Slashdot Mirror


Kim Dotcom Raid - What Really Happened

chill writes "People have been discussing the raid on the Dotcom mansion for months, but now more details and video footage of that morning have begun to emerge from the trial. From the article: 'At 6.46am on January 20, the raid was underway. The helicopter carrying members of the elite special tactics group flew into the Coatesville home of Dotcom. "Ground units, Gates are open," someone says into the radio. Dotcom's pregnant wife their three children, some guests and about a dozen staff were also there. All is quiet below. Within seconds four armed members of the special tactics group ran towards the main door. The helicopter immediately took off. The main justification for using it at all was that Dotcom's security staff could have stopped police vehicles at the gates. But as the chopper flew out, ground forces were already arriving just seconds behind.'"

194 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On Bernie Madoff.

    But who really robbed people for tens of millions?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course not. The MAFIAA weren't calling for his blood!

      --
      ... wait, what?
    2. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clearly you lack reading comprehension skills. Kim Dotcom was already charged, convicted, and punished of crimes. There is no need to punish someone again. Furthermore it is standard practice for people that have this kind of mansion to go to an emergency room whenever anything odd is afoot. He realized it was the police, kept the door unlocked and waited for them to come to him so he wouldn't be shot.

      He had no option to surrender himself to police because he was not sent a polite letter like Madoff. Dotcom was punched in the face and handcuffed all while FBI agents from the US were watching.

    3. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would like to know what they're looking for. Something was uploaded that had to be taken down quick...

    4. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by turkeydance · · Score: 2, Informative

      kinda/sorta like Waco without the wackos.

    5. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right, Dotcom only robbed people of millions, not tens of millions - insider trading and embezzlement

      Of course that may be true, but it is also completely irrelevant. According to wikipedia : "Dotcom also pleaded guilty to embezzlement in November 2003 and received a two-year probation sentence."
      I find it amazing that the most common reaction is -- "yes, what happened would have been normally wrong/unlawful, but since Dotcom is a sleazebag, then it's ok. He had it coming." Laws should be applied the same way regardless of how much of an asshole the particular person happens to be.

    6. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by thelexx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Corzine. Hundreds of millions in 'segregated' funds. Currently enjoying new multi-million dollar offices on Wall St.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    7. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He stole from no one, the court case to date is starting to show that. He barricaded himself after unknown armed assailants attacked the property. Consider this, does a kidnapper only need to use the magic word 'police' for a person to surrender themselves to an unknown fate or is more substantial identification required.

      Two policeman gainded admittance to the property the day before and could have quite easily arrested him. The reality here, is it was a show, forced upon New Zealand by the US government at the behest of the RIAA/MPAA, with possible lethal consequences, a straight up corruption of legal practices in two countries, that can pretty well be laid right at the feet of Barack 'The Betrayer' Obama.

      This distortion of the law to create a big show as a threat to others pretty well destroyed the case ie greed driven stupidity.

      The biggest crime of the last decades, lobbyists, they have robbed people of billions even trillions in the corruption of democracy and the resultant psychopathic distortions in economy. Right now every lobbyists practice should be subject to that kind of raid.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On Bernie Madoff.

      Madoff is part of the ruling class.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    9. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And without the religious people.

    10. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by SuperRenaissanceMan · · Score: 1

      only because Louis Freeh wasn't in charge

      --
      Any comment mentioning moderation is automatically Offtopic.
    11. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Patent+Lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It appears that the New Zealand SWAT team is like the SWAT teams in so many backwater U.S. jurisdictions. They might get some kind of real hostage situation once a year. Therefore they have to justify their expensive existence by smashing down the doors of non violent minor offenders.

    12. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      President Obama is not a betrayer. He is an honest politician. An honest politician is one who once bought, stays bought. He performed at the behest of his backers. Strangely enough, the people that back him also back his opposition. Issues like abortion, gay rights, civil rights and other push button issues that get people screaming names at each other and waving signs are only positions to politicians. These emotion charged issues are used to divide the people so that they don't notice their government being purchased right in front of their noses. The irony is that one trip to opensecrets.org will show you who owns your favorite candidate but people naively think that their candidate actually cares about them and their interests.

    13. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Was. You can steal all you want from the little people but I think he got a little greedy and stepped on someone else turf.

    14. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      For American units of "billion". ;-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    15. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Stupid cops are stupid-- no matter where in the world.

      Really, wondering when folks are going to wake up the the fact that police are protecting and serving, but not the people. They are traitors to their own brothers-- faithful servants to the rich and powerful.

      Funny thing demonstrated here is that while cops are servants to all rich and powerful, apparently even among their rich masters, some are more powerful than others.

    16. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is just the cultural difference between the nasty gun slinging New Zealanders versus the polite, peace loving Americans.

    17. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not RIAA. Universal Records.
      They were the ones who demanded youtube remove Megaupload's ad/music video (and also Tech News Daily which included a 15-second clip of the ad). They were the ones who became upset when a judge ruled, "You can't claim ownership of somebody else's ad, or the artists that participated." They were probably the ones who called the Obama White House and demanded action, so the White House ordered the raids in foreign countries.

      Welcome to facism (aka "corporatism" according to Benito Mussolini). The government ignores the law, ignores the court orders, and just does whatever it takes to keep its corporate friends happy.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    18. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by interval1066 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference here: if I recall correctly, Madoff was arrested by a couple (or at the most 5 or 6) lightly armed FTC investigators and FBI agents wearing ties. Madoff's crime: investor fruad in which he bilked hundreds of people directly out of $50 billion in a 20 year operation that had the respect of many wall street "experts" before he was caught. Wasn't he called the "darling" of wall st. or some shit? Dotcom: arrested by over 30 heavily armed New Zealand peace officers in armour using paramility tactics. Dotcom's crime: he sold advertising on a website that stored files placed there by users.

      I for one have a problem with this.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    19. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by macraig · · Score: 2

      Dennis Kucinich.

    20. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd more say for english speaking plus others units of billion:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_map_of_long_and_short_scales.svg

      It's mostly spanish and french (and derived) countries who use long scale.

    21. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nowadays in very many cases if you wipe out much of someone's life savings, you're reducing that person's life expectancy.

      Think about it, say you're retired and you have 30% of your savings in this supposedly great fund. And suddenly it's gone. Then another bunch in wall street wipe out another 40% (and still keep their bonuses). What are you going to do? How are you going to find a decent job if nobody wants to hire old people? It's not like you're as energetic as before.

      The other thieves are those who are holding 120 year monopolies on stuff that should have entered the public domain by now.

      As for megaupload, sure some of the stuff they are doing is dubious, but so what? Why not shutdown Monsanto if you don't like dubious?

    22. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      Yep. A unlocked door should have stumped the FBI that were present for hours!
      Pity a NZ cop got to the door first and used the handle. Dotcom's plan was foiled!

      Do you even read any of this fiasco? No barricades, no guns. He went to his safe room, left the door unlocked and sat there waiting for them.

    23. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      regardless of how much of an asshole the particular person happens to be

      I assume that defamation is the exception. Take the third turn on the left, there's a sizable bridge with a nice dark space underneath.

    24. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Sarius64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and yet people will still vote for Obama. Oh, I forgot. Romney doesn't care for the little guy.

    25. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by garaged · · Score: 1

      Wish i had mod points

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    26. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Binden is that asshole of the Hollywood he needs to go.

    27. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by macraig · · Score: 2

      I mentioned him re: opensecrets.org. He's not a (presidential) candidate. He's BEEN a candidate. People had their chance to get an honest "transparent" man of the people. Once again they blew it. At least the people of Ohio got some good use of him for quite a while.

    28. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Bernie Madoff wasn't ranked #1 in the world at Modern Warfare 3. I am not kidding. Look at Kim Dotcom's wikipedia page (which may be kidding but it does say that). So yeah, you gotta send in the helicopters lol.

    29. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember when democracy was supposed to give us options?

    30. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember when democracy was supposed to give us options?

      No.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    31. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Think he covered that in the previous reply

    32. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      addicted to trouble doesn't really justify being raided illegally(warrants saga) and being punched to face(deliberate force) for no reason.

      they knew he was a fattie and wouldn't shoot back anyhow, what was he gonna do - run? furthermore, they shouldn't have let fbi call any of the shots.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    33. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... a head of security ...

      Because a business isn't allowed to protects its assets or its record of your credit card number. This is a thinly-veiled "if you got nothing to hide" claim.

      The guy is addicted to trouble

      Then the police (of any country) can easily have an extradition order approved. Or forward their evidence to NZ for the local authorities to take action. The FBI using local forces as hired thugs is dirty politics all-round.

    34. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would armed security staff make a difference?

      Not if they pull him over with a marked police car as soon as he leaves his driveway, or arrest him after a public appearance, or some other civilized method that does not involve a full scale home invasion. Sad thing is, apart from the mansion it sounds exactly like your average pot-head bust.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    35. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by ccguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Blame myself for placing all the eggs in one basket and thinking that a investment fund cannot go bust. Don't you have Past performance is not guarantee of future results. standard disclaimer over there?

      Are you kidding me? That disclaimer doesn't say anything like "having honest management in the past is not guarantee of future management".

    36. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The AC to whom you replied pointed out that Kim Dotcom had a collection of guns, he liked to show them off, and this is unusual in NZ. That is all true. If you have a gun collection in NZ, you're out there.

      No, he didn't. Certainly not on the Coatesville property anyway. The only firearm was in a locked gunsafe, and was owned by the bodyguard.

      Add to the fact the guy had a head of security. This is New Zealand, a sleepy, bucolic country of four million people and 70 million sheep. The Mongrel Mob has security; business men do not.

      Actually, business men worth a lot of money in New Zealand DO have heads of security. Graeme Hart for example has a fairly large number of full time guards and also a very well paid head of security. It's not unusual at all.

      You comment he was waiting for the police, but neglect to mention the fact he was waiting for them with a shotgun in his hands.

      Where are you getting your information from? The media said something ridiculous like this on the day of the raid, but retracted it because it's entirely incorrect. As I stated, the gun was in a gunsafe as per NZ law.

      The gun was however found to be illegal due to the fact it had a stock removed and a pistol grip, and the bodyguard and head of security Wayne is being charged for that.

    37. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by BeanThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So do you suppose we should keep "due process", or are you suggesting we just get rid of it as if it was just some quaint outdated notion?

    38. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      Madoff had all the licenses. Corzine has all the licenses. Etc.etc.

      People must be free to start whatever business they wish without asking any governments for permissions.

    39. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually he was never holding the shotgun, that was extrapolated from an article stating that there was a shotgun in the room. He wasn't actually holding it.

    40. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It still does. The electorate just willfully and purposefully chooses to ignore them in favor of the guys with the flagpins, white teeth, perfect hair and the massive budgets.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    41. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by nut · · Score: 3, Informative

      You comment he was waiting for the police, but neglect to mention the fact he was waiting for them with a shotgun in his hands.

      *Bullshit.*

      Watch the news clip. He states was holding his hands up empty when he entered the room, and the police do not dispute this. There was, according to some reports I have read, a loaded gun in the room.

      The fact that you embellished this part of the story makes me suspect that some of your other statements also might be less than the unvarnished truth.

      --
      Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    42. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by hughk · · Score: 1

      The gun collection and shotgun appear to be a myth as probably were the grounds given the NZ law enforcement.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    43. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by strack · · Score: 1

      yeah. lets use the names of the actual culprits more often. the RIAA too often serves its purpose of drawing negative publicity away from the likes of capitol records and the like who run the RIAA.

    44. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope. Democracy is supposed to give you a way of overthrowing the government without having to kill lots of people (which tends to be bad for a society, leave it weak in the face of outside aggression, harm production, and, uh, kill lots of people). It doesn't give you options, it just provides a mechanism by which you can create options. Whether you choose to do so is up to you.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    45. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Barny · · Score: 1

      All correct. The only gun mentioned by police was a shotgun kept in a safe, separate from it's ammunition (as by NZ law).

      The search warrant has already been written off as illegal by the judge, basically the judge is trying to find out just how badly the police screwed up now, the fact they went in like this 'in case he tried to destroy the evidence on his servers' despite the FBI having locked down and copied them previous to this date, is the suspicious bit.

      Why was this done if not to terrorize him?

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    46. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by flyneye · · Score: 2

      Wackos were present, victims were present, Religious nuts were missing.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    47. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by flyneye · · Score: 1

      And yet people will still vote for Repubmocrats because voting outside the one party system is a waste of your vote.
      I propose anyone voting Republican or Democrat at the federal level ,has been the sole cause of our woes for more than a century now.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    48. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Remember when democracy was supposed to give us options?

      You still have options: a douche, a turd, or lucky dip (i.e. don't vote).

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    49. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because Madoff wasn't surrounded by an iron gate and guards when the FBI raided his offices? We'll see if Dotcom gets anywhere near the prison time Madoff is serving.

    50. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by thej1nx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it doesn't. What democracy actually is supposed to do is fool people into thinking they have any options or alternatives, and guaranteeing the physical safety and lives of ruling elites. Think of it this way. The french revolution was pretty much two power-hungry factions vying for control. One faction used the common people for this. However this involved the other faction having their necks chopped. And people will occasionally grow too angry and discontent, and will want to replace the rulers. Democracy is really a way to avoid the bloodshed of over-thrown elites in such case. Both sides get to loot the people, and grow rich in turns without any actual risk of life and limb. There are not really any options here, if you think honestly about it. Take USA as example. Having no anti-lobbying laws in USA, no proper limits on campaign donations pretty much ensures that USA can never be a democracy in any sense of the word, except as a mere meaningless label.

    51. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by thej1nx · · Score: 1

      To clarify, it is perfectly okay for people to lobby in terms of vote. Lobbying by corporations in terms of campaign donations, and bribes(e.g. future job offers post-office) should be illegal and should mean dissolution of the corporation if it was sanctioned by board of directors, or serious punishment crime amounting to life imprisonment.

    52. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Look, if the police, FBI, etc, show up at my house with guns to arrest me, I guess I'm getting arrested. I may have a problem with this, it may be stupid or wrong, but most likely I should be getting arrested. (Unfortunately it's looking more and more like they just like arresting people)

      If I commit a crime and some country like Sweden has me extradited, the FBI shows up here, arrests me, and sends me there. Sux.

      If fucking foreign police ministry shows up at my house with a military invasion force, THEY ARE GOING TO DIE. I'm under attack by a god damn foreign invader for shit's sake!

      Why did this guy surrender to foreign police making an arrest with a military invasion force in HIS country? He should have only surrendered to the police of his own sovereign state!

    53. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by SourceFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You comment he was waiting for the police, but neglect to mention the fact he was waiting for them with a shotgun in his hands."

      Even if this were true (it isn't), I don't find this shocking. If an unknown armed gang attempt a home invasion of my household I would also grab my shotgun to try defend my life and family. What would you do? Let armed robbers kill you? There is no way for an innocent home-owner to tell the difference, on a split second, between a home invasion by robbers and a police raid (which is why police raids for non-violent offenses are wrong and immoral; innocent people keep dying). You put it in bold, like we're supposed to find it shocking. In spite of being "peaceful" NZ does have a culture of gun rights.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    54. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      BBC used to differentiate between "Thousand Million" and "Billion".

      I believe the changes came as recently as the crash of the housing bubble, in 2005. There were to many interviews and sound-bites that needed constant translation.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    55. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      FBI raids in New Zealand.

      If that phrase doesn't trigger the "something's-fucked-in-Denmark" hairs, on the back of your neck?

      Then, you are really far too gone for a discussion that shares any common frame of reference or values.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    56. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      One can be both religious and a whacko, just as one can be athiest and whacko. Whether or not you're nuts has no bearing on your religion or lack of one.

    57. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Why was this done if not to terrorize him?

      It wasn't done for Dotcom's bene. It was done to show their FBI masters that NZ is "on board" with the US to stop the scourge of copyright infringement. The record labels pay US congressmen to victimize their own customers who aren't giving the labels their money, and they pay well.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    58. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Well, Bernie Madoff actually admitted his crime to his sons who turned him in. If Bernie Madoff had his own private security army and not essentially given him self away, they they might have called in the big guns.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    59. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Even the little guy doesn't care for the little guy. I bet you Obama and Romney get at least 98% of the presidential vote. People like to bitch about those assholes but when it comes to pressing buttons in a booth, there actually aren't any really strong feelings against them.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    60. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Not RIAA. Universal Records.

      Universal is part of the RIAA. All the major labels are.

    61. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Wheras Dotcom had no crime.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    62. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by hazah · · Score: 1

      VOTE OR DIE!

    63. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember when democracy was supposed to give us options?

      Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    64. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I was aware of him. I even voted for him at least once, but I forget the context. I knew at the time, however, that he didn't have a chance.

      It's quite rare for a candidate that honestly represents the voters to get elected, but it does happen, and once in office they are often able to use the incumbent advantage to stay in office. Occasionally they accumulate enough seniority to have some power. (I'm thinking Ron Dellums, but there may be others.) Note, however, that these are rare events. As such, unless they are a committee chairman or some other position of power, they can just be ignored by the non-elected powerful. They are even used a proof that they system is honest.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    65. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's true, username MEGARACER or something like that.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    66. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by sjames · · Score: 1

      In that case though, the whackos (speaking relatively) were ATF.

    67. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      ...and yet people will still vote for Obama. Oh, I forgot. Romney doesn't care for the little guy.

      REALLY? That's your argument against a two-party system that has acted like a one-party system since the 1980s? I'd say it's been that way since the formation of the Federal Reserve, but I can say since Reagan's terms, from my own observations. Jello Biafra has always called both parties Republicrats. That people think they have choice is the real illusion.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    68. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      It still does. The electorate just willfully and purposefully chooses to ignore them in favor of the guys with the flagpins, white teeth, perfect hair and the massive budgets.

      Tell that to the people that still don't think Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004 Federal elections were statistic anomalies. IIRC, there's at least one MIT statistician that believes Florida's outcome in 2000 was statistically impossible (specifically, regarding the 'hanging chad' problem). In my mind, until there's a fully-auditable papertrail after a voter makes their choice, I'll consider the fact that I (nor anyone else) don't really has a choice.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    69. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Anyone that changes his name to Dotcom, has already committed a crime against good taste. He should be sentenced to 10-20 years in a Filipino prison.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    70. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: you're one of those that thinks you're smart enough that something like this will *never* happen to you.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    71. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by garaged · · Score: 1

      No wonder the world is in the current conditions

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    72. Re:They Didn't Pull This Kind of Muscle by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Barrack 'The Betrayer' Obama stacked the US Department of Justice with RIAA/MPAA lawyers, with a pretty little song and dance about how it will enable them to keep an eye on the criminal distortions of the legal system the RIAA/MPAA were perpetrating. Look at what is actually happening as a result but of course it didn't stop there. Torturers and murders got let of the hook, criminal banisters got let off the hook, Universal health got turned into a permanent tax charged by corporations against the poorest, 30% off the top creamed for corporate executive mansions. Record corporate profits and record middle class losses. I mean what does it take.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Good thing they launched an aggressive assault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, such a violent guy.... he's like a terrorist. His children could have been at the windows with their ak-47s.

    1. Re:Good thing they launched an aggressive assault by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      It could have been worse. They might have burned the place down with his kids in it.....but then that's the ATF's modus operandi.

    2. Re:Good thing they launched an aggressive assault by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 1

      I think they learned after Waco and Ruby Ridge that burning people out (Waco), and shooting people (Ruby Ridge) gives them a black eye.

    3. Re:Good thing they launched an aggressive assault by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's nice to know the continued militarization of the police isn't just a US/UK phenomenon.

  3. This would have been called terrorism by sabri · · Score: 2

    If it would not have been to capture an armed and dangerous mafia boss..

    Oh, wait...

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  4. Several reasons come to mind... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...to stage a raid on a high-profile target like this...

    First, shock-and-awe factor, in the real terms of cowing the target of the raid and ancillary subjects so that they don't do something dangerous to the authorities, like grab weapons. This can be especially important for security staff that might not be wired quite the same as everyone else.

    Second, disruption of other elements of critical thinking. If there are things to be destroyed, from the perspective of the target of the raid, this might disrupt that plan.

    Third, and in my opinion, most likely, to make a show of force for others. My guess is that this raid didn't require air support, a number of practiced officers could have detained or arrested people on the ground, even security, quickly enough, if enough people were involved in the raid in the first place. It is possible that this was more cost effective in not requiring as many officers to breach and secure, but helicopters aren't cheap either.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The elements of critical thinking were already disrupted in the people that authorized that kind of things, no need to look elsewhere.

    2. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by stms · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Watch the video the servers were seized before the raid occurred. There was little evidence Kim had access to to destroy at the time of the raid.

    3. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All very valid and totally justified reasons...if you live in a police state.

      NZers are generally shocked and totally disgusted with their police force over this. Especially the co-towing to the US authorities part.

      Given the current right-wing government's stance on doing whatever the US or its corporate owners say it is not surprising...

      Ref:
      - Changing employment law for the hobbit movie
      - Signing up to ACTA despite it being bad for NZ
      - 3 strikes law
      - General foreign policy
      - Our special forces in Afganistan

    4. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Yes, all over a website. What a dangerous individual. Truly a threat to national security!

      Wait... I think I see a little girl running a lemonade stand down the street... without a permit! The army needs to get involved in this serious matter!

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    5. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by styrotech · · Score: 2

      Given the current right-wing government's stance on doing whatever the US or its corporate owners say it is not surprising...

      Ref:
      - Changing employment law for the hobbit movie
      - Signing up to ACTA despite it being bad for NZ
      - 3 strikes law
      - General foreign policy
      - Our special forces in Afganistan

      Out of those 5 examples, I can only think of one (the hobbit employment law thing) that might have played out differently under the previous Labour government. Some of them were already happening or at least in play previously.

      Not that I'm excusing either party mind you.

    6. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      Actually, not sticking up for old Johnny boy, but wasn't it his governement that put on hold the original 3 strikes law (after much kerfuffle) to get what we have today and not what was originally proposed? (although both are bad, I am sure the original bill was even more evil)

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    7. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by TWX · · Score: 1

      I find your comment juxtaposed against your signature line amusing...

      I'm not in favor of heavy-handed things that don't really affect a lot of people. Even if he's the biggest software/movie/music pirate or piracy facilitator in the world, one can argue that the number of people harmed by his actions is small, and the amount of harm caused to them is also small, relatively speaking on the latter. I would argue that a banker that profited off of the loss of someone's life savings has caused more real harm, and someone who has committed a violent crime has certainly caused more harm, and has the potential to cause more harm if likely to repeat the crime.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by sdguero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When they pushed the three strikes law through without oversight because of the earthquake... Man that pissed me off. And I live in California.

    9. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      What will it take to get the kiwis to vote for someone who is going to put New Zealand first and stop bowing down to the US and big American corporations.

    10. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is that you Winston?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Peters

    11. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing you said distinguishes this raid from any other instance of searching anything or arresting somebody. It's always possible that they will pull out a fully automatic rifle and lay waste to everything, but that possibility doesn't mean anything unless you've got a specific reason to suspect that that is what will happen. You either just accept that or you live in a police state with no rights. Unless you have good concrete evidence that searching an area is going to put the cop's welfare in danger, the proper procedure for searching an area is politely knocking on the door, showing the warrant and then proceeding to search the area. As long as the cop is not being prevented from doing his job he does not have any business being even just rude. What they actually did was send in a squad of heavily armed people with helicopter support to search the home of someone who makes a download service available and, as far as the story shows, that was done in the complete absence of any information showing that this person would be dangerous. If this is as it seems, drastic measures should be taken to root out that kind of culture in the police department responsible. Certainly in future, stunts like that should involve jail time for whomever ordered these measures (if things are as they seem, obviously).

    12. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter how much harm was done - I don't care if it were Hitler that they were going after. If the person doesn't pose a threat, there is no justification for sending a heavily armed team with helicopters.

    13. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      Possibly.. just when you thought he was gone. ..

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    14. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      You forgot
      - selling off of all the government's strategic assets
      - signing up to TPPA despite it being bad for everyone

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    15. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I think your third option is the only plausible one. There's a name for that kind of action. It's called terrorism.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Genda · · Score: 1

      Correct posture, wrong direction... the position I believe you are groping for is "Bending Over" though it includes the same subservience, there is a culminating act which distinguishes it from the more culturally acceptable bow. How'z it feel to be the 51st state?

    17. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Genda · · Score: 1

      You need to understand when it comes to fascist corporate interests, nations and governments are middling obstacles to crushed under the jackboot of those who would make a profit under any circumstance. The American people are faring no better against their corporate owned and operated government.

    18. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Genda · · Score: 1

      And legally bludgeoning and bankrupting a grandmother because her pubescent grandchild downloaded a J.Z. song??? These aren't business men. These aren't even thugs. They are social parasites, bleeding the masses dry. We the people, are in fact we the sheep, and these wolves are eating well. Every action is a block buster designed to keep us sheep under thumb.

      Only the sheep aren't hanging around to be sheared any more. Technology has democratized music (there is far better music available directly from artists than is now available from most labels.) Soon it will democratize the movie industry. Small Mom and Pop operations will produce eclectic, interesting, plot filled movies and while Hollywood will spend $100 bazillion dollars a year for some extravagant special effects pelvic thrust, and while smoking hundred dollar bills ask if it was good for us. The small independent will soon be making a bigger difference in the art of motion pictures. Personally, I'll stick with the interesting movies thanks. The various XXXAAs are making themselves hated, despised and superfluous. SO to the ass-hats of the universe, have fun while you still can, your days are numbered.

    19. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMHO it required one policeman to wait outside until Kim Dotcom went out for milk to say "you're nicked sunshine".

    20. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Hey bowing down can work too.

      "You got a pretty mouth...get on your knees and pray."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    21. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I think it should have been a fat policeman, because a fat person chase would be funny.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    22. Re:Several reasons come to mind... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, so you're actually suggesting we pay back low interest debt (it's fucking less than 4% interest rate. Seriously) by selling off high-yield assets? The power companies return 6%-9% dividends. So we're sacrificing a 6%-9% dividend to pay back a sub-4% loan. That's just fiscally retarded, unless the real reason is to move those high-yield assets from public hands to private ones.

      Also, we're borrowing a quarter of a billion a week because National is borrowing no less than twice what we actually need to borrow to pay the bills (because the debt is cheap) and using it to shore up the hole in the accounts left by lowering the tax rate for the rich (3% of all income over $60K is a LOT).

      So don't give me that bullshit that it's Labour's fault. National screwed the economy so that they could justify their asset fire-sale policies.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  5. What a Joke by metrix007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly, the NZ Police for being such a nice lapdog. Pretty funny when NZ stands up over something as silly as a nuclear free zone, but then does this.

    Secondly, this is the time of when the government needs to smack the government, HARD, and award Kim damages. Nothing else is really acceptable.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  6. Too much for such an intervention by L3sT4T · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it me or that was the type of raid that could/might have been used to capture Osama Bin Laden ?

    --
    Wer war der Thor, wer Weiser, Bettler oder Kaiser? Ob Arm, ob Reich, im Tode gleich
    1. Re:Too much for such an intervention by butchersong · · Score: 1

      This is almost standard practice in the US now. You can't give cops all these cool toys and expect them not to want to use them. Unfortunately it's rare for them to have really hard targets to work against so they end getting a judge to give them a no-knock warrent so they can practice by breaking down some guy's door and then occationally shooting the guy, his guest or a family member because someone is confused about what is going on and instinctively trying to defend himself.

    2. Re:Too much for such an intervention by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Super Saiyan Republican Butthurt ENGAGE!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. Dropbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And almost immediately Dropbox made it harder to share my family photos to extended friends and family (to new users).

    1. Re:Dropbox by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      More security breaches!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  8. NZ Perspective by Seriousity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a New Zealander, I'm frankly outraged that the US has this kind of influence down here. It's about to get a LOT worse as the Trans-Pacific Partnership gets finished off and pushed through... Most people won't have even heard of it until the deal is done. Dodgy, dodgy secret deals with US corporations, and my country stands to gain absolutely nothing but the unjust legislative offspring off the MAFIAA.

    --
    This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    1. Re:NZ Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As an American who has visited NZ and had a great time, I don't want NZ to be a puppet state of the US. There was no reason to launch this type of attack on Kim Dotcom. Let alone in a foreign country and having the US go after a non-American who never killed anyone is really shady.

    2. Re:NZ Perspective by Mistakill · · Score: 1

      I agree, as a Kiwi, its terrible... sadly business counts for more than the public it seems

    3. Re:NZ Perspective by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Keep this in mind when voting next time then. How Key gets away with this and the Sky City fiasco is beyond me.

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    4. Re:NZ Perspective by sdguero · · Score: 2

      I would be furious if I was a Kiwi... Only advice I can really come up with is pretty straightforward: VOTE THEM OUT! In my experience though, most Kiwis care more about their day to day worries than what is happening to their basic civil rights (like most Americans).

      As a Yankee who has spent a lot of time in NZ, I'm tired of personally getting blamed for the NZ government's actions (it has happened... a lot... At pubs, parties, bus stops, you name it, if a Kiwi hears an American accent there's a decent chance they will have a political bone to pick with you). The NZ gov't is more sold out to American corporations and special interests than the US government despite the fact that the NZ people have nothing to gain by it (at least in the USA the massive corporate profits mostly stay in country and get spent on fancy cars, swimming pools, and bar tabs). And it's not my fault!

      Also, I think the two party system we have in the USA might makes us a little more resistant to politicians selling out (it definitely still happens though!) since both parties fear being called out by the other. In a 3+ party system, all you need is a coalition and it's harder to point fingers at coalitions since everybody ends up in some they don't like.

      And don't even get me started on your tax code... :P

      Disclaimer: I really love New Zealand, the people (Kiwi, Maori, and the interesting relationship between them) and love my relatives down there. I'm their bossy asshole American cousin/nephew/brother/in-law but they still find ways to love me back. And now I'm craving a lamb sandwich.

    5. Re:NZ Perspective by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> Also, I think the two party system we have in the USA might makes us a little more resistant to politicians selling out

      Its exactly because the US has (only) a 2 party system that the US is so bad.
        Both parties (who are just as bad as each other) screw the citizens equally, because they know if they go a little to far and lose power at very worst they'll have to wait 5 years before they're back in anyway.

    6. Re:NZ Perspective by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      We can't vote "them" out when "them" are on both sides of the two major parties. I have no doubt Labour would have done the same thing. Who do you think sold half our assets to Americans in the late 80's.

      Apparently our tax code isn't too bad, most of the tax is paid by the rich. The poor pay very little.

    7. Re:NZ Perspective by Genda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (at least in the USA the massive corporate profits mostly stay in country and get spent on fancy cars, swimming pools, and bar tabs). And it's not my fault!

      Oh, sorry, you apparently didn't get the memo... the only thing "Trickling Down" in America is toxic sewage from D.C. The top 400 people in the U.S. have the same wealth and the lowest 1650,000,000. Exactly how many fancy sports cars and bottle of Clicquot do you think these clowns would have to buy to even make a dent in the vacuum in the American economy created by this level of hoarding? No, the only folks smiling (besides the insanely wealthy) are their Caribbean bankers. Even one else is swimming in something a wee bit browner than your typical pool. Corporations are turning America into a toilet.

    8. Re:NZ Perspective by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      As a US resident, I can tell you this sort of thing is business as usual here. Money = political influence = law enactment + enforcement = military force. It's pretty much all the same thing, and we have lots of it - lots of all of that. Well, not "we" as in all of us, but the elite here are VERY elite, and they intend to keep it that way. the American people enjoy a generally high standard of living and, as such, are unwilling to initiate change, even though things could be so much better for us, both here and around the world. But the greedy rich folks are VERY greedy and rich, and very good at staying rich and powerful. To the rest of the world, I apologize, as I am too fat and lazy to take matters into my own hands and make the world a better place by fixing my own country.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    9. Re:NZ Perspective by dkf · · Score: 1

      The top 400 people in the U.S. have the same wealth and the lowest 1650,000,000.

      Given that the official population of the US is supposed to be 311,591,917 (Jul 2011, according to US census), you guys sure have a bigger problem with illegal immigrants than I thought!

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    10. Re:NZ Perspective by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I would be furious if I was a Kiwi... Only advice I can really come up with is pretty straightforward: VOTE THEM OUT!.

      There's not really a viable alternative. I voted for the current government more out of a desire to vote out the previous lot, because of social engineering policies such as banning you from smacking your kid when he's naughty. They need to stick to running the country , not micromanaging people's lives.

      Voting for a minor party that champions an issue you care about, might get you action on that issue but then you are stuck with whichever major party they befriend for all the other issues.

      The current government seems to be selling the country off to corporate interests though, so we're stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    11. Re:NZ Perspective by kokako · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an expatriate New Zealander and now U.S. citizen, I share your outrage. It is hard not to conclude that the NZ police have been very naive at best, reckless and lawless at worst, in this case. The paramilitary-style raid on Dotcom's compound is unprecedented in New Zealand law enforcement for these sort of allegations. The fact that the police officers, despite being armed to the teeth (helicopters, police vans, semi-automatic weapons, Glocks etc. etc.), were not wearing body armor and readily admitted during the court hearing that Dotcom was considered not to pose any threat of violence, suggests that the raid was above all for show, if not for pleasing foreign agencies (i.e. FBI). In fact, the very nature of the raid itself was likely to increase any chance of violence on the part of Dotcom. This was an act of pure intimidation, no more, a use of the state monopoly of violence to threaten and terrorize individuals and their families extrajudicially. I'm sure the FBI couldn't believe they managed to get the NZ police to go along with this raid, which seems concocted in the feverish imagination of a Bourne Trilogy scriptwriter. Whatever the outcome of the litigation regarding the so-called "criminal" (in fact, probably should not amount to anything more than civil) allegations against Dotcom, and even if they manage to get an extradition despite the bungling with the warrants and the FBI seizure and offshoring of evidence, it is an embarassment for NZ. Dotcom is media savvy and is turning NZ public opinion to his advantage, but above all it is the failure of the NZ police here that is to be lamented. Sorry, the *epic* failure, lack of judgment, credulity and small-penis syndrome. A truly pathetic saga.

    12. Re:NZ Perspective by sdguero · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that someone who makes roughly $100,000/year in New Zealand (upper middle class) pays around 60% income tax, vs 38% in the USA. $100,000/year is not rich. It's barely enough to buy a standard single family home in New Zealand these days.

    13. Re:NZ Perspective by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      You earn $100K in NZ your marginal tax rate is 33c which kicks in at $70K. The other main source of Govt revenue is GST (sales tax) which is now 15% thanks to the National Party Government. There are few exemptions from GST (interest, rent & mortgages. Exports are zero-rated) so the lower paid sure pay their whack.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    14. Re:NZ Perspective by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Keep this in mind when voting next time then. How Key gets away with this and the Sky City fiasco is beyond me.

      You're dead right. We need to get Helen back from the UN to save us from these horrible, horrible centrists. She's the only one who can help us! Death to all business in New Zealand, and especially extra death to small business in New Zealand, those pesky, greedy capitalist pigs that need to be strung up and strangled by red tape forever!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    15. Re:NZ Perspective by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I make around $200k and pay just over 30% tax

  9. Dog & Pony show by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This whole thing is just a huge dog & pony show by Hollywood and the FBI. Its the exact same tactics they use when they catch someone downloading illegal content.

    Early on, they made a huge "example" out of the first offenders. Huge fines, drag them into court, media everywhere, blah blah blah. Now, the majority of the cases settle for a few thousand bucks and everyone moves on.

    Well, this is their first hosting provider that they (HollywoodFBI) have gone after, and they want to put on a big show so that everyone else knows they mean business. They'll bring in helicopters & troops & go after your kids and pregnant wife if you don't play by their rules.

    --
    No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    1. Re:Dog & Pony show by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Interesting point you make. Anyone have any general input on how it's going with those law suits? It's been a long time since I've seen anything about it on this site.

    2. Re:Dog & Pony show by jeti · · Score: 1

      Well - it works doesn't it? A lot of file locker services shut down after the raid.

    3. Re:Dog & Pony show by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Well - it works doesn't it? A lot of file locker services shut down after the raid.

      I know of NONE that shut down. A few disabled sharing, and several dozen new appeared on the scene...

      As to the effect on the pirate scene it was negligible; I doubt many had issues finding alternatives to MegaUpload and I for one was perfectly able to find the stuff I wanted just as easily as when MegaUpload was around.

      To tally the score:
      Hugely expensive raid and now legal proceedings. Might end up in an acquittal and and counter-suit for damages and loss of business, plus legal precedent that allows for file lockers like this, Practically zero effect on piracy in the short run and an increase in the options available to pirates later (now).

      In other words: MegaFail.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  10. Re:waa waa waa by Fned · · Score: 1

    ...arrested in such a way as to prevent him from destroying evidence.

    What, like, to keep him from jumping into his fucking time machine and going back to before the authorities had siezed the Megaupload servers?

  11. Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Kiwis are bored and feel left out, especially the NZ media which desperately craves big time American-style action and excitement.

    So, everyone who does anything online is a 1337 h4x0r genius ubercrim preparing to hold the world to a Bond villain-like ransom.

    Every 12-year-old kid of Asian descent who gets picked up shoplifting sweets is a Triad boss.

    Anyone who breaks any law is a "cunning and daring" master criminal, which is why the NZ police haven't yet captured them/which is why the NZ police are so amazing for capturing them.

    The NZ government, like some 14-year-old emo kid, is desperate to be noticed by big, powerful grown-up governments, and so will comply with any demands if it means an opportunity to be seen with somebody who may have been on the cover of Time magazine.

    It's all simply the inevitable consequence of living in a tiny country at the bottom of the world, forgotten by everyone else.

    1. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not too far from Australia. Australia is the place full of dust, dangerous creepy-crawlies, passed-out drunk men, and aged, leathery women with voices capable of shattering crystal. On second thoughts, New Zealand is in fact not far enough away from Australia.

    2. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same here in Australia.

      All things Australian are geared towards being American and everyone in Australia wants to be American. Any time an Aussie actor lands a role in an American movie or TV show it's like we ALL did and any time Australia gets a mention for any reason in the American press it's like everyone in Australia won the lottery or something.

      You'd think that after all this time we would have grown up and become happy with ourselves but no, we are still trying to be somebody else and somebody "better". Why the fuck we think being American would be better than being Australian is beyond me, but there you go.

      All I know about Australia is that Dingos eat your babies.

    3. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by drsmithy · · Score: 2

      I think I went to New Zealand once, it's right beside Florida at the edge of the World..... right?

      New Zealand is like Australia's Canada.

    4. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Australia is like NZ's North Korea.

    5. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 2

      Or Belgium's Netherlands? Or Venezuela's Cuba? Or Phillipine's Brazil?

      Typically Aussie's get along quite well with Canadians. Just don't offer them a Fosters. They don't drink that crap.

      --
      Wearing pants should always be optional.
    6. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      and their economy is kicking the pants off USA

    7. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by Genda · · Score: 1

      And the Dingos just say "Eat all you want, they'll make more."

    8. Re:Nothing of interest ever happens here in NZ. by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      No no no, you're holding the map upside down...

      Austrailia is like New Zealand's Canada

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  12. A guide to appropriate use of armed force by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    If it would look stupid as a 3D shooter, then you've probably used too much.

    Unless of course 'disarming unarmed citizens' and 'avoiding pregnant wife' suddenly became genre staples.

    1. Re:A guide to appropriate use of armed force by Genda · · Score: 1

      There's a movie from 1969 starring Ringo Starr and Peter Sellers called the "Magic Christian". It explains everything. Oh, and pay special attention to the "Pheasant Hunt". The take down at "Mega Uploads" was precisely a pheasant hunt.

  13. who knows? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Certainly not anybody posting here. Maybe they wanted to make sure they got somebody in there before he could destroy any evidence. Maybe they thought he might flee in his own chopper. Maybe they just thought it would be more fun that way.

  14. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Guess what, Slashdot hosts stolen content too. Sometimes submitters copy paste articles into Slashdot. Would you fault Slashdot for hosting stolen content? And would you justify Rob Malda's house being raided with a fucking SWAT teams and helicopters?
     
    And unfortunately I dont live in US or NZ. The only way I can hope to fix these is to get my country to go to war with one of these. For some reason I dont like that option.

  15. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by MightyMartian · · Score: 3

    An interesting point of view. Here's one to counter it. I've been following Robert Fripp's struggles to get UMG to give him a simple accounting of how many King Crimson and related releases have been sold, for several years now. What I'd more, in violation of contract, KC music has got on to online stores like iTunes. Will you support SWAT teams raiding UMG at gunpoint to seize those records, and if not, why not?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  16. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sure, he's a sleaze. But he's not even remotely a criminal. Contrary to the implication of your post title, he stole nothing, and provided no material assistance to any actual theft. All he appeared to do, all even the prosecution alleges he did, was help other people violate some licenses. Nothing at all was stolen. Not a scrap of paper or speck of dust was wrongfully taken away from someone who owned it. Nevertheless, the license violations certainly do expose him to a wide range of civil complaints, should the content owners ever decide to sue him--I personally think they have a decent case against him, in addition to the strong cases they could build against the actual infringers. But it's simply factually incorrect to compare him to an actual criminal like Madoff. It's more accurate to compare him to a divorcee in a nasty custody dispute. No crime doesn't mean there isn't still lots of drama, and bad behavior all around.

  17. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    Whoosh.

  18. Like religion in the 1600's by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 2

    This is like religion in the 1600's and earlier controlling the government to take out those who didn't play by their rules. We are better off with the separation of church and state and will be better off with a massive reduction in the breadth and depth of copyright/patent rules. I agree that it is good that if someone writes a book that the publishing industry can't just rip them off. But I disagree that the writer of Happy Birthday is still able to control who sings his song all these years later. Even the same with the Beatles. By this point people should be at least able to rework them into something modern and potentially more interesting. I suspect that much of the lack of variety in pop music is that they don't dare do something interesting that might be similar to something done

    Copyright rules at this point would be like a guy who you hired 50 years ago to paint one of your apartments is somehow able to demand 30% of the rent from that unit. He may have done a really really nice job but when you look at copyright as where the public good lay it would be better for all if these things came available way faster. Also the restrictions should be more relaxed. A song is the majority of a composition. Any copyright on a few riffs should be done in a year or two.

    The same with a story. The whole composition might have a decade or two of protection but the characters and storyline should lose out in a few years. It is definitely time for new blood in the Star Wars series but even Harry Potter characters should be fair game soon if JK can't be bothered with continuing their journey.

    1. Re:Like religion in the 1600's by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Beh. In the 1600's though to the 1300's you were freer to voice your opinions and "go against the religious establishment" than you are today to go against the government and the courts. Especially when the magna carta was fresh and new. 1100's through 800's not so much, 1200's were kind of a special case(see 1215 and the magna carta). But the period was rife with people rising up against the church. Martin Luther(you know the guy who sparked the reformation), among others. Hell it worked out fine for the monarchy in England too. Hence the "Church of England" the reality is, government is even more overbearing today than it was in the days of serfdom.

      The real problem is law doesn't reflect the will of the people, it reflects the will of the state. People like to blast groups like the tea party(and social-libertarians) who want smaller less intrusive government. But hey, lookie here just what the hell is this entire news article about? Overbearing government that's too large, working at the behest of not the people, but for groups, organizations, and companies, who get laws passed which benefit them.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  19. Raid was deemed illegal back in June by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can't believe I just spent 10 mins reading this guy's wikipedia entry yet this is the most important piece:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jun/28/kim-dotcom-judge-raid-illegal

    It's clear that the FBI acting on behalf of the MPAA/RIAA had an overzealous NZ police force keen to impress.

    The really interesting item for me was how UMG submitted an invalid takedown notice on a video on Youtube on baseless grounds. I'm surprised that some of the artists didn 't sue the record company.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:Raid was deemed illegal back in June by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

      The little saga with Universal, Youtube and Megaupload:
      http://www.thecmuwebsite.com/article/universal-has-no-special-takedown-privileges-says-youtube/

      I love how Will.I.Am's lawyer tried to take the video as well even though his client had signed a contract.

      I wonder if some legal eagles ended being fired ...

      --
      Wearing pants should always be optional.
  20. New Zealand is like Australia's Canada. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    I think I went to New Zealand once, it's right beside Florida at the edge of the World..... right?

    New Zealand is like Australia's Canada.

    Oh, so Australia has 51 states too? Cool.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:New Zealand is like Australia's Canada. by drsmithy · · Score: 2

      It's more like we're the 52nd state. What that makes NZ in that context I couldn't say. :)

    2. Re:New Zealand is like Australia's Canada. by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The 51st ? That would be the UK. Thatcher started them off down that course a good decade and a half before the neo-cons took solid grip on Australia.

  21. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Is that a chopper I hear? Hey! Who are you g...............

  22. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I'd pay to see UMG raided! Or maybe there's a torrent of it......

  23. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    I know, eh. One day someone uploaded a Hannah Montana DVD and my copy stopped working. They deprived my family of their use of a DVD by uploading it. I demand justice!

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  24. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    No, but we can tell the unions that "they're coming to take our 4 weeks paid leave" and they'll crush any attacking force like a bug.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  25. Yet another ignorant Dittohead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Heh. Yeah, if there's one group that stands their ground against entities with deep pockets, it's the Republicans.

    1. Re:Yet another ignorant Dittohead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What could be more annoying and less productive than drawing minor distinctions as boundaries, separating two parties that are obviously a single party with the same goal in mind. Notice we face the same problems and only accumulate more, election by election? Taxes don't go down, they go up, liberty doesn't flourish, it wanes. They point fingers at each other and point out small differences in values over minor problems, but they have both ruled the U.S. as a single party for more than a century. They've replaced the SCOTUS with their drones who even now reinterpret the constitution for their own immoral purposes. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/pagedetails.action?granuleId=&packageId=GPO-CONAN-2002
      Now we have a nation of drones, bolstering each others belief that they have been electing represenatives of their interests instead of being suckered into keeping a ruling class of criminals in office to utilize the people as livestock.
      Who's a dittohead now buddy?

  26. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who's Law? Jude of course.

    Hey jude, don't make it bad.
    Take a sad song and make it better.
    Remember to let her into your heart,
    Then you can start to make it better.

    Hey jude, don't be afraid.
    You were made to go out and get her.
    The minute you let her under your skin,
    Then you begin to make it better.

    And anytime you feel the pain, hey jude, refrain,
    Don't carry the world upon your shoulders.
    For well you know that it's a fool who plays it cool
    By making his world a little colder.

    Hey jude, don't let me down.
    You have found her, now go and get her.
    Remember to let her into your heart,
    Then you can start to make it better.

    So let it out and let it in, hey jude, begin,
    Youre waiting for someone to perform with.
    And don't you know that it's just you, hey jude, you'll do,
    The movement you need is on your shoulder.

    Hey jude, don't make it bad.
    Take a sad song and make it better.
    Remember to let her under your skin,
    Then you'll begin to make it
    Better better better better better better, oh.

    Na na na na na ,na na na, hey jude...

  27. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Your DVD still plays fine. It is your mind that is blocking the injustice you're subjecting to your eyes by watching it.

  28. It helps to be a friend of the U.S. President ... by drnb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Corzine. Hundreds of millions in 'segregated' funds. Currently enjoying new multi-million dollar offices on Wall St.

    It helps to be a friend of the President of the United States and a leading member of the Democratic party.

    “Jon Corzine one of the best colleagues I had in the Senate and one of the best partners I have in the White House.”
    President Barack Obama, Oct 21, 2009.

  29. Suggested new leadership by shuz · · Score: 1

    I have seen a lot of upset posts by people that don't like US leadership over this issue. Furthermore others have mentioned that the two top individuals most likely to get elected in November are both unlikely to take this issue in a different direction. What I have not seen are suggested alternate candidate names that upset US citizens can or should vote for. I did see the name Dennis Kucinich mentioned though I don't believe he will be on the ballot in most states, if any. Does anyone else have some suggestions we can all get behind and vote for?

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    1. Re:Suggested new leadership by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, it's too late for this election. I was hoping that something would come of the Americans Elect effort, but they self-destructed.

      The Greens might get themselves on a majority of state ballots. The candidates pull stunts like getting thrown in jail, but they might be somewhat inclined to listen to IP reform... it's already on their agenda in the form of patented genes. I wouldn't get my hopes up, though. But if you can stomach Krazy Kucinich, the Green Party platform might not sound too kooky to you. Both have a knack for embracing science when it supports their cause and switching to emotion when convenient.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  30. 'Lightly Armed' in the USA is the default by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just wanted to point this out to the 2-3 non-americans who might not already know, but in the USA 'lightly armed', IE with a service handgun, is pretty much the default for Law Enforcement personnel.

    You see an officer, he's going to have a handgun unless there's something special going on. 'Special' being it's somehow specifically dangerous to be wearing one(sometimes happens during crowd control duty), or 'special' in that an elevated danger situation is going on, where they'd be breaking out the shotguns/rifles and heavier body armor.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:'Lightly Armed' in the USA is the default by Barny · · Score: 1

      The officer in this instance was armed with a semi-automatic M4 rifle and Glock pistols (again, semi automatic).

      However, despite having equipment belts to carry extra clips, they were not in full tactical gear (so no grenades, etc).

      One thing to point out was that the officer on the stand only talked about what HE was equipped with, yet talk of breaching doors was made, so either they had a charge (unlikely) or one of the officers was sporting a shotgun with a breaching muzzle.

      No, this is not really heavy gear, but in countries where ANY semi-automatic gun is illegal, it is.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:'Lightly Armed' in the USA is the default by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I always thought that was kind of odd. In the US, law enforcement having more than a pistol on them is unusual and disconcerting, even though we have very permissive gun laws in general. In much of Europe and the UK, it seems much more common for police to have rifles or SMGs, even though citizens are not allowed much in the way of gun ownership.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    3. Re:'Lightly Armed' in the USA is the default by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It could be a skill level thing. A rifle/SMG is easier to USE effectively, but a handgun is easier to carry. Handguns are 'good enough' for 99% of the situations police get into by surprise. Beyond that, the rifle/shotgun is in the trunk and SWAT is a radio call away. If you see them, you know it's serious.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  31. Re:Helicopters by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    Theater.

  32. Re:He Hosted Stolen Content by Shompol · · Score: 1

    of the two you'd be best off attacking NZ - we don't have anything resembling defenses. We rely soley on the fact that no one can be arsed coming so far to conquer a big sheep farm.

    Well, from TFA we know that they have at least one helicopter.

  33. Why arrest him at all? by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

    The **AA could simply have sued MegaUpload for not taking sufficient action against copyright infringement. I don't see why the NZ police had to go after the founder directly, other than to intimidate him on behalf of US corporations.

  34. Megabox by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An interesting point of view. Here's one to counter it. I've been following Robert Fripp's struggles to get UMG to give him a simple accounting of how many King Crimson and related releases have been sold, for several years now. What I'd more, in violation of contract, KC music has got on to online stores like iTunes. Will you support SWAT teams raiding UMG at gunpoint to seize those records, and if not, why not?

    Kim Dotcom was on the way to launch Megabox which would flip the ratio of money the artists get versus what is held on to by the labels. Color my cynical but this upcoming service seems to be the only major difference between Mega Upload and the other file storage services. He claims to be planning on still going through with the launch. If so it will cut the labels out of the loop by allowing artists to sell more or less directly to the public. Good riddance I say.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  35. Lol, republicans by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    Voting for Obama means voting to be raped up the ass.

    Voting for Romney means voting to be raped up the ass with a sandpaper covered telephone pole while having to pay your raper.

    Welcome to American democracy. Your choice between bad and really goddamn awful fucking bad.

    Obama bows to his friends in business.

    Romney IS business.

    Obama at least has to pretend to listen to the voter, Romney openly states that business is not just his first priority but his ONLY priority.

    When you are a lamb let to be slaughtered, pick the butcher who least enjoys torturing small furry creatures. That is what I do.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Lol, republicans by indeterminator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Welcome to American democracy. Your choice between bad and really goddamn awful fucking bad.

      Why not vote on the third guy then? I mean, your country has to have more than two guys who want the job, right? Or is it somehow forbidden to have a political party that's neither republican nor democrat?

    2. Re:Lol, republicans by 1s44c · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not vote on the third guy then? I mean, your country has to have more than two guys who want the job, right? Or is it somehow forbidden to have a political party that's neither republican nor democrat?

      The system is rigged in such a way that there is no effective third party. Neither of the parties with true power will change this as it means giving away a share of their power. The voters are confused with constant republican v democrat non-issues and believe that any vote for any other party is just a wasted vote.

      In essence US democracy has reduced to a republican/democrat alliance that is garenteed power forever, it's a dictatorship with the illusion of free choice.

    3. Re:Lol, republicans by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      I mean, your country has to have more than two guys who want the job, right?

      2 guys + Hillary.

    4. Re:Lol, republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The american electoral system tends to promote a two-party system.

    5. Re:Lol, republicans by dropadrop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not vote on the third guy then? I mean, your country has to have more than two guys who want the job, right? Or is it somehow forbidden to have a political party that's neither republican nor democrat?

      The system is rigged in such a way that there is no effective third party. Neither of the parties with true power will change this as it means giving away a share of their power. The voters are confused with constant republican v democrat non-issues and believe that any vote for any other party is just a wasted vote.

      In essence US democracy has reduced to a republican/democrat alliance that is garenteed power forever, it's a dictatorship with the illusion of free choice.

      And until people start voting for the third parties it will stay that way, ironic isn't it? I'm not American, but I see this explanation every time. It's true, if you are liberal and vote for a third party you do risk giving the Republicans a win, and of course the same applies the other way around.

      However it's sure the parties who are in power would analyze why they lost, and if they found it was due to an increase in voters supporting third parties it would be sure to make a change in their tactics, and the more people would move to third parties, the more the current parties will be forced to make a change.

      While the problem is certainly more exaggerated in the US, it's not unique to you. For example here in Finland the strong parties have been trying to find ways to make it difficult for anyone to start a new party, and to find ways how a party with wide acceptance in some area will benefit from that in another area. Still, occasionally somebody finds a way to break their lock and it definitely makes a difference.

    6. Re:Lol, republicans by dcollins117 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, two and half men?

    7. Re:Lol, republicans by somarilnos · · Score: 2

      For a vote for 'the third guy' to mean anything, you have to have millions of people agree with you. And the two major political parties spend a lot of money convincing millions of people to disagree with you.

      If congress were allocated based on, say, percentage of votes obtained in the presidential election by each political party, then there could be a reason to vote for a third party candidate - even if they don't win, they get representation. This also solves the issue of two political parties getting nothing done in congress because of their opposing beliefs, assuming the third party gets enough representation and isn't so fundamentally close to one of the other parties to just push their agenda.

      But, that's not the way things are set up in the United States. So in practice, voting for a third party for the presidency is, in fact, just giving up your right to choose.

      Voting for them in elections other than the presidency can actually be viable, though.

    8. Re:Lol, republicans by andydouble07 · · Score: 3, Informative

      First past the post guarantees that third parties can never succeed on a national scale. It's not a matter of "not believing hard enough", it's Duverger's Law. Voting for a third party in a national election is just giving a pass to the (slightly) worse of the two candidates that actually have a chance of winning.

    9. Re:Lol, republicans by Mozai · · Score: 1

      > why not vote for the third guy then?

      Because their election system is First-Past-The-Post. Voting for the third guy means the option you like less will get more votes.

      Example: Your feelings about how to run the country are pretty indigo, but the leading parties are orange and yellow. You're sick of voting yellow, so you decide to vote for the third candidate, who politically aquamarine. People who prefer their politics in the infra-red are going to continue to vote orange. Result: orange has a wider majority over both yellow and aquamarine, which gives them a larger mandate for their reddish politics, and to ignore your indigo ideals.

    10. Re:Lol, republicans by dropadrop · · Score: 1

      And unfortunately it's still the only way you can get the parties to change.

    11. Re:Lol, republicans by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      The third guy is worse than the other two. The fourth worse than the previous three and on and on. No good people in politics. None. Even the guy who runs for the first time as an outsider is already tainted by the process. If he doesn't break bad in the campaign, he'll do it in office.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    12. Re:Lol, republicans by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Wow I don't think I've ever seen the truth so eloquently and accurately stated. The question now is what do we do about it?

      Install an actual proportional representation voting system. That way each vote counts.

      Sadly this goes directly against the interests of the republician/democrat alliance and they will fight with everything they have to stop it happening. Getting a majority of the population to understand the need for proportional representation would be a massive challenge against huge budgets and gigantic PR machines.

    13. Re:Lol, republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is that a majority of the population does not care what the policies are of the politicians; they just vote straight Republican or Democrat simply because it is what their parents did. Believe it or not, most Americans care more about American Idol than politics.

    14. Re:Lol, republicans by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      The system is rigged in such a way that there is no effective third party

      And do you know who "rigs" it? The voters. When you vote against all the other candidates this November, that'll be your way of saying that you don't want people to run who don't have a "R" or "D" next to their names. Persuade 200 million other Americas to do what you do, and we'll have collectively rigged the system against third parties. (Although it sounds to me like 200 million other Americans may have already persuaded you. Perhaps I'm mistaken?)

      That -- people voting that they'd prefer there be only two parties -- is the main barrier. It dwarfs all other barriers combined: the rules for getting onto ballots, the media's decision for who to invite to debates, the megacorps funding the campaigns of only Republicans and Democrats, who said something dumb enough to get quoted on The Daily Show, etc. All of that relatively impotent stuff is secondary to the decisions that we make when we cast our votes.

      Cynics say that if the people ever did vote for someone else, the powers that be would prevent our choice from taking office. Isn't it interesting, though, that we never test their resolve and make them perform that assassination, or whatever it is they're going to do? And isn't it interesting, that since we apparently have nothing to lose anyway (i.e. there supposedly isn't any democracy) we don't bother to act like people who have nothing to lose, by voting for who we want? Those cynics are full of shit: The Man isn't keeping us down; we choose to be down.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    15. Re:Lol, republicans by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Actually, in the last Presidential election, there were five parties on the ballot in enough states to have a chance of winning, if only the other three parties got any recognition. Even in the so-called debates the other three viable parties are always locked out.

      I always either vote Libertarian or Green, the other three want to put me in prison.

    16. Re:Lol, republicans by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      as this started with the presidential election i feel that I should point out the electoral college. although common belief is that the president is elected via a general election this is not actually the case. Vote for the third candidate all you want, it makes no difference. OTOH, if you look at the third candidate you will realize that it is the same as the first two, but this time with mint flavor.

    17. Re:Lol, republicans by RyoShin · · Score: 2

      I'm American, and I plan on voting for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. I'm not a big fan of the party, nor am I a big fan of his (though according to various political "match ups" I agree with him more than any other candidate), but I'm casting my vote to a third person (who I know will not get elected) to make the other two squirm. I believe that just as even competition leads to a better market, it can lead to better politics. If people keep voting for one or the other because of party lines or (worse) because "he's not the other guy", the two majority parties will happily continue sitting across from each other at the table, shaking a fist at each other above it and exchanging handjobs below it.

      It's going to take a major incident in both parties at about the same time to make the American public really change their voting habits to the point of electing a third party; however, in the mean time, if we can get people to diversify their voting (especially to the person instead of the party), it will put extra pressure on the Republicrats to actually, you know, represent those who elected them and shape up a little bit.

      I believe in this so much that I am going to put a Gary Johnson support sticker on my car (and it will be the only one), but only if I can easily remove it or it's magnetic because I hate bumper stickers in general.

    18. Re:Lol, republicans by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we wouldn't want the wrong lizard to get in, would we?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    19. Re:Lol, republicans by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You realise that by spouting such theories you are directly helping them come to pass.

      From your link:
      Duverger suggests two reasons why single-member district plurality voting systems favor a two party system. One is the result of the "fusion" (or an alliance very like fusion) of the weak parties, and the other is the "elimination" of weak parties by the voters, by which he means that the voters gradually desert the weak parties on the grounds that they have no chance of winning.

      (emphasis mine)

      So people don't vote for them because they think people won't vote for them. Whose fault is that? By propagating the myth that third parties have no chance, you are supporting the two-party system by making it come true.

      Enjoy your lizards.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  36. Madoff by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Bernie's high crime was robbing rich people, instead of poor ones. That is the only reason he is in prison.

    (30)

    1. Re:Madoff by rcs1000 · · Score: 1

      Ummm: also it was a THIRTY BILLION DOLLAR fraud. And they defrauded charities and schools as well as rich people.

      It's pretty hard to ignore something of that size.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
  37. Re:It helps to be a friend of the U.S. President . by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    No one on Wall Street goes to prison, drnb. Obama didn't make that happen. Wall Street did. They run the country. Don't like it? So vote Republican. Oh, wait...

    We had a chance to stop this takeover back in the eighties and nineties. We needed to provide taxpayer money to fund elections, remove all contributions WHATSOEVER, and restrict candidates to single points of communications. Running for office should require three staffers and a camera, not a billion dollars for media buys.

    But now, candidates must, truly must, do what money tells them to do, not because they want to get rich, but because they know that if they buck Wall Street, a billion dollars will rain down in opposition to them and kick them out of office. This is the death of democracy you're seeing, not "Obama", who somehow you've noticed has just invented kowtowing to Wall Street. Bush and Reagan utterly caved and let them take over, for Godzakes. This isn't about Democrats, it's about money and how our collective distaste for funding elections by taxes has let infinite amounts of money shut down democracy here, and soon around the world. We did this to ourselves with our own ideology and distaste for politicians and the political process. Democracy has never been popular with Americans. They prefer wealthy landlords, more or less, as long as they are entertained.