Slashdot Mirror


Windows Phone Homebrew Hits a Snag

symbolset writes "TheNextWeb is reporting that the first official jailbreak for Windows Phone 7, ChevronWP7, has 'sold out' of tokens to enable homebrew application support. Only 10,000 tokens to jailbreak Windows Phones were ever granted. According to an announcement through ChevronWP7's Twitter feed, they're discussing whether they will ask Microsoft to make more available. With Lumia falling flat in Europe Microsoft needs all the enthusiastic modding fans they can get."

185 comments

  1. Nokia Lumia by SharkLaser · · Score: 0, Troll

    With Lumia falling flat in Europe Microsoft needs all the enthusiastic modding fans they can get.

    Actually, Lumia is performing really well in Europe and Australia. In November it was on top of sales charts of Sweden and Australia and in December in United Kingdom, beating both Android devices and iPhone. Nokia and Microsoft did really well in Europe.

    1. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lumia was not even available to buy in sweden until this january.

    2. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that they didn't release them in Finland... not that I'd want one. My N900 will be replaced by an Android of some sort when it expires.

    3. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, both links you provide talk about online shops, one being expansys. You should well know that these shops don't represent any country by far.

    4. Re:Nokia Lumia by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      We're talking about Microsoft here. Let's leave facts out of it. The truth is whatever the Microsoft Shills say it is.

    5. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The acclaimed design of this phone and the domestic Nokia brand sold it in the EU (not the OS).

    6. Re:Nokia Lumia by leathered · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well I'd trust the mainstream tech media to give some reliable numbers on Lumia sales rather than an MS astroturfing site.

      Let's see: El Reg, Grauniad, Gizmodo, and many others..

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    7. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hello that same guy, who "mistook" pointing out one MS shill for "They censor anyone pro-MS!".

      Incidentally, top comment of that thread was same NOKIA LUMIA IS THE WINNER without any grounding in reality.

      Incidentally 2, he already posted it as unaccepted submission

      Incidentally 3, judging by your behaviours, I'll classify you as "yet another part of CmdrInterstsightfulFellowIn140Bytes sockpuppet account".

    8. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      how do you mean it was the top seller in Sweden? It was never launched in Sweden! I have been waiting to buy since it was released !

    9. Re:Nokia Lumia by fierce · · Score: 1

      That equates to 100 % sales.

    10. Re:Nokia Lumia by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      By none other than SharkLaser again. I'm shocked! Foe.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    11. Re:Nokia Lumia by WiiVault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Saw the username, looked at your endless troll submissions, ignore. If you aren't getting paid to do this it's even more lame.

    12. Re:Nokia Lumia by gabebear · · Score: 1

      It looks like at some point the Lumia 800 was on the top of Expansys' Swedish top20 page and Expansys' Australian top20 page.

      So "it was on top of sales charts of Sweden and Australia" isn't an outright lie...

    13. Re:Nokia Lumia by EEPROMS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I live in Australia and I have yet to see anyone with a WP7 powered device in hand. I catch the train to work every day and the train is full of people using their phones/tablets/tablets/mp3 players to pass the time. If you go to any mobile phone reseller WP7 handsets are never up front and in many cases are not even on display in the shops front window. I can only imagine the numbers Microsoft are showing are stock figures not actual sales especially considering most wholesalers are stocking up as the AUD dollar is very good (I work for a wholesale electronics company and our warehouse is full to be brim).

    14. Re:Nokia Lumia by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same here in the UK. I see tons of people with Android and iOS phones but no one with a WP7 phone nor do you even hear anyone mention them. If it weren't for the internet I wouldn't know they exist.

    15. Re:Nokia Lumia by sd4f · · Score: 1

      I know one person who has a windows phone, and he's very happy with it (iirc htc mozart). I'm a bit late to the smartphones, only getting one a few months ago, in an SGS i9000 and i'm really disappointed, gotta go to optus and whinge see if i can get something else out of them under warranty, phone doesn't like working all the time. Im unhappy with android, it's a real backward step going from a phone which is comparatively low on features, but works reliably, to a phone with lots of features, when they work, because it's not reliable. I am considering a win phone only because from independant reviews, it looks like ms is trying to push a good product.

    16. Re:Nokia Lumia by InsGadget · · Score: 1

      I know one person who has a windows phone, and he's very happy with it (iirc htc mozart). I'm a bit late to the smartphones, only getting one a few months ago, in an SGS i9000 and i'm really disappointed, gotta go to optus and whinge see if i can get something else out of them under warranty, phone doesn't like working all the time. Im unhappy with android, it's a real backward step going from a phone which is comparatively low on features, but works reliably, to a phone with lots of features, when they work, because it's not reliable. I am considering a win phone only because from independant reviews, it looks like ms is trying to push a good product.

      Actually WP7 is perfect for someone like you, much simpler than Android but still nearly as powerful. I have a Samsung Focus and love it.

    17. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Lumia falling flat in Europe Microsoft needs all the enthusiastic modding fans they can get.

      Actually, Lumia is performing really well in Europe and Australia. In November it was on top of sales charts of Sweden and Australia and in December in United Kingdom, beating both Android devices and iPhone. Nokia and Microsoft did really well in Europe.

      Actually, you're low life Microsoft Troll that lives in a basement who makes up shit about sales to prop up a POS product like WP7. The Lumina was a failure just like all other Windows Phones before it. Spin that you chimp.

    18. Re:Nokia Lumia by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, why not N9? It seems like a natural evolution of N900.

    19. Re:Nokia Lumia by jrumney · · Score: 3, Informative

      Out of interest, why not N9? It seems like a natural evolution of N900.

      Perhaps because it is a dead end. Advertised as such since over six months before it launched, which makes the average consumer scratch their head and wonder wtf is going on in Nokia's marketing department.

    20. Re:Nokia Lumia by Seeteufel · · Score: 0

      Ironically the Linux based Smartphones are less free than the Win Mobile7 environment. Anyway, the times of Microsoft world domination are over and they embrace open standards now. Competition is great and drives innovation.

    21. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? The N9 doesn't even have a fucking keyboard, it's a toy. Maemo is dead and there is no successor to the N900, move along, nothing to see here.

    22. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, by the time the N900 "expires", the N9 will have been forgotten. The N9 is not much of an improvement, has no keyboard, and doesn't support external SDs (hey, lumia doesn't even support standard file transfers over USB). I have 2 N900s and am not thinking of getting a new phone until 2014/5, unless they both get stolen or burnt or something.

      One of my N900s was damaged when someone kicked me but I was able to repair it with brand new original parts (as far as I could tell) from ebay. I don't think I'll be able to do this with the N9 in 2017.

    23. Re:Nokia Lumia by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

      In what way would my N900 be less free than a WM7 phone?

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    24. Re:Nokia Lumia by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Actually, Lumia is performing really well in Europe and Australia. In November it was on top of sales charts of Sweden and Australia

      Then you supplied the wrong link - try linking to a site with a stock level of more than 2 digits. Actual figures (not plucked out of your arse) might be a little hard to come by - but if you checked you facts you'd know that. Hint: which major outlets don't have it available until next month? If you said "all of them" you'd be right!

      Perhaps your confusing it with the N9 which sold a few thousand (because it's PenTile is crap) but it doesn't run WP7 - the only person I've heard of that owns one got it given to him by his employer (MS) and it's not something he boasts about (nice phone Damian - got that javascript to render yet?)

    25. Re:Nokia Lumia by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Ironically the Linux based Smartphones are less free than the Win Mobile7 environment.

      What metrics are you using?

      Anyway, the times of Microsoft world domination are over

      Are there unicorns and elves in your country?

      and they embrace open standards now.

      Wicked sarcasm - or did Steve Balmer die and I not hear the used car and aluminium siding salesmen weeping and wailing?

      Competition is great and drives innovation.

      Now there's an irony - Microsoft and competition driving innovation. In the same sentence. (and yes I know what you mean - good things come from making bad things not suck)

      Yep - can't root my Moko FreeRunner.

      I tried rubbing it gently, buying it champagne and chocolate - even told it looked good in plaid.

      Doesn't pay to making sweeping statements.

    26. Re:Nokia Lumia by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Yep - can't root my Moko FreeRunner.

      You also can't use it for meaningful data in the US. They (and Trolltech) stupidly decided to use a GSM chip that can't do EDGE, and only supports 1900/2100UMTS, instead of spending about $5 more to get the pin-compatible next version up that supported EDGE (and, I believe, 850/1900MHz UMTS), which means they're GPRS paperweights in the US.

    27. Re:Nokia Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually met someone with a WP7 phone (in france) she bought it because it was cute, but already had an iphone 4 for professional use...

      That's the only one I ever saw in the wild, and commuting every day I see dozens of iphone/ipads/androids/dumbphones (i'd say the most frequent type is samsung smartphone)

      One day some years ago I even spotted someone with a Zune :)

    28. Re:Nokia Lumia by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      > Yep - can't root my Moko FreeRunner.

      You also can't use it for meaningful data in the US. They (and Trolltech) stupidly decided to use a GSM chip that can't do EDGE, and only supports 1900/2100UMTS, instead of spending about $5 more to get the pin-compatible next version up that supported EDGE (and, I believe, 850/1900MHz UMTS), which means they're GPRS paperweights in the US.

      Same in this country - except that I'm not interested in EDGE for data (GSM and EDGE are expensive data options here, 3G is cheap and built in to my netbook) I use mine as a phone ;-p. We bought a number of them and use them in a remote non-voice projects running Debian (we spent the holidays exploring the GSM stack, because we can). [aside] Who would have a phone that won't function? Oh yeah (hi Damian) the phone in discussion - designed for Data As A Service, but only to the phone - no USB transfer. Handy.

      We have an order in for the GTA04 with Golden Delicious (byo case) - which are capable of the more useful 3G if it's data your after (I prefer my netbook for portable data). And again - you own the phone and pretty much everything is accessible and under your control (the GSM stack is difficult to get to, but that's outside the control of the manufacturer).

      Being from the US you might not be aware that "root" has different meaning. Try telling people outside the US you root for your team and watch them back away (getting some ass is gay, and sitting on your fanny is something only women can do - and then with great difficulty).

  2. Re:So.... by SharkLaser · · Score: 0

    Windows Phone 7 is actually the only current phone with no exploits. Both Android and iPhone have exploits (even tho users usually label them as rooting their phones, but essentially it's the same).

  3. Re:So.... by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows Phone 7 is actually the only current phone with no exploits.

    And as the Microsoft astroturfers keep telling us, that's only because the market share is so low that no-one cares enough to try to exploit it.

  4. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by lightknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reminds me of my senior year in high school -> the Administration had somehow convinced the students that while pranks were acceptable, they had to be approved before being implemented. Suffice to say, the quality of pranks has since dropped.

    Placing a bunch of chairs out on the quad does not compare with dismantling and reassembling a teacher's car on one of the higher levels of the library.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  5. Re:So.... by gstrickler · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Because they haven't sold enough WP7 to anyone to waste their time trying.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  6. Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Erm, try again:

    European customers yawning at Microsoft/Nokia Windows phone. ... lukewarm response in Europe despite rock-bottom dumping prices financed by Microsoft who badly wants Android to fail.

    1. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by SharkLaser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft doesn't want Android to fail. They are profiting half a billion every year from it, without doing anything.

    2. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure Microsoft would happily trade the $500m/yr for the outright elimination of a competitor.

    3. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing this out. I was beginning to wonder if it was true, considering this is the second post I saw saying that Lumia is doing well in Europe. Is Microsoft assembling its own fifty cent army?

    4. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, try again:

      European customers yawning at Microsoft/Nokia Windows phone. ... lukewarm response in Europe despite rock-bottom dumping prices financed by Microsoft who badly wants Android to fail.

      Of course it fails. Nokia knows how to make very good hardware with good software. On top of that Nokia phones are quite modable, or open if you like. Now imagine replacing the software component with that piece of shit windows phone that is as closed as anything coming out of Apple. Its no wonder Nokia customers are giving the finger to windows phones.

      Americans customers don't have any idea of just open and dynamic the phone market is in europe.
      By contrast the US situation is shit with a big S. Only an idiot would throw away a Nokia phone to replace it with a windows phone.

    5. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then you obviously don't remember your history because MSFT just came out from under antitrust and as long as there is competition MSFT can do whatever they want, just like their competitors. Besides as another pointed out MSFT gets paid for a large chunk of those Android phones, they don't get squat for the iPhone. That said i think a big reason why MSFT has embraced HTML V5 is thanks to MPEG-LA having complete and total control over H.26x they and Apple could split that market and the rest will "have to pay their $699 license fee" to borrow from an old meme.

      Personally, and you'd think the majority here would agree if ACs weren't infected this place like a cancer, I hope the WinPhone carves out a nice just as i hope RIM doesn't die and WebOS finds a home. Competition is GOOD folks, its what gives us low prices and new innovations because if you sit on your ass your market share dries up and blows away, just ask the IE team. The more competitors we have in the mobile field the better as far as I'm concerned because ultimately its good for the consumer to have plenty of choices. I mean can you imagine if it ends up just Android and iOS? apple will use the courts to kill all the higher priced units so you end up with the iPhone VS CCC (Cheapo Chinese Crapola) which will give them a monopoly on the high end. Say what you want about MSFT but their lawyers are just as nasty as any of the Nazgul they have working in Apple legal and Apple would be fools to try to lock WinPhone out of the market.

      So I hope we end up with a healthy market even if my guts tell me it'll end up a three way race. But of course I'm not an AC going "Everyone go to hell except cave 76!" and I don't treat OSes like ball clubs, hell I don't treat ball clubs like ball clubs. If /. wants to reverse their declining numbers how about instead of giving me the option to remove ads they give me the option to remove AC posts from my view? I bet the conversations would be MUCH more civil. Hell we might even get like we used to where you'd have long back and forth posts talking about subjects intelligently based on merits and demerits instead of all this AC horseshit ruining the flow.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      They don't control Android so while the money is better than nothing they rather you use WP7. Which is why they often give back more money than they get to companies that give into selling WP7. The whole Android shake down is about selling WP7 not making more money.

    7. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by MrHanky · · Score: 2

      Oh great. An AC getting modded up +2 for reposting the same link from the summary that SharkLaser (a known shill, admittedly) is modded down for disputing with other links. And some people say Slashdot isn't an echo chamber of idiot fanboys reposting the same inane bullshit over and over.

      Lumia seems to sell very well in the Netherlands.

    8. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Endimiao · · Score: 2

      Not even true Nokia phones. They are made by Compal and rebranded Nokia.

    9. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I don't think that Slashdot is an echo chamber of idiot fanboys reposting the same inane bullshit over and over.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Kalriath · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft does collect money on iPhones - they contain no small amount of Microsoft tech as well (Exchange ActiveSync licensing, etc).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    11. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      If no terms have been made public, how do you know no money has been paid?

    12. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by NicknameOne · · Score: 0

      Why don't you ask the same question to SharkLaser?

    13. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      It's not just microsoft. Nokia collets around 10USD per iphone sold, as it holds several key touchscreen patents that apple is licensing in addition to actual GSM/3G connectivity ones.

    14. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      I think you meant niche not nice.
      Anyway, you are correct about the alternative OSes, a good variance in them will move things forward at a better pace. Let's just hope they don't get caught up in idiotic patent wars... Ohh wait....

      --
      -- no sig today
    15. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Is that the same Nokia that in 2010 didn't have a capacitive touchscreen device?
      If I didn't know Nokia better I would have been surprised!

      --
      -- no sig today
    16. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      The very same. Nokia has a long history of touchscreen devices. It just never really pushed them to mass market.

    17. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't want Android to fail. They are profiting half a billion every year from it, without doing anything.

      Let me know when you're going gambling at the track - I'm going to bet on all the horses you don't. I'll make a killing 'cause you are wrong so often. Not everyone confuses figures plucked out of a journalists arse and multiplied by theoretical numbers. Clearly you don't understand how patent pools work either.

    18. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Do we need more confirmation you are a Microsoft shill? Microsoft did not receive a cent from any of the Android manufacturers (prove me wrong by providing a link to an article that is not speculating about the amount exchanged.) No terms have been made public. Microsoft is paying everyone to actually generate such positive press.

      The device manufacturers probably laughed in their face when Microsoft went to them pan in hand.

      Mod up - someone has done there homework.

    19. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      If no terms have been made public, how do you know no money has been paid?

      A: they are public - ironically you'll want me to what it for you? (tough), and B: both companies publish returns (MS stalled and stalled, but they did publish).

    20. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing this out. I was beginning to wonder if it was true, considering this is the second post I saw saying that Lumia is doing well in Europe. Is Microsoft assembling its own fifty cent army?

      Probably fivers. Though News Corp did commission a "survey" by Roy Morgan of householder and people in Supermarkets - so if you were one of those people asked about how you felt about malware on Android and Google's collection of your private data - you know who paid to influence your opinion - sorry I meant - you know who paid for your insights. Sure Rupert has a large investment in Microsoft, but it don't mean nothing.

    21. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Slutticus · · Score: 1

      This is interesting. Do you know what other tech apple is licensing for the iphone/ipad? A google search only turns up the Nokia and InterDigital(3G) stuff...

    22. Re:Nokia Lumia demand boringly flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rock-bottom dumping prices financed by Microsoft

      It goes for 400 quid here in the UK, which puts in on par with Samsung Galaxy S2. Your point?

  7. Re:So.... by nman64 · · Score: 1

    Windows Phone 7 is actually the only current phone with no known exploits. Both Android and iPhone have exploits (even tho users usually label them as rooting their phones, but essentially it's the same).

    TFTFY

    If new tokens are not issued, I'm sure the community will start looking for, and will find, such exploits.

  8. ChevronWP7 by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ChevronWP7 wasn't a jailbreak, it didn't give you control over the phone. All it really did was give you the rights of a developer account, without paying for it.

    Those of us who were waiting for a true jailbreak, with native-code execution and control of the system, were sorely disappointed that ChevronWP7 got so much publicity, because after that, people stopped working on trying to really jailbreak the phone. It was sad.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:ChevronWP7 by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you've got a Samsung phone, head on over to WindowBreak. It'll give you developer access and native execution abilities, even starting from a locked-down 7.5 (Mango).

    2. Re:ChevronWP7 by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      From your linked website:

      It also is not a full unlock. Just interop.

      You're right it's way better than ChevronWP7, and the original people who did that work should get way more credit than the people who came out with ChevronWP7, but it's not full access. You're still locked out of the system.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:ChevronWP7 by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      With the WP7 public stunts like those found on YouTube and the Mango reference dredging up Saturday Night Live memories involving a lovers' quarrel between Chris Kattan and Garth Brooks, WP7 is dead to me. I have no choice but to distance it from my person.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    4. Re:ChevronWP7 by ausrob · · Score: 2

      Yup, and the dead givaway that this wasn't a real jailbreak was: "they're discussing whether they will ask Microsoft to make more available".

    5. Re:ChevronWP7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that makes sense. I was wondering why the escaped convicts would be asking the warden for more "tokens". Like it's some sort of free-range jail with collars or something. In that regard, I guess it DID keep the convicts in line and limited the urge to, you know, ACTUALLY jail-break the thing.

    6. Re:ChevronWP7 by Eirenarch · · Score: 2

      I am curious why you got a Windows Phone if you were so interested in running native code and controlling the system. There are plenty of options out there for people who want full access to the system and with Windows Phone Microsoft actually markets the lack of access as kind of a feature. I am pretty happy with my Windows Phone but I cannot understand why people who care about full access would buy it.

    7. Re:ChevronWP7 by Eirenarch · · Score: 1

      After they managed to unlock the phone they made a deal with Microsoft and removed the original tool to release it as a paid (future proof) version. There are other jailbreak tools unrelated to MS though.

    8. Re:ChevronWP7 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Some people like to get things just to play with them and see what they can do. As my personal phone I have an old-fashioned feature phone, which I've gold plated (literally.....the gold-leaf is only $10 if you know how to do it).

      In my case, I'm lucky enough to have a job that pays me to do this. I usually have half-a-dozen different smart phones/tablets on my desk, some of which are pre-release. I spent some time hacking WP7, but once it became apparent that the marketshare would be small, I returned to spending my time reverse-engineering Android phones from vendors who haven't released the source code.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:ChevronWP7 by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Even worse, the ability for users to "Interop Unlock" their phones was mostly based on the manufacturer. I think there is one available for Samsung and LG; HTC got the shaft after the Mango update.

      Read on for more information: Click here

    10. Re:ChevronWP7 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeap, and interop unlock wasn't that great anyway. The only advantage it gave, as far as I could find, was allowing you to have full network access, instead of the silverlight broken network API. Which was something, but not much.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:ChevronWP7 by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the PS3 OtherOS feature. Gives hobbyists enough access to play around and be content in their tinkering, but not so much that they might actually make something useful and beyond the manufacturer's control. I'm sure we all recall that as soon as someone figured out a way to actually run code outside the sandbox, Sony removed OtherOS entirely via semi-manditory firmware update - and that hack didn't even need OtherOS to run.

    12. Re:ChevronWP7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right it's way better than ChevronWP7, and the original people who did that work should get way more credit than the people who came out with ChevronWP7, but it's not full access. You're still locked out of the system.

      Not sure how you define "way better". It only works on Samsung phones while ChevronWP7 works across all devices.

    13. Re:ChevronWP7 by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Informative

      What do you mean, locked out of the system? Use WindowBreak, then go install WP7 Root Tools (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1265321) using the free dev tools for app deployment. You'll have access to almost anything, limited only by what the dev of WP7 Root Tools has implemented so far. There are a handful of other apps out there that will also work, such as from http://touchxperience.com/ and elsewhere on the XDA-Devs WP7 hacking forum (http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=606).

      WindowBreak is an easy way to "interop-unlock" a Windows phone. Interop-unlock means you can can install and run apps that call into high-privilege drivers, breaking out of their sandboxes. Immediately, that opens up a lot of potential, but it also means you can run code as TCB (the WP7 equivalent of "root" or "Administrator"). Apps like WP7 Root Tools take advantage of this to enable a wide variety of functionality, though the current version only enables doing so on Samsung phones (the high-privilege drivers being different from each OEM).

      Incidentally, there are other ways to interop-unlock other phones. LG phones actually ship with a built-in registry editor that can be used to dev-unlock (install app packages) and interop-unlock (install high-privilege homebrew packages) the phones - there's absolutely no need for ChevronWP7 or the official AppHub account (which does the same thing, plus allowing you to submit apps to the Marketplace). HTC phones (the first-generation ones) can be interop-unlocked if they are already dev-unlocked. Their bootloaders can also be "unlocked" to allow custom updates (modify the current ROM) or full custom ROMs, with most of the latter having excellent support for homebrew (the kinds of changes that WP7 Root Tools can make being applied by default, obviously already being interop-unlocked, and having the ability to install app packages directly from the phone without needing a PC).

      Nokia, Dell, and Toshiba/Fujitsu phones do not have known interop-unlocks yet, nor do second-generation HTC phones. People are working on this, though.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    14. Re:ChevronWP7 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      WindowBreak is an easy way to "interop-unlock" a Windows phone. Interop-unlock means you can can install and run apps that call into high-privilege drivers, breaking out of their sandboxes. Immediately, that opens up a lot of potential, but it also means you can run code as TCB (the WP7 equivalent of "root" or "Administrator").

      That's good to know, I'll look into it when I get a chance.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:ChevronWP7 by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      because after that, people stopped working on trying to really jailbreak the phone. It was sad.

      Sounds like brilliant strategy to me.

    16. Re:ChevronWP7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pics please.

  9. Ahhh we still need codewords by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0

    "Homebrew" is by far my favorite codeword in all of nerddom. A close second is "evil."

    1. Re:Ahhh we still need codewords by Kalriath · · Score: 0

      Based on comments on the WindowBreak site, "Homebrew" is code for "Pirated". Such as "I tested it by sideloading NFS Unlimited for free".

      Yes, jailbreaking is about homebrew. Pffft.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  10. How much does MS pay you? by Cyberax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, basically, Lumia topped sales on one website for a few days. And another website had put into 'bestseller list' without releasing any numbers.

    Yeah, it really performs well. Maybe next month a "Joe's Web Store" site would put it into "Top Wishlisted" products.

    1. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, Lumia topped sales on one website for a few days. And another website had put into 'bestseller list' without releasing any numbers.

      Yeah, it really performs well. Maybe next month a "Joe's Web Store" site would put it into "Top Wishlisted" products.

      It probably depends on what MS wants to pay them.

    2. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Eirenarch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we should believe "the
      analysts" they are much better source and deserve our trust.

    3. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we should believe some random e-shops "top lists", they are very concrete and factual.

      Did you know that placing products that don't move fast enough in "hot"/"popular"/"bestseller"/"special promotion" section is an universal retail practice?

    4. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Eirenarch · · Score: 1

      I did not say we should believe them. I said that the other numbers are unreliable either. For example the number based on asking 5000 people what phones they were going to get was totally absurd and if true would mean that only 6000 Lumia phones would be sold in the UK which is obviously absurd. It seems like the middle ground of all information is about 800 000 - 1 000 000 Lumias sold till the end of 2011. Different sources do not agree if this is spectacular failure or relative success even if they agree on the numbers.

    5. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are different ways to estimate popularity and sales dynamics.
      Here's one, for example - it shows +1.7M Facebook app for iPhone daily unique users in last week, +1.9M for Android app and +10K for WinPhone app.

      Sure, it can mean "WinPhone users don't like and don't use Facebook" or "WinPhone official Facebook app sucks ass". Or "WP7 is a flop".

    6. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Eirenarch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that anyone expects Windows Phone to sell anywhere near Android or iPhone. They should not expect to sell even half of the iPhone numbers in the next 5 years. MS should go into Windows Phone with a strategy similar to Xbox which is "lose billions and after ~10 years we will be profitable and on the top"

    7. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      We'll go with "official app sucks ass". Trust me, I have one. It's getting better though.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    8. Re:How much does MS pay you? by amnesia_tc · · Score: 2

      I'd go more with "What do I need the official app for when anything I'd do on Facebook is built into the phone?"

    9. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Actually, Microsoft's XBox strategy so far has been lose billions and after ~10 years it is cash flow positive and a distant also ran. Heck, you could probably argue that the XBox beat the PS3, but just barely, and that is clearly damning with faint praise. What's more the console is clearly waning in importance. The growth market for games right now is handhelds and phones, and Microsoft isn't even an also ran in that category.

      I am sure that if you asked *Nokia* what the Window's phone goals should be it would definitely argue that it expects Microsoft to be able to compete with both Android and iPhone. Nokia doesn't have five years and billions of dollars to waste screwing around. If they thought it was going to take Microsoft half a decade to become competitive then it would have probably thrown its hat into the Android ring. In fact, I would assure you that Microsoft's investors feel the same way. The last thing that they want is another XBox debacle where billions of their dollars are invested in a project that is unlikely to ever pay dividends.

      Even now, it is hard for analysts and investors to take Microsoft's phone strategy seriously. The fact that Microsoft was able to trick Nokia into jumping on the WinPhone bandwagon is the only thing that is keeping the Windows Phone dream alive. People are waiting to see what comes of Nokia's big gamble. Right now it is beginning to look like a colossal failure, at which point the investors at both Nokia and Microsoft are going to be pushing hard for a change of course. There is almost no chance that this is going to turn into a 5 year train wreck.

    10. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, millions of iPhone/Android users find those apps useful, even though they've got it all too.

      Also note that FB's app is built-in on WinPhone.

    11. Re:How much does MS pay you? by amnesia_tc · · Score: 2

      No, there is a separate, official Facebook app for Windows Phone. And, as far as I can tell, the integration in iOS and Android is not to the same level as Windows Phone does it. I, of course, could be entirely wrong about that. I haven't played with iOS or Android for a whole now.

    12. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 1

      I would hope FaceBook never gets more integrated into Android. Took me 3 passes just finding all the FB integration apps on my Xperia Play and root to actually remove them all. But at least I could clear the infestation...

    13. Re:How much does MS pay you? by Eirenarch · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure Xbox made all those billions back and is considered a success. I can't remember where I read that but it was in some of the 10th anniversary articles.

      Now you may be right that investors and Nokia do not want to wait another 10 years but
      1. It was neither Microsoft nor Windows Phone that got Nokia into financial and market trouble. Nokia did want a big gamble because a small gamble would not do it.
      2. If Nokia went for Android no one would give them a billion in cash and give them any advantage on the Android platform.

      You may be right that Nokia and Windows Phone will fail but in my opinion (and in Nokia's opinion) the chance to fail with Android was higher.

      And why should Microsoft drop the platform? They already spent money to develop it and to pay to Nokia. The costs to continue to develop and market it are not that high. In fact I believe that the money they make from Android can pay for the continued development of Windows Phone.

    14. Re:How much does MS pay you? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when X-Box makes those billions back and/or is on top because neither has happened yet.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  11. Re:So.... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Or, because there was a "legit" way to root the phone. Now that there's not, watch an exploit appear.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  12. Re:So.... by mortonda · · Score: 1

    Whoosh....

  13. Cyanogen MOD by andydread · · Score: 0

    If Cyanogen can't run on it then I don't want it. So Nokia is out of the question.

  14. The N9 is/was beauiful by kurt555gs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought a Nokia N9 on the grey market to add to my collection of Maemo phones. I have an N770, N800, N900, and now an N9. What really surprised me is that the N9 is beautiful, the OS is great, and the screens are beautiful. People would have loved the N9 if they were able to buy it. Elop certainly made sure it was not only dead, but he had Nokia use up the N9 parts (except the processor) building that Lumina 800 thing.

    If I had my way at Nokia. They would still do what they do best making beautiful hardware, and allow people to choose from Symbian, Maemo, and Android. No one really wants WP7, and it just isn't very good.

    My guess is that Microsoft got to Nokia's board and installed Elop to have Nokia sign away rights to do anything other than pay Microsoft as part one. Part two is to destroy Nokia so that Microsoft can buy their stock for penny's and get control of Nokia's massive patent portfolio. Once that's done, Microsoft will become the world's largest patent troll and simple make Google and Apple pay to sell cell phones. After all, this would be the normal Microsoft modus operandi of extortion rather than development. Microsoft loves being sneaky. I am sure the bosses at Microsoft know that WP7 is junk, and could never compete on it's merits. To me, WP7 is just a sham to cover Microsoft's true objectives of fraud and extortion without being sued outright.

    So, there.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isn't big enough anymore to pull this over Apple and Google.
      You know Ballmer tried to "fucking kill Google" back when they were way smaller and it didn't work out.

    2. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But your approach would bankrupt the company. Prior to Elop taking over, it was pretty damn clear Symbian, MeeGo/Maemo/Harmatten was doomed.

      I think you're right that Microsoft played some dirty tricks with Elop(the conflicts of interest are glaring), but I think you're wrong that WinPhone 7 is junk.

      The problem with Nokia is that they dont' have any clear vision. The N9 is clearly an example. If I was Elop anything that wasn't Windows Phone or feature phone would've had the axe immediately. Hell, I would axe shitty feature phones. I know the impact on emerging regions would be horrific, but, take the current designs, open them up to local firms and have them build it. It's clear that feature phones with slim margins isn't going to keep the company afloat.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    3. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought an N9 as well, it's an excellent phone with 1-click root access and the ability to apt-get packages. I fail to understand why one would by a phone that requires you to jailbreak it before being able to do with it what you want.

    4. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Doomed perhaps but Symbian and Meego were/are open source.

      If Nokia cared about homebrew, they'd stick to a common hardware roadmap for all their future devices. Providing WP7 with an open boatloader and employing a skeleton staff to assist with driver development for meego/symbian/webos/android would go a long way to regaining the trust of those burnt by the 'Qt4 on everything' about face.

      Do Cyanogenmodders represent anything of a market share? My next phone will likely be an HTC but if Nokia were to provide any sort of commitment to the N9 community, perhaps I'd reconsider.

    5. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No; it didn't sell well because of poor marketing and poor release strategy, just like the "failure" that plagued the Nexus One. This was mostly proven when the Nexus S, which was marketed much better and made available through Best Buy, sold much better the following year. Then again, the N1 was mostly a testbed for the Nexus platform, so this might have been intentional.

    6. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by ninjakoala · · Score: 1

      "No one really wants WP7, and it just isn't very good."

      Speak for yourself, sir. Clearly at least 10k rooting customers disagree and I as well.

      I just ordered a WP7 phone. Not so much because I think it's the Best Phone OS Ever Made(TM), but because I feel like trying something different after using iPhone since the 3G came out. Since I have an iPhone 4 through work I thought it would be fun to try out WP7 on my personal number. Bought a mid-range phone (Omnia W) so I don't waste too much money if I end up not liking it.

      I've played around with it in shops and liked what I saw, though. Unlike Android (but like Meego) it is sufficiently different from iOS to pique my interest.

      That said I agree that Nokia should have kept working on Meego. I tried an N9 and while it didn't feel particularly polished, I certainly thought it was a promising start. I'm sad to see it go - especially after having followed the OS since it was Moblin.

      --
      Against the grain
    7. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by TheLongshot · · Score: 1

      But your approach would bankrupt the company. Prior to Elop taking over, it was pretty damn clear Symbian, MeeGo/Maemo/Harmatten was doomed.

      And now after Elop they are definitely doomed by signing on to the falling star that is Microsoft.

    8. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2

      Well, with MeeGo they had a powerful partner who had a strong interest for Nokia to succeed. They also had a clear upgrade path from Symbian and developers to support that. The strategy was sound, they did fail to deliver on it in time, though. So granted they had a problem.

      However Elop's approach was to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Nokia is now completely depended on the strategy of another company - which in turn does not depend on Nokia at all. MS will happily supply WP7 to other vendors, and other vendors are happy to add a few WP7 phones to their offerings, even if the market is tiny.

      Nokia could have supported Android and WP7 and kept their options open with their own OS. Neither HTC nor Samsung have all their eggs in one basket - they can all handle multiple systems. Nokia could have gone one further and just support all three OSes on one piece of hardware. That they are now using N9 parts to build a WP7 phone shows that it's possible.

      So maybe Google didn't give them great conditions for Android - no big deal: Nokia could have taken Cyanogenmod and set up their own apps market. K9 mail would have been suitable as a mailtool - Nokia desperately needed a good one for their phones. They could have added Android-app compatibility to their own OS and give it access to a lot of application that way. Even if eventually their own OS failed - they'd still have a nice stake in the Android market. As it is it looks like WP7 may well sink them - even if it eventually succeeds in the market, there is no guarantee Nokia will be along for that part of the ride.

    9. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Prior to Elop taking over, it was pretty damn clear Symbian, MeeGo/Maemo/Harmatten was doomed.

      I'm not sure about that. Immediately prior to Elop, Nokia had just bought QT. Nokia was about to go all-in into MeeGo.

      You're right about them lacking a clear vision though. If they really wanted to compete, they would've cut Symbia and put MeeGo on every device. Instead of having a billion product lines, have three or four, with officially bundled add-ons (that could be bought separately) for specific markets.

      Then, they should've dumped all of their marketing budget into these phones, made sure their developer tools were in good shape, and let the Nokia brand do the rest. Look at WebOS. It wasn't marketed at all, and yet the developer network was extensive and the apps were numerous. Certainly not as numerous as for iOS, but all of the major apps and arguably the only ones that matter are present in the WebOS app store.

      I was of the opinion that the abrupt about-face for the company would turn out to be disastrous. It's not just the fact that they moved to an untested, unproven Windows mobile platform that if history had anything to say, would flop like Windows Mobile 6.5 did in the recent past. It's more that the move alienates not only developers and partners (who were expecting Symbian for a few more years and MeeGo to be the future), but also developers and engineers within Nokia itself. How would you feel if suddenly, a whole division of your company gets put onto the chopping block? I'd certainly be polishing up my resume ready to jump ship at any time. After all, if upper management can drop that kind of bombshell, who knows what others they have ready to be released at the right time. Phone hardware? Network hardware? Research? Marketing?

      At this point, there's no turning back. They wasted too much money and too much clout in the transition to Windows Phone. Instead of putting all of their money into a viable and succeeding technology and working on a new strategy, they threw all of their resources and brand loyalty into the wind. If I was someone holding any of its stock, I'd cut my losses and sell, because it's going to be worth nothing very, very soon.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    10. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      The problem with Nokia is that they dont' have any clear vision. The N9 is clearly an example. If I was Elop anything that wasn't Windows Phone or feature phone would've had the axe immediately.

      I think that would be a huge, monumental mistake. N9 is selling rather well, while the Lumia devices have, basically, flopped during the holiday season.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    11. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Prior to Elop taking over, it was pretty damn clear Symbian, MeeGo/Maemo/Harmatten was doomed.

      Really? They were selling more phones than anybody else. You can segment things all you like until something else comes up as a winner in some segment but that distracts from the total. It's been downhill from there but since they sell so much stuff Elop will take a long time to kill Nokia if that's actually what he intends to do.
      However, I really do not understand why the MeeGo/Maemo/Harmatten stuff was sold almost by word of mouth and even then they appeared to ship a lot less than was initially demanded. More than a year is a stupidly long time between a release of a phone in one market and other. The entire MeeGo/Maemo projects were very cheap for Nokia because they had hardly anybody working on them.

    12. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by Error27 · · Score: 1

      But your approach would bankrupt the company.

      It would be hard to hurt the company more than Elop has. He has set a historic world record for destroying market share. RIM would have set the record by just muddling along without a good strategy but Elop managed to outdo them. They deliberately didn't sell the n9. How stupid is that?

    13. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Half of Nokia's problem was the fact that they basically wrote off the US as a market, without grasping that its mindshare and influence was several orders of magnitude greater than the number of phones sold might otherwise suggest. Symbian for all intents and purposes didn't exist in the US (I think Sony-Ericsson had a few that could do 3G on AT&T, and limp along with EDGE on T-Mobile, if you paid $800 to import one) , and as a practical matter neither did Nokia phones capable of doing anything better than GPRS from around 2004 until around 2009. As far as American tech review sites were concerned, Nokia didn't exist anymore. Because in America, they didn't.

    14. Re:The N9 is/was beauiful by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Well, with MeeGo they had a powerful partner who had a strong interest for Nokia to succeed.

      Now you can see how that powerful partner helps Samsung succeed with Tizen.

      Hint: they never, ever, released anything that could run on a smartphone. And their netbook UX was mediocre at best.

      Nokia could have taken Cyanogenmod and set up their own apps market.

      Well, that does sound like a sound decision on product development that could help them benefit from "the ecosystem" (of hobbyist basement dwellers?), doesn't it? They would be only, what, the 34th phone hardware manufacturer to try to strike gold with Android.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  15. Re:So.... by Microlith · · Score: 1

    There was never a "legit" way to root the phone. There was a way to pay money to do what (most) Android devices let you do out of the gate.

  16. Re:So.... by next_ghost · · Score: 2

    Maybe it has something to do with the simple fact that Linux is often used in big business to run servers with mission-critical services while WP7 phone is at best about as important as overpriced paperweight.

  17. So all that and only 10,000 MS-sanctioned pirates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hm, that's about 160 per day. Assume most were in the leading days, but that's not important. This is a KEY TO GET ALL WINDOWS PHJONE APPS FOR FREE!, without fear of MS popping up a "app revoked" on your next phone sync, and all you can move is 160 a day?

    I knoew Windows Phone market was fractional, but 160 a day? That is subfractional.

  18. Re:So.... by anonymov · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, desktop Linux is secure enough for only semi-loud malware story about it to be "someone uploaded trojan shell script masked as a Gnome addon to a third-party Gnome addons site, some people actually downloaded it and some even ran it". Can't remember did it try to get user to sudo it or just did what it could with user's permissions.

    Server Linux, on the other hand, is very attractive target as it hosts a big part of the web and targeted software is not Linux per se, but usually buggy CMS's and unpatched Apache installations.

    Windows, on the other hand, has a few nice MS-introduced OS level vulnerabilities discovered this year - not to forget about the beautiful times brought by LoveSan and alikes.

  19. Nokia Lumia 500 are just Fake Nokia N9 by rzr · · Score: 2

    Fight piracy ! use the original N9 one ... dont buy crappy copies such as that sandboxed toy for lamers I will ignore WP7 untill someone port a decent framework like Qt or native dll ...

    --
    -- http://rzr.online.fr/
  20. Re:So.... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    I don't consider phishing an OS exploit. Don't recall any iOS exploits and I doubt there is a reliable exploit for Android that can be carried out minus user intervention.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  21. Re:So.... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Because Linux is open-source. It has a million eyes looking at it. :)

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  22. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by Jiro · · Score: 0

    If dismantling and reassembling the car caused damage, were the students involved planning to pay for the damage they caused? What if someone got hurt, were the students going to perform surgery on them to fix the injury?

    (More likely, the students believed themselves invincible. They didn't consider the possibility they'd cause damage or hurt anyone because they were so sure of themselves that they didn't bother to account for it. (And no, the fact that it worked once without harm doesn't mean they were right--they just didn't hit the random chance of making a bad mistake. Crossing the street without looking out for oncoming cars works too--most of the time.)

  23. agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what kind of a jail break wont let you copy hte jailbreak to any phone...ROFL
    D....R.....M
    D...R...M
    do do do do
    D....R....M

  24. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

    True, but associated risk / repair costs are much lower

  25. Re:So all that and only 10,000 MS-sanctioned pirat by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    Holy Sh*t! 10,000 pirates, that is 731 pirates (rounded up) for every available app. Dude, we need SOPA, and we need it fast to keep companies that do good work, like Microsoft, alive. Without them, who would innovate?

                                        -Charlie

  26. Jail break. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another company to stupid to give the user wtf they want.

    Fail, I wont buy one. The last windows phone I had was OK but compared to the Iphone combined with xcode is really very exciting even after all this time.
    They are missing in action to me, after awhile they became just a memory.

    1. Re:Jail break. by InsGadget · · Score: 1

      The "last windows phone" you had was probably Windows Mobile, a totally different organism entirely.

  27. Re:So.... by chrb · · Score: 1

    There is a difference between an unlocked bootloader and an exploit. By your definition, every PC has an "exploit" because it is possible to boot an alternative OS.

  28. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno about most. My android device wasn't jailbroken until several weeks after it came out. Even then, the source code to the exploit was kept secret. I know HTC has promised to make this easier, but I have yet to see them keep that promise. They certainly haven't released an update for my phone.

  29. Re:So.... by wjsteele · · Score: 1

    Um... iOS does have exploits... where do you think the ability to jailbreak comes from?

    Heck, they even have simple web sites that will do it for you just by clicking on a link! If that's not an easy exploit, then I don't know what is!

    Bill

    --
    It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  30. Surprise by Bert64 · · Score: 0

    What's more surprising...

    The fact MS had so little confidence in their product to only provide 10,000 tokens...
    Or that they actually managed to sell 10,000 tokens at all.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  31. Re:So all that and only 10,000 MS-sanctioned pirat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50,000 apps and growing (weeds). It is your typical app store break-down of good, bad, and ugly. Thare are close to two million WP phones out there. Most are US but HTC WP phones are popular in Iran (the only WP phone brand sold there). Italy has a small base of devotees that swear by it (the italians love Free apps, which is understandable - and I don't mean free apps, but Free apps). Nokia is aiming for mainland China with the upcoming WP Tango version. Billions of customers Elop says.

  32. Linux exploit = Jailbreak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess WP7 has no such exploits ;-)

  33. Wait- what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa whoa whoa, wait a second- there are more than 10,000 WP7 users?

  34. WOW... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Linux is only secure if you hire a system administrator to install and configure it. And yet.. Linux webservers keep getting defaced daily. And yet ... Linux kernel has *always* had more security bugs than the NT kernel. If every security bug in Linux was front page news on slashdot like Windows bugs Linux would probably have 0.1 market sharre instead of 0.3. (LOL)

    http://www.exploit-db.com/platform/?p=linux

    1. Re:WOW... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 32 pages of Linux exploits vs 175 pages for Windows really drives your point home.

      Anyways, you're talking about "linux kernel and nt kernel bugs" and provide a link to db listing _everything_ that can count as exploit - kernel, core libs, 3rd party soft, local, remote, root, DoS, shells, reverse shells - all in one mixed listing. Very helpful, that.

    2. Re:WOW... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Any non-trivial OS is only secure if you hire a system administrator to install and configure it - and the trivial ones like DOS usually are too, as soon as you have an application running too.

  35. car analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows putting their software on Nokia is like Ford putting its engine in a Rolls Royce car.. looks nice, but fails to perform.

  36. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Short of a volkswagen beetle, what car could be so disassembled that it'd fit through the doors, much less be reassemblable inside of a library?

    I'd always wondered about this, since nothing produced (in the US at least!) in the past 30 years has been disassemblable to the level where it'd fit through double doors without using a hacksaw to split the unibody into 2-4 pieces in order to get it in to reassemble. And how many people would you need to carry the frame to begin with?

  37. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    You are the killer of fun, implementer of bureaucracy, neuterer of joy.

    --
    Good-bye
  38. Re:So.... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    The only people with WP7 phones are MS employees. Now why would they write exploits and risk losing their job?

  39. Re:So.... by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    But you don't need to "jailbreak" an Android device to install out of market apps, which is 99% of what "jailbreakers" want to do with their phone.
    On Android, it's just a check box, and it's free.

    Many Android phones, such as those from Samsung, are also "rootable" (the other 1% of the jailbreak) without any hacks.

  40. Nokia will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because its "image" is old as m$ image is old. They can sell their phones to some old guy that hasn't seen nothing different from the M$ crap in its life. He buys this stuff because he feels home there. Young people are far more open to new things and are naturally inclined to dump everything that smells as old .

  41. Re:Microsoft doesn't want Android to fail by snikulin · · Score: 1

    Finally! Now we can designate Android fanboi as M$ Shills!

  42. Windows Phone 7 has potential. by MrCrassic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two months ago, I traded my wonderful G2 for a HD7 to get a taste of the Windows Phone experience. I've used Windows Mobile since the 2003 version on the MPx200 (solid flip-phone; absolutely loved it) and wanted to see how far Microsoft has matured in the mobile arena.

    Windows Phone 7 has, hands down, the best mobile UI experience you can get right now. Everything is fluid, fast and easy. The stock applications and voice controls gel perfectly and make Android look like a total mess, though it's cleaned up its act with Ice Cream Sandwich. App switching is WebOS-like and will make multi-tasking awesome when it comes to life in the next version. It's integration with Windows Live and Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn is the best I have ever seen and used and totally antiquates the need for their dedicated apps. (This might not matter for many Slashdot folks, but it matters for most people.) Forget iPod and iTunes; the Zune is just as easy to use and is much prettier to use. (It helps that the Zune software runs great on Windows, unlike iTunes.) The camera has ZERO lag, though the lens on the HD7 absolutely sucked. It's experience is absolutely beautiful and I can totally see iPhone users defecting to this once the app ecosystem.

    Microsoft's strategy to use Nokia as their flagship supplier makes much more sense after you use it for a while; Nokia still has huge brand recognition and will shake up the market really nicely when they release (and market) their ace device.

    The biggest obvious problem is that Apple and Android both had first-mover's advantage and, thus, own the space at the moment. However, this is not as problematic as it seems. People are getting tired of iOS (it hasn't changed very much since 1.0, despite great hardware advances) and Windows Phone offers a very cool and equally smooth alternative that a lot of people will feel comfortable moving to, especially with its strong Facebook integration. It's going to be very difficult for Apple to match this and Android's UI improvements and they can't depend on making killer hardware leaps anymore since both fronts have caught up there. (Kind of like how Intel can't really market GHz anymore since every processor is "fast enough.")

    Apple is, finally, in trouble, but that's what happens when you're on top for so long. :)

    1. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Since you have the phone and might be able to answer this, i don't use facebook, or any other social networking stuff, except form msn messenger, can that strong integration be removed or hidden, ie, if i don't use it, i don't want those tiles to show up nor options to be available to use the social networking?

    2. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by InsGadget · · Score: 1

      Since you have the phone and might be able to answer this, i don't use facebook, or any other social networking stuff, except form msn messenger, can that strong integration be removed or hidden, ie, if i don't use it, i don't want those tiles to show up nor options to be available to use the social networking?

      Absolutely. Any tile can be removed or added from the start screen, while of course it will still be available in the long app list when you flick to the right.

    3. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by InsGadget · · Score: 1

      Nice post. I have a Samsung Focus and love WP7, hopefully people will get past their anti-MS sentiment enough to give it a try.

    4. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Apple is, finally, in trouble, but that's what happens when you're on top for so long. :)

      Ok, back to reality: even if WP7 will eventually succeed - right now it's market share is puny. Apple is not in trouble, they are doing almost absurdly well - granted in terms of marketshare they've lost a lot, but they they lost that to Android. Maybe 2012 or 2013 will be the year of Windows on the mobile device? I won't completely dismiss that possibility - one of MS' primary strengths is persistence.

    5. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by Osty · · Score: 2

      Since you have the phone and might be able to answer this, i don't use facebook, or any other social networking stuff, except form msn messenger, can that strong integration be removed or hidden, ie, if i don't use it, i don't want those tiles to show up nor options to be available to use the social networking?

      I believe the only thing you have to have to use a Windows Phone 7 phone is a Windows Live ID (you can use any email to sign up for a Live ID, not just live.com/hotmail.com email addresses), which brings with it some small amount of social-ness (contacts, picture sharing) but of course you don't need to use any of that. the Live ID is only there for marketplace/Zune access. For all the rest, if you don't put in a Facebook account or Twitter account or whatever, it won't integrate with those services. It's not magic. It can't automatically sign you up for Facebook or find your unrelated Facebook account from the Live ID you gave it, so it can't make you accidentally the social networking if you don't want it to. And for the accounts you do add, you're given the ability to decide what pieces of data are pulled in from each (calendars, contacts, pictures, etc) For example, I have my phone setup with my Live ID that's associated with my Xbox, my gmail account, and my Facebook account. I have no interest in setting it up for Twitter, and so as far as I'm concerned I just don't put in a Twitter account and I never see Twitter tweets.

    6. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by sd4f · · Score: 1

      It's not magic. It can't automatically sign you up for Facebook or find your unrelated Facebook account from the Live ID you gave it, so it can't make you accidentally the social networking if you don't want it to.

      I'm not too worried about that, it's more being constantly bothered to join, last thing i want is a phone which will start telling me that i need to join any particular thing. I don't mind the windows live id, because i already have a few to pick from. Thanks for the info though.

    7. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by Osty · · Score: 1

      I'm not too worried about that, it's more being constantly bothered to join, last thing i want is a phone which will start telling me that i need to join any particular thing. I don't mind the windows live id, because i already have a few to pick from. Thanks for the info though.

      I've not seen any nagging. It's been a while since I've gone through OOBS but I think it just prompts you once ("Hey, you can add accounts!") and then never again.

      Also, if you have multiple live IDs and you have one associated with an Xbox Live account, use that for the WP7 phone. You gamerscore and avatar will carry over to the phone, and any achievements you get from phone games will add to your Xbox gamerscore total. It's a nice little touch that makes phone gaming a little more interesting than, "I've got a minute to kill, may as well throw some birds at pigs."

    8. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it still have only one volume control? If you listen to music at a low level it also changes the ringer to low level? Such an oversight is a deal-breaker for me... in 1995 it was acceptable to have just one selection of ringer/text notification volume but not in 2000, and definitely not it 2012.

      http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/winphone/forum/wp7-wptips/separate-volume-control-needed/d43dccb5-022c-4e5d-a19d-b6a23ea43ec5?page=1

    9. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      One of Apple's key features is the longevity of their hardware, which works with and against them. If you buy an iPhone you'll get OS updates that work for 2-3 years, which means you can always run the newest software for that period of time (Siri being the main exception to-date, but that isn't really distributed on its own via the app store anyway). If you buy an Android phone, there is a decent chance you'll never get an update for it - often phones are sold long after they get their last update, and it is rare to get an update even one year after it FIRST goes on sale.

      Android's willingness to obsolete old hardware means that they can almost completely abandon backwards compatibility at the hardware level. If a new UI doesn't run on six-month-old hardware then that hardware just doesn't get the new UI.

      Apple on the other hand has built up a brand reputation and tends to support older phones, which means the newer phones often can't include dramatic improvements (maybe the camera captures more pixels, or the modem is faster, but not as many transformational changes).

      I'm torn on what the best approach really is. I'd like to see Android offer longer-term support for its devices, but I don't want to give up the big improvements that this might cost. Going with Android means that I have a phone that feels cutting edge for the first year I own it, and a bit stale for the second year that I own it. On the other hand, I got a top-of-the-line phone that was less than a month old for zero dollars, and most likely I'd get a similar opportunity the next time I renew my contract. So, I think in the end it tends to balance out.

    10. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      If you buy an Android phone, there is a decent chance you'll never get an update for it - often phones are sold long after they get their last update, and it is rare to get an update even one year after it FIRST goes on sale.

      There are two caveats to this:

      • Only applies to low-end devices. Historically, flagship devices have always had a clear-cut and well-supported upgrade path for at least one or two iterations.

        For example, this chart highlights the upgrades available for Motorola devices. All of the flagship devices they've sold, such as the Droid, Droid X and Xoom, have gotten carrier-supported upgrades to Gingerbread. I know that flagship HTC and Samsung devices, like the Droid Incredible, Desire HD/Inspire and Galaxy S (Vibrant, Epic, Captivate, Fascinate and International i9000), have all gotten similar treatments as well. This is, in part, because of:
      • Lack of customer demand. People that purchase lower-end devices usually get them to have a phone more capable than a regular phone for a decent price. Many of these folks don't know what upgrades are. Additionally, it takes real effort for these carriers to update and test every single CPU and/or GPU, sound DAC and USB controller (some of which run on hacks, as some ports to Cyanogenmod et. al. demonstrate) on top of updates to the UI (which some of these devices can barely run). Consequently, they focus those efforts on the higher-end devices and let the others have cake.

        It's sort of messed up, but when you consider that the point of Android was to give "the masses" a better alternative to smartphone computing, it's a lot better than shelling a few hundred bucks for a shiny iPhone or waiting a few years for the hand-me-downs to drop price.

      Fortunately, and unlike iPhone, because of Android's strong community support model and its openness, lower-end devices usually get upgrade options anyway.

    11. Re:Windows Phone 7 has potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent post - a rare thing on /. these days :)

  43. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by lightknight · · Score: 1

    The football team hefted the parts upstairs, if I remember correctly. Compared to what they encounter out on the field, I think any injury would be considered minor in comparison.

    And taking apart a car and putting it back together is something many mechanics do on a daily basis.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  44. Talk about control freaks by sjames · · Score: 1

    You need a special TOKEN just to develop for the damn things? And there's a shortage? Do they have a basement full of MS trolls hand-crafting each token?

    If they thought the ability was intrinsically dangerous, they wouldn't offer these tokens. If they weren't control freaks, they wouldn't make people beg them for a token just to have a bit more control over the phone. It's the worst kind of artificial scarcity.

    1. Re:Talk about control freaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. This article's kinda like club bouncer chasing passers-by to tell them "Hey, see that club over there? It's so fucking elite I don't let anyone in even though we need customers pronto and it's almost empty"

    2. Re:Talk about control freaks by Osty · · Score: 2

      You need a special TOKEN just to develop for the damn things? And there's a shortage? Do they have a basement full of MS trolls hand-crafting each token?

      Not exactly, no. You can develop for the emulator for free (all the tools and SDKs are available for free). If you want to put what you developed on your phone itself you can either pay $100/year for access to the market (the standard approach that Microsoft wants you to do, because it gets apps in the market and everybody judges smartphone platforms by the size of their market) or you could pay the Chevron guys $9 and get the exact same level of access to your phone but not be allowed to submit apps to the market. The apps you write can only be used by other people who have paid for Chevron or are "official" developers. They call this "homebrew".

      I don't know why Microsoft chose to limit the number of tokens for Chevron customers, but at least they're actively working with the homebrew enthusiast community rather than doing everything in their power to shut them down like Apple.

    3. Re:Talk about control freaks by sjames · · Score: 1

      They're not as bad as Apple (wow, that's a scary thing to say!), but it seems to me that sideloading is a natural right on a device I own.

      Technically you can develop using only the emulator, but you can never be sure it really works until you run on real hardware. It's also pointless to develop if you can't even use it personally.

      With Android, I can use the emulator to debug, then test (including running the debugger) and use on my own phone. Then I can either sign up in the market or I can just let people sideload it if they want.

  45. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Server Linux, on the other hand, is very attractive target as it hosts a big part of the web and targeted software is not Linux per se, but usually buggy CMS's and unpatched Apache installations.

    And when Windows is targeted its always the case that the OS is fully patched and Microsoft is at fault? Never Adobe.. Never Sun/Oracle.. Haha Well one cant expect anti-ms trolls like you to be honest, but hey atleast its obvious that you are a Linux cheerleader. No big deal...

  46. Re:So.... by InsGadget · · Score: 1

    The only people with WP7 phones are MS employees. Now why would they write exploits and risk losing their job?

    I have one. Not an MS employee. Sorry to have to kill that one.

  47. Dear Microsoft, please stop trying to be Apple by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Just let us install what we want on our devices from any source that we want. You don't have to allow "root" access just the same permissions and sandboxed isolated storage, manifest based security constraints as any app avaliable on the app store.

    I mean whats the difference between just making it a feature of the platform vs having to go through a few extra hoops for the same outcome? Your "enterprise" customers would thank you.

    Don't be another evil Apple who thinks it is ok to control what can be installed on our devices. This behavior is NOT ok. Unlike other platforms there is no valid security or reliability reason for it either.

  48. Good for everyone. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more they destroy their developer-base and show that they are unfriendly to developers, the more developers will avoid WP7. The net result being the suicide of WP7. This is great... well, except for the two people that bought a WP7 phone.

    You reap what you sow.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  49. Re:So.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    ChevronWP, in its present incarnation, is not root. It merely allows you to sideload apps on a limited basis - basically same as what developer account gets, for 1/10 of the price.

  50. confusion about "jailed" phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you buy phones which are "Jailed" in the first place? Why not just tell these companies to piss off. Why not boycott them, sending a clear message to these fascist companies that people don't want "Jailed Phones." Furthermore "jail break" presumes something has been broken. So basically you are buying a new phone and then proceeding to break it. After it's "broken" the warranty and everything goes out the window. If I step on your Priceless 1956 Collectable PEZ Dispenser and crush it to pieces and then super glue it back is it truly the same? If somehow people can swallow all this insanity, what I truly do not understand is why anyone would willingly buy a phone which you know is spied on?

    Would you buy a zillog Z80 when you actually needed an intel 8048 for the keyboard? Then what the fuck are you doing buying these stupid smart phones which are "jailed?"

    I must admit I am 100% confused. I have a backyard full of dog shit, would someone like to buy some future fertilizer? It won't work as fertilizer right now because it's working as shit, but if you buy it and work with it for awhile you can get it to a low grade fertilizer over time. Oh and in fact every time my dog shits, it's up for sale.

                    BUY BUY BUY 50% off SALE SALE SALE
                              Shitty Jailed Phones $199 now only $99
                      Wet Shitty Jailed Phones $299 now $149
    Little Brown Phones (aged a year, slight smell) $99 now $48

                                                                  Already Got a Phone?
                                                        Get a "killer (TM)" data plan
                                                                              $700 a month!
                                                                Free NSA Fios Splitter
                                                  Free Google, Facebook, Twitter
    Stream your 1st, 4th, and 5th amendment rights straight into the pentagon
                  Hurry now and send all your data to Big Brother and Big Sis!!

    1. Re:confusion about "jailed" phones by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > After it's "broken" the warranty and everything goes out the window.

      They say it is, but it's a deliberate lie (which, unfortunately, is not itself illegal in the US). Escalate to a manager, mention the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and you'll have no problems. Under the MMWA, they can only refuse warranty coverage if they can prove that the failure was DIRECTLY caused by rooting and/or reflashing.

        Put another way, if reflashing your phone to stock firmware fixes the problem, they can anally-rape you with service charges for wasting their time.

      If your custom ROM took two GPIO pins that were connected together (and normally tristated) & burned them out by making both "outputs" & setting one high & one low, they can legitimately deny warranty coverage for anything related to those two pins (though you could possibly argue back that directly connecting them without even a resistor in between was itself a design flaw, unless they could prove they had a legitimate engineering reason for doing it (like charlieplexing multiple LED elements from a small number of actual GPIO pins).

      Under MMWA, there are very few reasons why they can legally deny warranty coverage, but they aren't obligated to troubleshoot your custom ROM for you. Like PC manufacturers who are free to reimage your hard drive as part of a repair, phone mfrs. are free to reflash it to stock firmware with a JTAG (or give you a new/repaired phone with stock firmware), and aren't obliged to preserve your firmware.

  51. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't really expect to find objective commentary about Microsoft's products on this hive of freetards website do you?

  52. USA Prime Credit by MikePikeFL · · Score: 1

    No more Points, Coupons now. Next you convert Coupons to Tokens. Then you make Tokens into Credits!

    --
    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway" -Andrew Tanenbaum
  53. LOL @ "two people" by cbhacking · · Score: 2

    You know, the whole "two people who bought..." meme would be a lot funnier in an article that wasn't about how ten thousand tokens for homebrew development sold out in just a few months. Let's break down that 10,000 to get an idea of what it really means, though:

    These aren't needed for people who are already developers - they have legit developer accounts, which offer the same access plus submitting to the Marketplace.
    These people don't work for Microsoft - developer accounts are free to employees (I interned there and know some people who still work there).
    These aren't needed for people who were early adopters - the original ChevronWP7 Unlocker worked just fine for the first few months of after release.
    These aren't needed for everyday users - most of them will never have heard of homebrew or have any interest in dev-unlocking their phones.
    These aren't needed for LG device owners - their phones ship with a built-in registry editor that can dev-unlock the phones.
    These aren't needed for Samsung device owners (anymore) - WindowBreak does the same thing (though it only came out a few weeks ago).

    What does that leave:
    People who want homebrew, who bought the phone months after release, who don't have developer accounts and aren't MS employees, and who aren't using LG (or now Samsung) phones. Since availability started on 4 Nov 2011 (http://www.chevronwp7.com/post/12328024419/chevronwp7-labs-availability), ten thousand such people have used the service.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    1. Re:LOL @ "two people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess 50% of its use base just got offended, lol

    2. Re:LOL @ "two people" by md65536 · · Score: 1

      GP's probably sore that the other guy got all 10000 tokens.

  54. Disagree, Microsoft needs Nokia badly by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Nokia is now completely depended on the strategy of another company - which in turn does not depend on Nokia at all.

    Although Microsoft can and does distribute WP7 to other companies, I think you are wrong that Microsoft does not need Nokia - and they know it. They very badly need a high-quality phone to make headway in the market and without Nokia they would simply be DOA with phones out from a few vendors as an afterthought.

    Nokia and Microsoft pairing up as they have gives both of them a chance to get back in the game. That simply was not possible with MeeGo, it could not keep up with the modern mobile operating systems iOS and Android.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Disagree, Microsoft needs Nokia badly by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      So what does MS give Nokia which they don't give other phone vendors? Quite apart from the fact that MS has other revenue streams. They are not dependent on Nokia, even if Nokia is useful for them.

      Also Omnia 7 and Titan are available. If people want WP7 phones there is good hardware to chose from. Nokia just came out with their stuff, but Samsung and HTC are bound to have new phones in the pipe.

    2. Re:Disagree, Microsoft needs Nokia badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      money

  55. 10,000 tokens ought to be enough.. by bronney · · Score: 1

    for anyone.

    no?

  56. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >>the Administration had somehow convinced the students that while pranks were acceptable, they had to be approved before being implemented. Suffice to say, the quality of pranks has since dropped.

    Hmm, may or may not be a good thing. I can think of several senior pranks that were actively destructive and not funny, and others in the other subsets of {destructive,funny}.

    1) Destructive and !funny: seniors rented a chainsaw and chopped the limbs off the beautiful eucalyptus trees lining the drive to the school, making them look like shaved toothpicks. School had to pay a fortune to replace them. Wasn't funny.
    2) Destructive and funny: they covered a car in honey and birdseed. When the person (let's say it was the principal, even though it wasn't) went out to the parking lot, it was covered in birds eating at it. One free car wash later, and it was back to normal.
    3) Nondestructive and !funny: they created an entire crime scene on campus after hours, with chalk outlines, broken beer bottles, and police tape. People didn't laugh it it (it was more a WTF moment), and the police actually came out an interrogated people, thinking some crime had actually happened. (Okay, maybe that last bit was a little funny.)
    4) Nondestructive and funny: a certain computer science nerd introduced a virus on the school's computers that did nothing hostile (and didn't infect, so not a virus, whatthefuckever), but simply played the name of one of the graduating seniors, at a very low volume, once every half hour or so.

    Our administration would have approved exactly zero of the above. So, sure, it would have been a net win for the campus in terms of property destruction, but the campus would have been a lot less of a fun place, which is an intangible that people value highly nonetheless.

    In the case of Microsoft needing to approve rooting, and only allowing a limited number of "root licenses", I think it's a brilliant move. All the hardcore hackers will have theirs already, and if WP7 grows more, they can always issue more in small batches, which will pacify the nerds that will otherwise be working hard to root their systems, while still locking in 99% of the population into their closed ecosystem.

    Microsoft understands Judo. Sony, by contrast, does not. A bit ironic.

  57. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SharkLaser, you are such an obvious douchebag shill. Why are you here, anyway? Wouldn't you have a much better time just going into the (any) ghetto and screaming "Nigger"? You'd find a lot more controversial opposition to your point of view there, I'm sure, and you'd be every bit as popular. For a very short while.

    What a waste of skin you are, you fucking oxygen thief. Just go away and die somewhere.

  58. I don't know where this comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before rushing to those doomsday conclusions, one should always look at where both stood:
    Prior to Elop taking over, it was maybe clear that Symbian was doomed in the long run.
    BUT: Nokia was still market leader, in both feature phones and smart phones. They were still profitable in both sectors, with even rising profits in the featurephone market. They had a clear transition strategy in place with Qt from top (MeeGo/Harmattan) to bottom (Qt for S40!). They still had trust of many business customers. True, they had a problem. But the problem wasn't their vision. The problem was execution.

    Someone below me already posted, but it bears repeating: Elop threw the baby out with the bathwater. He may have done a lot in breaking the crust inside Nokia. But in the process, he destroyed a lot of mindshare and trust, starting with his infamous memo. He destroyed any reasonable transition strategy, thus alienating businesses, carriers* and retailers. He completely put Nokia's fate in the hand of an external company and a platform, which - although promising - was unproven, unsuccessful, and lacking quite some features that were contributing to Nokia's success (E.g., The enterprise features/policies in WP7 were a joke pre-Mango and are still surprisingly weak...), and which is the only mobile system where frameworks for reasonable cross-plattform development still aren't available.
    Oh, and while doing that he unneccessarily destroyed or at least damaged as many bridges as possible beforehand, or so it seems.

    *It should be clear that I'm not talking about US carriers here. There wasn't much to alienate here for Nokia..:)

  59. Re:So.... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    > Many Android phones, such as those from Samsung, are also "rootable" (the other 1% of the jailbreak)
    > without any hacks.

    Rootable, but not necessarily reflashable with AOSP or Cyanogen unless you're willing to sacrifice 4G data. For some inane reason (most likely having to do with Clear, its lawyers, and/or Sprint's status as an arms-length thirdparty customer instead of 95% of their reason for existing in the first place), Sprint and Samsung have never made it particularly easy to get 4G working in any unblessed configuration -- not even the allegedly 100% open Nexus S. It's not quite *impossible*, but 4G (wimax) data always seems to be the first thing that breaks and the last thing that gets fixed every time a newer kernel than Samsung has officially released is required to run a newer version of Android.

  60. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by PoopCat · · Score: 1

    You must be a whole ton of fun at parties.

  61. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by PoopCat · · Score: 1

    it was back to normal.

    How does this qualify as destructive?

  62. Lumia isn't a real Nokia by hardeep1singh · · Score: 1

    The real reason Lumia fell flat is that Nokia users can't relate to it. It may be good for iphone/android upgraders but it doesn't offer half the features Nokia/Symbian users are accustomed to. Whether its FM transmitter or USB host, HDMI out or Xenon flash, you name it and Lumia doesn't have it. Sticking an 8mpx camera with a smaller sensor than N8 didn't help matters either.

  63. Re:ChevronWP7 is not a jailbreak by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    It was completely covered in bird shit.