Slashdot Mirror


Why the Middle East Is a Good Place For Women Tech Entrepreneurs

pbahra writes "Conferences for start-ups and entrepreneurs often feature 'pitch contests,' slots in which aspiring entrepreneurs take to the stage to sell their ideas to the audience. Last month's ArabNet conference, held in the Lebanese capital, was no different. What was different, however, was the number of pitches from female entrepreneurs. The stereotype has it that women in the Middle East are subjugated, oppressed and barely let out of their houses. But if that is the case, how come 40% of the pitches were from women—a higher percentage than is typical in equivalent conferences held in Europe? Nor was this closer-to-equal representation of women unique to ArabNet--other conferences in the region boast similar ratios."

229 comments

  1. Soooo.... by baldass_newbie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many of them still had their clitoris?

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
    1. Re:Soooo.... by digitig · · Score: 0

      Have you actually followed up any of the references on that page? For example, the verse that allegedly claims that "Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie." is actually about testimony under duress not being valid. It's just an anti-Islamic disinformation site.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    2. Re:Soooo.... by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Troll? Seriously? Because the Middle East is such a hotbed of advances in the area of women's rights, I suppose.
      Yes, yes. It's not fair to paint the entire region with one brush, but to even remotely suggest that the region, in general, isn't still influenced heavily by ass-backwards, women hating, religious fucktards is to miss a stupendously obvious reality. I'd say the same about Tennessee, but I think women get a moderately better shake there.

    3. Re:Soooo.... by Jawnn · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course he hasn't. That would require effort, not to mention a mind open at least enough to admit the possibility that his preconceived notions about Islam might be incorrect. Can't have that now, can we?

    4. Re:Soooo.... by g8oz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thats primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa not the Arab world. It does happen in Egypt, but a recent campaign enlisted local Muslim clerics to preach against the practice and is evidently meeting with success.

      Don't you hate it when facts interfere with glib one-liners?

    5. Re:Soooo.... by Jessified · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I concur. The whole article seems to be trying to say that the Middle East isn't a sexist place.

      That's like saying saying racism didn't exist in the 50s because some subset of black men were allowed to become a doctors.

      "You see? X-bias doesn't exist because some token example contradicts the mountains of examples where the bias does apply."

      Honestly. Does anyone here watch Star Trek? (Of course you do.) Does this not remind you of the Ferengi, as mainly depicted in DS9? The only difference I can see is that the Ferengi prefer their women unclothed rather than fully covered.

      How about some examples from this article:
      Lets start with the picture of the business women covered up from head to toe. For every one woman that truthfully and freely prefers to be dressed like that, how many are coerced by a sexist society?

      More flexible work options, freelance, home-based work, low capital requirements; you can see why starting a company on a small scale is a much more viable thing for women to do than get a corporate job.

      Why is that?

      In Jordan, specifically, the main reason for women not entering the work force is the lack of a proper transit system. We don't have an affordable transit system that can take women from remote areas to the city.

      Is the lack of public transportation not an issue for men, too? Why do women suffer from a lack of public transportation but men do not?

      Home working also allows women to combine their traditional roles of homemaker and mother, with being an entrepreneur.

      There it is. Women belong in the kitchen. Also, I imagine it's less embarassing to have women doing business anonymously over the internet, because no one needs to know she's a woman.

      He said that some private-sector companies would consider employing women, but were put off by the cost and the lack of knowledge of how to hire them. "One of the problems is that they don't know where to go to find the right kind of talents."

      Apparently, hiring women costs more than hiring men, and it's apparently much harder to assess the abilities of women than it is for men. Did not know that.

      If you were to look at the law, even in a country that claims to be as liberal as Lebanon, technically if your husband wanted to prevent you from traveling, he can. Technically you cannot open a bank account as a married woman, your husband has to do it. However, in practice these laws are not enforced."

      Well, it's not a repressive country if they simply don't enforce oppressive laws...for now. And that's an example of the most liberal middle eastern countries!

      It would be ironic if a region that is castigated for its attitudes toward women actually turned out to be more welcoming of female entrepreneurs than those doing the castigating.

      Right. The entire article depicted a more welcoming environment than the western world.

      The fact that any women are succeeding despite living in repressive regimes speaks to their strength of will, not the supposed "progress" of those countries.

    6. Re:Soooo.... by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thats primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa not the Arab world.

      wrong, wrong, wrong.

    7. Re:Soooo.... by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      Is the lack of public transportation not an issue for men, too? Why do women suffer from a lack of public transportation but men do not?

      I can think of a few reasons.

      1. They might have more obligations at home due to tradition and/or male dominance.

      2. In some countries (like Saudi Arabia), women aren't allowed to drive. This is not the case for the quote, which is from a Jordanian.

      3. Walking long distances alone is more dangerous if you're a woman, especially if it's dark. This is true even in Western countries.

      --
      Visit the
    8. Re:Soooo.... by Jessified · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thanks. The question was rhetorical. All three of those answers make my point for me.

      And let there be no doubt that western societies still suffer from sexism too, for example, as evidenced by the fact that it is more dangerous for women to walk around in the dark than for men, as well as the nature of the crimes women are more likely to face vs those face by men. Of course, between the two regions, we are talking orders of magnitude of difference.

    9. Re:Soooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he hasn't. That would require effort, not to mention a mind open at least enough to admit the possibility that his preconceived notions about Islam might be incorrect. Can't have that now, can we?

      My preconceived notions about Islam was that extremist was a minority and that the vast majority of them was peaceful peoples that only wish to convert us with pacifists mean. This changed during the Muhammad cartoons events of 2005; To muslim the drawing was a blasphemy, hence the millions of angry Muslim violently protesting around the world. But yet, when a Muslim commit mass murders in the name of Allah, a much worst blasphemy mind you, none of these angry Muslim show up. They agree in silence.

      There is no such thing as a moderated Muslim (or the extremist are the 99% that make the 1% look bad). This i know from experience. It was hard to change my mind about them. But their action, or inaction in this example, speak truth.

      Now, will you have the courage to put aside your political corectlness filter and see the truth for yourself? Read the Quran, observe what they do. Islam is out for world domination, they don't accept competing ideologies and have proven that many, many time.

      Also, there is no god and his prophet is a pedophile.

    10. Re:Soooo.... by g8oz · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I didn't know that.

      I think this an issue where progress can be made because it is a cultural practice and clerics have made it clear (when pushed) that it is not part of Islamic teachings.

      In the Egyptian campaign mothers said they had it done to their daughters because they felt that not having it would make them unmarriageable. Showing example of uncircumcised girls who were doing fine, gotten married, gone to school helped change a lot of minds.

      Public education is needed, and personally I think the best method of delivery is soap operas.

  2. so they can pitch just not drive cars... by johnjones · · Score: 5, Informative

    Women driving has been a controversial issue in Saudi Arabia since 1990 when 47 women got into 14 cars and drove on to a main street in Riyadh. They were stopped, suspended from work for two years and condemned for years in religious sermons and social circles....

    honestly

     

    1. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the US it's repeated again and again that "driving is a privilege, not a right". Many men also are forbidden to drive by their ex-wives.

    2. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driving IS a privilege. But it's one thing to earn your privileges and another to be granted them because you've born in the correct sex.

    3. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many men also are forbidden to drive by their ex-wives.

      I have no idea what you're talking about. Care to elaborate?

    4. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      Many men are forbidden to drive by their ex-wives? Where? The only cases I know of is where I live the state takes your drivers license if you are a deadbeat dad who doesn't pay child support.

    5. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Many men are forbidden to drive by their ex-wives? Where? The only cases I know of is where I live the state takes your drivers license if you are a deadbeat dad who doesn't pay child support.

      ...said the happily married man who's never been through a messy divorce and lost most of his property.

    6. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by jesseck · · Score: 1

      He lost the car in the divorce...

    7. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      ...said the happily married man who's never been through a messy divorce and lost most of his property.

      or the man who doesn't have to pay over 45% of his net pay (yes, 45% of your take home for two kids in daycare - 25% of gross to child support plus an additional amount to daycare and health expenses since those aren't covered by the 25%) to child support. Now lets talk about alimony...I have to attempt to live on approximately 25% of my net pay of $85K. Luckily I live in the cleveland area so I can just get a studio in the bad parts of town (though my car continually gets vandalized...)

    8. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Rasperin · · Score: 2

      I've got to admit, that scares the living shit out of me. Note to the wise, if you're going to split with your wife try to make sure she has a job that makes nearly as much as you. It will reduce what you owe in child support, she'll be hard pressed to get alimony, and there's nothing you can do about daycare. It's fuckton expensive and as a married couple you can exempt 4500/year (total). I pay that in two months of day care.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    9. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Well, America isn't all that better! As a man, I think it's wrong that I got arrested just because I drunkenly stumbled into the women's bathroom and peed in the sink. If I peed in the sink in the men's bathroom there wouldn't have been a problem! SEXIST FACISTS!

    10. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That saying is way wrong BTW. All Rights are reserved by the people that are not given as a power of Government in the Constitution of the United States. That saying is another example of rampant brainwashing across America.

    11. Re:so they can pitch just not drive cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confused. That's not sexism. The question you need to be asking is: would a woman get get the same treatment. (that is, arrested for peeing in the women's bathroom sink while getting away with pissing in the mens room sink)

  3. As Arab cities go... by HBI · · Score: 4, Informative

    Beirut isn't very Arab. It's close to 40% Christian.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shh!!! You're not supposed to soil the narrative.

    2. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also not in Arabia.

    3. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those Christians are also Arabs.

    4. Re:As Arab cities go... by HBI · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily true. There is a rich ethnic mix in Lebanon, one of the reasons why there is so much fighting there.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:As Arab cities go... by fruviad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Can you tell me why you are not brave enough to post such nonsense under a real account?

      "Coward" applies in your case. Along with a number of other adjectives I won't add for fear of young children seeing them...

    6. Re:As Arab cities go... by operagost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correct. Islam is the main problem. The Qur'an says that beating women is a step in the process of obtaining obedience, and there are several references in the Hadith of women being inferior.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. Liberals don't want anyone to pay for someone else's birth control. We want women to pay for their own, through their insurance. Since shopping around for insurance is generally infeasible, we want to make sure that insurers do not discriminate against women's sexual health.

      2. Liberals do not fall in line with Islamic radicals. Liberals denounce and campaign against many elements of extremist religions, including Islam. Liberals fight for women's rights around the world. However:

      A. Liberals do not lump all Muslims into a faceless, extremist block. There are lots of Muslims that adhere to humanist views on gender, sexual orientation, politics, and religion. Yes, there are many extremist Muslims, and many poor and undereducated Muslims that are taken advantage of in extremist societies. But Liberals recognize that Islam isn't the root of these issues, it's just that in some cases is a tool by which its adherents are exploited. We would rather solve the root causes (poverty, inequality, inadequate education) than attack Islam itself.

      B. Liberals do not believe that bombing Middle Eastern countries is the best way to address those root causes of extremism.

    8. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We want women to pay for their own, through their insurance.

      That you cannot see the self evident contradiction here is either amazing or sadly, par for the course.

    9. Re:As Arab cities go... by operagost · · Score: 5, Informative

      Would the person who modded me "troll" please point out where my information is incorrect? Read the sayings of Mohammed as recorded by Al Bukhari: "A nation headed by a woman shall never succeed"; "If I have commanded kneeling for somebody, I would command a woman to kneel for her husband", "Women lack brain and religion". And the Qur'an, I think it's in Sura 5, "As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them, refuse to share their beds, beat them; but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of other punishment)." Don't deny the truth.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Judges 19:25 or 1 Corinthians 11:3. Yawn. At best western society is 2 generations ahead of the middle east in its treatment of women. While it's not right, we certainly can't look down on them for it.

    11. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How stupid do you have to be to treat Arab and Christian as mutually exclusive properties?

    12. Re:As Arab cities go... by LittleVito · · Score: 2

      Beirut isn't very Arab. It's close to 40% Christian.

      I think you mean isn't very Muslim, not Arab. The Christians in Beirut are still Arabs.

    13. Re:As Arab cities go... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Arab" is an ethnic group, not a religion. It's more than possible to be an "Arab Christian," (typical Copt), just as it is to be an "Hispanic Jew."

    14. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no contradiction. Insurance serves two purposes:

      1. Risk abatement for unexpected, catastrophic expenses. Everybody receives the same potential benefit, though gladly most people will end up not needing it.

      2. Purchasing power for everyday items. A large group has more power to negotiate favorable rates for services and products.

      You don't understand insurance if you think it means your expenses are paid by someone else.

    15. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beirut isn't very Arab. It's close to 40% Christian.

      You are mixing religion and ethnicity/geography. The 40% of Christians in Lebanon are Arabs. They are just not muslims.

      see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Christians

    16. Re:As Arab cities go... by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      Don't presume he'd go to all that effort for the likes of you.

    17. Re:As Arab cities go... by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      Beirut isn't very Arab. It's close to 40% Christian.

      Your statement is a textbook example of ignorance related to the Middle East. Arab's aren't Muslims. They're Arabs. Most of those Christians are Arabs.

      And to the person who commented that they're a mix of ethnicities: That's equally true about the Muslims in Beirut.

      --
      Beetle B.
    18. Re:As Arab cities go... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      You could be God Almighty himself and be marked as "troll". The moderation has nothing to do with the facts. It has everything to do with whether or not you pissed someone off with mod points.

      Not that I agree with it, just telling you how it is.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's close to 40% Christian

      So if you're a woman tech entrepreneur, this is the only place (other than Israel) that you could actually be heard.

    20. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At best western society is 2 generations ahead of the middle east in its treatment of women."

      Really? The Wyoming state constitution recognized the right of women to vote, from the day it was ratfied. I think Wyoming became a state more than two generations ago.

      And while most citizens of the United States identify themselves as Christian, most of them do not take verses of the Bible that subjugate women literally, or advocate putting the force of law behind those verses. For example, even a conservative religious group like Focus on the Family has never supported a law that would require a husband to open a bank account for his wife, or a law forbidding women to drive.

      Just because Western culture has not completely progressed to the point where women are treated with complete equality, doesn't mean we're only "two generations" ahead of the Islamic world. And just because the United States was founded on selected Christian principles doesn't mean that we have codified into law all of the oppressive commands that can be found in the Bible. If the posted is capable of thinking in shades of grey, now might be a good time to start.

    21. Re:As Arab cities go... by HBI · · Score: 1

      Textbook example of ignorance? My ass. I've been, you probably haven't. Most Arab states go the extra mile (or kilometer) to make sure that every native person is a Muslim. The confusion isn't 'random' or from 'bias', it's actively conspired at. Besides which, the inhabitants of Lebanon are NOT always Arabs.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Lebanon

      Now stop being a fucking ignorant idiot, ok?

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    22. Re:As Arab cities go... by HBI · · Score: 1

      The Maronites aren't Arabs, amongst others. Go elsewhere in SWA, and you'll find Arab and Muslim are synonymous.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    23. Re:As Arab cities go... by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      Most Arab states go the extra mile (or kilometer) to make sure that every native person is a Muslim.

      We're talking about Lebanon, not most Arab states.

      Not sure what your point in providing the Wikipedia link is. It doesn't indicate that most Christians in Lebanon are non-Arabs. More importantly, it doesn't indicate that the % of non-Arab Christians differs significantly from the % of non-Arab Muslims in Lebanon.

      --
      Beetle B.
    24. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      #1 defines Health Insurance.

      #2 is Health Care

      You don't understand Insurance at all. If you want to join some co-op that pools purchasing power to provide cheaper prices, fine, do that. Just don't call it insurance.

    25. Re:As Arab cities go... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would the person who modded me "troll" please point out where my information is incorrect? Read the sayings of Mohammed as recorded by Al Bukhari: "A nation headed by a woman shall never succeed"; "If I have commanded kneeling for somebody, I would command a woman to kneel for her husband", "Women lack brain and religion". And the Qur'an, I think it's in Sura 5, "As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them, refuse to share their beds, beat them; but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of other punishment)." Don't deny the truth.

      You can split hairs about this all day long but in the end it is pointless to make fundamentalist arguments like "if the Quran tells you to do <some misogynistic act> all moslems must be following that instruction mindlessly". This is especially true because the Bible is full of similar misogynistic and inhumane crap. When was the last time you saw a couple guilty of adultery begin stoned to death at the city gates? (That little gem came from Deuteronomy 22:23-24) Both the Quaran and the Bible were written in very different times long ago and that fact should kept in mind when reading either text. If you really want to convince us that all moslems take every archaic passage in the Qaran seriously then we must by the same logic also argue that all christians do as well. Thankfully most moslems and christians (apart from some die-hard fundies) do not take everything written in the Quaran literally and implement every crazy thing that is written in scripture. Only brainless fundies do that.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    26. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and I'm sure there are also some Christian Hispanic Jews!

    27. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you really want to convince us that all moslems take every archaic passage in the Qaran seriously then we must by the same logic also argue that all christians do as well.

      If someone tried to preach murder, violence and the destruction of democratic states in the largest christian church in the capital city of a major western nation, how long would he be allowed to continue? On the other hand Abu Hamza was able to do this for 5 years until stopped by part of the government.

      What Abu Hamza was able to do for so long in the Finsbury mosque shows that the die-hard fundies in Islam are more than just a tiny minority. Maybe they are not the majority, but they are a significant proportion.

    28. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll assume you're unfamiliar with the health insurance model in the United States, rather than a troll or a right-wing moron. #2 is absolutely part of health insurance in the US. Size of the insurance pool is the major factor in difference between drug prices from one insurance provider to another.

    29. Re:As Arab cities go... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      you'll find Arab and Muslim are synonymous.

      And that's somehow different or more accurate than saying "you'll find Hispanic and Catholic are synonymous?"

    30. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't accept the argument that you can pick which parts of the Koran to follow and still call yourself a Muslim. You're either following the Koran, or you're just doing "what feels right".

    31. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, one is Health Insurance and two is health care. The U.S. may glom them together, but that does not change the definitions.

      Which is one reason the Health Care systems is so screwed up.

    32. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't realise Arab (ethnicity) and Christian (religion) were mutually exclusive. And somehow you got a score of 5: interesting. Reading comments about the Middle East on most forums can be quite frustrating.

    33. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im sorry but the Christians in Lebanon are not arabs. The word arab was forced upon them at the end of the Civil War.
      During the civil war, you had africans, palestinians, syrians and local muslims fighting Christians in Lebanon. All of this is to weaken the Lebanese Christians and to make Lebanon an official muslim and arab state. You can deny it if you want but all muslims dream of an islamic state weather its Lebanon or the United States. The Christians in Lebanon are and still pro west but the west fails them.

      All this is at the end good for Israel because it will benefit from it: Force the christians out and have the palestinians settle in = less headache for Israel.

      Lebanon is a mix. You have a mixture of Phoenician, arab, ottoman, english and french blood

    34. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your conclusion is right, but your counterexample has a rather huge flaw.

      People love to point out harsh punishments and "inhumane" laws in the Old Testament as evidence of Christian inconsistency or craziness. This is akin to pointing to the beginning of LOTR and saying, "look here Gandalf is clearly advocating that Frodo keep the ring in the Shire; what a fool!" Nevermind that later parts clearly explain the change of plan. The New Testament goes to quite extreme lengths to point out that Jesus paid the penalty for sin. Even later parts of the Old Testament point toward something like that happening. Jesus does not condemn us, but died for us. So all those harsh penalties and strict rules are over and done. Adultery is still wrong, but the response is now grace (free to those who accept it), not death. Natural consequences are, of course, still in effect, as any adulterer can tell you, but Jesus paid the penalty. That was kind of the main point of that whole "cross business". Basing arguments on the beginning of a narrative without acknowledging its ending is...er.. flawed reasoning.

      The "die-hard fundies" who rant and rave about sinners violating laws in the Pentateuch (first 5 books of the OT) are similarly being stupid, so i don't totally fault you in this. They, more than you, should be reading the Bible enough to know better.

    35. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's a pretty damn sad misconception. Insurance doesn't magically pay for anything you know.
      Fundamentally, insurance is just supposed to spread the cost of rare events out over a larger time frame, or over a larger pool of people.

      Sadly, in the USA, health insurance companies take on a second role to "negotiate prices".
      This changes everything. Instead of a simple fund, it's now a gateway to reasonable prices (but only if you pay for their overhead).
      Now it isn't about paying for unlikely events, but reoccurring drugs as well. Now the insurance companies have control over
      what sort of healthcare they deem acceptable and which they choose to deny. And this is the point where the insurance companies are deciding that birth control isn't acceptable. Because they're sexist assholes.

      And that, my friend, is where "the leftist liberals" take issue.

    36. Re:As Arab cities go... by jvkjvk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your words would be commendable, but we have every day knowledge of how women are actually treated by proponents of the religion, in the current time. They would be more commendable if you didn't create arguments that no one has made - e.g "all moslems must be following that instruction mindlessly".

      You are the only one making that argument, and you do it so you don't have to fact the actual reality of what is happening.

      When was the last time you saw a couple guilty of adultery begin stoned to death at the city gates?

      Well, they generally just stone the *woman* now, so that's ok?

      You can claim the "no true scotsman" argument only up to the point you have actual governments that have implemented policies. It is then no longer just the die hard fundies - they have inculcated the society to accept their basic premises. This is easily seen by the lack of prosecution of people who murder their female relatives who have brought "dishonor" upon their house.

      Sorry, but you are the one being the brainless fundy, making up your own toy arguments and vanquishing those wooden soldiers.

      Regards.

    37. Re:As Arab cities go... by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

      No, that person can't point anything out. Once you've used a mod point, you cannot post in the discussion.

    38. Re:As Arab cities go... by amiga3D · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think the left tend to sympathize with the Islamist because they are the only other group that hate Christians as much as they do. Actually that's inaccurate, the majority of Muslims want to live and let live as much as anyone but there are so many extremists that are so full of hate and they have so much in common with the Hollywood left as far as hatred of Christians. It's funny to me because both sides, absent their common enemy, would despise each other totally.

    39. Re:As Arab cities go... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I also fail to understand why Insurance refuses to pay for birth control. Frankly it's much cheaper to pay for birth control than an actual birth not to mention that under a family plan they then have to pay for all those baby doctor visits down the road. It doesn't add up to me at all.

    40. Re:As Arab cities go... by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go to Jerusalem and piss on a Bible or a Torah, then go to Makkah and piss on a Quran.

      Post results.

      All superstitions are of course bad because they are nonsense, and because they are enemies of truth. Why we should respect anything thought up by people who thought the Earth was flat is highly questionable.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    41. Re:As Arab cities go... by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

      "At best western society is 2 generations ahead of the middle east in its treatment of women."

      When was the last time a woman in the US was sentenced to being stoned to death for adultery?

      How often are woman in the US hanged for the crime of being raped?

      Since when can you divorce a woman, in the US, just by saying "I divorce you" three times; and also get away with no alimony, no child support, and full custody, automatically.

      Since when have women not been allowed to drive, or work, in the US?

    42. Re:As Arab cities go... by Sun · · Score: 1

      No, that person can't point anything out. Once you've used a mod point, you cannot post in the discussion.

      Simply not true. You can post, but then the moderation is cancelled. Also, you can post as AC.

      If it were my moderation that was questioned (and I'd see the question), I'd certainly do one or the other (depending on whether I thought there was merit to the criticism).

      Shachar

    43. Re:As Arab cities go... by CubicleZombie · · Score: 1

      Insurance does cover birth control. Show me a policy that doesn't.

      Yes, I know that if you go to work for a catholic church, their policy probably won't cover it, but try to find a regular private or company policy that excludes birth control. Not going to happen.

      --
      :wq
    44. Re:As Arab cities go... by Sun · · Score: 1

      Still, Lebanon is not a very typical Arab country. It has a lot of ethnic groups, and at times, showed a very pluralistic approach to internal affairs (then again, the other times were spent in bloody citizen war between those very groups). Until the jury comes back with a decision on what Egypt is becoming, it is the only somewhat (see comment above) functioning Arab democracy.

      There are other Muslim democracies, such as Turkey, but they are not Arab. The only other contender for an Arab democracy is the Palestinian authority. Question of whether or not they are a state aside, what really prevents them from taking that title is the fact that the first time a regime change was voted, the new regime slaughtered the supporters of the old one, and the old prime minister refused to step down, effectively splitting the west bank from Gaza. Not exactly what you'd call a proper democratic process.

      So the fact that Lebanon is where the examples are taken from is not a good indication for what's going on in the Arab world at large. It just goes to show that treating the "Arab world" as one piece is just a misguided western view. Give me an example from Saudi Arabia or (yes, I know they are not Arab) Iran, and I'll be much more inclined to agree that my superstitions need to be revisited.

      Shachar

    45. Re:As Arab cities go... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      B. Liberals do not believe that bombing Middle Eastern countries is the best way to address those root causes of extremism.

      That's a lie. Obama's been bombing ME countries even more than Bush has. Liberals will give lip service to non-violence when they're trying to gain power, but as soon as one of their own gets elected, they're all about continuing the same warmongering policies that the conservatives were pursuing, and their followers will happily back them up with all kinds of excuses.

    46. Re:As Arab cities go... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're right that this is why the health care system here is so screwed up, but the fact that insurance covers #2 absolutely makes these things part of "insurance". Maybe it shouldn't be that way, but it is. Americans purchase everyday (health-related) items and services through their insurance providers; hence, "purchasing power for everyday items" absolutely does constitute a purpose for insurance in the US, as screwed up as that may be. I guess you could say that US health insurance companies are, in effect, co-ops like you mentioned, but they are still called "insurance companies". Words are defined by their popular usage.

    47. Re:As Arab cities go... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure what the people who wrote the various books of those religions believed, but even the ancient Greeks knew the earth was round (circa 500BC), and they even calculated its diameter to a fairly high degree of accuracy considering the lack of technology at the time. Thinking the earth is round is nothing new.

    48. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a lie, and Obama is not a liberal. He may be liberal on some issues, but he ran as a centrist and has operated as a centrist. Liberals call him the best Republican president since Eisenhower (or Clinton). Liberals have skewered him for missing deadlines on withdrawal from Iraq, skewered him for first expanding the effort in and now missing deadlines in the withdrawal from Afghanistan, skewered him for drone strikes on civilians, and skewered him for drone strikes in general. We don't excuse his pro-MIC policies and we apply the pressure we can to change them.

    49. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Lebanese Christians (Maronites) are Phoenicians, Iraqi Christians are Assyrians, Egyptians Christians are Copts. None of them are Arab.

    50. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a foolish thing to say, since 'murder, violence, and destruction of democratic states' is exactly what is preached in most major christian churches of america... alot of them tow the government line in these regards which I believe definitely does advocate these things. (war in the middle east is good, etc.)

    51. Re:As Arab cities go... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In the USA, "liberal" is whatever the Democratic Party says it is, and "liberals" are those who vote steadfastly for Democrats.

      Yes, some liberals have criticized him, but lots more have backed him up and made all sorts of excuses for him. Obviously, these are two different groups of liberals.

    52. Re:As Arab cities go... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Following a chain of logic isn't really your forte, isn't it?

    53. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was more outrage by the Afghans over the burning of the Qurans at that military base than the soldier who went on the rampage killing all those woman and children. People say pull out and do nothing, but than it becomes a huge brewing pot of hate that cannot be contained and spills out into other countries.
      It's a lose/lose situation and people say "oooohhh they don't represent majority of muslims", well bullshit on that as the majority of muslims remain silent and passively agree by not speaking out.

    54. Re:As Arab cities go... by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but this is typical uninformed drivel. Lebanese think of themselves as a Phoenician, Arab, Ottoman descended mix. Lebanon has been a crossroads for conquerors and traders for thousands of years. Some are Muslim - Shia and Sunni. Some are Christian - RC, Othodox, Maronite and so many others. During the civil war different Christian groups aligned with different Muslim groups for their own perceived interest. Half way though many broke alliances and formed new alliances.

      Pretending it was a Christians vs Muslims civil war displays an extremely superficial understanding of what happened in the 80s in Lebanon.

      Oh, and Syrians tend to think of themselves as Arabs and, like Palestinians, some are Muslim, some are Christian, and they don't follow the script you seem to think they do regarding dreaming of an Islamic state...

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    55. Re:As Arab cities go... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      So what is the problem? I see women on TV bitching all the time about having to pay for birth control? Personally I think it'd be smart for the States to hand it out along with the welfare checks. But then they aren't too big on smart. I think any woman who doesn't want to have a baby should be given free birth control. I'm mostly a libertarian but there are exceptions and this is a big one. People who don't want kids shouldn't have them! When they do it's mostly a bad thing. On some the instinct thing kicks in but for far too many it's a bad, bad thing.

    56. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have absolutely no idea what happens in a deep-Bible Belt evangelical church, do you?

    57. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone tried to preach murder, violence and the destruction of democratic states in the largest christian church in the capital city of a major western nation, how long would he be allowed to continue? On the other hand Abu Hamza was able to do this for 5 years until stopped by part of the government.

      Hahaha.

      We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.

      -- Anne Coulter

      I don't think she's been jailed or drone-missiled quite yet. She's not in a church, but have you ever seen a fundamentalist evangelical sermon before? Her bullshit is mild.

      No, the difference here is that these crazy assholes don't have much power in the West, whereas they run whole nations in the Middle East, not that they don't exist or aren't permitted to.

    58. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Lots of Arabs are Christians. "Arab" is an ethnicity, an extended tribal family group. "Christian" is a religion that anyone can join.

      Beirut is very Arab, no matter how many are Christian, Baha'i, Muslim or other.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    59. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're stupid.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    60. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're stupid. Your "American way of life" is the same theocracy as Muslim jihadists, but with a different trademark brand.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    61. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      Contraception saves insurers all the costs that come with pregnancy and also STDs. Insurers paying for contraception reduces the costs to everyone who buys insurance.

      You Republicans can't understand insurance. Or any other kind of investment, or risk management. All you understand is that your tribe is always right, and everyone else isn't human. You're stupid.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    62. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. The Democratic Party isn't even very liberal, and it's certainly not the official definer of "liberal".

      More to the point, many liberals have both criticized Obama and backed him up and made excuses for him. Because liberals aren't slaves to the binary thinking required of Republicans and "libertarians". "Better than Bush/McCain/Romney" is good enough to defend against the alternative, even if that's not good enough to be proud of. A reasonable adult can handle the nuance. Or they can vote Republican, and enjoy the lack of nuance that comes with always being wrong.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    63. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "The left", whatever that actually is, doesn't "sympathize with the Islamist". People who aren't crazy, stupid or evil understand that there are limits to what you do to even your enemies. Because not only is human decency real to most people, but we also realize that doing those things to your enemy makes it easier to see it done to you.

      This is of course all exactly what Jesus taught, and what Christians like to claim is their governing ideology. But fake Christians like you just want to claim the legacy while doing exactly what Christianity teaches must be avoided at all worldly costs.

      BTW, extremist Muslims hate Hollywood almost as much as Hollywood hates them. You really are good at being wrong.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    64. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The Bible also says all kinds of stuff about killing people who have "sinned".

      It's obvious that superstition used to abuse people is the problem, no matter which brand of superstition is being used.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    65. Re:As Arab cities go... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'd rather not vote at all than vote for liar Obama, since he's no better than Bush. If the Democrats can't run a better candidate, why bother voting? I'd rather see Santorum win so the whole country can collapse, and then at least we'll have a chance of getting some better candidates (at least in some of the new breakaway republics).

    66. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And the Mideast has states where women have been voting for more than 2 generations.

      The US wasn't founded on "selected Christian principles". Any more than its speaking English was a "selected Christian principle". It was founded on principles developed by people whose culture happened to be Christian, though they were explicitly far more secular than the culture they came from. The principles were not Christian; they were principles that were developed largely in spite of Christianity.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    67. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Several states have this year alone tried to pass laws requiring raped women to be forced to have an ultrasound probe repeat the rape if they wanted to abort the fetus. Many other states have all kinds of ways to humiliate women who were raped. These states are going this way under pressure of Christian theocrat activitsts. Not quite hanging them. But we're working on it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    68. Re:As Arab cities go... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I have been to several Arab countries. I don't know where in these Arab countries you've gone, but your personal experience is demonstrably wrong.

      Considering they're all military dictatorships, "going the extra mile" would by now have actually made every native person a Muslim. Yet many natives are Christians, Baha'i, Jews, Zorastrians, and plenty of other non-Muslims. In fact their internal Shia/Sunni conflict is a higher priority for these countries, yet they don't force all natives to be one or the other.

      But you think that replying to "most Lebanese Christians are Arabs" with "they're not always Arabs" somehow debunks it. That's a very lame logical fallacy. Which doesn't earn you standing to insist someone else stop being a fucking ignorant idiot.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    69. Re:As Arab cities go... by ffflala · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you saw a couple guilty of adultery begin stoned to death at the city gates?

      August 2010, in Afghanistan, under the guise of Islamic rule of law. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/16/taliban-stone-couple-for_n_683080.html

      And only a few days ago a woman in Iran was sentenced to stoning for adultery. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1291166/Iranian-mother-faces-death-stoning-convicted-adultery.html

    70. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Lebanese Christians are Phoenicians, not Arabs. They speak Arabic, since their former language is extinct, but that in no way makes them Arabs.

    71. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Koran is fairly sensible for a religious manual, especially by Abrahamic standards. "Beat them if they do wrong and forgive them if they stop wronging" is very post-Christ.

      Also, saying "Islam" is the problem is disingenuous. I can't think of a religion that doesn't subjugate woman. Religion is the problem. Unfortunately, it seems to be a necessary evil in many ways.

      Religion is about control, not necessarily in a cynical way. One of the easiest ways to control is "divide and conquer". If you are weak or in a minority, you will be subjugated.

    72. Re:As Arab cities go... by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. I've in the past been unable to post in a thread where I had moderated -- no "reply" link, but maybe something else was going on.

      -- hendrik

    73. Re:As Arab cities go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says you can't be Arab and Christian? What you said is a pure fallacy.

    74. Re:As Arab cities go... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      There was more outrage by the Afghans over the burning of the Qurans at that military base than the soldier who went on the rampage killing all those woman and children.

      Mostly because they felt the former was supported by the administration and the army as a whole, while very few believe that the latter was anything other than one man who snapped and went crazy. If he's given anything other than a guilty + harsh punishment sentence, expect that quietness to change.

  4. Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not true by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The stereotype has it that women in the Middle East are subjugated, oppressed and barely let out of their houses.

    In Saudi Arabia, that's *not* just a stereotype. Not to say that Saudi Arabia is representative of the entire region. But let's not pretend that more pitches from women at some conference makes it okay for one of the largest countries of the region to still tell women they can't drive, vote, show their faces in public, or even leave their house without male escort.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  5. False choice fallacy by sideslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Both may be true -- that this conference was friendly to women running startups, and also that women in many parts of the Middle East are drastically subjugated versus women in at last European and American countries. Who wrote this summary, anyway, and with what agenda?

    1. Re:False choice fallacy by sideslash · · Score: 1

      at last => at least

    2. Re:False choice fallacy by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. To elaborate. From the article: “Home working also allows women to combine their traditional roles of homemaker and mother, with being an entrepreneur.”

      It’s not unusual for women to run business – but I find this sentence telling. There is a difference between starting a good solid small business and a start up.

      The first is basically about creating a job for yourself. It may be a restaurant, day care, or a small professional business (lawyer, hair stylist, whatever ) but it’s about creating a job for yourself that lets you manage your life /work balance.

      The second is about putting in long hours for months at a time to hit that grand slam.

      This is, of course, a continuum between the two. I am just surprised that the submitter and article is pitching it this way. Are these woman truly liberality if they are forced into the shallow end of the pool? Small, home businesses are great, but it’s the lower end of the entrepreneurial market.

    3. Re:False choice fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To make explicit an answer to that question: the summary was written by someone working at the WSJ. Make of that what agenda you will.

    4. Re:False choice fallacy by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Who wrote this summary, anyway, and with what agenda?

      Yeah, I second that. Took me a few minutes to figure out that this isn't a story about 'Middle Earth'.

      I hate that sort of thing early in the morning.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:False choice fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wrote this summary, anyway, and with what agenda?

      What's worse, why in the hell was this drivel of an article pushed to the front page?

    6. Re:False choice fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wrote this summary, anyway, and with what agenda?

      What's worse, why in the hell was this drivel of an article pushed to the front page?

      Because Slashdot is overrun by weak minded, big "L" Liberal panty-wastes.

    7. Re:False choice fallacy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      So someone whose boss is Rupert Murdoch, the Fox News emperor? That agenda is to pretend evil is good, for fun and profit. Everything Murdoch has ever done has been good for the rulers of the Saud family.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:False choice fallacy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's right - liberals. Those feminazis, always pretending that Arabs treat their women equally.

      You Republicans have one track minds - derailed.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:False choice fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hi, I'm Dutch (en hier is een stukje Nederlandse tekst voor als je me niet gelooft) and consider myself a liberal.
      To my dismay I find that whenever I'm discussing any political topic with a leftist woman, she turns out to be both feminist and pro-Islam. And you can argue all you want, bring in statistics and figures and articles, but they're deaf in all languages. I always make fun of conservatives for their closed-mindedness, but cases like that are way worse.
      So maybe it's feminists whose minds are derailed. Oh wait, I'm a feminist too...

  6. TFA answers the summary's question. by Internal+Modem · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA answers the question: "Home working also allows women to combine their traditional roles of homemaker and mother, with being an entrepreneur. " So they are able to fulfill their expected roles. Also, "...most of the female entrepreneurs at the conference were young and had spent time in Europe, the U.S. or Australia." Many of them have more permissive families.

    1. Re:TFA answers the summary's question. by Dyinobal · · Score: 2

      Ya how the hell did this garbage make it onto slashdot, it's sexist and misleading.

    2. Re:TFA answers the summary's question. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Don't you love it when you answer your own question?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:TFA answers the summary's question. by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, kidding. It looks like it was written by some Saudi prince who thinks that imprisoning his wife in his house is liberating, as long as he lets her run a mail order business and only beats her once a month instead of once a week.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    4. Re:TFA answers the summary's question. by El+Torico · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's a joke here in Bahrain -
      How does a Saudi tell which woman is his wife when they are in public?
      She's the one that flinches when he raises his hand.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    5. Re:TFA answers the summary's question. by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      Ya how the hell did this garbage make it onto slashdot, it's sexist and misleading.

      Exactly! Usually /. summaries are just misleading! I don't want all of this misogyny getting in the way of my daily dosage of misrepresented facts, half-truths, and outright omissions!

    6. Re:TFA answers the summary's question. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Their parents probably wanted them to leave their home region to be educated in the West, where women are allowed to succeed and where there is not a culture of subjugation and oppression. That would potentially account for the higher percentage of women at the conference than elsewhere in the world.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  7. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by sycodon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget get being beating, raped and even murdered with the tacit approval of the society and the law.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  8. Ya know... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll bet they'd be in an even better position if they were in countries/cultures where they didn't have to worry about being stoned to death and could drive themselves to meetings. But that's just me.

    1. Re:Ya know... by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean like lebanon where this meeting took place?
      Not all of the Middle East is Saudi Arabia. Yet, the US backs Saudi Arabia while they do these things and threatens to attack Iran who does not.

    2. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question still remains why apparently women are more inclined at taking up tech entrepreneurship over there than in the West though.

    3. Re:Ya know... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Cause marrying a rich guy isnt as much fun as in the west.

    4. Re:Ya know... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 2

      No, Lebanon is not your typical Arab or Persian country. Try holding that conference in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen , Iran, Kuwait, Afghanistan or Pakistan. Or pretty much any country that has an overwhelming Islamic majority. As posted before, Lebanon is nearly 40% Christian.

    5. Re:Ya know... by ppanon · · Score: 2

      The cultural context is probably a big part of it. In many Arab nations the "proper manly" work is running businesses, and as a result the technical and scientific fields are not as popular with men and have a much higher female representation than in the West (where women are culturally expected to be poor at maths, the gateway to technical careers, with that cultural expectation acting as a self-fulfiling prophecy). Thus, since you have a higher proportion of women with the requisite technical training, it's not surprising that you would have a similarly high proportion (or even higher, when their mobility and work options are restricted) acting as entrepreneurs.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    6. Re:Ya know... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Even among the countries you list there are huge differences. Saudi Arabia is pretty much the worst in the in bunch you list, unless we are comparing Riyadh to a cave in the mountains of Pakistan or Afghanistan. The Iranians are among the best in that list, yet compared to the west still terrible. At least they allow women to drive.

      Turkey has an overwhelming Islamic majority and no such problems.

      Your generalizations are pretty much worthless and borderline racist. Like most such generalizations.

    7. Re:Ya know... by gtall · · Score: 1

      The only reason Turkey doesn't yet have those problems is because for generations it was run by secularists. The Islamic party currently running the joint has been slowing re-establishing Islamic control of society. I give them another 10 years before they too sink into the human rights abyss that is Islam.

    8. Re:Ya know... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Islam is young, in another 1000 years it will be as tolerant as those Christians who call women sluts for wanting birth control. You probably won't live that long so you can continue your mindless hate against the "Other". Turkey wants to join the EU, so they cannot do what you are claiming will happen.

      Indonesia is also majority Islam, over 85%, and has had a female president, something many Western nations have never done.

    9. Re:Ya know... by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Like Iran? If you read there are more female university students than males, ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5359672.stm ) I think they won't do too badly.

    10. Re:Ya know... by JRonin · · Score: 1

      Women can drive, and stonings are not practiced, in the vast majority of muslim majority countries. These kinds of bigoted generalizations say something about the poster's intelligence and anyone who voted his/her post as "Insightful". We're talking about 1.2 billion people spread across half the world and people like to dip their brush in one or two sample countries and paint the other four dozen or so with the same color. Grow up.

    11. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the men are too scared the Israelis will assassinate them if they become a scientist or engineer to go to university.

    12. Re:Ya know... by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Just as a matter of interest, exactly the opposite happened. In a bout of nationalist zeal, a lot of people applied for nuclear engineering studies.

    13. Re:Ya know... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yet, the US backs Saudi Arabia while they do these things and threatens to attack Iran who does not.

      Stoning to death for females was practiced in Iran, with recorded cases of use, until it has been removed from the books very recently. On all other categories, it is also a repressive religious theocracy when it comes to women's rights. Not as bad as Saudi Arabia, but definitely not a good example.

  9. Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoo, a large minority of people pitching ideas were women! See? All better now!..... I'm appalled by the tone of this summary. Whether it's a stereotype and it's in fact a small minority of women who are oppressed, don't you dare try to claim one bloody conference demonstrates that it is not a serious problem.

    1. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they say in Saudi Arabia, "we may beat and subjugate our women, but hey! they are dressed in the finest Hijabs in the world!"

  10. Feminists, hear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear hear all feminist entrepeneurs!

    1. Move to the Middle East
    2. ????
    3. Profit!!!

    1. Re:Feminists, hear! by jimmifett · · Score: 0

      yes, feminists, please move to middle east.
      thanks.

      -Manly Men

    2. Re:Feminists, hear! by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Hillary Rosen specifically.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Feminists, hear! by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Just don't move in a car, or without male escort, or without wearing a head-to-toe burqua.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  11. can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    Middle Eastern men still rule the household, which means their women have no rights. So being a businesswoman is not incongruous with other aspects of their lives, such as not being able to drive, or vote, or attend school. I'm sure many women from the Middle East are excited about expressing their limited freedom through entrepreneurship.

    However, not enough people call Islamists on their bluff - it was never God's will to subjugate women, no matter what their ridiculous heretical Mohammed said or wrote. Slavery is in the mind, and until women around the globe are free to do whatever the hell they want, whenever they want, and however the way they please, they'll still be slaves to men.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      free to do whatever the hell they want, whenever they want, and however the way they please

      That's not freedom

    2. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slavery is in the mind, and until women around the globe are free to do whatever the hell they want, whenever they want, and however the way they please, they'll still be slaves to men.

      Like not being told by men that they must use birth control and procure abortions? Let's respect women and not force them to take a bunch of harmful chemicals.

    3. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by gay358 · · Score: 1

      Middle-East includes more countries than just Saudi-Arabia, which is maybe the worst offender, although it is the friend of USA. Although women are not allowed to drive in Saudi-Arabia, it doesn't mean that the same is true in other Middle-Eastern countries. And in many countries in Middle-East, young women are better educated than men, just like in in western countries.

      If I remember correctly, even in fundamentalist Iran, over half of the university students are female.

    4. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by gay358 · · Score: 1

      Yes, over half of university students in Iran, are women:

      ...
      Well over half of university students in Iran are now women. In the applied physics department of Azad University 70% of the graduates are women - a statistic which would make many universities in the West proud.
      ...

    5. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      "Heretical" - seriously? From their position your religion is just as much nonsense as theirs to you.

    6. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Saudi-Arabia, which is maybe the worst offender, although it is the friend of USA

      Saudi Arabia isn't the U.S.'s friend. Their relationship is more analogous to a crackhead and his dealer.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    7. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      No, but it's pretty close. I'd be interested in your definition of freedom though.

    8. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Rick Santorum, is that you?

    9. Re:can't drive, can't vote, give your $ to a dude by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, they are friends. Go ask the crackhead if the dealer is his "friend", and he'll say "yes!". The dealer may say something different to you, but to the crackhead, he'll say "you're my friend, so I'm going to give you a good price on this crack". Ergo, they are friends.

  12. A bit misleading. by Haxagon · · Score: 1

    This article should be titled "Why is the Middle East a Good Place for Female Tech Entrepreneurs?", instead of the current title. The current one suggests that there would be an immediate answer.

    1. Re:A bit misleading. by yotto · · Score: 1

      The title also uses the word "women" where it should use "female" as you do.

  13. they found a way around it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Its called the internet. They are stuck at home. And while the husband is off doing his thing, they are online. I know their countries block and monitor and filter, but just like any reasonably intelligent person can do, they're finding some level of freedom and gaining power through the power of the internet. So, that mage you've been flirting with really isnt a 40yo male living in the basement of his parents home. Its a hot middle eastern house wife just waiting to having her inner animal released. ;)

  14. Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it weren't for Hizbullah and other lovely features of Lebanon, Lebanon would be at peace with the regions startup powerhouse, Israel. Where women actually have full political and legal rights.

    Holding up a conference where 40% of the people pitching ideas for capital, as the "usual" case throughout the arab world is either mind numbingly naive, or profoundly disingenuous. It is precisely because women have so few rights, see Saudia Arabia, Yemen, Gaza, ... for example, that this is unique.

    It doesn't make this bad. Actually this should be encouraged. Along with more educational opportunities for women. And more options for their entering the work force. And more maintaining control and responsibility for their own lives and health, including their reproductive health. These things are known to help elevate 3rd world countries quality of life, and increase all aspects that you and I might call "good things" in society, including tolerance, democracy, etc.

    But with militant islam on the march, taking over whole countries in the ME, one should despair of these hard won gains in any society that demands women "take the veil". Progress is about to be walked back, in an alarming way, throughout the recent "arab spring" countries.

    Its a matter of perception. The ME is viewed, apart from Israel, as being largely a backward and hostile place for women. And this is because, in reality, it is the rule that it is a backward and hostile place towards women, rather than the occasional exception you indicated. Lebanon, apart from the 800 pound gorilla in Hizbullah, should be as peaceful and prosperous as Israel, and should be friendly with Israel, so it wouldn't surprise me to see more women in startups and trying to pitch startups ... as is done in Israel. But Lebanon, like many of the other states in the region has these various 800 pound gorillas. Progress is on hold until they are put out to pasture, and their influence wanes.

    1. Re:Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by gay358 · · Score: 2

      Without Hezbollah Israel would probably had done similar kind of ethnic cleansing in Lebanon that Palestinians have faced within Palestine. Remember, Hezbollah was more or less started only after Israel attacked and occupied Lebanon and the main goal of Hezbollah was driving Israel out of the country.

      And in Israel some of the Jews have started their own gender separation, which is worse than in many Arabic/Muslim countries. For example, in many parts of Israel, women aren't allowed to use the same sidewalks, they have to sit in a different parts of busses etc. And women who don't obey, are severely beaten.

    2. Re:Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention one thing: In 1982, when Israel invaded Lebanon, the Shiites(Hezbollah) welcomed the Israelis with RICE to get rid of the PLO.
      Palestinians are hated by the Shiites but all the mumbo jumbo heard that Hezbollah supports Palestinians is all fake and propaganda.

    3. Re:Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... Ethnic cleansing at a rate of ... wait ... that doesn't make sense. How could one have ethnic cleansing at a rate of negative hundreds of thousands of people per year?

      If Israel wanted to wipe out the Palestinians they would have done so decades ago. They didn't and don't. It might shock you to discover that Palestinians living under Israeli jurisdiction have a noticeably lower mortality rate than most other Arabs in the middle east. Compare mortality rates pre-1967 to post-1948, or compare the mortality rates of Israeli Arabs to Arabs in the rest of the middle east.

      Whatever you do, don't let facts get in your way :)

    4. Re:Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by gay358 · · Score: 1

      Israel is constantly making their illegal settlements in occupied area larger and larger, and in same process driving Palestinians to even smaller areas, limiting their access to water (& farming land) from occupied areas, but giving it generously to illegal settlers, destroying their houses etc. That is ethnical cleansing.

    5. Re:Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      Yes, and when the PLO left Israel proceeded to bomb Beirut, deliberately targeting and killing civilians in an effort to set Lebanon back. Israel isn't interested in prosperous and peaceful neighbours.

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    6. Re:Best case: badly misinformed, worst case: ... by Quila · · Score: 1

      Without Hezbollah Israel would probably had done similar kind of ethnic cleansing in Lebanon that Palestinians have faced within Palestine.

      Israel was not looking to move into Lebanon. The only reason for Israel attacks into Lebanon was because the PLO was attacking Israel from there. After the PLO got kicked out of Jordan for starting a rebellion, they set up their base of operations in Lebanon to attack Israel. Hezbollah was Iran meddling in local affairs, attacking Israel by proxy.

      Israel hasn't had much of a problem with the Lebanese themselves, or the government, but the foreign forces, and foreign-sponsored forces, fighting from Lebanon.

      And in Israel some of the Jews have started their own gender separation, which is worse than in many Arabic/Muslim countries.

      Note that where it happens, the government and most of the population fights against it. Compare and contrast with your Arab/Muslim countries, where it is law.

  15. Don't believe the propaganda by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

    The news in the west is completely anti-Arab. Don't believe what the mainstream media says about them (none of it is all true, and a surprising amount is complete lies/so exaggerated that it might as well be a complete lie).

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by gooner666 · · Score: 1

      I guess we misunderstand all the demonstrations, burning effigys of Obama, US flag and all. They are really trying to say we love you Americans!

      --
      Lets get this over with... Fuck Off
    2. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by sycodon · · Score: 1

      And the videos of women being buried up to their chests and stoned...that was all ketchup I guess.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Women is Saudi Arabia can't vote, drive, leave their houses without male escort, show their faces uncovered in public, or participate in pretty much any civic or legal function without approval of their male guardian.

      So, which of those statements is the western media lying about?

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    4. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

      The part where one country is not an entire continent sized region or representative of a globe spanning religion.

      Also Women is Saudi Arabia can vote and run for office, historically they could not (like everywhere 100 year ago).
      Also there is nothing in the law about leaving the house. Particular families might practice that but you would have to look for statistics to see how prevalent, if at all, that it is.
      As for face coverings, yes Saudi Arabia practices that but most Arad nations outright ban the practice and the consensus is that that practice is a mistranslation and is only practiced by fanatics.

      So what is that? 2/5 complete lies, and the rest exaggerations [some of them so extreme as to have no sliver of truth] (particularly if you look at them as accusations against all Arabs).

      You can find crazies, fanatics, and hate filled individuals in all countries and religions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church).

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Also Women is Saudi Arabia can vote and run for office, historically they could not (like everywhere 100 year ago).

      No, they can't. They MAY be allowed to in 2015, if the King keeps his promise.

      Also there is nothing in the law about leaving the house.

      Arguing the technically on de jure vs. de facto practices went out here in the U.S. back when segregationists used to argue that TECHNICALLY in the LAW there was nothing stopping blacks from voting in the South. The reality is that women walking around without a male escort in Saudi Arabia are banned from all businesses and are subject to beating by the religious police there. But don't take my, or the evil western media's, word for it. Read the United Nations Report on the subject (part III, section D).

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    6. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by gtall · · Score: 1

      You mean someone in Saudi Arabia can decide to run for a few small potatoes offices and then only if they get approval by the central government which just happens to not approve very many women.

      It doesn't matter what's in the law if most men in Saudi Arabia will not allow their women to leave the house unescorted.

      That fact that face covering demanded by men is permitted is ridiculous, honor killing is winked at, child brides are aok, the whole region seethes with inhuman customs. Stop trying to white wash them.

      Where the West has one Westboro, in the Mid-East it is the norm. Trying opening a Jewish temple or a Christian Church in Saudi Arabia. Try telling them Muhammad was wrong on anything, see how reasonable they are towards you. In the West, that sort of freedom is enshrined, in the Mid-East, killing you for insulting Islam is considered a good thing.

    7. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      "No, they can't. They MAY be allowed to in 2015, if the King keeps his promise."
      2015 is the next election. No one can vote when an election is not being held.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:Don't believe the propaganda by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      The bit where they say Western countries support democracy. Saudi Arabia is the West's closest Arab ally.

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
  16. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

    Worse than using sa to characterize the region is doing so with Lebanon.

  17. The difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that in Europe, men have known for centuries that women are incredibly dangerous if given power (assuming the goal is to perpetuate a male-dominated social structure). In the Middle East, women are considered dumb slaves (and because of the social system, many are) barely able to wash the feet of their masters. I'm sure that males in the Middle East see this surge of women entrepreneurs as quite amusing, like watching a monkey tapdance, or a horse count to 3.

  18. Sure, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Saudi Arabia? That is the country in the Middle East that is the most oppressive of women. The funny thing is that women in that area had more rights when Mohammed was alive.

  19. Acceptance percent? by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 2

    According to summary, 40% of applicants were women. What percent of the accepted submissions were women? That would be a far mare significant statistic!

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  20. Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throughout the middle east the vast majority of people (men and women) believe that beating women is acceptable, in fact I dont think it's even illegal anywhere in the gulf.

    That "stereotype" is very well deserved.

  21. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A female VP from a major defense contractor was made to wait outside a contract signing not too long ago. A male subordinate sat at the event in her stead.

    And that's supposedly the way women can be treated by the business classes. I certainly would think twice before I subjected myself to such a culture. If you can be a successful entrepreneur, you would provably also succeed in a much more favorable culture.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  22. Nobody Will Hire You? Hire Yourself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is quite obvious. If you live in a world where nobody will hire you, and you need or want a job, what do you do? Create a job for yourself! Stopping this phenomenon is why Southern Democrats passed Jim Crow laws.

  23. Sounds like any other geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "subjugated, oppressed and barely let out of their houses". If you add "twenty-something male living in Mom's basement" would it be any different? :-D

  24. April Fool's Day already passed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost two weeks late /.

  25. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by crazyjj · · Score: 2

    They better hope that oil lasts forever. Because that's about the only thing that makes anyone want to do business there now.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  26. Ouch... by Troyusrex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article stressed how the women in Saudi Arabia could "Work from home". It neglected to say that the almost have to since they aren't allowed in public without a male relative around.

  27. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

    In Saudi Arabia, that's *not* just a stereotype.

    It is the stereotype. Please educate yourself on the meaning of the word. Being a stereotype does not mean that it's a misconception.

    But let's not pretend that more pitches from women at some conference makes it okay for one of the largest countries of the region to still tell women they can't drive, vote, show their faces in public, or even leave their house without male escort.

    And let's not pretend that the article is suggesting that it's OK for women not to drive, vote, etc. Your comment is essentially the same as responding to any positive aspect of the US with "Yes, but let's not pretend it makes it OK for them to invade other countries."

    And oh, BTW, name one Arab country that bans women from showing their face in public (with citation). I happen to have lived in Saudi Arabia, and most women don't cover their face in public. And not all of them had male escorts.
     

    --
    Beetle B.
  28. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

    And that's supposedly the way women can be treated by the business classes. I certainly would think twice before I subjected myself to such a culture. If you can be a successful entrepreneur, you would provably also succeed in a much more favorable culture.

    What you say is true, but a few decades ago women enterpreneurs often faced similar exclusion in the US in the business world. Thankfully, that didn't stop people from investing in the US. And thankfully, it won't stop them from doing so in the Middle East.

    --
    Beetle B.
  29. Locked in house. by metrometro · · Score: 1

    Subjugated, oppressed and stuck in basement? Sounds like a true geek to me!

    I jest, but I think this is actually partly true.

    I know an insanely talented female programmer who grew up in the states but was moved to Saudi Arabia around age 13. What did she do all day? Sit on her computer. A couple thousand hours of C+ later and she's back in the US getting a CS degree, on her way to a prime spot at MIT Media Lab. Key point: locked in basement for long periods of time = good at programming. Refused offline political and commercial freedoms = good at Internets.

    The other reason this happens, of course, is that our perceptions of the Middle East are based on a mash of cable news, Pentagon spin and CounterStrike, which are - surprise! - largely false. Pakistan has elected a female president; the US hasn't.

    1. Re:Locked in house. by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      The other reason this happens, of course, is that our perceptions of the Middle East are based on a mash of cable news, Pentagon spin and CounterStrike, which are - surprise! - largely false. Pakistan has elected a female president; the US hasn't.

      You're referring to Benazir Bhutto, the former Prime Minister (not President).
      You left out the fact that she was assassinated in Pakistan by Al-Qaeda in 2007.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  30. Read the UNDP report series by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Compiled for the UN by the Arab world's friendliest own Arab economists and technicians. The Arab world is at or near the bottom, for the entire world, in terms of literacy, education, technical proficiency, intellectual property creation, research and development, internet penetration, media penetration, social and media freedom, contract law, technical small business start ups and technology transfer. Below the levels of much of Africa and SE Asia. Culturally, the exclusion of women, minorities only speaks to part of it. It really has to do with a historical tradition of abandoning everything the West had to contribute since the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution. If you want a Turkish -centric history of this read "What Went Wrong?" by Bernard Lewis.

  31. It's because by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

    When you wear a burka no one can see your ugly nerd-face.

  32. That's mainly Africa by Quila · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Female circumcision is an African tribal custom, not Middle Eastern. It is now associated with Islam since most of the area was conquered by Muslims,. Muslim rulers generally let the locals continue their customs, and a lot of conversion was a converted king who told his populace to convert, but didn't dare risk rebellion by abolishing popular customs such as this. Arguments still continue as to whether it's an acceptable practice under Islam.

    1. Re:That's mainly Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which would explain why it's so popular in Iraq ? In which part of Africa would you find Iraq?

    2. Re:That's mainly Africa by Quila · · Score: 1

      *Mainly* in Africa, as I said.

      Wherever it goes, it's cultural. It is not part of the Quran or Hadith, but it has infected some other Muslim populations.

      Of course, male genital mutilation is still required, but nobody seems to care.

    3. Re:That's mainly Africa by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The Easter Bunny isn't part of the New Testament or any other official Christian religious text. But it's definitively Christian.

      Religion is as religion does. The actual scriptures are mostly just CYA boilerplate, except when they're invoked for wildly derivative attacks by theocrats on threats to their power.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:That's mainly Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are 4 schools of Sunni Islamic jurisprudence - Hanafi, Shafii, Maliki and Hanbali. Of these schools, the Shafii school is the one that mandates FGMs, while the Hanafi and Hanbali schools simply recommend it. I don't know about the Maliki school.

      "Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)" -- 'Umdat al-Salik e4.3

      "Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna [commendable according to the word or example of Muhammad, but not obligatory], while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband." - Umdat al-Salik e4.3.

      Umdat al-Salik is a book, translates into English as 'Reliance of the Traveller', and is one of the primary guides into what determines Shafii jurisprudence. It is produced by al Azhar university in Egypt, which is where everything in the Shafii school comes from - it doesn't come from anything in KSA.

      Now, the Shafii school is followed primarily in Yemen, Sudan, Somalia, Indonesia and Malaysia, and alongside the Hanafi school, it's followed in Egypt and Syria as well. The rest of the Arab and Turkic countries, as well as Muslims in the Indian subcontinent - Pakistan, Bangladesh and Muslims in India - follow the Hanafi school. The Maliki school was created in Andaluz, or Islamic Spain, and covers all West African Muslim countries - like Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Mali, Mauritania, Senegal and so on. Finally, in Saudi Arabia itself, they follow the Hanbali school, and Wahabism happens to be an offshoot of that, and is much older than Saudi Arabia - it was started in the 17th century.

      So in all of the above, it would seem that if any part of the Muslim empire doesn't practice this, it would be West Africa. It may well be that since it's not mandatory in Hanafi and Hanbali law, one doesn't see it widely practiced in countries like Pakistan, Jordan, Emirates or Turkey. However, just because it's not practiced in certain Muslim countries due to variations in Islamic law doesn't make the practice itself un-Islamic. Had it been un-Islamic, you can bet that the Muslim rulers of all these countries, like Somalia, Yemen, Sudan et al would have ruthlessly stamped it out, like they have anything else they construe as un-Islamic.

      Notice that in all of this, I left out Shia Islam. There, the primary schools are Jafari, which is used for Shias worldwide, except for Iran, where Khomenei school is used. Again, like in the case of the Malikis, I'm not sure whether the Shia have this or not.

      The other claims in Quila's earlier post - Muslim rulers generally let the locals continue their customs - is a bunch of hooey. Muslims didn't create a great religious empire stretching from Morocco to Brunei by just mixing among the crowd - it was a combination of conquests (themselves primarily for the purpose of spreading islam), forced conversions, discrimination aganst those who didn't convert and warfare against those who refused to accept Islamic overlordship - that created those empires. The example cited about a king who asked his followers to convert - that happened in only a single Javanese kingdom, and is often used to spread the propaganda that the whole of Indonesia peacefully converted. It didn't - Ibn Battuta, in his works, noted (cited in one of the National Geographics from the 90s) how Muslim warlords in Sumantra always had the upper hand in their wars with the locals. Mohammed himself sent invitations to the Byzantine and Sassanid emperors inviting them to convert to Islam or wage war, and when they refused, that's exactly what his successors did. And if the customs weren't compatible with Islam itself, good luck ever having them recognized, unless the enemy population was too big to be subdued.

    5. Re:That's mainly Africa by Quila · · Score: 1

      There is no passage in the Quran nor any reliable Hadith to support FGM. It's as simple as that. There is one unreliable Hadith, and it says not to make it severe so as to hinder a woman's pleasure.

      Where it exists, it is a cultural practice spreading under Islam, and outside of Islam too.

  33. Percentages and enforcement by Quila · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thankfully most moslems and christians (apart from some die-hard fundies) do not take everything written in the Quaran literally and implement every crazy thing that is written in scripture.

    First, we need to separate personal choice from law or enforced custom.

    A tiny percentage of Christians still practice strict biblical Christianity (believe gays should be put to death, women wear head covering in church, etc.), and NONE of them are able to put that into law to force others to obey their interpretation. In fact, they're generally laughed at or condemned by the society at large -- see the Westboro Baptists.

    A large percentage of Muslims still practice strict Quranic Islam, and many of them have it in law and enforced custom to force others to obey their interpretation. People are constantly jailed, beaten and even executed for violating these religious laws.

    There is a BIG difference in practice between Christianity and Islam.

    Both the Quaran and the Bible were written in very different times long ago and that fact should kept in mind when reading either text.

    People have been studying the Bible with this view for quite a long time. However, this has only recently started to happen with the Quran and Hadith, and such a thing should not be done in a Muslim country if you value your life. The Quran is still considered the absolute, unchanging, infallible Word of Allah by most adherents. That and Hadith form their law. If gays were to be put to death then, they are to be put to death now. Allah's law does not change.

    1. Re:Percentages and enforcement by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      A large percentage of Muslims still practice strict Quranic Islam, and many of them have it in law and enforced custom to force others to obey their interpretation. People are constantly jailed, beaten and even executed for violating these religious laws.

      It's called Sharia, and it's the fastest growing socio-political force in the world.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Percentages and enforcement by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Actually, capitalism is the fastest growing socio-political force in the world. Far more of the 60%+ of humans in Russia, China and India have converted to capitalism in the past generation than have adopted sharia worldwide.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  34. Stoning still happens in Iran by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you saw a couple guilty of adultery begin stoned to death at the city gates?

    Happens in Iran, I think you can see videos on youtube.

    Unlike any Christian society, you can be executed in Iran, or Suadi, for: whichcraft, apostasy, blasphemy, homosexuality, and many other such "crimes." Amputation, lashing, and other such barbaric punishments are also quit common - even for children.

    Woman also get punished, even executed, for the crime of being raped.

    Also, in Iran, children as young as nine years old can be executed.

    Yes the old testimate, and the Koran have a lot in common. But nobody lives in a theocracy where the old testimate is the law of the land.

    1. Re:Stoning still happens in Iran by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I saw a 70 year old couple celebrating their 50th wedding anniversary holding hands on an Old City Jerusalem street stoned by people who saw them.

      I also have seen recent news reports of Christians in the UK being killed by various "exorcisms". And of course Christians in the US not infrequently kill homosexuals or abortion doctors who (they say) violate their holy books.

      It's true that Christian and Jewish theocracies are not national (though Israel is fundamentally a theocracy, and working on becoming a fundamentalist one). But in communities that are theocracies old testament punishments are handed out. And the lack of judeo-christian theocracies (excluding the Vatican City, which is more corrupt in greed and baby rape than in extreme punishments) is due to the secular people taking power from the theocrats, not because the theocrats themselves abandoning their creeds voluntarily.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  35. You asked for it by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

    Freedom isn't to do whatever you want to do, it's to do what you ought to do

    --Rick Santorum

    1. Re:You asked for it by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      No man, that's duty. Freedom is being free to make mistakes and do wrong. Being able to ignore one's duty. Freedom often isn't pretty. The problem in the US is that we've given people choices and now we've freed them from the consequences of their choices. Some people save money their entire lives so they can be secure and others partied it up like no tomorrow. In the old days they'd have suffered for their foolishness but now we take from those rich son's of bitches and give that money to those poor old fuckers who don't have anything. With people immune to the consequences of their bad choices it's no wonder things have gotten so screwed up.

  36. *sigh* by shiftless · · Score: 2

    Note to the wise, if you're going to split with your wife try to make sure she has a job that makes nearly as much as you.

    Or better yet, don't be a moron, grow a pair of balls, and don't be a stupid ass by marrying a stupid bitch who's going to take you to the cleaners.

    I see this shit getting start every single day, at frat parties. I live in a college town and see all the dudes with ZERO game "somehow" "get lucky" and hook up with some decent looking chick who is going to college at a tech school for "business administration" and is clearly desperate as fuck to get out of this small town. Women have an extraordinary ability to rationalize themselves into this type of arrangement where they "think" they're happy....until they're not. It isn't until 3-4 years later that her mind and heart starts to wander, and by then she's probably got him cowering in a corner and bending to her every will.

    The cure to this is to develop actual value and confidence in that value.....then after marrying a woman of equal or [i]lesser[/i] value, work to maintain your value instead of sitting on the couch getting fat and nasty, and guess what???? If you do your fucking homework and pick the right girl, you'll never have a problem with a stupid bitch taking you to the cleaners!

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm the original AC poster who has to live on 25% of his net pay and while most of what you say is probably true for the majority of men I was in a different situation. My ex-wife is an MD - yeah, in her prime she made $200K. After our second child she got post-partum depression and stopped working for a year and a half. It was during this time that she thought a new direction in life would help, that new direction didn't include me. As far as I know she didn't cheat on me and vice-versa, but because of no-fault divorce and the assumption that mother is always the best place for the kids, even her despite the fact that she admitted to severe, career ending depression, was still awarded custody. Ohio is not like Cali, having joint custody doesn't always lower your child support obligation.

      So I'm stuck in a viciously declining circle - I have to live in a bad part of town to allow the state to take approximately 75% of my pay so that an M.D. can continue to not work (and put our kids in daycare for some odd reason). My car keeps getting vandalized, requiring new tires, which forces me to spend money I don't have and take time off I can't afford. If I lose my job, her lawyer can claim I'm deliberately attempting to lower my income and find me in contempt...in short, I used to really think the middle east was an ass backwards area - I now know sharia is the way to go and I cannot wait til it's implemented her so I can go slap the shit out of the ex...just saying

    2. Re:*sigh* by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      It's the fucking you get for the fucking you did. Just listening to you whine I can't believe you ever made first base with any woman much less one like you describe. No wonder she dumped you, you're a loser. Quit whining like a little bitch. I can sure see why you posted AC.

    3. Re:*sigh* by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      So if it happened to you, you'd be dancing in the street, overflowing with joy? Somehow I doubt it.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    4. Re:*sigh* by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised she was able to win custody with a serious disability like that. I know that the mother always win, but usually if you can prove that they have a disabling disease that keeps them from working, you can usually prove that they are raising your children in an unsuitable environment. It always got me that in a divorce the mother "won" (like it's a fucking game) the children. I'd fight my wife in court with everything I had, not so much because of my paycheck but because of raising my children with a manic depressed person is just a case for disaster.

      If what you are saying is true, you can most likely appeal the custody decision. However I am not a lawyer, it just seems absurd that the courts would choose an abusive situation (mentally) vs a stable situation.

      Oh, yeah, if you lose your job and fail to make your alimony payment or child support payment (curious why you are paying for day care if she's just sitting on her ass all day, you shouldn't be legally obligated to it that's what child support is for) they'll haul your ass to jail (which could cause you to lose your job) faster than your head can spin.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    5. Re:*sigh* by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I know sometimes it happens to people who really were just stupid but I've seen too many people I knew were assholes crying about having to take care of their kid monetarily. The reason child care laws came into place to begin with was that so many children were born to guys who went around fucking like dogs in the street and then left when the kid popped out. Most of the guys I know who are in this situation, not all but most, fit that category. Their dick runs their life. In most cases it got them into a marriage and then got them out of it as well. I'd say in over 80 percent, 4 of 5 cases. If you take the time to get to know someone BEFORE you climb in the sack with them you'll be better off. I'm not talking a few months either. Some people get lucky with love at first sight but it's rare. Best to spend a couple of years getting to know someone before moving to sex. If you don't love her enough to marry her then don't fuck her. Once the sex starts the objectivity is out the window. But hey, I don't really care what y'all do, I'm up for my 32nd anniversary with my woman and we're closer than ever. In fact once I finally got the kids outa the house it became better than ever.

    6. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted AC because while slashdot generally has a lot of interesting points of view, it's a liberal bastion and I get tired of the constant whining that generally eminates from here about the republicans or the big bad corporations or micro$oft, etc, etc. My initial response was to a person that was so obviously wrong I couldn't ignore, mostly because it hit personal undertones. Since most of the libtards here like to get their point of views from google, a simple search would have revealed that it's not only deadbeat dads that lose their licenses - guys who get laid off and can't afford to pay or have an unexpected expense, etc, also lose their licenses. Looking through your posts I can definitely tell you're an extreme lefty, so most of what I say will be lost, but it's still fun[/needed] to vent about how unfair the system can be - but don't you worry, I started one of those evil corporations to become an independent contractor so that I could keep most of my earnings protected by the corporate veil and still go out and nail the girls that fat old guys like you only dream about (and no, I'm not talking about super models, but just any girl that doesn't require being blown-up and run through the dishwasher when you're done with her) - probably part of the reason you're so upset - try getting laid, you'll feel better about yourself.

    7. Re:*sigh* by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      Let's see, I dated my current wife for 7 years before I married, I def. slept around like a wild dog before her without getting married. So I ask this, what guy would get married just to fuck? Seriously, I can say this much, I would hope like fuck he's not posting on slashdot. And I have to admit, I live in the fucking bible buckle and I've never met a guy like that.

      I may not be the poster you are replying to, but I feel this guys pain. What's just about a system that can technically make you pay more than you make in a paycheck? (upto 50% pretax for child-support and upto 50% pretax for alimony). Even if he is a deadbeat, I thought the idea was equal rights not rape you like a hurricane rights.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    8. Re:*sigh* by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You know I've seen some heavy child support levied but I've never seen anyone paying more than half their take home, even with 3 kids. Not saying it doesn't happen, I'm sure it does, but I don't think it's that common. Marriage is a funny thing, I've got a nephew that lived with a girl 9 years, married her and was split up and divorced less than a year later. Again there are always exceptions. Mostly though it pays to spend the time to get to know a person before you start the sex. Glad things are working good for you. I like to see happy marriages.

    9. Re:*sigh* by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      So you're screwed by the system that takes your alimony and child support, but you're dedicated to exploiting it to hide from taxes.

      Yep, you're a Republican all right. A Cleveland Republican. How's that working out for you?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb ass. Sell everything you have and go join the Foreign Legion if you're man enough. Judging by your post, you're not.

    11. Re:*sigh* by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I'm a lefty? You're an idiot as well as a whiny loser. I blew off on you because as a conservative I think people should live up to their obligations. You picked the girl, you had the sex with the result being a child, your marriage failed, you pay. Simple. It was such a whiny, whimpering post I just had to go off on it because I had put up with whiny cry babies all day at work who sound so much like your crying self. I do apologize for the language though, that was unnecessary. Lefty? Because I don't like deadbeats??

    12. Re:*sigh* by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Shoulda got a prenup bro. I'd ditch her fucking ass and tell the government to fuck off, deport myself to a nice freedom-loving "third world" country such as Urugyay. Something tells me though that the personality which got you into this situation isn't the kind that will get you out of it. I hope you prove me wrong, and elevate your life beyond the bullshit the government has helped you make it. Best of choices (not luck) to you, bro.

    13. Re:*sigh* by shiftless · · Score: 1

      The reason child care laws came into place to begin with was that so many children were born to guys who went around fucking like dogs in the street and then left when the kid popped out

      That's right, put all the blame on the guys. Because there were no instances of women "fucking likes dogs in the street" then abandoning their own children, now were there? Or are there? Giving them up for adoption, or straight up throwing them in dumpsters for another hit of crack?

      If a woman makes a poor decision about who to fuck and be impregnated by, and has a child by that man, its her own responsibility to either raise him or find another man to help raise him. Trying to "force" a guy to care for and raise a child he doesn't care for or want is stupid and wrong. That's the whole reason lesser males exist--not necessarily to propagate the species themselves, but to serve a purpose by marrying hot women who were first fucked and impregnated by a greater man, and raise his kids. At least that's the only thing I can figure must be their purpose, considering how often it happens and has happened throughout the millions of years of human history.

      (I'm in the "acceptance" stage of having learned how the world actually works, not "denial" or "bargaining.")

  37. guys will be guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys are the same anywhere. A female can get a guys attention more easily. It's the same reason models are used to sell cars at car shows. Duh.

  38. Re:Saying it's a sterotype isn't saying it's not t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they are going enterpreneurial because they can't find jobs?

  39. Clarifying the posting of results by Quila · · Score: 1

    If you piss on the Bible or Torah, please post results.

    If you piss on the Quran, please designate someone to post results for you after your demise.

    1. Re:Clarifying the posting of results by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You really don't know what would happen to you if you pissed on the bible or torah on a Jerusalem street? Try it. I won't expect you to post results.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Clarifying the posting of results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try pissing on a quran anywhere - New York, LA, Denver, Blackpool, Marseilles, Salzburg - result would be the same - you'd be targeted by Muslim fanatics, who'd probably kill you if you didn't make your own security arrangments. Try pissing on a Bible or Torah in Jeddah, Kandahar, Qum, Faisalabad, Sylhet, Mogadishu, Omdurman, Benghazi, Fez - nothing will happen to you, and you won't have to think a second time about it. Heck, even in the Western cities I mentioned above, you'd do fine. As well as in Jerusalem - there too, nothing will happen to you.

    3. Re:Clarifying the posting of results by Quila · · Score: 1

      You really don't know what would happen to you if you pissed on the bible or torah on a Jerusalem street? Try it. I won't expect you to post results.

      People wouldn't be happy, and I may even get beat up. But the Quran pissing would result in my death, and most likely Muslim riots around the world resulting in the deaths of many others.

  40. Adult breastfeeding fatwa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. THANK YOU, DUDE by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

    Seriously... When will people learn to distinguish between genes and religion? Oh, and let's not forget language: Muslims don't necessarily speak Arabic and some non-Muslims speak Arabic or a language that stems from it (I'm thinking about Maltese for that last one).

    --
    "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
  42. Not even close by Quila · · Score: 1

    The goal of these Christians as they see it is to prevent the murder of unborn children. The goal of the Muslims is to subjugate the women, protect the honor of the paternalistic family. This isn't even near the subject of hanging a woman for being raped. "Christians are just as bad" is total bullshit, and you know it. They may have been five hundred years ago, but the religion has advanced and lost state power almost everywhere.

    Full disclosure: I am an atheist and against these laws.

    BTW, as an atheist in a Christian theocracy, I may be not be considered a full citizen. In a Muslim country I'm fair game to kill if I don't convert, I don't even have that ostensible "people of the book" protection.

  43. You assume Islam is moving forwards by Quila · · Score: 1

    For a tolerance barometer, take the state of Jews in the Middle East and North Africa when under the power of Muslims. Under the Ottoman Caliphate they were treated with general civility, even allowed to immigrate and buy territory (much of it in present-day Palestine, fairly purchased). They lived pretty much unmolested.

    Now the only place in the Middle East and North Africa where there is any appreciable population of Jews is in Israel, and current-day Muslims are trying to destroy that. Elsewhere there are fewer than one percent left, driven out by the ever-more tolerant Muslim populations.

    Islam needs two things before it can advance: a successful reformation, and to lose state power.