Slashdot Mirror


Apple CEO Tim Cook Apologizes For Maps App, Recommends Alternatives

TheBoat writes "Tim Cook has apologized for the company's Maps app in iOS 6. 'We are extremely sorry for the frustration this has caused our customers and we are doing everything we can to make Maps better.' Cook said the company is continuing to work on the app, but recommended several alternatives in the meantime: apps from Bing, MapQuest, and Waze, or the map websites of Google and Nokia." This is unusual for Apple, but not unprecedented. Steve Jobs acknowledged reception issues with the iPhone 4 in 2010, but he wasn't quite so contrite about it.

110 of 451 comments (clear)

  1. Bye Apple by heptapod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve Jobs would have never apologized. He woudl've given it just the right spin that everyone would feel contrite over making jokes at Apple's expense. The next release would be perfect, as Steve would have demanded, and the kerfuffle would be consigned to largely forgotten history.

    Tim Cook goofed.

    1. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Steve Jobs would have never apologized. He woudl've given it just the right spin that everyone would feel contrite over making jokes at Apple's expense. The next release would be perfect, as Steve would have demanded, and the kerfuffle would be consigned to largely forgotten history.

      Tim Cook goofed.

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is. I have no doubt that this will be fixed in short order as Apple has gobs of money to throw at the problem and knowledge of where the problems are.

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      Disclaimer: I am an Android user and by no means an Apple fanboi. Frankly, I despise the company for abusing the court system for their anticompetitive practices. However, you have to give Apple credit here for admitting flaws. It's not something the company often does and they should get credit for it.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Bye Apple by clonehappy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Tim Cook goofed.

      Because he's not a lying egomaniac? I hope you were being sarcastic, but you can never be too sure.

      I appreciate his honesty and willingness to be forthcoming about a flaw in their product.

    3. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know about it being fixed in "short order". Think of how long it took and how many people it took to get Google Maps to the level it's at. Even if Apple spends enough to cut that time in half we're still looking at a decent wait.

    4. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      You should never, never, never, ever use a production release as a beta test. This is what Q/A teams are for. Apple can afford them.

      The point here is that Apple decided to create their own because Google wanted to run more ads and generally improve the branding on the maps app that Apple had been licensing from them in order to renew the agreement with the addition of turn by turn navigation.

      Normally I refuse to give Apple the benefit of the doubt, and in this case it was most likely a stupid decision to rush this app, but let's face it folks. Google's been mapping for years. They have a tremendous amount of money and resources invested in it. There's no way Apple could possibly catch up this fast. Though I wouldn't be surprised if they do eventually. They have enough money to pour into it.

    5. Re:Bye Apple by am+2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      The problem is, this is iOS version 6, not version 1. The customers don't care about inter-company politics. If they would, they wouldn't buy Apple products in the first place, being the kind of company it is.

    6. Re:Bye Apple by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      So you're saying they've adopted the Microsoft way: release software which is horribly bug infested, let the user's who've paid for the product tell you what's wrong, then go about fixing the problems you either knew about or were too lazy to fix in the first place because you saved a few bucks by not doing testing.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re:Bye Apple by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      as someone who bought apple shares before 2007 - i can only hope that fucking up then throwing money at problems to fix them carelessly is not the long term post steve jobs plan.

      Given the reports that they still had another year worth of contractually available Google Maps, if they wanted it, the early switch does seem like a questionable move; but the 'throwing money at the problem' part is simply an inevitability if they want to get into mapping.

      As they've learned(and any GIS people could have told them ahead of time...) the state of computerized mapping is such that you can't just throw a small number of talented programmers at the problem and expect it to work. Apple can do UIs, and the math behind various projections and coordinate systems and other cartographic stuff is available; but the underlying data about the real world are absolutely filthy and often patchy, outdated, scattered between multiple entities, etc, etc. They can either drop the product, or commit themselves to a long string of purchases of existing datasets and talent, and quite possibly a bunch of sheer slogging. Team Google doesn't have all those wacky spy cars running around purely for their novelty value, or because they have some moral objection to developing software to grovel through 3rd-party datasets...

      You can debate whether it is a problem worth throwing money at; but it is a problem that you either don't touch, approach cautiously and with a willingness to take it slowly(ie. openstreetmap), or go in with checkbook blazing.

    8. Re:Bye Apple by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up! Apple may have money to throw at this issue, but they do NOT have the time. They might have if they have developed this for a few more years in secret, but now that it's out, they're boned.

    9. Re:Bye Apple by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To paraphrase the AC.

      I don't think Steve would have allowed such as shitty product to completely be release.

      This is probably the beginning of many such goofs as Apple ceases to be Apple and becomes just another giant technology company.

      Steve was the nuclear fire that drove Apple. With the fire out, like a White Dwarf star, Apple will now simply fade away in the coming decades.

      Sad.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    10. Re:Bye Apple by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      That's acceptable if you're doing something really new and innovative that no one has done before – like the original iPhone itself, or the first release of Siri. On the other hand, if you're entering an existing marketplace, your first release had better be at least as good as the entrenched players, preferably better, or at least offer some substantial other benefit to offset that. (This is why I think Windows Phone 8 is going to be a massive flop.)

      This goes double if you're replacing functionality in an existing product. You can't replace a fully-working utility with a buggy beta and expect users not to complain loudly.

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      Using customers as beta testers is a sadly common practice in the IT industry, but one reason why Apple has been so popular with users is that they've avoided doing this – up until now.

    11. Re:Bye Apple by Goaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

    12. Re:Bye Apple by slartibartfastatp · · Score: 2

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is. I have no doubt that this will be fixed in short order as Apple has gobs of money to throw at the problem and knowledge of where the problems are.

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      The only reason why I use Apple is because they have well finished, polished software that are reliable and very pleasant to use. If I wanted beta apps I wouldn't pay that much on an iPhone or iPad.

      --
      -- --
    13. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      as someone who bought apple shares before 2007 - i can only hope that fucking up then throwing money at problems to fix them carelessly is not the long term post steve jobs plan.

      Good, fast and cheap; pick two! Fast was a necessity and they obviously didn't spend enough money to make it good. Now they have to. They went for what their executives called "good enough" knowing that it certainly wouldn't hamper sales, and it hasn't. Apple has never had free navigation so even a crappy app is better than what they had before. They are receiving negative press over this but I don't see a whole lot of Apple users jumping ship. Like the Samsung commercial, Apple users are saying, "we'll get that fixed next time."

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    14. Re:Bye Apple by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it funny how the public will equally go nuts over a small problem vs a large one.
      My Maps are not as good as the last time. Vs. Company has been embezling and misusing our tax money. Same amount of anger and fustration. Why do you think companies are staying corrupt. Because if they try to be the good guys whatever minor mistake they will get the same slack is if they make a major problem.

      Can't be the good guy, so let just be the bad guy.

      We should save our bickering for the big stuff, and let the little stuff slide a litte bit. Sure in this case report the problem. OK the CEO appologizes. No that isn't good enough we want Blood because we were 10 minutes lake to that party.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

      Google is not the only company that offers maps with turn by turn directions. I'm actually surprised that Apple simply didn't buy a company that already has things up and running like they did with Siri. They could have purchased TomTom, for example and had everything up and running immediately. All they would have needed to do is write the app. I can't see how that would have been that much more expensive that starting from scratch and eating all the negative press.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    16. Re:Bye Apple by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      The only reason why I use Apple is because they have well finished, polished software that are reliable and very pleasant to use. If I wanted beta apps I wouldn't pay that much on an iPhone or iPad.

      It's been a while since "It Just Works" was true.
      Furthermore, Windows 7 (and Ubuntu, to a certain extent) has delivered an experience that could be described as "It Just Works", especially when it comes to drivers. Improved competitors tend to highlight one's flaws.

    17. Re:Bye Apple by interval1066 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. Apple is so keen to cut their tether to Google they cut the customer's throats, "Kudos" to Apple for admitting they're wrong? Please...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    18. Re:Bye Apple by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is. I have no doubt that this will be fixed in short order as Apple has gobs of money to throw at the problem and knowledge of where the problems are.

      The thing is, you're looking at a short term one time fix.. but this isn't a bug in the OS where you can through money and coders at it and then throw a party when they problem is fixed. This isn't a flawed antenna design where you can throw engineers at the problem an offer free bumpers as an interim fix. It's an entirely different class of problem because maps are representative of the real world, and the real world isn't static. They not only have to fix the current snafu, but build an organization and processes that can take a fire hose of incoming changes and gracefully integrate them into the existing data. (And even with gobs of money and years of experience, Google hasn't got that quite right yet.)
       

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      That's a developer bromide, end users take a rather different view of being used as unpaid beta testers. Especially when the product being beta tested not only doesn't work, but it's feature set is inferior to what it replaced and they don't have an easy way to revert to an earlier version.
       
      Not to mention, if you want a public beta of your product, it should be *ready* for public beta - not barely capable of alpha.

    19. Re:Bye Apple by pr0nbot · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're probably sitting on enough cash to move towns and rivers to match their maps.

    20. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      So you're saying they've adopted the Microsoft way: release software which is horribly bug infested, let the user's who've paid for the product tell you what's wrong, then go about fixing the problems you either knew about or were too lazy to fix in the first place because you saved a few bucks by not doing testing.

      Pretty much, yeah! The difference is that Apple users are not paying for this app. It comes with the new iPhone. I don't think there were many in line waiting overnight to purchase the new iPhone5 simply because it had a map app. They were there to get the latest and greatest that Apple has to offer.

      Kind of the same way that people don't pay for Windows since it comes free with a new computer?

      Saying that people don't purchase the phone to get the map app is the same as saying that people don't purchase the phone for Siri, or the high res screen, or the fast CPU, or the LTE connection - they buy the phone for the "whole package", and for many people, maps is part of that package.

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping. The Blackberry was great for emails and for making phone calls and txts (my primary use of a smartphone), but the mapping app sucks, so even though the BB was completely free for me through work, I paid my own money for a better smartphone.

    21. Re:Bye Apple by voidptr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They didn't start from scratch. There's plenty of press that they acquired at least 2 GIS companies since 2009, and it's fairly evident that they licensed data from TomTom as well.

      --
      This .sig for unofficial government use only. Official use subject to $500 fine.
    22. Re:Bye Apple by Bongo · · Score: 2

      But aren't they now using Tom Tom? Map techs say the problems are amalgamating all the data they've gathered from different sources, including Tom Tom.

    23. Re:Bye Apple by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple's been doing this with (some of) their software titles for years. This is nothing new to them at all. The only thing that's new is that expectations are higher for Apple now, and they can't release a product without the eyes of the world scrutinizing every tiny thing they do.

      Everyone's making a big deal about Apple Map software, but nobody seems to remember that Safari, iTunes, and a half-dozen other Apple applications are steaming piles of shit, and that to make a proper operating system, they had to buy one that was based on BSD. This isn't about Apple adopting a bad software dev strategy, it's about Apple's bad software dev strategy biting them in the ass for the first time.*

      *Disclosure and notice to the flame-warriors: I say these terrible things about Apple not because I'm an Apple hater, but because I've been using Apple products almost exclusively for many years now, and have much experience with Apple's flaws as well as its finer qualities.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    24. Re:Bye Apple by rhsanborn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is absolutely not true. Jobs released a lot of dogs, and a lot of dogs that weren't ready. iCloud? Ping? iPhone 4 antenna? Please take off the rose colored glasses. This was a failure by Apple, absolutely. But let's not hearken to the good old days where no wrongs were made. They never existed.

    25. Re:Bye Apple by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Funny

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      It's now become "It Just Sues!".

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    26. Re:Bye Apple by Glendale2x · · Score: 2

      They actually are using data from TomTom, but apparently it isn't as easy as "just writing the app".

      http://gspa21.ls.apple.com/html/attribution.html

      --
      this is my sig
    27. Re:Bye Apple by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Team Google doesn't have all those wacky spy cars running around purely for their novelty value,"

      And now they can even run them driverless 24/7.

    28. Re:Bye Apple by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2

      They bought the data from different sources, but apparently messed up merging it. E.g. in Japan a slightly different GPS standard is used - which can shift your location by 250m or so if you get it wrong. They apparently also used data from openstreetmaps, which doesn't seem to be quite as good as they hoped for. Still considering all the data they bought, it's surprising the result is so bad.

    29. Re:Bye Apple by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Ah, so that's it! Might take a while...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    30. Re:Bye Apple by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      He would not have allowed a shitty product to go out.

      The problem for you is that Apple Maps is not a "shitty product". It's actually a really good mapping app, that currently has SOME data issues.

      But for many users it works most of the time, close enough to replace Google Maps which ALSO works most of the time.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    31. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that the maps app is a step backwards. But calling it "cutting customers' throats" is, you have to admit, a bit of hyperbole. I live in a mid-sized city, I've used iOS6 maps a half-dozen times in the last week, and it's been perfectly fine every time. I know anecdotes are not data, but I'd be willing to wager that for most people, in most areas, doing most searches, it's acceptable.

      Best ever? No. Flawless? Certainly not. As good as we've come to expect from iOS? Nope. But it's not cutting anyone's throat by any stretch of a sane imagination.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    32. Re:Bye Apple by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      It is a fact. However, that doesn't mean we need to "blame" Google. Google has every right to demand whatever they wanted for the technology, just as Apple has every right to show them the door. A poor map solution was inevitable--the old Maps app was already bad.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    33. Re:Bye Apple by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Informative

      They could have purchased TomTom, for example and had everything up and running immediately.

      I think it's a bit more complicated than that. From Apple's mapping attribution page:

      © 2006-2012 TomTom
      Business listings data © Acxiom, 2012.
      Map data © AND.
      Property parcel data for USA. © CoreLogic Inc., 2012.
      Satellite imagery data © DigitalGlobe, 2012.
      Map and postal data © DMTI, 2012. This software contains Postal Code OM Data copied by Apple under a sub-license from DMTI Spatial Inc., a party directly licensed by Canada Post Corporation. The Canada Post Corporation file from which this data was copied is dated 2012.
      Business listings data © Factual 2012.
      Map data © Getchee, 2012.
      © INCREMENT P CORP., 2012, http://www.incrementp.co.jp/gc01info/e/legal01.html.
      Map data © Intermap, 2012.
      Map data © LeadDog, 2012.
      Business listings data © Localeze, 2012.
      Mapping data for Australia and New Zealand. © MapData Services Pty Ltd., 2012, PSMA http://www.nowwhere.com.au/lic/NowWhereLic.htm.
      Map data © MDA Information Systems, Inc., 2012.
      Neighborhood data © Urban Mapping, 2012.
      Map data © 2012 Waze.
      âoeReviews from Yelpâ Yelp, 2012.
      (CanVec)
      © Department of Natural Resources Canada. All rights reserved.
      http://www.geogratis.gc.ca/geogratis/en/index.html
      (CGIAR-CSI SRTM)
      CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/
      Flickr Shapefiles Public Dataset, Version 1.0, http://www.flickr.com/
      (GeoNames)
      GeoNames and contributors, http://www.geonames.org.
      (GlobCover)
      © ESA 2010 and UCLouvain, http://www.esa.int/esaEO/index.html

      National Aeronautics and Space Administration, http://www.nasa.gov

      Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2012. Contains Royal Mail data © Royal Mail copyright and database right 2012. http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/

      (OSDM)
      © Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. This data has been used with the permission of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth has not evaluated the data as altered and incorporated within this software, and therefore gives no warranty regarding its accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose. http://spatial.gov.au

      (OSM)
      OpenStreetMap contributors, http://www.openstreetmap.org/
      (StatCan)
      Statistics Canada, http://www.statcan.gc.ca
      (TIGER/Line® fi

    34. Re:Bye Apple by flatrock · · Score: 2

      They didn't start from scratch, but their replacement simply isn't of the kind of quality Apple customers have come to expect. Apple has always demanded a bit of a premium price for a premium product. Maps are a critical app on a smartphone. I can understand that continuing to lack turn by turn navigation wasn't a viable choice for Apple. It's something they really should have had before now. However substituting their own solution that simply wasn't ready yet was a foolish choice. They should have either been investing more on a better solution of their own, or provided an alternative from another company until theirs was ready.

    35. Re:Bye Apple by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

      Google is not responsible for Apple's poor planning.

    36. Re:Bye Apple by Wraithlyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given the reports that they still had another year worth of contractually available Google Maps, if they wanted it, the early switch does seem like a questionable move

      John Gruber at Daring Fireball makes the best case I've seen for explaining the timing; that their contract would expire mid-way through the iOS6 cycle and Apple would be forced to re-negotiate "with their backs against the wall". Or in other words, the contract would not have lasted until iOS7 comes out, so it made more sense to push out a major change like this in iOS6 instead of cramming it into a point release like 6.1 or 6.2 (can you imagine the outcry if THAT happened? At least people expect x.0 releases to have some teething problems... point releases are expected to refine, polish, and bugfix)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    37. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping.

      First, since you say "smartphone" instead of "iPhone", shall we assume that you're an Android user, that this issue doesn't affect you and your comment about the mapping app sucks is based entirely on anecdotal data?

      When the CEO of Apple apologizes for the poor quality of their mapping app and recommends that dissapointed users download a different app, it's no longer "anecdotal data". This isn't a case of one guy saying "omg, I can't map my street! Apple maps suck!"

      The next question is, if you are indeed an iPhone user, then is your experience with the new maps app--as bad as it may be--better than or worse than the Blackberry experience you were trying to get away from? As a former Blackberry user myself, I'm going to guess it's still way way way better. iOS 6 maps are certainly a step backwards, so it's worth complaining about. But don't add to the argument that this application was the very reason you moved away from another platform that was and probably still is several orders of magnitude worse.

      I was careful to not say whether I moved to Android or iPhone, you made the (correct) assumption that it was Android, even if I moved to an iPhone 2 years ago, that doesn't change my basic point that maps are important to many people so a bad map implementation is worse than, say, not enough Fart applications.

      I chose Android for reasons other than mapping (at the time, IOS was using Google Maps), but if I were going to buy a Smartphone today, I'd rule out iPhone based on the mapping problems alone. The iPhone is a good phone and until the Android ICS release, I'd say that most consumers would be more satisfied with iPhone than Android, but now I see little overall usability difference.

    38. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can count me as one user who thinks it is the "best ever."

      Ideal? No.
      Best it can be? No.

      But "best ever", abso-fucking-lytely: YES

      I like it better than Google maps on my desktop, in fact:

      It's issues, as I understand it, can be itemized very simply: (1) some satellite images are warped; (2) searching for locations by name is flawed and risks taking you to the wrong place. No one actually cares about item 1, so woop-di-doo to everyone with their panties in a bunch over that. Yes, satellite view is very useful on occasion (as a mountain biker I depend on it often), but it's hardly used as much as map view and the few that critically rely on perfect satellite imagery probably have a preferred dedicated solution. For item 2, yes, everyone cares about this. But for me at least, maybe half of the critical navigation use cases for maps on the iPhone consist of entering an address, not searching. For the situations where I have to search, the workaround is simple: lookup the address elsewhere first and then ask Siri to take me there. Boom. Apple will straighten this issue out over time, and as we all know, the sooner they get the app in the wild being used by millions of people, the sooner they can do that.

      But the ADVANTAGES are HUGE.

      Do you remember zooming in on Google maps and waiting for the tiles to load? Do you remember zooming in and out and seeing blurry pixelated stand-ins while you waited for discrete zoom steps? Or worse, how about those awkward in-between zoom levels where you were stuck with fuzzy-looking maps? Wait, it got worse: how about tiles that never refreshed at all and you were left with a map that was part zoomed in and part zoomed out? Or even tiles that never loaded at all so all you get is a gray square?

      With Apple Maps, this is all a thing of the past. The maps are INSANELY responsive. Zooming in and out is seamless and smooth. Panning is seamless and smooth. No more stutters, no delays, no dropped tiles. No fragmented imagery. No more waiting for something that eventually times out and then your connection sucks and you can't get it back and you're suddenly stuck with no map. And it wasn't just iOS: I suffer the same some-tiles-that-never-load on my desktop computer when using Google maps even over a high bandwidth cable modem.

      How about walking around downtown somewhere, trying to find that bar five blocks over, and being lost... so you pull out your iPhone, but north is on top and you're walking south-east so you get confused about turning left or right at certain intersections. What did you do? You enabled compass mode so you could tell which way you were going to see if you were headed there. But now you need to zoom in or out again to see things better. Bam! compass mode would disengage and you'd lose your orientation again. It was impossible to keep both. Now that's a thing of the past, just rotate freely and pinch to zoom in or out without losing your rotation.

      And turn by turn? We got it now. Wait, even better: turn by turn that takes traffic into account and gives you the optimal route, updating live? We got that now. And 3D view (not talking the flyover stuff here, just basic 3D view) kicks butt and pans really intuitively and helps give you a feel for the layout.

      In short, usability -- Apple's hallmark -- has increased a hundred-fold. Google maps was practically useless for me. Really, it was. Apple maps on the other hand, is everything I ever expected from a mapping app and it's obviously only going to get better.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    39. Re:Bye Apple by ohnocitizen · · Score: 2

      It might be hurting prospective users. I am in between the Galaxy S3 and the iphone 5, upgrading from a non smartphone. The battery issues and map problems are both making me lean towards Samsung.

    40. Re:Bye Apple by jmerlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Android's mapping/navigation is so superior to the native stuff on iOS and even the paid store products it's not funny. The choice is clear. Though you should definitely get a car charger and dock if you plan on using it as a navigator. Active GPS + screen on = huge power drain.

    41. Re:Bye Apple by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      But calling it "cutting customers' throats" is, you have to admit, a bit of hyperbole.

      Your phone telling you to drive down train tracks isn't far off though, you have to admit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    42. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Adopted? What do you think happened with the OSX 10.0. What do you think the first version of iTunes or Keynote was like? Apple can't do magic, first versions of massive complex applications are buggy.

    43. Re:Bye Apple by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Given how shitty and out of date TomTom maps are (with false turns that get me lost all the time, just for the purposes of 'protecting copyright') making fun of them is quite acceptable to me.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    44. Re:Bye Apple by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple has never had free navigation so even a crappy app is better than what they had before.

      No, it isn't.

      Look, you can throw in all the 3D spinny effects/voice activation/turn-by-turn/traffic you want. If I say I want to go from point A to point B and the app comes back and says, "Sorry, I can't find point B," it is not better than what I had before.

      Like the Samsung commercial, Apple users are saying, "we'll get that fixed next time."

      The fanbois will always say that. These are people that you will not get, no matter what. 5% of the world are Apple lovers. 5% of the world are Apple haters. The other 90% fall somewhere in-between.

      Apple will survive and do quite well with their 5%. The problem is that to thrive and grow, Apple needs those other 90%. These aren't the people who say, "Look at the shiny Apple!" They expect things to "just work." When they don't, they'll look for something that does.

    45. Re:Bye Apple by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      As I keep saying, it's not that the maps are wrong. It's that the world is positioned wrong. People keep naming cities the wrong thing.

    46. Re:Bye Apple by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      They tried to renegotiate with Google. Apple wanted a few new things like turn-by-turn, and Google was asking for some stuff in exchange, like increased branding, that Apple wasn't willing to do. Unfortunately, I can't remember where the article I read this was. Anyhow, even if the timing for the contract renewal had worked out, they may not have been able to come to terms on the missing features. Things like turn-by-turn weren't needed (or rather weren't expected) in a smartphone mapping app in 2007, but by 2012 they were expected, and their absence in iOS was notable.

    47. Re:Bye Apple by toriver · · Score: 2

      i paid $0 for iOS 6 on my iPhone 4S though. Unless you were on an iPhone 3G and nedded to upgrade since your phone would be left in the cold otherwise, you did not have to get an iPhone 5 to get the new OS.

    48. Re:Bye Apple by jmerlin · · Score: 2

      I'm no zealot. Does anyone deny that Chrome is significantly better than IE? So then why, when faced with a similar question, do so many Apple users deny that Apple Maps is similarly worse than Google Maps? I like Android, sure, but this is an obvious one. If advising someone who's looking to make a purchase on the basis of maps support that they should pick the phone (not *A* phone, but one of a huge range of phones, some with incredible battery like the Razr, phones with more power, or even budget phones) with the best maps application is enough to make one a "zealot," this community has completely failed.

      To help cool peoples' lids: this post was written on my Macbook Pro. Woah.

    49. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Team Google doesn't have all those wacky spy cars running around purely for their novelty value

      No indeed, they have them for their Street View feature. The confirmation of road data via GPS log came as a bonus extra. But Apple get that benefit and more from the fact that every iPhone that's using navigation is regularly pinging the GPS position back to Apple. This will give very clear heat-maps of where the navigable roads are, one way systems, and restricted turns. More accurate in fact than the single sample of a Google car driving down a road once.

    50. Re:Bye Apple by trdrstv · · Score: 2

      You can only interpolate and run global models so much. Eventually you have to go to smaller and smaller regions. Then at a certain point you just have crappy data, which means someone needs to collect it. Other people need to correct all the above. That usually means lots of people, and lots of time. Something Google has had a lot of for a long time.

      However Apple does have a ton of cash. They could throw a LOT of money at it and make a big difference in a few years. It would be like organizing a large army however.

      For perspective on that "large army". Despite being twice the size of Google (based on market capitalization) Apple has ~ 13,000 non-retail employees, TOTAL, and Google has ~7,100 people working on Google Maps.

  2. Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He'd just say you were trying to navigate wrong.

    1. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by mrquagmire · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Our maps aren't inaccurate. Your towns are inaccurate."

      --
      giggity
    2. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "We have revised the location of your town. Pray that we do not revise it any further."

  3. Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    In an effort to figure out how innacurate the data in my area is I did the following:
    - Fired up Xcode
    - Determined that Apple Maps uses the CLGeocoder Class by peeking at the iPhone's debug console in Xcode while doing live searches in Apple Maps
    - Scraped an official list of towns and cities in the province of Ontario from the provincial governments website.
    - Coded up something quick in Xcode to get the results of a couple thousand searches. Searches always included the province name to be more specific.
    - Ran a quick analysis of the results - not perfect but enough to get a perspective on the matter.

    This is what I found:
    - 2028 cities and towns searched
    - 688 are not even on the map! Error Code 8
    - 551 are clearly incorrect (wrong country, street names that are similar to town names etc.)
    - 389 were close but not good enough (for example turn-by-turn might send you off a bridge but you'll get rescued close to where you want to be)
    - Only about 400 results were actually correct.

    Actual results data here and methodology here for those interested: http://www.mtonic.com/applemaps/
    (It's not perfect but gives you an idea of how bad it really is in Ontario Canada anyways)

    1. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are missing something. They used Tom Tom data and weren't bright enough to figure out it was crap.

    2. Re:Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At least 688 out of the 2000 towns are searched for on not even on the map ... you get the same CLGeocoder Error Code 8 whether you manually search for it through Apple Maps (watch the iPhones consol because it logs those errors) or whether you do it using your own code in an App.

      I agree they do not have good source data, however it's not hard to find good source data either. These missing towns for example are on every map I have ever seen.

    3. Re:Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree the actual map data they have is really lacking.

      However it's not hard to find good source data either. Almost 30% of my searches resulted int he location simply being "not found". These missing towns for example are on every map I have ever seen. It shouldn't be up to iPhone users to add towns onto a map - that is base location data that should be there from the start. Users can refine pin locations and add points of interests. But towns and cities should all be there as they have existed in real life since the 1800's or earlier.

      You would think Apple would have audited the map data from their suppliers and realized that the maps themselves are sub-par.

    4. Re:Really bad in Canada by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now run a comparison to Google's maps so we can see side by side.

    5. Re:Really bad in Canada by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      In my experience, car nav systems ARE badly flawed at the level of the errors Apple is being criticised for. But TomTom gets compared to Garmin, not to Google. Google has had the benefit of years of massive usage and millions of people contributing corrections. Apple will catch up, but not without getting that user participation.

      Google still makes mistakes too. The other day I was trying to find an address and Apple maps sent me eight blocks in the wrong direction, apparently because it didn't know about addresses that have an "east" or "west" in them. Google sent me several blocks in the wrong direction the OTHER way, for no apparent reason.

  4. I miss Steve Jobs by hawks5999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He would have just told us all that we are using the maps wrong, and we'd all apologize to him.

    1. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      He would have just told us all that we are using the maps wrong, and we'd all apologize to him.

      If you were heading toward anywhere cool enough to be worth going, Apple Maps would have gotten you there. If you want to navigate to places that are the geographical equivalent of the crappy ERP software that keeps you using XP at work, well, you'll just have to use something else...

    2. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by yotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You live in a really obscure town, I've probably never heard of it."
                                                    --Apple

    3. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You may actually be on to something.

      Think about how excited all the hipsters will be when they discover the new Maps application has either never heard of, or cannot find, their favorite stores/bars/locations!

      "I'm heading out to this new oxygen bar. You've probably never heard of it. Even my iPhone hasn't."

  5. Wait, What? by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought the whole No Google Maps on iOS was a plan, didn't they use their app for 5 minutes, and realize the HUGE outcry when they removed it? Further, due to the massive amounts of money (which apple has in spades) and time (which apple doesn't have at this point) what can they hope to do to fix it? And why didn't they pull the plug before it got to release state? Somebody really dropped the ball, or lied out of their ass during the status meetings. I'm wondering when the firings will start.

    1. Re:Wait, What? by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, the plan was never "no google maps on iOS" the plan was "we need turn-by-turn navigation in iOS and our existing deal with Google does not enable that and we can't agree on licensing terms so we will have to roll our own".

      There's no conspiracy to exorcise Google from iOS - they still have several apps on iOS, it's just that the native maps app is no longer one of them (an app written by Apple in the first place).

      You've always been able to use google maps from Safari (or make an icon for it so you can launch it like an app), and many people did it this way because it had more features then the built in app which hadn't been updated in a long time. The same thing was true of Youtube - the version provided by Google on the web was better than the built in one (which Apple wrote back in 2007 and didn't see the need to update for this reason).

  6. Somewhere, Google is Smiling by kstatefan40 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Steve Jobs must be turning in his grave. It sounds like Mr. Cook failed to learn from Mr. Job's demand for perfection before release. I guess this could be like iPhone v1 not having the copy and paste feature at product launch. Eventually, I wonder if people will get sick of dealing with this kind of attitude from Apple? I did - a long time ago.

    1. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by dopaz · · Score: 2

      A solution to both the iOS 6 map problem and iPhone V1 copy/paste problem is to simple: skip the first revision of a significant iteration. An iPhone 4S with iOS 5 has great maps. Early adopters have been treated as beta testers for years, and not just by Apple.

    2. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " An iPhone 4S with iOS 5 has great maps"
      No it doesn't... It doesn't even do basic turn-by-turn routing. Something standalone GPS units and Google Maps have had for years.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by alen · · Score: 2

      and that's useless while driving

      i'm not stupid enough to look at my phone every 2 seconds to make sure i didn't miss a turn. between apple maps, waze and navigon i have no need of google maps and have a lot more features than with android

    4. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by dopaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Maps app does indeed do basic turn-by-turn routing. What it doesn't do is text-to-voice, to announce the upcoming turns. Until Google released "Google Maps Navigation", Maps on Android didn't announce turns either.

    5. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      turn-by-turn routing... Something standalone GPS units and Google Maps have had for years.

      Which is exactly why Apple chose to invest in their own map data and software: they could not come to an acceptable agreement with their direct competitor to allow them to offer this feature. Apple made the right decision. When they catch up in a year they will be in a better place and consumers will have more choice. Win, win.

  7. Where's Steve? by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Steve Jobs never would have apologized. While he was certainly one to recognize errors and correct them expeditiously, he'd never own up to it in public. His sometimes boisterous show of unwillingness to compromise is partly what has created Apple's entire image as a "no compromise" company.

    Tim Cook is certainly a different guy, with a different approach. I feel he has somehow cheapened the iGadgets with this move - first by releasing a product that never should have made it through validation, and second by apologizing for it in public.

    1. Re:Where's Steve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really? That's funny, because when Cook started, AAPL was trading at ~$400; now it's trading at ~$700. If you think a 75% stock value increase in 12 months qualifies as a "major fuck up", then I'd like to know what stocks you're investing in.

    2. Re:Where's Steve? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      when Cook started, AAPL was trading at ~$400; now it's trading at ~$700.

      It shows that Tim Cook is good at milking the cow, but the cow is getting old.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  8. I knew it by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha I knew Apple would blame then end user for everything and spin it as just another fea... wait what?

    This is actually quite a dramatic about face from the usual way Apple deals with problems. Where's the blame, then the spin, and instead of an apology I was expecting Tim Cook holding up a competitor's product going "see it has problems too!"

    I'm impressed.

    1. Re:I knew it by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      I suspect the different approach is because Apple has finally figured out that this is a very different problem from any they've faced in the past. They can't put coders or engineers on overtime and issue a patch or change the design and offer to exchange bad phones within a few days or a few weeks.

      This is a problem that's going to persist for months, possibly years - as they scramble to build what amounts to an entirely new division producing an new product line (one that existing companies have already built high expectations for) in an entirely new market. Yes, I know they're hiring folks as fast as they can get them through the line... but it still takes time to build the organization and the processes and to integrate the vast amounts of data involved. Essentially they have to re-invent the wheel (both in maps and Google's core competency in data handling) and catch up with the years of experience Google has.

      Worse yet for Apple, not only do competing phones (I.E. Android) have this feature nailed flat - Google has tacitly announced they're in no hurry to return to the iPhone.

  9. in Yoda's words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    not ready the apprentice is
    more than just fancy presentations he must learn
    much too soon master has left

  10. Maps sure, but what about the OS? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want an apology for the fact that they've decided my 2.5 year old iPad isn't getting an iOS upgrade.

    That's way too short of a life to decide to abandon it. Telling your early adopters "tough luck" isn't a great idea.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by partyguerrilla · · Score: 2

      Hahahah, he bought an iPad. Look at him, look at him and laugh!

    2. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by hsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful
  11. they are not too bad in NYC by alen · · Score: 2

    i've used them here. the parsing is screwy. you have to input the address exactly or it will screw it up. but it wasn't too much trouble to do it for a few contacts.

    otherwise the routing works very nicely. previous maps app didn't have turn by turn and this is a pretty big improvement. especially the real time traffic from waze that's built in

    1. Re:they are not too bad in NYC by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I am actually well pleased, so far. Routing is good, the roads between my place and my parents' house are a bit goofy, and unlike my other nav software (Navigon) it gave the two most sensible routes. It also has traffic info even on crappy little roads here in the Netherlands, marked more clearly than it was on Google's map app. The parsing is not as good as Google's, but I found that typing in part of the street name resulted in a list of suggestions sorted on proximity, which allows me to quickly fill in the complete address. I haven't found any errors in the maps thus far.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  12. It really is the House of Steve by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1/ When Apple fired him (for being an egomaniac), the company went in the toilet.

    2. When Apple rehired him, it became a trillion dollar juggernaut.

    3. When he died, it began it's slide into mediocrity (as the map app debacle illustrates).

    It really makes you wonder what one man's outsized ego can do to the performance of a company and/ or a product line.

    Perhaps Steve would have prevailed a month or two ago and said "our map app sucks, not ready for prime time." But now there is no such ego of equivalent standing in Apple.

    And the mediocrity of consensus, rather than the exacting standards of the dictator with the right aesthetic, means Apple is doomed?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:It really is the House of Steve by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      plenty of crap released under steve jobs

    2. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're a football fan, I'd compare Steve Jobs & Apple to Peyton Manning & the Indianapolis Colts.

      The Colts were built around Manning, and when the team was all there, it worked perfectly. However, with Manning gone, they couldn't play the way they were designed to. Both the offense & defense were picked to complement Manning, and with any other quarterback, they are a poor team.

      I'd say the same with Apple. I think Cook can be a great change for Apple, but the team that has been built has been built for another quarterback. Either Cook needs to act like Jobs (which I think is a bad idea) or Cook needs to change the mindset and likely many of the staff at Apple.

      Either they keep going the same way or make a drastic shift, they can't work on a middle ground.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      The magic was he was usually right, AND he had the balls to tell the c levels suits, and the board of directors, to go shove it their ass if necessary. Cook is a supply chain guy, MBA, a cost cutter. No balls.

    4. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but when it was Steve's crap it was a stunning shade of UPS brown, shined like the top of the Chrysler building, and the smell was described as "earthy and inviting, like a forest floor on a spring morning" by all the bloggers.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. Failure in reporting by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good job driving ad traffic to BGR, who didn't even bother to link to the original source:

    http://www.apple.com/letter-from-tim-cook-on-maps/

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  14. Remove GMaps, Suggest GMaps Website? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 2, Funny

    Suggesting the Google Maps website is really thick. If Apple really wanted to fix the situation ASAP, why don't they re-release the Google Maps app?

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Remove GMaps, Suggest GMaps Website? by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe because it doesn't run on iOS6 and is many years old and has less function than using Google maps in the browser?

      Just a (well known, well reported) thought.

  15. iApologize by WilyCoder · · Score: 2

    Never thought I would see the day where Apple would introduce the iApologize...

  16. Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by Picass0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple screwed up (although they are haldly unique) is pushing the concept that an Operating system is a bunch of personal and productivity applications. Road Navigation software is not part of the operating system.

    The OS is the core environment, utility, houskeeping software, and desktop. Marketing idiots have confused the common consumer into thinking an OS also has programs for adding glitter to ponies.

    As seen here, when an app breaks the perception becomes the who OS is flawed.

    1. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one outside the IT industry cares about the boundary between OS and applications. That's purely inside baseball. End users want their product to work in a user-friendly, integrated fashion.

  17. Re:Admitted Failure by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just because it doesn't have a building exactly there doesn't mean it isn't valid to search for it. There is a 300 block on E 15th street, and searching for 315 on any mapping app other than iOS 6 maps will at least take you to a location interpolated between the two nearest real buildings on the odd side of the street.

    In this case, looking at the maps, it's a public park. It's perfectly valid to reference the park as "3xx E 15th street" where xx is odd. If you search for this, you should get some point along the street on the edge of the park.

    Also, someone could be searching for a valid address and typo the number. Easy to do - Any SANE mapping app will degrade gracefully in this case and take you to a location that's within visual range of your actual desired destination. Only iOS 6 maps won't.

    iOS 6 maps is the only one that will take you to A COMPLETELY WRONG ROAD.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  18. A correction by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Informative

    The idea that Steve Jobs never apologized for anything seems to be starting to become a common Slashdot misconception.

    I'm sure people can think of times when they wish he did apologize for something, but to say he never did would be inaccurate.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  19. The reality disortion filed by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    To paraphrase the AC.

    I don't think Steve would have allowed such as shitty product to completely be release.

    Well you nailed it. Like Paul Mason, jobs would release no wine before its time. Moreover, someone would get fired. Like it or not his process worked. It could be that this is just going to be the learning experience they need to get back their Wu.

    But in a way we are lucky. In the case of these maps, the Jobs reality distortion filed probably would have convinced us that the maps were right and the earth was wrong. If it was strong he might have just distorted the reality to match.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. So then let people go back to 5.X by RossR · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think what we (the consumers and people concerned with lock-in) should be pushing for is the ability to go back to older versions of iOS on devices that we own. If every story about this failure mentioned that people who try the new version are locked in without the ability to go back to a working version, maybe Apple would cave.

  21. Clever apologies by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first apology is for selling too much too quickly.
    The second apology is for lowering the price of the their product.

    This is like when in an interview, the interviewer asks "What are your weakness", you say "Sometimes I work too hard".

  22. Apple is not as far behind as you think. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've seen some humorous issues (though some of the things being stated as issues are actually made up).

    But for every day things, most searches work right now. And Apple is shipping 3D maps on mobile while Google is not.

    Lastly, already Apple finds some things Google does not. It's like everyone is blind to the fact that Google has plenty of errors still. Apple with Yelp integration, is going to find most things today that people actually want found when doing a general search on a map. The high-level issues people are seeing should be cleared out in short order, probably more a matter of months than years.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      True. Google STILL does not map out my old place. Every time I try, it puts the pin in the completely wrong spot. This, despite numerous attempts at "offer corrections".

      Hell, I think there's even Street View for it (there are certainly roads there on the map), but they're all unnamed and thus, unsearchable.

      NavTeq among others have properly routed to that address since the 2010 update. The satellite images and street view are dated, which is fine, but not having the street named (it was a new street ... back in 2008) or mappable for that long is inexcuasble.

      Of course, where I am now, both Google and Apple probably won't find it since it's a brand new street dating to last year.

      And heck, when Google switched map sources from Tele-Atlas to Google back around 2010, there was a lot of amusement going on as street names and entire towns were misspelled. It got so bad the only solution often was to use Bing or Mapquest.

      Of course, I do wonder how bad it was last week when iOS6 was released. Perhaps many of the issues got fixed in-between (such is common since the maps are "in the cloud").

    2. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by TrancePhreak · · Score: 3, Informative

      They have had this for a while, it's not the same, but it's better than you make it sound. http://www.google.com/mobile/maps/3d/

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    3. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by jmerlin · · Score: 2

      I just took this picture on my Android device: http://i.imgur.com/42oQd.png

      The reality distortion field is strong with this one! Also, not having textures just means I'm saving that much bandwidth. :)

  23. Valid search, but works on Apple by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just because it doesn't have a building exactly there doesn't mean it isn't valid to search for it.

    In which case Apple still finds it.

    The Motorola ad was complete fabrication. But outright lies are OK as long as it's funny!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Re:Admitted Failure by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple does show you a location which can be accurately described 315 E 15th- elsewhere in the city, on a different 15th Street. This location most closely matches the search term in that there is actually a building numbered 315 there, it just isn't in Manhattan.

    If you force it to look only in Manhattan by searching for "315 E 15th St Manhattan", it does interpolate the building numbers as you describe and returns a location in the park.

    http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/09/27/googles-ilost-motorola-ad-faked-an-address-to-lose-ios-6-maps

  25. It's a trap. by biodata · · Score: 2

    What makes you think they don't do this? In the UK, the main A-Z map makers have always done this - left out one or two small streets here or there to track imaginary property theft. Trap streets are a known thing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street

    --
    Korma: Good
  26. You know how long it took Google and Nokia? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple users are saying, "we'll get that fixed next time."

    Apple iPhone users have no idea what they're talking about.

    Fixing a buggy application can be done in a point release of software. The app is irrelevant, everybody, their dog and their dog's fleas have map reading software. What they don't have is good data. Why? It's expensive.

    Fixing terabytes to petabytes of poor data is an entirely different matter from upgrading a map reading application. There are really only 2 companies with good data. Google and Nokia. Both have been buying, assembling, collecting POI data and updating and fixing base map data for years.

    To fix this Apple are probably going to have to spend a fortune on large amounts of data, infrastructure to handle it, thousands of people to manage and check it. Both, expensive and slow. Then there's the weird melting 3D world that's going to have to change entirely. They'll have to decide if it's worth doing it properly or if they still think they can do it on the cheap.

    Looking at what they have right now, it absolutely will not be "fixed next time".

    --
    Deleted
  27. With no textures... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I just took this picture on my Android device: http://i.imgur.com/42oQd.png

    That's nice, but while I was not fully clear I was talking about this:

    http://i.imgur.com/iqTlW.jpg

    iOS does the outlines also in normal map mode, but I like being able to see the buildings from overhead at various angles.

    It is true I should not say Google has no 3D support though, just no 3D imagery in mobile maps (they have some kind of beta desktop version).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. Re:Not the same thing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Android has those too, via Google Earth, and they are launching for maps soon.

    The bottom line is that at best they existed long before Apple came along, and at worst they beat Google to it by a few months at the expense of releasing a half baked product.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  29. Re:Skewed methodology by jest3r · · Score: 2

    Apple doesn't suck. All my gear is Apple and that's the reason why this is disappointing.

    I did think of trying to cross reference population with the results because I am sure you are correct - it's the smaller towns in rural areas that have gotten the short end of the stick here. I also thought of using the Google Maps API to compare results but alas .. I've got better things to do really :-)

    I think we can both agree they went backwards on this update. I'm from a small town so when it's no longer on the Map App (even though it was on the map App before) it's disappointing. You lock into a 3-year contract with the new phone and never expect that an App you use every day would suddenly become unusable.

    - Port Perry Ontario pins you on an island about 5KM outside of town.
    - Bracebridge Ontario pins you in a forest about 10KM outside of town when you zoom in.
    - By my estimation 60% of towns in Ontario got relocated or completely wiped out.