Slashdot Mirror


Modest Proposal For Stopping Hackers: Get Them Girlfriends

kierny writes "Hackers/crackers who get arrested are typically male and young adults — if not minors. Why is that? According to research by online psychology expert Grainne Kirwan, it's because the typical hacker 'ages out' once they get a girlfriend, job, kids, and other responsibilities that make it difficult to maintain their hacking/cracking/hacktivist lifecycle. Could that finding offer a way to help keep more young hacking enthusiasts out of jail?"

96 of 566 comments (clear)

  1. obligatory reference by leaen · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dated a robot

    1. Re:obligatory reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Sony;

      You have put out almost nothing but shitty, proprietary crap for over a decade now. Your music CDs install rootkits on computers. You remove advertised features from the PS3. You sue people who have committed no crime just to shut them up. In response, you've been under relentless assault from hackers.

      This will continue until you change your ways, or you get us girlfriends. Either way, we're cool.

      -Anonymous

    2. Re:obligatory reference by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      After what you describe Sony as:

      put out almost nothing but shitty, proprietary crap for over a decade

      music CDs install rootkits on computers

      sue people who have committed no crime just to shut them up

      You still trust the quality of girlfriend(s) that Sony might get for you?

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    3. Re:obligatory reference by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

      I dated a robot

      My girlfriend is a Hacker and looks like Angelina Jolie

      Pics or it didn't happen !!
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    4. Re:obligatory reference by Evil+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny

      You still trust the quality of girlfriend(s) that Sony might get for you?

      You'll be hoping for a root kit but you'll just get viruses.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    5. Re:obligatory reference by davester666 · · Score: 2

      The outward quality of the girlfriend will probably be pretty good, but I would be really worried about the rootkit she installs...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is as retarded as the last story. Timothy must be taking his stupid pills today.

    1. Re:Wow by NerdmastaX · · Score: 5, Funny

      agreed.. if this continues i might as well go back to cnn.

    2. Re:Wow by Jobless+Fellatio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The story is completely true, tho.. Happened to me and many of my friends. Exactly as late teens, and then we got girlfriends.

    3. Re:Wow by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      That happened to me, then I left her and wound up with a girl who's willing to put up with my spending most of my free time in the basement cuddling with my server rack.

    4. Re:Wow by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems to be a very slow news day. Isn't that when someone posts an inflammatory article about Obamacare, AGW or evolution?

      Why doesn't Timothy go all the way and merge this with the next inevitable Raspberry Pi article?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you went back to your mom?

    6. Re:Wow by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, he went back to your mom.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    7. Re:Wow by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Funny

      Raspberry Pi used to mine BitCoins to fight AGW

      That's the next article I'm looking for.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    8. Re:Wow by ciderbrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tea, meet monitor, monitor meet tea. :)

    9. Re:Wow by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, here's the question:

      Did your girlfriend stop you hacking, or did something else stop your hacking and the increased social interaction landed you the girlfriend?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Wow by PerfectionLost · · Score: 2

      They don't have girlfriends, they have hoes.

    11. Re:Wow by jamiesan · · Score: 2

      drop Tea

      get No Tea

    12. Re:Wow by Creepy · · Score: 2

      Worked for me too. Stopped pirating software as well (as in cracking it). The other key was getting a day job where my disposable income made cracking/trading software a silly pastime, and all the expensive software I like to play with I already have at work (like CAD software). Note to FBI - I was a minor at the time and the statute of limitations should be way past by now. Also please don't kill me.

    13. Re:Wow by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did your girlfriend stop you hacking, or did something else stop your hacking and the increased social interaction landed you the girlfriend?

      In my case, she didn't do anything specific to stop my hacking, beyond existing. We have only a finite amount of time. Given the choice between hacking (it was called "cracking" back then, but whatever) or fucking a hot girl, I chose fucking.

      But isn't it just that way with us? The little head always overriding the big one?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    14. Re:Wow by readin · · Score: 2

      There is a good reason why polygamous societies are less stable and more violent than monogamous societies. Keeping young males out of trouble by allowing them to find a girlfriend or wife has long been recognized as good for society. Restricting men to marrying at most one wife makes it possible for more men to find a girlfriend or wife.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    15. Re:Wow by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

      No matter how you look at it, girlfriends cost a lot of time.

      Yeah, but you can't have sex with your computer.., at least, not YET...

    16. Re:Wow by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      drop Tea

      get No Tea

      I enjoyed the mud too much and died :(

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  3. The Girlfriend(tm) by happy_place · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Girlfriend(tm) could solve a lot of problems young adolescent males have... someone should patent that...

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
    1. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by cpu6502 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Solve problems? Ha! The Girlfriend (especially when upgraded to The Wife) creates tons MORE problems which is why males no longer have time for more fun activities like gaming and hacking. Too busy installing cabinets or working to pay off the bills.

      So far I have yet to meet any happily married males (or females for that matter). Even the ones who CLAIM to be happy fill their conversations with backstabbing comments about their spouse. Who needs that?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Githaron · · Score: 2

      You haven't gotten around much, have you?

    3. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by poity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      or..could you be attracting maladjusted people as friends?

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    4. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by poity · · Score: 4

      you know what, that was needlessly rude of me. I take it back, sorry man. (I've been on /. too long)

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    5. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What? My fellow coworkers/engineers? They ALL tell me tales about the "stupid thing" their husbands or wives did last weekend or last month. They claim to be happily married, but certainly don't sound it.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Anarchduke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Being married is not an experience that is easy to convey. I am happily married even though there are times my wife drives me crazy. Marriage takes effort, its a kind of job. Its worthwhile, but it takes work to make a marriage work.
      And you are right, marriage - and especially children - creates a lot of problems to deal with. So I can see how this would stop hacking. On the other hand, good luck with that. You are suggesting going up to a girl and saying, "Hey, you're pretty cute. How would you like to date an anti-social computer geek that has learned to relate to women through 4chan?"

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    7. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been married to my wife for 22 years. I am very happy.

      I suggest living with someone for a year, then if you get married don't have kids for about 7 years.

      Any time during that period you find your self excessively complaining about your spouse,I recommend that you calmly end the relationship. You aren't happy, and you aren't doing anyone any favors by being miserable.

      I hate the stupid pop culture idea that marriage is supposed to be misery and pain. IT's a crock. I blame dumb ass shows like "Everyone loves Raymond", "Home improvement", etc...

      Why do any of those men stay with the horribly screeching wives?
      And why do those women stay with horribly insensitive, and often abusive, men?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are they stupid thing as in funny anecdotes, or stupid things as in making people angry?

      I do the occasional stupid thing, and I'm sure my wife tells people about them. But no different then my friends telling the stores of the time my BBQ burst into flames.

      I know a lot of happily married men. The trick? marry someone you can do thing with without becoming annoyed.

      Of course, there are people who aren't happy, but they need to get out of the relationship. Unless kids are involved. The they need to suck it up* and create a happy and stable home life.

      * Meaning general annoyances. Clearly if abuse is going on, they need to get themselves and their kids out of that situation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by billcopc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just because my partner tolerates all the stupid shit I do, and I tolerate hers, does not automagically make us happy. It just means we're complacent. I see the traditional long-term monogamous relationship as a bizarre vestigial custom. We don't know why we do it, we just do. Social pressures and all... Yet there are some of us who might have grander aspirations than breeding and feeding.

      Sure, relationship issues can be overcome, just like any other problems in life. The real question is thus: what would you rather spend your life doing ? Tiptoeing around your partner's family-of-origin-rooted insecurities, or mastering the fine art of craft brewing ? There are only so many days in a life, and if someone prefers not to spend them in emotionally-charged conundrums, I see nothing wrong with that choice.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    10. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by dcsmith · · Score: 2

      Posted anonymously, of course, because his girlfriend/wife doesn't allow him to waste his time online.

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    11. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Dins · · Score: 2

      I'd mod this up if I had points left. Very well said, and good advice about living with someone/waiting on kids. I'm very happily married and have been for 16 years. But then, my wife and I enjoy just hanging out with each other. Try this: take a 1 week vacation with your prospective spouse and just stay home and hang out together. If you can't do that without going insane or driving each other nuts, forget marriage - it'll never work.

    12. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by wmbetts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're constantly tiptoeing around then you're with the wrong person. I've been married for many years and am quite happy. Am I happy 100% of the time? No, but that's unreasonable to expect. I would say I'm happy 90% of the time though and I do no tiptoeing. My wife and I enjoy playing the same video games (WoW, galaga, mario bros, etc), eating mostly the same food, and find the same type of humor funny. We have a few different interests as well (she likes playing music and I enjoy programming for example) and when we want to do something the other doesn't we go do what we want. When we have an issue with each other we address it and move on. I think a big problem with a lot of couples is lack of communication and being honest about their feelings with each other. If more couples would actually address their issues like adults instead of keeping them inside more relationships would work out. If you can't openly talk to your partner about how you feel then the relationship was doomed from the start.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    13. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by jeko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read one of those "human interest" interviews once with some 100-year-old couple that had been married for about a millenium. They asked the couple if they had ever considered divorce.

      The couple replied "Divorce? Never! Murder, sure, but never divorce." :-)

      --
      He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    14. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that most people who are happily married aren't very vocal about it. BUT, those that aren't happy, or are divorced, are VERY vocal.

      For example: I have been happily married for 5 years now, and we dated for 5 before that step. I get my wife flowers every week, because she puts up with me peeing on the toilet seat, breaking things to see how they work, and generally bitching when I've had a bad day.

      No one knows. Well, I've only told you folks about it - my family knows, but that's because they come over to my house.

      My supervisor has been divorced for nine years, and complains every day. Let me repeat - N...I...N...E......Y...E...A...R...S... and still complains every day. Who is the better model? Me. Who do people know more about? Her.

      It's simple logic - more exposure = more proof, right?

    15. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Applekid · · Score: 2

      I hate the stupid pop culture idea that marriage is supposed to be misery and pain. IT's a crock. I blame dumb ass shows like "Everyone loves Raymond", "Home improvement", etc...

      Why do any of those men stay with the horribly screeching wives?
      And why do those women stay with horribly insensitive, and often abusive, men?

      And woe to those that use popular media as a guide to how one should live their life.

      I seem to recall reading a book that claimed a lot of depression and personal happiness issues stem from people comparing their lives to fiction. They watch movies with extraordinary people having extraordinary adventures and wish their lives weren't so boring. They watch exceptionally funny television shows and wish they can be so witty. They watch attractive people with perfect bodies in porn and wish they had perfect bodies and had such sex lives.

      The reality is that things are just more dull, more ordinary, more simple. There's a difference between being motivated to leave your comfort zone, practicing improvisational skills, and going to the gym and being hammered in that entertainment shows you how you should be. It's the job of the limbic system that interprets the novelty and wishful thinking and translates that into motivation. In today's world, our limbic systems are over-stimulated in every which direction possible leading to eventual disappointment in one's lot in life.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    16. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They ALL tell me tales about the "stupid thing" their husbands or wives did last weekend or last month. They claim to be happily married, but certainly don't sound it.

      Think for a moment about what type of story is more interesting to tell.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by godel_56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suggest living with someone for a year, then if you get married don't have kids for about 7 years.

      By which time she's infertile.

    18. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Our population continues to increase regardless of whether people are forming "sustainable families". Not having those stable families creates additional, serious societal problems on top.

    19. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Gripp · · Score: 2

      telling tales of "someone doing something stupid" is simply more interesting than most anything else you can say about them. more a matter of social norms than a window into the whole of their relationship. Honestly there is a point where you can't win: I avoid talking about my wife simply because I know the only things worth talking about will paint the picture that you speak of, but then I get the "why don't you ever talk about your wife, are you not happy with her" question. Hence, no winning.

    20. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Requiem18th · · Score: 2

      You don't realize how judgmental your attitude comments come across, Ironically your motivation for speaking are that you probably wrongly judged.

      The thing is that different people are different. That's one of the oldest things in the book. He isn't wrong, in fact he's quite right. Living together means making concessions, that's inevitable, there's probably a ton of things in your wife that upsets you but you have chosen to tolerate. But different people tolerate different things for different stretches of time.

      The 50% divorce rate has coincided with the doubling of the human lifespan. It's quite possible that tripling our lifespan will raise divorce rates to 33%. I'd dare to say that all relationships are temporal and mostly limited to our life times.

      That's not to say you don't exist, that you are wrong in being happy with your spouse, but I have got to get on his side since he talks about choice and choice is at the core of the matter.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    21. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      Not only crime, but worse things as well. My understanding is that in China, there are roughly 160 million "missing" girls right now, relative to the expected male/female distribution. We'd better find something for those 160 million boys to do, and soon, or they're going to become a huge problem for their own country, their own government, and possibly the rest of the world. Hacking and phishing activities are pretty far down the list of concerns.

      The increasing availability of cheap, portable ultrasound gear in Third World countries that consider daughters less desirable than sons is something else that will have some interesting social effects down the road.

    22. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by EdIII · · Score: 2

      I see the traditional long-term monogamous relationship as a bizarre vestigial custom.

      A monogamous relationship is a natural result of being in love with another person. Not infatuation, not lust, but sincerely in love. I think for most ./'s, despite what they may say, really want that.

      Whether or not that monogamous relationship also has non-standard sexual practices, like say, swingers is another story. In the end though, you are still with each other.

      How long that lasts varies of course, but I do know people that by all appearances have been in love for decades.

    23. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Tom · · Score: 2

      You don't have the whole picture, so you shouldn't judge.

      People like the Gottmans (John and Julie), Helen Fisher, etc. have a much better idea of things, because they've been studying love and relationships for decades.

      I've only read a couple of their books and seen some of their talks. But I can give you the summary: The mark of a good relationship is not in never saying anything bad about each other, nor even in the number of bad things said - it is in the relation between the number of good and the number of bad things said. According to Gottman, as long as the ratio stays above 5:1, the relationship is sound. That's data from actual long-term experiments.

      So you may just be in the place where the bad parts get vented and back at home everything is just fine. Then again, you may not, and it may be different for each of your co-workers. You don't know.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    24. Re:The Girlfriend(tm) by Reziac · · Score: 2

      "there are people who aren't happy, but they need to get out of the relationship. Unless kids are involved. The they need to suck it up* and create a happy and stable home life."

      The problem is you can't force or fake happiness. And marital stress always devolves onto the kids as stress that the kids have no outlet for. If your marriage is unhappy, you can bet it's making your kids unhappy, even if they claim otherwise (kids will say what they think pleases the parent, not what the kid actually feels).

      Sometimes the very best thing you can do for your kids is get divorced. Kids will understand and accept people not getting along and not being able to live together anymore. They DON'T understand when you effectively LIE by pretending to get along while in fact hating each other. Kids will see right through that lie, and may even believe it's their fault (since in a kid's simpler world, if you don't like a situation, you get out of it, you don't "suck it up").

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Agreed by slazzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably the most effective idea yet. A girlfriend is a lot more fun than a computer, at that age anyway.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    1. Re:Agreed by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Taking care of peoples basic needs would stop a lot of bad behavior. Prostitution is negatively correlated with rape. Heroin maintenance programs reduce the damage caused by drug seeking addicts. A guaranteed basic income can dramatically reduce the problems associated with poverty.

      Too bad our society cares more about appearing "tough on crime" than effective solutions to our problems.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Agreed by JeffSh · · Score: 2

      I don't agree with your thesis. I had a lot of fun with technology when I was a kid. Worse is the feeling I get that tells me Slashdot is one of the few "safe places" where I may actually get someone else to agree with me instead of just saying "hu hu hu sex is fun, let's make stupid jokes about it."

      signed,
      well adjusted 30-something male, job, kids, all the normal things.

    3. Re:Agreed by phorm · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Copular interactions are fun, but the frustration of trying to figure out the opposite (or in some cases same) sex, coupled with the pain of breakups, etc.

      Computers were safer and more fun...

    4. Re:Agreed by sycodon · · Score: 5, Funny

      For a teenager, a couple of minutes is stretching it a bit.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    5. Re:Agreed by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Run a cutting edge distro of Linux and do a blind apt-get upgrade or similar every 28 days and they're about the same.

    6. Re:Agreed by mailman-zero · · Score: 2

      Computers were safer and more fun...

      Run a cutting edge distro of Linux and do a blind apt-get upgrade or similar every 28 days and they're about the same.

      Hey, now leave Arch Linux out of this!

      --
      Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
    7. Re:Agreed by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Funny

      A girlfriend is a lot more fun than a computer, at that age anyway.

      Not really. You can only hack a girlfriend once, and even then there are some associated difficulties (as Hans Reiser has found out).

    8. Re:Agreed by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right about needs, but money is not a need, because it's an abstract concept. Quality of living is a need. The concept of poverty, in a developed world, is a very contrived and nonsensical artifact of capitalism. We have enough resources to feed, house, clothe and entertain the whole world several times over, yet our societal systems create false scarcity as the hypothetical carrot-on-a-stick to keep people enslaved and working.

      It doesn't matter how much money is being thrown around, or how big the numbers grow, if someone isn't pulling their weight, they will cause a shortage somewhere else. The illusion of money only takes our eyes off the real issue of distributing resources. After all, why associate with millions of other people if we only seek to break them down and take what's theirs ? Building, not pillaging, should be the goal of any society. Wealth means nothing if you spend every waking moment in misery and frustration.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    9. Re:Agreed by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > You're right about needs, but money is not a need, because it's an abstract concept.

      While I partially agree with you, you are missing some key concepts.

      Please show me how to live in the western world without money. Because without it you are going to have a crappy life especially when you get sick.

      While Money indeed is mutli-dimensional, it is significantly more then "just an abstract concept"

      The three levels of money are:
      - Money is a token
      - Money represents time & experience
      - Money is an exchange of energy

      I agree with the rest of your post.

      > Wealth means nothing if you spend every waking moment in misery and frustration.
      The Western world is great at conning people into "living to work" instead of "working to live"

      Reminds me of that old joke ...

      An American businessman was standing at the pier of a small coastal Mexican village when a small boat with just one fisherman docked. Inside the small boat were several large yellowfin tuna. The American complimented the Mexican on the quality of his fish.

      âoeHow long it took you to catch them?â The American asked.

      âoeOnly a little while.â The Mexican replied.

      âoeWhy donâ(TM)t you stay out longer and catch more fish?â The American then asked.

      âoeI have enough to support my familyâ(TM)s immediate needs.â The Mexican said.

      âoeBut,â The American then asked, âoeWhat do you do with the rest of your time?â

      The Mexican fisherman said, âoeI sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take a siesta with my wife, Maria, stroll into the village each evening where I sip wine and play guitar with my amigos, I have a full and busy life, senor.â

      The American scoffed, âoeI am a Harvard MBA and could help you. You should spend more time fishing and with the proceeds you buy a bigger boat, and with the proceeds from the bigger boat you could buy several boats, eventually you would have a fleet of fishing boats.â

      âoeInstead of selling your catch to a middleman you would sell directly to the consumers, eventually opening your own can factory. You would control the product, processing and distribution. You would need to leave this small coastal fishing village and move to Mexico City, then LA and eventually NYC where you will run your expanding enterprise.â

      The Mexican fisherman asked, âoeBut senor, how long will this all take?â

      To which the American replied, âoe15-20 years.â

      âoeBut what then, senor?â

      The American laughed and said, âoeThatâ(TM)s the best part. When the time is right you would announce an IPO (Initial Public Offering) and sell your company stock to the public and become very rich, you would make millions.â

      âoeMillions, senor? Then what?â

      The American said slowly, âoeThen you would retire. Move to a small coastal fishing village where you would sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take a siesta with your wife, stroll to the village in the evenings where you could sip wine and play your guitar with your amigosâ¦â

  5. Bill Murray was so close... by haydensdaddy · · Score: 2

    "This guys a hacker, he's in New York, all we have to do is get him laid and we won't have any trouble!"

  6. This is not a new idea... by WMarkFelt · · Score: 3, Informative

    This approach has been used to rehabilitate terrorists as well. This idea is hardly new. http://bigthink.com/ideas/17036 "This is based on the belief that you’ve got to give these young men a stake in society and it’s been reasonably successful, although Al-Qaida is so cunning." It has some merit, but its an expensive and difficult process.

  7. It's All Very Simple by eldavojohn · · Score: 2

    If someone is bothering you, you take their life away from them.

    If someone who has no life is bothering you, you give them one so they have no time to bother you.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  8. Re:Same with terrorists... by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course they were married. Why do you think they volunteered?

  9. Or legalize prostitution by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's my takeaway from this.

    Then again that's my takeaway from most discussions.

    1. Re:Or legalize prostitution by Millennium · · Score: 2

      I don't think that would work.

      That Significant Others tend to have a strong calming effect on a person and his or her lifestyle is well-known, and this proposal is really just another application of that. But the effect comes from having a strong, stable, intimate social connection and the resulting feelings of responsibility. People don't generally use prostitutes for social connection, and so legalization wouldn't have that effect.

    2. Re:Or legalize prostitution by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

      We're talking teen-agers here. Emotional connection is probably not as big a factor as looks. Subsidize their prostitutes and I guarantee the hacking will decline.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    3. Re:Or legalize prostitution by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      To a teenager, every one feels like The One. I blame the hormones, and inexperience. Life has yet to instill sufficient cynicism in them.

  10. Excuse me by sa1lnr · · Score: 3, Funny

    A modest proposal?

    1. Re:Excuse me by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 2

      Yeah you know, like eating babies.

  11. And Girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's right... and when it comes to girl hackers, simply unstoppable :).

    1. Re:And Girls? by west · · Score: 2

      Considering the fairly clear historical linkage between an overpopulation of young men and war, there are many who believe that China and India may well suffer violent social upheaval and a much higher chance of war. Here's hoping it doesn't involve nuclear weapons.

      (The irony of producing too many males really starts when one considers that (generalizing terribly) women are probably better adapted for living in the modern world.)

  12. HEY! Not cool. by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, implying that this is only a problem for men is stupid. Women without responsibilities get into trouble too, often with consequences far beyond simple criminal mischief. Secondly, getting saddled with a relationshp does decrease the tendancy towards crime -- but then so does getting a car, a job, a house, etc. It'd be more accurate to say that criminals commit crime because they have less to lose.

    That's a terribly obvious thing to say, and it also provides no insight into what to do to achieve it. Should we institute arranged marriages? A chicken in every pot, and a car in every garage? Should we force employers to hire people with a criminal record? Please, do tell. I'm all ears.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:HEY! Not cool. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It'd be more accurate to say that criminals commit crime because they have less to lose.

      Except the biggest criminals are the wealthiest. I did the math a while back, and the wealth lost in the 2008 financial crisis exceeds that of *all property crime put together by several orders of magnitude*.

      If you are concerned about crime, focus at the top. Politicians and CEOs do far more harm to this country than drug addicts and gang bangers.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:HEY! Not cool. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Economic understanding fail. A $50k minimum wage will just end up with $50k having the same buying power that $8 an hour has today. Currency only has value determined by scarcity and trust, even if you outlaw the rich earning more than $70k, you will still devalue the currency and luxuries will be exchanged directly instead of with the state currency as a pathway.

      No, you fail to understand. The US GDP is ~$15 trillion, and there are ~100m working adults. That's $150k each. If you set the minimum wage to $50k, the wealthier people will still make 4-5 times as much as the poor, rather than the 100x to 1000x more that they make now. Now, you could argue that there would be a productivity drop, and you'd probably be right, but my point here isn't about exact figures, but rather that we live in a society that, if equitable, could provide a pretty good standard of living to all, rather than a shitty standard of living for most and a ridiculous standard for a select lucky few.

    3. Re:HEY! Not cool. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 2

      the grown-ups call this "communism" and it has proved to be a failure in many parts of the world. Even chinese figured out the state cannot just provide all to the masses, you've got to mix in the greedy capitalism part to get people to work for what they want.

      Sure seems to work in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Germany, etc. Hell, even the US has a minimum wage -- its just not enough to live on. Also funny that you mention communism, since it's a system advocated by Thomas Paine, one of the founding fathers of libertarianism.

  13. Discouraging/dumb title by gnujoshua · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we want more female hackers in the future, then we shouldn't present our ideas in a way that makes it seem like we assume all hackers in the future will be male. Also, I know a lot of openly gay hackers, so I find the title of the article dumb for that reason as well.

    1. Re:Discouraging/dumb title by LateArthurDent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most men are intimidated by smart women, and so most women who are smart try to conceal it.

      This doesn't apply to you because you say you're gay (and I assume other women wouldn't be intimidated by smart women), but those other women you're talking about are doing it wrong. You don't hide who you are, especially not your virtues, such as intelligence, in order to make a relationship last for longer. That only makes it harder to break up when you find out your partner has that inferiority complex. What intelligent woman wants to be in a relationship with a guy who needs to feel superior to her?

      When I meet a new girl, I tend to go out of my way to put all my nerdiness out there. More often than not (much more often than not), there's no second date. I consider that a benefit. I'm not going to change who I am to fit a woman's model of what I should be like, so if she doesn't want to date a nerd, I don't want to date her. I don't want to suffer through a painful breakup later when she finally figures out who I really am and the personality I was hiding. Those relationships that did last were significantly more meaningful as a result, and I retained a friendship with a few exes because I truly enjoyed their company and personality. "We should still be friends" isn't an insult to me, and if I had I enjoyed their company while we were dating, I'm glad to take them up on that offer when they make it seriously.

    2. Re:Discouraging/dumb title by makomk · · Score: 2

      I have this odd feeling that she has no particular desire to attract men of any kind.

  14. Good luck... by nighthawk243 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know how hard it is to find a girl who likes guys who are overweight, work on computers, have an affinity for Cheetos, Mountain Dew, and avoiding showers?

    1. Re:Good luck... by Trentula · · Score: 2

      There are plenty of them. Problem is, they're overweight, work on XYZ, have an affinity for Cheetos, Mountain Dew, and avoiding showers. And these fat, disgusting male nerds have this false sense that they're entitled to a gorgeous woman.

  15. Outdated information by hessian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the early days, hackers were young hobbyists.

    The people who are most dangerous now are simply criminals who've learned to operate computers.

    Teenage and young adult hacking is part of the learning process and should be encouraged as part of the growth process. Most of those people will go on to futures in computer science.

    The criminals will not.

  16. You can use this for evil, too by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Getting "a life" damages young mens' productivity/creativity/drive. Film at 11.

    You could use life against "hackers" (that word in the bad sense) but could also use it against anyone else who is doing things you don't happen to like, too. Politically active for the wrong party? Get 'em a girlfriend. Work for a competitor? Here, have a wife. And if those things don't work, b&e their houses and puncture their condoms for some Surprise Baby Drama.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  17. No wonder China has those birth policies! by DdJ · · Score: 2

    It all makes sense now! They're prepping for a massive cyber-war in the mid 21st century!

  18. Novel approach! by bobetov · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just wanted to congratulate TFA's authors for this incredibly novel approach to finding a girlfriend - drafting all of society into a plan to find them dates. Ingenious!

    A bit desperate perhaps, but still... genius!

    --
    Looking for a Rails developer in Chapel Hill?
  19. And The Source? by PatDev · · Score: 2

    And from where exactly do they propose we get these girlfriends for the crackers? If we accept the supposition that these are all a bunch of young persistently-single men, then clearly these men are either a) not putting in the effort / participating in activities conducive to getting a mate, or b) insufficiently desirable to any potential mate met thus far.

    The common thread in both cases - there is no woman (also, why all the heteronormativity?) interested in him. So do they propose that we kidnap some women from the street and tell them that they're taking one for the team?

    Women are people too. Just because it would solve your problem if a woman were to screw this guy, doesn't create an obligation for any particular woman to screw him. I guess you could hire a bunch of escorts, but is it really worth the cost of a decent hooker providing a "girlfriend experience" for long enough to fool the guy into thinking he actually has a girlfriend?

  20. Yeah but... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've already seen how this ends up:

    http://i.imgur.com/q0ycr.png

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  21. Hackers? Heck, it worked on terrorists. by rbrander · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The best way to eliminate terrorists was actually invented by Yasser Arafat and some of his advisors, who themselves had invented Black September, the terrorist group that murdered Israeli athletes at the 72 Olympics in Munich:

    http://m.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2001/12/hoffman.htm

    When they weren't needed any more...they married them off. Told them to go into deep cover in Jordan, found pretty Palestinian girls to marry the "heroes", have kids, be "sleeper agents"...and never gave them a mission. Interviewed years later, few were willing to accept one any more.

  22. This will NEVER work! by tekrat · · Score: 2

    First of all, where are you going to find girls that are interested in geeks? Are you going to import mail order brides from China or something? Half the hackers in the world are already in China!

    Secondly, despite being overweight, unshaven, sloppy, smelly, ugly themselves, hackers have a very high self-opinion of themselves, and, after having watched a gazallion hours of pr0n on the internet, will be remarkably picky about the looks/abilities of the potential girlfriend. They aren't going to settle for just anybody. Ideally, this person needs to look like Jeri Ryan and should have the brains of Jeri Ellsworth (come on, I think that was a pretty clever match-up)...

    And lastly, such girls don't exist, so, finding them, and then, what, paying them to date and have sex with these guys without blowing their cover? It just won't work, it will never work, and the whole idea just doesn't add up at all.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  23. Re:Same with terrorists... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    There were no 9/11 "bombers", well outside of conspiracy land.

    But yes a quarter of them were married.

  24. correlation != causation by tverbeek · · Score: 2

    Don't assume that just because they discovered girls at the same time they quit hacking it's the reason why. Maybe they started paying attention to girls (or girls started paying attention to them) because they got bored playing with tech toys? Or that both happened for the same reason: adulthood?

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  25. Many troll articles today by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article is full of prejudice, misinformation and bullshit. First of all, the hackers causing real damage aren't your stereotypical basement dwellers: most of them are either part of a criminal organisation or a state agency. The young kiddies who do it for the lulz, as a challenge or to support an ideology are only the visible tip of a huge iceberg, as they are the ones who are either too careless to cover their trails or directly announce their deeds. Most of the time they cause little harm, and sometimes can even be valuable when pointing out vulnerabilities which could have lead to the loss of sensitive data in the hands of a more mischievous hacker. If you want to stop them from growing up to be blackhats, the most important thing would be legislation that doesn't send them to jail for pointing out that a door is open. If you don't want them to become outcasts, don't cast them out. Provide them with ways to use their skills within the boundaries of the law. Sending a shoplifting kid to jail is a sure way to turn him into a robber, and the iron fist approach will not work any better on adolescent hackers.

  26. Decisions...Decisions by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 2

    I wonder what would be more effective in this thought provoking conundrum?

    Yeah I suppose you could get them girlfriends...or you could just take away their computer and give them an iPad instead.

  27. Mates not required. by antdude · · Score: 2

    I am an over 35 years old virgin male nerd/geek who never had a date/lady mate before (blame my multiple disabilities I was born with). I also barely have time for fun (used to play computer games a lot). I do security testings for work though. Maybe I will finally get a woman one day or not... :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  28. Re:guess he author doesn't remember being that age by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    If you are under 20 mod parent down.

    If you are over 20 mod parent up.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  29. No Girlfriends possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Intelligence oriented towards abstract thinking, objects, and machines repels women like a meeting of the local Linux User's Group or SABR (Society of American Baseball Research). Women find intelligence un-leavened with machismo, narcissism, mild sociopathy (or high), the "dark triad" revolting. Since it correlates nicely with lower testosterone and social dominance.

    We are prisoners of our DNA and genetic inheritance. Primates don't have money, or mansions, or possessions. Pretty much all primates mate in the fashion that the most dominant male secures all the females. Until he's killed off by a contender or predators, disease, etc. That is the primal urge of pretty much all women, unless moderated by social environments in turn responding to resource scarcity: not enough food, water, shelter, clothing, etc requiring a nuclear family and "settling" for guys unsexy but who make serious weapons. More J. Robert Oppenheimer and Albert Einstein, than your sexy dancer and aspiring rapper.

    To get these guys girlfriends, when the prospective girlfriends will NEVER BE HOTTER AND DEMAND MORE MALE INTEREST (ages 15-22, basically, and yes that's a product of our DNA -- primates don't wait until fertility is almost gone to mate) is impossible. There is no social structure steering them into that, and away from say Levi Johnston or Kevin Federline. The boys are at the nadir of their sexual value (as they age, achieve power and dominance, the get enough to find the last aging bitter "settling" fertility window of the formerly hot). The girls, the peak.

    That is a fundamental mis-match in sexual value in the marketplace. Never going to happen.

    Heck the guys seek local hacking dominance just to raise their peer value and thus (pathetically) hoping to raise their sex value. Which does not happen, only by sheer primate-driven local social dominance over others (cruelty unpunished, aggressiveness, machiavellianism, narcissim, sarcasm unpunished, other dominance displays) can men be attractive to women. Even if the guys worked out, bathed, ate right, and dressed well their inner lack of social dominance around others (pushing people around SUCCESSFULLY and intimidating others is the surest way to draw hot teen girls) dooms them to failure.

    Indeed the failure of boys to gain higher sexual value ("I hacked Wal-Mart! And all girls still avoid me!") guarantees that they will double-down on efforts to go even bigger and more disruptive, as the ability to push people around is simply not in them (too high IQ, too oriented towards abstract systems) any more than they can dunk like LeBron James (or James can use a spreadsheet or write a PERL script).

    I suppose you could match the boys with over-aged MILFs with perhaps 1% of their former hotness, but that's a raw deal compared to the top 10% Alphas hogging about 80% of the actually attractive aged peers. And like most raw deals generates pushback action by the buyers.

  30. Make them a prisoner's girlfriend by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2

    It doesn't have to be get them a girlfriend or put them in prison.

    Put them in prison and they automatically have (umm I mean, become) a girlfriend!

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  31. Girlfriends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...has anyone asked the *girls* what they think of this idea?

    I dunno, just asking.