Slashdot Mirror
TSA Says Screening Drinks Purchased Inside Airport Terminal Is Nothing New
First time accepted submitter lcam writes in with a story about a video that has started a new round of condemnation against the TSA over the testing of drinks. "The video, posted on YouTube on Monday and featured on NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams Tuesday night, has already garnered almost 125,000 hits and nearly 900 comments from angry travelers. It shows two TSA officers swabbing bottles of water, a carton of coconut water and a cup of coffee, among other liquids. 'Now remember that this is inside the terminal, well beyond the security check and purchased inside the terminal ... just people waiting to get on the plane,' YouTube user danno02 says in the video's description. 'My wife and son came back from a coffee shop just around the corner, then we were approached. I asked them what they were doing. One of the TSA ladies said that they were checking for explosive chemicals (as we are drinking them).' The TSA insisted Tuesday that its policy of checking liquids beyond the security gate has been in place for five years now. TSA agents will randomly patrol the gates using a test strip and dropper containing a non-toxic solution, it said."
What about the explosive diaerara you get from eating the junk they have in the terminal?
Why not use this "technology" to resume allowing people to carry liquids >3oz in carry-ons?
Perhaps limit the number of such bottles to save time but if they can swab drinks bought in the security zone, they can swab our drinks while we wait to be nakey-scanned...
Fuck the TSA
Is the strip and solution really non-toxic? Will TSA provide independent test lab results to prove it? (unlike the poorly tested backscatter x-ray machines)?
If they have a reliable test to determine if a liquid is hazardous or not, then how about letting me bring liquids through the checkpoints?
TSA security theater story of the day:
On a recent flight from IAD, just before the flight started boarding, the gate agent announced "Please have your ID available for inspection, TSA will be conduction random ID checks and baggage searches upon boarding". And sure enough, as we boarded, there was a TSA guy with his magic flashlight, randomly checking ID's for validity, and farther into the jetway was a pair of TSA agents randomly searching luggage.
What's the point of a random check if it's announced when passengers can choose not to participate? If I were a bad guy with a fake ID or something bad in my luggage, I'd go home and try again a different day with a different fake ID.
I was an American teenager in the 1970s. Back then, people made fun of the Soviet Union. One of the most popular jokes referred to a Soviet citizen's internal passport, which apparently they were supposed to carry even when going from city to city. And of course there were all the stories about the KGB.
Fast forward to now. The TSA is becoming more and more intrusive into all aspects of our lives. They are even trying to worm their way into searching you on city buses and trains. Also Congress has, on more than one occasion, entertained proposals that would require US citizens to carry what amounts to an internal passport.
Reagan told Mr. Gorbachev to tear down that wall... and we thought we won the Cold War. But I guess Breshnev and company are having the last laugh.
#DeleteChrome
If you are going to check something at a checkpoint then it makes sense to stochastically sample with secondary checks to test your error rate. Apparently the TSA believe that there is a reason to limit the liquids through airport checkpoints and screen those liquids that they do allow through. Irrespective of if this is itself a rational position, if you believe that it is then it is also rational to check randomly sample liquids after the checkpoint.
If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
based on the rationalization mentioned in the article: random colonoscopy at some point before the security check point may be introduced because... no one will expect it... brilliant...
cryst
This post is provided without warranty as to reliability, accuracy or otherwise or fitness for any particular purpose.
NO!
The real reason for this is to make you, the idiot public, feel safe by having some random person in a uniform approach you and proceed to do something vaguely scientific-looking while assuring you that you're very safe here. See, you're safe because we're doing this thing of dubious value, but we're dressed in uniforms that command authority.
If you want to see this first hand, dress up in a suit, wear an official-looking nametag (it needs to have a BIG official-looking gold seal on it) covered in laminate, and then walk around a commercial building telling people what to do. Tell them men's room is closed and everyone has to use the women's (or vice versa). Stand in front of an elevator and tell people it's out of order (even as people exit from right behind you). Now, take it to Troll Level 99 by getting a couple of your friends involved in it: Come up with something completely outrageous (claim you're an USDA food inspector and need to look at anyone carrying a sandwich while in front of a cafe), and make sure your friends agree to do whatever you're doing. Then demand the same of other random people. Take a bite out of their sandwich and then tell them it's "acceptable" and let them go. You can have one of your friends object, at which point you eat the entire sandwich and treaten to write them a citation for interfering in official inspector business.
You'd be surprised just how far you can take it. I mean, you can basically rob someone of everything they own, and as long as other people are complicit to allow it, they'll just fold in like a deck of cards. No. I really mean it. But don't do it since it's unethical. But they do, they really do. :(
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
How do you know it's a TSA agent dripping a strange liquid into your drink and not a crazy guy dripping a slow acting poison or virus that won't be noticed until hours later after hundreds of people come down with a strange affliction all across the country?
Even if you demand to see ID first (is the TSA agent obligated to show ID upon request?), how many people know what a TSA badge is really supposed to look like?
I've had a sneaking suspicion that the TSA is a stealth jobs program for the otherwise unemployable. It's not so much the intrusive searches and so on as the STUPIDITY of their measures (how are four small bottles of liquid different from one large bottle?). As a game I stand in line at the checkpoints daydreaming about all the ways I could sneak things through—ideas that I won't share because it appears that terrorists are generally, thank goodness, even dumber than the gatekeepers. Many critics have already dissected their policies, e.g., http://www.schneier.com/ It's just too easy.
Terrorism is a very serious problem that can get people killed. So is the TSA.
So they go around sticking test strips and liquid in peoples drinks. Sure it's perfectly safe we told you so. Has the FDA even approved it or is it super secret we cant let them know it does not work.
No sir I dont like it.
Keep your bottled drink in your carry-on bag, and don't remove it to drink it when TSA agents are roaming around.
I read a comment on one of the other sites carrying this story that the test itself was of minor interest to the TSA - instead the goal is to talk to more passengers in order to gain "human intelligence." To these cynical ears, that sounds like exactly the kind of half-baked plan the TSA would come up with. Somebody thought it would be a clever way for their "behaviour profilers" to have an excuse to "profile" people without obviously creeping them out.
My personal experience is that I've flown once in the last 8 years, and the one time I did fly one of those TSA guys tried to talk me up while I was in line. It was uber-creepy - I spent the next hour trying to figure out if the guy was just naturally creepy or if he been trying "profile" me. Either way I did my best to say as little as possible to the guy and just get on past the checkpoint as quickly as possible. Talking up someone while you both wait a minute or two for the "test strip" to change color is probably going to be less obviously creepy. Still assinine and utterly ineffective, but less creepy.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
Non toxic, as defined by the folks who blast "non-toxic" radiation at everyone going through their body scanners.
I really hate to defend the TSA but there is a legitimate infiltration vector that this does address - that employees beyond the checkpoint can being in substances and transfer them to passengers.
Now, I do not defend their approach - that the passengers are the ones that get interfered with. The TSA should be working behind the scenes so that dangerous materials never get brought in by employees. Someone could slip some C4 onto a palette which gets passed along to the cashier then to the traveler. Then at another store picks up the detonator, then assembles it all on the plane.
I have no idea what security there is on getting stuff into airports, I figure it's got to be nearly impossible to adequately screen everything. .
And another thing is that you wouldn't put C4 into coffee, you'd put it on the bottom of the cup in that little area created by the seam. Of course, a coffee cup is the last place. You could just cram it in a hollowed out book. You'd fit way more.
So the other give away here is that they are after a liquid threat, and we already know there are no liquid threats capable of being produced in mid-air, or on the ground without raising a lot of suspicion. It'd have to be pre-packaged.
Someone somewhere must have gotten some intel about this vector.
Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
I wonder if some TSA came by an drop checker and swabbed your drink getting whatever powder into your drink would it not cause the customers to throw the drink out then buy another one?
Just a thought there. IDK but was thinking if it was a way to help boost up some sales post security gate. Who knows.
At Ontario airport over a year ago. We were lined up ready to board, and two fossils with a cart came up to us and then waited for the line to actually start to board the plane to start pulling people out to screen them. They used some kind of test strip and held it over my open bottle of water (I had drunk half of it while they watched), stuck it in a machine, and then a few seconds later, moved on to the next guy.
They didn't bother to check my backpack, where I had two other bottles of water I had bought from the same shop.
While it's fun for everyone to bitch about the TSA, what is it doing here on /. ?
Actually, I've been wondering if the whole "no drinks through security" rule was made at the request of the airport merchants who charge three dollars for a $0.30 bottle of water....
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
FUCK THE TSA.
Seriously, these goons are on a power trip that would make the Wehrmacht proud. I've flown several times since 9/11, but only because I had no other alternative at the time (I even drove 17 hours straight to visit my girlfriend while she was in San Antonio, because I had enough time to actually be on the road). Each time I've flown, I've opted out of being irradiated in favor of a pat-down.
Is it more invasive? Yes. Does it take longer than being scanned? Yes. Does it invonvenience them (even slightly) and force them to do more than just wave me through a machine? Yes. Does it make the screener uncomfortable? Hopefully that answer is also a yes. It's still useless and wrong, but I'm willing to give up a small bit of my dignity in order to make a point. I smile like an idiot during the entire pat-down these days.
Be that as it may, I will have to say that the screeners I've encountered at Austin-Bergstrom and in Nashville have been 100% professional and polite about the process. The people shoving everyone else through the machines seemed annoyed at having to get said screeners to deal with me, but that's not my problem.
that this comes up now after supposedly 5 years being done. Did people all of a sudden get more sensitive to that BS? Doubtful.
Thanks for submitting!
Avert your eyes, plebes! It is forbidden to watch, discuss or criticize the patricians!
He'll lower taxes on hedge fund managers so that... uh...
shit, I don't know.
paintball
All these "enhanced procedures haven't stopped a single terrorist. We are constantly inconvienenced and harassed all for nothing!!!! Even the shoe bomber was caught on the plane not before boarding. All this is for the illusion of safety and has nothing to do with stopping terrorists. Even the strip search X-rays haven't foiled a single terrorist plot. In ten years of microscopes up your rectum they can't point to a single case where the TSA has stopped a terrorist. Even with all the billions spent on new equipment and rights abused the actual terrorists are found before they get to the airport or on the plane itself not during check in. What is the value of the TSA? Zero, zip, nada unless you sell water and coffee in the post check in shops then they are a gold mine!!!
I would say, "hell no you're not putting that shit in my drink!" and chug it really quick!
Liberty plz.
Can we sue the TSA for putting us in harms way? I am sick and tired of them making me stand in line, next to a barrel full of suspected explosives.
Security theater is always better if it is not just up on stage but if the TSA actors actually come down into the audience and randomly do interactive skits with people in the audience. It shows they take their art seriously.
Someday, people will come to realize that there was one single change after 9/11 that effectively eliminated the possibility that hijackers could use our planes to fly into targets - they put locks on the cockpit doors.
Everything else is a charade. The TSA was created and is funded specifically to allow politicians to brag that they "created jobs", even if those jobs are completely worthless and nothing more than "security theater". It's a federal work program, nothing more. You might as well named it the "Ditch Digging Administration" and put the same low income, low skill workers in fields digging ditches and filling them back in. At least that would have some tangible benefit and stop causing so many people the nuisance.
In fact, the privacy invasions, delays, and "no fly lists" put in place by the TSA have caused significantly more deaths than happends on 9/11 - because people avoid the airports more and drive... getting into highway accidents.
How do you know that the fine upstanding TSA is taking all precautions by using sterile equipment and not putting a toxin into your beverage? WTF happened to the USA? When did we become Soviet America?
Name says it all.
The best source for information about the TSA and the abuses is http://shinybadge.com/
Did you know hat 318 TSA Officers have been arrested just last year for crimes committed against passengers?
To allow such practices ...
From where I stand, it looks that the USA are terrified.
Or that the TSA is just a gang of jerks.
Does anybody there remembers "He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." ?
I guess I'll continue to avoid the USA (and China, Russia, ...) on my flight destinations.
A couple years ago these goons pulled me aside as I was about to board the plane, frisked me and interrogated me about my sandwich. All in front of everyone boarding the plane. By the time they finished groping me and learning about the particulars of a rather uninteresting sandwich, the plane was nearly full. Fucking bastards. In retrospect, everyone on the plane probably thought I was a terrorist too. I hope you're laughing as you're reading this because humor is about the only legal way to deal with this bullshit.
Swab® Brand Beverages - The only beverage endorsed and trusted by the TSA. Make the Swab® Choice - The only Choice© for honest passengers.
INGREDIENTS: Reclaimed Water, Radiocontrast Agents, Aspartame, MDMA, Potassium Sorbate, Castoreum, Scopolamine, Nano Lead.
Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
I know exactly what I'm going to do when they do attempt this with my drink.
"Oh, you want some coffee? Here, take mine, no worries, thanks."
Or maybe...
"Please hold on to this for me, thanks."
+1 to the "ditch digging" comment up-thread. Yeah, spot on. I want the security jobs, IF THEY ARE ACTUALLY ADDING MATERIAL SECURITY VALUE.
Blogging because I can...
For a long time now, I've defended (some of) the TSA's actions. Basically, if they legitimately can't ensure safety without some highly intrusive measures, then I can respect the intrusiveness of those measures. But, that was all based on the notion that there was (maybe http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/03/07/0329255/the-ineffectiveness-of-tsa-body-scanners) a legitimate justification. However this new act has no logical justification. I could understand if they randomly sampled vendors' goods (especially drinks) to make sure nothing illicit got through, though presumably they already do this. But to do something like this to the passengers after the frisking, body scanning, etc. Unacceptable.
Was part of a bet. Worked fantastically well.
It's also good for just walking around places. If you are presenting as somebody who is supposed to be there, you simply are. Kind of amazing really.
Blogging because I can...
Ha! Ha! Ha! The Americans are scared shitless now! Us terrorists have won!
Seriously.
If they are going to spot check the liquids, just do it before I purchase said liquid. That's kind of a nice deal, given it actually has some impact on my safety. Random checks after the purchase has a really shitty end game:
1. Liquid found to be benign: "Sorry for bothering you, and trust us the chemicals used for testing are no big deal." Right. Feeling good about that one. NOT!
2. Liquid found to be dubious: "I'm afraid we need to conficate your coffee miss..." She asks, "Well, what about that guy over there, who got one too?" Yeah, that's ugly. Do they go and get his to put up a brave face, eventually just taking all the coffee? Or is it just a lie, or menacing behavior to get her to just shut down? And if she asks, "But you guys certified them for sale inside the terminal right?" Their reply? LOL!!!
3. Liquid found to be dangerous: See dubious, but for a lawsuit. +1 for pain and suffering on all sides. Might as well just start handing out good drugs to prevent the headaches that are going to happen. Here in Oregon, somebody might just strip over it! State law permits nudity as a legit protest. Hello 10 O'Clock news!
There are times when I seriously wonder whether or not anyone actually thinks about these things on more than a basic level.
Of course, the vendors would throw a fit! They need to make the money, so fuck us, right? Right.
Blogging because I can...
Why do people still put locks on their checked bags?
I mean, those bags are under the strict control of the TSA. It would be impossible for any criminal wrongdoing to occur under their supervision.
Surely luggage theft has been eliminated.
Surely no one who would take something valuable from a bag would be of such low character as to put something dangerous into a bag. Surely such a person could not be swayed by ideology or a bribe.
Right?
Watching that video makes me want to take a fucking pencil and jam it into that fucking domestic terrorist bitches neck.
Mod up. Sounds trollish, but it's absolutely true, as proven by TFA.
This is why I have gone from 20 flights per year to 2 flights per year.
I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.
A couple of years ago I flew back to London from Las Vegas via Denver (I think) and the TSA wouldn't let any drinks over 100ml purchased inside the airport terminal go onto the connecting flight.
Every single person was forced to either hand it over during the screening proces or stand around and drink it before proceeding. It was extremely annoying to find that we couldn't take our overpriced bottle of water onto the flight.
If they are now screening drinks then it's better than it was before.
Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
3 dollars? Damn its cheap where you fly the airport i fly out of for work 2-3 times a week charges 4 for a 20 oz bottle of water and 4.75 for a bottle of coke. Now if you go to the bar and get a fountain drink (in a glass you cant take with) its 3.05.
I travel back and forth from Japan pretty regularly. They have a special machine that they take the drink pop it in a holder and within seconds throws the green light or the 'Abunai' Red alert signal. Its been there for years. Kinda cool that I can buy my tea from outside the security zone and bring it right now.
Swabbing? LOL..
There's no Freedom like UFP-dom
So they're admitting the security theater at the checkpoint is ineffective? And more theater is needed?
If you dislike the TSA, please expend the small amount of time and calories to:
1) reduce your airline flights as much as possible and notify an airline in writing ("I estimate that I've avoided spending $1800 this year alone on plane tickets, and have instead spent about $2100 and more time on other forms of travel, in order to avoid the TSA treatment.")
2) write to a congressperson to complain
3) always POLITELY request to be hand searched rather than scanned, and try to POLITELY take up as much as their time as you can
4) try to carry many completely innocent items which they must remove or scan -- things like a bottle of coke, etc.
This takes many, many of us doing it to have the desired effect.
You just suggested yet another way to smuggle explosives into an airport undetected. Just ingest a few pounds of plastic explosive and an detonator. It might make you sick give enough time, but you could just swallow it 30 minutes before you take off, and check in for a flight that has short security lines. If you are intending to become a suicide bomber, what does it matter if it goes off inside or outside you? Back scatter will pick up nothing, and nobody gets swabbed for explosive residue.
TSA keep protecting us from...well whatever is is you protect us from.
What's worse is when you're transferring. If you have any liquids left and you have to go through security again, you lose it..even when it's in the contained transfer area. So stupid.
After making a very long international flight with many transfers, we often had to through security again, despite just coming off a plane, and not exiting the security area. Even the small bottles of water they give you on the plane itself got confiscated. It's pure fucking idiocy .
Why would I care if its toxic or not, if they want to put in in my drink they can do it in a small sample or they can buy me a new drink.
Doesn't bother me any. It really isnt an apocalyptic NWO genocide. Its a fuckin bottle pat down. Big whoop, and if a TSA agent wants to touch my crotch I can care less. Not like im stripping naked. Its as pedant as having to captcha before ya post a comment.
I always hated the cattle crush anyway.
Not that this makes any of this nonsense right.
I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
The TSA insisted Tuesday that its policy of checking liquids beyond the security gate has been in place for five years now.
Also, we've always been at war with Eastasia.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
I imagine that having some stranger, even one wearing a shiny badge, come up and wipe something over the mouth of that $3 bottle, or put a drop of "non-toxic" fluid in it, will result in the sale of one more $3 bottle of water.
times 14.2.84 miniplenty malquoted liquid allowance rectify
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
If enough folks do that, it will only be a matter of time before pressure from airport management due to the extra cleanup work will stop this practice.
DONT U ALL SEE? they are using this as an excuse to plant secret nanobots in us to mind control us...
In Ethiopia, you have to retain your receipt for drinks purchased in the terminal because you WILL be asked for them by security personnel. But, they do not do any testing of open drinks.
Several years ago, while emptying my pockets for the security scan, I found my pocketknife. Ah! shit! forgotten! I had carefully packed it in my hold-luggage for the way there, but I'd used it and kept it in my jeans pocket after that.
So I put it in my camera-bag near the LIPO batteries because those might be opague to the X-ray scan....And lo and behold... I got through with the forgotten knife between the LIPO batteries....
Fast forward three and a half years. Different airport. This time: "Sir, you have a camera in that bag, can I take a look at your camera bag?". "Sure, go ahead". So the guy carefully looks at all the compartments in my camera bag, finds nothing and waves me through...
I consider telling him of the story of the forgotten knife three years ago, but think better of it.
Fast forward about 3 days....
Looking through my bag I find a few objects that I hadn't intended on taking along on this trip..... A 30 cm long needle and... the knife that wasn't confiscated 3 years ago..... Ooops.
I'm pretty confident that I acted innocently: I didn't know I had forgotten those objects in there.
Even if they swab the drink to get a sample, that still does not explain the chemical they are putting in the drink. The only thing that will do is get some chemical into your body, and THAT crosses a line. Your body belongs to you and you should NEVER tolerate anybody wanting to put any kind of chemical or medication into your body without your asking them to.
Time to contact the vendors in the airports and tell them their products will no longer be purchased due to TSA practices.
This is getting old.
If I chug a whole can of Pepsi at once, it's been known to cause explosive burps that could easily cause explosive decompression in the cabin if that CO2 were to make it onto the plane lol.
What are they going to do about breast-feeding mothers who are producing lots of milk while waiting to go through those lines?
"Excuse me, Maam but I need to squeeze your funbags to sample your milk for explosives."
History is going to look at this time period with sadness.
Well, that's one way to build up a DNA database. Didn't the spooks recruit a doctor to get Bin Laden DNA under the guise of vaccinations?
~~~~~~~
"You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
Actually, this brings up something that went through my head the last time I was prepping my 3oz bottles of scotch to bring onto the plane...
How long until some hot-shot chemistry geek goes into one of the gift shops inside the terminal and buys a bunch of items for sale beyond the checkpoint, and then takes them home and makes a YouTube video about how to make a cool bomb out of them using only those items and stuff you'd have available in an airplane lavatory?
I didn't take careful note of the stuff you can get in the shops, but I imagine you can get hand-sanitizer (~70% alcohol), anti-perspirants (with aluminum, which can be highly reactive), lots of cold medicines with all sorts of compounds in them, etc. Granted, chem isn't my area at all, so I don't know how feasible it is... but I figure this would be a great project for a chem hack.
It seems like they are either
1)aware of some new strange concoction,
2) or are not thinking too clearly
3) or trying to smoke out something
4) or just not being nice folks
5) or something else
I'd bet on a simple harmless #2, but I'd bet if pushed they would double down and claim #3. ;-)
(That correlates with #2 perfectly.
Can we "opt out" of these inspections, or do we risk the $10,000 fine?
There's no fucking way I'm drinking that after they've put whatever in it. Can I at least make them buy me a new drink? Probably not.
1) Start selling Airport safe 2.9oz bottles of water!
2) Profit.
My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
So then, how do I tell the difference between a TSA employee swabbing my drink with a supposedly non-toxic liquid vs someone dressed as a TSA agent swabbing my drink with a toxic compound ? And how does the TSA know whether I am sensitive to the supposedly non-toxic liquid they are using ? Seems to me that the TSA is actually enabling the bad guys here.
The next time you are screened by a non-US citizen TSA screener, just remember:
In Soviet America, Alien Probes YOU!
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
I'd accidentally spilt my liquids on them. So sorry. I get nervous when approached by God Blessed American Authority. Then started signing the National Anthem of Freedonia. Tazed. end scene. BTW, anyone notice how lax subway/train security is compared to airports. It sucks I see little they can do about it. I mean if I was going to get to the Airport, I'd take the train. It's reliable and follows the same path every trip. I mean the train tracks let you know that. The schedules are kept to maximise profit and minimise accidents. So the train will with an almost 100% certainty pass the same point each trip at the same time. Most of these trips also happen to take place during an airports busiest hours. Did you know the majority of trains are highly magnetic. You could lay in a ditch on the side of the tracks and throw a magnet and it would stick, especially if it was rare earth. I'm glad trains don't derail too often coming into the train stations, the kinetic force of a commuter train moving at 55 mph is alot. Not to mention how terrifying & messy that kind of crash is.
The TSA is another one of his lovely legacies.
My daughter has traveled to Israel several times over the past 2 years and has flown El Al. When asked if they wanted to see her quart-sized Ziploc bag, they just laughed and said they had no restrictions on carry-on liquids. It really does seem like the US is spending a lot of time and money obsessing about liquids/aerosols/gels. And obviously the terrorists have a work-around: Meet on the other side of the security checkpoint and "pool" their quart Ziploc bags.
What if it's an inside job? What if somebody who works at the terminal store places explosive chemicals inside a conventional drink? Oh wait the fact that you can still take lighters on airplanes makes that irrelevant.
It is not clear to me that the TSA folk are mindful of the most
simple sanitation issues related to food and drink:
Call The Health Department and CDC
when you see grubby grimy gloves rummaging in your
personals. I have seen agents with gloves so grimy that
they may have just come in from hand broadcasting
horse manure on a farm filed.
They are worried about biologic agents yet their process
would disperse agents far and wide. It may be simple
salmonella or that nasty virus reported from Yosemite.
They are in your clean clothes, your toiletries, your toothbrush,
your shaving kit. Then there is the pat down and junk grab that
most assuredly goes on to a degree some would not disclose.
Just a wipe of his arm pits, then the next victim gets hers/his.
To my knowledge TSA agents are not screened for communicable
diseases the way food handlers are. Clearly they do not wear protective
clothing, hairnets or clean gloves.
Yet they are into your breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks....
purses full of soiled tissue from people with the flu, common cold...
Be polite... communicate who, what, when, where....
This is a health issue not an urgent national security issue
until Typhoid Mary gets a TSA job.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the former."
My sig is too lon
Hah! There's no freakin jobs here to switch to and we're better off than many areas! Where u from that you can still feel so cavalier about your current position?
Having said that, I don't see the point, unless they're trying[...]to put up a show.
Bingo!