Slashdot Mirror


Sharp Warns That It Might Collapse

angry tapir writes "Japan's Sharp, a major supplier of LCD displays to Apple and other manufacturers, has warned that it may not survive if it can't turn around its business. The Osaka-based manufacturer said there is "material doubt" about its ability to continue operating in its earnings report filed Thursday. Sharp added, however, that it still believes it can cut costs and secure enough credit to survive. Its IGZO technology for mobile displays is likely to be a key element of its business strategy."

284 comments

  1. They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sell their LCD's to apple at a higher cost why should apple be the only one making a premium off the screens?

    1. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      because then Apple tells them to get bent, buys all their displays from someone else and Sharp goes under instantly.

    2. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What does anyone really expect when SHARP sells BS products like the Sharp IG-BC2UB High Density Plasmacluster Ion Generator for Car Use?

      What does that even mean?

    3. Re:They just need to... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You sound like an expert on the subject.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same price as Apple's 27" display:
      Dell UltraSharp U2711

    5. Re:They just need to... by isopropanol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's an air filter. Negative ions in the air make smoke particles stick to the (positively charged) filter better. They work better than filters with no ion generator, but not anywhere near as good as not smoking in the first place.

    6. Re:They just need to... by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's volume? Sharp probably bid for Apple's business like others did. Selling it for more would mean no business at all.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    7. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ionizers literally drove The Sharper Image into bankruptcy. The Sharper Image produced the Ionic Breeze ionizer which Consumer Reports concluded was "ineffective" as an air cleaner and produced "almost no measurable reduction in airborne particles."

      Worse, all ionizing purifiers generate ozone. The EPA states, "Relatively low amounts [of ozone] can cause chest pain, coughing, shortness of breath, and, throat irritation. Ozone may also worsen chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and compromise the ability of the body to fight respiratory infections".

      So in reality not only are ionizers ineffective, they're actually bad for you.

    8. Re:They just need to... by elfprince13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And Apple's comes with a webcam, built in 50 watt speaker, Firewire, and GigE connectivity. Not to mention Thunderbolt.

    9. Re:They just need to... by alexander_686 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It’s not volume – it is overcapacity. LCD manufacturing has high fixed costs – that is it is a capital intensive business.

      A few years ago everybody built fab plants – and then the economy turned south so people stopped buying large screen TVs. (oversimplied, but.)

      So, when there is overproduction one has 2 choices – mothball the entire plant (complete loss) or engage in a brutal wall of price cuts and attrition. The logical choice is price cuts and attrition (well, the logical choice would be to go back in time and not build the plant in the first place, but.)

    10. Re:They just need to... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but so is smoking.

    11. Re:They just need to... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Yup, Sharp built the world's largest in Japan, which started operations in October of 2009, and Sharp is already considering selling it because it sits mostly idle.....

    12. Re:They just need to... by ne0n · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem, from Apple's perspective, is that Samsung is the only viable producer of top-quality displays. Only Samsung and LG can produce the volume necessary, and Samsung is openly hostile now that Apple's been trying to bend them over one too many times. So now they're stuck with crap SSDs (Toshiba) and crap IPS panels (LG) unless they pull a rabbit out of the hat. Keeping Sharp afloat with purchasing agreements would be the Microsoft move (a la the investment in Apple, early 90's) but Apple is more likely to buy Sharp and try to keep the entire supply chain in-house. It would take years for this one to bear fruit but, hasn't Apple been patient before? And they've got the cash to build out in a hurry.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    13. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who exactly? samsung told them to fuck off, Sony doesn't have enough yield, and LG keeps having quality problems. And don't say buy out a small player and do it themselves, because between a lack of patents and basic engineering, it would take years to get quality up to their levels.

    14. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me, you'd better tell all those lightning storms to produce massive amounts of ozone whenever there's a lightning strike.

    15. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple can't. They have already told Samsung to go get bent. If they tell Sharp the same they will have to significantly cut production of devices.

    16. Re:They just need to... by redback · · Score: 1

      And the same LG panel inside.

    17. Re:They just need to... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Now that Samsung needs their own display output there is no other display vendor but Sharp Apple can turn to who can produce the quality of displays Apple needs in the appropriate volume. This will only get worse as other vendors' Android tablets, TVs and Chromebooks compete for this constrained supply. The only appropriate response for Sharp is to increase their prices to Apple and others to all the market will bear. This turns into a huge win for Sharp.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    18. Re:They just need to... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Sharp pretty much has Apple over a barrel and if they were smart they'd make it clear if they don't see better prices they'll have to deal with the cheap junk screens, wouldn't help Apple's "top quality" image if their screens start dying left and right.

      Although I think they'd be better off buying Sharp directly, if they weren't a Japanese corp I'd call it a done deal. We all know how much Japan protects their businesses, i can't see one of their major players selling to an American corp would go over well.

      But one way or another Apple HAS to have those screens, with Samsung royally pissed at them they simply don't have anywhere else to go for great quality screens.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:They just need to... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      There aren't that many places to buy high quality LCD displays in volume and Apple just burnt its bridges with Samsung. I say, with Sharp teetering (no doubt in part because of Apple stinginess) LG is in an excellent position to raise prices.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I was going to mention Thunderbolt, but I thought everyone here would bitch about it even though it's nice. I forgot about the webcam and speakers, which makes it even more awesome. Using it is pure bliss.

      But Apple is gouging blah blah blah...

    21. Re:They just need to... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would Apple want to go into the messy business of actually building hardware again?

      You can't charge a repeating fee for hardware.

      --
      This space available.
    22. Re:They just need to... by mwvdlee · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ionizers literally drove The Sharper Image into bankruptcy.

      With such intelligent ionizers that they can literally drive a vehicle, I'm somewhat surprised they couldn't sell it. Even with the ozone production they would have still made excellent driver-less transport vehicles. Or do you mean to say the ionizers themselves were literally cars? By the way, where is this "bankruptcy" place? I can't find it on the map.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    23. Re:They just need to... by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Literally drove them to bankruptcy is correct in this instance. Though "drove" means "caused" in this statement, "literally" is not misused. If the Sharper Image had not declared bankruptcy, but instead de-listed and closed most of their stores, then you'd be right, but you are not right. Your pedant on "literally" is wrong.

    24. Re:They just need to... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      because then Apple... buys all their displays from someone else

      Like who? Samsung?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    25. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      because then Apple tells them to get bent, buys all their displays from someone else and Sharp goes under instantly.

      An electronics manufacturer I talked to was in a similar situation where a large customer pretty much said that they wanted things made cheaper or they would take their business elsewhere. Instead of shitting his pants he went over the numbers and regrettably informed the customer that he couldn't build things at the price they demanded. A few month later they got back and accepted his original price.

      Moral of the story?
      If you can't produce at the demanded price then chances are that your competition can't either.
      The customer is only right as long as he is willing to pay, if he doesn't want to pay he is no customer and you should spend your time on those who appreciate your services.

    26. Re:They just need to... by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      Well, Sharp has a very nice patent portfolio, so that could be valuable to Apple. Sharp used to manufacture very nice phones. On a side note, for what I saw in Japan Apple is seen in the same light that many Japanese corporations, so that wouldn't be really a problem. After all, Sony had a stupid moron of American origin* for too much time at its helm and that almost destroyed their company, too. But, I think that what is causing now more troubles to Japanese corporations are the high prices on energy since they still have most of their nuclear energy power stations stopped and the very strong yen. A strong currency with high energy prices is a combination that would cripple any corporation that depends on exports.

      *not to be called an attack on Americans. Stupidity, sadly, is shared among people of all ages and nations.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    27. Re:They just need to... by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      In the world of busines... Maybe. Knowing how desperate they are is a great route to provide screens, with the proviso that they drop all this silly patent shenanigans. Then Samsung wins either way. Though Sharp IS in a bad situation at this time, this could all be posturing for the Apple TV manufacturing. If Apple's reliant on Sharp to produce them (if they are real), then this would be the time to ask Apple for a great wodge of cash to prop them up, as Sharp too would know that Apple would hate to go back to Samsung and ask for anything.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    28. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * 'Stupidity, sadly, is shared among people of all ages and nations.'

      ** but is actively desired and encouraged in Americans

    29. Re:They just need to... by ianare · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perri-air, fresh from Druidia, will always be the best.

    30. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A true pedant wouldn't ASS-U-ME that the post was a sarcastic nab when it's entirely plausible that there was no such meaning.

    31. Re:They just need to... by GNious · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see that in the Automotive sector.

      OEMs go to the suppliers yearly, demanding a (often contractual) reduction in price by 1-2% ... whether the suppliers are able to supply the parts at the lower cost is irrelevant, and most will gladly bend over in fear of not loosing the next deal (which they'll likely also lose money on).

    32. Re:They just need to... by vlm · · Score: 1

      You can't charge a repeating fee for hardware.

      LOL talk to the automotive industry about that. Weld the case shut so you can't swap out the battery or HD/SSD and its guaranteed trash in a couple years.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    33. Re:They just need to... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can't charge a repeating fee for hardware.

      LOL talk to the automotive industry about that. Weld the case shut so you can't swap out the battery or HD/SSD and its guaranteed trash in a couple years.

      I read your comment three times and I still can't figure out what it has to do with the automotive industry. You didn't made a bad automotive analogy — touche, sir. Well played, I guess.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:They just need to... by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      It would take years for this one to bear fruit

      I seed what you did there...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my mom has a really bad bronchial infection right now and uses an ionizing purifier... god damnit mom!

    36. Re:They just need to... by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      That ozone is generated at higher altitudes ;)

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    37. Re:They just need to... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I own one, as well as a few other Plasmacluster devices.

      They are basically air purifiers that use a combination of filters and ion generation. Unlike older ion generators they don't produce ozone. The ions cause airborne particles to either fall to the ground or be neutralized (e.g. mould is killed).

      I use them to help control my allergies. They were really bad, especially at work. I find that the Plasmacluster on my desk, the one you linked to that I keep in my car and the two I have at home do reduce the symptoms quite a bit. Combined with medication I can breath more or less normally now. I tried Panasonic's Nanoe devices but didn't find them to be as effective.

      That sort of product is extremely popular in Japan, where several manufacturers have large ranges. Sharp went a bit nuts with theirs, adding ion generators to things like vacuum cleaners and washing machines. They do definitely work though - NHK did a test where they tested various product's ability to kill mould and found that some were quite effective.

      The only real down side is that they need humidity to work, generally 50% or more. Newer models often have a water tank so that they can humidify the environment up to around 60%.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You likely haven't been to east asia, but pretty much every home in Japan has a Sharp air cleaner or two. Smoke+pollution. The rest of east asia? Knock offs of the Sharp units.

    39. Re:They just need to... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I imagine a reference to a source of persistant grumbling from car people. Modern car engines are heavily computerised, and not in an open manner: The computers are sealed, often embedded in epoxy, and their only means of control is via propritary communications protocols which are understood only by the official manufacturer's diagnostic unit - a device that they may or may not make available to independant mechanics, and will charge a fortune for if they do. Without this unit it's impossible to access data needed for diagnostics or to adject even simple paramaters like ignition timeing. Essentially, if the engine needs repairing, you need to go back to the authorised dealer and pay whatever they demand.

    40. Re:They just need to... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not. Most if it is generated near the ground.

      But it isn't generated inside your house either, while the ozone from a ionizing filter is. Also, it's not constantly generated, leading to at most rare and fast expositions (ozone don't last for long), while that device leads to constant exposition.

      All said, I have no idea if the ionizer is actualy harmfull or not (it certainly produces a very small quantity of ozone). It is not something I'd actively seek to be near, but it is also not something I'd avoid at all costs.

    41. Re:They just need to... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Unlike older ion generators they don't produce ozone. The ions cause airborne particles to either fall to the ground or be neutralized (e.g. mould is killed).

      It is very hard to ionize anything in air without producing ozone, and it is normaly the ozone that "neutrilizes" dust and kills mold. So, I kind of doubt their advertizing.

      Anyway, it doesn't really matter. Any ion is equaly bad (as in "not very much", since there are very few of them). If it kills mold, you can be sure that it isn't very health for you to breath (but, again, concentration is everything).

    42. Re:They just need to... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

      Are you going to complain about device drivers having nothing to do with cars next?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    43. Re:They just need to... by DamonHD · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Disagree: "literally" means no metaphors/non-literality at all, and that text was riddled with non-literal wording and meaning, including that use of "drove" in the absence of cars or cattle or drive shafts. Let's keep "literally" and "infinitely" and even "exponentially" for when we mean and need them, not as a poorly-thought-out cheap replacement for "very" and its ilk.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    44. Re:They just need to... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      my mom has a really bad bronchial infection right now and uses an ionizing purifier... god damnit mom!

      hooked on ozone?

    45. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice cherry pick. The only problem is you can buy a PC S-IPS monitor of the same size and same resolution for less than half of that price or roughly $400 USD.

    46. Re:They just need to... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      They do. As do laser printers and rotting seaweed. It's well established that ozone isn't particularly good for humans (unless it happens to be sitting in the upper atmosphere blocking UV). The "sea air is good for you" thing, before you ask, is probably because a bit of sunshine and fresh air happens to be better for you than a little ozone exposure is bad.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    47. Re:They just need to... by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he meant that computer vendors could apply the same model as the automotive industry. The automotive industry has been trying to make it harder to diagnose and fix problems in cars thanks to proprietary systems. So with a computer the equivalent would be to weld the case shut.

      Something like that, anyway.

    48. Re:They just need to... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      Also, said computers can cost several thousand dollars to replace; almost as much as the engine or transmission. Who knows if this is in line with the actual manufacturing cost... it'd be debatable whether there should be an IP mark-up like with chips since you already paid for the car in the first place. They then use this as "well our computers often fail before 100k so you should get our extended warranty" crap.

    49. Re:They just need to... by digitalsolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really? A good friend just finished customizing the programming on a 2013 Ford F-150 Ecoboost, and I have modified the software in my 2008 Corvette computer several times (kinda necessary when the engine/computer no longer live in a Corvette).

      There is much talk about this every time a new ECU comes out, but it is still (with very few exceptions) not the case yet. Every new ECU promises to be "locked" and unable to be edited, every new ECU is then cracked for modifications directly afterwards.

      Not to mention the fact that you can hook up a little bluetooth dongle from eBay (15 dollars) to your Android phone with a 5 dollar app and read all fault codes/statuses from the ECU directly. If anything, modern cars are EASIER to work on that old carb'd stuff. The only downside is that you can't just stare at it and guess, you actually need to learn what to do. Of course, that always should have been the case anyway.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    50. Re:They just need to... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      So, the only reason it's still possible for anyone not blessed by the manufacturer to work on the engine is that some hackers have manage to break through the security? If you're a hobbyist, that'll work, even if it is inconvenient. But how is that supposed to operate in a business? I somehow imagine that a garage might find it hard to get business or liability insurance if word gets out that they are using uncertified tools of unknowable origin obtained from semi-underground forums in order to service engines.

    51. Re:They just need to... by vlm · · Score: 1

      You can't charge a repeating fee for hardware.

      LOL talk to the automotive industry about that. Weld the case shut so you can't swap out the battery or HD/SSD and its guaranteed trash in a couple years.

      I read your comment three times and I still can't figure out what it has to do with the automotive industry.

      I'm perfectly happy with my 1987 commuter car. Its just a chariot to haul me around so don't guilt trip me with style changes. I would never pay a repeating fee for that hardware because it was basically good enough if left to myself. Yet I have to keep on buying new cars because the industry prefers that I do so. Detroit in the 70s used to value engineer cars to self destruct in about 2 years, but the japanese competition eventually forced them to make them last 10-15 years, regardless of the actual lifespan the rule remains, you WILL have to buy a new car on the manufacturers defined schedule unless you go to heroic "collector/hobbiest" extremes.

      This is a bit different than (a part of) the furniture market. I honestly have no idea how old this cedar blanket storage chest is. The hinges look almost homemade, but the very few nails and screws look machine made. I know for a fact its over 100 years old, thats only 1912 and my GGrandparents had it in their house at that time, but how much older than 1912, I donno. I understand walmart particle board "furniture" is made to fall apart quickly to encourage repeat sales. At least for some furniture you cannot charge a repeating fee.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    52. Re:They just need to... by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      You've added a great deal of drama to the subject without reason. The tools that allow basic changes and in-depth diagnostics are available from major automotive tool manufacturers, it's not some secret underground group. It is also illegal for a manufacturer to void the warranty on the vehicle if they cannot conclusively prove that the modification in fact caused the under-warranty failure. You are free to imagine whatever you wish, but you are incorrect in your understanding of the subject.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    53. Re:They just need to... by vlm · · Score: 1

      Re: ODB-II readers, I bought one a decade ago for $100 and it still works fine. Its not like you have to buy another every time you fix something, or you have to buy another every time you buy a new car. Works just as well on my 97 Saturn as my wifes new(er) prius. Now a hardware code scanner is something like $50. Or you can borrow the one at autozone for free, assuming you buy parts from that autozone.

      Mysteriously, the biggest whiners about a $50 code reader always:
      1) Remember code scanners used to cost $750 back in '96 so they demand over and over that they must still be unaffordable today.
      2) invariably have $20K in snap on tools, so its not like they're poor. Trade in your seventh gold plated unused metric torx socket set and buy a code reader with the dough.
      3) have a garage full of weird specialty tools like the weird wrench that can only be used to set the ignition points on a '72 Saab and other than that its a really expensive paperweight, but go bonkers about buying a code reader that can be used on any car sold in the USA from 96-present.

      I mean really, its about as generic and universal as a voltmeter now. Its not 1995 anymore and the skys not gonna fall and its not a big deal.

      It'll cost $20 to get a dongle and download "torque" from the app store and for the next decade or so you'll be able to scan cars to find the exact broken part. Compared to the parts cost alone of $30 for an O2 sensor its hard to get all agitprop about ODB-II.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    54. Re:They just need to... by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      High humidity is what creates mold in the first place. So the device creates mold for it to kill. Neat. Quackery if I ever heard it.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    55. Re:They just need to... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The issue is that "drove them to bankruptcy" was "ionic breeze" the addition of "literally" doesn't change the definition of the idiom.

    56. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regardless of the actual lifespan the rule remains, you WILL have to buy a new car on the manufacturers defined schedule unless you go to heroic "collector/hobbiest" extremes.

      Really? My last car lasted 10 years and well over 200,000 miles. The only reason it's not -still- my car is an unfortunate highway accident that smashed the front left quarter and probably bent an axle. The only extreme measures I performed on the car were paying for maintenance items like brakes, belts, and the timing chain.

      Perhaps you didn't mean to suggest that 10 years was outside the "manufacturer's defined schedule". I don't think the dealer where I bought my new car felt that way. He implied quite directly that I was basically a cheap SOB for keeping a car that long. I ignored that insult and bought a car I expect to last -at least- 10 years into the future.

    57. Re:They just need to... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      It should. The word "literally" means that the literal interperetation of the statement is the intended meaning. In this case the word "drove" has some other meanings, so we are not necessarily talking about a car. Generally though, literally does indeed change definitons of idioms.

    58. Re:They just need to... by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      So what's out there that is equivalent to a GM Tech II? Sure, I can get DTCs, and freeze frames with my little scanner, but what about the Body Control Module, ABS subsystem, Transmission/Transfer case controller, etc?

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    59. Re:They just need to... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't. Literally. "real" used to have the same function, until it was corrupted to mean "very". The same has already happened with literally. It's too late. It did literally "drive them to bankruptcy" so long as you apply the literal to the entire clause. That's better than most usages of literally, so to pick on that one is literally silly.

    60. Re:They just need to... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally :

      Usage Discussion of LITERALLY
      Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary.

    61. Re:They just need to... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      What's the benefit over a good HEPA filter?

    62. Re:They just need to... by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      Lots. Most codes are required to be published to allow following of standards, it's just a matter of knowing where to find them (a critical skill if you wish to run a company who makes tools for this).

      My eBay scanner + Torque app on my phone can read some of the BCM and other system codes, and it's a 5 dollar app on Android. Snap-On and Matco tools can do much, much more and are not prohibitively expensive if you are speaking from the shop standpoint vs. home hobbyist. It's worth noting that most things utilize CANbus now also.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    63. Re:They just need to... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It doesn't become impossible to service them, it becomes uneconomical and significantly more difficult. You may not be able to use the on-board debugging, but if you know how the sensors work you can read them yourself (e.g. with an oscilloscope or some fancy meter — digital scan-and-hold oscopes are fairly typical automotive tools for the electronics man) and perform your own diagnosis. The dealer has the advantage that they can hook up the factory scan tool that can talk to the PCM and get more than the OBD-II standard mandated codes out of it, and as you say, they can adjust the timing. But that's not required to maintain the vehicle, only to tune it. Any car worth one tenth of one shit will work anywhere no matter where you buy it. It might get slightly better mileage if tweaked for extremely high elevations, and obviously if you want to make modifications there are serious limitations, but we are talking about repair here, right?

      I don't want to give the impression that I support manufacturers being able to keep their PCM codes secret from the customers. I find the practice abhorrent and I would like to see them prevented from doing so, legally. There is no legitimate reason whatsoever that they should need to keep their codes a secret from the customers, or from anyone else, except protectionism favoring dealerships and partners which ought to be considered anticompetitive. But it's not because it makes repair impossible, it's that it makes it more difficult and expensive.

      I, of course, drive simple vehicles with little electronics. I hope to eliminate the automatic transmission from each (one was phenomenally cheap and the other was only offered with an automatic) in order to eliminate the rest of the dependency on silicon to move down the road... down the road. But not everyone has that option, because not everyone knows which end of a wrench does what.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    64. Re:They just need to... by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Don't go getting all pragmatic on me!

      I definitely want to keep a small arsenal of absolutes (though I misuse "absolutely!" myself) and superlatives to indicate the extremes on a scale.

      Just because others carelessly and capriciously misuse such terms doesn't mean that you and I should accept them as reasonable.

      Any more than when one someone misuses other art terms, eg legal terms.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    65. Re:They just need to... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Any more than when one someone misuses other art terms, eg legal terms.

      Try convincing someone that 10 GE fibre is baseband, and not broadband, while DSL running at 128kbps is technically broadband.

      As a technical person, I find that most technical people don't use technical terms accurately anymore. Vernacular won. Just go for a cry and accept it.

    66. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with $86 billion stored overseas, you think that Apple could pay a little more. Or maybe just buy up Sharp? HMMMMMM.......

    67. Re:They just need to... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm perfectly happy with my 1982 upper-middle class German family sedan, which was sold here as a top-flight luxury car. I replace things that wear out, for example I'm getting a new turn signal/etc. switch in the mail shortly I hope. And there's a braking support rod bushing to replace. The springs have been done. Turbo rebuilt. Window switches replaced, blah blah blah. Is it built better? Well, yes. But are the other cars impossible to service? Nope. Not if you got a Nissan. Maybe if you got a Toyota ;) (Not impossible, but stuff that's replaceable on the Nissan will be captive on the Toyota, and you have to replace the suspension member entirely.) If you bought a USDM car of the eighties, well, sorry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    68. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NHK did a test where they tested various product's ability to kill mould and found that some were quite effective.

      Okay, introduce mold directly to the device, pass it through, and it dies. Does that mean the device can reduce the overall amount of mold in a room? (Especially considering it increases humidity to work) Does that mean that putting one at your desk will have any appreciable difference in air quality?

    69. Re:They just need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to learn yourself some English.

    70. Re:They just need to... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The only reason that stuff is there is because Apple won't supply a proper docking station for their laptops, so their solution is a $1000 monitor that will probably be useless in 5 years (and can't even be used now with a Mac Pro...lol). Meanwhile the Dell screen comes with actual ports you might want to use on a monitor, like DVI, HDMI, and DisplayPort.

    71. Re:They just need to... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It kills mould and neutralizes spores in the air without them having to pass through the HEPA filter (it has one of those too).

      On the TV they did a test. A slice of bread left in the open, one in a room with the air cleaners and one without. Both rooms were cleaned daily. The one without went mouldy after a few days, the one with the air cleaners didn't.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    72. Re:They just need to... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      There's no need to kill the mold if you're just going to trap it in the filter. Also, you say the test on TV compares filters versus no filter, not HEPA versus HEPA+zapper.

  2. Time for Apple to go for the jugular by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This would be an opportune time for Apple to buy Sharp, re-organize the beast then ramp up displays and other parts for its booming business. If Sharp collapses, Apple will be in trouble - guaranteed.

    1. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This would be an opportune time for Apple to buy Sharp, re-organize the beast then ramp up displays and other parts for its booming business. If Sharp collapses, Apple will be in trouble - guaranteed.

      Right sure, vertical acquisitions, go nuts. What could possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple can not buy sharp because Apple's profit margins are way to high, buying Sharp will kill those margins and Apples share price along with it. The problem with Sharp is it kept narrowing down their product base and made itself very vulnerable to fluctuations in sales in it's remaining markets, hence the current problem. It will likely be fine in a few years, still no where near profitable enough for Apple to buy.

      Basically they have put themselves up for sale for their manufacturing facilities as a merger with a more solvent and complete electronics company. Optimum partner would be of course Panasonic who invested heavily in unmarketable plasma screens and needs to shift to LCD.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if profit margins go down, as long as profits go up at the same time. Adding another profit base to your business isn't bad just because your margins go down.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by isopropanol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Vertically integrating one of your main suppliers would probably not reduce profit margins as much as stopping production because you can't get parts.

    5. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple will not be in trouble. This is utterly false, just as false as the Too Big To Fail nonsense that was getting passed around. Sure, the restructuring of the supply chain would be problematic but Apple already has suppliers lined up as it is. Apple is going to have more problems with Samsung distancing themselves than they are if Sharp went belly up tomorrow. They just don't supply that much to Apple.

    6. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by MangoCats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if profit margins go down, as long as profits go up at the same time. Adding another profit base to your business isn't bad just because your margins go down.

      You are speaking rationally... perception is what matters in stock valuations, especially a stock as widely held by "enthusiast investors" as AAPL. Part of the valuation perception in AAPL is the unusually high profit margin, merge them with a nice profitable entity like Archer Daniels Midland and it will muck up that crystal clear picture of what makes AAPL such a desirable stock to hold.

    7. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can apple manage a manufacturing business? Looking at what the American management did to sony, I doubt it.

    8. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by StormReaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This would be an opportune time for Apple to buy Sharp....

      This would be an even more opportune time for Samsung to buy Sharp.

    9. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Sharp produces commodities. There is no profit in commodities. Apple is unlikely to buy Sharp. It will continue to buy small innovative companies like Siri.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    10. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      I doubt that would happen, historically the Japanese and Koreans haven't exactly been bff....

    11. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Kal+Zekdor · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter if profit margins go down, as long as profits go up at the same time. Adding another profit base to your business isn't bad just because your margins go down.

      You are speaking rationally... perception is what matters in stock valuations, especially a stock as widely held by "enthusiast investors" as AAPL. Part of the valuation perception in AAPL is the unusually high profit margin, merge them with a nice profitable entity like Archer Daniels Midland and it will muck up that crystal clear picture of what makes AAPL such a desirable stock to hold.

      Apple could always acquire Sharp through a subsidiary company. That way Apple's profit margins (and hence, stock price) are firewalled from Sharp.

    12. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Apple pretty much already manages Foxconn... All the processes are designed and supervised by Apple.

    13. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      All else being equal, If you've got 1 billion in the bank, and you get 15% letting it sit there, or by acquiring a company that returns 15%, but instead use it to acquire a new business that returns 7% you just threw away 80Million in year one, and that just compounds over time.

      So yes, adding another profit base to your business can easily be quite a terrible idea.

      Of course if the company in question is a major supplier of yours, it is entirely possible that all things are not in fact equal.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    14. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by cinereaste · · Score: 1

      Apple pretty much already manages Foxconn... All the processes are designed and supervised by Apple.

      Uhm, no. A quick look at the Wikipedia article on Foxconn lists quite a few other major customers and competitors to Apple, such as Amazon and Samsung. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn#Major_customers

    15. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by roidzrus · · Score: 1

      I think he meant to say that they're micromanaging the production of their own products.

    16. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The Japanese are going to let Koreans take them over. RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.

    17. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by symbolset · · Score: 1

      This is handled the same way as "block breaking" in the US in an era when ethnicity of homeowners was subject to "gentleman's agreements". A Japanese subsidiary would be set up with appropriately Japanese staff and concealed corporate ownership. A distressed seller is motivated to not look too close at an enthusiastic buyer willing to pay full price.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    18. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      perception is what matters in stock valuations, especially a stock as widely held by "enthusiast investors" as AAPL

      Are those the same "enthusiast investors" who drove AAPL down $120 in the seven weeks since the iPhone 5 introduction?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    19. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I doubt that would happen, historically the Japanese and Koreans haven't exactly been bff....

      Oh how true, whereas America and Japan have always been best buddies, I totally get your point.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the *** are you getting 15% by having money sit in a bank???

    21. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "unmarketable plasma screens"? Plasmas are the best TVs there are. Best colors, best motion, best black level.

      Dumb consumers just look that they don't look as as bright in the store. If you are used to TV running day and night and begin to itch when there is no TV around maybe plasma isn't for you.

      But if you want to watch the movie in the dark room, nothing beats the plasma.
      Just read reviews and opinions of people who know instead of looking at intentionally tuned TVs in stores.

    22. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      This would be an opportune time for Apple to buy Sharp, re-organize the beast then ramp up displays and other parts for its booming business. If Sharp collapses, Apple will be in trouble - guaranteed.

      Why? Let some other electronics manufacturer buy Sharp, reorganize and dump non-proitable lines. and then buy displays from them. Apple doesn't care what name is on the display as long as they can get the desired quality at the right price. They do not need the distraction of reorganizing a company and the political fallout from laying off staff; what they can do is ensure they have a significant order for Sharp displays to make that part of Sharp worth saving, assuming they need the displays.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    23. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you seriously know any history or are you just mouthing off because you somehow think it makes you sound smarter? You are aware that opposed to a 4 1/2 year war, Japan brutally occupied Korea, raping women(and not apologizing for it), stole massive amounts of resources, almost caused near famine towards the end of the war when they started shipping all the rice out of the country to Japan etc. Not to mention continued territorial disputes and a historical animosity that goes back millennia.

      But yeah, your smart ass point about something I didn't even say negates all that. Kudos.

    24. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple already has suppliers lined up as it is.

      Nonsense.

      There are four LCD manufacturers capable of supplying Apple with what it needs in the volumes itn needs:

      1. Samsung
      2. LG
      3. Sharp
      4. Japan Display

      Samsung will no longer sell; Japan Display concentrates on other market segments.

      So other than LG, who does Apple have lined-up?

    25. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That's a damn bad way to put it then, because the entire point of companies like Foxconn is that they let their buyers micromanage their production.

    26. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      You are clearly from US and have had very little if any contact with how cultures in the "outside world of there be dragons" interact when it comes to neighborly conflicts that lasted centuries to millenia.

      Reality is, it's not going to happen. No matter what.

    27. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually apple would be hoping for sharp to collapse
      while still stable, sharp would be negotiating a higher price to be back into the black
      but if sharp fails, all the assets go up for sale to pay back creditors
      it's higher risk though as apple may lose out to a certain korean company that may be interested
      but that could be happening right now if sharp is in talks with mentioned korean company

    28. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The share market lives on profit margins, that's just the way it is, end of story. Companies routinely dump less profitable portions of the business empire to increase profitability and share prices.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    29. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      That would destroy Apple. It would saddle them with a high fixed cost plant right at a time when their ability to push new iPad sales indefinitely is starting to look like there may be a question mark in there some place. They only thing worse for Apply than not getting the displays they need would be having or having production capacity for ones they don't.

      It would be better to have to source them elsewhere. The Koreans can crank then out as well AUO stuff might not be as dense but apple could make do

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    30. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > 15%

      (Posting AC because I've been modding in this thread.)

      He's not talking about the savings accounts (or even mutual funds) that you or I have access to. There are all sorts of sweetheart and "insider's" deals available for entities with tons of cash, things that most people have never even heard of.

      Example: a large corporation that does a lot of cash sales. At the end of a very good day, they're flush with cash, so they put the word out. A 2nd business just needs a quick million (or billion) to buy something. Business 1 loans the money for a week, Business 2 makes the purchase, then pays them back plus a small fee.

      That "small fee," if calculated as an effective APR, is astronomical, but both companies are happy. Business 1 made a tidy little profit off of cash that was just sitting idle for a few days, and Business 2 gets to borrow a ton of money for a sweetheart deal.

      Now, rinse and repeat, and you start talking about some real money. 15% is not at all unreasonable.

    31. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by DevilM · · Score: 1

      Foxconn will buy Sharp and all will be well for Apple.

    32. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It will likely be fine in a few years, still no where near profitable enough for Apple to buy.

      The notion that a company should be profitable before purchase is a ridiculous one. If you can increase your profitability profitably over a reasonable time scale (i.e. if you can pay off the purchase quickly) then it's worth it to buy them. Not that I think that Sharp would be a good buy for Apple, only that they don't have to be profitable to be worth it if Apple can either make them profitable (by changing case and UI and slapping on an Apple logo) or become more profitable (by getting displays cheaply, since they ship so many displays.)

      I love my SHARP AQUOS TV even though it has too many capital letters, and will be sad if Sharp kicks the bucket. But Apple buying them wouldn't help, because they would probably result in more expensive products, and the draw of my TV in the first place is that it was better than Bravia and yet cheaper. Good contrast for what it is, and immediate display of video that doesn't need to be processed, with only one processing stage for scaling when necessary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Japanese regulator would never allow it. They would rather let Sharp be broken up and sold to other Japanese companies.

      It sounds like protectionism but I can see the merit of that policy. In the UK most of our large companies are now foreign owned, especially utilities and transport services. Naturally they just bleed the UK as much as possible for maximum profit, not caring about the wider economy because they have no real stake in it. Of course they pay almost no UK tax either.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If apple bought sharp I don't think they'd continue to make all the stuff sharp does. They'd shut down everything except the LCDs they need, and their profits would go *up*.

    35. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      And yet Thatcher is still a heroine to so many people.

    36. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Apple could always acquire Sharp through a subsidiary company. That way Apple's profit margins (and hence, stock price) are firewalled from Sharp.

      Large corporations produce group accounts that include all their subsidiaries. The stock price is for the whole group.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, IF Apple were a good business. They were a great, organized, efficient company under Jobs. Without Jobs, I'm not sure they have the management team to keep themselves organized, much less re-organize a multi-national conglomerate involved in numerous products beyond Apple's scope that is predominantly located and staffed by nationals with a completely different business culture.

    38. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But if you want to watch the movie in the dark room, nothing beats the plasma.

      Except going to the cinema, of course.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The share market lives on profit margins, that's just the way it is, end of story.

      Well, no. The stock market lives on market perceptions of future resale value of the stock, which sometimes is based on profit margins, and sometimes not. How Wall Street looks at Apple is different than how Wall Street looks at Amazon.

    40. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Samsung will no longer sell

      That announcement was made after (and based on) years of reduced Apple orders under the existing contract (as Apple moved volume to cheaper suppliers, mainly Sharp but I think also LG) that made it no longer worthwhile for Samsung to continue the relationship. I doubt (despite the popular association of the move with the Apple-Samsung patent dispute) that Samsung has any problem continuing to make money selling to Apple if there is sufficient volume to make it worthwhile (or higher prices at the reduced volume, but that's not likely to be relevant if Sharp isn't around.)

    41. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      You are speaking rationally... perception is what matters in stock valuations, especially a stock as widely held by "enthusiast investors" as AAPL. Part of the valuation perception in AAPL is the unusually high profit margin, merge them with a nice profitable entity like Archer Daniels Midland and it will muck up that crystal clear picture of what makes AAPL such a desirable stock to hold.

      So AAPL, being 68% held by institutions, is considered "widely held by 'enthusiast investors'"? How about MSFT which is 65.3%? I guess that's also an enthusiast stock, and let's see MCD which is 66.3%. I guess enthusiasts love their Big Macs...

    42. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      When's the last time a MSFT holder bent your ear about the stock?

      Price is driven by the active traders, not the institutional holders.

    43. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      One and the same.... I bet a lot of them are getting pretty jittery about holding their 3 and 4x gains.

    44. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by ne0n · · Score: 1

      They're on a spree trying to reduce exposure to a failing US dollar (thanks Bernanke) because they're sitting on a gigantic cash pile that's devaluing every single day. Buying a productive asset is a perfect offset to the Fed's bout of insanity, plus it solves a major problem for Apple's next generations of products. Not just iPhones, but across the lineup. And buffers against backlash from Samsung. Win win win for Apple, assuming it flies in Japan (which is far from guaranteed regardless of whatever current crap Sharp's mired in).

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    45. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Your estimate of the strength of racist strength is apposite my experience of its conflict with personal interest. I have considerable experience in this regard and while racism and ethnic strife can persist in political units with well-defined borders, once these cells experience fast communication with the outside world they realize their neighbour isn't that much different from them relative to the rest of the world.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    46. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      At this point, it's not longer an estimate. It's a certainty. You're beyond clueless on the subject, because in addition to being ignorant of the issue at hand, you're also assuming the "neighborly relations" talk about person to person relationships. In a way, you cannot help it - youre a product of your environment. And that is probably a positive thing - if more people were like you, most of the conflicts in the world would not exist.

      If you need an example of just how deep the "hate your neighbor" goes, look at Japan-China relations. Both sides hate each others' guts. They tolerate each other as long as business demands it on both ends, and as long as survival demands it on both ends. But god forbid one side will feel that it can get away with something - then it will do that something. No matter how bloody it will be for the other side.

      If that doesn't satisfy your interest, start going to other places. Look up the current climate in Africa. Look at situation in Balkans. Look at any long term neighborly relations at all, and you'll see the same massive antagonism. It's the reality that is invisible and very difficult to understand to the native of US, because US is a massive exception in terms of its ethnic, racial and cultural background in the world. It's a chimera of a state, a former colony that actually collected immigrants from all over the world. This is a very rare kind of a state, and it has problems of its own - but as a result it also lacks many problems that rest of the world has. Such as the cultural disposition to "hate those different from us who were competing with us for millenia".

      Your claims of "realisation" shine from this point of view. To you, this would actually make sense. To those of us who grew up in the rest of the world, it's naivete of remarkable proportions.

    47. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You're beyond clueless on the subject, because in addition to being ignorant of the issue at hand, you're also assuming the "neighborly relations" talk about person to person relationships

      I was a white kid born in 1965 who grew up in the area commonly known as "Watts". Torrance is what we call that spot now. Not only am I not ignorant, I have considerable personal experience of the evolution and practice of civil rights in that area, and the reaction of the populace thereto. You are basing your social activism on your idealistic interpretation of what happened there. I was there, and know from personal experience what happened there. Don't you dare presume to school me.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    48. Re:Time for Apple to go for the jugular by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Indeed. You view about hundred years of animosity with those you have to face as the peak, something so terrible that it can't get any worse. As a result you simply have no connection nor understanding, intellectual or subconscious of what millenia of feuds against those you do not see but hear about all the time do to the collective and individual psyche. You simply lack the base for understanding, as you have never encountered this in your own life. As is the case for many people that come from US and Canada.

      The only problem is that you also assume that you do in fact have the knowledge, and that there can't be anything worse. For that is where you are terribly wrong.

  3. Not so Sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bet big on the wrong screens

  4. Re:SHARP AND AAPL: SHE IS A GOING DOWN MY CAPTAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how many shares have you shorted since you're so convinced of this?

  5. Maybe Samsung dumped Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sharp is probably suffering from the prices they agreed to with Apple. It can fun throwing your weight around but it has limits.

  6. Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by guidryp · · Score: 0

    ... major supplier of LCD displays to Apple ...

    Really, which LCD displays do they supply to Apple? LG and Samsung are major suppliers, I can't remember the last time I saw an LCD in an Apple product wasn't LG/Sharp.

    Perhaps if Sharp actually was a major supplier they wouldn't be in quite so close to bankruptcy.

    1. Re:Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you're using one and that would explain your proofreading failure

    2. Re:Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      ... major supplier of LCD displays to Apple ...

      Really, which LCD displays do they supply to Apple? LG and Samsung are major suppliers, I can't remember the last time I saw an LCD in an Apple product wasn't LG/Sharp.

      Perhaps if Sharp actually was a major supplier they wouldn't be in quite so close to bankruptcy.

      I guess you meant to say "LG/Samsung" in that second sentence, not LG/Sharp.

      From what I've heard, the new iPad Mini uses Sharp screens.

    3. Re:Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone 5.

    4. Re:Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by guidryp · · Score: 1

      That was the rumor, the only thing anyone has seen in a Mini, is a Samsung display. Which wasn't part of the Rumor.

      Yeah, that was a typo, I meant to say Samsung/LG.

    5. Re:Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by guidryp · · Score: 1

      That isn't evidence. They are just repeating the rumor, much like the rumor for iPad mini, where Samsung was out, and Sharp was in.

      But when they dissected a Mini, it had a Samsung screen. So much for rumors.

      There is also one other problem. Sharp doesn't build IPS screens. LG and Samsung do (though Samsung calls it PLS).

      Sharp is heavily invested ASV technology which is a VA offshoot with inferior viewing angles.

      I have yet to see any evidence that Sharp screens are used in any of Apple products.

    6. Re:Name one Apple product that uses Sharp LCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the tumor, the only thing anyone has seen in a Mini, is a Samsung display. Which wasn't part of the tumor.

      Yeah, that was a typo, I meant to say Samsung/LG.

      Speaking about typos and collapse... FTFY.

  7. Re:SHARP AND AAPL: SHE IS A GOING DOWN MY CAPTAIN by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The 24-month chart is probably more informative than your 3-month chart. I realize it kind of spoils your intended narrative, though.

    Like any stock, Apple's shares have seen significant corrections before - especially in the modern market.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  8. Lacking clarity by Adammil2000 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Coincidentally, we laughed at the store yesterday noticing that the only fuzzy displays were the Sharp ones in comparison to the others. Can they be so ignorant of their product quality issues?

    1. Re:Lacking clarity by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      How did you know it was a Sharp LCD? How did you check?

    2. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you were any kind of a smart consumer you would know that the showroom displays are never calibrated correctly... Many times they are adjusted based on what else they are trying to sell.. (eg: monster cables vs regular cables, hdmi vs component, LED vs LCD, 3D vs anything else)..

    3. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ive noticed sharp have the best LCD quality. altho Its priced out of the market :(-

      Ive often seen department stores playing low res SD content on SHARP TV's and blurays on the Samsungs.

    4. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LED vs LCD

      If you were any kind of smart consumer I guess you would have said LED vs CCFL, as in backlight technologies. There's no such thing as LED displays for consumer-grade monitors and screens, only OLED displays for mobile phones and some hand-held gaming equipment.

    5. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Store displays are notorious for being configured to make whatever gives them the best profits and commissions look the best. Not saying Sharp are good displays, but NEVER base your opinions of LCD or plasma screens on what you see in a store. There are plenty of non biased sites that can provide accurate information.

    6. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising. Other manufacturers, such as Panasonic, encourage sales of their products by giving holidays and other prizes to the highest-selling salespeople. It's not markup that keeps your manufacturing company afloat, it's sales volume.

    7. Re:Lacking clarity by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stores often calibrate displays according to what they are currently trying to push. using tricks such as lower res vs high res video, warm colours and poor calibration to guide you to what they want you to buy. Always check online before browsing displays for real agnostic reviews.

    8. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      displays are one of those things where you can say "It is the exception that proves the rule". never shop for displays in store, stores can make any TV look good or bad and frequently do. This is one of those exceptions where actually seeing the product in person can give you are far more warped view of reality than looking online, selecting a display from in store is for mugs. There a quite a few independent sites that review TV's with published details of how they calibrate and compare them and even whether they are using calibration settings as specified by the manufacturer, Use those sites and to be sure always cross reference with a couple of them.

    9. Re:Lacking clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When comparing displays, I've always asked the store to run the same HD stream to all of the displays, and also asked if I can calibrate them myself. They've always been happy to oblige. This in northern europe, though. Is this a no-no in the US?

    10. Re:Lacking clarity by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without Monster Cables, the other displays are going to be cubic but far less rounded, the contrast less warm, and the colours markedly less spatial. I'm no expert, but even my unprofessional eye can spot these differences if I'm told up-front that Monster cables are being used.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    11. Re:Lacking clarity by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Im actually not sure if youre serious or not, well done.

    12. Re:Lacking clarity by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      This in northern europe, though. Is this a no-no in the US?

      If you look like you have money and are planning to buy something, they usually will let you fiddle with the computers quite a bit. That's been my experience anyway, and I often look like a scruffy nerf-herder. As long as you've got money, you get to do stuff. It's the American way, after all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Lacking clarity by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1, Funny

      Joking, thankfully. Just pleasantly entertained by the crowd who think their DVDs will become 1080 HD if they use Monster HDMI cables, lovingly crafted under the first full moon of Autumn and electrically insulated by braiding the hair of virgins (female) with yeti pubic hair.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  9. Short all around - shorting stock, shorter vision by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Apple's stock constantly hovers around a 13-14 P/E.

    So what happens next quarter when Apple has had yet another 27-40% growth spurt, fueled by a large number of new products recently released?

    The stock all along has been drug along by the combination of inexorable growth and the inevitability of the stock having to rise to keep up with the profits that Apple is actually making.

    BTW, Amazon's stock has a P/E of 3000 (!).

    So mull that over before you decide to short.

    Basically the only people not buying AAPL are people who lack any vision.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. well by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

    that's dull

  11. Apple are trying to move away from Samsung by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2

    Really, which LCD displays do they supply to Apple?

    Apple tried to diversify their supply chain away from Samsung. Sharp are amongst those who made the retina displays for the iPhone 5 (and the mini Ipad)

    This would be a really good time for Samsung to put the boot in. Interesting to see if they do anything.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Apple are trying to move away from Samsung by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      This would be a really good time for Samsung to put the boot in.

      Samsung already announced they wouldn't renew their supply agreement with Apple (apparently largely due to the declining volume of orders under it as Apple moved to other suppliers, including Sharp, for cost reasons), so its not exactly like they've got a boot left to put in. Obviously, if Apple loses access to some of the alternatives, and looks to work with Samsung again, Samsung can drive a hard bargain, but its not like they wouldn't do that anyway.

  12. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Basically the only people not buying AAPL are people who lack any vision.

    When I hear that said about a stock, I'm inclined to research shorting it.

  13. Great products, poor marketing by guises · · Score: 4, Informative

    My impression of Sharp may be anachronistic, I don't know if the company is still what it used to be, but I think of them as manufacturing really terrific products, particularly portable electronics (remember these?), but hardly selling them or anything at all outside of Japan. Even within Japan I guess their marketing wasn't so good. Sorta the anti-Apple - poor marketing, but great and often pretty open products.

    1. Re:Great products, poor marketing by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Well a big part of the problem is that Sharp didn't anticipate the effect that smartphones would have on the portable electronic market.... They made some really cool gadgets but as smartphones continue to encroach on the functionality of these gadgets, many are questioning the wisdom of spending extra money and carrying extra gadgets when their smartphone can do 95+% of what said gadgets can do....
      And of course Sharp was really late to the game with Android smartphones, and their offerings(while having really nice screens) are pretty meh imo.

    2. Re:Great products, poor marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen some good (consumer) products in the past from Sharp but what they are doing now? Most of their product line is now either "special", industry or (non-home) office .

    3. Re:Great products, poor marketing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They are very popular in Japan, but they have struggled to export their products. Most Japanese manufacturers go to great lengths to localize their products for other markets, to the point where people don't really think of them as being Japanese. Sharp doesn't seem to have that nack.

      Another problem is that a lot of the products Sharp makes simply are not saleable in the rest of the world. They have some fantastic lighting system, but who outside of Japan is going to buy a high power LED ceiling light with remote control, ion generator, insect repellent, multiple lighting modes, morning wake-up feature and so forth? Their health products like ion generators are not popular in the west either, so while a fridge or vacuum cleaner with ion generator might be popular in Japan it won't get far here. Only the Japanese want a dust sensor that can detect particles too small for the human eye to perceive, because to the rest of us if it looks clean it is clean.

      Sharp is just unlucky in that respect. The downturn in Japan and the downturn in global TV sales hit them more than other manufacturers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Great products, poor marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course Sharp was really late to the game with Android smartphones, and their offerings(while having really nice screens) are pretty meh imo.

      If you look at their entire set of Android offerings (go to Android.com and select "all countries"). A number of the ones exclusive to Japan look good at first glance. Only two of those are available here and they're not particularly good.

  14. Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by guttentag · · Score: 4, Informative

    The #3 television manufacturer in the world, Sony, announced on Friday it's cutting its medium-term TV sales goals in half.

    Four days earlier, #5 Panasonic (Matsushita) announced it's cutting its flatscreen TV production in half.

    Sharp is ranked #4. Apparently all three of the Japanese manufacturers bet too big on TVs and are getting trounced by Korean rivals Samsung (#1) and LG (#2).

    1. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and LG (#2).

      Surprising. I've never thought of LG as a maker of well designed, quality products. The smartphones I've seen from them, for example, are crappy.

    2. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by v1 · · Score: 1

      This is probably because a lot of consumers have figured out that the TV they have is fine and they don't need a new one. Since they just got done buying one recently, the manufacturers seem to think that the buying trend will just continue to climb. It's a bubble, and it's popping.

      There's just very little profit to be made selling TVs nowadays. Everyone that wanted a large TV *has* one by now, and there's nothing really that new that will encourage them to replace what they have. Prices have been driven down so far now that it's hard to turn a buck.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by RubberDogBone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Korean brands have a lot of awareness right now, thanks in part to Apple basically standing Samsung up and saying "we're scared of Samsung!" which really added both brand awareness and boosted their reputation -which was nothing to sneeze at anyway.

      Samsung has worked very hard to kill Sony. For a long time, that was their main mission: effing bury Sony. The only problem is that they've overshot the goal by making better products more or less across the board, and also that Sony has flopped in nearly every business unit. Samsung now sets the trends in phones and TVs, does very well with tablets, and has decent exposure in regular consumer electronics like pocket cameras and other items. Sony can only hope to follow. Aside from the PlayStation brand, Sony leads.... nowhere. In the future, Samsung is only going to become an even tougher company. They play to win. If iconic Japanese brands die along the way, that's absolutely fine with Samsung.

      LG, after changing their name, embarked on putting appliances in lots of homes. That's a great way to make entire families aware of your brand: it's the fridge, the washing machine, and also the TV. And it's a brand with great peer acceptance. Your neighbors know LG and probably think it's a fine brand.

      Both of these brands make good products for the most part. The neat part is that they both fight like hell to beat each other. So not only are they stomping on Panasonic and Sony, they are also trying to beat each other. This puts tremendous pressure on everybody else in the game. If you are Sony, you don't have one opponent or even two, you have closer to three or four because as much as Samsung and LG are bitter rivals, they have the same enemies and they will fight as one very tough force. If you are Sony, you don't just have to beat Samsung, you also have to beat LG AND you have to beat both of them combined which is intense enough to be its own entity.

      After them, the Japanese brands are kind of lumped in with the no-name Chinese brands. Panasonic and Sony can't easily compete on price with the likes of Vizio or Sceptre, or the new Chinese-licensed brands like JVC, Magnavox or Philips. China hasn't stopped their own brands but they have realized they can just license some old brand name like JVC, play off the name and market what would otherwise be a noname product as a brand product.

      TVs went through a phase where flat screens were a premium product, and at the high end yes they still are. But the low end is dominated by cheap TVs. Heck, you can get a 32-32" LCD TV at drug stores now, same as in the old days when a 12" B/W TV sold at drug stores. China will own that end of the market moving to the middle. Korea owns the top end -with Pioneer in for honorable mention on the high end. Everybody else needs to put on some knee pads and brace for impact. The middle market is going to get squeezed like an Oreo double-stuff left out in the sun.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    4. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where planned obsolescence is coming into play though, and people don't have money to buy a new TV every 10 month when the economy sucks.

    5. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by teadrop · · Score: 0

      Good analyse, too bad I run out of mod points.

    6. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone that wanted a large TV *has* one by now, and there's nothing really that new that will encourage them to replace what they have.

      Yes, but even so... If you were in the market for a TV, would you rather pick from a pool of Sony/Panasonic/Sharp or a pool of Samsung/LG?

      Given my own observations, many consumers think Sony = overpriced, Panasonic = plasma, Sharp = RCA (lol, as far as brand recognition of "quality", whether it's true or not). What's left if you're the average consumer? Vizio if you're into bang-for-buck, Samsung/LG if you're into name brand/quality.

    7. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't really about Samsung and LG being superior, though Samsung certainly has passed Sony and arguably Sharp as well in Quality. However this is more about the wrong bets these companies made on manufacturing in Japan, the strength of the Japanese Yen is driving there business through the floor, while you could certainly argue this is there own fault for putting all their eggs in one basket it isn't really about product quality or desirability.

    8. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      JVC stands for Japan Victor Corporation.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    9. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      While generally they are not fighting for first place in the quality stakes, they do have a very compelling price/performance set of offerings, the top end of the market is rarely going to be the highest volume of sales, it is the middle and low end where LG play that garner the high sales, they even sell some of there panels to Sony for there bravia range I believe? at least I remember some articles about that happening a year or 2 ago.

    10. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me either but then I realised all the TVs in my house are LGs because they happened to be the nicest value at the time.

    11. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 2

      That was last year. Still, I think that what are hurting them the most are the high prices of energy and the strong yen. The yen is around 20% more expensive than 2 years ago. No matter how much they try to restructure they can't offer competitive prices against Korean or Taiwanese offers.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    12. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its nothing more than a brand anyone can license now...

    13. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by nolife · · Score: 1

      I don't think televisions were a bubble, I think the switch over from CRT is done and lcd and plasma televisions are generally now just plain old commodity items. The industry tried keeping the prices higher by adding small incemental tweaks to the line up and exracting more money with higher end units by adding internet functionality and applications, wireless, changing from florescent to LED, DLNA, slightly thinner, 3D, 120hz, 240hz. All the while adding features but the overall prices were still about the same. Now, what's left to maintain the premium price and to keep people looking for something better, what specific features seperates one brand from the other now? They are all "good enough" and cheap enough for the average person. The premium is gone.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    14. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep the bubble caused by the HD change over has finally popped. I predicted this when HD tv ownership among my friends hit 60% this year.

    15. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by It's+the+tripnaut! · · Score: 1

      Korea owns the top end -with Pioneer in for honorable mention on the high end.



      Pioneer ceased manufacturing its vaunted "Kuro" TV's in 2009. The company fully exited the tv business in March 2010.

    16. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by slew · · Score: 1

      I think you are mistaken about Samsung and Sony. Sony has never really been a very big industrial company. Although it hit it big in a few big consumer electronics markets over time (transistor radios, TVs, cd-player, Playstation) and diversified into media holding, compared to the mega industrial companies in Japan, it never really was a big industrial player, say like Panasonic (Matsushita), JVC, or Mitsubishi. On the other side, Samsung has always been one of the big Korean Industrial giants (chaebols or family owned industrial conglomerates).

      Samsung's goals have been simply to just dominate every market they enter (basically the war-cry of it's ex-Founder/Chairman Lee). I don't think they ever specifically looked at Sony as a company to emulate or even take-out, but just yet another company to trounce along the way. I don't know if you remember but back in early 2000 there was a wave of Samsung Trinitron TVs. As I understand it, this was because Sony needed a supplier of LCD for the transition to up-and-comming LCD-TV market and traded a licence to the (dying) Trinitron name and tube-technology to sweeeten things up for Samsung. If they wanted to, Samsung could have killed Sony right there.

      Sure some Sony-Samsung rivalry makes a good fiction for a cable-tv miniseries, but doesn't really jive with reality.

    17. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      Panasonic = plasma

      You say that like it's a bad thing, you can have my Panasonic G20 when you prise it from my cold dead fingers.

    18. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pioneer sold its elite line to sharp

    19. Re:Japan's Big 3 TV Makers Struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Panasonic Microwave....

  15. Is this important? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure I understand the relevance to tech or geeks.

    Sharp's position is entirely determined by the choices they make or have made. If they make bad decisions, their business will suffer and if they make good ones their business will prosper.

    Unlike tech-oriented political news or tech-oriented situation reports ("such-and-so has a 0-day exploit"), we have no influence over the outcome. Our collective outrage can inform and influence political positions (maybe), and our judgement and expertise can influence technical decisions ("they never fixed the problem"), but can we really influence business decisions?

    There are other LCD manufacturers, right? Does this even affect us?

    Sharp might collapse? Um... OK, got it. Next article.

    1. Re:Is this important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! I'd think slashdotters would be far more interested in knowing about the formal recommendation within the Federal Trade Commission to sue Google over anti-trust violations in its FRAND patent licensing practices.

    2. Re:Is this important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most moronic clueless post ive ever read on Slashdot.

      Can you safely bet your entire saving/assets on a currency years in advance knowing its going to go up or down in a big way? Well if the yen hadnt risen to such heights you wouldn't be reading about all these giant Japanese corporations now being in trouble.

      Also a lot of people may not be aware but sharp actually produce some of the best LCD's with the best picture quality. but most wouldn't know it. It would be a crying shame if Sharp went under.

    3. Re:Is this important? by godrik · · Score: 1

      I still feel like it is important to know for me. It gives an idea of the current shape of the market: "sharp is being eaten".

    4. Re:Is this important? by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are very few large scale LCD manufacturers. Arguably the 2 biggest names are Sharp and Samsung, Apple are actively pushing away from Samsung and looking to Sharp so it would be very nasty for apple. The collapse of Sharp would have a big impact on who makes your tablet, smartphone and television screens in future and potentially the market prices of those devices as shortages or lack of competition will potentially affect prices.

    5. Re:Is this important? by mellyra · · Score: 1

      Sharp's position is entirely determined by the choices they make or have made. If they make bad decisions, their business will suffer and if they make good ones their business will prosper.

      There are external factors such as exchange rates that can hurt a business badly without it making any "wrong" choices.

  16. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    And those who are taking a profit. AAPL generally follows the market but when it's bearish, it tends to go down slightly more than average.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  17. They just need to...Yen & R&D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Part of Sharp's problem's are twofold. Their investment in R&D accounts for a lot of their debt. And of course Japans overall problem with the Yen.

  18. Testing the waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Checking to see if SHARP can also jump on the "too big to fail" free money bandwagon. Isn't it fun when failure has no consequences?

  19. Flat Panel TVs have become Cheap by Streetlight · · Score: 2

    Flat Panel TVs have become pretty cheap and with all the added functions and reliability, everybody who wants one or more may already have them. I have a Sharp Aquos which has an estimated 60,000 hours of liftetime. It's great, by the way. At 8 hours per day, that's about 20 years of use. And, as I said, everyone who wants or needs one or more of these things already has them, there's not much of a market. I've seen prices for 50 +" Samsungs or Sharps for $1,200 - $1,500 at Costco. It seems that Sony has already given up on flat panels even though they are supposed to be pretty good, maybe the best. Not to advocate an illegal pricing structure, it does seem like the producers have to increase prices.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Flat Panel TVs have become Cheap by Comen · · Score: 1

      I have two Sharp Aquos TV's a 65" and a 46" and both have been great TV's, it would be sad to see them fall I think.

    2. Re:Flat Panel TVs have become Cheap by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I happen to know that a 52" AQUOS has been available at Costco for around $1200 in the past... and that it's a brilliant display. Sucks down the power though, if only I'd just waited for LED backlight.

      I dispute the notion that Bravia is any better than AQUOS. The reviews don't say so, they didn't look better even in the utterly unideal environment of costco, there's no reason to believe they should be any better... Sony is the Japanese Apple. Make it look nicer and slap your name on it and sell it for more. I miss the days when they actually made better kit, but those days are long gone. Now they just charge more.

      I don't want to hate on Sony just to hate on Sony, so I will mention that I've owned countless Trinitron displays, but eventually happened on Diamondtron which is superior — not least because of the color of the mask lines. And I own a STR-DE635 which also came from Costco, many many moons ago. I still have the whole set. I have carted it from place to place to place and set it up many times, abusing it all the while. I have hooked it up to speakers which made it cry, or at least shut off the front channels. And it has performed faithfully all along, its only crimes being topping out at Dolby Digital 5.1 and lacking video switching fancier than composite, which I don't use anyhow. The TV has a ton of inputs and I like to be able to switch audio and video independently.

      I got lucky there, I miss the days when you could buy something that said Sony on it and expect it to last for a while. Except CD players, they never did manage to reliably make a laser pickup that would last worth a crap. For being so involved with the invention of the optical drive, they sure are bad at making one that will last, or even eject properly. I've got one of their DVD-RWs in my PC (as the second) and I have to fiddle with it to get it to eject. I've got a mac DVDRW slot-loading drive in my HTPC and it wants ages to ID a disk that a TSST will just play.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Is this important?-Yes Virginia it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it every time slashdot has a story, there's always one questioning why the story is even posted here? Here I'll do the research you didn't. Sharp makes a lot of electronics that is sold to other companies to brand under their names. Two Sharp makes electronic components that also go into a lot of products. There absence would be a big hole for awhile.

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. He meant the LCD panel itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tear open that Apple display, you won't find an Apple logo on the display panel.

    1. Re:He meant the LCD panel itself. by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You won't find a Dell logo inside the Dell display either. What's your point?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:He meant the LCD panel itself. by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like there's a Dell logo on that U2711 display panel, righty?

  23. Exactly, and less reliance on Samsung results! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And wouldn't that make Apple just so happy.

  24. Re:You Priviliged Oppressor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The horror, the horror

  25. Apple could end those other product lines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And keep the divisions relevant to their products. I mean, Jobs did this very thing to Apple itself when he returned.

    Do you remember the Apple QuickTake digital camera?

    Nor does anyone else.

    1. Re:Apple could end those other product lines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a QuickTake 150. Noisy fucking piece of shit and not resolutionary at all. Worst. Camera. Ever. Even $2 web cams in the supermarket are better.

    2. Re:Apple could end those other product lines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sharp is a Japanese company, if you think an American company will be able to walk into their market and buy a company with the intension of stripping it down to only what they need you are dreaming, if they let them buy it at all it will come with a whole load of provisions requiring them to maintain it. This simply will not happen. Either the company needs to find a Japanese buyer or they need to make the harsh cuts and realignments themselves before being sold. Either way is bad news for apple. Only real way for Apple here is probably to help support them financially with prepayments or large orders as Apple are up shit creek if sharp go down.

  26. translation is (partially) to be blamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2012/11/05/sharp-statement-lost-in-translation/?mod=WSJBlog

  27. Extract the Chinese child's soul. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insert into iPad mini. Call it magical.

    Your iPad is made with the tears, sweat and blood of the underclass of China - and someday it'll be made with the tears, sweat and blood of the underclass of South Carolina. Mark my words, we won't always be the consumers of the world.

    1. Re:Extract the Chinese child's soul. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Mark my words, we won't always be the consumers of the world.

      We can only hope.

    2. Re:Extract the Chinese child's soul. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You want the return of early industrial age, when most people could barely afford to live on monotonous 14-16 hour a day factory work?

      Are you insane?

    3. Re:Extract the Chinese child's soul. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      No, but it's not good to consume and not produce. It's got to come to an end eventually.

  28. Sharps market cap is about $3 billion. by voss · · Score: 1

    Apple has easily 10 times that in cash on hand and a quarterly profit of 8 billion. If Apple wanted Sharp, the only thing blocking it would be japanese or american regulators. In reality a middle company like Foxconn or one of apples other suppliers would make a better fit.

    1. Re:Sharps market cap is about $3 billion. by symbolset · · Score: 2

      If only it were that easy. A number of patent cross-licenses and other contracts go void in the event of a change in control. That's why nobody has bought AMD yet.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Sharps market cap is about $3 billion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Wikipedia, Sharp has total assets of ¥2.614 trillion ($32,480,109,271 USD). That is quite a lot more than $3 billion.

  29. Capitalist fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone expect any other result, who gets stuck with the bankruptcy bill.

  30. They just need to...Buy Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from the fact that Apple doesn't have the needed expertise to run a company like Sharp. Money, nor a need for particular parts confers that expertise. There's also going to be a culture clash between an American company and a Japanese one. Also much like the American government has say so over foreign companies buying locals, the Japanese government has the same power.

    1. Re:They just need to...Buy Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't have the money??

      Sharp is ready to collapse!

      Expertise I can give you.

    2. Re:They just need to...Buy Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung should by them and stop sending displays to apple

    3. Re:They just need to...Buy Apple. by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1. No, not nearly enough unless they want to spend pretty much all of it. Sharp is huge, and selling to a foreigner would require massive amount of extra funds to essentially bribe a lot of japanese legislature.
      2. Sharp has problems with money flow due to current banking environment and crisis hitting its sales and profit margins hard, in addition to increasing competition. It's not really ready to collapse, that statement was most likely aimed at helping it secure low cost loans with governmental backing, as is the way of things in Japan.
      3. Expertise in question simply doesn't exist. This is what Sony tried once, threw a LOT of resources at the problem and failed in a spectacular margin. Biggest problem is completely different corporate culture, japanese and american simply do not mix.

      Many people nowadays think that money solves everything. It really doesn't. What money can do is support inefficiency until it runs out. But it won't fix the problem causing the drain.

    4. Re:They just need to...Buy Apple. by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      He didn't say Apple doesn't have the money, he said money doesn't automatically confer expertise.

    5. Re:They just need to...Buy Apple. by Curupira · · Score: 1

      It's not really ready to collapse, that statement was most likely aimed at helping it secure low cost loans with governmental backing, as is the way of things in Japan

      Are you really sure that this way of things is exclusive to Japan?

  31. what will Geoge Takei do now? by Virtucon · · Score: 0
    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  32. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I see people shorting a stock because they read a comment on slashdot.......

  33. Mega Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, sometimes I think it would be awesome if people learned what they were talking about before spouting off.
    From someone in Japan, who reads Japanese news, and knows about Sharp, let me dispell a few things:

    >What does anyone really expect when SHARP sells BS products like the Sharp IG-BC2UB High Density Plasmacluster
    PlasmaCluster is a very respected brand in the US, and Sharp is widely regarded to make the best air filters.
    These also sell for quite a profit margin, I expect. (They are not cheap, but I doubt they cost that much to make).

    >Sharp produces commodities.
    Well yes, and no. Sharp produces both components (like LCD Screen panels), and appliances like air filters, cell phones, etc.
    Sharp is *not* a budget brand in Japan.

    >Coincidentally, we laughed at the store yesterday noticing that the only fuzzy displays were the Sharp ones in comparison to the others
    Well firstly, why would you laugh about that? Anyway, Sharp is well known to be one of the most sophisticated manufacturers of LCD displays in not just Japan, but the world.
    Their Aquos brand LCD TVs are easily one of the most popular in Japan because of the display quality, and they source LCDs to Apple and other manufacturers as well.
    If you saw a crappy Sharp display, it was either very very old, or you are full of crap. How would you know what brand display panel was in the thing you were looking at?

    >I'm not sure I understand the relevance to tech or geeks.
    Well if Sharp were only a LCD manufacturer, it might be one thing, but they make a lot of components and products.
    Sharp disappearing will leave a crater on not just the Japanese Business Landscape, but the electronics landscape.

    > Sharp Failed to Diversify
    Again, Sharp makes lots of products, and lots of components that go into other stuff. I don't think they make anything with an obscenely high profit margin, though, and if they do, then it probably pays for something else that's losing money.
    (The prices may be high, but I think many of their costs are high as well).
    They pay high labor costs do to most of their manufacturing in Japan, and they invested hugely in a very large plant for making very large LCD screens.
    This was a bet-the-company type of move, and they made it just before the Lehman shock thing, and guess what - not so many people wanted huge screen TVs right after that.
    They also invested heavily in making solar panels, but I think that hasn't worked out as well as planned, either.
    And now when people have money, they like buying smaller screen things like PSP Vita or SmartPhones/tablets. They are trying to re-gear in that direction, but it is taking them time.
    They were a bit late to the SmartPhone game, although their Aquos Keitai Android phones are among the most popular in Japan now.

    Still Sharp has a log of world-class technology, experience/experts, and legit patents/processes.

    They won't disappear, someone will buy them if it comes to that.

  34. Sad by drolli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Big Japanese mobile companies always take a long time to turn around if something happens. They all still don't understand why the iphone is successful since all the management level there was brought up in a time when NTT had a monopoly and the companies produced mobile phones nearly exclusively for NTT/docomo (imode), which in turn force fed the mobiles to the customers.

    I liked Sharps products, learned programming on a MZ-80B. I always wanted to buy a zaurus, one of the first linux-based PDAs, but it was mainly sold/available inside Japan. When i lived in Japanlater, i bought a sharp netwalker T1 (only available in Japan).

    The netwalker demonstrates all of Sharps shortcomings in a technically not so bad device:

    -Target the Japanese market only from the beginning

    -make no advertisements about the special features it has (e.g. standard usb host port, interesting pointing device layout)

    -make a half-assed decision of using Ubuntu on it (for *two* devices they used the ARM port of Ubuntu)

    -leave it unpolished, with easy to fix show-stopper bugs, trusting that the Japanese will always buy Sharp

    1. Re:Sad by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Big Japanese mobile companies always take a long time to turn around if something happens. They all still don't understand why the iphone is successful since all the management level there was brought up in a time when NTT had a monopoly and the companies produced mobile phones nearly exclusively for NTT/docomo (imode), which in turn force fed the mobiles to the customers.

      Japanese electronics companies are some of the most innovative and fastest changing in the world. The Japanese economy is build in the idea that every year they come out with new models that have new widgets that people buy even though their old one isn't broke.

      Japanese phones have had a lot of features that are only just coming to the west for years. Things like indoor navigation in underground railway stations, NFC payments, amazing camera stabilization, WiMax.

      Every Japanese electronics manufacturer's motto is something to do with innovation. Their whole business model is built around making new features that induce people to buy a few appliance even if the old one is still working fine. Fridges that photosynthese you vegetables, washing machines that can iron your cloths and recycle water to cut down your bills. Tea makers that sent a text message when used so that you can be sure your elderly relative is still okay and active. Most western appliances are basically the same as they were 20 or 30 years ago.

      I wish more of those products were available in the west. They call Japan the "Galapagos" because it has different technology to everyone else, lots of Japan only products whose features might eventually filter down to the rest of us if in a few years.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Sad by drolli · · Score: 1

      *Most* japanese appliances sold are the same as 30 years ago. Yes, Japan has a diverse market with a larger than usual amount of devices which have advanced features (which i enjoyed). However, in the four years i spent there i have seen a lot (the majority) of normal fridges, low end phones, and water cookers for 20 Euro which did not sent text messages.

      Not lets talk about text messages, a good example for my comment, which was not at all about technological lack of progress. For sure you are aware that Japan is the only country where the big phone providers blocked SMS to customers of the other provider? (Which put me in the absurd sitation that, when roaming, i could sent SMS to everybody, but when i bought a phone only to half of the people).

      NFC payments in Japan are by no way a property of the phones there NFC payment card existed independently and later some phones also got this technology. *ironically* NFC payments are *not* a technological difficulty (as you suppose) but an organizational. Without JREast pushing the Suica cards this never would have happened.

      And, yes your comment *exactly* states the problem. Japanese companies were used to pushing out generation by generation of devices. They completly relied on the Japanese market. And technology was only a pretext for doing so. The reasons and cultural deficiencies behind this are complicated to understand if you have not lived there for some time. However, nowadays the Japanes market is crumbling slowly away, and the outside products get cheaper and cheaper, and the Japanese buy these like hell.

      So. the world has changed, and istead of adapting and pushing products into china and the rest of the world, Japan stays in isolation. What really fucking irritated me was that no Japanese found in necessary to learn Chinese.

  35. Repost that it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should open source their OS. I've been hoping to see someone more kernel hackey crack the current display menus, and I'm sure it would a draw a buzz. Quick cash injection Sharp! Look to it!

  36. Re:SHARP AND AAPL: SHE IS A GOING DOWN MY CAPTAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    your right, but stock dropping $100 after the release of a new phone is a little worrying.

  37. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    So what happens next quarter when Apple has had yet another 27-40% growth spurt, fueled by a large number of new products recently released?

    What happens if Apple has a shrink spurt instead?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  38. keep it away from computers too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ion air cleaners are also REALLY REALLY REALLY BAD anyplace with electronics..

    Yeah the ion sticks to the dust and lets you get it out of the air easier... but... that charged particle is now attracted to all your nifty expensive electronic equipment and starts growing little forests of fuzz on everything.

    its worse for your electronics than owning a longhaired cat....

    1. Re:keep it away from computers too by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      worse for your electronics than owning a longhaired cat

      My cat was acquitted on all charges in the case of bad drive vs Orangie Orangejuice

    2. Re:keep it away from computers too by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the ozone also breaks down a lot of rubbers and softer plastics making them brittle. Granted, it's more of an annoyance when it comes to computers, but if you hold in your case fans with those rubber screw things you can expect that your fans will suddenly detach themselves from your case after a while.

  39. X68000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should start making and selling X68000 computers again.

  40. That's what unmarketable means by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It's not about quality, it's about how many you can sell. Nobody wants a TV they can only watch in a dark room, except for a very small group of men. That makes the product rather... unmarketable.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  41. Re:Apple buyout? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Doesn't sharp current produce the LCD display found in the iPhone 5?

    Because Samsung gave them the finger.

  42. You can't solve financial problems that way. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    You can't solve financial problems by raising prices. You have charge prices similar to what others are charging or else you will just lose all your business. You have to look at what's driving your costs and figure out if you can reduce them enough to stay afloat, or if you need to be rethinking your business plan.

    1. Re:You can't solve financial problems that way. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You can charge more when there's a shortage on the market. But there isn't one now, unlike people are implying. There may be on in the future as there are basically three large scale LCD panel manufacturers in the world, Samsung, LG and Sharp. If apple really does manage to get itself banned from purchasing from Samsung, LG and Sharp may be able to increase prices on their hardware sold to apple due to less competition and possible shortage with increase in sales from other competing products.

      That said, this is extremely unlikely. Samsung, like most huge megacorps is an amalgam of essentially independent parts, and even if one part is in a pissing match with the buyer of product of another part, that is unlikely to seriously impact business.

    2. Re:You can't solve financial problems that way. by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      You can't solve financial problems by raising prices.

      You can if you have a monopoly. As far as I can tell, there's only two players in the high end, high volume LCD business, and one of those is at war with Apple. That leaves Apple with only one choice of supplier.

    3. Re:You can't solve financial problems that way. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Samsung is supplying LCD panels to Apple now, but not for much longer. This is going to hurt the quality of Apple's products, because LG can't make Retina displays worth a damn; apparently only Samsung can.

  43. Not likely. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    Apple doesn't buy large companies. And there's a good reason, Apple's management doesn't need to be worrying about restructuring and turning around a failing Flat-Panel display manufacturer. They've got enough to worry about just designing and selling their products.

    But, Apple has been known to invest in companies in order to ramp up and modernize production. It's not too big a step to go from that to bailing out a company with loans. Though It would probably be smarter for them to give the money to a company that isn't on the verge of collapse to buy the facilities from Sharp. Less to worry about.

    1. Re:Not likely. by Teun · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't need to invest in Sharp to keep it afloat, they only need to pay a reasonable price for Sharp displays.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  44. Happy Sharp Aquos owner here! by alantus · · Score: 1

    As a happy owner of a Sharp Aquos TV, I really hope Sharp can survive.

    In Japan, Sharp is the only brand of TVs with both Japanese and English menu settings.
    My 3 year old Sharp TV even has an RS-232 port that I have connected to my HTPC and I use it to control most things from it: power on/off, change input, volume, etc. The TV even came with a manual describing the protocol, what else could I ask for?

    I have checked their newer models and unfortunately they have removed this feature. I am hoping to find some similar control capability via the network port, with an open protocol, but haven't found anything yet (I welcome any hints!).

    The only thing my Sharp TV doesn't do well is displaying the image properly when using nouveau, but since it works well when using the nvidia driver I'm not sure if its a buggy EDID implementation from Sharp or nouveau.

    1. Re:Happy Sharp Aquos owner here! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's possible it has bad EDID 1.x fallback information, and only EDID 2.x works. Try exporting the EDID under nvidia and then making your own EDID 1.x, then loading that manually in the driver options. Fun eh? There's some free software for windows to make EDID 1.x files, if you can't find it, send me email (see above) and I will figure out what it was and where to get it. I want to say it was from phoenix.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Happy Sharp Aquos owner here! by alantus · · Score: 1

      Yes, its from Pheonix, just found it and will give it a try, thanks for the tip!

    3. Re:Happy Sharp Aquos owner here! by swb · · Score: 1

      Me too, I'd kind of like them to stay in business at least for continuing firmware updates on my six month old 70" Aquos. There were two updates in the last month, and I'm sure the second was to fix issues in the first, but I never noticed.

      I don't really use the "smart" features of the TV (although I do have it networked) since I have so many other "smart" devices (Tivo, AppleTV, etc).

      But I'd hate for something major to happen like some HDMI protocol change that newer boxes started using that my TV didn't understand.

  45. Re:SHARP AND AAPL: SHE IS A GOING DOWN MY CAPTAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charts like these exist for one purpose: The Trend. If a stock is trending down, it will most likely continue down. That's why it's called a trend. That's why the chart exists.

    Not even a month ago (or so) a Slashdotter saw AAPL go below $700 and bought it at 695, saying, it will be back "over $700 tomorrow". That was $200 ago. I believe he bought 100 shares (claimed). That's 200 x 100 American, plus those piss fees. All because he "thought" he knew what he was doing. Trends don't lie. Think of all those babies' shoes.

  46. Re:Apple buyout? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Samsung is still producing apple displays, the small ipad one is samsung for example.

  47. Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this void the warranty of my Sharp EL-330A calculator (in black)?

    1. Re:Warranty by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Will this void the warranty of my Sharp EL-330A calculator (in black)?

      D'oh

  48. Sad times by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    I have fond memories of some really nice Sharp HiFi (Optonica) but despite being fairly ubiquitous in the market with a toe in pretty much all electronic/electric product areas, they did seem to shift from a 'High Street' brand to a parts supplier. As a result, they have dropped of most people's radar as a brand.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  49. True by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Just like say Japan did to the European colonies and Germany did to almost all of Europe?

    There is indeed lingering resentment and the Japanese indeed did not apologize or pay damages unlike the Germans but to think this matters on a high level unless it is convenient (when either side needs to divert attention from internal problems) is childish.

    The higher-ups have no morals, they are perfectly willing to deal with former enemies often before the last victims have stopped twitching. See McArthur and the rebuilding of Japan. Prosecuting Japanese war criminals? Far to inconvenient when massive contracts are to be won.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:True by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      You dont understand, this enmity goes back a long time (long time as in 10+ centuries). And it has persisted for a long time too.

  50. So Apple supports via prepayments for panels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharp is then encouraged to slim down to their work with Apple. Apple buys the newly streamlined Sharp. Tada.

  51. There is something wrong... by Quakeulf · · Score: 1

    ...with the internets when I can read this article and appreciate the correct use of possessive in the form of its without the erroneous apostrophe.

  52. But a "Sharp Apple" by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apple is more likely to buy Sharp and try to keep the entire supply chain in-house.

    But a "Sharp Apple" could leave a bitter taste

    1. Re:But a "Sharp Apple" by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if it was a Sharp Apple with rounded corners?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:But a "Sharp Apple" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that joke just never gets old...

  53. That is too bad... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Because right now SHARP tv's are the best you can buy. They are better quality than Anyone else and honestly far larger than anyone else. Where else can you pick up an 80" LED backlight LCD for under $3500.00

    LG is crap recently. their redesign has all plugs coming straight out the back.... DUH, no wall mounting unles you want a 3" gap.
    Panasonic is still plagued with failed power supply boards.
    Sony is overpriced rebranded LG.
    Samsung sets are junk. Just like how their projectors are junk. Control protocols for samsung are random at best, and not reliable to even turn the sets on or off.

    I really hope they can turn it around. They were suposed to have 120" sets out early 1st Q of 2013 and I have at least 15 clients wanting them for the board room instead of a projector and screen.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:That is too bad... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      LG is crap recently. their redesign has all plugs coming straight out the back.... DUH, no wall mounting unles you want a 3" gap.

      A lack of side mounts is annoying, but L-shaped cables and adapters exist. I got an L-Shaped adapter for the back of my SHARP LCD TV so that I could plug one of those HDMI Android machines into it. The Service USB port (nice for power) sticks out the side, though, with one set of inputs, which is nice for accessibility if I want to temporarily connect something that's not composite and thus can't be connected to the front of my VCR.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:That is too bad... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Because right now SHARP tv's are the best you can buy. They are better quality than Anyone else and honestly far larger than anyone else

      I disagree, BOSE's TVs are better in my opinion.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  54. FAILIURE=failure to admit failure: by Snirt · · Score: 1

    Nokia and other hailing companies should come out too!!

  55. Interesting observation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever an established Japanese company is in danger, most comments here suggest an economical solution (Samsung buy Sharp, Apple buy Sharp etc). But when an established American company is in danger, then we all want a political solution (raise taxes on imports, stop globalization).

    Yes, off-topic, but an interesting observation none the less.

  56. 90s called. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Perhaps they think they'll make it up on volume?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:90s called. by danomac · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't make a difference if they're losing money, if anything, it'll speed up their demise.

  57. It's already priced in up front by sjbe · · Score: 2

    OEMs go to the suppliers yearly, demanding a (often contractual) reduction in price by 1-2% ... whether the suppliers are able to supply the parts at the lower cost is irrelevant, and most will gladly bend over in fear of not loosing the next deal (which they'll likely also lose money on).

    Actually what happens is that the lower tier suppliers price in future price reductions knowing that the OEMS will demand price reductions in future years. The suppliers aren't stupid so they price that in up front. Occasionally someone is dumb enough to not take this into account and they lose their a$$ on the job and aren't a factor the next time around. I'm a cost accountant and deal with this all the time. You pretty much have to assume between 1% and 5% give backs (amount depends on the customer) when pricing a part to a US auto supplier. I've even seen them demand retroactive discounts going back 3 years.

    This really is more of a problem with the US auto makers and their bigger suppliers. Frankly the US auto makers tend to have a pretty dysfunctional relationship with their supply chain. They tend to prefer their suppliers to be right on the edge of bankruptcy if possible. The Japanese manufacturers don't tend to beat up their suppliers so much and tend to have much more of a partnership relationship. I've actually had a Japanese auto maker ask a company I worked with if they were making enough margin to be healthy. You really do not want to be a Tier 1 supplier to a US auto maker. Tier 3+ is fairly safe and there are profits to be had there.

    1. Re:It's already priced in up front by GNious · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mainly deal with Tier-1s, and I've occasionally seen some forget to include stuff in their bids or not manage to hit projected price-reductions. Scares me a bit, since these are my customers.
      Would still like to see suppliers tell OEMs to go somewhere else when they try to squeeze them too much, but doubt it'll happen.

      Note: European OEMs tend to be pretty OK in dealing with their suppliers (Opel has impressed me a few times, despite being "GM-E"), generally. Don't have too much experience with Japanese ones, though.

      On the notion of asking about margin and health, I notice in SCM (and other areas) that bids include statements on overall company health, requested in the RFP. So appears (to me) to be a lesson companies have learned about not letting your suppliers go belly-up :)

    2. Re:It's already priced in up front by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Would still like to see suppliers tell OEMs to go somewhere else when they try to squeeze them too much, but doubt it'll happen.

      If someone is willing to take a bad deal that is their burden. We had a customer just this past year "ask" for a 5% price reduction even though they send less than $10,000 worth of business per year our way. We ignored them. Easy to do when someone is 5% of your business. Much harder when it is 50%.

      Don't have too much experience with Japanese ones, though.

      They come with their own challenges. Different culture, different ideas. They worry about different things and cause different problems. Pricing pressure is less of a problem but communication has (for us) been a bigger challenge.

      On the notion of asking about margin and health, I notice in SCM (and other areas) that bids include statements on overall company health, requested in the RFP.

      Things like that are two edged sword. If it is a genuine partnership that sort of thing is fine and probably healthy. Problem is that they ask the same questions when the customer trying to ascertain how much they can squeeze the vendor. In my experience it is usually the later. Perhaps my experience has made me a bit cynical but there is safety in a healthy skepticism.

  58. Re:You Priviliged Oppressor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solution: Deport all blacks living in America to their home countries. We'll see if you like living in a mud hut without electricity and eating grubs.

  59. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup, the only problem is getting your timing down....I've thought for years apply products have too much hype behind them, and if you just this year decided to act on it....if you bought in January 1, expecting to short, you could have gone from a 400$ stock to a 600+$ stock in a mere 3 months. it's hard to time when a bubble pop's.

    i thought about it seriously at 600, nad passed. I darn near did at 700, but i decided would not want to be caught in an avalanche going the wrong direction, and that's why i stick to ETF's mostly.

  60. The best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have made the best stereos & TVs & sound systems out there. The good will stay & the bad will go, that is business, see you guys next year :)

  61. Happy!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bought some Japanese wireless mouse three years ago, costing US$70 and it always shakes when my hand stops moving - the accuracy is far worse than the cheapest Logitech models, practically unusable for gaming and painting. One would never expect such terrible quality for a mouse of that price.

    Bought a Panasonic-made electric toothbrush two years ago, costing US$200, died within one year because the battery made in china died and it's NOT REPLACEABLE.

    Then I bought a german one, cost only one third and unlike those Japanese crap it's actually made in Germany (including the battery!) instead of 3rd-world factories full of slave workers.

    Conclusion: Japanese companies just sell overpriced crap with fancy appearance.

    I'm very happy that they're all going to die now. The sooner and the better!

  62. Well there's a smart move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Announce that your business isn't surviving but you'd like to turn it around, then try to get credit for such a move.

    Yeah, if I were a creditor I'd totally jump all over that one. Note the sarcasm.

  63. Re:SHARP AND AAPL: SHE IS A GOING DOWN MY CAPTAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/z?s=AAPL&t=3m&q=l&l=off&z=l&a=v&p=s&lang=en-US&region=US

      [romney_wants_to_buy_your_vote.com]

    From over $700 per share not even two months ago to heading under $477 per share today !! How the rich and shiny fall so fast !! It's a taking Sharp, The Jap Conglomerate, with it !!

    Is the bad punctuation and grammar an "All Your Base" joke?

  64. Re:SHARP AND AAPL: SHE IS A GOING DOWN MY CAPTAIN by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst both your bubbles, but if you track a 2 year chart of the Nasdaq and in fact the Dow Jones composite too, and you overlay it on the AAPL chart, you see that AAPL for the past year have basically been broadly tracking the overall ups and down of the market itself ... and that actually has more to do with factors like central bank market interventions, currency and bond markets, inflation, happenings in Europe etc.

    Nasdaq

    Dow

  65. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    So what happens next quarter when Apple has had yet another 27-40% growth spurt, fueled by a large number of new products recently released?

    What happens if Apple has a shrink spurt instead?

    Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and short AAPL?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  66. Re:Short all around - shorting stock, shorter visi by cavebison · · Score: 1

    Basically the only people not buying AAPL are people who lack any vision.

    Well it all comes down to whether there are any people of vision left in Apple.

    Not sure if you remember, but Apple's stock only really started to rise in 2004, when they started to get a name as a funky consumer electronics company, instead of that company that makes those Mac computers that artists and designers use.

    Jobs did have a vision or two, which came at the right time in PC and Internet history. Personal mobile devices that did really amazing stuff. Do you think it would have worked if everyone didn't have a Windows PC to run iTunes on, or have WiFi and reasonable mobile broadband? You know what they say about "an idea whose time has come". How often, exactly, do you think that happens in the life of a company?

    Steam is one such idea, and it has been milked for a long time, because there were no competitors. Now there are, in the various "app store" models emerging. Facebook has been even luckier, they're in a very hard to break monopoly position.

    But, like Steam, Apple's great ideas have competition now. Now Apple is, once again, just like any other I.T. company. If you think there's another guy at Apple with the next New Idea Whose Time Has Come, let me know and I'll buy stock.

    For now, however, chances are Apple is in a slow slide back to that place from whence they came - a company with a niche product that doesn't do very well against competition.

  67. So what?! by metaforest · · Score: 1

    Sharp painted itself into a corner. The Board and Exec staff did it, and the shareholders have to suffer with it.

    Happens all the time. So what!

    Making bad choices in a volatile market will hurt... and may be fatal. To quote Queen: Another one bites the dust.