Slashdot Mirror


New Evidence Indicates Amelia Earhart Survived For a Time on Pacific Atoll

In light of new evidence publicly released Friday showing artifacts believed to have been Amelia Earhart's, the U.S. Navy is prepping a mission to investigate the area where they were found. Next month marks the 75th anniversary of Earhart's disappearance, but the just-announced discovery of personal effects and the evidence of cooking represents the most concrete evidence yet that she did not simply crash into the ocean.

365 comments

  1. Yay by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good on her for surviving

    1. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The most amazing part is that after WWII she managed to turn an escaped Hitler into not such a bad guy. That's not to mention how she helped Elvis start to eat better. She was an amazing person.

    2. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      She didn't survive long. She was eaten by giant sized coconut crabs. I kid you not. Google it. Plenty of evidence there that giant crabs ate her. Coconut crabs can be as large as garbage cans.

    3. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, dumb ass. They're saying Coconut Crabs may have eaten her and carried away her bones after she died, not killed her.

    4. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dumb ass. He didn't say that they killed her. He said that they ate her, exactly as you said.

    5. Re:Yay by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, these were mutant coconut crabs the size of cars. They were the product of experiments by Captain Nemo. Unfortunately, she wasn't able to find refuge in the Nautilus because it was sunk when the island's volcano erupted, turning it into an atoll.

    6. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's unfortunate that they were unable to flip the crabs over, as that would reveal their weak spot.

    7. Re:Yay by bratwiz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps with a bit of lemon and butter?

    8. Re:Yay by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Where would crabs get butter?

    9. Re:Yay by bratwiz · · Score: 1

      At the Safeway on the other end of the island.

    10. Re:Yay by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      No, but the implication was definitely there. Otherwise, he would have said "She didn't survive long, and after she died, she was eaten by giant sized coconut crabs."

      Let's not be obtuse, now...

    11. Re:Yay by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh bullshit. Everybody knows she was carried away by space aliens to the Delta Quadrant and put in cold storage until Voyager found her!

    12. Re:Yay by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I buy it. There were two people on that aircraft and the current theory is that both made it to the island together. There is some possible evidence of a camp site. Surviving there would not have been beyond their ability, and even if they did die they would surely have left some kind of clear evidence of their having been there. Names carved into a tree, rocks arranged in an S.O.S. pattern or some other sign to those who would eventually find that place.

      It just seems implausible to bring items useful for survival with you to an island (because they would have sank with the aircraft otherwise) but then apparently give up and die without lighting a huge signal fire or even apparently exploring the whole island.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Yay by proslack · · Score: 1

      I would have though Chianti and fava beans...

      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    14. Re:Yay by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I buy it. There were two people on that aircraft and the current theory is that both made it to the island together. There is some possible evidence of a camp site. Surviving there would not have been beyond their ability, and even if they did die they would surely have left some kind of clear evidence of their having been there. Names carved into a tree, rocks arranged in an S.O.S. pattern or some other sign to those who would eventually find that place.

      It just seems implausible to bring items useful for survival with you to an island (because they would have sank with the aircraft otherwise) but then apparently give up and die without lighting a huge signal fire or even apparently exploring the whole island.

      If they did get marooned on this island, there's nothing to prove that they were not seriously injured during a crash landing, which would have seriously hampered their ability to explore/thrive/not slowly bleed to death of internal injury.

  2. Cool beans. by owenferguson · · Score: 2

    The only thing new is the history that you don't know.

  3. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No offense, but who is she? Can't you add this information in the damn summary?

    1. Re:Who? by owenferguson · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would mod this up if I could. You win one internets.

    2. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of curiosity what country are you from?

    3. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people have heard of the first woman to solo the Atlantic; it's a matter of basic historical education. If you haven't, can't you just search it yourself?

    4. Re:Who? by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess the writer assumed, and I would of as well, that every Slashdot user knows at least a little about general history, the history of technology, or has at least watched a little star trek.

      She is the most famous pilot ever, and was one back when that it was a huge deal that she was a woman. She eventually wanted to be the first the cross the pacific or something like that and was never heard form again. As as such there are very many myths about her (abducted by aliens, etc.).

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:Who? by artor3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A famous aviator, that everyone in the US knows of (if only for the fact that she disappeared). The phrase "needs no introduction" comes to mind. Explaining who she is would have been like starting an article with "Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States during the Civil War". If you don't recognize the name, then you're either a small child or from some other country. If it's the latter, you should accept that American websites will sometimes refer to American celebrities, and in such situations Wikipedia is your friend.

    6. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most people have heard of the first woman to solo the Atlantic; it's a matter of basic historical education. If you haven't, can't you just search it yourself?

      I'm sure you talk a lot about her in US, but the world is not limited to US (common knowledge in the rest of the world). Neither is Internet and Slashdot, so it would really be appreciated to provide proper information in the summary.

    7. Re:Who? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      She is in no way Snoopy.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agree with all of the above, except for:

      She is the most famous pilot ever ...

      I think "most famous pilot ever" has to go to Charles Lindbergh, not only because of his achievements but also the infamous kidnapping of his baby. And if anyone doesn't know who he was, may I suggest you avail yourself of a search engine before you go getting all indignant?

    9. Re:Who? by DesScorp · · Score: 3, Informative

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      Nope. Chuck Yeager is the most famous pilot ever. And people still know who he is.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    10. Re:Who? by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Product of a public school i take it?

      If you really didn't know who she was and are from the USA, this is a sad day as i'm sure you were not alone.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    11. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Not all people live and are educated in the US. In some other countries other people that you have never heard of are important. And star trek... really? I mean after watching star trek this is what you remember? :)

      Oh, and "alien abduction"? This is really american.

    12. Re:Who? by tragedy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about the Red Baron? Isn't he a contender for most famous pilot ever (even if most people don't know his actual name)? I think we can agree that Amelia Earhart is _one_ of the most famous pilots ever and that there probably isn't one singular "most famous pilot ever".

    13. Re:Who? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Plus, Yeager is obviously a much better pilot and navigator than these two dead wanabees

    14. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She is the most famous "female" pilot, though. As far as famous pilots, though, there's Lindbergh, the Wright brothers, etc. Lots of candidates there.

    15. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. Charles Lindbergh is the most famous pilot ever. And people still know who he is.

      How long are we going to play this silly game? Also, it's a bit unfair to compare the popularity of someone who's still alive to people who've died decades ago.

    16. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeager was a test pilot. He wasn't the greatest pilot ever, just the last man standing. The greatest pilot ever is and probably will forever remain anonymous.

      Saying that pilots made popular by the media are the greatest ever is like saying Justin Bieber is the best singer ever.

    17. Re:Who? by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      Charles Lindbergh, not only because of his achievements

      Lindbergh yes, but name me the first to cross the atlantic with a plane?

    18. Re:Who? by sdnoob · · Score: 1

      snoopy! awesome!

      ....In the nick of time, a hero arose
      A funny-looking dog with a big black nose
      He flew into the sky to seek revenge.....

      maybe he meant most famous female pilot.. after all, you have orville, wilbur and that lindbergh fellow to consider, too, besides that most famous of world war i flying aces.

    19. Re:Who? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Saying that pilots made popular by the media are the greatest ever is like saying Justin Bieber is the best singer ever.

      And your point is...?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    20. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's the most infamous pilot ever. He was an anti-Semite, eugenics supporter, and Nazi sympathizer.

    21. Re:Who? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She is the most famous pilot ever...

      Really, the most famous pilot EVAR? More famous than the Wright brothers?

    22. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends entirely on where you are. In the US Chuck Yeager, rest of the world? No way. I only know of him cause my dads in aviation.

    23. Re:Who? by PPH · · Score: 1

      What about Wrong Way Corrigan? He made a bigger navigational error than Earhart/Noonan. And survived.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    24. Re:Who? by digitig · · Score: 2

      Not all people live and are educated in the US.

      I don't live in the USA, and wasn't educated there, and I reckon that the writer of the summary was right: Amelia Earhart was more famous than most of the people I see mentioned in the summaries. Heck, there has even been a British folk album name-checking her.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    25. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How the fuck are Americans supposed to know if the rest of the world knows who Amelia Earhart is. Get off your lazy ass and google her.

    26. Re:Who? by MisterSquid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you talk a lot about her in US, but the world is not limited to US (common knowledge in the rest of the world).

      That's right, bitch, USians only care about Amelia Earhart because she's Amuhrican, not because she's the FIRST WOMAN TO SOLO ACROSS THE ATLANTIC.

      Make sure you KEEP your sexist, ethnocentric, xenophobic ass in that backwater you call a country and stay the hell away from us.

      --
      blog
    27. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hinton and stone were first -- the brits, alcock and brown, were two weeks later.

    28. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      Nope. Chuck Yeager is the most famous pilot ever. And people still know who he is.

      Chuck who?

    29. Re:Who? by tomhath · · Score: 5, Informative

      Earhart and Noonan missed the island because the chart they had was wrong and the plane's radio receiver wasn't working. They arrived at the spot where the chart said the island was and did everything right to find it.

    30. Re:Who? by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      Well put.

      After reading your thoughtful and well-considered comment, I'm abashed. I just went ballistic on an AC who suggested knowledge of Amelia Earhart was merely the product of her being American. : P

      --
      blog
    31. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not from the US but because I've had a basic education I've heard of her. Maybe every word in every summary should link to a dictionary or wikipedia page so even the dumbest visitor understands them?

    32. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares what you say.

    33. Re:Who? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      She is in no way Snoopy.

      Of course not. Snoopy people don't crash their airplanes to live the rest of their lives on desert islands. The only way to get snoopy on a desert island is to get deeply introspective, and that gets quite repetitive after a while.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    34. Re:Who? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's a pizza. What the hell does that have to do with this thread?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    35. Re:Who? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      All of you giving this guy a hard time for not knowing something that's considered common knowledge are missing out on your big chance: http://xkcd.com/1053/

    36. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I'm sure you talk a lot about her in US"

      Ummm.. dude. She's, at least, the most famous female aviator of that era. She gets 6 MILLION google hits. She's one of the most famous pilots of all time, among either sex.

      You think there's a more famous female pilot of that era, tell us who you think it is, and we'll see. There isn't. It's her. It would be like me saying, "Sure, I'm sure you talk about Yuri Gagarin a lot in Russia, but I'm from the USA, so how should I have heard of him?" Well, the answer is that unless I have no clue at all about history, I know who he is even though I'm not from Russia.

      Sheesh. By the way, Emelia has far more google references than Yuri. That should tell you something.

    37. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. Chuck Yeager is the most famous pilot ever. And people still know who he is.

      He may be the most american pilot ever, but I would venture to guess that more europeans are familiar with Amelia Earhart or Richthofen, than Chuck Yeager. Now, normally I try to avoid wilfully appearing ignorant; but, since it serves the purpose of a sound one-person population study, I shall mention that I, personally, could not recognise/place the name Chuck Yeager in your post.

    38. Re:Who? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how can someone be so stupid?

      I believe you meant "uninformed."

      By the very act of asking the question, the GP is demonstrably not what I would call "stupid."

      Do they have an education system in your country? Internet? books?

      A rather presumptuous implication, given that all you know is that the GP doesn't know one fact from the history of one country.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    39. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proving, at least, that he was no fool.

    40. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't talk about her any more than any other historically famous person. The fact that you don't know who she is shows you have a lack of common knowledge, not that she's only famous in the USA.

      It's like asking who Neil Armstrong or the Wright brothers are. If you don't know, then you've been living under a rock, regardless of which country you live in.

    41. Re:Who? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In US, perhaps. I very much doubt that there is a single name that would be equally recognizable regardless of one's cultural background, though. For me, the first name that pops into my head corresponding to "most famous pilot" is probably Chkalov.

    42. Re:Who? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Only in your city, maybe in your country.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    43. Re:Who? by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yuri Gagarin? He was the helmsman on Star Trek, right?

    44. Re:Who? by Mephistro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most people have heard of the first woman to solo the Atlantic

      Well, I have heard a lot about that girl who soloed Dallas, but THE WHOLE ATLANTIC? What else?

      PD: ;-)

    45. Re:Who? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

      Oh come on people. Yes, Yeager, the Wright Bros, Snoopy, The Red Baron, Tom Cruise in Top Gun (but not when he was freaking out) and, indeed, Earhart were all admirable pilots, but none compare with Biggles.

      Or possibly Pilot from Farscape.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    46. Re:Who? by fiziko · · Score: 2

      The only part of the parent I disagree with is "of that era." I can't think of a more famous female aviator from any era.

      --
      - W. Blaine Dowler
      http://www.bureau42.com
    47. Re:Who? by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      It wasn't simply that she wanted to be the first woman to fly solo across the Pacific. That task would be relatively easy. The quest she'd set about that brought her fate upon her, was to be the first woman to circumnavigate the globe flying an airplane-- something few men (if any) had yet accomplished, at the time. She almost did it, too. She started from the United States, headed East, and was last heard from over the Pacific. It's really quite the inspiring story.

    48. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well of course you would know the name of the first pilot to fly across the pacific.

        Sir Kingsford-Smith was the first to fly trans pacific. USA to Australia. In 1928. ~10 years before Amelia. He was also a WWI flying ace where he lost most of a foot. Charles Lindbergh's flight was impressive, but the Atlantic is a tiny ocean compared the pacific. Its more of a sea.

        Of course everyone knows this name. He pioneered long distance flying. He also went down and they never found his plane. They only found a wheel.

        Of course, I know who Amelia Earheart is.

    49. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amy Johnson

    50. Re:Who? by Superdarion · · Score: 2

      Well, I had never heard of Charles Lindbergh before. I'm in no way a cross section of everything except myself, but as for google results, Amelia Earhart has 52,000,000 while Charles Lindbergh has 700,000.

      Using quotes (which should reduce the results for both), google yields 5.8 million for Amelia Earhart, 2.6 million for Charles Lindbergh.

      Let me add a couple of names who get lower results than Amelia Earhart (using quotes): Chuck Yeager and the freaking Wright Brothers.

    51. Re:Who? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say she was the most famous pilot ever. But she was trying a round the world flight.

    52. Re:Who? by Relayman · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to The Straight Dope, 84 men flew across the Atlantic before Lindbergh. What Lindbergh accomplished was to fly non-stop from New York to Paris. The fact that he flew solo was not a factor in winning the Orteig Prize.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    53. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea who that is, yet I do know who Amelia is. Go figure.

    54. Re:Who? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      She's the cover story for recovering a nuclear submarine in the area. Glomar Explorer was dispatched to the region about three months prior to the secretary of state unexpectedly announcing that they would be assisting helping look for her airplane. Google "Glomar Explorer" and/or "Project Azorian"

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    55. Re:Who? by neonsignal · · Score: 1

      not to mention Neil Armstrong

    56. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pops into my head corresponding to "most famous pilot" is probably Chkalov."

      Well, let's see what google has to say. In quotes for each:
      "Valery Chkalov": 21 thousand hits
      "Amelia Earhart": 5.8 *million* hits

      Don't think there's much comparison in the world at large.

    57. Re:Who? by turbidostato · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "It's like asking who Neil Armstrong or the Wright brothers are."

      No, it's not. It's more like asking who were Alcock and Brown, or Blériot.

      By the way, have you the slightest idea who they were?

    58. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "No, it's not. It's more like asking who were Alcock and Brown"

      Uhhh.... sure. Whatever you say. The internet is worldwide remember? Let's see what it thinks.

      "Amelia Earhart": About 5,780,000 results
      "Alcock and Brown": About 61,300 results
      "John Alcock": About 226,000 results
      "Arthur Brown": About 231,000 results (most of which are a DIFFERENT Arthur Brown)

      What were you saying, again?

    59. Re:Who? by machine321 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's not. It's more like asking who were Alcock and Brown, or Blériot.

      By the way, have you the slightest idea who they were?

      I think Louis Blériot is Ke$ha's grandfather.

    60. Re:Who? by Little+Brickout · · Score: 1

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      Nope. Chuck Yeager is the most famous pilot ever. And people still know who he is.

      He doesn't count. Designing a popular flight sim doesn't make you a pilot! XD

      What's next, Sid Meier is the best ruler ever?

    61. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A famous aviator, that everyone in the US knows of (if only for the fact that she disappeared). The phrase "needs no introduction" comes to mind. Explaining who she is would have been like starting an article with "Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States during the Civil War". If you don't recognize the name, then you're either a small child or from some other country. If it's the latter, you should accept that American websites will sometimes refer to American celebrities, and in such situations Wikipedia is your friend.

      You meant Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter, right?

    62. Re:Who? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My point was to illustrate that this is highly specific to a particular culture one was born and raised in.

      I'm sure that in the English-speaking world, Earhart is much more popular - and, of course, if you use English spellings to search, that's what you're going to get. Searching in Cyrillic, on the other hand, gives (me) 640k hits for Chkalov and 98k hits for Earhart.

      And I have no idea what name all the 1.5 billion Chinese would consider first, but I bet it's neither of those. So "world at large" might surprise you as well.

    63. Re:Who? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Nope. Chuck Yeager is the most famous pilot ever.

      I can't agree with that. I'd have to go with either Dwight Eisenhower or George W Bush.

    64. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basic point seems valid. but not the specifics. Even adding together your 640K htis and the 21 thousand english hits, that's nowhere near what Earhart gets in English alone. And it IS the "world wide" web.

      It seems reasonable to say the Earhart is considerably more famous.

    65. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you simply asked people who the most famous pilot is, I think that Earhart would be at the top of the list. If you gave people a list of pilots, with Earhart and the Wright brothers were on the list, then the Wright brothers would probably win out. The thing is, people associate the Wright brothers with inventing the airplane, not flying it.

      The other names put forth are a bit of a stretch too. Earhart, being a woman, has been promoted far more in contemporary education and the press. Armstrong may have been a famous test pilot but, like the Wright brothers, he is famous for bigger things. Yeager, well, he's probably best known to people who are fanatical about aircraft (or played late 20th century flight simulators).

    66. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She piloted the Pterodactyl Dinozord. I'll agree that puts her in the same league as Amelia Earhart.

    67. Re:Who? by turbidostato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What were you saying, again?"

      I'm saying that in an strongly American-biased Internet is no wonder finding American idols being over-represented.

      And I'm saying the first pilot to cross the English Channel or the first ones to flight over the Atlantic are in the same league than a woman known basically only to English/Americans and aviation freaks and certainly in a completly different league than the Wright brothers, Neil Armstrong or even Lindbergh (which already isn't the same league than the first two).

    68. Re:Who? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Well, duh. You're comparing, essentially, the population of ex-USSR - less than 150 million left by now, probably, since those born after the collapse tend to not know much about their history - with the population of US (300 million) + UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Add to it the fact that Internet is still disproportionally centered around Western countries, with the notable exclusion of China.

      Anyway, like I said, if you want to find out the "most famous pilot in the world", ask the Chinese.

    69. Re:Who? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      Judging by the quality of video games named after them, I'd go with Red Baron over Chuck Yeager any day.

    70. Re:Who? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Orville and Wilbur weren't famous pilots, they were famous inventors. They invented and built the first airplane that could maneuver, instead of taking off, flying a little bit in a straight line, and crashing. They didn't do a lot of piloting.

      Earhart is easily one of the top #3 most famous pilots, the other two being Lindbergh and the Red Baron. Earhart gets bonus points because she's female, in an age when women didn't normally do anything besides cook and sew, and did something that few men were brave enough to do (fly around the world).

    71. Re:Who? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Chuck Yeager is famous for two things: 1) being the first person to exceed the sound barrier, and 2) being in the "The Right Stuff" movie, where he made the "spam in a can" quip. Not that he wasn't a great pilot, but I think he was made quite a bit more famous by the movie. Earhart only got a movie very recently, long after her ill-fated voyage (starring Hillary Swank, who looks eerily like her).

      I can't speak for the rest of the world, but it sure seems like Earhart should have him beat on name recognition.

    72. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad his name it more likely to be confused with the famous trumpet player/singer

    73. Re:Who? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      How did you get that? It's Blériot.

    74. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Cruise in Top Gun (but not when he was freaking out)

      When was that? All I remember is him behaving like every other Scientologist, and he still is one.
      Not sure why you didn't mention the other celebrity Scientologist who actually is a pilot, John Travolta.

      Here's hoping they wake up from the cult in time to get the call to escape to everyone that joined because of them.

    75. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think he's the psychokenetic wonder who totally pwns The Amazing Randi whenever they meet.

    76. Re:Who? by bosef1 · · Score: 2

      Close, but not quite; he was the navigator.

    77. Re:Who? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You're either old as dirt or you got into your father's record collection.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    78. Re:Who? by Dr+Fro · · Score: 1

      Also the most famous aviator from Purdue University, until Apollo 11.

      --
      ********************
      I object to Intellect without Discipline.
    79. Re:Who? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Chart was wrong? How did that happen? Did the mapper make an error/mistake? Someone gave her a falsified map for this disappearance happen? :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    80. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. As a non-American, the red baron was the first pilot that came to mind when i thought of famous pilots.
      I only know of Chuck Yeager because of a flight simulator and know of Charles Lindbergh because of the kidnapping.

      Famous is relative to your geographical location.

      AC

    81. Re:Who? by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      This. Well, for subjective values of "no one", anyway.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    82. Re:Who? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      No offense, but who is she? Can't you add this information in the damn summary?

      She's a minor character in "Moai Better Blues", a second season episode of Sam&Max.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    83. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe pilots know of her, but I and many others had never heard of her before.

      USians only care about Amelia Earhart because she's Amuhrican

      In a way, yes. Who was the first woman in space? Who was the first man to climb Everest? Who was the first woman to climb K2 (had to google that one, what a silly name for a mountain)? I doubt most people would know, unless, you know, their countries made a big deal out of it for some reason. Besides, most people probably don't know every single "first X to do Y" unless Y is something they really care about.

    84. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "female"

      Why on earth is this in quotes? Do you know something we don't?

    85. Re:Who? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Well of course you would know the name of the first pilot to fly across the pacific. Sir Kingsford-Smith was the first to fly trans pacific. USA to Australia. In 1928. ~10 years before Amelia

      Actually, no I didn't. But if I was on a predominantly Australian website, I wouldn't complain about the lack of a bio in the article summary. I'd just google it and then all would be good.

    86. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Star Trek was in any way realistic, Sulu would be the captain cruising the galaxy for green dudes. Chekhov would be the guy wearing a red shirt every week, kind of like Kenny from South Park.

    87. Re:Who? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      a woman known basically only to English/Americans and aviation freaks

      As someone who is male, neither American nor English and not particularly interested in aviation; I second that if you haven't heard of Amelia Earhart, you probably didn't pay attention in school (or live in a country that mostly ignores international history to focus too narrowly on its local history (USA does this too, for reference)); don't watch a lot of movies (even movies not about her may reference her from time to time); don't "wikipedia surf"; and are probably rather uninteresting.

      I don't mean that as horribly offensive; just that even if you'd never been exposed to knowledge of who she is (which to me seems extremely unlikely on the assumption you live anywhere outside of the 3rd world - you probably just ignored/dismissed/forgot it); you could have at least done a quick Google search to find out.

      and certainly in a completly different league than the Wright brothers, Neil Armstrong or even Lindbergh

      I'd put her only slightly under the Wright Brothers and Armstrong for name recognition, and way above Lindbergh (when I read the name, it rang a bell, but wasn't immediately clear to me - quick Google search showed me the text "Spirit of St. Louis" and then I remembered).
      Note that I did say "for name recognition" - not necessarily for their achievements/activities)

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    88. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's Snoopy?

    89. Re:Who? by jovius · · Score: 0

      first woman to solo accross the atlantic.

      Brazzers

    90. Re:Who? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      They don't have Google in your country, asshole? Maybe you should get back to subsistence farming and stop wasting our time with these ridiculous questions. Who is Amelia Earhart? LOL...

    91. Re:Who? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      3 seconds later on Google:

      http://www.aviation-history.com/airmen/alcock.htm

      Captain John Alcock and Lieutenant Arthur Whitten Brown, in a modified Vimy IV, made the first non-stop aerial crossing of the Atlantic. They took off from Lester's Field, near St. Johns, Newfoundland on June 14,1919, and landed June 15,1919, at Clifden in Ireland. The time for the crossing was sixteen hours, twenty-seven minutes.
      The news of the adventure spead like wildfire and the two men were received as heroes in London. For their accomplishment, they were presented with Lord Northcliffe's Daily Mail prize of £10,000 by Winston Churchill, who was then Britain's Secretary of State. A few days later, both men were knighted at Buckingham Palace by King George V, for recognition of their pioneering achievment.

    92. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words for you, Orville Wright >.

    93. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded insightful ... MWUHAHAHAHA

      Wecome to /.! Home stadium of the 'Hilariously Insightful Squids'

    94. Re:Who? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Note I am neither American nor am I an aviation freak, however I'm an old fart and she was often singled out as a role model for the women's liberation movement during the 70's so it's not surprising a lot of people know here story. Also fame does not correlate well with achivement and probably never will, or as John Lennon put it "The Beatles are more popular than Jesus".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    95. Re:Who? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      Nope. Chuck Yeager is the most famous pilot ever. And people still know who he is.

      At about 800,000 hits, the internets say Han Solo is far more famous with nearly twice that at 15,800,000... Yeager is only about as famous as Lando Calrissian, who was, contrary to popular belief, not only a fair pilot, but just the one to lead this crazy attack

    96. Re:Who? by jd · · Score: 1

      It'd be closer to asking about Amy Johnson (first British aviator to fly solo from Britain to Australia, killed in WW2 in a night-time air mission over London - not sure on specifics), Elisabeth Thible (first woman balloonist) or Jeana Yeager (one of the two crew of Voyager in the first round-the-world non-stop non-refueling flight).

      Amelia Earhart also did extremely well in aviation racing worldwide, she wasn't just a US kid.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    97. Re:Who? by jd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Snoopy is the nickname given to Roy Brown, who was famous for shooting down and killing the Red Baron. This was played on by a cartoonist in the US, but ultimately the history is much more interesting.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    98. Re:Who? by jd · · Score: 1

      The Red Baron gets 7.7 million returns. Amy Johnson gets a shade under 1.2 million. Steve Fossett gets a pathetic 430,000. Bruce Dickenson gets 5.5 million. (Hey, he's a pilot and he's famous!) Quotes used in all cases.

      So I'd have to say Manfred is the most famous, Amelia is second, Bruce "Air Raid Siren" Dickenson third, Charles fourth and Amy comes in fifth, based on the names and totals listed.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    99. Re:Who? by jd · · Score: 1

      I posted elsewhere to a response on someone googling and rating fame by google returns that the Red Baron is well in the lead on the fame stakes, Amelia would be second and Bruce Dickenson (fully qualified pilot, takes the band on Eddy Force One and used to fly Boeings for a small airline) comes in third. Amy Johnson is a surprising fifth by this rather dubious metric.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    100. Re:Who? by jd · · Score: 2

      Maps, even today, are horribly inaccurate at times. Back then, it was far far worse, with cartographers rarely sanity-checking the work and frequently copying from older maps without verifying them. When it came to remote islands, it was a disaster.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    101. Re:Who? by jd · · Score: 2

      First to survive passing the sound barrier. Other pilots had broken the barrier but lost control because the air surfaces behave differently at supersonic speeds. Indeed, the British pulled out of the efforts because pilot fatality levels were too high. People were going faster than sound, but none lived to tell the tale.

      (In a very bitter twist to the tale, once Chuck Yeager had broken the sound barrier the Brits replicated the feat several times only to have their test plane disintegrate over a large crowd at an air show when decelerating, causing considerable casualties on the ground as well as the death of the pilot and the loss of about the only supersonic airframe in the UK at the time.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    102. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only part of the parent I disagree with is "of that era." I can't think of a more famous female aviator from any era.

      well, being German I had never heard of Earhart but I sure as hell know about Hanna Reitsch.

      theses sorts of heroes vary by country

    103. Re:Who? by fnj · · Score: 2

      66 of those 84 were on two airships whose crossings took days uring which the crews slept and ate comfortably, so there were really only 18 who made the crossing in airplanes before Lindbergh, and NONE of them flew solo, which was a huge accomplishment.

    104. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most English speaking people would be aware of her, as an Aussie I certainly new who she is and I would say the majority of people I know would as well

    105. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earhart is more famous because of her disappearance and subsequent featuring in a number of TV series (E.g. Star Trek) and movies. I had no idea who Charles Lindbergh is, but I did know who Amelia Earhart was primarily due to her pop(ular) culture presence.

    106. Re:Who? by HJED · · Score: 1

      OP was complaining about the summary assuming that everyone who reads /.is American (an assumption that is made on /., but not in this case) I think it is far to assume that people who read /. have an English speaking background most of the time, so your point whilst accurate isn't really relevant to the discussion.

      --
      null
    107. Re:Who? by HJED · · Score: 1

      The Wright brother don't really come to mind as pilots (although technically they where), but more as inventors. So yes, most famous pilot ever.

      --
      null
    108. Re:Who? by HJED · · Score: 1

      As an aussie I only recognized that name because Sydney Airport was named after him... Whilst I did recognize Earhart, primarily due to pop culture refrences

      --
      null
    109. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should apologise to the AC you went ballistic on. While he/she didn't take the trouble to look up Amelia Earhart she/he was perfectly polite. You overreacted.

    110. Re:Who? by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      Really, the most famous pilot EVAR? More famous than the Wright brothers?

      As inventors they were pretty awesome but in all honesty, the Wright brothers actually didn't fly all that far, the last and longest flight was just 24.5 miles. Most famous female pilot? Should be Marina Popovich, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Popovich

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    111. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "amelia earhart" pilot - 1 040 000 results
      "prince harry" pilot - 1 360 000 results

      The British are coming!

    112. Re:Who? by jgardner100 · · Score: 1

      Nope, has to be Burt Hinkler as they named the road at the end of my street after him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bert_Hinkler

    113. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me this is a joke, and that you really do know that Chuck Yeager is the test pilot who broke the sound barrier.

    114. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curse you, Red Baron!

    115. Re:Who? by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      For example, Douglas Bader FTW, but probably unknown to yanks and ruskies.

      But might I suggest that the best known pilot worldwide would be Yuri Gagarin or Neil Armstrong (or is that cheating?).

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    116. Re:Who? by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who made a model Vickers-Vimy as a child?

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    117. Re:Who? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Because slashdot doesn't allow <u>underline</u> for emphasis, perhaps?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    118. Re:Who? by antdude · · Score: 1

      That sucks. Was this specific map only for them or did others have this specific bad map too? I wonder what happened to those cartographers? DId they get blamed for the Eahart's accident? :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    119. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe if your PC which is most on here. psssst she was a spy.

    120. Re:Who? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. You've gotta be truly ignorant of history to not know who Amelia Earhart was.

      I'll give you a pass, AC, if you grew up in the fucking bush and have never set foot inside a school. As most of those people don't make it here to Slashdot, however, I think that it can be assumed that you have and are just an idiot.

    121. Re:Who? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      While the first and last things on your list are certainly deplorable, I have a hard time being against eugenics unless it is forced. Voluntarily choosing not to pass on genes that cause sickness and disability would have a benefit to the genome as a whole down the road.

    122. Re:Who? by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. dude. She's, at least, the most famous female aviator of that era.

      Well, famous, maybe. But that's due to political correctness, I guess. Hanna Reitsch for example has some similar achievements listed, but I guess due to her being a test pilot for Nazi planes and therefore a darling of them, that makes her not one to brag out.

    123. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is the most famous pilot ever

      I dare say Neil Armstrong is the most famous pilot ever. Even if you don't know his name you almost certainly have heard of his accomplishments and his famous quote. I suspect that's also more globally true than it would be for a lot of pilots as pilots tend to be national heroes (Armstrong is no exception, but it's not an exaggeration to say the whole world was watching when he landed on the moon.)

    124. Re:Who? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Seems like UTF-8 mangling.

    125. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say Pancho Barnes is more famous from that era.

    126. Re:Who? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Erm Hermann Goering? He actually was a WWI fighter ace.

    127. Re:Who? by readin · · Score: 1

      No offense, but who is she? Can't you add this information in the damn summary?

      She was love interest in Night at the Museum II. Stop wasting your life in front of the computer and go watch some movies.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    128. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have said the Wrights. ;)

    129. Re:Who? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      And he also either can not deduce that he should use the internet or books to look it up, and so others must do it for him,. THAT would lead me to call him stupid.

    130. Re:Who? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps he's more than capable, but is trying to make a point about the assumptions that Slashdot summary writers often make. All it would take is prefacing her name with "pioneering aviator", or similar (you know, like real journalists do, all the time), and everyone's instantly much better informed at the cost of two words.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    131. Re:Who? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      It's likely that George Welch purposely and repeatedly exceeded the speed of sound in testing the F86, several weeks before Yeager's X1 flight. The F86 airframe was capable of supersonic flight in a dive, he knew it, and people who knew about the idea of supersonic flight heard what they identified as sonic booms when he was flying. There are contradictory claims about whether the test engine in his airframe was capable of producing the thrust necessary, but there are also claims that flight radar confirms the supersonic claims.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    132. Re:Who? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Saying that pilots made popular by the media are the greatest ever is like saying Justin Bieber is the best singer ever.

      And your point is...?

      Obvious?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    133. Re:Who? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      Maybe pilots know of her, but I and many others had never heard of her before.

      I first heard of hear in the pilot for the TV series "Misfits of Science" (Deep Freeze). But yeah... I'm a pilot, too :)

      OK... I'm old.

    134. Re:Who? by ktappe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I had never heard of Charles Lindbergh before.

      I don't expect the current generation to know everything about the previous generations. But if a person's achievements resulted in a huge ticker-tape parade being thrown for them, and subsequently were on the front pages of every newspaper in the country when their baby was kidnapped, then that's a name you should probably have been taught in school. I don't blame you, I blame your teachers. Shame on them.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    135. Re:Who? by ktappe · · Score: 1

      I won't get involved in the "who was the greatest pilot ever" debate. I will just say that when you are involved in a trivia contest of any kind and the word "aviatrix" comes up, the answer will definitely be "Amelia Earhart."

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    136. Re:Who? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The thing is, you were given the answer and couldn't even deduce "famous". That's much easier than being given the accomplishment and being expected to produce the name.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    137. Re:Who? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Chuck Yeager, 692,000.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    138. Re:Who? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We (the British) pulled out because the Americans screwed us. We gave them our supersonic flight research, including the viable Miles M.52 aircraft design, with the promise of getting US data in return. We got nothing, just like when we assisted with the building of the first atomic bombs, and so the project was considered too expensive to continue and instead we just waited for the US to figure it out and then bought or studied the finished product.

      I don't know why we think we have a "special relationship" with the US. Israel does, but all we ever seem to get from it is screwed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    139. Re:Who? by ZaskarX · · Score: 1

      Yeager was a phenomenally talented pilot who used skill and intuition to save himself and his expensive test aircraft on many occasions. Combine this with the fact that he has giant brass balls and you certainly have a candidate for the greatest pilot ever. The fact that he survived to break the sound barrier has little to do with luck.

    140. Re:Who? by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      well, being German I had never heard of Earhart but I sure as hell know about Hanna Reitsch.

      In late 2000 I was at the Planes of Fame Air Museum at Valle Airport, Valle-Grand Canyon, Arizona, with an fgf (that's an Americanism for "former girl friend"). I saw a photo of Hanna Reitsch flying a V-1. http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/v1.html says she was "asked to work out why test pilots were unable to land it and had died in landing attempts." Very impressive work by an extremely gutsy aviatrix.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    141. Re:Who? by meltyman2 · · Score: 1

      Never play "Chuck Yeager's Air Combat"? It was bad ass. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Yeager's_Air_Combat

    142. Re:Who? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      He had some issues dealing with Goose's death, lost his "edge". If we're including large jetliners in this I'd include Bruce Dickinson (Iron Maiden frontman) before Travolta.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    143. Re:Who? by treeves · · Score: 1

      He needs it too, since he could use it to Google "Amelia Earhart".

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    144. Re:Who? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How in the HELL can anyone not have heard of Amilia Earhart? What grade are you in, kid? Fourth? Jesus, there was even a Star Trek Voyager episode involving her! Few history books about the era neglect her, and she's been the subject of discussion and fiction since her plane disappeared.

      Amazing that a comment THAT ignorant can be modded "insightful". Whoever modded that should never get mod points!

    145. Re:Who? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      One of the top 5. I think that this United States Navy pilot and this US Marine Corps pilot may be more famous, though not necessarily for their skill at flying aircraft.

    146. Re:Who? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, when someone says "most famous pilot", what I'm thinking of is who's famous for their actual piloting endeavors, and in aircraft, not spacecraft. As someone else here pointed out, George W Bush was a pilot too and is easily more famous than all those people, but it certainly wasn't for his piloting work. Eisenhower was also a pilot, but most people probably don't know that. At least Glenn and Armstrong are famous for things more closely related to piloting aircraft, namely piloting spacecraft and walking on the moon, rather than political stuff.

    147. Re:Who? by jakoye · · Score: 0
      --
      Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven
    148. Re:Who? by jakoye · · Score: 0

      Still pissed about Yorktown, huh? Yeah, sorry (sort of).

      --
      Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven
    149. Re:Who? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Why use UTF-8? The letter e with an acute accent is #233, ie, single byte. Maybe Slashdot should support UTF-8.

    150. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asking the question here instead of at google is demonstrably stupid.

    151. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aviatrix

    152. Re:Who? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you are wrong, he was also a real fighter pilot in several wars, and also an instructor.

    153. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why public education is a bad idea. Can I have some of my squandered tax dollars back? Thanks.

    154. Re:Who? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      There was even a Doctor Who with her in it...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    155. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      name me the first to cross the atlantic with a plane?

      A Viking ship's carpenter?

    156. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Wright brothers...?

  4. I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This group has been criticized for not looking into alternate explanations for their artifacts. While it is plausible that these artifacts come from Amelia Earhart's trip, it is also plausible they could come from many other sources.

  5. *YAWN* by RLiegh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    who cares?

    Remarkably, we've pretty much had the Earhart mystery solved ever since partial remains were found on an island... in 1940. That's right, 70 years ago. Only four years after she vanished.

    Read more: 6 Famous Unsolved Mysteries (That Have Totally Been Solved) | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article_18718_6-famous-unsolved-mysteries-that-have-totally-been-solved.html#ixzz1wlalcIS3

    1. Re:*YAWN* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right! Facts are so, like, boring. What's on TV?

    2. Re:*YAWN* by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      You're right! Facts are so, like, boring. What's on TV?

      Some "reality" show that has absolutely nothing to do with facts.

    3. Re:*YAWN* by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      What's on TV?

      The Amelia Earhart episode of Ancient Aliens

    4. Re:*YAWN* by artor3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Obviously not you, and yet you took the time to post. Tell me, exactly how boring is your life?

    5. Re:*YAWN* by ModernGeek · · Score: 1
      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    6. Re:*YAWN* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ass

  6. Did she have a Wilson volleyball on board? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TIP always bring a Wilson volleyball when flying a private plane over the Pacific.

  7. Why is this an interesting story? by nastav · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'd totally understand this story making top headlines on ILoveAmeliaEarhart.com, but why Slashdot?

    --
    -- obligatory (but true) caveat: my comments my own, and don't reflect my employer or colleagues' positions.
    1. Re:Why is this an interesting story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unsolved mystery involving beautiful adventuress from the swashbuckling pioneer days of aviation.

      Now we're entering a swashbuckling era of private space flight. Will anyone care what happened to specific actors 75 years from now? We'd like to think there'd be interest from technology enthusiasts as well as historians.

  8. First Gilligan post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Gee skipper, do you ever think well get off this island?

    1. Re:First Gilligan post? by PPH · · Score: 2

      Get ready. Oblig. Ginger v Mary Ann thread in 5..4..3..2..1..

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:First Gilligan post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Professor and Mary Ann were seriously dissed when the original theme song lyric was changed from

      "The Professor and Mary Anne...here on Gilligans Isle"

      to

      "And the rest... here on Gilligans Isle"

      Gee guys, that didn't even shave off any seconds for the commercial break.

    3. Re:First Gilligan post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have it backwards. 'And the rest' was the original. it only shows up in some of the black and white episodes. The names were added later, and stayed that way for the remainder of the series run.

      Yes, I know this by memory. There's a reason I'm posting this as AC.

    4. Re:First Gilligan post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earhart was a ginger, so bonus points for Gingers.....oh wait.

    5. Re:First Gilligan post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep counting, this is the last post on the page at the time of this reply :P

    6. Re:First Gilligan post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, I didn't know that.

      I guess I saw the year 3+ reruns before the year 1 ones.

  9. Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sounds like they were surviving fairly well which would indicate they weren't so injured that they couldn't keep themselves going on the island. And, if they were fishing (and not relying on birds/eggs) they could probably survive indefinitely. So, what did them in?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hate to break it to you, but...nobody can survive indefinitely. We all die at some time, for very little reason sometimes.

    2. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine yourself living in a small, isolated place with your wife, 24/7. Now imagine the wife a strong, stuborn feminist.

      Poor Fred.

    3. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Creepers.

    4. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by artor3 · · Score: 2

      Thirst, possibly? Depending on the size of the atoll, it might have been very difficult to find fresh water.

    5. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by goffster · · Score: 5, Informative

      The particular island she landed is noted for an extremely poor supply of freshwater.
      People have tried to live on this island but failed because water was not at all reliable.

    6. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps old age after being stuck on the island so long :)

    7. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by HW_Hack · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've seen some videos of this groups work on this little island. It is no tropical paradise. I don't believe there is any fresh water - so they would need to capture evaporating water somehow. And the island is infested with spider crabs from the size of golf balls to the size of soccer balls. And these crabs are looking for something to eat. You could survive a short time there - long term would be a slice of hell.

      Plus we all take modern medicine for granted -- stranded on an island a cut or injury could become infected and that is pretty much game over .... then the crabs eat your body and scatter your bones.

      --
      Its not the years, its the mileage .....
    8. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Come on, we all know that Charles Lindbergh killed her after she saw how the Lindbergh baby got sucked down the toilet.

    9. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by hey! · · Score: 0

      Imagine yourself living in a small, isolated place with your wife, 24/7. Now imagine the wife a strong, stuborn feminist.

      Poor Fred.

      Yeah, all that on top of no booze.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She didn't die well...
      Ever read stephen kings survivor type?

    11. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hate to break it to you, but the vast majority of people survive indefinitely. Indefinite is not synonymous with infinite.

      Unless, you know, you know when everybody is going to die. In which case, you must be fucking rich from shorting stocks as top execs die off unexpectedly (to.. everybody else).

    12. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Why is the rum gone!?

    13. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Earhart probably died of thirst. Post-loss radio transmissions suggest that Noonan was seriously injured during the crash landing; if so he probably went before she did. The last credible reception of an Earhart broadcast was on July 7, five days after they disappeared. Niko is hellishly hot, and finding water would've been a real problem. Neither of them understood Morse code, nor had they undergone any meaningful survival training, When seach planes from the battleship Colorado flew over on the 10th they were possibly too weak to get to a clear area in order to wave. That first night encountering coconut crabs must've been truly terrifying. They won't predate you, but if you fall asleep they might think you were carrion....

    14. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indefinite is not synonymous with infinite.

      Yes it is.

    15. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time, still undefeated.

    16. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stranded on an island a cut or injury could become infected and that is pretty much game over

      Huh? It's easy to flush a wound with a hot saline solution when all you are surrounded by is sea water. It is also safe to presume they would be carrying basic medical supplies such as iodine.

    17. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by grcumb · · Score: 1

      Thirst, possibly? Depending on the size of the atoll, it might have been very difficult to find fresh water.

      Nah, as long as you know how to climb a coconut tree (an acquired skill), you can survive. If you're desperate, you can always cut or burn the tree down. Green coconut is excellent for rehydrating, and the meat is not only tasty, it's good for you, too. Combine that with some fresh fish and/or turtle meat, and you're gold....

      Until you get sick, or until the next hurricane comes.

      My guess is they were pretty banged up when they landed, and infection set in. In the tropics, bacterial infections can get into the blood stream in a couple of weeks. Especially coral cuts, which lodge thousands of tiny bits of grit and microbes under the skin. All it takes is a small scratch to turn septic. And cyclones are no-fooling-around serious, especially on low-lying islands, where the surge can literally immerse the island.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    18. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So maybe she survived on his remains for a bit?

    19. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As noted above they had no training in Morse (Because a few more photo-opportunities were needed.) so it is not safe to presume they would have been carrying basic medical supplies.

    20. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but...nobody can survive indefinitely.

      "You're only saying that because nobody has."

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    21. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt Earhart was afraid of anything, especially crabs.

    22. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not.

      Infinite: unbounded/unending
      Indefinite: does not have a predetermined or known end-point.

    23. Re:Assuming this is correct, how'd she die? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is kind of hard to imagine going on a cross-ocean flight in those days without knowing morse code, and at least carrying a sextant or something.

      Even commercial airliners and bombers used to carry those until relatively recently.

  10. Why US Navy? by nastav · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why on earth would the US Navy spend taxpayer dollars for this expedition? Unless they have too much money and don't know what to do with it all - which is quite plausible considering the proportion of budget allocated to the military. Meh!

    --
    -- obligatory (but true) caveat: my comments my own, and don't reflect my employer or colleagues' positions.
    1. Re:Why US Navy? by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why on earth would the US Navy spend taxpayer dollars for this expedition? Unless they have too much money and don't know what to do with it all - which is quite plausible considering the proportion of budget allocated to the military. Meh!

      This isn't even a drop in the bucket of the Navy's budget. Hell, this isn't even a fraction of a drop in a bucket. And sailors can always use the practice in honing their skills. Considering that this is truly a national mystery, I don't see the harm in it.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    2. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHo was the idiot who invented the phrase "taxpayer money"? It's not your money - it's the government's.

      If you want the government to spend it otherwise, or not have it in the first place, campaign. But recall that property only exists because the government protects it, so make sure enough people agree with you in the long term!

    3. Re:Why US Navy? by hemo_jr · · Score: 2

      According to the WWII Japan, she was a U.S. spy. And if she was a spy, it may have been for the U.S. Navy. And the Navy takes care of its own.

    4. Re:Why US Navy? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Why on earth would the US Navy spend taxpayer dollars for this expedition?

      I don't know, but it might explain why they're moving the fleet to the Pacific

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Why US Navy? by nastav · · Score: 1
      Taxpayer money is a useful phrase that conveys the idea that taxpayers have (or can have) non-trivial influence over how much of it exists, and how it's spent. Of course, once it is in gov't coffers, it belongs to the gov't - but you are stating the obvious. Even if something does belong to the gov't, the entirety of gov't operations is subject to various kinds of oversight, including the kind that results in campaigns, and legislation that focuses expenditures towards productive ends.

      I said nothing whatsoever about property etc. You are incorrectly extrapolating from my comment that I'm advocating elimination of government.

      --
      -- obligatory (but true) caveat: my comments my own, and don't reflect my employer or colleagues' positions.
    6. Re:Why US Navy? by nastav · · Score: 1

      And what's the marginal utility of all of this towards the goal of "taking care of one's own"? I don't see how there can be such a thing as "taking care" in the absence of a clear subject who's alive and capable of experiencing such a benefit.

      --
      -- obligatory (but true) caveat: my comments my own, and don't reflect my employer or colleagues' positions.
    7. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what would answer your question? Reading the effing article.

    8. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you can't understand that, you aren't in the Navy. If you are, ask your superiors. They can explain.

    9. Re:Why US Navy? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      When you're lost at sea, we will be sure to tell the Coast Guard not to bother looking for you. So stick to your backyard, you'll be much better off.

      It's what governments do. Even the nasty 'ol Iranians would get up out of bed and wander around all night long looking for your sorry ass should the need arise.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can't understand that -> You aren't in the Navy

      (else) If you are (In the Navy) -> You can understand that

      If you are (In the Navy) -> Ask your superiors.

      You can understand that -> Ask your superiors.

      Does not compute.

    11. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he doesn't get it he's not a service man from any branch.

    12. Re:Why US Navy? by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      It comes to 'espirit de corps'..... "If you're one of us, you won't be forgotten, and you won't be left behind"

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    13. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An ex-military coworker once replied to a similar comment about a rescue mission undertaken by the Navy to help some fool who was unprepared for the voyage they undertook. "Look, all those guys are on the payroll, and they are always in training. If that fool hadn't gotten stuck out there, the Navy would have to stick one of their own guys out there. This time it wasn't a drill, but it usually is."

    14. Re:Why US Navy? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would the US Navy spend taxpayer dollars for this expedition? Unless they have too much money and don't know what to do with it all - which is quite plausible considering the proportion of budget allocated to the military. Meh!

      Rumor has it she was on some secret mission for Roosevelt to take pictures of a Japanese stronghold to prove the Japanese had violated some treaty. I'd like to know what secret mission John F. Kennedy, Jr. was on to warrant the U.S. Navy locating his submerged plane and recovering his and his wife's bodies within a mere 5 days.

    15. Re:Why US Navy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically she is MIA. She was spying for the US government as part of her trip. The US gov't has an obligation to follow up on any credible leads for any MIA. If only to locate the remains and give them a proper burial.

    16. Re:Why US Navy? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      True money is specie -- coined gold. Fake money (fiat currency) is the used toilet paper that government produces.

      Anyway, money is the property of the person in whose pocket it resides. You trade it with the government or other persons for products or services (or it's stolen from you.) It is not the government's money when it's in your pocket.

      For practical purposes, property exists whenever it's relatively secure. It can be secured by government action, personal action, contracted private action, or by living among people who respect each other. Government is not necessary.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    17. Re:Why US Navy? by proslack · · Score: 1

      Training with a purpose is more productive than "training to train", in any event.

      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    18. Re:Why US Navy? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The US Navy's budget in the late 1930s was not excessive, and IIRC the search used a lot of the year's allocation of fuel, requiring restrictions on other activities.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    19. Re:Why US Navy? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup. The military actually does need training. Granted, we seem to employ them so often these days blowing people up, that hasn't been in short supply. However, during peacetime giving the military something productive to do isn't all that big of a waste. They'd be sailing all over the ocean anyway - might as well give them something useful to do while they're at it.

  11. This isn't new information. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    These TIGHAR folks have been pushing this pet theory of theirs for quite a while.

    http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4295

  12. Here's a useful link by PPH · · Score: 1
    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Not good evidence by technothrasher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It makes my chuckle that there is a "RECOMMENDED: Are you scientifically literate? Take the quiz" link imbedded into the article, as this 'evidence' from TIGHAR is exactly the opposite of good science. They have been pushing this nonsense for a while. They've decided she was on this island and continue to look only for confirming information to support their hypothesis, rather than attempting to falsify it. They could start by admitting that there have been a lot of people who traveled to and briefly lived on that island throughout the years, particularly many, many pearl divers, and that finding various pieces of junk on the island is completely and entirely consistent with this, and not even slightly compelling evidence that Earhart left this junk.

    1. Re:Not good evidence by jmcharry · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a preliminary phase in Good Science in which one looks to amass enough evidence for a hypothesis to justify the effort of properly testing it? At an early stage what may turn out to be good theory is indistinguishable from humbug.

    2. Re:Not good evidence by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Reading the linked articles (in defiance of ./ tradition, I know), it looks like artifacts that were significantly more identifiable as being linked her, and human remains that might have actually been her, were recovered from the island 1 to 3 years after her disappearance (1938-1940). With proper investigation and preservation of the findings it might have settled the matter then. It is not like there was no material evidence to already think this is the crash site.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    3. Re:Not good evidence by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      No, TIGHAR's hypothesis isn't proven. That's what they're trying to do. Approach it with skepticism, yes, but what they're postulating is the best fit for the data. For example, the most intuitive and common-sense theory is they simply went down over the water, but hey CANNOT have gone down in the ocean, as the Electra couldn't operate its generator to run the radio if it was floating. The post-loss radio transmissions indicate they were alive somewhere, and on land. Bearings taken by ships and other recieving stations indicate that that land was Gardner. I invite you to go to TIGHAR's website and read through it thoroughly. They lay out their case pretty well. Like I said, no, it isn't PROVEN, but it's the best explanation for the data.

    4. Re:Not good evidence by technothrasher · · Score: 1

      No. You have it backward. Science is not, in fact, about collecting evidence which supports your hypothesis. Science is about collecting evidence which shows your hypothesis to be false. If, after you have tried as hard as you can to disprove your own idea, you still cannot show it to be false, you then ask others to find your error. If they too cannot show it to be false, then, finally, you have something that tentatively might be true.

      Anyway, we are not at an early stage in the Earhart crash. There has already been plenty of evidence collected, such as the fact that this island is far enough away from Howland Island (their destination), that they would have had to have been aiming for this alternate island from the moment they took off in order to have enough fuel to reach it. It simply isn't a possible 'we ran out of fuel and have to ditch' location. So the only other possible reason they would hit this island would have been navigation error. But, again, this alternate island is quite far away from the original island. Noonan, the navigator (one of the best of his day), would have had to have made an incredibly huge navigation error. It's just not likely. Possible? Sure, anything is possible. But finding some junk and a skeleton on an island which is known to have been commonly populated is not even close to compelling evidence to suggest that Earhart and her navigator made this particular massive error.

    5. Re:Not good evidence by technothrasher · · Score: 1

      You need to keep reading beyond an article which just rehashes TIGHAR's bias. The artifacts, including the skeleton (which was male, BTW), are not at all identifiable as linked to her. They are simply consistent with what could have been her and her navigator. Big deal; They're also consistent with a million other people.

    6. Re:Not good evidence by technothrasher · · Score: 1

      No, unfortunately, they're hypothesis is a terrible fit for the data. Skeptoid

    7. Re:Not good evidence by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      What you look for in science depends upon the particular nature of the science in question. In archaeology, it is not good practice to dig up the entire surface of the earth looking for artifacts of A.E. to show that she wasn't in one particular place.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  14. Robinson by macraig · · Score: 1

    I hope she happened to have a copy of the book Robinson Crusoe on hand to take her mind off of her predicament.

  15. Tough call by arcite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Crash land into the ocean and die relatively instantly.... or land on a chunk of useless rock, last for a few days eating fish or crabs, then dying a slow horrible death from dehydration and exposure.

    1. Re:Tough call by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      or land on a chunk of useless rock, last for a few days eating fish or crabs, then dying a slow horrible death from dehydration and exposure.

      Worse -- in Soviet Kiribati, crabs eat you.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    2. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third option: understand basic survival techniques and live a long time

    3. Re:Tough call by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

          Just a rough guess from the article, it wasn't a short while. I'd say at least a few weeks. Who knows what finally did them in though. A little while without rain could have depleted their water supply. Exposure to the sun could have done it. There wasn't a mention of any makeshift cover. For all we know, a particularly nasty storm could have swept them out to sea. A 1938 report stated that the highest point was 16 feet above low sea level, and nothing is to say that they camped at the highest point. Looking at the island with Google Maps, it appears the sea sweeps across the southern side on a regular basis.

          It would be nice to think they only survived for days. It could have been months. With no real supplies, something as simple as a cut could have been fatal.

          In any case, they didn't survive. That is very unfortunate, as they could have if they had been found in time.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Tough call by TFAFalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If there is no fresh water and it doesn't rain for a few days then no technique will help you.

    5. Re:Tough call by Relayman · · Score: 1

      And they could have been rescued if the rescuers had a clue.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    6. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fourth option: Thinking Amelia Earhart didn't understand basic survival skills, then finding yourself in a similar situation and dying very quickly because your smugness doesn't protect you when you're in the wild (rather than sitting on your fat ass).

    7. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crash land into the ocean and die relatively instantly.... or land on a chunk of useless rock, last for a few days eating fish or crabs, then dying a slow horrible death from dehydration and exposure.

      Earhart? Pfft. After gaining the trust of the natives of nearby islands, she probably modernized their culture and lived in comfort the rest of her days (except, of course, for the regular expeditions in the jungles she insisted on; might not have been comfortable, but tribal records make it clear that she wasn't really happy unless she was pushing the envelope).

      Nature learned, you don't mess with Earhart. She was a badass.

    8. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Evaporate the salt water and collect the water vapor. Do it right and you can get a run off of drinkable water. The hotter it is, the better it works.

    9. Re:Tough call by chonglibloodsport · · Score: 1

      False. With some scraps from the plane she could've built a simple still to desalinate the sea water.

    10. Re:Tough call by Immerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually if you have a sheet of plastic and some sort of container to catch the water (bowl, hubcap, etc) it's quite easy to build a solar still to collect enough water to survive - just dig a hole in moist soil/sand, put your container in the center, then cover it with the plastic, weight down the edges, and set a small rock in the center so that as water vapor condenses on the underside it flows down and drips into the container. There are other techniques as well, but that's one of the easiest, and one of many good reasons to keep at least one sturdy garbage bag in your survival kit.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    11. Re:Tough call by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      You could make a solar still.

    12. Re:Tough call by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      That's assuming you can get enough usable supplies from the plane to do so. What if the plane sank in the ocean and they had to swim to shore, carrying nothing but their clothing? Plus, plastics weren't in such widespread use then as they are now, and those are pretty useful in building solar stills.

    13. Re:Tough call by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I don't think they had plastic garbage bags in 1937.

    14. Re:Tough call by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Neither of them had had any decent survival training. The Norwich City castaways from 1929 had left a few containers of water behind, but after so many years in equatorial heat chances are it made them sick, if any of it was even left. Niko is frickin' HOT, and they would've weakened quickly even after on a day or two. They may have a had some stores left on the Electra but after that was gone they'd've had to wait for rain. I doubt very much that had any equipement on board to evaporate salt water. Someone else stated that the island was anything but a tropical paradise and they were right. Even some of the fish were poisonous. Someone without serious military-grade survival training would not have lasted very long there.

    15. Re:Tough call by Immerman · · Score: 2

      They had plastic sheeting of some sort I'm sure, or waxed paper, tin foil, etc. Quite possibly the technique hadn't been discovered yet though.

      My response though was to the PP's " ...won't help you", not her, making it a general-case modern-day statement which is completely false. And since knowing a simple technique to collect fresh water virtually anywhere is at the top of the list of survival skills, right up there with avoiding freezing to death (another good use for large plastic bags) and knowing how to apply a tourniquet (and why not to), I thought I'd share.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    16. Re:Tough call by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes of course, I agree it's a good idea these days. Just saying to all the people complaining that she didn't do this back in 1937, things were a little different back then.

    17. Re:Tough call by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      They didn't survive? Well, neither has anyone else who was born in 1897.

    18. Re:Tough call by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Informative

      They didn't survive? Well, neither has anyone else who was born in 1897.

      Dina Manfredini and Jiroemon Kimura are alive, and they were both born in 1897. As is Besse Cooper, who was born in 1896.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    19. Re:Tough call by binarylarry · · Score: 2

      Yeah I just asked Siri and she said people didn't learn how to live on islands until the late 1970's when reggae started getting popular.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    20. Re:Tough call by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how long you can live off just coconuts. Drink the juice, eat the insides, use the branches and leaves to build a shelter. Heck if you're luck you might even find a few fallen ones and try making a raft.

    21. Re:Tough call by bratwiz · · Score: 2

      Heck, If you have coconuts, all you have to do is wait for a big tropical storm and then use a string of perls to cut through the international telephone cable that will inevitably wash up on the shore. Then you can use jungle vines to place a call for rescue. Of course, none of these skills are of any particular use for patching a three-foot hole in a boat...

    22. Re:Tough call by iphinome · · Score: 2

      coconut milk gives you the runs, you lose more water than you gain.

    23. Re:Tough call by bratwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

      And they could have played the piano if they only had some sheet music.

      And a piano.

    24. Re:Tough call by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We remember them because what they were doing was cutting-edge at the time. Techniques and technology for search and rescue grew by leaps and bounds during WWII, which is to say, before that it sucked.

    25. Re:Tough call by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      The proffessor already tried that in one episode, of course Gilligan messed it up as usual.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    26. Re:Tough call by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      "Calment smoked from the age of 21 (1896) until the age of 117, only five years before her death."

      WTF?

    27. Re:Tough call by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Because Gilligan was the smoke monster... it wasn't a mistake... there were never any mistakes.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    28. Re:Tough call by fnj · · Score: 1

      Cellophane had been known for a long time and was easily available industrially - it was used on cigarette packs and other packaging. A pound of cellophane film would have been enough for hundreds of stills (cellophane is pretty flimsy and tears easily). That and a light aluminum framework and some bowls would have been cheap insurance that wouldn't have impacted the plane's payload meaningfully.

    29. Re:Tough call by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Evaporate the salt water and collect the water vapor. Do it right and you can get a run off of drinkable water. The hotter it is, the better it works.

      But it may not work at all if the relative humidity is not high enough, whatever the temperature.

      It's not too difficult to imagine using a blackened vessel and/or a reflector to enhance energy capture and boost the rate of evaporation. However, the rate of condensation is just as critical, and there will be essentially no condensation if the local dew point is below any achievable temperature. In tough cases, you need better apparatus which might be hard to jury-rig.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    30. Re:Tough call by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      And they could have played the piano if they only had some sheet music.

      And a piano.

      They might have needed a piano teacher too. While we're at it if they took an orchestra and chorus with them they could have put on a show.

    31. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In hot climate, digging the solar still will generally require more water from you (due to the hard work) than it will provide. Remember that these stills give very, very little water.

    32. Re:Tough call by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

      Except that there is a lot of evidence that she was using the radio in the plane for SOS calls. So, the plane survived for at least a few days.

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    33. Re:Tough call by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

      You drink the water, not the milk (which is made from white flesh). Should be OK unless you're allergic/sensitive to coconut. Coconut water is hypotonic, so if there's a good supply of coconuts you can live quite long just on coconuts alone - get calories from the coconut flesh. Add fish and you'd do even better.

      --
    34. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which shows you don't know anything about survival. It's simple to setup a series of stills to collect, fresh, clean water.

    35. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the island's compositition, underground water may also be an option. Beyond that, there are numerous desalinisation techniques which can provide enough water for drinking, especially in early days where she likely had plenty of fuel. As others have said, she had no survival training, which likely doomed her to days at best.

    36. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they did crash. I'd not be surprised if she died due to injuries a few days later.

    37. Re:Tough call by Kookus · · Score: 1

      I put plastic sheets over my wood piles to dry out the wood over the summer. Inevitably, the plastic heats up and cools off enough times to crack and becomes useless for that purpose.

      Plastic might get you through a couple of months, but you'd better have an alternative plan in place pretty quick. I'd try to find some fresh water.

    38. Re:Tough call by GNious · · Score: 1

      Whenever a TV show on survival (Am watching too much Discovery Channel) mentions the solar-still, or related setups, they tend to come back to it not producing enough water to survive on, and much too little compared to effort (at least initially).

    39. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      humidity will be high in your collection apperatus. You can pee in a sand pit in the desert, put a receptical in the middle and cover with a black plastic bag and get fresh water. as long as you have decent coverage it should work 100% of the time.

    40. Re:Tough call by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, with some luck (the right yeasts in the air) you might be able to drown your sorrows with an alcoholic beverage too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_wine

      So did the atoll have enough coconut trees? Judging from the photo ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikumaroro_Lagoon_Entrance_AKK.jpg ), there are worse places to be stranded at (e.g. desert and/or some very cold place for instance).

      --
    41. Re:Tough call by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      My great uncle started smoking at age 12, and stopped at age 82 when a skin cancer on his lip scared him. He lived another ten years.

    42. Re:Tough call by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Did you watch mythbusters? They built a still and it made maybe a few thimbles of water per day.

    43. Re:Tough call by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup, clearly quitting did her in... :)

    44. Re:Tough call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how we find the signatures of her life just when ones maximum lifetime has been reached. (if born in 1897)(114 being a very tough year to get by. Google it)

      Life is funny and designed with intelligence. :)

    45. Re:Tough call by fredrated · · Score: 1

      Actually, it seems you can be perfectly hydrated in that environment.

      A few years ago a small group in a life raft was rescued (off the coast near San Francisco) after several weeks at sea, and they were all perfectly hydrated, yet had no basic source of water other than the ocean.

      A nurse with the fishing party had a kit that included surgical tubing. With the tubing she regularly gave the occupants of the life raft enemas of salt water. The lower intestine, designed to remove water from the waste stream, proved capable of extracting salt free moisture from the sea water, enough to keep the victums hydrated.

      Next time I go out on the sea I will take an enema bulb in my gear!

    46. Re:Tough call by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      humidity will be high in your collection apperatus. You can pee in a sand pit in the desert, put a receptical in the middle and cover with a black plastic bag and get fresh water. as long as you have decent coverage it should work 100% of the time.

      Black plastic bags were in short supply in the 1930s. Another poster who suggested building a still from parts of the plane would have had more luck, assuming fuel was available to boil water.

  16. This brings money into Kiribati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kiribati is the small nation that includes Gardner Island. A US Navy expedition into the area would pump money into the local economy. This sort of expedition is often encouraged by local governments. The military is a diplomatic tool as much as it is anything else. Considering the shifting politics of the region keeping a good relationship with a small but well placed country could bring significant benefits in time of crisis. For historical reference Tarawa, of the Battle of Tarawa, is the capital of Kiribati.

    1. Re:This brings money into Kiribati by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Except that Kiribati wasn't Kirinati and wasn't even a nation until 1979; until then it was yet another British colony (not unlike the US, until 1776). Why would the pre-WWII US Navy care to stimulate the economy of a British colony? Then again... why did the US wage a nuclear war against this same British colony after WWII?

    2. Re:This brings money into Kiribati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Kiribati wasn't Kiribati and wasn't even a nation until 1979; until then it was yet another British colony (not unlike the US, until 1776). Why would the pre-WWII US Navy care to stimulate the economy of a British colony? Then again... why did the US wage a nuclear war against this same British colony after WWII?

      I offer no apologies for this double post, which is why I logged out before posting.

    3. Re:This brings money into Kiribati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the asshole who moded parent redundant: please tie a cannon ball to your legs and jump in the ocean.

  17. This brings money into Kiribati by raque · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kiribati is the small nation that includes Gardner Island. A US Navy expedition into the area would pump money into the local economy. This sort of expedition is often encouraged by local governments. The military is a diplomatic tool as much as it is anything else. Considering the shifting politics of the region keeping a good relationship with a small but well placed country could bring significant benefits in time of crisis. For historical reference Tarawa, of the Battle of Tarawa, is the capital of Kiribati.

    sorry for the double post, but this time I am logged in.

  18. New evidence? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    The "new" evidence seems to consist of modern modelling of seventy-five year old radio logs and photo-analysis of a seventy-something-year-old photograph. It is hard to believe that she would not have attempted to make some sort of mark on the island. Why wasn't she wearing a spark-plug necklace?

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
    1. Re:New evidence? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      Well, combined with other circumstantial evidence it does seem likely that this is a decent place to look if it's something one is passionate about. Certainly when combined with other physical evidence (documentation of a body found under a tree just a few years after the crash, a zipper manufactured in Pennsylvania, remains of a bottle of what may have been a "freckle ointment", remains of a pocket knife etc) I think there's decent reason to figure that this is possibly where the Electra went down. Probable? Hmm... that's a stretch I think but I for one am quite happy to see this one particular mystery given a bit more time. She was a pioneer and became a model for many young women both during her time and after to step out of the shadows of men... something that became much more prevalent many years after her death with the women's rights movement (really, plural) that literally changed the way Western civilization functions. For that, well I think some closure would be nice.

      There's even some good circumstantial evidence that this might be the place... though granted it's a little flimsy. One that I liked particularly though was the S.O.S. painted on the side of the Norwich City, where the crew abandoning her had no real reason or probably time to paint that. Creepy and cool :) And yes, I know the discussion is linked from the same people who are investigating this... but they seem to have a trove of circumstantial evidence that no-one else seems to talk about or has on-line.

      Personally, I find it fascinating and will be following with great interest.

  19. wait, what? by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

    So the Voyager episode "The 37s" didn't/won't really happen?

    Now I'm disillusioned.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always think of that episode when hearing her name because ten years ago I never new the story. . I'm surprised that someone else is bringing up the episode by a name I'd forgotten, given the poor reception of the show. I really wish UPN would return to the midnight reruns, which I think were how I became a fan of Trek in a few weeks.

      Google "Five minute voyager". This is the first ever "[Something] abridged" thing I ever consumed on the web, and it was a good way to cope with the loss of the show. I spent a few days of nostalgia at the VOY version of Memory alpha a couple months ago.

      Good day to you.

    2. Re:wait, what? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      So the Voyager episode "The 37s" didn't/won't really happen?

      Now I'm disillusioned.

      Voyager itself didn't happen. Neither did Enterprise. So I'm not sure what episode of a non-existent series you could possibly be referring to.

    3. Re:wait, what? by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      One episode down, 171 to go.

    4. Re:wait, what? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Google "The Voyager Conspiracy" for 50+ montages exploring the Janeway/Seven relationship... if you feel like descending into fanslash. Some of the videos are very good, some are downright terrible.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  20. Crabs eat everyone by geoffrobinson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know a retired cop who fished one too many bodies out of the water. He refuses to eat crab.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Crabs eat everyone by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      The lesson I got from that is that if you're going to be a cop, it should be in one of those sleepy towns where the most exciting crime you're likely to have to deal with is public drunkenness.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    2. Re:Crabs eat everyone by Immerman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why ever not? Eating them back is the only way to ensure justice is served! (Ideally with garlic butter and lemon juice)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:Crabs eat everyone by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know a retired cop who fished one too many bodies out of the water. He refuses to eat crab.

      Oh, now you mention it, I think I once saw some book about a 'low crab' diet.

    4. Re:Crabs eat everyone by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Think of it as recycling ;).

      But yeah crab, lobster, prawns are basically roaches of the sea.

      --
    5. Re:Crabs eat everyone by FacePlant · · Score: 2

      That's the basic reasoning behind why shellfish aren't kosher.

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
    6. Re:Crabs eat everyone by Mufasa_ooh_sayitagai · · Score: 1

      I know a farmer that has seen too much manure in his field. He refuses to eat any crops.

    7. Re:Crabs eat everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the basic reasoning behind why shellfish aren't kosher.

      Poor Zoidberg!

    8. Re:Crabs eat everyone by rleibman · · Score: 0

      You're wrong... there's no reason why shellfish are kosher, other than 2000+ year old mythology (and maybe, only common sense that applies to an era without modern refrigeration)

  21. Earhart was a resourceful, intelligent woman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A famous aviator, that everyone in the US knows of (if only for the fact that she disappeared). The phrase "needs no introduction" comes to mind. Explaining who she is would have been like starting an article with "Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States during the Civil War". If you don't recognize the name, then you're either a small child or from some other country. If it's the latter, you should accept that American websites will sometimes refer to American celebrities, and in such situations Wikipedia is your friend.

    Her survival does not surprise me atoll. ;-b

    Nevertheless, the idea that her name is known to all except children and foreigners is absurd. I don't think knowing who she was is a scholastic requirement, I can't remember when and where I heard of her, (I'm neither a child nor a foreigner...) but I have. However, I feel it IS possible for an adult, well-educated, informed American never to have heard of Amelia Earhart. It's just unlikely. Now, an adult American never having heard of George Washington, or Christopher Columbus, for example...

    Let me ask you this... what was the name of the Sailing Master on Columbus' ship, during his first voyage to what they ended up calling "the New World"? What about his Chief Carpenter? George Washington's dentist? These were important men, each of whom had a hand in shaping American history. But you've never heard of them, despite their importance. Who taught Marie Curie basic chemistry? Who taught Albert Einstein math? You've probably never heard of them either. Who taught Charles Lindbergh to fly a plane? Just because someone was important doesn't mean you or anyone else would necessarily have ever heard of him. Conversely there are a lot of very famous people who just don't matter, and never did. For example...

    More Americans probably know who Kim Kardashian is, (or however the fuck you spell it, I can't be bothered to look something so inconsequential up...) even though I think she could live to be a hundred and never achieve anything as significant or important as Amelia Earhart.

    Actually, if that whole family got on a plane and tried to fly around the world and got lost for 70+ years, I'd be fine with it. I know I got off on a tangent, but this whole article is a tangent.

    Really, WTF does Amelia Earhart either being found or not, have to do with anything on /.? You might as well also mention Richard Dawson died (he did).

    1. Re:Earhart was a resourceful, intelligent woman... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "what was the name of the Sailing Master on Columbus' ship"

      A very good example about what is or isn't famous.

      You basically won't find a single Spanish child that doesn't know the answer to that question.

      In fact, much in the line of MisterSquid, they would have pointed their fingers at you with a "HA-HA" ala Nelson because of you ignoring who the Pinzon brothers were and (seemingly) not knowing Columbus expedition was composed by three ships, not one.

      I certainly knew about Amelia Earhart, but don't fool yourself: only Americans/UK and aviation freaks know about her.

    2. Re:Earhart was a resourceful, intelligent woman... by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're an American and never heard of her, then you're quite ignorant and obviously never got a decent education. She's an extremely noteworthy person in Americna history. Did you also never hear of Al Capone or Elliot Ness? If you don't know who many big names from the first half of the 20th Century are, then you're missing out on a lot of cultural knowledge that you really need to be considered a "well-educated, informed American".

    3. Re:Earhart was a resourceful, intelligent woman... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      She wasn't very resourceful, she wasn't that good of a pilot and she didn't know how to operate a radio. She had multiple accidents and by all accounts was more into the glamour and promotion aspects, pushing her clothing styles, rather than promoting women in aviation. Lucky? Sure. On her first attempt around the world she cracked up her plane. That was going East to West around the globe with the most difficult leg of the flight being early in the attempt. There were a lot of famous pilots who died trying to set records or do things nobody else had done with an airplane during her era.

      What made her noteworthy was that she had a rich husband who promoted her exploits as much as possible and always made sure there were cameras and reporters around. Think of her as a 1930s Pia Zadora.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  22. Confirmed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A broken bottle that might have held the freckle cream that she would have used if she had known about it? Well, that's enough for me! Mystery solved!

  23. Re: sleepy towns by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    With the exception of places like Snowtown of course.

  24. Where the heck was the NAVY ? by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 2

    The crash island is just a few hundred miles next to the target island. A proper investigation would try to visit the uninhabited islands within some range of the plane's fly path. 70 years later the US Navy is reinvestigating, maybe they feel they neglected something..

    1. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Navy DID look for her. They pulled out all the stops, on orders from Roosevelt himself. Earhart shoud've been better prepared for such an endevor-- but neither she nor Noonan could understand Morse code (something that would've prevented their loss) nor did either receive any survival training (something that might've saved their lives on Niko). The Navy sent a battleship and an aircraft carrier to look for her, but her lack of Morse skills doomed her. Even the Japanese navy helped to look for her.

    2. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have *any* idea ow hard it is to search the area "a few hundred miles from the target island" ? It's expensive in fuel and pilot time, there's no strong to think that it might work, and ocean flying planes were quite raire and expensive and mostly already in commercial use, minimal guidance systems, and little indication of upcoming weather problems.

      You probably think that we can cure overpopulation by just *explaining* it to people.

    3. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 1

      Well, looking at the satellite map, could this object be the crashed double motor plane in the lagoon?

      http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=-4.6792341&lon=-174.5047772&z=19&l=0&m=b

    4. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. They landed near the Norwich, probably thinking it was a sign of habitation. Tidal action would've broken the Electra up into little bitty sheriff meatballs in a relatively short time-- Gallagher's colonists would've reported finding more than just stray pieces of metal and glass. There's a very steep dropoff on the reef edge nearby. The remnants of the plane, if Niko was indeed the place where they landed, are in the abyssal depths. That's one of the main things the new expediton is looking to find.

    5. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 1

      If there was a bad weather they might have prefered to ditch to the lagoon, jump off the plane... that would have saved the plane from tidal/reef disaster you are writting about.

    6. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      No, she was shot down at Hull Island, captured and interrogated by the Japanese military, and taken to Japan. That's probably Cutter John's wheelchair:

      Having blown off course and crashed.... Cutter was captured by a Soviet submarine and held as a spy. Opus developed amnesia during the incident and found his way back to the Bloom Boardinghouse, and told everyone what had happened once his memory returned. Eventually Cutter was traded for Bill the Cat, who had apparently been moonlighting as a spy. He appeared much less often after that. "Cutter John's" true name is Cutter Jeff. He prefers to be called Cutter John, though.

    7. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      All I can say is, go to the TIGHAR website. Read through their findings. I'm convinced but not entirely so. If you were running out of fuel over a mostly open ocean, looking for the bes place to land, and you saw a wrecked ship on the edge of an island, you'd think, "I'll land near there! There might just be people, and at the least there might be resources I could use after I go down!" Earhart may have been untrained and unwise, but she wasn't stupid. IF I had been her that's what I would've done. Still all this presupposes that she and Noonan did land on Nikumauroro. That's why I say go the website. The sheer weight of all the circumstantial evidence is massive.

    8. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      ONLY a few hundred miles. lets do some quick maths. lets say those lazy searchers did search out to a 200 mile radius. So that gives us a search area of approximately 125 thousand square miles. Still think it is ONLY a few hundred miles and the searchers simply sucked?

    9. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Morse code skills probably wouldn't have helped them. When they ditched their plane, the transmitter and the radio would have sank.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Where the heck was the NAVY ? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      If the island was mapped, they should have been found. Searching empty ocean after a couple of days would have been an inferior choice compared to looking at all known islands. It's not as if there are a lot of islands in the area, and Nikumaroro Island is about 3 miles long. Of course, if the island was unknown, that's hard luck.

      High point on destroyers and other major surface warships is easily 100 feet, which gives a horizon of 12 statute miles. At 10 knots, that's over 3000 square statute miles per day per ship. I suppose the records of the search are available, and someone could find out if anyone looked in the area, and if yes, how close they came.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  25. Nonsense. Everyone knows... by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Amelia Earhart was actually abducted, taken to the delta quadrant, and kept in suspended animation for some 430 years before being revived by the crew of the USS Voyager. HTH.HAND.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  26. The 37s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here they go covering the truth again!

    Earhart was taken to the Delta Quadrant by an alien species named the Briori. She will be reawakened from hibernation when discovered by Captain Janeway in the 24th century.

  27. I wonder what she died of by khipu · · Score: 1

    The island is not that small, it has trees, shade, coconuts, lots of crabs, and a lagoon full of fish. It's probably a bit short of fresh water, but between coconuts, rain, and a simple solar still using a tarp, she should have been able to get by. And someone else seems to have been able to survive there by themselves for a few years.

    1. Re:I wonder what she died of by catmistake · · Score: 1

      The island is not that small

      A ribbon 6km long and 2km wide, with a great big lagoon in the middle... I'd say any island you can walk entirely around three or four times a day at a leisurely pace is pretty small.

    2. Re:I wonder what she died of by khipu · · Score: 1

      It's more than big enough to settle and support dozens of families and plantations. And the expeditions looking for Earhart haven't even come close to exploring it all.

  28. if true, they blew it rescuing her by Locutus · · Score: 1

    One of the stories on this new evidence stated that a pilot saw Gardner Island and stated that he'd not seen anyone but saw signs of habitation. For some reason nobody looked into it further. And another thing that's interesting is someone found a human skull and a few navigational instruments on the island and again it was not considered to be of interest or associated with the Earhart story.

    To bad LRH wasn't still around or else he could have made a Goddess out of her.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  29. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched a documentary with all of this supposedly new information a while back. Interviews with a woman who as a girl wrote down messages from her and everything.

    But ya, it's new somehow.

  30. The world is big. It's a long flight. by Arancaytar · · Score: 1
  31. edgar cayce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edgar Cayce was asked to locate her and her navigator. Available at http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog.aspx?id=6479&blogid=445 ; it will be never known if Edgar Cayce accurately tuned into her correctly, but given his track record, he would be quite close.

  32. it was by crutchy · · Score: 1

    aliens that kept her alive

  33. Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it's the latter, you should accept that American websites will sometimes refer to American celebrities, and in such situations Wikipedia is your friend."

    This is arrogance at best. The readership from slashdot has long swelled to be a sizeable international reader, if not a majority of reader. It is not about linking every goddamn noun to a dictionary, it is about linking *personal name* to a wiki to make it easier for your international readership. The fact that it is not done *combined* with telling other to just google it, seems quite indicative of the arrogance some feels entitled here.

  34. I did not expect this. by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    No. I did not expect this atoll.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  35. Poor Amelia by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Years ago on a tour of the National Air and Space Museum, our (female) guide gave us the straight dope on Amelia Earhart. She was at best a mediocre pilot who was pressed into performing stunts like crossing the Atlantic by her publicity-mad husband.

    If, of all words of tongue and pen,
    The saddest are, "It might have been,"
    More sad are these we daily see:
    "It is, but hadn’t ought to be."


    .

  36. Cartography by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Those are good questions, antdude. I would like to learn more about the cartographic practices that resulted in the map they carried.

    I wonder what Earhart and Noonan knew or presumed about the chart's accuracy with respect to islands when they were leaving New Guinea?

    I wonder what they made of what happened when they were talking about it afterwards on Gardner island?

    1. Re:Cartography by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my brain sparked up when inaccurate maps were mentioned. I didn't even know about that part. :( I wonder if she and her buddy were trained for survivals too.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. Not definitive evidence so far by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    We'll know more if they find the aeroplane. They are going to have a good look soon.

    1. Re:Not definitive evidence so far by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      Have you seen the photograph that 'shows' this airplane? It's a joke. The Loch Ness Monster photos are more convincing.

      Photo

  38. Perspective from "neutral" country by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    As someone not from the US and not from Russia (from Greece if you are wondering), I should give some insight of what "the world" knows about that stuff - as a bonus my language does not use the latin or cyrillic scripts, so I can make some less biased searches.
    So, to answer the GP post, no, Chuck Yeager is certainly not known to non-US people, unless they are interested in the history of flight or spaceflight. I guess this makes most /.ers candidates for knowing Chuck Yeager - I did, but very few of my friends would know him. Now, Amelia Earhart has certainly been publicized more (at least outside the US) so she has made it in more general/history books, so it lowers the bar of knowing who she is - you just need to have read some books, so most of my friends know her. Heck, even reading books is not required - my nieces know her from her "Night at the Museum" appearance...
    Going on to the parent post, Chkalov is about the equivalent status of Chuck Yeager, but this time in Russia. Given the fact that Hollywood has exposed us to so much US culture and yet most people would have not heard of Chuck Yeager (no, The Right Stuff is sadly not well known in most of Europe), it is easy to explain why a handful of people would have heard of Chkalov. On the other hand, Yuri Gagarin is known by virtually every Greek (while you could find a few who would not know of Neil Armstrong or at least the fact that he was not a Jazz musician). But the Cosmonaut thing puts the bar too high I guess, he is not a single pilot. So there is at least one Russian pilot who is also not very well known, but more known than Chkalov (to Greeks at least): Alexey Meresyev. And rightfully so - the guy faught the Luftwaffe, got shot down, dragged himself to friendly territory losing his two legs in the process, then trained non-stop for many months with his prosthetic legs and flew again shooting down even more Germans! I don't think a pilot can top that.
    Anyway, to sum up, Amelia Earhart should probably be known to every geek around the world. Real geeks would also know more important but less advertised aviators, but if you haven't heard of her it is simply your fault and not a matter of culture.
    And here is the interesting piece, trying the names in the Greek script on google:
    Yuri Gagarin: 70200
    Neil Armstrong: 30500
    Amelia Earhart: 17800
    Chuck Yeager: 909
    Alexey Meresyev: 6
    Valery Chkalov: 1

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Perspective from "neutral" country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Greeks:
      Your economy is in shambles.
      Stop wasting time on the internet and go to work.
      make sure you get paid in $US.

  39. Re:Fire Ring by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    TFA mentioned evidence of a fire ring, which they conjectured might have been to discourage the hordes of hungry hungry crabs swarming the survivors at night.
    Maybe they lived to regret having survived the landing.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  40. Re: sleepy towns by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    ... and Enumclaw

  41. Same o same o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived in the Marshall Islands for over 7 years and nearly every year a team of explorers and researchers would arrive claiming to know exactly where she landed.

    The teams, shrouded in secrecy, would hire locals to take them to some of our outer islands. Without exception they would all return with nothing but more secretive claims of where they were sure she crashed for their next trip.

    This exercise happened throughout Micronesia (Kosrae, Phonepei, Chuuk/Truk, etc), the Gilberts(Kiribati), and many other island chains. In spite of the enormous size of the area she may have crashed in, most locals on these tiny atolls can guide to you just about every wreck, munitions depot, bomb crater, and sunken Taiwanese purseiner.

    On a dive trip to the island of Jaulit our group was told by our guide that a local on the other side of the island knew of a Japanese flying boat sunk in 100 feet of water somewhere in the lagoon. We drove over to the other side of the island picked up an old Marshallese man who guided us to the middle of the lagoon. He lined us up with some coconut tree across the lagoon from us and said "right here". We sort of shook our heads and said ok, dropped into the water and 100 feet down a fully loaded WWII Japanese flying boat came into view.

    The point of this story is that if Amelia crashed anywhere but the open ocean, island locals would know and this mystery would have been solved decades ago.

    She crashed in the middle of the ocean and died. Sorry.

  42. Re:Fire Ring by idontgno · · Score: 1

    I don't think that fire ring was purely self-defense. I suspect the survivor party brought their doom onto themselves by poaching some of the younger, smaller, tastier coconut crabs. After that, the crab community at large was forced to take forceful action to defend themselves.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  43. Of course she survived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in her stasis pod all the way until she was revived by the Enterprise :-)