Slashdot Mirror


Critics Blast Apple's Cheesy New Ad Campaign

theodp writes "BetaBeat reports that people are pretty much falling over themselves to mock Apple's cheesy new Genius ad campaign, using zingers like 'intellectually cheap,' 'cringe-inducing,' 'borderline smarmy,' and — perhaps the unkindest cut of all — Microsoft-worthy — to describe them. Apple's trilogy-of-terror ad lineup includes Mayday ('An Apple Genius shows a fellow passenger how easy it is to make great home movies with iMovie. All before the tray tables are returned to their upright position.'), Labor Day ('An Apple Genius shows a soon-to-be father all the amazing things he can make with iPhoto.'), and Basically ('An Apple Genius points out there are a lot of things that separate a Mac from an ordinary computer, like great apps that come built in.'). The Atlantic's Jordan Weissmann says Steve Jobs would be appalled by the new ads, which certainly don't fare well in a head-to-head comparison with Think Different."

42 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Successful ad campaign is successful by drinkydoh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They even got their ad campaign freely detailed on Slashdot and by all those different critics. Can't be more successful than that.

    1. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's detailed well elsewhere too.
      if views were a metric, then it's successful. but if apple had filmed a turd for 20 seconds and published that as an official advert it would have the highest viewcount on youtube - however I really doubt that would mean it's a successful advert for them in building of their brand image.

      Basically they're Apple adverts, basically.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They even got their ad campaign freely detailed on Slashdot and by all those different critics. Can't be more successful than that.

      If the ads were any good we'd see Samsung ads that look just like it.

      I still haven't seen the ads... mythtv dvr with auto commercial detection and autoskipping, adblocker on the web browser, don't watch sports, haven't watched live TV in years, don't buy newspapers or magazines (although I get a couple "journal" type mags)... What's apple's plan to push their message to a guy like me who has buckets of cash and no ad viewing habit? Oh, I see, get their ads discussed on /. damn you apple damn you that worked pretty well.

      The only ads I've seen a couple years are the ford sync / etc / ads inserted inline on twit and revision3. However, recently when I watch revision3 shows on my roku the first thing is womens herpes medications WTF is up with that. Are all ads that poorly targeted out in the real (aka unblocked/unskipped) world? Like are sporting event commercials all romance novel publicity spots, etc?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      but if apple had filmed a turd for 20 seconds and published that as an official advert it would have the highest viewcount on youtube - however I really doubt that would mean it's a successful advert for them in building of their brand image.

      People would have said they liked the new fully cornerless design and swirly textures. Brown is obviously the new white (or black) and you have to be impressed by the new smell feedback technology. It's soft and warm to the touch as well, making it comfortable to hold.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by MrCrassic · · Score: 2

      That's true, but it doesn't make them any less weird. They aren't funny like their Mac vs PC commercials were or impressive through subtlety like their iPod/iPhone/iPad commercials usually are. They seemed kind of pointless...almost like Microsoft commercials, except with more obviousness.

    5. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People say that there is no such thing as bad publicity. That isn't the case. Ask BP what it was like to be in the news constantly for the oil spill.

      Microsoft is in the news for losing market share in just about every key segment since Ballmer took over. Apple is in the news for failing to meet sales expectations for the iPhone and a disappointing earnings statement.

      These ads suggest that Apple may have lost their touch when Jobs died. Consumers and stockholders might have reason to question the future of the company under Tim Cook.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear about Microsoft a lot here too. Do you think that all helps Microsoft?

      Anyway, David Mitchell - who played PC in the British Mac vs PC ads - said it best. In Britain, we hate smugness and prefer the PC character. So this can only make things worse.

    7. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by BriggsBU · · Score: 4, Funny

      Basically they're Apple adverts, basically.

      Are you from the Department of Redundancy Department?

    8. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      People would have said they liked the new fully cornerless design and swirly textures. Brown is obviously the new white (or black) and you have to be impressed by the new smell feedback technology. It's soft and warm to the touch as well, making it comfortable to hold.

      But being Apple it wouldn't be compatible with a genetic anus, it'll be proprietary.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    9. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2

      Apple has a history of mixed success with Ads. Look at the "I'm a Mac" ads. People loved to hate them on the internet, and they had tons of exposure. But were they successful? I would say no, given Mac market share remained pretty much stagnant at a time when Microsoft released their worst OS ever (Vista). Instead of running to OSX, people ran back to XP.

      The problem with the "I'm a Mac" ads were that people identified more with the funny quirky "PC" character than the pretentious hip "Mac" character, and the point of the ads seemed more to be to affirm the choice of current owners rather than to woo new ones.

      Now these new ads feature the "Apple Genius," another pretentious title which screams "I'm better and smarter than you" and supposedly the mac user is always clueless, when this Genius comes to save the day. I guess the takeaway is that Macs have support when you need them, but what I'm getting is just another variant of "You're holding it wrong." As a mac user I'm insulted, as a potential mac user, I don't want to have to deal with some asshole kid telling me "No it's easy, just do this..."

    10. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by khendron · · Score: 2

      but if apple had filmed a turd for 20 seconds and published that as an official advert it would have the highest viewcount on youtube - however I really doubt that would mean it's a successful advert for them in building of their brand image.

      People would have said they liked the new fully cornerless design and swirly textures. Brown is obviously the new white (or black) and you have to be impressed by the new smell feedback technology. It's soft and warm to the touch as well, making it comfortable to hold.

      Good thing I didn't step in it!

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    11. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      I hate to burst your bubble, but that presumes an awful lot about advertising working. Do you really think vlm is going to buy women's herpes medication? Ads that have no hope of translating into purchases or recommendations are wastes of everyone's time and money. That's why this article is hardly free attention for Apple—basically, we're laughing at them, basically.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    12. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are the first in a long time that don't lie. All the iPhone and iPad ads were sped up, the real devices not being as fast as they show them to be. The Mac vs. PC ads made ridiculous claims about Macs not getting viruses. Maybe if you strip away the bullshit this is what is left.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Nixoloco · · Score: 2

      As I posted below, I don't think these ads are for Apple's current customers.

      Did you figure that out all by yourself? Why would Apple advertise to people who are already buying their crap? They're trying to sell their crap to people who aren't buying it, like every other business ever.

      Ignoring the condescension... Businesses often advertise focusing on existing customers as well as new ones. That's how they let them know there are new products/new versions/next-greatest-thing etc. These commercials don't appear to be like that.

    14. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Stormtrooper42 · · Score: 2

      Wait, so you don't think Slashdot editors should be held to higher standards than the average poster?

    15. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by Cederic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surely a generic anus is a genetic one?

      (No, I can't believe I'm posting this either)

    16. Re:Successful ad campaign is successful by mjwx · · Score: 2

      People say that there is no such thing as bad publicity. That isn't the case. Ask BP what it was like to be in the news constantly for the oil spill.

      The saying "there's no such thing as bad publicity" is true when you're not trying to manipulate public opinion/thoughts.

      This is true for a lot of companies, just to get or stay in the public consciousness. Companies like Microsoft, McDonalds, Citibank and Walmart aren't really hurt by negative publicity and benefit by it by simply being mentioned. Even BP wasn't harmed by the negative publicity from the oil spill, they were harmed more by the loss of production (x barrels per day removed from the revenue stream).

      However the reverse is true for companies that are trying to maintain an image such as Apple, BMW and Rolex. If the "Prius" control error happened to a BMW (or Lexus, considering many Lexus' are just re-badged Toyota's) the brand would have suffered greatly, losing a chunk of it's luxury status. As it stands, Toyota is still considered a highly reliable brand despite the Prius issues. Because Apple needs everyone to think a certain way about it to support its business model, negative publicity is very harmful to them. Hell, this is why Toyota and Lexus are different brands, no one likes a Camry, Land Cruisers are too blue collar so a Toyota can never be luxury, but a Lexus... well that's different(TM).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. Think Different by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the Think Different Ad: "They push the human race forward."

    By litigating so that their competitors can't sell what may end up being superior products! Yeaaaaaaahhhhhh! Keep pushing the human race forward Apple!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  3. the 'Steve Jobs would be appalled' hypothetical by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This inevitably pops up everywhere, but I think it's more symptomatic of a lack of confidence in post-Jobs Apple, producing a self-fulfilling prophecy, than necessarily an independent assessment. Perceptions of Apple have been so closely tied to Jobs for years that evaluation of how smart decision are are strongly influenced by that. There are things that Apple could do today that will get people kvetching about "ugh, if only Steve Jobs were still here he'd never do that", but if Steve Jobs himself had done the identical thing 5 years ago, people would raise an eyebrow, maybe think it's weird, but give him the benefit of the doubt, assuming he knows what he's doing. Basically, people don't trust Apple knows what they're doing the way they trusted jobs, so even things Jobs would've done get that "if only Jobs..." treatment!

    1. Re:the 'Steve Jobs would be appalled' hypothetical by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, they say the portrait of Jobs in the Apple boardroom shed a tear when the ads were screened. Or maybe they had the AC turned up too high.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:the 'Steve Jobs would be appalled' hypothetical by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, the funny thing is that if you substitute "Commander Taco" For Jobs and "Slashdot" for Apple, your paragraph still works pretty well.

      Founder effect?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:the 'Steve Jobs would be appalled' hypothetical by fafaforza · · Score: 2

      But maybe Jobs' successes were what would affect people's opinion of a poor ad and make them think that *they* are the ones missing something; make them assume that everything was done in a certain because Jobs has such a better idea than the rest of us.

      Here, it's more of a blank slate. Everyone's opinion can remain unbiased by someone's reputation. This ad is something Microsoft would come up. Way too much talking, way too self promoting, too long, etc. Apple ads and design have become known for simplicity and clarity. An ad like this just muddies the water with unnecessary minutiae. The unrealism of this kid wearing "genius" t-shirt on a flight and pompously calling himself "a genius" and not just "an apple genius" won't engender much sympathy from viewers either.

      This is an ad that a focus group of business development consultants would come up with. It is significant in that it might be indicative of whether the same design process will creep into Apple's products in their post-Jobs era.

  4. Who cares? by DynamoJoe · · Score: 2

    Really, why does this matter?

    --
    bah.
    1. Re:Who cares? by coldsalmon · · Score: 2

      It matters because it could be a significant blow to Apple's business model, which depends upon being fashionable. People buy Apple products because they think the company and the products are cool, and that buying these products will make the consumer cool as well. It will be a complete disaster for Apple if people start to realize that Apple is not actually cool, and is instead a corporate behemoth engaging in rent-seeking behavior (just like Microsoft). People don't like being tricked.

  5. Re:People are talking by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    GEICO and Progressive ad campaigns generate giggles, but they're being dumped because they actually don't generate any increase in revenue.

    Personally I can't see how anyone thought it was a good move to label Apple technicians "Geniuses". If they were geniuses, they would be doing something useful.

  6. Re:Why is this a subject of debate? by x6060 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You big-ketchup shill. Everyone knows Rold Gold is the finest in tomato based confectionery condiments. NO BLOOD FOR KETCHUP!

  7. the ad campaigns were insulting by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's insulting, as a male, to see a husband portrayed as a complete ditz; if they'd done it with a woman, there would have been hell to pay, or people wouldn't have thought it was funny. Look at the idiot man, everyone!

    As a techie, I found the way the Genius acts to show someone who is practically codependent. They're not people - they're apparently robots who spend their entire lives wherever they are, serving as customer service agents?

    1. Re:the ad campaigns were insulting by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      I agree. I caught part of the "husband's wife is having a baby so he consults an Apple Genius at home" ad and all I could think was: How stupid is this dad-to-be if his first thought when his wife went into labor was "I need to consult my local Apple Genius on making a multimedia presentation or something."

      Then again, husbands and fathers are often portrayed on TV as being idiots who don't know anything and with whom the beautiful and intelligent wives/mothers have to put up with. One time I caught part of a sitcom where the dad was the smart one (having no income due to a strike, opted not to buy a new TV set) and the wife did the stupid move (bought the expensive new TV set after they agreed not to). I thought it was refreshing until a news program suddenly came on in the sitcom explaining that the strike was over and everyone had their job back. Suddenly, the wife was shown as the smart one (despite having made the wrong decision based on the information they had at the time) and the husband apologized to her. So even when the wives do stupid things and husbands do smart things in sitcoms, the wives are still right and the husbands are still wrong.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:the ad campaigns were insulting by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 2

      One time I caught part of a sitcom where the dad was the smart one (having no income due to a strike, opted not to buy a new TV set) and the wife did the stupid move (bought the expensive new TV set after they agreed not to). I thought it was refreshing until a news program suddenly came on in the sitcom explaining that the strike was over and everyone had their job back. Suddenly, the wife was shown as the smart one (despite having made the wrong decision based on the information they had at the time) and the husband apologized to her. So even when the wives do stupid things and husbands do smart things in sitcoms, the wives are still right and the husbands are still wrong.

      The ultimate message of this scenario is not men are dumb and women are smart, it is that that consumption is good and women can be suckered into consuming by presenting them with patronizing hat-tips to their innate wisdom. Given that, is it men or women who are getting the short shrift?

  8. The take-away by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple customers need help for even the simplest thing on their Apple computer.
    Apple customers lack common sense.
    Apple customers don't even know what an Apple computer is.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:The take-away by Junta · · Score: 2

      Before the message was consistently 'you won't need support, our stuff is so effortless'. That's a much more compelling sort of message to send. The frantic tone of these ads actually evokes a message more like 'our experience is just like everyone else's'. Maybe you say that's a necessary midset to entertain to play in the same game as the other PC manufacturers, but if image-wise they are on equal footing, they will lose on pricing. Otherwise, they start being price competitive in which case their widely envied margins get flushed down the drain.

      The PC/Windows market may not be worth it.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  9. Are they as deceptive as past iPhone ads? by lee1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If they are basically truthful, then they are improving on their record.

  10. Re:Wrong by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    The myth that more the eyeball, more successful the ad is just that, a myth. Pushed ad nauseum by mindless bots like you.

    It's not totally untrue. Brand awareness does help sales. If people are looking for a product of a certain type, they are more likely to buy one from a company that they have heard of than one that they haven't.

    In the case of Apple, however, it's a pointless goal. Everyone who hasn't been living under a rock for the past decade has heard of Apple. They've also probably heard of Nokia, Samsung, and Dell. An advert for a company in this situation needs to say more than 'we exist and are in this market!' it needs to say 'our products are good for these reasons.'

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. Re:Why is this a subject of debate? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't an ad campaign basically a self-measuring practice? Either their sales will go up, or they wont.

    Half of the money spent on marketing is wasted. The problem is figuring out which half.

  12. Think Different by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Yeah, sure, this is an astroturf post. Why else would it repeat Apple's words, as well as provide links to all the appropriate ads? You know, they intentionally make lame ads like this to "encourage" social media discussion. The worst ad is the one that nobody talks about.

    Enough about that, let's examine Apple's most famous ad, "1984". Read the text, while thinking (differently) about the kind of company that Apple is in 2012.

    "Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.
    We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology.
    Where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths.
    Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth.
    We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause.
    Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion.
    We shall prevail!"

    How ironic, eh? Apple has become the very thing that they despised, back then. One True Way of doing things, and if you don't like it, hit the highway.

    I'm a late adopter, for very good reasons I won't go into here. I recently saw my first iPad in the wild, my new roomie has one. I had some cool Cajun mp3s he wanted, so I gave him my USB stick to transfer the files. I even GAVE him the actual CD that I purchased from the hand of the artist himself, to keep, as I didn't particularly care for the music and he loved it. Oops! The iPad doesn't have a USB port. He explained he had to do everything by iTunes. Bummer, eh?

    Next, he was going for a new job, and wanted me to look over his contract. He sent me the .DOC file by email, and I annotated it using Libre Office's "CTRL-ALT-C comment" function. I highlighted the parts of the contract I thought should be changed, made my comments, and resent the file to him. Oops! Turns out, there's no free .DOC reader that will show those comments. His brother ended up loading the files onto his PC and sending him JPG screenshots. I'm sure if he wanted to pay $19.99, there would be some sort of solution to his problem. Again, a garden of pure ideology, secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths.

    Jeez, the entire Apple motto, "Think Different", is a riff on IBM's motto, "Think". Let's all think differently and ignore the obvious grammatical error. Oof, how outdated! It's like how Texas A&M defines themselves by the rivalry to UT, and has no personality without it...now they're in different conferences. Awkward.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  13. Re:Why is this a subject of debate? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

    You big-ketchup shill. Everyone knows Rold Gold is the finest in tomato based confectionery condiments. NO BLOOD FOR KETCHUP!

    You put ketchup on your confections? lol gross. I do NOT want to know what you do with mayonnaise.

  14. Re:People are talking by chispito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is generating buzz. Bad or good, that is the goal of an ad campaign.

    You don't want to generate buzz by destroying your hard-earned brand identity. Let's compare:

    1) Old campaign "You can intuitively and effortlessly do cool things with our products."
    2) New campaign "You will find yourself in tech emergencies while using our products, from which only a trained professional can save you (even though we used to tell you this only happened to customers of our competitor)."

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  15. Just by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

    some dorky ads. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  16. Re:What's the problem? by Junta · · Score: 2

    I only watched mayday, and the thing that struck me was the impression I thought likely was that 'you better hope there's an apple genius around to help use your macbook, or else you will be screwed'. Historically, Apple focused on everyday people being self-sufficient without a lot of complexity, no 'genius' needed.

    That and the tone of the ad just seemed so frantic and unsophisticated somehow.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  17. Re:People are talking by Moses48 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also,
    1) Old campaign "You will be cool and fashionable as an Apple user"
    2) New campaign "Only annoying geeks are Apple genius"

  18. Re:People are talking by datavirtue · · Score: 2

    I think you are right, it was usually at the word "genius" that I started to cringe.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  19. Re:People are talking by mjwx · · Score: 2

    GEICO and Progressive ad campaigns generate giggles, but they're being dumped because they actually don't generate any increase in revenue.

    Such ad campaigns are deliberately designed to be annoying. They know its a negative effect but they also know it gets in your head. You're more likely to remember something you dislike rather than so the theory goes you'll remember the name Progressive or GEICO because you dislike their ads. This unfortunately does work, but not all the time. Most people aren't smart enough to determine why they remember "progressive" let alone make a conscious decision to avoid them because of their annoying ad (more often than not, these are the people who claim "advertising doesn't affect them").

    Personally I can't see how anyone thought it was a good move to label Apple technicians "Geniuses". If they were geniuses, they would be doing something useful.

    Apple thought it did. Apple needs to maintain the image that their products are for the "discerning" and "Intelligent" buyer despite the opposite being true (don't know how to use a computer, get a Mac because they're soooo simple). You cant have such a person serviced by an ordinary technician. No, they have to be serviced by a genius even if all the genius can say is buy a new Mac.

    When you see someone getting out of a BMW in a BMW ad, they are a suave mid 30's business man in well tailored suit, square jaw, slightly ruffled hair, a hint of stubble and possibly an attractive woman in a low cut dress in the passenger side. Why do they use this image instead of Billy-Bob in his latest designer flannel (the on with only two holes in it)? Because BMW need to maintain an image of luxury and exclusiveness despite their cars becoming more common.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.