Slashdot Mirror


Is It Time For the US To Ditch the Dollar Bill?

coondoggie writes "It seems well past time that the U.S. ditch its $1 bill — considering such a move could save the country somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 billion. But there is much resistance, or perhaps a lack of real consideration of the issue from most people. Watchdogs at the Government Accountability Office this week testified before a Congressional hearing on the topic, and said dollar coins could save $4.4 billion over 30 years (PDF), or an average of about $146 million per year."

116 of 943 comments (clear)

  1. I'll be the first to say... by thesameguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

    1. Re:I'll be the first to say... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That will just bump the tips up to higher denominations.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They spread em and then you chuck loonies ($1 coins) and if you can get them stuck in the slot they'll give you a poster or something. As much as I like naked women I still can't figure out how they came up with this stupid game.

    3. Re:I'll be the first to say... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What will affect more people is the newly priced $1 cans of soda/pop...

      Sweet!!!

      You mean we'd get an immediate price drop for the usual $1.25+ it costs in the machines nowdays?!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Kneo24 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strippers will coin the phrase, "making it hail".

    5. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Genda · · Score: 4, Funny

      So now you can answer that question your Momma always asked... "Go wash you hands,,, do you know where that thing's been!!!?

    6. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      not if the strippers are of the same caliber as they are now.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:I'll be the first to say... by booyoh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't find a machine to vend 12 oz cans.

      There are still around. I have seen quite few of them this week on Auto Repair Shops. I noted that the cheaper the soda can price ( Cheapest was $0.60 USD) the cheaper the quote. Most expensive was $0.90 USD

    8. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is so much crap. Within a few weeks of dollar coins being out vending machines would be updated. They are a business and need to be able to take your money. Canada converted to $1 coins and then $2 coins, lots of EU countries completely changed their currencies and things kept working etc. The gov might have to give incentives to help particular industries convert initially but over but the long term it will work out.

    9. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ebh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most vending machines these days take dollar coins. The reason the vending machine industry wants to keep the dollar bill is that it's a lot easier to get a slug past the coin mech than it is to get a counterfeit $1 past the bill acceptor.

    10. Re:I'll be the first to say... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what I've heard, vending machine manufacturers and operators hate dollar bills. Those scanners are easily faked out, but also have a high false-negative rate, get jammed with damaged bills, frustrate customers whose bills aren't new enough, etc. Vendors only started adding them to machines because they didn't want people to have to feed half a dozen (or more) coins into a machine to get a Pepsi.

      A one-time conversion to accept $5 and $1 coins would result in much less hassle for the vending machine folks, because coin-counting devices are fairly difficult to fake out (you can't produce counterfeit metal quarters with a computer and inkjet printer) and much more reliable.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 5, Informative

      This might be correct if the dollar coin were a new thing, but dollar coins have been in circulation since the Carter administration. Vending machines that take the Susan B. Anthony dollar should also take the newer Sacagewea dollars and Presidential dollars, because they were manufactured to be electrically compatible. So any vending machine that has been updated since the 80s should accept dollar coins.

    12. Re:I'll be the first to say... by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Funny

      How to get a free dental extraction in Canada:

      1) Grab a couple "Loonies" ($1 coins) and some big bills.
      2) Head to the strip club
      3) Get shitfaced. Trust me, you'll need the anesthesia.
      4) Use your lighter to heat the $1 coin until you can't handle it
      5) Throw hot coin at the stripper
      6) Repeat
      7) Wait patiently for the "surgeon" to take you to his alley, er, office.
      8) ???
      9) No teeth!

    13. Re:I'll be the first to say... by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      As a Canadian, I can tell you that Canadian strippers hate Americans and their dollar bills. Minimum Canadian tip is $5 - tossing coins on stage will get you thrown out :)

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    14. Re:I'll be the first to say... by lattyware · · Score: 4, Informative

      You say that, but here in the UK, we introduced £2 coins ($3.2USD - must admit, I find a note for around 60p crazy, our lowest note is £5, or $8USD) and while, yes, there was a small period in which it was a little awkward, fast forward a few years and it was all sorted. It really didn't take long.

      There are a lot of calls here to scrap 1p/2p coins, actually, as everyone doesn't really value them, and there is literally nothing you buy for less than 5p any more.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    15. Re:I'll be the first to say... by SEE · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, no. The vending machine industry (under the name Dollar Coin Alliance) doesn't want to keep the dollar bill; they're the primary lobby for getting rid of it. To quote them, "Jammed $1 bills in vending machines cost the industry hundreds of millions in annual repair costs and lost sales."

    16. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      The USA manages a single currency across it's 50 states. There's no reason why Europe can't. It's the F word that's required... federalisation.

    17. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 2

      The USA manages a single currency across it's 50 states. There's no reason why Europe can't. It's the F word that's required... federalisation.

      Exactly, there are two systems that works: one is confederation where each member state keeps budget and money sovereignty, the other is federation, where all member states abandon budget and money sovereignty to a supranational federal state

      There is a requirement for federalism and democracy to live together: we would need the peoples of Europe to consider themselves as a single people, the rich regions being ready to pay for the poorest. This is not the case. UE has been built by bureaucrats without the peoples, and now it is built against the will of the peoples.

      If we carry on toward federalism, we will have to give up democracy. I would rather prefer dumping federalism, and go back to confederalism, which gave us things nice things like Ariane or Erasmus

  2. Not yet... by broggyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not gonna happen; we still have pennies, for chrissakes!

    --
    Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    1. Re:Not yet... by redback · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This will not happen until Americans can let go of their irrational attachment to dollar bills and pennies.

      In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes for coins in 1984 and 1988. 1c and 2c coins were dropped in 1992.

    2. Re:Not yet... by boristdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, my wife bitches when I say we should get rid of pennies and just have purchase totals rounded up or down to the nearest five cents.
      Her: "But the retailers will price everything so it gets rounded up!"
      Me: "No, multiple item purchases will make it just as likely to round down, and that's only for cash transactions."
      Her: "But I still may pay more when I go to the store!"
      Me: "Uh yeah, If you make 10 CASH transactions per week you might pay about 30 cents more per week, or about $15/year."
      Her: "It's a way to rip me off!"

      She makes over $100K/year. People like her are why we will always be stuck with pennies.

    3. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes[...]

      In the USA, we still like to pretend our currency has value.

    4. Re:Not yet... by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When they got rid of the half-penny, the penny (the newly lowest denomination) was worth $.23 in today's money. There's nothing inherently specially about the $.01 value. If I had it my way I'd get rid of everything up to the dime and replace the dollar bill with a coin. But then, I think spending $.025 on making pennies, and $.11 on nickels is ridiculous. And wasting money on reprinting worn out $1 bills when coins would last much longer equally so.

    5. Re:Not yet... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like fifths ... Jack, Jim, Jose ...

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Not yet... by PhotoJim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a failure because the US didn't pull the $1 bill out of circulation.

      Canada started withdrawing paper $1 bills when the $1 coin was introduced. If you didn't want a $1 coin in your change, within a few weeks all a store could give you instead was quarters or smaller instead. That got rid of a lot of people's resistance. (Mind, we still had $2 bills and they were increased in circulation, but they were withdrawn in the same manner for a $2 coin a few years later.)

      Before long no one worries about it anymore. It is what it is and people get used to it.

      We've lost 10-cent bus fare, 10-cent payphone calls and 1-cent candy and managed to do just fine. We can live without small bills too.

      (Perhaps interestingly, the Canadian paper money in largest circulation is not the $5, it's the $20 bill... because of bank machines.)

    7. Re:Not yet... by NReitzel · · Score: 2

      It's not a question of "irrational" - though that is the case. It's more a case of having a bunch of congresspeople who are technically invertebrates. If they had any spine at all, they would do what other close neighbors have done. Don't make a big PR push about "converting" - just stay shut up, and then stop printing the one dollar bills. After a few years, the problem will be an unproblem. And because it isn't a "changeover" shoved at the public, there won't be any organized resistance.

      Given the way our Congress works, there's even an easy way to approach this. Treasury can simply "delay" printing one dollar bills for whatever reason they want to dream up. As the circulating bills start to resemble wet paper towels, dollar coins will gain in popularity.

      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    8. Re:Not yet... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder if it would help to engrave a pair of fabulous tits on the new dollar coin.
      Hmmm... George Washington, tits. George Washington, tits. It could work.

    9. Re:Not yet... by compro01 · · Score: 2

      They must charge a smaller fee where you are. Up here, they gouge for 11.7%. I'll do my own rolling (with my handy-dandy motorized coin sorter) and keep my $30-40.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    10. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      You don't need to give change for such ludicrously small amounts of value. We used to price to the half cent, and the world didn't end when that was dropped.

    11. Re:Not yet... by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You might wanna find out what actually happened in the US before laying on too much sanctimony.

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight. In our first attempt, the dollar coins were also silver like the quarters. So it was hard to quickly identify which coins are dollars and which are quarters.

      But while that mistake was going on, all sorts of equipment was built to accept dollar coins that were that size and shape. So when it came time for serious attempt #2 (Sacagawea dollar) the coin still had to be the same size and shape or every vending machine would have to be replaced. So they tried changing the color to gold in order to satisfy humans and machines.

      Well, it was the only gold coin most people in the US have seen, so it was odd. And it still felt like a quarter in your pocket. So still didn't win much acceptance. Plus a lot of people responded to the name of the coin with "Sack a Jew what?"

      We're trying again with the Presidential Dollar Coins. They're still close to quarters to satisfy the vending machines, and gold to try and satisfy the humans. And they've got "normal" names.

      Realistically, the changeover will happen in one of three ways:

      • Very slowly
      • Screwing over the vending machines so we get a coin that feels different
      • Congress banning the paper dollar, which will piss off a lot of people who need something to be angry about.
    12. Re:Not yet... by FrankSchwab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      100% agree...Kill the penny, kill the nickel, kill the quarter, kill the $1 and $5 bills.

      The dime (the physically smallest coin) becomes the smallest denomination. 10 of'em to the dollar. If you absolutely have to, create a 50 cent piece that's a bit larger than the dime.

      Build a dollar coin that DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A QUARTER, goddammit. Even the gold Sacajawea dollars, after a couple of years, tarnished to look like an older quarter. Build it with an external polygonal rim, or put a hole in the middle of it,. Maybe make it about the size of a penny, or nickel so coin holders in cars, etc., will hold the new dollar. .Build a 5 dollar coin if you must, just a bit larger.

      In my world, that'd be two coins ($0.1 and $1.0). The numismatists (who single-handedly keep the penny alive) would probably require 4 ($0.1, $0.5, $1.0, $5.0). Then, three bills - $10, $20, $50. Despite my misgivings about losing a cash economy, the ease of counterfeiting (especially at the nation-state level) probably means that making higher denomination bills is a poor choice.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    13. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Sure if you get cash from them, but the gift cards tend to give you the full amount (I assume that amazon pays the company running the machine - since now you have to spend that money with them). Since I'm going to buy something from amazon anyway...

    14. Re:Not yet... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Hi. I'm right here in the good old USA, and I can confirm for everybody that is in fact 100% an irrational attachment.

      It's a relatively recent development, too. I was around in the 1970s, and I don't recall anybody back then insisting that the government introduce 1/4-cent pieces and paper 25-cent bills to address the value points filled by the current dollars and pennies.

    15. Re:Not yet... by boristdog · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a small price to pay for a nice body and a healthy sex drive, though.

    16. Re:Not yet... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I want to know is why the US has quarters instead of 20c coins.

      I'll bet it's because the US dollar was modeled after the Spanish dollar, which was in turn worth 8 "reals" (aka "bits"), and was introduced centuries before decimalization came into vogue. That's why a quarter is still sometimes called "two bits".

    17. Re:Not yet... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd use $0.04, $0.08, $0.32, $0.64 and $1.00 coins. But I'd also have 128 cents to the dollar, for I like round numbers.

    18. Re:Not yet... by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight.

      No, the problem is the size and shape of the newer dollar coins. For most of US history, dollar coins (orginally silver) up until the Eisenhower (71-78) were logically larger than half dollars.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenhower_dollar

      It was the '79 Susan B. Anthony that started the quarter/dollar confusion.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    19. Re:Not yet... by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might wanna find out what actually happened in the US before laying on too much sanctimony.

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      Being in the UK where the pound note was replaced by a coin about 15 years ago, amid much moaning from some, I do not understand what is meant by "failed". So what happened? Did people throw them away when given them (in change or payement)? Or did they refuse the transaction entirely (and then do without the business)? Historically, there was great difficulty getting people to accept notes in the first place rather than coin; so what irony!

      In the UK, the pound coins just started appearing to the public in change from shops, and notes just disappeared over a timescale of a few weeks because, when they passed through a bank, the bank withdrew them (as they would withdraw worn-out notes). In fact once the process started people became reluctant to accept a pound note because they did not want to get stuck with it (although banks would accept them for a long time after).

      Personally, I always find money very acceptable.. Yes, anyone could "refuse to accept" coins like they can alway "refuse to accept" cars, the Internet, electricity, the sun, rain, whatever .....

    20. Re:Not yet... by runeghost · · Score: 2

      We could always revalue the currency, so that pennies, nickles, and so on are actually relevant denominations again. But that would really drive home to the public how much inflation there's been in their lifetimes, and the government certainly doesn't want anyone thinking about the causes of inflation...

    21. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason it failed was because the USA didn't actually make the decision to stop printing $1 bills.

      Canada initially made a similar error when we introduced the loonie here. The $1 bill was not actually removed from circulation (they only reduced the number of $1 bills printed) for a number of months after the coin's introduction, during which the $1 bills that existed were wearing out faster (because people preferred them to coins and would use them so much more frequently), and this necessitated the mint printing more than initially estimated. The solution, Canada determined, was to discontinue the $1 bill entirely and increase production of the $1 coin to compensate.

      It worked.

    22. Re:Not yet... by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

      The British (technically, English) £1 note was abandoned before I was born, but here's an article from the time: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2012/nov/13/pound-note-replaced-coin-1984

      And here's another: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/12/newsid_2518000/2518637.stm

      British coins are very easy to tell apart -- low-value (½p, discontinued), 1p and 2p are brown with plain edges, mid value coins are silver: 5p and 10p are thin and have milled edges, 20p and 50p are heptagonal with plain edges; £1 and £2 are gold-coloured and thick.

    23. Re:Not yet... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, dollar bills were never withdrawn from circulation. Nobody made you take coins, you could always have bills. And that's what everybody continued to use, while the coins sat in the vaults, untouched.

    24. Re:Not yet... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight.

      Yes. And the Susan B. Anthony's perhaps were confusing. But the Sacagawea's aren't confusing at all.

      There's no "problem" except the fact that the Treasury Department keeps printing dollar bills. Stop printing them, and people will stop using them. People use what is familiar... and if you have two things in circulation that do the same thing and one is less familiar, people will continue to use the old one.

      But just stop handing out the old ones. The average life of a dollar bill in circulation is pretty short, so most of them will disappear pretty quickly as banks hand in bills but only get coins back. But people will still want to buy crap. Hence, they will learn to carry coins.

      There's no other "problem" at all.

    25. Re:Not yet... by Macman408 · · Score: 2

      I was recently in Australia for a week, and in that time, I found $4 on the street - two $1 coins and a $2 coin. Now losing a couple quarters is no big deal - worth maybe a can of soda. But lose a couple of the quite small $2 coins, and there goes a latte - and you know how us Americans are with our Starbucks! With such small but high-value coins, the wealth that's caught in the couch cushions down under could probably solve the financial crisis of a small European country!

      Seriously though, I prefer plastic to paper, and paper to metal. Mainly just because that's what's easiest to carry in my wallet. If I spend cash and get change (which is rare - I usually just do it on small purchases for the benefit of the merchant to avoid high credit card fees), that change sits in my pocket for the rest of the day. At the end of the day it gets dumped on my desk. After a week or two, whatever change is on my desk gets dumped in a jar somewhere. And about every 5 years, that jar goes to the bank. If I start dumping a couple dollars at a time into that jar, it holds a lot more money. And I'm not likely to carry coins around with me, since I rarely go somewhere intending to use cash.

      If we ditch the dollar bill, I don't care if we replace it with a particular coin - but let's fix the problem of high credit card fees on tiny transactions so that it makes sense to use a credit card for everything. Then we'll be one step closer to getting rid of the rest of our currency too.

    26. Re:Not yet... by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      They never produced enough of the dollars coins plus the cowardly Americans never did have the balls to phase out the dollar bill while introducing the coins.

      In the end all the dollar coins ended up at collectors.

      Another way of saying it: They never even tried. They never even tried three times.

    27. Re:Not yet... by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Originally the 5p and 10p coins were minted to be the same size and weight as the shilling and florin (2 shilling piece) as it aided the transition to decimalisation in 1971 from pounds, shillings and pence and were worth the same. As the banks received shillings they were replaced with the new pence equivalent. The half crown (12 1/2p) and crown (25p) were withdrawn immediately and the heptagonal 50p piece replaced the 10 shilling note. The Royal Mint started minting 50p pieces a full two years before decimalisation to deal with that.

      Around 1982 the heptagonal 20p piece was introduced and the pound note was replaced by the coin a couple of years later. A few years later we finally got rid of the halfpenny bit.

      Subsequent to that there was a replacement of all 5p, 10p and 50p pieces with smaller coins that are the ones currently in use and the £2 coin was introduced which is a larger version of the £1 with a silver inner circle.

      There is a £5 coin produced but it isn't legal tender as it is only used for commemorative coins. When it is made legal tender it will remain the same size and weight.

      All non-copper coins that are round have milled edges.

      In over 40 years the 1p and 2p pieces have never changed since their introduction.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    28. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Not to mention a wife who pulls in 6 figures. My wife costs money.

    29. Re:Not yet... by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      We've never been without dollar coins, since 1776. It's the greenback that's new.

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight.

      Until coins marked 1965 and newer, all reeded US coins (dimes, quarters, halves, dollars) were 0.9 fine silver; the reeding was to discourage filing of the precious metal. The values of the coins were based on their weight in silver, a ratio (though not their original weights) that persists today: a half-dollar weighs as much as two quarters, which weighs as much as five dimes, and any combination of all three that equals $20 weighs 1 lb avoirdupois.

      After all circulating coins were reduced to base metals, the Eisenhower dollar coin was introduced in 1971. However, it was the same size as the old (true) silver dollars, weighing as much as four quarters, proving to be an unwieldy size. This large size made sense when they were minted of precious metal, but not so much with base metal. It failed to catch on.

      (Meanwhile, the half-dollar fell out of common circulation, because everyone obsessed over JFK.)

      The Anthony dollar of 1979 was an effort to fix this. In order to distinguish it from other denominations, it was originally going to be a different shape: a curve of continuous width, with 11 sides (in honor of Apollo 11, whose mission patch was on the reverse). This original feature can be seen in the artwork of the coin, with both the obverse and reverse having a hendecagon inscribed around the edge. However, coin-operated machinery operators were concerned about the reliability of their equipment accepting such an unusual shape at the time, resulting in a last-minute change to a circular coin.

      It should be noted that Canada essentially copied the Anthony dollar's original design in their current "loonie," only changing the color. The number 11 doesn't hold the historical significance to Canada as it does to the US, but the loonie has 11 sides just the same.

      So when it came time for serious attempt #2 (Sacagawea dollar) the coin still had to be the same size and shape or every vending machine would have to be replaced.

      As noted above, the loonie is the same thickness and diameter as the Anthony dollar. In addition to this, Canadian pennies, nickels, dimes and quarters are also the same size and shape (and color) as US coins of the same denomination. (Half-dollars are different, but are rarely seen in either country regardless.)

      Because of this, coin-sorting equipment can be made to easily switch between US and Canadian coins, which only really differ in weight and metallurgy (i. e. magnetic signature). Keeping the newer golden dollars the same size and shape as the Anthony dollars wasn't just a matter of backwards-compatibility but cross-compatibility as well. The yellow color of the golden US dollars also continues the trend of using the same colors for the same denominations.

      The real issue for the golden dollar was maintaining the same magnetic signature as the Anthony dollar, in spite of using a different color alloy.

      And it still felt like a quarter in your pocket.

      Until you feel the smooth edge. It doesn't have the loonie's corners, but it's still easily distinguished from quarters by touch, just as you can distinguish between quarters and nickels, and between dimes and pennies.

      We're trying again with the Presidential Dollar Coins.

      Past tense. Production was halted prematurely this year, with Grover Cleveland's first term.

      Besides, they were always intended as a limited issue, much like the "50 State Quarters" program. Sacagawea dollars were minted alongside them, along with some special, limited-issue reverses reflecting "Native American heritage." The only permanent change is moving "In God We Trust" from the edge-printing to the obverse, after a certain well-publicized snafu with the Presidential dollars.

    30. Re:Not yet... by dryeo · · Score: 2

      The people also wanted a balanced budget and this was one step in that direction. We did end up with a balanced budget, at least until the right wingers came to power with their philosophy of cutting taxes, services and increasing spending on spying on citizens, locking people up and war. Nothing like no bid military contracts to create a deficit.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    31. Re:Not yet... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, this is complete crap.

      I'm going to compare the USA 1,5,10,25,100 system against the very common 1,2,5,10,20,50,100 system (125 system, for short.)

      By my calculation (done by hand, so may be a little out) to make all the quantities of change from 0 to 99, the USA system needs 470 coins, the 125 system needs 340 coins. The only quantities for which the USA system needs fewer coins are 25, 26, 35 and 36, for which it is one coin more efficient in each case.

      If you took away the 2c coin to have 1,5,10,20,50 (i.e. a 20 and 50 instead of a 25 compared to the USA system) you'd still need only 420 coins (vs 470) for all change from 0 to 99c.

      The 125 system works so well because the denominations are nearly equally spaced logarithmically. Starting with 1, you get the next denominations by multiplying by 2, 2.5, 2, 2, 2.5, 2. In the USA system, the multipliers are 5, 2, 2.5, 4. It is those large multipliers (5 and 4) which make the system so inefficient.

      If you wanted to span the 1-100 range with just four coins, I believe 1, 3, 10, 30 would be optimal, as it is closest to logarithmic spacing. (Actually, 1,3,10,32 might be better, but that would be a real pain to make change with.) (Even more efficient would be a true logarithmic system: 1,2,4,8,16... or 1,3,9,27,81,... or 1,4,16,64,256... but none of these mesh well with our decimal system.)

      On what evidence do you know "THE AMOUNTS MOST COMMONLY NEEDED"? Even accepting your unsupported claim "the very large majority of "change" needed is less than 50 cents", for each amount of change 0 to 49 cents, USA system needs 185 coins vs 145 for the 125 system, so you fail on this count too. If you remove the 2c from 125 and consider only change less than 50c (effectively removing the 50c from the 125 system as we'll never use it, so denominations are 1,5,10,20) then you *finally* get marginally ahead: 185 vs 190. Against this, the 125 system is about one coin better for every number from 50c to 99c, so your 'very large majority' will have to be greater than 90% to even get marginally ahead. (And remember, this is without the 2c, which the 125 system would normally have.)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    32. Re:Not yet... by darkonc · · Score: 2

      $/99 plus a 5% sales tax would come to 1.04 with $.96 in change -- meaning that you'll now eed to buy a boat load of $.99 items to get to the 'below $.50 range that you claim most change sits in. In reality, most change ammounts should be randomly distributed.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  3. Won't someone think of the strippers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm thinking about them right now .....

  4. Dollar Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about the penny first.

  5. pace by alienzed · · Score: 2

    It seems like everything in the US takes forever to accomplish. Everything changed when the internet came to be. We can do things now in seconds that used to take days. The governing system needs to learn a thing or two from this. However, Canada gave up the dollar bill a long long time ago, and soon we're getting rid of the penny. It seems more and more like we're the real leaders in North America now.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    1. Re:pace by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have a government where powerful politicians can openly claim that significant scientific theories are "lies from the pit of hell", and that came up with the TSA and Gitmo. They're inefficient and slow on purpose, do you really want these people to be able to take significant actions quickly and efficiently?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  6. Inflation beware by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in Europe it is widespread belief that the fact that 1 and 2 euros are in coins are a reason for inflation. You think twice before spending a bill, while psychologically a coin is easier to part with.
    It does happen quite often to have 10-20eur in coins so it's probably not all wrong.

    1. Re:Inflation beware by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have this backward. €1 and €2 are coins because of inflation, not the other way around. You shouldn't think twice about spending €1 on something because it isn't much money.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Inflation beware by PhotoJim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That must be why the Swiss franc is so weak. They have 1, 2 and 5 franc coins and have for decades. Their smallest paper bill is a 10 franc note.

      No, wait... the franc isn't weak. Guess that means these things don't correlate. :)

    3. Re:Inflation beware by xaxa · · Score: 2

      Irish, Maltese and Cypriot pounds were worth more than €1.

      (Not sure about those currencies, but the British pound had £1 and £2 coins when the Euro was introduced, which were worth something like €1.60 and €3.20 at the time.)

  7. Re:Allowance by Radres · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With dollar coins?

  8. Familiarity by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait, they're saying we can save potentially billions of dollars, by simply changing our expectations and habits in a very slight and non-destructive fashion? Unless we can declare war on it as some kind of abstract ideological concept, nobody's going to go for that. This is America, dude, where we turn off the lights when we leave the bathroom to save the environment while we let petroleum producers dump thousands of tonnes of oil into the water because they half-assed the construction and bypassed most of the safety procedures. We come in peace, ignore the Predator drones.

    The only sensible way to do this is to shove it down the average person's throat with them screaming bloody murder... only to find out a few years later that they actually like it better the new way. It's how things have always been done here. Don't ask me why, I don't know whether it's human nature, or there's something in the water that makes people this resistant to beneficial change, but will happily make useless changes to everything...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  9. Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's all there is to this comment. I throw away pennies. The only coins I save are quarters, and I only do that out of frustration. I don't carry a coin pouch. Seriously.

    1. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might feel differently if coins were worth something.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Yeah, just wait until you have $1 and $2 coins in your pocket like we do in Canada. And at the end of the week, you dump out all the change and there's $50 worth.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  10. Strike a zero, keep the dollar by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We should just strike a zero from the coins and keep the dollar. In other words, the pennies sitting in your piggy would immediately be worth $0.10. Paper money and the existing dollar coins would keep the same value, just multiply the value of all the other coins.

    1. Really not that expensive compared to the national debt.

    2. It would be a form of stimulus that goes to middle class people with jars full of coins, not fat cats. It would spark the kind of spending they want to stimulate, just in time for Christmas.

    3. The mint would once again be making money minting pennies and nickles instead of losing it. In the long run it would pay for itself. As an added bonus, you don't need to change the minting process.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  11. Came here looking for the Planet Money link by guises · · Score: 5, Informative

    Planet Money did a whole podcast on this. Don't see anyone linking to it, so here's the most current thing:

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money

    The short is: switching to dollar coins is both less convenient and more expensive than sticking with bills. It's surprising, given the much longer lifetime of coins, but unambiguous.

    1. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although the main argument of the linked article on why it's more expensive, is that people tend to hold on to coins (put them in useless jars) rather than use them, so the government had to produce 1.6 dollar coins for each 1$ paper billed replaced.

      In the linked PDF file [1], search for "1.6", you will find this sentence in the same paragraph:

      "However, in both cases, once the transition was complete, coin
      production was very low or even nil in some years. Therefore, we
      determined that a 1.5-to-1 replacement rate would be appropriate for our analysisâ"low enough to avoid an excess of $1 coins without creating an undue risk of producing too few."

      It was only a transition issue, there is no mention about people forgetting about those coins in jars. A 1$ coin is useful, it's what is usually given as a tip for a beer in a pub, so I find the argument that people put them in jars kind of odd..

      [1]Âhttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11281.pdf

  12. Not a big deal... by Atticka · · Score: 2

    Up north we have 1$ and 2$ coins and its really NOT an issue. Time to get over the "no way, not ever, coins are icky" attitude and do the responsible thing to save money.

    Honestly, something has to be done to reduce government expenditure and this is a simple, no brainer way to go about it.

    --
    No sig here...
  13. Re:But, think of the strippers! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    RFID tags in their outfits, and when you go in you get given a "watch" wristband that will read the tag and credit that stripper's account. You prepay at the bar or on the door, and you charge your drinks to it too. If you go over, just top it up with the handy credit card machine that a hostess will bring to the table with your next round of drinks.

    You can keep it anonymous, or you can register with the system for a discount on drinks and to make sure you always get a dance from your favourite girl.

    This one's free, bitches. You know who you heard it from first.

  14. Value of $1 by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to Wolfram Alpha, $1 in 1950 had the approximate purchasing power of $9.54 today. So the dollar is the new dime. Pop quiz: did it make sense to print ten-cent notes in 1950? (Hint: no) Then why retain the $1 bill today?

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Value of $1 by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Now a $1 bill will get you a burger.

      Where?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Value of $1 by VisceralLogic · · Score: 2

      Now a $1 bill will get you a burger.

      Where?

      Welcome to America: http://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en/food/meal_bundles/dollar_menu.html

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
  15. Re:But, think of the strippers! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    You insert them in the slot.

    Is this really that hard to figure out?

  16. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2

    Backing up a currency is a tragic waste of gold, which has substantial industrial uses but sadly is too expensive because of the irrational attachment that people have to it. Plus if a new source of very large amounts of gold were to be discovered, then it would endanger the economy.

  17. Re:Long been time. by operagost · · Score: 2

    You want to carry a stack of 1 and 5 dollar coins in your pocket? Or will it be in a sack tied to your belt?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  18. Dollar coins already exist by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've tried several. The big problem is that the Treasury won't simply ditch the dollar bill in favor of coins. They try to issue the coins along with dollar bills, so of course people treat the coins as collectibles instead of currency and they never catch on.

    The right way to do it is to just do it: issue the coins and stop issuing dollar bills. Bills would still be in circulation and accepted, but no new $1 bills would be issued to banks. If a bank orders $1s, it'd receive them in coins. Any dollar bills received by the Federal Reserve banks or the Treasury would be destroyed, and any replacement would be done with coins. I figure within a year we'd be on coins completely, most dollar bills would've been returned as worn and destroyed and with no new bills being issued coins would become so prevalent that they wouldn't be collectibles anymore.

  19. Re:Not again by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use them. Way easier to keep a bunch in the ash tray to pay tolls with.

    People would use them if they stopped printing dollar bills.

  20. Re:Not again by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if anybody wants them or not, the solution is simple. Start making one dollar coins. Stop making one dollar bills. Very quickly, your entire economy has switched.

    That's what happened in Canada. What, you think there wasn't resistance when we eliminated our one dollar bill or two dollar bill (which was far more commonly used than in the US)? Of course there was. And it didn't matter, because people didn't get a choice. The government decided they wanted to save money, so they did. It's not an election-level issue, so they could do that sort of thing.

    The only reason that the dollar coin has not succeeded in the US is because the US government doesn't know how to do such transitions.

  21. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Smallpond · · Score: 2

    Nothing is stopping you from buying gold.

  22. Re:Allowance by magarity · · Score: 2

    I give my daughter her allowance in dollar coins (the gold colored presidential series and sacageweas); she has absolutely no problem at all putting them into circulation...

  23. Re:Allowance by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    The idea isn't to eliminate the unit of currency, but replace the physical form with a more durable one. I fail to see how that changes anything in terms of you giving your children an allowance.

  24. Re:Elsewhere by Noughmad · · Score: 2

    the smallest euro bill is 5€, the smallest bill here is worth ~10usd

    Unless you try to buy electronics with it, then it's only worth like 3usd.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  25. Re:Long been time. by Microlith · · Score: 2

    I already don't carry around cash much. Even the vending machines in my office take cards (most evil thing ever.) Chances are I'd end up saving more when I did have cash on me as I'd toss 'em in the bucket I have of coins at home, grabbing a handful when I need them.

    Not that I can withdraw 1s and 5s at the bank as it is. Minimum of $20 and a multiple of $20 from there.

  26. Re:Great for tracking... by magarity · · Score: 2

    Really, subject says it all. I sometimes get cash out of the ATM, just because I like to have some on hand. The great thing about cash is that if you end up in a bad position, anyone anywhere will accept it.

    Well that's great and all but rather off topic. Cash for in case of a bad position comes in the form of a 20 or larger, not a stack of singles. And the topic at hand is dollar *coins* which are much better for privacy if you stop to think about it since unlke dollar bills, dollar coins don't even have serial numbers.

  27. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once thought this way too. But it is possible. Instead of a $1 USD buying a loaf a bread, it might actually buy 4 loaves of bread. I wish I could find the post that pointed this out, but I'm too lazy. We would still have money, but it would be worth more in the long run.

  28. Re:Not again by PhotoJim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Getting rid of $1 bills isn't despotism, it's pragmatism.

    Should the US start printing 25-cent bills? 10-cent bills? More choice is better, right?

    At a certain point, you have to realize that having unlimited choices is just silly. A $1 coin functions just as well in an economy as a $1 bill (and lasts longer, thus costing society less). If you don't like increasing amounts of change, do what most Americans do and use credit or debit cards.

    As a side effect, use cash, save those increasing piles of change and you can put hundreds of dollars into your savings account every year just by rolling it all up.

  29. Sacajawea dollars in Ecuador by Dwedit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For anyone wondering where all the Sacajawea dollars went to, they are mostly in Ecuador. Ecuador uses US dollars as the currency, and people there use dollar coins all the time. You can see some photos of dirty tarnished dollar coins that have obviously been used, which is unheard of in the US.

  30. the USA will drop the Dollar Bill... by idji · · Score: 2

    ..when they drop inches, Fahrenheit, SUVs, bipartisan politics, Creationism, buying on credit, pork barrelling, guns, corn syrup, jingoism, Hollywood and voting machines.

  31. Re:Long been time. by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    Why would you have a ton of them? You cycle through them. If you have some loonies or toonies, you pay for your coffee with that. If you don't, you break a bill, and get some coins, and pay for the coffee with coins the next time. Since most vending machine payments are with loonies or toonies, that also eats them up pretty fast.

    Americans love coming up with reasons why the transition to coins is impractical, except most countries already did the transition and didn't have any of those problems.

  32. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Exactly. Here's some reading for you.

    Link

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Money BACKED by gold and silver doesn't have to be made of gold and silver. You could fix the dollar to the gram for instance. You can never have more dollars in the system than you do grams of gold at that point. This might seem to limit how much currency is usable but there is no particular reason the dollar can't be divided into smaller units than hundredths.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Xeranar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with the gold standard is that it uses a division principle to adjust for inflation so that the rich get markedly richer while the poor literally starve. The point of fiat currency is that the stronger your GDP is the more money you can print without hurting your economy. Thus the guy who sits on his 100 million at 3% interest will meet inflation but the average worker every time we raise the minimum wage will see a vastly larger benefit. In short we need fiat currency to keep a modern economy working because of the huge surplus labor pool mixed with the insanely large world economy.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by alexander_686 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it causes deflation.
                Gold is basically fixed in quantity. Mining has little effect on the overall supply.
                As the economy grows and the money supply is fixed, the value of money increases.
                This shifts wealth to those people who hold cash, a non-productive asset.
                This increase real interest rates, deterring investments in productive assets.
      It is a horrible, horrible thing.

      See “A Monetary History of the United States “ by Milton Friedman

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Xifer · · Score: 2

      An original US gold dollar contained a gram and a half of gold on close order and at today's gold price was worth about 85.34 Federal Reserve Notes. A seated Liberty silver dollar contained .77344 troy oz of silver (about 3/4 of a troy oz) and was worth about 25.86 Federal Reserve Notes today. When i grew up in Eastern Montana, we almost always spent cartwheels and almost never saw a silver or gold certificates as the state motto is Oro Y Plata. There is a move afoot in this state to move to trade in silver by weight as it would be paying for things with real market goods or art works instead of fictitious paper goods foisted on us on by an entity that is not our real government. Silver dimes are worth somewhere around 3 FRN's and silver quarters are worth somewhere in the vicinity of 6 FRN's and silver fifty cent pcs come out around 11 dollars or so.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Think again. Compared to gold, silver, copper, oil, wheat, corn, soybeans, and many other commodities, the dollar has lost a pretty good chunk of it's value.*

      *Citation needed

      The major problem with tying a currency to a precious metal (or commodity) is when the supply and/or demand of that commodity changes, radically, in a short period of time, as happened in the 1890's.

      As another example, look at the attempt to manipulate silver prices in the late 1970's and early 1980's by the Hunt brothers.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Sabriel · · Score: 2

      Which is all well and good until the first asteroid miner brings home a literal gigatonne of gold.

      It occurs to me that there's really only three fundamental commodities: Time * People = Happiness. Anything we can produce requires an investment of time by one or more people, whether it's six people spending eight hours sweating away over a forge or one person spending one second pushing a button in an air-conditioned office, and everything we do in life affects our happiness.

      Society called the factor of the first two units the "man-hour", and since for any given population there is always a finite, precious amount of it available, projects were undertaken based on three datums: first, the cost in "man-hours" to complete and maintain the project (e.g. digging a well and keeping it clean), second, the return in "man-hours" after the project was completed (e.g. no longer having to walk each day to and from the nearest freshwater river), and third, the happiness, or quality of life, for those involved before, during and after the project (e.g. no longer having to worry about whether the tribe upriver is dumping their crap in it), with the primary goal being to obtain the most happiness with the secondary goal of doing so for the smallest cost and the greatest return.

      Has anyone seriously investigated the feasibility of building a modern economic system based more closely on these fundamental commodities and objectives? The dollar is supposed to be a measure of this (in a Winston Churchill "democracy is the worst form of government except for all others that have been tried" kind of way), but our present system seems to be increasingly distancing the source and destination of those dollars (and as many a revolution demonstrates, e.g. the American Revolution, societal happiness is strongly proportional to the inverse of that distance).

    7. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Antonovich · · Score: 2

      And this comment is modded Insightful! Just shows that /. people are pretty tech-based and don't have much sophistication in other areas...
      The lunacy of the idea of perpetual growth on a finite planet is beginning to become evident with environmental degradation now starting to show the cracks in the system. Completely virtual fiat currencies are the most unjust and undemocratic instruments known to man - together with deregulation of the financial markets they lead to massive transfers of capital to those who create no actual wealth.

      And aside from that, there is a major practical flaw in your argument, as shown typically by the tech industry. Screens are a perfect example - I have a 25" LCD screen plugged into my laptop. 15 years ago it would have cost many thousands of dollars. 3 years ago I paid a couple of hundred and today it would probably only cost a hundred or so. HORRIBLE DEFLATION!!!!!!!!!!!!! Run for the hills my friends, we're all doomed!!!!!!!

      Isn't, in reality, deflation in the price of a particular good or service a true reflection of "progress" or "advancement"? As we become more efficient at doing a particular thing and as competition increases, isn't it in fact the only natural and logical result?

      I believe that the problem is not with having a fixed money supply but rather foolish economists (and most of us for believing without reserve) who can't imagine other, more efficient ways of doing things. After all, what is the "purpose" of the monetary system? Perpetual growth? Nope, it's to facilitate the (hopefully maximally) efficient distribution of scarce resources in a particular economy/society...

    8. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is nonsense. Money is is divisible. If your gold coin is worth too much to by a pair of boots, you exchange it for a smaller denomination. Deflation doesn't matter.

      The requirement to use smaller denominations, mean the higher denominations are worth more. It seems that you are admitting deflation happens, but hand waving it away with a suggestion that it "doesn't matter". There is a lot of literature out there that says otherwise, and it is quite unlikely that deflation doesn't matter, so if you want to say deflation doesn't matter or is better than the current situation, then, the burden of proof is on you to show that.

      Deflation has tangible negative effects on folks that are not rich -- when you borrow some money, the deflationary effect essentially means that you might never be able to pay back the loan, because the value of the gold in real terms that you have to pay back is increasing, on top of the actual interest charges; you can't know the economic growth in advance....

      If the economic growth doesn't happen, there's no job for you to get to repay your loan or buy a house. If the economic growth does happen, and you owe money, then your debt becomes as much more burdensome as the rate of inflation caused by that growth, with a non-fiat currency.

      It also means, that as the economy grows, wages will continuously go down -- a certain amount of gold becomes worth more over time, therefore, to be paying the same rate, the employers have to continuously decrease the amount of gold paid, and employers who hold large quantities of money have the advantage, since they receive money from the revenue making activities of their business, and there is a delay before they pay employees; whereas, in an inflationary environment, wages continuously increase, and this works to the disadvantage of the employer who has large quantities of cash, and to the advantage of the lower/middle-class laborers .

      You can not increase the wealth and quality of life by inducing inflation.

      Sure you can... inflation acts as a stimulus, encouraging new investment and revenue generating activities; just leaving your money in the bank is marginally penalized, due to the gradual decrease in value.

      Investment is rewarded, with inflation and economic growth -- resulting in more productive use of the money, then sticking it in a bank account.

      Non-inflationary currency rewards stagnation --- leave your money in safe keeping. It will just continuously be worth more and more over time, and you will need smaller and smaller denominations to pay for products and services with.

      This means the other businesses you are buying products from, and laborers you are buying services from are at a disadvantage, because over time they are receiving smaller and smaller denominations of gold for their services.

      E.g. You get just an artificial reward for holding onto the currency you obtained, before demand increased, instead of investing in profitable activities.

      Not that there is a problem with saving money -- but it is nothing to base a system of trade on, at least not one that is expected to excel.

  33. Re:Not again by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was saying that the attitude that the government will just make decisions that favor it over the people is a sign of despotism.

    But this isn't one of those decisions. Removing the $1 bill saves the people money. It doesn't particularly help the government at all. So how is this despotism?

  34. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aside from the price!

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  35. Re:Allowance by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    Are the too sickly to handle the weight of a coin? Or just too stupid to understand what a coin is?

  36. Re:Long been time. by painandgreed · · Score: 2

    You want to carry a stack of 1 and 5 dollar coins in your pocket? Or will it be in a sack tied to your belt?

    Having gone to many trips through the countries of Europe, I can say that you typically don't have a stack of coins in your pocket. Now that your change is worth something, you spend it first and only go to paper afterwards, rather than just using your pocket as a dump for all your change which gets emptied out at the end of the day. If you do get an uncomfortable amount of change in your pocket, that is just a reminder to use it first the next time you buy something and the problem is resolved. Because you use your coins first, you also tend to use all those small denominations too for exact change. Even if you pay with paper, you still pay off the change bit if you have it because you've already checked your pocket for enough money. End result is that I have less coins in my pocket than I usually do back in the States.

  37. Re:Data? by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So that's $146,000,000/yr.

    No, no. That's not the right way to look at it. It's 4 BILLION being saved. What? Yes, that's over THIRTY years, but so what? Doesn't "4 BILLION" sound so much better than "1 BILLION" or even just "146 MILLION"?

    Now we have the latest style of inflation: the number of years a small savings is multiplied by to produce the sensational amount to be reported by the media. With the budget, it's typically been 10 years (so they won't say "this cut to spending will save just 100 million", they report savings of "1 billion". Now it's 30 years. We've automatically saved three times as much as before!

  38. Piggy bank by phorm · · Score: 2

    Coins, I might add, fit very nicely into a piggy bank and the added jingle tends to be more impressive to children.

  39. we still don't have metric for chrissake by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if you hadn't noticed, there's a particularly loud virulent strain of "oppose all common sense progress as evil" in the USA

    i know such stubborn blockheadedness isn't unique to the USA. but they seem more powerful here. how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by __Paul__ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

      Free education.

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    2. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

      We don't vote for them.

  40. Re:Long been time. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    Not that I can withdraw 1s and 5s at the bank as it is. Minimum of $20 and a multiple of $20 from there.

    I can tell you for a fact that banks (and credit unions) have 1 and 5 dollar bills on hand, as well as a full range of coins. They have to, since very few people have accounts that are an integer multiple of $20 and they have to be able to allow you to take your money out.

    Maybe you're complaining because the ATMs don't hold anything but $20 bills? That's not the only way to withdraw money from the bank. It's the cheapest way for the banks, and it's cheaper to make a machine that deals only with one kind of bill, so that's what the ATMs do.

  41. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Jetra · · Score: 2

    I'm more concerned that the government might be conditioning us to get ready for when they finally introduce the Amero, linking us, Mexio, and Canada in some sort of Euro-esqe society.

  42. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by dbIII · · Score: 2

    Instead of speculation from the economist that steered things into a bubble and crash why not consider the old "cross of gold" speech from back when a gold standard was causing problems?

  43. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

    That sounds nothing like an individual buying gold.

  44. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by shaitand · · Score: 3, Informative

    The gold standard wasn't the problem. The problem is that people weren't bright enough realize it is easier to divide the dollar to further decimal places than to divide a piece of gold.

  45. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2, Informative

    They also killed the Liberty Dollar, which was backed by silver and gold, calling its founder a "domestic terrorist". Seriously.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  46. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually it was a problem since it created an increasing barrier of entry to people who wanted to use any sort of resource to do anything. The golden rule was that whoever had the gold made the rules. In that sort of system "startups" are impossible without an old money patron. The shift away from such things over the last few centuries resulted in modern society instead of static feudalism.

  47. Re:Not again by captjc · · Score: 2

    Ask any Scotsman, football is serious business. Any game that doesn't end in a riot wasn't a real game.

    I believe Philadelphia Eagles fans are the same way.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  48. Re:It worked for Canada... by dryeo · · Score: 2

    That's strange as 80% of stuff in Canada is things like 3.78 l, 454 g, 473 ml and so on.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism