure you will work long hours too but then you will also get extremely generous holiday periods to compensate you for it plus the previous mentioned benefits

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  100. Re:Die in a fire. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    I don't recall. All I remember was it having something to do with rebuilding infrastructure.