Slashdot Mirror


Stephen Hawking Looking For Personal Techie

kaptink writes "One of the great grandmasters of space, time and the history of our existence is seeking an assistant to help develop and maintain the electronic speech system that allows him to communicate his vision of the universe. An informal job ad posted on Stephen's website said the assistant should be computer literate, ready to travel and able to repair electronic devices 'with no instruction manual or technical support.' He lost his real voice in a tracheotomy in 1985, but has something based on NeoSpeech's VoiceText speech synthesizer mounted on his wheelchair that helps synthesize speech by interpreting the twitches of his face. The synthesizer's robotic monotone has become nearly as famous as Hawking himself, but the computer — powered by batteries fastened to the back of Hawking's wheelchair — isn't just for speaking. It can connect to the internet over mobile phone networks and a universal infrared remote enables the physicist to switch on the lights, watch television, or open doors either at home or at the office. It's a complicated, tailor-made system, as the ad makes clear. A photograph of the back of Hawking's wheelchair, loaded with coiled wires and electronic equipment, is pictured under the words: 'Could you maintain this? If your answer is "yes", we'd like to hear from you!'. Hawking's website says that the job's salary is expected to be about $38,500 a year."

289 comments

  1. also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    also he will steal your girlfriend if you have one.

    1. Re:also by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      The pay is pretty low, all things considered. I guess Hawking is relying on his rock star status. Would be a helluva thing to put on your resume, though. "Maintained Stephen Hawking's cyborg interface."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:also by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is money the only value you could derive from a working relationship with Stephen Hawking?

    3. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      also he will steal your girlfriend if you have one.

      Worse, he'll probably appropriate my last working DECtalk devices.

    4. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When his peers were asked for the highest achievers in his own field, IIRC, he didn't even make the top 100.

      He is a rockstar but generally not for the reasons laymen are quick to know or acknowledge.

    5. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always consider the lurker when you discuss things online. Your message is not just to the person you're sending it to ,

      I've seen some of your posts and I like what I see, but please fix this.

    6. Re:also by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

      Is it really? I don't imagine that the hours would even close to approach a part time job. You are only maintaining a very small amount of electronics.
      Getting paid $40K a year for re-soldering a handful of wires is hardly a small amount.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    7. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is money the only value you could derive from a working relationship with Stephen Hawking?

      On the plus side, somebody on the "care team" gets to wipe his ass once or twice a day. Fringe benefits!

    8. Re:also by wiedzmin · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the plus side, somebody on the "care team" gets to wipe his ass once or twice a day.

      What I see is "Make sure your job contract does not state "and other duties" in small print". Also, the paycheck is miniscule... $18.50 an hour for someone who has IT and electrical engineering knowledge? He obviously agrees with Sheldon Cooper's view on engineers :)

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    9. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you read the page?

      "The post is more accurately described by the title "Technical Assistant to Stephen Hawking." It is not a PhD or Post-Doc position for academics looking to study physics, but a purely technical post to allow Prof. Hawking to function within the physics community and as a public speaker.

      The original purpose of this position was "to aid Professor Hawking in those areas which he has difficulty due to his disability." The job has since expanded and now includes:

      Managing national and international travel for Prof. Hawking and his care team. Expect to spend around 3 months per year abroad!
      Development and maintenance of Professor Hawking's communication and speech systems
      Procurement and maintenance of his wheelchairs and accessible van
      Preparation of lecture graphics and public speaking
      Dealing with the media and press
      Answering inquiries from the public and maintaining the website
      The post requires a wide range of skills, most importantly:
      Ability to work under pressure
      Maintenance of "black box" systems with no instruction manual or technical support
      Computer literacy
      Electronics knowledge
      Ability to speak to a large audience
      Ability to show others how to use complex systems"

    10. Re:also by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      working with SK would be great!

      I'm not so sure I'd accept living (and traveling in/out of) the UK.

      yes, that, itself, is a show-stopper.

      it wasn't always that way with me; I used to travel somewhat regularly (business paid travel) to the UK. but that was before they started studying orwell's 'instructions' a bit too much and using it as a model for their new society.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:also by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      it sounds like you are *always* on-call and if he travels, you travel with him. you're the repair guy and can't be some plane ride away if his shit breaks down.

      at least that's my take on what the job is about. its tech support, high pressure, and you have to be not-to-far-away from where he is at all times. that sounds pretty style-cramping, to me.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    12. Re:also by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      It's a nice pay for the technical side but you are doing a lot of PA work too and you travel when he wants it and you need to speak to the public for him in some cases and demonstrate systems to others.. It is low pay but it's a job funded through the university. It is going to be acceptable pay but not the sort of pay you would get for doing the same in the private sector (if it were possible to find a similar job elsewhere). So yes you get something that looks cool on your CV but you are technically taking a bit of a hit for that financially. You're also taking on a job that isn't guaranteed to be there next year. It's a contract job that may not get funding in 12 months. Though admittedly since it is for Stephen Hawking I'm sure it's more secure than most contracts you could get through the university.

      I'd almost consider it just because it would be cool but as a developer it potentially could be pointless for my career and as a pet owner the fact that some of that travel could be for weeks at a time means I can't consider it. But it could be fun.

    13. Re:also by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What is the logical fallacy in question?

    14. Re:also by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      "It's an honor to work for you Mr. Hawking. Now you could please help me go over my high school physics textbook? I still don't know the fucking difference between an Ohm and a Watt. Something about the resistance? Are they talking about Solidarity?

    15. Re:also by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      YES, yes, and yes. Money is everything.

    16. Re:also by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 4, Funny

      working with SK would be great!

      Yes, but this is SH. He's cool too, but his books are less realistic.

    17. Re:also by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I'd wager Hawking doesn't say "God did it."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others have noted it here.

      I, for one, would forgo salary outside my living expenses to be in this man's presence on a regular basis. The depth of knowledge, and the way he thinks is simply remarkable, and just to be in the same room with him would be a joy.

      Free pass to every symposium, lecture, and interview he ever gives? SIGN ME UP.

    19. Re:also by syousef · · Score: 1

      Is money the only value you could derive from a working relationship with Stephen Hawking?

      You don't get to be his equal and discuss the universe in smoking jackets. You get to be his bitch!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    20. Re:also by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      it sounds like you are *always* on-call and if he travels, you travel with him. you're the repair guy and can't be some plane ride away if his shit breaks down.

      at least that's my take on what the job is about. its tech support, high pressure, and you have to be not-to-far-away from where he is at all times. that sounds pretty style-cramping, to me.

      That's pretty much how I interpreted the job as well. And for under $75k/year, fuck that!

      I won't be on call at a single location for less than $50k/year. Unpredictable travel schedules and all would require much more money.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    21. Re:also by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I think this would be an absolutely fascinating job for any geek. Far more so than getting to work with the Disney robotics team or NASA's engineers.

      Caregivers for the ill are almost always underpaid. The fact that you'd be feeding his computer systems instead of changing his sheets still leaves you in the unenviably low paid position of home care giver.

      Imagine being able to work with him on new ideas for assistance technology that would help not only the professor, but other people who face severe communications challenges. There are more of them in the world than you think.

      The more I think about it, the more I think this would be an intensely rewarding and satisfying position for someone on many levels. As long as it pays enough to survive, I'd think the experience would be irreplaceable.

      After all, do missionaries get paid a lot of money to help people out in foreign nations? There's more to job satisfaction than money -- a lot more.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    22. Re:also by syousef · · Score: 1

      also he will steal your girlfriend if you have one.

      I can see it now - Steven Hawking, the sitcom!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    23. Re:also by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      More accuratly, he is venturing into science education.

      Cosmology is a very mathy field. It involves a lot of equasion, many of them a quite scarey length. Hawking can solve these equasions, and improve upon them - but to all but the most uber-nerdy of specialists in the field, his work would be incomprehenseable. As his fame has grown, he has devoted much of his time to science education: The difficult task of trying to get at least an outline of his work in a form accessible to a layperson. For this to be possible he has had to set aside the scarey math and embrace the less intimidating philosophy: At least with that approach people can understand him without needing a three-year university course first.

    24. Re:also by stjobe · · Score: 1

      I used to travel somewhat regularly (business paid travel) to the UK. but that was before they started studying orwell's 'instructions' a bit too much and using it as a model for their new society.

      I take it you're not American then? Because that would be the pot calling the kettle black, squared (or even cubed).

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    25. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hardly call him a rock star. It's well established that he's a rapper.

    26. Re:also by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it definitely wouldn't be a stand-up comedy...

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    27. Re:also by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You don't get to be his equal and discuss the universe in smoking jackets. You get to be his bitch!

      You've never had a boss that you learned things from?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not exactly rocket science. :P

      Having said that, if I thought I could, I would totally be all over this. I'm sure there are other benefits. Besides, just think of the knowledge that could be gained working for one of, if not THE, smartest man alive!

      Plus, like you said, that's quite something to have on your resume.

    29. Re:also by Guignol · · Score: 2

      What the hell is wrong with you people ? (sorry nothing against you personally, but I'm seeing too many posts like this one)
      I would pay for this !!
      I am unfortunately probably not good enough for a start, and then, children, house to pay, ...
      But 15 years ago, I can't imagine I wouldn't have tried very hard to get such an opportunity
      I'd be right there with my paper saying

      Will do it for food (*)


      (*) food is negotiable


      Also, what is it with all those posts somehow diminishing Stephen Hawking's value / intellectual might ? is this brain envy ? sheeesh..
      Alright I'll calm down and get some more coffee...hmmm...

    30. Re:also by P-niiice · · Score: 1

      i'm going directly to hell for laughing at this line of discussion.

    31. Re:also by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That's it then, I am PERFECTLY SUITED for this job!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    32. Re:also by Anarchduke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When an pseudonymous poser - err poster - refutes one of the most highly respected physicists on the planet and claims his ideas have logical flaws, it might be a good idea to have some sort of evidence. Otherwise we're just going to assume you are full of shit. Or to put it another way

      [citation required]

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    33. Re:also by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      but if it works - the machine, you can just jack off all day long.

      also you could twist his words. how about some day all it does is tell instructions to move all his money to you...

      seriously though why doesn't he just mail ben heck? he'd do it for free

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    34. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It is a bit old, isn't it? I think I'll go back to my original, which is what gave my my nick way back in Usenet days.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    35. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Replacing the word "God" with "Gravity" doesn't exactly change anything.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    36. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      To be exact, he says "Gravity did it".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    37. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      True- if he were better at it. As it is, he ends up having his cosmology criticized by a Jesuit from Spokane, Washington, because it's become philosophy and he apparently doesn't even know enough philosophy to understand First Cause.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    38. Re:also by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      But does this include living expenses? I mean if you are going to follow him around the world, I would expect you would also get free food and lodging.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    39. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm basing it on _New Proofs for the Existence of God: Contributions of Contemporary Physics and Philosophy_ by Robert Spitzer, not my own work. He goes into some detail about where cosmology in general fails as a philosophy- and why physicists should stick to physics.

      http://www.amazon.com/New-Proofs-Existence-God-Contributions/dp/0802863833

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    40. Re:also by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      He's not well respected, just well known. Many cosmologists and astro-physists say Hawking is mostly irrelevant to the fields and may have actually set them back by years with his popular but incorrect theories which get overwhelmingly too much attention by the media. Hawking is a mediocre cosmologist at best. If he weren't confined to a wheel chair and using a computer to speak for him, no-one would be paying attention to anything he says.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    41. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [audience laughs]

    42. Re:also by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Sure it does - "God" implies a personality, "gravity" does not.

    43. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      When you turn Gravity into a creative force that makes decisions, that implies a personality.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    44. Re:also by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      He's not well respected, just well known. Many cosmologists and astro-physists say Hawking is mostly irrelevant to the fields and may have actually set them back by years with his popular but incorrect theories which get overwhelmingly too much attention by the media. Hawking is a mediocre cosmologist at best. If he weren't confined to a wheel chair and using a computer to speak for him, no-one would be paying attention to anything he says.

      Troll.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    45. Re:also by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      What in modern physics (I assume you refer to the Big Bang theory?) describes gravity as "making decisions"?

      I mean, you could possibly interpret it that way, but it would be as meaningful as saying that things fall down "because gravity decides so".

    46. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all, but some people like to maintain a comfortable lifestyle and work toward owning a home. You're cutting it pretty thin there if you're more than a single person.

    47. Re:also by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Rather, you personally infer a personality from the word "God".

      I suggest you don't read anything by Einstein. It'll probably confuse you.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    48. Re:also by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Much as no-one pays attention to you. Perhaps you should buy a wheelchair and a speech synthesizer.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    49. Re:also by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A non-personal God - i.e. pantheism - is a philosophical opinion rather than religion. You can't meaningfully worship something that cannot in any way respond to your worship.

    50. Re:also by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      This is the first time that the concept of worship has appeared in this thread. Having said that, since you brought it up, not everything that falls under the heading of "religion" involves "worship".

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    51. Re:also by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It helps to define what you mean by religion in that case, since there are many definitions floating around, some of which are so broad as to be effectively all-encompassing (and hence useless).

    52. Re:also by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      "What in modern physics (I assume you refer to the Big Bang theory?) describes gravity as "making decisions"?"

      Nothing in modern physics- which is why I say Stephen Hawking has moved beyond physics and into philosophy.

      "I mean, you could possibly interpret it that way, but it would be as meaningful as saying that things fall down "because gravity decides so"."

      Yep. In other words, a philosophic explanation for the anthropic constants being what they are is because "Gravity made them so" is philosophically equivalent to "God made them so". It doesn't remove the need for a personality designing and creating those constants; it merely reassigns that personality from God to Gravity.

      And that's why I say Stephen Hawking is a bad philosopher, no matter how brilliant his physics are.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  2. Peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That salary is peanuts.

    1. Re:Peanuts by augustw · · Score: 1

      It's more or less the average wage in the UK.

    2. Re:Peanuts by McGruber · · Score: 4, Informative

      That salary is peanuts.

      The salary is for a "Graduate Assistant to Stephen Hawking".

      Most Graduate Assistants don't make 38k...

    3. Re:Peanuts by solidraven · · Score: 1

      You're probably going to need a skilled and experienced EE to maintain a system of such scale and to constantly upgrade it.
      And an experienced EE can easily pull in double that wage a year without trying too hard. And that's not including benefits like company car, health insurance, ....

    4. Re:Peanuts by luke923 · · Score: 2

      It's on the low-end in southern California. That's around what most grocery store clerks make out here.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    5. Re:Peanuts by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Good thing the job isn't being advertised in southern California then. Unless something dramatic happened, Hawking divides his time chiefly between Cambridge and Waterloo.

      Seriously, what?

    6. Re:Peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A teaching assistant in grad school probably makes around 24k - 35k. So if you are a student, good at tech then this job will serve you well to pay a big chunk of your student loan. This is infinitely better than making Subway sandwiches at your university student center. This isn't intended to be a job for life you know. Once you graduate you move on to a real job that pays bills.

    7. Re:Peanuts by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      It's actually towards the higher end of average for a technical position.

      The thing to keep in mind with UK vs US wages, however, is that we get a LOT more holiday time. Legally it's a 28 days/year minimum: http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Employees/Timeoffandholidays/DG_10029788

    8. Re:Peanuts by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You don't pay the average wage for highly skilled IT work. If you did, nobody would go into it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Peanuts by augustw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy £50K for an EE? You're not talking about the the UK, are you?
      So, it's totally irrelevant to a job based in the UK.

    10. Re:Peanuts by augustw · · Score: 1

      Junior lecturers (assistant professor in US-speak) in the UK start on about the same -- and they will normally have PhDs. It's not a bad salary for a recent graduate, which seems to be what Hawking is looking for.

    11. Re:Peanuts by chrb · · Score: 4, Informative
      The actual stated value is £25k. Median UK salary is about £24k. The position is advertised as "graduate" and academic research scale (funded by University of Cambridge). Given those constraints, £25k is decent - the low end of the pay scale is around £17k. (Bizarrely, there are people who think academic researchers are all about the money)...

      The summary actually overstated the technical aspects, the actual job advert states that maintaining the speech system is only part of the position.

      Managing national and international travel for Prof. Hawking and his care team. Expect to spend around 3 months per year abroad! Development and maintenance of Professor Hawking's communication and speech systems Procurement and maintenance of his wheelchairs and accessible van Preparation of lecture graphics and public speaking Dealing with the media and press Answering inquiries from the public and maintaining the website

    12. Re:Peanuts by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      And here in central Oregon, a grocery store clerk will be lucky to make $18,000 per year for a 40 hour week with no benefits. Seeing as Mr. Hawking won't be here either, it's rather irrelevant.

    13. Re:Peanuts by chrb · · Score: 1

      And a salary in California is on the low end of a salary in Monaco. But it doesn't mean that much - the absolute value of a salary is not usually directly comparable between nations. You need to use a metric like PPP instead.

    14. Re:Peanuts by Mendy · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's only temporary until you learn to make it say to give you a pay increase...

    15. Re:Peanuts by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      That salary is peanuts.

      The salary is for a "Graduate Assistant to Stephen Hawking".

      Most Graduate Assistants don't make 38k...

      You wouldn't know this, since neither TFA nor TFS bothered to link to the actual post, but most Graduate assistants also don't have to "Expect to spend around 3 months per year abroad", or all the other things on this page. You not only have to maintain his gear, but also have to be his travel agent, his press agent, his web designer, and his auto mechanic.

    16. Re:Peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i understand the UK is pretty good for holiday but the law doesn't have a lot to do with it. 28 days yes, but at least 9 of them are already non working days...

      "bank and public holidays can be included in your minimum entitlement"

      Having said that I give 25 + bank holidays.

    17. Re:Peanuts by tibit · · Score: 1

      How the heck can anyone make the ends meet for 25kGBP/year is beyond me. UK has higher costs of living than US does, supposedly?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    18. Re:Peanuts by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I can do all of that, except I'm worried I might be a bit too assburgerish for the PR work :-(

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    19. Re:Peanuts by solidraven · · Score: 1

      I'm talking global average wages actually for senior EEs actually...

    20. Re:Peanuts by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Teaching isn't very much of a high-tech skill. Plato did it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    21. Re:Peanuts by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Then you have him give you a raise.
      I bet you can do it with regular expressions.

      Replace "Stars", with "Give my IT Guy a $90.00 an hour raise."
      Also "Your fired" with "good job"

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    22. Re:Peanuts by chrb · · Score: 1

      Actually the US median salary is lower than $38k: "The overall median personal income for all individuals over the age of 18 was $24,062[4] ($32,140 for those age 25 or above) in the year 2005.[5] The overall median income for all 155 million persons over the age of 15 who worked with earnings in 2005 was $28,567." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States

    23. Re:Peanuts by tibit · · Score: 1

      Yep, but I'm sure you can live OK in some areas in the U.S. for much less than in U.K.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Peanuts by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It is being advertised on a web site, not a local newspaper. Therefore it is advertised globally.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. You know... by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The significant drop in salary could well be worth it. Being able to talk to the man every day, see how he works. What an interesting job indeed!

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for like a week or two..

    2. Re:You know... by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could also probably supplement it later by writing a book or something about being Stephen Hawking's techie. It's a nice attention-grabber to have on your resume, too.

    3. Re:You know... by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2

      You seriously don't think this would be a daily affair do you? $38k for a "johnny on the spot" maintenance and upgrades guy is a pretty good pay scale for P/T work.
      However, this guy's time is valuable and I highly doubt you'll be afforded any private time to converse and pick his brain on the few occasions you do get around him
      Especially since he wont be able to converse while you do your work since his means of talking is what you'll be repairing.

    4. Re:You know... by cpaalman · · Score: 2, Funny

      As if he wants to have hours long conversations with his personal gadget repairman.

    5. Re:You know... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      Having an interesting job doesn't pay the bills.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:You know... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      I don't know -- I get the impression that he's bitter about his ALS and says there's no God b/c he has his condition.

      Well at least he's doing something about it. Trying to prove there is no god and all.. Most people are to lazy to try...

    7. Re:You know... by CoderJoe · · Score: 1
    8. Re:You know... by ThorGod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know -- I get the impression that he's bitter about his ALS and says there's no God b/c he has his condition.

      Got a reference to back that up?

      I've heard he's not a pleasant person to work with in the past. But, I think it's a stretch to say his work in physics has been fueled by some deep hate of his condition and a rage toward some guilty god... ...I bet it's more likely a chance to explore the universe outside of his rather confined body.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    9. Re:You know... by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      I don't know -- I get the impression that he's bitter about his ALS and says there's no God b/c he has his condition.

      Well at least he's doing something about it. Trying to prove there is no god and all.. Most people are to lazy to try...

      It's a misnomer to say physics presumes the non-existence of a god. I further fail to see a link between studying black-holes and anything related to god.

      That's a difference between science and religion, by the way. All scientific hypothesis must be testable for them ever to become theories. TESTABLE. If a hypothesis can never be tested...it's slipped over to the religion side of things.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    10. Re:You know... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Given the system description- a bunch of cobbled together bits with no documentation- I'd be surprised if it could actually make it more than an hour or two without crashing.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:You know... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's rather presumptuous(and typical) of religious people to assume that people become atheists only out of spite, and not possibly because believing in a supernatural being is batshit insane and is as ridiculous as believing in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny. I get that shit all the time from religious people, who respond to my beliefs with ,"Oh, what happened?" as if they cannot comprehend how people can independently arrive at the same, sane conclusion. that's when I roll my eyes and say, "my kitty cat ran away, dumb motherfucker."

      ...And if Hawking did become an atheist out of spite, it was probably due to the church's past and present treatment of fellow scientists - astrophysicists like Galileo, who was lucky to be put on house arrest instead of killed.

    12. Re:You know... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      His work on atheism isn't physics. It's philosophy, and from what I've seen so far, he's particularly bad at it. He should have stuck to physics.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:You know... by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Not really. There's an enormous gulf between a religion and the more esoteric parts of string theory. One of them is a religion, and the other is, well, a more esoteric part of string theory. I think it's probably better to say that if a hypothesis can never be tested... it's slipped over to the maths side of things.

    14. Re:You know... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe Hawking is still around. Someone with his diagnosis usually checks out 10-12 years after the first signs. That he's hung on this long is some testament. I can't see him lingering on for much longer.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    15. Re:You know... by thinktech · · Score: 0

      What happened? Not to change your view of religion, but what happened to make you such an angry person? People tell me there's no god all the time... But I don't freak out.

      --
      What's up with this box everyone has to think inside of or outside of? Why does there have to be a box?
    16. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man is a complete arsehole. I met him once. I wouldn'd do the job for 100K

    17. Re:You know... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was a teenager, my beloved pet frog Fred leaped out of his bowl and escaped. He jumped on the radioactive box in my backyard, which turned him into a giant mutant frog, then he lept down the bottomless pit in my backyard and disappeared.

      I followed him into the hole, falling down a thousand feet and landing on my ass next to this car that also kinda looked like a tank. The keys were left in the ignition, so I drove it around and used its ability to fly and climb walls to blow shit up. I finally found Fred, but he wasn't looking or acting the same as he used to (he was trying to kill me), so that made me so sad I had to kill him in self-defense -- once in level 4 and again in level 7.

      I lost everything in that hell. I had to kill the frog I loved, twice, and now my car broke down on me so I'm sitting on a hilltop in this strange underword wondering what the fuck I'm gonna do. There, you happy?

    18. Re:You know... by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      It used to drive me insane when I was at a catholic school. Now, really who cares. If you believe in god, you'll be easier to manipulate. Your loss.

    19. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That was awesome. One of my favorite games as a kid. For those not in the know - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaster_Master

    20. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened? Not to change your view of religion, but what happened to make you such an angry person? People tell me there's no god all the time... But I don't freak out.

      I would say he got asked this question way too many times. But then I would say it is really his own fault if he gets asked that question as I've found I'm more likely to ask that question of someone if they seem to react really strongly against religion. So amusing to see the reaction.

    21. Re:You know... by tepples · · Score: 1

      I think it's probably better to say that if a hypothesis can never be tested... it's slipped over to the maths side of things.

      In other words, God just adds up.

    22. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not even a misnomer, its completely unreleated.

      To start with, you cannot prove an negative.

      Second of all, while Hakwking doesn't believe in a God. It has nothing at all to do with his work.

    23. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think one could better say that gods divide

    24. Re:You know... by Tamran · · Score: 1

      Didn't you read the summary? He doesn't talk, which is why he needs that contraption to begin with.

    25. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not entirely clear he even has ALS, and not some other unknown degenerative disorder. It's certainly atypical for ALS. It's not a virus or anything, so it's hard to definitively test for.

    26. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Integer, only integers !

    27. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Master Blaster!

    28. Re:You know... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And he speaks so highly of you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    29. Re:You know... by necro81 · · Score: 1
      you haven't actually looked at the job description, have you?

      The original purpose of this position was "to aid Professor Hawking in those areas which he has difficulty due to his disability." The job has since expanded and now includes:

      Managing national and international travel for Prof. Hawking and his care team. Expect to spend around 3 months per year abroad!
      * Development and maintenance of Professor Hawking's communication and speech systems
      * Procurement and maintenance of his wheelchairs and accessible van
      * Preparation of lecture graphics and public speaking
      * Dealing with the media and press
      * Answering inquiries from the public and maintaining the website

      The post requires a wide range of skills, most importantly:
      * Ability to work under pressure
      * Maintenance of "black box" systems with no instruction manual or technical support
      * Computer literacy
      * Electronics knowledge
      * Ability to speak to a large audience
      * Ability to show others how to use complex systems

      This is most definitely a full-time job, on his schedule. For the necessary skills, expected work, and unusual hours, the pay is pathetic. If you are doing maintenance on his system, expect to do a lot of it when he isn't using it (i.e., when he's sleeping, as in working 2nd and 3rd shift). I'm not saying it wouldn't be a cool job and have unquantifiable benefits more valuable than the actual salary, but it hardly counts as "$38k for a "johnny on the spot" maintenance and upgrades guy is a pretty good pay scale for P/T work".

    30. Re:You know... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Lack of documentation doesn't mean it's necessarily poorly designed. There's a whole lot of decently designed systems out there with no documentation or lost documentation. Or documentation that's written in such a style that noone today can understand it. And I'm not talking about something that fits on a wheelchair. Think entire industrial plants.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect he at least knows how to spell "because", though.

    32. Re:You know... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      "Lack of documentation doesn't mean it's necessarily poorly designed."

      It just means utterly unmaintainable after about 3 months.

      " And I'm not talking about something that fits on a wheelchair. Think entire industrial plants."

      Yep. I've seen entire industrial plants needing to be scrapped and re-engineered from scratch for exactly this reason.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    33. Re:You know... by tibit · · Score: 1

      So, since reengineering implies design and implementation (including building/putting it together), wouldn't it be cheaper to reverse engineer?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    34. Re:You know... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how bad the design was to begin with.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    35. Re:You know... by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      I hear that repetitive annoyances, like constantly being told you're an atheist only because of spite, or that you cannot be moral no matter what actions you do if you're an atheist, can really piss someone off. In the same way that a dripping tap can drive someone mad. Another repetitive accusations that can make someone angry, seems to occur on the internet a lot, is that if someone has strong words and opinions, that they're actually angry, and not just an assumption of the reader. I find that people who make such accusations often feel they are superior for bringing it up, because you can't be a holier-than-thou asshole if you're smiling and calm while being a holier-than-thou asshole.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  4. $38.5k, is that all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any tech capable of handling it will just use it as a resume builder. Unless he wants to place this ad every year, he'd better up the pay. OK, if you like to travel the world that's a nice perk and presumeably provided for but... $38.5k? You could make that in many jobs that are much less demanding.

    1. Re:$38.5k, is that all? by dwillden · · Score: 2

      It might be fun to take the job and program in some bogus speeches for him to give. Something about him finding religion, discovering creationism to be true and so on and have it end with a comment about maybe he should pay his chair engineer a decent salary so his stuff would actually work right.

      You have to admit it would be funny at least once.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  5. Downside by discord5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you make a mistake the world will say you broke Stephen Hawking.

    1. Re:Downside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funniest thing I've read on the Internet in months!

    2. Re:Downside by dimeglio · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine, you can make him say anything you want. I would make him speak in 'Mars Attack' martian voice: tak tak taaak. Or maybe random obscenities a la Tourette...

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    3. Re:Downside by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      +1 Grossly inappropriate... And still funny!

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Downside by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      "ahh Clem broke de Stephen Hawking..." Unhappy macnam.

    5. Re:Downside by syousef · · Score: 1

      If you make a mistake the world will say you broke Stephen Hawking.

      He was already broken when I got there. Honest!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Downside by almitchell · · Score: 1

      I laughed out loud at this, thank you for making my morning happier.

      --
      Baseless self confidence kills more people each year than bathtubs.
  6. Sounds fun but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I've become jaded in my old age and the bubble I live in is a bit opaque these days, but 40 grand a year for someone to develop and maintain a mix of hardware and software components on-site, especially something that could be sold with a small profit for others with similar conditions to use, seem a bit low? His budget for this aside, of course.

    1. Re:Sounds fun but... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      If only Darth Vader had taken the same attitude with Palpatine approached him. "Well, helping you to dominate the galaxy sounds cool and everything, but $38.5k? You've got to be fucking kidding me."

    2. Re:Sounds fun but... by tibit · · Score: 1

      You're thinking backwards about it. This would be a first-rate opportunity to learn about requirements for such a system in a real use scenario. Figure out what the shortcomings of the existing design are, but also likely what is brilliant about it, and make your own product based on that.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:Sounds fun but... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Actually if they actually haggled over their Darth Vader salary in episode three it world probable at least add some tension of him going over to the dark side.
      Vs.
      Oh Crap You are the Sith Lord!
      Yes. I can bring people from the dead wanna join me.
      Ok Sure!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  7. $38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry if I did not immediately jump for joy when I saw that "salary". If you're a janitor with that salary you might be underpaid.

    Once you say "computers" and "maintain" you have to get ready to to pay a bit extra, add "without support" and "electronics" and you've just gotten a license to bleed from your wallet.

    Goodluck with the search Mr. Hawking.

    1. Re:$38500? by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      Sorry if I did not immediately jump for joy when I saw that "salary". If you're a janitor with that salary you might be underpaid.

      Once you say "computers" and "maintain" you have to get ready to to pay a bit extra, add "without support" and "electronics" and you've just gotten a license to bleed from your wallet.

      Goodluck with the search Mr. Hawking.

      WTF? Really you wouldn't want to pimp his ride? I bet MTV would give you a show and shit... Dang!

    2. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry if I did not immediately jump for joy when I saw that "salary". If you're a janitor with that salary you might be underpaid.

      Once you say "computers" and "maintain" you have to get ready to to pay a bit extra, add "without support" and "electronics" and you've just gotten a license to bleed from your wallet.

      Goodluck with the search Mr. Hawking.

      WTF? Really you wouldn't want to pimp his ride? I bet MTV would give you a show and shit... Dang!

      Even people that sweep floors on shows that "pimp rides" on MTV earn more. Perhaps the appeal is not in the salary but rather in proximity to the godemperor of text2speech cyborgs.

      Of course, most of us poor bastards work for a salary, not "for the love". Some of us have kids to feed, bills to pay, taxes, that sorta thing. The rest, that have nothing better to do with the money just wanna get paid fairly. You can maintain nails with better pay. Dang indeed.

    3. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the appeal is not comparing the salary with salaries in some utopia where graduate students working as an assistant earn more than £25k/year. This is in the UK, it's a graduate job, it's not aimed at 40 year olds earning $200,000 a year working for some mythical company with money dribbling from their Californian arses.

    4. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A graduate job! oh god, sorry. I did not realise we were talking about slavery. They should get on their knees and thank their lucky stars they are even in education, let a lone a job.

      "Thank you for choosing to educate yourself; your first lesson being that you are not entitled to fair payment."

    5. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Christ you're a prick.

      1. Cambridge is not California. Californian salaries - or, indeed, any other salaries - are utterly irrelevant.
      2. The salary is actually about the level of a first postdoctoral position. It's not that low.
      3. The salary is higher than the UK national average salary.
      4. It's unlikely to be for a very long time.
      5. It will increase the impact of the CV of the guy who gets the job quite impressively.

      Someone who wants more money doesn't apply for the job. Someone who thinks the money is OK and thinks that two years' working as Hawking's mixture of web admin, techie and travel organiser might look good on their CV, does.

    6. Re:$38500? by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      Even people that sweep floors on shows that "pimp rides" on MTV earn more. Perhaps the appeal is not in the salary but rather in proximity to the godemperor of text2speech cyborgs.

      Of course, most of us poor bastards work for a salary, not "for the love". Some of us have kids to feed, bills to pay, taxes, that sorta thing. The rest, that have nothing better to do with the money just wanna get paid fairly. You can maintain nails with better pay. Dang indeed.

      No no you are not thinking this out. Greed has gotten in the way of what is really important in life... Think about it, you will have total control of one of the most important physicist of our time! Just install a joystick controller and you can make him do your biding and say whatever you want.

      You would win the Internet. Trolling people with statements like "By my calculations the LHC has already begun breaking down the fabric of our universe as was prophesied. Soon the great mighty Cthulhu shall return. Hail Cthulhu! MU HA HAHA MU!!!

      or something more simple like HAIL SATIN! or HITLER or S.H.I.T I am so wasted right now.

    7. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So really, beyond the fact you dislike what I said, you're saying (1) money has nothing to do with it. ALTHOUGH (2) if money was important you would earn as little as an initial postdoctoral position. Which are of course in the gutter...

      So the salary is higher than the UK average, wow. Excellent point. (3) Does the average UK person need to have that entire list of a skill set? I think not.

      Unlikely to be for a very long time in becoming the support to an undocumented system? (4) so what's your idea? to take the role for a year, have a little bulletpoint on your CV and move on?

      Ah, the CV. That's by far the worst answer. (5) The next time you are at a job interview I suggest you lie your teeth out and not say something like "Oh it will look really good on my CV." That means that you don't care at all.

      If you were looking to hire and a possible candidate gave you a feeling they are not there to contribute, not there because they are passionate, not there because they enjoy the job, not there for anything other than a fucking bulletpoint on their CV, would you hire them as a personal assistant?

      Maybe the job should be advertised as "Seeking a highly skilled and capable person to follow me around and get paid in crackers." At least then you'd get a person that genuinely wants the job or the crackers instead of some self disrespecting CV whore.

    8. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're a moron.

      1): No, I'm saying judging the salary by whatever weird standards you're judging it by is silly and small-minded. It's above average for the country, and it's at the level of a first postdoc. It's not small money, no matter how often you try and tell me that it's utter peanuts.

      2): You're an idiot.

      3): Yes. The only hard part of the job is the technical aspect. The rest of it is extremely easy. Anyone who had an inkling of a career in academic engineering or computer science could do it, and they'd be getting paid the same as they would on a first post-doc.

      4): They say explicitly that contracts tend to be given for a year, though in the past they have been renewed for longer. Since it's on a grant funded from Cambridge University, it would be extremely hard to fund it for more than three years maximum. Also, Hawking isn't going to be alive for *that* much longer.

      5): Eh? Are you trying to say that having an official research position as Hawking's technical assistant (with a surprisingly wide range of responsibilities) wouldn't look good on your CV? Next time you're at a job interview I recommend you turn around and walk out since you clearly won't get the job. It's not about getting a fucking bullet point on a CV, it's about doing a job you're interested in also knowing that it'll look good on the CV.

      Maybe the job should be advertised as "This job is not aimed at retarded Americans who'll insist on comparing the salary to what they might earn if they managed to stop flipping burgers and got a job as an engineer at Google while waffling shit about CVs". It's clearly not advertised at you.

    9. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So judging by whatever standards I have is "small-minded" but your standards are clearly better...what has eluded you is that I believe post, doctoral or even pre is financially undervalued, a shame really. It is small money. The amount of effort and time invested does pay particularly well if you consider other legal employment options.

      My being an idiot or not will not automatically make you right, redundant considering your previous.

      So the only hard part is the technical part ha? I suppose you think that's a great selling point.

      Retarded Americans you say? this might shock you but I am not an American. Nor do I see need for an individual to label 300+ million people because he thinks I am one. This reflects poorly on you.

      So fair enough he gets the popular vote from most but it's amazing just how much sympathy he gets. You go so far as to explain who handles the budget, how much they can afford. Is that what you normally do? "Oh I should get $5000 more for this but the budget is only $3700, oh OK then."
      If this was a serious offer it would not have been made so publicly. the last thing Hawking needs is some star-struck leech pestering him. If anything, a serious job offer would have upped the pay & kept Hawking's name out. This way you get someone that is there for the job, not for a silly CV.
      Of course the option to make this public essentially let's them reach millions of people, out of those someone will find a reason why this is great. I found some reasons why it isn't. I guess I'm being "negative", god forbid.

      The amount offered makes no sense. The fact many people earn this little is of no comfort at all. Be star struck and tell me about this gem of an opportunity, who knows maybe you're the one in a million that will actually leverage it to something beyond "I fixed his chair".

      My bottom line and to conclude this time wasting affair: put that in your CV, "Willing to bend over for the privilege", everyone will love you, your boss will think you're awesome (at least to your face) and you'll eat plenty of stick.

    10. Re:$38500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to insist on missing the point that this "small amount of money" is both typical for that stage in someone's career, and is higher than the average salary in the country it's in.

      I believe post-doctoral work is financially undervalued. I do post-doctoral work. I would like a higher salary. That doesn't change the fact that I get paid above average, and that I took the jobs knowing the salary scales. It's public money, funded through universities who ultimately get it from governments. The pay scales are well-known, and well-controlled (and currently under a serious squeeze, too).

      The only hard part of the job - on an intellectual level - is the technical work, and that could be extremely tough given that the entire setup appears to be totally undocumented and you're expected to reverse-engineer it. The rest of it may be tiring work, but it's not particularly intellectually demanding to book travel and make his PowerPoint slides.

      It's a serious offer because it's a job that's been performed for ages - unless you think that he's only now realised he needs a mixture of PA and technician. They state explicitly on his website that people typically take the job for a year, but that extensions have happened. Lord alone knows why various media outlets have picked up on it this time, but this isn't a brand new position, it's advertising a job extremely similar to those that have gone before. (My guess is that this time they added in a bit more about maintaining the wheelchair, most likely because it's beginning to glitch a lot more.)

      It's not so much you're being negative, as you're deliberately missing the point - this job isn't aimed at you. It's aimed at me, either. We both want more money for our jobs. Someone just out of - or even entering, given the right qualifications - a Masters or even a PhD might like the prospects especially given it's a short-term contract.

      The amount offered makes plenty of sense. It would be illegal to offer anything more, frankly, since it's a research position offered by the university. You didn't seem to like that I brought that up, but it's extremely important. This is not a position advertised by Stephen Hawking and funded by Stephen Hawking. This is a position funded by the university, either through their own grants (at a level that is required by law to be pinned to the appropriate scales) or through the STFC (who also pin jobs to the appropriate scales). It would be impossible to pay any more on these, even if the money were available, which it most likely isn't because both the University of Cambridge and the STFC are on a tight budget at the minute. Explaining who "handles the budget" is vital if you're to understand why they're offering what they are - it's close to, or even at, the maximum they possibly can given the job description.

      Any "star-stuck leech" pestering Hawking is likely to get a severe bollocking. This is a job to be a mixture of a technician and a PA, not a student. They also go out of their way to make that point on the website. Anyone who looks at interview like he's doing the job so that he can gush at Hawking and try and lick up some of the drips of wisdom from him are not going to get the job - I totally agree with you that that would be the last thing he'd want. It's not what it's advertised for. They want someone who'll turn up, maintain the wheelchair (which is likely to be a seriously non-trivial occupation unless someone's documented more of it than the advert lets on), and do what they're asked. They don't want someone trying to talk to a man who cannot have conversations. I totally agree with you on all of that. I'm not being star-struck or trying to tell you, specifically, about this job; it's clearly not good for you and it wouldn't be good for me either, but there are people for whom it would be. My main point though was that the pay is nothing like as derisory as people in this thread keep making out.

      My point about the CV is that any job of this kind is going to look good for the future. This i

    11. Re:$38500? by makomk · · Score: 1

      Cambridge isn't exactly a cheap part of the country to live in, though.

  8. link to the picture by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:link to the picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I hate reading about something when I could just see it.

    2. Re:link to the picture by f8l_0e · · Score: 1

      It looks like a proton pack. I hope whoever he gets to work on it is licensed to work with particle accelerators.

    3. Re:link to the picture by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      "These pages have been designed to make your access to the information as straight forward as possible."

      Written in a small, fuzzy, white on black font as a gif image *facepalm*

      But then again, I guess a screen-reader is kind of the opposite of Steven Hawking and could theoretically (no pun intended) be considered his nemesis...

    4. Re:link to the picture by hutsell · · Score: 1

      http://www.hawking.org.uk/

      Here is a list showing the criteria required for the "Technical Assistant to Stephen Hawking" position; the disparate qualifying skills are definitely a mixed bag: mechanically inclined (including automotive maintenance), Electrical/Electronic background, Computer Technologist, Media Coordinator, Speaker and Travel Agent. Also, there are references to a lack of documentation, including a comment about "Black Box" technology--which I could be misinterpreting as a security issue creating additional maintenance complications. (Fortunately, nothing seemed to vaguely imply additional responsibilities in personal care, but that may be there in the small print, as mentioned in a previous post.) There aren't going to be a lot of people meeting all of these requirements--the successful applicant will most likely be someone with very good BS skills.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    5. Re:link to the picture by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      I hope SH just doesn't cross the streams :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  9. is it getting hard to lift the de-magnetizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it getting hard to lift the de-magnetizer?

  10. pay is low what is the budget for hardware by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    How much will he pay to just on the hardware costs? If he can't pay a good rate to get a good person much will he pay on the up keep costs?

    1. Re:pay is low what is the budget for hardware by necro81 · · Score: 1
      Methinks he can get whatever he wants. Lots of high tech companies give him stuff gratis just to say that he's sporting their hardware. For example, from his website:

      The computer is running on Windows XP. For many years it has been impossible to upgrade beyond Windows'98, because Professor Hawking's favourite speech software, Equalizer by Words-Plus, was made in 1986, and was designed to run only on DOS based operating systems. However, Intel has kindly funded the conversion of the software to XP. This involved Words-Plus re-writing the whole program for today’s operating system.

      From other parts of his website, it looks like he has more than one system, or different configurations thereof, plus a van, and a house and workspace that's been tricked out to allow him a great deal of independence and mobility.

  11. Just green pieces of paper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The salary is just green pieces of paper. Helping to get more ideas out of Prof. Hawking's head is priceless.

    1. Re:Just green pieces of paper... by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

      Well, then! You just volunteered right?

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Just green pieces of paper... by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      The job is based in Britain, so the pieces of paper won't be quite as green as you'd expect.

  12. The story behind this by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 5, Funny

    most likely goes like this:
    - some genius put that original backpack computer together
    - he barely made it work, but he was not sure why it worked and he never bothered to write any documentation
    - he left as soon as it was up and running, out of fear that it might break any moment and he had no idea what to do then
    - now it is breaking apart and the genius is gone.
    - it is your job to fix it, good luck

    1. Re:The story behind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a point and click game from Sierra..

    2. Re:The story behind this by Cus · · Score: 2

      "he barely made it work, but he was not sure why it worked and he never bothered to write any documentation"

      From the site:
      'Maintenance of "black box" systems with no instruction manual or technical support '

      Alarm! Alarm!

    3. Re:The story behind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, I could not maintain it. I have professional standards. I could probably replace it, except I am not licensed or certified in the UK, so well, basically, I just cannot do it. AAnd that is handwaving the questionable pay.

      I'll go fix the Grand Coulee dam first.

    4. Re:The story behind this by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      most likely goes like this:
      - some genius put that original backpack computer together
      - he barely made it work, but he was not sure why it worked and he never bothered to write any documentation
      - he left as soon as it was up and running, out of fear that it might break any moment and he had no idea what to do then
      - now it is breaking apart and the genius is gone.
      - it is your job to fix it, good luck

      Is this going to be the next Half-life story line?

    5. Re:The story behind this by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a opportunity to reverse engineer it and make it available more generally for those in a similar situation.

    6. Re:The story behind this by augustw · · Score: 1

      Don't worry; we don't have state licensing or certification for EEs over here.

    7. Re:The story behind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a coincidence. That's exactly how God put the universe together. :-)

    8. Re:The story behind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, you don't have states!

      Whether there are any differences between England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland, I admit I don't care, nor do I much care about the existence of actual regulations, but I'm sure you do have legal standards for what is acceptable practice and what is not, which would be an issue in terms of insurance and lawsuits.

      And don't tell me you don't have civil litigation.

    9. Re:The story behind this by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Maybe Mr. Hawking should lower the bar a bit and figure out how his own stuff works first. All he needs is a few mirrors, laser pointers and perhaps a few robotic back scratcher thingies. Sir, I await your 1,000+ page documentary with breathless anticipation.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:The story behind this by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      That's the job of an entire team, all for the pay grade of your boss's nephew who's been to put in the IT department for the summer to get IT work experience. You know the worker. Even with the privilege of working for someone like Hawking, that salary isn't going to retain someone for long, but 12 months and they are back to advertising the position again.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    11. Re:The story behind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I thought. And then I asked myself: if the guy has no documentation, no support, he must've had it developed for himself. Why wouldn't he share the technology for the rest of the world to develop it? I know speech systems already exist and all, but if this guy (I mean: some other guy for him) managed to hack some improvements out of a plastic bag, a chewing gum paper wrap and a band-aid, why not make it open from the very beginning? It's not like he's directly making money out of it. Perhaps other people, and Hawking himself, could benefit from it.

      A scientist who develops new technology and keeps it to himself gets a lot less points in my book, more so if it's illness/disability/accessibility related.

    12. Re:The story behind this by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Does the UK have healthcare and other socialized stuff like that because that's not a bad pay if it has it.
      Is that the netto or bruto pay ?

    13. Re:The story behind this by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      It does have lots of socialism type stuff, the pay is actually above the average for what fresh college grad would get in England. Loads of money obsessed people in this thread, lots of them not realising there's a huge difference in pay between America and Europe for similar living standards.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    14. Re:The story behind this by tibit · · Score: 1

      Dude (or dudette): that's a relatively simple back-of-the-wheelchair system, not a bridge nor a HVAC system for a 50 story highrise. Even if it does have safety implications as, presumably, it also controls the motion of the wheelchair. Heck, I'd consider it negligence to just let it linger unknown and undocumented. Professional standards, my ass, you consider it professional to whine?! Professional standards mean that you'll take care reverse engineering what's there, documenting it for your successors, and will do the job you're asked to do. Reverse engineering is often done in a lot of professional work where you want to extract extra value from existing products that are either unsupported or where the support is uncooperative. I've done it on some servo drives simply because they had shortcomings in their design and they came to light after we deployed hundreds of them in the field, on multiple continents to boot. If I refused to do it, I might have as well written a resignation letter. Engineers are there to solve problems, hiding behind some made-up moral high ground is silly.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    15. Re:The story behind this by tibit · · Score: 1

      If I had no family to support, I'd jump on that job, even if it meant taking a huge pay cut.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    16. Re:The story behind this by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't really get it, considering that costs of living seem to be higher in UK. Even grocery store prices seem significantly higher (50% or more).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    17. Re:The story behind this by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      It is due to the many socialized programs paid for with high taxes. Income tax rates are in the region of 50% if you make good money. Groceries have higher taxes than america too I believe, any luxury item is 20-25% extra tax. If the tax rates were as low as america things would probably seem a lot more even. It means we have to pay very little money for any healthcare, childcare, pensions, schools, college, etc. College is only 2k euro per year for me for example as a mature (over 25) student, and I get paid (a meager amount, 200 euros, which is just enough to live on) for attending as I was unemployed.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
  13. Diverse skills by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Informative

    This entails a lot more than just technical aspects:

    • Managing national and international travel for Prof. Hawking and his care team. Expect to spend around 3 months per year abroad!
    • Preparation of lecture graphics and public speaking
    • Dealing with the media and press
    • Answering inquiries from the public and maintaining the website

    Sounds like a lot of direct PR stuff is involved, including scheduling and logistics, and even graphics design, which are probably not skills the typical techie would be strong in. Also, the pay sounds kind of low considering it's a whole lot more than just maintaining his technology.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Diverse skills by steelfood · · Score: 2

      He's pretty much looking for a personal assistant.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Diverse skills by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like a lot of direct PR stuff is involved, including scheduling and logistics, and even graphics design, which are probably not skills the typical techie would be strong in. Also, the pay sounds kind of low considering it's a whole lot more than just maintaining his technology.

      I agree, there's a lot of people in this thread saying that complaining about the pay is ridiculous but for all you're expected to do and all you'll have to know to do it it's actually very little money. It's grad student money. It's fucking insulting, is what it is. If you have some serious physics problems he promises to help you with, it might be worth it. We're talking about maybe only one job's worth of work, but it's three careers' worth of skills, and inadequate pay for any of them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Diverse skills by million_monkeys · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a lot of direct PR stuff is involved...

      Perfect! I happen to know a recently out of work PR guy. I'll have to foward this opportunity to him.

  14. You Can Keep Your Secrets For Chump Change, Loozah by ph4cr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    WTF! Are you kidding me! Is he going to pay travel expenses for the lucky boot licking acolyte?! BTW - I'm an agnostic. However, Steve H's latest scribble, that the universe just popped into existence and didn't need a creator was lame. Before the flames begin - At least let's discuss that the universe/multi-verse is more complex then our current understanding of physics allows for. Funny that for a guy in a box, mind is little more then a grey goo theater! It's OK to say "We just don't fucking know, and we may never know!" I would respect that more from a man of science. Pity that human beings never really got solid on Copernicus. I suggest "The Best Of Tom & Jerry" for Steve H's interface to us humble fucks. Good luck with your tech job Loozah!

  15. Good luck by joh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finding someone for that kind of pay who is able to do all of this and do it well won't be easy:

    Managing national and international travel for Prof. Hawking and his care team. Expect to spend around 3 months per year abroad!
    Development and maintenance of Professor Hawking's communication and speech systems
    Procurement and maintenance of his wheelchairs and accessible van
    Preparation of lecture graphics and public speaking
    Dealing with the media and press
    Answering inquiries from the public and maintaining the website
    The post requires a wide range of skills, most importantly:
    Ability to work under pressure
    Maintenance of "black box" systems with no instruction manual or technical support
    Computer literacy
    Electronics knowledge
    Ability to speak to a large audience
    Ability to show others how to use complex systems

    1. Re:Good luck by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      I suspect if they get someone it'll be for one or two years, after which they'll drop all the technical requirements and hire someone to focus on just the PR stuff, hoping that the rejigged machine outlasts Hawking.

    2. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maintenance of "black box" systems with no instruction manual or technical support

      That would be at the top of the list to take care of. Write it all down document it. Then decide how (or if) any upgrades should happen.

        Anything older than 10 years would be up for replacement if you can not source parts for it.

      There are my two tips for anyone willing to take that job. I make more already and do not want the pressure :)

      This also sounds more like a personal assistant job not a techie job...

    3. Re:Good luck by lazycam · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that this would be an excellent 'internship' opportunity for a young engineer. Internships typically do not pay well (38K seems pretty fair to me) and whoever is hired to work on the system would learn how to reverse-engineer, document, and maintain a complex system. After a year or so of working on the system that individual could walk to any tech company working on high-tech handicap access technology or make a killing. Furthermore, I'm sure there are plenty of young researchers would would enjoy learning from one of the greatest minds of the 20th century.

      --
      my mom posts on slashdot.
    4. Re:Good luck by syousef · · Score: 2

      Finding someone for that kind of pay who is able to do all of this and do it well won't be easy:

      Academics have a name for such people. They're called "grad students".

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:Good luck by joh · · Score: 1

      Finding someone for that kind of pay who is able to do all of this and do it well won't be easy:

      Academics have a name for such people. They're called "grad students".

      Basically, yes. But then you'll be responsible to keep all that tech not only maintained but also up and running while replacing and updating it, and this with someone who has (probably) only very limited years to live and work. Breaking this old tech and then working half a year on a real new, real good, full-featured modern replacement for it is not really an option.

      Well, I'm not saying he won't find someone. Could be a cool and rewarding job anyway.

    6. Re:Good luck by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      I don't know what engineering internships you're referring to, but I got paid the equivalent of $65K.

    7. Re:Good luck by tibit · · Score: 1

      This is not some magical thing. Parts will be available unless they used custom chips, but this is no digital storage scope, there are no ASICs in there. About the only thing that would worry me would be some PAL/GAL or an FPGA somewhere with a protected bitstream -- that'd be a single point of failure. It breaks and you're done. Those can be reverse-engineered, though.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  16. I' by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

    The salary is for a "Graduate Assistant to Stephen Hawking".
    Most Graduate Assistants don't make 38k...

    Not to mention graduate assistants generally put up with anything and everything that will get them better connections and research experience, typically with little regard to pay, and Stephen Hawking is a big frickin connection. I'm sure there are dozens of graduate students who would pay him to get that job, even take on loans to do it. Hell, I'd do that for this job and I don't give a rats ass about engineering or physics.

    1. Re:I' by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which might explain why he's got a totally undocumented piece of shit to begin with.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:I' by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Undocumented because it's unique. One of the advantages of being a person of importance at a university. If you need a never-before-designed piece of revolutinary communications equipment, you just pop down the corridoor to the engineering department and they'll make it.

    3. Re:I' by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Undocumented because it's unique.

      Non sequitur because you're a retard.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:I' by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Try thinking about it harder. It's undocumented because it's only used by one person, who works with the people who actually built it. I imagine they didn't document because they didn't expect anyone else would have to maintain it. Documentation is made by the designer for other people: If there are no other people, no documentation.

      It's a common approach, though one that tends to go wrong if the one person who knows how something works should be unavailable. Makes perfect sense for small projects though, when the time and expense of producing documentation can easily outweigh that of the project itsself. There are many undocumented things at my workplace, but none of them critical - just things like the timelapse camera we have pointed at the construction site for our new building, and the program that monitors user areas for anyone trying to sneak in their pirate music collection.

    5. Re:I' by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Where it usually fails is that people fail to realize that six months later they're not the same person who built it in the first place.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  17. Autotune! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just connect to him an iPhone with an autotune app!

  18. Jedi Hand Wave by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 2

    "You don't want more than $38,500." Oh, wait, sorry. :P

    --
    "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  19. Are you all kidding me? by lonelytrail · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ok, so TFA doesn't say it very clearly but his site does.
    This is for a graduate assistant to STEPHEN HAWKING.
    My stipend was 1/4 of that at best and, oh yeah, did I mention... This is for a graduate assistant to STEPHEN W. HAWKING.
    I know you guys are all so F'ing incredible that you don't need resume bullets or care about other peoples' ideas, but how's about
    1. 2012-2013 - Personal assistant to STEPHEN W. HAWKING

    Um, if I were eligible I'd be making them KNOW I was their man!

    1. Re:Are you all kidding me? by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is for a graduate assistant to STEPHEN HAWKING.

      No, not really. It is for a personal assistant who has some technical skills to maintain the assistive devices he uses.

      A graduate assistant position is a part-time position that is used to fund PhD or MS students while they are studying, and the webpage is quite explicit in saying that this is NOT a position for someone who wants to study physics. This position has nothing to do with a graduate student.

      One thing universities are quite clear on, at least those I've attended and worked at, is that if you aren't a graduate student you aren't eligible for graduate assistantships. In fact, we just had a student graduate who needed a short-term position until her real job started, and she was not allowed to be a GRA, she had to get an appointment as a faculty assistant.

      Not that this job wouldn't be interesting, but it would be more of a caretaker than an academic relationship.

    2. Re:Are you all kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stephen W. Hawking ranks pretty damn low on the scale of great Scientists. He is well known only because he is a gimp, that's all. His accomplishments are lower than those of others within the field.

  20. He needs an upgrade. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    It's truly amazing what having to think before you speak can accomplish.

    If I remember correctly he was stuck on some long discontinued TI speech synthesis chip. I remember the initial story when they first did it in particular because I also was playing with a similar part at the time in High School.
    Finding parts and people has to be getting difficult.

    At the same time I can completely understand him not wanting to upgrade his system, from the GUI he's used very successful for 25 years or Voice that has now become that trademark of Steven Hawking's.

    Well I am thinking we should be able to emulate that whole system including the speech syntheses. Worst case it can be done as a series of recordings from the original chip.

    Maybe do it as a Kickstarter project or something, do the whole thing open source. Surely there must be others with this problem.

    I can imaging upgrading him to AR goggles with eye tracking, that's all off the shelf today. Then in to a little Mini PC or ARM board, and nothing but software.

    With something like that we should be good till we get direct brain interfaces and quantum computing wrist watches in another 25 years, if he still even needs it.

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:He needs an upgrade. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Worst case it can be done as a series of recordings from the original chip.

      No, worst case would be having Majel Barret record the voice. Or would it be worst? Imagine, one of the most famous scientists of all time speaking in the voice of one of the most famous computer systems of all time?

      Or maybe as Hal? "What's the equation for the sixth string dimension, Stephen?" "I can't do that, Dave".

      I'd offer my FSW Votrax unit, if I knew which box I had it stored in and it still works.

    2. Re:He needs an upgrade. by Mononoke · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, worst case would be having Majel Barret record the voice. Or would it be worst? Imagine, one of the most famous scientists of all time speaking in the voice of one of the most famous computer systems of all time?

      If he can get Majel to record the voice, then he will have once again turned our understanding of the linearity of time completely upside down.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    3. Re:He needs an upgrade. by ianare · · Score: 1

      The original system has already been upgraded, at least twice. Here is the most recent : http://www.gizmag.com/go/2708/

  21. Does he read /.? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does he read /.?

    That may be important to consider, before you post.

    1. Re:Does he read /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - I do. Now get off my lawn.

  22. I guess even celebrities are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His net worth is posted as $20 million dollars. He needs an assistant to ensure that the customized electronic devices he has continue to make his life liveable. That's worth $38,000 a year to him. Don't know what to say.

  23. Wow by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, here we have a golden opportunity to work for one of the most brilliant humans to ever exist, tinkering with an amazing if poorly documented system, jetsetting around the globe, being paid to attend sold-out physics lectures... and all half the /. community can think to do is bitch about the pay grade.

    Seems the Green-Eyed Monster (and this global recession) has ruined a lot of folks. The way I see it, the fact that Hawking is likely footing the bill for the room, board, and travel expenses of whoever gets the gig (as they would be considered a member of his 'care team'), not to mention getting to hang out with Stephen fucking Hawking, $38,000 per annum seems like a pretty damn good deal.

    Now, if only I could get my wife on board... I wonder if he needs an economist, too...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Wow by pclminion · · Score: 2

      Sad, isn't it? And if it's not about the money, it's because "I think he's wrong about X." As if agreeing with a guy is a necessary condition for respecting a guy. I'm not putting Hawking on a pedestal -- I'd gladly take $38k to work for any of a number of top scientists.

      I understand that people with families and debts and complicated lives can't just drop everything... But I get the feeling most of the whiners in here are obnoxious 20-somethings. Older people can recognize the value in this, even if there's no way they could actually make it work. I hope.

    2. Re:Wow by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are exactly wrong. It is young people who are willing to work for less pay. Old people on the other hand have a better idea of how much their expertise is worth. Lets face it, slashdot is getting middle-aged.

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people work for money, not because they are in-love with their boss like some soap opera hero. What do you think? you'll be BFFs and he'll chitchat with you about his thoughts of sliding universe theory whilst you try to come to terms with just how much your don't understand?

      This is a job, not a best bud or "Hey I'll teach you physics on the side" role. It is to maintain a system, to be a frigging gardner. e.g. You're "the help". If you like that sort of thing, joy. The bitch about pay just show how wrong the pay is, not how this is some majestic of opportunity.

      You talk as if famous people are super nice to their car mechanic, interiror decorator and this is going to be such a dream job.

    4. Re:Wow by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Old people on the other hand have a better idea of how much their expertise is worth.

      Older people should also have a better understanding of what friends and colleagues are worth.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's not. Cambridge is (from the website):

      "The role of 'Graduate Assistant to Professor Hawking' is funded as a research post at the University of Cambridge. Normally it has been under a 12 month contract, although recent graduate assistants have stayed on for several years."

    6. Re:Wow by syousef · · Score: 0

      So, here we have a golden opportunity to work for one of the most brilliant humans to ever exist, tinkering with an amazing if poorly documented system, jetsetting around the globe, being paid to attend sold-out physics lectures... and all half the /. community can think to do is bitch about the pay grade.Seems the Green-Eyed Monster (and this global recession) has ruined a lot of folks.
       

      I am the sole earner for my family. When I can pay the bills for their food, clothing, shelter medical, education and transport by saying I work for Steven Hawking (let alone having anything on the side to buy luxury items like gadgets) you can call me greedy. In the mean time grow up and stop calling people greedy when it is clear you don't have much of a grasp on what it might be like to really struggle. This is a job. Unless you're independently wealthy, you do it for the pay. You are not going to be paid to smoke a pipe and discuss the universe with Hawking - you are going to be his servant.

      The way I see it, the fact that Hawking is likely footing the bill for the room, board, and travel expenses of whoever gets the gig (as they would be considered a member of his 'care team'), not to mention getting to hang out with Stephen fucking Hawking, $38,000 per annum seems like a pretty damn good deal.

      Now, if only I could get my wife on board... I wonder if he needs an economist, too...

      If you're seriously considering perhaps your wife would do better with a counsellor or failing that a divorce lawyer. You are suppose to be the bread winner for your family - travelling and getting free board may appeal to you but you are displaying a non-financial form of greed by not thinking about your family.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with pretty much everything in your post, except that the bitching about pay merely demonstrates how out of whack people's perceptions of pay scales outside of their own state really is.

    8. Re:Wow by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Maybe it shows "people are smart" and are looking past the glamour to the real job. It looks like a shitload of work for very little cash. All this plus getting to work for a known angry boss? Just so you can be close to fame. How pathetic is that?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Wow by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, here we have a golden opportunity to work for one of the most brilliant humans to ever exist, tinkering with an amazing if poorly documented system, jetsetting around the globe, being paid to attend sold-out physics lectures... and all half the /. community can think to do is bitch about the pay grade.Seems the Green-Eyed Monster (and this global recession) has ruined a lot of folks.

      I am the sole earner for my family. When I can pay the bills for their food, clothing, shelter medical, education and transport by saying I work for Steven Hawking (let alone having anything on the side to buy luxury items like gadgets) you can call me greedy. In the mean time grow up and stop calling people greedy when it is clear you don't have much of a grasp on what it might be like to really struggle. This is a job. Unless you're independently wealthy, you do it for the pay. You are not going to be paid to smoke a pipe and discuss the universe with Hawking - you are going to be his servant.

      This may come as some surprise to you, but many people manage to support a family on "only" $40K a year - without public assistance. Maybe they don't live in a house as nice as yours or drive a car as nice as yours, but there's no reason why you can't support a 4 person household on $40K/year. But they don't buy many gadgets.

      I'm not independently wealthy, but I chose to take a job working for a non-profit for less pay. It's not all about the money for all people. I do get paid (and it's more than $40K/year), but I think the cause of the non-profit is worth taking a lower salary.

      I don't think this job is Hawking's servant any more than I am the servant of my current boss.

      The way I see it, the fact that Hawking is likely footing the bill for the room, board, and travel expenses of whoever gets the gig (as they would be considered a member of his 'care team'), not to mention getting to hang out with Stephen fucking Hawking, $38,000 per annum seems like a pretty damn good deal.

      Now, if only I could get my wife on board... I wonder if he needs an economist, too...

      If you're seriously considering perhaps your wife would do better with a counsellor or failing that a divorce lawyer. You are suppose to be the bread winner for your family - travelling and getting free board may appeal to you but you are displaying a non-financial form of greed by not thinking about your family.

      What do you mean he is supposed to be the bread winner for his family? Do you live in the 1950's when every wife was destined to stay home, raise the kids, and every day, touch up her makeup and meet the man of the house with his martini every night? A father doesn't have to buy his kids gadgets to show he's thinking of him - how about taking his son to work to help him refurbish a famous physicist's wheel chair? How about exposing his daughter to an extremely accomplished disabled man to show her that she can be anyone she wants to be - she doesn't have to relegate herself to being a housewife solely dependent upon her husband as the breadwinner for the family.

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not everyone at /. has the desire to hang out with geniuses like Stephen Hawking. Most of use would be quite content to read their work (although the work of Stephen Hawking that showed real genius is pretty inaccessible). There is more to life than science, intellectual curiosity, and being smart. And believe it or not, money is generally useful in life.

    11. Re:Wow by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Well, I had intended to respond to this royal asshat's baseless assumptions regarding my rationale, but you've done a fine job of covering the major points quite succinctly. Commendable, sir.

      The only thing I can think to add is that perhaps OP is the one who has some growing up to do.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 0

      get buy on 40k, but support?
      For me support means College, sports programs, and some luxury. Living in an apartment, paycheck to paycheck and your kids needing to work and probably end up in the same rut is not supporting them.

      " how about taking his son to work to help him refurbish a famous physicist's wheel chair?"
      Cool... not as cool as a good college.

      " How about exposing his daughter to an extremely accomplished disabled man to show her that she can be anyone she wants to be -"
      if you have to go to England to do that, then you have failed her.

      "she doesn't have to relegate herself to being a housewife solely dependent upon her husband as the breadwinner for the family."

      yes, with your plan, both people can spend there lives slaving to the man, with the added bonus of someone else raising your kids.

      In our house, we looked at who was in the profession that is like lt to make the most money. That happened to be me.
      My spouse does work part time, and the kids school. So she is home when they are.
      If she chooses, she could got to school, do interesting things, and enjoy life more.

      And if I could swap with her, I would.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's almost like people want to actual ahve a life.
      Here is the problem, the vast majority of people who are actually qualified have 15+ years of experience. That usualt means family, house, etc...
      So the pay grade is a real concern. If I was single? Sure, I'd take the pay hit.

      I'm not a selfish prick like you who would put their family on a financial cliff so I can name drop my boss.

      Hey, I have to take public transportation, my kids wont' get a good education, and I live where crime is high, and now my wife also has to work 10 hours a day and my kids don't see us very often, but I work for Steven Hawking! Screw my family.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 2

      But young people won't have the expertise. At this pay rate, we will either get a senior person who is unmarried, noone to support, and is willing to take a pay cut, or someone who wuill need 2 years to get up to speed.

      And after your hero has drooled on you for enough hours, demanding you 24/7 and you had to deal with other 'situation' after a couple of years a new job will be looking pretty nice. For most people.

      Some people can dedicate themselves to this for a fraction of what they could make elsewhere. And good for them. Are you seriously one of those people? cause drool from an old man is gross.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Wow by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

      I consider myself in the middle-aged category, heh.

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    16. Re:Wow by hawguy · · Score: 2

      get buy on 40k, but support?
      For me support means College, sports programs, and some luxury. Living in an apartment, paycheck to paycheck and your kids needing to work and probably end up in the same rut is not supporting them.

      That wasn't a made up example, one of my siblings raised a family of 5 on no more than $40,000/year (combined income, many years it was lower - I know this because I helped them with taxes for years). They lived in a small town, originally in a mobile home, but through an FHA guaranteed loan they were able to purchase a small house (and now own it outright). Their eldest son chose a trade school (which his parents helped him to pay for). He's making a decent living as a carpenter. Their middle child started at a local community college, and then went to a state school (for which she took out loans). She's a IT Manager for a hospital and is doing well. Their youngest child decided to forgo school and spent about a year traveling and doing odd-jobs abroad before coming back closer to home and is now a restaurant night manager. Granted, they didn't have many luxuries in life, they lived in a small house with used furniture from Goodwill, eating out (even just at McDonalds) was a treat, their cars were old (and practically held together with duct tape and a prayer). Now that the kids are out of the house, they have more money to spend on luxuries.

      Having money makes having a family easier, but you can still raise a healthy, well adjusted family on comparatively little money.

      " how about taking his son to work to help him refurbish a famous physicist's wheel chair?"
      Cool... not as cool as a good college.

      The two are not mutually exclusive - there are plenty of affordable community and even state schools.

      " How about exposing his daughter to an extremely accomplished disabled man to show her that she can be anyone she wants to be -"
      if you have to go to England to do that, then you have failed her.

      You don't *have* to go to England to do that, but you *can*. And she ends up with some cool stories to tell at school.

      "she doesn't have to relegate herself to being a housewife solely dependent upon her husband as the breadwinner for the family."

      yes, with your plan, both people can spend there lives slaving to the man, with the added bonus of someone else raising your kids.

      Well, it's not "my" plan, but it's the way millions of people across the country live. In my sibling's case, the mom was a stay-at-home mom until the kids were old enough for school, then she had a part-time job. There were no strangers involved in their child-care (except for occasional babysitting from the grandparents) - when you're living on less than $40K/year, having hired help is often more expensive than staying home to do it yourself. I guess you could say that the husband is slaving to the man, but that describes almost every working class person in the country, it's hardly a unique situation.

      In our house, we looked at who was in the profession that is like lt to make the most money. That happened to be me.
      My spouse does work part time, and the kids school. So she is home when they are.
      If she chooses, she could got to school, do interesting things, and enjoy life more.

      And if I could swap with her, I would.

      Then why are you telling the previous poster that it's his job to be the breadwinner? Maybe his kids are in school and his wife is a high-paid attorney and the main breadwinner?

    17. Re:Wow by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify my own post:

      That wasn't a made up example, one of my siblings raised a family of 5 on no more than $40,000/year (combined income, many years it was lower

      That's a household of 5: 3 children + 2 parents.

    18. Re:Wow by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Well, I had intended to respond to this royal asshat's baseless assumptions regarding my rationale, but you've done a fine job of covering the major points quite succinctly. Commendable, sir.

      The only thing I can think to add is that perhaps OP is the one who has some growing up to do.

      Thanks, I just hate it when someone says "Well, if you don't subscribe to my narrow world view, then you aren't doing it right". Just because one person thinks it's important to have enough money to buy gadgets or "sports programs" (what is that? TV pay per view wrestling? Soccer camp?) for their children doesn't mean that someone is a bad parent if he does not.

    19. Re:Wow by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      thinking he is and actually is are two totally separate things, a lot a below average salary break fix job is going to do anyone when you have to spend 3 weeks in a 200+ dollar a night hotel

    20. Re:Wow by syousef · · Score: 1

      Old people on the other hand have a better idea of how much their expertise is worth.

      Older people should also have a better understanding of what friends and colleagues are worth.

      Yes, a lot more than your average stint as a personal assistant. I can't believe there are so many people here so ignorant. If you put down PA to Steven Hawking on your resume, a lot of future employers will just read PA.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    21. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't retire on hearing amazing ideas.

      If work does not pay the bills. It sucks ass no matter what you're doing.

    22. Re:Wow by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      If you put down PA to Steven Hawking on your resume, a lot of future employers will just read PA.

      That really depends on which future employers you're applying to, now doesn't it? Seems to me the ones that would read "PA" and miss "to Stephen Hawking" wouldn't be the ones that people applying for this job would be applying to in the future.

    23. Re:Wow by tibit · · Score: 1

      Maybe you want to skip the employers that can't even understand your fine resume?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Wow by tibit · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You've made my day. It had to be said, and you've said it very well. Heck, my wife works and it doesn't make my penis any smaller, ha.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    25. Re:Wow by tibit · · Score: 1

      And they are, I think, all the better for it. Being used to living with plenty can make you pretty vulnerable should circumstances change.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    26. Re:Wow by scribblej · · Score: 1

      ...one of my siblings raised a family of 5 on no more than $40,000/year (combined income, many years it was lower - I know this because I helped them with taxes for years). They lived in a small town, originally in a mobile home, but through an FHA guaranteed loan they were able to purchase a small house (and now own it outright).

      So this was at least 30 years ago? C'MON, SERIOUSLY? Have you HEARD of INFLATION?

    27. Re:Wow by hawguy · · Score: 1

      ...one of my siblings raised a family of 5 on no more than $40,000/year (combined income, many years it was lower - I know this because I helped them with taxes for years). They lived in a small town, originally in a mobile home, but through an FHA guaranteed loan they were able to purchase a small house (and now own it outright).

      So this was at least 30 years ago? C'MON, SERIOUSLY? Have you HEARD of INFLATION?

      Sorry, I should have been more clear -- that's adjusted for inflation. In the 80's, the husband was making around $8/hour without healthcare coverage - they used to use a family physician and paid for each doctor visit (back when you could visit a doctor for $20 - $40). But he's had healthcare coverage for years now. He's been with the same company and his pay has mostly stayed ahead of inflation. They had an interesting relationship with their family doctor - he traded childbirth expenses for some handiwork done by the husband. Neighborhood family doctors like that are hard to find these days - that doctor finally had to give up his family practice after liability insurance cost too much so he had to join a larger medical group to stay in business.

      They had a 30 year mortgage, but paid it off in just under 25 years by making extra principal payments when they could, and made a final payment with a year-end bonus from work.

      Obviously someone making $40K/year in the 1985 would have been doing pretty well and would be making around $80K now if their pay kept up with inflation.

    28. Re:Wow by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I see you're still trying to distill everything into dollars. That is not at all what I am talking about.

    29. Re:Wow by syousef · · Score: 1

      I see you're still trying to distill everything into dollars. That is not at all what I am talking about.

      No I'm trying to distill everything into tangible benefit. That doesn't necessarily mean a high paying job, but if people only see the PA part, you won't make any contacts or get any other kind of recognition that may lead to opportunities - well paid or otherwise.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    30. Re:Wow by syousef · · Score: 1

      Maybe you want to skip the employers that can't even understand your fine resume?

      That's fine. You'll be standing on the welfare line before you know it. Enjoy.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    31. Re:Wow by syousef · · Score: 1

      If you put down PA to Steven Hawking on your resume, a lot of future employers will just read PA.

      That really depends on which future employers you're applying to, now doesn't it? Seems to me the ones that would read "PA" and miss "to Stephen Hawking" wouldn't be the ones that people applying for this job would be applying to in the future.

      Seems to me that the employers that care that it was Steven Hawking would see that all you were was his PA and you still wouldn't get a look in.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  24. VoiceHack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    However, gets this Job needs to change the voice to glaDOS!!!!!!

    1. Re:VoiceHack by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      However, gets this Job needs to change the voice to glaDOS!!!!!!

      I'd settle for a patch to the speech system that ends each sentence with "puny human".

    2. Re:VoiceHack by phorm · · Score: 1

      April Fools could be quite fun...

  25. Re:You Can Keep Your Secrets For Chump Change, Loo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps if there were intelligent conversation, it wouldn't have been modded down. Your post amounted to:

    "I don't agree with his universe origin theory. He's stupid, and anyone who wants to work for him is stupid."

    Shock and amaze that you didn't start a long and meaningful conversation with that.

    He proposed a hypothesis. If you have a different one to refute it, put it forward and see what others say about it. But until you're done your temper tantrum and yelling insults, it's probably just best you go sit facing the corner for a while.

  26. If only by hawguy · · Score: 1

    If only I were about 10 years younger (back when I had my hands into more hardware and with no house payment or wife), I'd take that job, work on improving most of his cobbled together hardware with something a little more modern (and software controlled) and open source it so others can benefit from the same thing.

    Getting paid £25k/year to hang out with Stephen Hawking sounds like the geek chance of a lifetime.

  27. Re:You Can Keep Your Secrets For Chump Change, Loo by ph4cr · · Score: 0

    Interesting. I saw no screaming caps in my response. I've actually read all of Steve's stuff. Among many others. As I said previously, anyone wanting to start any meaningful conversation is jumped on and crushed. We could have started something. Nope - Jump and crush!. Never said anyone who would work for him is stupid. (Although others have and they are less charitable then I) Never said he was stupid. He throws coins in the same fountain as the rest of us. Stevie has an audience. He is a freak show and H-Wood loves, just LOVES a FREAK, with a SHOW! You love that up special! Tuck it into bed with you and pray or theorize that the crooked man has you, me and everything figured out! Did you note my high five to Copernicus? we are not the center - we do not matter - there was more and will be more and less

  28. Considering the job is based in Cambridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hawking's website says that the job's salary is expected to be about $38,500 a year." ...the pay is way too low. Yes it may be average UK salary, but anyone that capable can get a better gig with better pay in/near Cambridge.

    On that salary the person will be living in a shared house with other people - they won't have a hope of renting or buying anything of their own.

  29. So most of you have never worked for a lunatick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Considering that the job description is for a top-marks executive assistant who is ALSO a highly skilled electronics technician, AND the employer is the kind of fucktard who insists that you can not RTFM, it will be literally impossible to fill this position. Because all the applicants will be immature and incompetent.

  30. 38K? by geekoid · · Score: 0

    So you ant some with a lot of technical expertise, than can understand your system without a manual, be at your beck and call, and integrate future systems?

    for 38K?

    yeah, good luck.

    If it paid reasonable I would send in my resume, even though I would have to move there. I mean what a great challenge! But, 38K?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. Re:You Can Keep Your Secrets For Chump Change, Loo by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > Steve H's latest scribble, that the universe just popped into existence and didn't need a creator was lame.
    Agreed. Energy can not be created nor destroyed yet his explanation is something came from nothing. Riiiiight.

    > "We just don't fucking know, and we may never know!"
    As a Mystic that's the height of scientific ignorance right there: "I don't know, and neither does anyone else." Uh, no, you don't know what I know. At least the agnostics are _honest_ enough to admit, that _they_ don't know.

    Science is NOT the only way to find answers, but for the majority of people, it is the BEST way. Science is _incomplete_, and always will be.

    > At least let's discuss that the universe/multi-verse is more complex then our current understanding of physics allows for.
    Agreed. Unfortunately most people are not ready to unlearn before they can learn.

  32. Being near him is worth what, now? by ReekRend · · Score: 1

    Have any of you that are so excited to "work with/around Stephen Hawking" considered that aside from name-dropping value, you probably won't get anything out of it unless you are somewhere near his intellectual level and are up to speed on his current work? That's assuming he's willing to take time to share/discuss his work with you (he won't be) besides just saying "fix it and gtfo". For what this rather weighty, highly skilled/experienced, multi-talented, round-the-world on-call job actually entails the money is pathetic. If you have the former qualifications wouldn't you already be working with him or doing your own research? And with the latter qualifications I'd expect you to be making a ton of money maintaining some crazy important systems.

    1. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Have any of you that are so excited to "work with/around Stephen Hawking" considered that aside from name-dropping value, you probably won't get anything out of it unless you are somewhere near his intellectual level and are up to speed on his current work? That's assuming he's willing to take time to share/discuss his work with you (he won't be) besides just saying "fix it and gtfo". For what this rather weighty, highly skilled/experienced, multi-talented, round-the-world on-call job actually entails the money is pathetic. If you have the former qualifications wouldn't you already be working with him or doing your own research? And with the latter qualifications I'd expect you to be making a ton of money maintaining some crazy important systems.

      In a previous job (as a university AV tech), I've had the opportunity to talk a number of renown scientists in their field, and they were always happy to make small talk with me backstage while I was helping them prepare for a speaking engagement, including talking about their field of expertise in language I could understand. It seems that people who spend their lives devoted to a single subject take great pride and pleasure in talking about it, even to people who aren't experts in the field. I've come across some jerks too who treated me like the hired help I was, but overall, they were friendly.

      I know a number of talented AV techs at my current job who can fix nearly anything electronic (projectors, remote control circuit boards, audio equipment, etc) and would be good candidates for this job (aside from living on the wrong side of the Atlantic), and they get paid just about the same as what Hawking is offering.

    2. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yea because shining lights and amplified audio is exactly the same as an undocumented custom built computer system that has its base in the 1980's and has had all sorts of "upgrades" patched on

      you would be lucky to document one subsystem so you could just figure out what is wrong for a known grump all packed up on a rolling platform traveling the world, this aint a Pentium with a voodoo2 needing an OS upgrade

    3. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      yea because shining lights and amplified audio is exactly

      Not all AV departments are created equal. At my facility they maintain all public facing electronics - everything including light controllers, projectors (from an old film projector to a state of the art digital 4K theater), moving displays, animated water displays (with 1000 discrete valves, not built in-house, but the company that built it is no longer in business), custom LED displays, etc. Some of the technology dates back to the 70's. I have no doubt that any of the AV techs could handle an automated wheelchair.

      the same as an undocumented custom built computer system that has its base in the 1980's and has had all sorts of "upgrades" patched on

      you would be lucky to document one subsystem so you could just figure out what is wrong for a known grump all packed up on a rolling platform traveling the world, this aint a Pentium with a voodoo2 needing an OS upgrade

      You say "has its base in 1980's" as if that's a bad thing.

      The older it is, the easier it is to understand. Give me a logic analyzer (or even an oscilloscope) and I can watch the inputs and outputs of that SN7808 and follow them to the next chip in line. I can even figure out a alot about how it works just from tracing the circuit board. Watching the traffic between the EPROM and CPU would give me the source code. Give me something older, and I'll be able to look at the wiring to identify logic gates implemented with discrete transistors.

      I spent one summer in college helping a guy reverse engineering his competitor's product that was largely based on discrete logic chips (so he could build a cheaper, inferior imitation). Not my most ethical job, but hey, it gave me plenty of beer money.

      But put me in front of a more modern SoC system and even with a JTAG port, it's going to be a lot harder to figure out how it works.

    4. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I say "based in the 80's as a bad thing because there is nothing nice and tidy like more modern systems, its all software now, just dump it and analyze it in a simulator in your leisure

      or if your setup is anything like mine take your 1 foot deep fragile crt scope, LA and debugger and attach it to random cables with random protocols while keeping up with some guy on the move

      you seriously underestimate his wheelchair, its not a motor and a joystick, patch in a hacked together 80's face recognition system, with his hacked together upgraded 90's synth, a couple pocket pc's running who knows what for network, some rigged up cellular and so on

    5. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what your saying perhaps replacing his voice controller with a FPGA. Just a thought.

    6. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by dasqua · · Score: 1

      That job isn't much different from so many others. technical side + administrative + travel. Good job for someone starting out or wanting a change. An undergrad eng student with a well rounded mind should breeze this. (And be highly employable afterwards!)

      On a different note, I get the sense that most of the people commenting now aren't actually techs or even remotely capable of tech unless it's handed to them on a silver platter... oooh there's no documentation.... waaaa! babies. Seriously, if you need everything 100% documented before you can work on it, go and get a job outside IT/engineering. Maybe in a gov bureaucracy or a big corp filling out TPS reports or similar. (Then you'll just complain there's no creative element etc).

      Slashdot is full of MBAs. Bitter ones at that. Idiots who would expect 100K for this job. Shit its just basic grad work.

      --
      tihs isg mead fmro rcecydle tpyos
    7. Re:Being near him is worth what, now? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      No need to guess [so much] the info about the system is online http://www.hawking.org.uk/index.php/disability/thecomputer ... looks like the website needs some serious updating though, particularly as it doesn't validate and they're showing validation links.

  33. Re:You Can Keep Your Secrets For Chump Change, Loo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only intelligent parts of your comment were the down mods.

    Loozah.

  34. Better interfaces by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    Why is he relying on such archaic equipment? There is far better equipment out there than what he is using. Even assuming he doesn't want to undergo some sort of implant, there is eye scanning tech, EEG devices, etc. They are even putting them in toys these days.

    Link the EEG from a Force Trainer into a computer with a eye scanning device and a android tablet in front of him. He could use the EEG device to let the eye scanning computer to know when to start looking at his eye movements, it would track where he's looking at on the android screen interface and using either the EEG or a twitch to let the interface know when to simulate a screen touch. He would be able to communicate on a large tablet at least as fast as normal person using their finger to touch the screen. He could even have an app setup to control the chair movements or even to control a robot.

    For that matter he could even have someone implant a control device in a tiger and use an android app to control the tiger to take out his enemies. :)

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:Better interfaces by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Why is he relying on such archaic equipment? There is far better equipment out there than what he is using. Even assuming he doesn't want to undergo some sort of implant, there is eye scanning tech, EEG devices, etc. They are even putting them in toys these days.

      The man is 69 years old, he likes using what he's used to.

      I can't even get my 70 year old dad to use an ATM machine (when he needs money he gets a check cashed at the bank, like he always has).

      I'd cut him some slack, he's happy with the system he has and doesn't want to spend time learning something new, even if it's technically superior.

  35. Hello, my name is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $38,500 a year? What a joke! Does that include having to clean his drool? You can go on all day about how it would be an honor to be his bitch, but when it all comes down to it... Really? I could have him talking like no other, with just some studio time and a few good compressors maybe try a few different mics (dynamic VS condenser)? The programming would be the least of the problem, in my opinion... Then again for shit wages?

  36. Problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone on /. would come up with and put together a better system, that wouldn't need much if any maintenance, and put themselves out of a job.

    Tell me you wouldn't.

    1. Re:Problem is... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to. I hate to work.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  37. Much Patience Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who only hear the playback of his synthesized speech may not understand this, but it requires an amazing amount of patience to engage in conversation with Stephen Hawking -- any anybody else who has such limited movement that they have to do one letter at a time.... v.....e.....r......y.........s.....l......o.......w.....l.....y.

    In my case, that would be the hardest thing about working for him.

  38. How cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... would it be if the next guy launched a series of "Kickstarter" projects to slowly replace all the black-box components with open-hard / software? Obviously the standards would have to be extremely high, but I bet the long-term results would be way better than what any single person could manage as they described it.

  39. I would but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pay is about 1/2 to 1/3 too low and working with dicks with monotone voices sucks.

  40. I'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two catches:
    1. I don't live in the UK
    2. I don't have a degree in anything (which is usually required for sponsorship of a job anyway)

    The part that got my attention was "black box" , I love to reverse engineer things and make them better. I've generally learn anything needed quickly.

    The real question is, can someone publish some schematics of what he currently has to give some idea what the technical side involves. If it's all stuff that I could learn, I'd probably apply even if there was zero chance due to point 1 or 2. If it's so complex it sounds like fun.

    But yeah, salary-wise, unless someone has a real love for SH, I don't think anyone with a degree, mortgage and a spouse would apply due to the time commitments. I don't have a degree, but I'm also not tied down due to financial or significant other commitments.

  41. Valid point by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, I doubt that Steven would introduce the employee as "My bitch", he would certainly be more respectful than that. He would probably refer to the person as "My technical assistant" or "The genius that makes it possible for me to communicate".

    The circles that he would travel in would be quite prestigious. In the science community he'd be regularly in the presence of some of the greatest minds alive today. In the political community, he's among the "Rock Stars" that politicians want to have pictures of themselves standing next to... as if the association would make them smarter.

    On top of that... companies focused on making hardware/software solutions would almost certainly consider a person who worked directly with Steven Hawkings on his accessibility solutions as an ideal CTO for their company. If a person is interested in accessibility solutions as a career and would be interested in starting a business, obtaining government grants or simply raising money for the company would be simple having had that position earlier.

    I'd imagine that there are even some great UN posts for someone who held this position. Technical adviser or chairman of this committee of another.

    So... while the pay sucks majors balls... if a person sticks around in this position for 4-5 years... they can almost certainly gain the visibility and even a certain level of prestige which would secure their future indefinitely.

    Oh... the fact that the person could in theory learn something along the way or even have the opportunity to test their system upgrades by having high level conversations about theoretical physics with a person, who though not as amazing as the press makes him, but still certainly capable of holding his own might be a big bonus for some.

    If I weren't married with kids, I would seriously consider this position.

    1. Re:Valid point by syousef · · Score: 1

      I think the only career it would put you in good stead for is technical assistant to other rich and famous. That's IF you get along with Hawking. If you look at people who are successful CTOs etc. they rise quickly. They do not stick at low paying jobs for half a decade for brownie points.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Valid point by kylemonger · · Score: 2

      Maybe you're right about the career opportunities, but for proof I'd want to know what the last guy who maintained Hawking's rig is doing now. Is he launching his own company or did he just get sick of the job and go back to mending broken appliances? Also, Hawking is pushing 70 years old and he still has ALS. Would you bet on his lasting another five years, with your livelihood hanging in the balance?

    3. Re:Valid point by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Politicians don't want to look smarter. Quite the opposite: Many of them go to great lengths to appear dumber. Witness GW's cowboy act, or McCain's choice of populist anti-intellectual Palin as his VP candidate.

    4. Re:Valid point by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The people who achieve high points on corporate ladders are there because they do what the fuck they want, don't take no from anybody, and refuse to listen to bad advice given by idiots. The first and most important reason YOU aren't a CTO right now, is because you won't even try. You've defined your own little corner and now you're stuck in it.

  42. I held the job previously by kanweg · · Score: 1

    It was a perfect job because it allowed me to further my own theories on the universe, which became quite popular. The only thing I forgot to program was that the voice said: "My assistant Bert brought to my attention and proved that ....". I may miss the Nobel prize because of that.

    Bert

  43. The Quakeman Commeth by AcesDnied · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one thinking The Mighty Stephen Hawking is a fucking Quake master? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXLIzk_7KCE

    1. Re:The Quakeman Commeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he was an Angry Birds master.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUn7nDKCXLo&feature=related

  44. Personally I wonder if by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

    He has seen things like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn7-fVtT16k and what his opinion is on it :)

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  45. Replace it by Woek · · Score: 1

    First thing I'd do is replace the whole thing with an Android tablet. Reproduce the interface on-screen, front facing camera is there to observe his face, 3G connection for access to internet and make calls, USB interface to whatever IR interface you'd like. And best of all: easy to code for and make changes and test things on a backup version.
    Technology progresses...

  46. your world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why don't you buy his books and works and try to understand them instead?

  47. your world.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why don't you buy his books and try understand them instead?
    I would not consider this article serious in a HR perspective.

  48. Re:You Can Keep Your Secrets For Chump Change, Loo by tibit · · Score: 1

    We don't know if energy can not be created or destroyed. We know that we don't know how to pull it off, doesn't mean it's universally impossible.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  49. Focus On Finances Troubling by Web+Goddess · · Score: 1

    Amazing paid travel and meeting of fine minds, the freedom to know first hand the world Dr. Hawking lives in, the ability to say whatever you think to whoever you want -- ZOUNDS! all this and money, too?

    Focus on finances :: troubling.

    I would take this job in a heartbeat, and figure out the wires, hardware, and software interface as I go. It's obviously custom, and I m able to pickup where the former person left off. Credentials--Scientist who is comfortable setting up complicated lab equiment, learning to run and troubleshoot HPLC and PCR (piece of cake) and microarras, surf along the growing information network, as new replaces old. Experienced coder on-the-fly Perl and Java Python concatanations.

    Better question is this, "Sir: Is there a person leaving who will train me?"

    Forget about the money. Take the job.

    1. Re:Focus On Finances Troubling by tibit · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to contact you? wendy_at_dee_ee_vee_oh_ell_vee_ee_dot_com bounces :(

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  50. Hawking's secret by cachimaster · · Score: 1

    Maybe Hawking is a regular guy and it's really the speech system computer coming with all the theories. That would be hard to maintain.

  51. Mr. Hawking's unsecure job submission form by lerxstz · · Score: 1

    Jeesh, the guy who can posit on the origins of the universe and time travel gives us a job application page that submits over an unencrypted channel? He really does need a tech guy!

    --
    I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
  52. But what about the tours? by afabbro · · Score: 1

    Working on his tech might be fun, but being a roady when he goes on tour to do his hip hop concerts would be a lot of work.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  53. Sounds like a pretty crappy job by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 2

    The description sounds pretty bad - they're trying to combine the job of a personal assistant, PR manager and technician into one position and are pretty clear that Prof. Hawking has no interest in conversing with you about physics. You're just his bitch. I'm not overly familiar with typical salaries in the UK, but here in the states I'd consider that salary pretty low for the qualifications they're looking for.

  54. Re:You know... Blaster Master by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the plot to the NES game Blaster Master if anyone thinks this guy made it up. Wait... are you the game designer?

  55. Better Pay in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a computer techie that suffered in the tech collapse of 2001 I now work as a PCA (personal care attendant) for a friend who has Multiple Sclerosis. I see the pay as not being that bad. PCAs in Massachusetts earn $12.48/hr currently (less than half of what I was making in tech) and working for him would be an increase in pay for me. Add to that Nationalized Health-care in the UK to the mix and it is even better. I currently have to give up $ 5k + per year (my deductible) to my hospital under Romney Care here in Massachusetts to get the basic health care that I need.

    I currently service an electric wheelchair (Fortress 760V), laptop computer and its software (speech to text etc), TiVo, van, led large-screen tv, and so forth.... as well as caring for her and doig or assisting with shopping, meals, laundry...

    All in all Prof. Hawking's offer seems like a good deal to me!

  56. what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://w3.ualg.pt/~pcondado/easyvoice/index.php?op=home