Slashdot Mirror


Saudi Arabia Implements Electronic Tracking System For Women

dsinc writes "Denied the right to travel without consent from their male guardians and banned from driving, women in Saudi Arabia are now monitored by an electronic system that tracks any cross-border movements. Since last week, Saudi women's male guardians began receiving text messages on their phones informing them when women under their custody leave the country, even if they are travelling together. 'The authorities are using technology to monitor women,' said columnist Badriya al-Bishr, who criticised the 'state of slavery under which women are held' in the ultra-conservative kingdom. Women are not allowed to leave the kingdom without permission from their male guardian, who must give his consent by signing what is known as the 'yellow sheet' at the airport or border."

116 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. Apartheid by Richard_J_N · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When South Africa did this (to black people, rather than women), under Apartheid, the civilised world rightly condemned it, and imposed trade sanctions.
    Where are the trade embargoes on Saudi Arabia? They're in contravention of the UN declaration of Human Rights.

    1. Re:Apartheid by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Won't happen, and remember this is in accordance with sharia law too. Which is supposed to elevate women above western standards, or so flappy headed groups keep telling us.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      South Africa only has gold and diamonds, not oil. Also, South Africa doesn't have a state religion to hide behind. Any criticism of Saudi Arabia would be "anti-islamic" bigotry.

    3. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When South Africa did this (to black people, rather than women), under Apartheid, the civilised world rightly condemned it, and imposed trade sanctions. Where are the trade embargoes on Saudi Arabia? They're in contravention of the UN declaration of Human Rights.

      Because it goes against Political Correctness.

      See Apartheid was done by white people against black people. Political Correctness says it's okay to be against that. Matter of fact it's mandatory.

      But sharia law is implemented by "brown people" against other "brown people" and comes from a non-Western mostly non-white religion. So Political Correctness says that anyone opposing it must be a racist. Political Correctness does not allow for a principled stand against anything. It is strictly based on group identity.

      So if you think treating women like shit just because they are women is brutal and oppressive, well you're just oppressing those poor brown people by trying to enforce your Western norms on their culture. How dare you say that no person should systematically abuse any other person for any reason? Who are you to judge?! So on and so on... It's why nothing ever changes.

      When the day comes that we finally figure out that WE'RE ALL HUMAN FUCKING BEINGS then perhaps more of us can be adults about this. Until then the group-identity hypersensitivity will reign supreme, in its shrill, foaming-at-the-mouth unreasonable "that's so offensive!" sort of way.

      The only thing dumber than Political Correctness are the people who don't question it.

    4. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      At that time the UK derailed all sanction attempts on South Africa for economical interests. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Apartheid_Movement

      and BTW, countries like Pakistan and the Taliban in Afghanistan are not any better...

    5. Re:Apartheid by tsa · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess we will buy more oil from them in the future. That'll teach them a lesson!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    6. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Won't happen, and remember this is in accordance with sharia law too. Which is supposed to elevate women above western standards, or so flappy headed groups keep telling us.

      Sure, just like Islam is the "religion of peace" even though, of the 120 or so active shooting wars happening today, Muslims are involved in over 100 of them.

      At least during the Crusades and the Inquisition, nobody went around talking about how the Catholic Church was the "institution of peace". It's like the farther back in time you go, the more sense the average person had.

    7. Re:Apartheid by Nostromo21 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is this a patented method...? :)

      Really, do muslim men have such small dicks & huge, over-inflated egos, that they cannot keep their wimen in check with flowers, chocolate & pretty lies? *duck*

      Seriously, this is an entire country supporting gender-terrorism (there, I said it first!), but that's ok, because they have a 'state religion' to hide behind & rationalise an oppressive law??? Isn't it high time you yanks stopped chasing the oil/money & started disbanding all state religious leaderships in the world with your anti-WOMDs & laser-guided asshole destroyers...? Just please, for GOD'S SAKE, don't turn them into representative demoncracies FFS!

    8. Re:Apartheid by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but we need their oil. Oil is more important that women's rights, obviously.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Apartheid by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      are you saying its all about the flappy headed Mo's

      (I know, I'm in trouble for that one).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Apartheid by dmbasso · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, and the prophet Muhammad is the perfect man, whose acts are a model for all to follow, for all eternity.

      So go ahead and marry a 6 years old girl, wait for her to be 9 or 10, and then you can have sex with her (his dear Aisha).

      Ahh, but she is a girl! That's where the Catholic priests got it wrong! To rape a 10 year old boy is wrong, but if it's a girl it's ok! Allahu akbar!

      Too bad hell is a fictitious place, these people really deserve it.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    11. Re:Apartheid by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To leave China, you need an exit visa. This is also in contravention of UN declaration of human rights. Would you expect a trade embargo against the Chinese too?

      Its even worse in Saudi Arabia .. according to the great and powerful wikepedia Exit Visas are required by foreign workers in Saudi Arabia and Qatar

      .. Hence at the end of a foreign worker's employment period, the worker must secure clearance from his/her employer stating that the worker has satisfactorily fulfilled the terms of his/her employment contract or that the worker's services are no longer needed ..

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    12. Re:Apartheid by ilguido · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sanctions against South Africa had positive effects like devaluing the rand 17 times and so making diamonds much cheaper. Sanctions against Saudi Arabia on the other hand could rise the oil price.

    13. Re:Apartheid by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      this is in accordance with sharia law too. Which is supposed to elevate women above western standards, or so flappy headed groups keep telling us.

      It is suppossed to. The problem is that men are in charge of the implementation and that's a common problem across the entire world. Regardless of the laws on the books, if the people interpreting them are not representative of the people they are applied to, the end result is going to be biased like health insurance paying for viagra but not birth control pills.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:Apartheid by thoth · · Score: 2

      I don't there will be sanctions. Unlike Saudi Arabia, south Africa didn't have a valuable resource the would needs - oil. In this case, economics trumps morality, unfortunately.

    15. Re:Apartheid by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If not, turn em around and play in the mud," at least according to the religious leadership of the Cathos and Mussies.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    16. Re:Apartheid by Bengie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair, it was "normal" back then for them to have sex that young. I'm sure 1300 years from now, certain "normal" things that we do today will be looked at as barbaric.

    17. Re:Apartheid by dmbasso · · Score: 2, Interesting

      10 years old is the lower bound of the beginning of puberty in girls, in other words, definitely not ready for sex/reproduction. But it seems Aisha was somehow praised for being a true virgin, that is, when Muhammad first raped her she didn't have had her first period yet.

      The upper bound of the end of puberty in girls is 17 and, as Chef from South Park correctly said, that is the right time for sex (laws and social conventions aside).

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    18. Re:Apartheid by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry but ALL religion is insidious and evil. It is a means of control for the unintelligent and mentally lazy.

      With organized religion there is some truth to that.

      When an individual is seeking a way to express the more abstract parts of his or her nature, what is called spirituality, and finds that some of the best real teachers had one "persuasion" or another but tend to all say very similar things, as though they all saw the same things and put them in different terms according to different frameworks ... there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Ignoring the progress made by those who came before means you are doomed to constantly reinvent the wheel.

      The trick any real individual understands is to not get caught up with any particular language or framework, to instead focus on what truly advanced people have seen or done. It's the difference between looking at the finger that points, versus seeing the heavenly constellation it tries to point out.

      Obviously individuals who really grok this tend not to herd together in large congregations with bylaws and conventions and someone to take the meeting minutes. For the most part, that is for the insecure who need to be surrounded by the like-minded to feel validated. Thus anyone who seriously questions or objects is a sort of threat. I for one say fuck that.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    19. Re:Apartheid by ahabswhale · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you seriously blaming the lack of an international response to this situation on political correctness? I just want to be certain because you would win my "Who said the stupidest fucking thing I've heard all year contest" without an even remotely close competitor.

      NOBODY fucks with Saudi Arabia because of oil. Period. Political correctness doesn't even enter the picture. If they so much as fart in public, the price of oil doubles. Seriously, pull your head out of your ass and wake the fuck up.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    20. Re:Apartheid by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      "Political Correctness" - top oxymoron of the 21st century! How did those two words even get into the same phrase/sentence orignally?

      It was originally introduced as a joke phrase, as a way of ridiculing those who preached and practised it. So it was deliberately ridiculous, as you observe. However, when those who preach and practise it heard the phrase, being so disconnected from reality they failed to recognise it as a joke at their expense and, thinking the phrase was rather good, began to use it themselves. Then eventually they did realise it was a joke against them and they now avoid it.

    21. Re:Apartheid by lucm · · Score: 2

      Too bad hell is a fictitious place

      Clearly you have never visited Laramie, Wyoming, especially during the winter (which lasts about 10.5 months out there)

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    22. Re:Apartheid by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You make it too complicated. The international boycotts against South Africa were justified because they were effective. An embargo against Saudi Arabia would be ineffective, even if it were possible.

      In short, South Africa was a small country that could be pushed around; Saudi Arabia makes too much oil for that to be possible. Any such demonstrations would be pointless and would cause more harm than the original insult.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    23. Re:Apartheid by mjwx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Won't happen, and remember this is in accordance with sharia law too. Which is supposed to elevate women above western standards, or so flappy headed groups keep telling us.

      The only idiot who has said Sharia law will elevate women above western standards is you.

      The reason this wont be condemned like Apartheid in South Africa is that Saudi Arabia has oil and South Africa didn't.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    24. Re:Apartheid by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      At least during the Crusades and the Inquisition, nobody went around talking about how the Catholic Church was the "institution of peace".

      Pax vobiscum.

    25. Re:Apartheid by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not so long years ago girls were getting married in the USA at age 12 or 13.

      Didn't Edgar Allen Poe marry his 13-year-old cousin?

      --
      No sig today...
    26. Re:Apartheid by no-body · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry but ALL religion is insidious and evil. It is a means of control for the unintelligent and mentally lazy.

      You may have a problem if you are born into one of "those" societies, conditioned from day one and then having to work off that imprint.

      Your statement is pretty arrogant, blaming laziness and stupidity as cause. There are people - smart and courageous - putting their life on the line in totalitarian societies.

      It's probably more beneficial to understand the pathological mechanisms causing the exploit by "leaders" and exposing it.

    27. Re:Apartheid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would more classify it as the central component of religion—into which mythology and theology and laws can be plugged to create a full structured belief system—rather than a 'version' of it. It's the sense that there must be something greater out there, a result of human curiosity and imaginativeness untempered by the agnosticism of science.

      (In computing, we call this a security vulnerability.)

      That being said, spirituality doesn't make you go out and start wars or subjugate others. That takes someone with ambition. Ideally with a beard, narcissism, and/or early signs of schizophrenia (read: a Messiah complex or pathological liar claiming to have a Messiah complex.) In the absence of such god-kings, religions with destructive practices tend to limit themselves to the occasional virgin sacrifice. No one had to invent a religious motive to attack Carthage.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    28. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hate to break it to you, but the Christians during the Crusades were the technologically and culturally inferior group. Islamic philosophers were debating Aristotle and inventing things like chemistry, algebra, and hospitals. Christians didn't even know about the Greek philosophers, and when they found out it was because they translated them from Arabic. At which point the religious leaders denounced them and forbid the teaching of them.

      The Muslim world obviously went to shit, but don't pretend that the Christian world wasn't composed of mindless fanatics at many points in history. If the Crusades never happened causing the Muslim world to draw in on itself and become paranoid, the Renaissance probably would have occurred in Baghdad.

    29. Re:Apartheid by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it goes against Political Correctness.

      I think it's fair to say that this specific situation has bugger all to to with "political correctness" in the sense you mean it.
      It's about oil, "stability in the middle east" (ie oil), an "ally to the west" (ie oil).

      It is not "political correctness". It is diplomacy in the worst sense of the word. The sense that allows countries to "smooth over" inconvenient realities and buddy up to the extent that dependency increases to the point becomes practically impossible to say "no". The "bleeding hearts" didn't get us here, the cold pragmatists did.

      Political expediency is the problem not political correctness. The solution? Frankly I don't see an easy one.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    30. Re:Apartheid by YourMomsRight · · Score: 2

      In accordance with whose Sharia law? There is no one Sharia law. Each sect in Islam has its own Sharia, sometime two or more. There is one agreed upon Sharia law for all Muslims. What the Saudi's are doing is unique to Saudi. You don't see this B.S at in other countries (you may find a nut or two). Please read a bit more about things, before you label and demonize them.

    31. Re:Apartheid by YourMomsRight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok, 80-200 years ago: "of the 120 or so active shooting wars happening today, Chirstian are involved in over 100 of them" There is nothing unique in Islam or Christianity that makes them war prone, In fact they are not. These are political/land wars. Where religion is used to motivate people.

    32. Re:Apartheid by YourMomsRight · · Score: 2

      Political correctness less, Oil more. It should be condemned, but not by blaming the religion. Research a bit, Saudi's version of Islam is made up to suite the ruling regime. Its rejected by most Muslim countries. Lookup Whahabi Islam (its the Westboro Baptist equal of Islam)

    33. Re:Apartheid by sageres · · Score: 2

      Try boycotts of the Saudi Arabia. Besides oil, their biggest export and tourism attraction is the religion. Prevent 2 billion muslims from doing their sacred hadj in the name of women's rights, see a world war 3 unfold.

    34. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No it wasn't. If you haven't actually studied Islamic science I recommend you shut up now.

      Islamic science and religion were closely related. One of the reasons it was is because unlike Christian science, the natural world wasn't considered some separate entity from God. Muslims felt that studying the natural world was studying God's creation and thus giving them a better understanding of God. There are several hadiths that mention that searching for knowledge was a Muslim duty. Because of this, there was very little censorship of scientific ideas in Medieval Islam even when they contradicted dogma.

      The easiest way to describe the difference between Medieval Islam and Medieval Christianity is this: Christians were seeking to increase their faith despite what the natural world told them while Muslims were seeking to understand the natural world in order to better understand God.

    35. Re:Apartheid by Tagged_84 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, because a website like muslim.org isn't at all bias. Just look at their tagline: "presenting Islam as peaceful, tolerant, rational, inspiring"

    36. Re:Apartheid by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Religion is what allows civilization to not just progress through a social evolution, but to survive. Humanity needs religion as a whole, because our brains are wired that way.

      Meanwhile, back in reality, people are rightfully starting to worry about the combination of Atomic Age weaponry that modern science has given us and the and Bronze Age morality that the world's mainstream religions have saddled us with.

      Ever read the Bible? How about the Koran? Ever imagine going back in time and giving those guys nukes? How does your "civilization" look in that scenario?

    37. Re:Apartheid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Arguably, the only reason that scientific thought flourished under Islam was the decentralized nature of the faith. In Christendom you had the Pope waving his golden sceptre and enforcing dogma at an empire-wide level. In Islam spiritual leadership comes from the local imam. If you were intellectually driven and didn't feel appreciated under one imam, you could always leave and find another. That option wasn't available to Christians.

    38. Re:Apartheid by sl149q · · Score: 2

      Orwell described the process in 1984, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink.

      You direct people away from what you are doing by simply relabeling it. The "institution of peace" instead of "institution of war" (Orwell's example was Ministry of Peace (war), Ministry of Love (torture), Ministry of Plenty (generally supplying barely enough to keep people from starving.)

    39. Re:Apartheid by sl149q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Quite possibly true in the distant path. But demonstrably untrue since the Age of the Enlightenment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment) and the improvement in mankind's general condition from the accompanying industrial revolution.

    40. Re:Apartheid by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is suppossed to. The problem is that men are in charge of the implementation and that's a common problem across the entire world. Regardless of the laws on the books, if the people interpreting them are not representative of the people they are applied to, the end result is going to be biased like health insurance paying for viagra but not birth control pills.

      Really? So I now have two people within a mere 40mins of each other, one saying it does. Another saying it doesn't. Odd. Oh, as for your idea that it does? I take it that you've read that good book, and the various legal documents surrounding sharia. Especially the parts where a women's testimony is worth less than a man's, where rape is the women's fault and so on.

      Don't be naive. It has nothing to do with "men who institute it." The entire system of sharia, is built around oppression, for the sake of oppression.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    41. Re:Apartheid by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> back then the average life expectancy was about 35. So if you didn't have kids young, you wouldn't be around to raise them for long.

      Slight side note there. The average life expectancy may have been 35, but remove all the infant deaths (those dying aged 0-2 years old) and the average bounces way up into the mid-60's, not so massively different to today's.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    42. Re:Apartheid by camperdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry but ALL religion is insidious and evil. It is a means of control for the unintelligent and mentally lazy.

      That's why the bible says "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." (Acts 17:11). It is noble *NOT* to be unintelligent, and mentally lazy. It is noble *to validate* what you are being taught. It is not RELIGION that is the problem. It is that people lack diligence and let themselves be controlled.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    43. Re:Apartheid by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      I strongly doubt it was ever considered 'normal'. The autonomic empathic response is the natural normal state of human social interaction. An adult raping a child is not 'normal' it is insane, it was always insane, it is crazy to claim an insane act as normal.

      I'll fix it for you, "You could get away with raping child, animals, slaves and, serfs", you could beat slaves and serfs to death for amusement if you were the psychopathic lord of the region. Just because you could get away with this does not make it normal. Reality is 'normal' was to eliminate those psychopaths before they could rape your children and get away with it.

      Barbaric was always barbaric, pay closer attention to history. In fact the only really big lies in history were those that painted barbaric acts as 'normal' and 'good', based upon who was committing the acts of barbarity and those lies that propaganda was created because everyone knew what was and was not a barbaric act.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    44. Re:Apartheid by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      The problem is that men are in charge of the implementation and that's a common problem across the entire world.

      The problem is that Saudi Arabia is home to a particularly shitty and fundamentalist sect of Sunni Islam known as Wahhabism or Salafism.

      For example: the Taliban in Afghanistan aren't/weren't Wahhabis/Salafis, but they were educated in Pakistan, through Saudi funded schools pushing Wahhabi/Salafi interpretations of Islam.

      Much of the shit show in the Middle East can be tied one way or another to the virulent fundamentalism rooted in Saudi Arabia.
      /Except for Iran, which is a different branch of Islam, which is why all their Sunni neighbors hate them.
      //Iran is mostly the USA's fault for repeatedly overthrowing the government and pissing off the Iranians.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    45. Re:Apartheid by engun · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't that morality back in the day was different (i.e. more primitive). The problem is that, faithheads think that what's written in the book is absolute. So the example of Mohammed sleeping with a 9 year old, or the bible advocating slavery, genocide etc. are examples to prove that modern morality is far better than the obviously flawed "absolute" morality advocated in those books.

      That is why this Aisha story comes up so often.

    46. Re:Apartheid by Nyder · · Score: 2

      Religion is what allows civilization to not just progress through a social evolution, but to survive. Humanity needs religion as a whole, because our brains are wired that way.

      My brain isn't wired that way. I find religions offensive to the human spirit, and think they are what is holding society back.

      Religions are the excuse humans use for the unexplained because they are either too scared or too lazy to find the truth. It's easier to pretend that "magical" things are going to happen after you die, since they do NOT happen while you are alive.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    47. Re:Apartheid by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Wow! Just wondering where you get your news, and what blinders your journalists wear. Feminists should back off the burqa-bashing.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    48. Re:Apartheid by tbird81 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry but ALL religion is insidious and evil. It is a means of control for the unintelligent and mentally lazy.

      Completely true. But some religions are worse than others - and Islam is terrible.

    49. Re:Apartheid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More like a profound state of suggestible cluelessness. A design flaw, exploited by culture to hold society together when people were too stupid and unenlightened to do it on their own.

      You sound like the kind of person who is easily doomed to repeat history.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    50. Re:Apartheid by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      What is your point? We are the ones who made nukes and they have been used twice already. I'm not so sure we should be throwing rocks at the ancients on this one. They weren't idiots any more than anyone else is. You demonstrate what such a weapon can do, and they wouldn't have used it either. I suppose it is great and all that we have been able to hold off on using them, but don't take our weapons of mass destruction and assume they'd do something we wouldn't with them.

    51. Re:Apartheid by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      The only idiot who has said Sharia law will elevate women above western standards is you.

      I assume the GP's statement was sarcastic; in fact he/she was just repeating the official stance of Islam.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    52. Re:Apartheid by EdIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They weren't idiots any more than anyone else is. You demonstrate what such a weapon can do, and they wouldn't have used it either.

      They would've used them all the time. Just giving them the weapons, and showing them the immediate results, is not enough to deter future use.

      In order to stop they would need a complete understanding of the environmental impacts, advanced medicine, genetics, complex systems, etc.

      Even right now you have morons who can't figure out, or believe, how small the world actually is and how a single nuclear event can have widespread, long lasting consequences. Same people who believe the world is too large, complex, and that the Jesus would not allow it to happen.

      If Galileo had problems explaining the Earth revolved around the Sun, just how hard do you think it would be to really explain the consequences of such weapons to people who were wholly ruled by superstition?

    53. Re:Apartheid by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      a 6 year old... is not a "woman"

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    54. Re:Apartheid by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      I cant draw a picture of their leader without worrying about all 2 billion of them tryng to kill me so....until they grow the fuck up, fuck them, they can all choke on a fat cock

      the crusades were no good, and all religions have had their time of shame, however in this day and age, there is no excuse.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    55. Re:Apartheid by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no, the problem is that saudis have oil,. if they didnt, MOST places around the world would not give a fuck about them, and as such they would disappear into the ages. But until their oil runs out, or we get off oil, we are stuck dealing with savages

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    56. Re:Apartheid by jandersen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... Bronze Age morality that the world's mainstream religions have saddled us with

      Stop slandering the Bronze Age - ancient Greece, where democracy was invented, was a Bronze Age society. Oppressing and enslaving people for "moral" reasons is an invention of a more advanced civilisation; the Greeks had slaves, but their slaves could win their freedom, unlike in the modern versions.

      It is worth remembering also, that religion is constructed by people, and religious people wrote the stories in the holy books. It is wrong to say that religion makes people do things, whether they are good or bad. Good people do good things and bad people do bad things; and if they happen to be religious, then they will blame both on their religion, but it doesn't mean that it is true.

      There was a time when the Muslim civilisation was the greatest on the planet, a beacon of knowledge and tolerance, while the Christian world was in the deepest darkness; now it is the other way round. This is not because of religion, race or any of the other stupid non-explanations - it is simply because of wealth and power. Freedom, democracy, tolerance and so on tend to seem like luxury items when you can barely find enough food or water each day. Perhaps it would be helpful if we stopped going on about what people in developing ought to do in terms of freedom, and instead concentrated on making it possible, by fighting poverty and corruption.

    57. Re:Apartheid by TractorBarry · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Make up your own belief system and follow it for as long as convenient. When it no longer fits make up a new one. There's plenty of gods/rituals to choose from so find something that works for you. It's an infinite omniverse out there and it does not fit in the human mind.

      Religion should make you grateful for your existence, appreciative of other existences (from the low to the high) and should help you get your way through life. The minute you find yourself telling others how to live or what to believe in you should realise that you're wrong.

      "We place no reliance on virgin or pigeon. Our method is science. Our object religion".

      And 23 praises to Eris & "Bob" !

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    58. Re:Apartheid by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The quran does not put the blame on the woman. The remedy is marriage, which is barbaric by modern standards and sure as hell seems like blaming the victim, but it is hardly unique to islam

      Not being unique to Islam doesn't make it not blaming the victim, which is what it is.

      As for sharia elevating women aboive western standards, it is empirically true because the west doesn't make an effort to codify that at all

      Uh no. That is so ass-backwards it would be funny if it weren't pathetic. The west has succeeded in fact in codifying equality for women in numerous cases. Not religious ones, though... secular. That is, law. And some law is slanted in favor of women today, e.g. sexual harassment law. Of course, that's only an attempt to counter pervasive oppression of women, but it's still the case.

      If I had to guess, I'd say everything you know comes from people with an agenda to denigate islam rather than from the people for whom it is no big deal.

      I have the same problems with Islam that I have with Christianity. I think both are a blight upon modern culture used to control the masses first, and any benefit to their lives is incidental.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    59. Re:Apartheid by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More accurately, during WWII, Germany and Japan also had nuclear programs. The U.S. just managed to get there first. After the war, Russia go into the game, quickly followed by France and Britain.

      And the two nukes dropped on Japan were not dropped in a vacuum. After a grueling war in the Pacific, Japan was fully prepared for an invasion. Given the way Japanese soldiers fought to the death in Saipan, Guam, etc., the U.S. faced the prospect of creating another million deaths on the home islands as well as losing another 300,000-500,000 G.I.s invading Japan. And leaving an unbowed Japan after what they did in China and SE Asia and given their then culture, it would have guaranteed a new war when they re-armed. Presented with that, Truman decided to use the nukes in the hopes of getting a quick end. And it almost didn't happen. There was a palace coup that nearly succeeded, it seemed some in the Japanese military thought the Emperor would capitulate rather than continue to fight on.

    60. Re:Apartheid by Psyborgue · · Score: 2

      If poverty causes religion, how then do you explain the wealthy Saudis who flew themselves into the twin towers? Well to do engineers who plot to blow up time square? Military psychologists who shoot up bases? Take a look at the profiles of your average terrorist. If what you're saying is true, it doesn't add up. Don't let your political views blind you to reality. Read the Qur'an and the Sira and Sunnah. Then tell me what they do has nothing to do with religion. Tell me the reason women are stoned has nothing to do with the very clear commands to do so. Tell me the domestic violence against women has nothing to do withe Qur'an 4:34, and it's accepted interpretation in arabic (i.e. beat/strike/scourge is not a mistranslation).

    61. Re:Apartheid by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Yawn, another idiotic comment from someone who's knowledge of religion came from a first year lecture by a crotchety old atheist.

      Not that you or anyone else is actually willing to consider this, but the major problem in religion is that humans are the actors, and tend toward being uncivil jerks to each other.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    62. Re:Apartheid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Spirituality is the vulnerability and religion is the malware that exploits it. I've been pretty consistent.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  2. We need to frack by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need to get our fracking industry going full bore, convert all semi's to use it, and get to where we import 0% oil from anywhere. Let China and Russia keep the straights of Hormuz clear. Let the Saudies fall back into the decrepit 3rd world pit it deserves to be.
     

    1. Re:We need to frack by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We need to get our fracking industry going full bore, convert all semi's to use it, and get to where we import 0% oil from anywhere. Let China and Russia keep the straights of Hormuz clear. Let the Saudies fall back into the decrepit 3rd world pit it deserves to be.

      No... We need to get our bio-diesel industry going full bore, convert all vehicles to use it, and get to where we import 0% oil from anywhere. Fracking is simply the equivalent to swirling the straw around the bottom of the cup, trying to suck up the last dribbles of milkshake. If you have to frack, the well is dry.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:We need to frack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really, it's just not conveniently located at all the right places.

      But give me 10 nuclear power plants and I can make all the fresh water you want.

    3. Re:We need to frack by Nostromo21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We KNOW wind, solar, wave & geothermal work. We know a number of alternate bio-fuels work. We know natural gas works. We know hydrogen & electrical power sources work, the ultimate power source notwithstanding. We know nuclear fission reactors work, are relatively safe (I don't want to argue the point) & produce far less pollution & environmental damage per Gigawatt than fossil fuels. We know that nuclear fusion works, we just haven't invested seriously enough into it to make it practical, which we could have done 20-25 years ago. We know a number of other fuel sources & methods that could work, if adapted to varying degrees.

      However, we also know that oil works far, far more easily & cheaply than any of those right now & into the foreseeable future & is far more profitable, both in a monetary and geo-political sense. Not to mention the very deep pockets half the world's politicians & corporate heads have that touches on the oil industry in one way or another. It would perhaps be easier to get rid of electricity & copper wire as the main delivery method that powers all our devices, than oil as a primary fuel source right now. And that's saying something...

    4. Re:We need to frack by Ferretman · · Score: 2

      Here's a wild idea...how about we do BOTH?!?!?!

      Drill baby drill.....produce so much oil that imports plummet.

      Grow baby grow....produce so much biodiesel that we're exporting the stuff.

      Then let Middle East rust back into insignificance, or let Russia and China fight over it

      Ferret

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  3. Call of duty for world wide hackers! by aglider · · Score: 2

    Those are electronic devices with some embedded communication device.
    Do you need more fun that that?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  4. 2 years old and not only women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "service" has been in operation since 2010 and it applies to all "dependents" which includes children, contracted laborers, etc. See: http://riyadhbureau.com/blog/2012/11/saudi-women-tracking. As offensive as the Saudi gov't policies are, getting half the story isn't going to help matters.

  5. Re:Dangerously spreading islamic radicalism by Snotnose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm guessing about half the population doesn't like this idea. But that half can't vote so who cares about them.

  6. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you seen what has been going on in Indonesia lately?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  7. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... if you let the insane Muslims invade them.

    Just ask France. France has entire districts run by Muslims that even the police are afraid to enter. In their own country. France is not alone here. It's spreading across Europe.

    These are generally not people who assimilate into their new culture melting-pot style. These are people who take over by having a drastically superior birth rate.

    I'll give the Muslims credit for one thing - they're smart in that realistic sense, same way the Chinese are. They won't fuck over their own nations with psychotic immigration policies just to prove how "inclusive" they are. We do. Perhaps they deserve to survive in a way that we don't.

    No culture that doesn't preserve itself has ever survived, big surprise there. No, valuing and preserving your own culture is NOT wrong in any way and feeling guilty about that is just the kind of plain insanity that's so common these days. It's only wrong if you try to stop someone else from doing the same.

  8. Not True, Saudi Arabia didn't sign UN declaration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Muslim countries didn't sign UN declaration of Human Rights because they perceived it as not compatible with Islam. Although these countries got own version of Human Rights declaration:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairo_Declaration_on_Human_Rights_in_Islam

  9. Re:That's a waste of resources by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    - kill them all

    This is the best of all of those solutions. Think about it .. it doesn't take any resources at all to implement, and in a generation or so Saudi Arabia will have totally cured itself of all those pesky upstart women!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  10. Newsflash! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

    Diversity means accepting a little more than just being served by mustachioed waiters with amusing accents in quaint ethnic restaurants.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Newsflash! by approachingZero+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So there's this ugly realization that if you embrace the concept that all cultures are equal you must stand by and helplessly watch as little girls have their clitoris mutilated and homosexuals hung. It's like giving people democracy only to find out they want to elect people from the seventh century. Crap. Now what?

      --
      'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
    2. Re:Newsflash! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      I don't get it. Is "bipolar pattern" a thing? Do boobs have poles?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Newsflash! by Xarvh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's retarded.
      You don't "give" people democracy.
      They have to take it for themselves.
      You can nudge, encourage, provide education, but ultimately "democracy from above" will never work, because it's a matter of culture and you can't have democracy if first you don't change the culture.

    4. Re:Newsflash! by approachingZero+ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps you are mistaken? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_female_genital_mutilation_by_country Saudi-Arabia - Female genital mutilation is prevalent, but is declining

      --
      'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  11. you know, if this happened in the west... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    it could actually start a ...

    pussy riot!

    (what? WHAT?? someone had to say it!)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  12. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2
    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Re:Dangerously spreading islamic radicalism by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Firstly, genetics isn't the only form of hereditary. Cultural values are transmitted from parents to children - including attitudes to women. Secondly, the GP was talking about Muslims, which is a religious group, not a racial group.

    So, yeah, you're stupid on two counts.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  14. Re:Saudi Arabia by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too bad you need the shit they export in huge quantities, eh?

    Well played, but I'd like to point out that my family does not own a car - we go around mostly by bike or walking (I commute to work by bicycle every workday, even in winter). For the rare occasions that we need to go further than 20 Km, we use public transport. So, while we do use hydrocarbons indirectly (various polymers and other chemicals), we're trying to minimize it by not having a car and recycling plastics.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  15. Re:Dangerously spreading islamic radicalism by stephanruby · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately things such as this reflect the will of much of the population there...

    I doubt that. Out of the entire population, only 20% are Saudi citizens (the rest are migrant workers with no say in anything). Out of that 20%, less than half are women. So this means, that this new system is being supported by less than 10% of the population.

    In fact the saudi arabian government has expiremented with loosening the laws on women but have been met with death threats and back lash from the population from trying such things.

    Death threats? Obama gets death threats and back lash from the far-right every day. That doesn't mean he lets them set the agenda.

    Face it. Saudi Arabia is a highly hierarchical structure. The minority in power do not want to let go any of its power. That's why we're getting laws like that one.

  16. Fail. by VAElynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm no feminist, but this is unjust and stupid
    It's also hilarious how the USA are all over supposed human rights in Russia and Belarus where people live with dignity, and overlook insane places like the Saudi Arabia is.

    1. Re:Fail. by jcr · · Score: 2

      This isn't even a feminism issue, it's a human rights issue. Only tyrannies interfere with the right of anyone who hasn't committed a crime to leave the country.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  17. Re:Dangerously spreading islamic radicalism by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 2

    It's not racism, just an observation that parents usually teach children values similar to their own.

  18. This is merely the digitisation of the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It may surprise people but.... Saudi has ALWAYS had this system of tracking women.

    As a child, when I left the country to visit my grandparents, accompanied by my mother, we had to be legally escorted to the airport and signed out by my dad, on re-entry we were re-checked into my dad's care.
    We were westerners living under the same rules as the locals. This was as far back as early 80s... the system has been in play forever. This is merely a modernisation of the system. I'm not saying I agree with the practice but, this is hardly headline news as its simply an upgrade to rules and methods for applying those rules that have been in play for a long long time.

    Why is it only now, when computers get involved that people are having issues with the basic concept? It was widely unknown it appears when the system was paperbased.

    Expat Brat.

  19. Re:Dangerously spreading islamic radicalism by LordLucless · · Score: 2

    The GP clearly does not think religion is genetically transmitted. he was accusing the GPP of thinking that religion is genetically transmitted.

    Which is pretty stupid, since the GP said nothing about genetics.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  20. Re:Saudi Arabia by styrotech · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's great, but what do you think the ashfelt that you cycle on is made of?

    If I had to guess, I'd say ash and felt?

  21. Re:Allies... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    When Israel engages in ethnic cleansing

    If Israel is engaging in ethnic cleansing, why are they sending food and medical supplies into Gaza?

    http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/11/21/matt-gurney-while-hamas-fires-rockets-israel-delivers-food-and-medicine/

  22. Re:View from common person by tqk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "... let's just tell all of their women to come to the West where they will be appreciated."

    How, pray tell, can they do that without permission from their (slave?) masters?

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  23. Re:Saudi Arabia by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    We don't need it, we've chosen to use it. We have other options. TPTB have chosen this path for us.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Re:Allies... by jcr · · Score: 2

    Bullshit. If Israel were as evil as the Arab propagandists claim, there wouldn't have been any palestinians left by 1950.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. frack you - biodiesel is wrong by zaroastra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    bio diesel industry is wrong, the benefits you get are obscured by:
    - food scarcity
    - goverment bonuses to big farmer and big evil (insert monsanto/whatever here)
    - patent trolls
    - CO positive, because mass farming is OIL intensive industry
    - lowest return on the barrel ever
    - ecological destruction of habitats
    etc etc etc... just go read about it!

    --
    I'm trying to get modded "Interesting Flamebait Informative and Insightful Redundant Troll" *-* Please Help *-*
  26. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just ask France. France has entire districts run by Muslims that even the police are afraid to enter. In their own country.

    You're quite right, and is the list of them as they stand right now.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  27. They treat women like children by Beeftopia · · Score: 3, Informative

    Women there are treated like children. But we can't get too high and mighty here. Women only got the right to vote in the US in 1920.

    On the other hand, as far as I can tell, never in non-Muslim cultures have women been forced to cover themselves from head to toe, with only their eyes visible. Or not allowed to leave the house without a male custodian. That's a unique curiosity only found in portions of the Muslim world.

  28. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    Evil will always win because good is dumb?

    --
    Good-bye
  29. Re:That's a waste of resources by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    I know right, they had to bring in IBM to help them caculate more effecient methods.

    --
    Good-bye
  30. They're just one step from... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...taking them to the vet and "chipping" them.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:They're just one step from... by Max_W · · Score: 2

      9 million women were burned In Europe in Middle Ages for "witchcraft", i.e. for nothing.

      Millions are women in Europe and the USA are still victims of violence and discrimination each year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_women

      We are far away from congratulating ourselves.

    2. Re:They're just one step from... by Alsee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In modern US more that 200 thousand women are sexually assaulted each year http://www.rainn.org/statistics

      No, read it again. It indicates about 200 thousand PEOPLE are sexually assaulted each year.

      About 100% of assaulters are men.

      Factually false.

      If we want to combat sexist prejudiced stereotype bullshit in society, we need combat all of it. And that includes the sexist notion that any man is "lucky" to have sex. The sexist notion that men cannot or do not refuse consent to sex. The sexist notion that men are not raped, and fucked-up definitions of "rape" which categorically deny the possibility of a man being raped (except by another man).

      Lets look at a very recent survey done by the United States Center For Disease Control. It defines "Rape" as attempted or competed forcible penetration of the victim as well as drug/alcohol facilitated completed penetration of the victim. It reports lifetime "rape" rates at about 18.3% of all women and about 1.4% of all men. However this report has a brand new section, a category that has been implicitly excluded for pretty much all previous rape research. It's a category called "made to penetrate". I will remind you that "made to penetrate" does is EXCLUDED from the definition of "rape". The report gives a lifetime rate of 4.8% of all men "made to penetrate".

      And lets be clear on what "made to penetrate" means. I was recently reading a message board which had nothing to do with sexuality where, out of the blue, someone commented on the stereotype that men cannot be rape victims, and posted a request for men to share their stories if they had ever been raped. A completely generic non-sex-related community with a fairly random sampling of male readers. Unsurprisingly most of the replies were anonymous. They included reports including a man raped at gunpoint, a man walking on campus in the dark being tasered by an unknown woman then handcuffed to a tree raped and tasered again to the rapist could remove the handcuffs and run off, multiple reports of men discovering their drink had been drugged and being unable to fight off their attacker, multiple reports of men being threatened with being accused of rape themselves if they did not submit - including a case where a man walked into his bedroom to find a naked woman demanding sex and when he resisted she deliberately scratched his neck and hands and threatening to claim he tried to rape her. The reports just went on and on. Those are just what I recall offhand.

      Not a single one of those incidents qualifies as "rape" in the CDC survey, not a single one of them constitutes "rape" under virtually any rape survey ever done. They fall under the brand new category "made to penetrate"..... because somehow forcible penis-in-vagina sex is not rape when a woman does it. All men are sex-obsessed animals without the ability or right to decline sex. Because any man who gets raped is "lucky" he got to have sex.

      And one notable fact is that not a single one of them reported their rape to the police. The rate of women reporting rape is abysmally low, but it doesn't remotely compare to the effectively ZERO rate of men reporting rape. The social stigma, victim blaming, shaming, and rape-denialism against women is an abomination, but it is as bad or worse for any man attempting to report being raped. Not a single one of the male rape victims reported it to the police.... but there was one case of a male rape victim who tried calling a rape-support hotline. And you know what happened? The person who answered the phone (presumably female) CALLED HIM A LIAR and told him to stop making prank calls. Seriously, how fucked up is that? A fucking RAPE SUPPORT LINE calling a rape victim a liar, saying no you weren't raped and stop fucking calling. Solely because the victim was male. Pure unadulterated sexist ideology and prejudi

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  31. Re:to the men of Saudi Arabia by sageres · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are very courageous behind that keyboard, young master.
    Next time tell this to a Saudi man in a face.

  32. Dear Muslim world: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as long as you treat half of your society like cattle, you are never going to have a happy, prosperous, or just culture.

    Yes, I know: "honor," "dignity." Well why don't you let your women take care of that for themselves on their own.

    The Chinese, the Indians, the Americans, the Europeans, they will advance. And you will fester. Because of your poor choices.

    Regards,
    the rest of the world

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  33. Re:Allies... by belmolis · · Score: 3, Informative

    The fact of the matter is that Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have high rates of population GROWTH, as do Israeli Arabs, which by itself puts paid to the ridiculous claim that Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing. The fact that Israel admits over 100,000 Palestinians from Gaza, Judea, and Samaria for medical care (provided at no charge if the PA does not pay for it) every year is also inconsistent with the claim of ethnic cleansing. Jordan has killed far more Palestinians that Israel ever has.

  34. Hmm ... by tqk · · Score: 2

    They're just one step from taking them to the vet and "chipping" them.

    I suspect they may already have gotten to that.

    I've often wondered, after all the US' TLAs have done (South & Central America (United Fruit/Chiquita Banana), Cuba (Bay of Pigs), S. E. Asia (VietNam), The Cold War, ...), why hasn't sufficient provocation been found yet for the US military to roll over Saudi Arabia? Grenada and Panama ranked, so why not SA? They couldn't hope to stop the US. You'd think it would be a drop dead simple (practically bloodless coup even) solution to "The Troubles" in the Middle East. Forget Iran; blow away the House of Saud, and doesn't that area become a lot more friendly for everyone, including Iran and Israel? Doesn't Saudi Arabia have a lot of oil, after all? It'd even pee off Pakistan and Indonesia, woohoo!

    Does Prince Bandar have pics of JFK raping kittens and puppies or something?!?

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Hmm ... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And consider these interesting 9/11 facts:

      o 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi Arabian
      o The superstition driving the group is rooted in Saudi Arabia
      o Osama bin Laden - Saudi Arabian
      o Osama's brother in law, Jamal Khalifa - Saudi Arabian - partially bankrolled the 9/11 group
      o Saudi Prince Naif, the interior minister, and Saudi Prince Sultan also partially bankrolled the 9/11 group
      o 28 pages of the 9/11 Joint Inquiry report dealing with Saudi Arabian connections have been censored

      So Bush attacked... Iraq.

      Go figure, eh?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Hmm ... by Ltap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the Saudi regime hasn't given the US any cause to invade -- it already sells oil cheaply. Remember that the only oil-producing countries the US is unfriendly with are ones that hint that they won't follow every whim of US foreign policy (like Venezuela supplying oil to Cuba).

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    3. Re:Hmm ... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      sounds very... conspiracy-theoryish.

      I'm simply pointing out that the actions that were taken don't suit the actual data. Any theory you create from those data points is your own. I didn't offer one. I find it enlightening to look at the data we have, and the actions we take, and compare those with the public narrative. I also find it enlightening to follow the money, in the cui bono sense of "follow."

      To the person who suggested we attacked Iraq over WMDs... Iraq had no WMDs, unless you want to class some old gas shells as WMDs, in which case, ok, they had them, but no, that's no justification for attacking them because they posed zero credible threat.

      To the person who suggested we attacked Afghanistan because of Bin Ladin... that's actually pretty silly. That's like attacking London because some miscreant went to school at the war college. Also, we got Bin Ladin. You'll note we're still playing large-scale military games in Afghanistan.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Hmm ... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      Because the Saudi regime hasn't given the US any cause to invade

      That's certainly the public narrative. That it doesn't match up with the data — even a little bit — is what I find interesting.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  35. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by renoX · · Score: 2

    > Just ask France. France has entire districts run by Muslims that even the police are afraid to enter.

    Bullshit, the reason why the police is afraid to enter is that they are run by gangs (selling drugs usually).
    The religion has nothing to do with it.

  36. Re:This will be reality in all countries... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

    Balls, the police weren't afraid to enter - Sarko destroyed the "police de proximité", giving all the cash to his blue eyed boys in the "Brigade Anit Criminalité" who spent all their time running around like the cowboys they were, ending up shaking down the drug dealers for cash.

    10 years of right wing authoritarian blather and reductions in police man power are what let the situation get to where it is now.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  37. Not just women... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2

    ALL dependants are covered: women, Children (both boys and girls) *and* all workers whose work visa you have given.

    If they are on your ID card (women and children don't get separate ID cards) or their Passport (as their "kafeel" caretaker, or visa giver, as it were), you need the Saudi man's permission to leave, and they will now be informed of it.

    I think this system was made for the "worker" part of the category in mind; they want to know where their slaves^H^H^H^H^H^H are going, and if they are escaping. Poor labourers are practically indentured slaves, kept in live via the sword of heavy debt; I have know people try to escape by leaving everything behind with just the clothes on their backs. This is to prevent that.

    Make of it as you will.

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  38. Re:to the men of Saudi Arabia by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2

    I would if I weren't so creeped out by this Saudi gent being in a face.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  39. Re:Saudi Arabia by Inda · · Score: 2

    You jest, but ash from coal-fired power stations is often used for making roads.

    We call it asphalt here.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.