Slashdot Mirror


Web Developer Sentenced To Death In Iran

An anonymous reader points out the case of Saeed Malekpour, an Iranian-born permanent resident of Canada who worked as a web developer. In 2008, during a visit to Iran, Malekpour was arrested and detained by Iranian authorities on charges that he designed and moderated "adult content websites." In 2009, he was sentenced to death for "acting against the national security, insulting and desecrating the principles of Islam, and agitating the public mind." Malekpour wrote photo-uploading software, and in a letter he sent from prison, he said it was used by porn sites without his knowledge. This week an Iranian court reviewed the case and confirmed that the death sentence was an acceptable punishment. According to one Canadian publication, "Human rights monitors believe that Malekpour, one of a number of people held on Internet-related charges, is trapped by a convoluted justice system that is manipulated by rival factions in Iran."

237 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're in danger the second you step into Iran. Don't do business there, don't visit there.

    1. Re:In other words, by villew · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are in danger the second you enter a country with a failing justice system and the death penalty, including the U.S....

    2. Re:In other words, by Racemaniac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since when do you have to enter the US to get arrested by it? look at the megaupload guys...

    3. Re:In other words, by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What really irks me is that case of American hikers caught by the Iranians in Iraq. First of all, why do they have to go to Iraq to go hiking? They KNOW it's dangerous. By being caught, they gave Iran a bargaining chip. What the hell is wrong with these people?

    4. Re:In other words, by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it is remote, inaccessible and dangerous. That's the fun for the hiking hardcore.

    5. Re:In other words, by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or live in the UK: Richard O'Dwyer

    6. Re:In other words, by bky1701 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or they could just go to Somalia and avoid the international incident bit, but with the added bonus of pirates!

    7. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What really irks me is how a random group of Americans can be discovered by Iranians wandering into Iraq, the media is told OH THEY'RE JUST HIKERS, and a single person finds the story credible.

    8. Re:In other words, by greentshirt · · Score: 1

      So your point, insofar as one exists in that jumbled mess of arbitrary thoughts, is that because he has a secret drug addiction (to which you are privy) it is all right for the state to have him executed?

      I mean, yes of course you're trolling, yes of course you're attempting humour, but truly, that is the best you can produce even when shielded by anonymity and a computer screen? Really? Incredible.

    9. Re:In other words, by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Nowhere near as remote, inaccessible and dangerous as Antarctica.

    10. Re:In other words, by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      First of all, why do they have to go to Iraq to go hiking?

      One possibility: Their CIA or DIA superiors ordered them to. Just because the Iranians are bastards about who they'll execute doesn't mean that they weren't spies, and the US intelligence agencies would definitely lie to the US public about whether they were spies in order to avoid blowing people's cover. In fact, they may even use a completely false story to try to convince the public that going to war with Iran is a good idea, if they have leadership that is part of the old and honorable profession of starting wars.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:In other words, by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      The worst I'll tolerate whizzing around my head is mosquitos, not bullets. And even then, the mosquitos can't have malaria.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    12. Re:In other words, by dmesg0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great comparison between justice systems in Iran and USA. Those who moderated the parent insightful deserve being sent to Iran to get a clue. They should bring their porn collections for initial evidence.

    13. Re:In other words, by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Ah you mean they tortured him to confess - I am sure they could have got him to confess to the reichstag fire if they wished.

      Lets hope the Arab spring gets to Iran and you and your fellow travelers got what the milice did in France post ww2 - if your lucky a clean death by firing squad against the wall.

    14. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to the guys at gitmo, or to those who will be detained based on the "National Defense Authorization Act".

    15. Re:In other words, by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Get back to us when you can be put to death in the US for making a porno in Canada and we'll talk.

      (Who the fuck modded this Insightful?)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:In other words, by Cederic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, in the US you only need to be born black in Detroit to be put to death.

      Meanwhile hosting a website that links to other websites can earn you 20 years in jail when you've never even fucking visited the fucking country.

      I haven't even mentioned the decade of torture and false imprisonment in a foreign country for the evil crime of "pissing off someone that works for the Americans". Or do you really believe that everyone in Guantanamo is guilty?

      Trust me, from where I'm sat the US poses are far greater threat to my ongoing life and freedom than Iran does.

    17. Re:In other words, by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. For instance, now I mentioned the CIA. They are reviewing this conversation now. Iranian agencies don't have the capacity.

    18. Re:In other words, by Kalriath · · Score: 2

      Yarr, tharr be Photoshop off the starboard bow!

      Oh... wrong pirates.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    19. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you accept that the United States is bad, but it just isn't as bad as Iran? Way to set the bar.

    20. Re:In other words, by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Exactly, it may be true that our justice system committing these sorts of abuses less frequently than say the Iranians, but its the same capriciousness and ethical emptiness seen there.

      It absolutely needs to be pointed out now while its still possible to do something about, that does not require firearms.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    21. Re:In other words, by DarkOx · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Right Islam is a violent faith based in hate. It always was, right from its beginnings but for some reasons we are required to ignore history both ancient and recent to be politically correct.

      Personally I think we should declare war on Islam, and the best part is nobody needs to get hurt or killed! At least not by our hands, though they may do those things to each other. If there is one thing certain proven by their own fear of it, its that our modern American culture is viral, pervasive, and addicting.

      What we should do is install directional transmitters in any friendly territory near the Muslim world with so much envelope power they can't jam it easily, or if they can it makes their own communications equally useless.

      Then we take our high altitude bombers and drop Hollywood productions, clothing, pamphlets, etc on every major city every night; extolling American values, American products, and American propaganda. It will probably cost less than the munitions we dump on them now. We don't have to send soldiers into die, we don't have detain children in camps and we don't have to harm anyone. I bet there will be next to nothing left of Islam inside of 20 years.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    22. Re:In other words, by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Straight trollin'

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    23. Re:In other words, by f3rret · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naah, CIA is not that good with new SIGINT, that's all The NSA.

      And ooops, now're they're on us.
      Everybody say hi to the NSA!

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    24. Re:In other words, by boots19 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What? The US is a paragon of mercy and fairness; to my knowledge, no web developer who ever worked for geocities was ever executed . . .

    25. Re:In other words, by darthium · · Score: 1

      Because it is remote, inaccessible and dangerous. That's the fun for the hiking hardcore.

      This kind of people seem desperate to get a Darwin Award.

      If theyre so eager to go into ' inaccessible and dangerous' after being warned, they should not become a burden to other people to 'save them' (wasting tax money or even the life of others in the process of saving them). They looked for it, they should be allowed to fix the issued themselves, its not the same case of an innocent hostage, isn't it?

    26. Re:In other words, by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Informative

      it may be true that our justice system committing these sorts of abuses less frequently than say the Iranians

      Considering how many people we arrest each year, and how comparatively few the Iranians arrest (the US is the world leader in arrests and imprisonment), I am not even sure that is true.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    27. Re:In other words, by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Strangely enough the CIA, which is reviewing this thread, doesn't mind you bad mouthing it. In fact, I think they enjoy knowing that they are feared. They do, however, have a problem if you start talking about blowing things up or something of that ilk. I can't imagine why. And I'm pretty sure they enjoy looking at Porn so the dude would have been fine on a trip to the US.

    28. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I recently heard of a case of Germans living in New Zealand being arrested and extradited to America to face punishment under American law even tho those German born citizens didn't vote for American laws nor vote to be represented by American politics.

    29. Re:In other words, by MyUIDisHUGE · · Score: 2

      Remote, but not inaccessible or dangerous. My Antarctica trip started with a (small) ship from the Falklands through the Drake Passage to Antarctica. Good food, tea and fresh baked cookies at 4, and lectures in the evening. A few days' sail and we were hiking extinct volcanos among the penguin colonies on the continent.

      I just need Africa and Australia to complete the set!

    30. Re:In other words, by alreaud · · Score: 1

      One can't even begin to compare a society run by an insane religious system and anything in the West. Perfect example of the mentality is Boko Haram, a fucking religious nut cult that is perpetrating terrorism in one of the most stable and prosperous countries in Africa, Nigeria. Look to any place where there is an Islamic theocracy in power and indicate one that isn't repressive with respect to free speech and free expression.

      Sherman Austin got some time in prison for weapons making instructions somebody posted on his site but no, in the West, we normally don't execute you for web pages. You might disappear, but that's another story...;-)

    31. Re:In other words, by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why? Most people in both countries can live quite happily without ever being involved with the legal system (I've not been to Iran, but I have a few friends from there, so admittedly I'm only speaking based on second-hand information). In both cases, you can be imprisoned for quite ludicrous things (e.g. owning a specific quantity of a certain kind of plant in the USA). In both places, the state reserves the right to kill its citizens.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    32. Re:In other words, by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      But if I ever catch the bastard who taught them the blink tag ....

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    33. Re:In other words, by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      You're in danger the second you step into any country where religious "authority" is used as the basis for law and government . Don't do business there, don't visit there.

      TFTFY.

    34. Re:In other words, by dmesg0 · · Score: 2

      You can happily live in any country without being involved with the legal system (though definition of happiness may vary substantially). The question is what happens if you do become involved, for one reason or another. Do you honestly think you'll receive the same kind of treatment in both?

    35. Re:In other words, by poity · · Score: 5, Informative

      He's reacting to the equivalence fallacies.
      This is what happens on Slashdot every single time:

      1. Some other country trespasses egregiously on human rights (e.g. death penalty for software unwittingly used by porn sites)
      2. First comment says "this is no different than the USA", gets modded +5
      3. Someone responds to that post with "that's not a fair comparison since the US reacts differently for [crime in topic]"
      4. Someone like you twists #3's words around to frame him as an apologist with low standards when in fact he was calling out the non-sequitur for having no logical connection.
      5. Someone chimes in about how this is a cultural phenomenon and we should sympathize with abusive foreign governments (to which I can only laugh because it begs the silly question: why doesn't the world sympathize with the abusive US government for reasons of cultural understanding?)

      Yes of course you SHOULD be vigilant in policing the abuses by the government, but when you can no longer separate bad from worse, you will have lost all hope of separating good from bad. If you want a country to get better, then you better know exactly where it stands in relation to others, those which are better than it and those which are worse than it. Only what that self-knowledge can you seek to improve. Defeatist like #2 have neither the insight nor the inclination to improve a country.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    36. Re:In other words, by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Why the false dichotomy? You can do interesting and adventurous things without going to theocratic shitholes, in fact it's probably harder to find interesting and adventurous activities in such places.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    37. Re:In other words, by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is credible. Hiking's not my passion, but in mine there are "places to go" that are considered way better that what you can find in the US. If you've advanced far enough in your sport and want to push the limits ever further, you have to go to places that are dangerous. The danger you intend to face is environmental, but the countries that happen to house them also contain political dangers, as in your country hates my country.

      It's completely plausible. It's also possible they're spies, but it seems like a really dumb cover story. I don't speculate which is true because without direct info I can only say both are possible.

    38. Re:In other words, by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More than Gitmo, you can cite Al Awlaki, an American citizen we executed over making partisan videos. The new standard in America is free speech, so long as the Feds don't object to it.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    39. Re:In other words, by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      You should be modded +1million. Sadly you will languish at 1 or 2 with as many replies while the cynics and hysterical half-truths elsewhere will be 4 and 5. Sad. So much for logic and reason.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    40. Re:In other words, by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're in danger the second you step into Iran. Don't do business there, don't visit there.

      That's funny, that's what I tell people about the USA, and I live here.

      That doesn't dilute your point anywhere, but I think what's more relevant is that it's really true everywhere. If the powers-that-be someplace have views that conflict with yours, you're an idiot if you go there, do business with them, et cetera.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought you got sent to gitmo for no charges at all

    42. Re:In other words, by anagama · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well actually, Obama just executed an American citizen (Al Awlaki) by drone attack without any evidence, not even a show trial, and it appears that the reason was posting partisan videos in which he talked smack about America. So at least in Iran you get a show trial before your execution. The fact that people look at this story and think "Iran is Evil" without thinking the same of the Feds, should create huge cognitive dissonance. That it does not, suggests to me that the civil liberties our country was founded on don't have much time for this world, at least not in America.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    43. Re:In other words, by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends. How rich are you?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    44. Re:In other words, by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Right Islam is a violent faith based in hate.

      So is Christianity unless you delete the fourth primary author entirely. What's your point?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:In other words, by mjwalshe · · Score: 2

      get caught with "certain plants" in many middle eastern country and you will be facing very serious penalties.

    46. Re:In other words, by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      What really irks me is that case of American hikers caught by the Iranians in Iraq. First of all, why do they have to go to Iraq to go hiking? They KNOW it's dangerous. By being caught, they gave Iran a bargaining chip. What the hell is wrong with these people?

      Based on extensively researching Covert Affairs, I can safely say that any American hiking near the Iranian border works for the CIA.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    47. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Great comparison between justice systems in Iran and USA. "

      Buddy, you don't have the first clue about what REALLY goes on in the US "justice system".
      I mean you have no fucking idea. All you "know" is what you have been told by the people who
      want you to believe you live in a free and just society. Well, the truth runs counter to the idea that
      the US is a free and just society.

      I have done time in the US system.

      In the US, torture does happen, to US citizens. It's called "diesel therapy". Ask any
      prison guard about this phrase. There are also people who have been locked up for years
      without a trial. The method used for this is for a judge to order the person sent to a prison
      facility which has psychological "expertise". The person can be held there with no trial for
      years, and his friends and family don't even know what has happened to him. Yes, this is terrifying,
      and it is real. No, I don't have a citation, because the government makes it difficult to acquire
      evidence about these things. But I will stake my life that everything I wrote is true.

    48. Re:In other words, by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Yes, because you get sent to gitmo for porn related charges

      There are other prisons than gitmo. For porn related charges, no state-sanctioned torturers are needed, as your fellow prisoners have been brainwashed to gladly assume that task free of charge!

    49. Re:In other words, by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      And I'm pretty sure they enjoy looking at Porn so the dude would have been fine on a trip to the US.

      As long as all the actors had their 18 years of age (or is that 21 in the US?), and the director has photocopies of their ids on file showing so...

    50. Re:In other words, by quibbler · · Score: 1

      I respectfully suggest you move to Iran. (Hand your citizenship to one of the millions waiting at the door if you would please.)

    51. Re:In other words, by mrjb · · Score: 1

      You're in danger the second you step into Iran. Don't do business there, don't visit there.

      There's obviously a different perception about what "justice" means there compared to in the United States. Frankly, I think the meaning of justice is distorted in both places; in one place by religion (and if you don't happen to believe the same as they do, death is deemed appropriate), in the other by money (and you'll rot in jail or at the very least be financially ruined for life if you step on the toes of big megacorporations). The message is the same. Conform to those in power, or be doomed. As long as *that* is the message of justice, we can't have true justice.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    52. Re:In other words, by quibbler · · Score: 1

      I shall call you "Mini-#2"

    53. Re:In other words, by purpledinoz · · Score: 1
      Let me quote myself.

      What really irks me is that case of American hikers caught by the Iranians in Iraq.

      My problem isn't them getting killed, but giving the Iranians some leverage... It's irresponsible.

    54. Re:In other words, by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      So you don't think the western judicial systems aren't influenced by the in the western countries dominant religion?

      By which you surely mean Islam, since here in Europe nothing else as much as aspires for dominance...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    55. Re:In other words, by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Sarah Shourd
      Piper Perabo

      No comparison.

    56. Re:In other words, by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Al Awlaki was killed in Yemen, after the Yemeni government ordered him captured dead or alive, right? You need a better example than this for bashing the US.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

    57. Re:In other words, by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      More than Gitmo, you can cite Al Awlaki, an American citizen we executed over making partisan videos. The new standard in America is free speech, so long as the Feds don't object to it.

      OT, but I find Wikipedia sometimes rather amusing: "Cause of death: Hellfire missiles"...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    58. Re:In other words, by sidthegeek · · Score: 1

      I am sure they could have got him to confess to the reichstag fire if they wished.

      I don't think they believed that fire even happened.

    59. Re:In other words, by Alomex · · Score: 1, Troll

      Sorry, but it is not. In fact, events by now have thoroughly refuted it. The woman was an agent and she was traded for, the two guys were innocent patsies and they had to earn their release through standard channels. The OP is right: the original story strained credulity all along and in the end it was proven false. Only in American would people not raise an eyebrow when told about this.

    60. Re:In other words, by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I want to do that? I live in a country that doesn't have the death penalty, in which I can fight to prevent US interests overriding our own.

      Far more of an issue is your attitude. Instead of making a point that "It's worse over there" how about starting work on "It should be better over here"?

      Personally I'd like to see it get better everywhere, and identifying where improvements are needed is a necessary step on that journey.

    61. Re:In other words, by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Degree doesn't matter.

      That is an utterly ludicrous statement. Degree absolutely does matter, there's a huge difference between killing someone and fining them, for example, even if both are abuses of human rights. The fact that one abuse is of lesser degree doesn't make it right, or acceptable, but it does mean that its less bad than the abuse of greater degree.

      If my country tortures just one person, it's lost any kind of moral high ground from which to cast criticism

      Now you've changed your argument from "degree doesn't matter" to "quantity doesn't matter". That I can agree with, not so much because quantity truly doesn't matter but because accepting a given degree of abuse in small quantities almost inevitable results in that abuse in greater quantity over time.

      I do have to point out that there are different forms of torture, which constitute different degrees of abuse, however. None are acceptable, and I do not approve of my country engaging in torture at all, but there are still differences between playing loud music all night, waterboarding and flaying.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    62. Re:In other words, by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... Ira[qn]

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    63. Re:In other words, by confuscan · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you have ended this with an urgent plea for money to help bribe the guards and set him free?

    64. Re:In other words, by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      You are in danger any time there is a strong central government (which, unfortunately, is almost everywhere). Centralized organizations tend to attract psychopaths and greedy bastards who leech off the concentration of power and money. The only real answer is to decentralize power as much as possible to the local level. Evil bastards will still be attracted to it, but they can do less damage if it's split up.

    65. Re:In other words, by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

      It works both ways.

      Fact Sheet on the U.S.-UK Extradition Treaty

      The numbers do not demonstrate imbalance:

      The United States has not denied a single extradition request from the UK under the treaty. While the U.S. does send more extradition requests to the UK than it receives, this difference is largely due to the differences in the size of the respective populations. The panel report notes that the U.S. has a population about five times the size of the UK, but there have been fewer than twice the number of people extradited to the U.S. than to the UK. The number of U.S. requests is not disproportionate.

      The standards are the same in practice:

      All extradition requests between the U.S. and UK must meet the same evidentiary standard: probable cause. All requests from the U.S. must meet the standard of “reasonable suspicion” required under UK law. However, all requests from the U.S. must also be based on a charging document that meets the “probable cause” standard required under U.S. law. This is the same standard that the U.S. requires of extradition requests from the UK The panel reviewed the evidence and concluded: “There is no practical difference between the information submitted to and from the United States.”

      Independent review of the United Kingdom's extradition arrangements

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    66. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      6. Someone points out that "Begs the question" doesn't mean "raises the question."

    67. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah the usual american "we have more rights than anybody else in the world" mantra. Well guess what, in most european countries you have more rights against government abuse than you do in the good ol' us of a. And we don't even need the right to bear arms. From our perspective the USA is a land of uncivilised savages. Come back to the civilised world once you've banned torture, the death penalty, conviction through the use of "secret" proofs that cannot be disclosed in a courtroom etc....

    68. Re:In other words, by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Right Islam is a violent faith based in hate.

      So is Christianity unless you delete the fourth primary author entirely. What's your point?

      Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”

      Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” Mathew 22:34-40

      Wow, that is harsh and hate filled.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    69. Re:In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of the smaller countries, like San Marino, most likely have an almost flawless, if not perfect, record: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,4565c22532,4565c25f425,,0,,,SMR.html

    70. Re:In other words, by Jack9 · · Score: 2

      > You are in danger the second you enter a country with a failing justice system and the death penalty,

      Thanks for reaffirming.

      > including the U.S....

      Nope.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    71. Re:In other words, by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      No matter what evil, unconscionable, egregious monstrosity you accuse ANY government of committing, my money is that it's TRUE!
      Most especially the USofA these past few years.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    72. Re:In other words, by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Hiking in Iran?? with GPS!
      Are they STUPID? They're NOT stupid! Ergo they're spies!

      How is this complicated?

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    73. Re:In other words, by jensend · · Score: 1

      They weren't even in Iran. They were apprehended on the Iraqi side of the border.

    74. Re:In other words, by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Does freedom of speech superceed threats and acts of violence? He's an Islamic terrorist and sympathizer. I'm pissed that we didn't double-tap his sorry ass just to make damn sure he was in fact dead.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    75. Re:In other words, by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wrong author, but I understand how a poor ability to understand the written word could cause someone to love the bible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    76. Re:In other words, by cffrost · · Score: 1

      States that don't kill their own citizens have lower crime rates than those that do. Further, trusting your government with the power to take your life is foolish, especially with the levels of government/police corruption we know exists.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    77. Re:In other words, by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Important information for and planned hiking trip in Australia...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    78. Re:In other words, by Krid(O'Caign) · · Score: 1

      Those partisan videos called for people to commit acts of violence against US citizens. I'm pretty sure telling people to kill other people has never been considered protected speech.

    79. Re:In other words, by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It worked reasonably well against the USSR because USSR was hypocritical - it declared itself the most free, most democratic country in the world (yes, really - it was all right there in the Constitution), but then didn't live up to that in practice. Hence, when Western propaganda talked about freedom, Soviet citizens knew very well what was meant by that, and knew what they were being promised and then denied.

      Islamic states are different. They openly proclaim that they do suppress some things, and go to great lengths to explain why they do so. For someone living in such a state and indoctrinated from birth, it can be very hard to explain why it is wrong.

    80. Re:In other words, by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Are you, per chance, using the death toll methodology exemplified by "Black Book of Communism" and other such trash research, where pretty every death, from any cause whatsoever, occurring in a nominally communist country, was automatically added to the list of "victims of communism"?

    81. Re:In other words, by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      what he said , death by porn .. i can imagine more pleasant ways

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    82. Re:In other words, by amirulbahr · · Score: 2

      Of the nuclear power kind...

    83. Re:In other words, by Weezul · · Score: 2

      Umm, a smaller population should mean a smaller number of extradition requests, sounds like the U.K. is being screwed by an order of magnitude.

      Oh, I understand your point, a larger population means a larger number of rich assholes to take offense at your mostly harmless activities. Yeah, maybe that's possible, but I didn't check how many were bullshit extraditions. It might be Americans just throw a shit ton of people in jail for no good reason though. Occam's Razor.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    84. Re:In other words, by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Then again, Nietzsche having aid that in Germany, seemingly did not have enough of an impact to avoid problems which came to be some 50 years later... I wonder if the US is in an inescapable downward spiral...

      Considering that the closest the US seems to come to philosophers are dead comedians... yeah, probably.

    85. Re:In other words, by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure telling people to kill other people has never been considered protected speech.

      Unless of course it's totally legal to kill them, say because of a "police action" or because they're suspected of being related to a "terrorist". Then it's perfectly legitimate for everyone, especially politicians, to encourage people to kill those people. Because people come in two classes; killable, and not-killable. The trick is to remain in the "not-killable" class as long as possible. Enjoy your police-state life.

    86. Re:In other words, by Eraesr · · Score: 1

      Funny, this Iranian way of justice sounds exactly like how SOPA works.

    87. Re:In other words, by anagama · · Score: 1

      Lots of works promote violence against people. Here's one you can order today:
      http://www.amazon.com/Mein-Kampf-Adolf-Hitler/dp/0395925037

      I know I've godwinned myself, but I'd bet it's not the only one out there. A person with greater knowledge of hate literature than I have could likely find books that do advocate the killing of US citizens. Of course there are some writings that we can't read, such as Obama's secret memo authorizing the due process free execution of other American citizens. I mean, isn't that fact alone enough to show the lie that in the "America Good, Iran Evil" meme DC has been pushing down our throat since sometime in the middle of the Bush administration?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    88. Re:In other words, by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Actually, just the state-enforced famine deaths in Russia and China, plus the Soviet, Chinese and South Asian communist death camp deaths will get you to half a billion dead. I do know about the black book of communism, and frankly while it's on the very high side it's not absurdly unfair. It's certainly not impossible that the numbers are right, albeit somewhat unlikely.

      Sadly, one thing Stalin was right about, is that once you get to a million corpses, the exact number hardly matters.

      What especially baffles me about genocides, is that the nazi genocides were unique only in a single respect : they used real weapons, and they were much more discriminatory than most other genocides. There was a documented reason for each and every death that they possibly could document. The constant muslim genocides are mostly committed with knives and kidnapping people into slavery, starving them and working them to death, often killing a sizeable population of muslims on the way, and throwing the rest into misery. The only "successes of islam", and all tolerance just happened to take place in places that while nominally under muslim control, had vast majorities of Christians and/or Jews. Extremely low-tech. Most communist deaths, even in death camps, were famine-related, again extremely low-tech, and again, killing a very large population of communists along the way.

    89. Re:In other words, by Krid(O'Caign) · · Score: 1

      Ah, see, there's a flaw in your argument. Specifically, it's your implication that protected and legal are the same thing. They are not. All protected speech is legal, but not everything that's legal is protected speech. While it may be legal for an authority figure to tell a soldier to kill somebody, it's not protected speech.

    90. Re:In other words, by Krid(O'Caign) · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm mistaken, the US tried to kill Hitler too. Many times. Then there's how possession and dissemination is legally distinct from authoring it, plus the historical significance of the work itself. Then there's the distinction between advocating policies and calling others to direct action.

    91. Re:In other words, by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I know of no islamic based laws in my country,

      I haven't said that there are Islamic laws in any European country, I merely hinted at the fact that of all the religious groups present in Europe, Muslims are the most vocal ones and the ones most ready to bend the rest of the populace to their will (although I'm perfectly happy to acknowledge that most of them are not doing it of ill will but simply as a matter of habit), with a certain cooperation of the establishment, including, e.g., legalized polygyny (in Britain, e.g., for immigrants, and with concommitant extra welfare benefits), which is a privilege that nobody else enjoys.

      In this context, when I say dominant, I don't mean majority. You can easily have a majority population that does not try to dominate anyone, and then you can have the exact opposite.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    92. Re:In other words, by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      there are still differences between playing loud music all night, waterboarding and flaying

      While I'm not actually disagreeing with you, prolonged sleep deprivation is more than an inconvenience and can potentially be fatal.

    93. Re:In other words, by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Does freedom of speech superceed threats and acts of violence? He's an Islamic terrorist and sympathizer. I'm pissed that we didn't double-tap his sorry ass just to make damn sure he was in fact dead.

      But no doubt if he was a white neo-Nazi you'd be defending his right to absolute free speech including the threat of violence against other races? Also, there is a big difference between threats of violence and actual acts of violence.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    94. Re:In other words, by swillden · · Score: 1

      there are still differences between playing loud music all night, waterboarding and flaying

      While I'm not actually disagreeing with you, prolonged sleep deprivation is more than an inconvenience and can potentially be fatal.

      True, but the degree of sleep deprivation you're talking about isn't achievable with loud music.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    95. Re:In other words, by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      "It might be Americans just throw a shit ton of people in jail for no good reason"

      US prisons contain around 1% of the Resident Adult population the highest in the world

      2.1% of the population are on parole

      US has 743 in prison per 100,000

      UK has 156 in prison per 100,000

      Looks like that might be the case ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    96. Re:In other words, by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      The likelihood of me being extradited to Iran is Zero (They are a known user of torture so my country will not extradite me)
      I have no intention of every going there, so their laws do not worry me (although I would like to see them tempered)

      The likelihood if me being extradited to the USA is unknown, they have extradited others from my country on flimsy evidence of crimes that did not affect my country

      The likelihood if some of my friends being extradited to the USA is unknown, they have extradited others from their country on flimsy evidence of crimes that are not illegal in their country

      I have no intention of ever going to the USA, but apparently this is irrelevant, as I can be charged with something that is not even a crime where I live...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    97. Re:In other words, by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that 2 of these American hikers had been living in Damascus, Syria for 2 years before this incident. The girl was an English teacher in a school, and the guy was a freelance journalist. I assume they both speak Arabic.

      It's not like they just hopped a flight from Ohio to Iraq, all wide-eyed and naive. They lived in Syria, were familiar with the region, etc etc.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    98. Re:In other words, by WildBlueYonder · · Score: 1

      Al Awlaki was killed in Yemen, after the Yemeni government ordered him captured dead or alive, right? You need a better example than this for bashing the US. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

      Ah ok, so once you are convicted in Yemen the US military can be used to carry out the sentencing? Interesting, I didn't realize that this country worked for Yemen. Honestly though, I'm relieved. I used to think that the US was responsible for all of their actions around the world, and it made me pretty ashamed. Now I can just say "Sorry guys, we know this looks bad, but our hands are tied, Yemen told us to do this."

    99. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Muslims are the most vocal ones and the ones most ready to bend the rest of the populace to their will

      That's because the Christians already did that and won. Christianity is on the decline and not as rabid anymore (so long as you steer clear of the teabaggers). The Christians did it with the Crusades and Inquisitions and such, but had given up when a number of countries had 100% membership.

    100. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Does freedom of speech superceed threats and acts of violence?

      Yes, yes it does.

      If he's so bad, and it's so obvious, why not try him in absentia prior to the death sentence? Nope, no due process here. He received no process other than a wink by the President and a button press by the military. The issue isn't executing someone for treason. The issue is that he was never even accused of a crime, any crime, and was assassinated for being inconvenient - we couldn't let anyone think that someone raised in the US as a US citizen could join any other cause. We are best. Bow or be executed.

    101. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If it was illegal, why didn't they ever charge him with anything? He was an unaccused innocent (in the eyes of the law) bystander, singled out for execution by the President.

    102. Re:In other words, by Krid(O'Caign) · · Score: 1

      He wasn't charged with anything because that comes [i]after[/i] being arrested. He was, however, [i]suspected[/i] of many things. I would like to note that I am not taking a stance on those events, I am simply showing flaws in your arguments.

    103. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You can be charged before being arrested. You can even be tried in absentia, if arresting you is impractical. He was never "officially" suspected of anything. He never had anyone contact a court and apply for an arrest warrant, or file any legal action against him at all. You are defending (I know you said you aren't defending them, just attacking me) people who killed someone with no process at all, due or otherwise.

    104. Re:In other words, by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      I think the distinction between protected and legal speech is precisely the distinction between the classes of killable and not-killable people. It's protected speech to advocate for the killing of "terrorists" or foreign combatants in a war. A suggestion to kill an innocent person is generally neither legal nor protected if it could be expected to result in criminal action. Perhaps you can think of some situations where this does not hold, e.g. where it is protected speech to advocate for the killing of a person who could otherwise not legally be killed, or for instance a legal order to kill a person (or class of people) which could not otherwise be stated as protected speech, maybe along the lines of George W. Bush's "Kill them!" speech. Ultimately what matters is whether the government can legally kill you, and how easy it would be for you to become legally killable.

    105. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When Iran is the only place worse than the US, you've already lost your argument. Also, citizenship is non transferable, and there are lots of other countries with long immigration lines. Are you implying that is any indication other than that the US is the best marketed country in the world? When I travel abroad, I mention being an American and people ask all sorts of silly questions about starting businesses and such. The truth is that the availability of cheap credit is the last thing the US has going for it. All the other real advantages are long gone. You can only get rich if you are already rich. The trick is that you can borrow rich, make more, then pay back your borrowed rich. That's the only way to change casts in the US, and it's easy in the movies and fiction about the US, but nearly impossible in practice. But the people who don't even have that opportunity see that as an improvement (or don't understand the logistics of actually doing it).

    106. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      why doesn't the world sympathize with the abusive US government for reasons of cultural understanding?

      Because the US doesn't have a culture. Iran is thousands of years old (and China and some others). The US is barely 200. The new kid on the block who has no national identity other than electing buffoons to president runs around telling China, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, India and such what to do when those civilizations are much much older than the US, even if the government is newer.

      It's not unlike the 6 year old shouting parenting advice to a parent with a screaming child in the supermarket. The parent in question won't listen and everyone else things the 6 year old is silly for butting in and they couldn't possibly know anything. It doesn't matter if the 6 year old is right or wrong.

    107. Re:In other words, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they thought that with GPS and such, they'd not be Americans caught by the Iranians in Iran. It's not unlike Mexico crossing the border to haul back some San Diegans or El Pasites. A border incursion to snag someone for the crime of walking near them is what should have triggered the outrage, not the status of the apprehended as spies or innocents or whatever.

    108. Re:In other words, by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Iraq has some of the oldest ruins and ancient monuments in the world. I'd love to go see them some day.

  2. wow by jmb1990 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I've written some bad code in my time.. but not that bad.

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      As the poor bastard that has to maintain some of your shit I would have to disagree.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      you're both fired.

  3. Oh, come on Iran. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Give the man a break. It's not like he deployed untested code to production.

  4. Savages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Canada should go to war over this. Another country is murdering one of their citizens (Iranian born or not) on trumped-up charges. Are there any crimes in this savage country that don't deserve the death sentence?

    1. Re:Savages by qbast · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't remember Canada going to war when another of their citizens was captured and tortured by different bunch of savages on trumped-up charges. Why act differently now?

    2. Re:Savages by haruchai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to mention that they were complicit in the rendition of another of their citizens into the hands of Syrian torturers.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:Savages by geogob · · Score: 1

      After observing the Canadian conservative government go for a while now, I would say don't expect them to do anything. They'll just ignore it, because 1) he's Iranian, 2) it won't contribute to get them reelected and 3) it won't contribute to some good friends in the prairies.

      At most, what they could do is revoke his permanent residency and put some security flag on him (ie. put him on some potential dangerous people list).

      The conservative, not only do they fail at understanding anything related to international politics, did a great job in the past protecting its citizen abroad and will surely continue doing so in the future.

    4. Re:Savages by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it is bizarre that Iran apparently has people who track the authors of software used to host pornography and associates it with their residency status and availability for arrest in Iran.

    5. Re:Savages by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're a pervert in Iran, you either go to jail ... or the secret service.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Savages by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Iranian tax dollars at work?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    7. Re:Savages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isnt it? I think it is something quite different. LIkley, First someone who had a vendetta or interest in his father's property decided to take care of him. then bribe some judges, then find out when he visits, then arrest him. THat's much more likely.

    8. Re:Savages by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I mean it's not like Canada can do much after all, after it tells it's citizens. Don't go there. And it can't do much diplomatically besides recalling it's ambassadorship, and besides it's not like we're already in a roll with them after refusing them another embassy in the country because they're terrorist scuzz suckers in the first place either. You don't know as much as you think you know, let alone understand as much as you think you know.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Savages by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Diplomacy would be a better move... It's quite likely that Canada could achieve his release through diplomatic channels. Or at least, it was quite likely before the current administration took over.... Now, I'm not so sure. But going to war with Iran wouldn't achieve anything, nor would it be a particularly intelligent move. Far more people would die.

      Part of the problem is that this person is a dual citizen. He's both Iranian and Canadian. If he had renounced his Iranian citizenship when he got his Canadian citizenship, we would't be having this discussion, because he would have been extradited to Canada 3 years ago.

    10. Re:Savages by geogob · · Score: 1

      I wonder how you can bring out such bold statements following a single vague comment on my part. THAT I don't understand.

    11. Re:Savages by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Interesting reading. You do realize he was captured in a firefight in Afghanistan don't you? That is the very definition of enemy combatant. He pled guilty to five charges and is serving an 8 year sentence for murder. Hardly sounds like a tourist and at least he can look forward to going home one day. I'm not a fan of Guantanamo Bay, if people are caught they should be tried and sentenced if guilty or sent home if innocent. This crap of holding on to people for years with no trial is definetly wrong and should be stopped.

    12. Re:Savages by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Yes. Arar was wrongfully sent home to Syria, a country he is a citizen of, and they tortured him. He was cleared of any charges by them and a Canadian commision. He was later apoligized to by the Canadian Premier and awarded 10.5 million dollars(Canadian). A clear case of wrong doing by over zealous governments. It still hardly compares to the case above. Want to bet this guy survives to collect any money? Would you really rather take you chance with Iranian justice instead of US or Canadian? Don't get me wrong. I don't like the attack on civil liberties since 9/11 and I think the war on terror is out of hand. That said, if you think Iran and the US are on the same plane you've clearly lost any sense of perspective.

    13. Re:Savages by qbast · · Score: 1

      "Plead guilty", are you serious?. So you have confession forced by torture, some kind of kangaroo court instead normal law process and you are just sure that his pleading was something else than "please don't send me back" ? Hell, even if agree to that 'unlawful combatant' thing (funny how in every war waged by US, the only lawful combatant are American and allied soldiers) article 3 of Geneva Convention still applies - especially humane treatment.

    14. Re:Savages by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      Going to war to stop killing. That's a really bad idea, especially in this case. If I have a relative in Iran who is on death row then, presumably, I have other family in Iran as well. A war would put them in great danger of dying as well. How would that help?

      In addition, more people in the west really need to realize that most Iranians don't like this Islamic regime. But they are trapped in it. Threats of war (or, god forbid, an actual war) would just boost the strength of the regime. People there may not like it, but they prefer it (as anyone would) to invasion by a foreign country.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    15. Re:Savages by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Yeah you can't expect anything from the Conservatives under Harper. If it doesn't:
      a) Give Harper more power, or
      b) Give money to Big Businesses that have contributed to his election, or
      c) Make Canada more like a Republican-Inspired police state
      d) Do something substantial to bring money to the Praries, ... it wont happen on his watch.

      I am so ashamed of my fellow Canadian citizens for electing Stephen Harper. How can they have been so incredibly stupid?

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    16. Re:Savages by anagama · · Score: 1

      You so don't get it it's ridiculous. You don't get to plead guilty. There is no arraignment. Not due process. And I'd be surprised any are guilty, considering we were paying people 5x the local annual per capita income for tips. What a deal, live high on the hog AND get rid of that annoying neighbor.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    17. Re:Savages by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 2

      A little different than the U.S., where it's either jail or Congress.

    18. Re:Savages by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Seriously the guy pled guilty. It's not a kangaroo court, they follow rules even if those rules are not unanimously approved by everyone. Evidently the torture isn't of an all consuming nature there since many of the detanees maintain their innocence. Many have been released due to lack of evidence which doesn't happen in kangaroo courts. Again, while I don't agree with what goes on at Guantanamo it's not even close to what passes for justice in Iran.

    19. Re:Savages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) He isn't a Canadian citizen; he has permanent residency and is working toward citizenship.
      2) I don't know what the rules are in Iran about renouncing your citizenship, but I do know that dual citizens travelling to Iran must do so under their Iranian passport. If someone is Iranian, a foreign citizenship (or residency status) does not provide any protection if they run afoul of Iranian laws. International media coverage may help some.
      3) Diplomatic channels have not worked in the past. Zahra Kazemi was a dual-citizen photojournalist arrested for taking photos outside of an Iranian prison. She died in custody. Hossein Derakhshan is a dual-citizen blogger who was arrested during a trip home to Iran and has been imprisoned there for a couple of years.

      In short, I don't think there's a whole lot Canada can do. I wish there was--I really respect Iranian-Canadians for their contributions to Canada and their courage in opposing the regime in their homeland--but I'm not optimistic.

    20. Re:Savages by jmactacular · · Score: 1

      Exactly how much time do they have on their hands, when they're not using their hands for utilizing said software?

    21. Re:Savages by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      He's an Iranian citizen. He's not a citizen of Canada, but a permanent resident.

    22. Re:Savages by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      (funny how in every war waged by US, the only lawful combatant are American and allied soldiers

      That isn't even close to true, although I can understand why you might think that.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    23. Re:Savages by qbast · · Score: 1

      Could you explain what Soviet or Syrian massacres have to do with anything? The only involvement of US and UK in Katyn was covering it up for political reasons.

    24. Re:Savages by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I don't remember Canada going to war when another of their citizens was captured and tortured by different bunch of savages on trumped-up charges. Why act differently now?

      I'm not sure you are keeping your "savages" straight. (By the way - thanks for the link.)

      In October 2010 he pleaded guilty to the five charges against him as part of a plea agreement with military commission prosecutors. He was captured on July 27, 2002 by American forces at the age of 15 following a four-hour firefight in the village of Ayub Kheyl, Afghanistan. . . .

      Khadr pled guilty to the murder of Christopher Speer. On October 29, 2010, despite the prosecution psychiatrist testifying that he showed no signs of remorse;[31] Khadr apologized to the widow of Speer for the pain he had caused her. . . ..

      The following day, soldiers including Silver returned to search the premises. Local villagers were believed to have taken away two bodies and provided them an Islamic burial, but refused to disclose their location to the Americans who wished to identify the fighters.

      Believing that the wooden boards beneath the last-killed rifleman could have been used to cover an underground chamber, an excavator was used to tear down the walls of the buildings. This demolition uncovered five boxes of rifle ammunition, two rockets, two grenades and three rocket-propelled grenades in the huts. Some of them had accidentally detonated while lying in the smouldering ruins. A plastic bag was discovered in the granary, containing documents, wires and a videocassette. OC-1's report claims the videotape was found in the main house, rather than the granary, and also mentioned detonators modeled as Sega game cartridges.

      The video shows Khadr toying with detonating cord as other men including Abu Laith al-Libi assemble explosives in the same house as had just been destroyed, identifiable by its walls, rugs and the environment seen out the windows in the video, and planting landmines while smiling and joking with the cameraman. It has been suggested that these were the same landmines later recovered by American forces on a road between Gardez and Khowst.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    25. Re:Savages by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Evidently the torture isn't of an all consuming nature there since many of the detanees maintain their innocence

      Perhaps that's because not all detainees have been shipped to Syria for torture - I mean, interrogation?

    26. Re:Savages by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Perspective is a matter of where you stand. Yes, Iranian justice sounds terrible but I'm not affected by it unless I GO THERE . That's not necessarily true of US "justice" - especially since America seems to actively strong-arm other countries into playing by its rules.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    27. Re:Savages by qbast · · Score: 1

      I do keep them straight. Any organization or government that uses torture in order to extract information, force confession or just because they feel like it is bunch of savages in my book. Which can be applied to both sides of Afghanistan war.

    28. Re:Savages by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's not a kangaroo court, they follow rules even if those rules are not unanimously approved by everyone.

      The rules they follow are in direct conflict with the written rules that authorize those rules, and even then, they don't follow them. He was the youngest person tried as an adult by a military court since WWII. So the Us military goodwin'd themselves.

      Again, while I don't agree with what goes on at Guantanamo it's not even close to what passes for justice in Iran.

      Hold you indefinitely and torture you until you confess. What's the difference again?

    29. Re:Savages by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The question was about unlawful combatants. The assertion was that in US wars, the enemy is *always* unlawful. I think he was pointing out that others have similar records, though that is irrelevant to the US's record. The US doesn't fight military. There is no military that can hold up to the US, so none will fight it. So instead, the only way to even attempt military parity is to fight a guerrilla war, using tactics the US learned in Vietnam and taught to al Queda and others over the years.

  5. Wait and See by UncleWilly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He will end up being pardoned and sent back to Canada, thus showing Iran as having an enlightened justice system. We've seen this over and over again.

    1. Re:Wait and See by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Before, or after, the sentence is carried out?

  6. We've had a similar case here in NL by bytesex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The question is: why oh why do all of these people go back to fscking Iran ?!

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:We've had a similar case here in NL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      One day a guy was sleeping in the sun with his pants off, and the papa tapeworm and the baby tapeworm got out in the sun. It was a first for the baby, so it looked at everything with big eyes and started asking. Pa, pa, what is this big shiny blue dome? The sky, son, the sky. Pa, pa, what is this shiny yellow thing in the middle of the sky? The sun, son, the sun. Pa, pa, what is the beautiful green thing all around? A meadow, son, with flowers. Pa, pa, when there are so many beautiful things in the world, why do we live in this stinking hole? Motherland, son, motherland.

    2. Re:We've had a similar case here in NL by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      In this case, family matters. His father was (still is?) terminally ill. He wanted to see his dying rather one more time while he still had the chance. A story worthy of a cheap soap, but in this case happens to be true.

    3. Re:We've had a similar case here in NL by MAD+R · · Score: 1

      The question is: why oh why do all of these people go back to fscking Iran ?!

      The draw of checking Iran's filing system is a powerful force indeed

    4. Re:We've had a similar case here in NL by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Because it's his country? He probably has family there.

  7. Iran is a crazy country ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    what i read this as my first thought sprang to my mind was 'Oh, dear god, will someone bomb that crazy country.' I don't mind other shock and awe campaign takes place there... Really.

    I wish all the best for Malekpour. :(

    1. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Bombing is easy. The US is good at bombing. The problem is what to do afterwards. If you just bomb and then ignore, you end up with the government reforming or a worse government emerging, and in a few years you're back where you started - except that now the people hate the western world even more, because they lost friends and relatives in the attacks. You could bomb and occupy to control the rebuilding, but that is very expensive - just look at the fiasco in Iraq, how much that cost over how many years. Iran has twice the population. Then there are economic considerations: Iran exports a hell of a lot of oil, and if they stopped pumping the resulting price rise would raise the cost of many businesses so much it'd push the already-struggling global economy back into a full-blown depression. The only way to solve the problem perminantly through force is a scortched earth campaign: Nuke the country so hard that there are no survivers. The international community tends to frown on such actions though, and would likely end up initiating world war three.

    2. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by sjames · · Score: 2

      I wonder if Dmitry Sklyarov feels the same way about the U.S.

    3. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by geogob · · Score: 2

      Yes, of course. Don't judge something because, regardless of the facts, this other fictional fantasy (redundancy intended) might perhaps with luck (again) be true.

      I'll be careful and I'll stick to facts, thank you.

    4. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, Sklyarov was not sentenced to death.

    5. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, history tells us there is another option. But genocide has gone out of style.

      Figures. Now that we got the means to actually do it efficiently...

      (yes, I'm a cynic. But just a little)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Not to mention if you nuke the country, what happens to the oil?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    7. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Not to mention if you nuke the country, what happens to the oil?

      If we bring back the neutron bomb, not much.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    8. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Kill the meat, save the metal eh?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    9. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The problem with genocide (well, aside from the moral issues) is that it only really works if you can make sure that you've got everyone. That means everyone in iran, and the transitive closure of anyone either related or sympathetic to anyone there. Otherwise, you kill a lot of people and leave a small group who passionately hate you and feel that they have nothing to lose. And, once you've worked out who you need to kill, it's generally everyone except a few thousand sociopaths who don't care what happens to anyone else.

      It's usually much cheaper to spread evidence that the demagogues are child molesters (or idolators or whatever the culture demands).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by anagama · · Score: 1

      Al Awlaki was executed without trial, without evidence, on Obama's word alone that he was a bad guy. It appears that Al Awlaki made anti-US videos. In other words, he was executed for his speech.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    11. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      The problem with genocide ... is that it only really works if you can make sure that you've got everyone.

      It seemed to have worked with Japan (and it wasn't even everyone).

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    12. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by sjames · · Score: 1

      True, but only because the particular perfectly legal thing he did in his own country happened not to carry the death penalty.

    13. Re:Iran is a crazy country ever. by cjsm · · Score: 1

      Yea, and kills tens of thousands of innocent people in the process. You, and the millions of Americans who think like you, are murderers.

      --
      This ad space for rent.
  8. Convoluted Justice? by Flipstylee · · Score: 2

    is trapped by a convoluted justice system that is manipulated by rival factions in [insert country here].

    FTFY.

  9. Mixed thoughts by vikingpower · · Score: 2

    On the one hand, one might argue that Malekpour knew - or should have known - what he risked by returning to Iran.

    OTOH, the death penalty is heinous in and by itself.

    The question that comes to my mind, and that I would very much like to have feedback upon, is: does this case deserve a campaign, under "us" computer programmers, geeks, architects, database tuners and birds of many digital feathers, to free Malekpour ?

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Mixed thoughts by Zorque · · Score: 2

      The summary itself even says that he didn't know porn sites were using his software, why would somebody know or even suspect they would be arrested for such a thing?

    2. Re:Mixed thoughts by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      The question that comes to my mind, and that I would very much like to have feedback upon, is: does this case deserve a campaign, under "us" computer programmers, geeks, architects, database tuners and birds of many digital feathers, to free Malekpour ?

      Yes.

  10. Pay attention to compiler warnings! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, it's easy to just glaze over things like, "conversion from int to long," "unused variable," or "insulting and desecrating the principles of Islam." But it's better to fix them . . . it may save your life!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Pay attention to compiler warnings! by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      It's not a bug, it's a feature. Defect closed.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Pay attention to compiler warnings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, it's easy to just glaze over things like, "conversion from int to long," "unused variable," or "insulting and desecrating the principles of Islam." But it's better to fix them . . . it may save your life!

      Unfortunately, the whack jobs of all religions get all the press because they do stupid and whacky things in the name of their religion.

      I wish the Islamic World would just go and condemn the Saudi, Taliban, Iranian leadership for dishonoring the principles of Islam and while they're at it, give the fucking Shia's a break.

      I'm at least trying to put the Christian nutters in my country in their place when I can - because many of them would do the same fucking thing if we weren't a land of the rule of law. Some do anyway - like the murder of abortion docs and bombing of women's clinics in the name of God.

    3. Re:Pay attention to compiler warnings! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well it's obviously a feature come egypt today too.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  11. Death penalty by lorinc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is one of the numerous examples why death penalty should never exist.

    1. Re:Death penalty by GrBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would go one further and say that situations like this is why RELIGION shouldn't be allowed.

    2. Re:Death penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While religion can be destructive at times, it does do a lot of good. I'm an atheist, but stating that religion should not be allowed is a violation of human rights. Prosecuting every religion is the same as prosecuting just one, which is often what happens in countries like Iran. However, the death penalty definitely should be banned.

    3. Re:Death penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      WTF, people? Seriously? 5, Insightful? For this stupid comment? "RELIGION shouldn't be allowed." This is an idiot.
      Let me say it: There's nothing wrong with religion. The problem is with those people who abuse it as a reason to kill people. Same thing for atheism, believing what politicians say, or any other belief. Belief is not something that should be prohibited. That would be insane. That would be even worse than censorship, because censorship only prohibits whatever someone would like to publish, not whatever someone thinks.

    4. Re:Death penalty by NightlordTW · · Score: 2

      religion is only an argument, take it away and one will easily find another.

    5. Re:Death penalty by artor3 · · Score: 1

      This was modded +5.

      Let any atheist still holding that their beliefs are different from religion take note. There are people among you every bit as intolerant, authoritarian, and bigoted as you would find in any religion.

    6. Re:Death penalty by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      How about organized religion shouldn't be allowed? It does seem to be far more trouble than it's worth. Kind of like the Mafia.

  12. MEGAUPLOAD by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    The flip side of megaupload. Who knows which of the ~200 governments doesn't like what you do?

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  13. Avaaz? by greylion3 · · Score: 2

    Maybe a case for avaaz.org?

    --
    Privacy begins with ..
  14. Re:Lets tell it like it is by qxcv · · Score: 2

    This is what happens when any country is run by insert religion here. We see it in Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, etc. These countries really are better off under dictators rather than leading themselves, compare Saudi Arabia to Somalia. We will see a lot more of this in the "Arab Spring" countries. I expect to be modded down by the PC crowd with their "all belief systems are equal" and "a Theocracy can be just as good as secular democracy (as long as it isn't Christian)" comments but they are just ignoring what actually happens whenever insert religious group here get into power. Surprise surprise they follow the teaching of insert religion here - from a demented warlord with a taste for little girls.

    Bonus points: come up with five religions that could make the above quote factually correct.

    --
    "The most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough." -- Eric S. Raymond
  15. british soldiers by shentino · · Score: 1

    Remember all those british sailors who got captured for sailing into their territorial waters?

    Again, forced confessions, torture.

    Iran is probably just flexing its muscles in an attempt to assert sovereignty.

  16. Re:Lets tell it like it is by jimicus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not, I would say, a particularly PC view, and doubtless one that will get you modded troll quicker than a quick thing. But I would temper your view with a rather more - shall we say diplomatic? - way of putting things.

    Some views are fundamentally incompatible and unless both parties are prepared to compromise, conflict will ultimately result. Full stop, end of conversation. Get together people who feel strongly enough to kill to make their point and give them the means to do so, you probably shouldn't be too surprised when they do. There's no way of getting around this, and to pretend there is is probably the most damaging thing extreme political correctness has ever achieved.

    In this case, the conflict is between very conservative Muslims who happen to be in charge of a country and the West, but it could just as easily be between animal liberation people and drugs testing labs.

  17. The RIAA and MPAA are jealous by Required+Snark · · Score: 2

    If they had their way, this is the kind of "justice" that they want: the worst penalty they can get away with, using the full power of the state, and no effective appeal. In both cases, tyranny is the desired result.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:The RIAA and MPAA are jealous by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      It's just a matter of time, really.

  18. Re:Lets tell it like it is by Chrisq · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not, I would say, a particularly PC view, and doubtless one that will get you modded troll quicker than a quick thing. But I would temper your view with a rather more - shall we say diplomatic? - way of putting things.

    Some views are fundamentally incompatible and unless both parties are prepared to compromise, conflict will ultimately result. Full stop, end of conversation. Get together people who feel strongly enough to kill to make their point and give them the means to do so, you probably shouldn't be too surprised when they do. There's no way of getting around this, and to pretend there is is probably the most damaging thing extreme political correctness has ever achieved.

    In this case, the conflict is between very conservative Muslims who happen to be in charge of a country and the West, but it could just as easily be between animal liberation people and drugs testing labs.

    Islam is not just incompatible with the west but fundamental principles such as equality, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to life (for homosexuals etc.), democracy, and a lot more. Its true that some animal testers would go to war with anti-vivisectionists and vice versa, but they would want a reformulation of laws that would apply to everyone - they would not want to prevent certain sections from expressing their view or testifying in court. Islam is fundamentally opposed to our ideas of rights and equality.

  19. Re:Media Manipulation by dkf · · Score: 1

    Read the protocols of their elders for some evidence.

    What, like Telnet and UUCP and stuff like that?

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  20. Globalized injustice by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Globalized injustice...

    Iran currently has one among the most insulting and desecrating governments on planet Earth.

    It is one among many countries who detain foreign nationals without a proper legal system, and like many other 3rd world countries it has retained the death penalty.

    How many countries act on these lethal principles? I don't know, but the list is long and is typically related to countries where the populace and those who believe in supernatural forces have a say on the political agenda.

  21. Re:We should expect such activities by jamesh · · Score: 1

    If america is going to shut down websites and prosecute foreign citizens (MegaUpload.com) for violation of OUR laws then we should expect the same from foreign countries. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
    Im Just Sayin

    So take the guys cars away from him.

    OTOH, maybe this is just the start of the outsourcing of the death penalty by the US. "Attention MegaUpload.com guy, due to technical difficulties the plane currently extraditing you to the US for trial is making a brief stopover in Iran. Feel free to get out and stretch your legs.".

  22. Re:A question of priorities by Cederic · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of this Burt Prelutsky, but is he always an ignorant cunt?

    I mean, seriously? Nobody's worried about jewish people building houses in Israel. They're pretty fucking pissed about Israeli people building houses in Palestine but that's a very different thing.

    Not to mention the attempt to incite religious divide by naming the activities of two religions, rather than the fuckwits practicing either.

    The idiots in Tehran would be idiots in any religion. The Israelis illegally settling in Palestine may actually be Christian, atheist or in fact fucking Muslim themselves.

    No wonder you posted as AC, I too would be ashamed to have made such an ignorant and stupid statement.

  23. Re:Media Manipulation by Zaldarr · · Score: 1

    It is an exclamation mark in brackets, and it doesn't have a name. [English nerd here]

    --
    I write professional videogame reviews! http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/
  24. A Pitiful lot, these iranians and muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, a piece of software for photo uploading can damage islam? WHat a f*cking weak religion.

    Looks more like maybe he was the sole inheritor of property of his father, and someone wanted him out of the picture. So they came up with the grand charge of 'insulting islam' and bribed some judges..

    Tell me, according to these islamists, is there any person alive on earth (except those unwashed bearded mullas) who are not guilty of insulting islam some way or the other?

    Heck, everyone connected with any part of internet would all be guilty of insulting islam and therefore target for murder, then.

    1. Re:A Pitiful lot, these iranians and muslims by Thing+1 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Heck, everyone connected with any part of internet would all be guilty of insulting islam and therefore target for murder, then.

      Well, I did my part this morning: I imagined that the shit I took was an image of Mohammed, just before I flushed him.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:A Pitiful lot, these iranians and muslims by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Not very long ago the same happened in Christian societies.. fact is, Islam, Christianity and Jewish faith is more or less the same. The rest is lack of education and lack of social reform.

      Religion is a great weapon for bigots, fanatics and anyone seeking power.

  25. Porn is bad but not actual sexual assault? by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1

    "Once in October 2008 the interrogators stripped me while I was blindfolded and threatened to rape me with a bottle of water."

    So the Iranian government is worried about porn, but it's okay for its interrogators to threaten sexual assault? How does this make any sense?

    1. Re:Porn is bad but not actual sexual assault? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      "Once in October 2008 the interrogators stripped me while I was blindfolded and threatened to rape me with a bottle of water."

      So the Iranian government is worried about porn, but it's okay for its interrogators to threaten sexual assault? How does this make any sense?

      It make no sense, of course, but that's what happens when you allow borderline-illiterate savages to run governments. Reason and justice are not even on the list when corruption and feigned religious piety are at the top.

  26. Re:We should expect such activities by qbast · · Score: 1

    ... or have them stretched for you. Torture? No, we don't do it here! This is just 'enhanced physical activity'.

  27. Governments are inherently evil. by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    Never forget that governments are inherently evil, because they occupy the space that is historically occupied by the inherently evil forces that fight for power over people.

    That's why Constitution is important - law above the government set by the people to limit what government can do.

    That is why people who should really be supporting a system of laws set by the Constitution, but who find themselves defending government's action that go above and beyond any Constitutional restrictions are so confused. Often those are the people who want government to cuddle them and give them entitlements and put obligations on others to provide those entitlements, but then government gains strength over all people and those who rely on entitlements are the ones who are going to suffer at the end, because those don't want entitlements can already take care of themselves and always see a government for what it is.

    1. Re:Governments are inherently evil. by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

      Constitution by itself means nothing. All dark regimes (including Iran and N. Korea) have some kind of constitution - it doesn't prevent the governments from either completely ignoring it or adjusting the constitution to their needs.

      What's really required for the constitution to work is an independent authority with power to enforce it, and much more importantly, people willing to stand for their freedoms.

    2. Re:Governments are inherently evil. by base3 · · Score: 1

      It's that last part we're sorely missing. Witness the line of compliant sheep waiting to be patted down on the way into sporting events, groped at the airport, or show their receipts on the way out of the Wal-Mart. Suggest that all this is unnecessary and the bleating in favor of whatever surveillance in the name of security drowns out any voice of reason.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    3. Re:Governments are inherently evil. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Definitely.

      Look at the republican debates. Any time that the warmongers on the stage talk about attacking Iran and building the most powerful military in the world that nobody would ever even think about attacking USA - there are applause.

      When Ron Paul says: do to others as you want to be done to you - he gets booed by the crowed.

      What Ron Paul needs to suggest is that it is not he, who is 'weak on defence', it's the people then, because if asking Congress to declare a proper war is 'weak on defence', then it means the people don't trust themselves to be 'strong on defence'.

      These people have either no ability to think beyond any sound bite or are real cowards.

    4. Re:Governments are inherently evil. by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

      I also found that incident very disturbing. People who would boo the Golden Rule can only be sociopaths, cowards or imbeciles, and I suspect they are all three.

    5. Re:Governments are inherently evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nice Libertarian try, but like most nice Libertarian tries, so very wrong. Let's get one thing straight: we do NOT have a problem with runaway government in the US. We have a problem with runaway LAW ENFORCEMENT, aided and abetted by statist control freaks. These people have nothing to do with entitlements, in fact generally can't stand entitlements, social safety nets, or anything else that might actually promote a civilized and just society because they consider anybody who isn't insanely rich to be sub-human. Then there's the kind, usually but not always college kids who haven't been beat up enough in the world yet, who believe somehow that if they work hard they'll be rich one day too, so by extension anybody who isn't rich hasn't worked hard. That people still believe that crap is just amazing.

      As to those who don't want entitlements seeing government for what it is--that I can agree on. They see government exactly for what it is--something that can take tax money that should be used for the public good and funnel it to themselves. I'm referring of course to the business and corporate class in our society, which has turned this into a high art form. See, to have necessary social programs still takes money, and so what REALLY makes government take too much money from people is the necessity of having enough to perform those functions that should be performed by government PLUS having to have enough to funnel to crony capitalists. Why do you think other countries, with a much higher satisfaction of living than the US, manage to have working social programs without the bloated military and without the burden of "privatization" of things that are most properly government services?

      Oh, and there's another kind of person who sees government for what it is: that would be the useful tools like the religious zealots who see government as a method of enforcing their idiotic beliefs on people who wouldn't otherwise accept them. Go try to buy a beer on Sunday morning (or at all) in most places in the US and you'll run smack into this. Go ask a random sampling of people you'll meet if this is stupid and you'll get a resounding "yes", but nothing is changed for fear of pissing off those who would use laws and law enforcement to enforce their own unpopular moral codes on everyone else. The corporate types need those because corporations can't vote (yet) so they have to have useful idiots to vote against their own self interests.

      What you might think of as "liberals" know all this. They know who law enforcement targets, and who it doesn't. You want to stop customs from leering through your electronic data at the boarder just because they say they can? Liberals will be on your side with that. You want to stop the TSA? You'll get no argument from most liberals. Think DHS is the biggest threat to this country that's ever existed? On your side there. Think the Supreme Court was wrong about the government taking your property and selling it to developers? You've got a lot of allies. The list goes on. There will be disagreements. You might think we have too much government regulation. I think we have too much of the wrong kind and not enough of the right kind because our government does not serve the people who created it anymore--and this needs fixing badly. You think your tax burden is too high? I think that's because monied interests have shifted their share of taxes onto you, which is wrong.

      The point is, to effect change, we've got to do the one thing the statist control freaks fear: stop fighting amongst ourselves and start working for HUMAN FREEDOM, to put the individual above the corporate and the state. You would do wise to heed some words spoken by Franklin Roosevelt: "Necessitous men are not free men. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made." That is why unfettered capitalism, no taxes at all, and no regulation at all have nothing whatsoever to do with a democratic and free society, and in fact will result in an undemocratic and not free society just as surely as a communist dictatorship will.

  28. Any country controlled by religion by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...are bound by illogical and fantasy rules & regulations that only makes sense to a fanatically indoctrinated mind.

    The headline in this post is also typical of the sensationalist kind, yes - it's sad that it's a web developer that got the death sentence, but it would be equally sad that it would be anyone in any other category as well, it's why they're being judged that we should react on - not what status they have in society.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Any country controlled by religion by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Any country controlled by religion are bound by illogical and fantasy rules & regulations that only makes sense to a fanatically indoctrinated mind.

      One nation, under God. But since you can't seem to figure out plurals you must be from the UK — For God, Queen, and Country!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Any country controlled by religion by PPH · · Score: 1

      One nation, under God.

      That 'under God' bit: added in 1954. And its been down hill since then. I want my country back!

      you must be from the UK - For God, Queen, and Country!

      To the credit of the British, their attitude toward religion is much more flexible than that of our evangelical Christians. When King Henry VIII couldn't get a divorce from the Vatican, he just changed the nation's church.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Any country controlled by religion by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To the credit of the British, their attitude toward religion is much more flexible than that of our evangelical Christians. When King Henry VIII couldn't get a divorce from the Vatican, he just changed the nation's church.

      Well, they're importing Muslims to try to fix this problem... (I kid, I kid...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Re:Lets tell it like it is by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

    Bonus points: come up with five religions that could make the above quote factually correct.

    Buddhism? I dunno, how about you go first..

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  30. Questions anunswered by mapkinase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1/ what's the name of the software (I tried to google him in various file extensions, but could not find him)
    2/ list of websites that use it.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  31. Campaign to help by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a campaign to help this man: https://peoplewithoutnation.wordpress.com/

    Most recently, there's an appeal to write to the Prime Minister of Canada, who hasn't yet spoken out in support of Saeed:
    https://peoplewithoutnation.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/take-action-write-a-letter-to-stephen-harper-canadas-prime-minister/

    The death sentence could be carried out imminently.

    Saeed Malekpour was in Iran to visit his gravely ill father. He was waiting for Canadian citizenship and the Iranian regime are aiming to make an example of him, having tortured him and denied him due process. I think the Canadian government does have a particular moral duty to stand up for him under the circumstances, although really all democratic governments ought to oppose this sort of thing.

    The Iranian regime seems to have an interest in intimidating the population (and making an example out of cases that are highly-publicised internally, such as this one) since there's an election coming up in March, as well as the general interest in keeping the population scared.

    Amnesty also have some information on the case:
    http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/iran-must-halt-execution-web-programmer-2012-01-19

    I'm just piecing together some information I've found here, I'm not connected to the case.

    1. Re:Campaign to help by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And what exactly is the Canadian government going to do? Fart in Iran's general direction? This is a country that is notorious for not giving a damn what outside countries think; it is capricious to the extreme.

      The stupid bugger should never have gone back, period. Frankly, if I got free of a place like Iran, I'd never look back, nor, do I suspect, would my relatives there expect me to.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  32. Re:Lets tell it like it is by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when any country is run by Muslims. We see it in Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, etc.

    How's the situation in Indonesia, by the way? It also has a strong Muslim population base, Jakarta being the world's 2nd largest city (Tokyo is 1st).

  33. Re:Agreed. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    A country run by (fundamentalist) Muslims is not a good idea. Same goes for fundamentalist Christians. Or fundamentalist whatever.

    To have any moral standing you'd have to fight death penalty in your own country.

    My country doesn't have the death penalty

  34. Re:Lets tell it like it is by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    This is what happens when any country is run by Muslims. We see it in Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, etc.

    How's the situation in Indonesia, by the way? It also has a strong Muslim population base, Jakarta being the world's 2nd largest city (Tokyo is 1st).

    Aside from mobs attacking churches, laws coming i that call for amputation, and laws that subjugate minorities it is doing well. As Muslim states go it is a political paradise, only a low level of sustained violence with occasional massacres .

  35. "acting against the national security" by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is a crime in most any countries. It just varies what that means from place to place. Here in the US, copying a song, or selling breath mints, qualifies.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. US versus Iran by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, let's see here. Maybe not *in* the US, but *by* the US:

    you can be gunned down by Apache helicopters for peacefully assembling
    you can be thrown into indefinite jail on the word of a paid informant
    If you are a foreign leader, you can be deposed and hung
    or deposed and brought into the US to stand trial for breaking US laws
    If you are a foreign citizen, you can be extradited and put in jail for breaking civil law
    If you are a US citizen the president can have you killed by the CIA
    You can be tortured by the US (for some definitions of torture)
    You can be shipped to another country and tortured (for all definitions of torture)

    I dunno, it's a tough choice. Is Iran worse than the US because it visits harsh penalties on a few people, or is the US worse because it's actions are milder but more widespread?

    Because, as we know, we can only oppose one evil at a time. Comparing the relative evil helps us to make that choice.

    Oh, and let's not forget China.

  37. And the lesson is... by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    Don't got back to Iran.

  38. Glenn Greenwald approves by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I am sure our libertarian/liberal fascist nazi blogging overlords wholeheartedly endorse this.

    1. Re:Glenn Greenwald approves by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Did Glenn Greenwald show support for this? His beliefs (as described in Wikipedia's article and citations on him) aren't consistent with support of the death penalty.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  39. this is one case when Iran is NOT right by vleo · · Score: 1

    Usually, I don't side with Iran bashing. But THIS particular case upsets me.

    I do not accept US imposing its laws outside of its borders. Remember that case of a Russian programmer that as part of his job in Moscow had written code that was removing some form of DRM by Adobe? How he was then grabbed by US authorities and threatened with 20 year sentence or so?

    Now - 20 years is better then death penalty, BUT, he was not a citizen of the US. Yet arrested for violating US laws, not Russian laws, while doing job, assigned to him by his supervisor, as an employee (not owner) of the company he worked for.

    Fortunately EFF and others got involved and this way or another he got back to Moscow, but I doubt he will be visiting US again, although Russian people are known to be crazy enough to do things like that :)

    Maybe EFF should get involved, if they are not, with this case as well.

    --
    Vassili Leonov ...it is the actions that affect us, not the motive...RMS
  40. Re:Unforgivable crimes of Iraq and Iran by hoeferbe · · Score: 1

    I've been following the U.S. elections for a bit (the selecting of the Republican candidate);

    and they all want to increase their popularity with the Republican voters by jingoism against Iran.

    I've noticed there was one Republican candidate who didn't do that...

  41. The religious right are jealous by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

    If they had their way, this is the kind of "justice" that they want: the worst penalty they can get away with, using the full power of the state, and no effective appeal. In both cases, tyranny is the desired result.

    This is the religious right in the US wants. (To be fair, it's what any religious adherents want.)

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  42. Re:Iran has SOPA and PIPA by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    As bad as they are, I don't recall that anyone would be put to death because they wrote software to, say, share copyrighted material.

    A sense of perspective goes a long way.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  43. porn? how about child porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And I'm pretty sure they enjoy looking at Porn so the dude would have been fine on a trip to the US.

    child porn?

    1. Re:porn? how about child porn? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      And that's a whole different category now isn't it?

    2. Re:porn? how about child porn? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Depends on who you ask. Bart & Lisa porn is illegal in many places (child porn where it's impossible that anyone was harmed, let alone minors, as both are portrayed by 40+ year old women).

  44. Right on cue: by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when any country is run by Muslims. We see it in Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, etc.

    How's the situation in Indonesia, by the way? It also has a strong Muslim population base, Jakarta being the world's 2nd largest city (Tokyo is 1st).

    Aside from mobs attacking churches, laws coming i that call for amputation, and laws that subjugate minorities it is doing well. As Muslim states go it is a political paradise, only a low level of sustained violence with occasional massacres .

    Right on cue: Indonesian Man Faces Five Years For Atheist Facebook Post

  45. It is also totally stupid, and useless by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Unless you presume that Slashdot is a 100% US site, only read by US viewers and only concerned with happenings in the US (and thus only reporting on foreign news as it effects America) then it is moronic and egotistical to try and steer everything to be a discussion about the US. People not from the US (and heck those from it as well) might be interested in what is happening in the rest of the world, and discussing it. It is stupid to try and twist the discussion back around to always be about the US.

  46. Not really by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    The crime being stuck to the person is the problem; the punishment is merely relative to the culture. Iran probably will not kill him; they love those harsh things then make some sort of deal we don't know much about and a few years later he is out like an American hiker.

  47. This is not right by davesque · · Score: 1

    I saw a link to this website in another person's comment:
    https://peoplewithoutnation.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/take-action-write-a-letter-to-stephen-harper-canadas-prime-minister/

    I took a few minutes to write my own letter to Canada's Prime Minister. Who knows if he will read it or if it will make a difference? And who knows if Mr. Malekpour is actually guilty or not? Regardless, no one deserves to die for something like that. Please take a moment to speak your mind to Canada's Prime Minister: pm@pm.gc.ca

  48. Help me list other capital crimes in Iran by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    - witchcraft
    - apostasy
    - blasphemy
    - homosexuality
    - crimes against chastity (i.e. the crime of being raped)

    And Iran executes more people, per-capita , than any other nation

    Also worth mentioning, Iran executes people for these "crimes" in the most gruesome, and painful ways possible: beheading, hanging, even stoning. The hangings are usually suspension hangings which are far more painful, and last much longer.

    Iran also executes children as young as nine years old.

    Other than execution, Iranian punishments include: amputation and flogging. Although sometimes those turn out to be executions also. As in the case of a child who was sentenced to 100 lashes, after being raped by a relative. She collapsed after 70 lashes, and died soon afterward. No punishment for the relative.

  49. Re:Lets tell it like it is by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Bonus points: come up with five religions that could make the above quote factually correct.

    Hanafi, Hanbali, Maliki, Shafi'i, Jafari? ~

  50. Re:Lets tell it like it is by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    The difference is that we've already mostly dealt with militant Christianity in the West. Not to say it isn't still there (especially in U.S.) or that it's not the problem. But it doesn't run the whole thing; at best, it's one of the parties.

  51. Great by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    :) thanks.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  52. ISLAM IS THE CANCER by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

    Enough said. Anarchy is Democracy.

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
  53. As someone of Iranian extraction... by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

    This is one more reason why I'm not going back to visit until they start giving the mullahs the Benito Mussolini/Nicolae Ceauescu treatment.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."