Slashdot Mirror


First Impressions of Windows 8 Powered Nokia Lumia 920 and 820

Nerval's Lobster writes "Nokia CEO Stephen Elop first took to the stage at Center548 on New York City's West Side, where Microsoft had first unveiled Windows Phone 7 in late 2010, to claim that Nokia was becoming a 'more nimble competitor' thanks to several strategic decisions under his tenure, including the choice of Windows Phone as the company's primary smartphone platform. ... In terms of [the 920's hardware]: the battery is 2000 mAh; the processor is a dual-core Snapdragon S4, which was apparently selected for its energy efficiency; and the aforementioned wireless charging, based on the 'Qi' wireless charging standard. ... Despite the enthusiasm displayed onstage for Windows Phone 8, the new smartphone platform poses something of a conundrum for Nokia. The company invested heavily in Windows Phone 7, all but abandoning its homegrown operating systems — including Symbian, once a dominant player in the mobile arena — in favor of Microsoft’s platform. But those Windows Phone 7 smartphones won't upgrade to Windows Phone 8 software, and nor will they run Windows Phone 8 apps."

251 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. I can't wait for wireless charging. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You just put it in the microwave and turn it on high for about 3-4 minutes.

    1. Re:I can't wait for wireless charging. by jedwidz · · Score: 2

      That's awesome but now my phone won't turn on?

      If I don't get my fix of Angry Birds soon, I'll have to resort to lobbing real-world objects at other real-world objects...

  2. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Mike_Theory · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The hardware itself does seem almost too good to be true... It seems like an aazing device, Though, I'd be much more inclined to purchase if there were an Android offering... Simply because of the lack of pre-existing apps/community support for windows 8, Especially on mobile devices. This will likely improve with time, but, at least for now, i think the software is killing an amazing device

    --
    /endrant
  3. "Welcome to being a Microsoft patner..." by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...here's your complimentary knife in the back."

    1. Re:"Welcome to being a Microsoft patner..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      In memoriam: Microsoftâ(TM)s previous strategic mobile partners

      ïMicrosoft's new "strategic partnership" with Nokia is not its first. For a decade the software company has courted and consummated relationships with a variety of companies in mobile and telecom. Here are the ones I can remember:

      LG. In February 2009 Microsoft Corp. signed a multiyear agreement for Windows Mobile to be included on devices from LG Electronics Inc. LG would use Windows Mobile as its "primary platform"for smartphones and produce about 50 models running the software.

      What happened? LG made a few Windows Mobile devices but with WinMo uncompetitive, they abandoned the platform and moved to Android losing years of market presence and all their profits.

      Motorola. In September 2003, Motorola and Microsoft announced an alliance. "Starting with the introduction of the new Motorola MPx200 mobile phone with Microsoft Windows Mobile software, the companies will collaborate on a series of Smartphone and Pocket PC wireless devices designed to create a virtual "remote control" for the Web-centric, work-centric, always-on-the-go mobile professional." In addition, the alliance includes cooperation on joint marketing and wireless developer programs.

      What happened? Motorola launched a series of Windows Mobile phones culminating in the Motorola Q "Blackberry killer". As Motorola hit the rocks in profitability new management reached for the Android liferaft. The company now relies exclusively on the Droid franchise.

      Palm. In September 2005 Palm and Microsoft announced a strategic alliance to "accelerate the Smartphone market segment with a new device for mobile professionals and businesses. Palm has licensed the Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system for an expanded line of Treo Smartphones, the first of which will be available on Verizon Wirelessâ(TM) national wireless broadband network."

      What happened? Palm shipped a few Windows Mobile, famously dismissing Appleâ(TM)s potential entry as something "PC guys" could never achieve. A new CEO, a private placement and an acquisition later the company is a division of HP making its own operating system.

      Nortel. When Steve Ballmer was famously laughing at the iPhone and saying that he likes the Windows Mobile strategy "a lot" he was sitting next to the then-CEO of Nortel (Mike Zafirovski formerly of Motorola) with whom the company had just closed a strategic deal. "an alliance between Microsoft and Nortel announced in July 2006 ⦠includes three new joint solutions to dramatically improve business communications by breaking down the barriers between voice, e-mail, instant messaging, multimedia conferencing and other forms of communication".

      What happened? Nortel declared bankruptcy two years later.

      Verizon. In January 2009 "Verizon Wireless has selected Microsoft Corp. to provide portal, local and Internet search as well as mobile advertising services to customers on its devices. The five-year agreement will go into effect in the first half of 2009 when Microsoft Live Search is targeted to be available on new Verizon Wireless feature phones and smartphones." The deal would ensure Bing distribution to all of Verizonâ(TM)s smartphone customers.

      What happened? Bing did ship on some devices but in October 2009 Droid came to Verizon.

      Ericsson. In September 2000, "Ericsson and Microsoft Corp. today launched Ericsson Microsoft Mobile Venture AB. This previously announced joint company will drive the mobile Internet by developing and marketing mobile e-mail solutions for operators. The first solutions are expected to be on the market by the end of the year. The company is part of a broader strategic alliance between Ericsson and Microsoft"

      What happened? Ericsson divested itself of the mobile division forming a joint venture which would go on and make more strategic alliances with Microsoft over Windows Mobile culminating in a loss of profits and eventual flight to Android.

      Sendo. In February 2001, Mic

    2. Re:"Welcome to being a Microsoft patner..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are no rebuttals and it sits at +5 because it's ALL TRUE. I know you shill fucks aren't really acquainted with actual facts as they exist in the real world but I assure the bullshit you get passed to you from the Waggoner Edstrom PR training manual is 100 percent pure spin bunk. I worked at Nortel when it happened. Did you?

    3. Re:"Welcome to being a Microsoft patner..." by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Microsoft - Where handset manufacturers go to die.

      Kind of sad really. Nokia, for all the horrors symbian provoked on the world, has always made sound and solid handsets, and really deserve most of the credit for the mobile phone revolution in the third world.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    4. Re:"Welcome to being a Microsoft patner..." by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      On the other hand HTC made it big time with Windows Mobile.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  4. Nokia stock price plummets by amazeofdeath · · Score: 5, Informative

    After the announcement, Nokia stock price has gone down 15 % from yesterday's closing value at OMX Helsinki. So, not the kind of announcement the market was expecting, it seems.

    --
    U+F8FF
    1. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple's does the same thing after most announcements. Investors are a fickle bunch.

    2. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Apple stock always drops after an announcement because the rumour mill generates such hysteria that people are expecting something mindblowing. When it turns out to be only an 8 or 9 instead of a 10 they're disappointed. I don't think anyone really had those expectations about this announcement.

    3. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but obviously expectations did not line up with what they delievered... so what exactly were they expecting is the question? The new Lumias are solid spec wise and offer some real advantages over competing phones (Windows Phone or otherwise), Windows Phone 8 addresses most concerns about the platform, app availability is increasing at an excellent rate, accessory support is expanding, Lumia devices are selling... so I'm not sure what Nokia could have done differently today that would really change what simply appears to be a fickle investor reaction.

    4. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by ItsIllak · · Score: 2

      I think some were still expecting a 20MP sensor and a tablet device.

      I'd advise that the drop is entirely temporary and you can make yourself an easy 10% in less than a month by buying today.

    5. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Have something that would let them sell 70 million rather than 7 million phones.

      Unfortunately windows 8 sucks. If people don't buy windows 8, why would they particularly care about a windows 8 phone? Does it do anything to the market that the iPhone (for people who want a good phone but know nothing about how phones work) or Android (people who want good phones and who are happy to install a cyanogen nightly build, or people who want a cheap phone that still has some smarts) don't do? Not really. This is nokia's problem, there's really not a lot of room for them to innovate, they aren't a semiconductor company, they aren't a software company, and they're not big enough to shift the market with the the small set of hardware and software they do make, they're the dell of phones.

      The unified windows 8 product family was an opportunity for microsoft to really deliver a combined, integrated entertainment and productivity experience. And they didn't. You desktop/laptop is where you do all of your productivity, but you can take it with you on your phone, you can browse TV on the web or PC, and use the phone to control your TV like a remote, through your Xbox 3. They have all of the pieces, they just didn't bring them together.

      What will be more interesting is if Sony can pull off, using android, what microsoft didn't, while still leaving productivity as a microsoft windows PC problem. (Apple of course is trying the same thing, just with Apple TV rather than a playstation or Xbox).

    6. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by micheas · · Score: 1

      Or investors see this as the last chance to sell any quantity of stock before Nokia files the Finnish equivalent of chapter 11.

      Struggling companies tend to fall on good news as people holding the stock view it as their best chance to dump it.

      Nobody said. iPhones are dead this is really great. It does "X' (where "X" is something like telepathic user interface)

    7. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Because "good enough" is just not enough in the market where competition is fierce, entrance is quite low for "good enough" and everyone looks for "best".

      Those are rules. They are sure silly, but that's how market work these days.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    8. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      I'd advise that the drop is entirely temporary and you can make yourself an easy 10% in less than a month by buying today.

      I guess that's only if they can sell phones for less than the marketing they spend on them.

    9. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      he unified windows 8 product family was an opportunity for microsoft to really deliver a combined, integrated entertainment and productivity experience. And they didn't.

      Not sure how exactly you can say this. I have Xbox, Windows 8 on a laptop, Windows 8 on a tablet, and Windows Phone 7. Music and videos are available across all devices. I can pause on one device and resume on another. For instance I can listen to music on my TV, pause it and continue listening in the car. Or I can watch a TV show on the TV, pause it and hop in bed, continuing it there.

      My tablet or laptop (or soon phone) acts as a remote controller for my Xbox; I can browse for music or movies or do searches on the device in my hand and see the results on the screen. This is especially good when searching for music to play, which is much easier with a keyboard.

      Documents I write on my desktop are available to all my other devices via SkyDrive, and pictures or movies I take on my phone are automatically synced with Skydrive. These are also synced wirelessly if I choose with my laptop, along with any music I download. Soon I'll be able to play a game on my phone, pause it, then resume it on my tablet or xbox.

      Caendar, mail, contacts, messages, all sync between desktop, tablet, and phone. I can even turn my purely entertainment Windows 8 tablet into a fully functional productivity PC (capable of running all my current software including matlab, photoshop, and office) by plugging in a keyboard and mouse.

      So please, I'd live you to point me to an ecosystem which can do all this as seamlessly.

    10. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by starless · · Score: 1

      After the announcement, Nokia stock price has gone down 15 % from yesterday's closing value at OMX Helsinki. So, not the kind of announcement the market was expecting, it seems.

      "Buy the rumor, sell the fact"
      e.g.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_exchange_market#Market_psychology

    11. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by swb · · Score: 1

      AirPlay mirroring though kind of covers the gap between large-screen device usage (ie, XBox) and what you can do locally on the iPhone or iPad. I bought an AppleTV on a lark and find I use the mirroring function a lot in the living room when I find something worth throwing up on the screen. It can be a little weird touching the screen in my hand but looking at the screen across the room, but it works pretty well with games you can control via accelerometer.

      I'd like to see some more apps available for AppleTV, but I think a broader benefit would be wider licensing of the AirPlay mirroring capabiity to TV/AV receiver makers.

    12. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for this sort of integration for a while. I thought Apple would be the first. They had almost all the parts together, although their OSX and iOS integration sucked, pretty much (iTunes is it? Seriously?).

      Now MS has an opportunity to scoop up all the marbles. I thought they were going to do this years ago when they announced all the Zune integration, but the integration was never quite up to snuff. Recompiling your apps for Zune never quite worked. It was akin to Java's "write once, debug everywhere" mantra. They never announced a handheld gaming initiative that really worked, either. They were talking about Xbox everywhere, but Zune didn't do it, and Windows Mobile never got off the ground.

      I'm getting stoked reading about the Windows 8 development and the available data synchronizations between desktop devices, tablets, and mobile. The whole "write once, compile to any Windows 8 device (drivers included)" is just the sort of thing to get me to invest big in this new technology.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    13. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Something that gave them the "wow" factor, something that said they'd steal Apple's profits or Android's popularity. Sure, it's an alright launch for a platform that has a 3.5% market share and climbing but this is Nokia we're talking about, the Chipzilla of cell phones. The people still holding Nokia stock are those who bought into the Elop kool-aid and for every quarter some of them go "You took a smoldering platform and poured gasoline on it for THIS?!", their Q2 sales were crap and compared to Q2 last year they've gone from a 391 million euro profit to a 327 million loss on operations - that is they're now losing money on selling phones before all the other costs. They can't afford to burn this kind of cash for long, and if the steam runs out before their market share recovers, well...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      I have

      Right, so do I. I suspect most /. users can do almost all of these things already. But we are the distinct minority. That's what I mean by 'having all the pieces but not bringing them together'.

      to all my other devices via SkyDrive

      Unless you have the work fuck in them. then you might be in trouble. http://androidspin.com/2012/08/21/microsoft-skydrive-not-so-private-no-nude-content-or-profanity-in-the-cloud-or-risk-being-banned/

      Hence it's not quite ready for prime time.

      I'd live you to point me to an ecosystem which can do all this as seamlessly.

      No one can, that was sort of my point. This is a benchmark those of us who know what google docs or skydrive or dropbox are, and know how to configure a router can do already with a hodgepodge of devices from various manufacturers. But the average consumer can't navigate doing so yet. Microsoft, Sony and Apple all *could* produce something that everyone manage that. But they aren't.

    15. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, it's gonna land with a resounding "thud"

      Probably, but that doesn't mean the prospect of it all working isn't appealing.

      They're betting the farm

      I've wondered about this. I don't think they are. They'll bet he farm on windows 9, between now and then they're just shoveling a very expensive lab project at us.

    16. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Right, so do I. I suspect most /. users can do almost all of these things already. But we are the distinct minority.

      This is where you're wrong, doing these things takes no expertise and no futzing or fiddling with settings. You sign in to Windows Phone or Windows 8 with your microsoft account, and everything I mentioned is all automatic. Log into a Windows 8 PC or Windows RT tablet for the first time and you have your mail, calendar, contacts, pictures, music, apps are all ready. Same for Windows Phone. Skydrive is installed by default and there's no configuring required. Xbox smartglass is as simple as starting the app. No configuration is needed to get things talking as long as you are both on the same network. Not a single "advanced configuration" option is required to enable the above. The catch is you have to be within the Microsoft ecosystem of products to have everything talking together, but that's the price to pay for things "just working".

    17. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that everything that you said is possible with iOS and iCloud right and has been since last year?

    18. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1
      First thing's first:

      I realize you are sort of a MS shill, and I get where you're coming from.

      Sorry, not even close. It's a shame the climate on slashdot is as such that I have to actually type this out to justify my point of view without being labeled a shill. What you're implying is that I post opinions here I don't actually hold outside of monetary compensation from Microsoft. This is not true at all. I bought all the aforementioned products (except Windows 8, which I have through Dreamspark Premium) after comparing them with the competition and choosing which is best for me, given my requirements. I'm probably the opposite of many Slashdotters in that I use Linux daily for work and use Windows at home by my own choice. My profession is roboticist, and I'm a published researcher in the field. I contribute regularly to the largest open source robotics project, ROS. I have no connections with Microsoft, live on the east coast, and no one in my family or friend group works for or is associated with Microsoft (except my girlfriend's cousin was Bill Gate's personal assistant for many years. Never met her.). I hold a positive view of Windows 8, Windows Phone, and Microsoft Office including the Ribbon and Metro interface, and use each by my own choice regardless of any outside influences. I also own an iMac, an iPad, various cheap Android tablets for hacking, and I have positive views of those pieces of hardware as well.

      Windows 8 is terrible, so no one is going to use it. So that's not helping. It doesn't matter what you *can* do with it, it won't be done because no one sane wants to use Windows 8.

      Windows 8 is an excellent OS for almost all objective measures of OS quality. It's stable, secure, compatible with a vast array of hardware, it maintains compatibility with old software, it is easy to configure, easy to maintain, and the resource footprint is very low. More importantly, on all of these points it exceeds its predecessor. That is, it is more stable, secure, etc. than Windows 7 for a variety of reasons I can list if you really want me to. Please note that in all discussions held here on Slashdot, these points have not been in question. No one is talking about how buggy and bloated and unstable Windows 8 is (because it isnt't; there's nothing to complain about in that regard). All discussions revolve around the most subjective and personal aspect of the OS (and also the most customizable): the UI.

      What I think you mean when you say Windows 8 is terrible, and correct me if I'm wrong and you really mean the other aspects I mentioned of the OS are in question, is that you hate the UI (and therefore most everyone else will hate it). I think for a great many users, Metro offers benefits that perhaps aren't realized by most people on slashdot, as they are more computer literate. These include consistency in the UI, as search and settings is in the same spot for every app; predictability across the OS, as pressing the right mouse button, pressing the windows key, swiping in from edges or mousing to corners does the same thing no matter where you are in the OS; easy to manage controls, as most user centric settings have been distilled into a simplified settings screen; easy ways find, update, and uninstall apps, as there's a centralized repository to manage this, and uninstalling them is as simple as right clicking instead of delving into the control panel. Most of these benefits are not realized for people like you or me, but, as evidenced by the success of the iPad, simple interfaces like this can be very effective for novice users (which is most everyone).

      That might leave you to say MS has abandoned the power user in Windows 8, but I find it's customizable enough to fit my needs. Here's my current start screen on one of my test machines I'm experimenting with. The transparent background is a little buggy with animations, but it's coming along. I like this much better than the start m

    19. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 is technically fine. It's just a terrible design. The inconsistent UI makes is basically unusable.

      These include consistency in the UI

      You've clearly never had to evaluate accessibility professionally. Windows 8 is completely inconsistent in how it behaves. We've been running it through its paces here at work (where we have a lot of people who are experts on this sort of thing, including working with microsoft on office) and basically, don't use windows 8. Everything that's wrong with windows 8 can be summed up in 1 word: inconsistent. The UI doesn't behave predictably, and it's not consistent with previous behaviours for no apparent reason.

      Also, you come across like an MS shill, most people here come across as linux shills. As i said, your point of view makes a lot of sense in the enterprise.

      I'm sorry, I think you're being contradictory. If I'm understanding you correctly, you want some sort server type product you have at your home which hosts all your data and media with minimal configuration and talks to a variety of devices from a multitude of manufacturers to facilitates seamlessly sharing data across different standards of communication and data formats to all different devices. Sorry that's not happening. Ever.

      No, that's not what i said, and I'm sorry you don't understand, but you'll get there. You actually have a good view of what an idealistic world should be, but of course we don't have that (full interoperability, which, as I say, is what those of us who live the lifestyle now have, linux servers, iphones, PS3s, home lighting, all talking to each other). As I said, how do we configure everything now (without skydrive)? Right, I have a windows 2008 file and webserver, windows 7 desktops, some home theatre PC for TV, etc. etc. etc. Small business and 'home' are merging. MS has, traditionally, been pretty good at realizing that. With Skydrive they are - they're just assuming they should be the server provider, which is a non starter.

      I don't know how to make that clearer.

      well for starters you're a student who managed to find dreamspark software for free. Good for you, if you're one of our students you'll encounter some of our professors (who have PhD's in comp sci or software engineering) who can't manage that. When you get caught up to the point of realizing that's the problem you'll figure out just how unclear this stuff is. Without a doubt the Xbox has been microsofts greatest push forward in usability and accessibility, that's why both your dad, and an 8 year old who can barely print letters properly (average grade 3) can both manage to use it.

      Have a look at http://seattleorganicseo.com/sosblog/top-google-searches-in-2012-the-most-popular-keywords-study-version-3/ it's a bit off topic but it tells an enormous amount about how people understand the technology they use. The most searched for thing on google is facebook. Think about that. Let it sink in. People use google to find www.facebook.com. On average 4 or 5 times a month for every facebook user. Given that a lot of users probably don't use google to find facebook, some don't use google etc. you have an enormous collection of people, literally hundreds of millions, for whom the concept of typing in www.facebook.com, is too much and even need to type in google to google search to do a google search. And they do this repeatedly. That's the level that accessibility and usability live at. Windows 8 can't even decide whether it's 'metro' or traditional desktop.

      they just don't work how you want them to: without a centralized data cloud service.

      so you mean they don't work. If your home user service relies on uptime to a centralized data cloud service it's not a home user service. That's called an online backup service.

      You asked what's the point of a centralized cloud service which maintains data

    20. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed this little thread; this is one of the reasons I come to slashdot. Unfortunately I won't be able to respond to your post in detail except to say I understand your position on my point of view more clearly, and agree with some aspects, but I still can't discern what you would consider a fully working implementation given the current technology climate (the ideal situation I posed is not tenable). That is, you say Microsoft has all the pieces, but what according to you is unites them to your satisfaction? I don't see any reasonable resolution given the constraints your impose. If Microsoft isn't the server provider, and the user isn't the server provider (too complicated, too much configuration) who is? Or is there even a centralized server coordinating devices in your view?

      Anyway, cheers.

    21. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not even close. It's a shame the climate on slashdot is as such that I have to actually type this out to justify my point of view without being labeled a shill.

      It's not everyone, just some people on here that either think using the 'shill' label is an adequate rebuttal when discussing Microsoft or use the 'shill' label to attempt to gain the upper hand in the argument (like the 'I realize you're trolling, but I'll bite' method of starting a response).

      I bought all the aforementioned products (except Windows 8, which I have through Dreamspark Premium) after comparing them with the competition and choosing which is best for me, given my requirements.

      You'll find quite a lot of people on here do the same thing. I use Windows at work and a bit at home but i mostly use OSX (laptops and mac mini), i have an xbox (and ps3), had an ipad (but found i never really used it) and i had a WP7 phone and really liked it (i reckon the platform is brilliant) but the iphone made more sense because the apps i wanted weren't available on it at the time and while I use OSX predominantly at home the Windows Phone connector software is pretty average. I'm really torn on whether to go with Windows Phone 8 or the next iPhone, i really like WP but the iphone is kind of the bog standard choice and the support at the apple store if something goes wrong is great!

      Now a lot of people - like me - just avoid posting anything positive about experiences with Microsoft products, or things Microsoft is doing well because it's not worth the effort given that it will likely just be down-modded and flooded with 'Shill' and 'Troll' responses. Windows Phone actually is objectively a good product, but instead of discussion on its merits you get detractors going back in time to discuss Windows Mobile instead or Microsoft's past business practices or dismissing it for its low marketshare (Linux and OSX can have low desktop marketshare though, that's ok).

      All discussions revolve around the most subjective and personal aspect of the OS (and also the most customizable): the UI.

      Actually it's only one aspect of the UI, the start screen, and some people will act as though this one element is the be all and end all of the entire operating system yet if they had done Windows 8 with the start menu you'd have people saying 'why should i upgrade, it's no different'.

    22. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by smash · · Score: 1

      Most of the big ones on 2003 currently that I'm aware of are upgrading to 2007 / 2010 in the next 6 months.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    23. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by humanrev · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it works well for you. For better or worse though, I'd rather have an ecosystem which was comprised of elements from different vendors and open platforms rather than surrendering all my tech to only one proprietary vendor (in your case, Microsoft). Probably wouldn't work as seamlessly, but it would mean less trouble later down the track should I feel that vendor is being a dick, I can swap out components for something else.

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    24. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Stock price had increase by about 100% in little over a month before the fall.

      So indeed the stock has pulled in some new people and lots of people new to Nokia hoped that they would release something awesome. And this at least was expected since it's what has been leaked about Windows Phone 8 already. Many wanted tablets and 808-like PureView(?) cameras to.

    25. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      They certainly don't seem to advertise that very well.

    26. Re:Nokia stock price plummets by ItsIllak · · Score: 1

      Just thought I'd pop back... Stock price "plummeted" from 2.80 to 2.40 - it's now back up to 2.79 - as I said, easy 10% on your money...

      Stock market swings are not a reflection of the consumer market, it's a reflection of how bankrupt that whole industry is...

  5. I can't wait to get my hands on this baby. by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And I thought you'd be getting a free one, what with working for Nokia ; ).

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  6. Does it run Linux? by pesho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a nice piece of hardware, but does it run Linux (read Android or MeeGo)?

    1. Re:Does it run Linux? by bondsbw · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes.

      (Stupid question deserves stupid answer.)

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    2. Re:Does it run Linux? by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Meego would be nice. I wonder if any of the Nokia engineers have it working on the new hardware?

    3. Re:Does it run Linux? by rathaven · · Score: 1

      Only if you can get around secure-boot...

    4. Re:Does it run Linux? by peppepz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Windows Phone 8 uses the real Windows 8 kernel, doesn't it? If so, I'll bet that the thing runs UEFI-on-ARM, with the associated "secure" boot in its non-deactivatable personality. In this case you could forget about installing anything not signed by Microsoft on the device.

  7. Platform tweaks needed to the OS? by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From TFA:

    Nokia’s PureMotion HD+ is the company’s name for its tweaks to the display, including blur-free scrolling.

    Why isn't this not only standard, but the only acceptable state these days? When will people (Android, I'm looking at you here) figure out that getting the basics so completely solid that nobody thinks about them is the kind of work that people should expect from their OS/Environment provider? Watching a video talking about how many cores the latest whatever has with jittery scrolling is just embarrasing.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:Platform tweaks needed to the OS? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      When will people (Android, I'm looking at you here) figure out that getting the basics so completely solid that nobody thinks about them is the kind of work that people should expect from their OS/Environment provider?

      People who work for handset manufacturers buy pools and Audis with the bonus money they get for developing highly-marketable thingies like "PURE-MOTION-AITCH-DEE-PLUS".

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:Platform tweaks needed to the OS? by fa2k · · Score: 2

      Well it does say "blur-free" and that's technically different than jitter. They are probably using the term incorrectly, but they could be referring to ghosting, which would be a seen as a kind of motion blur. I've never seen that problem before though. Also , smooth scrolling will be standard on Android 4.1.

  8. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The best thing about this is how effective the platform can be for developers.

    There won't be any developers. Developers want to code for platforms people are using--iPhone and Android. People want to use platforms developers are coding for--iPhone and Android. It's a self-feeding loop and Nokia is way, way too late to the party. Any phone that doesn't run iPhone or Android apps is dead, dead, dead.

  9. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As usual on a Microsoft related story, the astroturfer writes a long, praising comment at the exact same minute as the story is published. Haven't you guys learned yet? Why do you keep burning IDs making it so easy to detect the astroturfing accounts?

    Come on, give us a harder challenge next time...

  10. Re:Wave by Sparticus789 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's that large $500 hole in my checking account in the distance, it looks like... iPhone 5.

    FTFY

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  11. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering it's a shill, yes. Their first post to Slashdot is alengthy and gushing post about Windows Phone with a time stamp identical to the story's post time.

  12. Hardware by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    The hardware does look impressive. Will everything come iwth NFC now?

    1. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This hardware will be "impressive" for about 5 minutes. There are already Android devices that have been on the market for months that surpass it. Windows Phone will always be behind because Microsoft designed the OEM partnerships that way.

  13. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Desler · · Score: 4, Informative

    There doesn't need to be when it will run all apps from WP7.

  14. Stop with the fud. by seann · · Score: 1, Informative

    in favor of Microsoftâ(TM)s platform. But those Windows Phone 7 smartphones won't upgrade to Windows Phone 8 software, and nor will they run Windows Phone 8 apps."

    Stop saying that.

    Say that windows phone 8 applications that are targeted for only windows phone 8, and use only windows phone 8 features will not run on windows phone 7.5.

    This is not an issue.

    --
    I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    1. Re:Stop with the fud. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      What would you call an app that is targeted for windws phone 8 and uses windows phone 8 features? I would call it a windows phone 8 app. That app will not work on windows phone 7. It is an accurate and true statement. saying it your way is just needlessly confusing and stupid. I think what you would like people to say is that very few applications will be written for windows phone 8. Therefore, it is not an issue.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Stop with the fud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop saying that.

      But it's true.

      Say that windows phone 8 applications that are targeted for only windows phone 8, and use only windows phone 8 features will not run on windows phone 7.5.

      But that's incomplete. No WP8 applications will run on wp 7.5, regardless of what features are used. You might as well say "WP8 phones won't run any iPhone fart apps made before 2008."

      So your idea to stop with the FUD is to not mention WP7 buyers being abandoned, and instead focus so narrowly on just part the problem that it no longer looks like a problem? WP7 not being upgradeable is not FUD, it's Certainty.

  15. Re:Wave by Desler · · Score: 1

    Or as most US consumers will do, they'll get it for $199 on contract.

  16. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fact is, developing for Windows 8 is also developing for (for the most part) Windows Phone 8 and Windows 8 RT, and probably in the future Xbox 720 (or whatever they call it). Whether you like Metro or not, Windows 8 will be shipping on all Desktops and Laptops in the Fall, and will be a viable platform with an immediate install base. As bad as Vista was, it still managed to find its way on more computers than Mac OSX. Developers *will* code for Windows 8, they *will* code for Windows RT, and if the marginal benefit is in their favor they *will* code for Windows Phone 8. Maybe that marginal benefit will not be there at first, but the scales will tip.

  17. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to have a Windows machine.

    Listen, I like the Nokia phones, and that's what I was going to buy. I brought my Ubuntu laptop into the store to check it out, see if it was compatible, but it isn't. You absolutely must have a Windows install, and a virtual machine won't cut it. (This was the quite-new 610, but looking around online shows that the 700 and 900 have the same issue.)

    It uses the Zune file system, and nobody but MS has been able to figure out how to mount it. You can't transfer files with Bluetooth. You can't put music on it. You can't sync to anything. It's a completely stand-alone device unless you're running Windows.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  18. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by amiga3D · · Score: 2

    Oh man, I think SCO won that one.

  19. WP 7 will get upgrades by alen · · Score: 3, Informative

    from what i've read they will get most of the upgrades and will go to version 7.8

    but even then it shouldn't be a big deal to code apps for 8 and 7. happens all the time in the app store where most apps now require iOS 4.x and will have some special iOS 5 features if you have the latest version

    1. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by sharpneli · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it's not just "Similar OS but with more features". WP8 is a completely new OS with completely new API. You need to do everything differently. WP8 uses the WinRT API. It's like going from pure java android (ndk not allowed) into iOS:

    2. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      from what i've read they will get most of the upgrades

      That's a lie. 7.8 gets the new homescreen and that's about it. If wp8 takes off, you can say bye-bye to wp7 development because who in their right mind wastes money devving for a platform with no users. They'll be too busy learning and using the new wp8 APIs. WP7 is done, dude. And if it isn't it'll only be because WP8 flopped.

    3. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      it shouldn't be a big deal to code apps for 8 and 7. happens all the time in the app store where most apps now require iOS 4.x and will have some special iOS 5 features if you have the latest version

      Inaccurate statement. We're talking about a completely different realm here from "people do this in iOS all the time." We're talking about App makers paying app developers to code the same thing two different ways so that their app will work on two platforms, neither of which has any market share to speak of. Even if 8 takes off, no one will pay to port these things to 7--the market share is just too small.

      Basically, I feel bad for anyone who bought a phone running Windows Phone 7, because it is a lost cause. And anyone who going forward buys a phone running Windows Phone 7 is either stupid, doesn't care about apps (this may be true of anyone who buys a Windows Phone anyway), or was badly informed by a dishonest salesperson.

    4. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You don't really have to do everything differently. First, because it still runs Silverlight-based WP7 apps. And second, because WinRT APIs are actually very close to Silverlight, so porting can often be done with as little as changing a bunch of "using" statements for namespaces in your C# code.

    5. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying anything about backwards compatibility. I was responding to a comment that claimed that you had to "do everything differently" as a developer when moving from WP7 to WP8, which is false.

      Reading comprehension is very important if you want to write quality troll comments.

    6. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by exomondo · · Score: 1

      If wp8 takes off, you can say bye-bye to wp7 development because who in their right mind wastes money devving for a platform with no users.

      In that case who cares? Saying bye-bye to wp7 development has no effect if the platform has no users.

    7. Re:WP 7 will get upgrades by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure if windows phone 8 takes off devs are going to bother being backward compatible with a dead platform with next to no users. Tell me another one.

      Then who cares? If the platform has no users then being backwards compatible serves no purpose. The only thing that would matter would be going forwards, which doesn't appear to be a big deal.

  20. Anyone know where Steve Balmer is? by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

    Quoth the man himself:

    I'll bet you right now that the next app developer to hit it really big will be a developer on Windows."

    I'd quite like to take him up on that bet.

    1. Re:Anyone know where Steve Balmer is? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's just how you define hitting really big.

      his words pretty much imply though that nobody will hit big this year.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  21. Re:They're dead by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    Rovio already said they're not going to make Angry Birds for this platform.
    Others are following suite.

    wp7 has angry birds, I think it was alex or Ab in space that wasn't?
    anyhow.. they're probably port it over to wp8 since you can finally use some real languages and there's cpu to use.

    that still won't make answering a call and resuming your play after that a pleasant excercise.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  22. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Desler · · Score: 1

    Writing for Windows 8 does not necessarily imply using Windows RT. You can write Win32 apps to run on the desktop.

  23. "More nimble competitor"? by pnot · · Score: 1

    For once I agree with Elop on something. I can fully believe that Nokia are "nimble" these days. Same way a gnat is more nimble than an 800-pound gorilla.

    Personally I'm more interested to see what Jolla come up with.

    1. Re:"More nimble competitor"? by incongruency · · Score: 1

      As a current N900 owner, I'm also very interested in what Jolla will produce, as I'm very much hoping that to be my next phone.

      However, as a US citizen the radios they choose to put into the phone may prohibit me from using it, as I'm not keen on switching from TMobile because of my grandfathered data plan.

      I'm also concerned about if their phone will have a physical keyboard or not, but it is said that there will be a developer edition, which may be more to my liking.

      They're also saying that the Jolla phone will be able to run Android applications, and if so that'll be an exciting development:

    2. Re:"More nimble competitor"? by pnot · · Score: 1

      They're also saying that the Jolla phone will be able to run Android applications, and if so that'll be an exciting development:

      Thanks, I'd missed that bit of news! That would be a massive boost for them -- probably a necessary one too, given the size of the app ecosystems they're up against. Hmm, think I'll hold off on the Galaxy Nexus purchase for a little while longer...

  24. Re:Wave by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

    Only if they are eligible for a new contract at the time. Most people will be somewhere in the middle of a contract and will likely have to pay something between the $199 and the $500 for an early hardware upgrade.

  25. -1 Pedantic by Tarlus · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Windows 8" != "Windows Phone 8." There is a huge difference.

    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:-1 Pedantic by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Kernel, same. Userspace, though, rather different. Certainly different enough to not warrant lumping them together, not anymore than OS X and FreeBSD.

      It would be more correct to say that both are NT 6.2, since that's the kernel version.

    2. Re:-1 Pedantic by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Kernel != OS

      --
      /* No Comment */
    3. Re:-1 Pedantic by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Another pedantic thing: When the title is "First Impressions of Windows 8 Powered Nokia Lumia 920 and 820", I'm a bit dissappointed that most of the description is not about first impressions of those devices. Oh well, I'm sure we'll get a lot of first impressions on 12th.

      --
      It is what it is.
    4. Re:-1 Pedantic by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 Phone and Windows RT will both include the Win32 API, or much of it. Only Microsoft gets to use it. The WinRT version will be on all systems. Sure, the set of default applications will be different, hard binaries can't run on all three (and MS is using managed/VM code, rather than fat binaries, to support the same WinRT apps on different hardware). So there's more than just the kernel in common. Same basic APIs.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  26. Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To think that Nokia's own Symbian had more than 50% smartphone market share only three years ago and big plans for their Linux based highend OS, which was universally praised, and instead now going for an OS that not only locks the user down, but locks themselves in a position where they give away control of OS development, outsource all manufacturing (after shutting down most locations in Europe and firing loyal employees by the boatload) and need to contend with the likes of Samsung who do their own CPU, RAM, display etc. fabrication is just unfortunate. It's hard to not be cynical about this.

    Microsoft obviously is pushing for positive publicity offering free samples to bloggers etc. but all the money in the world won't make the OS more attractive to the end-user, even with their new funky looking N9-like design. Functionality wise the it's lacking compared to Android and the restrictive Metro UI whether on your computer or on your phone is butt-ugly at worst and uninspiring at best.

    On the other hand this might actually what MS alternatives have needed to become worth considering by more end users.

    1. Re:Very sad by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's nice real world example that the Wrong CEO can utterly destroy a company almost overnight.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Very sad by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, because everyone knows the future is pushing your own boring knock-off of PalmOS, just like Apple and Google. There's no future in pioneering the first significant UI upgrade since 1984. They should have just keeped on keepin' on, like RIM.

      I can't stand companies that ruin themselves by innovating.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:Very sad by imnotanumber · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, because everyone knows the future is pushing your own boring knock-off of PalmOS, just like Apple and Google. There's no future in pioneering the first significant UI upgrade since 1984. They should have just keeped on keepin' on, like RIM.

      I can't stand companies that ruin themselves by innovating.

      Either I missed the <SARCASM> tag or you don't know the meaning of the words "upgrade" and "innovating"...

    4. Re:Very sad by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      outsource all manufacturing

      They didn't outsource manufacturing, they shifted it to their own factories in Asia.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    5. Re:Very sad by grumpyman · · Score: 1
      The situation is different for RIM but it's interesting to see many /.ers opinions is that RIM should not develop their own OS and for RIM to dump their own OS and adopt Android.

      I recall at the tail end of 3Dfx, they made plenty of marketing splash with Voodoo 4 and 5 and garner plenty of of excitement...

    6. Re:Very sad by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      What are you smoking?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. Re:Correction: Dual-Core by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    NOT quad-core

    well, S4 is named to increase maximum confusion.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  28. It's time to switch by DingerX · · Score: 1
    I'll liked this line:

    “This is Lumia, and it’s time to switch,” she said, in what felt like a possible official tagline for the device.

    Isn't that what Nokia owners have been saying for the last year already? You know. "Hmm... I think I'll go see what Symbian device or Maemo/MeeGo iteration Nokia has on offer. Oh. This is Lumia, and it's time to switch."

    Yes, Nokia has great hardware. They've done that well. Now they're pulling the plug entirely on WP7 upgrades. So any developers or customers who took a chance on WP7 are being told "sorry, please buy(-in) again". Maybe some customers will; but I doubt any companies will fall for the MicroLighting Stranger.

    1. Re:It's time to switch by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Now they're pulling the plug entirely on WP7 upgrades. So any developers or customers who took a chance on WP7 are being told "sorry, please buy(-in) again"

      They are not "pulling the plug" as there are still updates in line for WP7. Consumers are getting many features not related to hardware via the 7.8 update and various apps. For instance the apps Nokia showed off today are all available for the Lumia 900. Developers aren't being screwed either, as all WP7 apps are forward compatible with WP8.

    2. Re:It's time to switch by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Um, no. The only 'feature' of 7.8 is make the root display appear to be Windows Phone 8. They might throw in some bug fixes. It cannot be compared at all with the current 'best in class' OS provider, namely Apple.

      The best thing about this update for existing users is that it will force some carriers to at least push out the last bug fix, which fixed a significant text-input problem.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:It's time to switch by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Not true, some of the features of Windows 8 including data counters, offline maps and turn by turn, xbox music, smartglass, are for sure coming to WP7 (some are already here). Microsoft released developer specific details of Windows Phone 8 at the Windows Phone developer summit. Most were hardware dependent, and the only non-hardware dependent feature talked about was the start screen. People thought that was it for WP8, but since then, tons of non-hardware dependent features have been leaked from the leaked SDK. At the developer summity Joe Belfiore, when asked if more features would be added, was very coy about the issue. Of course any features announced for WP7.8 at that time would also take the wraps off of WP8, which they're still keeping tight probably until Build 2012.

      So the state of things are, more than just the start screen have already been brought to 7.8, the start screen will come in the future, and more features look like they'll be on the way. We are not getting Windows 8, but the state of things is a far cry from "pulling the plug."

    4. Re:It's time to switch by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Um, no. The only 'feature' of 7.8 is make the root display appear to be Windows Phone 8. They might throw in some bug fixes. It cannot be compared at all with the current 'best in class' OS provider, namely Apple.

      The best thing about this update for existing users is that it will force some carriers to at least push out the last bug fix, which fixed a significant text-input problem.

      Yeah, you won't be allowed to buy apps that you can't use on older devices, like iOS allows you to. FAIL!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    5. Re:It's time to switch by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      100% of their old customers

      All five of them!

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    6. Re:It's time to switch by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's EOLing support for Windows 7 Phones, not Nokia. They will have the 7.8 update, but that's basically the last scheduled service pack. It adds some UI queues from Windows 8 Phone, but not app compatibility. That's the place current Windows 7 Phone users are being screwed -- that phone you bought last month, or may yet buy this month (not folks here, sure, but there are plenty of people not wise to the ways of Microsoft, and a small number of them are buying Windows 7 Phones), is going to be abandoned, software-wise.

      Developers aren't being screwed, no... the apps they've written (most major companies were paid by Microsoft to port them) will still run on Windows 8 Phone. And they'll be relatively easy ports to full Windows 8, except for the parts that aren't that portable. And if the developers stick with Windows on mobile, they'll all be jumping to Windows 8 now, that's where the hardware will be, since desktop Windows 8 will run these apps, too. No one's going to keep writing Windows 7 Phone apps, with only some 4 million sold... the first day of Windows 8's release, if it's Microsoft's greatest failure, they'll sell more than that.

      However, it's not surprising the Windows 7 Phone hardware isn't being updated, and that's also Microsoft's fault. They didn't have any trouble orphaning Windows Mobile users for Windows 7 Phone, so it should come as no surprise the same is happening all over again. And by design. Windows 7 Phone, being based on the ancient WinCE kernel, was limited to single-core processors. Not sure what drove Nokia to not even try on the GPU side of things, or maybe that, and certainly the lower screen resolution, were dictated by Microsoft as well. Nokia's only fault was throwing everything after Windows 7 Phone. Microsoft paid for that, with $250 million per quarter to Nokia for doing so. Of course, the 10's of thousands of Nokia employees let go thanks to the tanking of the company over this (mostly the dramatic fall-off of SymbianOS sales, with no replacement sales from Windows Phone) also paid.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  29. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Tapewolf · · Score: 2

    Whether you like Metro or not, Windows 8 will be shipping on all Desktops and Laptops in the Fall, and will be a viable platform with an immediate install base. As bad as Vista was, it still managed to find its way on more computers than Mac OSX. Developers *will* code for Windows 8, they *will* code for Windows RT, and if the marginal benefit is in their favor they *will* code for Windows Phone 8.

    I rather suspect they'll continue coding for Windows 7 or even XP so to have the widest install base. Enterprise clients in particular hate having to upgrade, so jumping in and making something that only works on Metro is a non-starter.

  30. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by peppepz · · Score: 1

    It's dual core, not quad.

  31. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    I wonder why...

  32. This thread is reserved for MS shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I was expecting to see a long first post shilling for Microsoft and Nokia, but it seems that the whole thread is overrun with them. "amazing, wonderful, inclined to purchase..." Please stay away from this thread, it is reserved for professional advertisers only.

  33. Re:Wave by Desler · · Score: 1

    Sure, the raving fanbois will pay early, but most people just wait for their uograde period to come.

  34. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Baldrake · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, this is simply false. There is a Windows Phone Mac Connector program that allows syncing to the Mac. As a Mac user, I can attest it works great. This of course leaves Linux users in the cold, but it is not a Windows-only solution.

    More to the point, there is less and less requirement to sync to a PC at all. Photos auto-sync via Skydrive. Email is all cloud-based. Podcasts are directly synched without requiring a PC to download them. Music comes directly from your Xbox Music Pass. Apps are directly downloaded. Files can be shared via dropbox or Skydrive.

    There are obviously still cases where you would like to sync directly with a computer, but they are becoming really infrequent.

  35. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Windows Phone 8 has SD card support for transferring any data you please to any platform you please. I'm not sure yet if this means plugging it in via USB will mount the SD card, but that's what Joe Belifore seems to indicate in his interviews. We shall see. Also updates are OTA in WP8. You can also alternatively sync files via SkyDrive which is available cross platform.

    Windows Phone 7 isn't Windows only also; a syncing program has been available for OSX for a while.

  36. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Tx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're an Android power user, and you want to see reasonable OS updates, then you know to buy a Nexus device, that's the point of them. Google can't force the various carriers and handset makers push out updates, and it's not in their interests to do so since they want you to buy a new handset every year, so you should understand what's going to happen there. OTOH my Nexus S had ICS and Jelly Bean almost from day one, no hacks, and running perfectly, and that's a pretty old phone now.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  37. Re:Correction: Dual-Core by Desler · · Score: 1

    There is also an S3 but that doesn't mean tri-core. All the S1s and S2s were single core. The number has never had anything to do with CPU core count.

  38. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    Did they ever fix WP7 to not require registry hacks to mount as a drive in Windows? As of 2009 the bleeding edge of mtpfs's support for ZuneFS was getting the directory listing to work. I think after that people quit caring about Zunes.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  39. Start button by puddingebola · · Score: 2

    Where is the Start button?

    1. Re:Start button by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Nobody uses the start button, thus you aren't looking at it either. Why are you asking where something is if you don't even remember it exists?

    2. Re:Start button by puddingebola · · Score: 1

      But how do I launch Minesweeper?

  40. Re:Wave by Desler · · Score: 1

    Great. So what?

  41. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Sir_Sri · · Score: 2

    Windows phone is really good to try out. I haven't tried windows phone 8, but WP7 was really quite interesting to see. I'm not sure it's good or bad but it's certainly different than the iPhone/Android setup.

  42. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by outZider · · Score: 1

    Yes, but only the Nexus devices get reasonable update cadence, so much like the iPhone, if you don't like that one form factor, you're boned. I admit that some of my frustration is based on the fact that HTC and Samsung currently have devices with much better specs than the current top of the line Nexus device, and lips have been sealed on what's next from the Nexus line. I'm hoping these announcements make something appear, and hopefully, they aren't like the middling device that's been rumored as the upcoming refresh of the Galaxy Nexus.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  43. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fact is, developing for Windows 8 is also developing for (for the most part) Windows Phone 8 and Windows 8 RT, and probably in the future Xbox 720 (or whatever they call it).

    Fact is, developing for a smart phone is a completely different thing from developing for a desktop or game console; the difference in screen size, input methods, memory size, processing power and battery restrictions make them utterly different. Windows 8 apps may be theoretically runnable on Windows Phone 8 (And I'm not convinced people will be writing them anyways--as has been pointed out elsewhere, people will be writing Windows XP apps for a while yet for maximum audience), but they won't be *usable* on Windows Phone 8. I'm not surprised that Microsoft doesn't understand this; the entire attempt to shoehorn Metro into Windows 8 shows that they don't understand that you can't run a cellphone interface on a desktop, and vice-versa.

  44. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Desler · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, it will. You misread the summary. WP7 will not run WP8 apps. The other way around will work as Microsoft has repeatedly stated.

  45. How about some enthusiasm from a sub 100k ID then? by ItsIllak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not in the 10k region but still - I appreciate the first post was a bit heavy on the enthusiasm - my guess is an enthusiastic MVP rather than anything more sinister..

    A dual core CPU and a huge battery are pretty great hardware specs. Also a mechanically stabilized sensor mechanism could be very big news, especially if their software really does make innovative use of the available pixels. The point has been made recently that for PC usage (sharing on FB etc, 2MP is more than enough, for print 5MP is enough - IF THE QUALITY IS THERE.

    I assume the stock has plummeted because until a few days ago everyone was hoping for a 20MP sensor and a new tablet to go with the phones. On the other hand - the markets are idiots - buy today, you'll be 10-15% richer by the end of the month if you sell at a time when they don't arbitrarily decide to mood swing again...

    I am a bit disappointed that we loose the smaller screen model - the 820 doesn't really replace the 800, it's more of a slightly smaller variation on the 920 - which is a pity. I personally prefer to hold a smaller screen closer to my face... However, for the feature set that WP8 brings (NFC, more home/lock screen flexibility, better camera tech), I might just have to go larger.

    Final comment as everyone takes a snipe at this. I have a lumia 800 and I'm looking forward to windows 7.8. I don't care that they're not giving me Windows 8 - the differences between 7.8 and 8 are the differences between the base specification of the current hardware and the next gen hardware (screen resolution, NFC etc). Microsoft are just being honest that their latest phones have features that their older phones don't support. Apple astroturf that fact and that causes heaps of faulty software that fails to cope well enough.

    Love Windows Phone, like iPhone (though these days can't justify the cost), frustrated by having to sideload, hack and generally tweak Android whenever I use it.

  46. Re:Wave by Inda · · Score: 1

    And the rest of the world will get an S3 gratis on contract.

    $199? seriously?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  47. Re:Wave by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    With 2 year cell phone contracts, 1/24 or so would be eligible at random. However, the iPhone 4 was released in June 2010 so there are 3 months worth of early buyers that are freshly off contract.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  48. Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was hoping see some decent competition from MSFT to keep Apple on its toes but that is so weak. Why do they insist on that stupid flipping titles? People that I care about? If I want to see what "people that I care about" are doing, I can see notifications in the notifications bar pop up on my iPhone 4S or I can *gasp*, go into my facebook or twitter app instead of cluttering up my homescreen with their faces. Alternatively, I can alway "call" them. I hate the hub concept still and the flipping tiles are likely to give someone an epileptic seizure. It reminds me of some really badly designed website from the late 90's or early 00's.

    Get it through your thick skulls MSFT, people like apps and they don't like distractions with flip-flopping tiles on the homescreen. I have to give you credit for trying to be original but give it a rest already. Also, nobody except fanboys like the "hub" concept. Stop trying to oversell your Xbox live and other services on the mobile platform.

    BTW. Nice touch on slavishly copying Apple on the screenshot with the power and home button combo.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Get it through your thick skulls MSFT, people like apps and they don't like distractions with flip-flopping tiles on the homescreen. I have to give you credit for trying to be original but give it a rest already. Also, nobody except fanboys like the "hub" concept. Stop trying to oversell your Xbox live and other services on the mobile platform.

      Uh, the tile concept would be closer to Android than iOS.

      Google did the "home screen" thing to avoid the "rounded rectangles with square grid of icons" patent on Android. So what happens when you unlock an Android phone? You see the home screen, which by default has a huge analog clock (only present on the lock screen on iOS, and it's digital there), and a bunch of frequently used apps (phone/messaging/browser), while the "grid of icons" is hidden by the "show all apps" button.

      In its place, you can drop widgets to your heart's content on the home screen so you can see the weather at a glance as well when you unlock your phone, plus all your other social media things.

      And judging by Android users, especially on /., they like the widget thing and seeing htat stuff.

      Microsoft extended the concept with tiles - thus avoid any design issues with iOS and Android. The tiles are effectively widgets and you can see all your update stuff right there on your "home" screen (whatever it's called on WP8).

      Why does "blocking innovation" mean "you must copy the UI"? Between Apple, Google and Microsoft experimenting with different UIs, I'd say it's far better they don't copy (Microsoft probably did LiveTiles to avoid anything Google might have.)

      People want widgets - Microsoft extended Andorid's concept a bit further to explore stuff. iOS merely took popular widgets (weather and stocks) and tucked them away in a pull-down drawer (probably again to avoid anything Google might have), the concept of which well, came from Android (which would be hard for Apple to defend against if Google has patented that).

      It's called innovation. Incremental at times, but worthy to test it out.

    2. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Get it through your thick skulls MSFT, people like apps and they don't like distractions with flip-flopping tiles on the homescreen.

      That would be why so many people hate widgets in Android, right?

    3. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      I can see notifications in the notifications bar pop up on my iPhone 4S or I can *gasp*, go into my facebook or twitter app instead of cluttering up my homescreen with their faces. Alternatively, I can alway "call" them.

      You can do all this in Windows Phone too. The difference is there are no hubs in iOS, so the opposite isn't true. For me, the iOS equivalent to hubs is launching twitter and checking twitter feeds, then launching facebook and checking facebook feeds, then launching linkedin and checking linkedin feeds then launching... you get the pictures? Everything in WP is aggregated right there, and any app can hook into it. In my photos hub I have all my photo editing apps right there when I'm browsing my pictures... no need to search manually group them into a folder or search through an unorganized list.

      Even better with tiles is I can pin a contact to the home screen and see updates for that one person across all social networks he or she is on. Or I can pin myself to the home screen and see all updates for me across all social networks. Or I can open the pictures hub and see all picture updates across all social networks, and comment or like them right there.

      Seriously, the only negative thing you can say about the tile concept is you don't like the animations. The idea is solid, and the implementation works.

    4. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Get it through your thick skulls MSFT, people like apps and they don't like distractions with flip-flopping tiles on the homescreen.

      That would be why so many people hate widgets in Android, right?

      Do most Android users bother with widgets? Don't they consume battery power and slow down the UI? I would think that most people find gadgets on a phone to be a passing curiosity.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    5. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Tiles are interactive with this flipping thing, though it's obviously not anywhere near what Android widgets can do.

      How a live tile changes itself is up to the app. They don't really have to keep looping.

    6. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm an Android user, and I find widgets very handy. It's nice to be able to see my calendar for today and weather report as soon as I unlock the phone.

      I didn't notice any slowdown or battery drain with stock widgets, or a couple popular third-party ones that I've had installed. Keep in mind that they shut down when the phone is locked, just as any other app.

    7. Re:Speaking as a .NET developer, underwhelmed. by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Uh, the tile concept would be closer to Android than iOS.
      Not even close. Android has a clear split between the list of all apps and the home screen stuff (which can be a variety of things, anything the user wants). Microsoft's mixing the app lister with the informational displays (which you can have on Android via home screen widgets). Microsoft's is clumsy.

      And as far as tiles go -- they just even larger boxes around icons than Apple draws. Wasted space. And sure, you can draw those boxes around widgets too. But it's even less efficient, since hunting for a rarely used app should talk longer than those used all the time, and the information stuff shouldn't be randomly mixed with the app launcher stuff. This is entirely at one's control in Android -- you can pin your most-used Apps on the home screen, in a drawer on the home screen, or just leave it to widgets, if you need to get a quick 411 on a bunch of things with a glance at the home screen. Far more efficient, but maybe ever so slightly more difficult for novices to use.

      Google did the "home screen" thing to avoid the "rounded rectangles with square grid of icons" patent on Android.

      Incorrect. Apple design patented the "grid of rounded square icons" to avoid being copied. No one (well, except early versions of SymbianOS) did the rounded square icons. Android icons are like those of Windows, Linux, PalmOS, Newton, etc. And the row of icons is similarly historical -- on iOS and Android, they're both riffing on PalmOS and some of these others.

      And in fact, the pop-up grid doesn't around Apple's patent. Samsung had the bad business sense and aesthetic taste to enforce a grid of rounded squares in their home shell (TouchWiz), to try and look more like iOS. That's one of the design patents they got slammed on last month.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  49. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by DCstewieG · · Score: 1
  50. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that Google can't find another instance of anyone ever writing out that command before.


    Showing results for apt-get install zune
    No results found for apt-get install zunefs

    Search Results
    Download the Zune Music + Video Software | Zune.netwww.zune.net/Cached - Similar
    Use the Zune Music + Video software to sync your digital media to your Windows Phone. ... Use the Zune software to install updates to your Windows Phone. Download now ... Get to know your phone by using the Windows Phone website.

    How to Use Zune with Ubuntu | eHow.comwww.ehow.com ComputersCached
    You cannot install the Zune program out of the box, however, though your Ubuntu ... sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa ... sudo apt-get install wine1.3 ...

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  51. WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by Lashat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know that I swim against the /. current here when it comes to Window Phone. I haven't drank of the MS or Apple or Linux koolaid. I use all three desktop OS flavors at work every week and they all have strengths and weaknesses. I never bought the first iPhone because of the soldered in battery. At the time I was using 2 batteries a day in the field. (not to mention the privacy concerns of not being able to REALLY turn off my phone). I had a miserable experience with the first Droid (randomly calling and texting). I went Blackberry for a while. Revisited iPhone, but the screen typing was horrid (large fingers). When it was time to upgrade in 2010 I went with the Samsung Focus and it just worked for me. I do like the Metro interface on the touchscreen, but always by-pass it when using Win8 on the desktop. Seems pretty useless on the desktop, but it would surely be useful on a tablet and possible a laptop with touchscreen.

    The Nokia 900 WP7, had some advantages over the Samsung Focus S on the spec sheet. Bigger screen, bigger body (again... large hands), and the camera cmos appeared faster to me in the store. The other advantage is the Xbox Live connection. Love it! Games developed my interest in computers and I am a gamer at heart. My only complaint is that with the Case-Mate case I confuse the phone with my wallet when it's in my pocket sometimes, but I am working on the brain power required to recognize the difference.

    I am only mildly concerned about not being able to upgrade to Windows Phone 8 with my Nokia 900. If I feel like I'm missing out on some must-have super app before my 2-year upgrade comes around, I will bite the bullet and pay the phone price.

    --
    For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    1. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I am only mildly concerned about not being able to upgrade to Windows Phone 8 with my Nokia 900. If I feel like I'm missing out on some must-have super app before my 2-year upgrade comes around, I will bite the bullet and pay the phone price.

      Funny, how MSFT had those fake viral videos about other platform phones being a smartphone "beta test" and yet people like yourselves were beta testers for the Windows Phone platform. Enjoying your beta test?

      I look forward to be being able to upgrade my iPhone 4S and iPad 3 to iOS 6 for "free" and later upgrading to iOS 7 next year again for "free".

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I like the WP7/8 design.

      But Microsoft and Nokia made a TERRIBLE mistake by not letting people that bought at least the flagship WP7 phones upgrade to WP8. There is no excuse, and this has pissed a LOT of people off.

      I even knew someone who had a WP7 phone. He ditched it to get an iPhone. You can't simply abandon users after a year and demand they upgrade hardware every year to get the latest update, that's way too often.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by Lashat · · Score: 1

      I look forward to be being able to upgrade my iPhone 4S and iPad 3 to iOS 6 for "free" and later upgrading to iOS 7 next year again for "free".

      You have that guarantee in writing, right?

      Don't attack the messenger. I'm just asking because it seems that iOS 6 leaves out those original iPad owners. http://jaxov.com/2012/06/ios-6-features-compatibility-release-date-all-you-need-to-know/

      I guess koolaid makes some people forget that existing generations of the iPhone are NOT always compatible with new iOS versions. Here is another story from way back in March 2011 to remind you http://www.idownloadblog.com/2011/03/05/ios-4-3-will-not-be-compatible-with-all-idevices/

      People like myself prefer to be called early-adopters or hobbyists. Look into it.

       

      --
      For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    4. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Then you are a fool. You were sold a flagship phone all the while MS and Nokia knew that what you really had was a lame duck.

      Could you please point me at an official statement from Nokia to the effect of: "this is our top of the line phone for years to come". Or, maybe: "Now that we have our new WP8 phones, we decided we will leave Lumia 900 without any new features, applications, or bug fixes". The GP was sold a very decent phone, one that is still fully supported, and it wasn't made any less valuable by what's coming next. Not everybody is a wonky kid who must sport the absolutely latest everything. Ironically, people who care about what's "flagship" this month ditch their phones every year anyway.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    5. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      But I doubt the NT kernel is something they can just transplant onto existing hardware that it was never written for.

      Let's play with this statement by changing one word:
      "But I doubt the Linux kernel is something they can just transplant onto existing hardware that it was never written for."
      This does not sound as credible; I wonder why.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    6. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Pretty shocking they'd include the 3GS, 4, and not the original iPad, given that the original iPad has the same basic hardware as the iPhone 4, only clocked slightly faster. Then again, the 3GS is still on sale (free at AT&T), so they may feel compelled, even if the performance will suck.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    7. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by hazydave · · Score: 1

      It's also got to make you question Microsoft in the long term. They dumped WinME compatibility for Windows Phone 7, and now Windows Phone 7 users are dumped for Windows Phone 8. Sure, it'll likely be three years or more before Windows Phone 9, but I'd be concerned, if I had any interest in W8P.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    8. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I agree they cannot stay on a CE kernel.

      However they should have done whatever it ook to make the NT kernel work on AT LEAST the last Lumia phone. Failure there was not an option - except that it apparently was. It will cost them so much goodwill and market momentum though, it's a huge burden they did not have to overcome.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    9. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by sd4f · · Score: 1

      I look forward to be being able to upgrade my iPhone 4S and iPad 3 to iOS 6 for "free" and later upgrading to iOS 7 next year again for "free".

      Excellent choice of weasel words "being able to" as we all know your 4S hasn't got long to go, and as soon as the next ipad comes out, you will also flock to that. That's what gets me with apple fanatics; the tech is so great that they can't wait to replace it... Makes no sense to me, good technology in my opinion is hard to replace.

    10. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I look forward to be being able to upgrade my iPhone 4S and iPad 3 to iOS 6 for "free" and later upgrading to iOS 7 next year again for "free".

      Excellent choice of weasel words "being able to" as we all know your 4S hasn't got long to go, and as soon as the next ipad comes out, you will also flock to that. That's what gets me with apple fanatics; the tech is so great that they can't wait to replace it... Makes no sense to me, good technology in my opinion is hard to replace.

      Weasel words? Is that the best you've got? Really? The iPhone came out a year ago and given than the iPhone 3GS is upgradable to iOS 6.x, it stands a good chance that even the iPhone 4 will be upgradable to iOS 7 next year when it comes out and the iPhone 4S will be as well as a virtual certainty given the history of past upgrades. The iPhone 4S has an A5 chip. Given that the iPad 2 will receive the iOS 6 upgrade, it is likely that the Retina iPad will also receive the iOS 7.x upgrade next year. The only weaselling I see is from you. Go back to wikipedia editing with your "weasel words" troll.

      See: http://www.apple.com/ios/whats-new/ at the bottom, the recently discontinued 3GS will still get the iOS 6.x upgrade as will the iPad 2.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    11. Re:WP7 Nokia 900 owner here. by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Weasel words? Is that the best you've got? Really? The iPhone came out a year ago and given than the iPhone 3GS is upgradable to iOS 6.x, it stands a good chance that even the iPhone 4 will be upgradable to iOS 7 next year when it comes out and the iPhone 4S will be as well as a virtual certainty given the history of past upgrades. The iPhone 4S has an A5 chip. Given that the iPad 2 will receive the iOS 6 upgrade, it is likely that the Retina iPad will also receive the iOS 7.x upgrade next year. The only weaselling I see is from you. Go back to wikipedia editing with your "weasel words" troll.

      Swing and a miss...

  52. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sorry, I only have my own experience to draw from, from real life. I really wanted to get the Lumia, but I had had enough of missing features with my Walkman, and I didn't want to play that game again.

    If I was hallucinating at the time, I apologize. My dream-state, which looked surprisingly like a Best Buy, was unable to mount a Nokia Lumia 610 Windows 7.5 phone to an Ubuntu installation. Now, I was only there for about an hour, dreaming, but the phone and my computer together made it impossible to mount.

    Perhaps there are instructions for how to do that. If there are, they aren't online anywhere.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  53. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    The New Sony Xperia S is now supported by AOSP.

    Expect there to be nexus phones from most of the major players within the next 6 months.

    Even a middling android device has nicer hardware than the current iPhone or these new windows phones these days.

  54. Of * course* it's not compatible by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    As a vendor/customer/developer, that's *your* problem, buddy. Start recoding. Too bad about that little cost thing you and your clients now have to deal with. Unless you're a C++ developer, of course, in which case, compatibility is magically not a problem.

    Microsoft's motto: We don't provide and automatic compatibility or upgrade path unless our development staff happens to give a shit.

    Cheers!

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Of * course* it's not compatible by Desler · · Score: 2

      You don't necessarily have to recode since WP8 is backwards compatible with WP7 apps.

    2. Re:Of * course* it's not compatible by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      You spoiled a perfect rant with your pointless facts and unnecessary knowledge of the matter.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  55. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by peppepz · · Score: 2
    Personally, I think that the recent news of the personal details of 1 million Apple users ending up on a single person's laptop, and from there getting spread publicly over the Internet, might make somebody reconsider if there's really need for every single personal detail of their life to pass from a datacenter on the other side of the planet while travelling from their own phone to their own PC.

    Also, there's plenty of use cases for standard connectors and protocols. Why should I have to send a 1080p video clip (that this phone is able to take) to SkyDrive if all I want to do is to watch it once on my TV / PC? It will take forever for me to upload it to Microsoft's servers over wifi, and if I'm not at home, uploading it over 3G will be expensive (and even slower).

  56. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WP7 was really quite interesting to see

    Yeah, it was so great that it literally sold in the dozens. Dozens

  57. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

    the difference in screen size, input methods, memory size, processing power and battery restrictions make them utterly different.

    In terms of processing power, this is all true. But today, we're in a position where the computers in our pocket are just about as powerful as the onces on our desktops not even 7 years ago. There's a large class of applucations, especially for content consumption, that can be written for consumers across all platform types mentioned. Input and screen size are different issues, but that's where you have to re-implement a unique interface for each device. This is much easier than completely recoding everything from scratch for every platform, especially when the toolchain is streamlined by Microsoft.

    people will be writing Windows XP apps for a while yet for maximum audience

    Many of these people who still have XP also have a cellphone or tablet on which they probably spend more of their computer-facing time. Ever since I got my mom a tablet, she hasn't sat down at her desktop as that's where she does her email and reading. This whole tablet and smartphone thing isn't a fad, and it's quickly outpacing desktop PCs, a great many of which are corporate and other non-personal machines. By targeting XP + Windows 7 + Windows 8 (desktop) you might be targeting more physical machines, but you might be targeting less customers who would actually buy your app.

    the entire attempt to shoehorn Metro into Windows 8 shows that they don't understand that you can't run a cellphone interface on a desktop, and vice-versa.

    This statement just shows that you don't understand exactly the purpose of the Metro interface. Most people are completely afraid of their computers. They don't know how to manage their machines, they don't know how to configure them, they don't know how to fix them when things go wrong, they don't know how to discover and explore new functionality... Metro provides an easy, consistent, predictable UI. Search is always in the same place, settings is always in the same place, sharing is always in the same place, app behavior is predictable and consistent... these are all very real benefits no matter what platform you are on. Mouse and keyboard shortcuts are very prevalent, and there is nothing stopping any developer from making mouse or keyboard centric metro apps for desktop PCs and making them more touch friendly for tablets and phones.

  58. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by outZider · · Score: 1

    I'm completely uninterested in an iOS device, but this new Lumia 920 is pretty impressive, hardware-wise. The Galaxy Nexus isn't bad, but not necessarily what I want to pick up now to last a year or two. I'm also not a huge fan of Super AMOLED.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  59. Micro$oft expects you to upgrade by na1led · · Score: 1

    every year. Upgrade your PC to run the new Windows, and upgrade your Phone to run the new OS. 1 year warranty, and 1 year life cycle.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  60. I wonder how HTC Samsung etc. feel by dell623 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Repeated exhortations of how WP8 and the Lumia 920 were developed in conjunction. Wheeling out top Microsoft execs for every Lumia launch. Does any other WP8 really have a chance? Why do they even bother? There are several problems with Android, but Google has always gone to extreme lengths to make sure they didn't appear to favour an OEM, releasing flagship NExus devices with Motorola (when they were independent), Samsung, HTC, and Asus. That may of course change with Googorola. But right now, it seems Microsoft seems to feel that it won't hurt them at all if Nokia drives other OEMs out of the WP8 market. And you know what, I think they're right. With their insipid design and terrible software, I don't see Samsung and HTC competing with Nokia anyway. Maybe at the low end of the market. But when was the last time either of them released something as distinctive as the Nokia Lumia 920? Never.

    1. Re:I wonder how HTC Samsung etc. feel by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      With their insipid design and terrible software, I don't see Samsung and HTC competing with Nokia anyway.

      You have a point about HTC but Samsung could squash Nokia like a bug. Samsung makes their own CPUs, Screens, etc. while Nokia has been wholesale dissolving their manufacturing capacity. Samsung is still the sleeping giant in the cellphone industry despite being the second strongest player.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    2. Re:I wonder how HTC Samsung etc. feel by dell623 · · Score: 1

      How does that matter? Apple manages to make the lion's share of industry profits without manufacturing anything. Even's Samsung's recent jump in profits has been thanks to growth in their smartphone division, not the component division. Nokia seem to have retained their capacity for making cutting edge designs like Apple have. That's vital in the age of standardized software. Apple devices no longer sell because they have the best OS. They sell because of their brilliant designs and the fact that the first mover advantage and standardization has given them a huge advantage in their app ecosystem and user friendliness.

      Nokia doesn't need to manufacture anything themselves to be successful again.

    3. Re:I wonder how HTC Samsung etc. feel by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Nokia is no Apple. Stop kidding yourself.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    4. Re:I wonder how HTC Samsung etc. feel by dell623 · · Score: 1

      Eh? No one is Apple. That doesn't mean you need to have your own component manufacturing business to be a successful smartphone company, which is what you are suggesting.

    5. Re:I wonder how HTC Samsung etc. feel by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Nokia is a has been. Now they're just a commodity integrator of other people's parts. Samsung would have them for lunch. You're obviously a fan. Sorry.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  61. Re:They're dead by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    Rovio already said they're not going to make Angry Birds for this platform.
    Others are following suite.

    I'd certainly hope so. After all, if Zynga or Intuit started to make Angry Birds for the Windows 8 platform, I'd expect that to get its own /. article!

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  62. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by peppepz · · Score: 5, Informative

    This phone has no SD card slot.

  63. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    This whole tablet and smartphone thing isn't a fad, and it's quickly outpacing desktop PCs, a great many of which are corporate and other non-personal machines.

    Never said it was a fad. I have two smartphones myself (one for work, one for personal--both Android, as a matter of fact). What I *do* say is that the market dominance of Android and iPhone will break Windows Phone 8, and compatibility with Windows 8 won't save it.

  64. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    Oh, thank you, I didn't know that it would work with Mac. Not that it matters in my case, but good to know.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  65. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    but shipped millions!

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  66. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by lxs · · Score: 2

    1% of a thousand times more would mean ten quality android apps for every wp7 app in existence. I like those numbers!

  67. Re:First impression? It sucks! by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    unlike XP where you could see everything you had in one shot.

    For the vast majority of people, having three or four columns of Start menu, fold out with a chaotic grouping of small icons next to small folders didn't help them find their programs. They still had to take their mouse and scroll over each and everyone, just to make sure that they didn't miss what they were looking for. Many times it resulted in the mouse wandering too far outside of some invisible boundary, causing flyouts to collapse, and they'd start scanning all over again.

  68. Re:Happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Samsung slavishly copied Apple

    Yeah, according to one court that sits about 5 miles from Apple HQ. Funny the rest of the world disagrees you jingoistic Americunts.

  69. Re:Wave by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Unlike all the other smartphones...

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  70. Re:Happy by romiz · · Score: 1

    Samsung slavishly copied Apple and Nokia has clearly proven you can design a next-gen phone that looks nothing like the iPhone

    Apple paid $1 billion to Nokia, plus $8 per device for patent infringement because iPhone's technical parts were infringing Nokia patents. And that is for real, hardware patents, not bouncing menus or pinch-to-zoom. Apple is as much guilty as Samsung may be, and I really wish Nokia went all the way and refused licensing instead, to give Apple a taste of its own medecine.

  71. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    Right... so where's my Jelly Bean update Verizon? (Galaxy Nexus user since launch day)

  72. Anyway ... by ultrasawblade · · Score: 1

    what's to become of Windows CE? Is this it's death knell?

    1. Re:Anyway ... by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. And that seems to be the way Microsoft wants it. It's lack of modern capabilities certainly held W7P back on technology. It's not really suitable for much... I guess it may still live on in some GPS units.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  73. Re:They're dead by cbhacking · · Score: 2

    Mango apps resume instantly (they're suspended in RAM, that's all). If Rovio hasn't gotten around to recompiling Angry Birds for Mango I'd be surprised (it's literally a three-click process in Visual Studio) but I suppose that's possible. In any case, most games resume instantly after you switch back from the call interface, even if you're still on the call (games will usually resume in a paused state for obvious reasons, but that's just a convenience fo rhte user).

    WP8 will run all WP7 apps, which presumably means it will continue to support instant resume. The increased amount of RAM on some models may also allow suspending more apps, which would be nice.

    Also, you can totally use C/C++ for WP7 development. There are even some (few) third-party apps in the Marketplace which do so. You just have to either figure out the tricks yourself (homebrew developers did this almost immediately) or get Microsoft approval (OEM apps and the officially-sanctioned Adobe Reader app being examples where that permission was granted beforehand).

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  74. And..... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Still nobody will buy it.

    Honestly, they just cant compete with iOS and Android. and with the latest release of android, Google just upped their game hard. Now all they need to do is tell handset makers that if they dont use the latest version they cant call it android or use any android branding to help flush off the craptastic 2.3.3 gingerbread phones that are still coming out.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:And..... by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Still nobody will buy it.

      Millions already did, even with Windows Phone 7.5.

      Honestly, they just cant compete with iOS and Android. and with the latest release of android, Google just upped their game hard.

      Too bad its installed base is still below even that of latest Windows Phone.

      Now all they need to do is tell handset makers that if they dont use the latest version they cant call it android or use any android branding to help flush off the craptastic 2.3.3 gingerbread phones that are still coming out.

      Well, as they say here, good luck with that. It has been part of the deal for the vendors to be able to take Android and run with it, hasn't it?

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    2. Re:And..... by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Millions already did, even with Windows Phone 7.5.

      But just millions, about four million over two years. Like a couple of good days worth of sales for Android or iOS. That's a real problem, no matter how you spin it.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    3. Re:And..... by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      It's over 7 million Lumia phones alone. And why is this a problem, as long as the sales are growing?

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  75. Re:OP is missing the point by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Right.... never used android or IOS have you.

    I have a 4 year old iphone tat runs the latest OS.
    I also have a 2 year old android phone that runs the latest android.

    Tell us how the nokia is EXACTLY like the other phones again in how it cant be upgraded.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  76. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by fa2k · · Score: 1

    You absolutely must have a Windows install, and a virtual machine won't cut it.

    Are you sure? I find that most USB devices work fine in VirtualBox. For example, I had a Windows Mobile phone and that worked, but it was a bit buggy. Don't get me wrong though, I wouldn't use it in Linux with a VM, it's pretty shitty to have a 2GB "sync application" constantly running and doing nothing

  77. Re:Wave by gutnor · · Score: 1

    S3 gratis on contract

    gratis on contract that's like unlimited data up to 500Mb, unlimited 1500 SMS, free call after connection fee, ... If you want to make price comparison, either compare the sim-free version or the total cost of contract. Otherwise, hey my bank offered my mobile phone for free with an extra 6GBP cashback. I just had to show my credit card at the shop and type the 4 digit number my bank sent me.

  78. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

    Not without installing it yourself you didn't.

    http://www.mobilebloom.com/verizon-galaxy-nexus-4g-jelly-bean-4-1-on-the-way-unofficially-already-out/2221143/

    Promising delivery by the end of September...

  79. My continuing complaint with Windows phones by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "those Windows Phone 7 smartphones won't upgrade to Windows Phone 8 software, and nor will they run Windows Phone 8 apps"

    My G1 can in fact run a very limited relase of Android Jelly Bean. The CyanogenMod guys keep doing this just because they can.

    IOS 6 does run on a 3GS, albeit missing some features. Before that, I think the iPhone 3 is pretty much out of it, but that's what, 4 generations back? My G1 is at least 3 generations back...

    But your Windows 7 phone, booting Windows 8? Nope. Not even for fun.

    And this goes back past Windows Phone to the old CE releases.

    Clearly Microsoft still doesn't get it. Or they want to continue to go forward, leaving the old behind.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:My continuing complaint with Windows phones by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Clearly Microsoft still doesn't get it. Or they want to continue to go forward, leaving the old behind.

      Ah ha hahha! Because most people hack their old phones with CM8 or something, right? How many people do you know that have Cyanogenmod running on their phones? Count 'em!

      I'm a techie and having tried a few times, I can assert that it's totally not worth it for me. I've been using RedHat Linux as my desktop since Red Hat 5.1 (note, not RHEL 5.1, RedHat 5.1, kernel 2.0) and there's just no way I'd be interested in trying to hax0r my phone. Sure, I welcome CM guys to do it, and appreciate that somebody out there goes for it, but it's not for me.

      My phone had better "just work" and the balance of drivers needed to get good service, good battery life, and good performance all together is not something easily accomplished by the hacking community.

      As a comparison, my Dell laptop running a recent Fedora works great as a mobile workstation, but battery life is less than half what I get with Windows. On my lappie, I don't care so much, but my phone?

      Forget it. People buy a new phone every couple years, and it's been a couple years since the WP7 phones were sold.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:My continuing complaint with Windows phones by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you're ignoring the three updates I got OTA. I went to CM after T-Mobile said no more.

      And from what I see, the G1 was simple by comparison. My Sensation is going to be a pain to root, but the factory load is becoming too flaky to tolerate willingly.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  80. galaxy S3 32GB is at least $150 here in Canada by Chirs · · Score: 1

    The 16GB is at least $100. Depending on the provider it can be more. Where I live, at least.

  81. Re:Happy - iHappy by knarf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Samsung slavishly copied Apple

    Always follow the party line, no matter what. "Die partei, die partie, die hat immer recht"

    Possibly an eye-opener: if Samsung slavishly copied Apple, who did Apple copy? The differences between Apples first attempt at a mobile phone and earlier phones from more experienced manufacturers are not that big, all the way from the basic shape (rounded cornered rectangle, screen dominated front, speaker and microphone at logical positions) through the basic interface (a grid of icons) to more specific features (slide to unlock, context-sensitive actions on text, etc). Literally all of this had been done before. Nobody had made an iPhone before, and nobody - other than Apple - has made one ever since. The same can be said though for, eg, the HTC Prophet. HTC never claimed they owned the basic shape of this device, nor did they claim to own the basic interface (a grid of icons). LG did not claim they owned the concept of a rectangular, rounded cornered screen dominated slab with a capacitive touch screen. Which is logical - they did not invent the capacitive touch screen, nor did they invent the rectangle or the colour black. You did not see any HTC or LG (or any of the other manufacturers') users claiming these things either. Samsung never claimed to own these things, even though they had several products which predated Apple's first phone while encompassing many of its features.

    Oddly enough Apple does make these claims, and many Apple users parrot them.

    Please take some effort to answer this question: who did Apple copy? If your answer is 'nobody, they invented all of this themselves' then I'm afraid you'll have to do some more studying.

    Apple made a popular phone, which sold by the millions even though the price was inflated. It still sells by the millions, and these sales have made Apple a stupendous amount of profit (both because of the obscene profit margin on these phones as well as the sheer number of phones they sold). In other words, they made a successful product. Where they went wrong was when they started claiming to be the sole proprietors of the basic concepts behind this phone.

    Please use some common sense before you parrot their statements. Have a look at the television wall in some electronics store to see what I mean. Look at the washing machines, or the calculators, or just about any other product. Look around you and see - nobody is an island. No company creates something out of nothing. This includes Apple. They, like everyone else, look around them and base their products on what they've seen. The difference between Apple and most other companies is that they then turn around and claim never to have looked, that they came up with it all by themselves. This is wrong, and you know it is wrong.

    Don't just blindly follow the party line.

    Think Different.

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
  82. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Fact is, developing for a smart phone is a completely different thing from developing for a desktop or game console; the difference in screen size, input methods, memory size, processing power and battery restrictions make them utterly different.

    Not as different as you might think, actually. Keep in mind that Win8 apps are supposed to run on tablets, including ARM tablets. And those things are pretty much smartphones with a bigger screen (and a correspondingly bigger battery, but only to support that screen) today.

  83. Re:First impression? It sucks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    It's Windows 8, of course it sucks. It's even worse than Windows 7.

    What does this have to do with Windows Phone? You realize it's a whole different OS, right?

    And do you really want to run XP on your phone?

  84. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by organgtool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More to the point, there is less and less requirement to sync to a PC at all. Photos auto-sync via Skydrive. Email is all cloud-based. Podcasts are directly synched without requiring a PC to download them. Music comes directly from your Xbox Music Pass. Apps are directly downloaded. Files can be shared via dropbox or Skydrive.

    So as long as just about everything you need is in the Microsoft ecosystem, then you won't really need to sync. Great!

    There are obviously still cases where you would like to sync directly with a computer, but they are becoming really infrequent.

    Speak for yourself. I transfer files to my Android phone over Wifi all the time. And I'm not alone - my mom just got a phone and she wanted to be able to pull pictures from relatives' phones without requiring both phones to have the same obscure transfer app. I told her she could do this natively on Android over Bluetooth, but it may only work with other Android phones since Apple likes to lock down Bluetooth (probably to make the record labels happy). So even non-techies are looking to do things that are not possible with these locked-down platforms.

  85. Not universally praised by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    big plans for their Linux based highend OS, which was universally praised

    Not by developers it wasn't.

    It might have been fine compared to how people used to develop apps for Nokia Phones, but the MeeGo stuff was awfully limited looking at it from an Android or iPhone developer standpoint.

    The truth is that MeeGo was a good update for pre-iPhone OS's, but could not cut it in the new world which was why Nokia was forced to partner with MS. They just did not have the resources to bring it up to scratch in time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not universally praised by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

      It was especially praised by developers.
      Maemo still has more real apps than all other phones combined.

      No, farting apps and advertisement don't qualify.

      The usability however, was slightly lacking on n900, which isn't strange for a first edition dev-phone, although it's no worse than android or iphone. It's merely just as bad.

    2. Re:Not universally praised by alci63 · · Score: 1

      big plans for their Linux based highend OS, which was universally praised

      Not by developers it wasn't.

      It might have been fine compared to how people used to develop apps for Nokia Phones, but the MeeGo stuff was awfully limited looking at it from an Android or iPhone developer standpoint.

      The truth is that MeeGo was a good update for pre-iPhone OS's, but could not cut it in the new world which was why Nokia was forced to partner with MS. They just did not have the resources to bring it up to scratch in time.

      Well, Qt / QtCreator / QML is a pretty good platform to develop on. I'd be curious to know what part are "awfully limited" compared to say, Android ?

    3. Re:Not universally praised by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Qt / QtCreator / QML is a pretty good platform to develop on

      What about equivalents for:

      CoreLocation
      CoreData
      CoreAnimation
      MapKit

      Or what about the equivalent of Android Intents?

      In addition many networking and string libraries and so on on both platforms...

      Just having a decent graphics library alone is not nearly enough.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  86. Re:They're dead by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1

    Actually you're touching on the one really really strong point of WP here, the games. On my android tablet I tried for a long time to find games that were actually decent and found a minimal number, but for my windows phone while there are admittedly less games than android, the majority of them are really strong, well-made games. I think this is because the windows phone's support for the XNA framework. Admittedly the android landscape has probably changed since I was last trying to play games on it ~1.5 years ago considering the quality of hardware has spiked since then for android devices.

  87. Re:Happy by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

    Seems that everyone was cool with the FRAND licensing terms Nokia had. Everyone except the new kid on the block.

  88. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

    I do have to admit that visual studio is great but unfortunately it won't run on wine so I use something else, I wish i could find open source ide that has all of its features like built in gui designer.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  89. Re:Wave by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1

    You completely ignore the fact that many people would be past their 24 month period, moreover I believe you get discounted upgrades for contract resigning at 18 months to ensure people upgrade before tasting the sweet taste of contractlessness, so it's actually 1/(18-n) people based on the number of people past their 18 months.

  90. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that Win8 apps are supposed to run on tablets, including ARM tablets.

    "Supposed to" and "Good idea to" are two different things. So far, I do not know of any successful app that runs on both a smartphone/tablet and a desktop. Let me know when somebody does it, okay?

  91. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    So in short, W8 phones are as bad as W8 computers reportedly are? I'm glad I don't own MS stock!

    I wonder if you can use it with Apple (even though I have no Apples, and wouldn't buy it anyway despite the fact that I have two Windows machines). No uploading or downloading?

    Is Windows going to be the new CP/M?

  92. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That doesn't have anything to do with the fact that WP8 will run WP7 apps. The point was that all WP7 apps will be available for WP8 on the day it is launched. The only catch 22 seems to be in your thought process.

  93. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    The point is that people writing Win8 Metro apps will primarily target tablets, not desktops - and then those apps would be a natural fit to port to WP as well. I didn't say anything about those apps being a good fit for the desktop. I personally don't use any Metro stuff on the desktop despite running Win8.

    And yes, people are writing Win8 Metro apps already. For example, Amazon had a Kindle app - in fact, it was already there during Win8 beta.

  94. Re:First impression? It sucks! by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    Now you can't even see what you have installed. You have to scroll, and scroll, and scroll to see what's there and even then it's not a complete list.

    Yeah, burying everything in menus is the future. OS vendors have been prefecting the technology of hiding everything you want to see since 1984, and it's obvious that no other UI will ever work, ever.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  95. Re:OP is missing the point by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    You have a 4 year old iPhone 3GS? Wow! You must be some kind of tech insider to have gotten that in 2008, more than a year before everyone else! Or else you're lying.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  96. Nokia is back in the game! by ninjacut · · Score: 1

    Most of the key features touted surpass all other phones at this point, the camera, image stabilization, navigation, indoor maps, display, wireless charging, UI, NFC. Looks like I will jump ship from Samsung to Nokia in coming months.

  97. Re:How about some enthusiasm from a sub 100k ID th by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    A dual core CPU and a huge battery are pretty great hardware specs.

    Yeah...a year ago.

    Also a mechanically stabilized sensor mechanism could be very big news

    Only by checkbox marketers and the idiots impressed by gimmicks.

    You managed to defeat your own point within the same comment, bravo.

    Is it just me or are Android fans getting really angry over the Nokia news? It must feel like a perfect snub: design great looking, innovative hardware, make the software work glitch-free and easy to use — bypassing the One True Platform in favor of something that comes out of Redmond. Quick, we must flood the comment threads pointing out how quad-core CPUs, ridiculously high-res displays, and a zillion samey-looking apps make all the difference.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  98. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    How is it impressive?
    Compare to an S3 or a One X.

    The Lumia CPU is outdated, and the screen is AMOLED. So if you think Super AMOLED is not for you neither is this.

    I love my Galaxy Nexus, but if I had to make the same decision now I would not get it. At the time it was a great device, but the S3 or OneX or the Xperia are better choices these days. The first two if you will do your own updates the latter if not.

  99. Pathetic, very pathetic by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Photos auto-sync via Skydrive.

    If you actually want to use Windows Live.

    Email is all cloud-based.

    For tiny little miniscule values of all...

    Many of us keep photos on our home servers (my /media/Photos tree has 310GB of files) . Many of us keep emails either on the home server, or accessed from POP/IMAP servers using an email client.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Pathetic, very pathetic by Baldrake · · Score: 2

      Photos auto-sync via Skydrive.

      If you actually want to use Windows Live.

      Ok, you got me there. If you don't want to use Microsoft's services, you indeed don't get access to Microsoft's services.

      Email is all cloud-based.

      For tiny little miniscule values of all...

      Many of us keep photos on our home servers (my /media/Photos tree has 310GB of files) . Many of us keep emails either on the home server, or accessed from POP/IMAP servers using an email client.

      If you want to have a subset of the 310GB of photos on your phone, you dump that subset in your Skydrive or Dropbox or put it up on Facebook or Flickr. Re mail - Windows Phone does support pop and imap as well as EAS. If none of those work for you, I'm afraid I'm going to call you an edge case.

    2. Re:Pathetic, very pathetic by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

      A Microsoft account is required to use a Windows Phone the same way a Google account is required to use a Google experience Android device and an Apple ID is required to use an iPhone... NEXT

      Email is cloud based FOR EVERYONE FROM ITS INCEPTION. NEXT

      You mean to tell me you have a home server running and you can't figure out how to put a photos web page on an intranet? N008

       

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    3. Re:Pathetic, very pathetic by hexagonc · · Score: 1

      A Google account is not required to use a "Google Experience" phone. You won't be able to access the Android Market or your purchased apps but you could configure the phone to use Yahoo or Windows Live email if you want. You can also install your own software manually or from, say, Amazon's appstore. All "Google Experience" means is that Google designed the phone and it has stock Android with minimal carrier accoutrements.

  100. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by outZider · · Score: 1

    Note, I'm in the US, so the S3 and One X are both crippled here, so by comparison, the Lumia looks great. I'm not seeing that the Lumia 920 has AMOLED -- it has the "PureMotion HD+" IPS display. The 820 stays with the AMOLED display, which is notably darker and grainier than the 920's display.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  101. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by DrXym · · Score: 1

    My Lumia 800 mounts under Linux but it's listed as a media device via MTP. That means I can use it to transfer files but not to update firmware or similar actions. The phone doesn't do OTA updates so I'd be screwed if I didn't have a Windows PC. Not that I expect it will receive many updates in future aside from 7.8.

  102. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

    I didn't say it was great to buy, it was great to try out. Somewhat different problem.

  103. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Crippled?
    You can get the international version just fine. Amazon has it for sure.

    If by crippled you mean waiting on carriers for upgrades the Lumia will not fix that. They have already announced that WinPhone 7 folks are not getting WinPhone 8. What do you think they will do with WinPhone 9?

    My D1 is running ICS right now, and will be running JB soon enough.

    Well, that is what I get for trusting Wikipedia it said AMOLED.

  104. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Snapdragon S4 MSM8960 is the same processor as in some versions of the S3 and One X: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_S4#Snapdragon_S4

    As for Super AMOLED, the downside is the pentile (RGBG as opppsoed to RGB) pixel arrangement which induces fuzziness in text. Displays with this screen contain 1/3 fewer subpixels compared to RGB, but with the same resolution. Lumia 900 is a clear black AMOLED technology with RGB pixels and looks amazing. I haven't seen a 920 obviously, but if it's anything like the 900 it will be gorgeous.

    As for other impressive hardware in the 920, you have NFC, wireless charging, advanced optics (floating lens image stabilization), curved glass display, unibody design, super sensitive touchscreen (can touch with normal gloves on or even fingernails), and at 1280x768 on 4.5 inches has a higher pixel density (332) than the S3 (306), OneX (312), and iPhone 4S (326).

  105. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by outZider · · Score: 1

    International version won't get LTE on AT&T, won't get T-Mobile US at all.

    My G2 is running ICS as well, but as I said, hack after hack. It sucks that no W7 devices will get W8, but they're offering some level of compatibility, and the first devices made it through 3-4 versions before going away. Even the Nexus One didn't achieve that.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  106. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

    The game ARMED is a good example of a non MS app that works great on Windows 8, Windows RT, and Windows Phone 7. There are many cross platform MS apps, but I'm sure after all three platforms are released we'll see more.

  107. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

    I think I hear a swoosh sound ... You might want to check out the last half of the echo command.

  108. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Android iterates versions a lot faster, I thought.

    G2 has official ICS, no need for hacks.

    LTE is pretty limited, especially AT&T. Technically the GT-i9300(s3 international) would work T-Mobile USA just edge speeds only.

  109. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by outZider · · Score: 1

    G2 does not have official ICS. Updates stopped at 2.3.6. Current iteration of ICS for G2 is limited to the 2.6.x Linux kernel, which leads to other issues. JB lacks a camera and a reasonable experience on the G2, but those will sort themselves out.

    EDGE is a poor experience. :)

    I understand the points you're trying to make, and I'm merely checking out the competition. It's nice to see WP8 become a player, because it just means the other OS options will continue getting better.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  110. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    The T-mobile G2 has official ICS.
    http://www.androidcentral.com/t-mobile-galaxy-s-ii-ice-cream-sandwich-update-now-live
    Which G2 are you talking about?

    I totally agree. I just am not as excited as I am just so sad about the death of Nokia. I wish they would have come up with their own OS and done all the things we both wish would happen like no carrier interference.

  111. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by outZider · · Score: 1

    That's a Galaxy S2. I'm talking about the older HTC model with the flip out keyboard. I sold off my hacked Galaxy Note and am back on that device until I find something worth upgrading to.

    And, yeah, preaching to the choir. I was a N900 owner, and looked forward to a MeeGo world.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  112. Re:First impression? It sucks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    No, it isn't. Windows Phone 8 use exactly the same NT operating system as does Windows 7 and Windows 8 (and Vista, XP, 2000, NT 4 etc before it).

    It uses the same kernel. It doesn't mean that it's the same OS. The userland is different.

    And, of course, it still doesn't make the original post to which I've replied make any more sense, given that it was complaining about the UI changes between desktop Win7 and Win8 (and XP for goot measure), like the Start menu. Certainly something very important on a smartphone, I understand.

    It is exactly the same as saying that Android sucks because of Gnome Shell and Unity making things so much worse.

  113. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    The New Sony Xperia S is now supported by AOSP.

    And it has the "XCP" easy-root feature, removes functionality from the device after it's already paid for, and leaves your customer info on an internet facing database in clear text.

    Why would you buy a digital device from a company with a history like that? The foolishness of such a purchase borders on madness.

    Stop buying eqipment from Sony lest everyone knows you to be a fool.

  114. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by oakgrove · · Score: 1

    As for Super AMOLED, the downside is the pentile (RGBG as opppsoed to RGB) pixel arrangement which induces fuzziness in text.

    That's funny. I'm looking at a Galaxy Nexus right now and the text isn't remotely fuzzy. As a matter of fact it is crystal clear.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  115. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lumia 900 is a clear black AMOLED technology with RGB pixels and looks amazing. I haven't seen a 920 obviously, but if it's anything like the 900 it will be gorgeous.

    I have a Nexus S and I've compared it side by side with a Lumia 900. The Nexus S has a crisper display with blacker blacks. And that thing is comparatively old. You'll forgive me for not being impressed by checklist marketing specs.

    As for other impressive hardware in the 920, you have NFC,

    So do a lot of phones.

    wireless charging,

    Again, what's new?

    advanced optics (floating lens image stabilization),

    Does it also have sparkomanoflaps on the disfabulator? Again with the checklist gimmickry.

    curved glass display,

    Done to death on the Nexus line.

    unibody design,

    I'm talking on it not driving it. I don't give a shit.

    super sensitive touchscreen (can touch with normal gloves on or even fingernails)

    Can you say "BUTT DIAL"?

    What an uninspired piece of trash.

  116. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Ah, my mistake. Your right, the G2 did not get ICS.

    The guy at work with a Galaxy S2 always uses GS2 and I just mixed that up.

    Meego would have been nice, so would WebOS. Android is good enough, but I was hoping for more, especially from Nokia.

  117. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by jbolden · · Score: 1

    This user 2 comments in their history both the same with no content.

    Repulsive on the part of Microsoft.

  118. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

    "f you're an Android power user, and you want to see reasonable OS updates, then you know to buy a Nexus device, that's the point of them."

    Unless you have a Nexus phone on the largest carrier in the U.S.

    http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/07/27/lack-of-nexus-s-4g-android-4-1-jelly-bean-update-bad-sign-for-verizon-galaxy-nexus/

    "Google can't force the various carriers and handset makers push out updates,"

    Apple doesn't seem to have a problem updating all of their devices across carriers worldwide without waiting on the carriers. Surprisingly enough, even Microsoft takes responsibility for Windows Phones updates without waiting on the carrier or OEM.

  119. Re:How about some enthusiasm from a sub 100k ID th by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Put down the crack pipe and read the post again.

    Done: that AC derides Lumia 920's specs as "last year", apparently meaning quad-core CPUs and other useless overdrive, and then goes on a tirade about idiots impressed by gimmicks.

    It must feel like a perfect snub: design great looking, innovative hardware, make the software work glitch-free and easy to use

    All debatable and easily found on every platform.

    Heh. We both know how hard are all these qualities to come by with the Android devices that are on the market, especially if you want all of them together.

    How about this, Mr. Windows Phone guy. Before talking shit how about SHIPPING SOME GODDAMNED PHONES. Then you can crow all day long. RIght now you sitting at under 5 percent and sinking. SHIP fucker. Then you will have something to say. Until then it's just pathetic posturing.

    Boy aren't you a handsome example of the rabid fanbois that keep me amused every time I read comments about non-Android smartphones. I bet next year the tune will change to "your under 10 percent and sinking, show me some real SHIPPING". Meanwhile the indifferent world will roll by, and people will keep offending you by buying what looks better for them.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  120. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    No, I saw that, but I figured he was calling me a retard for not knowing the command for zune adaptability.

    Poe's Law, sorry.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  121. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I bought Astro, it's quite magnificent for transferring files from my NAS. It's also got a BT module, it worked great for grabbing all the photos from my dad's old phone.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  122. Re:How about some enthusiasm from a sub 100k ID th by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Open up Chromium on that Linux box and lock the affinity to one core. Now go down slashdot middle-click opening every set of comments and see how much the box starts to lag. Now reboot and do the same test again while using both cores and note the difference. The fact that you even made this lame attempt at trolling saddens us all.

    I thought it was going to be something like that... Sorry, I have better uses for my CPU cycles than abusing Slashdot's poorly scalable attempt to keep up with Web 2.0 (I'm browsing it now with the mostly single-threaded Firefox, to not much trouble). The thought of browsing Slashdot comments on a phone is downright revolting. Please find something that, you know, people out there with a life would do.

    You asked me to satisfy your requirements and I did. Now you are trying to distract me by moving the goalposts. Troll harder. Please. BTW, the display is gorgeous and only the most persnickety of pimple-faced aspy's tell a real difference in day to day use.

    Thanks for your stern answer to the AC up in the thread who seemed to find an issue with the level of hardware specs found in Lumia 920 :-)

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  123. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2

    What exactly have you been looking for? Are there Windows 8 versions of all of this? Oh wait, your account is brand new, you're obviously a shill. An actual "Android Power User" wouldn't care one jot about Windows Phone.. it's irrelevant really.

    I'm an Android "power user" who thinks that Android is a terrible OS, less stable and mature than Windows 3.11. I think that iOS (with which I have experience as a user, but I've never fiddled with the OS) is at the same level as Android. I suspect that Windows Phone is probably also crap, but since it's the major smartphone OS I haven't yet tried I'm interested in giving it a shot before I declare all mobile operating systems garbage. I think that anyone who has spent real time with Android or iOS and has any experience with software or a remotely critical mind would be pretty interested in jumping ship, even if the life raft is probably just as leaky.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  124. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by smash · · Score: 1

    When did you last try iOS? I haven't had any stability issues to speak of (other than facebook app crashing) since v4. V3 i had do some wierd, wierd stuff though.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  125. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by smash · · Score: 1

    And 99% of your time wasted looking for those apps.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  126. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    You did well, friend. Your check is in the mail.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  127. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    I don't know, SCO was kinda slow to die, Nokia has a good chance to show a better time.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  128. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Only if you are one of those retards who single-step through their programs in futile attempts to understand what the fuck they wrote.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  129. Elop... by humanrev · · Score: 1

    For some reason whenever I see the name "Stephen Elop" my brain subconsciously sees the word "Flop" instead. Maybe it's trying to tell me something...

    --
    Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
  130. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Githaron · · Score: 1

    It is a OR statement. The second command will only run if the first command returns a false;

  131. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Githaron · · Score: 1

    Not really. Most of the good apps tend to bubble to the top where they get a lot of exposure. Now if you like to be "trendy", you are going to have to work harder.

  132. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

    It's not your own phone or your own PC, you just license the use...don't even lie and say you've read every EULA of every piece of software you've ever used...

    --
    "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
    -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
  133. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

    Please, I need a good laugh tonight, tell us the funny story about trying to explain "pairing" to your mother...

    --
    "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
    -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
  134. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Auroch · · Score: 1

    I've become bored and annoyed with an ecosystem that relies on hack upon hack just to keep your phone useful after a year.

    Then buy something super-common and well supported. It doesn't have to be a nexus device, but that's a good choice. Because the only way you get stuck using hacks to keep your phone current is to buy a phone so obscure that NO ONE will port the latest stable cyanogenmod. I mean, honestly? My 2 year old "free with contract" android phone had an update to 4.0 before I sold it a few months back. It has had cyanogenmod support since I bought it.

    I just made sure I didn't buy the most obscure, unknown phone out there. It's called "making a smart buying decision". Maybe you think the WP8 phone will fix that problem for you... but android is the only phone that gets frequent updates on unsupported phones. Don't look at apple, they don't do it. And the other phone options ... Blackberry? Or Symbian? Or WebOS? PalmOS? ... really.

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
  135. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

    Nobody buys the playbook because it's not competitive with other tablets in its class. Does it have email and calendar yet?

    --
    "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
    -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
  136. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

    Is Windows going to be the new CP/M?

    Someone is going to come and copy it but make the commands and devices incompatible? Pretty sure Linux has already tried that...

    --
    "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
    -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
  137. Re:Apparently correlation == causation by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    If someone posted a similar story highlighting all the companies that partnered/used failed Google services it would be downmodded as troll but because it's Microsoft this gets modded up.

    So your point is that correlation == causation?

  138. Moving apps to Lumina by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    You can get help migrating your apps to the Lumina using a program from Mark/Space that helps you move your data as well.
    http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/31/mark-space-welcome-home-eases-us-into-new-nokia-lumias/

    Disclaimer: I work for Quixey, a company not mentioned in the Engadget article, but which provides part of the back-end service.

  139. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by somersault · · Score: 1

    I've never had any stability issues with Android. With individual applications, yes. Like the other poster who replied to you, I find the Facebook app is one of the worst offenders.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  140. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    DOS (Windows) copied CP/M. At the time, no commands or devices were compatible; that didn't happen until Compaq cloned the IBM BIOS.

    Linux is a clone of Unix, and all the commands and devices are compatible. You can take a 40 year old Unix program, recompile it, and it will run on Linux (and now on Mac as well). In fact, Windows is the only incompatible OS (except some mainframe OSes).

    But by "the new CP/M" I meant incompatible with everything and obsolete.

  141. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by jbolden · · Score: 1

    Evernote, Keynote, EA's Monopoly.

  142. Re:How about some enthusiasm from a sub 100k ID th by hazydave · · Score: 1

    I thought it was very "last year", too, initially. But they are using the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4, which is based on Qualcomm's Krait processor, not the ARM A9 or the yet even slower Qualcomm Scorpion core. I think a dual core Krait, while not a match for a four core A9, is still very much a 2012-vintage processor. Display and camera are also fairly contemporary, if nothing unusual.

    In fact, only real flaw I see is the locked-down Windows 8 Phone software....

    --
    -Dave Haynie
  143. Re:How about some enthusiasm from a sub 100k ID th by hazydave · · Score: 1

    There's no "cheap pen-tile" when you're talking about a 720p screen that's 4.5" wide. Once the pixels are too small to be seen anyway, there's little wrong with the pentile arrangement. For an OLED display, it keeps the display 20% lower power and 20% cooler, which has traditionally been a problem with OLED -- overheating shortens display life.

    Of course, Nokia's OLED phones are RGB, like Samsung's old Galaxy SII, which isn't much of a problem when you have a gigantic screen and low resolution. The 920's screen went back to LED, because Nokia doesn't have access to higher density OLED technology at present. They have a few tweaks to the tech (dubbed PureView... apparently, all new Nokia technologies will be dubbed Pure-Motion). They claim traditional high density IPS LCDs (I'm sure they mean Apple) are too slow for video (not even slightly a factor on any OLED screen -- the LEDs switch in nanoseconds), so they're using a high voltage spike (and, of course, more power) to deliver a claimed 7ms response (fast enough for video, yes) versus a claimed 28ms response for an unnamed "typical" display. They also have higher output LED backlights, which they claim will make their device more readable than the unnamed "typical" display (as are all OLEDs) in bright sunlight. No comment given on what all this does to battery life, particularly since the display, LCD or OLED, is generally the place all your power goes on a smartphone.

    They're also claiming the touchscreen can be operated with fingernails or even gloves. To me, that's pretty interesting... I have thick guitar-generated calluses on my left hand, which the Galaxy Nexus pretty much ignores. So I can only touch-screen with my right hand. Not a biggie, but something I'd look for (in Android, of course) if it was actually available. And that's the one reason I'll track down a 920 at some point and play with it... like to see if that's real or not.

    They put out a whitepaper on this stuff... kind of a marketing thing, but with a little meat here and there: http://i.nokia.com/blob/view/-/1824216/data/2/-/PuremotionHD.pdf
    Anyway, Nokia was nice enough to put out a whitepaper on this stuff. Pretty much marketing-oriented, but it does dig in a bit.

    --
    -Dave Haynie
  144. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

    Screen is a IPS with a super bright mode for outdoor use, changed from the AMOLED in the 900.

    --
    This space for rent.
  145. Re:Interesting, very interesting +1 by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Not only I write code for living, I do so for two decades, and never seen a Visual Studio user who used it for any reaon other than compensating for his stupidity or ignorance.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  146. If you tie hardware and OS together by goldcd · · Score: 1

    then you really have to come up with something special on the hardware front.
    I'm no fan of Apple, but thank god they forced every other manufacturer to start putting Hi-res screens in their devices.
    I think this Nokia phone serves two purposes as well - firstly it's the 'physical home of WM8', secondly it creates a benchmark that other phones are judged against.
    Good example of what happens if you don't do this is Android. I've had a variety of decent phones and love it to bits, then was a bit confused when people complained, then picked up a cheap no-name tablet and knew exactly what they meant. It was VILE.
    My guess as to the purpose of the Nexus 7 is to provide a benchmark - If you as a no-name Chinese manufacturer can't make either something significantly cheaper, or significantly better, your product will die in the water. Therefore crappy Android systems should now be leaving us.
    Likewise with this Nokia WM8 phone - It doesn't have to be perfect, it doesn't have to be the only phone - however every WM8 phone that is released will be compared to this.