Slashdot Mirror


West Nile Virus Outbreak Puts Dallas In State of Emergency

Penurious Penguin writes with news from the BBC that the city of Dallas "is experiencing a widespread outbreak of mosquito-borne West Nile Virus that has caused and appears likely to continue to cause widespread and severe illness and loss of life," and writes that the city "has declared a state of emergency. West Nile virus can be asymptomatic or produce multiple symptoms, but can also lead to fevers, and the potentially fatal meningitis or encephalitis. Birds are the most common carriers and mosquitoes are the vector for human infection."

167 comments

  1. Buy DEET by arcite · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buy DEET, 50-90% concentration, apply liberally. The higher concentration stuff is rather strong, but you can spray it on your clothes (ie. Socks, shoes, sleeves).

    1. Re:Buy DEET by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Informative

      >> you can spray it on your clothes

      Not synthetics, however, which tend to degrade from DEET.

    2. Re:Buy DEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does kill the plastic used on most electronic gadgets though

    3. Re:Buy DEET by MisterSquid · · Score: 0

      Buy DEET, 50-90% concentration, apply liberally. The higher concentration stuff is rather strong, but you can spray it on your clothes (ie. Socks, shoes, sleeves).

      That's it. Toxify your local environment and expose yourself to biochemically active substances...

      Why not just move the fuck away from places with mosquitoes?

      --
      blog
    4. Re:Buy DEET by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Buy DEET by Ollabelle · · Score: 2

      Lower concentrations work fine too. http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/toolkit/DEET.pdf. It wears off sooner, but if you're not going out for hours at a time, no big deal.

      --
      Ibid.
    6. Re:Buy DEET by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Where might you suggest we go? The bastards live everywhere.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Buy DEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moon, of course!

    8. Re:Buy DEET by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      move the fuck away

      Where?

      A-W-A-Y

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    9. Re:Buy DEET by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "Toxify your local environment and expose yourself to biochemically active substances..."

      Life is full of tradeoffs, and you still die in the end.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Buy DEET by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Antarctica and certain parts of Siberia.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Buy DEET by Barsteward · · Score: 0, Troll

      When are the churches going to start shouting its the fault of the homosexuals in Dallas????

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    12. Re:Buy DEET by sjames · · Score: 2

      Eat less sugar and more hot peppers.

      Neem oil (available in convenient pump spray) also helps.

    13. Re:Buy DEET by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's it. Toxify your local environment and expose yourself to biochemically active substances... Why not just move the fuck away from places with mosquitoes?

      Where do you live, McMurtry? Why not simply get an electronic repellant? I've had one for years, they work. Well, until the battery goes out; I think that's how I got the "flu" a couple of months ago that I suspect was West Nile Virus. The next one I get will have a pilot light so I can see it's working.

    14. Re:Buy DEET by pspahn · · Score: 2

      This.

      Also, maybe 15 years ago or so I was up in Wyoming on a fishing trip. We were near the Medicine Bow river on a private stretch one evening and the mosquitoes were the worst I have ever seen.

      The following day, we stopped in a tiny little tackle shop with one old guy working the counter.

      "Have any mosquito repellant?" we asked

      "I dun use that sheet. Whatchu need is some pure vaniller extract. It's in aisle two."

      The old guy was right. It worked quite well, but I suspect it worked well because it coated my skin with a film impenetrable by their puny proboscis.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  2. No one has posted in minutes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess all the other would-be first posters have died of West Nile.

    1. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are all off changing their PSN passwords

    2. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by DJRumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unlikely ;)

      For most, they won't even know they are exposed. This is a lot like SARS in that respect. It only severely effects about 1% of those infected. About 20% get mild symptoms, headaches, etc.

      It does adversely affect those with compromised immune systems though (the elderly, immunocompromised, etc).

      30% concentration of DEET is recommended for adults. Certainly NOT 90%.
      10% DEET concentration for children.

      The concentrations the poster above is suggesting would be toxic.

    3. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      The concentrations you are suggesting would be worthless. I have tried both and only the concentrations that can only be applied to clothes and not skin seem to keep the bastards away.

      I suggest we start fighting fire with fire, lets create some diseases that kill mosquitos.

    4. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      You should probably let the CDC know that...

      http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/qa/insect_repellent.htm

    5. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1
    6. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by DJRumpy · · Score: 1
    7. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      lets create some diseases that kill mosquitos.

      Dragonflies and bats are the mosquitoes natural enemies. Put up bat boxes to get more bats and they will have a field day munching on the buggers. The one downside to dragonflies is they need swamps and such to breed, the same place as mosquitoes do.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    8. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by Neil_Brown · · Score: 2

      The concentrations you are suggesting would be worthless.

      I can only relate to my experience, but I agree — when I was in the jungle/rainforest part of Sabah, Borneo, we attempted to use DEET to keep the mosquitos from landing on us. The stuff from camping stores seemed to attract, rather than repel them — even going up to as higher percentage as we had with us (around 90%, from memory), and it was not much use, even when applied directly to the (small areas) of exposed skin.

      Covering up as much skin as possible, and hoping that the mosquitos found others in the group more attractive, were pretty much the only successful approaches.

    9. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      in your scenario you get a balance with mosquitoes that still carry the disease. So, it's not really any good.
      Genetically engineered sterile male mosquitoes is how to go about it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't need to wear Off, I just need you to wear On.

    11. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Bats only go after mosquitoes if there is nothing better to eat (like moths). It would take a whole lot of bats to make any appreciable dent in the mosquito population.

    12. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      I suggest we start fighting fire with fire, lets create some diseases that kill mosquitos.

      Nuke it from orbit.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    13. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      30% concentration of DEET is recommended for adults. Certainly NOT 90%.

      I'm not seeing the recomendations your talking about,

      A product containing 23.8% DEET provided an average of 5 hours of protection from mosquito bites.
      A product containing 20% DEET provided almost 4 hours of protection
      A product with 6.65% DEET provided almost 2 hours of protection
      Products with 4.75% DEET were both able to provide roughly 1 and a half hour of protection.

      These examples represent results from only one study and are only included to provide a general idea of how such products may work. Actual protection will vary widely based on conditions such as temperature, perspiration, and water exposure.

      10% DEET concentration for children.

      Again I'm not seeing a recommendation

      Since it is the most widely available repellent, many people ask about the use of products containing DEET on children. No definitive studies exist in the scientific literature about what concentration of DEET is safe for children. No serious illness has been linked to the use of DEET in children when used according to manufacturer’s recommendations.

      The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Environmental Health has updated their recommendation for use of DEET products on children in 2003, citing: "Insect repellents containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, also known as N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) with a concentration of 10% appear to be as safe as products with a concentration of 30% when used according to the directions on the product labels." AAP recommends that repellents with DEET should not be used on infants less than 2 months old.

      The concentrations the poster above is suggesting would be toxic.

      Yeah right, does that even make sense? Why would putting on 10% DEET every hour for 10 hours be more toxic that putting on 90% DEET once? Sounds to me like you've been drinking Chemophobic flavored koolaid. I've used 90% DEET regularly over year, up in the North forests, you'll wake up with knots the size of marbles if your insect repellent runs out over night; used to drench my clothes with 30% aerosol and put them in a sealed plastic bag to marinate for a day or two also.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    14. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      Wow useless information from a government website, what a surprise. The same morons that insist you cook meat to a point where you might as well just eat something else.

      Try it, I have and those concentrations mean I am getting eaten alive.

    15. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by DJRumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look here:

      http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/consultations/deet/guidelines.html

      To prevent the possibility of adverse effects, products containing DEET should not be used on children younger than 2 months of age. For children over 2 months and for adults, the use of a product with a concentration no greater than 30% DEET is advised. Use the lowest concentration DEET product that will provide adequate protection. Reapply the repellent only after effectiveness diminishes with time.

      Studies have also shown that anything above 50% provided no additional protection (but did provider longer protection). In other words, it was no more effective, but lasted longer.

      http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/toolkit/DEET.pdf

    16. Re:No one has posted in minutes! by Allen+Akin · · Score: 1

      In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency has stated that concentrations of up to 100% are safe for adults. The American Academy of Pediatrics has stated that concentrations of up to 30% are safe for children. In both cases the repellent must be applied properly! Consumer Reports recommends 30% to 50% for adults, and helpfully explains that higher concentrations last longer, but don't repel any more effectively than lower concentrations.

      Personally, I've used 100% DEET for a week at a time, a few times a year, over several years, without any of the documented side-effects. If someone is in one of the (relatively uncommon) situations where it's appropriate, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend trying it. Otherwise, adults can use 30% to 50% DEET and reapply as needed. My kids use 10% to 30% when necessary.

      All this is subject to the usual cost/benefit tradeoffs, of course. There appears to be a lot of data showing that the risk of using DEET is low, so if West Nile or some other mosquito-borne disease is threatening, the benefit probably outweighs the risk.

      Allen

  3. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it a little pathetic that we're not hearing anything about this from domestic sources?

    What... does this affect a corporate sponsor in some negative way?

    1. Re:huh? by Enry · · Score: 1

      West Nile can't be stopped by hordes of rednecks with CCWs. (kidding on the square)

    2. Re:huh? by stiggle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But West Nile can stop the hordes of rednecks :-)

    3. Re:huh? by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 2

      Is is that you didn't look or just aren't willing to?

      CBS News

    4. Re:huh? by whargoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, no we're not. The liberals you speak of are mostly California refugees that are fleeing the product of the choices they've made, laws and regulations they've mandated and politicians they've voted in. They're broke and it's their fault, but they'll never understand nor admit that it's the result of the choices they've made. Now they're spreading and they're going to fuck the rest of us the way they've fucked themselves.

    5. Re:huh? by ghinckley68 · · Score: 1

      I was visiting family there last couple of weeks and they are freeked out about. Its all over there news.

      We get here in orlando in the summer all the time so we are use to it.

      --
      Linux modi 2.6.26-2-parisc
    6. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the reason California has its debt load is because of following a Conservative anti-tax policy. That, and their electricity deregulation which gave boatloads of money to companies like Enron all in the name of a free market.

      You'll never understand nor admit that it's the right-wing policies that harmed California, nor that the fix is relatively simple.

      BTW, if California is broke, then so is Texas. They both have huge debt loads.

    7. Re:huh? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There broke because conservatives change taxes without changing services. It's their overall approach is to divorce the idea of taxes from services, cut taxes and then watch everything fail.

      It's nice to know you live up to the Texas reputation of inbred morons.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:huh? by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Come to the Old East in the coming weeks, whargoul. I'd guess 4 out of 5 yards with signs in them will be repping D, going by previous elections.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    9. Re:huh? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There must be a lot of Californians there. That explains all the In-N-Out Burgers I saw when I was there this summer.

    10. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you need to re-evaluate each of your specific "domestic sources." Think of this as an opportunity to more easily identify entertainment which poses as news.

    11. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "the reason California has its debt load is because of following a Conservative anti-tax policy"

      Good grief! The stupidity of the things I read on this site continues to astound me. How can you possibly say these things with a straight face?

      Because they're true. I'm familiar with Proposition 13 even if you aren't. I noticed what really happened in California after its power deregulation and who profited from it. See I know it's the Conservative Mantra that liberals, especially those California liberals, are evil, and do things wrong, but you never check the facts.

      You just go with what you think you know. Because it must be true.

      ALL the liberal run cities and states are going broke one after the other with California and New York at the top of the list. Anti-tax? Are you high? California has already had what three cities declare bankruptcy and still the liberals tax and spend like there is a money tree growing on every street corner.

      Cities, huh?

      And what have those cities been doing? Have they been keeping their tax policies sound, or have they been following right-wing ideas of keeping taxes low, relying on growth, and hoping it didn't blow up in their face?

      Do look it up.

      Besides, chances are some of the bankruptcies are the result of financial improprieties, much like say Birmingham in Alabama or even Orange County back in the 90s.

      It's hard, I know, to blame the bankers, for screwing a government entity over, but they can and do. And then the conservatives give them medals and cheer them for being the REAL producers.

      http://taxfoundation.org/state-tax-climate/california

      "California's Top Individual Income Tax Rate Is Second Highest in the Nation
      With seven brackets and a top rate of 10.3 percent for those earning over $1,000,000, California's individual income tax has the second highest rate and one of the most highly progressive structures in the nation. In 2010, California's state-level individual income tax collections were $1,229 per person, which ranked 5th highest nationally. Since most small businesses are S Corporations, partnerships, or sole proprietorships, they pay their business taxes at the rates for individuals. That makes California's taxes on small businesses some of the most burdensome in the nation."

      C'mon, you can't possibly be *this* stupid are you?

      C'mon, you can't possibly be stupid enough to think that analyzing things in a vacuum is valid. You're just throwing out statistics and hoping they'll lead things how you want.

      No wait, you're listening to TaxFoundation.org, a group with its own slant on things. Oh sure, they insist they are non-partisan, but others disagree. Maybe you don't realize that California's tax burden includes massive payments to the federal coffers that they don't get back. You don't bother to check how much revenue California actually gets from its taxes, or how it's allocated. You don't see that California's corporate tax revenues have dropped as a result of changes in tax policy, not business operations. You don't see the price of tax cuts, you just think that if only they cut them, then magically revenues would go up without consequence.

      Compare California's net tax burden today, to what it was before Proposition 13. Make sure you control for inflation.

      You'll see a different picture than the one the Tax Foundation wants to present.

    12. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. I know California history also.

      Keep drinking the kool aid drone. Nothing you have pointed out indicates conservative anti-tax policy, that is utter foolishness. The place is a cesspool of liberal tax and spend politicians - and voters. And it's getting worse.

      You want to see what conservative anti-tax policy does, look at Wisconsin.

    13. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      National 5 days ago. Just because you did not see it does not mean it is not there.

      West Nile Virus Outbreak: Planes Spraying in Dallas County After 8 Deaths

    14. Re:huh? by Vancorps · · Score: 2

      Uhh... look at Arizona too, so broke they sold their capital building and they are about as conservative as you get. The whole argument is just stupid, the most prosperous states in the union were always left leaning. Oil put Texas and Alaska in a status of their own. Of course that's still no reason to base a decision. Instead you have to look at the retarded methods used to deal with a budget issue. Until the Bush tax cuts, revenue was looking pretty good, we were on track to be debt free. Now you see people arguing to continue tax cuts and cut spending which millions are relying on during an economic down turn.

      Of course the conservative agenda says personal responsibility and blah blah, really not a bad ideal for an individual to live by but insane to expect everybody to follow. So casting all those people with medical bills to the wolves and depressing already low-income people is supposed to lead to what? More jobs? Why would a corporation hire more people if their wasn't demand for more product? That's why I can't stand hearing about tax rates and jobs in the same sentence. There is a level of taxation that is burdensome but we're no where even close to it.

      Last I checked too, California was still the best place to get venture capital, I wonder why?

  4. Man-Made climate change by arcite · · Score: 2

    Rising temperatures, increase drought, more importantly, increased rain and flooding, will all ensure the spread mosquito vectors. I wouldn't be surprised to see one of the newly mutated strains of Malaria to make a resurgence. Par the course, all we can do is adapt to this new life.

    1. Re:Man-Made climate change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Man made liberals create fantasy's as well. Mock religion but not this fake shit you speak of. .

      Praise the Lord! That feverish delirium and uncontrollable shivering is evidence of the Holy Spirit upon you!

    2. Re:Man-Made climate change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is an Amish doing on a tech site?

    3. Re:Man-Made climate change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " fantasy's..."

      2 spelling mistakes in 1 word, I rest my case.

    4. Re:Man-Made climate change by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Presumably you post anonymously because you don't truly believe your bullshit and have no wish to be associated with it in public.

  5. I'm in VA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot, Tell me why this is nothing to worry about.

    1. Re:I'm in VA... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      That post was not insightful. deserves -1 ignorant.

      So you are saying we shouldn't worry about it until thousands die?
      How about you let the smart people handles and you just worry about getting your ticket to the 'B' ark.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I'm in VA... by BrentH · · Score: 1

      Contrary to car accidents or lightning strikes, the West Nile virus is contagious and its spread may accelerate.

    3. Re:I'm in VA... by jpapon · · Score: 1
      Parent asked why it was nothing to worry about. I told them why; because the chance of contracting the disease and dying from it are basically non-existent, especially when compared to other things. Before one worries about getting West Nile, it makes sense to worry about other, much more likely causes of death.

      So you are saying we shouldn't worry about it until thousands die?

      Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Let the CDC worry about it. Worrying and/or panicking over some disease you have almost no chance of contracting is just pointless.

      How about you let the smart people handles [sic] and you just worry about getting your ticket to the 'B' ark.

      Did you just make that up, or is that an expression? Either way, it's not very clever.

      Fine though, you worry about West Nile. Maybe doing so will raise your blood pressure and cause you to have a heart attack, killing you. Which is certainly much more likely than you contracting and dying from West Nile.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    4. Re:I'm in VA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying we shouldn't worry about it until thousands die?
      How about you let the smart people handles ....

      "Let the smart people handles ( sic ) " ?

      One thing is certain, you aren't one of the aforementioned smart people.

      Your illiteracy is appalling. I am completely serious. Of the posts you
      have submitted relative to this article alone, more than half contain
      grammatical and spelling errors. What I am trying to say is that you
      are an idiot and every time you make a remark here you make that
      more obvious.

  6. A little. by neoshroom · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is in area news, but it hasn't hit the national airwaves yet. However, the local news doesn't describe it as a "state of emergency" like the BBC does. Maybe though they just don't want to get people overly scared. What is happening is pretty much the same as what happened in New York a couple years ago.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
    1. Re:A little. by bws111 · · Score: 1, Informative

      In reality, all a "state of emergency" means is that state money is available to combat the problem. There may also be some laws put into effect (like getting fined if you leave standing water on your property). It does not mean that things are dire or that drastic measures are being taken, which is how many people read it.

    2. Re:A little. by Silentknyght · · Score: 1

      It is in area news, but it hasn't hit the national airwaves yet. However, the local news doesn't describe it as a "state of emergency" like the BBC does. Maybe though they just don't want to get people overly scared. What is happening is pretty much the same as what happened in New York a couple years ago.

      Hasn't hit the national airwaves yet? I heard about it this morning on NPR, and the report stated that the locals have claimed it a "state of emergency", presumably for receiving/requesting emergency funds to combat it.

      http://minnesota.publicradio.org/features/npr.php?id=158911307

  7. Re:Sure hope they don't expect the gov'mnt to step by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What a hateful, ignorant comment. But then, hatred is always found next to ignorance, so I suppose there is no surprise here.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  8. Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by bengoerz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Dallas. People are not dying in the streets. We are not living out Monty Python's "Bring Out Your Dead" sketch.

    The "emergency" was declared primarily so we could gain access to 5 pesticide-spraying planes from the Texas Department of Emergency Management.

    1. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      We are not living out Monty Python's "Bring Out Your Dead" sketch.

      Dallas is more of a crunchy frog town.

    2. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      No kidding. 14 people dead and it's an emergency?

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    3. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is 2012, not 1812 or even 1912. We have the technology and resolve to reach near-0% death rates for certain diseases.

      It's not that people's lives are worth more now. In the past, people just accepted death at a young age because there was no way to prevent it. Now, because we have much more capacity to prevent death, we're less tolerant of allowing it to happen.

    4. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the wishful thinking...

    5. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Are there no pesticide spraying planes NOT owned by the Emergency Management department? I can't imagine that it is that complicated or expensive to hire crop dusters.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    6. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      I dunno, 14 people dying of something in eight months is still pretty low even by modern standards. About 100 people have been murdered in Dallas so far this year, so you're still more likely to be shot than die of West Nile.

    7. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I think the issue is IF the rates are increasing, then it could mean they are losing control of the mosquitoes and the disease.

      A lot of places in the USA aren't very different from Africa. But you bunch aren't dying from as many nasty diseases.

      All it takes is for people to screw up big time and one of the diseases could take hold.

      --
    8. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      Take out some u' them lib'rul muh-skeeters that t'aint thinkin' natshrul, raht?

      --
      -
    9. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 1

      'ang on, 'e says e's not dead yet!

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    10. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by dahl_ag · · Score: 1

      Plague / Pandemic is still only #3 at Doomsday Pie. So I will continue to place my fear and worry in the Zombie Apocalypse. Hrm... or maybe West Nile is the precursor of some zombie virus....

    11. Re:Resources from TX Dept of Emergency Management by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Hell, 14 shootings in Chicago is a slow weekend. Those mosquitoes are slackers.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  9. nylon by nten · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nylon is fine, but it will destroy other stuff. Permethrin should only be sprayed on clothes, but it does a good job too, actually kills the things.

      I think we should bring back DDT worldwide, they have lost some of their developed immunities by now. Once they start developing immunities we can start with the organochlorides, then the organophosphates, then the pyrethrins, and by then they should be vulnerable to DDT again. Sure, we won't have any birds or flowering plants, but we can get by on wind pollinated crops. Probably need to devote some extra money to cancer research too.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
    1. Re:nylon by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Honey bees are not native to the US, so no big deal. Native REAL AMERICAN flowering plants will do just fine. It's those illegal immigrant flowering plants that will disappear.

    2. Re:nylon by budgenator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with DDT, you just have to use per the label instructions i.e. indoors; it does bio-accumulate in fish and does nasty things to birds that eat fish, which is why it's not used outdoors. In mammals like Humans, its very safe, used to be used for delousing people and the Sales-driods used to eat it by the teaspoon to demonstrate it's safety. This does mean that DDT is not a good fit for mosquito control in countries where window screens are wide spread; it's great for bedbugs. Bacillus thuringiensis israeliensis works on mosquitos outdoors.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:nylon by gman003 · · Score: 2

      You know what else works really well on mosquitoes?

      Napalm.

      Of course, I shudder to think of what would happen should they develop an immunity to that...

    4. Re:nylon by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know what else works really well on mosquitoes?

      Bats.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    5. Re:nylon by gman003 · · Score: 2

      Oh, that works too. There's a bat that's nested in my attic for the past few summers - I call him Bruce, for obvious reasons. He even seems to have formed an alliance, or at least a truce, with my cats (work great on the moles and possums).

      Now if only I had something to kill all the spiders... napalm perhaps?

    6. Re:nylon by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Spiders eat mosquitos too, name each one of them Patrick and call it a day.

    7. Re:nylon by sjames · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but even the best Major Leaguers can only manage a bit over 0.300.

    8. Re:nylon by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Dragonflies and Daddy Longlegs spiders too. Various birds as well.

    9. Re:nylon by celle · · Score: 1

      Barn swallows love mosquitos.

    10. Re:nylon by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with DDT, you just have to use per the label instructions i.e. indoors; it does bio-accumulate in fish and does nasty things to birds that eat fish, which is why it's not used outdoors.

      Yours is the best comment ever made on Slashdot - ever. Nothing wrong with it, then a partial list of what's wrong with it.

      You win one internet.

      The problem is, You say there's nothing wrong with it. I know others that say there's nothing wrong with it at all, and fully intend to use it outdoors if it were legal again. I also know others who acknowledge that it is bad for avian wildlife but do not care. They will use it for whatever they damn well please if they get their hands on it. They won't follow the instructions. And that sir, is the reason it is illegal. Nothing wrong with PCB's either by your logic. I mean it's hell on guinea pigs, and just gives people a little acne. But nothing wrong with it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:nylon by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Barn swallows love mosquitos.

      And if you watch in the sky in the evening, the swallows will swoop around until almost dark, then suddenly the bats will take over. Pretty cool to watch. They both eat lots of flying nasties.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:nylon by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      But it's so unambiguous.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    13. Re:nylon by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Well played.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    14. Re:nylon by sjames · · Score: 1

      More seriously, I am happy to see that the bat house I put up seems to be attracting bats.

    15. Re:nylon by budgenator · · Score: 1

      DDT isn't illegal, it regulated, you need a license to get it and it's really hard to get even with a license, but it's not illegal.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    16. Re:nylon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what all the three bladed pollinating fans that are popping up are for ...

      Yet another reason the "job creators" are earning my money ...

    17. Re:nylon by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
      Here's some help.

      Even today it helps. Too bad there is no medical solution effectively implemented yet.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  10. Vampire Mosquito's by na1led · · Score: 1

    Here in Maine, the Mosquito's will drain your blood long before the West Nile Virus can do any damage. It's been an unusually humid, and wet summer.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      But, to offset that, you can track the (not so) little bastards by radar.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by Amouth · · Score: 1

      Should visit the outer banks in NC, they can kill the deer there.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps once the Paralympics are over we can pick up a cheap AA battery from London for mosquito control.

    4. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Here in Maine, the Mosquito's will drain your blood long before the West Nile Virus can do any damage. It's been an unusually humid, and wet summer.

      I'm sure its bad up there, but can't imagine it would hold a candle next to the mosquitos down here in the New Orleans area.....

      I mean, after all...the mosquito is our state bird you know....

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Here in Maine, the Mosquito's will drain your blood long before the West Nile Virus can do any damage. It's been an unusually humid, and wet summer.

      Pft. You've never been to Canada I take it. Here in Canada, black flies are the size of small dogs, and will carry of small children to use for their meals. And mosquito's are about half as big. If you get up near Algonquin National Park, sometimes you can hear the screams of deer, and moose. That's the sound of the mosquito's sucking them dry in one go.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      er... what?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by sjames · · Score: 1

      When you have big mosquitoes, you need big guns!

    8. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      OK - but what does that have to do with AA batteries, London, or the Paralympics?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by sjames · · Score: 1

      In this context, AA = Anti Aircraft.

    10. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... I... I can't believe I did that. I think I'm used to seeing it as AAA (anti-aircraft artillery)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by sjames · · Score: 1

      :-)

    12. Re:Vampire Mosquito's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get it!! It's Anti-Aircraft

  11. But... What About The Mosquitoes? by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Won't someone think about the poor endangered malaria mosquito? This majestic creature used to roam the plains in the billions, but thanks to eradication efforts and habitat encroachments in now roams the plains in slightly fewer billions! You know what the problem is? It's fair weather environmentalists! Oh sure, it's easy to get behind an endangered animal when it's cute and fuzzy! But they're nowhere to be found when it has six legs, sucks human blood and helps spread a deadly disease! I suppose if another spraying program is enacted, they won't be down at city hall protesting! Won't someone think of the mosquitoes?!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  12. West Nile Emergency?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What crack have the Dallas County Commissioners been smoking that John Whiley Price has been dealing around the County Courthouse? We've had West Nile outbreaks every year since 2002ish (as I recall) and the city used ground spray trucks previously. We've had approximateley 100 people every year contract the issue and about 20 die from it. I agree with the above comment that the emergency is manufactured, but I suspect it's so that the county can get access to cheaper to purchase pesticides that have a higher chance of side effects.

    Those that get infected are already on the watch list for diseases (Young, Old, Immune system compromised). It's quite simple how to avoid it

    1. Don't go outside at dawn/dusk
    2. Drain standing water pools
    3. Wear a decent bug spray.
    4. Wear clothing over most parts of your body if you must go outside for extended periods of time

    Needless to say that the night when they overfly my neighborhood I'm going to shut all my windows/doors and not think about what's happening outside.

    1. Re:West Nile Emergency?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Needless to say that the night when they overfly my neighborhood I'm going to shut all my windows/doors and not think about what's happening outside.

      I live in a swamp and they sometimes do the aerial spraying combined with trucks that drive around spraying. Honestly I think it does more harm than good. It does kill the mosquitoes for a short time but then they bounce back with a vengeance.

      The main problem we have seen is that the spraying kills almost all the predators of the mosquitoes. Dragonflies, toads, tree frogs, praying mantis, etc. all get killed by the spray either directly or their eggs are killed (plus it kills honey bees). Then the following years all that's left is the mosquitoes and they are much worse. It's a vicious cycle.

      For the last few years they have stopped spraying and now there are more predators than I have ever seen in 30+ years. There are mosquitoes but they're more or less kept in check by the predators. It's a lot more consistent situation compared to when they spray.

    2. Re:West Nile Emergency?!? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I think I had West Nile during one of the outbreaks in the midwest during the late 90s or so. Had a night with the worst headache I've ever had in my life and the next morning I was fine. Could have been something else but with any luck I'm now immune to West Nile...

    3. Re:West Nile Emergency?!? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      What crack have the Dallas County Commissioners been smoking that John Whiley Price [wikipedia.org]

      Wow, that article came across as being written by the John Birch Society.

    4. Re:West Nile Emergency?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: Certain types of mosquitoes don't care what time of day it is. They'll fly out in the heat of the day to reach you. ( Asian Tiger )
      2: Simple to do. Trying to convince your idiot neighbors to do the same is a lot harder.
      3: Some mosquitoes don't CARE what you have on. They'll get you anyway. I've used every product available and they still get to me.
                The heat + humidity down here makes keeping any kind of insect repellant actually ON your skin, quite difficult.
      4: You really don't want to wear long / heavy clothing here this time of year. 110 f + 60% humidity = you on a stretcher soon afterwards

      Maybe I can market a fashionable garb from mosquito netting in the form of a Burqua :D

      For the most part, the standard vector for infection seems to come from the sneaky ninja-bastards that get in the house. On your clothing,
      or just fly in through the door when you walk in. They get you in the night while you sleep. Sometimes the only indication you were hit was
      the itchy ass swollen lump where the bite actually took place. Nothing like waking up in the morning with a huge lump on your forehead where
      some little blood-sucker was feeding :|

    5. Re:West Nile Emergency?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also gain immunity to West Nile over time. Most people exposed will never even get any symptoms too.

      http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/qa/transmission.htm

      And if West Nile is such a grave grave threat as some media want to portray it, maybe there should be vaccines for it? Oh right, it is not a major threat, hence no vaccines for humans. Horses, on the other hand, do have vaccines for West Nile because West Nile kills horses.

      So basically this entire "spraying West Nile carrying mosquitoes" is a giant waste of money.

  13. No biggie. by Qbertino · · Score: 0

    I guess its a good thing that according to a astonishingly big portion of USians think the US dosn't require public gouvernment-funded health care. Guess the free market will take care of this too. ...
    Just saying. ...
    For the US sake, I hope some hardcore anti-healthcare people get bitten and learn a lesson or two.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:No biggie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently the only medical treatment for West Nile Virus is: rest, and drink plenty of fluids. If you get it, you might die or you might not. Health care -- however it is funded -- doesn't have much to do with the outcome.

    2. Re:No biggie. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Severe West Nile is treated with supportive care. It makes a tremendous difference to survival rates and, since you're hospitalized, potentially for quite a while, it's probably fairly expensive in the US.

  14. Fearmonger by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

    This is a bunch of fearmongering BS. There were dire warnings on national news this morning, too.

    So what is the extent of the "widespread outbreak" that is causing all the disease, mayhem and death that "appears likely to continue to cause widespread and severe illness and loss of life"?

    Almost 700 cases have been reported across the country

    WOW! Almost 700 cases across the country! Just this year! They don't actually say how many in Texas, or Dallas. Does that mean 700 deaths? No. 700 serious illnesses? No. 700 people, though, right? No.

    There have been cases of infection reported in people, birds or mosquitoes

    Ah. This is cause for a panic and a state of emergency? What for?

    The move clears the way for aerial spraying to kill infected mosquitoes that transmit the disease.

    Ah - there we go. Hmmm. "Don't worry about the stuff being sprayed out of those planes, citizen. It's for your protection!"

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Fearmonger by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      > stuff being sprayed out of those planes

      hypnogas used to get people to take off the tinfoil hats.

      Watch out next will be the mind ray broadcasters installed in the smart meters.

    2. Re:Fearmonger by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ". This is cause for a panic and a state of emergency? What for?"
      what you, and others on Slashdot don't seem to have any grasp on is that this is an indicator. Left unattended and it will be tens of thousands of people. Why can't you people grasp the idea of cutting it short?

      Also coming to the US is Dengay fever.
      Another thing we should stop short.

      "Ah - there we go."
      Ah, you're a loon.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Fearmonger by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't remember what they used to use for mosquitoes: DDT. Check it out - it was safe for humans, but didn't turn out so well for the fish and birds.

      But, you know, you should trust whatever it is they are spraying these days. I'm sure it's perfectly safe. Anyone that questions it is bound to be a conspiracy nut. Right?

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    4. Re:Fearmonger by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

      ""Ah - there we go.""
      "Ah, you're a loon."

      Actually, he has a point.

      Aerial spraying, while better targeted today than ever before does have a high rate of collateral damage and the pesticide being used now includes chemicals which are designed to cause "benign excitation" to ensure "wider delivery".

      Reps for the company did not state what that compound was, nor how it would affect species outside the target scope.

      All of this for 7 confirmed deaths and 200+ suspected cases in the affected area. Malaria affects many more in the underdeveloped world in a month, but you don't hear MSM bleating "Imminent DOOM" about that.

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    5. Re:Fearmonger by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      Well, there are degrees of safety, and what they are using for the mosquitoes are synthetic pyrethroids. These break down quickly, and are sprayed at night to minimize the effect on beneficial insects like bees, which stay in their hives at night. http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/health/What-is-Duet-Adulticide-Aerial-Spraying-West-Nile-Virus-166325486.html

      Living is terminal. In the grand scheme of things, pyrethroids are pretty low risk for humans and, dispensed properly, should be low impact for wildlife and beneficial insects.

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
  15. Give me a break! by patchouly · · Score: 2

    I live in an area that has had West Nile since 2002. We are constantly finding dead crows. Even though we have been severely inflicted and were one of the first in Canada to have it, we still only have a handful of cases and only two of those were fatal. There was one old man that died in 2002 and then a second, old lady that died in 2011. That's it for the whole region. About 20% of the people exposed to West Nile virus develop "West Nile fever". West Nile fever's symptoms include headache, body aches and a fever. Not enough to send you to the doctor though, as it only lasts a few days. Also, the end result is you wind up producing antibodies that keep you from getting it again, for the rest of your life. The majority of people exposed to the virus, show no symptoms whatsoever. Of the folks who are exposed, less than 1% suffer from any sort of problems, beyond flu symptoms. West Nile can be fatal in very rare cases but then so can driving a car. It's not the monster killer the press is making it out to be. Don't be fooled.

    1. Re:Give me a break! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the news.

      I love this site for the speed at which networking takes place.

      Knowledge is power.

  16. How about acting in your own self interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get out of the air conditioned cave, during the day, and emptying any standing water of more than 1/4 depth *anywhere* you find it.

    1. Re:How about acting in your own self interest by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is common sense.

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    2. Re:How about acting in your own self interest by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not emptying my pool, but it's chlorinated, so that should be OK, shouldn't it?

      Unfortunately, a lot of the wetlands in Massachusetts are protected areas, so they're huge mosquito breeding grounds. It'd be nice to drain them all, but that has side effects.

  17. Speaking of mosquitoes by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Dengay is coming to the US as well. But ignorant dipshit want to stop an effective way of limiting.

    http://www.pusware.com/quackcast/quackcast97.mp3

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Speaking of mosquitoes by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Dengue? Don't make fun of ignorance if you're going to get the name wrong.

    2. Re:Speaking of mosquitoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dengay is coming to the US as well. But ignorant dipshit want to stop an effective way of limiting.

      http://www.pusware.com/quackcast/quackcast97.mp3

      The correct spelling is Dengue Fever.

      You're really an idiot.

      Do the world a favor and go jump off the 405 bridge.

  18. Antarctica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't have any mosquitoes in Antarctica ;-)

    1. Re:Antarctica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yet...

  19. Living in the area by Datamonstar · · Score: 2

    It's not that bad. the disease is mostly affecting people with weakened immune systems, the really young and the really old. This is not too different than the flu in that regard, except it's much more difficult to control the spread of it and it has some really nasty side effects if it goes untreated.

    That said, I think treating it like a dire emergency is not the right way to go. I really don't want me or my children breathing in any chemicals unnecessarily. If any of us get sick from the virus, we'll go to our doctors that we trust or a emergency room. With all the pollution we already have on top of allergens, I really don't want to know what adding those chemicals to the mix will do, but there's a chance that it may be even less treatable than the disease.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Living in the area by omnichad · · Score: 1

      "State of Emergency" is poorly named, but that's what it's called. It's not an emergency, it's a state of readiness.

    2. Re:Living in the area by bws111 · · Score: 1

      "State of emergency" mostly means that un-budgeted funds are available to help with the problem. It doesn't have anything to do with "direness" or drastic actions.

  20. I live in Dallas by DontLickJesus · · Score: 1

    It's no state of emergency here, but the city is set to start aerial spraying.

    --
    Where genius and insanity become confused true wisdom is found
    1. Re:I live in Dallas by 3dr · · Score: 1

      Does Dallas currently spray for mosquitos, either by truck or aerially?

      Houston has always sprayed by truck, and Austin sprays by truck, but a lot less than Houston.

    2. Re:I live in Dallas by DontLickJesus · · Score: 2

      We already spray via truck. It's been happening for years. The aerial spraying is using the same chemical, only it's oil based instead of water based. It's called Duet. Here's a KERA article about it, but I don't have any better sources on the chemical.

      http://keranews.org/post/company-tries-reassure-residents-about-aerial-spraying

      --
      Where genius and insanity become confused true wisdom is found
  21. Dallas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dallas is more of a crunchy frog town.

    Especially the part where the Inspector says "FUCK your sales, we've got to protect the public!"

  22. Cowboys Upcoming Season... by Thundaaa+Struk · · Score: 1

    I don't want to hear from the Dallas Cowboys that this years season was a wash due to the West Nile Virus......Everyone knows Romo isn't a true quarterback. Anyone who parties with Mr. Belding from Saved By The Bell is not a top notch QB.

  23. Spray planes in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are hundreds of spray planes here in Texas, privately owned, all sitting idle and their owners/pilots are dying for work right now due to the nationwide drought that has killed off most of the farm crops this year and eliminated this season's work for the pilots. One of my best friends owns and flies an Air Tractor and the past two years he's only gotten about half the spraying contracts he normally gets so he's desperate for work so he doesn't have to sell the plane. He's looking into the mosquito spraying contracts, but the state is making it so difficult to get the extra licenses needed for spraying mosquitoes that it seems like they're deliberately protecting someone's monopoly or something.

    1. Re:Spray planes in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the state is making it so difficult to get the extra licenses needed for spraying mosquitoes that it seems like they're deliberately protecting someone's monopoly or something.

      Or maybe they're exercising due diligence by not allowing every yahoo with a crop duster to shower pesticides on residential areas.

    2. Re:Spray planes in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or maybe they're exercising due diligence by not allowing every yahoo with a crop duster to shower pesticides on residential areas.

      The only ones allowed to hire aircraft to spray for mosquitoes in the first place are local governments and state health districts, so your concern is completely out of place. Only government agencies are allowed to purchase such aerial mosquito spray services here in Texas. The problem is that the supply of qualified pilots and planes ready to service these official government contracts is being artificially and unreasonably restricted by another government agency.

      Also, "crop dusters" are not "yahoos".

      You may be stuck thinking in the 1950's when the industry was not very regulated, but today "aerial applicators" (they are not referred to as "crop dusters" anymore except by folks who don't know what they're talking about and are just trying to stir up negativity) are a highly regulated and professional business. The aircraft cost several hundreds of thousands of dollars, sometimes well over a million each. The pilots have to go thru special training and certification programs in addition to being certified by the FAA as commercial pilots. They also have to be licensed by every state they operate in for the chemical handling and deployment regardless of whether it's sprayed by aircraft or ground vehicles, in addition to the federal FAA certification requirements on the pilot and the aircraft. They are all also required to have boatloads of special, very expensive insurance too, to cover the chemical cleanup in case of accidents.

    3. Re:Spray planes in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I with you on this. I also live in the Dallas area. I've been wanting them to follow the money on this because i don't see any emergency. When does the government react so quickly? Never.

      Somebody's brother is getting those spraying contracts. The government is inheritantly inefficient, but they are going gang-busters on those pesky mosquitos in Dallas. Seriously, the mosquitos here are nothing. The symptoms are a mild fever and maybe feeling like you got a cold. The people that are dying of West Nile are dying of other complications.

  24. Pandemic anyone...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only safe place is Madagascar. Trust me, I've tried...

  25. I live in Dallas by SLot · · Score: 0

    There is an interesting conclusion that can be drawn from this actually. Most of the deaths have occurred near the Park Cities - extremely wealthy parts of town.

    They also are known to use more water than else where in the city: 254 gallons per person per day. This leads to lots of runoff and standing water.

    Not surprising at all that they have a West Nile problem.

  26. there are place on earth without mosquitoe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can try McMurdo station, the whole antartica, maybe artic shelves, some mountain with permanent ice shelves...

  27. Always drumming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geekoid always supports the side of the authorities, even with their ongoing craptacular track record.

    Makes you wonder...

  28. Government Logic by ApplePy · · Score: 1

    So a few people are getting a mild illness from mosquitoes. Let's spray the entire city with carcinogenic pesticides! See? Now EVERYONE is affected by West Nile!

    It's a pretty safe bet that no chemical will ever eliminate the mosquito. As long as there is water on which to lay eggs, and animals with blood for them to eat, there will be mosquitoes. Spraying for them, even if the poisons weren't doing more damage, is at very best an exercise in ignorance-fueled futility.

    Oh, that DDT was great stuff, it killed the little buggers, right? Except it destroyed the amphibians and bats that ate the mosquito, too. So the first few years when the spraying stops, there's nothing to keep the mosquito in check. Same thing goes for every insect pest. The chemical "answer" kills the predators too, but the pests bounce back faster.

    I'm not a rabid environmentalist. It's a shame that a few old folks with weak immune systems die from West Nile. But that is not a good reason to wage chemical warfare on the public.

    --
    That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
  29. A whole lot of bats by Zinho · · Score: 1

    ... It would take a whole lot of bats to make any appreciable dent in the mosquito population.

    On the plus side, though, then we'd have a whole lot of bats!

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  30. 2 mosquitoes with one stone by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 1

    Don't we have a sustained unemployment problem nationwide? ...check!
    Wouldn't it be a burden on taxpayers to have to provide supportive care to people who are just making the unemployment figures high? ...check!

    Is there a way we can make this West Nile Virus a national epidemic, and maybe increase it's potency? (I kid, I kid!)

  31. Oh, suuure by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    The "emergency" was declared primarily so we could gain access to 5 pesticide-spraying planes from the Texas Department of Emergency Management.

    .
    .
    .
    .
    CHEMTRAILS!!

    We'll right back, with more Art Bell.

    1. Re:Oh, suuure by sjames · · Score: 1

      TRUCKS!

      Sense and anti-sense!

  32. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, I figured they would start getting some plagues pretty soon, Next Oklahoma. Thanks for changing the weather with your cload seeding projects.
    I figured would eventually they would face some sorta wrath. :-)

  33. Park cities by nonameisgood2 · · Score: 1

    Let's ignore the presence of Turtle Creek and other somewhat stagnant bodies of water in the vicinity, or the age of that population compared to the city as a whole. All it takes is a collection of infected vectors in a natural, or semi-natural, body of water, and all that takes is a collection of infected carriers in the trees. Lots of trees in the park cities. Lots of birds. Lots of ponds and creeks. Lots of old people. Maybe Jerry Jones...

  34. State of Emergency eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many deaths have their been to justify this "state of emergency"?

    Until I see some hard data, I assume this is more alarmist BS.

  35. Conspiracy to wipe out Agile Conference attendees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would wonder if this is part of a larger conspiracy to wipe out the large concentration of Agile 2012 Conference attendees who stormed the city this week.

  36. And shut down Madagascar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One Hundred Forty Fifth Post!

  37. DEET concentration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should probably let the CDC know that...

    http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/qa/insect_repellent.htm

    More specific info on DEET concenctration can be found at:

    http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/mosquitoes/ai_insectrp.htm

    where it says: "Formulations registered for direct application to human skin contain from 4 to 100 percent DEET."

  38. I prefer the 1950s by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    DDT it is good for you and it is good for me!

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  39. How to reduce the number of mosquitoes by bjb · · Score: 1


    I've seen this so many times it amazes me. Think you have a lot of mosquitoes on your property? I bet you have a lot of stagnant water pools. No, it isn't your neighbors pond because if they have fish, they're eating the pupa. Most likely, it is that bird bath or that wheelbarrow or that childrens see-saw with the foot wells that collect rain water or, as I see almost all the time, that tarp you have over your firewood that has ever so small puddles of water (like half a cup). Those little wiggling specs of dirt? You better believe they're flying tonight!
    </public-service-announcement>

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...