Slashdot Mirror


Multiple Sclerosis Damage Washed Away By Stream of Young Blood

FatLittleMonkey writes "A new study on mice suggests damage caused by diseases like Multiple sclerosis, as well as natural aging, can be reversed by an infusion of stem cell rich blood from younger mice. Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that erodes the fatty myelin sheaths around the axons of the brain and spinal cord, and can result in serious disability. Similar effects occur naturally with aging. From New Scientist: 'White blood cells called macrophages from the young mice gathered at the sites of myelin damage. Macrophages engulf and destroy pathogens and debris, including destroyed myelin. "We know this debris inhibits regeneration, so clearing it up is important," says team member Amy Wagers of Harvard University.' Here's the academic paper's abstract."

216 comments

  1. So...vampire treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vant to suck you blood!

    1. Re:So...vampire treatment? by ae1294 · · Score: 0

      Is it fresh? I mean really fresh... Daddy needs to loose 10 years....

    2. Re:So...vampire treatment? by koan · · Score: 0

      "loose"

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    3. Re:So...vampire treatment? by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      "loose"

      trollin away the day.

    4. Re:So...vampire treatment? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      The study was made in cooperation with the University of Transylvania.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    5. Re:So...vampire treatment? by koan · · Score: 0

      I have my share of spelling and grammar mistakes but using "loose" for "lose" is a pet peeve of mine, write it off any way you choose.

      You know where I'm at? Yeah behind the preposition at, which is something up with I will not put.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    6. Re:So...vampire treatment? by ae1294 · · Score: 0

      I have my share of spelling and grammar mistakes but using "loose" for "lose" is a pet peeve of mine, write it off any way you choose.

      You know where I'm at? Yeah behind the preposition at, which is something up with I will not put.

      Your reality is starting to come loose. Arent you scared of losing you're mind?

    7. Re:So...vampire treatment? by koan · · Score: 0

      Oh good you looked it up.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    8. Re:So...vampire treatment? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 0

      They see me trollin
      They hatin
      Patrollin admins they try to catch me writin dirty
      Trying to catch me writin dirty.

    9. Re:So...vampire treatment? by ae1294 · · Score: 0

      Oh good you looked it up.

      No comment on the 'You Are' hu? o well... LuLz.....

  2. Virgins... by bhagwad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Need to bathe me in some virgin blood - Ahahahahaha!

    1. Re:Virgins... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Countess Bathory, MD, PhD, postumously awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine?

    2. Re:Virgins... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know a joke is obvious when you get to the comments section only to discover three people have already made it. Alas!

      Unrelatedly, TED has a lot to say on the topic of ageing, much of it accessible. The general gist seems to be "as long as food is plentiful, it's in our best interest to reproduce fast and die young, so eating conservatively makes our bodies think they need to survive longer."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Virgins... by RDW · · Score: 1

      Expect a new story in the Buffy/West Wing crossover fanfic series any minute now:

      http://www.fanfiction.net/Buffy_The_Vampire_Slayer_and_West_Wing_Crossovers/13/288/

    4. Re:Virgins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Need to bathe me in some virgin blood - Ahahahahaha!"

      All of the /. posters cower in fear.

    5. Re:Virgins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know a joke is obvious when you get to the comments section only to discover three people have already made it.

      Ha. I only clicked on this article to see what jokes would be made around it.

    6. Re:Virgins... by voidphoenix · · Score: 4, Funny

      They did say "young"... I don't think 40-year old virgins count... ;p

    7. Re:Virgins... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be a problem finding a selection of them on this site. Of course, they might not fit the idea you have in your head of what a "virgin" looks like, but hey, it's the blood that counts, right?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  3. Good, good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life extension gets at least SOME coverage on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Good, good. by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      I agree, It is always cool to see stuff like this. The only problem is that it always gives me a terrible urge to go check up on The Singularity Hub.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    2. Re:Good, good. by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Robert Heinlenn covered this in his novels "Time Enough for Love" and "Methusala's Children".

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    3. Re:Good, good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "gives me a terrible urge to go check up on The Singularity Hub"

      [smack] Snap out of it!

    4. Re:Good, good. by emilper · · Score: 1

      what Heinlein covered was Eugenics, which was still kind of polite to talk about in the '40s ...

    5. Re:Good, good. by NevergoldMel · · Score: 1

      Actually, he specifically mentioned the use of new or young blood to reverse disease and aging. It's about the same point in the book Lazarus talks to President (something with an F I think).

    6. Re:Good, good. by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Isn't that something Kieth Richards is rumored to have done?

    7. Re:Good, good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, he very specifically wrote about the replacement of blood as a means of attaining longevity for those who were not genetically contrived to be long-lived.

    8. Re:Good, good. by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      No, he very specifically wrote about the replacement of blood as a means of attaining longevity for those who were not genetically contrived to be long-lived.

      Not only that, he described growing (cloning) blood to do so in his 1940's story.

    9. Re:Good, good. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The odd thing is that the more I think about it the more it almost seems inevitable.

      All medical research does is removes selective pressure on health. Once you do that you just get drift until you reach a new equilibrium (lots of people dying despite spending lots of money on healthcare). If you improve healthcare further then life expectancy goes up a little until you reach a new equilibrium. You end up having to spend more and more money to basically stay in the same place.

      If you applied eugenics to the problem then society could probably afford to care for those who are alive much better, because an effort would be made to avoid bringing into the world those who are less healthy. A simple way of implementing it would be to say that you're not allowed to have children unless 3 of your grandparents lived until the age of 80, or something like that. Since most disease strikes after reproductive years, the health of the parents themselves is almost irrelevant (sure, if they already have cancer then don't let them reproduce, but being healthy at 30 does nothing for the bills associated with caring for 90 year olds).

      Obviously the counterargument is the slippery slope. That would obviously be something that society has to deal with...

    10. Re:Good, good. by emilper · · Score: 1

      Eugenics was not fixing what is wrong with the DNA etc., eugenics was about selecting the "fit", for some apriori definition of "fit".

    11. Re:Good, good. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The latter is a method of accomplishing the former. If you don't let anybody whose grandparents didn't live to the age of 80 reproduce, then over time the longevity of the population is likely to increase. In this case the apriori definition of "fit" is "lives to the age of 80,"

      Eugenics is nothing more than artificial selection, applied to humans.

      Of course, lots of people use it to select for stuff that is racist in nature or whatever (which is evil), or nutjobs try to use it to select for stuff that isn't genetic in origin (which won't work, and often is done in ways that are evil). I'm not convinced the concept in itself is evil, although it depends on whether you consider reproduction a fundamental human right. My thinking is that kids would be a whole lot better off if it wasn't - why not let kids be born to parents who will actually raise them properly (which is tangential to eugenics).

    12. Re:Good, good. by emilper · · Score: 1

      If you don't let anybody whose grandparents didn't live to the age of 80 reproduce

      That would select only for well fed people that lived in secure locations and did not work much under the open sky. Why not select for people who ate cake ?

    13. Re:Good, good. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Looks like you found a solution to the health care crisis - we just have to eat lots of food, live in secure locations, and avoid being outside. I wonder why people are so worried about obesity since apparently it promotes longevity (in some minds).

      I guess the obvious thing I didn't state was that I was talking about people who lived to 80 without major health issues. Types 2 diabetes would obviously disqualify.

    14. Re:Good, good. by emilper · · Score: 1

      ... so I understand you know what causes type 2 diabetes, and have found a cure for (skin) cancer ? :)

    15. Re:Good, good. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how to treat either. However, if they are influenced at all by genetics then using family history for artificial selection would reduce the rate at which they occur.

      Evolution is like the market - you don't need to know who will win or lose in advance - you just have to set up the conditions for everything to sort itself out on its own. And, just like the market perverse incentives cause big problems. Right now the perverse incentive is that your success at reproduction has almost nothing to do with your long-term health outlook. If you institute eugenics there is of course the risk of creating other perverse incentives, but it isn't like the status quo is a bed of roses. The real ethical question is whether reproduction is a fundamental human right. If it is not, or it is outweighed by the right of future generations to be healthier, then eugenics is a means to an end.

      However, there really isn't much room for debating whether artificial selection works - clearly that has been well established and I don't know anybody reputable that would debate this. The only question is how it is applied.

    16. Re:Good, good. by emilper · · Score: 1

      Right now the perverse incentive is that your success at reproduction has almost nothing to do with your long-term health outlook

      maybe the long term health outlook is not important, then ? there were a few hundred million years of multicellular life and I think evolution might have settled it's priorities right :)

      oh, and evolution does not work with individuals, but with populations, and genetic diversity is as important, if not more important, than fitness, no matter how you define it. We need both the jocks and the geeks, the lazies and the hyperactives, the exasperatingly meticulous and the hurried and superficial ...

      read a few years ago an article about an experiment done on birds, testing their response to stress and scarcity: when subjected to the same amount of predation and same amount of stress, during scarcity the bold birds had a better chance of survival, during plenty the the timid birds had a better chance. In humans, the obese are found most among populations that used to live in colder climates, which is a form of adaptation to cold (larger volume for smaller surface, and stores of fat for long periods of low food availability).

    17. Re:Good, good. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      As you point out natural selection has worked, but it has worked to make humans work well in environments they no longer live in. Also, from an evolutionary perspective people dying at age 60 is a feature and not a bug. People at age 60 do not generally raise children, but they do compete with them for resources. However, as a society we have chosen to reject this utilitarian position and try to extend lifetimes. Since longevity long after child-bearing years has little beneficial impact on the birth and survival of progeny this is a fight against evolution.

      Now, if we want to just leave the elderly to their own devices as "nature intended" then we can have cheap healthcare and let people breed as much as they want, since nature is effectively on our side. However, if we want to engineer our society to have long lifetimes, then it probably makes sense to engineer our genepool accordingly.

      As far as evolution working on population and not individuals goes - obviously this is the case, but it doesn't really help your argument. Eugenics will do nothing to extend the life of anybody living today - it can extend the life of people living a generation or two from now. Individuals will vary, but the mean will steadily move in accordance with selective pressure.

      As far as diversity goes - I agree, but that is more of an argument against naive applications of eugenics than eugenics itself. You don't need to base selection on only one or two attributes - you could take a weighted sum of many attributes. You could also use a Nivenesque "birthright lottery" for the sake of diversity, but keep this to a low portion of the population.

      From a purely natural selection standpoint, long term health outlook probably isn't important. After all, look at bacteria and insects - they are very successful despite having very short lifetimes - they just have to live long enough to reproduce. You could apply the same to people and the human race would grind on just fine if we all died in our 40s after having kids shortly after puberty. However, society is not constrained to following a purely natural path - we can engineer a society that we want to live in, if we wish. I'm not really sure what "natural" even means when the human brain is as much a part of nature as any ant or antelope.

  4. Warlock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baptised or unbaptised?

  5. Finally! by BradleyUffner · · Score: 5, Funny

    A use for all those annoying neighborhood children.

    1. Re:Finally! by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey you kids! Don't get off my lawn! In fact, there's even better grass down in the basement, come check it out!

    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll be outside hiding in a bush with a video game tied to the end of a string. "Come on kids, take the bait..."

    3. Re:Finally! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I'll be outside hiding in a bush with a video game tied to the end of a string. "Come on kids, take the bait..."

      What you'll get is a herd of Slashdot nerds - is their blood really what you want?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Finally! by comrade+k · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, you can be sure they're free of HIV -- No sex to transmit it to them!

      --
      "Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized, it becomes commonplace." -Robert H. Goddard
    5. Re:Finally! by CSMoran · · Score: 0

      I'll be outside hiding in a bush with a video game tied to the end of a string. "Come on kids, take the bait..."

      What you'll get is a herd of Slashdot nerds - is their blood really what you want?

      Dunno, but virgin blood is said to be the best.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    6. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with you included in that group buddy.

  6. Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Someone get Michael J. Fox some new baby blood, stat. He's got a sequel to make.

    1. Re:Back to the Future by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but he has Parkinson's, not MS.

    2. Re:Back to the Future by SomePgmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      We should try it anyway. For Marty's sake.

    3. Re:Back to the Future by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate to break it to you, but he has Parkinson's, not MS.

      when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.

    4. Re:Back to the Future by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Just be sure you have consent; otherwise, "Better get used to those bars, kid."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  7. Bathory wasn't crazy! by Spinalcold · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what a misleading subject. It made me laugh though.

  8. Re:Links to Aspartame by hedwards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There aren't any credible reasons to believe that aspartame causes MS. If that were the case you wouldn't expect the highest rate of MS in the world to be in Seattle where folks tend to be fairly paranoid about aspartame and artificial sweeteners in general.

  9. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...If we can grow stem cells in test tubes and then periodically inject those, is that morally dubious? Like growing artificial meat? Or we go the Bioshock route and go harvesting...

    More like we'll go the capitalistic route. Little Johnny Wong and Jill Sindu can help their families by selling blood for $2 a unit. What could possible go wrong with that?

  10. Re:Links to Aspartame by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    If we can grow stem cells in test tubes and then periodically inject those, is that morally dubious?

    Absolutely not - but it would exacerbate the problem of overpopulation, at least until we learn to terraform other planets and/or live in space.

    The Star Trek: TNG episode Too short a season underscores the pitfalls of vanity-related age reversal.

  11. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i always thought the lesson was impatience will kill you.

  12. southpark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only me who is reminded of the episode of southpark where Christopher Reeves snap babies in half to suck out their spinal cords?

  13. Methuselah's Children? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    Isn't this basically what Heinlein used in Methuselah' Children back before I was born?

    Be funny as hell if we ended up with a Public Health Service providing new blood to everyone when they needed it, as a life-prolonging treatment....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  14. Young blood by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    A black dude I knew years ago used to call me "young blood". Now I know why.

  15. Good news, everyone! by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Professor Farnsworth knew it all along, so did Mr. Burns.

  16. Monsanto? by improfane · · Score: 1

    It is interesting that aspartame was once manufactured by Monsanto. I have no idea why there are so many pages linking aspartame and MS. I don't see how Monsanto would benefit from this either.

    Hmm...

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:Monsanto? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's due to a hoax that made the email rounds years ago and it's never been completely eradicated. People keep it going because of irrational fears and conspiracy theories.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Monsanto? by improfane · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise it was a hoax email. I've seen it in a number of publications (even print) ones which is surprising.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    3. Re:Monsanto? by MisterMidi · · Score: 1

      The patent on aspartame has expired. I wouldn't at all be surprised if Monsanto is spreading FUD about it, to push their new sweetener.

  17. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got to love that the 4th link listed is the snopes bit showing why the others are crap.

  18. Re:Links to Aspartame by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Informative

    Absolutely not - but it would exacerbate the problem of overpopulation, at least until we learn to terraform other planets and/or live in space.

    One of the points made in Kim Stanley Robinson's trilogy beginning with Red Mars is that even with things like multiple space elevators, you'd never be able to move more people off the planet than are being born everywhere on it. The colonization of space is not a solution for population pressures.

  19. Re:Links to Aspartame by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm afraid not. There is no conclusive link between aspartame and MS within the scientific community. Such claims are often repeated by doctors-turned-authors, scam artists, and conspiracy theorists, though.

    Moving on, I do wish this madness with stem cells would end. They have their own soul as much as my feces (mostly dead blood cells and bacteria) do.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  20. Re:Links to Aspartame by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always thought the high incidence of MS in Seattle was due to their headquarters being in Redmond

    *ducks

  21. You won't stop me, Hackman! by kiloechonovember · · Score: 0

    Stop calling me Christopher! That name no longer has meaning to me! Christopher was someone who lived in a wheelchair! Always being pushed around by others! The old Christopher Reeve is dead! From now on, I am... [looks back menacingly] Chris!

    1. Re:You won't stop me, Hackman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/153917/super-human-irony

    2. Re:You won't stop me, Hackman! by TW+Burger · · Score: 0

      Matt and Trey don't seem so crazy now. Do they?

  22. Dig More by improfane · · Score: 2

    It's not hard to find more than one page suggesting it's just a hoax.

    http://laurafreberg.com/blog/?p=55

    Maybe one day we'll learn the truth (the truth is out there) but something just seems fishy to me. I know someone with MS who drinks lots of diet coke, I don't trust it.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:Dig More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's related at all, I'd say it's something else in the soda, not the aspartame. I drank lots (and lots) of non-diet and was diagnosed just out of college.

    2. Re:Dig More by improfane · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me more about this?

      I have always assumed it was the aspartame as the active ingredient in diet drinks.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    3. Re:Dig More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's related to soda at all, it's going to be due to extreme long term exposure to high levels of caffeine.

      MS has been around for quite a while now. Much longer than aspartame.

  23. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. Started with lesions in my spine taking out all the sensation from my neck to my hips for a month or so, then the blindness in one eye, since then various bouts of stocking+gloves neuropathy that come and go, mixed with random sensations of walking barefoot on gravel and every now and then I lean right while walking in a straight line.

    At the time of the first incident, I was drinking about 2 liters (straight from the bottle) of non-diet Dr. Pepper a day, and didn't touch the diet stuff.

    Now I drink the diet stuff (still about 2L/day) and lost 60 pounds. Doesn't seem to make a difference neurologically to me. YMMV.

  24. Re:Links to Aspartame by improfane · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am not really sure to be honest. I do not see what these individuals can benefit from scaring people away from aspartame? The security industry? I am suspicious of aspartame because it was/has been manufactured by Monsanto and know people with MS who drink too much diet colas.

    http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article062.htm
    http://laurafreberg.com/blog/?p=55

    There is at least a link to symptoms that are similar to MS. Given the number of people who drink diet coke, there must be some people who are sensitive to it.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  25. Sugar industry* by improfane · · Score: 1

    That should read sugar industry.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:Sugar industry* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The corn syrup industry, you mean. The sugar industry priced itself out of the market by getting protective tariffs passed, and failing to combat the corn lobby....

  26. Re:Links to Aspartame by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I don't see why growing artificial meet would be morally dubious. Better than killing intelligent animals, for sure.

  27. Re:Links to Aspartame by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

    MS and MSFT are both equally virulent diseases which have resisted our efforts to cure.

  28. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suspect you'd also see a huge correlation between Type 1 (and maybe even Type 2) Diabetics and MS if aspartame was a causal link. Since I was diagnosed with Type 1, I consume massive amounts of artificial sweeteners to avoid sugar.

  29. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given the number of people who drink diet coke, there must be some people who are sensitive to it.

    Just about every product both natural and artificial has some people that are sensitive to it. If you decide not to eat something because someone somewhere is sensitive to it then I can assure you that you will die of starvation. As to what the people scaring others have to gain, money, notoriety, attention, research dollars, market share.

  30. Re:Links to Aspartame by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    That's assuming that population growth remains constant when life expectancy and standard of living increase. However, it seems that living better and longer tends to result in having fewer children. Figuring out the exact effect would be difficult, but it could possibly make overpopulation LESS of an issue. In a nutshell, the way it might work is that people would be forever young and have no intention of settling down, and many people may be more career driven if they can achieve new levels of education. However, a lack of aging doesn't protect us from accidents, homicide, and suicide, so we'd still have those factors taking down our numbers.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  31. Re:Links to Aspartame by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Comrade Chairman, I think I found a way to not only enforce our "one child per family" rule, but also profit from it...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. Re:Links to Aspartame by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    Heinlein made that point in Farmer in the Sky, in 1953.

  33. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The colonization of space (particularly Venusian upper atmosphere floating cities) by the ludicrously wealthy is actually a reasonable solution, short-term, for the (small) population pressure due to life-extension work, since they'll be the only ones able to afford it, and coincidentally the only ones able to afford Venusian vacation/retirement homes (and the contract labor to keep the place up and running, naturally).

  34. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_B%C3%A1thory

  35. New Market for Children? by TW+Burger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I could see this becoming a new business in the third world. Selling children's blood would not be far fetched. Look up were all (or most) of the hair for natural wigs and extensions comes from: Little girls in India.

    1. Re:New Market for Children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least we don't have to worry about the Boomers literally harvesting the young. Their game plan has been to die off before anyone has to deal with their mess, not a whole lotta motivation to prolong things there...

    2. Re:New Market for Children? by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      Look up were all (or most) of the hair for natural wigs and extensions comes from: Little girls in India.

      I'm fairly certain that they don't kill the little girls for their hair, and last I checked a haircut was pretty non-invasive.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    3. Re:New Market for Children? by tftp · · Score: 1

      last I checked a haircut was pretty non-invasive

      Did you ask a girl, or it's your own opinion how girls should feel about a major haircut?

    4. Re:New Market for Children? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Did you ask a girl, or it's your own opinion how girls should feel about a major haircut?

      Well I asked them how they feel about starvation and/or going into the prostitution business, and they weren't too keen on either of those ...

      Seriously, who gives a damn? If people want to sell their hair, or their blood, let 'em. If it's a case of parents forcing their children to do it ... well, we might want to look into putting some controls in place to ensure it doesn't get overly abusive, but for many of them it's still better than the alternative.

  36. Re:Links to Aspartame by narcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ugh, this aspartame nonsense is the worst kind of pseudo science. I suppose you also believe that vaccines cause autism? What about peach-pits curing cancer?

    Wait, let me guess: the "medical establishment" doesn't want you to know the "shocking truth".

    Looking below, it looks like you also believe Monsanto is in on the conspiracy!

    I'd laugh if spreading nonsense like you've been doing wasn't so dangerous. People like you are causing real and measurable harm.

    Leave medical science to the experts. Hmmm... I better clarify that: Reading a few conspiracy websites does NOT make you an expert!

  37. That explains a lot by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    natural aging, can be reversed by an infusion of stem cell rich blood from younger mice.

    That explains how Dick Cheney manages to hang on so long; he's been sucking the life force from local villagers at night.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:That explains a lot by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "That explains how Dick Cheney manages to hang on so long; he's been sucking the life force from local villagers at night."

      Worked for Jerry Sandusky until he got caught!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:That explains a lot by tsotha · · Score: 1

      You know, people make jokes, but that dude had his first heart attack (of 5) 34 years ago. Whatever he's done to keep himself alive seems to have worked pretty damn well.

    3. Re:That explains a lot by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, people make jokes, but that dude had his first heart attack (of 5) 34 years ago. Whatever he's done to keep himself alive seems to have worked pretty damn well.

      What he's done is to just be rich - it works wonders with regards to access to health care.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:That explains a lot by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Access to health care only matters so much, and from what I understand statistically it's access to a primary care physician that matters. You can catch things like hypertension and diabetes before they become serious.

      Rich people die of heart disease all the time. I'm assuming Cheney never goes anywhere without a cardiology team, but that's not enough to explain 34 years. No amount of money would have mattered very much in 1978, and even today doctors can do only so much.

      It may just be survivor bias, but still.

    5. Re:That explains a lot by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      It's simple, he tells his doctors if anything bad happens to him, he'll shoot them in the face.

    6. Re:That explains a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He continues to pay the vig on his contract with Satan, that's how.

  38. hell they already sell 'womb access' by decora · · Score: 1

    now the biomedical companies that make profits from selling to blood banks are suddenly going to have a whole new revenue stream.

  39. Not-so oblig reference by cvtan · · Score: 2

    "A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual..."

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  40. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have been getting MS long before Aspartame was even invented.

  41. Blood donations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the hope of artificial blood, one would expect the future need for blood donations to wane. However, if this new research pans out, the demand for real human blood will probably rise. And with a potential Fountain of Youth, I would suspect a potential black market to form.

  42. Re:Links to Aspartame by TW+Burger · · Score: 1

    MS = Microsoft and MS = Multiple Sclerosis therefore Microsoft = Multiple Sclerosis! You're right! This is pure mathematical proof that Windows is a disease.

  43. Not as sexy, but MS found to be reversed by diet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even cheaper, and something that can't be patented by unscrupulous scientists and pharmaceutical companies, but researchers have already found MS can be reversed by changing your diet.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLjgBLwH3Wc

    Dr. Terry Wahl presented at TEDxIowaCity that eating nutrient dense foods reversed her second stage MS, and they have moved on to trying it is more subjects. But it sure won't get government stem cell money. And the recommendations fly in the face of government dietary recommendations. Not to mention probably more than a few slashdotters habits.

    Compare, trials in mice. Versus clinical trials in humans.

  44. Re:Links to Aspartame by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

    As mentioned elsewhere, the scammers sell books and gain fame, which they use to sell more books and get on talk shows.

    Distrusting a biological chemical because it was once manufactured by a biochemical company who makes some particularly nasty products is as ludicrous as trusting a product because its company has made a few good products lately. Do you think they somehow encode pure evil into the molecule, and it's somehow never noticed by the myriad safety studies?

    iPads suck for slash dot. I will cease my rant now...

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  45. Countess Bathory by germansausage · · Score: 1

    So Elspeth Bathory was at least half right.

    1. Re:Countess Bathory by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Well, she did experiment with taking virgin blood both internally (drinking) and externally (bathing in it). You see, a good scientist uses different approaches and repeats the test on a big enough sample to get good confidence.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  46. Re:Links to Aspartame by tsotha · · Score: 1

    Artificial meet? What, like, a dating site?

  47. Re:Links to Aspartame by improfane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You sir are arrogant and unpleasant. Maybe in X years we will truly find out how safe these things are. There is no conspiracy, only a link.

    People like you do not see things before they are too late. People who stop and think about things (and witness them) are people who discover problems. Nobody thought X was harmful until it was too late. Maybe I am wrong about aspartame, I honestly have no idea, I just thought I would throw it out there. There is plenty of sources that state both angles.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  48. This sounds like it could actually pan out by tsotha · · Score: 2

    It looks like, for once, we could actually see a treatment in a relatively short period of time.

    1. Re:This sounds like it could actually pan out by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      It's hard enough to get adequate blood supplies for emergency use.
      I can't imagine where we're going to find more donors for therapeutic purposes.
      Not to mention the cost of screening all that blood.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:This sounds like it could actually pan out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I can't imagine where we're going to find more donors for therapeutic purposes.

      These people got moneys: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_multiple_sclerosis

      Unemployment is still not great these days I'm sure it can't be hard to find a 20something year old that will donate blood for a couple grand. I've known people who've donated blood, they pay you so little you might as well be volunteering and then you feint randomly through the rest of the day.

    3. Re:This sounds like it could actually pan out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like the prefect opportunity to create an inhome blood transfusion kit. Its time those snot nosed munchkins started earning their keep.

    4. Re:This sounds like it could actually pan out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do we need stem cells or just the Macrophages of a young person? Yes, I only read the summary. Reading scientific abstracts make my lips sore.

  49. Re:Links to Aspartame by improfane · · Score: 2

    No, it is that Monsanto has a bad reputation for manipulating public opinion and suppressing facts. There are many front groups that are funded by corporate interests. To ignore this when judging the merits of research is folly.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  50. Diet Soft Drinks by improfane · · Score: 1

    I may have been wrong about singling out aspartame, it could be another chemical that is in diet colas.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:Diet Soft Drinks by narcc · · Score: 2

      I may have been wrong about singling out aspartame, it could be another chemical that is in diet colas.

      See, you still don't have any correlation between diet soda and MS!

      People like you do not see things before they are too late.

      Perhaps MS is caused by fumes released by scented candles? We better warn everyone of the dangers!

      Oh, maybe it's caused by exposure to residue left from tub & tile cleaner? Stop cleaning the bathroom now! We don't know if we're safe!

      You sir are arrogant and unpleasant.

      Quite possibly. However, people like you are a serious danger to society. Not only do you spread misinformation, but countering that nonsense takes resources away from more productive avenues of research. If that weren't enough, you call attention to all the idiotic consipriacy sights that may be spreading even more dangerous nonsense, like the false vaccine-autism link that has caused the deaths of hundreds of young children.

      I'll take arrogant and unpleasant over that any day.

    2. Re:Diet Soft Drinks by improfane · · Score: 1

      Who peed in your cornflakes?

      You are conducting various logical fallacies including slippery slopes and ad-hominem attacks and putting words into my mouth that I did not say. I never mentioned anything to do with autism and vaccines. You are way too angry to be considered healthy. You're coming down hard on someone who actually shares your thoughts...

      Look outside, pretty much everything can kill you if you are unlucky. If you did not know people who react badly to certain things (or strange allergies) you would think it is crackpot. Do not be quick to judge, especially online.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    3. Re:Diet Soft Drinks by narcc · · Score: 2

      You are conducting various logical fallacies including slippery slopes and ad-hominem attacks

      Conducting? I think you mean committing.

      As for "slippery slopes", you're 100% wrong there.

      Ad-hominem? Undoubtedly. Of course, it's not a fallacy as I'm not trying to dismiss your argument by attacking you -- I'm attacking you because you're spreading misinformation.

      Perhaps you should learn what those terms mean before you try using them!

      Look outside, pretty much everything can kill you if you are unlucky.

      So we should warn everyone of every possible danger, even if there is no evidence to support it? That's what's at issue here: the nonsense you're spreading about aspartame causing MS. There is no evidence to support that claim, yet here you are warning us about a possible danger! There isn't even any reason to suspect it!

      Oh, but there's danger all around. Better not light any scented candles or clean the bathroom with any of those dangerous cleaners! You never know, they could kill you!

      If you did not know people who react badly to certain things (or strange allergies) you would think it is crackpot.

      No, I understand that people have strange allergies. I wouldn't call them crackpots; they're just unlucky. I am calling you a crackpot, for spreading nonsense about aspartame causing MS with absolutely no evidence!

  51. Re:Links to Aspartame by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    how is growing stem cells morally dubious?

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  52. Re:Links to Aspartame by DesScorp · · Score: 1, Insightful

    . They have their own soul as much as my feces (mostly dead blood cells and bacteria) do.

    Who has argued that stem cells have souls? What's been argued is that embryo's are human (albeit at the earliest stage), and that getting into the habit of producing human life in a lab to be harvested for its resources (in this case, stem cells) on a mass scale open's a Brave New World kind of Pandora's box. If you're going to argue, at least begin from a real premise.

    Second, all the big advances have come not from fetal embryo harvests, but from adult stem cells that have been repurposed in the lab. Feel free to correct me with a link should you have one, but I'm not aware of a single breakthrough in any of the fetal trials. Our own adult cells seem to be the best way to get the results we're looking for. And none of the people objecting to the fetal cell research object to adult stem cell research. So harvest your blood, bone, and skin tissue to your heart's delight. Not a single Catholic or Evangelical will object. And you're much more likely to actually get a working result.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  53. Re:Links to Aspartame by canajin56 · · Score: 2

    Way to counter somebody's snopes link with the very same links the snopes article completely debunks. Everything on their is completely false. It's proven fictional writing featuring made-up doctors and absurd MSG-Floride-Aspartame Zionist New World Order conspiracy garbage. You have been conned, and not even by a slightly convincing troll. It's just painful how nonsensical that bullshit is. The "link" you are going on about is this: Decades ago an actual researcher left their email logged in, and somebody else sent out a terribly awful troll chain letter about the evils of aspartame. They mention that it metabolizes into methanol (true) and that methanol poisoning has MS/Parkinsons like symptoms (true) and concluded therefore that aspartame causes MS and Parkinsons (as well as about 50 other diseases from heart disease and stroke to cancer). And when the actual doctor said "I didn't send that" well that was just more proof for all of those "in the know" about the evils of the Monsanto or the UN or whoever is using aspartame to make money / brainwash people into supporting the NWO / whatever it is they're doing. They had back-traced the email and threatened this researcher, forcing them to recant, clearly, so that's all the proof you need! They wouldn't have made this researcher pretend they never sent the bogus email unless it was true!

    At any rate, it's not MS aspartame causes, it's cancer. A friend in highschool told me. Her chainsmoking diabetic grandma died of cancer, and she drank a ton of died 7-up. QED.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  54. So what if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can clone yourself grow "it" to 11 months old, then use the blood to rejuvenate yourself? Wonder what will become of us if we figure that bit of science out what with our situational morals.

  55. Seem to recall hearing that before by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 2

    natural aging, can be reversed by an infusion of stem cell rich blood from younger mice

    Drink young blood, stay young forever...now where have I heard that before?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  56. new serial killer motivation by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

    1. Stalk pretty young girl. The younger the better.
    2. Extract her blood with a needle and inject yourself with it while it is still warm.
    3. Rinse. Repeat.
    4. Solve Rubik's Cube and prepare for eternal life.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  57. Here we go... by spotlight2k3 · · Score: 1

    This will spur more twilight movies.... Please help us now.

  58. Re:Links to Aspartame by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    You have to meat the meet.

  59. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you explain your reasoning on your ... interesting use of apostrophes? The plural of embryo is embryos. That's it, add an "s" and you're done. How about "open's"? Was there something belonging to the open, or did you mean open is or open was?

  60. Should Make the 1% Happy by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    This should make the 1% happy and those among the 99%, like their fawning Tea Party who protect them, a purpose in life.

  61. Such Insight! by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    Here they kept telling me my basement altar for child sacrifices wasn't useful for anything!

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  62. Re:Links to Aspartame by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2

    MS was recently linked to vitamin D deficiency.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  63. Re:Not as sexy, but MS found to be reversed by die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freakin' hippies...

  64. Re:Links to Aspartame by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    Second, all the big advances have come not from fetal embryo harvests, but from adult stem cells that have been repurposed in the lab.

    And until there's a change in US policy, it'll probably stay that way.
    Embryonic stem cell research was leaving the US to take advantage of Europe's more liberal laws,
    BUT last year, the European Court of Justice banned patents on procedures that involve embryonic stem cells.
    So now the research is going to go where the profits are, which are creating stem cells from non-embryonic sources.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  65. Southpark did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the southpark episode of Christopher Reeve becoming more powerful than you could possibly imagine by cracking open baby fetuses and sucking the stem cells out was TRUE!

  66. I am 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am running out of time. Quit the damn mice and throw some of that shit on me.

  67. Sounds great, except for ethical considerations by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Easy enough, right? Just get regular transfusions from someone young. Except nobody is going to advocate blood donations from children. Could you have your own cells harvested, reverted to stem cells, and reintroduced into your bloodstream?

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Sounds great, except for ethical considerations by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Except nobody is going to advocate blood donations from children.

      Why not? First of all "young" doesn't necessarily mean "preteen" and, second, where's the harm? Other than the instinctive "think of the children!" emotional bullshit, what's the problem?

    2. Re:Sounds great, except for ethical considerations by jouassou · · Score: 1

      I can easily picture a 16yo kid selling blood transfusions for a few bucks; just make a place for it at the mall.

  68. Re:Links to Aspartame by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    I only submitted the story because of the original headline "MS damage washed away by a stream of young blood", in anticipation of Microsoft jokes. (Curse you, competent editors.) Glad to see I got my jokes after all.

    Thank you sir and/or madam.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  69. Re:Links to Aspartame by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    I do not see what these individuals can benefit from scaring people away from aspartame?

    People that sell alternate sweeteners (i.e. Stevia based). Alternative, Homeopathic, Naturopathic, or CAM practitioners that sell their services. People that make money off of books about medical conspiracies and nonsense. People that make money from ads from page hits on their blog about medical conspiracies. People that like fame and want to gain followers somehow.

    Never mind that some people just really like a good conspiracy. Reality hasn't gotten in the way of chemtrails people, and I'm not sure there's much money to be made there.

    The "there's no money in ____, so why would anyone say it unless it's true?" argument is rarely, if ever, valid.

  70. Some issues by currently_awake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cells of the human body have a limited lifespan. The aging process is basically you running out of replacement cells. Using blood transfusions will help some, but it's the stem cells that will make you young. And stem cells from someone else will trigger your immune system- and using anti-rejection drugs is a horrible way to live. So you want your own rejuvenated stem cells, and getting there should only be one Apollo project equivalent away- so about 10 years if you have the money. The second issue- it will cost. So most medical plans won't cover this. Meaning the rich get to live forever, not you. And if you don't see a problem with that, just think of Bill Gates NOT getting old and retiring. Ever. Having a ruling class of immortals running the earth is how that will end. Rich enough they don't care about you, from another generation so they don't understand you, owning everything and constantly looking for the next google so they can buy it up. This would make a cool plot for a science fiction movie, but in real life it will suck.

    1. Re:Some issues by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having a steady supply of stem cells is only part of the solution, it's a matter of efficiency. Will the stem cells be able to repair organs and tissues faster than they are becoming damaged? If not, the subject will die when something critical fails. Also, DNA only becomes more and more degraded over time. This will ultimately cause some sort of terminal cancer in the subject. Until there's a 100% effective cure for cancer, this would never work.

      Also, this sort of immortality would be more of a curse than a blessing even if it were possible to pull it off. Who would want to live in a broken-down, aged body forever, kept alive only by a steady stream of stem cells? Is this world such a nice place that you would want to stay here forever, even if it means existing like that? I wouldn't do it even if I had the option. Death would be preferable. The stem cells wouldn't give someone who is 250 years old the same body they had at 18...they would probably be trapped in a bed in a severely debilitated state. The worst type of immortality is one that brings no pleasure.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    2. Re:Some issues by walshy007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who would want to live in a broken-down, aged body forever, kept alive only by a steady stream of stem cells?

      So long as my mind is intact, fully functional and I have a decent means to communicate with the outside world? I would.

    3. Re:Some issues by pwizard2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So long as my mind is intact, fully functional and I have a decent means to communicate with the outside world? I would.

      Are you sure? It's easy to feel that way now, but visualize yourself in that situation. Even if you were able to communicate and had your mental state preserved, there is no guarantee that you would be able to enjoy life or do much of anything. What would someone in that state do to pass the time? After several years of being trapped in a useless husk of a body and spending your days staring at the ceiling, would you still want to live? The real horror would be that you would have centuries of that to look forward to and that all your days will be mostly the same. Would people still come to see you after your friends and family passed on, assuming they didn't get the treatment?

      I'd rather live a normal lifespan and then die surrounded by friends and loved ones. Having my consciousness cease to exist would be a better alternative to that sort of immortality. I'm 28, in good health, and I'm already weary of this world. I stay here because I have people who care about me and there are things I want to do in life, but when my time comes I will go without complaint or regret. Seneca taught that being able to face and accept inevitable death without fear is a sign of strength and wisdom. Quality, not quantity of life is what matters.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    4. Re:Some issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And yet two thirty year olds can make a baby. Where did that information come from? You don't "run out" of cells. Otherwise how could cancer work?

      "just think of Bill Gates NOT getting old and retiring."

      Yes yes yes, we all watched The Outer Limits in the '90s. All doom and gloom. It never occurs to anyone that all the GOOD people will also live longer?

    5. Re:Some issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm already weary of this world.

      That's too bad. I view this world with continued wonder every day. How much there is to explore, how many wonderful people I already know and wish I could spend more time with, how many wonderful people I haven't met yet. How much more time I'd love to spend with my parents, grandparents, and children over the coming decades and centuries.

      I also feel strongly our society would change for the better if we increased longevity across the board. I think we'd care much more about Global Warming if our lifespan were measured in 1,000+ years. We'd move more quickly to find alternate energy sources. We might realize we can already meet the basic needs of the entire population through automated conversion of energy into basic needs, and we'd think more compassionately about what society could and should look like.

      And then imagine exploring not just the planet, but the solar system. If you can live indefinitely, then being suspended for a few hundred years on a journey across space, might be worth it, if you know your family and friends will still be there 2,000 years later when you return.

      The future may be more amazing than we realize. I wouldn't be so quick to be ready to check out.

      (I'm also perhaps naively ignoring that your post seems to have a tinge of depression to it. Having been there myself and deeply, I can tell you your brain lies to you when you're depressed. I found it was easy to forget the joy in the world and simply feel weary, but you can get better. You can find the joy again. Don't let your brain lie to you and tell you you don't need help or that no one would help. Help is everywhere you turn if you're willing to ask for it.)

    6. Re:Some issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously thinking like a poor person. You could do anything to pass the time, from watching every movie in existence to paying whores to wrestle naked in front of you. You wouldn't be "spending your days staring at the ceiling", you would be still running your business, or if you retire, play computer games with ultimate virtual reality headgear, or whatever, having servants at your disposal to satisfy your every whim. People would still come to see you, if only to have a chance to get some of your richess, and you could afford to give the treatment to your friends or whoever you want. And if you do get bored with life, you could always pull the plug.

    7. Re:Some issues by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there is no guarantee that you would be able to enjoy life or do much of anything

      So how did Steven Hawking take your recommendation that he should just die.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    8. Re:Some issues by walshy007 · · Score: 2

      Even if you were able to communicate and had your mental state preserved, there is no guarantee that you would be able to enjoy life or do much of anything. What would someone in that state do to pass the time?

      In two words, 'the internet'

      Many of us already spend considerable time learning new things and talking to new people over the net, once you have the ability to sort the crap information from the good there is far more to learn in this world than can possibly be done in a lifetime.

      After several years of being trapped in a useless husk of a body and spending your days staring at the ceiling, would you still want to live?

      Good old fashioned suicide solves that, if you no longer want to live.

      Would people still come to see you after your friends and family passed on, assuming they didn't get the treatment?

      Some people enjoy the peace and quiet of being alone, and while human psychology tends to like communication and interaction with others there will always be at least some interaction with others even if it's just the nurse that is looking after you.

      Seneca taught that being able to face and accept inevitable death without fear is a sign of strength and wisdom.

      Freaking out about death is pointless, but why let it happen when it can be avoided? As an analogy if you get an illness which when left naturally kills most people but when treated is harmless, why avoid the treatment?

      Quality, not quantity of life is what matters.

      I'd agree with that but quality is defined as fit for purpose, if your goal in life is to learn as much as you can and assist others in intellectual endeavours then having an ancient body doesn't hinder you too much.

    9. Re:Some issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or the cost could be driven down so that countries that aren't the Randian States of America can provide it via their socialized medicare systems.

      I have to imagine pushing back or the retirement age, or having some sort of system to take some years off, while keeping people working, would save trillions versus paying out money to old age pensions plans to people who stop paying taxes.

      No incentive in America, but a huge incentive for countries that actually have what's called "society".

    10. Re:Some issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It never occurs to anyone that all the GOOD people will also live longer?"

      Never.The BAD ones won't let them.

    11. Re:Some issues by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      I think we'd care much more about Global Warming if our lifespan were measured in 1,000+ years.

      I think there would be a lot more war if our natural lifespan were measured in 1,000+ years. Children are a big part of the human experience, and while it would certainly be possible to try to institute some controls á la China's one child policy, I think it's pretty safe to estimate that people, on the whole, would tend to have at least one new generation of children every 100 years or so. The couple that has two kids now would have 20 kids in their lifetime, and those kids would have 20 kids, and so on. It doesn't take long for the wold population to grow wildly out of control.

      Sure, having eleventy trillion people around and a long lifespan would give us both the incentive and some new measure of means to go forth and populate the rest of the universe, but I don't really think we'd get that far. When resources get scarce, people pick up sticks and stones, and break each other's bones.

    12. Re:Some issues by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      So long as my mind is intact, fully functional and I have a decent means to communicate with the outside world? I would.

      You're in luck! The future looks bright for you.

    13. Re:Some issues by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Even if you extended the human lifespan, you won't get people to have more kids than normal, because women can only have kids for the first 40-55 years of their life (and sometimes not even that long). They're born with all the eggs they'll ever have, and once those run out they're done. Worse, the eggs after 5 decades are pretty old and most are not viable anyway.

      So solving the aging problem is only part of the equation; to let women have kids in their 100s or later, you have a whole separate problem to solve. This could be done with artificial means (like using donor eggs) with today's technology, but that's not as easy as just jumping in the sack, and costs money, so only people who really, really want to have some kids will do it.

      On top of this, if a lifetime of centuries becomes commonplace, many people won't want to bother having kids in their first 30 years, and will put it off longer (perhaps with cryogenic egg storage), so population growth will be limited.

      And finally, eliminating aging won't mean that no one dies; people die all the time from things not related to aging: cancer and trauma. Cancer may or may not be solved along with the aging problem. But nothing will stop you from getting hit by a bus when you absentmindedly walk into traffic. Or getting killed in an auto accident, which today claims 50k lives per year in the US alone (250k worldwide).

    14. Re:Some issues by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's always more stuff to do. Instead of being stuck with one career, you could take up a different career at 60-70 years old doing something entirely different than what you were doing before. It's not that easy to change careers these days, esp. if you have a family because of financial obligations, and also because of age discrimination. But if you still look 35 at 100, age discrimination will be gone, and you'll easily be able to live long enough to get your kids out of the house and then go back to college yourself to do something new.

      And if we ever start doing serious manned space exploration, you could take a job doing mining on the moons of Saturn or something, for a real change of scenery.

    15. Re:Some issues by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Plus, even if Bill is immortal, that won't stop him from getting killed by a bus. If he really is still making peoples' lives miserable after so many years (I doubt it; he doesn't seem all that involved in MS anymore anyway), someone will probably get mad enough to arrange a convenient "accident" for him.

    16. Re:Some issues by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      and writing software that adds value but REQUIRE corporations to employ an army of IT workers with various specialties -

      Try reading about the Broken Window Fallacy. Writing crapware that requires far more work than better software doesn't help society, it holds society back.

    17. Re:Some issues by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      "I'm 28, in good health, and I'm already weary of this world."

      While I understand the sentiment, and the other points you made on connections and Seneca are wise, you might still want to check your vitamin D levels and think about how you are eating and exercising. Some health tips I put together:
      http://www.changemakers.com/discussions/discussion-493#comment-38823

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    18. Re:Some issues by __aancvu2993 · · Score: 1

      Oh, how do you love your dystopian futures. Do you think they make you cool or would be funny? How about this: all the devices we need get smaller and spend less power all the time. There are already energy efficient homes that cost three times as a shitty regular one and can generate all the electricity needed including heating/cooling. They are in Germany and everywhere you care to look. Beginning your working life with the intention of retiring in 20 years will be possible in the first world. It is possible now if you are not afraid of what your neighbours think (you already smell bad, don't you?). But seriously, personal power and efficiency will bring a revolution many cannot begin to imagine. The only other thing you need is food and information. So you can choose to become a wage slave, no matter how good you are, or you can alter your priorities and work towards self-enhancement during the best years of your life instead of hoping to 'have fun' when you retire and your coronaries are screaming little insults to you in their insult-rich coronary language. I envision a future where corporations will be smaller and financial independence will be normal. It is possible now if you want to take control of your life. Many are afraid of it, though.

    19. Re:Some issues by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      But nothing will stop you from getting hit by a bus when you absentmindedly walk into traffic. Or getting killed in an auto accident, which today claims 50k lives per year in the US alone (250k worldwide).

      Backups. Backups will stop me from ending my existence when I walk in front of a bus, to see what happens. (Yes, I will also know how to erase all the backups, if I so choose. I'm not trapped.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    20. Re:Some issues by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      But if you still look 35 at 100, age discrimination will be gone

      Actually? I think it'll be reversed. "You look age 35; how old are you actually?" Those who really are age 35 are stupid children; those who have lived a double-handful of decades know how to survive.

      Especially if our trends of statutory (14-18), military (18), drinking (21), and driving-with-lowest-premium (25) ages continue.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    21. Re:Some issues by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Who would want to live in a broken-down, aged body forever, kept alive only by a steady stream of stem cells?

      The same type of rich person who has no problem taking taxpayer funds to move jobs out of the country, indulge their endless appetite for vulture capitalism, believes their money is proof of their absolute moral virtue and personal eternal chumship with the Almighty, and thinks they should regulate everybody else's having any fun, is the one who will want this and think the others are weak for not wanting it as bad. The same person who thinks he is a superior species to the common human and that it is that man's duty to die as need be for the life, the convienience or even the whim of that superior species. The same person that doesn't really love life in the slightest, but has an overwhelming fear of death, far beyond that of any rational entity. The same person who will make life on Earth a living hell for himself and everybody else and think, right up to that last system failure, that he is winning.
              I'm going to give you a couple of references: Jonathan Swift's (and to some extent Larry Niven's) Struldbrugs. Niel Gaiman's Teknophage. The people who are mentioning Dracula are understating the sheer evil possible here.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    22. Re:Some issues by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

      The summary brings up stem cells, but as far as I can tell the actual paper attributes the benefit to white blood cells.

      --
      For great justice.
  71. Re:Links to Aspartame by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    In that case, did XP mean Xeroderma Pigmentosum because it couldn't withstand the light of day?

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  72. Countess Bathory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stories about Countess Bathory bathing in virgin blood are considered by most scholars to be slander. Most info we have on her suggests that she was a horrible, vile, cruel human being, but the degree to which she's been made into a monster is just a matter of the story growing in the telling (by her political enemies, mostly).

    Turns out that back in the day it was a lot easier to just make up ridiculous shit about people you hated because there was no good way of disseminating evidence to the contrary or of fact-checking. Marie Antoinette's infamous "let them eat cake" is another great example of slanderous rumor-mongering turned "history."

  73. Re:Links to Aspartame by lonecrow · · Score: 2

    Two liters of soda pop a day!! Good god man are you mad!

  74. New Blood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Read Methuselah's Children by Robert A. Heinlein.

  75. Re:Links to Aspartame by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Hmm interesting. I wonder if there are large number of vegans in Seattle?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  76. Re:Links to Aspartame by tsotha · · Score: 1

    I've always been wont to mete the meat, but to each his own.

  77. Re:Links to Aspartame by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2

    http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vitamin-d-and-ms/AN01894 There are a large number of clouds in Seattle. Sunlight is a primary source of vitamin D.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  78. Cloning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another argument for Cloning.

  79. makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about those stories of baby sacrifices...

  80. It would be nice if normal cells could be reverted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if normal cells could be reverted to stem cells, but as far as know that is in the realm of science fiction.

    However harvesting stem cells and storing them for later infusion is happening every day.

    When my son was born 2 years ago, the placental cord blood was collected and processed (at our cost). The stem cell rich blood is sitting in cold storage in case he needs them at some time in the future. I hope he never does, but it's a small investment compared to losing him to leukemia or some other childhood disease.

    Since then we have heard of 2 children among our associates who have childhood leukemia, the best treatment involves cord blood/stem cells infusion, but neither banked the cord blood, so hopefully the chemotherapy will be successful.

  81. Re:Links to Aspartame by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

    You might want to check this out: Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency - CCSVI

  82. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would still seem to me that depending on Dr. Pepper for your daily fluid intake might not be the smartest thing to do.

  83. Re:Links to Aspartame by dargaud · · Score: 1

    When I worked in the US a decade ago I had a colleague who drank a gallon of coke for breakfast. She came in the morning with what, to me, was a bucket with a handle, full of ice and coke, way bigger than her head. It usually took her 2 to 3 hours to finish it. Since it was a bit too heavy to lift confortably, she would rest it on her bulging stomach (as some kind of self-fulfilling feedback loop I guess) while sitting in her chair, then lean back in the chair and drink. It was like watching some weird feeding ritual in a zoo.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  84. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asinine.

    Replace space elevators with personal space faring shuttle craft or the entire air transport system with a space capable analogy and this argument is torpedoed like a Romulan warbird.

  85. Re:Links to Aspartame by improfane · · Score: 1

    You are very much correct. I did not think about other sweetener manufacturers.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  86. Re:Links to Aspartame by CSMoran · · Score: 0

    People have been getting MS long before Aspartame was even invented.

    People were dying of lung cancer before cigarettes were even invented.

    While I agree with you that there is no link between MS and aspartame, I think your argument was poorly thought out.

    --
    Every end has half a stick.
  87. Re:Links to Aspartame by houghi · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am wrong about aspartame, I honestly have no idea, I just thought I would throw it out there.

    Black people are lazy. Jews are greedy. Rednecks are stupid. Americans are fat. /. posters live in their moms basement.
    Maybe I am wrong about these things. I honestly have no idea. I just thought I would trow it out there.

    See how silly this is?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  88. XP really means... by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

    In that case, did XP mean Xeroderma Pigmentosum because it couldn't withstand the light of day?

    completely off-topic, but XP was an inside joke by the NT team at MS. The project name for the client-server architecture to be based on NT was "Cairo". Win95 and Win98 were the first public releases of the Cairo client-side architecture. It was disappointing to the Windows dev community, because they lacked many of the security and networking features promised by the Cairo team. The gist of the forums comments were, "Where's Cairo?" W2K was the first public release of the server-side Cairo architecture, but it still had only a bare subset of the Cairo features. Again, public commentary was basically, "AD and NTFS is nice, but where's the journaling file system? C'mon MS, give us Cairo." So, the Cairo team responded, and gave the world XP. X is the greek letter chi, and P is the greek letter rho -- Chi-Rho, or Cairo.

    1. Re:XP really means... by lennier · · Score: 1

      So, the Cairo team responded, and gave the world XP. X is the greek letter chi, and P is the greek letter rho -- Chi-Rho, or Cairo.

      And here I thought it was just because they were D&D players.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  89. Katherine the Great by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Looks like she did know what she was doing after all.

  90. "cool plot..." Re:Some issues by Fubari · · Score: 1

    It would look kind of like this: Vampire Hunter D.

  91. Re:Links to Aspartame by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    .

    People who stop and think about things (and witness them) are people who discover problems. Nobody thought X was harmful until it was too late. Maybe I am wrong about aspartame, I honestly have no idea, I just thought I would throw it out there. There is plenty of sources that state both angles.

    The problem with your approach, which would seem to be that there are people saying X is bad, so it might have some truth to it, so we better not use X, is the exact argument that anti-vaccine zealots often use. So onset of autism symptoms comes about at the same age that children get vaccines? Must be the mercury in vaccines! Remove the mercury, No change. It must be something else in those same vaccines. Study after study has shown there is no correlation at all. The researcher has been thoroughly discredited - it appears that his plan was to make money in conjunction with a lawyer.

    Despite all this, despite children actually being harmed and killed by perfectly preventable diseases, there are still people who insist that vaccines are somehow at fault for things that they do not cause.

    So no, it doesn't make sense to reject anything that someone says causes something. That's because there is a paranoid undercurrent, perhaps even people who "make shit up" because they enjoy causing people worry.There is also the rumor mill of people who have an agenda, be it profit, or sometimes even vegetarian zealottry. And with the "some guy on the internet said" phenomenon I don't know which one is which, but I don't really care.

    Anyhow, if diet soda caused MS, we would be seeing a serious epidemic, easily traceable, because a lot of people drink a lot of diet soda. That would be a lot of MS cases.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  92. Re:Links to Aspartame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Ok, I just read your link and I don't see any pitfalls there at all. The problem was that the age reversal didn't work (or perhaps that he screwed it up by taking both doses himself, instead of following the instructions).

    If there's a lesson there, it's to always follow the instructions when you're given medication.

    The solution to overpopulation is education. Every society where education has increased and economic prosperity has increased, population growth rates have decreased. There's really plenty of room here for all 7B of us, and probably up to 15-20B. The problem is our addiction to fossil fuels; if we could eliminate that, our population wouldn't be such a problem. There's plenty of solutions: denser cities, SkyTran personal rapid transit, etc.

  93. So did Voldemort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only I could find a unicorn!

  94. Re:Links to Aspartame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    There's a slight problem with your comparison, specifically the one about Americans. Americans ARE fat. There's no denying it, it's an established fact. Every study done about it shows that Americans suffer from obesity far more than most other populations in the world. Obviously, not every single American is fat, but to say that "Americans are fat", which is obviously a generalization, is true. Trying to make it out as a prejudicial statement is wrong.

    As for the first three, they're all true too, the problem is that they single out certain groups and imply they're more guilty of it than the rest of the population, which probably isn't true and is unfair to those groups. Humans, in general, are lazy, greedy, and stupid.

  95. Re:Links to Aspartame by lonecrow · · Score: 1

    No wonder Americans are so over-weight! Their like children gulping that much corn syrup.

  96. Re:Not as sexy, but MS found to be reversed by die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but this is anecdotal bullshit. I hope nobody is mislead by this charlatan.

  97. Real MS Person by dontgetshocked · · Score: 0

    I have MS and of course I would love to see this cured but this procedure is not acceptable.Not all people go along with this stem cell thing and I am one of them.For those people who do,that is their choice.I also am an ordained minister and on the point of living forever,this is simply not possible since man has inherited sin and the wages of sin is death.Not meant to start a debate but the above statement is simply a fact and above that statement is my opinion.

  98. Doctor Reverses MS in 9 Months Eating These Foods by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    "Knowing people with multiple sclerosis, I can say it is a horrid disease, you gradually lose your functions over time. I believe there is some links to aspartame intake."

    I would mod you back up, but then I could not reply. Hope this can help the people you know:
    "Doctor Reverses MS in 9 Months by Eating These Foods "
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/23/overcoming-multiple-sclerosis-through-diet.aspx

    There is a mention of avoiding aspartame there (I don't know how big a part of that it is), but there is also getting enough vitamin D, getting Omega 3s, getting enough iodine, eating lots of fruits and vegetables, and more... Those for sure could make a difference for many people eating the Standard American Diet and avoiding the sun.

    The website of that doctor in the video who cured herself by eating better:
    http://www.terrywahls.com/

    More health links by me:
    http://www.changemakers.com/discussions/discussion-493#comment-38823

    Much chronic disease in the USA will yield to dietary interventions and vitamin D (see Dr. Joel Fuhrman's website, too, and Dr. John Cannell's).

    Hope those people you know can benefit from this.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  99. Terry Wahls, MD, defeated her MS with nutrition by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

    http://www.terrywahls.com/
    "In 2003 Terry Wahls, M.D., was diagnosed with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and soon became dependent upon a tilt-recline wheelchair. After developing and using the Wahls Protocol, she is now able to walk through the hospital and commute to work by bicycle. She now uses intensive directed nutrition in her primary care and traumatic brain injury clinics. Dr. Wahls is the lead scientist in a clinical trial testing her protocol in others with progressive MS. "

    Also:
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/23/overcoming-multiple-sclerosis-through-diet.aspx

    Her work was done In Iowa, so maybe a little better then Transylvania? :-)

    See also my other comment to this article mentioning Dr. Joel Fuhrman and Dr. John Cannell; with links here:
    http://www.changemakers.com/discussions/discussion-493#comment-38823

    Perhaps there is some nutrients and vitamin D and such in the blood of young creatures? But you can get it from vegetables, sunlight, and other things instead of blood...

    From Dr. Wahls' site:
    ========
    I am a clinical professor of medicine at the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine in Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A., where I teach internal medicine residents in their primary care clinics. I also do clinical research and have published over 60 peer-reviewed scientific abstracts, posters and papers.

    In addition to being a doctor, I am also a patient with a chronic, progressive disease. I was diagnosed with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in 2000, just as I began working for the University. By 2003 I had transitioned to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. I underwent chemotherapy in an attempt to slow the disease and began using a tilt-recline wheelchair because of weakness in my back muscles. It was clear: eventually I would become bedridden by my disease. I wanted to forestall that fate asmy long as possible.

    Because of my academic medical training, I know that research in animal models of disease is often 20 or 30 years ahead of clinical practice. Hoping to find something to arrest my descent into becoming bedridden, I used PubMed.gov to begin searching the scientific articles about the latest multiple sclerosis research. Night after night, I relearned biochemistry, cellular physiology, and neuroimmunology to understand the articles. Unfortunately, most of the studies were testing drugs that were years away from FDA approval. Then it occurred to me to search for vitamins and supplements that helped any kind of progressive brain disorder. Slowly I created a list of nutrients important to brain health and began taking them as supplements. The steepness of my decline slowed, for which I was grateful, but I still was declining.

    In the fall of 2007, I had an important epiphany. What if I redesigned my diet so that I was getting those important brain nutrients not from supplements but from the foods I ate? It took more time to create this new diet, intensive directed nutrition, which I designed to provide optimal nutrition for my brain. At that time, I also learned about neuromuscular electrical stimulation and convinced my physical therapist to give me a test session. It hurt, a lot, but I also felt euphoric when it was finished, likely because of the endorphins my body released in response to the electrical stimulation. In December 2007, I began my intensive directed nutrition along with a program of progressive exercise, electrical stimulation, and daily meditation. The results stunned my physician, my family and me: within a year, I was able to walk through the hospital without a cane and even complete an 18-mile bicycle tour.

    In 2007 I was losing my phone and keys and was afraid my chief of staff would soon be calling me

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Terry Wahls, MD, defeated her MS with nutrition by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

      While her nutrition advice generally aligns with current research, the only evidence that her "protocol" does anything for MS specifically is the anecdotal evidence that Wahls, who had relapsing-remitting MS is not as bad off as she was awhile back. The first three pages of Google results for "Wahls protocol" are connected with the Wahls foundation itself.

      --
      For great justice.
  100. Re:Links to Aspartame by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    On solutions to any fossil fuel limits:
    "GE: Solar Power Cheaper than Fossil Fuels in 5 years"
    http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/29/ge-solar-power-cheaper-than-fossil-fuels-in-5-years/

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  101. Re:Links to Aspartame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    It honestly doesn't matter how cheap solar power is, you still can't use it to replace fossil fuels in any kind of vehicle, unless it's a golf cart or perhaps an electric car that's built for very short distances (such as the Nissan Leaf: it's fine for short-distance commuting, but that's it). Until the battery technology problem is overcome, that's never going to change (or unless they start building real public transit that can realistically replace cars for most uses, such as SkyTran, which wouldn't replace all uses of cars, but would make the need to use cars much less, causing many people to just use public transit in town and rent a car if they need to go somewhere else.

  102. Re:Links to Aspartame by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    If that were the case you wouldn't expect the highest rate of MS in the world to be in Seattle

    MS was recently linked to vitamin D deficiency.

    Hmm interesting. I wonder if there are large number of vegans in Seattle?

    There are a large number of clouds in Seattle. Sunlight is a primary source of vitamin D.

    You got there before me, as I'd originally intended saying this to the OP.

    I live in Scotland, which has the highest prevalence of MS in the world, and it was in the news here recently that our general lack of daylight (*) may be one possible cause for this.

    I don't know how Seattle compares to Scotland in general, but I did know that it's further north and generally not as blessed as California is when it comes to sunshine.

    (*) Although people do forget that the shorter days in more northerly locations is balanced by the fact that in *summer* they're conversely longer. Then again, you also have to consider that (i) the sun is going to be lower in the sky in general- and hence weaker- the further north you go, and (ii) that the generally greater levels of cloud (from poor weather) robs you of significant amounts of daylight.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  103. Re:Links to Aspartame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I also forgot to mention, you can't use electricity for aircraft or ships, you can only use fossil fuels there, for all the same reasons as with cars, only worse.

    I guess I did forget one other factor: if solar-generated electricity became cheap enough, you could use it to synthesize fossil fuels, rather than digging them out of the ground and refining them. But it'd have to be really cheap to reach that point, since natural fossil fuels have a natural advantage in that the energy needed to make them was provided by eons of natural processes and is already done, so all we have to do is pump it out (which granted, is getting more expensive as the lower-hanging fruit dries up) and then refine it, and a synthetic process, while it would be able to skip the refining step and go straight to the desired fuel, would have a lot of inefficiencies to factor in (and then of course there's the giant inefficiency of burning it to create usable power, wasting most of the energy in the form of waste heat, but we already suffer with this).

  104. Re:Links to Aspartame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love the pseudoscience about corn syrup. The quantity is sick, but sugar is sugar.

  105. Scary... Very Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just about the scariest thing I have ever seen. Think through this...

    Given what was actually done in the study:
    4 needles
    2 tubes

    Then connecting the blood supply of a old mouse with a young mouse.. And HUGE improvement in the older mouse.
    I posit that this physically simple thing is being done, and has been done by wealthy people for decades, maybe even for more than 100 years.

    2,000 children go missing in the US each DAY.
    Many hundreds of the 2,000 are never found.. each day.

    Some rich, famous, or powerful people seem to defy odds with their appearance and longevity.
    All they need is a compatible host, perhaps a small child, and a few hours here and there hooked up to them.

    Do you really think that people at the top, who start wars, poison water and air,steal food and medical care from the poor, and all around play at EVIL would be above of doing this if it was the fountain of youth?

    Do you not think that doing something simple like this would not occurred to others over the decades? Did the Nazi or Japanese
      death camp doctors never include this experiment in the long list of horrors they inflected on death camp victims?
    And once discovered, it is so very easy to apply.. Just a few standard blood tests, 4 needles and 2 tubes.

    I guarantee, if it was NOT done in the past, there is some dictator, drug lord, aging movie star, oil tycoon, or the like running blood tests on some abducted child at this very moment .
    If compatible they will be hooked to them before the end of the week.
    Once no longer of use they will 'disappear', just like hundreds of children each day in the USA.

    Seriously, this is scary to even think about.

  106. The blood of virgins by ulzeraj · · Score: 1

    So Elizabeth Bathory was right all along?

  107. Re:Links to Aspartame by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    Yes, sugar is sugar. Something chemically not-exactly-like-sugar is not processed by your body the same way sugar is.

    What was that you were saying about pseudo-science?

    ("First you get the sugar...")

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  108. Re:Links to Aspartame by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    So harvest your blood, bone, and skin tissue to your heart's delight. Not a single Catholic or Evangelical will object.

    Won't object? I'm certain they'll figure a way to link this behavior to masturbation. Instead of realizing that by suppressing this natural urge to rid the body of testosterone, they have caused many more wars than would otherwise have happened.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  109. Re:Not as sexy, but MS found to be reversed by die by ndykman · · Score: 1

    Nothing wrong with a good diet, and proper D3 levels are already tested by a lot of neurologists and supplements are recommended to maintain them in MS suffers.

    But, of course, the authors claims that good food is all you need. It all falls down when I saw the recommendation not to take interferons, which, unlike this diet, has a huge amount of research that shows that it reduces relapses for those with relapsing-remitting MS, and lengthens the periods between replases.

    Given how little is understood about MS, it is greatly specious to claim that MS can be cured by a diet. And to assume that the doctors behind this work don't have their own biases and agendas just because they don't toe the "party line" in research seems a bit naive.

    Finally, given that MS has periods of remission, how can you claim that MS is reversed vs being in a period of remission? Here, the authors are quite slient on this question as well.

  110. Sheen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the thing about Charlie Sheen and the tiger blood all begins to make sense...

  111. couchdouche the troll blows it & runs away? LM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  112. This explains by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    while the richest and most evil are living longer (Cheney, Murdoch, Pickens, etc.).

  113. Re:Links to Aspartame by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Why not just embed the charging system in the road?
    If was only done on the freeway that should be enough. That way you can drive unlimited distance on the freeway + 100 miles worth of battery should do.

    The added cost seems to be the only real issue.

  114. Re:Links to Aspartame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    1) How would you do that? Inductive coupling at high speed with a 12" gap? I don't think so.

    2) How would you meter that and charge people appropriately, without resorting to Gestapo GPS systems tracking everyone's movements?

    3) The efficiency would be shit. You can't transmit electricity under a road for hundreds of miles without losing most of the power in resistance losses. You only get around that by stepping the voltage up to very high levels (like 765kV for transmission lines), but then you can't use that under a road for charging cars.

  115. Re:Not as sexy, but MS found to be reversed by die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anecdotes are not evidence, true. But usually charlatans have some sort of profit angle. Everything she is advocating can be bought at a supermarket. Also, she isn't pushing some sort of vegetarian idology (she recommends organ meat and fish). She isn't selling a diet book or anything.

    None of this makes her correct, but I have a hard time seeing how she would qualify as a charlatan, even if she is wrong.