Slashdot Mirror


One In Eight Chance of a Financially Catastrophic Solar Storm By 2020

An anonymous reader writes "A privately employed solar scientist named Pete Riley estimates there's a 12 percent chance of a massive solar storm comparable to the Carrington Event in 1859 which resulted in breathtaking aurorae across the United States and other temperate regions of the globe. The electromagnetic surge from the 1859 event caused failures of telegraph systems across Europe and North America. A similar storm today could knock out power grids, GPS and communication satellites, data centers, transportation systems, and building and plumbing infrastructures and wreak $1 trillion or more of economic damage in the first year alone, according to a 2008 report from the National Academy of Sciences."

32 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. What are the chances by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that it will happen in 2012?

    1. Re:What are the chances by Krneki · · Score: 4, Informative

      that it will happen in 2012?

      12,5%

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    2. Re:What are the chances by DamageLabs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me just check my Mayan calendar...

      Oh yes, there it is.

    3. Re:What are the chances by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me just check my Mayan calendar...

      Oh yes, there it is.

      Is this a leap year?

      Why? Do leap years make you jumpy?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:What are the chances by NFN_NLN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually we don't know if it is the solar maximum... The sun is very periodic but it is still a bit unpredictable as to when exactly the periods start and stop. The only way to know is if in 2013 it shows the telltale slowdown of the decline cycle (that is, if we are still here...)

      Interesting, this is the same strategy employed by economists. It seems most of them won't recognize an economic bubble when they're in one... but after the "telltale slowdown" is becomes extremely obvious in hind-sight.

    5. Re:What are the chances by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is strange, because I knew we were in a bubble while it was going on. When the houses around me started selling for $150,000 more than I bought mine for in a matter of a couple years, with no real underlying changes to the economy, it was pretty darn obvious there was a bubble.

      Economists aren't that dumb, they're either being hopelessly optimistic that economics has suddenly discovered perpetual motion, or they were just keeping their mouths shut lest they be the guy who went down in history as the one popping the bubble and starting the inevitable recession.

    6. Re:What are the chances by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IIRC there actually is a psychological, medically acknowledged, syndrome that has to do
      with giving up on prosperous concepts/enterprises. In layman's terms it describes optimism
      in a more elaborate language, though it also describes gambler's addiction at some point.

      Can't remember where I have read about it though..

      It could have been the 150 year old book "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" which basically cited the many self-induced economic bubbles/busts up to that point in history, and has been a blueprint for every one of them since. What's interesting is how every time the pattern repeats we swear that a) we didn't "really" see it coming with enough foresight to stop it and that b) we are sure as hell never going to let it happen again. Those two complete fallacies are the cornerstone of our tragic existence.

  2. What's much more important is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... Can it knock out out my PC and if so how can I protect it?

    1. Re:What's much more important is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      you must build... an ark, with two of every device

    2. Re:What's much more important is... by philip.paradis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Make multiple backups of everything you care about, using a mix of different media types. Store your backups in geographically diverse locations, in hardened containers, preferably some of them subterranean. Of course, you're already doing that anyhow, right? Past that, your PC becomes significantly less useful if major communication grids are down/damaged, at least if you like the Internet.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    3. Re:What's much more important is... by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes.

      Turn it off when you're not using it and disconnect it from power and communications (eg disconnect the power cord and network cable). Since if something Bad Happened, it's likely going to come in through the AC or in through the DSL/Cable/Sat modem - same as any other power surge.

      In these storms, what happens is that long lines (data and power transmission) resonate more or less with the "fun" and so you get powerful AC currents induced into them. The smaller wires in your peripherals and inside the computer are too small (so they resonate too high frequency) and so shouldn't be directly vulnerable. It's those large AC voltages coming in from those long lines that release the magic smoke.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:What's much more important is... by robthebloke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. I saw a documentary on the history channel about this. According to the program, the best protection is to get two sticks of Hazel, and use them to douse for ley lines near your house. Any device within 50 meters of a ley line should be protected using a conical cosmic ray deflector, which should be gently placed on top of the gadget, with the tip pointing skyward (don't point it at the ground, you'll just wake up the sleeping aliens!). Be warned that this won't fully protect your touchscreen devices though. There's something odd about capacitive devices, which will require your pet cat to be earthed at all times before they are fully protected. Those cuddly critters are serious conductors of cosmic rays. I've also gone to the extent of hanging some garlic on my front door too. Not sure what that does, but I figured it couldn't hurt....

    5. Re:What's much more important is... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Store your backups in geographically diverse locations, in hardened containers, preferably some of them subterranean. Of course, you're already doing that anyhow, right?

      Storing back-ups in hardened containers in subterranean bunkers? No, I'm not, and somehow I doubt most other people here are either.

      Backing things up safely, securely and frequently is surprisingly hard for individuals to do given all the technical wonders we have in the world today.

      (In case anyone's knee is jerking, please read the actual terms and check the actual reliability stats of any Internet-based back-up service you're about to recommend before you post it. Chances are, you'll never make the post.)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    6. Re:What's much more important is... by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Screw that, don't buy into this so-called 'conical cosmic ray deflector', which is probably some sort of fraudulent device.

      Everyone knows that only Real Brazilian Power Crystals(tm) can actually help with this. Even the FDA would not deny that it is possible in English to have said that these crystals were very efficacious for dealing with solar storms and rheumatism.

    7. Re:What's much more important is... by Bemopolis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but only because Eve was holding it wrong.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  3. By Any Other Name by RapidEye · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, is "privately employed solar scientist" a euphemism for "crackpot scientist"?

    --
    "Murderer? Well, that's a harsh word. I prefer to think of myself as a Mortality Technician."
  4. Re:convert to electric, quick! by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your car is already an electromechanical device. EMP would disable modern gasoline vehicles just as surely as it would electric vehicles.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  5. With a bit of luck... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a Solar eclipse will happen at this very time.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  6. Be Prepared... by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Print out your porn.

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  7. A lot of confusion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think a lot of people are very confused.

    This won't directly break your car or your computer. It affects long runs of conductive cable.

    It will break power distribution and telecom. It might break your computer if it's plugged in, but absolutely will not break your computer if it is not plugged in. Likewise with cars. If you own an electric car, just hope that it's unplugged when this happens.

    1. Re:A lot of confusion. by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope - because satellites don't get all the protections of being in the atmosphere. They get raw solar radiation.

      Down here in the dirt, it's only the (relatively) low frequency stuff that makes it through - and that's the stuff that long runs of wire pick up (or any long conductor - metallic piping could potentially pick it up too)

      If they are lower in orbit, they are still at risk - since the EM of the Earth actually focuses the incoming radiation into bands/layers that the satellite might pass through. Think "ant under a magnifying glass".

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:A lot of confusion. by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're going to get some odd waveforms coming in - the UPS will only save you if it isolates the load instead of just switches to a battery. The surge protector isn't going to help much. Those are meant to suppress "lengthy" transients and overvolts, quick spikes can still break shit but not pop the protector.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  8. BS Flag by jasnw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, I throw the BS flag all over this one. I've been in this business (space weather) for over 40 years, and one of the biggest problems in the whole field are these "OMG the F-ing SKY is FALLING" pronouncements from self-proclaimed space weather experts (or NASA scientists, which is just sad). What this guy has done is a typical "lies, damn lies, and statistics" analysis of the worst sort, and he even kinda admits this with the caveat at the end of TFA's abstract in Space Weather. This is not to say that a big Carrington-magnitude storm came along it wouldn't cause havoc, it most certainly will, but there's only been one of these in our recorded history. That seems to fall well outside the realm of useable predictability. It's in a class of problems the weather service folks who try to predict 100-year floods know all too well. If you only see one instance of something in your record, at best you can say that you get one of those beasts every record-length/2 years (if that). This guy is just blowing smoke to advertise his business.

    1. Re:BS Flag by rndmtim · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was an event in the 1920's (less than the 1859 event) and another in the 1990's (less than the 1920's event but it took down pieces of the Quebec grid). Doesn't do anything to help measure the frequency of the 1859 level events. Also, it kind of doesn't matter, since power facilities like the one I work at are required to prepare for things like the "maximum possible flood" not a "500 year flood". If your sample set has at least one of these, and we can't quantify it to be say less than a 1 in 10000 - and we certainly can't - then we should be working on this problem. Not as if the sky is falling, but we've been working on changing out some stuff in my plant for a decade, so we definitely should get on it, since remediation is going to take a long time, and the consequences would be very bad.

  9. Re:Plumbing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has plumbing really become dependent on electronic control systems? Or does this phenomenon somehow affect gravity too?

    Plumbing consists of pipes running for long distances in straight lines (i.e. antennas). Magnetic storms can cause currents to run through these pipes resulting in electrical damage. In addition, for buried pipes, the magnetic storm can cause their relative voltage to shift, resulting in massive corrosion. This is of particular concern with respect to oil and gas pipelines.

  10. Re:convert to electric, quick! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your car is already an electromechanical device. EMP would disable modern gasoline vehicles just as surely as it would electric vehicles.

    Which is a big part of the reason I love my old, beat up, carburated pickup.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  11. Re:Plumbing? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would think that electronically controlled sewage treatment plants are at risk. Most people don't think about where their poo goes, but once it starts going nowhere, it will pile up very quick for communities.

    That's alright, I live on top of a hill.

  12. Re:convert to electric, quick! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a lot to be said for contact breaker ignition. Of course, diesels are even better. I've driven a diesel car with no functioning electrical system of any kind (although I don't recommend it due to the absence of brake lights).

    The scariest part was getting it started. Yes, sure, it'll push start but until the engine has been running for 15 seconds (big heavy old Citroen CX 25DTR Turbo) there is no hydraulic pressure for the steering or braking system... Better hope the handbrake will stop it before the back wall of the yard does!

  13. Re:If only :) by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's the broken window fallacy. It would immediately suck $1Trillion out of the economy that would have been spent other ways, it would prevent a lot of useful work from being done while the infrastructure was down, and it would most likely be rebuilt in a crappy, haphazard way, not in some nice, well-designed way that would make everything better.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  14. Re:convert to electric, quick! by EllisDees · · Score: 5, Informative

    Solar flare != EMP

    While the power grid would be knocked out by a massive solar flare, your electric car would be just fine. Unless it happened to be plugged in when the power grid was fried...

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  15. Re:convert to electric, quick! by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good thing this storm isn't an EMP effect.

    What happens is you get large induced currents/voltages in transmission lines (power, cable etc) which smoke things connected to them. This happens because they resonate with the solar radiation.

    Small shit like the wires and traces inside of your car resonates at far too high a frequency for that to happen.

    As for GPS etc - those die because they are in orbit, either outside the majority of the earth's EM field's protection - or their path happens to make that same protection their death-sentence as it tends to concentrate the radiation into distinct bands/layers.

    The sun would still be the sun, and the GPS satellite would be the ant. The earth's EM field would be the magnifying glass. Poof.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  16. Re:convert to electric, quick! by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, but such a tiny amount that it shouldn't cause trouble.

    You run into issues when they are resonant (or near resonant) because that allows standing waves to form - and the stuff that makes it in through the magnetosphere is the lower frequency (longer wavelength) stuff.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...