Slashdot Mirror


San Diego's Fireworks Show Over In 15 Seconds

First time accepted submitter fotoguzzi writes "Garden State Fireworks is investigating how the entire Fourth of July show was launched after a signal was sent to the barges that would set the timing for the rest of the show after the introduction. Can anyone suggest how such a trivial step could go so disastrously wrong?" It's not the first time such a thing has happened, either.

241 comments

  1. Wasn't there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

    1. Re:Wasn't there... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Well.. it's better than reading the idiot comments about it on Twitter...

    2. Re:Wasn't there... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

      Awesome 15 seconds, but 30 minutes of driving, 15 minutes to find a parking spot, 30 minutes of waiting, 1 hour of fighting traffic to leave... (the better viewing places get overwhelmed with people on the 4th). I'm sure some people were bummed even though It would have been awesome to see. I bet there's a few people who were looking the wrong way too.

    3. Re:Wasn't there... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

      Plot for new Hollywood thriller - Gone In 15 Seconds

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Wasn't there... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Informative
    5. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people who think a fireworks display is worth all that wasted time would probably be fine with such a once-in-a-lifetime spectacle, being laid back as they must be.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    6. Re:Wasn't there... by localman57 · · Score: 2

      It actually isn't all that great, at least on the video. Part of the magic of the fireworks is how they move and expand. With that many going off that close to each other, it just turns into a bright pink blur. The beauty of the motion is gone. Fifteen seconds of a really good finalle seems better to me than 15 seconds of really bright blur.

      Much more entertaining, I thought, was the CNN video of a fireworks stand that caught fire.

      I can just hear the cops on the side of the road... "Move along people... move along... Nothing to see here..."

    7. Re:Wasn't there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can just hear the cops on the side of the road... "Move along people... move along... Nothing to see here...

    8. Re:Wasn't there... by milbournosphere · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was, up on the hill at USD. The sound-wave alone was AWESOME. Probably far more memorable than the actual show would have been.

    9. Re:Wasn't there... by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny

      The best part was the way everyone thought that was the opening. Then it dawns, somewhat reluctantly, that was the whole show.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    10. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welp, I don't normally respond to a cynical mod-down, but I'm dead serious with this one.

      Lets face it, we all draw a line somewhere when we decide to attend something, right? I won't drive toward the beach (bay area) after 9am or so because that's when traffic becomes molasses, or stand in a long line for a slightly faster phone, or anything like that. Other people will. It takes a certain personality type to have the willingness to do so and I don't have it.

      The intent of the above quip wasn't to disparage those who do, but I can only imagine that if I'm the impatient type who times recreational activity around minimal wasted time (traffic congestion, staring at loading bars, waiting in lines), those who are willing to do these things are either
      A. much more laid back, or I suppose...
      B. doing it for their kids. Maybe I should've mentioned that before.

      In either case, a laid back person would think it's funny. A kid would think it's awesome. Kids haven't developed the sense of aesthetics needed to appreciate the rhythm and choreography behind the display -- they're just thinking "awesome, big explosion! Do it again!"

      So if you're so pissed off by my statement that you feel the need to hit Underrated in the popdown, maybe you're not laid back enough for such recreational activity. :P

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    11. Re:Wasn't there... by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, go to the movie and discover the trailer you already saw was the movie.

      The sped-up aspect of it is sorta like Blipverts.

      The smoke must have been dense. Perhaps one could have bounced signals off of that. I recall that when a power failure hit during a large California fire, I discovered that some reflected out of town FM and tv signals were quite strong

      Smoke isn't the best way to get those weak DTV signals, but the deadline for rural low power analog tv stations to have applied for a subsidy refunding some DTV conversion costs ended July 2nd. It looks like there may have been $20 million left to hand out too.

      http://www.ntia.doc.gov/legacy/lptv/index.html

      Well it was a fun 4th, hopefully everyone still has their fingers.

    12. Re:Wasn't there... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      The porn industry already beat you ...

      Gone in 60 Seconds --> Cum in 60 Seconds

      http://www.listal.com/list/porn-versions-famous-movies

    13. Re:Wasn't there... by somarilnos · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, people got back to their cars 45 seconds before Nicolas Cage made off with them.

    14. Re:Wasn't there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I live relatively close to DC (about 40 miles away) and I work a few blocks from the Mall area where they are shot from so I am familiar with the area and the local tranportation system. Even though my building offers roof seats with refreshments, I'd NEVER come down here to watch the fireworks. Too much hassle. I go to my local town of Manassas VA which puts up an impressive display. It takes me 10 minutes to drive there and another 15 minutes of walking to get to a spot that I can sit comfortably in my portable chair proably about 100 feet back from the closest point you can get to it. I could actually even scale that back and sit in my car where I park but I like to close enough to feel the booming. When its over, I am parked far enough away that I don't sit in traffic for more than a few minutes for the mass exodus. It makes for a great stress and hasle free evening. More bang for the buck!

      On a side note.. I feel the same way about a lot of things, an example is eating out. If I have to make reservations, wait for a seat, conform to a specific dress code, drive out of my way, wait a long time etc.. The overall experience is diminished so the food better be damn good. I'm not paying to be hassled, or the "experience" of luxury, I'm paying for good food and convienence. Put the soda dispensor in the dining room and let me fill up the cup myself instead of making me wait 5 minutes for you to eventually fill my 12 ounce crystal cup from your polished silver decantor. The American way... if it costs more and you can act like you are important, it must be better.

    15. Re:Wasn't there... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      That

      was

      awesome!

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    16. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 1

      You're right, it doesn't, but the "I disagree" mod down is essentially like an AC replying with "I disagree because...", only more anonymous and without the "because" part. Just wanted to get my "reply" in properly because my first post sucked. (and there's subtlety to modding, like getting modded down now that I made this post would probably just be intentional instigation, which I'd ignore :P )

      Also, I'm aware of the irony of posting on a message board...about avoiding wasted time. To me, wasted time is time spent doing something intermediary to my desired activity.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    17. Re:Wasn't there... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      considering they did all the for what was supposed to be an 18 minute show, I don't really feel for the guy.

      Firework crowds are one of the stupidest.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Wasn't there... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'd expect that much powder going off at once to cause hearing damage. I'd give it six months for the tinnitus lawsuits to start rolling in.

      Ob. cartoon paraphrase: Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be an ear-shattering kaboom. (Spoken by someone unaware that the blood running out of his ears came from what is left of his eardrums....)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    19. Re:Wasn't there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am from NYC, but I'm in San Diego for the summer. I didn't rent a car, so it took me three hours to get downtown by public transportation from where I live to see the show. Sure, half the fun was the adventure to get there, but I am sorely disappointed at what happened. The only analogous situation I can think of is the Grinch stealing Christmas. Yes, seeing this was certainly an experience, but I would have much rather gotten the full show. Considering that I don't know the next time I will be back in San Diego for the 4th of July, this kind of sucked.

    20. Re:Wasn't there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, I've seen the NYC show, but unlike NYC, I had a fantastic seat on the rocks along the bay and could see four barges at once. I didn't have thousands of people pushing and shoving me and I got to sit down. In that sense, it is better than NYC which is why I am sad.

    21. Re:Wasn't there... by stepho-wrs · · Score: 1

      Any irony in waiting for the 11 second ad to finish before being allowed to see the 15 second show (which had about 30 seconds of nothing exiting tacked on the end)?
      We had a similar experience back in the late 1990's. Big promo during the week about the newest and biggest individual firework. Halfway during the show there was a pretty big one that had us all wondering "that was bigger then anything we've seen before, what must the really big one be like?" Turned out that a remnant of an earlier firework floated down into the firing tube of the biggy and set it off half way through the show.

    22. Re:Wasn't there... by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      My son described it as "watching the sun explode." It seemed as if the intense heat was actually detonating the fireworks quite low - usually it takes a few seconds for them to arc into the sky and explode, but each barge just launched an angry ball of fury. As for the sound, it was kinda like filling a football stadium with old tractors and revving them until they backfired and the engines explode.

    23. Re:Wasn't there... by thermopile · · Score: 1
      Just had to say, that CNN video was some of the most amusing footage I've ever seen.

      Thanks for the laughs.

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    24. Re:Wasn't there... by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      I'm onboard with the quote, but let's make Marvin's quote accurate: "Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth -shattering kaboom!"

    25. Re:Wasn't there... by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      My son described it as "watching the sun explode." [. . .], but each barge just launched an angry ball of fury. As for the sound, it was kinda like filling a football stadium with old tractors and revving them until they backfired and the engines explode.

      WTH I am totally laughing myself into tears. What an awesome and hilarious series of phrases to describe an accidentally time-compressed pyrotechnic show. Best part? You end with an analogy involving vehicles withinternal-combustion engined engines!

      --
      blog
    26. Re:Wasn't there... by roothog · · Score: 2

      Welp, I don't normally respond to a cynical mod-down, but I'm dead serious with this one.

      So if you're so pissed off by my statement that you feel the need to hit Underrated in the popdown, maybe you're not laid back enough for such recreational activity. :P

      "Underrated" means that they were modding you up, not down. The mod down is called "Overrated".

    27. Re:Wasn't there... by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      Think of a mod-down as a time-saving feature for all of us. If someone decides to view all comments above Score:2, and yours is one of the weakest of the Score:3s, it is a favour to everyone else that your comment becomes one of the best of the Score:2 comments rather than a drag on the Score:3s.

      Right now this thread has 43 Score:5s and 47 posts greater than Score:3. Down-modding would be a favour to someone who only has time right now to look at the Score:5s.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    28. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I kicked myself shortly after posting -- after having proofread it (for once), I got it backwards.

      But to keep it somewhat on topic, that's why we need an edit function -- for impatient types like me.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    29. Re:Wasn't there... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      That was kind of the joke....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. Just Like My First Time by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

    Yep, just like my first time ... she didn't seem to think so though.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Just Like My First Time by steelfood · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally! A topic we can use sex analogies to describe!

      No wonder there are so few comments.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Just Like My First Time by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      What took you so long? ;)

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    3. Re:Just Like My First Time by drkim · · Score: 2

      Don't worry...

      On /. they will find a way to describe sex using car analogies.

    4. Re:Just Like My First Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I really like the new headlights my car has, but I wish I had a better muffler. Oh, and its too bad the tailpipe isn't also an intake valve (Its possible, I've seen videos on the Internet, just haven't gotten there in RL).

    5. Re:Just Like My First Time by drkim · · Score: 1

      On some models you can use the carb as an intake, but you make have choke issues...

    6. Re:Just Like My First Time by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I drove my car without using gloves and now I have a little RC car that I have to spend all my money on.

  3. maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they were using Windows 95 to control the display?

    1. Re:maybe by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      they were using Windows 95 to control the display?

      I think even Microsoft will avoid direct blame in this one. Expect 11 months of finger pointing, half-assed investigation, incriminations, recriminations, punishment of the innocent and promotion of non-participants.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:maybe by IAN · · Score: 1

      they were using Windows 95 to control the display?

      Or maybe Vista?

      (This seems oddly appropriate.)

    3. Re:maybe by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It was most likely just due to turning off the test mode. They were probably doing a last minute quick test to get the order correct. And forgot to put it into production delayed mode.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      they were using Windows 95 to control the display?

      Or maybe Vista?

      (This seems oddly appropriate.)

      Windows 8 consumer preview.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was most likely just due to turning off the test mode. They were probably doing a last minute quick test to get the order correct. And forgot to put it into production delayed mode.

      Ah - those sweet computers.

      Which brings up an issue I have with modern fireworks displays. In our community, they have a pretty big fireworks display on the 4th. Big enough that people come from fairly far away to see it. They have been trying to outdo their selves every year, so what was once a really nice fireworks show is now a VIP Pass and pay-for event, synchronized with radio, computer controlled extravaganza that takes hours to get out of, so half the people try to leave while the display is still going on. All those headlights do not add to the ambiance, rest assured. They have had computer problems also, having to restart the show, ans restarting some of the tunes to re-synchronize. As a joke, I noted that it was probably a acrobat reader, or HP printer update.

      Coupled with the "We are so damned great and awesome" ads and news stories for it, the whole event has become more of an ordeal than enjoyable.

      Then a year or two ago, I happened upon a private fireworks display with a couple families and their children. A few hundred rockets, and the children playing with sparklers. Completely hand done, no synchronized music or anything. I enjoyed that a whole lot more than the "Bigger and better than last year" events by a long shot. Since then, I seek out the small shows.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:maybe by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      I agree... I watched my city's hand-launched display this year at a park a couple of miles away and really enjoyed being able to focus on the fireworks themselves as they appeared, especially when an unexpected finale was launched as I walked home about five minutes after the show seemingly ended. In contrast, I find that the computer-controlled ones always seem overly predictable due to the precise time gaps between explosions, and their invariably slightly-out-of-sync (or seemingly unrelated) music distracts me rather than enhancing the experience.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    7. Re:maybe by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      A neighbor bought a couple fireworks "cakes" that have their own internal timing (I'd imagine by fuse), much like this one shown on YouTube. They didn't shoot all that high (maybe 40-50 feet max), and they only had two of them (probably because they are expensive), but for everyone with a direct line of sight, they're just as flashy as the fancy professional shows. A group of people with synchronized watches could put on a show with these, though of course they wouldn't sync up with music particularly well. Most of them weren't stupidly loud either. There were a couple big booms, but they were visually unimpressive and may have been misfires. Almost all of the powder charge went into flash and propulsion, which is how it should be.

      Get 20 people to chip in for some cakes, find a place where shooting them off is either legal or tolerated (the latter being the case here), and have your own awesome show!

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  4. I think we call that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...premature Californication....

    1. Re:I think we call that... by jamiesan · · Score: 2

      The only problem with instant gratification, is that it's too slow.

    2. Re:I think we call that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This goes nicely with that comment. http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/412210/jackin-it-in-san-diego

  5. Nothing unique....so I hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear that happens to every fireworks show at some point in its life. It just needs to relax, take some stress off and not worry about how it performs. Just enjoy the show.

    1. Re:Nothing unique....so I hear by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that the pyrotechnician should have put on a second condom before starting the show.

    2. Re:Nothing unique....so I hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, we're saying you should stop attempting funny posts and stick to sucking at Informative and Interesting.

    3. Re:Nothing unique....so I hear by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 2

      Worse is when you can't get the fuse to light, no matter how hot and sweaty the crowd is with anticipation. Much, much worse.

    4. Re:Nothing unique....so I hear by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      this year was at friend's house on foothills overlooking San Jose, CA. Though a couple places with legit fireworks, rest of city had continuous launches of fireworks and lots of explosions. This went on from sunset to late at night. I wish I brought my camera to post what I observed at elevation. I had to wonder amount of arsenal that was stockpiled in the city, all black market and bootlegs. California ain't like Florida with the big Fireworks Stores where anyone 18 and over can buy explosives, rockets, and all kinds ordance.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    5. Re:Nothing unique....so I hear by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      There's a little place just south of Cali called, Mexico... apparently they have a lot of fireworks and a fairly competent supply chain

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
  6. What are people complaining about? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea sounds awesome. The videos look awesome. They've all had probably a once in a lifetime experience. And the one guy in the article was complaining about having to pay for parking?

    1. Re:What are people complaining about? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I took your word for it and went to watch the video.
      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      It might be awesome into you're into seeing things get blown up or are easily impressed with anything that goes boom. But when entire families spend their day camped out on the waterfront after a drive of who knows how long and paying the exorbitant parking fees, you can bet your ass they'd be upset.

      They were expecting an artistically choreographed fireworks show -- not a Redneck BBQ.
      The only once in a lifetime experience I see here is that they can fondly look back at the year the 4th of July was a complete ripoff.

    2. Re:What are people complaining about? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can see an artistically choreographed fireworks show next year. They probably saw one last year. Around here they do one every Thursday, all summer. How often do you get to see what happens when all the fireworks go off at once?

      "The only once in a lifetime experience I see here is that they can fondly look back at the year the 4th of July was a complete ripoff."

      Strange how people getting a fireworks show for free can feel ripped off. Quite the sense of entitlement, hey?

    3. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange how people getting a fireworks show for free can feel ripped off.

      This. Strange how people think hundreds of thousands of dollars in explosives, timers, permits, and insurance equals free.

      Quite the sense of entitlement, hey?

      At the risk of claiming No True Scotsman, you must not pay taxes here in the USA, where we tax payers expect to celebrate the birthday of our nation with - PAID FOR WITH TAXES - fireworks shows.

      I would go on, but the first three letters of your handle are CEO. I'm going to take a stab in the dark and suggest you are merely upset that the panem et circenses didn't suppress the Serfs to your satisfaction.

    4. Re:What are people complaining about? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      I did think it was awesome! So it doesn't matter if it lasted 15 seconds or 15 minutes. And I say that coming from a city that boasts one of the top 10 firework displays in the nation. Ours lasted 30 minutes exactly and the finale was similar to that 15 seconds (though slightly longer). I'd prefer it be slightly shorter b/c you do get tired of the routine after a while.

    5. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know they were paid for with tax money, and not sponsored by local businesses?

      I'm not saying it's impossible but shouldn't you find out first?

    6. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange how people getting a fireworks show for free can feel ripped off. Quite the sense of entitlement, hey?

      Many fireworks shows are at taxpayer expense. In what meaning of the word free does "paid for by tax, by taxpayers" mean "free?" Now I'm not asserting this show was paid for by taxpayers, but unless you know otherwise, they likely did pay for it.

    7. Re:What are people complaining about? by lastx33 · · Score: 1

      Happened at a Bonfire Night show where I live and it was the best show they had put on in years. 20 minutes of fireworks in one minute. Very noisy though I would recommend it.

      --
      "You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead!" - Stan Laurel
    8. Re:What are people complaining about? by archen · · Score: 1

      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      That's a big part of the problem with them all going up at once. Within a few seconds the smoke clouds the fireworks. One of the biggest factors of a good fireworks display is allowing the smoke to disperse so you can see sparkles. That's why setting them off is done in progression, spaced in different parts of the sky, and why the biggest burst is the finally (no fireworks thereafter so smoke is no longer a factor).

    9. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite the sense of entitlement, hey?

      Welcome to America!

    10. Re:What are people complaining about? by Roachie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My sentiment exactly, Ordinarily I would refuse to sit in traffic and get all bunched up with lake people and their little cracker spawn for some shitty fireworks show.

      Now, if they would have said, "This year, we shoot the whole god dammed thing at once, just to see what it looks like". I would have driven to San Diego.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    11. Re:What are people complaining about? by glassware · · Score: 1

      It looked really cool in person. The glow was magnificent. It went on for what felt like much longer than the videos show.

    12. Re:What are people complaining about? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      a _big_ cloud of glowing in color smoke. it looks shit on video sure.. but I'd rather go to see that than a regular fireworks show.

      paying for fees to see a fireworks show though.. they got scammed. but technically they paid for parking - not the show . "haha". however the whole fireworks show was just a small bit of their whole day anyhow.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:What are people complaining about? by SlippyToad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      The Universe is pretty awesome, IMHO.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    14. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was paid for by SF city proper and the child was visiting from SC city, then his family didn't pay for it.

      If it was in SF, and he was in SF last year and will be in SF next year, then it wasn't "once in a lifetime", it was just "disappointing for a year".

      I cycled to SF for fireworks in 2005 iirc (from SC), it took 6 hours. The fireworks were probably nice, but SF was fogged in that year, so basically the clouds changed colors. It was about as useful a show as this one. If he's in the SF area, then the fireworks show he missed was KFOG KaBoom which ended in 2010 :(.

      He also missed an actual once in a lifetime fireworks show: Festival To Mark 75th Anniversary Of Golden Gate Bridge, although i suspect he can take his children to the 100th anniversary one if he's in town.

      There are at least 2 fireworks shows on July 7th:
      Cityhood Fireworks Celebration | Oakley | Saturday, July 7 – 6:00 pm | Cost: FREE | Freedom Basin
      Santa Clara | Great America Fireworks Show | Saturday, July 7 – 9:30 pm | Cost: $46.99* | Great America

      Yes, the SC show isn't free. Maybe his parents can drive him to Oakley? It's a bit further than just across the bay....

    15. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, just realized this was San Diego and not San Francisco.

      Seaworld has fireworks every night @9:50pm:
      https://www.seaworld.com/SitePage.aspx?PageID=115#FWSCHED

      there are probably other shows around...

    16. Re:What are people complaining about? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      allowing the smoke to disperse so you can see sparkles.

      Fuck sparkles. The sky was on fire!

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    17. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, people should be thrilled to see something that they don't want to see, because they've never seen it before. Completely logical.

    18. Re:What are people complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think taxpayers pay for these shows? The city doesn't pay for them. Local sponsors do dumbass.

    19. Re:What are people complaining about? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      With your definition of free, nothing ever will meet that defintion. As such, the word has no meaning at all, and should be given a new meaning so that the word could be used with meaning. I can see no logical reason why "free" would mean what you say, nor does anyone use it in that manner, other than a few ACs who try to prove a point that they never successfully prove.

    20. Re:What are people complaining about? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      It looked pretty good to me, and I'm sure it would have been even more impressive in person (fireworks on TV is never the same experience). Also, in the videos I watched the crowd was cheering wildly.

      In summary, remove the stick from your bum and lighten up.

    21. Re:What are people complaining about? by SJS · · Score: 1

      They can see an artistically choreographed fireworks show next year. They probably saw one last year. Around here they do one every Thursday, all summer. How often do you get to see what happens when all the fireworks go off at once?

      Every night during the summer SeaWorld has a fireworks show at 9:45.

      The only good reason to complain about this is if you didn't catch it.

      --
      Pick One: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~stremler/sigs/sigs.html (Note - disable Javascript first!)
  7. Common problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I know how my wife feels.

    1. Re:Common problem... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      You give her 15 seconds of fireworks so intense they can be seen in the next state?

      I don't think you need to worry about her cheating on you.

    2. Re:Common problem... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      but he only does it once a year

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:Common problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because Scientist discovered a substance that kills the sex drive in women so effective she only wants it once a year. I forget the scientific name for it, but the common street name is called wedding cake.

  8. You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/t) by pem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I said, n/t.

  9. SMPTE timecode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One possibility is that the show was run by SMPTE timecode and someone mistakenly either started the code at a late point in the show causing the firing system to "catch up". Another possibility is the timecode was played back at fast forward instead of normal speed.

    1. Re:SMPTE timecode by tiberus · · Score: 1

      Anyone know which firing system was being used? Was any part of it wireless? Were the barges tethered to tugs with their radars on?

      Even if you go with the assumption that the show was programmed and loaded correctly, there are a number of things that could have gone wrong both internal to the system and environmental that could have caused this. I'd be very interested to hear what the findings are of the 'investigation'. My money would be on being they never find out what caused the show to go all at once.

    2. Re:SMPTE timecode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll take: "Dumbass hardware engineers that think they know how to write software and didn't put any checks, verifications, safeties in place."

      I'm betting it was even properly debugged by checking the edge cases. Engineers are notorious for writing code like that. All engineers think they can be programmers, very few do it well.

    3. Re:SMPTE timecode by Applekid · · Score: 1

      I'll take: "Dumbass hardware engineers that think they know how to write software and didn't put any checks, verifications, safeties in place."

      I'm betting it was even properly debugged by checking the edge cases. Engineers are notorious for writing code like that. All engineers think they can be programmers, very few do it well.

      Maybe they were writing the software in imperial seconds instead of metric.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
  10. How is that not better? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    FIreworks displays always run too long, that one sounds like it would have been great.

    You could set them off over a period of 15 days, or 15 hours, or 15 minutes, or 15 seconds. How does is not get better as the time reduces?

    1. Re:How is that not better? by Hatta · · Score: 0

      You could eat a 20lb sack of potatoes over the same timeframes. How does that not get better as time reduces?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:How is that not better? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could eat a 20lb sack of potatoes over the same timeframes. How does that not get better as time reduces?

      The shorter the time frame, the more entertaining it is to watch someone try and devour 20lb of... well, anything.

      Otherwise, why bother timing eating contests?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:How is that not better? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I think a white ball of fire and smoke seems a bit boring. And judging from the youtube videos, it was.

      There's craft in doing a good show that's exciting enough, but also long enough to be impressive.

      You're right though, some try to spread too few fireworks over too long a show by choreographing it all really thin.

    4. Re:How is that not better? by tiberus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not always. Most customers (the folks who pay for the shows) want the longest show for the least money. I've worked show where we were launching one shell every three seconds in order to meet the show duration requested by the customer. Think this turned a nice 5 minute show into a painful 30 minute experience.

      How does is not get better as the time reduces?

      As time reduces you approach what we call a sky puke. Okay it's a lotta boom but, you really don't get to see much.

    5. Re:How is that not better? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Because enjoyment from eating isn't a function of quantity consumed per unit time. Whereas enjoyment of explosions is a function of energy release per unit time.

      Now obviously there are other factors, but that didn't come close to reaching the point at which there's enough bang per unit time to make more time better than more bang.

    6. Re:How is that not better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could eat a 20lb sack of potatoes over the same timeframes. How does that not get better as time reduces?

      Eating them ins't the problem, it's when the 20 lbs come out the other end that you'll wish you took your time. You'll even have some fireworks if you ate them with hot sauce.

    7. Re:How is that not better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the question might be if it would have been better to see all these shot off in the same small area over 15 seconds or geographically dispersed a bit so the different types of fireworks could somewhat be distinguished from each other. I think setting it up over a mile or so and setting it all off would have been better.

    8. Re:How is that not better? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Next time they do this, they should use 10x as many barges spread out nicely. Also relax the safety rules to allow more declination. They just dadaed up a new fireworks form. Call it blitz.

      Still not as cool as the Tennessee machine gun shoot finale. Miniguns rule.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:How is that not better? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Taking video of bright lights at night is notoriously difficult. The results are never as good as what the eyes (and other sensory organs) perceive while actually there.

  11. Disappointing by Aditya88 · · Score: 0

    It should be very disappointing to all the people who can to see a spectacular show..... small mistake costed a lot ..

  12. Orban, UK by Ginger_Chris · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-15611160

    I'd rather watch these short ones than be stood out in the rain (England) for hours.

    1. Re:Orban, UK by craigwilkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which bit of "scotland" in the URL you posted did you not understand?

    2. Re:Orban, UK by localman57 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can read it just fine. It's usally when the Scotts try to talk that I can't understand...

    3. Re:Orban, UK by sjames · · Score: 1

      I guess the Guy's ghost finally managed to get the kaboom he was looking for :-)

    4. Re:Orban, UK by cfc-12 · · Score: 1

      I can read it just fine. It's usally when the Scotts try to talk that I can't understand...

      At least we can spell.

    5. Re:Orban, UK by Inda · · Score: 0

      Scotland, just like Wales, is a county in England and that's the way we English like it.

      Shhh, be quiet, you all love England, our jobs, our money, our beer, our weather and our football (no, not you Taffy, back to your singing).

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    6. Re:Orban, UK by GodGell · · Score: 1

      At first I found it hilarious that there is apparently a town called Orban in the UK. Then after clicking the link, I found it hilarious that you accidentally added that 'r' in just the right place :) (I'm referring of course to the current "village idiot meets Stalin" of Central Europe, Viktor Orbán).

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    7. Re:Orban, UK by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Wha? Isn't Scotland part of the United Kingdom / Great Britain and NOT a part of England?

  13. Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...for fireworks to be like that, just constant rockets and explosions non-stop for 10-20 minutes. Why do fireworks shows limit their bursts to a Grand Finale?

    Put me in charge of destroying money like this, and I'll create a number of bursts that keep you watching for the entire show, leading up to a ridiculous ending worthy of shore shelling from the Iowa.

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the show in Austin, TX. It is a good thirty minutes of what most places consider a finale.

    2. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by toxonix · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I get bored unless I'm the one lighting them. Even then I'd rather see them go off all at one time in one big massive fireball.

    3. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Debris and smoke

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on the show. Those that are simulcast to music might have limitations on when/if they burst. Also I've done/seen shows that does ground effects at different times.

      Generally the budget I've seen is for a small city, one minute == $1000. Depending on the pacing at least one shell is being launched every 3rd second. That's 20 shells minimum if there are no multiples firing at the same time. $50 per shell including labor materials, other costs, etc. is what it boils down to. For a 30 min show, that's 600 shells.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 1

      Then again, it's the US. Finely crafted pyro shows? Who gives a damn - people just want to see big loud booms and call it a night. (And yes, they do make mortars whose sole purpose is to just make big loud booms...).

      Yes, well, in large metropolitan areas, 90% of the people watching your fireworks can't hear the music. So all that choreography is about as valuable to the viewers as the signature on a famous painting. However, 2-3 blocks away on a hill, I can hear your loud booms, and I'm hoping to.

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    6. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Stand at the top of Olympiaberg in Munich at midnight on NYE.

      The *entire* city is lit up with fireworks from pretty much every street, and it goes on for almost an hour.

      Beats *any* display I have ever seen or heard of, it's truly awesome.

    7. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 1

      I live in Los Angeles, all you need to do is find a hill. There's so much civil-disobedience around here w.r.t. lighting off rockets/mortars on the 4th that I'm suspecting most law enforcement is starting to just give up trying to cite people.

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    8. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At every major fireworks show I've been to, a local radio station was playing the music in sync to the firworks, so 99% of the people watching the fireworks can listen to the music if they care to.

    9. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 1

      If they did this in LA, they would run out of Radio Stations

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    10. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by SoothingMist · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Our local military base set theirs off all at once without even waiting for dark. It was a grand taxpayer-funded DoD display of "shock and awe". :) What happened was that a vicious storm was approaching and they did not want to leave all those explosives out in the open.

    11. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Thing is, in Munich, it's legal so the density of fireworks above the city it immense. Also, there are no skyscrapers there which just adds to the effect.

      Are there any hills in LA that would tower over even the highest skyscraper there?

    12. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 1

      Well, there's these mountains only to the north that get Snow each winter. The tallest of them topping out at 3300 meters or so. They're about 20km away from Downtown Los Angeles, but easily viewable from anywhere on a clear day.

      Also, Los Angeles skyscrapers are a tiny island surrounded by an ocean of single family homes. They don't tower over the city, the city expanse dwarfs the skyscrapers.

      There are quite a few hills interspersed in the municipalities, but the rich people have generally claimed them as places for mansions overlooking the city lights.

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    13. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LA construction is mostly an endless blanket of low-rise apartments and single houses. There is a small cluster of skyscrapers called downtown, mainly offices, not much residential, which is the part they always show in helicopter fly-over shots in movie intros. It does not play a central role comparable to NY Times Square or such.
      Best fireworks view we ever has was driving on the 110/105 intersection, it's pretty elevated.

    14. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, then it could work I suppose.

      The mountain thing would not work though, tooo far away and too high! With the Munich idea, Olympiaberg is right in the thick of it :)

    15. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Simulcast to the Ramones, hey ho, let's go!

    16. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever visited Valencia, Spain, in the third week of March? I think you'd enjoy it.

    17. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Is Munich a bone dry tinder box? There's the difference.

      I'm as much a pyro as most geeks. I had to put it away in CA. S CA is worse. We should unofficially reschedule the 4th of july to the 4th of Jan.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They worry more about firearms shot in the air, which do occasionally kill innocents. The fireworks laws are mainly to discourage and for insurance exemptions (you burned down your house with an illegal negligent act, no payout for you).

    19. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fireworks are only visually impressive when you are up close, so they take up a good part of your field of view.

      Where I grew up, we could climb a 1000 foot ridge and see about four different professional fireworks shows in different directions, but the largest bursts had perhaps half the angular width as a full moon. You think you're going to see a massive fire ball and instead it's that damn kid and his little red balloon.

      To be honest, I've seen more impressive displays of palm trees swaying over the skyline, and they weren't even on fire.

    20. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by tom17 · · Score: 1

      That was my point, though maybe badly explained, with the Munich one. When up Olympiaberg, you *are* up close and personal and it's all around you, as far as you can reasonably see.

  14. No Sound by David89 · · Score: 1

    The video in TFA has no sound...

    --
    Track IP - Remotely track the IP address of a machine via email or MySQL.
    1. Re:No Sound by David89 · · Score: 1

      My bad... Didn't fully RTFA

      --
      Track IP - Remotely track the IP address of a machine via email or MySQL.
    2. Re:No Sound by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Scroll down. there's another video with sound.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Decimal Poine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place
    or something. Shit. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane
    detail.

    1. Re:Decimal Poine by hey! · · Score: 1

      That'll teach you to write system control code in archaic Fortran, a language which has both auto-declared variables and space intolerant keywords. That's the only language where you can write (do10i=1.100) (assigning new float variable "do10i" a value of 1.1) when you meant "do 10 i = 1,100" (repeat line 10 with i taking values from 1 to 10).

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Decimal Poine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Random Guy 1: So.. this "Sleep();" function takes seconds right?
      Random Guy 2: Let me check this on the command line...
      Random Guy 2: Yes, looks like it does!

    3. Re:Decimal Poine by 0racle · · Score: 1

      No, it would appear that you replaced a 't' with an 'e'

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  16. Milliseconds instead of seconds? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe the timings were in milliseconds instead of seconds (or a new version of the software suddenly thought they were). Now, 30 minutes of fireworks gets done in 1.8 seconds. But since fuses take a couple seconds and some are longer than others, you get a total of 15 seconds.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    1. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      You just need to keep up... fast times we're living in!

      They probably sync them all through a blasting fast cloud computer!

    2. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it just demonstrates the well-known fact that concurrent programs are hard to debug.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by Locutus · · Score: 2

      from what I read, they uploaded a configuration right before the show which sets the timing sequence for the entire show. On 3 out of the 4 launch systems which received the upload the control system immediately launched everything at once. The originating timing software could have saved a sequence file with incorrect seconds timing but what is obvious is that they do not test or validate the sequence file before accepting it. At the very least they don't check for out of bounds events like launching more than X number of mortars in Y seconds without validation.

      They can blame it on the "device" but it looks like a software glitch and hopefully it's at the application level and not something like an OS BSOD. Wouldn't it suck if the uploaded sequence file crashed the app _and_ the OS and garbage went out to the trigger unit causing the simultaneous launch.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      What was the interface? Most likely midi would be my guess. Though I suppose it could have been RS232 too. In any event, I don't see too many applications throw windows for a BSOD using either of those interfaces. At worst, the application bombs out. But with Windows XP on up, not likely. It might have been Windows 95 for all we know. A stand-alone PC they drag out once a year and upload a config.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by darkonc · · Score: 1
      It's more like seconds per minute. Either it's dropped bits (64 times the speed) or someone specified beats/second instead of beats/minute. either one of those errors would give roughly the result seen.

      You can see them going off in sequence... It's just way too fast.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    6. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      no idea of the OS let alone the version or even the protocol to transmit the config. What I do know is that these running the show ran this same show a dozen or so times before running this one, they run hundreds of shows per year. I doubt rs232 is what they used considering they had 4 barges along a few miles and out in the middle of San Diego Bay( video/pictures and article story told us that ). Probably some wireless transport.

      as for BSOD's, we just saw the OS locking up on the MS Surface demo and XP BSOD'ing is not all that rare. No idea about Vista nor Windows 7 since any new machines just got those wiped off.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    7. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The timing might have been uploaded as timestamps. If one byte was missed in the data stream (due to jitter in transmission), it could have overflowed every timestamp if using signed numbers, or giving a very small number if unsigned. Either way, if the timestamps were all in the past, then they would all fire at once to catch up.

      They should have a checksum on the whole configuration in addition to validation on the values.

  17. Ponderings by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you were able to slow the playback of the audiences ooooohhhhhhs and aaaaaaahhhhhhhs, counted them, would they have been perfectly synchronized and in lock step with each burst?

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  18. NOT NEWS by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 0

    This is seriously not news. This kind of accident happens all the time with fireworks shows. How this got on to the front page of Slashdot I'll never know.

    1. Re:NOT NEWS by jovius · · Score: 2

      Outsourcing?

    2. Re:NOT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is seriously not news. This kind of accident happens all the time with fireworks shows. How this got on to the front page of Slashdot I'll never know.

      So what's it like working at Garden State Fireworks?

    3. Re:NOT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell by your UID that you're new to Slashdot. If this crosses the line for you, may as well leave now. It's clearly tech related, and I thought the story was hilarious. It's the first time I've laughed so hard I cried in a long time. It's one of the biggest fireworks shows in the country. They had buses and shuttles to handle the crowds (hundreds of thousands of people). Hotels even had special rates so that people could watch the show from their rooms. This is a comedy gold mine, but KillJoy McGee over here wants to bitch.

      More stories like this, and less about fucking Obamacare.

    4. Re:NOT NEWS by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing?

      You mean to India and China? Well, they already have the missiles, re-aiming all of them at California shouldn't be a problem.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:NOT NEWS by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      It got on TV news too.. so if it suffices for their news (at least the time waster at the end of the news), it at least qualifies for 'idle' here, IMHO.

  19. I can explain that by geekoid · · Score: 1

    People make mistakes, and nothing is perfect.

    Next.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I can explain that by jd · · Score: 2

      The easy solution is to have 30x as many fireworks and then run it at this speed all the time.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  20. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ugh.

    Don't do that. No one reads the comment subjects. When you stick the whole message there, you just look like an idiot.

  21. Three words... by NeroTransmitter · · Score: 0

    Big Red Button!

    --
    ^ Probably Sarcasm...
  22. Blame it on faster than light neutrinos . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    . . . or it was an Imperial Units / Metric System mix up again.

    Metric System: meters per second.

    Imperial Units: furloughs per fortnight.

    I always buy Metric System fireworks . . . that go up to 11.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Blame it on faster than light neutrinos . . . by gawaino · · Score: 1

      I think you might mean furlongs (approx 1/5 km) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_system Although with some business cost-cutting measures, "furloughs per fortnight" as a metric doesn't sound that far-fetched nowadays.

  23. Saw it happen once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in college I saw something similar. It was a sticky hot 4th of July evening. Just as the show was starting a big thunderstorm moved in. When they shot the first couple of rockets up, big flashes of lightning arced through the clouds in response. It was pretty impressive. They decided to shoot everything off at once, one after another; fireworks, thunder claps, lightning, all at once. It was totally awesome. Then it started to rain and all the braless coeds in tee-shirts had to walk back to campus. One of the better displays I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Saw it happen once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cool story bro.

    2. Re:Saw it happen once by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      One of the better displays I've ever seen.

      Which part?

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    3. Re:Saw it happen once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need to ask that question, it's time you stepped out of the basement and check out some three-dimensional women.

  24. Terrorists by master_kaos · · Score: 1

    This was clearly an act of terrorism, trying to ruin a joyful event of 1/2 million people. 1/2 million people * 18 minutes = 17 years. They just wasted 17 years worth of time! FUCKING TERRORISTS

  25. It happened here, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing happened in Edmonton (a capital city), Alberta (Canada) a few years ago.

    Thing to remember is that fireworks are typically triggered electronically...o RIGHT electronics never fail. What was I thinking.

  26. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read it.

  27. Lots of WTF in that story by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Informative

    San Diego fireworks show exploded in 15 seconds, ruining show

    Well.....

    Best part about #bigbayboom fail is that EVERYONE has always wondered what would happen if all fireworks went off at once," tweeted @richandcreamy.

    There we go. That's more accurate, lol. I think "ruining the show" is a bit harsh :-P

    By the way...

    "I waited 3hrs in the cold and payd $12 for parking & got one little explosion?" tweeted @aj521z.

    What ****ing planet is this person from?! It is NOT COLD in San Diego at the moment at any time of day.

    1. Re:Lots of WTF in that story by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      > What ****ing planet is this person from?! It is NOT COLD in San > Diego at the moment at any time of day.

      answer: San diego

      I assume you don't know many people in hot climates. I used to chat with some people in Florida. Every year they would be talking about how cold it is and needing to "bundle up" because its so cold..... then I would check and it would be just under 70 F down there... while I am going outside with the wind whipping 20 F air at me.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:Lots of WTF in that story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a complementary anecdote, I was in Northern Scotland when it was about 20 C outside. They were complaining about the heat.

    3. Re:Lots of WTF in that story by pgn674 · · Score: 1

      National Weather Service says it was 66 to 64 F.

    4. Re:Lots of WTF in that story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only $5 to ride the trolley. I'm guessing they only paid $12 because they didn't want to walk any amount of distance in the freezing cold. Freezing cold being 50 something that it gets near SD bay after sundown.

    5. Re:Lots of WTF in that story by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      When I was in school I had a roomate from vermont. He used to walk to class, through the snow, in flipflops, wearing shorts and a t-shirt.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  28. Killjoy. It was awesome!!! by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    There's tons of great video and it's funny as hell. Nobody was hurt except the profession reputations of the fireworks people.

    Your sense of humor. Go work on it.

  29. Plagiarism in summary by fotoguzzi · · Score: 2

    (Submitter here.) I should have put quote marks around the portion of the sentence about signals and introductions. I meant to, but after multiple previews I still forgot. It took me fifteen seconds to submit this story....

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  30. bad translation in hardware maybe by v1 · · Score: 1

    Launch All Zerg

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  31. Metric system people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If people would just convert to the metric system, this whole disaster could have been avoided.

  32. Testing Circuit Failure? by weiserfireman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Electric matches on the circuits take 5 milliamps to ignite them.

    After the fireworks are loaded and wired up, testing is done to identify matches that aren't wired up right. Is there a chance that the testing process failed. On computer systems, it is pretty automated and happens fast. If the test resistor wasn't in the circuit properly, it might look like that.

    Notes
    I am a BATF licensed pryotechnician.
    I assist with a small show every year (our last night went flawlessly)
    I have never worked with a computer fired circuit

    1. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by PPH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Electric matches on the circuits take 5 milliamps to ignite them.

      That's a bit low (see: http://www.pyromate.com/Basics-of-Electrical-Firing.htm). 5 mA sounds like the test current.

      It's going to be an interesting investigation. Most modern pyrotechnic controllers incorporate a shorting system to keep the squibs from being fired inadvertently by static electricity or single point control failures. To fire each circuit, the safety shunt must be removed and then the firing voltage applied. That's two failures at the lower level of the controller. And on every circuit simultaneously. I doubt it.

      From the video, it appears that the fault was common to three separate sites. They almost certainly used (at least) one controller at each location, tied together through somee communications network to a central control unit handling the timing. My money is on a software failure at that central point.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by CatBandit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agree on this. This is a test procedure with firing currents instead of test currents.

      I designed the electrical and sofware part of a Firing System, and the matches needed much more than 100mA to fire, the 5mA seems on the test range.

      In our case our circuit tested the whole show in just a few seconds like this (each match every 0.05 or 0.1s). So if firing current (>>100mA) was applied a faulty test would do this.

      But because of this (this is also an economical disaster for the company), the test procedure is hardware forced with low current, with redundant circuits that block that disable the firing current by two or more ways by different systems, that means, that software and hardware must enable the fire.

      As this fired at the three places at the same time, this seems a completely software plattform with no apparent HW securities... bad idea.

    3. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by CatBandit · · Score: 2

      Just add that this is an economical disaster, but more important a security disaster, imagine someone near the fires looking for the cabling when they did the test.

    4. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by 91degrees · · Score: 3

      But nobody was, and this isn't surprising. Pyrotechnics people have a very belt-and-braces approach to safety. If you're going anywhere near the explosives, the power is off.

    5. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by CatBandit · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on this.

      The people I worked for, would never be near the fireworks during test procedures.

    6. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My money is on a software failure at that central point.

      They obviously forgot to run date -s "`date`" after the leap second was applied.

    7. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by cusco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on your pyrotechnics people. When I lived there Traverse City, MI, used to go withe the lowest bidder for their Cherry Festival fireworks. We lived two blocks from the National Maritime Academy pier where they launch from, and would walk down and watch the fireworks from the park there. In either '95 or '94 the bozos they had contracted somehow trashed their control board and proceeded to run the whole program by hand. This consisted in a guy walking up and down the pier with a FLARE setting off random fireworks in no particular order.

      This was amusing to watch, and even more amusing to hear the idiots nearby commenting on how wonderfully they were choreagraphing the fireworks to the radio station they were listening to, until all of a sudden the guy tossed his flare in the water, covered his head and ran like hell. A few seconds later one of the larger shells went off **in the mortar**, showering us with sparks and setting off a dozen or more fireworks at once. That turned out to be our "finale", except for those of us who were close enough to the company's trailer and got to listen to the worker tell his bosses to go fuck themselves because he was NOT going back out on that dock with another flare.

      I think they've abandoned the lowest bidder habit, at least for the fireworks display.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    8. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by g1zmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a licensed pyrotechnician (FPO) in Texas.

      (Hand-fired) reload shows are still done to this day, mostly because they are cheaper and the customer naturally wants to pay as little as possible. It's also how it was done when my grandpa first got into the business in the 50's.

      The last two shows I did were reload shows, and yes, it is basically just the shooter walking up and down the line of mortars buried in the ground touching a fusee (a.k.a. road flare) to the quickmatch fuses. Running behind the shooter are his helpers with armloads of live shells, dropping them down into the empty mortars that often still have smouldering paper in the bottom. It's quite a rush, and although I personally prefer an electronic show, there are plenty of adrenaline junkies who won't do anything other than hand-fired shows.

      Starting in the 70's you would see shows fired electronically, with a master control box where the shooter hits a switch for each shot in the show. This was the era when choreographed shows starting becoming possible. Many shows are still done this way. Nowadays lots of shows are computer-controlled with a laptop and an RS-232 (or other) connection in place of the shooter and switch panel.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    9. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh hem...

      > Running behind the shooter are his helpers with armloads of live shells

      If they're running, you need more helpers or a slower firing pace.

      My reload team *walks* from the ready area to the racks, with no more than 2 shells each (one per hand). Any more, and you're likely to drop some and crack the casings. But we run a show with the hand-launched shells interspersed with electrically-fired cakes and other ground stunts, so there's time to reload the main tube line.

      Of course, nothing helps with the small mountain of post-show paperwork and reports I have to generate...

  33. Oh, That was the GROUND wire! by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    Voltage exerted on a ground wire can do silly things to pyrotechnics.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  34. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Leper! Outcast! Unclean!

  35. The real explanation by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meriadoc Brandybuck, and Peregrin Took - I might have known!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  36. Shit! I always do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. Shit! I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail.

  37. California must really be broke by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    They're crowdsourcing the investigation on Slashdot?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  38. Not surprised by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Funny

    Among the accomplishments listed on the Garden State Fireworks (pyrotechnics company responsible for the show) web site:

    Statue of Liberty Bicentennial Celebration

    That time, they managed to shoot off the show a whole century early!

  39. Human error by bhlowe · · Score: 0

    Almost certainly operator error... I bet one of the operators thought it would be a good idea to do a last minute reboot (sync the clocks one more time?), hit a "reset all" button, or even made a last minute tweak to the control software. The vendor says they are looking into it, but there is at least one dude who started swearing after their mistake.

    Huge bummer for those with kids.. (My kids are too young to stay up late so we watched a few high-def YouTube videos of fireworks on the TV.)

  40. Software bug maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the controling software?
    Windows, Linux, or Apple based?

  41. Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have designed the electronics and software of a fireworks firing system for a company that does regular shows here in Catalonia/Spain.

    Believe me, experienced people are very cautious in everything they do, but unexperienced people can make big mistakes if they are overconfident in a black box system that will do everything for them.

    In one point specifications said:

    -The firing system must make an autotest for each circuit for the team to check all connections are in place.

    They test the firing circuits of the fireworks several times before the show to fire all the material. In our case it was done exciting the fuses (sorry I'm not native english) with a safe very low current to see if the fuse is electrically present, and the inspections does a check of a circuit every 0.05s, so you can check the entire show in a few seconds.

    For me this seems the check was done with full current on the circuits which fired all the fireworks during this test procedure.

    It's quite surprising to have someone design a system that lets this happen from my point of view, in our case we made the circuits impossible (due hardware to redundant hardware switches and circuits) to excite to fire during the test (there are various physical limiter).

    So... it seems someone who had not enought experience with fireworks managed to build his system and convince this people to use it... but its surprising, it's a pretty conservative people, at least the ones I know.

    1. Re:Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that informative post; it probably took you a while since you're not a native English speaker. Your English is fine.

    2. Re:Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      (Submitter again.) Concur. Great English and a reasonable answer to the question. When I submitted, I was thinking that the top fireworks people would be akin to the small community of building demolition specialists. Maybe not!

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    3. Re:Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by tragedy · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is called a continuity test in the fireworks shows and model rocketry events I've participated in. They're notorious for accidentally launching the whole show, especially with people's custom gear. The annoying thing about a continuity test is that none of the regulations and organizations that require one, seem to provide any guidance or references on how a continuity test should be properly carried out. As a procedure it strikes me as about a good idea of stopping at all railroad crossings. I don't think I've ever heard of a car being hit by a train where the vehicle didn't either stall on the tracks or the driver actually saw the train but decided to race it.

    4. Re:Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by jroysdon · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the laws in other states, but in California all large passenger vehicles (buses) have to stop prior to railroad crossings, open their doors and look left and right down the tracks (and presumably listen for a train).

      Agree or disagree, that is the law here.

      So I was riding the bus home one day (years ago, while saving to by a car for cash) and the bus driver failed to notice a set of train tracks (industrial area where you can't see the tracks except right in the road). So the driver hits the breaks *on the tracks* and opens the door, looks down the tracks (mind you, it's about 20 feet behind her, with the middle of the bus over the tracks), and then keeps going. Epic logic fail. You already broke the law, and now you're potentially endangering lives stopping on the tracks.

  42. No, you make people wonder about what they missed by obarthelemy · · Score: 0

    Ain't it ?

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  43. Does Michael Bay happen to live in San Diego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could explain a lot.

  44. Fire One by smurd · · Score: 5, Informative

    A am a pryotechnician that works exclusively with computer fired shows. From what I'm hearing on the mailing lists so far, they were using the Fire One controller. We also use them (we have over 100 modules at $795 each). I haven't been involved in the "Loading" of the show into the embedded controller for the past few years, but I was called into action about 3 years ago when we had the same problem with our "semi automatic" shows (press a button for each event). I found there was an additional step when downloading the show from the PC to the firing controller called "Assign Delays" that had to be manually entered when loading. Without that step, all shells for each event fired immediately. I don't know if Fire One ever fixed it because it's now part of our written checklist for loading and we haven't had a problem since, and Fire One is notorious for fixing a problem with one customer, updating the firrmware but not telling the rest of their customer base that there is an update.

    If you are using Fire One, you can thank me for the new Line receivers in the new modules, I had to go to the plant and show them the problem.

    1. Re:Fire One by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      Fire One is notorious for fixing a problem with one customer, updating the firrmware but not telling the rest of their customer base that there is an update.

      Glad I'm not the only one that does that. Our emails to customers typically go along the lines of "this update contains several changes and bug fixes, some of which you might notice."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Fire One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      While looking at their web site I found this quote:

      "FireOne is the only system in the world capable of firing multiple firing modules and multiple cues completely simultaneously - zero time dispertion between firings. The system can simultaneously fire any number of Firing Modules"

      Found at this URL: "http://www.fireone.com/system_spec.htm"

    3. Re:Fire One by smurd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, Don't get my above rant wrong, Fire One is the best system, really the only system out there for firing large shows. I use all of the others, but they are the only ones out there that can handle large pyromusicals (I.E. > 2000 cues).

      It has more then enough juice to fire an entire module (32 cues) at once, and that is a good thing for mine fronts, set peices etc... We need and want that feature.

      I'll be back at the magazines tomorrow and want to run a test - I'm thinking if you either forget to assign delays, or assign them twice for a fully scripted show, you will have the same result.

      As far as I know, there are no commercially available products out there that will let you test ematches with firepower on (the Capacitive Discharge circuit) powered, so I'm pretty sure it's not a testing issue.

      Even though Garden State is a competitor, I feel for those guys, We've had our share of learning curves too.

    4. Re:Fire One by smurd · · Score: 1

      Wow, it would be nice if we even Got an email.
      It typically goes like this:
      We call Fire One and tell them we had a problem.
      They say: Oh yeah, we fixed that one 3 updates ago, send in all 100 of your modules and we'll upgrade them for the low, low, price of $195 each.

    5. Re:Fire One by geekoid · · Score: 0

      So what do the computers do?
      Do you just set timing, connect the pyro to a relay then connect the relay to the computer? And I imagin an emergency interrupt.

      Or is there some other pyrotechnic deal that needs to be done that I ma not aware of?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Fire One by PPH · · Score: 1

      In other words: Its a feature, not a bug.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Fire One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire One ? It should be rebranded to "Fire All"

  45. the video ... by mbaGeek · · Score: 1
    --
    It ain't what they call you. It's what you answer to. http://mylyceum.us/
  46. Spinal Tap? by yotto · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they were thinking minutes but programming in seconds.

    All they needed to fix it was a bunch of people dancing around really fast. Nobody'd notice.

  47. Can anyone suggest how such a trivial step could. by stcm · · Score: 1

    Can anyone suggest how such a trivial step could go so disastrously wrong?" WINDOWS

  48. lack of testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figure it's not possible to really test these things. And anything that hasn't been tested is broken by definition.

  49. In other words, it's like sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, it's like sex

  50. Blame it on javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy doing that was trying node.js instead of C because it is hip. Unfortunately he forgot that javascript measures delays in miliseconds. Also non-blocking programming is new with him.

  51. Re:Re:N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ain't it, what??

  52. The best video I've seen of this (most are overexp by CalRobert · · Score: 1

    Most of the videos are of a large, panoramic view and grossly overexposed, so you can't see much. This one is a much, much better picture. http://youtu.be/4ifn8LJl5n0

  53. As a child I was shocked & awed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you should consider a second career, like Secretary of Defense or Shiva Destroyer of Nations.

  54. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said nothing because no one can bother to read idiots who put text in subject line.

  55. Big Bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big bang?

  56. Feature, not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this quote on the FireOne web site:

    "FireOne is the only system in the world capable of firing multiple firing modules and multiple cues completely simultaneously - zero time dispertion between firings. The system can simultaneously fire any number of Firing Modules"

    On this page: http://www.fireone.com/system_spec.htm

  57. Failure? by jmerlin · · Score: 1

    That was EPIC. I've seen so many fireworks shows and they're always the exact same. Pop. A few more pops. Bam. Some silence.. pop pop. A few fancy looking fireworks. Repeat for 20 minutes. Then unleash 20 things at once and call it a finale.

    What I always want to see is EVERYTHING going off at once. That's some shit you don't forget, like when a bottle-rocket falls over and comes flying at you, you know?

    1. Re:Failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was EPIC. I've seen so many fireworks shows and they're always the exact same. Pop. A few more pops. Bam. Some silence.. pop pop. A few fancy looking fireworks. Repeat for 20 minutes. Then unleash 20 things at once and call it a finale.

      What I always want to see is EVERYTHING going off at once. That's some shit you don't forget, like when a bottle-rocket falls over and comes flying at you, you know?

      I hate 20 minute displays. I used to do professional pyro and the guideline we used for a show was £1000/minute. Its better to do a 4-5 minute display with lots going on than 20-30 minutes with only a few fireworks to use each minute (although we once did a 15-minute show at the £1000/minute intensity for some rich guy - THAT was awesome.)

  58. Re:Re:N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, me, this moment.

  59. Re:Save dogs, don't do fireworks by cusco · · Score: 1

    Lazy bastard, work with your poor dogs to get them over their fear of unexpected noises. Yes, it will inconvenience you a little bit, well maybe a lot if you've let it go on long enough to become a phobia, but you'll improve thier quality of life dramatically. July 4 isn't the only day of the year when a loud noise happens unexpectedly, if your dogs don't know how to deal with it the next roof replacement or road work in your neighborhood is going to terrify them. It's not rocket science, either, my dad was dealing with gun-shy hunting dogs half a century ago. If he can do it with nothing more than a bag of Purina and a couple boxes of .410 shells you should be able to.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  60. I think it was more like 17 seconds. by darkonc · · Score: 1

    That would be 18minutes / 64.
    I.e. somebody slipped a few bits in setting the rhythm for the show timing.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  61. I was there, and it was fantastic! by Impish · · Score: 2
    We were up on Clairemont Mesa so we could watch a bunch of the firework shows around the San Diego bay area. When the downtown one went off it was spectacular. The horizon lit up for 5 - 10 seconds and the sound was wonderful! Everybody immediately started to check twitter to see what had happened and we all talked about it for 1/2 hr while we waited for the other firework displays to go off.

    We watched two more displays (yawn) and you know the only one anybody is talking about? Yup, the one that all went off at the same time. You know which ones I'll be telling as a great story for years to come? Yup, the one that screwed up. Do you think anybody cares what the Sea World fireworks looked like July 4 2012? No, no they don't. Hell, I forgot them 10 minutes after they were finished.

    The screw up was fantastic to watch and I'll still tell people about it years later: "Ever wonder what it would look and sound like if they all went off at the same time? Been there, witnessed that."

    So it sucks people paid to park and sat in the chilly evening, but c'mon, now you have a great story. Nobody would care to hear about the fireworks if they had worked!

  62. Obligatory meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "First world problems"

  63. Re:Save dogs, don't do fireworks by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    It is a troll. You aren't going to advance awareness by telling people you disagree with to burn in hell.

    I think that pets need to be trained to handle loud noises because loud noises are going to happen. Cars backfire, thunderstorms, etc.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  64. Bada bing, ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... bada boom!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  65. Re:Can anyone suggest how such a trivial step coul by geekoid · · Score: 1

    seriously? windows is your reply?

    What a dipshit.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. This is what happens by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you use det cord between shells rather than using time fuse.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  67. Re:Save dogs, don't do fireworks by kthreadd · · Score: 1

    I don't have any dogs (or other animals for that matter), just happen to have many neighbors with scared dogs. For some reason cats seams to do much better.

    Sorry for the bad language, I was in a particular bad mood. One of them is at the vet since their dog wouldn't stop shaking after the fireworks and I was upset about it. It truly is torture for these poor souls.

  68. Re:Save dogs, don't do fireworks by kthreadd · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the bad language. I was in a particular bad mood, had just come home and found out that one of my neighbors is at the vet since their dog wouldn't stop shaking after the fireworks ended. For some reason it had been fine previously but I guess age or something else had set in. I was very upset at the moment but should have controlled my language better.

  69. Saw One LONG before computer control by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    I remember a similar type of show back in the late 1960's and I think it was on the 4th of July too. No computer control back then, but I think they might have been electrically fired from a console. The show was staged on top of Stone Mountain about 12 miles East of Atlanta Georgia. There was some sort of glitch in the electrical circuits or there might have been some induced current from lightning some distance away. In any case it looked like the top of the rock was erupting, which might be a fitting show for what was the magma chamber of a long gone volcano.

  70. Just think ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    These people could have been the ones who built the control system for our ICBM network.

    "How about a nice game of chess, Doctor Falken?"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  71. Re:Save dogs, don't do fireworks by cusco · · Score: 1

    My reaction was probably excessive as well, but it really annoys me that so many people get a dog and then won't go to the trouble of learning how to help them get through something that happens every year. A lot of people seem to think of their dog as a small person with four feet that they can reason with, which is stupid. They're dogs, they see things and understand things differently that we do, they need to learn how to do things that we might take for granted, and if the 'owner' can't be bothered to learn that they aren't being fair to the dog.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  72. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about San Diego fireworks show? Note: these are messages are read all over the WORLD.

  73. Re:Save dogs, don't do fireworks by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    That is awful! I hope their dog is OK.

    On the topic of firework noise, a lot of people do the wrong things when their pets start acting scared. There is a lot of good information here that might be helpful. One common mistake is to physically or verbally comfort the pet, this trains them to play up their fear.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  74. Reminds me of the first time getting laid. by utkonos · · Score: 1

    That's totally what happened when I lost my virginity.