Slashdot Mirror


Aging Eyes Blamed For Seniors' Health Woes

Hugh Pickens writes "Scientists have looked for explanations as to why certain conditions occur with age, among them memory loss, slower reaction time, insomnia and even depression looking at such suspects as high cholesterol, obesity, heart disease and an inactive lifestyle. Now Laurie Tarkan writes that as eyes age, less and less sunlight gets through the lens to reach key cells in the retina that regulate the body's circadian rhythm, its internal clock that rallies the body to tackle the day's demands in the morning and slows it down at night, allowing the body to rest and repair. 'Evolution has built this beautiful timekeeping mechanism, but the clock is not absolutely perfect and needs to be nudged every day,' says Dr. David Berson, whose lab at Brown University studies how the eye communicates with the brain. Dr. Patricia Turner, an ophthalmologist who with her husband, Dr. Martin Mainster has written extensively about the effects of the aging eye on health, estimate that by age 45, the photoreceptors of the average adult receive just 50 percent of the light needed to fully stimulate the circadian system, by age 55, it dips to 37 percent, and by age 75, to a mere 17 percent and recommend that people should make an effort to expose themselves to bright sunlight or bright indoor lighting when they cannot get outdoors and have installed skylights and extra fluorescent lights in their own offices to help offset the aging of their own eyes. 'In modern society, most of the time we live in a controlled environment under artificial lights, which are 1,000 to 10,000 times dimmer than sunlight and the wrong part of the spectrum,' says Turner. 'We believe the effect is huge and that it's just beginning to be recognized as a problem.'"

149 comments

  1. Basement lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I usually keep the lights here in the basement off.

    1. Re:Basement lighting by EliSowash · · Score: 1

      Same with the rock I live under.

    2. Re:Basement lighting by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Did you read the summary much less the article or the study? The amount of light assists in the body's internal clock. The amount of light is not the only regulator and her research has never indicated what you proscribe to it. It may be a factor and worth some more research. Your personal anecdote is just that, a personal anecdote. That's like saying your uncle was a two-a-pack smoker; he didn't die of cancer so all the studies linking smoking to cancer from these "biologists" and "doctors" are hogwash.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Basement lighting by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Where's Dr. Bob, DC when you need him? I was looking forward to hearing about how the radiation from the commonly used business lighting causes vertebral subluxations to damage the spine and thus cause the eyes to have problems... ;)

      But seriously - I've always wondered about this. I find I'm happier when I force myself to get outside every couple hours during my working day to get some sunlight. I'm really much happier on vacations when I can get a full day's sun, and even the sunlight going to/from home in summers is much better than the "get up, dark, drive to work, dark, sit in work under flourescents, bleck, drive home, dark, go to bed, dark" rhythm of winter - there are definitely days where my rhythm gets off and I'm starting to slip into the "natural without lighting" 28-30 hour cycle that miners have reported experiencing after working too many long days underground.

    4. Re:Basement lighting by sjames · · Score: 2

      It only takes one eye being stimulated to reset the clock, so a cataracts in one eye shouldn't have a lot of effect.

      The question of those born blind and with disease of the retinas does need to be answered. Of course, a lot of blind people do retain some residual awareness of light and dark and still others might have an in-tact pathway to the SCM while having no conscious awareness of it.

    5. Re:Basement lighting by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Funny I'm just the opposite, that evil daystar makes me feel all crappy and run down, but give me those nice warm summer nights with big sky with stars aplenty and a big fat moon and ...ahhh, its like paradise. Even with ultra dark shades on more than an hour or two under that evil daystar gives me a serious skullthumper and just ruins my mood. Lucky for me that even though my GF is an "up with the roosters" happy morning person she has done accepted its pointless to change me, she just leaves me in the bed cave until noon for "breakfast" of home made pizza or burger and fries..damn now I'm hungry, y'all have a nice discussion i'm gonna go get a pizza.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Basement lighting by Pope · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a blue LED anti-SAD light. I do 30 minutes in the morning while eating breakfast. Done me a world of good so far this winter.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:Basement lighting by godel_56 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The question of those born blind and with disease of the retinas does need to be answered. Of course, a lot of blind people do retain some residual awareness of light and dark and still others might have an in-tact pathway to the SCM while having no conscious awareness of it.

      Total blindness certainly DOES cause disruptions of body circadian rhythms. Just Google "blindness circadian" and get an eyeful.

      www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10085469

      www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200010123431503

      jcem.endojournals.org/content/75/1/127

      Those above are just a few of the available references.

    8. Re:Basement lighting by HForN · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are special photoreceptors for UV light that you don't actually use to see that are directly connected to the SCN. Even if you were born without sight, as long as those work, you should still have a normal circadian rhythm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosensitive_ganglion_cell

    9. Re:Basement lighting by sjames · · Score: 1

      That does appear to answer the objections. Thanks.

    10. Re:Basement lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explains so much. :)

    11. Re:Basement lighting by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I have one of them gadgets. Hasn't helped me a bit. It makes a cool (but expensive) alarm clock though. Maybe it's because I'm 40ish and have become immune to blue wavelengths.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    12. Re:Basement lighting by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      No, hairyfeet, you are not a vampire, you are just a filthy Microsoft shill. Accept it, and maybe kill yourself or something.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    13. Re:Basement lighting by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Awww...did the poor little FOSSie have his perception bubble busted again? i do find that so delightful. I don't know whether to laugh at you or feel pity at your being so fucking pathetic, I mean I have wrote article on how to make Linux more accessible to small business, what have you done besides wave your tiny penis and scream shill at anybody that won't kiss RMS' sweaty ass? But don't worry i have some nice facts that will make your day, a place where linux is winning? Its vulnerabilities..

      Not only does Linux have 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities its competitor Windows Server 2008 does, but it bears 3 remotely exploitable unpatched security vulnerabilities (THE WORST KIND!): one and a two and a three. But hey, what can you expect from an OS that actually has less users than JavaME which is a shitty sub basement OS they put on Tracphones. Of course when you were given an equal chance to compete a decade old Windows beat the shit out of your Linux on netbooks and even ASUS, which invented the whole netbook for the masses with a Linux unit even ASUS has given up on your bullshit How about how you actually have the balls to celebrate getting a whole 1% market share ?

      But you stick your head under your little blankie and start crying about how "Only a shill wouldn't love our perfect OS!" while ignoring all the bugs, the vulnerabilities, failures, hell even Dell has to run their own repos just to keep your "precious" from crapping itself. How much money you think that costs Alex? wanna bet dell is LOSING money on every sale? I bet you think they can make it up on volume though huh? You just keep telling yourself I'm a bad man, I must be a "M$ Ninja" when in reality I'm your worst fucking nightmare...a retailer that has tried your shit and seen what a turd it is. hell its not even up to WinXP standards, much less OSX Lion or Win 7. Hell Vista was the biggest POS on the planet and even with MSFT not even having a horse in the race they fricking STOMPED you with a decade old creaking POS, how fucking sad and pathetic do you have to be to get beat by an OS that is so damned old it came out before SATA or even dual cores and it STILL kicks your ass?

      Maybe instead of calling names you should volunteer to fix some of the mess huh? i'm sure you think of yourself as some kind of programming genius because you can copypasta into a CLI. Of course in Windows we would call that a script kiddie, but I guess that means genius in your world. Oh a final bit of info, just FYI...Kernel.org pwnage , Linux.com pwned too oh and MYSQL.com throwing malware worse than a "look at teh titties" toipsite in case you missed it. Man gotta be impressed by that kick ass Linux security, them eyes that make bugs shallow must have cataracts huh?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Basement lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude hes just trying to annoy you. This Belits asshole already knows that you are not a shill, but he wants everybody else to think that so that they mod you down. He has already admitted that he will lie to discredit MS.

    15. Re:Basement lighting by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      lol wut

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    16. Re:Basement lighting by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh I know this, I just use the opportunity as a public service to point out what a giant fail his precious really is. You see its in a way like the failure of communism. You see the communists never could figure out how to fix the "busted shitter" problem and neither can Linux. Everyone wants to be the artist, nobody wants to be the guy that cleans toilets so they don't get cleaned. The communists had to actually order soldiers to do "potato duty" just to get someone to do the shit jobs nobody wanted but Linux don't have that luxury so what you get is a facade that covers a tarpaper shack with a busted outhouse attached. Sure it looks good on the outside but actually try living in it and its a stinking drafty about to fall over mess, and that is exactly what Linux is.

      Look at the links, more vulnerabilities rated severe than Win 2K8, Dell is losing money on every Ubuntu sale (Alex thinks they can make it up with volume, funny huh?) and even they can't get enough QA to get a lousy dozen devices to have their drivers checked before the next release makes a big old stinky all over them, so they have to run their own repos. Linux is Windows 98, nothing more. Its a CLO OS with a GUI bolted on that doesn't really work well, has shitty drivers, and if anything goes wrong you have to go CLI just to work on the POS.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:Basement lighting by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Oh I know this, I just use the opportunity as a public service to point out what a giant fail his precious really is. You see its in a way like the failure of communism. You see the communists never could figure out how to fix the "busted shitter" problem and neither can Linux. Everyone wants to be the artist, nobody wants to be the guy that cleans toilets so they don't get cleaned. The communists had to actually order soldiers to do "potato duty" just to get someone to do the shit jobs nobody wanted but Linux don't have that luxury so what you get is a facade that covers a tarpaper shack with a busted outhouse attached. Sure it looks good on the outside but actually try living in it and its a stinking drafty about to fall over mess, and that is exactly what Linux is.

      Are there supposed to be some actual arguments in this shit?

      Look at the links, more vulnerabilities rated severe than Win 2K8

      The definition of "vulnerability" is different for open source software -- all bugs are listed as vulnerabilities unless someone proven that a bug has no security implications. What no one bothers doing because it's easier to fix the bug, distribute the fix, and return to doing something productive.

      Microsoft, on the other hand, only acknowledges security bugs when they are exploited by someone.

      , Dell is losing money on every Ubuntu sale (Alex thinks they can make it up with volume, funny huh?)

      Why should anyone care about Dell money, or how much do they lose in Microsoft bribes when they don't sell Windows? For all I care, Dell management can commit a mass suicide.

      and even they can't get enough QA to get a lousy dozen devices to have their drivers checked before the next release makes a big old stinky all over them, so they have to run their own repos. Linux is Windows 98, nothing more. Its a CLO OS with a GUI bolted on that doesn't really work well, has shitty drivers, and if anything goes wrong you have to go CLI just to work on the POS.

      Repeating the lies often, does not make them true.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    18. Re:Basement lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft, on the other hand, only acknowledges security bugs when they are exploited by someone.

      This is false. There have been dozens and dozens of fixes which have never been released before any exploit was found. But if you want you can continue thinking that in your tiny head. Its obvious you have no talent in computer security beyond whatever propaganda you read on slashdot.

      "The first fact to face is that UNIX was not developed with security, in any realistic sense, in mind; this fact alone guarantees a vast number of holes."

      - Dennis Ritchie

      Haha.. . hes right .. nobody sane would ever choose this shitty design if they wanted a secure system.

    19. Re:Basement lighting by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      This is false. There have been dozens and dozens of fixes which have never been released before any exploit was found.

      Silently, without announcing it as a bug or ever getting near CVE.

      "The first fact to face is that UNIX was not developed with security, in any realistic sense, in mind; this fact alone guarantees a vast number of holes."

      - Dennis Ritchie

      Haha.. . hes right .. nobody sane would ever choose this shitty design if they wanted a secure system.

      Even Dennis Ritchie occasionally had some incredibly stupid ideas. STREAMS and Plan 9 come as two most prominent examples.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  2. Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count? by na1led · · Score: 3, Funny

    What are the effects of too much exposure to light? Should I use a screen filter for my monitor?

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  3. So much for geeks by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    that people should make an effort to expose themselves to bright sunlight or bright indoor lighting when they cannot get outdoors

    In neither case does bright lighting come into the equation. There's a reason geeks are thought of as pasty white,* though at least Sheldon has a set schedule of going outside to get sunlight once a week.

    *Yes, I do realize there are many geeks who get outside for various activities. It's a joke.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:So much for geeks by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      I do realize there are many geeks who get outside for various activities. It's a joke.

      Really? They must not be very serious geeks if they have time for such folly.

  4. another reason to get cholsterol under control by circletimessquare · · Score: 2
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  5. what about the blind? by j2.718ff · · Score: 2

    I wonder, do the blind have the same "health woes" when aging as the sighted?

    1. Re:what about the blind? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Life expectancy of the blind is usually less than half that of someone with eyesight the same age."

      That's according to http://www.cureblindness.org/world-blindness/ which probably includes lots of accidents which are non-health related deaths. (Wow, there's a concept. He's dead, but a *healthy* sort of dead.)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:what about the blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm talking out my ass here, but I think its more that the cycle is set at the wrong point, where if you were blind, it would be not at all.

    3. Re:what about the blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Wow, there's a concept. He's dead, but a *healthy* sort of dead.)

      Below the neck, he's perfectly healthy.
      What about above the neck?
      Perfectly healthy there too.
      So why is he dead?
      My guess is that the two perfectly healthy parts don't work quite as well when they're on different sides of the room.
      Oh.

    4. Re:what about the blind? by cratermoon · · Score: 1

      I wondered that exact same thing myself. At the very least, the authors of the study need to touch on this question. How do their claims stack up when applied to those born blind, or who lose sight at an early age?

    5. Re:what about the blind? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      that's because the blind are a gift to Shal-Hulud

    6. Re:what about the blind? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      No, no, they can't investigate the blind, professional welders or farm workers, since the results from multiple data points will likely ruin their business model.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    7. Re:what about the blind? by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      As every worm that ever crossed my young self will contest to.

    8. Re:what about the blind? by durrr · · Score: 1

      No, they are entirely preoccupied with dodging traffic. Of course only those that survived the introduction of the silent killer: the hybrid car.

    9. Re:what about the blind? by turtledawn · · Score: 2

      Many non-photosensitive congenitally blind people have what is called non-24 hour sleep-wake disorder, where their circadian rhythm is basically free floating. Blind people who are still photosensitive have lower incidence of this disorder, as long as they get some light each day (preferably morning sunlight).

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    10. Re:what about the blind? by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      The creators of this study aren't worried about the blind.... only aging rich people who are looking for something to worry about to fill their vapid lives.

  6. Cataract Surgery by wisebabo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe the article mentions that cataract surgery will fix this problem, allowing the full amount of light (in the correct part of the spectrum) back in. (In fact, as a recent slashdot story mentioned, it sometimes allows you to see in the UV!).

    I wonder if people will choose to have cataract surgery done even if they have no cataracts. My mom was recently evaluated for the surgery, evidently it's a (relatively) simple procedure; the patient goes home the same day and only has mild discomfort for a few days.

    Hi Carl!

    1. Re:Cataract Surgery by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I think the average slashdotter would rather be able to see in the infra-red range, not the ultra-violet range.

    2. Re:Cataract Surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My mom had cataract surgery done and was shocked at how much brighter the world was. While they were at it they fixed her vision so she only really needed reading glasses. She was used to wearing bifocals at all times. This totally screwed her up for about a year. Her vision was one way for 60+ years (well aside from the gradual changes over time) and suddenly was completely different. She actually hated it at the time. The plus side was that her seasonal depression went away. Now that she is used to the change it does not bother her and she is actually much happier.

    3. Re:Cataract Surgery by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      As the person who has Ultraviolet vision after Cataract Surgery, a reminder that many IOL's (Intra-Ocular-Lens) actually do filter UV light - this is also mentioned in TFA. I've read quite a bit of Mainster & Turner's work and while I'm a wanna-be-eye-doctor at best, believe they are "right" in that you should not filter UV with an IOL.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    4. Re:Cataract Surgery by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'm curious about the control groups used for these studies. I only have access to one of the articles the NYT links to, but in that study they compared reaction times before and after cataract surgery. What they didn't do is compare the effects of clear lenses vs blue blocking lenses.

      It seems to me that blue blocking lenses are the appropriate control, and since they are in common use there shouldn't be any problems getting that past the IRB. Actually, if I were on the IRB I wouldn't have let this experimental design proceed. It doesn't tell us anything about the actual question they asked (does blue light affect reaction time?).

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Cataract Surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cataract surgery CAN go bad, and if it does and it causes a blood leak into the aquous humor, you will be blind for quite a while (years, if not forever). You get that surgery done when it is time to do it, not before, and certainly not for something you can cure by exposing yourself to strong light at morning, which can easily be done either the proper way (force yourself to wake up earlier and go outside), or the nerd-way (buy full-spectrum high-power light sources, and subject yourself to it while getting ready for work).

    6. Re:Cataract Surgery by assertation · · Score: 1

      My father was never a reader, as long as I can remember. In his mid 70s he was also a computerphobe.

      One day his wife told me that he finally broke down and had cataract surgery ( I didn't even know he had a problem ).

      He took my advice, got a Mac and took the Mac classes. He learned enough to make his own web site and I can now communicate with him via email and have read links to articles I send to him.

      He even reads books I buy for him now.

    7. Re:Cataract Surgery by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      I wonder if people will choose to have cataract surgery done even if they have no cataracts.

      Actually, they already do. "Cataract surgery" is an amputation; your eye's lens is removed and replaced with an artificial one. The newest one can even focus, as it sits on struts inside the lens capsule. These will not only cure cataracts, but nearsightedness, farsightedness (even age-related), and astigmatism.

      I wore thick glasses all my life until steroid eye drops gave me a cataract in my left eye. Now I wear no corrective lenses at all, not even reading glasses, and I'll be 60 in a couple of months.

      If you have the cash you can get the surgery without having cataracts. It's painless (I had no discomfort at all and could read the clock on the wall of the recovery room) but it does kind of freak you out when they stick that needle in your eye.

    8. Re:Cataract Surgery by smelch · · Score: 1

      It is a really simple surgery. I've had both done. However, the important thing to realize is that when you get your new lens (at least at the time I got my implants a couple years back), you can't change the focal length without the help of glasses. Long range I see a lot better, but now I need reading glasses. Also, no self respecting ophthalmologist would remove your natural lens for no reason. When I had my cataract surgery in my left eye, three days later my retina tore and detached. Granted, I'm prone to that sort of thing, and if the cataract wasn't so thick from delaying the surgery it shouldn't have happened, but it's still a possibility.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    9. Re:Cataract Surgery by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      I and several member of my family have congenital cataracts in both eyes - seems to have started with my grandmother, and seem to have approx 60% chance of passing them on to offspring.

      We use eye drops (Atropine 1%) that relax the muscles that constrict the pupils, such that a larger amount of light can get into our eyes and get past the mass of the cataract. My pupils are almost permanently dilated as much as possible and with them I can go outside - regular people with the same eye drops could not go outside as it would be far too bright.

      My (corrected) vision is 6/12 -1, so my vision is poor by most standards - it has not changed has far as we have records so I don't know what will happen over time. I'm currently 42, and have had nothing done to my eyes yet. When I visit my ophthalmologist we often chat about surgery options to get them removed, but she recommends that I don't have anything done until my vision starts to go downhill (she even has her own laser surgery practice)

      My brother has has one eye corrected with laser surgery, and while his vision improved markedly it is still not 20/20. The ophthalmologist says (in my words) that because our eyes have never seen with normal vision our brain will not be able to understand a fully corrected image - seems to be basically correct based on my brother's experience. My niece had her cataracts removed at 6-months, and will need either contacts or glasses until she finishes growing, then she can have her lenses shaped to give her fairly normal vision.

      Apparently our condition is not that uncommon - but I have never encountered anyone outside of my family with congenital cataracts.

      (not sure what my point was with writing all that, but I fell better anyway)

  7. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cancer.

    So uh, do populations where it's sunny year round have a significantly smaller population of people with memory loss attributed to ageing?

  8. Silly doctors. by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    Direct sunlight, with its ionizing radiation? Are they crazy?

    The obvious solution is to preserve our delicate photoreceptors by avoiding light as much as possible... at least for the decade or two it takes engineers to invent replacement eyes.

    And if we really need periods of intense light during the day, well, that's why God made enormous LED-lit displays.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  9. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It wouldn't be a bad idea, but honestly if you had a problem you'd know it by now, take it from someone with a circadian rhythm disorder. During my bad spells I have every symptom of an 80 year old man; lack of concentration, poor memory, poor reaction time, moodiness and anger, physical exhaustion, and of course extreme drowsiness. And that's even if I manage to get a decent 6 hours of sleep, when your body is determined that it is time to sleep it does not appreciate being kept awake. You can push through it for a day or two, maybe a week with enough willpower, but 3 weeks into a stretch where your body thinks that 5AM to 1PM is the perfect time to sleep when family, work, and friends all think differently... well... yeah... you'd know if you had circadian rhythm problems.

  10. How does going outside help? by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    If you live in Seattle, it doesn't matter how old you are.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    1. Re:How does going outside help? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Actually, it turns out that's not the only Seattle-related health problem. Time to move, maybe?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:How does going outside help? by gangien · · Score: 1

      i was gonna make that joke too.

  11. I always thought it was the other way around... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    I've always been careful with both my eyes and ears, ok - they're not the same, but at least for my ears...I'm over 40 and have tested my ears with delicate test-instruments and top-notch headphones, and can still hear well in the 20Khz range, 23 Khz, when I was 20 years old.

    Same for vision, while I do notice in the dark...that the exact center spot of my eye, blocks the weakest of light, I can still see pretty much the way I did as a kid, and I always kept low light conditions, and wasn't much exposed to the sun at all.

    Those however that did - doesn't even have anything CLOSE to my vision, so I really wonder. Maybe it's the diet.

    I've also noticed that if I eat vegetables for 14 days straight, my vision increase to extreme sensibility, and gets "night-ready" faster.

    Go figure...

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:I always thought it was the other way around... by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Same for vision, while I do notice in the dark...that the exact center spot of my eye, blocks the weakest of light

      It's not quite "blocking" the light. The center of your eye has the highest concentration of cones, which are optimized for colors and bright light. It also has the lowest concentration of rods, which are optimized for dim light of any color.

      So it's not that there's anything blocking dim light in the center of your eyes. It's that there just aren't sensitive light detectors in that area.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:I always thought it was the other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gollum, is that you?

      Joking aside. You should protect your eyes from UV light, but light isn't bad for them. You don't seem to know about vitamin A or the difference in your eye between rods and cones. You also might not get enough vitamin D if you're totally avoiding light exposure.

    3. Re:I always thought it was the other way around... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have some good news for you: everyone is blind in the middle of their field of vision in a dark environment. The centre of the retina is extremely crowded with bright-light/colour vision cones, which is what gives us our excellent ability to see detail. There's just no room for rods left over, so we get a dark spot in our night vision instead.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    4. Re:I always thought it was the other way around... by Opyros · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently, there is a third type of receptor which mattters a great deal to the circadian rhythm.

    5. Re:I always thought it was the other way around... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Well, there you go, that IS good news, thanks ;)

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  12. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by vlm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So uh, do populations where it's sunny year round have a significantly smaller population of people with memory loss attributed to ageing?

    That alone proves its bogus. A simple trigonometric function of latitude should correlate strongly with age related problems. That strong correlation does exist for indoor lighting.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  13. Wouldn't it be easier to just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use melatonin supplements?

    I mean, why use surgery to fix things on old people when you can just fix the problem with a cheap solution?

    Also, isn't the concept of people living beyond the age of 70 relatively new in human society? Maybe we just haven't evolved (or our "intelligent design" hasn't kicked in) for this new development yet. I mean, doesn't it take more than a couple centuries for significant changes to occur?

  14. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Sevalecan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually have a circadian rhythm disorder myself. Between 2005 and 2010 my sleep 'schedule' would go around the clock fully over a period of every 1-2 weeks. So, part of the time I was up during only the night, sometimes in between, sometimes during normal parts of the day. I have a greater than 24-hour sleep cycle naturally it would seem. However, I've been maintaining a pretty normal schedule for 1.5 years now. I started using sublingual 2.5mg melatonin lozenges after my sister told me about them. It totally did the trick in my case.

    Of course, more relevant to the article, there are lamps you can also buy for bright light therapy. I actually just got myself one about 11 days ago. It can take up to a few weeks to have an effect, and I think I've finally started to feel a measurable effect over the past 3 days, but I'll see how it goes before I make a final determination. According to what I've read, it can help with circadian rhythm disorders, but I personally bought it for the antidepressant effect. Perhaps I'll be able to switch over to using only the light, which would be pretty neat. But I wouldn't complain if I still had to use melatonin.

  15. Dont know about the elderly by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

    But their bad eyes are certainly contributing to my car insurance woes.

  16. It's simpler than that.... by John+Murdoch · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had cataract surgery in my left eye (which is the dominant eye) four years ago, at age 49. I had cataract surgery in the right eye 18 months later.

    Simply put--as your eyes cloud over, your brain has to work substantially harder to compensate. Your brain has to decipher blurred vision, compensate for the "halo" effect cataracts give you around bright lights (the reason why older people don't drive at night is the halo effect of oncoming headlights--completely blinding them).

    All of that changes with cataract surgery--you don't just see better. (And you see MUCH better--if you wore corrective lenses beforehand they implant a custom-fit lens that corrects your vision to 20/20 or better.) All of the "clock cycles" that your brain was devoting to countering the effects of cataracts (even things like keeping your balance) are all of a sudden freed up. The change is dramatic--it really is life-transforming.

    My mother-in-law is 90--she had cataract surgery last fall. Last summer, before the surgery, her daughters were wondering about "what are we going to do about Mom"--at the time I suggested that they wait till after the cataract surgery; I was sure it would have a big impact. Boy, did it--my mother-in-law is active, alert, far more capable, and busy with plans for an expanded vegetable garden this summer.

    Until you go through the experience, you can't really understand how much effort your brain puts into interpreting what you see. The impact of cataract surgery is unbelievable.

    1. Re:It's simpler than that.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I can corroborate that with my own experience with astigmatism. Without my correction, my brain manages* - but it seems at a cost as I have a lot more general fatigue and not-giving-a-shit.

      * - without correction, I get triple vision but with a low angle - eg each eye has slight double vision, with the false images being a bit weaker, "blurred" (closer to smeared), and offset at different angles and rotation. After a few minutes (about 10 to 15) my "correction" kicks in and I only notice this when only one eye can see something, or point light sources (think LEDs, text on a screen, looking in a scope). I believe my brain starts to discard information that both eyes don't see, if possible. This results in some loss of definition for surfaces - I can see the shapes of things clearly, but it's almost like someone turned the world's texture resolution down.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:It's simpler than that.... by durrr · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat near sighted, getting glasses was like upgrading that 8 year old computer. Was a very neat transition. That said, how much did the lens manufacturer pay you for that post?

    3. Re:It's simpler than that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to your eyes? I have the same symptoms, but the astigmatism was induced by a botched lasik job.

      http://photo.omnistep.com/mylasikvision/

    4. Re:It's simpler than that.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Born that way I suppose. It progressed in my late teens to how it is now (mid 20s) - no idea if it's staying where it is or not.

      I've been wearing the same (my first) prescription for a few years and I don't think I need a new pair, except for the few scratches etc.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:It's simpler than that.... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Holy cow. Is there any treatment for that? That sounds like pure living hell.

  17. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Can you toss more information on those lozenges to me? I seem to have almost the exact same issue you describe having.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  18. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

    :) just learned what I have. People never understood how I could sleep +1 hour later everyday. wonder if I can get melatonin lozenges.

  19. Correlation with the Move to AZ and FL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is there any psychological correlation with this phenomena and the desire to move to the brighter sunnier states - like Arizona and Florida - when one hits 75?

    1. Re:Correlation with the Move to AZ and FL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    2. Re:Correlation with the Move to AZ and FL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. Rather, as you age, you will notice your skin gets all wrinkly and scaly and you will lose the ability to regulate your body temperature. Eventually you will fully transform into a reptile. At this stage you will have a natural urge to head for warmer climes.

    3. Re:Correlation with the Move to AZ and FL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes lots of retirees in those two states, along with all us that suffer from Seasonal Affective Disorder. My joints also seem to work better too, my water on the knee has hardly affected me since my move south. Just have to stay more out of the sun as to avoid skin cancer and also more careful on the road to avoid the senior drivers. If your young and thinking about Arizona, I would reconsider, they have a overactive state prison industry there.

  20. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are the effects of too much exposure to light?

    Combustion.

  21. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Too much staring at computers? Nothing. I guarantee your computer screen is not bright as the outdoors under daylight*, and your eyes are made to handle that.

    Staring at a computer not in proper phase with your 24-hour schedule? That's a problem -- particularly staring at it just before you go to sleep.

    *clear sky (not the sun directly) is a few thousand nits, and fills up to a hemisphere. Your screen is hundreds of nits, and subtends a smaller angle.

  22. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Venner · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cataracts are one possible effect; clouding of the lens due to exposure to bands of UV light. Certain medication can also contribute to the effects of light on the eye, but the common one that many people use without knowing the potential effect is St. John's Wort.

    I'm profoundly affected by the shortened (and usually sunless) days beginning in the fall, through the awful winter, and into the spring. (I'm self-diagnosing, but I'd say it qualifies as SAD.) I've used St. John's Wort in the winter months with a reasonable degree of success, but I think adding bright light to my work area helped a lot more. As in, four 300W fluorescent bulbs.

    Much to my chagrin, however, I learned that St. John's Wort and Bright Light don't Mix.

    Cataracts are (generally) easily treated, thankfully, but that might not be the extent of the possible effect. And I don't particularly want cataracts before I hit 40.

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  23. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by durrr · · Score: 2

    Melatonin is considered a supplment in some parts of the world, and prescription drug in others. If considered a supplement where you live, go to the pharmacy and pick up ~1mg pills, should do the trick(effective dose is something like 0,1mg)

  24. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Sevalecan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use the Nature's Way Sublingual Melatonin in the 2.5mg potency. You can order it on Amazon, if you prefer. They also come in other forms where you just swallow them, but then you tend to have to take them a few hours before you go to bed, whereas you can take the lozenge closer or at the time you intend to go to sleep.

    Disclaimer: I'm no doctor of course, but I'm told it's perfectly safe. I actually know of 3 people other than myself that use it without issues. I've also heard that if you take much more than 2 mg it can lessen the effect, but I've had no issues with the 2.5 mg lozenges.

    Interesting tidbit: I just did the math. I used to sleep for 9.5-10 hours, and then was awake for 16. That would make my sleep cycle around 25.5-26 hours.

  25. A Factor by __aamdvq1432 · · Score: 1

    Let's try to temper this discovery (not so much new as newly re-emphasized by this work) with the understanding that, it is only one of many contributing factors. Surviving longer allows us to encounter a plethora of new-&-improved woes for old folks. Sure, getting out and soaking up more rays is a good thing when properly managed, but let's not go overboard and attribute to one cause that which is complexly determined.

    Memory's the first thing to go. I forget what the second is.

  26. The Olde' Eyes by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    And the gov gives no thought to the older generation when they mandate getting rid of incandescent bulbs and have us use the "energy saving", (what amounts to dim candles) bulbs.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    1. Re:The Olde' Eyes by hardie · · Score: 2

      If you think they're dim, buy a brighter bulb. Dim isn't the fault of the bulb technology.
      You can even get different color temperatures. The 5000K ones are pretty nice.

    2. Re:The Olde' Eyes by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      And the gov gives no thought to the older generation when they mandate getting rid of incandescent bulbs and have us use the "energy saving", (what amounts to dim candles) bulbs.
      Reality: lots of incandescent bulbs are and will remain on the market. LED and halogen bulbs are and will remain on the market. And even in the CFL zone, it's easy enough to jump from 15 to 26 W to get sufficient candlepower output, and you now have a wide range of color temperature-equivalent bulbs. Not that I think any of this will reduce total energy consumption, but that's a separate topic and has been covered often on /. .

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    3. Re:The Olde' Eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, my F1 car is also much faster than my electric golf cart ...

      You can get energy saving bulbs in just the same brightnesses as incandescent bulbs.

    4. Re:The Olde' Eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off and die. I hate the low-efficiency bulb ban as much as anyone (assuming for the sake of argument the government has a right and duty to improve lighting efficiency, a tax is a much better way to do such things than an outright ban with exceptions for (most) legitimate reasons they're needed), but just fuck off and die if you're gonna be so ignorant.

      First, if you cared about brightness and quality, you'd already be using halogens -- which are also more efficient than vacuum or inert bulbs, and thus not included in the ban.

      Second, at a given power level, you can get more light with LED or CFL bulbs. Or you can get the same light level, with less power -- though the "xxW Equivalent" on the packaging is worthless, look at the lumens of your old bulbs, and pick one the same or higher.

      Finally, the banned bulbs have low CCT, therefore little blue light content, therefore worse even at the same brightness level vs. some CFL and LED bulbs. (Sadly, because there's a lot of people who like the sickly yellow light of a long-life vacuum bulb -- because they're used to it, and refuse to get used to objectively better ~5000K light -- a lot of the CFLs and LEDs are "warm white" (low CCT), which sucks ass. And no, it doesn't do a damned thing to change the (very real, but small for most purposes) spectral deficiencies of CFLs and LEDs. It just makes them ugly piss yellow.)

    5. Re:The Olde' Eyes by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      And therin lies the problem. You can't get a brighter bulb. Well not easily anyway. The "equivalant" of 100w is available but it's not just the lumens. It's the temp. And how many can you buy before you finally (maybe?) get one you can live with?
      Now they have 9,547.2 different types of bulbs out there. Soon lighting will be proprietary. Oh, wait... even some of the "right" size bulbs don't fit the socket they're supposed to fit.
      Now the standard incandescent may not be going awat too soon, but shop for lighting. Go ahead. Find something that takes an old fashioned bulb.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  27. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I use a full spectrum monitor

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  28. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like anti-aging! Aging is natural and makes us better and wiser! We shouldn't tinker with nature! Except when it comes to colonizing Mars, well then we should go all out on the technology. Because nothing is more important than sending middle-aged weak apes to other planets.

  29. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Melatonin is one of the body's natural substances - I think the synthetic is supposed to be identical. I used it for a while, then quit, now just starting up again. It evidently works best when taken at the same time every day and then go to bed, not to read. In my case (before) it worked for a while in getting me to sleep but I would still wake up two or three times a night. After a while it quit working entirely. I was not good at the 'same time every day' part, so I think that my body just decided the signals were screwed up and started ignoring it. I have also been told that taking too much will reduce its effectiveness. Now I've just started taking it again, but I'm also taking some other things that help me stay asleep (without knocking me out like Sominex etc.) We'll see.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  30. How about people in the PNW? by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    What does this theory say about the poor folks who live in places like Seattle and Portland? Are they all doomed to a dismal old age at age 45? This would mean I waited too long to move away. :P

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  31. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    They have it at WalMart (in the US).

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  32. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a program called Flux or something like that which changes the light temperature coming from your monitor based on the time of day.

  33. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Have you seen the study that correlates eye socket diameter with latitude? (Spoiler: it's a significant, positive correlation).

  34. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by radon28 · · Score: 1

    Obviously, an individual's eye socket diameter informs their decision on where to live.

  35. Floaters by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    I just hope someone is working on 'floaters' in eyes as well; I have one already before the age of 50 and was told by an opthamologist nothing can be done about them.

    1. Re:Floaters by MindPrison · · Score: 2

      Argh...I hate floaters... I've had them since I was about 25. Now I'm around 40 and STILL have them, one of them got firmly stuck in the middle (focus center) and was in focus all the time, like a pearl-threaded-snake-necklace or something, vigorously shaking my eyes every day for nearly 2 years, finally "shook" it lose, so it's just floating around like the other floaters now.

      But you can "program" your brain to ignore the floaters, that's what I have done, it works...just sort of tell yourself to completely ignore them, and try to avert focusing in on them, but look at other spots in the room, monitor, outside etc. After practicing, the floaters goes away, yes...they're still there...but training helps the brain totally wipe them out "mentally". Weird...yes, but it works.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    2. Re:Floaters by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

      I've got floaters. I've had one since I could see! I've got one that shape of a bubble. It's small when I'm reading but if I look far away it can be the size if a dime @ 12 feet away ( yeah I measured it). It's translucent so I can see through it, though it's shaded like a bubble. I had one that was shaped like a M.... small and above the bubble. I was always told to ignore them. but now I dunno. I'm older and the one that looked like an M has changed shape. It's a curve now. same position. Treatment for bad floaters is they suck the aqueous humor out, replace it with saline. Your body replaces the saline with new aqueous humor. But I don't want to risk it. I figured I'd have more floaters after the procedure. I know what you are saying... floaters suck. I think the threaded ones are capillaries that broke off due to an injury.. like head trauma. I played football in high school, and after a few hard hits that's when the M shaped floater showed up.

    3. Re:Floaters by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I always assumed that everyone had them, that they were essentially just dust and assorted other crap floating on the eye, and that they came and went.

      Also, I have just become very aware of mine having read this comment thread, so thanks for that... ;p

  36. Testable theory by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Most of this should be fairly easily testable with statistical methods. Do people living in low-sunlight environments (eg: perpetually foggy or cloudy areas, or close to the poles during the dark months) show a higher incidence of all the same "aging" problems than their age would imply?

  37. Interesting hypothesis but... by synthespian · · Score: 1

    Young adults in industrialised countries typically receive only 20–120 min of daily light exposure exceeding 1000 lux.42 87 108 109 Elderly adults’ bright light exposures average only 1/3 to 2/3 that duration.42 110 Institutionalised elderly receive less than 10 min per day of light exposure exceeding 1000 lux,55 111 with median illuminances as low as 54 lux.55

    The article was very interesting. However, how would it stack up against other epidemiological data, such as the fact that depression in Brazil (lots, and lots of sunlight), approaches U.S. rates of depression?

    http://www.webmd.com/depression/news/20110726/richer-countries-have-higher-depression-rates

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  38. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists have looked for explanations as to why certain conditions occur with age, among them memory loss, slower reaction time, insomnia and even depression looking at such suspects as high cholesterol, obesity, heart disease and an inactive lifestyle

    Gee, I don't know, because of OLD AGE?

    Thank the heavens there are such geniuses around leading to scientific break-throughs of such magnitude.

  39. Poor summary by Angostura · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the original abstract: " A 45-year-old adult retains only half the circadian photoreception of early youth" which the summary translates into: "by age 45, the photoreceptors of the average adult receive just 50 percent of the light needed to fully stimulate the circadian system".

    Sigh.

  40. Cholesterol is a distraction by nido · · Score: 2

    One of the reasons bodies make LDL cholesterol is to make pregnenolone. Pregnenolone gets turned into Progesterone or DHEA. Progesterone becomes Cortisol; DHEA becomes Testosterone, which gets turned into estrogen. Wikipedia has a nice flow chart somewhere... Progestogens, I think.

    If the cholesterol -> pregnenolone conversion isn't working very well (because of hypothyroidism, or a lack of required vitamins), the liver pumps out more "base material" [LDL cholesterol] with the hope that more of the needed hormones will be produced.

    Cloudy eyes has to do with a loss of order in the lens' proteins, possibly due to low energy (hypothyroidism). It's sorta like how a clear egg white turns white when it's cooked - the proteins lose order with the application of heat.

    Two asides: Knee-capping the body's hormone system via Lipitor/Crestor is a crime against physiology. My father refuses to take Lipitor because he sees what it does to his patients. Mom goes along with what her doctor says, and figures her lack of energy is just "normal aging".

    Chemical birth control (the ones that use prescription hormone disruptors) also interferes with the progesterone -> cortisol pathway, but doesn't much touch the DHEA->Testosterone->Estrogen pathway. Which leads to women having too much testosterone and estrogen in their bodies. The transformation takes a couple decades. My first post in that series isn't quite finished. Soon, though. :^)

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:Cholesterol is a distraction by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      "cholsterol is not a problem" trolls

      not as bad as gluten/ fructose/ artificial sweetener/ vaccination trolls

      still annoying

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Cholesterol is a distraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolls? It's called science.

      Might want to learn some biochemistry and stop reading some annoying non-scientific population surveys.

  41. Why Was Helen Keller So Upbeat Then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blind people should have a dramatically higher incidence of all these issues in old age, if the claim is valid. Surprised they didn't do that study as well.

  42. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    You take it a little before the desired "bed time" I take it?

    We have nonprescription sleep aids that have melatonin in it, so I'm assuming for now I can actually get it.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  43. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by AJH16 · · Score: 1

    If I stay awake until I get tired, I stay awake for 24 hours at a time and then sleep for 12. I just lucked out because I'm able to sleep alright after 16 hours awake, though it does make for brutal mornings. For a few weeks one summer though I went to a 24/12 schedule and it was the best couple weeks ever even if people had trouble getting used to when I was available and when I wasn't. Apparently it is fairly common to have a longer than 24 hour circadian rhythm. I know someone had put together a 6, 28 hour day a week schedule that could be done if you have flexible enough hours, though thus far I have not been in a situation where the hours are flexible enough to try it.

    --
    AJ Henderson
  44. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For about a year I was on a 28 hour schedule by choice. Awake for 20 hours, sleep for eight. It was glorious. Awake until you are tired then sleep until you are rested. Repeat. You sleep six times over seven days. You will wake up at the same time on each weekday, 8am on Monday, Noon on Tuesday, 4 pm on Wednesday, etc. I do miss it.

  45. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Phat_Tony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everybody in this thread - The natural 25-26 hour schedule is completely normal for most diurnal mammals. They've done research with humans giving them NO time queues for days, and it turns out EVERYBODY falls into a slightly over 24-hour schedule.

    The conclusion here is that our chemical engines are too imprecise for us to evolve a dead-on circadian cycle. So instead evolution gave us an unaided circadian cycle that's calibrated with a mean of about 25 hours, so that people with a naturally extremely short cycle are still just over 24 hours, and it goes up from there. Then we get a natural reset cue to adjust the cycle every day to keep it in sync with the world. The primary component of the reset signal is sunlight exposure in the morning. If you get up at a reasonable time (near or after sunrise) and GET OUTDOORS for about 15 minutes, then you will feel like going to bed at the right time to get enough sleep and want to get up at about the same time the next day. We and our ancestors spent tens of millions of years with no choice but to receive natural light in the morning, so it was a pretty good system before we evolved to live in our parent's basements and stare at little screens all day.

    I suffer big time from this - every day I want to stay up and get up about an hour or so later than I did the day before - but not if I'm spending much time outdoors, especially in the morning. When I'm backpacking, wholly cow do I just want to go to bed when it gets dark, and get up just after sunrise. If we spent the day exercising outdoors like evolution intended, we wouldn't have this problem... but good luck being able to/wanting to do that all the time. But if you just drag yourself out of bed and take a 15 minute walk outdoors, even if it's cloudy or right around sunrise, problem solved. It does get tricky if you have to be at work before sunrise. Or if you work night shift (which I did for about 2 years) you're just *'ed.

    I think the light exposure causes melanin production on about a 14 hour delay, making us want top go to sleep about 16 hours after exposure. This is why melanin supplements near bedtime are somewhat functional as a surrogate for actual light exposure in the morning.

    Or as an alternate solution, since the day gets longer by about 1.7 milliseconds per century, by my calculations you could just wait about 200 million years for the earth to get in sync with your natural clock.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  46. Melatonin by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

    For those who use it, you understand.

    1. Re:Melatonin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's banned in most 1st world nations. Not surprisingly, it's legal in the USA.

      It's also surprising how many people consider the really complex, difficult, and potentially dangerous option before going for the easy and simple option: melatonin.

      Melatonin has also been proven to cure insanity in people that haven't slept in over 20 days.

    2. Re:Melatonin by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I've seen some insane people who could use it. How do you cure insomnia, though?

  47. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    I use a full spectrum monitor

    So, you stare at a florescent light bulb all day.

    You must be in management.....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  48. Switch to LED light bulbs by Jeff1946 · · Score: 2

    White leds are actually blue leds with a phosphor to down convert some of the blue to yellow and red. If you look at the spectrum of white leds (go the Cree web site) you will see there is a peak in the blue part of the spectrum, particularly with the "cooler white" versions which should be helpful as a daytime light for folks who have a problem with their circadian rhythms.

  49. Sunlamps, cancer, eye damage and melantonin? by assertation · · Score: 1

    The gadget lover in me has thought about getting a sunlight lamp for years. I've heard that they can damage eyes or cause cancer. Is this true? If not, can anyone tell what is a reasonable price and or model of one?

    Would melatonin work just as well for circadian rhythm issues?

    1. Re:Sunlamps, cancer, eye damage and melantonin? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Neither worked for my circadian rhythm issues, but melatonin worked much better than the blue light while it worked. The blue light in the morning didn't alter my clock at all. The melatonin did keep things steady for about 1 lunar cycle though.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  50. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    I had just gone down to Fry's and grabbed 2 long 6 outlet strips, a dozen 'Daylight' (blue tint instead of the 'warm' red tint) compact florescent bulbs, and 2 wall outlet timers. I did have to stop at the hardware store as well to get 10 minimal fixtures (just to turn standard outlets into bulb sockets)

    I spend 15 minutes every morning as I wake up just gazing into the lights...

    Completely changed my life; instead of having problems with insomnia and waking before noon, I now get naturally tired around midnight, and naturally wake up between 7 and 8.

  51. I think I'm doing this wrong by Jason+Straight · · Score: 1

    And here I sit with my windows blocked off because I thought the sunlight was causing fatigue on my eyes, making me tired.

  52. Re:Yes by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    I know someone who had some surgery - they drained the fluid, fixed stuff, and re-filled the eye. In the process, they filtered out the floaters.

    Maybe it was cataract, I don't remember. But yes, those can be removed. I doubt any doctor would do surgery just for those, of course.

  53. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Obviously, an individual's eye socket diameter informs their decision on where to live.

    Nah, it's all those tropical islanders & jungle dwellers with the beady little eyes....

  54. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So uh, do populations where it's sunny year round have a significantly smaller population of people with memory loss attributed to ageing?

    That alone proves its bogus. A simple trigonometric function of latitude should correlate strongly with age related problems. That strong correlation does exist for indoor lighting.

    Well don't tell everybody yet. At least wait until I've sold millions of sets of my age-fighting glasses with miniature sunlamps shining directly into the user's eyes. Complete with solar-powered charger, of course.

  55. John Ott by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    John Ott was promoting the health benefits of natural light in the 1960s. Nothing new here...

    1. Re:John Ott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As well as Andrew Weil, and Pearson and Shaw touched on it too.

      Andew Weil, was using the idea of sunlight exposure not for circadian rhythms, but to correlate the link between the origin of conciseness and cubensis mushrooms.
      His central idea was the permeation of sunlight down the underside of the corpus constillium, to stimulate the hypo campus directly.

      Also there were studies done in Russia in the 1960s for those children who's lack of vitamin D was causing some concern.

      To sum it all up, this is still after decades, a fruitful area of research of which we have only scratched the surface, but
      there is NO EXPENSIVE DRUG MONEY IN IT. so it will only progress at a snails pace.

  56. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by MisterSquid · · Score: 2

    When I'm backpacking, wholly cow do I just want to go to bed when it gets dark, and get up just after sunrise.

    Just watch out for the rascals who sneak up in the middle of the night to tip you over.

    --
    blog
  57. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    What are the effects of too much exposure to light?

    Combustion.

    Nice one.

    On a serious note, another effect of too much exposure to light (depending on the source) is skin cancer.

    --
    blog
  58. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    I think the light exposure causes melanin production on about a 14 hour delay, making us want top go to sleep about 16 hours after exposure. This is why melanin supplements near bedtime are somewhat functional as a surrogate for actual light exposure in the morning.

    Sadly, for some of us, that delay is larger, significantly so. In my case the delay is closer to 20 than 14, meaning my body essentially gets reset incorrectly every day. With careful management of a host of different factors, I can just about fall asleep at 1AM on a good day. If something disrupts that, if I don't get bright light in the morning, don't turn down the lamps, don't turn off the computer monitor, or just plain get kept up for 10 minutes past 1, it's all down hill from there. A single missed day can take weeks to recover from, because every day my circadian rhythm gets set to a value that's off by 5 hours compared to the normal world.

  59. Wouldn't older people's eyes be dilated? by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    I actually believe this study (please see my post above about cataract surgery) but I was just thinking.

    If this were true, wouldn't older people's eyes be more dilated? Because they're trying to get as much light as possible? Has anyone noticed this?

    Of course maybe the mechanism that controls eye dilation senses a different frequency of light than what controls circadian rhythms. This might be an interesting topic to pursue further in a study!

    1. Re:Wouldn't older people's eyes be dilated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Beginning around your mid-40's your pupils don't open as wide as a younger person's. So it's a 1-2 punch.

      The aging process can result in diminishing pupil size; this, in turn, results in less light reaching the retina of an aging person. According to The Eye Digest, the average 20-year-old's eye receives approximately 6 times more light than the average 80-year-old's.

  60. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Cataract beget LENS REPLACEMENT and that, for me, was wonderful. It was like going from an ancient CRT to a good modern flatscreen. I had various other eye problems which lens replacement partially corrected.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  61. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've self-diagnosed myself with SAD too. My doctor has diagnosed me with RLS, which has it's own sleep issues. My doc put me on 1mg of melatonin a couple of hours before bed (as others have mentioned). He also told me to get a "Blue Light (~450nm)" and put that on the desk in front of me in the mornings to help "wake me up" when I have to get up before sunrise. I've had fairly good success. Finding out that I was ultra-low on Ferritin and taking iron supplements has helped so much with the RLS and sleep issues that I've been able to abandon the melatonin. It's hard to quantify, but I think the extra iron has helped with the SAD too. No, checking your Ferritin is not a normal part of a blood test, the doctor has to put it on the lab order. You want to ask your doctor about that.

  62. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed this exact thing several years ago when I quit my job because of burnout and took it easy for many months.

    I had all the windows in my bedroom covered in tinfoil so it was 100% dark when the lights were out regardless of time of day.

    I would go to bed at a certain time and wake up when I felt like it. First day would be say 9AM, the next day 10AM,then 11AM etc etc. It was kind of freaky when I started waking up at 8PM and felt totally refreshed. It just kept going and going until eventually I was waking up at 8AM again. I think I went thru this cycle about 5 or 6 times until I got a new job.

    One thing I do remember it was probably the best time in my life even though I was unemployed. I had never been so productive before or since. I learned VHDL and did some cool console electronic projects. Played the shit out of the guitar and drums and learned a lot more then ever previously.

    If they could only make the job/working aspect of society center around this sleep schedule Im sure a lot more could get done for people that are like that.

  63. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    As in, four 300W fluorescent bulbs.

    You should try halogen lamps. They have a wider spectrum of light.

    One issue with halogen lamps is that they're more prone to cause fires (if a curtain touches the bulb), so many manufacturers have removed them from consumer offerings for liability reasons, but halogen lamps (or halogena bulbs) are still the de facto standard for galleries and stores that care about having the most attractive displays.

  64. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

    You can get tools which adjust the brightness and color based on the time. That can help you fall asleep after getting off the computer. The standard bright LCD does keep you awake. I've found it can make a noticeable difference if you're the sort of person to get stuck up late on the computer without ever feeling tired.

  65. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    There is a name for the disorder now. Well if it really is a disorder. It is called Non-24 or sometimes N24. Not a great name, but what can you do?

    I have struggled with this for years. I don't understand how others who have this can hold down any kind of normal 8 hr per day job. Every time I try I end up getting fired for being late during the half of my cycle when I can only sleep during the day.

    I have a Philips GoLite and after many trials I can confidently say that it does not work for me. It does not change my +2 hr per day cycle. Also it gave me headaches in the morning after I used it. I tried turning down the brightness to the lowest level and not looking directly at it. Nothing helped, but then I am prone to headaches. It is a cool gadget though.

    I recently tried melatonin. It did work for me at first. For almost a month in fact. But then it just stopped working. I tried many different dosages both higher and lower, but it doesn't seem to do much. I still think it's a good idea to take 1 mg or less of timed release melatonin 1-2 hours before you want to sleep. Melatonin has a very short half life so extended release is pretty much mandatory. I tried a number of brands and the 1 mg Natrol brand worked best for me, but, as I said, it seemed to stop working.

    Dark therapy is my next goal. It is not so easy though. Most lighting that you would think would work for it doesn't. Or at least shouldn't. The idea is that after sunset you should not be seeing any blue light at all and in fact even green, yellow and orange light seem to suppress melatonin according to some studies. Just not as much as blue. The only wavelengths that don't seem to suppress melatonin or at least only have a negligible effect are right around the very edge of the visible spectrum above 690 nm.

    There is no natural sort of lighting that will give you that. Not low pressure sodium. Not neon. Not salt lamps. The only option is LED lighting and commercial far red or near infrared lights don't exist. I plan to build my own 700, 720, and 740 nm lights using high power LEDs in order to properly test out this dark therapy thing. If that doesn't work then I'm out of options.

    I've also tried spending all day outside doing some kind of strenuous activity as much as possible. That doesn't seem to work for me either. Certainly not the same day. I find that physical strenuous activity doesn't make me mentally tired. It makes my muscles tired, but not my brain. Studying advanced math and physics all day is more likely to make me tired. I think sleep is more of a brain recharging system. Even if spending all day outdoors did cure me, I wouldn't want to live that kind of life.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  66. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Venner · · Score: 1

    The bulbs I have are 5000K, sitting in the nice "daylight" slot in terms of color temperature, and also have a CRI of 90, which is pretty good for fluorescent. They're probably not full-spectrum, granted, but they suffice.

      Halogens are nice, but as you mentioned, they tend to get really, really hot. My work space (upstairs) has seven-foot ceilings and can get pretty stuff as it is :-)

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  67. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Melatonin is a very poor sleeping pill and you shouldn't use it as such. You use it to help reset your circadiam rhythm. Take just enough that you can't feel its effects (~0.5mg) about 4 hours before the time you want to be asleep. This tells your body to start doing all the internal things it's supposed to do that makes you feel tired. To get 0.5mg, you'll need to break the pills up. They're commonly sold as 3mg pills. Melationin works for circadiam rhythm disorders: DSPS, ASPS (oppsite of DSPS) and N24. If you're having some other issues with your sleep, the melationin won't help.

    If you're using bright light therapy for sleep reasons, you should feel it's effects the first time you use it. It won't suddenly fix your sleeping problems, but you'll feel different.

    Read these:
    DSPS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_sleep_phase_disorder
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circadian_rhythm_sleep_disorder

    I have a circadiam rhythm disorder. It switches between DSPS and N24. It is/was hell and I've attempted suicide over it before. I was only diagnosed last year. Up until then for the past 15 years of my life, I just thought I was a worthless lazy ass. I needed five alarms clocks and could still sleep through them all. I'd spend all my energy duing the day trying not to fall asleep during school (middle school, high school, college -> almost failed out) and then laid awake in bed all night stressed out about not being able to fall asleep and worring my parents would check in, notice I was still awake, and scold me for staying up late (when I was a kid). I was forced to be late to everything. If I wasn't, the down time of waiting 5-10 minutes for everyone else to show up was enough for my body to decide "hey, lets go to sleep now" and I would struggle to stay awake for whatever meeting/class I was in. If I was late then the stress, aniexty, and adrenaline of rushing to the event was enough to keep me going for a little while. I'm doing better, not great but better.

  68. Slashcrap science by __aancvu2993 · · Score: 0

    Breaking research! Blind people should be sleeping all the time!

  69. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by durrr · · Score: 1

    0,5mg 4 hours before, for a medication that have 35-50 minutes halflife means you'll have no left in you when you go to bed. For me it works splendidly to take one right before going to bed. Wheras I used to fall asleep only after lying in bed for over 1hour, sometimes 3 and not all that seldom even 5 hours I can now jump from a brightly lit screen straight to bed and be fast asleep within 40 minutes with good reliability. The bad part of course is where you run out of melatonin tabs and find that your body have downregulated production to zero. As for required disorders, fuck that, human variability and the way reference ranges are set ensure that a lot of people could not get a diagnosis yet still will benefit from melatonin, if nothing else, it could be placebo, but if it works, it works. It's not terribly expensive and very nontoxic so trying is no great harm.

  70. Easy to Verify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should be easy to verify. Areas of the world such as Africa where there is a lot more bright sunlight should have fewer sleep problems.

    My experience in gloomy wintery Canada and sunny summery South Africa over a few months has shown no difference (in this sample of one). Obviously a controlled experiment is required, but I am skeptical.

  71. Matt. 6:22-23 by Paul+Dubuc · · Score: 1

    “The eye is the lamp of the body. So, if your eye is healthy, your whole body will be full of light, but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!" An interesting parallel.

  72. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >>What are the effects of too much exposure to light? Should I use a screen filter for my monitor?

    You laugh, but it causes insomnia and ASPD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_sleep_phase_disorder).

  73. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

    Cancer.

    Working nights is listed as a possible carcinogen by IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). The link that has the biggest research base is between breast cancer and night work. The dominant theory is that circadian disruption caused by exposure to light at night lowers melotonin production which is either a causal factor in cancers or supresses protective mechanisms. So, too much sunlight in the day causes skin cancer, too much artifical light at night possibly causes breast cancer.

  74. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not required, just tends to work best for those people. Other sleeping pills don't adjust a person's circadiam rhythm, they just make you unconscious.

    Melatonin is a hormone; your body makes it. Taking it 4 hours before bedtime says hey, you should be having this stuff in your blood stream now. People's melatonin level natually starts rising before they get tired. The small amount before hand helps kick your body into it's natural production. You take it that early to readjust your circadiam rhythm which in turns lets you sleep a more normal schedule. You can take it 30min-1hr before bed as a mild sleeping pill, but it doesn't adjust your circadiam rhythm that way. My advice is more for someone who's having tons of problems falling asleep at night and waking in the morning. People with DSPS commonly can't fall asleep until after 4am and don't get up until noon. They don't do that by choice.

    "I can now jump from a brightly lit screen straight to bed" You're using it as a cruch like people use caffine and pwer drinks instead of getting enough sleep and eating well. I'm not saying you can't or shouldn't use it that way (I definitly have, plus some doctors recommend 4-6mg), just that you can take it eariler for a different type of effect and for some people that effect is more useful.

  75. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    If you take it every night the effects will wear off. I take it two nights a week, same dose for a year now and all is well.

    --
    I come here for the love
  76. sleep & your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sleep repairs telomeres (the ends that keep-the chromosomes from unraveling) like the tips on shoelaces. without them, we age, get cancer and other age-related diseases. Sulfides in your food could be absorbed into the eyes through the membranes of the mouth; the more you eat out and do not read labels; the more you age: that is just my research. So meditate, clear your mind eat like a pauper. live long and prosper on the earthschool.
      http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/begin/traits/telomeres/

  77. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by asavage · · Score: 1

    Yes, take it 30m before bedtime. It is also fantastic for dealing with jet lag or shift work. It also gives you a deeper sleep so I feel like I got an extra 30m or so of sleep when I take it.

  78. Re:Does staring at a Computer Screen all day count by pweidema · · Score: 1

    I LOVE my light therapy lamp. Got it 3 years ago for winter depression, and was surprised when it also caused my sleep cycle to reset to allow me to function much better in the morning