Slashdot Mirror


The History of the Floppy Disk

Esther Schindler writes "Ready for a nostalgic trip into the wayback? We had floppy disks long before we had CDs, DVDs, or USB thumb-drives. Here's the evolution of the portable media that changed everything about personal computing. 'The 8-inch drive began to show up in 1971. Since they enabled developers and users to stop using the dreaded paper tape (which were easy to fold, spindle, and mutilate, not to mention to pirate) and the loathed IBM 5081 punch card. Everyone who had ever twisted a some tape or—the horror!—dropped a deck of Hollerith cards was happy to adopt 8-inch drives. Besides, the early single-sided 8-inch floppy could hold the data of up to 3,000 punch cards, or 80K to you.'"

204 comments

  1. Read Error by zippo01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I/O Error, Try again.... I/O Error, Try again. Damn it! Now how am I going to play Oregon Trail.

    1. Re:Read Error by Cockatrice_hunter · · Score: 1

      Slide the cover blow on the magnetic disk whilst spinning. Maybe it was just a dust bunny that crawled in your disk.

    2. Re:Read Error by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What was "fun" was some of the later OS installs that came on floppies. Anybody remember how many floppies Win95 took? And it never failed that one of the floppies, usually one of those needed at the very end, wouldn't work.

      Still I remember how excited I was when I got my first CD burner...no more floppies yay! And I could overburn too! I for one was damned glad when floppies finally bought the farm, I always seemed to end up with the damned discs dead and my data toast, no matter how much I babied the stupid things.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:Read Error by Theophany · · Score: 2

      28 floppies if memory serves. Win98 was like comparative nirvana for me; a floppy to boot and a CD to install.

    4. Re:Read Error by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      Yep. I also remember paying close to 20 guilders (let's see .. that's about 8 euro .. or 9-10 dollars?) for a 650M CD recordable. Not to mention the re-writables that costed me twice that amount.

    5. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My memory served me 15, but it seems that it was 13 pieces of 1.7 MB floppies, source http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/08/19/453612.aspx

    6. Re:Read Error by troc · · Score: 1

      I remember the "fun" of installing Office from floppy in the 90's when it came on something like 44 discs.

      aaaargh the nightmares.....................

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    7. Re:Read Error by CodeheadUK · · Score: 2

      Anybody remember how many floppies Win95 took?

      I still have my box of Win95 install floppies. There are 39, but mine were created at first boot by the OS. A slight money grab by the supplier (PC World), they wouldn't provide OS install media, but would sell you 4 boxes of floppies to create your own backup.

    8. Re:Read Error by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Netware 2.15 came on 40 floppies and could not be installed from the originals, you had to make a backup copy first, which needed half a day alone since each disk had to be switched several times during the copy process.
      Then during install, you noticed that the 40th copy was bad.

    9. Re:Read Error by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Ahh the nostalgia of trying to back up software from its home directory. DOS was easy, Win 3.x was easy the rest was something else. But did I stop? Not a chance ;)

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    10. Re:Read Error by shippo · · Score: 2

      At work we had an installation of Windows NT Server (3.5, perhaps) that came on floppies. There was over 40 of them. We had many other OS installations on floppy too. Banyan VINES (which we resold) had about two dozen, and as Banyan were compartively late in supporting CD media for installation, and even then didn't support IDE CD-ROM drives, many servers had to be installed and upgraded this way well up to the late 1990s. We had other operating systems on floppy, too, including several versions of OS/2, Netware and SCO Unix. Then there was that floppy installation of Slackware I made for in-house installation on test PCs, as most of our test boxes lacked CD drives.

    11. Re:Read Error by byrtolet · · Score: 1

      The internet solved this problem for me long before I got my CD writer.

    12. Re:Read Error by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      My first Linux install was Slackware on about 40 diskettes. I ftp'd them all over a weekend via my lowly 9600 baud modem. I know that sounds like I'm spinning a 'we had to walk in the snow uphill, both ways' tale but it's true.

      I remember the first time I installed an OS from CDROM. I believe it was OS/2. I was amazed.

    13. Re:Read Error by rjr162 · · Score: 2

      Slide the cover blow on the magnetic disk whilst spinning. Maybe it was just a dust bunny that crawled in your disk.

      Um... most of us I'm sure played Oregon Trail on some variant of the Apple ][, which used these:
      http://www.ivanexpert.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/525_floppy-300x300.gif
      Please explain what cover I am suppose to slide?

    14. Re:Read Error by rjr162 · · Score: 2

      Yes! I remember installing OS/2 Warp on my grand father's old Swan 486 (which sadly ran Windows applications faster than Windows 3.1 did on the same machine...)

      That was a ton of floppies + if I recall correctly there were about 7 to 10 more with "Printer Drivers" or something along those lines

    15. Re:Read Error by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      Comment just to add that was OS/2 Warp v2.x

    16. Re:Read Error by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      damn... my memory is bad! I guess it was v3.x, not v2.x as v3.x was the version labeled as "Warp"

    17. Re:Read Error by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Anybody remember how many floppies Win95 took?

      Yes, actually. It was so bad Microsoft actually started selling 80 MB drives with it pre-installed.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    18. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 95 did not take all that many floppies. I was working with the Chicago Beta, and practicing installing it on different hardware. A great way to pass the time. I got the whole thing running on a system with 4 Meg of RAM and 50 Meg hard drive. (trick is, install stripped down system, "double" the hard drive and then reinstall with the extra pieces. Loved the DriveSpace Happy Box that indicated success)

    19. Re:Read Error by Tore+S+B · · Score: 2

      What was "fun" was some of the later OS installs that came on floppies. Anybody remember how many floppies Win95 took? And it never failed that one of the floppies, usually one of those needed at the very end, wouldn't work.

      That's nothing. The Norwegian company that delivered the computing hardware and software for the F16 flight simulator, Norsk Data, was actually required by the US Air Force to deliver their software as punched cards for quite a few years after punch cards had really gone out of fashion.

      Every software patch was the same - requiring staff to manually collate the source code punched cards - basically, manually merging patches.

      --
      toresbe
    20. Re:Read Error by cusco · · Score: 1

      28 floppies was for Office 4.2, which had the most delightful bug. It wouldn't ask for the installation code until disk 9, and if you typed it in wrong even once you had to start the process all over again. Fortunately that was fixed in 4.3, but by that time we had figured out how to dump the whole installation on my server's enormous 2 gb hard drive.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    21. Re:Read Error by bobthecow · · Score: 1

      I spent several weeks one summer installing Windows 95 on 60 computers from disk.

      I would put the first disk in one computer, finish with disk one on that one, put disk two in that computer and disk one in another, and so forth.

      I want my time back.

    22. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      AIX 3.2 upgrade on 200 3.5" floppies, the 1.44 MB density ones. Bootable upgrade portion was first 60-odd floppies. I/O error on floppy 37. Call IBM, rush another set of 200. Insert new 37, yes! Complete upgrade!

      Now had 400 floppies to use, woohoo!

    23. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it was only 40 disks? It seamed like more than double that.

      I was at uni at the time and had plenty of disks. Plenty of bandwidth too. But good god it took a long time to write it to floppies.

    24. Re:Read Error by neokushan · · Score: 1

      None, because apple patented installing software on a mobile device or some such bollocks?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    25. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your memory served you 15, as mine did, then am I correct in assuming that you too had a less than original copy of it? ;)

    26. Re:Read Error by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The Apple ][ never had an 8 inch disk, they were 5 inch disks. AFAIK no PC used an 8 inch disk (please correct me if I'm wrong), although we had some 8 inchers still around 25 years ago in my office. They were used in what was once called "minicomputers".

      The image you linked was a Radio Shack five inch disk. The "cover" the GP referred to was the flap on the drive; the dust bunnies will be inside the drive.

    27. Re:Read Error by gv250 · · Score: 2

      AFAIK no PC used an 8 inch disk (please correct me if I'm wrong)

      It depends upon your definition of "PC". The Heathkit H-89 used an 8-inch floppy.

    28. Re:Read Error by sconeu · · Score: 1

      CP/M machines often used 8" floppies.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    29. Re:Read Error by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      My first Linux was Slackware. 300 baud. I remember having just enough floppies for the base and network. I also remember praying to all the gods that after I formatted my only hard drive that they all worked. It did, and I ran Linux (eventually Debian) for the next 11 years.

    30. Re:Read Error by kermidge · · Score: 2

      The Tandy/Radio Shack Model II, with one built-in 8-inch drive (mounted vertically) started shipping in October '79.
      http://oldcomputers.net/trs80ii.html

      On my own and other's machines, later on, it was not uncommon to get a 3.5" diskette to read by pulling aside the slide and blowing dust off the floppy - even if that dust or lint had come from the drive itself.

    31. Re:Read Error by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      My copy of W95 cand on a CD, and I still have it and my DOS 6.2 floppies. All three of them. And the half inch thick book that came with them... too bad they stopped giving printed documentation and instad have those unhelpful help files.

    32. Re:Read Error by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      I had bought a laptop back in the day, a Compaq Presario 1070 preloaded with W95. Upon booting it for the very first time, it wanted me to create a backup using 31 1.44MB floppies.

    33. Re:Read Error by mspohr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was the most frustrating part of Netware... besides the large number of disks, you had to put some disks in several times and switch them back and forth. They also stayed with single density disks when the double density disk drives were widely available so the number of disks was twice as many as necessary.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    34. Re:Read Error by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Wow... Banyan VINES... now there's a name I haven't heard in a long long time. That was a pretty impressive system, back in the day.

    35. Re:Read Error by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I installed ESIX (Everex's version of Unix) off of floppies, some time in 1991 or 1992. I think there were 48 disks, or some horrible number like that, and naturally the 45th or so was unreadable. I had to wait to finish the install for a couple of days until I could get another copy of that disk mailed to me. Oddly, I can't remember now whether they were 3.5" or 5.25" floppies.

    36. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      And they were never in order. You may start with disk #1, then go to disks #3 - #7, and then back to disk #2.

    37. Re:Read Error by antdude · · Score: 1
      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    38. Re:Read Error by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      Never said they did :)
      3.5" had the slide, 5.25" looked just like the picture I posted (which is labeled as a 5.25" but you're correct, it's a 8" based on the hole being above), but either way 5.25" and 8" didn't have a slide to move and blow the dust out (which was more my point lol)

      Anyhow, for others who didn't quite notice the difference between the 8" and the 5.25" in the picture I originally posted the link to, you can tell right away here:

      5.25" has the hole on the right, 8" has it above

      http://www.designboom.com/history/floppydisk/01.gif

    39. Re:Read Error by CubicleZombie · · Score: 1

      Slide the cover blow on the magnetic disk whilst spinning.

      Noob.

      --
      :wq
    40. Re:Read Error by CubicleZombie · · Score: 1

      I had two 8" drives on my TRS-80 Model I, but it was a custom job hard wired straight into the expansion interface.

      --
      :wq
    41. Re:Read Error by mschaffer · · Score: 1

      There were plenty of PCs that used 8-inch floppy media.
      I used a few S100 systems that had 8-inch floppies.

    42. Re:Read Error by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Jesus Tap Dancing Christ...40 floppies? Are you serious? 40? Damn and I thought we had it bad with Win95 and the 15-17 floppies we had to deal with but....daaaamn, that must have been like the fifth circle of hell or something, what with all the swapping and the practical guarantee that one towards the end would fail and hose the whole thing. I wouldn't wish a 40 floppy install on my worst enemy!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    43. Re:Read Error by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh I believe you friend, I remember doing a WinNT 3.5 floppy install and I think it was like 42 or 43 floppies, just nuts. the kids today don't realize how truly nutty it had gotten with the floppies right before the CD took off, we had 17 floppies for Win95, someone else posted Office 4.2 took something like 40 floppies for a full install, Banyan took a couple of dozen, your Slackware took 40...it was insanity.

      I remember at the shop I was working at the time we had these giant filing cabinets just filled with row after row after row of floppy boxes with various OSes and software marked on the top. This is why we were practically dancing with joy when the first CD burners got released, even though the discs were high and the burning software would get flaky, just because the amount of damned floppies we had to deal with on a daily basis was like some bad parody.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    44. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... Banyan VINES... now there's a name I haven't heard in a long long time. That was a pretty impressive system, back in the day.

      And from my recollections about Banyan VINES while contracting with the military, it was stable and once installed and configured there was practically no maintenance required. But those hardware tokens necessary to activate a Banyan server were a pain in the butt if you needed to stand-up a temporary server for testing.

    45. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no such thing as OS/2 Warp v2.x. Warp was the name given to OS/2 v3.x and higher.

    46. Re:Read Error by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Did you use the packet writing software too? Me and everyone else I knew that jumped on the early burners used the packet writing stuff so we wouldn't have to "waste" a whole CD because they were so high!

      Man was I pissed when I bought a 4x DVD burner for $200 and had the prices drop to $60 6 months later, the CD burners took something like a year or two to really come down so I figured having that much space would be worth the early adopter penalty. To this day I've got probably a couple dozen spindles of DVD backups around the apt, everything from funny videos to the first versions of Firefox, I backed up everything back then.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    47. Re:Read Error by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      I had two 8" drives on my TRS-80 Model I, but it was a custom job hard wired straight into the expansion interface.

      I did, too. I also had a Lobo Max-80, a TRS-80 workalike, and it could handle a combination of four drives, 5-1/4", 8", single and double density, single and double sided. Ran under Both CP/M and LDOS (originally an acronym for Lobo's Disk Operating System, later became Logical Disk Operating System when rewritten to work on TRS-80s as well, and which was bought by Tandy to become TRS-DOS 4.

    48. Re:Read Error by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      I know that sounds like I'm spinning a 'we had to walk in the snow uphill, both ways' tale but it's true.

      Newcomer. I had to flip switches on a front panel to even get my first S-100 bus system to boot.

    49. Re:Read Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (uh... you never thought the metal in the case was actually just a little bit MAGNETIC?)

    50. Re:Read Error by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      What 'developing country' did you live in where you only got 300 baud? I was at 9600 in 1991 at the latest. Initial slack release was '93. Heck, by then I may have been at 14.4.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    51. Re:Read Error by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      I must have been thinking about my Atari 8-bit. XM301 300 bad modem.

  2. Floppy disk drives are not history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still teach students about Foppy Disk drives, their interfaces, the PC architecture, index hole, write protect notch, clamping notch, tracks, densities, FM and MFM recording to students in Engineering. This is still included in syllabi of most Indian Universities. We are able to get hold of 5-1/4" floppy diskettes to show to the students, but the 8" media is very very hard to find.

    1. Re:Floppy disk drives are not history... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      You might want to have them read http://www.amazon.com/dp/B006QMXYEA "The Floppy Disk Story - which describes the evolution of the FD from the user's end

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:Floppy disk drives are not history... by djjockey · · Score: 4, Funny

      That, and if you don't teach people about them they won't know which icon to click to save their work.

    3. Re:Floppy disk drives are not history... by isorox · · Score: 1

      That, and if you don't teach people about them they won't know which icon to click to save their work.

      People used to save their documents on floppys. In those enlightened days the average joe knew the difference between files and programs.

      Nowadays many people save things "into word", and have no concept of a file.

    4. Re:Floppy disk drives are not history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word!

  3. I remember the old floppies well by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing I remember was a colleague spilling sweet hot coffee on a 5.25 inch floppy that had just arrived in the post. We all thought he would have to tell head office that we had just destroyed our latest update disk and get them to send another, but he opened the envelope, took out the actual disk, rinsed it under the tap, and carefully dried it. Next he got a blank floppy, opened this, and substituted the internal disk - finally sealing it with sellotape down the edge. We all said "it will never work", but it read perfectly - the first thing he did was take a back-up of course.

    1. Re:I remember the old floppies well by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First step - make a back-up.
      Second step - put the originals somewhere safe and use the back-up disks
      We got tripped up with this on a graphic design program for the Archimedes at school. We made a copy of the original and ran off that for a while. Then the copy went missing so the teacher grabbed the original and tried using that. It refused to work. We thought that it had somehow gotten fried but someone dutifully ran off a copy anyway and that worked fine. We were all really confused till we realised that the original had the write-protect tab set. The program needed to write back to the disk occasionally nut the manufacturer had assumed that everyone who used the program would run off unprotected copies... fun times.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    2. Re:I remember the old floppies well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandfather bought a new version of TRS-DOS on floppy, I wasn't around, so he stapled it to the inside of the three-ring binder where he kept all the papers for the computer. Yep, stapled it right through the floppy sleeve, and the floppy itself..... I was pretty disappointed, then I decided to see if I could fix it, I rotated the disk until the holes appeared in the window, with the burr side (where the staple exited the media), put a piece of paper over it and rubbed it with a pencil eraser.

      Yep, it worked, at least well enough to make a couple of copies. Bits must be pretty big on a 5.25" single sided, single density disk...

      Get off my lawn!

    3. Re:I remember the old floppies well by doesnothingwell · · Score: 1

      First step - make a back-up.

      Second step - put the originals somewhere safe and use the back-up disks

      Third step - Get floppy files stored to a hard drive or network share if the install program could be fooled into using it.

      Fourth step - making a network boot floppy for server os du jour, and never using those install floppies again.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  4. I got what I came for by skipkent · · Score: 2

    "Wang needed a smaller, cheaper floppy disk."

  5. FDD RAID by cffrost · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    1. Re:FDD RAID by u64 · · Score: 1

      Around the mid '00 i had a floppy binge period. I took parts from one floppy-cable and placed
      on a second connector - allowing A: and B: floppies on a single cable.
      But XP refused to read/write from both floppies at the same time.
      Can't remember how it worked on Linux...

  6. Glad floppy dick is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just not very satisfying...

    1. Re:Glad floppy dick is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been coming here a long time, but it's the comments like this one that keep me coming back... They're just simple and funny.

    2. Re:Glad floppy dick is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been coming here a long time, but it's the comments like this one that keep me coming back... They're just simple and funny.

      Why are you replying to yourself?

    3. Re:Glad floppy dick is gone by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Thats why I browse at +6 off-topic, they are usually the best /. has to offer(though unfortunately spammers have been ruining that, /. needs a separate binspam moderation)....and since this post is off-topic I expect it to earn a 5 on my screen.

  7. Yes I still have my BBS... by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 2

    ... unfortunately it's only on a single set of 3.5s just like my ASCII/ANSI artwork. Probably unrecoverable by now. Windows for Workgroups and the rest are just minor nostalgia pieces I haven't trashed yet as I find it finny to run across them in my old hardware boxes. - HEX

    1. Re:Yes I still have my BBS... by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Yes I stand by my use of the word finny, fucking hell stupid typo. - HEX

    2. Re:Yes I still have my BBS... by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      ... unfortunately it's only on a single set of 3.5s just like my ASCII/ANSI artwork. Probably unrecoverable by now. Windows for Workgroups and the rest are just minor nostalgia pieces I haven't trashed yet as I find it finny to run across them in my old hardware boxes. - HEX

      Why unrecoverable. 3.5" drives are easy to come by, and are still supported in Windows 7.

    3. Re:Yes I still have my BBS... by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Sitting in boxes for years on a single set of disks, while I may be able to recover some I am doubtful I'll get all of my files back. - HEX

  8. 5.25" USB Floppy Drives? by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    I still wish someone would make (and sell) a USB 5.25" floppy drive. I still have a few 5.25" floppies kicking around that I'd love to get data off of, if they're still readable.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:5.25" USB Floppy Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a kickstarter project waiting to happen.

    2. Re:5.25" USB Floppy Drives? by yuhong · · Score: 1
    3. Re:5.25" USB Floppy Drives? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      USB doesn't supply enough power to run a 5.25" drive, but this might help, though it might be easier just to find an ancient functioning 286 and do it that way.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  9. that smell of 3M 5" disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    still remember it...ahhh

    1. Re:that smell of 3M 5" disk by pegdhcp · · Score: 1

      Just when I was thinking that I am really old. I always wondered that if it was a natural (!) odor of components, or if it is an intentional addition to the box. That smell was the smell of joy and despair, as in the anticipation of a new game, and suspicion of a problem happened during the (naturally illegal) copy process...

    2. Re:that smell of 3M 5" disk by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      That smell was the smell of joy and despair, as in the anticipation of a new game, and suspicion of a problem happened during the (naturally illegal) copy process...

      Back then copying (commercial) games and software was so relaxed. We still knew it hurt the producers, but there wasn't worries about Pirate Bay being blocked, MPAA/RIAA, and no severe ethical issues. It was just nice to have games. Maybe my friend bought Secret Weapons of Luftwaffe, of which I made a copy for myself, and let him have a copy of my original Kings Quest V.

  10. Oh yes, the memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my drive A:?????

  11. Transforming DD into HD by andyteleco · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember taking bunches of old DD 3.5'' floppies and drilling a hole on the lower left side in order to later format them as HD (1.44 MB). Of course many of them were destroyed or ended up with lots of defective sectors in the process.

    Aaaaah, the good old days!

    1. Re:Transforming DD into HD by troc · · Score: 1

      And before that we took single-sided 5.25" floppies, carefully removed the disc, cut some extra holes in the case, carefully replaced the disc and, if we were lucky, had a double-sided disc instead!

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    2. Re:Transforming DD into HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur! I had one of those specially designed square notch punches.

    3. Re:Transforming DD into HD by ag0ny · · Score: 2

      I remember doing the opposite. In the late 90s I was still using 8-bit computers from the 80s as a hobby (MSX, relatively popular everywhere but the U.S.). Because the communications software was limited, we used to download software from local BBSs via our PCs, and then copy into floppy disks to use on the MSX.

      The problem was that the PC didn't accept that I was trying to format 2HD disks in 2DD format, so in my MSX disks I always covered the little hole. This was either under MS-DOS 6.22 or OS\2 Warp (I didn't really use Windows much even back then).

    4. Re:Transforming DD into HD by swb · · Score: 1

      All you needed was a paper punch. And some reasonable hand strength No disassembly required.

    5. Re:Transforming DD into HD by tgd · · Score: 1

      All you needed was a paper punch. And some reasonable hand strength No disassembly required.

      No, but I do recall having had to make a hard-sector disk from a soft-sector disk using a punch and taking the disk itself out.

      That was so long ago, I can't remember if it worked or not, I just remember having done it. Probably means it worked, as a failure would've been more memorable.

    6. Re:Transforming DD into HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to ask what happened to the trusty hole punch technique? It always worked for me.

    7. Re:Transforming DD into HD by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Or, one of these...

      floppy notcher

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
  12. Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

    "For data storage it used—I kid you not—a cassette tape player."

    Do people not know that personal computers used audio cassettes to store data any more?

    09
    0A
    0B
    DATA!
    BLOCK!
    Please Rewind Tape!

    1. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For data storage it used—I kid you not—a cassette tape player."

      Do people not know that personal computers used audio cassettes to store data any more?

      09
      0A
      0B
      DATA!
      BLOCK!
      Please Rewind Tape!

      Yep, and those of us who still have our MSX computers or whatever that uses tapes have found that portable CD-players are pretty useful. Every program gets its own track.

    2. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I wonder if a minidisc can be hacked into an analogue stream for data storage/retrieval (audio I/O on a ZX Spectrum, anyone)?

      I'll let you know when I've done it.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Do people not know that personal computers used audio cassettes to store data any more?

      Young people don't know.

    4. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      For a short while, domestic VCRs were used for program saving and loading sometime in the early '90s. Didn't catch on though.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      That...

      Is..

      AWESOME!!!!! *8D

      FETCH ME MY BBC!!!

      And a FLAC equipped MP3 player.

      That it also a gloriously decadent method of storage. 700MB to store about 700K. It's the Roman Empire of storage mediums.

    6. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      Stoopid young people. I know about wax cylinders and core rope memory, so should they.

    7. Re:Aw, I remember taking demo disks to school... by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you could get backup solutions based on that.

  13. Ahhh memories! by Jahta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked in tech support in the 1980s and 5.25" floppies were a great (unintended) source of fun.

    For example, in response to "can you send me a copy of that floppy?" I was sent (a) a photocopy the floppy and (b) a floppy with a covering note stapled to it!

    But best of all was the time I asked a user if they had a backup of some important documents. She pointed me to a 5.25" floppy - attached to the side of a filing cabinet with a fridge magnet.

    Happy days!

    1. Re:Ahhh memories! by ag0ny · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah, those urban legends that didn't happen to you either, but everybody says they experienced them first person. :-)

      Yeah, those didn't happen to me either, but I've heard them many times.

    2. Re:Ahhh memories! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      I worked in tech support in the 1980s and 5.25" floppies were a great (unintended) source of fun.

      Sure, you did. I've heard those same stories a million times.

      My own true anecdote is the first time I used a Macintosh at university -- the first or second generation -- 128 kB RAM, no hard disk, just ran on a floppy. I borrowed a system disk from a tutor and inserted it to boot it up.The message appeared "Initialise disk?" Since "initialise" means "begin" I of course agreed, and it reformatted the floppy and wiped out the tutor's files.

    3. Re:Ahhh memories! by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Either these three things happened in more than one company or we worked at the same place. I saw all these things too, exactly.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    4. Re:Ahhh memories! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, if you worked in tech support for any length of time during that era, it happened to you.

    5. Re:Ahhh memories! by tgd · · Score: 1

      Ah, those urban legends that didn't happen to you either, but everybody says they experienced them first person. :-)

      Yeah, those didn't happen to me either, but I've heard them many times.

      I find the photocopy story a little hard to imagine, but FWIW, the staple thing I saw MANY times, and the magnet thing at least a couple times.

      Of course, the staple thing wasn't really a problem most of the time -- I can't recall for sure, but I doubt I ever saw one where someone actually hit the disk itself. And, frankly, the magnet wouldn't do much either. Moving (strong) magnets are a problem, a little fridge magnet in the corner isn't going to do anything. The data density was very low and the regions were fairly strongly magnetized.

      So, I guess, at that level I agree -- urban legends in as much as the stories suggest there was some data disaster associated with it.

    6. Re:Ahhh memories! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a friend's mom, while he was on break at school, decided to help organize things and rolled the floppy throught the typewriter to put indexes on the pre-affexed labels.

    7. Re:Ahhh memories! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Well, I've run into the first and the last, although it was a horseshoe magnet rather than a fridge magnet. Never had anyone staple a floppy, but one woman was complaining because her "hard drive" (the 3.5" floppy) wouldn't go in the drive any more. She had noticed that the aluminum slide could pull back to expose the media, so to make sure no dust got in it she taped it shut.

      She was the assistant to one of the executives, and kept all the important correspondence she generated on the floppy because she'd been told by some random person at her church that if she copied it to the network it could "get lost". We never could convince her otherwise (bunch of godless heathens that we were), so we surreptitiously copied the floppy and then made sure that the drive failed.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    8. Re:Ahhh memories! by knarfling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You may not have experienced them, but many of us have.

      The magnet issue happened to my supervisor, but I was there at the time. What made it difficult was that he would bring the disks in to the shop completely trashed. It took over a week and 5 sets of replacement floppies before we figured out the trouble.

      Stapling, however, happened to me personally. An office assistant was told to bring the floppy to our shop and was given a paper with our address on it. She was specifically told not to paper clip the address to the floppy so as to prevent bending, so she stapled it. Surprisingly, we were able to gently pry the staple out an recover the data. But it prompted us to have fun with other customers. We took a bad floppy, put it in the protective sleeve, covered it with a piece of paper that said "Important Data. Do NOT erase" and stapled it to the disk and sleeve about 20 times. We then placed it out on the counters next to the demo machines and counted how many people tried to slide the disk out of the sleeve. Several people asked us if we could put it in to see what was on the disk, a few tried to slide it out, and at least four tried to put the disk, sleave, staples and paper into the drive.

      My favorite experience happened when someone tried to return a game as defective. He stated that it worked the first time, but he took it to a friends house and it didn't work. When he brought it home, it didn't work. When I asked him if I could see the disk, he took it out of his shirt pocket and unfolded it. It was still in the the sleeve. I put my hands behind my back and asked him to turn the disk over and read the warning on the back of the sleeve. When he got to the "Do Not Bend" warning, he looked up and said, "That's probably why it doesn't work, isn't it?"

      --
      Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
    9. Re:Ahhh memories! by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      Well, there were also these warnings from Beagle Bros.:

      http://stevenf.com/beagle/diskcare.html

      I always would forget to not feed the disk to the alligator, and an more than one occasion forgot the warning and cooked the disk in a toaster. ;-)

    10. Re:Ahhh memories! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I did that myself once. I wanted to see if it was actually stupid enough to reformat its own boot disk, and sure enough... it was.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    11. Re:Ahhh memories! by Jahta · · Score: 1

      Ah, those urban legends that didn't happen to you either, but everybody says they experienced them first person. :-)

      Yeah, those didn't happen to me either, but I've heard them many times.

      I find the photocopy story a little hard to imagine, but FWIW, the staple thing I saw MANY times, and the magnet thing at least a couple times.

      Bizarre as it sounds, it did happen. Turned out that the user had never been shown how to copy diskettes, but reasoned that the photocopier worked for "regular" documents so why not documents on a diskette? Live and learn!

    12. Re:Ahhh memories! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It's because of users like you and the GP that Apple decided to make a walled garden.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:Ahhh memories! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Wow! They did all this because 30 years ago I wanted to see if a an Apple Lisa could recognize its own boot disk? Cool.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    14. Re:Ahhh memories! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      No, it's the mindset. Trying to break something out of idle curiosity and a desire to see how/if things work. It is rewarding to some of us, but can cause issues for the hoi polloi. I'm not knocking you. At some point my parents should have put the screwdrivers under lock and key due to the number of things I took apart but couldn't quite get put back together.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    15. Re:Ahhh memories! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      See, I think you're wrong. A properly-designed system should make this kind of activity unnecessary. These days it generally is, but you shouldn't need to experiment to find out how things will work.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  14. "Loathed"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember cards, and they weren't loathed. They were... cards. Just tools of the day.

    You're one cheap writer. Please get off my lawn.

  15. Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We would call the big ones "floppies" and the small ones "stiffies" (for obvious reaons) to keep them apart. And we would do it with a straight face.

    This seems to have been a local thing in South Africa, however, since I have only heard it there.

    1. Re:Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Informative

      We would call the big ones "floppies" and the small ones "stiffies" (for obvious reaons) to keep them apart. And we would do it with a straight face.

      This seems to have been a local thing in South Africa, however, since I have only heard it there.

      lerppu(floppy) vs. korppu(hardy).

      of course hard disks were then called kovalevyt so.. but we had that distinction in finnish too. maybe english is the only language where it doesn't exist?-D

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      lerppu(floppy) vs. korppu(hardy).

      Later computer magazines also tried to root the term "romppu" for CDRs, but it was mostly used by lamers only.

    3. Re:Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was only 1999 or so when I discovered that foreigners called 3.5" diskettes "floppies" - I was mildly surprised because I had thought that the term died out with 5.25" disks. I think people here were always uncomfortable with calling disks "floppies" because that word was a racial slur, whereas "stiffy" hadn't quite caught on as slang for erection until after "stiffy disks" had already become commonplace.

    4. Re:Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by antdude · · Score: 1

      3.5" disks are floppy inside their hard plastic cases. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      We would call the big ones "floppies" and the small ones "stiffies" (for obvious reaons) to keep them apart.

      Oh, so you're the asshole who got the muggles calling the little floppies "hard drives"? People often asked me why they were called floppies when they were stiff, so I got great pleasure out of breaking one open and showing them the floppy disk inside the case.

    6. Re:Differentiating the 5.25" and the 3.5" disks by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I don't recall such usage in Russian. That said, there were some people who didn't know the lingo and ended up thinking about a 3.5" floppy when someone spoke of a "hard disk" to them - I've seen that personally.

  16. Stiffies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in South Africa we used to call the 3.5" Floppies with the hard plastic cases stiffies.

    1. Re:Stiffies by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      I could never be proud of having a 3.5" stiffie.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    2. Re:Stiffies by tgd · · Score: 2

      I could never be proud of having a 3.5" stiffie.

      Great. Now I feel like I shouldn't be proud I had my hands on quite a few 8" floppies when I was a young child ...

  17. Floppy disk music by humanrev · · Score: 1

    There's only one good use for a "modern" floppy disk drive - MUSIC!

    Doom's E1M1 soundtrack on eight floppy drives:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a7-5WYOKxE

    Guy also has plenty more tracks. Makes me want to break out the Arduino again...

    --
    Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
  18. USB to ST-506 interface! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a USB ST-506 adaptor, so I can transfer files over sneakernet on a 20MB Miniscribe. OMFG! That would be the awesomest show-and-tell ever!

  19. This brings back memories... by thomas8166 · · Score: 1

    The only type of floppy I remember handling is in 3.5" (I'm still a young'un), but I still remember a kid's science magazine (not published anymore here in Taiwan) teaching us to insert the 5.25" floppies all the way to the bottom, flip the drive bay latches 90 degrees to lock it in place, and boot from A: using MS-DOS. I still have a 5.25" drive cleaner (where the magnetic material is substituted with some kind of textile and packaged in a standard casing) lying around, though I have no actual disks.

    --
    I make hardware RNGs, which give 2.5849625 bits of entropy per use in theory (actual performance dependent on usage).
  20. Not all punch tape was fragile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanted an archival medium today, you could do worse than mylar punch tape. That stuff was damned near indestructible. You couldn't tear it if you tried. We kept all our important/frequently used data and programs on it.

  21. Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Which made them frankly fairly useless for data storage and backup. Any company IT dept worth its salt used tapes and your average user just had to make sure he backed the same thing up on enough floppies that after N months/years at least one would hopefully still work. And as time went by and manufacturers cut costs to make up for falling sales reliability got so bad that in boxes of some of the last floppies to be produced at least 1 or 2 disks wouldn't even work to start with if my experience was anything to go by!

    I miss some things about computers of the past but floppy disks are not one of them. Thank god for USB sticks and SD cards.

    1. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      To this day I don't fully understand why tape is so much more reliable than floppies. Aren't they essentially the same medium (magnetized substrate) but just in a different shape (long-long-long rectangle vs donut)? Is it a density thing, or is the material actually that much different (I know floppies are stiffer, but I always figured they were just thicker).

    2. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Data density was much higher on a floppy disk than tapes of the day (if you think about it , and entire floppy disks surface area is probably only equivalent to a few inches of tape) so consequently minor faults that would do nothing to data on a tape could cause complete data loss on a floppy disk.

    3. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by rs79 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It wasn't. 9 track tapes lasted a few years and at that point the oxide flaked off. Ever wonder where Google's Usenet archive came from? DejaNews. Wonder where that came from? Archive.org (I think it's all still there somewhere in 4 of the biggest files on earth). Wonder where they got it from? I sort of arranged them to get a copy from magi@uwo who had taken Henry Spencer's tape backups made because a friend of his wanted rec.birds ad it was easier to just store all of it. magi told me at the worst point they'd run a tape for a foot, then have to stop and clean all the flaked oxide off the heads and keep going. It took, I think, two summers to read them all that way.

      Tapes were ok if you used them the same year or next, but if you were serious about data, you kept it on disk packs, either 2314 single platers or 2311 packs or multiple platters.

      8" floppies may have been introduced in 71 but it wasn't really anywhere close to common until the late seventies and never had much traction with large computers. More so with minicomputers but still fairly useless given the volumes of data. Where they shone was with micros, their 8-bit cpus and low data requirements made them ideal; you could easily boot an O/S off one and have all your data on the other and this lasted until about the early to mid 80s when 5" floppies - much less reliable - took over.

      IBM introduced them and they were called "flexible diskettes" and nobody thought they would work or work reliably if they did, which really wasn't too far off the mark.

      You know all those gaps in Google's Usenet archive? That's where the oxide flaked off and that data is just plain extinct. No, tapes sucked but then, as now, expensive dick drives had outstanding longevity.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    4. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      I yearned for a floppy disk drive while i pissed around with audio cassettes. Booting and running dos 3.3 from floppy (many years later) was sheer joy.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    5. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by donaldm · · Score: 1

      To this day I don't fully understand why tape is so much more reliable than floppies.

      Are there still people today that use floppies? :)

      Basically for any professional backup service tapes are always the best and this is still the case today. Even back in the early 1980's any decent system admin would never consider using floppies for system and data backups since they had limited capacity and weren't that reliable. Of course floppies were relatively cheap in comparison to tapes however when you consider a 1.2MB 3.5" floppy (I have seen 10" floppies) verses a 100MB plus reel to reel tape and later cartridges (current LTO tapes have capacities of over 1.5TB) it makes much more sense to use magnetic tape since it is easier to store them on or off site than something like a floppy, CD, DVD, BD or even a hard disk.

      Today it must be noted that if you have a PC and want to back that up the cheapest way is to use one or more external hard disks since you can get these relatively cheaply with capacities up to 3TB.

      For many businesses DLT and LTO tape cartridges are still the best backup media, however a total solution must be put in place and this may not be cheap. Two of the first questions I always ask companies that are contemplating a backup solution for their business are "What price do you put on your data" and "How long can an outage for recovery purposes take before it impacts the business". There are plenty of other questions to ask but those two are a good start.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    6. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by isorox · · Score: 1

      Are there still people today that use floppies? :)

      Yes, we have various old bits of equipment which use floppys to store settings etc. Astons and vision mixers come to mind.

    7. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was all about the write current at the head. You see, tapes are always single-sided.
      Floppies (originally single-sided too), are double sided. Too much write current and you
      write-through the floppy and affect the data on the other side. So it became a balance
      of write current vs. double sided reliability. Yes, the single sided floppy was much more
      reliable - just as good as a tape. Seems that factoid was forgotten.

      CAPTCHA = creator

    8. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Hard Disks - Expensive (in comparison) but large and quick
      Flash drives - Very Expensive and small
      Tape - Cheap and reliable and big enough for most
      Cloud - Slow (unless you have a huge pipe), and expensive (cost per month)

      A bunch of tapes in a safe off-site is still the best solution for most people .... your mileage may vary

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    9. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Tore+S+B · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're describing "sticky shed syndrome", or hydrolysis of the polyurethane binding layer between the oxide and the base. Some tape brands are more susceptible to it than others. Storage conditions are another significant determinant.

      Basically, humidity reacts with the glue that keeps the rust sticking to the plastic. If there was archival data of such significance, the tapes should have been "baked" - that is, slowly heated to a precise temperature which would re-dry the glue. After that, the tapes would probably mount fine.

      If you had conferred with some people like the Computer History Museum (just down the block from the Googleplex), they would have helped you out.

      --
      toresbe
    10. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by jmauro · · Score: 2

      Are there still people today that use floppies? :)

      Yes. I click on them all the time to save documents and files.

    11. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Does it matter if its oxide flaking off or simply losing magnetism? Floppy disks were unreliable. Ok , data was lost due to flaking on tapes , but you could still read the rest of the tape. Good luck reading much of anything off a floppy disk if you lost any directory metadata.

    12. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by gv250 · · Score: 2

      8" floppies ... never had much traction with large computers.

      Are you forgetting the VAX 11/780's console floppy drive? No VAX would have ever booted without it.

      No, tapes sucked but then, as now, expensive dick drives had outstanding longevity.

      Best typo today.

    13. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Opyros · · Score: 1

      No, tapes sucked but then, as now, expensive dick drives had outstanding longevity.

      Freudian typo?

    14. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by wallsg · · Score: 1

      You know all those gaps in Google's Usenet archive? That's where the oxide flaked off and that data is just plain extinct. No, tapes sucked but then, as now, expensive dick drives had outstanding longevity.

      Heh heh. He said "dick". Heh heh.

    15. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'expensive dick drives'?

      So they had pr0n in those days too. Tell us more.

    16. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah.

      I have 3.5 and 5.25 drives - at least three of each - plus an ancient notebook (a 386) with an internal 3.5 drive, and some guts hanging out to support a jury-rigged 5.25 quasi external.

      I collect old gaming software, and the notebook lets me check out the media before I buy.

      Just picked up a couple of perfect Leisure Suit Larry titles, and a very nice "I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream" - with the mousepad.

    17. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      8" floppies may have been introduced in 71 but it wasn't really anywhere close to common until the late seventies and never had much traction with large computers. More so with minicomputers but still fairly useless given the volumes of data. Where they shone was with micros, their 8-bit cpus and low data requirements made them ideal; you could easily boot an O/S off one and have all your data on the other and this lasted until about the early to mid 80s when 5" floppies - much less reliable - took over.

      Uhh, 5.25" floppies were used in many computers in the late 70s, and 3.25" disks were what took over in the mid 1980s.

    18. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by jimbob666 · · Score: 1

      Are there still people today that use floppies? :)

      Yes, when one of our old Dell servers fail and they have a RAID controller. Windows Server 2003 install requires you to press F6 to load additional disk drivers at first stage of install and this dialogue only looks for A:

    19. Re:Yeah , they were pretty unreliable by serialband · · Score: 1

      I found early floppy disks to be quite reliable. I'm still reading data from them. They became unreliable when AOL started dumping their cheap floppies. All my early floppies from the 80s still worked. When AOL started dumping, the manufacturers started making them cheap, for one time use and actually selling them to the consumers, because people would see the price and buy the cheaper ones. Every manufacturer followed suit.

  22. The Sector Wars by mbstone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Y'all forgot, there weren't just 5.25" and 8" floppy drives, there was also no agreement among OEMs on whether diskettes should be soft sectored or hard sectored, and there were maybe 30 formatting schemes in use -- hard sectoring required punching holes in the media, sometimes several.

    Even after the IBM-PC (which adopted 5.25" soft-sectored disks as the standard) there were attempts to use punched holes, or nonstandard data written to the disks, either as a copy protection scheme or in order to require computer purchasers to purchase the OEM's own diskette media (DEC Rainbow).

    1. Re:The Sector Wars by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      Actually IIRC the DEC Rainbow just didn't have formatting capacity on its floppy controller. There is software to get PCs to format RX50 diskettes, and there is a single DEC with an RX50 that can be triggered to format RX50 floppies. Part of me wants to say that it was the Rainbow - that or the Pro 380...

      --
      toresbe
    2. Re:The Sector Wars by Megane · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, early '80s, someone at the local TRS-80 user group would buy large quantities of floppy disks so that everyone could take advantage of the better pricing. I get a box, take it home, and try to format it. Instead of the "Click... click... click..." the drive went RAT-A-TAT-A-TAT! They were hard sectored (10, I think), so formatting was stepping eleven times faster than normal.

      Anyhow, I imaged all my old disks a few years ago with a Catweasel board. It uses the ultimate formatting method: time between magnetic changes. There were no disk errors other than the ones that were already there 20+ years before.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  23. 5.25" floppies were really reliable by gay358 · · Score: 1

    My experience was that 5.25" floppies were really reliable. I had hundreds of 5.25" floppies and I don't remember any of them ever failing. I had some failures with 3.5" floppies, but not too often. IMHO, USB flash drives are much more unreliable than floppies were (although capacity of USB flash drives is much larger than floppies).

    It would be interesting to check if the floppies that I used over 20 years ago are still readable. I have to try that some day...

    1. Re:5.25" floppies were really reliable by donaldm · · Score: 1

      My experience was that 5.25" floppies were really reliable

      From personal experience I would have to mostly agree (I have seen embarrassing failures) however there is nothing worse than some clueless git using them as a coaster or worse spilling their coffee on them. I have even seen people fold them and don't ask what a hot summers day can do to one. The 3.5" floppies mainly stopped the coaster issue but it still did not stop abuse.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    2. Re:5.25" floppies were really reliable by Tackhead · · Score: 1

      My experience was that 5.25" floppies were really reliable. I had hundreds of 5.25" floppies and I don't remember any of them ever failing. I had some failures with 3.5" floppies, but not too often. IMHO, USB flash drives are much more unreliable than floppies were (although capacity of USB flash drives is much larger than floppies).

      It would be interesting to check if the floppies that I used over 20 years ago are still readable. I have to try that some day...

      Ah, Elephant Memory Systems. At least for the disk I booted, it's true: An Elephant Never Forgets. (The artwork that went into their marketing swag was some of the most surreal in the industry.)

      All the manufacturers also had sets of helpful icons/instructions about care and handling on the backs of the envelopes, which were parodied by Beagle Bros.

    3. Re:5.25" floppies were really reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have several from the early nineties; the double sided high density 3.5" floppies are mostly still readable - depends on the floppy drive; the double sided double density 3.5" floppies that I formatted as high density are mostly garbage and the ones that are formatted properly are mostly still readable if you can find a computer os/drive that supports non 1.44MB formatted diskettes. I have still have some 5.25" floppies, but haven't tried reading them.

    4. Re:5.25" floppies were really reliable by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to check if the floppies that I used over 20 years ago are still readable. I have to try that some day...

      I just tried reading four original Lotus 1-2-3 5" floppies from 1983. No joy, but I can read three floppies with copies of 6502 cross-assembler stuff I did in 1986.

      Not too shabby for 26 year old media!

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  24. 3.5 inch? Really? by Kapiti+Kid · · Score: 2

    I was always under the impression that they were actually 9 cm discs. Being Japanese (Sony) in origin, they were in rest-of-the-world measurements, not American.

    1. Re:3.5 inch? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia confirms that. Curiously, even in the rest of the world (Germany here) we call them 3.5 inch floppies.

  25. NeXT by MojoRilla · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yes, Steve Jobs popularized floppies with the Apple II, but he wasn't always so lucky. At the time the NeXT Computer came out, the lack of a floppy drive was a serious problem. Sneakernet was alive and well in those days, and uploading files via the network required bizarre things like Kermit and ZModem. And the NeXT magneto optical drive was horrendous. NeXT did eventually introduce a floppy in 1991, pretty late in the game. Of course, NeXT was way ahead of its time, the computer that the world wide web was invented on. and a precursor to OS X and iOS.

    1. Re:NeXT by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

      Good point. I believe the NeXT system crashed and burned primarily because of its lack of basic IO devices and its reliance on a network that never really materialized. I could be wrong, and feel free to correct me if I am. My understanding was this WAS one of the first completely networked PCs, and suffered due to the prevalence of a dialup world. Lol, Dial-up. Blii blii blii blo blo blo blsssshhhhH!!

    2. Re:NeXT by unixisc · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the black NeXT workstations in our University Computer lab did have floppy drives - I'd sometimes save certain files on them. We had a different problem - those NeXTs were diskless workstations, which were a pain to work w/. Apple did exclude the floppy drive from the first iMacs - I think they had arrangements for an external superdrive. Some PC vendors @ the time who copied the iMac made sure to include a floppy drive w/ it.

      Of course, once USB drives became popular, the floppy was dead. Heck, even CF cards were an improvement.

  26. 3.5" floppies are the worst by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    I was pretty amazed that I could read floppies from the 80s and very early nineties flawlessly, those were 5.25". I was collecting crap back then so I ended up with an Apple II and a PC/AT (where I added a VGA card, and a null modem cable for transfers).

    3.5" were at least more physically robust, though you could bend the metal latch and at worst destroy the drive when you get it stuck in it. but, it was so incredibly unreliable! back then too, a home computer was only useful for gaming and the floppies were used for piracy. no used had a modem or used a BBS, because the costs would have been prohibitive. it was a US thing. as a kid I really wondered where these cracked versions of games were coming from.

    1. Re:3.5" floppies are the worst by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

      I love your enthusiasm for 3.5" disks, but no. You are wrong. Well, at least from my perspective. 3.5" disks were crap. They were very high density which meant they failed due to summer fashions and windy weather. The protector mechanism f*%ked up all the time (slidy) with its rubbish spring. Read my post below about how the military kept using 8-inch floppies. I think the data density was the real killer on these disks. I have C64 5.25 inch disks that my 1541 drives are still able to read but almost no 3.5" disks still workable, and I'll tell you right now, the Commodore disks aren't nearly as well taken care of.

  27. IBM Cards by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that 5081 refers to a specific single-field layout, not to 80-column punched cards as such. There were many layouts. I seem to recall using something very similar to this FORTRAN card even when I wasn't doing FORTRAN, and I don't think they had "FORTRAN STATEMENT" printed on them.

    I don't recall anybody loathing punched cards. They were a simple, reliable, if somewhat bulky medium. It is true that magnetic discs represented a great improvement. In my case, floppies were never more than a backup medium, since the systems I worked with always had hard disks.

    1. Re:IBM Cards by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that 5081 refers to a specific single-field layout, not to 80-column punched cards as such. There were many layouts. I seem to recall using something very similar to this FORTRAN card even when I wasn't doing FORTRAN, and I don't think they had "FORTRAN STATEMENT" printed on them.

      I don't recall anybody loathing punched cards. They were a simple, reliable, if somewhat bulky medium. It is true that magnetic discs represented a great improvement. In my case, floppies were never more than a backup medium, since the systems I worked with always had hard disks.

      Yep. Dug into the closet and only the "blank" cards say 5081 on them. The yellow Assembler cards have a different number (two of them actually, since they're not Genuine IBM), blue COBOL cards are 3393 and the pink FORTRAN (sic) cards have a 88157 on them.

      I recall being disgusted because after too many trips through the RJE card reader, a quarter-inch wide notch would wear out in the top center of the cards (where the picker pushed them) and quite a few incidents of woe from dropped decks, but the only floppy I ever got near on a mainframe was the one that held its microcode. For actual data and program entry people were either using punched cards or key-to-disk/disk-to-tape systems.

  28. Abort, Retry,Ignore Fail by gnalre · · Score: 1

    Ahh, floppies. The very definition of optimism knowing that when the following message came up

    Not ready reading drive A
    Abort, Retry, Fail?

    That you were screwed, but you would still choose one anyway

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abort,_Retry,_Fail%3F

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    1. Re:Abort, Retry,Ignore Fail by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      For me that just meant I accidentally took the floppy out while it was still using it. Stuck it back in and hit retry and you were good.

      I don't recall having nearly as many problems with floppies as others seem to have had. I guess I just took good care of mine.

    2. Re:Abort, Retry,Ignore Fail by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  29. I used Xtree Gold a lot as a kid. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I was a dodgy little software pirate too, I was constantly formatting floppy disks and checking for bastard CRC errors. I only had a 20mb hard disk to begin with.

    So that is why the pin for my ATM card is 145766412139
    (I can't fit the 52 at the end, they max out at 12 digits here, not 14)
    Sad, I know.

    The 2 combined numbers there, which you might be more familliar with in Ztree are.
    1,457,664 BYTES FREE
    1,213,952 BYTES FREE
    No CRC errors on those bad boys, every block is working :)
    Oh and I have an 8" floppy stuck up on the wall of my nerd cave :( although I never got to work with them, the bank I was working in used them for transactions from offices only about 10 or 12 years ago - which really is pretty recent when you think about it.
    (A lot of our Aussie companies here purchased used hardware from the US to set themselves up, I believe Coles supermarkets used US based registers and ANZ banks used some kind of US based banking hardware - both second hand)

    In conclusion: I don't miss the sound of drive heads seeking on cheap floppies with cheap drives, but I do fondly recall some aspects of them.
    730,112
    362,496

    1. Re:I used Xtree Gold a lot as a kid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice post. Loved XTGold. Still have many of the hotkeys memorized. File managers just weren't the same after that. I know you can get clones that work today, but it's not the same without those 8.3 filenames, and my package manager keeps everything pretty well sorted out anyway, I never really need to browse outside my home folder.

  30. bios changed so as not to recognize 5.25 floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep an old Compaq 500 mhz box in my basement so that I can read 5.25 floppies on a 1.2 meg floppy drive (I don't often, but I can.). The bios changed after that, and (in my experience) wouldn't recognize any floppy drive other than the 1.44 meg.

  31. Their death I remember by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Loading Windows & Office on a new PC using more than 60 floppies, spending all afternoon praying God the last one wouldn't fail...

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  32. Track 0 rattle by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    I remember both Apple ][ and Commodore floppies would seek past the end of the rail to recalibrate track 0. The apple made a noise on power up but 1541s made a scary noise whenever formatting a new disk or trying to recover a read error.

    After a while the rattle actually threw the head out of alignment as the pulley was slipping on the axle. I connected the read head to the microphone input of a tape recorder to listen to the signal strength as I adjusted the stepper motor alignment.

    After a while the screw threads were worn and I had to tap&die them. Then I got tired of realigning the heads and drilled in a cotter pin to stop the pulley from slipping.

    Good times.

  33. 80K is a lot more than he thinks it is. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    FTA: "Besides, the early single-sided 8-inch floppy could hold the data of up to 3,000 punch cards, or 80K to you. I know that's nothing today — this article uses up 66K with the text alone – but then it was a big deal."

    There is no way that the text ALONE in this article could take up 66K. That would be something like 200 pages.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:80K is a lot more than he thinks it is. by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      He might have confused disk space used for actual file size.
      A windows notepad file with a single character takes up 4k on disk even though its actual size is only be 1 byte.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
  34. Ahh, the good old days by EmagGeek · · Score: 2

    My first computer was that 1977 TRS-80 Model I, with the 600 baud cassette tape player. It finally bit the dust around 1990.

    My favorites, though, were the Tandys I had. In 1985, my dad brought home a shiny new Tandy 1000A. He spent the money to upgrade it to dual 360K floppy disks, and bought the DRAM on the aftermarket to upgrade it to 640K. It took a lot longer to boot with 640K than it did with the factory 128K it came with.

    DOS 2.11 was the O/S at the time, and DeskMate was something revolutionary to my 10 year old eyes.

    He added 1200bps modem to the mix for his business in 1988 or 89, and it was then that I discovered the online Bulletin Board System. I spent the next couple of years monopolizing the PC, starting my own BBS that ran on floppies, running MiniHost.

    So in 1990 for my birthday, I came home to find a new Tandy 1000TX sitting on the desk in the basement. I had originally thought he had just bought a 3.5" floppy drive for the existing PC, but I was elated to learn I had received a new PC for my birthday.

    The 3.5" floppy was amazing. With the companion 5.25" floppy, I was able to copy everything over no problem. My new PC had its own 1200bps modem in it. Having the larger floppy meant I could put a few precious more programs on my BBS, which ran Phoenix RCS. I installed a couple of door games, and even a sub-BBS since Phoenix could do that. I also borrowed a 2400bps modem from a friend who had an extra one, and expanded my BBS to consume 2 of the 4 phone lines we had in the house, primarily for my dad's business.

    When I was 15, my brother "handed me down" an old rusted out Honda Accord that I could fix up and use for a car when I turned 16. I promptly traded it to a guy at school for a 40-megabyte hard card that was compatible with the TX. It used a Miniscribe 8450 RLL Hard Disk, and an ST-412 RLL controller.

    Boy, that was epic. My BBS could finally store files! I started leeching everything I could from other BBSes in the area: Tiny BBS, PC Paradise, The Works, The Outer Limit, The Open Door, and many others. Tiny in particular had become a huge BBS in the Hudson Valley - I think he grew to 3 or 4 phone lines, two of which were reserved for donators.

    I would have friends over and stay up all night downloading from two different BBSes on two computers and phone lines. I was so officially a nerd by then, also having gotten my ham radio license in 1987.

    When 1990/1991 rolled around, I had gotten my drivers license and a car, and was getting to the point that my juvenile computer pursuits were falling by the wayside in favor of being outside more. But, I still worked on the BBS, and spent late nights writing code in BASIC to do various things, and playing with things like DESQview, bimodem, MNP/5, and other cool things that came about during my formative years.

    1992 brought about graduation from high school and a move away from home for college. I had built myself a 286 machine over the summer, with 1MB of RAM and QEMU on it. So, I left a lot behind. The Tandy 1000TX stayed home, but the hard drive came with me, so the BBS was no more. The 2400bps modem I had borrowed went back to its owner as well, but that didn't matter since the dorms at Ga Tech had their very own DB25 with a direct serial connection to Hydra - it was like being on a 9600bps BBS all the time! And this email thing - whoa - it was instant, too.

    I dabbled in BBSes here and there, especially after I moved out of the dorm and could do it again, but it was never the same. By 1996 the Internet was starting to take shape in a big way, and I realized that BBSes were to quickly become a thing of the past, in favor of this World Wide Web thing everyone was talking about.

    In 1997, I still had floppies in my computer. By then I was still in school, having taken the requisite year or two off to get in-state tuition. I started playing with Linux, and built myself a whopping dual-CPU machine. Floppies were still handy, as I'd still had all of the ones I had used on the old Tandy 10

    1. Re:Ahh, the good old days by Megane · · Score: 1

      My first computer was that 1977 TRS-80 Model I, with the 600 baud cassette tape player. It finally bit the dust around 1990.

      That's 500 baud, unless you started with Level I basic, which I think was 250 baud. I still have a lot of tapes from 1979-1981 or so that I need to decode (1979, 14th birthday, Level II 16K). I finally decided to try a few weeks ago, and guess who still sells a cassette tape player? The Shack. CTR-121, fifty bucks. I did some rips with Audacity with beautiful waveforms, but what bits of code I have to decode from WAVs don't work with them.

      A few years later I got a CoCo 4K (and immediately upgraded it to 16K) just because I wanted to play with 6809 assembly language. But then I became one of the first "switchers" and went straight to Macintosh in 1985. I had a Fidonet BBS on a PC, and had Linux PCs to do internet stuff, but I've used Mac all the way, even through the crappy days of the early PowerPC era.

      A few years ago I imaged all my old TRS-80 floppies with a Catweasel board, with no errors beyond the ones from 20+ years ago. Then I tried to image a bunch of other random disks I'd acquired for other systems, mostly from being a thrift store junkie. Atari 8-bit wasn't too bad, just a speeded up motor and inverted data. Apple II took some work to make a GCR decoder, and I got both 13-sector and 16-sector working. But Commodore's GCR method was crap. It doesn't even have a proper address mark like Apple II does, so it's hard to sync up to the bitstream.

      My ultimate goal is to rig up that Catweasel with an 8-inch drive and read a bunch of TRS-80 Model II/16 disks that I have. I have a few old machines with 8" drives under piles of stuff, and I should be able to get at least one of them working.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  35. Quizz question by openfrog · · Score: 1

    The typical terabyte hard drive is equivalent to how many punch cards, and how much would they weight?
    --
    Ah, the smell of punch cards in the morning!

  36. Zip drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No mention of the Zip & Jazz disks that were an attempt to keep the portable "floppy" magnetic disk paradigm alive? I remember using the Zip drive with a parallel port connection, and the 'Guest' program so you could use these on other computers.

    1. Re:Zip drives? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I still have an internal 120MB Zip drive - still works, I still have five disks as well. I also have a 120MB Floptical drive (these could also read 1.44MB/2.88MB floppies). What I'm really after is an internal minicassette drive like this one. Absent one of these, I've had to fall back to ol' reliable Walkman.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    2. Re:Zip drives? by Megane · · Score: 1

      I've amassed a large collection of Zip disks from thrift store shopping over the years. Too bad that most people either never used them or actually bothered to delete everything before getting rid of them, because digital archaeology can be so fun.

      And what's really sad is that it's easier to make a random tiny computer (like an Arduino or some kind of ARM-based SoC) use an SD card that can hold 20 or more Zip disks worth of data than it is to use an actual Zip drive. So they're really completely useless.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  37. Smart Ass by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    As a joke, I once stuck a 5.25" floppy to the refrigerator with a large magnet.

    On the floppy, a sticky note to my roommate read: "Alex. This is important information. Please keep it safe"

  38. Floppy by nischal360 · · Score: 0

    Disk

  39. First use was on the IBM System 360 by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

    I believe the first use of the floppy was on the IBM System 360. It was used to distribute changes to the microcode. That would have been in the early to mid 1960s.

  40. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1000 cards could hold ~80K bytes (1000 x 80 columns).

  41. back in the days at Memorex Plant in 1979... by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I worked there for three months, got paid little more than minimum wage, not too bad as living expenses were not as high like they are now. This was the flexible disk plant at Central Expwy and San Tomas (I think) in Santa Clara, right there in Silicon Valley when this place was rockin. Rest of country may have been in the gutter in 1979 but here in Santa Clara Valley you would never know. Lots of places hiring, engineers can name their own price. Assemblers hired with no experience necessary. My first job was to insert a 5.25 cover (with no disk) into a machine that stamps out holes, this cover was then passed over to someone else that inserted the flexible disk.

    This Memorex plant produced 5.25 and 8 inch floppies. Magnetic medium came in large rolls, i.e. recording tape but about 9 inches or 6 inches wide from "The Tape Plant" which the flexible disks were stamped from the roll. These circular disks were then burnished. Covers were made from black material that was pressed with white soft cloth with a heat stamp. For you younguns, need to get one of these old disks and take it apart to better visualize these pieces. After covers were pressed with white clothes, they were folded in half and given to me to stamp out the holes for the recording heads to make contact with magnetic medium (I worked swing shift, normally could stamp about 9000, one night on a roll I got up to 10,000 stamped well had a larger number of botches...). This plant was a 3-shift operation, but many times we also had to work Saturdays (which I hated). Later on I did a few other things but overall it was boring. I had cash flow problems and had to get a job real quick.

    One particular thing I most remembered is this 2-story building had the sales and marketing upstairs (they only worked day shift), all these people upstairs were all tall, thin, and beautiful. Everyone below were all short, fat, and ugly. However there was one lady that worked grave shift, nice looking and she wore tons of makeup. Not sure why at this time of night but she was quite attractive.

    There was one time when demand for flexible disks was high and Memorex was pressed to deliver more (customer was a computer company, I forgot who). When disks were burnished they were inspected for blemishes in the magnetic material, too many blemishes they were placed in a rejected pile (which actually was quite a large quantity). Because of the demand, they pulled these disks out and we took a second look, "well this one doesn't look too bad" and proceeded to make a final product (which finished disks are individually tested for write/read). I asked the boss if this computer company knows we are "recycling" from the reject pile, he said, "None of their concern!"

    There was one case when someone working the machine that presses white cloth to the black material, he saw a spider, grabbed it, and put it between the white cloth and black material and fed into the heat press. So somewhere there is a Memorex 8-inch floppy with a squished spider inside.

    Yep, such as things were in the 20th century.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  42. Somewhat interesting fact. by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    I don't know how many people are aware of this, but here is my brief story. As an Australian I had the privilege of boarding a US Battleship when I was younger. An interesting fact I came away with was the fact that they committed (this is in about 1997) everything to those 8 inch floppy. Why? With its incredible 80kb - 1.2MB storage capacity, apparently the 8 inch drive was the most resilient storage medium in the event that the vessel was sunk and records needed to be recovered from the ocean floor. I personally found that fascinating.

    1. Re:Somewhat interesting fact. by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      Those old floppies were resilient. I have floppies from the late 70's which are still perfectly usable today, while 3.5" floppies from just a decade ago no longer work. You'd think that the harder shell would make them more resilient, but not even close. I guess the low density of the old floppies makes them more reliable.

    2. Re:Somewhat interesting fact. by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Those old floppies were resilient. I have floppies from the late 70's which are still perfectly usable today, while 3.5" floppies from just a decade ago no longer work. You'd think that the harder shell would make them more resilient, but not even close. I guess the low density of the old floppies makes them more reliable.

      The 720K (880K on an Amiga) 3.5" disks seem pretty reliable to me. I suspect either (a) HD made the difference, or (b) production quality went down towards the end of the floppy era.

  43. I still remember... by bennomatic · · Score: 1
    ...the look on a friend's face when he learned a 5.25" floppy could hold 170k of data.
    ...the look on that same friend's face when I showed him how to use a hole punch to double the amount of data.
    ...how proud I was of my filing systems, which allowed me to find the right disk for a particular file in just minutes.
    ...spending extra $$$ on the higher-quality Loran and Elephant brand disks because I wanted to be sure they would last forever

    And my favorite memory is...

    ...keeping a binder full of my floppies for several years after my C64 was stolen, meeting someone who was still using a C64, and playing the game I had half-written on her system one last time before saying goodbye to the memories.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  44. I had good luck with 8-inchers by swschrad · · Score: 1

    used them in a Motorola eXorcisor and, of course, the VAX 11/785 booted from a Wang floppy drive. came time (past time, DEC was not going to support us any longer if I didn't apply the 3 years of updates my predecessor had not installed) that I had to build a new boot floppy for VMS 6.x, and man, was that the most careful I have ever been in my life.

    worst floppies ever... 1.2 Mb PC-DOS format. scratch, scratch, scratch Abort, Retry, Fail?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  45. gazelle backup 1988 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on a 286 with a compatible a floppy controller . I could backup 16 megs (not gigs) on 16 high density floppies in 20 minutes. It used an error correction method that could recover bad sectors 95% of the time (throw away another disk).

    I loved that program, it literally saved my butt several times.

  46. floopy i have by delete2kill · · Score: 0

    ya know i have one of those new solid state drives they call them floopy drive .yeah n i am an IT manager .pretty smart one at that

  47. Maths Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > 3,000 punch cards, or 80K to you

    Punch cards were 80 column. 3,000 x 80 -> 240Kb which is the actual capacity of the original 8 inch SSSD disks.

    5,25 disks originally had a capacity of 80Kb, such as those on the Apple II. This may be where you got your confusion from.

  48. 3,000 cards is 234k by MensaMoron · · Score: 1

    Not to nitpick too much But for 3,000 punch cards to be 80k that would mean each card only had 28 columns. 3000 * 80 = 240,000 / 1024 = 234k I think it's the 3,000 that is the wrong number. The original IBM 23FD was about 80k or about 1,000 80 column punch cards worth. I used to do microcode updates on the mainframe at work. It was a huge pain and took forever. When the 5 1/4 disks came out it was Amazing!

  49. that's MR. TRASH-80, to you, sonny! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    AFAIK no PC used an 8 inch disk (please correct me if I'm wrong)

    h8ers gonna hate

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  50. Still in use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, I still have to use 3.5" floppies on a weekly basis. My lab has very old (specialized, expensive) equipment that only runs with a DOS interface, and we use floppies to transfer the data because there is no other option. This was very nostalgic at first, then quickly just became a PITA.

    Interestingly, the older floppies we have tend to be slightly more reliable than the later-produced discs ... makes me wonder if production quality went down towards the end (though it could be any number of reasons).

  51. PUNCHED cards not PUNCH cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..ferpetesake. Get it right.

  52. 3,5" floppy still saves me power by u64 · · Score: 1

    I changed the Registry and placed the Windows logs (.evt files) on floppy. And those creepy WBEM .log files.

    I suspect that a floppy spin-up uses less power than a HardDrive spin-up from sleep.

    In any case i get the wonderful ka-chick ka-chuck sounds randomly several times a-day. Windows is very log-happy.

  53. 8" on War Games by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Just last week I watched War Games - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086567/
    Still a good movie.
    Matthew Broderick uses 8" floppies and a 300 baud acoustic coupling to hack into a mainframe. Circa 1983.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  54. 3,000 carrds is MORE than 234K by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    I hate to be pedantic, but 5081 Hollerith cards had 12 holes per column, which means you could actually encoded 12 bits per column if you wanted to. 12 bits x 80 columns = 960 bits per card, or 120 bytes. 120 x 3,000 = 360,000 bytes; divide by 1024 = 351.5 KB

  55. VAX 11/780 had 8" floppy by billstewart · · Score: 1

    The VAX 11/780 has a PDP-11/23 microcomputer as the console processor that booted the machine, and the 11/23 used an 8" floppy in some DEC format. There were drivers in 4.1BSD and maybe in System V that made the floppy device accessible if you wanted to use it.

    We had a project in the late 80s which had a bunch of people sending us field data in all kinds of random and often inappropriate data formats, and one set of users sent us data on 8" floppies. We ended up deciding that yes, it really would be safe to put this dubious floppy into the console floppy drive, the machine really only used it at boot time, and we tried it and successfully copied the data into the Unix machine, where we could parse it into some useful format. Made sure to take the floppy out right after reading it and put the standard one back in. Other formats people sent us included a lot of VMS backup tapes, and a stack of tapes with duct-tape labels on them and a badly photocopied description of the bytes.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  56. and now that slashdot has geezer readers, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we will have stories about floppy dick?