Slashdot Mirror


Pay the TSA $100 and Bypass Airport Security

An anonymous reader writes "Catching a flight in the U.S. isn't a great experience anymore due to the security checks involved. You have to remove your shoes, your belt, get your laptop out, be scanned and subjected to radiation in the process. Hundreds of other people are doing the same thing, meaning it takes 40 minutes instead of four. Now, the TSA has come up with a clever, money-making alternative. Instead of scaling back security or speeding it up, you can instead pay $100 and bypass it completely!"

42 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. All I can say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    W.T.F??
    Oh, and first post!

    1. Re:All I can say is by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed! WTF?! What the fuck took them so long?

      Unless... oh dear... don't tell me they ever actually thought they were making us safer. I mean, I know the gate jockeys who feel you up or bark at you to stand still while they look through your clothes are actually convinced they're standing between terrorists and our safety, but I guess I just assumed that the guys at the top, the ones who completed high school, were smart enough to realize they were scamming us.

    2. Re:All I can say is by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it as rigorous as the background check needed to be hired as a TSA employee?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:All I can say is by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Yes- the TSA hires from ads on Pizza boxes and gas pumps.

      That explains a great deal.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:All I can say is by Kagato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And just like an Airline Employee Global Entry allows you access to crew lines at customs and immigration. Given the amount of time the interview process takes it's not worth the money or hassle for someone that doesn't travel much. But if you travel several times a year it's a big plus... well until too many people enroll.

    5. Re:All I can say is by rhook · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Background checks do not cost anywhere near $20k. And it only costs around $50 to have a urine test performed at a national lab.

  2. Thespians by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Secuity theater has been on the decline from comedy to tragedy for a while. Now it is simply a farce. It is about control and money and the illusion of security.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Thespians by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed.

      I'd sooner deal with the 1 in 1 billion odds (TSA estimate from the article) that I will step on a plane destined for being blown-up, then the 1-to-1 odds that I or my wife will be sexually assaulted (or Xrayed).

      What's worse is the TSA is extending this BS to train terminals, along highways (border state checkpoints), and post offices, hotels, unemployment/social security centers. Except they call themselves VIPR instead of TSA. What a perfectly Orwellian name! :-|

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Thespians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's free market when it's government regulations...

    3. Re:Thespians by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      DHS had a virtual presence there already. on all the monitors before the checkout line was PSA with the butt-ugly dumpy mug of Janet Reno, saying to turn in your fellow american if they were acting suspiciously. God damn, don't people under 40 see what's happening?

    4. Re:Thespians by Totenglocke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And it could all be ended in just a few weeks if the masses simply refused to fly. The airlines have been constantly on the verge of bankruptcy for decades and have been bailed out multiple times. If all non-business related air travel stopped suddenly, they'd bleed money so fast that they'd be screaming at the government to get rid of the TSA in no time or else they'd cease to exist. After the outrage over the bank bailouts and bailing out the failed auto industry, only a truly idiotic politician who didn't want to get re-elected would vote to bail out the airlines.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:Thespians by Paco103 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is why old people rock! At least that kind of old people!

    6. Re:Thespians by MoldySpore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The public has spoken, and they're clearly in favor of bailouts, TSA, and wars, on both the Democrat and Republican sides.

      There are plenty in the public who do not support these things. The fact is only a tiny fraction of the population actually votes. And this has more to do with votes not really counting for anything more than who the candidates are or what they support. Until they get rid of the electoral college and you get 1 vote for 1 person, and make it easier for people to vote either by having a national holiday on election day or online voting, our "democratic" system is really just smoke and mirrors with 2 parties that support the same political policies. The only differences they have now are philosophical and religious, with the Republicans being on the more crazy, anti-progress side of things, and the Democrats being in the center not willing to more forward. The "party of backwards", and the "party of stationary", respectively.

      Despite everyone's initial glee over Obama, there are few democrats that will defend him breaking his promise to close Gitmo, nor do they support the TSA (though they will support him in the coming election because...honestly...have you seen these republican candidates? Even Ron Paul is pretty crazy and he is the most sane out of all of them, which is saying a lot). I have many, many conversations, with a wide variety of people, and only the most hardcore Republicans support the TSA and GitMo anymore, and even then whenever they fly they bitch about TSA. So it is kind of bullshit anyway, they just regurgitate the same FOX News Republican talking points as the current array of idiots up for the Republican nomination. They don't actually know what they are talking about, and are usually voting against their own personal interests.

      In actuality, the outcry over the TSA especially has been huge, it's just that there is nothing for anyone to do about it. The most anyone can do is boycott flying and just stop taking airplanes to travel. But for some this is just not a possibility. They are a 3 letter government agency put in place and kept in place across both political parties since almost the turn of the century. Americans are lazy. Our political process has become one that encourages laziness because for someone to make ANY kind of difference, even to get people talking about a topic, it requires way more effort than just showing up on election day or taking part in a protest. Occupy Wallstreet barely accomplished getting the nation talking about the wealth inequality, and we basically had to sacrifice our right to public assembly and protest to get that to happen, since most of OWS has been broken up or arrested now under orders from state or local government officials (both republican AND democrats).

      Saying the "public has spoken" and that they are FOR the things you mentioned is not accurate. It would be better to say "The public has spoken, but nobody is listening, so they've all but given up". There is a huge difference between support, and being voiceless. Unless there are changes in the way our political system works and the way the citizens are able to interact with it, nothing will change and the trends we've seen with Gitmo and TSA are only the beginning.

      --

      "I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."

    7. Re:Thespians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just look at the Obama voters; they're so dumb, they were complaining about Gitmo, the wars, TSA, etc. before Obama was elected, and now that he's continued those policies (or made them worse; the TSA wasn't nearly this bad under Bush), they defend him any time someone criticizes him.

      Err, what? Obama voter here -- and I certainly plan to vote for him again.

      I do hate Gitmo. And the wars. And the TSA. And bailouts (although you do know the first ~trillion dollars of bailouts in 2008 were done by Bush, right?).

      You know what else I hated? I hated don't-ask-don't-tell. I hated unnecessary restrictions on stem cell research. I hated medical insurance companies not disclosing what percentage of premiums went to actual medical care. I hated lifetime medical insurance maximums that meant my employed, fully covered neighbor who got breast cancer at 35 would be dropped from her plan before treatment was over, and I hated the pre-existing condition discrimination that would have kept her from ever having medical insurance again. I hated that same-sex partners of federal employees weren't eligible for spousal benefits. I hated the lack of financial reporting requirements that allowed enormous companies to get themselves into the "I need a bailout" position in the first place.

      So I'm now dumb for voting Obama because he only did ten times as much toward fixing the gripes I had/have as any other candidate in 2008 or 2012 would? That doesn't hold water. You're full of shit.

      Also, I realize it's fashionable to claim that Democrat and Republicans are the same. They're not. That's bullshit. They may both fail similarly in some significant areas (e.g. the TSA), but the Republican party has devolved into thinly veiled bigotry, xenophobia, and crony capitalism.

    8. Re:Thespians by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are plenty in the public who do not support these things. The fact is only a tiny fraction of the population actually votes. And this has more to do with votes not really counting for anything more than who the candidates are or what they support. Until they get rid of the electoral college and you get 1 vote for 1 person, and make it easier for people to vote either by having a national holiday on election day or online voting, our "democratic" system is really just smoke and mirrors with 2 parties that support the same political policies.

      I'm going to disagree here about the electoral college. It's not really working the way it was designed (us electing representatives that somewhat independently decide who'll the best president will be, hasn't been that way since the 2nd president where they gave him a VP of the opposite party) but it's still protecting us from voter fraud. You see, the US census every 10 years determines how many electors each state gets to send - more population, more electors. Well, anybody who has ever covered US elections probably knows we probably have one of the most in the 1st world on the local and state levels with massive hijinx every election. Just look up the Republican primaries this time around and read about all the irregularities. BUT, the electoral college at least acts as a firewall; no state can send more electors than it has no matter what so the problem is a bit more contained. In a straight up popular vote, really big states who have 1,000,000 dead voters going to the polls will change the outcome much more often than in the electoral game and they'll be extra incentive to do so.

      Adding more democracy has been always a time honored cry to make things better but has it? In 1913, the 17th amendment got adopted. It also added more democracy, it was the mandatory direct election of Senators by the people of their states rather than the states making their own rules, including often appointment by the state congress or governor. In effect, we got two houses of representatives rather than 1 and a house representing state's interests.

      And what has this change landed us?
      http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/debt_deficit_brief.php

      Perpetual wars and massive debt to gdp. Now, I'm not saying the 17th is responsible for all that, 1913 has indeed landed a host of changes to make things more "democratic" like income tax promised to only be applied to the top 0.01% super rich since tariffs were reportedly burdening the common man as well as the Federal Reserve.

      But what I'm definitely saying is that tweak the systems as much as you want, when you have, in the words of George Carlin "If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant leaders. Term limits ain't going to do any good; you're just going to end up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans. So, maybe, maybe, maybe, it's not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here... like, the public."

      Go look at other countries, practically the whole western world and all 1st world countries are as deep in debt as us. Europe and Japan with their multi party Parliaments and whatever, tweaks, tweaks, tweaks didn't do a damn thing. We're just human and that's the problem with the assumptions. Collectively we just suck no matter what we tell ourselves about it being the fault of our systems instead. The only thing a system can do is minimize it for a (relatively) short time until it's bypassed one way or another.

    9. Re:Thespians by Asic+Eng · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you don't vote for the lesser evil you'll get the bigger evil, though. (You want a Santorum supreme court?) And if you can't even be bothered to vote, you sure as hell won't fight back.

    10. Re:Thespians by Hatta · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, you only get evil as long as everyone chooses to vote for evil. As long as you are making excuses for voting for evil, you are a very large part of the problem.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  3. Great! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now only terrorists who can afford the $100 can take a bomb on your plane.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Great! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt the Saudis who did 9/11 would have had too much trouble raising $100.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Great! by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No no you mean the terrorists from Afghanistan.

    3. Re:Great! by ehiris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As if this security is really to prevent terrorists and not to make a bunch of cowardly sheep feel better about flying.

    4. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No no no you mean those terrorists from Iraq, er, Iran.

    5. Re:Great! by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Said the AC.

    6. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And passed through customs by the Mossad agents working with the Israeli-owned security companies with the airport contracts in question.

      Who is ultimately served by expensive US aggression in the Middle East? Israel meets its objectives without going broke. Nice.

      And you're a hate-spewing retarded monkey, btw. One among millions. No wonder this country is on the rocks.

    7. Re:Great! by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Precheck members usually get to use security lines set up for first-class and elite-level frequent fliers.

      Are they implying that first-class travelers are already getting this kind of preferential treatment?

      Because the 911 terrorists all had first-class tickets!

      I'm sorry, but as long as first-class passengers have their own sectioned-off area in the front of the plane, near the cockpit area, they should be checked and groped more thoroughly than any of the Economy-class passengers (otherwise, this entire thing is a farce). First class sections rarely have passengers in them, furthermore I very much doubt that the one or two sixty year old executives that normally sit in those sections would be able to do very much physically if they saw their terrorist seat-mates trying to take over the plane.

      When there is a passenger uprising against the terrorists, it will come from the Economy-class, -- not the First class (barring a few exceptions). And if terrorists try to take over a plane again, they'll try it again from First class, not the Economy class (they'd be crazy not to come from First class). And maintaining this old Caste system under this new terrorist threat is only helping the would-be terrorists.

  4. Well, if you were in the Third World by medcalf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could do the same thing, but cheaper. Seriously, how is this fundamentally different from legalized bribery?

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    1. Re:Well, if you were in the Third World by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because bribery would be illegal...

  5. For the people that matter. by Sean_Inconsequential · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article makes it seem as though the offer will only be extended to those who, due to flying frequently, are invited to the program by air lines. So really it is for CEOs, celebrities, and politicians that fly frequently to avoid those few run-ins that they have had in the past. Maybe it is just cynicism, but I am feeling like this is just "we are trying to be better" posturing masking an attempt hopefully prevent accidentally groping someone that can use their social position to have their voice easily heard by a large number of people.

  6. Re:I knew freedom had a price.... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They don't tell you what the qualifications are.

    Just a guess, but they're probably not entirely different than the requirements for a TWIC Card, also issued by the TSA to gain access to secure areas such as maritime ports, refineries, and other "sensitive" locations.

    I do have a TWIC card. It's always interesting (scary?) when I present the federal credential to a TSA agent at an airport. Although the TWIC card provides no access to airport facilities, it is a valid form of government ID issued by the TSA, Most agents are familiar with it, but one agent, after checking my boarding pass and waving me on asked me "what is this TWIC thing, anyway?"

    Security theater!

    --
    Beware of the Leopard.
  7. simpler and cheaper by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bypass everything in the US touched by the government. Dump the dollars, don't go to the US. Nothing, as it becomes overrun with orwellian BO (Bushie-Obamite statists etc devolving parallel to the UK example) . Hitler and Mussolini could only dream of the coercive powers being developed in the US.

  8. Re:Something people may not have caught... by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The caste system has always been in place. Coach/steerage gets the general line. First class gets a special, shorter line (since it's just FC passengers). Private jet passengers have no line, no check.

    This is more of a nod to the frequent fliers who are constantly going through this. I'm of two minds about this: folks who are putting up 200k miles are unlikely to be terrorist bombers, and this addresses part of the "bad for business / lost hours" problem that the TSA creates which I like to harp on. That said, it just makes those of us who fly infrequently madder to see folks breezing through the lines and TSA agents standing around doing nothing while the regular line snakes around the corner.

    As for the smiles - that's just human nature, not some kind of special Disney treatment you get with your pass. Those agents don't have to deal with constantly grousing passengers, people who have lost patience with the lines and required security striptease, and the inevitable idiot who has no idea what their doing (or is intentionally belligerent) and fouls up the works. I'd smile too if everyone who passed through my line was happy about NOT being in that OTHER line.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  9. Be A Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It works for me, and I'm normally a very nice person. When I go to the airport though, I let the TSA know exactly how far they can push me around, and that is NOT AT ALL. Be snarky. Rush them. Let them know you do not like, or want, to stand for their bullshit, and let them know that *you* know that's exactly what it is: bullshit. Don't use the "security theater" moniker. What they're doing there doesn't deserve terminology all it's own. It's bullshit, plain and simple, for the purpose of control. I have found that if you resist it strongly, with confidence and a proper amount of aggression, they will rush you through, knowing they'd rather avoid a scene than try and collar someone of a stronger will than their own.

    Of course I'm a white male in my mid-30s, so your mileage may (unfortunately and to the utmost shame of my people) differ. Best of luck to everyone going through these situations though. The most important thing is to stand up for yourself and don't be complacent.

    Lastly, I understand I will probably be arrested someday for how far I can take things at the "security" checkpoint. I feel that it's a worthy sacrifice for real, actual freedom though, and I hope everyone who reads this can and will feel the same. This whole situation will not end well for any of us if we just let it go.

  10. Why it should be free... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's what I object to about paying for the 'security' card: I'm a 'safe' citizen - No criminal record, no issues etc. So in effect every time I step in front of an officer at security I'm eating up the (expensive) valuable resources of a trained officer who would be better served questioning more 'suspicious' characters.

    If I consented to a check, the governments of the USA and Canada would not have to waste valuable resources asking me questions any more, and would in fact save themselves money. Instead, they charge *me* money for the ability to repurpose their officers. They should be encouraging as many 'safe' citizens as possible to get these cards (for free) so security can be more efficient, and cheaper to operate.

    I object to this non-sensical government tax grab.

  11. Flawed by suso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not exactly like that, and it's not exactly new. First you have to pass a rigorous background check, the same one I passed to work for an airline.

    Yeah, exactly, you have a pass a rigorous background check that will ensure that under no circumstances can you be bribed or threatened into bringing a bomb onto a plane by threatening or giving a pile of money to your family. First rule of security. Treat all people the same. Anyone getting special treatment is a huge liability.

    1. Re:Flawed by tempest69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      heck, ever heard of a "blind mule" like Juan Andres? A good bump-swap of bags and you can get a bomb on a plane. Yea a special line is really a bad thing.

    2. Re:Flawed by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      TSA is a placeholder for people who can't get employed anyplace else. It's all a "make work" job creation racket funded by your tax dollars at work. The $100 fee is to ensure extra money goes into expanding the program even further.

      As a conservative, GWB should have known this. Starve the beast, don't feed it! Then again, he was one of the biggest spenders in recent history. Only Obama beats him.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  12. Re:We've always been friends with Iraq... by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Soon enough you will realize that you too love big brother.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  13. Re:Sorry... mathematics nazi. by Fned · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not anyone. A lot of us have understood how stupid they are from the get go.

  14. 1 in a Billion by Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

        "We can reduce the size of the haystack when we are looking for that one-in-a-billion terrorist," said TSA Administrator John Pistole.

    Wow.

    So if there's 7 Billion people in the world, then... there are only 7 people we need to find. Wow we're wasting a lot of time, money, and resources at the airports.

  15. Re:Assholes on every flight by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate it when people try to sneak on an oversize bag rather than just book it into the baggage hold. A plane has limited space, so just stop being so greedy and get a properly sized bag. It's not difficult.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  16. Re:"government issued picture ID" by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it had in HUGE text what the damned expiration on it was

    What happens when your ID expires? Do you turn into someone else?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  17. Re:Assholes on every flight by mrxak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should really do quite the opposite, charge people for carry-ons, and checked baggage is free.

    It would speed up the security checkpoints.
    It would speed up boarding.
    It would give everyone who actually needs to carry on baggage (people with medicine, kids, etc.) a much easier time finding space close to their seat.