Slashdot Mirror


DIY Laser Cutter Raises Capital, Concerns

An anonymous reader sends this quote from Wired: "Affordable 3-D printers and CNC mills are popping up everywhere, opening up new worlds of production to wide ranges of designers. However, one major tool still hasn’t received a DIY overhaul: the laser cutter. Maybe people are sensitive because Goldfinger tried to cut James Bond in half with one, but all that changes now with Patrick Hood-Daniel’s new Kickstarter, 'Build Your Own Laser Cutter.' ... A 40-watt laser tube and power supply means it can cut a variety of materials: wood, plastic, fabric, and paper. ... There is one major red flag, however. The machine’s frame is built from of Medium Density Overlay (MDO) — a type of plywood. Hood-Daniels says this is a feature, making the blackTooth less sensitive to thermal distortion and inaccuracy than a metal frame, but it also creates a serious, fire-breathing concern. ... When asked for comment, Hood-Daniel says 'Initially, I had the same thoughts as to the precarious use of wood for the structure, but even with long burns to the structure which were made on accident when starting a run, there was no ignition.'"

133 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. So... by RobinH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So that means there's not really any story then?

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:So... by Java+Pimp · · Score: 5, Funny

      The "Concern" in the title is that it is made of wood... and therefore may be a witch.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    2. Re:So... by Spottywot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "Concern" in the title is that it is made of wood... and therefore may be a witch.

      Only if it weighs the same as a duck.

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
    3. Re:So... by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      More than just "there's no story", there's not going to be a product. Hardly anyone is interested in funding a kickstarter with 25 bucks for essentially nothing in return but your name on a vanity list. Next step up from there is 1500 bucks. So if I'm interested in supporting the project with anything between 50 and 1400 bucks, they're basically telling me to go take a hike. Instant fail.

      Yep, instant fail....on your part

      Enter your pledge amount
      It's up to you.
      Any amount of $1 or more.

      So once again, please remind me which number "between 50 and 1400 bucks" is not "$1 or more". Now, it's true the don't have any reward levels between there, but I'm not sure what you want. $1500 is how much it costs to have the parts. Anything less, and all they can offer you to give you crediit for your pledge (which they do...$200 gets you the same reward as $25), or else they can offer you some useless symbolic stuff (like a t-shirt or coffee mug) that really has little to do with the project. So I guess the big fail on their part is not giving away some useless Cafe Press stuff or something. If you really want that, then instead of donating $200, donate $175 and go buy yourself a shirt.

    4. Re:So... by mrmeval · · Score: 2

      The MSDS on a cursory search says some have a flammability that is damn near nill. You have to have open flame and 400F for some products. This does vary by manufacturer so choose one that is better than Lowe's low end stuff.

      Several proclaim they can be laser cut as they use inflammable adhesives McCathay is one but I'm sure there are others. So pick ones that can be laser cut and has a favorable MSDS and you should be ok.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    5. Re:So... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I have a laser engraver and I've tried to cut what I think is run of the mill MDO. It really doesn't go very well, but it didn't seem dangerous either. I think you probably need to pump pure oxygen to get a flame.

      I don't know about the temperature stability issue, I don't expect to use a laser engraver in extreme temperatures.

    6. Re:So... by White+Shade · · Score: 2

      I understand where he's coming from though. I don't mind donating $25 cuz it's cool, but if I ever have enough cash to throw $100 or $200 or $500 or $950 towards the project, it would be cool to get a t-shirt or a pen or even just some random piece of scrap wood or plastic with laser burn marks all over it.

      It's the principle of the thing... even if the reward is physically worthless, it's still nice to have something to show for it. A conversation piece.

      --
      ìì!
    7. Re:So... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You can only tell for sure by throwing it in a lake. If it floats, BURN IT!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    8. Re:So... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      There is specialty MDO, you would find it in consumer electronics an age ago. I've had that crap put OUT a huge bonfire started with diesel fuel. It was the cabinet for a 70s era zenith TV. It burned blue and then green and then a white noxious fog came out and killed the fire.

      I was impressed. Phillips Magnavox brand avoided serious lawsuits due to a misdesign that caused a vaporized metal plasma torch that would burn a hole through such material but did not catch the house on fire. It did damage the carpet.

      In both cases it was a mix of veneer, laminate and particle board.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    9. Re:So... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I am currently fireproofing items with a Borax wash that I shoot with an ordinary compressor and paint gun.
      I think if I were concerned at all, a coat of some acrylic enamel followed by applying straight "Boraxo" to the sticky coat by hand in powder form.
      Then you would have a nice fireproofing. I suppose some baking soda would be nice mixed in, as well.
      Warning: don't add borax to latex paints as you will get a blob of polymerized crap, rather than workable paint.
      Cardboard does fine with Borax and water, then let dry.
      Wood and water, not so awful good, I'd put it on a sticky coat and groove with a matte finish.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:So... by sidesh0w · · Score: 1

      The title is also a great example of Syllepsis

    11. Re:So... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Cool. I was going to post that the stuff wouldn't burn when I tossed it in our fire pit, but your account beats that to hell and gone.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    12. Re:So... by epSos-de · · Score: 1

      Guys, you are all Germans ? The coconut riders was on TV in Germany last weekend !

    13. Re:So... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You'd have hair pricking up on some of the designs out there. Phillips seems to be one of the worst at catastrophic meltdowns yet their designs were capable of withstanding it. The only one I saw that was better was Admiral when it was designed by rocket engineers till sometime in the 70s when it as a company went bloof. I actually worked at a place that had 1970s era parts to repair them. They were the first of any who had a switching power supply...in the 1970s. Theirs had a tendency to cause a catastrophic failure of the high voltage tripler at around the 20 year mark. They used wood over a 1/2" water and flame proof laminate that contained the detonation that could and did damage the metal frame structure of that eras construction. ;)

      Bad designs? Zenith slapping their brand name on Goldstar guts and Goldstar using paper laminate PCBs instead of FR4 or equal. Fun times. The paper tended to degrade in the epoxy and I'd find the board shattered from the vibrations of normal use or the weight of the parts, never could tell.

      It's no longer a viable career but it has it's stories. I worked in it from 1985 to 1997.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  2. This is bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will destroy Rock, Scissors and Paper.

    Nothing beats Laser Cutter. The game is ruined.

    1. Re:This is bad news by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Funny

      This will destroy Rock, Scissors and Paper.

      Nothing beats Laser Cutter. The game is ruined.

      Rods from God beats 40 watt laser cutter.

    2. Re:This is bad news by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don’t know. In every game of laser chess I played mirror beats laser. Now we just need to figure in lizards and Spocks.

    3. Re:This is bad news by mr1911 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "all the girls" = AC's nickname for his left hand

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    4. Re:This is bad news by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      I don't know what version you're playing. But 2.0 only has Anubis as having a special rule.

      http://www.khet.com/

    5. Re:This is bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This will destroy Rock, Scissors and Paper. Nothing beats Laser Cutter. The game is ruined.

      RPS is doing just fine with laser and 100 other weapons.

    6. Re:This is bad news by SuperMooCow · · Score: 2

      Don't say that out loud! You want to get him into trouble or what?

      His left hand is his girlfriend but his right hand is his wife!

    7. Re:This is bad news by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      only Pam and her five lovely daughters...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    8. Re:This is bad news by Meski · · Score: 1

      Mirror.

  3. Just cover it in Durashine! by eddy · · Score: 2
    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  4. Somewhat dangerous? by captaindomon · · Score: 2

    Maybe they haven't received as much attention because it's difficult to permanently blind yourself with a 3D printer?

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The power supply for a 40 watt gas laser will give you a bit of a tickle, as well, if you fuck up... Fire is the least of your problems here.

    2. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suspect the idea here is for this to be the enthusiast's enthusiast toy. One of the single largest cost factors in building a 3d printer is the cost of the laser cut gears, I suspect this is a plan to cut that cost considerably. If you've got one guy out of 20 who can cut new gears for all his friends, suddenly the cost of making and maintaining a 3d printer plummets, and interest sky rockets. I sincerely hope they don't plan on having a DIY 40 watt laser enclosure in every house, I suspect this is more of a bootstrap effort.

    3. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I sincerely hope they don't plan on having a DIY 40 watt laser enclosure in every house

      Next thing you know lunatics will be demanding kilowatt level radio frequency magnetrons in every kitchen.

      And powering lawn trimming machines using refined ultra low flashpoint hydrocarbons

      Oh the humanity think of the children

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      I did specify DIY. I wouldn't feel terribly comfortable standing in front of a microwave that one of my friends banged up in his garage either.

    5. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Really? You wouldn't feel comfortable standing in front of one of the simplest to design devices? A microwave is nothing more than a magnatron emitting into the a metal box. Providing gaps in the metal are as small as the holes you see in the microwave door you'll be perfectly fine.

      Even if it isn't properly sealed you'll get localised heating. You'll know quite quickly that something is wrong and have plenty of time to turn it off. The only way you're really going to injure yourself is by staring into the magnatron antenna when it is turned it on.

    6. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      One of the single largest cost factors in building a 3d printer is the cost of the laser cut gears, I suspect this is a plan to cut that cost considerably

      Lasers are great for cutting all manner of parts, but gears are not one of them. For geartrains to properly mesh, transmit load efficiently, and not chew themselves to pieces after a few thousand revolutions, the gears need to be properly made. That means hobbing, broaching, and injection molding. A laser cutter can't produce a smooth involute profile - the best it can do is interpolate it.

    7. Re:Somewhat dangerous? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was my thought, though if you're going the route of cheap-as-in-cost parts, you can spend a lot of time hand-fitting laser-cut gears.

      Not something I'd want to do, but I'm sure there's at least one person in 7 billion with a surplus of time and very little money who would be willing to...

  5. Obvious Solution by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dope and paint the wood with flame retardant if it's such a concern.

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:Obvious Solution by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dont even do that. Paint it white.

      we stopped a 100 watt laser from damaging the cutting sled by painting it gloss white. if you reflect 98% of the energy it's no longer strong enough to cut or burn. Granted you cant be a moron and work around these things without safety goggles, but keeping it from burning is really easy.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Obvious Solution by Rakishi · · Score: 2

      The bigger issues with this may be that it causes the laser to bounce back into the lens which asfaik can cause damage to the lens. A decent tabletop laser cutter should be opaque to the laser itself so even a reflection shouldn't requires safety glasses.

    3. Re:Obvious Solution by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      There was no worry about it bouncing back into the laser with white paint, we used common light scattering paint instead of perfectly reflective front surface paint.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Obvious Solution by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      But... but... the song tells me to paint it black...

    5. Re:Obvious Solution by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Dont even do that. Paint it white.

      White paint would have no effect unless of course it was "titanium white" in which the titanium would be a relfector. The rest of it would simply vaporize away. This isn't a little laser pointer we're talking about... it's a 40 watt CO2 laser... that has a wavelength of 10600 nm. That's a far longer wavelength than the ~800 you can see in the near infrared and will be absorbed in quite a few materials you think are good optical reflectors. Using a rough metal shield would be the best thing to have. (Smooth metal shields tend to be infrared mirrors... which wouldn't exactly help the issue.)

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    6. Re:Obvious Solution by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      The bigger issues with this may be that it causes the laser to bounce back into the lens which asfaik can cause damage to the lens.

      Why would a bouncing infrared laser hurt the lens that the laser beam just passed through??? The other end of the laser tube is another IR mirror. There is no ill effect of having the beam bounce back directly down the path.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    7. Re:Obvious Solution by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Is there any particular reason not to shine it in to a flowing container of water? Enough water moving would keep too much of it from converting to steam, and it would keep the bench cool for quite a while, and is easily to cycle out with more cool water.

      Most of the big metal laser cutters I've seen on TV are in a bed of water already.

    8. Re:Obvious Solution by MastarPete · · Score: 1

      The bigger issues with this may be that it causes the laser to bounce back into the lens which asfaik can cause damage to the lens.

      Why would a bouncing infrared laser hurt the lens that the laser beam just passed through??? The other end of the laser tube is another IR mirror. There is no ill effect of having the beam bounce back directly down the path. Bill

      IANALE (not a laser engineer) but maybe the concern is with the beam widening, given enough distance, thereby heating up the parts surrounding the lens that would then transfer heat to the lens itself potentially causing it to warp.

    9. Re:Obvious Solution by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      And a 40W laser is a toy compared to the 100W laser I was talking about. and no it was automotive cheap glossy white. easy to spray.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Obvious Solution by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Because water is reflective (I believe for CO2 lasers as well). And you really really don't want a 40-watt laser reflecting back into your eyes, skin, or anywhere you don't want it, really, even for a very brief time (sure, safety goggles are absolutely mandatory, but even so, you could still cause damage to yourself or things around you).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    11. Re:Obvious Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So that's why stormtrooper armor is glossy white!

  6. What's the point? by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

    If I can't cut nosy Brits in half?

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  7. Cover the wood with aluminum foil. by quax · · Score: 2

    That should do the trick.

    1. Re:Cover the wood with aluminum foil. by quax · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a word of caution I should add that if you do this please always wear protective goggles. (Not that you shouldn't always do this when around a powerful laser anyhow).

    2. Re:Cover the wood with aluminum foil. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      To open the windows?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  8. When did this happen? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When did the notion start to circulate that anything remotely related to wood is some kind of incendiary deathtrap? Is it when people stopped having to start fires with nothing more than minimal tools and careful arrangement of sticks?

    Christ, you've got something designed to cut through plastics with a laser, plastics which are basically just waiting for some added heat to turn into sticky, flaming, hydrocarbon death, and nobody says a thing. Suddenly, terrifying wood,. notorious for perfunctory smoldering in response to heat, bursts onto the scene and everybody is freaking out about ignition. Kids these days.

    Somehow, people have been practicing pyrography for millenia without bursting into flames.

    1. Re:When did this happen? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Christ, you've got something designed to cut through plastics with a laser, plastics which are basically just waiting for some added heat to turn into sticky, flaming, hydrocarbon death, and nobody says a thing. Suddenly, terrifying wood,. notorious for perfunctory smoldering in response to heat, bursts onto the scene and everybody is freaking out about ignition. Kids these days.

      Did you miss the part where you pressurize the wooden working area with nitrogen from a wooden pressure tank before you start cutting?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:When did this happen? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      When did the notion start to circulate that anything remotely related to wood is some kind of incendiary deathtrap? Is it when people stopped having to start fires with nothing more than minimal tools and careful arrangement of sticks?

      Christ, you've got something designed to cut through plastics with a laser, plastics which are basically just waiting for some added heat to turn into sticky, flaming, hydrocarbon death, and nobody says a thing. Suddenly, terrifying wood,. notorious for perfunctory smoldering in response to heat, bursts onto the scene and everybody is freaking out about ignition. Kids these days.

      Somehow, people have been practicing pyrography for millenia without bursting into flames.

      Or no one can make a Makerbot Replicator. After all, its case is made of laser-cut wood (eek!), complete with the signature burnt edging. But then again, if the wood didn't burn up during the piece cutting stage, it could burn up while you're printing, after all, it's wood, there's a heated build platform, and a hot nozzle...

      Oh yeah, laser-cut wood. If only we could figure out how to do that without igniting the wood.

    3. Re:When did this happen? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Over 3500 people die each year from fires. And yet, in thousands of stores across the country, you can buy tools useful for starting fires. Some bars even give them away for free! And Congress does nothing about it.

      Now, some of you will claim that most municipalities have teams of people who are specially trained to ensure that fires don't get out of control, but if we really want to be safe, we need to ban all use of fire in homes. Also, because electrical problems can cause fires too, we should ban all use of home wiring immediately. Anything else is an obvious deriliction of duty.

      This message brought to you by the National Raw Food Association and Sweater Manufacturers of America.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:When did this happen? by cusco · · Score: 1

      The problem is the "municipalities have teams of people who are specially trained to ensure that fires don't get out of control". Since every true Libertarian knows that any government solution is much worse than not having a solution at all we must get rid of these teams before they burn the whole country down!

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:When did this happen? by Meski · · Score: 1

      *Wooden* pressure tank?

  9. ...really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe people are sensitive because Goldfinger tried to cut James Bond in half with one

    Oh no, a fictional character used a real item to attempt to cause harm, everyone be afraid of said item!

    1. Re:...really? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Top hats.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:...really? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It was a bowler.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  10. 40W Laser by Art+Challenor · · Score: 2

    Wait, so we have a DIY device with a 40W laser and people are worried that the plywood might be a fire hazard?

    1. Re:40W Laser by Romwell · · Score: 1

      What should they be worried about? A crazy hobbyist running around with a dangerous laser in his garage? A chainsaw is more dangerous in terms of power, speed and portability, and good old gasoline canister is a greater fire hazard.

    2. Re:40W Laser by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Looks like with a 40W Laser you can basically blind everyone in sight. Much more dangerous than a chainsaw.

    3. Re:40W Laser by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Looks like with a 40W Laser you can basically blind everyone in sight

      yeah, well, only once.

      so, over time, the risk is nil!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:40W Laser by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      To be fair, in the hands of someone who is irresponsible a 40W laser is far more likely to cause injury than a chainsaw. Obviously (or, it should be obvious; I've run saws for years so my bar for "obvious" could be different) the type of damage with the chainsaw has far higher variability, and is likely to only occur to the operator, while the laser has few injury types which can be inflicted upon anyone within line of sight.

      I agree though, for a hobbyist (who typically take care to understand the implications of what they're doing), neither is dangerous to the point where there should be a discussion about limiting their availability.

  11. Re:various materials by Pentium100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It depends. A laser that can cut metal is obviously dangerous and you should not place any part of your body that you want to remain attached in the path of the beam. So, a very high power laser is like a disc saw - everyone can see that it's dangerous (it can cut a piece of wood or metal, obviously it can cut off a finger).

    The lower power lasers are different. They do not burn, do not cut and are powered by a couple of batteries, like a flash light. To understand that it is still dangerous, you need to understand that the beam is highly concentrated and can still burn the retina, even tough it does not burn a piece of paper and you do not feel it if you place your hand in the path of the beam.

    Similar stuff with guns. Most people understand that a real gun is really dangerous and you can kill someone with it (they may not understand all the safety precautions, but will tell you that you should not load the gun, aim it at somebody and pull the trigger if you do not want to kill that somebody). On the other hand, BB guns are not seen as that dangerous, kids shoot each other all the time with them and if nobody manages to hit an eye, it will be OK.

  12. Lasers are now scary? by Romwell · · Score: 2

    I thought lasers stopped being scary after everyone played with a laser pointer. Or a CD/DVD drive. Or a laser mouse. Or a laser barcode scanner in a store. Or after the Star Wars style laser weapons didn't exactly materialize after all the years of research and investment. As for CNC machines, waterjet systems are more powerful (try cutting stone with a laser), and turret/punch systems are, IMO, more dangerous (things are actually slamming around). I always thought that you'd use laser when you need the extra precision that laser CNC gives you, not the "dangerous" power. As for the fire hazard - try setting a block of wood on fire with a magnifying glass. In general, you would use a laser CNC to cut wood, not to set it on fire (and it cuts nicely indeed). It seems like all the issues the summary talks about are not the real reason why DIY laser cutters aren't abundant. The real reason - talked about in the article - is that commercial cutters are already available for less money than even this kickstarter is asking for (you get a smaller, but metal-framed and fully assembled device).

    1. Re:Lasers are now scary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, the work area of the commercial cutter is MUCH smaller at 9.5" x 14.5" vs 20.5" x 24.5" of the kickstarter unit. The kickstarter unit is also $1,500 vs $1,850 for the commercial unit (the $1900 version contains a computer, which the commercial unit does not have). The DIY version is also much easier to self-service if needed, lighter and much more compact that any other unit with similar engraving area. Cons: wood construction, unproven warranty, after-purchase support. As for myself, I'm keeping an eye on this project and will probably buy in if it looks favorable in the next week or so.

      As to the wood's potential flammability: 1) never run this item unattended, 2) paint the wood with some flame retardant, 3) smoke alarms and fire extinguishers near this device. Simple prudence.

    2. Re:Lasers are now scary? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      The wood base may or may not be a con as stated elsewhere from thermal expansion issues. The would base should also be pretty easily replaceable too. There are products like timbersilwood.com that infuse wood with a glass matrix making them pretty flame retardant too, much less likely to be toxic then the chemicals in flame retardants and paint.

    3. Re:Lasers are now scary? by quax · · Score: 2

      Laser of that class are scary. Even the stronger laser pointers on the market have enough power to irrevocably damage your eyes. All the more because you won't feel any pain.

  13. How much experience does poster have? by dbc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I wonder how much experience the poster has with either MDO or laser cutters. I have a laser cutter, and have used MDO, but have never tried cutting MDO. Go try it. I cut plywood and MDF -- I'm less worried about a fire than the laser cutting through the MDO given enough dwell time. But basically, this artcle seems like a "I'm clueless and scared, so let's post unsubstiated speculation to SlashDot."

    BTW -- there is another open source laser cutter out there: http://labs.nortd.com/lasersaur/ I'll probably replace mine with a Lasersaur when my machine dies (it's acting poorly :(

    1. Re:How much experience does poster have? by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Plus there are TONS of DIY and open source laser cutters. They were around before the RepRap/Makerbot/Fab@Home/etc DIY FDM scene arrived. Hardly something that's in need of a 'DIY overhaul'.

    2. Re:How much experience does poster have? by Inda · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA. Never heard of MDO.

      Gaboon ply was always seen as the "daddy" of composites. It's extremely stable. Why not use that?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:How much experience does poster have? by dbc · · Score: 1

      MDO == Medium Density Overlay. Core is MDF, but there is an outer skin of "some kind of" very thin, smooth, (synthetic?), laminate. It is assembled with exterior grade glues. Major application is outdoor signage. Usually needs to be special-ordered as it isn't commonly stocked at building supply centers. Machines very nicely on a CNC router, and takes finishes very well.

    4. Re:How much experience does poster have? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Maybe the concern was weight, but I have to wonder why they didn't just use MDF rather than MDO.

      You don't have nearly the flammability concerns of the external veneer layers, and it's more stable anyway.

  14. Re:various materials by Rhywden · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, theres the small problem that the reflection of the beam may still be dangerous. That's something most people don't think of when speaking about the dangers of high-powered lasers:
    It's not only the direct beam you want to be wary of, but indirect sources as well. A friend of mine once got 3rd degree burns from the reflection of a high-power UV laser.

  15. Re:various materials by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    So, a very high power laser is like a disc saw

    It's much worse than a disc saw. A disk saw doesn't detach from the table and fly around randomly at the speed of light while bouncing around among reflecting surfaces.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  16. Needs to cut sheet metal by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Something like 0.3mm would be great. Then you can cut motor laminations. This would be much closer to replicating its own part than the other guys.

    1. Re:Needs to cut sheet metal by Animats · · Score: 1

      Laser cutters for sheet metal are widely used industrially, but need more power than this little one. 150W to 6000W CO2 lasers are used for metal.

      Metal cutting is more difficult than cutting wood or plastic. Getting a clean cut is harder. On plastics or wood you can burn your way through slowly, but on metals, you need enough power for fast cutting or you get slag on the edges.

  17. Re:various materials by Rhywden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I forgot, just to be clear: I'm not speaking of reflections in a polished mirror. I'm talking about reflections from an ordinary wall.

  18. You need fire protection by Animats · · Score: 1

    I was just cutting medium density fiberboard on a laser cutter last night. The problem is not the laser beam igniting the cabinet. That's hard to do. The problem is igniting the workpiece, which is easy for many materials, and the cabinet not being able to contain the resulting fire. The cutting process should take place in a nonflammable box with an exhaust to the outside.

    Sheet steel is cheap. Spot welding is cheap. This is not rocket science.

    1. Re:You need fire protection by TWX · · Score: 1

      Given how mundane the actual manufacture and assembly of rockets is, rocket science is quite a bit less advanced actually...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:You need fire protection by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Thermal warping of metal can turn cheap simple things difficult. Burning thru the entire sheet of MDO takes a long time. Just take a torch to any 1/2" sheet of wood product. A solid sheet of MDO on the bottom would keep the fire from falling thru for a long time. The edges separating would be the biggest danger. The choice of plexiglass for the windows would effect the flammability of the unit more. Proper fire detection and a safety zone around any heat/flame/spark generating unit are what determines if your workshop burns down. Exhaust to the outside should be a given on any product that uses high heat to vaporize materials, think of the volatiles you're breathing.

  19. Someone needs a lesson in material science by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    On what planet is wood less susceptible to thermal distortion than ... well any metal, or resin or well most other materials I can come up with that would be suitable?

    How about ambient moisture changes? Wood warps over time, even various plywood types depending on which side gets more airflow/heat/whatever.

    Sigh, I wouldn't worry too much about him burning the place down if he doesn't even grasp the basic materials he's working with I'm not too concerned with him creating a functioning system.

    And as for fire ... you guys do realize that laser CNC machines cut wood all the time without fire ... right? It puts its own fires out as the steam coming out of the wood destroys any hope of an active fire. Have you ever started a fire with a magnifying glass on a 2 by 4? No, no you haven't. You might ignite other more flammable materials and use those to light the 2x4, but the energy isnt' there otherwise.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Someone needs a lesson in material science by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think these people are a bunch of liars, trying to justify the use of an ultra-cheap material (plywood) over aluminum or steel by making up bogus claims about metal distortion.

      There's other low-cost CNC systems out there that also use such materials (usually MDF), but they don't do it because it's a better material, they use MDF because it's dirt cheap and for hobbyists just doing some engraving or woodcarving, it's usually good enough. But don't pretend it's actually better than aluminum because it's not. It doesn't have anywhere near the rigidity an aluminum or steel-frame CNC machine has, and if you're cutting harder materials (like metals), at any kind of speed, than you absolutely need a highly rigid frame.

    2. Re:Someone needs a lesson in material science by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Laser CNC machines cut all the time without fires, until there is a fire. Lots of fabric, paper, plastics and coatings go through a laser cutter.

      Hundreds of workshop fires start per year because people don't keep their workspace clean. If you are using a high power thermal cutter you better make damn sure that you clear out all particulate, scrap, melt, and loose material. Also giving the machine a check every few days to see heat damage buildup and replace what's going wrong is a good way to keep your shop from burning. This goes for any kind of tool that uses fire, electricity, or creates heat friction.

  20. or how about a different material... by TWX · · Score: 2

    ...like asbestos and lead?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  21. New game: rock, laser cutter, mirror ... by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will destroy Rock, Scissors and Paper.

    Nothing beats Laser Cutter. The game is ruined.

    Or replaced by a newer variation: rock, laser cutter, mirror.

    1. Re:New game: rock, laser cutter, mirror ... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2

      This make so much more conceptual sense than rock paper scissors

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  22. Cutting in a burn risk environment by girlintraining · · Score: 2

    Just put the 3D printer and the material in an oxygen-depleted environment. It's not like a canister of Nitrogen is expensive, or even dangerous (the gas, not the risk of explosive decompression if you go full retard). It's pretty easy to build a glass enclosure to seal everything in. That way, you could work with wood that would ordinarily burst into flames and it won't. You'll need to setup a infrared thermometer to rake the workbench after and only unlock once the material has cooled, obviously... and air-cooling something that's several hundred degrees takes a few hours... but I see no problem here.

    It's simple to design safety features for a design like this. As a backup, you could put a water pressure sprayer in the containment area as well, in case the seals break while the material is in a super-heated state.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  23. Re:various materials by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    yours doesn't do that? I must have built my disc saw improperly....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  24. Local hardware store would work fine ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suspect the idea here is for this to be the enthusiast's enthusiast toy.

    Or maybe just put one in the local hardware store. Take your pattern in, they cut up a piece of metal for you.

    In principal its a little like the key duplication machine.

    1. Re:Local hardware store would work fine ... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      In principal its a little like the key duplication machine.

      So, in principal they'll tell me they can't make they device I want because some says they shouldn't, just like they won't copy certain keys of mine. This is why we make a DIY laser cutters, to tell the copy police to go fuck themselves.

    2. Re:Local hardware store would work fine ... by jezwel · · Score: 1

      It's different when you're a part owner of a strata title property (block of units). I need written permission from the body corporate to have certain keys cut, as they open a number of doors in the complex.

    3. Re:Local hardware store would work fine ... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If anyone can walk in and have copies made of a key that's stamped "Do Not Duplicate", it defeats the purpose DND key.

      Is there some legal enforcement of this signage not to duplicate? Back in my college days, I needed keys duplicated for roomates. I noticed the "Do Not Duplicate" stamp, thought "Whatever," and took it down to the corner pharmacy. The guy behind the counter didn't bat an eyelash.

    4. Re:Local hardware store would work fine ... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Really? I've taken keys that were plainly marked "Do Not Duplicate" to Ace Hardware and they've never hesitated to copy them. One store even asked if I wanted the new key stamped "Do Not Duplicate" too.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:Local hardware store would work fine ... by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm aware of. Most states can adequately enforce sanctions after the fact in the case the key is actually used for criminal purposes. That doesn't stop them from making asinine prohibitions that are impossible to enforce though, so it's entirely possible.

  25. Hyrdrojet Cutter by Marksolo · · Score: 1

    I would rather have a DIY hydrojet cutter. The consumables are cheaper and it is much easier to get one powerful enough to cut metal. To cut metal with a CO2 laser requires over 1000w of power which is a very large and expensive laser.

  26. Horse of a Different Medium by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I love how all these "new" cutters and shapers and printers are nothing more than your standard 2D CNC mills with the "mill" part swapped out in favor of a laser, or water jet, or extrusion nozzle... I guess if it ain't borked, don't fix it, right?

    What'll we think of next?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  27. This is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem with laser cutters is that they cause plastics to give off toxic gasses when cut. You're literally burning plastic. These systems can start fires, I've seen it. There's a reason you aren't supposed to leave them unattended. This is really not an issue because you should always have a fire extinguisher close at hand when using ANY machinery. However, I'm far more concerned with the toxic gas issue here. You can't just set one of these systems up in your house without a ventilation system and run it. You have to have exhaust fans and ducting to the outside.

  28. Bad Idea by cachimaster · · Score: 2

    I used to work programming laser cutters. Let's summarize the ways these machines can kill/maim you:

    1) Fire: You can build your entire machine on metal, that won't prevent the thing you are cutting from catching fire.
    2) Smoke: There's a reason most laser cutters have huge ventilation tubes. The laser will produce smoke, if you cut anything but wood it will be toxic smoke. Not good.
    3) Laser: 40 watts is 100 times the power needed to instantly blind you. Lasers of that power are dangerous even bouncing on non-reflective surfaces. The laser is probable IR so invisible too.
    4) And IMHO the worst: The high-current high-voltage power source (10 KV or more) can instantly kill you.

    The company I worked for had huge problems with the certification of the power source alone.

    DIY 40W Laser = terrible idea. CNCs are much cheaper and safer.

    1. Re:Bad Idea by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I see what you're saying, but look how easily you can maim yourself with any power-tool - just touch the blade while it's running. Or a car: just turn the wheel 15 degrees in either direction into oncoming traffic.

      That said, most of us aren't old enough to remember, but it took about a hundred years during the industrial revolution to make common machines (from farm equipment to sewing machines to water heaters) safe enough that people weren't killed or maimed on a pretty steady basis. Invent a new machine, and you're back on that learning curve (ouch!)

    2. Re:Bad Idea by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      1) Fire: You can build your entire machine on metal, that won't prevent the thing you are cutting from catching fire.

      Nitrogen canister, regulator, pump to measure gas volume... enclosed container. Fire needs oxygen to burn.

      2) Smoke: There's a reason most laser cutters have huge ventilation tubes. The laser will produce smoke, if you cut anything but wood it will be toxic smoke. Not good.

      Seal the equipment in an air-tight chamber, vent it to atmosphere when safe or pass exhaust through activated-carbon.

      3) Laser: 40 watts is 100 times the power needed to instantly blind you. Lasers of that power are dangerous even bouncing on non-reflective surfaces. The laser is probable IR so invisible too.

      Safety interlocks to prevent chamber from being opened while laser is active; Viewing ports made of laser-safe safety glass to absorb specific wavelength of laser beam (same as the safety goggles you should know to wear...).

      And IMHO the worst: The high-current high-voltage power source (10 KV or more) can instantly kill you.

      Isolation transformer, sealed unit, zero-delay ground return fault interrupt from mains, capacitor buffered to smooth initial load during firing (which would otherwise trip the aforementioned). Proper grounding. Oh, and proper grounding. And proper. Fucking. Grounding.

      Now you're right, these things are all dangerous and can kill you... but so can climbing into a hot tub if you're drunk. You can't make something perfectly safe, but you can make it reasonably safe. Your microwave also contains a power supply rated for similar voltages... and similar risks for body damage if the safeties are compromised.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Bad Idea by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying, but look how easily you can maim yourself with any power-tool - just touch the blade while it's running.

      But there is a limitation in range. Unless you actively go to your neighboor who is in front of his home and actively touch him with the tool, it is very difficult for you to harm him. But with a laser that potent you can easily harm him without moving.

      Or a car: just turn the wheel 15 degrees in either direction into oncoming traffic.

      I don't know about USA laws but I think that you need a licence to operate such a dangerous machinery. And DIY vehicles are not allowed in the road unless they pass a complete inspection and get registered.

      Not to forget that cars serve an useful function for a great part of the population, while the utility of 40W lasers for the common user seems marginal, at best (and no, saying than "in ten years it will be different" is not a reasoning).

      Could you pick some better analogies, please?

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    4. Re:Bad Idea by cachimaster · · Score: 1

      1) Fire: You can build your entire machine on metal, that won't prevent the thing you are cutting from catching fire.

      Nitrogen canister, regulator, pump to measure gas volume... enclosed container. Fire needs oxygen to burn.

      The only deadly thing a Laser lacks is something that can explode and throw shrapnel at you. Now it have it.

      2) Smoke: There's a reason most laser cutters have huge ventilation tubes. The laser will produce smoke, if you cut anything but wood it will be toxic smoke. Not good.

      Seal the equipment in an air-tight chamber, vent it to atmosphere when safe or pass exhaust through activated-carbon.

      Instead of toxic smoke now we have concentrated pressurized toxic smoke.

      3) Laser: 40 watts is 100 times the power needed to instantly blind you. Lasers of that power are dangerous even bouncing on non-reflective surfaces. The laser is probable IR so invisible too.

      Safety interlocks to prevent chamber from being opened while laser is active; Viewing ports made of laser-safe safety glass to absorb specific wavelength of laser beam (same as the safety goggles you should know to wear...).

      Good luck absorbing 40 Watts in 0.1 mm^2 of glass though.

      And IMHO the worst: The high-current high-voltage power source (10 KV or more) can instantly kill you.

      Isolation transformer, sealed unit, zero-delay ground return fault interrupt from mains, capacitor buffered to smooth initial load during firing (which would otherwise trip the aforementioned). Proper grounding. Oh, and proper grounding. And proper. Fucking. Grounding.

      Now you're right, these things are all dangerous and can kill you... but so can climbing into a hot tub if you're drunk. You can't make something perfectly safe, but you can make it reasonably safe. Your microwave also contains a power supply rated for similar voltages... and similar risks for body damage if the safeties are compromised.

      Fair enough. When isolating the stuff remember 10 KV can kill you through a 5 cm air gap.
      Yes the microwave can kill you that's why there are no DIY microwaves.

    5. Re:Bad Idea by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Oh, and proper grounding. And proper. Fucking. Grounding.

      It would scare you to see how many residences I've been to that the grounding has become ineffective with time, or grounding that works ok in the wet season but is ineffective in the dry season. Resistance to ground can be a bitch.

    6. Re:Bad Idea by timeOday · · Score: 1

      OK, guns. Flame away :)

    7. Re:Bad Idea by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      The actual operation of a firearm is legally controlled in every populated area in the USA (the target country assumed, I'm relatively certain) and almost every unpopulated area.

    8. Re:Bad Idea by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Points #1 and #2 in conjunction cancel out your objections to them individually.

      The ventilation system maintains negative pressure. An explosion requires positive pressure. No compression, no smoke accumulation.

    9. Re:Bad Idea by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Or was never properly installed. So common it's really freakin' scary.

  29. Specular surfaces by dirtaddshp · · Score: 1

    And what about the beam refraction? Specular surfaces anyone? 2w beams are dangerous if they hit you in the eye (instant blindness), what could a 40w do?

  30. Cue Billy Joel in 3..2..1... by davidwr · · Score: 1

    We didn't start the ... oh wait.

    For those too young to remember.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  31. When did WHAT happen? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I think wood or plastic would be a concern.

    I just don' get where your outrage is coming from, I don't see anyt "anything remotely related to wood is some kind of incendiary deathtrap". Nobody's saying wood isn't a safe material. (I'm lying on a wooden couch with a cotton futon as I write this.) But it's kind of the wrong material for a device that tends to run hot. Maytbe it's "safe enough" for this particular application — but you don't need to leap down the throat of anybody suggesting that it's not.

    Especially when they haven't even mentioned Obamacare!

  32. Monster lizard ravages east coast! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I initially read that as:
    DIY Laser Cutter Razes Capitol, Concerns

    Les, the "B" is out on the printer!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  33. Re:Comments from a Laser Jock by ballpoint · · Score: 2

    ...but just about everything is shiny at 10 microns, thus that needs to be watched

    Or rather not.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  34. What? It's not UL Listed? by rickb928 · · Score: 2

    Darn, now my insurance company will be asking if I have any laser cutters, 3D printers, etc. And it will probably cost me more than a pit bull, fireplace, or inground pool.

    Thieves. Next thing you know, they will also tell me what I can or cannot make with it. Oh, wait...

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  35. Re:various materials by Antipater · · Score: 1

    Obviously, you haven't played enough Tribes.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  36. DIY laser cutters are nothing new. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    People have been making DIY laser cutters for a few years now. But sometimes it ends up being cheaper to just buy the whole damn thing instead of wasting months fine-tuning all the fiddly bits and still getting less than stellar results.

    It's TRUE that there's no real 'definitive resource' for the A-to-Z on how to get it done, but then the same is true for CNC conversions, even though hundreds of people have done them.

    I'm in the process of converting my mini-mill and mini-lathe to CNC, after that I've definitely got my eye on making a laser cutter! :3

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  37. New song by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    by David Byrn: Lasing down the house!

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  38. Not a trivial safety concern. by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    I've worked with three different laser ablation systems last year. For that, I had to go through a one-day training session, to prepare me for all the safety issues involved. Most notable is protection of your eyes. Any of the lasers at the research institute where I was working, was capable of permanently blinding. Most of them had a continuous power of "only" a few tens of W, while one was a 300 W IR laser which melted a computer's case placed 7 m away - only with the reflected light.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  39. much more burn-resistant than the first prototype by ffflala · · Score: 1

    ...the frame of which was constructed entirely of pressed straw.

  40. Obligatory by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

    James Bond: Do you expect me to talk?
    Auric Goldfinger: No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to be cut into parts for my mechanical clock!

  41. Re:various materials by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

    Air rifles are not quite that safe. They are now used to hunt deer. I, personally, have an air rifle that, if shot directly towards someones heart, will likely kill them! So, please, don't spread the false belief that air rifles are harmless!!!

    --
    My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
  42. 40watt? not enough by drwho · · Score: 1

    You just can't do much very quickly with 40 watts. Besides monogramming or similar, it's just not fast enough when cutting anything more than paper. They talk aboit 5 inches per minute....really guys, you need something much bigger and faster.

  43. Thermal distortion? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    Why is he worried about thermal distortion? I work for a laser welding shop and believe me, thermal distortion is not a concern when it comes to the machine frame. We built two of our workstations, the first was built using 80/20 and the second machine has a welded frame that was designed in house and built by a 3rd party. Thermal distortion was a non issue and we work with tolerances down to the nearest 1/10000 inch (2.54 um).

    To me this "article" is more about promoting his kickstarter than anything else. He is splitting hairs when it comes to using wood vs metal to justify using a cheap and simple to work material. If he used metal frames his machines for would cost as much as the competition. I have seen laser engraving and cutting systems for under 10 grand, some as low as 4-7 grand.

    Tag this article shameless self promotion.

  44. Re:various materials by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    I was not talking about those air rifles, but about the ones that kids use. Do you give your air rifle to a kid and let him play with it?

  45. Wood spells trouble. by formfeed · · Score: 1

    1. Chicago Hackerspace will buy one of these wooden Laser cutters.
    2. A Cow will accidentally turn on the Laser cutter.

    4. Lots of real estate opportunities.

  46. Re:don't look at laser cutter with,oh, never mind. by quax · · Score: 2

    As the other AC helpfully pointed out it is the reflections that are the biggest concern. They are likely to increase if you put aluminum foil on your wooden frame. Hence my warning.

  47. The good news by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    Everyone's focusing on the blah blah blah, but this is the big news: a laser cutter that can be bought for less than $1000! That would make it affordable to hobbyists.
    Being a 2D machine, it's also easy to prepare drawing files for. Much easier than making .stl files for a 3D printer or CNC machine. This means it's also affordable from a time perspective.

    1. Re:The good news by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      ok, make that $1500. Still, a BIG price drop.

      Bummer that it's US-only for now.

  48. Been done by DCFusor · · Score: 1

    Though with no intention I know of to become a product. Many page detailed write up of how this has been done with mostly junkyard parts, yet to great accuracy on my site (I didn't do this, one of the other members did). 6 pages of just how Jerry Biehler did it here: (with pix and videos) http://www.coultersmithing.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=78&hilit=laser+cutter When hackaday linked this last month, we got slashdotted (but our servers handled it OK).

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  49. I have built two of his machines. Don't do it. by Aggrav8d · · Score: 3

    I've built the BlackToe 8'x4' router and the WhiteAnt 3D printer. Don't fund this.

    In both cases the shipments arrived with multiple mistakes and require two or more reshipments. Instructions were out of date, assumed you knew things, and didn't cover any safety issues. When I would write for help I'd frequently get an automated out-of-office message, followed by his response a few minutes later. Everything about the way this guy does business says "this is going to lead to disaster".

    He would have been better off running a kickstarter on his RedFrog pick & place machine.

  50. Re:various materials by cusco · · Score: 1

    Seriously? Holy crap. I haven't been paying attention. The one that my brother-in-law and I use will barely kill a mourning dove. What brand do you use?

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  51. Re:various materials by Meski · · Score: 1

    Probably the lens/cornea of your eye, and not the retina. Unlike visible and near IR, the lens in your eye doesn't work at 10.6um. Not that this in any way makes it safe. IWALE

  52. Re:various materials by Meski · · Score: 1

    At the speed of light? What rpm was it running? Correction, rps?

  53. Re:What? It's not UL Listed? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    You live someplace you can get insurance with a pit bull?

    Every state I've lived in the last 10 years has lacked companies offering coverage to owners of a dog that has even a drop of recognizable pit bull blood in it.